Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Nobody wants to get pulled over, even if it is a random stop at a check- point. When you see a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on whether you will spend the night in a cell or be off with a warning . Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical.
Step One: Pull over safely and turn off your car engine.
Step Two: Put out any cigarette or gum your were chewing. First impressions matter.
Step Three: quickly roll down your window and place your hands on the steering wheel.
Step Four: A police officer who stops you for a traffic violation is normally not allowed to search your vehicle.
(Be careful…. what your body language says about you can tip off a police officer. An officer will watch for any sort of “furtive movement.” A sudden lowering of one or both shoulders, for example, will tip the officer off that you’re attempting to hide something under the seat.)
Step Five: In California, an officer who stops you for an alleged traffic violation has the right to insist that you and your passengers get out of your car. So, ask for instruction on what to do if this happens to you.
Step Six: Don’t be hostile. Hostility has led to many a problem with police officers. This includes even saying more than necessary.
Step Seven: Seek a lawyer if a traffic stop leads to serious accusations—like a charge of driving under the influence or possession of drugs.
Most parents try to instill discipline, values and morals within their children. Remember those old PSA commercials that reminded parents that “It’s 8 o’clock. Do you know where your children are?” Today you don’t have to wonder anymore. Teens are more likely to have smartphones and post their daily activities on social media. If you monitor their daily posts you can know what they are up to to an extent. Now, what do you do if your teen gets arrested? Here is a list of some things you should do in case this happens.
1. When in custody, ask for a lawyer. This is the first thing that a parent should always do. Hire one or ask for a public defender.
2. Parents shouldn’t play lawyer. Even if you know your rights, a proper lawyer with experience will help the situation.
3. Your rights as a parent may be limited. Though some states require parental consultation for questioning, you have no federal right to be present when your child is questioned.
4. Cooperation and respect go a long way. The best time to explain this to your child is before an arrest or police interview. Cover these basics: Ask questions, remain calm and if you don’t know remain silent and let the lawyer take over.
5. The police are not on your side. In fact, they shouldn’t be on anyone’s side. The police respond to complaints and to what they’ve seen. Police officers try to open cases and to close them.
6. Communication between parents and teens is key. if you have that close relationship with your teen, communicate and get their side of the story. Also, let your lawyer know what you talked about.
7. Check their social media and let your lawyer know. At times what your teen posts can be an alibi or evidence.
8. Your Teenager is no angel; he or she got arrested for some reason. Part of being a teen is doing stupid and dangerous things sometimes. Teens will often do things out of character, and oftentimes parents can make a mistake with their own child’s character.
It’s hard to leave a bad relationship. It’s even harder to leave an abusive relationship – whether you are a man or a woman. Every 9 seconds in the U.S. a woman is getting beaten or assaulted. One of the reasons why it’s so hard for women to leave abusive relationships is because 1/2 of them who leave end up homeless and broke. You may not have a place to go, but there are resources that can help you transition to a better life. If you are one of the few lucky ones that are leaving or about to leave an abusive relationship, here are some steps to help you.
Step 1: Call family and friends who can help you. If you are an abused woman, seek women centers that help women and children go through this.
Step 2: Delete all traces of your digital footprints, including your search history.
Step 3: SEEK LEGAL HELP!
Step 4: Change addresses on bills and documents, passwords, social security number, and telephone number.
Step 5: See if you can get a new credit card in your name only. The same thing goes with a bank account.
Step 6: Deal with money and work. This will not be easy, but it must be done. Let your work know what’s going on.
Step 7: Cancel joint account(s) if you can.
Step 8: If you are using the car, contact the department of motor and vehicles and change everything.
Step 9: If you have children together, seek custody.
Step 10: Seek a divorce.
Hey Arizona! Have you been putting your donkey to sleep in your bathtub? If you are, you just broke a state law. As funny and ridiculous as it sounds, outdated laws like this exist in every state simply because they have been forgotten. Many states haven’t kept up with the advances in technology and progress, and laws like the donkey in the bathtub law were there since the wild west and still remain in effect today. Since I am in the great state of California, here are some silly laws that are still in the law books. The source for these laws are from Findlaws.com and Dumblaws.com
- Women may not drive in a house coat.
- Arcadia: Peacocks have the right of way to cross any street, including driveways.
- Baldwin Park: Nobody is allowed to ride a bicycle in a swimming pool.
- It is a misdemeanor to shoot at any kind of game from a moving vehicle, unless the target is a whale.
- California prison workers will no longer be allowed to have sex with inmates
- Film producers must have permission from a pediatrician before filming a child under the age of one month.
- You may only throw a frisbee at the beach in Los Angeles County, CA with the lifeguard’s permission.
- Animals are banned from mating publicly within 1,500 feet of a tavern, school, or place of worship.
- It’s unlawful to let a dog pursue a bear or bobcat at any time.
- Bathhouses are against the law.
- Blythe, CA: You are not permitted to wear cowboy boots unless you already own at least two cows.
- In San Jose and Sunnyvale it is illegal for grocery stores to provide plastic bags.
- Carmel, CA: Ice cream may not be eaten while standing on the sidewalk. (Repealed when Clint Eastwood was mayor)
Happy 2017! Now that 2016 is over and you’re planning to quit the gym in about a week, it’s time to see what else is going on in 2017. For most of us Californians who have already started rolling some joints in public and growing it, wait right there people with “License” to sell. Maybe you think it also allows you to grow and sell in public.
The Bureau of Marijuana Control has until January 1, 2018, to begin issuing those licenses. It creates a Catch-22. Though it’s legal for Californians over the age of 21 (and adults visiting the state) to possess and grow marijuana starting immediately, there’s no place to buy it legally. Sorry to be your buzz-kill but it’s better to know this now. So, for now… smoke it at your place.
For Traffic here is a list of driving rules you will see in traffic school. So pull over and start reading this.
- Assembly Bill 1785: a motorist can only use his or her hand to activate or deactivate a feature or function on the device that requires a single swipe or tap. The law does not apply to systems that are installed by manufacturers and embedded in the vehicle.
- Assembly Bill 53: The bill, which was signed in 2015, expanded the existing law, which stated that children under the age of 8 must be placed in an appropriate passenger restraint system while in a moving vehicle. This law extends a requirement that children under 2 years old must sit in an appropriate rear-facing child passenger restraint system, unless he or she is more than 40 pounds, or is taller than 40 inches.
- Assembly Bill 51: The law, which goes into effect Jan. 1, defines the practice of a motorist driving a two-wheeled motorcycle between rows of stopped or moving vehicles. It also authorizes the California Highway Patrol to develop educational guidelines on lane splitting to help ensure the safety of all motorists. CHP would have to consult with specified safety agencies and organizations in order to craft the guidelines for motorcycle lane splitting.
- Senate Bill 1046: This would extend a pilot program that requires most convicted DUI drivers to install ignition interlock devices — also referred to as IIDs — that would prevent them from operating a motor vehicle while under the influence. Under the law, the offender will be able to obtain a restricted driver’s license, have their license reissued, or get their motor vehicle privileges reinstated on the condition that they install an IID in their vehicle for a prescribed amount of time. The bill extends the pilot program in four California counties — Los Angeles, Alameda, Sacramento and Tulare counties — before it expands to the entire state on Jan. 1, 2019.
- Senate Bill 838: Starting April 1, the vehicle registration fee on every vehicle or trailer coach will rise to $53, an increase of $10.
- Senate Bill 1072: All school buses, school pupil activity buses, youth buses, and any child care motor vehicle used to transport school-age children will be required to have a “child safety alert system. Additionally, all schools are required to have transportation safety plans that ensure no students is left alone on a bus.
- Senate Bill 839: the fee for the issuance of Environmental License Plates will increase from $43 to $53 beginning on July 1. The fee for the renewal, retention, transfer or duplications of the personalized environmental plates will go from $38 to $43 on Jan. 1.
- Senate Bill 491: The minimum threshold for property damage that is required to be reported when a driver is involved in a crash will go from $750 to $1,000 in the new year.
- Assembly Bill 1289: This law would enact the Consumer Automatic Recall Safety (CARS) Act, which would prohibit dealers and rental car companies from loaning or renting a vehicle that is under a manufacturer’s recall no later than 48 hours after receiving such notice, and until the vehicle has been repaired. Additionally, under the bill, the DMV will be required to issue a recall disclosure statement with every vehicle registration renewal notice. The agency will also have the power to suspend or revoke the license of any dealer that violates the CARS Act.
- Senate Bill 1429 will expand the Year of Manufacture license plate program so that anyone who owns a 1980 or older-model year vehicle will be able to obtain a license plate from the year corresponding to that car’s model year. The vintage plates would then take the place of a regular license plate. Previously, the law only applied to vehicles that were from 1969 or older, or a pickup truck that is a 1972 or older-model year.
Gun Laws!? Check out next week’s blog for my part 2.
A new year deserves a new first blog for 2017. If you read my last blog, you can read the new traffic laws that will be enforced in 2017. In addition, California now has new gun laws that were voted in for January 1, 2017 and July 1, 2017.
Under AB 1151, a person can’t loan a firearm to anyone other than family. However, there are limitations to this bill; the loan to a family member cannot occur more than six times a year and the loan must be for less than 30 days.
SB 869 requires law enforcement officers to lock their handgun out of plain view in an unattended vehicle – either in the trunk or a locked container.
Senate Bill 1695 (“Stop the Illegal Gun Sales Act”) makes it a crime to make a false report about a lost or stolen firearm. The penalty for this will be the inability to purchase a gun for ten years.
Under Prop 63, a firearms owner has five days to report the loss or theft of a firearm, while a firearms dealer has 48 hours to make a report
SB 1446 states that people who own magazines that hold more than 10 rounds (not including several exemptions) must give them up before July 1st of 2017.
For more details visit http://www.signalscv.com/2017/01/03/california-institutes-new-gun-laws-2017/]
Leah Legal Criminal Defense
14401 Sylvan St. Suite #201
Van Nuys, California 91401
818-484-1100
http://www.leahlegal.com
To crack down on cyber bullying and continued harassment on social media, Twitter has rolled out a new way of cracking down on online bullies. This could probably lead to some positive change for Twitter. The changes include:
- Keeping serial abusers from creating new accounts.
- New “Safe Search” function.
- Blocking abusive and “low quality” tweets from your conversations.
According to Twitter, the new “Safe Search” function will prevent abusive tweets or tweets from blocked and mute accounts from appearing in users search results. Those tweets can still be found if people want to see them, but they won’t clutter search results any longer.
I applaud Twitter for what they are doing. For most people Twitter is a great tool to promote and advertise, and to use if they want to know what is happening in real-time. Many lawyers use Twitter to update their clients and followers on current laws, current events, and business hours.
If you don’t believe this blog. Follow me on Twitter.
The worry of not knowing whether there is a warrant for your arrest can be crippling, especially because being in police custody may lead to your detention. Most people who suspect that they may soon face arrest would want to know whether law enforcement officers are after them. Knowledge is necessary, as it allows you to take the necessary steps.
However, the process of determining whether there is a warrant for your arrest is not always straightforward. Due to this, most people are caught by surprise when officers make abrupt arrests, leaving them in a vulnerable position. On the other hand, learning various sources of information to help you find an arrest warrant against you is beneficial. Upon finding the details, you can approach an attorney for further guidance and have him/her defer your arrest if possible.
Where to Search for a Warrant for Your Arrest
If you suspect that police officers may be planning to detain you for criminal charges, you want to work as fast as possible to ensure they have a valid arrest warrant. To do this, you can explore several websites or service providers to conduct professional searches and find the warrant. With your efforts to search for the warrant, you are better positioned to face the subsequent occurrences, including a court trial. The various ways of searching for a warrant of arrest issued against you are:
- Run a Record Check on Your Name
Normally, the issuance of a warrant for arrest translates to a registered record in your name. This occurs because you are a suspect in criminal activities, and the warrant is a validation of your detention in preparation for trial. Subsequently, searching for your name in California record departments is a good way to begin your research to find results hopefully.
The opportunity to run through various records may require you to enter your identity details in the various websites, so we recommend having your ID number or Driver’s license registration number with you when conducting searches.
One of the websites to visit is the criminal records section. As mentioned, an arrest warrant implies that you are about to face a criminal trial. Therefore, the persons in charge of updating these records will preempt your arrest and record your name as soon as the judge authorizes the warrant.
When searching the criminal records, you also want to enter your search in the appropriate offense section. Since you may know the type of activities leading to a possible warrant against you, you can browse through the sections to find your details fast.
Alternatively, you may also browse through the public records section to find any relevant information on the warrant. Usually, information on the public includes your name, identification numbers, and documents, as well as any pending orders against you. The database is a reserve for all registered citizens and has many uses.
Hence, upon opening your profile, you will see your details, including whether you have an active arrest warrant issued. On the other hand, your search may end on a positive note, having found that no warrant has been issued.
Thirdly, you may also search through records kept by government agencies. Like the public access records, your details include any pending court orders issued against you. This includes arrest warrants, if any, meaning that you can access the required details. However, you should note that some agency records require identity verification which may take a while.
- Make an Inquiry in the County Sheriff’s Department
Apart from running online searches, why not approach your nearest sheriff’s department for an in-person inquiry on the arrest warrant? The option is useful if you know the county where an arrest warrant is likely to be issued and what offense. For example, if you committed an offense in your area of residence, approaching the sheriff’s department may be an easier option if you know how to access the offices.
Once in the office, you will receive assistance from the personnel assigned to conduct searches for the general public. This online search is limited to the sheriff’s department website, as each office stores data from the county it serves. Thus, it may be quicker to access records from the sheriff’s department compared to running through various online databases on your own.
When the personnel finds your details, he/she will provide the information and ask you to fill out any necessary forms to show your acknowledgment of the warrant. As a result, fighting off an arrest later becomes more difficult because you will be aware of the details, and the sheriff’s department has proof of it.
- Request for Search Services from a Professional
Often, navigating the various websites, offices and databases may become challenging even for those with rich knowledge in conducting searches. Therefore, seeking the services of a professional is recommended to help conduct a thorough and expeditious search.
Among the many professionals to approach is your criminal defense attorney. He/she is likely to have a wealth of experience in handling arrest warrant cases based on the field of practice. Moreover, an attorney has access to additional services from trained paralegals who easily navigate multiple databases.
Therefore, you do not have to worry about missing your name or searching in the wrong field when working alone. A professional’s touch would give you all the confidence you need to conclude the research and begin preparing for the resulting arrest if an arrest warrant was issued.
- Conduct a Search on the Superior Court Site
Since a judge issues an arrest warrant in a superior court, the clerks working on various cases are responsible for updating the superior court website with any court orders and warrants. Normally, the updates are available shortly after the judge issues written orders, meaning that you can access the information within a short period.
We advise you to check your records in the correct court section, as the superior court details are separated according to several departments. You can also access the superior court details by visiting the department of justice website if you prefer their interface. They hold all the records as required, making it easier to navigate the records to find your arrest warrant.
How to Ensure You are Searching for the Correct Warrant
While the term “arrest warrant” applies to a broad range of reasons for arrest, a special distinction exists for offenses committed while offenders are in court for trial or mentions. Therefore, bench warrants are reserved for suspects who were already previously arrested and demonstrate unlawful behavior during their trial process. From the distinction, you may have an arrest or bench warrant issued against you.
Due to the differences in issuing the warrants, you should be aware of the type of offense you will face. This helps you determine the correct section to look for your arrest warrant details and avoid dealing with unforeseen police visits. One of the best ways to distinguish between the two types of warrants for arrest is by learning their characteristics, when they are issued and what they entail.
Attributes of a Regular Arrest Warrant
A warrant issued for your arrest mandates a law enforcement officer to apprehend you based on the reasonable cause you broke the law. It would operate as a justification for your arrest if no officers witnessed you breaking the law but have sufficient proof of your unlawful actions.
While the arrest warrant acts as an automatic ticket for your arrest, it must be issued following the necessary procedure. Usually, a presiding judge holds the discretion to issue the warrant based on various considerations.
Firstly, he/she may receive details from an authorized police officer concerning your illegal engagements. The details may be reported by a witness who was present when violating the law or investigating officers who tipped the peace officer about your activities.
Apart from providing the judge with details of the offense, the officer should also provide evidence to justify the need for your apprehension. Sources of proof may vary depending on the type of crime you are suspected of committing. For example, if you are involved in drug trafficking, details on your dealers, hideouts, and drug paraphernalia are important details for the judge to assess.
Alternatively, the judge can issue a warrant for arrest based on an indictment from the grand jury. The indictment may occur when a jury handles a separate case where you are mentioned as a prime suspect. You should note that the indictment can prevail even though you are not a party to the case handled by the jury at the time.
For example, the jury’s current case may involve a carjacking where you escaped as an unidentified suspect. Thus, if sufficient details are available to hold you accountable, you may receive the arrest warrant from the indictment.
Further, knowing the format of an arrest warrant is important to help you determine whether you are searching for the correct document. Various details must be present in a valid warrant for arrest, especially because they help identify you. They include:
- Your name.
- The name of the judge issuing the arrest warrant.
- The type of charge you are likely to face.
- The location where the warrant is issued.
- The judge’s signature, date, and the time of issuing the warrant.
- The name of the court issuing the warrant.
Attributes of a Bench Warrant
Without knowing the difference between a regular arrest warrant and a bench warrant, you may go through the wrong category of names. Consequently, you risk not finding details about your warrant, leading to a surprise arrest by officers later on. To avoid this, we recommend understanding the attributes of a bench warrant, as your information may be listed under this category. They include:
The Bench Warrant is Issued for Being in Contempt of Court
The main difference between a bench warrant and a regular warrant is its reason for issuance. While an arrest warrant is useful for most crimes, a bench warrant only applies for contempt of court offenses. Thus, most receptors are persons with an ongoing matter in court and can be in the criminal or civil division.
Failure to pay court fines on the specified dates is one reason for a warrant to be issued against you. The lack of adherence to the judge’s orders amounts to contempt, so he/she is authorized to issue the order.
Secondly, missing a mandatory court appearance can also lead to the issuance of the warrant, especially if you have already defined a previous warning. The non-appearance is often taken as an attempt to avoid facing trial, meaning that you will delay the process of dispensing justice.
Thirdly, the judge may also issue other court directives during the proceedings, including maintaining order and abstaining from using offensive language. Defying these orders repeatedly can also prompt the judge to authorize a bench warrant in your name.
The Bench Warrant is Useful Until the Judge Recalls It
Unlike an arrest warrant that can be revoked, the bench warrant is actively applicable until the judge decides to recall it. Even so, he/she will only recall the warrant if you show signs of following the initial court orders, thus correcting your actions in contempt of court.
The Importance of Working With a Defense Attorney When Searching for Your Arrest Warrant
As mentioned, an attorney is one of the professionals you can approach to help you find out whether an arrest warrant against you exists. However, he/she plays a more vital role than searching. When the results show that a judge or jury ordered your arrest, you want to run several checks to determine whether the documents are accurate and correctly issued.
Your attorney can guide you on the appropriate steps to follow after finding out that the warrant is existent and valid. For better engagement, scheduling an in-person appointment with your lawyer should be a priority. During the meeting, you can discuss the best course of action to follow pending the apprehension.
Additionally, your lawyer’s input is important if you are unsure of the reason for the arrest warrant. Cases of mistaken identity or inaccurate details are not uncommon, meaning that some people may face improper arrest. Thus, going through the warrant document to scan for errors in detail can save you from facing unfair detention and a bad experience overall.
Further, some reports leading to the issuance of the arrest warrant may be false or exaggerated. Since peace officers can act from a witness or complainant’s tip, verifying the reason for the arrest is crucial. However, some parties may act maliciously to impose false accusations and fabricated evidence. Eventually, the details reach the judge’s desk awaiting an official order. If no due diligence is conducted, you will face an unfair arrest, which contravenes your rights.
Due to all these reasons, your lawyer can help by presenting your case in court to clear the warrant. Before approaching the judge, he/she ensures that the reasons for warrant clearance are credible and justified by counter-evidence in your favor. For example, you can consolidate evidence proving a conspiracy to fabricate details leading to the arrest warrant in the case of false allegations. The motion may be challenging, but a skilled lawyer will do his/her best to secure a successful outcome.
Nonetheless, most arrest warrants are issued rightfully, meaning that you committed an offense. In these cases, denying your involvement is futile, as the judge will have already approved all the details presented against you. Subsequently, the best option is to prepare for your arrest by determining the bail amount you expect to pay.
Your lawyer can help you in the preparations by determining the charge you will face before the prosecutor presents the details. Afterward, he/she will run through the court website to confirm the amount of bail you can expect to pay after your arrest. During your meetings, you may further discuss the nature of the trial you will face and the possible defenses to present.
Find a Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
Finding out if a warrant is issued for your arrest is vital to help you prepare for the possible outcomes. Moreover, it can help you dispute the warrant early enough, especially if you have valid reasons against its validity. In doing this, you will save yourself the stress and expenses faced after detention in jail, especially if the arrest warrant details were wrong. However, without the help of an experienced criminal defense attorney, knowing whether an arrest warrant against you exists may be difficult.
To avoid facing major setbacks in your research, we recommend partnering with Leah Legal for the best criminal defense services in Van Nuys, California. Partnering with our team gives you access to prudent and expeditious legal assistance that aims at creating positive outcomes for our clients. Additionally, our experience in handling cases related to fighting off arrest warrants has equipped us with the necessary skills to support your case. If you require legal assistance in knowing whether an arrest warrant against you exists, contact us today at 818-484-1100.
Your criminal defense staff may be overwhelmed by answering all the incoming calls and, at the same time, attending to existing client’s legal matters. Additionally, you are scared of increasing the firm’s expenditures by hiring extra staff members to help your current staff. Moreover, you are finding it challenging to provide your clients with services after normal working hours.
However, the solution for your law firm’s problems is partnering with an answering service as soon as possible. With the service in place, you will avoid recording missed calls; you will provide your clients with services any time they need you the most, and keep your office growing and competitive. Partner an attorney answering service today and start enjoying the following benefits:
Focus On Practicing Law
In a law firm, there are several activities taking place at the same time. Answering clients’ calls, scheduling appointments, jotting down their details and their legal claims may be time-consuming, especially when you have other pressing matters to handle. Therefore you may be unable to concentrate on the existing client’s cases and end up making mistakes and wrong decisions. By doing so, you may end up losing clients. However, with a phone answering service that handles your incoming calls, you will have adequate time to prepare the scheduled consultations and solve the existing clients’ legal cases.
Answer All Calls
Are you worried about frequently missing incoming calls from defendants and plaintiffs? A call answering service is a solution to your problem. You should expect the clients to make their calls at any day or night time. Notably, a client may have a list of law firms on their palm; therefore, when they call your law firm, and the call is transferred to a voicemail, they may feel frustrated and move to the next attorney on their list. However, with an active phone answering service accessible around the clock, you will never record missed calls anymore and lose clients. Even when you are meeting with the existing clients, relaxing at home after business hours, or representing your clients at the court, the incoming calls will be answered by experts. They will talk like an employee of your law firm and record all their details.
Have a Better Organization of Your Law Firm
The organization of a law firm begins from how they receive their clients up to the final stage of the court. Will a client go for a disorganized or organized law firm? The answer is the client will go for the most organized and reliable law firm. An answering service will eliminate the need to keep track of every call and message. The call service will organize the information easily and text or email to the criminal defense law firm. Additionally, the service will provide a secure account where you may access, find, manage messages and emails, and then plan your client’s appointment accordingly.
The Service is A Good Alternative To An In-House Receptionist
A phone answering service is more flexible than hiring an in-house receptionist in several ways. For example, a receptionist will undergo training, will be unavailable after the regular working hours and over the weekend and holidays. However, an answering service will receive all the incoming calls at any time, either day or night. No days off and probably fewer costs since the charges are per the number of the received calls.
Reach Your Customers 24/7
Crimes happen at any time of the day. The client may be arrested any time and conduct your office at that particular time they need your help the most. For instance, your client may be arrested on Saturday and quickly need assistance from your law firm. The arrestee may require a consultation before they appear before the court on Monday. If the law firm is closed over the weekend, you may miss the client to another law firm. Alternatively, hiring additional staff may increase the firm’s expenditure. The team may find it challenging to handle the existing cases and, at the same time, pick the incoming calls.
As a professional lawyer, you will be caught in court and consultation. It will be impossible to answer every call. Even when you overwork your staff team, they still may not manage with the multi-task. Notably, a call answering service will manage large volumes of incoming calls either during the day or night. Therefore you will have the freedom to continue providing services to new clients while serving the existing clients.
Retain Your Clients
Receiving a client isn’t a guarantee they will work with your office. Alternatively, every day a law firm loses clients due to a communication gap. Most clients are frustrated when they make a call, and they fail to speak with a live person. They speak with automation services. Therefore once the potential client can’t reach you, they will move to another law firm. However, a call answering service will save your law firm. The service will ensure the clients are received professionally, and they receive the best services out of your office. Probably they will share the good news with their relatives and friends and refer them to your criminal defense law firm when they violate the law.
The Agents At The Call Answering Service are Well Trained
Since the clients share their personal and critical information with the lawyers, they need the privacy of their details. The call answering service has well-trained experts compliant with several protection laws like FACTA, COPPA, and HIPAA. The details of your clients are protected with the utmost care. Additionally, the service focuses on one activity, answering clients’ calls. The service doesn’t have any other duties, ensuring you receive what you pay for and the work is conducted efficiently.
Reduce Your Staff’s Interruption
Since law firms are often busy handling both the new and existing clients, the staff team will probably face interruption from either the clients or the incoming calls. Therefore they will need enough time to engage in legal cases at that particular time. Additionally, when the staff is busy, an incoming call becomes a distraction. The call may be a real problem, especially when the staff member is handling a critical issue and at the same time can’t afford to lose a client on the phone. Therefore the call would result in poor decision and poor service delivery.
However, an answering service is the best solution for your law firm’s problem. The agents will receive incoming calls when you are busy with other legal matters. After recording the caller’s details, the information will be available for you once you are back.
The Call Answering Service Answers Routine/Basic Questions
The service will do work as per your law firm’s regulations. Therefore the gents have knowledge and experience in handling relevant issues for your office. They will answer the basic questions to the clients on behalf of your law firm. By doing so, they will prevent your staff team from facing interruptions while conducting critical matters. Notably, they will answer questions relating to your firm’s direction, appointment scheduling, and confirmation, among other routine questions.
An Answering Service Will Do More Than Just Answering The Incoming Calls
A call answering center’s primary task is answering the incoming calls and redirecting them to the respective departments. However, the service may offer your practice with additional services at a very cheap cost. The agents are highly trained, thus qualified to offer other services from customer support to other more complex tasks. They perform the tasks securely following your firm’s internal regulations. By doing so, the service frees up much time for your administrative team to handle other critical duties. The other services provided by an answering service agents are:
- Collecting Clients Contact Details and Their Legal Issues
The collection of clients’ details is essential but time-consuming. You can avoid the problem by hiring an answering service rather than an in-house receptionist to perform the task. The agents are professionally trained and meet government requirements as well as HIPAA compliance. Therefore they will gather the client details securely.
- Call Filtering and Transfer
The call service may filter the wrong numbers and determine the most urgent calls from how the callers provide their information. Additionally, you may instruct the agents to forward the calls to your administrative staff team when necessary. By doing so, your administrative team may engage in other tasks.
- Scheduling of Appointments
A client calling your law firm on behalf of a person in jail may be unable to schedule an appointment with your firm during the regular working hours. Therefore a call service may promote your firm by connecting and scheduling appointments with busy clients. Additionally, the service will provide appointment reminders to avoid no shows. By reminding the clients, they will feel recognized and respected by your law firm. Notably, if the client decides to skip the appointment day due to his/her issues, the service will help reschedule the appointments.
- Taking Messages and Redirecting The Clients To The Respective Departments
Most clients hate automated services, especially voicemail messages, because the clients sometimes require a lawyer urgently. However, once the clients make a call and a live person answers them, they will probably feel well and leave their message. For instance, when a client calls your office after the normal working hours and has an option to leave their message with someone they know will follow up their issues, they will most likely leave their message. Even when your staff team is very hardworking, they won’t work full time. However, partnering with a call answering service, they will professionally be available 24/7 and keep your firm in touch with your clients.
- Giving New Clients Direction of Your Criminal Defense Law Firm
A client may be late or miss an appointment just because they don’t know the position of your law firm. However, answering agents will provide the clients with the exact direction of the law firm and answer their questions if they are in doubt. Additionally, the agents will provide help once the clients are stuck on the way.
The Call Service Will Do Things Your Way
Do you want to run your law firm uniquely? Ok, the answering service will do that or your law firm. The agents at the answering service perform their duties under your firm’s orders. For instance, if you want the agents to incorporate specific terms about your criminal defense firm, they will do so. Additionally, if you want the agents to skip particular phrases, they will skip. Notably, the call service is flexible and will follow your guidelines. Therefore the professional answering service won’t stick to their way of doing things. They will quickly adapt to your methods. Your law firm’s greeting method will be incorporated accordingly.
Keep Your Law Firm Competitive
As a law firm owner, you should expect competition from both new and established law firms. Sometimes you will have limited time to link up with the clients looking for your services urgently. Most clients will link up with criminal defense law firms with professionals, organized, reliable, and focused on handling their issues. Does your law firm meet those features? One of the tips to make your law firm responsive, reliable, and stay competitive is partnering with an legal answering service. The service will be beneficial in achieving the goals of your law firm. The calling clients will receive immediate attention and be served to satisfaction.
Final Thought
Hiring a professional call answering service for your criminal defense firm will link your firm with the clients even after normal working hours. The clients will enjoy quality services anytime, anywhere. You will record positive feedback from the clients and maintain them. With client satisfaction, your facility will be marketed with client satisfaction and make it sound established even when it is a new law firm. If you are managing a criminal defense firm and experiencing problems managing the client’s call, make a quick step of partnering with a call answering service and saving your law firm from drowning.
As you know, law enforcement officers are strict on cases related to driving under the influence (DUI) because it is the leading cause of most fatal road accidents. Therefore, when law enforcement officers point out your car to pull over at a DUI checkpoint, you should know what to do to preserve your legal rights and increase your chances of fighting any probable DUI charge.
Your interaction with the officers can determine if they will arrest you or will proceed with your journey. A stop at a DUI checkpoint does not have come down to an arrest, even if you perform poorly on the sobriety tests. This article discusses reliable tips on what you do when you are pulled over for a DUI investigation at a sobriety checkpoint on the road for the best possible outcome.
What to Do When You Are Pulled Over for a DUI Investigation at a Sobriety Checkpoint
While sobriety or DUI checkpoints are very helpful in curbing road accidents which occur almost every day due to driving under the influence (DUI) of alcohol and other illegal drugs, sometimes police can violate your rights, leading to a wrongful arrest. Typically, police at the DUI checkpoint will signal your vehicle to pull over after a reasonable suspicion that you might be DUI.
Police do not need probable cause to signal your vehicle to pull over for a DUI investigation at a sobriety checkpoint. As long as a police officer has a reasonable suspicion that you were DUI, for example, by swerving or by making an illegal left turn, he/she will point out your vehicle to pull over for a brief investigation.
Failure of the law enforcement officers to follow the proper legal steps for setting up a DUI checkpoint and stopping potential suspects who might be DUI can make it unconstitutional, making any evidence against you inadmissible in court.
Although you can challenge your stop at the DUI checkpoint later, you should know your constitutional rights during the investigation to avoid being another victim of police misconduct. Here is what to do to stay on the safe side of the law when the police officers at the DUI checkpoint signals your vehicle to pull over for investigation:
Pull Over in a Safe Place Along the Side of the Road
Remember, DUI investigation starts immediately when the police signal your vehicle to pull over at a DUI checkpoint. Therefore, as you pull over, you should do so carefully and safely to show them you are a careful and cautious driver. If you slow down abruptly as you park your vehicle or you happen to park it in an unsafe location, the police officer will note this in his/her report to show you were impaired.
Have Your Essential Documents Ready and be Polite as You Talk to the Officer
Stay in the car and ensure you have your essential documents in an accessible place before the officer comes to your vehicle, including your driving license, vehicle registration, and insurance. Once you pull over, you should make the police officer believe that you are sincere and respectful by answering all his/her questions politely.
If you are hostile or rude to the officer, the more he/she is likely to believe that you are drunk driving and arrest you.
If Possible, Do Not Answer any Questions
The more you talk to police officers investigating you at a DUI checkpoint, the more likely you will provide incriminating statements that they might use against you. The police officer who will be questioning you will be keen to note if you are displaying objective signs of intoxication like slurred speech, watery or red eyes.
Even if you had one or two bottles of beer, it is advisable not to answer any police officer’s question concerning drunk driving or who you were with, or where you were. Remember, you have a legal right to refrain from answering tricky questions from the police officers at a DUI checkpoint according to the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution.
Perform the Required Sobriety Tests
When the officer reasonably suspects that you were drunk driving, he/she will ask you to step out of the car. As you come out of your car, you should avoid using its door or other parts of the car to support yourself because that is an indicator of alcohol impairment under the officer’s eyes.
Once you are out of your car, the officer will want to determine whether his/her suspicions about you driving under the influence are true or not by requesting you to perform the following two types of sobriety tests:
- Preliminary Alcohol Screening (PAS) Tests
The most common and first step the officer will take to determine if you were drunk driving is to blow a breathalyzer, also known as the PAS test. A breathalyzer is a portable device that detects alcohol in your breath vapor once you blow it.
Although a breathalyzer test enables the officer to estimate the level of your blood to the alcohol content (BAC), it is not as accurate as he/she may want you to believe. A breathalyzer test is prone to errors compared to blood or breath tests at the police station, which happen if you are under arrest.
The purpose of the breathalyzer test is to assess whether there is a probable cause to initiate a DUI arrest, depending on your level of impairment.
- Field Sobriety Tests (FSTs)
After taking a PAS test, the officer may require you to perform field sobriety tests to find more evidence against you. To physically and mentally determine your level of impairment, the officer will ask you to perform a series of field sobriety tests.
The officers will consider the poor performance of the following standard field sobriety tests as a sign of impairment and a probable cause to arrest you:
- One-leg stand
- Walk and turn
- Horizontal gaze nystagmus
Even a sober and cautious driver can perform poorly on the above standard FSTs because of an underlying medical condition, poor balance, or poor vision if it happens at night. Therefore, you can politely decline to perform FSTs because there is no correlation between your performance on these field tests and alcohol impairment.
You don’t have to perform any of the above sobriety tests at a DUI checkpoint, and the officer will not force you to do so. However, if the officer finds probable cause to arrest you, he/she will do so, and you might spend the night in police custody.
Submit a Chemical Test
Following an arrest, the officer will require you to submit a chemical test of your blood, urine, or breath at the station. You must cooperate with the officers once you are under arrest and submit the required chemical test samples for further analysis by a qualified lab expert to determine if you were DUI of alcohol or any other illegal drugs.
Under implied consent laws, refusing to submit your chemical test when you are lawfully under arrest for DUI can make you subject to negative consequences, which include:
- A longer time at the DUI school
- Suspension of driving license
- Longer jail term if the court finds you guilty of the offense
- Installation of Ignition Interlock Device (IID) in your vehicle
Talk to a DUI Defense Attorney
After an arrest and booking process for an alleged DUI charge, you should consider contacting a DUI defense attorney if you haven’t already. It is wise to have a competent attorney by your side during these tricky moments for legal counsel and representation because the possible penalties of a DUI charge are harsh and unbearable.
Possible penalties of a DUI conviction will increase if there are aggravating factors surrounding your case, like a passenger under 14 in the vehicle, prior DUI conviction record. Your attorney will fight for your rights and best interests as your case continues to achieve the best desirable outcome. Therefore, you may want to consider the following factors when searching for a reliable DUI defense attorney:
- Location
- Experience
- Cost
- Reputation
- Availability
Remember to inform your attorney of the experience you’ve had with the police officers since your encounter with them at the DUI checkpoint. The information you will discuss with your attorney will aid him/her in preparing and building defense arguments to counter DUI charges against you.
Remember to Attend the DMV hearing
After an arrest and booking process, the officers will also confiscate your driving license and give you a temporary pink driving license. Typically, the Department of Motor Vehicle (DMV) will suspend your driving license after thirty days if you have this temporary license unless you schedule a DMV hearing within ten days following your arrest date to fight for your rights to retain the license.
For a first-time DUI offense, the DMV may suspend your driving license for four months. However, for a second DUI charge, the DMV may suspend your license for up to one year, which is a long time without your driving privileges. You don’t have to attend this administrative hearing if you have an attorney because he/she can do so on your behalf.
Possible DUI Charges You Could be Subject to When You are Pulled Over for a DUI Investigation at a Sobriety Checkpoint
Depending on your specific DUI case circumstances and facts, you could face any of the following possible DUI charges under the law:
A Violation of Vehicle Code 23152(a) (Drunk Driving)
According to Vehicle Code 23152(a), it is generally unlawful to DUI of alcohol regardless of your BAC level. To secure a DUI conviction against you, the prosecutor must prove to the jury beyond a reasonable doubt that you didn’t have the mental and physical ability to drive like a cautious driver using circumstantial pieces of evidence like:
- You had a smell of alcohol
- You were driving erratically or swerving
- Your performance on FSTs was poor
- You had bloodshot, red, or watery eyes
If there are no aggravating factors in your drunk driving case like an accident, you will be subject to the following possible penalties for a first-time DUI charge:
- A maximum of six months jail term
- Informal probation for three to five years
- A fine not exceeding $390-$1000
- Suspension of your driving license for six months
- Attend a DUI school for a term of 3 to 9 months, depending on your BAC level
Note, the above penalties will become severe with every subsequent DUI conviction on your record. For instance, if it is your third DUI conviction, you will be subject to a DUI school for 30 months and a suspension of your driving license for up to three years. Your attorney can raise the following legal defenses during your trial to counter this DUI charge for the best possible result:
- The Defendant’s Driving Was Not Due to Alcohol Impairment
One way of convincing the court that you weren’t drunk driving is by countering the prosecutor’s circumstantial evidence from the officers who were arresting you. The court will consider this defense argument reasonable if the following is true:
- You had an emergency
- There was momentum distraction as you were driving
- You had fatigue
- Your vehicle had mechanical problems
- Your Performance of Field Sobriety Tests is not Due to Alcohol Impairment
Several issues that are not related to alcohol impairment can make even a sober, cautious driver perform poorly on FSTs. For instance, a sober driver can perform poorly on the typical walk and turn test at the DUI checkpoint due to the following reasons:
- Poor terrain
- Poor lighting
- Anxiety and nerves
- Medical conditions
- Uncomfortable shoes
- Police Misconduct
If the arresting officers didn’t follow the right and required legal procedures for setting the DUI checkpoint or arresting you, the court might dismiss the DUI case against you. Below are few examples of police misconduct or mistakes:
- Coercing or forcing a confession
- Pointing out your vehicle to pull over without reasonable suspicion for doing so
- Administering the FSTs improperly or incorrectly
- Failing to read or inform you of your Miranda rights
- Collecting and storing your blood samples improperly
- Arresting without a probable cause
Even if it is evident that you were drunk driving according to the prosecutor’s evidence, your attorney can raise doubt on his/her DUI case against you if the above facts are true beyond a reasonable doubt.
A Violation of Vehicle Code 23152 (b)
You violate Vehicle Code (VC)23152(b) when you DUI of alcohol with a BAC of 0.08% or above, and the offense is chargeable as a misdemeanor. Even if you didn’t display signs of impairment, the prosecutor could still file a DUI charge against you for violating VC 23152(b) as long as your BAC is 0.08% or greater and you were driving a vehicle.
Note, even if you were drunk driving against VC 23152(a) and DUI of alcohol exceeding 0.08% simultaneously, the prosecutor cannot file both DUI charges against you under the law. Possible penalties you could face for violating VC 23152(b) as a first-time offender are similar to penalties mentioned above for drunk driving against VC 23152(a).
In addition to the above mentioned legal defenses for countering a DUI charge under VC 23152(a), your attorney can raise the following legal defenses to counter a DUI charge against you for violating VC 23152(b):
- Your BAC Level Was Below 0.08% At the Time You Were Driving
After drinking an alcoholic drink, the alcohol may take some time to absorb into the bloodstream, depending on a person. Therefore, if you had a bottle of alcohol and it was absorbing into the bloodstream at the time you were driving, your BAC level may rise to unlawful levels when the officer takes your breath or blood sample two hours later at the station.
In that case, it would be wise and reasonable to argue that your BAC level was below 0.08% at the time you were driving before your stop at the DUI checkpoint. This defense could work out in your favor to dismiss or reduce this DUI charge against you to an alternative less severe charge like wet reckless under Vehicle Code (VC) 23103, which carries less severe consequences.
- Your Breath Tests Results Were Erroneous
Your BAC reading or results in the breathalyzer are prone to errors due to many reasons. A competent attorney can argue that your BAC results from the breathalyzer were not accurate due to mouth alcohol arising from:
- Dental work
- Regurgitation
- Mouthwash
- Belching or burping
- Acid reflux
Your attorney can summon a reliable medical expert to prove this DUI defense argument by showing other reasons, like the one mentioned above was the cause of your high BAC readings.
- There Was a Compromise of the Chemical Testing Equipment
If the arresting officers violate Title 17 of the Code of Regulations that defines rules for conducting DUI breath and blood tests, the test result might be erroneous. Your defense attorney might be able to convince the jury to drop the DUI case against you if the arresting officers didn’t follow the proper procedures and standards for:
- Equipment maintenance and operation
- Collection and storage of your blood/breath samples
Knowing ahead of time what to do when police signal your car to pull over for DUI investigation is vital to achieving the best possible outcome when that happens to you because DUI checkpoints are everywhere nowadays.
Find a DUI Defense Attorney Near ME
We invite you to contact reliable and aggressive DUI defense attorneys at Leah Legal for legal guidance on what to do when you are pulled over for a DUI investigation at a sobriety checkpoint. Not only will we offer you legal advice, but we also represent you through every court proceeding to fight for your interests and legal rights for a desirable outcome.
Call us now at 818-484-1100 to schedule your initial consultation with our experienced DUI defense attorneys.
It is cumbersome and complicated to navigate the California criminal justice system, especially when you are accused of committing a crime. If you don’t have law knowledge, you may not know the steps you need to represent yourself in court. Seeking legal guidance is a crucial step when dealing with the justice system.
Having legal representation goes far beyond advocating for your interests in the courtroom. You want to ensure that your attorney is a person who can walk you through the entire and complicated legal process. Your choice of a defense attorney could make a difference between serving time in prison and having your charges dismissed. Selecting the right defense attorney is crucial in protecting your rights and ensuring a positive outcome in your criminal case. Following are some qualities you need to look out for in a defense attorney:
Many Years of Experience
The amount of experience a lawyer has is one of the most crucial aspects you need to look out for when hiring a defense attorney. Every lawyer begins as a new lawyer with education and credentials but lacking experience. With every case that an attorney handles, they gain more experience in their practice area. Most new lawyers often handle minor court cases, and with more experience, they can handle more complex cases. When handling your case, an experienced defense lawyer is likely to make fewer mistakes and knows the possible angles to approach your case and ensure the best outcome.
Experience allows an attorney to acquire skills that they did not gain in school, including:
- Picking a suitable jury for the case.
- Cross-examining witnesses.
- Finding fault and casting doubts in prosecutors’ evidence and witness testimonies.
- Persuading the judge to rule in your favor, including lowering or dismissing your charges.
- Making a compelling argument in court and to the jury at trial.
Additionally, your prospective attorney’s certifications could speak volumes of their knowledge based on your case. For example, some lawyers have certificates in litigation, criminal law, among others that indicate their specialties. If you have a minor case, any competent attorney could handle it. However, if you have a severe case with possible life-changing consequences, it is wise to find a lawyer with extensive experience.
Specialization in the Criminal Charges You are Fighting
Finding the right defense to guide you through a legal matter is not easy. The attorney who helps you recover compensation in a personal injury attorney may not be necessarily suitable in helping you fight murder charges. Some lawyers may do a little of everything when matters are not urgent. If your case is severe, you may need to contact a lawyer who limits their practice to a specific direction.
A specialized lawyer in a specific field of expertise has the knowledge and skills that general practice lawyers may not possess. Some of the specializations may include Domestic crimes, theft crimes, DUI, among others. It is essential to hire an attorney who regularly defends individuals facing the kind of criminal charges you face. This will help you be more comfortable with the possible outcome of your case.
If you are eligible, the court could grant you a public defender. Even though these defenders have more experience in different matters, they may not be as good as a private attorney whose specialization lies in one defense field. Therefore, whether you accept a court-appointed attorney or hire a private legal representative, you should consider the concentration of the attorney.
Positive Reviews from Legal Websites
An easy way to check if a defense attorney is worthy of representing you is by checking reviews. Most legal websites have customer reviews displayed on the front page, but these are often positive reviews. You can have a good idea of the services provided by a particular lawyer or law firm by checking more common reviews from sites such as Google. Lawyers do not control the source of reviews put on some of these websites. Therefore, it is likely that you will receive an honest opinion.
A reasonable attorney is one whose reviews fit what you are looking for as a defense in your case. It is essential to remember some of the high rates may be skewed. Therefore, you should consider the attorneys with four-star and three-star ratings. However, it is crucial to understand that there is no guarantee that a particular lawyer will give you your desired result.
Attorney’s Integrity
Most people have a perception that lawyers are often shady and dishonest. Even though some lawyers fit the stereotype, most lawyers are hardworking and dedicated to their jobs. Having a legal representative whose practice is governed by strong moral principles is essential when hiring a defense lawyer. A defense lawyer is supposed to defend your rights in the case and make favorable decisions for you.
A good lawyer might be aggressive and tough in negotiations, but they should always work towards the outcome you need for your case. A good lawyer will be honest in their dealings since your reviews could help them acquire other clients.
Aggressive When Fighting for Your Rights
When formulating and presenting a legal defense before the judge, aggressiveness is necessary. When used at the right time, being aggressive can make a difference in the outcome of your case. A good defense attorney should be aggressive in gathering relevant information and presenting it to ensure the best outcome for you.
Affordable Attorney Services
Hiring an expensive lawyer does not always guarantee the success of your defense in the case. However, you need to hire a competent defense attorney whose fee does not exceed your budget. Often criminal cases come as a surprise. Therefore, the funds to cater for a defense attorney are not always anticipated. When hiring a defense attorney, it is vital to learn how the fees work. If a lawyer quotes an amount too low, it would be wise to acquire more information about their qualifications and experience.
Since the cost of private defense varies, it is best to understand the factors that affect the price. Most attorneys charge for their services based on factors such as their experience, case complexity, and the nature of your charges, among other factors. Some lawyers will not explain how they calculate the legal fees for their services. Therefore, you may end up paying more than you agreed.
You can contact several attorneys and compare prices before settling with one. Before hiring a defense attorney, ensure a written agreement spells out the terms of the contract and indicates the costs of defense services. This will ensure that you do not pay extra.
Good Communication Skills
Clients often spend a significant amount of time with their lawyers. If your case goes to trial, you may spend many hours with your lawyer preparing for the case. You would not want to spend your time with someone who does not listen to you. Clients and lawyers need to communicate with their defense attorneys for a successful case. A good lawyer will want to understand your side of the events and know the outcome you expect for the case.
Telling your side of the story is crucial in evaluating your case. A reasonable attorney will ask you to put your facts together and explain in detail the events that led to your arrest and the alleged charges. Your attorney will need to learn about your social background, which can be a key in defending your case. Open communication with your lawyer helps them to build a strong defense based on the facts of your life and the case.
Your attorney should always inform you of the progress in your case. If there are motions they want to present in the pretrial phase, they must consult you and explain the importance of each step they take in the case. Respect, understanding are all part of good communication, and these traits should develop between you and your lawyer. Also, your lawyer should effectively communicate with other lawyers and prosecutors in negotiating the terms and conditions relating to your case.
Before you hire a defense lawyer, you should interview a few and decide if they have desired communication skills. When you call an attorney or a law firm for the first time, they need to give you the contacts and email the lawyer who will be handling your case. This helps ensure that you can easily communicate with them when you need it.
Attorney’s Reputation
Lawyers are judged by their clients, their peers, and the judges. Over a long period of practice, a lawyer is likely to develop a reputation. If they have the time to handle your case, lawyers with a reputation for excellence would be the best choice for a competent defense. You can learn about an attorney’s reputation by seeking referrals from friends who have been in a similar situation. If your friends are happy with the representation from the particular attorney, you can schedule an appointment to chat with the attorney about your case.
If you have dealt with an attorney for a different legal battle, you can ask them to refer you to a good defense attorney. The reputation of your attorney helps you keep your mind at ease, knowing that your situation is in the hands of an experienced individual.
Attorney’s Analytical Skills
A good defense lawyer should use their analytical skills to review your situation and develop the best course of action. Different lawyers may have different approaches in a case. Therefore, your choice of a lawyer could be significant in determining the fate of your case. Your lawyer must have the skills to analyze your situation from every angle. Also, they need to absorb all information provided to build a strong defense and ensure a favorable outcome in your case.
Often there are several approaches that your case could take. Some cases are dismissed after your attorney presents favorable pretrial motions. Some cases go to trial and are dismissed for lack of substantial evidence. Sometimes, you may need to accept a plea deal to avoid severe penalties. A competent attorney must review the facts of your case and advise you on the best approach to take for the case.
Skills in Dealing with People
Most lawyers have the knowledge and education required to defend a case. However, convincing a judge of your position requires an attorney with people skills. A good lawyer needs to be persuasive and personable with all the people involved in the case. In most criminal cases, your lawyer will work to create doubt in the evidence presented by the prosecutor against you.
Therefore, a lawyer with the right skills to deal with people can tactfully interview the witnesses and dispute all evidence presented against you. Knowing what you need from your attorney will ensure that you have the right person working on your defense.
Proper Research Skills
Criminal cases require extensive research and time. You do not need an attorney who will walk into the courtroom and use the general defenses. Since each case is different, you should look for an attorney with competent research skills. This will help ensure that every aspect of your case is considered and all avenues are explored.
Ability to Critically Judge Situations
The ability to come up with reasonable and logical conclusions from limited information is crucial in a defense attorney. Your defense attorney must consider arguments critically and anticipate the potential areas of weakens and formulate a defense from these weaknesses. Often a strong defense could arise from a simple statement made by the prosecution. A competent lawyer can critically judge the little information provided in court to develop a reasonable defense for your case.
Approachability of the Attorney
It would help if you considered how easy it is to reach a lawyer when you call their office for the first time. The response you received to your questions can also help you gauge your defense lawyer’s approachability. It may not be a good sign if you call a defense attorney and you receive an automated message requiring you to leave a message. Most situations that need a defense lawyer are often sensitive and urgent. You will want to speak to a live person and express your concern.
A good lawyer will carefully listen to your story and understand the situation at hand. The first impression you receive when you contact a potential defense attorney is always an indication of things to come. Facing criminal charges can be stressful and scary, especially when you imagine the potential consequences. Understanding and empathetic defense lawyer can help ease the emotional stress associated with these situations.
When hiring a lawyer, you need to check out if they are concerned about your welfare and family. They should also be conscious of minimizing the exposure of your case to third parties.
Knowledge and Connections in Local Courts
In every city and state, the legal community has a distinct structure. Attorneys know prosecutors, and every legal personnel knows presiding judges. If you are looking to hire a defense attorney in California, it makes sense that you want an established lawyer. Lawyers with connections and knowledge of the local court can persuade the prosecutor and judges to offer you favorable deals and outcomes of your case.
High Level of Confidentiality
Matters surrounding criminal cases and other legal situations are often sensitive. An arrest could trigger stigma from society and affect your social and professional life. A good attorney should be able to keep all details of your case confidential to help avoid too much insight from other parties. Some elements of a case you share with your attorney could be incriminating. Therefore confidentiality in these issues is critical.
Personal Qualities
After considering several attorneys and the crucial factors that go into ensuring the best-case outcome, you can choose a lawyer with the personal qualities of your liking. The characteristics you seek in a defense attorney may be specific to you. Therefore, you can select a legal representative you feel comfortable working with. You can decide to hire an attorney from a small or large firm. You can also choose to go for an attorney who works alone or a group of attorneys in a law firm. Determining whether a potential attorney has the qualities you hope to find, you can carry out several interviews and make the choice that suits your needs.
Find a Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
Hiring a criminal defense lawyer is essential when facing charges. Choosing a good lawyer is like choosing any product or service in the market. Your choice of a defense attorney can make a difference in your situation. It is best to research thoroughly to make an informed decision. If you or your loved one faces criminal charges, contact a competent lawyer. At Leah Legal, we offer competent legal guidance and representation in your criminal case. We serve clients facing charges in Van Nuys, CA. Call us today at 818-484-1100 to discuss the details of your case.
Surprisingly, not all criminal cases reach trial. Prosecutors might decide to dismiss some charges, especially when there is no or inadequate evidence to prosecute you. At times, the prosecution might decide to refrain from filing a charge at the preliminary hearing Some defendants also escape trial through pretrial motions like a motion to suppress. So, what makes all criminal cases fail to go to trial? What cases go to trial? And what circumstances can make a case go to trial? This article seeks to bring light to all these questions.
Factors that Reduce Chances for Criminal Cases to Going to Trial
A vast majority of legal cases never go to trial. Instead, the defendant usually agrees to plead guilty to a lesser charge than the one they would have gone to trial in a process known as a plea bargain.
Plea Bargains and How They Bar Criminal Cases from Going to Trial
A plea bargain is an agreement between a defendant and the prosecutor. The defendant agrees to a “no contest” or “nolo contendere “or pleads guilty in exchange for an agreement for the prosecutor to drop one or several charges. The prosecutor usually reduces the charges to a less serious offense or recommends judging a specific sentence acceptable to the defendant.
As many people are being arrested, prisons and jails continue to be more crowded. At the same time, prosecutors and judges alike feel an increased pressure to move their cases quickly through the judicial systems. Criminal trials usually take several days, weeks, months, or even years, while plea bargains take only a few minutes. Therefore, prosecutors find plea bargains the best option to reduce the judicial system’s burden.
For these reasons and others, plea bargains have become popular despite their many critics against them. More than 90% of convictions have come from negotiated pleas, meaning that only less than 10% of the criminal cases end up in trial. Although most people have seen plea bargains and sneaky forms of judicial agreement, both federal and state governments have formulated explicit rules that govern how to arrange and accept plea bargains in court.
Plea Bargains in California
The passing of California Proposition 8 in 1892 saw a significant change in how plea bargains are conducted in California. Under this Proposition, serious felonies like violent sex crimes, using a gun in particular offenses, and certain DUI offenses were banned from a plea bargain. However, three exceptions would make these restricted offenses go into a plea bargain. These exceptions include:
- Insufficient evidence to prove you are guilty.
- Lack of testimonies of a material witness.
- When reduction or dismissal would not lead to a substantial change in the sentence.
Sometimes cases can continue to be negotiated even when the exceptions provided above don’t apply. How so? This happens since the plea bargain restriction only applies when there is an indictment or changes of the charge information. Therefore, there is no restriction on bargaining before these two procedures.
The prosecutor and defense attorneys usually bargain during these stages. During these bargains, both sides might suffer if they don’t have enough information to make relevant offers and acceptance. In some cases, both parties might decide to negotiate a plea if their evidence is inadequate.
Charge and Sentence Plea Bargaining
Judges and lawyers usually divide plea bargains into two types. This includes sentence bargaining and charges bargaining. Sentencing bargaining is a plea bargain in which the prosecutor agrees to a lighter sentence for a specific allegation if the defendant pleads guilty or no contest to them. On the other hand, a charge bargain is a method where the prosecutor agrees to drop specific charges or reduce the charge to a less serious offense in exchange for a defendant’s plea bargain.
California Infractions and How They Reduce Chances of a Jury Trial
Another instance where a case cannot go to a jury trial is when charged with an infraction. Unlike felonies or misdemeanors, a defendant charged with an infraction only has to appear to court at a court-issued date. The date of the infraction citation is usually a due date on which the defendant must schedule an arraignment.
Defendants also have the chance of paying fines for the infraction online or schedule an arraignment date in court. An attorney would still appear on behalf of the defendant for all the court appearances. A defendant can enter a guilty plea, no contest, or guilty. The matter usually moves to trial in a not guilty plea, which should be held within forty-five days of the arraignment.
Please note, the only difference between a trial in an infraction and other trials in other types of offenses is that defendants aren’t entitled to a jury trial.
Motion to Suppress Evidence and How It Affects Cases Going to Trial
A motion to suppress evidence can bar an allegation from going to trial. Motion to suppress evidence is a form of pretrial motion that the defendant makes to exclude any illegally obtained evidence.
If the court rules in favor of the defendant, prosecutors cannot introduce the evidence in question during the trial. However, when the evidence is completely suppressed, the prosecutor will have nothing to present during the trial, meaning that they will either resolve into a plea bargain or have the court dismiss the case.
Defendants can hold the motion to suppress evidence at the preliminary hearing or at a pretrial hearing held to address the motion specifically. The main goal of suppressing evidence through a pretrial motion is to exclude evidence obtained through illegal search and seizure. Penal Code 1538.5 describes illegal search and seizure as:
- A search that’s undertaken without a warrant or is unreasonable.
- A search that’s conducted without a sufficient warrant.
- A search that’s conducted whereas the property in question isn’t included in the warrant.
- A search that’s conducted without probable cause on the warrant.
- Violation of both federal and state constitutional search standards.
- A search that’s conducted in a manner that involves police misconduct.
Both the prosecution and the defendant must meet the required burden of proof during this motion. For a search warrant made without a warrant, it’s presumed it was unreasonable, meaning that the prosecution has the burden to show that the search was reasonable. For a search undertaken with a warrant, the court presumes that it’s legal, meaning that the defense has the burden to justify that the warrant wasn’t legal.
Regardless of the side that must present evidence, it must prove the case by a “preponderance of the evidence.”
Another thing that you need to understand is, you must demonstrate that you expected reasonable privacy in the place that was allegedly illegally searched. Failure to meet this requirement will consider the search legal, which in turn doesn’t suppress the evidence as expected.
California laws exclude the following properties or places as places where you expect reasonable privacy:
- An abandoned place.
- A car that you’ve stolen.
- A car that you were riding but you didn’t own.
On the other hand, California laws include the following properties as places that you’d expect reasonable privacy:
- Your vehicle.
- Your home.
- Your cellphone’s content.
- A tent designed to keep you away from the public.
- The personal belonging that you’ve brought to school.
Pitchess Motion and How They Can Bar a Criminal Case from Advancing to Trial
A Pitchess Motion is a pretrial motion made by a defendant to inspect a law enforcement officer’s file as evidence of police misconduct. Defendants usually file a pitchess motion when they suspect that their arresting officer would have made a false police report filing or used excessive force.
You can use the pitchess motion to prove that the arresting officer committed misconduct against you. Examples of misconduct that you can file for include:
- Racially profiling
- Use of excessive force
- Lying in the police report
- Planting evidence
To prove these misconducts, you should access the officer’s personnel file to collect relevant evidence. The personnel files allow defendants to see whether the police officer committed some misconduct in the past. Proving any former misconduct shows that the officer is used to this, which is critical in dismissing any evidence collected by the officer.
California laws allow defendants to obtain relevant details from an officer personnel file through information request according to Senate Bill 1421 or by filing a Pitchess Motion.
Senate Bill (SB) 1421 allows specific types of police records to be open to public scrutiny. These records include:
- Records related to an incidence or investigation about an officer who shoots his or her gun at another person.
- Records related to an incidence or investigation about a police officer who uses force against another person resulting in significant bodily injury or death.
- Records related to an event showing a police officer’s engagement in sexual harassment.
- Records related to an event prove that the officer’s actions were dishonest.
In the last category, dishonest conducts may include any of the following:
- False statement.
- Falsifying evidence.
- Filing a false report.
- Destroying evidence.
Under SB 1421, the specific information that the defendant seeks to be released for public inspection include the following:
- Investigation report.
- Autopsy reports.
- Photographic and video evidence.
- Copies of the officer’s disciplinary records.
- Transcript or recorded interview.
- Recommended findings.
Alternatively, you can file a Pitchess Motion in court in the effort of raising doubts on the credibility of the information provided by your arresting officer. In California, the process of filing a Pitchess Motion entails three crucial elements. These elements include:
- Procedural filing steps.
- Showing “good cause.”
- “In camera hearing.”
Once you complete these steps, there are two possible outcomes that you would expect. These include granting the motion and disclosing the information or denial of the motion, which does not disclose the information.
If the judge grants the motion, he or she will provide the defendant with information of anyone who’d previously filed a complaint against the officer in question. The defense attorney will then contact these people and interview them about the facts representing them as potential witnesses.
Please note that if the judge orders disclosure of the information, but the agency holding the information doesn’t comply with the request, the charges against you must be dismissed.
Unavailability of Witness or Lost Evidence
If there is no key witness available to testify in a criminal case or the prosecutor loses crucial physical evidence, he or she will have no choice but to dismiss your case since there is no enough evidence to prove that you’re guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. In some allegations, the presence of physical evidence is crucial. Therefore, without it, the prosecutor cannot prove his case.
Prosecutors might also lack physical evidence if the witness dies, disappears, or refuses to testify on the ground that the testimony might incriminate him. Some cases also rely on the ability of a witness to identify a defendant as a perpetrator. Without the identification, it might be challenging to convict someone, which might lead to a dismissal of the case by the prosecutor.
Your prosecutor might also dismiss your case before it goes to trial when you prove against how the police conducted a line-up to identify you as the perpetrator of the alleged crime. If the judge finds out that the police did the line-up improperly, he or she might not allow the witness to identify you at trial, meaning that the trial will probably not be held.
Dismissal of Your Allegation Under the Prosecutor’s Discretion
Under rare circumstances, prosecutors might decide to dismiss charges when there are extenuating circumstances. For instance, a prosecutor can decide to dismiss a misdemeanor charge like loitering or trespassing if you have a clean record. There are questions about the process used to collect evidence. Prosecutors have the discretion to release allegations without prejudice. This means that they can re-file the case later if you pick up new charges or get into trouble within a specific period.
In very rare circumstances, a victim might request charges against a defendant to be dismissed, and the prosecutor might agree to do so. Normally, victims don’t have control over whether a particular criminal case should move forward, but they might make this decision under the prosecutor’s discretion. In these circumstances, the prosecutor might decide to dismiss a case if the victim’s testimony in court would lead to devastating emotional harm that has a long-term effect on him or her. This is common in sexual assault cases.
Supreme Court Provision on Mandatory Cases that Should Go to Trial
The right to trial by jury resides in Article three, Section 2 of the federal constitution. According to this right, judges must handle the trial of all crimes through a jury except for impeached cases. Also, under the Sixth Amendment, the accused should enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial conducted by an impartial jury.
However, the right isn’t as broad as it suggests, meaning that most defendants have to settle for a judge trial if there are high chances that they are guilty of a particular crime.
The Supreme Court suggests that jury-trial should only apply when serious offenses are at hand. Under this provision, serious offenses include those carrying a potential sentence that lasts for more than six months in prison. If the imprisonment lasts for six months or less, the crime becomes a serious one if the sum of its penalties is weighty.
Multiple Files and How They Affect Cases Going to Trial
Prosecutors regularly file more than one charge against defendants. So, what happens when there are multiple charges against a defendant when an individual carries six months or less but exceeds the six months when added together?
Unfortunately, the Supreme Court has held that jury trials cannot apply in circumstances when there are multiple filings against one defendant. Therefore, if the defendant has been charged with two allegations of obstructing the mail, each providing a maximum of six months, the Court still holds that this defendant cannot hold a jury trial.
Please note, the Supreme Court only determines what constitutes a serious offense, meaning that they only entitle the jury to set the minimum standard. This means that a jury trial should be held only when an offense is serious according to the Court’s standard. However, this does not restrict them from guaranteeing a ruling when crimes aren’t sufficiently serious as per the provision of the federal standard.
Find a Van Nuys Criminal Attorney Near Me
The chances of minimizing your case from going to trial are usually high. All you need to do is hire a professional attorney who can help you file a pretrial motion and ensure that your motion is granted. At Leah Legal, we have passionately helped clients facing criminal allegations in Van Nuys, CA, reduce the chances of having their allegations move to trial and its surrounding areas. From the day you’ll contact and hire us, we’ll prepare the best defense strategies to challenge the evidence presented in court by the prosecutor. For more information, contact us at 818-484-1100 and schedule an appointment with us.
Under California law, a drug crime can be charged as a misdemeanor or felony, depending on the circumstances of the case. The prosecutor considers several factors when determining whether to charge a drug crime as a felony or misdemeanor. A felony conviction is likely to lead to a prison sentence that could affect your life adversely. Therefore, you should contact an experienced criminal defense attorney immediately after the prosecutor convicts you of a drug crime. An attorney will help you fight the charges and possibly avoid a felony conviction.
Felony Drug Charges
Under California law, drugs fall under several categories, known as schedules. This classification is in line with the Federal Controlled Substances Act. The categorization classifies drugs based on their value against their potential for abuse and addiction. Schedule I drugs are the most harmful and dangerous drugs, and they include drugs like heroin. Schedule V drugs are the least harmful. Possession of marijuana for recreational use is legal under California law. However, Federal law classifies marijuana as a Schedule I controlled substance. Below are circumstances under which a person arrested for a drug crime may face felony instead of misdemeanor charges:
- Type And Quantity Of The Drug
The types of charges the prosecutor files against the defendant will depend on the type, and the amount of drug the defendant possesses. For instance, if you have a dangerous drug like cocaine and heroin, you will automatically face felony charges.
The prosecutor will also consider the extent of drugs possessed. You are likely to face felony charges if you have large quantities of a controlled substance.
- Possession for Personal Use or With Intent To Sell
Possessing a controlled substance for personal use could lead to misdemeanor charges, but possession of a drug for sale automatically leads to felony charges. The lawmakers consider the harm of each type of possession. If you possess a drug for personal use, you can only harm yourself with it. However, if you possess a drug for sale, you could supply it to other people and hurt them.
The Intent to Sell
The most crucial part in prosecuting a possession for sale charge is determining whether the defendant had the intent to sell drugs. You could face charges for possession of a drug for sale even if you did not intend to sell the drug personally. You could face charges even if you intended to have another person sell the drugs on your behalf. The jury could convict you of a lesser crime if the prosecutor shows that you possessed a drug but can’t prove that you had the intention to sell the drugs. A conviction for possession of a drug for personal use subjects you to less severe penalties and increases the likelihood of being subjected to a drug diversion program.
It is difficult for the prosecutor to prove intent to sell. While proving intent to sell, the prosecutor relies on circumstantial evidence that surrounds your case. The prosecutor will consider several factors while proving the intent to sell. They could also consult an expert witness like a narcotics officer to help determine whether the drugs were for sale. The factors that help distinguish possession for personal use from possession for sale are:
- The quantity of the controlled substance
- The packaging of the drug
- The presence or absence of drug paraphernalia
- Whether the defendant is under the influence
The prosecutor is likely to charge you with possession of a drug for sale if you possess a higher quantity of substance than the quantity an average person would consume. However, it isn’t easy to prove the intent to sell based purely on the extent of drugs the defendant has. For instance, if you are a habitual drug user, you may stock large quantities of a drug to ensure you don’t run out of supply. Therefore, having a large stock of drugs is not adequate evidence to prove possession for sale.
The most damaging evidence when determining intent to sell is the drug packaging. The prosecutor will assume that you intend to sell the drugs if the controlled substance is packaged in:
- Bundles
- Baggies
- Balloons
- Bindles
- Any other packaging related to drug sales
The law enforcement officers will assume that the drugs you possess are for sale if the packaging suggests. If the police find you with large quantities of drug packaging materials, they could assume that you sell drugs.
The presence of drug paraphernalia could make the prosecutor and the law enforcement officers assume that the drug is for personal use, thus helping you avoid felony charges. Drug paraphernalia may include syringes, pipes, and other instruments used to inject and ingest the drug. The presence of paraphernalia indicates that the drugs are for personal use. However, you could face felony charges if the police also find you with the following items:
- Measuring instruments
- Weighing scales
- Tools used in separating, diluting, and packaging drugs
The discovery of such items alongside the drug paraphernalia will strengthen the prosecutor’s evidence that you possessed the drugs for sale.
If you are intoxicated at the time of arrest, you are likely to face misdemeanor charges because the prosecutor will assume that you possessed the drugs for personal use rather than intending to sell them. However, this evidence may not be enough to prove that you did not intend to sell the drug because many drug dealers are also users. Therefore, the prosecutor will consider other factors that could indicate the intent to sell based on the current facts of the case.
- The Presence of Aggravating Factors
If you are currently facing drug charges, you are already in a difficult spot. However, you could even be in worse shape if the drug crime involves certain persons or you committed it in certain places. The prosecutor may charge the defendant with a felony drug crime if several aggravating factors are present. The presence of aggravating factors could make a drug crime that would otherwise have been a misdemeanor a felony charge. The aggravating factors that could lead to felony drug crime charges are:
- Committing a drug crime in a school, near a school bus stop, or in a school bus
- You are a repeat offender with prior drug convictions
- Committing a drug crime in or near a particular public building, including housing units, swimming pools, or on public transportation
- Committing a crime near a drug treatment facility
- Committing a drug crime in the presence of a minor below 18 years
The worst and the most common aggravating factor in drug crimes is selling drugs to a person below 18years. Having a minor sell drug is also a severe aggravating factor that could increase your charges.
It is an aggravating factor to sell drugs in public places, including public schools, places of worship, public parks, and places where senior citizens are, including senior centers, assisted living facilities, and nursing homes.
When you commit a second or subsequent drug crime, you are likely to face felony drug charges. First-time drug offenders are likely to face misdemeanor charges. You will face a longer jail term if the court convicts you of purchasing or possessing a controlled substance for sale and you have a prior felony conviction for a different drug crime involving more than the mere personal use of a drug.
Aggravating Factors Possession Of a Drug For Sale
It is an aggravating factor to possess or purchase cocaine base with the intent to sell. The penalties for this crime include a jail time of three, four, or five years in county jail. The court may also impose a hefty fine of up to $20,000.
You will face additional punishment if the court convicts you of possessing a controlled substance for sale (Health and Safety Code 11351 HS) and the substance involved is heroin, cocaine, or cocaine base:
- If the substance is more than one kg in weight, three years additional jail time
- Five years if the substance is more than 4kg
- Ten years if the substance is more than 10kgs
- Fifteen years if the drugs weigh more than 20kgs
- Twenty years if the substance weighs more than 40kg
- Twenty-five additional years if the substance weighs more than 80kg
The Penalties For Felony Drug Crimes
The penalties for felony drug crimes are more severe than the penalties for misdemeanor drug crimes. The specific punishment for a crime will depend on the type of felony drug crime you commit:
Felony Possession Of a Drug
The California Health & Safety Code 11351HS outlines that it is a felony offense to possess certain controlled substances for sale. The controlled substances include heroin, cocaine, LSD, and prescription drugs like codeine, Vicodin, and Oxycontin. The prosecutor can prove that you possessed a drug for sale if you have large quantities of the drug. Other signs are if the drug is packaged in a manner that indicates you intend to sell it, you have lots of money, especially in small denominations, and the presence of weighing scales. The prosecutor may also prove that you sell drugs if many people come to your place and leave after a few minutes. These could be customers coming to purchase drugs.
The penalties for possession of a drug for sale are:
- Two, three, or four years jail time in a county jail
- A fine not exceeding $20,000
If you have an experienced criminal defense attorney, the attorney can help you negotiate for probation and jail time of up to one year in county jail. You will not be eligible for drug diversion after a conviction under HS 11351.
Felony Sale or Transportation Of a Controlled Substance
The California HS 11352 makes it a crime to sell or transport a controlled substance, including heroin, cocaine, LSD, and peyote. It is important to note that California HS 11352 doesn’t apply to the sale of meth, marijuana, and other specific categories of drugs. According to HS 11352, it is illegal to:
- Sell drugs
- Transport controlled substances with intent to sell them
- Furnish or administer drugs to other people
- Give away controlled substances
- Offer to do any of the acts outlined above
Before 2014, the transportation of controlled substances included taking a controlled substance somewhere for your personal use. However, after the amendment of HS 11352 by the California legislature, it is only a crime to move controlled substances from one place to another, intending to sell them.
The violation of HS11352 is a felony offense. The consequences for the crime include:
- A jail time of three to nine years
- A fine that does not exceed $20,000
However, the jail time and the maximum fine could significantly increase if you sell drugs to a minor or transport large quantities of certain drugs.
Operating or Maintaining a Drug House
According to the California Health and Safety Code 11366 HS, it is an offense to maintain or operate any place to give away or sell controlled substances. The crime of operation of a drug house is a wobbler, meaning the prosecutor could charge it as a felony or misdemeanor. The prosecutor must prove that you maintained or opened a place with the intent of selling, giving away, or allowing people to use controlled substances in that place.
A place could mean an apartment or a house. A motel room or a hotel room could also qualify as a drug house. You will only face charges for this offense if you open or maintain a drug house to provide other people with the opportunity to use drugs. You will not face charges if you maintain or open a place for your drug activity.
It is also important to note that you should sell or give away controlled substances repeatedly or continuously for you to face charges for opening a drug house. If the provision or the sale of a controlled substance was a one-time thing, you would not face charges.
If the court convicts you of felony operation of a drug house, the penalties are:
- Imprisonment of up to three years in a state prison in California
- A fine that doesn’t exceed $10,000
Other penalties may include the confiscation of the property where the drug house was based.
Felony Laundering of Drug Money in California
According to the California Health and Safety Code 11370.9 HS, it is a crime to launder unlawful drug sales proceeds. Laundering involves concealing or disguising the source of the funds. The prosecutor will have to prove that you acquired, received, or engaged in a transaction involving money or property derived from a controlled substance. The prosecutor must also prove that you disguised or concealed the money’s source, ownership, and control. It should be evident that the amount you laundered was more than $25,000 within 30 days.
If the court convicts you of a felony, the penalties will include:
- Imprisonment of up to four years in a state prison
- A fine of up to $250,000 or twice the laundered amount, whichever is higher
Fighting Felony Drug Crime Charges
With the help of an experienced criminal defense attorney, you can use several legal defenses to fight charges for various felony drug crimes under California law:
Illegal Search and Seizure
You can fight felony drug charges if the law enforcement officers subject you to an illegal search and seizure. For example, you could be a victim of an unlawful search and seizure if:
- The police search your property without a valid California search warrant
- The police exceed the scope of the search warrant
- The officers detain or search you unlawfully without a probable cause
Police Misconduct
Police misconduct is also a common defense for many felony drug charges. For instance, in the felony crime of sale or transportation of a controlled substance, you may cite police misconduct if the police:
- Plant evidence, which involves placing drugs on a person, their vehicle, or their apartment to enable them to make an arrest
- Lying about the location of a controlled substance — For example, the police may lie that they found the controlled substance in your bag or pocket, yet the substance was on the ground close to where you were standing.
- Lying about the probable cause that made them arrest you
- If the police use excessive force to obtain evidence from you or obtain a confession
Police Entrapment
You can use this defense if you feel that the law enforcement officers coerced or lured you into committing an offense. It is common for the police to harass, coerce, and entice innocent people, making them commit a crime. For an officer’s conduct to qualify as coercion, it should be more than an offer or a suggestion. The police should have lured or coerced you in a manner that is difficult for a reasonable person to refuse.
You Had No Knowledge of the Crime
Lack of knowledge is also a common defense in certain felony drug crimes like the sale and transportation of a controlled substance. While citing this defense, you can state that you didn’t know about the presence of a drug. You can also say that you did not know that the item you transported or sold was a controlled substance.
Find a Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
A felony drug crime conviction comes with severe consequences, including mandatory jail time, hefty fines, and ineligibility for a drug diversion program. Contacting an experienced criminal defense attorney will reduce the chances of a felony conviction. An attorney will present a defense and mitigating factors that could make the prosecutor charge the crime as a misdemeanor. If you need reliable legal representation in Van Nuys, CA, Leah Legal can help. Contact us at 818-484-1100 and speak to one of our attorneys.
California categorizes different kinds of theft crimes based on severity, while the criminal statutes punish these crimes based on whether the offense is a felony or misdemeanor. For felonies, the prosecutor’s decision is dependent on the property or services’ value and the nature of the crime.
Sometimes, felony theft is called grand theft, but the definition is not always proper because the offense is also classified as a misdemeanor. Discussed below are the circumstances that make your theft crime a felony.
What Makes a Theft Offense a Felony?
Theft, otherwise referred to as larceny, is a crime that involves deliberately taking someone else’s property without their permission to deprive them of its benefits. Simply put, theft is an act of acquiring someone else’s property illegally.
Many people fail to understand that theft crimes have many categories, and you may be charged with grand theft, petty theft, embezzlement, robbery, burglary, shoplifting, and others. Whether the prosecutor will charge you with a felony depends on the kind of property, its value, your criminal history, and the facts of the case. Discussed below are factors that make a theft offense a felony.
- Property Value
California statutes classify thefts in terms of the amount obtained illegally. PC 484 defines petty theft as deliberately acquiring another person’s property unlawfully when the property value is no more than $950. The offense is filed as a misdemeanor whose punishment includes incarceration for up to six months in jail, court fines, victim restitution, and probation.
On the other hand, grand theft is outlined under PC 487 as illegally acquiring someone else’s property when its value is not less than $950. The offense is a wobbler, meaning the prosecutor has the discretion to file misdemeanor or felony charges. From this definition, it is clear that if the stolen item’s value is $950 or greater, then the stolen item’s value makes the theft a felony.
You can end up with grand theft charges in many ways. These are:
Grand Theft by Larceny
Larceny occurs when:
- You take possession of a tangible property belonging to another party
- You lack consent from the owner to take the property
- You take someone else’s property to deprive the holder of its use indelibly, take it for a prolonged duration from the owner to deny them its enjoyment or service, and move the property regardless of the distance and keep it for a particular duration.
Keep in mind that even simple shoplifting can result in grand theft by larceny charges if the stolen commodity’s value amounts to $950 or more.
Grand Theft by False Pretense
Theft by false pretenses is outlined under PC 532 as doing the following:
- Deliberately deceiving another party by saying something untrue
- You lied to make the individual let you have their property
- The individual relied on the false pretense to pass on possession or ownership
False pretense isn’t as apparent as you might assume. For the element to be present in your case, the prosecutor must demonstrate that you had plans of deceiving another party and you:
- Said something you knew was a lie
- Recklessly argue something as a fact while you don’t believe so
- Refuse to furnish details that you should have provided
- Promise something you don’t plan on fulfilling
Another crucial element that must be proven during these charges is that the victim of your actions relied on the false information to hand over their property. Although it might not be the only reason for the owner of the property to give it away, it needs to be clear that the victim relied on false pretenses.
The evidence required to charge you with this offense include:
- False token or writing
- Testimonies from not less than two witnesses
- Testimony from one witness plus additional evidence
- Writing which presents the false statement with your handwriting or signature
If you look at other ways that grand theft occurs, you will realize that there are more requirements under false pretenses before ending up with a conviction. This is because it is easy for an individual to falsely accuse you of having false pretenses to obtain their property after willingly handing over its ownership to you but later changing their mind.
The law recognizes the chances of false accusations in these cases, so they try to guard you and other defendants against these accusations by requiring testimonies from at least one witness.
Grand Theft By Trick
Grand theft by trick is a form of theft that occurs:
- When you obtain someone else’s property while fully aware, it belongs to them.
- When you utilize deceit to convince the owner to relinquish its ownership
- When taking the property, you planned to permanently deny the holder of its use or take it with you for long enough to deprive them of its value or benefit.
- You held on to the commodity for a specific duration regardless of how brief it is
- The holder of the item had no intention of transferring property ownership.
Note that although grand theft by false pretenses and grand theft by trick might look alike, the two are different because, under false pretenses, the victim lets you have control and ownership. On the other hand, grand theft by trick pushes the idea of someone handing over control of their property to you, but without the intention of transferring ownership.
Theft By Embezzlement
Embezzlement occurs when someone has entrusted you with a particular property and put you in a trust position on the property. Still, you decided to use the property for personal gains with the plans to deny the holder of its benefits for a particular duration or permanently. Even if you planned on returning the property after some time, theft by embezzlement charges would still hold in court.
You could be subject to felony theft when the property value is $950 or more. Anything less than this amount is petty theft and often charged as a misdemeanor. However, although it’s common for petty theft to be charged as a misdemeanor, sometimes the charges are deemed felonious based on the type of property stolen and not the property’s value.
If you end up with a conviction for felony grand theft, you will face up to thirty-six months in jail and court fines not exceeding $10,000. The judge might also impose three years of probation and require you to pay restitution.
- The Type of Property Stolen
You might end up with felony theft charges even when the property’s value taken without the owner’s consent is $950 or less. California categorizes particular theft crimes based on the kind of property stolen. There are many cases when grand theft can be charged as a felony based on the sort of property in question. These include:
Grand Theft Auto (GTA)
California PC 487(d)(1) says that you will face GTA charges when you steal a car or any other vehicle with the plans to deprive the possessor of its benefits indelibly. It may include stealing a vehicle to flee a crime scene, stealing a car to strip its parts and sell them, or stealing a car to permanently deny the holder of its use, to abandon it later. Therefore, whenever the prosecuting party proves that:
- You stole someone’s car
- With plans to deny the holder of its use temporarily or indelibly
- Without the owner’s consent, and
- You move the car and retain it for some time; you will be subject to GTA penalties.
Similarly, if you:
- Trick another party to give you their automobile
- Steal a vehicle the owner entrusted you with
- Use false pretenses to acquire a car. These actions will make your offense categorized as a felony whose penalties are harsh.
Stealing a car makes the act of theft a felony whose penalties when sentences include 16 to 36 months in jail or court fines amounting to $10,000. However, if it’s your first offense, the offense is categorized as a misdemeanor.
Grand Theft Firearm
Your theft offense will be deemed a felony if you steal a firearm like a rifle or gun. Grand theft firearm is defined under PC 487(d)(2). Although you could face petty theft charges if the firearm’s value is $950 or less, the offense is like GTA. However, if the gun you have stolen is worth at least $950, you will face PC 487(d)(2) felony charges. The court will impose three years of county jail incarceration or ten thousand dollars in court fines during sentencing.
- Criminal History
Your theft crime will become a felony if you are a repeat offender, even when the value property in question does not reach the felony standards. Offenses like petty theft are deemed as misdemeanors, but if you have a prior criminal record, the record makes the type of theft a wobbler, meaning you could face a felony or misdemeanor charge. A felony conviction for petty theft will attract up to three years in jail or $10,000 court fines.
If the offense you committed was supposed to be charged as misdemeanor grand theft, but it is discovered that you have a criminal history, the prosecution is likely to make the theft a felony.
- The Degree of Theft
California differentiates particular crimes as misdemeanors or felonies based on the degree of the theft. Therefore, if you commit one of these crimes and belong to a felony degree, you will face felony charges. These crimes are:
California Burglary
California PC 459 is the statute that defines burglary as entering a residential or commercial structure with the plan to commit a felony when you make your way in. Note that even when you fail in achieving the felony once inside the facility or room, entering a room or building alone with plans to engage in criminal activity is enough to result in burglary charges. Further, one of the following elements must be true:
- The property you acquired illegally or planned on stealing was valued at $950 or more.
- The structure you gained access to wasn’t a commercial establishment
- The facility was a business establishment, but you entered it after operating hours
Burglary is classified as first-degree if it involves entering a residential structure, while second-degree burglary involves entering a commercial building to commit a felony. So, if you engage in a theft that involves entering a residential building, the theft crime becomes a felony. A residence, in this case, refers to an occupied house, hotel room, boat, trailer coach, or a room within an occupied structure.
Keep in mind that an inhabited or occupied structure means someone lives there. Therefore, even if the individual dwelling in the room were absent when entering to commit a felony, your theft crime would still be deemed a felony.
If the court finds you guilty of residential burglary, the penalties you will face include:
- Felony probation
- No more than six years imprisonment in a state prison
- Court fines not exceeding $10,000
Besides, you will add a strike on your record under the Three Strikes Law.
Similarly, your theft offense might become a felony if you commit second-degree or commercial burglary, despite it being a less severe crime than a residential burglary. Generally, a second-degree is a wobbler, and so, you could face felony or misdemeanor charges. The felony penalties for the second degree are lesser than those of the first-degree burglary, and they include:
- Formal probation
- As much as thirty-six months in jail
- A fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars
A misdemeanor sentence, on the other hand, attracts the following consequences:
- Summary probation
- No more than twelve months of jail custody
- As much as $1,000 in court fines
It’s worth noting that if you have a prior conviction for second-degree burglary that could qualify as shoplifting, you can apply for resentencing to face a misdemeanor shoplifting charge under Prop 47. However, to do this, you will need to work with an experienced criminal attorney.
California Robbery
Penal Code Sec. 211 defines robbery as taking another party’s property against their will, utilizing threats or force. The property in question can be in the victim’s immediate presence or person. The offense is a wobbler, and to earn a conviction, the prosecuting team must demonstrate the following elements:
- You took possession of another party’s property
- The property was already in possession or under the control of someone else
- You took the item from their person or within the victim’s reach or observation
- You took possession of the property against the owner’s will
- You utilized threats or force to take control of the property or to deter the victim from resisting.
- When making threats, you planned on denying the property holder of the item permanently or for a significant period, enough to dent them of the property’s benefits or use.
For the crime to be absolute, you must have used fear or physical force or obtained the item against the owner’s will.
Robbery is also categorized as first and second-degrees. First-degree robbery is a felony, and you will face these charges if the following is true:
- Your victim is a driver or occupant of a subway, taxi, or any other transportation for hire.
- The robbery occurs in an occupied structure or someone’s dwelling
- The theft occurs at an ATM or right after the victim leaves an ATM
If any of these elements are present in your case, your robbery case becomes a felony whose potential sentence includes:
- Formal probation
- As much as six years prison sentence
- A ten thousand dollar fine
You should understand that if you commit a robbery in the 1st-degree in an inhabited room with the help of at least two individuals, your sentence will be increased up to nine years.
On the other hand, second-degree robbery is also a felony, although the definition doesn’t meet the first-degree’s threshold. The penalties for the offense upon sentencing include formal probation, a $10,000 fine, and prison incarceration not exceeding five years.
If there are aggravating circumstances in your case, like inflicting great physical harm on the victim, you will be subject to subsequent and additional 36 to 72 months in prison. Where there is the use of firearms during the robbery, the sentence is significantly longer. In specific, the commission of robbery using a gun will result in:
- Ten years incarceration for personally using a firearm during a robbery
- Twenty years incarceration for using and firing a gun in person during a robbery
- Twenty-five to life incarceration for causing great bodily harm or death using a firearm in the commission of a robbery.
- Manner of Theft
Your theft crime will become a felony based on the manner that it occurs. Robbery, for instance, is deemed a violent felony because it involves the use of threats or force to take another party’s property from their immediate presence.
Find an Experienced Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
A felony sentence for theft in Van Nuys, CA, is severely punished, which is why you need an experienced attorney to contest the charges. Even a minor offense without a prior criminal record can destroy your future if you end up with a conviction because joining the military or acquiring a job will be almost impossible with the record. Luckily, a proficient attorney who understands the local felony theft statutes can provide quality legal representation. If you are charged with felony theft, contact Leah Legal today at 818-484-1100 for a free consultation.
In most instances, many criminal charges don’t go to trial because your attorney advises you as the defendant to take a plea bargain. But in some cases, the criminal lawyer might advise you not to accept a plea bargain but instead, go to trial. Many factors influence the decision to go to trial or agree to a plea bargain. These factors include the evidence the prosecution has gathered against you and the potential sentence you face if found guilty. Your attorney might advise you not to take any deal if the prosecution doesn’t have strong evidence against you.
If the attorney believes the evidence against you is weak or might receive a light sentence, they might advise you to go to trial instead of accepting a plea bargain.
In California, the court can charge you with different crimes, and the court process for each crime is very different. For example, if convicted of a misdemeanor, you will be sentenced to one year in county jail or fined up to $1000. But if convicted of a felony offense like armed robbery or murder, your sentence could include life imprisonment without parole or death.
Read on to understand why some cases go to trial.
Court Process In California
The first step starts with an arrest, and then the law enforcement officers book you. Next, the police investigate and gather evidence against you to determine whether there’s enough proof to charge you with a crime. If they don’t find anything incriminating or if all charges are dropped, then the prosecutor has no choice but to release you from custody unless ordered otherwise by the judge.
But if there’s sufficient evidence, the prosecutor will present your case to a grand jury. If the prosecutor believes they have enough evidence, they’ll ask for an indictment from the grand jury and request the court to hold you without bail while you await trial.
Reasons Why Your Attorney Might Advise You To Let Your Criminal Case Go To Trial
If you accept a plea bargain, you waive your right to appear before a grand jury. On the other hand, trials allow your attorney more time to prepare your defense. The trial can also provide valuable insight into how jurors might see specific evidence.
The Prosecution Doesn’t Have Enough Evidence.
Your criminal case can go to trial if your attorneys decide to take your case to trial because it is their opinion the prosecution does not have enough evidence to warrant a conviction.
Your criminal case can go to trial if your attorneys decide to take your case to trial because it is their opinion the prosecution does not have enough evidence to warrant a conviction. This may seem like an easy decision, but in reality, it requires careful consideration by both you and your attorney.
Trials Provide The Opportunity For Sentencing Judges To Issue Sentences Outside Of The Statutory Range
Trials provide the opportunity for sentencing judges to issue sentences outside of the statutory range. This is a common misconception among those who think that trials are only necessary when there is overwhelming evidence or in cases with complicated circumstances. The truth is, sometimes it doesn’t matter how strong the case against you as a defendant, maybe if you haven’t been found guilty. Trials allow judges to consider all factors and decide whether or not they should go beyond what’s provided by law to ensure justice is served.
As earlier stated, it sometimes doesn’t matter how strong the case against you may be if you haven’t been found guilty. Trials allow judges to consider all factors and decide whether or not they should go beyond what’s provided by law to ensure justice is served. This means you could still receive probation if you have committed an offense, but the prosecution doesn’t have any evidence at all.
When you go for trial, the judge may decide to issue you probation instead of jail time if convicted, especially if you are a first-time offender. The court sentence will depend on whether you have any previous offenses and your current level of cooperation with law enforcement while awaiting trial status. If you meet one or more of these criteria, the judge may issue you probation instead of jail time if convicted.
An experienced attorney can help with this type of decision-making by pointing out what could happen in court and answering any questions about whether or not taking this particular route would be beneficial for you at that specific moment in your life. In addition, they can offer guidance because they know how sentencing works and the different types of sentences that the court could impose on you if it finds you guilty.
The attorney can use their experience to predict the kind of sentence the court will issue. For example, the judge can sentence you to home detention instead of jail time or probation rather than incarceration, depending upon the case specifics.
The Outcome Is Not Predetermined Like It Would Be In A Plea Bargain, And You Have More Control Over Your Fate By Choosing Trial
If you are facing criminal charges, you choose two options: trial or plea bargain. However, the many benefits of choosing a trial make it the better option for most people. The outcome is not predetermined as it would be in a plea bargain, and you have more control over your fate by choosing trial.
If you choose to take your case to trial, then the jury of peers will determine whether or not you are guilty. On the one hand, this may seem intimidating because a group of 12 people will ultimately decide on your fate with their verdict. But what many don’t realize is that when someone pleads out and enters a plea bargain, they agree to a predetermined sentence that the judge decides.
If you choose trial instead of pleading out and accepting punishment without seeing the evidence against you, you will be able to make your case in front of a jury. You can present witnesses like eyewitnesses, objects such as DNA or fingerprints, and other evidence to show that you didn’t commit the crime.
It is essential to have a trial because the jury needs to hear your side of the story and know you. The jury also has an opportunity to see how well you answer questions under pressure from challenging attorneys, which can help them decide if they are likely to believe what you say on other matters in court or not.
On the other hand, choosing trial instead of pleading out with a plea bargain gives you more control and can decide your future.
If you plead out with a plea bargain, then one of two things will happen: either you’ll be found guilty, or the case will be thrown out because there’s not enough evidence against you. If it is thrown out, this means that no charges can later be filed against you in the future. But if it is found that you are guilty, then there will be a predetermined sentence already set by the judge, and this may not be what’s best for your situation.
Plea bargaining can also impact other aspects of life like employment or housing because sometimes charges stay on someone’s record even after the case is over. So again, this can have a significant impact on your life because employers or landlords may not want to hire you or rent an apartment to someone with a criminal record.
A Jury Comprises Of Twelve People Will Determine Your Verdict Rather Than One Person
Your lawyer might decide to move to trial because twelve people will determine your verdict, rather than just a single judge.
Your lawyer might decide to move to trial because twelve people will determine your verdict. Rather than the trial being based on one person’s opinion, 12 people will have to agree that you were guilty of your crime before they can convict and sentence you.
For a jury in California, or anywhere else in the country, to find someone not guilty or innocent of their charges, all twelve jurors must be convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that you aren’t guilty. This is also known as “beyond any shadow of a doubt.”
If these many people are required to grant innocence, it’s easier for your lawyer to present evidence to show you are not guilty of the offense you are accused of committing. At trial, your attorney presents many witnesses and exhibits as needed to show that you are innocent of the charges against you. The presentation of many witnesses and exhibits is crucial since it will influence the decision of the jury. Thanks to the evidence and exhibits, the jury will decide whether or not you committed this crime rather than allowing prosecutors or judges alone to make that decision.
As a result of their unique role in the courtroom and society at large as legal decision-makers, especially when they’re passing judgment, jurors have an obligation not only to consider all the evidence presented before them but also to be unbiased by outside influences or public opinion. It is up to each juror, in turn, to take on these responsibilities themselves while also striving for group consensus during deliberations.
They are chosen at random with no regard for their race, political affiliation, occupation, and any other such factors: a person’s criminal record may affect whether they can serve–but it does not necessarily dictate if they will do so! (This means that someone who has committed crimes like fraud cannot sit on your jury!)
Another Reason Why Your Case Can Go To Trial Is That You Receive The Benefits Of The US Constitution
Your lawyer might decide to take your case to trial because, according to the US constitution, you’re innocent until proven guilty, even if it’s been found that you committed the crime. The right to be tried in front of a jury and receive your day in court are both guaranteed by the U.S Constitution, and these rights cannot be revoked unless you have violated them before, that is if you have previously been accused of serious crimes.
These basic constitutional protections help ensure a fair trial by allowing your lawyer to present complicated evidence such as children’s testimony, DNA testing, and of course, eyewitness accounts.
Some cases go to trial because the prosecution does not have enough evidence. For example, in a rape case, if there is no DNA or other form of physical evidence and the allegation cannot be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, then it would make sense for you to take your chances on going to trial rather than pleading guilty.
Another reason some cases will go to trial is when they are based on eyewitness testimony alone, which can lead to them being overturned later due to new developments or investigations. A good example of this was in North Carolina, where a man served 30 years behind bars after being wrongfully convicted with eyewitness testimony and fingerprint evidence before his conviction was overturned by DNA testing.
If You’re Accused Of Committing Publicly Second Offense
The legal system’s goal for justice is to best serve all involved parties’ interests by examining an impartial process with fairness toward both sides as much as possible. It might also be prudent to use a bench trial when you appear on television before judges because they may make assumptions about your criminal record based on appearance alone, which could then skew them against you from the start. A bench trial is where you waive your right to a jury, and the judge alone listens and determines your case. The goal is that the judge, opposing counsel, and prosecutors will serve you justice as best as possible through an impartial process to understand that the true goal is to determine whether you are guilty or innocent based on evidence rather than appearance.
If you are accused of committing a publicly scorned offense like sex offenses, DUI, or other similar offenses, it’s better to have the judge determine the case. In such incidents, you waive a jury trial. The advantage of having the judge only try your case is that they will not be swayed by public opinion, and you can make some of the arguments that would have to be omitted in front of a jury.
It might also be prudent to use a bench trial when your appearance is such that your race, sexual orientation, or other such personal identifiers might prejudice the jury.
Call A Van Nuys Criminal Defense Lawyer Near Me
In California, some criminal cases go to trial. Sometimes, the defendant has a strong defense that they want to argue in person rather than accept a bargain plea. Other times, you might realize as a defendant that the prosecutor doesn’t have enough evidence. You become confident you have a chance at an acquittal by presenting your case before a jury of peers. Your lawyer might advise you to take the case to trial if you have a strong defense.
They may also advise you to go to trial if the prosecutor doesn’t have enough evidence. If you or your loved one is facing a criminal charge in Van Nuys, CA, it’s critical to employ the services of a qualified defense lawyer. Do you want to take your case to trial? Contact Leah Legal. At Leah Legal, we have highly experienced lawyers who will ensure you receive a very favorable outcome in your trial. You can reach us at 818-484-1100.
Under California law, offenses fall under three main categories. Felonies, misdemeanor, and infractions. A felony is an offense punishable with imprisonment in the state prison, death, or any other punishment imposed by the law. A felony offense could also be punishable by imprisonment in county jail, but this will depend on the facts of the case. Given that a felony conviction is a severe offense, many people often wonder whether it is possible to expunge a felony offense. Yes, it is possible to erase the sentence since a criminal attorney can negotiate to have the felony reduced to a misdemeanor.
A Common Misconception
A common misconception is that felony offenses cannot be expunged. If you have the proper legal representation, many felony offenses are reducible to misdemeanors. If the conviction resulted in probation and not actual imprisonment, it is possible to erase the case. However, it is essential to note that certain sexual offenses do not qualify for expungement.
The process of expunging a felony conviction could take between 10 and 16 weeks. The specific duration will vary depending on how old the conviction is, the court handling the case, and the case’s complexity. If a felony case is complex, the expungement process could take longer than the typical 6 to 10 weeks. A felony conviction will not be expunged by the mere passage of time. You have to file a petition for expungement to the court with the help of a criminal defense attorney.
Many Felony Offenses Are Wobblers
Many cases in California are not automatic felonies but wobblers. A case is a wobbler if the prosecutor has the discretion to charge the case as a felony or misdemeanor. An attorney can negotiate to have the case reduced to a misdemeanor and expunged from your record. Most theft cases in California are wobblers. If a case is an automatic felony, like most drug crimes, your attorney cannot negotiate to have the case charged as a misdemeanor. If you served time in state prison, it is not possible to expunge your felony conviction.
Before You Begin The Expungement Process
Before filing for expungement or dismissal of your felony case, it is crucial to understand what an expungement is, the benefits of expungement, and its limitations. As outlined by California law, an expungement is a legal procedure that diminishes or removes certain offenses. California PC 1203.4 outlines that if a defendant convicted of a felony or misdemeanor meets the prison sentencing and probation conditions, they may be eligible for expungement of their criminal records. When your felony conviction is expunged, your case is reopened, and your guilty verdict or guilty plea is set aside, and your criminal case is dismissed. According to PC 1203.4, an expungement will release you from all penalties and disabilities of the felony conviction.
What An Expungement Will Do For You
After an expungement of a felony conviction, you will no longer have to disclose the conviction when applying for a job. This could be extremely helpful in helping you secure meaningful employment because employers will not discriminate against you based on your criminal record. It is unlawful under California for any employer to discriminate against an employee based on expunged criminal convictions. After an expungement, the law requires employers to treat defendants as though they have not had any criminal conviction. An expungement could also help you gain professional licensure or join a professional organization. Through an expungement of your felony conviction, you can avoid deportation or other immigration consequences that could result from the felony conviction.
The Limitations Of Expungement Of Felony Convictions
There are several limitations of the expungement of your felony conviction. First, having your conviction expunged does not mean that the conviction will be entirely hidden from public view. According to California PC 29800, a felony with a firearm expungement will not restore your right to possess or own a gun. Finally, even after expungement, your felony conviction might still affect your driving privileges.
If the felony conviction had affected the defendant’s right to hold public office, the expungement of the conviction can’t restore this right. It is also important to note that if a felony conviction required you to register as a sex offender, expungement of the conviction wouldn’t relieve you from having to register as a sex offender. If you had registered as a sex offender, your registration remains available to the public even after the expungement of your felony crime.
The expungement of a conviction will not prevent the conviction from being used against you in future sentencing for any additional offenses you commit. An expunged felony conviction could still count as a strike under the California Three Strikes Laws. With the help of an attorney, you can resolve some of the limitations of an expungement through other legal means like the Governor’s Pardon and certificate of rehabilitation. You can be able to restore your firearm rights by having your felony conviction reduced to a misdemeanor.
How An Attorney Will Assist In The Expungement Of A Felony Conviction
Not everyone who has been convicted of a felony offense is eligible for an expungement. In addition, specific details of your case could affect the circumstances of your filing for an expungement. Therefore, it is essential to ensure that you are familiar with the facts of your case to help you determine whether you are eligible to have your criminal record expunged. An attorney will play the following roles during the expungement of your conviction.
Request For Copies Of Your Criminal Records
Your criminal records will include all the relevant information contained in the papers you received during your conviction. Additional documents can be obtained from the attorney who handled the initial case, your probation or parole officer, or the superior court where the conviction took place. Copies of your criminal records are also available at the California State Department of Justice Criminal Record Review Unit or Office of the Attorney General’s website.
You may have to pay a fee for the retrieval of your criminal records. The Department of Justice Criminal Record Review Unit charges a cost of $25. However, if you provide proof of income, you may be exempted from paying the retrieval fee. It could take several weeks for you to receive your criminal records.
Finding Out If You Are Eligible For Expungement
An attorney will also find out if you are eligible for the expungement of your criminal record. You are likely to qualify for an expungement if the following factors apply:
- You have a conviction for a felony or misdemeanor
- You aren’t facing any criminal charges at the time of applying for expungement
- You aren’t currently serving a sentence for a criminal offense
- You did not serve imprisonment in a California state prison
- You obtained an early termination of your probation or completed your probation
- You do not have any unpaid or outstanding court fines
- You successfully served and completed your sentencing and all its requirements. Requirements for sentencing may include community service alongside other programs
- You faced charges and conviction in a state court and not federal court
- It has been at least one year since your conviction if you did not receive probation
- You have a prior conviction for a felony offense, you served jail time in county jail, and it has been at least two years since completion of the sentencing
- You did not fulfill all the probation conditions, but you are not currently facing charges for another offense
- You were formerly a member of the U.S military, and you suffered trauma, injury, or other mental health problems as a result of your service in the military.
A felony must first be reduced to a misdemeanor for it to be expunged from your criminal record. A felony offense that qualifies for expungement is that which could have otherwise been a misdemeanor. These types of crimes are known as wobblers.
When You Are Not Eligible For Expungement
You may not be eligible for expungement of your felony conviction if any of the following factors apply:
- You faced conviction in a federal court
- You served time in a state prison in California
- You are currently facing charges for another criminal offense or serving probation or sentence for another criminal offense.
- You committed a sex crime that involves children.
- You are still serving probation, and you have not succeeded in having your probation terminated early.
An attorney will consider all the facts of your felony conviction to determine your eligibility for an expungement.
Gather All Details Of Your Conviction
An attorney will also gather all the necessary details of your conviction. For example, if you have multiple convictions, an attorney will find out the following:
- The case number
- If a verdict occurred
- If the defendant entered a plea and whether the plea was no contest or guilty
- The details of the defendant’s sentencing
An attorney will determine if the defendant was to serve some time in prison, the date of release and whether they were released on parole.
Determining The Status Of Probation
When determining whether you qualify for an expungement of your criminal conviction, an attorney will also determine your probation status. If the defendant is still serving probation, they must have the probation terminated before applying for an expungement. The defendant must file a petition in court to have the probation terminated. The termination of probation will depend on the court’s discretion. When determining whether to terminate a defendant’s probation, the court will hold a hearing and determine:
- The conviction and its degree of seriousness
- The defendant’s criminal record
- The defendant’s ability to get a job after probation termination
- Whether the defendant deserves to have their probation terminated, which mainly depend on how they behaved while on probation
- The defendant’s community ties and the people they support or the volunteer work they have done.
If the defendant violates the probation terms, they may still apply for expungement and attend a hearing to have the judge determine whether to terminate their probation.
The Process Of Expunging A Felony Conviction
Which steps do you need to take when seeking expungement of your felony conviction? Below are the steps that you should follow:
Hire An Attorney
If you hire an experienced attorney to represent you through the expungement process, you will succeed. You should hire an experienced attorney who has a thorough understanding of all aspects of California law. An attorney will help you complete all the requirements of your expungement application.
Obtaining And Completing The Relevant Forms
Your attorney will help you determine which forms you will need to complete the expungement process. If you intend to apply for expungement but have not yet completed your probation, you should first file a motion to terminate probation.
If the court denies your motion to terminate probation, you should file a petition for dismissal. You can obtain the petition for Dismissal form from your courthouse. If the form is not available, your attorney can help write your own.
If you seek to expunge a felony, the felony must first be reduced to a misdemeanor offense. If the crime is a wobbler, it can be reduced to a misdemeanor by petitioning the court. For other felonies, the defendant must fill the relevant forms to have the felony reduced to a misdemeanor. These forms are available at the courthouse, and if not, the defendant can draft their own with the help of an attorney. After the felony has been reduced to a misdemeanor, the defendant files a petition to dismiss a misdemeanor under PC 1203.4.
If you are applying for an expungement of several convictions, you must fill the relevant forms for every sentence. In addition, you may have to attach certain documents to the forms when submitting them to court. The documents include a written proof of your completion of community service and your character reference to help strengthen your petition for expungement of your felony conviction.
Filing For Expungement
You may file for expungement after you have completed all the necessary paperwork for your case. It will take between several weeks to several months to complete the expungement. The court hears cases in the order in which they were filed. You should submit the expungement forms in the court in the county where you were convicted.
The petitions to terminate probation and petitions to reduce a felony to a misdemeanor should be delivered or mailed to the clerk of the court. Depending on your county, you may submit a petition to the probation officer or district attorney. The process of filing a petition will vary from county to county and will also depend on the seriousness of your case. A felony petition fee will be higher than filing a petition to dismiss a misdemeanor petition. When you pay all the relevant fees, the court will set a date when your forms and petitions will be filed.
Meeting With An Attorney To Prepare For The Hearing
The other step involves meeting with your attorney to prepare for the hearing. You may or may not have to appear in court for the expungement hearing. During the expungement hearing, your attorney will raise your reasons for seeking an expungement. You should ensure that you are prepared to handle all questions that might arise. Your attorney will help you gather all the relevant evidence to your case and help you prepare a statement to present in court.
The Expungement Hearing
Expungement hearings are usually held before a judge, and there is no jury present. An expungement hearing proceeding will take around 10 minutes. Therefore, you should ensure that you are on time for the hearing and behave appropriately. The court will consider several factors when determining your eligibility for expungement at the hearing:
- The charges applicable
- Your parole status
- Whether you have additional convictions
- Whether you are capable of finding and holding a job
- Your community involvement and community service
When The Judge Accepts Your Petition
If the judge accepts your petition for expungement, you will receive a signed order from California’s superior court judge. It is important to note that the record may still be accessible by the public unless you have your criminal record sealed even after the expungement. After the expungement of your felony conviction, you will no longer have to answer yes when people ask you whether you have a criminal record. However, you have to disclose the criminal conviction even after expungement in the following instances:
- When applying for a state license
- When running for a public office
- If you intend to work in the California lottery commission
When The Court Denies Your Petition
If the judge denies your petition to expunge a felony conviction, you have a night to ask why the judge denied your petition. Then, you can re-file the petition six months after the petition is dismissed.
Alternatives To Expungement
You should not give up after finding out that you are not eligible for an expungement of your felony conviction. There are some additional methods of clearing your record that you can consider. The methods include:
- Having your records destroyed or sealed
- Obtaining a certificate of rehabilitation
- Receiving a direct pardon from the governor
If you seal your criminal conviction, all the arrest records, police records, and documents about your case will be destroyed. If you were wrongly arrested and not convicted of a crime, you could have your documents sealed. A certificate of rehabilitation is available seven years after your release from probation. A direct pardon from the governor relieves the defendant of all penalties associated with a conviction.
Find A Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
If you are in Van Nuys, CA, have a felony conviction on your record, we invite you to contact Leah Legal. Our experienced attorneys will evaluate your case and determine if you qualify for expungement. Contact us at 818-484-1100 and speak to one of our attorneys.
If you face criminal charges in Van Nuys, CA, the judge could send you on probation in place or together with a jail/prison sentence. The judge’s decision is guided by the details of your case and your criminal history. For instance, you could receive misdemeanor probation on your conviction, whereby you are released back into your community but on strict conditions that could last a given period. You cannot violate probation conditions if you wish to remain free from incarceration.
Understanding misdemeanor probation and its conditions are crucial to avoid making mistakes that could cause your re-arrest and subsequent incarceration. In this article, we’ll discuss all there is about misdemeanor probation. For more information and legal help, you could contact a competent criminal attorney for support and help with your case.
Legal Explanation of Misdemeanor Probation
Probation refers to a criminal sentence whereby the judge releases convicts from confinement but puts them under court supervision. Sometimes the judge gives probation in place of jail or prison time, and other times the convict receives both in one sentence. Other times the judge suspends incarceration due to consistent good behavior and gives probation in its place. But it all depends on the nature of your charges and your criminal history.
In California, the criminal justice system gives two types of probation based on the nature of the underlying offense: misdemeanor and felony probation. Felony probation is mainly granted for felony cases.
Misdemeanor (or summary) probation is a substitute to incarceration, given mainly for misdemeanor cases. When you face conviction for a misdemeanor offense, the judge has total discretion to send you to jail, or probation, depending on the facts of your case.
During the probation period, the court will directly supervise you instead of placing you under the supervision of a probation officer. The judge will order you to periodically go back to court to provide progress reports and show that you have complied with the terms and conditions of probation.
Misdemeanor probations last for a maximum of 12 months in California, though sometimes it can be longer depending on the case’s specifics. During the probation period, you will be required to abide by specific probation conditions like attending counseling, participating in community service, and paying restitution to the victim or the victim’s family. The judge determines probation conditions, depending on the details of your case. Violating probation is a separate offense that could attract additional criminal penalties.
California misdemeanor probation could be somewhat complicated, especially for first-time offenders. Thus, it could make the legal process smoother for you if you engaged the help of an experienced criminal attorney. Your attorney will help you understand what probation entails, the terms and conditions, and help you make the right decisions that could be in favor of your case.
Misdemeanor probation comes with many benefits that you should be aware of if you face misdemeanor charges in Van Nuys, CA. For instance, probation allows you to work within your community. That is better than spending several months in incarceration. As you work to develop your community, you could earn money to support your family, which would not happen if you are in confinement.
If you have a significant problem like an alcohol or drug problem, or even domestic violence, probation offers you a chance to enjoy the support of your family and friends as you go through recovery. That could help you get over the probation permanently. You can also attend court-ordered programs to better your situation, like counseling and alcohol or drug-related programs.
More importantly, probation helps the state to cut down on the costs of managing convicted persons. Incarceration costs the taxpayer a lot more money than probation.
Who Receives Misdemeanor Probation?
Anyone who faces a misdemeanor charge in California is eligible for misdemeanor probation. Criminal court judges have total discretion in determining whether to incarcerate you after conviction or grant you probation. The goal of probation is to do one or more of the following:
- To protect members of the public
- To bring back the victim of the offense
- To rehabilitate the defendant and give them a second chance to correct their behavior.
In most cases, California courts will grant misdemeanor probation to juvenile and first-time adult offenders. However, even individuals with previous convictions could be placed on misdemeanor probation for various reasons. The judge first assesses your case and your situation to determine what you would do if the court granted you a second chance. Mostly, offenders who show remorse or a possibility to rectify their behavior are placed on probation under the supervision of the court.
Working with an experienced criminal attorney could impact the judge’s decision. For instance, your attorney could convince the court of your willingness to change and start life afresh to avoid a jail or prison sentence. A solid defense is necessary if you wish to avoid incarceration after conviction.
How To Get Misdemeanor Probation In the Place of Incarceration
When a judge finds you guilty of a misdemeanor offense, he/she can sentence you to jail time or probation. If you are a first-time offender, or the details of your case allow a lenient sentence, the judge will automatically grant you probation in the place of incarceration.
However, it doesn’t always work like this. Sometimes your attorney will have to strike a deal with the prosecutor as a plea bargain for you to plead guilty to the charges to be granted probation. That is one of the reasons why you need to work with a competent criminal attorney. A reliable attorney will only enter a plea bargain if they feel it’ll be in your best interest.
If the judge grants you probation with jail time, you’ll only stay in jail for a short period and not the maximum period the sentence requires for that offense.
Example: Joan is facing DUI charges for the second time in ten years. The prosecutor has compelling evidence against Joan. Therefore, her chances of having the court drop her DUI charges are slim. Joan’s only choice would be to enter a plea bargain with the prosecutor for probation in the place of jail time.
Joan’s maximum jail sentence will be for one year if the judge finds her guilty. But, her criminal lawyer successfully comes to an agreement with the prosecutor. Thus, she is placed on misdemeanor probation for three years and is only required to serve a maximum of 96 hours in jail.
You could receive a better deal if you work with a private criminal lawyer than a public defender. Personal lawyers have the resources and time needed to fight for the best possible outcome of their client’s cases. Your lawyer will have your best interests at heart at all times and will fight aggressively to protect your rights.
Note that probation goes on for a more extended period than the set jail time. Thus, some defendants opt to serve jail time for a much shorter period than with probation terms and conditions for so many months. For instance, spending six months in jail might seem like a better idea than five years on probation. Judges do not force probation on defendants who don’t want it. If you have nothing to lose by spending a few months behind bars, the judge will welcome the idea and only sentence you to incarceration.
However, it is possible to make an irrational decision when you are overwhelmed by the idea of a conviction. That is why you need the support of an experienced attorney to advise and help you make the right decision.
Misdemeanor Probation Terms and Conditions
The judge will not just release you back to your community without imposing some terms and conditions for your probation. Note that California judges have total discretion in designing probation conditions. However, they have to be guided by two main factors, namely:
- That misdemeanor conditions must be proper and fitting to ensure that justice is done in the end.
- The conditions must be logical and reasonable — They should be related to the underlying offense.
Some specific conditions are provided by law for particular offenses. For instance, if you face misdemeanor charges for domestic violence, you must successfully go through a batterer’s treatment program while on probation. Let us look at some of the most common summary probation conditions that could apply in your case:
- A mandatory requirement to pay court fines, court fees, and victim restitution where applicable
- You must participate in individual or group treatment or therapy — The type of individual or group therapy will depend on the underlying offense.
- You must complete treatment or therapy programs related to your charges — For instance, anger management treatment for violence-related offenses or drug/alcohol treatment for DUI-related violations.
- You must participate in community service/Caltrans roadside works
- The judge will require you to find gainful employment at least during the probation period— gainful employment will keep you out of trouble and keep you within the community where the court can monitor your progress
- You could be subjected to a restraining order, especially if the underlying offense is related to domestic violence
- You must abstain from drugs and/or alcohol and might be required to attend a drug abuse treatment program if the underlying offense is DUI- or drug-related
- If on DUI probation, you must not operate a vehicle with even the slightest amount of alcohol or drugs in your blood. You must also not refuse to submit to DUI testing within the probation period
- You must show up in court during all the set court dates for review and follow up
- You must submit to random and frequent drug tests
- You could be required to install an IID system or wear a SCRAM — Mainly for defendants with multiple DUI convictions.
- You must not violate any law and be careful not to be arrested or have any issue with law enforcement officers.
The judge can give you more or just a few probation conditions based on the details of your case and your criminal history. Note that you must not violate any probation condition given by the court on the day of your release. Violating probation conditions leads to further criminal charges.
When the judge realizes that you have violated one or more probation conditions, he/she will issue a misdemeanor probation violation bench warrant for your arrest. The warrant will automatically trigger a violation hearing. Once the police execute the warrant and are arraigned in court, the judge will quickly schedule a hearing for a probation violation to determine what will happen to you. The probation hearing is also called a probation revocation hearing since one of the likely outcomes of this hearing is for the court to revoke your probation and send you to jail.
If you face arrest for violating a condition or two of your supervised release, you might be eligible for a bail release before the probation violation hearing. Judes have total discretion to make decisions like these. You could be granted bail if the following are true:
- The probation violation was relatively minor or a technical violation
- Your underlying conviction was for a first-offense misdemeanor
- You had complied with all the other probation conditions
During the hearing, the district attorney has the burden of proof to demonstrate that you violated your supervised release’s specific term(s). The prosecutor will provide evidence to support his/her arguments. Note that heresy proof is allowed in hearings like these. It becomes easier for district attorneys to argue their cases and convince the judge to revoke your probation with that. That is another reason for you to hire an experienced criminal attorney to represent you during this hearing.
The judge has two decisions to make after listening to the evidence presented in court:
- You did not violate any probation condition — The judge would release you to resume your supervised release.
- That you violated one or more probation conditions — If that is so, the judge will sanction you.
If the court finds that indeed you violated the conditions of your summary probation, the judge can do any of the following:
- Revoke the probation and turn your probation sentenced to prison time — The judge will send you straight to prison, where you’ll serve the maximum sentence allowed by law for the underlying offense.
- Modify the terms and conditions of your probation — The judge can decide to make the terms and conditions of your probation stricter than they were and then release you on those tough conditions.
- Reinstate the original conditions of your probation and release you once again
Misdemeanor Probation Progress Reports
Misdemeanor probation is mainly a supervised release. Therefore, the court will closely monitor your progress to ensure that you abide by all the conditions for your probation. The judge may not keep a close watch on you but will order you to submit periodic progress reports to the court.
Once you have agreed to all the probation conditions set by the judge, he/she (judge) will select a court date during which you will show up in court. During the court’s visit, you will show the judge proof that you are doing everything he/she ordered you to do on the day of your release. Misdemeanor probation can last up to five years. Thus, the judge will require you to come back a few more times with progress reports. Some courts will set the court appearance after every 30 days, others after ninety days, while others after six months.
Note that failing to appear in court on the scheduled date is a form of probation violation. Thus, it will result in the judge issuing out a bench warrant for your arrest. The consequences for failing to appear could be similar to the implications of the probation violation discussed above.
Note that keeping up with these progress reports brings you closer to completing probation. It could also cause the judge to terminate your probation early.
Early termination of probation is possible under California law. The judge could terminate your probation when you complete the terms of your probation before their time and with no violations. However, it doesn’t happen in all courts. Some judges prefer to follow through with probation to the end. The judge can also be skeptical about granting early termination of probation in cases related to domestic violence and DUI.
Find a Van Nuys Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
Misdemeanor probation has its advantages and disadvantages. Even though you will be serving your term out of incarceration, you’ll be ordered to abide by specific terms and conditions that sometimes could make your life difficult. Working with an experienced criminal attorney in Van Nuys, CA, could help you make the right decision when you’re faced with jail time and probation. Your attorney could also negotiate for more favorable probation conditions on your behalf. At Leah Legal, our priority is our clients’ best interests. That is why we fight until we obtain a favorable outcome of all our cases. Call us at 818-484-1100 for more information and guidance through every stage of the legal process.
Driver’s license suspension is one of the most life-changing consequences accompanying a conviction for driving under the influence in California. The license suspension process is lengthy, and seeking a restricted license to drive to school or work is expensive, making it impossible for some DUI defendants. When you face a driver’s license suspension, it can be challenging to continue with your daily life unless you operate with a suspended license, a criminal offense under California Vehicle Code 14601.2.
Driving with a suspended license is a severe offense. However, you risk facing harsher penalties when you operate with a suspended license due to a DUI. If you have been arrested and charged with violating VC 14601.2, it is crucial to seek legal guidance. Your attorney can help investigate the facts surrounding the situation to help you avoid the harsh consequences that accompany a conviction for this crime.
Driving With a Suspended License after a DUI
Under California Vehicle Code 14601.2, it is a crime to drive a motor vehicle with a license that has been suspended for DUI. In California, driving on a suspended license is one of the most common traffic offenses. Although most traffic violations are infractions, driving with a suspended license is a misdemeanor that could attract severe penalties, including incarceration and probation. Furthermore, you will face an enhanced sentence for driving on a license arrested for DUI.
When a police officer stops your vehicle in traffic and finds that your license is suspended for DUI, you will face an arrest and charges under Vehicle Code 14601.2. Before the court finds you guilty of driving with a suspended license for DUI, the prosecutor must establish the following factors beyond a reasonable doubt:
You Operated a Vehicle when your Driver’s License was Suspended or Revoked
When proving your guilt under VC 14601.2, the prosecutor must prove that you operated a vehicle with suspending or revoked driving privileges. In California, several reasons could prompt the DMV to suspend your license, including reckless driving and driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs. The length of driver’s license suspension varied depending on the circumstances of your case and your criminal history. If the Department of Motor Vehicle suspends or revokes your license, you must not drive until the period of suspension ends.
Also, it is essential to understand that your driving privileges will not be reinstated automatically after the suspension period elapses. You will need to pay reinstatement fees, apply for a new license and complete all the court order and DMV requirements. Therefore, you may still face charges for driving with a suspended license even after the suspension ends. To prove this element, it must be clear that you were the person driving the vehicle at the time of the arrest.
Your Driver’s License was Suspended for DUI or DUI, Causing Injuries.
Although there are numerous reasons for license suspension or revocation under California law, VC 14601.2 addresses license suspension for DUI. Therefore, you will only be guilty under this statute if you operate a motor vehicle while your license is suspended for drunk driving or DUI causing injury. If your license suspension results from other driving offenses, you could be charged under VC 14601.1, which attracts lesser penalties after a conviction.
You Knew that Your Driving Privileges Were Suspended
The prosecutor can only prove your guilt under this statute if they establish your knowledge of the suspended nature of your driving privileges. You could not face a conviction for driving with a suspended license if you did not know that the license was suspended. In California, the Department of Motor Vehicle is responsible for license suspension. If you face charges for DUI, you could suffer a court-imposed and administrative driver’s license suspension.
After a conviction for DUI, license suspension is one of the penalties you face. At the hearing, the court will notify you of the license suspension. If you lose a DMV hearing, the DMV must mail you the notice of suspension. Therefore, the prosecution must provide proof that you received your suspension notice.
You Violated the Restricted License
If you are operating on a restricted license, the prosecution must prove that you violated the terms. After a driver’s license suspension for DUI, some defendants are lucky to obtain a limited license that allows them to operate in specific areas. Most DUI defendants are eligible for a restricted license under the following circumstances:
- You do not have a previous DUI conviction.
- You are above twenty-one years. If you face a conviction for underage DUI in California, the court cannot allow you to operate on a restricted license.
- You did not refuse to take the breath and blood tests in your previous arrest for DUI.
- You are not on probation for an alcohol-related offense.
If you win the DMV hearing but face a court-imposed license suspension, you can apply for the restricted license right away. Before acquiring a limited license, you must file a certificate of financial responsibility and pay the limited license fees. However, if you lost the DMV hearing and suffered an administrative license suspension, you must wait up to thirty days to obtain the restricted license.
Driving on a restricted license has some regulations that you need to follow. If you operate a motor vehicle while in violation of these rules, you can be arrested and charged with driving on a suspended license:
- Driving to and from work.
- Driving for work-related purposes.
- Driving to and from court-imposed programs and counseling.
Also, the DMV may require that you install an ignition interlock device. The IID works to check the alcohol content in your breath before you start your vehicle. If you fail to install the IID device when operating on a restricted license, you could be arrested and charged under VC 14601.2.
As long as you drive on a restricted license, it would be best to match your operations to what is allowed to avoid additional criminal charges. If you are stopped by the police while driving on the restricted license, you need to be careful of your answer about your driving purpose.
Penalties for Violating California Vehicle Code 14601.2
Driving with a suspended license is a severe offense under California law. However, when the suspension of your license was a result of a DUI conviction, you could face harsher penalties. A conviction under Vehicle Code 14601.2 is a misdemeanor that attracts the following legal consequences:
- A jail sentence of up to six months for a first offense and one year for a second offense.
- Fines not exceeding $1000 for a first offense and up to $2,000 for a subsequent offense.
Misdemeanor Probation for Driving on a Suspended License for DUI
Instead of spending time in jail for violating Vehicle Code 14601.2, you may be sentenced to misdemeanor probation. Although probation is a great way to escape incarceration, not all defendants are eligible for this sentence. Informal probation is a program to protect the public and ensure that low-risk offenders are rehabilitated out of jail. Guidance from a competent attorney can increase your chances of receiving the alternative sentence instead of time behind bars.
When you face a conviction for driving with a suspended license after a DUI, your attorney and the prosecutor will agree on probation as part of a plea deal. Sometimes, the judge could grant probation when pronouncing your sentence. Probation is not the best alternative in all cases. Therefore, you can accept or reject the offer depending on the circumstances of your case.
When you receive a probation sentence after a conviction for violating VC 14601.2, the judge could subject you to the following terms and conditions:
- Payment of court fines.
- Participate in group or individual therapy.
- Abstain from alcohol or drugs.
- Avoid criminal activity while on probation.
Probation Violation for Driving With a Suspended License After a DUI
Driving on a suspended license after DUI is considered a violation of DUI probation. If you face a conviction for drunk driving in California, you may be sentenced to probation instead of incarceration in county jail. In addition, you could suffer driver’s license suspension or revocation. One of the terms and conditions that you must obey while on probation is to avoid engaging in criminal activity. Driving with a suspended license after a DUI conviction is a crime and thus considered a violation of probation.
If you violate your DUI probation, you will face an arrest and may need to attend a revocation hearing. When you drive with a suspended license while on probation, you will face charges under California Vehicle Code 14601.2 but still face the consequences of violating probation. However, at the revocation hearing, you have the chance to fight the allegations and avoid the harsh penalties that accompany probation violations.
Even when you are found guilty of driving with a suspended license, your probation will not automatically be revoked. Therefore, it is crucial to seek competent legal guidance when you face accusations of violating DUI probation. By reviewing the evidence presented against you and testifying to your account of the events, you may maintain your probation status.
Unlike other hearings where you need to convince at least one member of the jury not to find you guilty, you have only one shot at convincing the judge that you did not violate probation. In a probation violation hearing, the burden of proof is less for prosecution, and the court will likely find you guilty of the violation.
If the judge finds you guilty of a probation violation for driving with a suspended license, they may consider several factors before deciding your sentence for the violation. The court may check your criminal history and the amount of time you spent on probation before the violation. Depending on the circumstances of your case. A probation revocation hearing may have one of the following outcomes:
- The court may reinstate your probation under the same conditions as earlier ordered by the court.
- The court can reinstate your probation and modify the terms. Some of the modifications may include an increase in the probation period or more strict conditions.
- The judge can revoke your probation and sentence you to serve time in jail.
Revocation of your probation is one of the harshest penalties that accompany probation violation. If you are accused of violating probation for driving with a suspended license, you should contact an experienced defense attorney to help you protect your rights.
Defenses against Vehicle Code 14601.2 Charges
If you are arrested for driving on a suspended license because of DUI, all is not lost. Not all arrests for violation of this statute result in a conviction. With the help of your attorney, you can explore the following defenses against your charges:
Claim That You Did Not Receive Notice of Suspension
Before you face a conviction for driving with a suspended license after a DUI, the prosecution must prove that you knew of the suspension. Therefore, it is a strong defense strategy to claim that the DMV did not notify you about the suspension. If the court or Motor Vehicle department suspends your driving privileges, you will receive a notice of the suspension. Sometimes, you may be notified of a potential license suspension but fail to receive the confirmation of the action. Luckily, there are ways through which you can find out whether your license was suspended after a conviction for DUI.
In California, there are two main ways through which your driver’s license can be suspended for drunk driving:
- Court Imposed Suspension
In most cases, DUI convictions are accompanied by license suspension under California law. The period of court-imposed suspension varied depending on the circumstances of your case and your criminal history. If the court finds you guilty and you are convicted for DUI, the judge will inform you of the license suspension at the hearing.
Also, the court will require that you sign paperwork concerning the sentence. The moments following a conviction for DUI can be very challenging d=for you and your family, and it is easy to lose the paperwork. Since the rules surrounding license suspension are complicated, you may be unsure whether your license is still suspended.
- Administrative Driver’s License Suspension
The California Department of Motor Vehicle handles the administrative license suspension, which happens within thirty days of DUI arrest. The administrative process starts as soon as you face an arrest. The arresting officer will take away your license and offer you a notification to operate within the first thirty days. In California, you have up to ten days after the arrest to contest an administrative license suspension. Unfortunately, the arresting officer may forget to give you notice of a potential suspension. If you fail to request a DMV hearing, your license will be suspended automatically.
If you contest the license suspension at the DMV hearing, you will learn of a suspension depending on your hearing outcome. If you lose the DMV hearing, you will face an administrative license suspension. It is crucial to understand that an administrative license suspension is independent of the court-triggered suspension. Therefore, even when you win the DUI case and escape the license suspension, you must follow up with the Department of Motor Vehicles. If you did not receive notice of your license suspension, you might have a chance to fight charges for driving on a suspended license.
Your License was Not Suspended for Drunk Driving
One of the elements of the crime that the prosecution must establish is that your driver’s license was suspended after a DUI. You will only be convicted under California VC if your suspension fits in the above category. Generally, driving with a suspended license is a criminal offense. However, you risk facing a harsher penalty if you operate a motor vehicle when your license is suspended for drunk driving. This is because California law is strict on individuals who drive while intoxicated. As a defense to your case, you can argue that your license was suspended for other reasons. In this case, you will face lesser charges.
You Were Not Driving
Vehicle Code 14601.2 charges require a prosecutor to prove that you were driving a vehicle with a suspended license. Therefore, if you can prove that another person was driving when the officers stopped you, you may have a chance to fight the charges.
Find a Van Nuys Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
California law is stringent on individuals who operate motor vehicles while under drug or alcohol influence. Due to the danger that drunk drivers pose to themselves and other road users, a conviction for DUI attracts severe legal penalties, including driver’s license suspension or revocation. When your license is suspended, you cannot operate your vehicle unless you acquire a restricted license. In most cases, a restricted license only allows you to drive to specific areas.
Driving with a suspended license after a conviction for DUI is a criminal offense charged under California Vehicle Code 14601.2. A conviction for violating this statute attracts severe legal penalties that may include incarceration. In addition, if you are sentenced to probation for DUI, driving with a suspended license will count as a probation violation and could attract additional penalties.
Seeking the legal guidance of an attorney from Leah Legal is crucial when you face charges for driving with a suspended license. We serve clients facing criminal charges throughout Van Nuys, CA, to ensure the best outcome in your case. Contact us today at 818-484-1100.
In California, conspiracy laws are outlined under California 182 PC. The law considers conspiracy a scenario where one or a group of people agree to engage in a crime. The crime is charged as either a misdemeanor or felony based on your criminal record and the facts surrounding the case. Before you face charges for the crime, the court will require the prosecution team to prove two main elements of the crime.
The elements are agreement and an overt act. The crime will come with a heavy fine and extensive jail terms. It is recommended you seek legal help from a competent conspiracy attorney to help you learn more about conspiracy, its effects on your future life, and the harsh penalties you will risk facing. Remember, the criminal defense attorney you go for will determine the outcome of your case. Thus a competent conspiracy attorney is a priority for the best results of your case.
What is the Legal Meaning of Conspiracy?
Conspiracy occurs when two or more people intentionally agree to engage in a crime and actions are taken to advance the crime. Under California Penal Code 182, it’s a crime to commit a conspiracy. Before you face conviction for the crime, the prosecution team must prove all the elements of the crime. When the prosecution team fails to prove the elements of the crime, you will not face conviction. The elements include:
- You agreed with another person or people to engage in a crime
- One of the involved parties in the agreement took over to advance or further the agreement
- A least of the over acts were performed at the state
You must note that an arrest for a suspicious conspiracy charge will not necessarily lead to the conviction. You cannot be guilty of the crime when:
- You did not have any intent to commit the crime
- You merely associate or accompany members of the conspiracy
As a member of a conspiracy, you do not necessarily know the duties or identity of other conspiracy members. The main focus is whether you agreed to engage in the offense. The main questions will only arise around:
- Overt act
- Agreement.
Parties Agreement
The agreement is one of the main elements of the crime. It’s not necessary for you and other involved parties to come into a formal or detailed agreement. The agreement might be inferred from your conduct when you had a common purpose to engage in the crime.
For example, Paul and John are seen sneaking into a residential home at nighttime. They are both dressed in a black suit, and Paul is carrying a bag. John a small long piece of wood in front of the house door to see whether the homeowner puts the light on. Under this situation, both Paul and John would face burglary charges. Even if they did not have a detailed or formal agreement to engage in the crime, they would face the charges.
What is the An Overt Act?
Another central element of the crime is an overt act. In California, an overt act is a behavior conducted to advance or help accomplish a planned crime. The act is committed After you agree to commit the crime. Remember, the overact should be more than planning or agreeing to engage in the crime, but it doesn’t have to be a criminal behavior itself. The behavior might be as simple as:
- Renting a car or room
- Purchasing a firearm
- Entering into a room to locate its exits
- Making a call
- Making signals to the co-conspirator
California Penal Code 182
Under the law, conspiracy occurs when two or more people conspire:
1. To commit any offense
2. Maliciously and falsely indict another person for any offense, or procure someone else to face arrest or charges for the crime.
3. Falsely maintain or move any action, suit, or proceeding.
4. To defraud or cheat someone else of any item through any criminal means or obtain properties through false promise or pretense
5. To engage in any behavior that might cause public injury or obstruct or prevent justice.
6. To perform any offense against the people of the president or deputy president of the US. Or the governors of any territory or state, or judges and the secretary of any US executive departments.
Examples of Conspiracy In California
Bill and Abel plan to mug a nearby bank. They sketch the building and inform Stephen to disable the building’s surveillance cameras. The deliberate plan and communication desire fulfill the crime’s elements of intent and agreement. Also, drawing the damage of the premise’s cameras and the map meets the features of the crime’s act. If Stephen knew the purpose of disabling the surveillance camera, all the involved parties would face conspiracy charges.
Howard told James had planned to hijack his neighbor Grace, and he wanted to borrow his pick up to carry out the kidnap. James then agrees and even suggests Howard use one of the rooms in his house to store Grace after kidnapping her until her father pays ransom money. Both parties prepare a room and write a ransom letter after kidnapping Grace.
James helped Howard perform the offense, fulfilling the features of the crime, intent, and agreement. Again, preparing the room and writing the ransom letter will fulfill the element of an overt act.
Who Can Face Charges for Conspiracy in California?
- A party of conspiracy will face the charges even when the alleged crime was not carried out. Remember, conspiracy and the alleged crime of conspiracy will come with different charges. Thus you will face charges for the crime when you are involved under the following situations:
- As a part of the conspiracy group, you don’t necessarily need to know the duties of the other members or even their identity to face the conviction.
- A party of a group is not accountable for the behavior of other involved members after accomplishing their goal of the crime.
- You are not accountable for someone else’s behavior, not a party to the conspiracy, even when their actions helped you achieve the aim of the conspiracy.
A party of the conspiracy will be accountable for any crime they conspire to engage in despite which group party committed it. As a part of the conspiracy, you will be responsible for any part of the group when their acts aim at furthering the crime. Also, when their behavior is probable and a natural effect of the design and plan of their agreement. The rule will apply even when the behavior was not in their initial goal. Under the same rule, a conspiracy member doesn’t necessarily need to show up during the crime.
Punishment, Sentencing and Penalties Guidelines for Conspiracy
Like any other criminal offense, conspiracy is heavily condemned and sentenced in the state. So, the crime will attract fines and jail terms. Under California Penal Code 182, the law sets different penalties for different kinds of conspiracies. The charges will match the crime in question even when the crime did not take place. The California PC 182 guides the penalties you face under the various conspiracy cases as follows:
Conspiracy Against a Government Official
When you conspire to commit conspiracy against a government official, as outlined under paragraph (6), you will be guilty of a felony. Thus, you will remain behind bars for a period ranging from 5 years, seven years, or even 11 years.
Conspiracy Aimed at Committing More Felonies
The charge is a felony and is punishable by the penalties made for the felony crimes. When one conspiracy involves more felony offenses, the conspiracy conviction is punished by the fines placed for the most severe felonies.
Conspiracy to Commit Murder
You may face charges for conspiracy to murder whether the killing was completed or not. For instance, you may face conviction for first-degree murder when you do the following:
- You gave aid, abetted, instructions, commands, or counseling to the killer.
- You induced, hired, solicited, attempted to kill, or convinced someone to kill.
Conspiracy to Engage in Fraud
When you conspire to engage in a behavior outlined in paragraph (4), you will face punishment by jail time in jail for 12 months. Or you will pay a fine of up to 10,000. Also, you may face both fines and jail terms.
Conspiracy to Engage in Identity Theft
When you obtain a felony conviction for conspiring to engage in identity theft, as per section 530.5, the criminal court may require you to pay a fine not exceeding $10,000 for the misdemeanor charge. The charges will vary depending on the facts surrounding the case and your criminal record. Also, the charge may be either a felony or a misdemeanor. When a felony, the court will require you to pay a fine of up to 25,000. You will also remain in jail for up to 3 years.
Conspiracy to Engage in a Violent Offense Resulting in Death
When you conspire to commit a violent offense in California like kidnapping, robbery, carjacking, arson, or rape, which result in the death of the alleged victim, or a foreseeable consequence, the crime is first-degree murder. Thus you will face the charges placed for the first-degree murder regardless of whether the killing was intentional or not.
Other Acts of Conspiracy
When you conspire to engage in any other act outlined under penal code 182, you will remain in a county jail for 12 months or according to section 1170 subdivision (h). you may also pay fines of up to $10,000 or even face both jail time and heavy fines.
Conspiracy and Expungement
Just like in many crimes in California, you may erase the conspiracy conviction from your criminal records. You want to work closely with your criminal defense attorney. When you face conviction for conspiracy, you are entitled to expungement when you:
- Complete the ordered probation
- Complete your jail term
When you violate the probation terms, you may still qualify for expungement. But, it would be the judge’s discretion. Under California PC 1203.4, expungement will release you from all penalties coming with your conviction. Ensure you consult your conspiracy lawyer. The lawyer will help you understand the benefits of expungement to your future life. Again they will guide you during the expungement process.
The conviction for conspiracy would also hurt your rights to possess a firearm. According to the law, a convicted felon is prohibited from owning or possessing a gun. So, you will lose your right to have a gun.
Possible legal defenses for conspiracy
Under California laws, conspiracy charges are severer than anyone would expect. When facing the charges, you need the assistance of a conspiracy lawyer to fight for your rights. Below are the legal defenses your lawyer may use to fight against your conspiracy charges.
Withdrawal From The Conspiracy
You would not be able to face conspiracy charges if you pull out of the planned conspiracy before the crime takes place. To pull out of the conspiracy, you must affirmatively and truly reject the conspiracy. Leaving conspiracy includes communicating it by actions or words to the involved members before an overt act is taken towards the crime.
By withdrawing effectively, you will not be liable for any act of co-conspirators that they committed after your withdrawal. The prosecution team should prove you didn’t pull out of the conspiracy before the crime in question occurred to face conviction for conspiracy. When the prosecutor fails to prove, you cannot face conspiracy charges. Again your defense lawyer can prove you affirmatively rejected the conspiracy before an overt act furthering the offense occurred, hence beating the charges.
Mistake of Law
In California, a Mistake of law can be a defense to a conspiracy when you have a reasonable belief that your conduct is not illegal. Your honest good faith belief is the only requirement for this defense. To face conviction for conspiracy, you should have agreed to engage in the crime. If you didn’t know you were conspiring to carry out an illegal act and had a reasonable belief that you were within your legal right, you could not face the charges.
False Accusation
Under California laws, conspiracy involves several people being involved in planning and committing the crime. You may be falsely accused of conspiracy since co-conspirators may accuse you due to fear, revenge, or anger. To face conviction for the crime, the prosecutor must prove you agreed and had the intention of committing the crime. When the prosecution team falsely accuses you of conspiracy when you were not a member of the conspiracy, you will not be convicted for conspiracy since our defense lawyers will help uncover the false accusations.
No Agreement
The prosecutor must prove you had an agreement with the conspiracy team to engage in the crime. You may use lack of agreement as a defense if the prosecution cannot establish any prior agreement to engage in the crime. Remember, the offense might still occur even when you did not have any agreement to commit it. Thus it’s not considered a conspiracy. When the prosecution fails to prove a prior agreement towards committing the crime, you cannot face conspiracy charges.
No An Overt Act in The Alleged Crime
When no overt action was taken towards committing the crime, a defense lawyer may help by attacking any false evidence. This is because planning a crime does not mean undertaking it until steps are taken to carry out the crime. A competent criminal defense lawyer can use this defense and show that no conspiracy member performed an overt action towards committing a crime. However, the defense works when you did not overtly commit the crime and will not be convicted for conspiracy.
For example, John and Jimmy agree to kidnap Sam. John suggests they use their bedroom to keep sam. They prepare a room where they will keep Sam, but they don’t undertake further actions. Although they conspired to kidnap Sam, and no overt steps were taken apart from planning, they will not face conviction for conspiracy.
Mere Associations
The court cannot establish a conspiracy by mere associations with the conspiring parties. So, the prosecutor must show you participated; you were interested, you had a common illegal design with the conspiracy parties. These mere associations with the conspiracy members will not make you part of the team. Even when you made a statement or acted in actions to further the conspiracy, that alone is not sufficient to make you a member of the conspiracy team.
Contact a Van Nuys Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
Conspiracy cases are complex. Handling the conspiracy case alone might be challenging, especially when it’s your first-time offense. Thus, when you face a conspiracy conviction in California, you must discuss the situation with your conspiracy attorney. The attorney will help you learn more about conspiracy laws and understand your rights. You need to receive legal representation from our compassionate attorneys from Leah Legal. We serve our clients in and around Van Nuys, CA, on a 24/7 basis. So, you may reach us today at 818-484-1100 or by visiting us online and speak with one of our skilled conspiracy attorneys.
Even without a conviction, any criminal charge or arrest in California will result in a criminal record available to the general public. Having a criminal record can have devastating consequences in life, especially when looking for a job, promotion, or college admission.
Luckily, California law provides individuals with a clean slate by clearing their records through expungement, a process where a criminal charge, arrest, or conviction is erased from your record, such that you are released from all its detrimental consequences. Not everyone is eligible for an expunction, but there are multiple benefits you can derive from the process if you are. This article defines expungement under the law and its benefits.
Legal Definition of Expungement Under California Law
Otherwise called a dismissal release, expungement is defined under PC 1203.4 as the legal process where you are released from all the detrimental consequences and penalties stemming from a sentence. AB 1008 of the ban the box law bars employers from asking applicants to divulge their criminal record information unless they are presented with a conditional job. Evaluation of the applicants should be individualized and based on merit before denying them opportunities because of a criminal record.
After the expunction, your employer can still view your conviction history but cannot use it as a basis of denying you employment even after making a constrained job offer. Also, with a cleared record, you can tell a potential employer, landlord, or licensing agency that you have never been arrested, charged, or convicted of a crime without breaking the law.
Note that even when the use of marijuana became legalized, the Department of Justice was tasked with reviewing and sealing the records of past cannabis convictions because it was no longer illegal. You don’t need to request an expunction because the marijuana conviction is cleared from the record.
Qualifying for an Expunction
California PC 1230.4 provides criteria that must be followed during an application for expungement. The requirements for expunging a felony or misdemeanor are:
- You mustn’t have been incarcerated in state prison for the criminal act.
- You shouldn’t be presently charged with a crime, serving probation time, or serving a sentence because of a violation of probation.
- You must have received an early probation termination or completion of probation.
- The offense you want to be cleared from your history must be a misdemeanor or a felony that ought to have been prosecuted as a misdemeanor.
- You must have cleared all your monetary court fines and restitution for the underlying crime.
It’s worth noting that you are not eligible for expunction if you have been convicted for a felony and served a jail or prison sentence. Furthermore, you do not qualify for expungement if the baseline offense is a sex crime towards a minor or a car violation that adds two points to your driving record.
Also, if you had served a jail sentence, you could still qualify for expunction if you committed the crime after the passage of Prop 47 in 2011. For your offense to be eligible under Realignment legislation, the following exceptions must be present. You must not be:
- carrying out a sentence,
- Serving probation, or
- charged with engaging in any kind of criminal activity
Successful completion of probation means meeting all the conditions imposed by the court for the program like victim restitution, payment of court fines, undertaking community labor, and concluding counseling programs. If you are presently charged with a crime or your attorney skipped court when you were on probation, it won’t be deemed successful completion.
However, you may still violate some terms of probation and still be eligible for expunction if you obtain a special hearing from the court to determine your candidature. On the other end, even if the court determines you are a candidate, but it turns out you have previously served a jail sentence for a sex offense involving a child, your record won’t be deleted. These sex offenses that can deny you eligibility for expunction are:
- Sodomy with a child as codified under PEN 286(c)
- Statutory rape under PEN 261.5(d)
- Lewd act with a child under PEN 288
- Oral copulation with a minor as per PEN 288 (c)
Early Termination Of Probation To Qualify For Expunction
Under California PEN 1203.3, a judge can grant your request for early termination of probation. For you to be eligible for this relief, you must have served at least twelve months in jail for informal probation and a minimum of 18 months of formal or felony probation sentence. Even when you qualify for the relief, it doesn’t come automatically. Your criminal defense attorney must request a court hearing by filing a motion with the relevant court two days before the proceeding.
Chances are high the court will consider an early termination if you have completed a mandatory counseling program or community labor, compensated the victims of your actions for the damages caused, and ended all the court-imposed classes. Before ruling on the matter, the court considers your criminal record, challenges stemming from the probation, the characteristics of your case, and the prosecutor’s opinion on the subject.
If you are lucky the court’s decision is in your favor, you will be granted the early termination of probation, and that way, you can commence the expungement process as outlined under PEN 1203.4.
Lowering A Felony Conviction To A Misdemeanor To Qualify For Expunction
Losing your gun ownership rights for years because of a felony conviction is your last wish. Luckily, you can obtain an expunction by having your prior felony conviction reduced to a misdemeanor to be eligible for expungement. Although the procedure is complex, it’s worth undertaking because you preserve some of your rights and benefits.
PEN 17(b) gives judges the authority to reduce a felony conviction to a misdemeanor if you have been charged and convicted for a wobbler and successfully served your probation sentence. By reducing the felony to a misdemeanor, you eliminate all the penalties and disabilities that come with being a convicted felon.
The factors that the judge considers before granting the reduction include:
- The characteristics of your case
- Circumstances surrounding the case
- Your criminal history
- Your compliance with probation conditions
It’s worth noting that reducing a felony to a misdemeanor has many benefits, but there are individual penalties that it doesn’t eliminate. These conditions are:
- For purposes of California’s Three Strike law, the conviction will remain a strike if you were found guilty of a violent felony.
- The reduction of the felony to a misdemeanor won’t affect the records in the federal authority because the conviction will still be deemed a felony.
- If the conditions of your felony conviction included registering as a sex offender, you would still be required to do so under PC 290 even after reducing the sentence.
- Licensing agencies and the California State Bar may still consider the conviction a felony despite the reduction.
The Cost of an Expunction
If you want a clean slate through expungement, you must be willing to part with $60 for a misdemeanor and $120 for a felony petition. Also, the court where the petition is filed determines the amount you pay for the petition. If you cannot afford the amount, don’t lose hope because several modes of payment are available for persons who can’t raise the required money. Inquire with your expungement attorney about the available options in your county and the best option based on your circumstances.
To increase the process’s chances of success, you must hire a criminal attorney who understands expungement laws. It comes with additional costs that you must be willing to pay. However, if you hire the right legal team for the job, you will save money and obtain the clean slate you want.
What Are The Benefits Of An Expungement?
There are manifold benefits associated with criminal record expunction under PEN 1203.4. These benefits are:
- Expungement Eliminates Employer Bias, Making It Easy to Find an Employment
If you have been on a job hunt, you already know that many employers run criminal background checks on prospective employees or job applicants. The assessments will reveal all your prior arrests, charges, or convictions if any. Additionally, running background checks will show if you have ever served a probation sentence. During interviews, the employer will inquire if you have ever been convicted.
When it comes to particular jobs that involve holding a public office, a criminal charge or conviction will disqualify you from employment. Very few employers don’t run background checks on potential workers, but unfortunately, the pay is poor, so you might need to work multiple jobs to pay bills.
Also, the law is unambiguous that private employers should not inquire about a misdemeanor conviction that has been expunged under PC 1203.4. It’s unlawful for an employer to do the following:
- Inquire about an arrest or charge that never resulted in a conviction
- Seek information about a criminal conviction record that has been judicially ordered, sealed, expunged, or eradicated through a statute.
- Inquire about an arrest for which a pretrial diversion program has been completed
The most valuable benefit of expunging a criminal record is that it helps you with job applications. The reason being even when filling out application forms or answering questions in an interview, you can confidently say you have never been convicted without lying. Also, you are not required to disclose your criminal record, meaning you can apply for the well-paying jobs you want and be offered the same opportunity as the individuals without a prior history.
- Improved Education Opportunities
If you wish to jumpstart your career, a criminal record can become a huge barrier because many graduate schools are less likely to consider you if you have one. These programs are highly competitive, and having a criminal record could be the reason for missing out on admission. However, if you obtain an expunction, the record will be sealed, meaning you will have an equal chance to get college admission just like the other applicants.
- Allows Rehabilitated Offenders to Integrate Back to Society
A criminal conviction carries with it a lot of stigmas even if you are rehabilitated. When people find out about your past, they will always judge you for being charged and convicted of a particular crime. However, by deleting the record, you no longer have to worry about people finding out you have a criminal record, making it easy to integrate with society. You don’t have to isolate yourself because you are afraid people will find out about your conviction. It will enable you to rest easy knowing you are rehabilitated, and it matches what people who run criminal background checks find.
- Increased Housing Options
When leasing or renting an apartment, many landlords will require you to fill out an application form that requires you to disclose if you have a criminal record. Others will run criminal background checks, and if they find out you don’t have a clean record, they might not enter into a rental or lease agreement with you, regardless of when the crime happened.
However, your record will look clean after an expunction, and landlords will never know they are renting their property to a person with a criminal past. An expunction will open more housing options which means a comfortable life for you and the family.
- Helps You Obtain State Licenses
Having your criminal record expunged makes it easy to access state professional licenses. Even after an expunction, you must disclose your criminal record to the relevant state licensing agency. However, the agency will overlook the prior criminal history if it was successfully erased or cleared from the documents through an expunction.
A criminal record looks better if it has been erased because it means the DA and the judge that decided to withdraw the initial plea and dismiss the case did the thorough vetting. Therefore, the licensing board reviewing your application for a professional license to operate as a medical practitioner, lawyer, or any other profession will consider you an ethical person and one likely to uphold the principles of the domain hence likely to issue the license. Completion of your probation sentence and expunction process will make your candidature for the license even more favorable.
Although an expunction will help you obtain a state license, its limitations make it necessary to have a certificate of rehabilitation. The certificate indicates that even with your past criminal record, you have undergone rehabilitation. With the document, you can enjoy many benefits like the automatic application of the Governor’s pardon. Also, nobody will deny you a state professional because of your criminal history.
- You can Easily Become a Member of a Professional Organization
Like employers, many professional associations run criminal background checks on individuals willing to join or hold positions. With an expunged criminal record, the impact of your prior conviction will significantly reduce, enhancing your chances of obtaining the desired position or membership in the said professional association.
An expunged conviction won’t appear on the public database when someone runs a background check. Instead, it’s a dismissal that appears because once the record is cleared, an updated database will show no conviction.
- Enhanced Credibility as a Court Witness
Another merit of having your criminal record expunged is that the opposing side cannot use the conviction to impeach your credibility as a court witness unless you face new charges.
Usually, when you are a witness and you have a prior felony conviction, the opposing legal team will bring up your previous record to question your credibility as a witness. As a result, if you were suing someone in a civil suit, your testimony might be doubted by the judge or jury, and this might result in an unfavorable outcome. However, if you have an expunged record, the law prevents them from bringing up the issue in court, which means your testimony will be credible and might result in a favorable verdict.
- Brings a Sense of Redemption and Closure
An expungement comes with a form of personal relief and satisfaction. Although it doesn’t change the fact that you committed a crime and were found guilty for it, it helps bring a sense of redemption and closure to a frustrating and challenging phase of your life. You enjoy more peace of mind knowing the crime you committed has been dismissed and that the rest of your life will be crime-free.
- Fostering and Adoption to Start or Expand Your Family Becomes Easier
Expunging a criminal record provides you with the opportunity to start or expand your family through fostering or adoption. If you are a foster parent candidate, the Department of Human Services runs criminal background checks to know if you have a history of crime. Having a criminal record might become a barrier, which is why you need to hire an attorney to expunge your record. That way, the conviction will no longer be a barrier to the adoption or fostering process, thus allowing you to grow your family.
Find a Van Nuys Criminal Defense Lawyer Near Me
Expungement of your criminal record provides you with a sense of redemption and allows you to move forward without being haunted by the past. Therefore, if you are in Van Nuys, CA, and considering having your criminal record expunged or want to learn more about the process, don’t hesitate to reach out to our legal team at Leah Legal. We have helped many people in the past enjoy the benefits of an expunction highlighted above and are ready to do the same for you. Call 818-484-1100 today for a zero-obligation consultation and to analyze your case.
As outlined by California law, a wobbler is an offense that can be charged as either a felony or misdemeanor. In most cases, the prosecutor determines whether to charge a crime as a felony or misdemeanor. While making this decision, the prosecutor considers the defendant’s criminal history and the facts of a case. The judge can also decide whether to charge a crime as a misdemeanor or felony. Even if you are prosecuted for a wobbler offense, you can file a petition to seek a reduction of your felony conviction to a misdemeanor. Leah Legal can assist if you commit a wobbler offense in Van Nuys, CA, and need guidance on reducing your charges.
Wobbler Crimes Explained
The decision of how to charge a wobbler offense is crucial because California law recognizes three main categories of crimes: felonies, misdemeanors, and infractions. Some crimes can only be charged as felonies; these are known as straight felonies. Wobbler crimes are also known as alternative felony or misdemeanor crimes. Certain crimes also wobble between being misdemeanors or even infractions. These crimes are known as wobblettes.
Reduction of A Wobbler Crime From A Felony To Misdemeanor
A California wobbler crime can be reduced to a misdemeanor at four main stages:
- When the prosecutor charges the defendant with the crime
- During the preliminary hearing, when the defendant answers to felony charges
- During the time of sentencing
- After the defendant completes a formal or felony probation, provided, the defendant was not sentenced to prison.
However, after completing probation, the defendant must file a petition to have their felony conviction reduced to a misdemeanor. If the prosecutor charges the defendant with a straight felony, this crime cannot be later reduced to a misdemeanor like a wobbler.
Deciding How To Charge An Offense
The California law does not outline standards or guidelines on how the prosecutor should charge a crime. Therefore, how to treat a wobbler crime is a decision that lies with the prosecutor. When deciding on how to charge a crime, prosecutors mainly rely on the charging standards established by the California District Attorneys Association, commonly abbreviated as CDAA. These standards enhance uniform crime charging standards. As outlined by the CDAA, the prosecutor should consider the following factors when deciding whether to charge a crime as a misdemeanor or felony:
- The severity of the offense
- How the defendant cooperates with the law enforcement officers
- The defendant’s age
- The defendant’s past criminal history
- The probability of the defendant continuing to engage in criminal activities
- Whether the defendant qualifies for probation instead of jail time
- The strength of the prosecutor’s case against the defendant
When The Judge Can Reduce A Felony Conviction To A Misdemeanor
According to California PC 17, judges and prosecutors have a right to use their discretion to reduce a wobbler felony crime to a misdemeanor. The judge can decide how to charge a crime at:
- The preliminary hearing
- During sentencing
- When the defendant completes probation, provided the defendant was sentenced to felony probation instead of jail time.
In the case of formal probation, the defendant must file a petition seeking a reduction of the felony conviction to a misdemeanor. When deciding whether to reduce a crime from a felony to a misdemeanor, the judge is not bound by the prosecutor’s decision regarding the crime. Even if the prosecutor charges a crime as a felony, the judge is free to reduce the wobbler crime to a misdemeanor provided there are circumstances in mitigation. Mitigation circumstances refer to the factors that persuade the judge to be more lenient in the sentencing. The typical mitigating factors that could make the judge reduce the defendant’s charges are:
- The defendant is a first-time offender and doesn’t have a prior or any significant criminal record
- The defendant played a minor role in a crime or was a passive participant
- While committing the crime, the defendant used caution to prevent property destruction or harming people
- The defendant voluntarily admitted to their wrongdoing at an early stage of the case or criminal process
- The defendant agreed to pay restitution to the victim. Paying restitution to the victim involves compensating the victim for the loss they incur as a result of an offense or the defendant’s actions
- The defendant recorded a satisfactory performance in their probation or parole
How A Felony Conviction Affects Your Rights and Privileges
Many disadvantages accompany a felony conviction. For example, the court may revoke some of your rights and privileges after a felony conviction. Other disadvantages are:
- You have to disclose the felony conviction in all your job applications
- You may lose your professional license, for example, your right to practice medicine or law
- A felony conviction could also lead to the loss of your gun rights
- You will be subject to more severe sentencing if you happen to commit an additional or subsequent felony conviction
- If the court grants you probation instead of jail time, you will be subject to more extended and more restrictive probation than you would for a misdemeanor conviction.
You should contact an experienced criminal defense attorney; your attorney will do everything possible to negotiate with the court and the prosecutor to reduce your crime to a misdemeanor.
Offenses That Can Be Charged As Misdemeanor or Infractions
An offense that can be charged as a misdemeanor or infraction is known as a wobblette. Infractions are non-criminal offenses that are usually punishable by fines instead of jail time. Under California law, most infractions are punishable by fines that do not exceed $250. On the other hand, most misdemeanor offenses are punishable by:
- A jail time of not more than six months in a county jail
- A fine that does not exceed $1000
Wobblettes operate in the same way as wobblers. The prosecutor can reduce a misdemeanor charge to an infraction; the prosecutor can only reduce the crime to an infraction during the charging. The judge can also reduce the crime to an infraction during sentencing.
There is no significant difference between a wobbler and a wobblette. Before a wobblette can be reduced to an infraction, the defendant must agree. If a defendant is charged with an infraction, they are not entitled to a jury trial. The defendant is not also entitled to a public defender unless the defendant is held in custody. Some defendants may prefer to be charged with a misdemeanor to an infraction.
However, most people agree to be charged with an infraction whereby they only have to pay a small fine. Most misdemeanor crimes can be punishable by a jail sentence instead of a fine. If a defendant has served jail time for a related crime, they may prefer a jail sentence to paying a fine. Usually, a jail sentence for a misdemeanor offense does not exceed six months.
Wobbler Crimes Under California Law
Hundreds of crimes qualify as wobblers under California law. These offenses include sex crimes, fraud crimes, and domestic violence crimes. Some of the specific crimes that are usually charged as wobblers are:
- Sexual battery under PC 243
- Vehicular manslaughter under PC 192(c)(1) and (2)
- Assault with a deadly weapon, commonly abbreviated as ADW under PC 245(a)(1)
- Statutory rape under California PC 261.5
- Child endangerment under California PC 271
- Spousal battery under PC 273.5
- Lewd acts with a minor under California PC 288
- Burglary under PC 459
- Making criminal threats as outlined by PC 422
- Forgery under PC 470
- Grand theft under PC 487
- Stalking under PC 646-9(a)
- Carrying a loaded firearm in public under California PC 25850(a)
Wobblette Crimes Under California Law
Several crimes wobble between misdemeanors and infractions. These are wobblettes and mainly include disturbing the peace under PC 415 and criminal trespass under the California PC 602. Many California vehicle code violations are also wobblettes, chargeable as misdemeanors or infractions. The common wobblette offenses under California law include:
- Disturbing the peace under California PC 415
- Criminal trespass under California PC 602
- Exhibition of speed under VC 23109
- Driving without a license under VC 12500
- Driving with a revoked or suspended license under VC 14601.1
- Failure to appear for a traffic violation as outlined by VC 40508
Felony Sentencing In California
The sentencing for felony offenses under California law may include imprisonment in a county jail or state prison. The court may also impose hefty penalties of up to $10,000 on the defendant. The judge may also sentence a person facing felony charges to felony probation, also known as formal probation.
How long a felony sentence lasts will vary depending on the facts of your case. A felony sentence can be low term, medium term, or high term. Some California statutes set forth the specific terms applicable to an offense; they also state whether the defendant will serve a sentence in a county jail or state prison. The law requires courts to impose sentences on the lower end of the penalty range, provided no extraordinary circumstances are available.
Sometimes, the law does not set forth the specific sentence for a crime. Instead, the law states that the offense should be punished according to California PC 1170 (h). If the law calls for punishment under PC 1170 (h), the judge may sentence the defendant to a jail term of sixteen months, two years, or three years.
Deciding Between Low, Middle, And High Term Sentencing
Generally, the judge will impose middle-term sentencing for a felony crime. However, the judge may impose a high term sentencing on the defendant when aggravating factors are present. Aggravating factors in felony crimes include causing significant bodily injury to the victim, crimes involving extreme violence, or using a weapon while committing a crime. When mitigating factors are present, the judge is likely to impose a low term sentencing on the defendant. Mitigating factors include whether the defendant is a first-time offender or a passive participant in a crime.
The punishment for a California felony may include a fine. Sometimes, the statute defining a crime sets forth the applicable fine. If the law does not specify the fine, the judge may impose a fine of up to $10,000. The fine could be imposed in addition to the jail time or instead of jail time.
Felony Probation And How It Works
If the prosecutor charges a wobbler as a felony, the judge has the right to use their discretion to convert part or the entire felony sentence to a California felony probation instead of jail time. The goal of felony probation is to rehabilitate the defendant and enable them to live as law-abiding citizens. While on felony probation, the defendant serves part or all of their sentencing under the supervision of a probation officer instead of serving a sentence in jail.
At times, a sentence of felony probation may be accompanied by a jail time of up to one year in county jail. However, most people sentenced to felony probation serve little or no jail time. If a case is probation eligible and no extraordinary circumstances are present, the law requires California courts to grant probation instead of jail time.
For a non-violent felony, formal probation lasts for up to two years. However, the probation may last for up to three years if the defendant commits any of the crimes below and the offense involves more than $25,000:
- Grand theft as outlined by the California PC 487 (b) (3)
- False personation and cheats under PC 532a
- Embezzlement under PC 503
The two or three-year probation limit does not apply to crimes whose law specific the probation period or violent felonies. For these crimes, the probation period could be up to five years. While on probation, the defendant must comply with specific probation terms. The probation terms include but are not limited to:
- Meeting with the probation officer every month
- Paying restitution to the victim
- Group or individual therapy
- If the felony involved a California drug crime, the defendant might have to submit to impromptu drug testing.
- Community labor or service
- An impromptu search of the defendant’s property or person without or without a search warrant
When The Defendant Violates The Probation Terms
If the judge sentences a defendant to formal probation, but the defendant violates the probation terms, the judge may:
- Revoke the probation
- Send the defendant to jail or prison for the maximum sentence for the crime.
However, if the defendant has a good reason or explanation for violating the probation terms, the judge may not punish the defendant. The judge may also make the probation terms harsher or lengthen the probation terms.
Felony Paroles And How They Work
Parole laws are almost similar to probation laws. However, parole laws only apply when the defendant is sentenced to a California state prison, and the defendant completes the probation or is granted an early release. Parole comes with conditions like probation. Like probation, the judge can revoke a California parole. If the judge revokes parole, they may send the defendant back to prison.
Expungement Of A Wobbler Conviction
It is possible to expunge many wobbler convictions under California law. Expungement refers to a form of post-conviction relief provided under California law. After expungement, a conviction ceases to exist for most purposes. Usually, you do not need to reveal an expunged conviction on your job applications. Expungement is available for many wobbler crimes irrespective of whether the charge resulted in a felony or misdemeanor conviction. The following must apply for a defendant to qualify for expungement of their wobbler conviction:
- The defendant should have completed probation successfully or offered an early probation termination.
- The defendant should not have served time in a California state prison. However, the defendant could still qualify for an expungement if they served time in state prison for a crime that would now lead to confinement in county jail after the passage of Proposition 47.
Completing your probation means that:
- You honored all the probation terms, including paying restitution and fines, completing counseling programs, and community services
- You attended all the necessary court hearings in person, or your attorney represented you
- You did not commit additional crimes while on probation
However, you can get an expungement even if you did not honor all the probation terms. If you violated the probation terms, the court would hold a special hearing to determine whether you are a good candidate for expungement. The court will use its discretion to decide whether to grant you probation or not. Some of the factors that the court will consider are:
- Your criminal history
- The seriousness of the underlying conviction
- Your overall performance while on probation
- Other factors that show you deserve a relief
It is important to note that certain crimes cannot be expunged under California law. For instance, you can’t qualify for an expungement if you commit serious sex offenses against children. However, you could still obtain a Governor’s pardon or a Certificate of Rehabilitation.
You are not eligible for an expungement of your criminal conviction if any of the following is true:
- You are currently facing charges for a criminal offense
- You are serving probation for a criminal offense
- You are serving a sentence for a criminal offense
Find A Van Nuys Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
If you have been charged with a wobbler in Van Nuys, CA, we invite you to contact Leah Legal. Our experienced attorneys will evaluate your case and guide you on the way forward. We will do everything to negotiate with the prosecutor to reduce your charges from a felony to a misdemeanor. We will also guide you on the expungement process to relieve you of the burden of the wobbler conviction. Call us at 818-484-1100 and speak to one of our attorneys.
In California, law enforcement officers are responsible for ensuring that residents abide by the laws, are safe, and their rights are protected. But they are human beings like everyone else, making them an easy target for the few people who want to keep violating the law. California law is apparent on how residents should react to the police. The law makes it unlawful for any person to disobey a police officer on duty. It is a grave offense that carries severe criminal penalties and life-changing consequences.
However, some people commit crimes out of ignorance. Everyone must know what the law considers as disobeying a police officer. It will help you determine the right course of action to take if you face charges under this statute.
What is Considered Disobeying a Police Officer
California law against disobeying a police officer is under VC 2800. That law defines the offense as willingly refusing or failing to comply with a direction or legal order from a police officer. The police engage in various activities while performing their duties, including stopping and questioning residents and suspected offenders. The law allows them to perform those activities, but on the condition that they do not violate residents’ rights. On the other hand, the law requires residents to comply with directions and orders from the police to make it easier for the officers to carry out their duties.
However, a thin line exists between obeying and disobeying a police officer. Sometimes a person might be too scared to face the police. Walking or running away from an officer could seem a good idea at that instance, but it could cause legal problems when translated as disobeying an officer. It helps to know what counts as disobeying a police officer and what you can do if you face charges under this law to protect yourself and avoid a conviction.
Examples of Actions That Count as Disobeying a Police Officer
In California, a person’s encounter with the police could occur under different circumstances. Your conduct at that instance could be termed as obeying or disobeying an officer. Here are some of the actions that could cause you legal problems under California VC 2800:
Failing To Provide Your Name and Address
The law allows police officers to stop and ask a person’s name and address if there is a probable reason to suspect the person of wrongdoing. It could happen in the middle of the day or at night. For instance, if the officer is walking down the streets and meets with you, how you react to his/her presence could cause the officer to suspect you of wrongdoing.
Note that being stopped by the officer does not mean that you are under arrest. The officer only wants to study your behavior further to determine whether he/she has a good reason to be suspicious of your conduct.
Failing to provide your name and address to an officer upon the officer’s request violates the law. It also makes the officer more suspicious of you and could cause him/her to detail or even arrest you.
Remember that this could happen to anyone, not just random people walking down the streets. It could be a motorist, pedestrian, bicyclist, motorcyclist, or a person sitting somewhere, doing something or nothing.
After providing your name and address, you are not under a legal obligation to provide more information to the officer. If you are not comfortable answering more questions, simply say that to the officer, and ask him/her whether you are free to leave. The officer could allow you to go or detain you further, depending on the situation.
Failing to Provide the Name and Address of a Vehicle Owner
Vehicle crimes are on the rise in California, and the police are more vigilant than ever. It means that an officer can stop you on the road at any time if they notice suspicious behavior or for random checks. Failing to stop when flagged down by an officer on the road counts as disobeying a police officer. Additionally, the law requires you to provide the information the officer asks to help the police perform their duties.
If you are driving someone else’s vehicle, you will probably indicate that to the officer. If the officer has a probable reason to take more details from you, he/she will ask for more information regarding the vehicle you are driving. You are under a legal obligation to provide the name and address of the vehicle owner to the police upon his/her request.
California police are well-equipped to find information like this by doing a quick background check on the vehicle registration. But the officer will ask the question anyway, for several reasons. First, the officer might want to engage you more in a conversation to study your behavior. Or, the officer might want to determine whether you are lying. All these help the officer perform their duties. That is why you must comply.
Giving an Officer Wrong Information
It is illegal to give a police officer wrong information. When the police ask for specific information, like your name, address, and details regarding where you work or where you are going/coming from, you make it difficult for the officer to perform their legal duties when you give false information.
Police officers do not randomly ask residents their names and addresses. For instance, if the officer is walking down the street at night, he/she might only stop one or two people, and only with a probable reason. It could be that the officer is working on a tip-off regarding a case he/she is following up with, or the officer has observed suspicious behavior and wants to get to the bottom of it. Providing the wrong information to the officer will make it impossible for him/her to accomplish the duty and could hinder the progression of a case.
The law is clear regarding willfully providing false or misleading information to a police officer. It counts as disobeying the officer and could lead to criminal charges against you. If an officer asks a question you are not willing to answer, you are legally allowed to decline politely. Let the officer know that you wish to exercise your right to remain silent. Police officers will never force you to provide information but follow due process to perform their legal duties.
Refusing to Stop When Signaled To Do So
Police officers in California use different signals to stop residents whenever there is a need. For instance, police might flag down a motorist at a police checkpoint. The motorist is required by law to find a safe place to pull over and politely answer the questions the officer might have.
An officer can stop you by the road as you walk to work or school or even as you ride along the highway or street. The officer might have noticed something and is only stopping you to confirm or dismiss his/her suspicions. Do not make this difficult for the officer by refusing to stop or ignoring the signal.
When you refuse to stop when a police officer signals you to do so, you give the officer more reason to be suspicious of you. The officer might obtain a warrant for arrest, investigate, and even cause the prosecutor to open criminal charges against you for ignoring police orders. It means that your actions could bring you even more significant legal problems that could leave you with a criminal record.
The right thing to do is to stop when an officer signals for you to stop. Listen to what the officer has to say without being defensive. If the officer asks incriminating questions and you are afraid you could land into problems, politely decline and ask the officer to let you go.
Refusing to Give Your Driver’s License and Registration When an Officer Asks
Police officers are constantly stopping motorists to ensure they abide by the provided regulations to keep everyone safe on the road. Thus, it is not unusual for an officer to stop you while driving along California roads. It doesn’t mean that you are in the wrong. Many motorists only believe in stopping when stopped by an officer but will refuse to cooperate as the officer conducts his/her initial investigations.
When an officer stops you, keep your hands where the officer can see them. Cases of criminals attacking officers after being stopped on roads are high. Keeping your hands where the officer can see them only makes it easier for the officer to carry on with his/her job.
Next, the officer will ask to see your driver’s license and vehicle registration. A driver’s license is proof that you have the legal permit to drive on California roads. Remember that driving is not a right in California but a privilege that you must obtain after a qualification. Again, giving the officer your driver’s license and vehicle registration does not mean you are guilty of anything. The police will ask to see these documents even during a regular check.
You could face criminal charges for failing to provide a driver’s license or vehicle registration to the officer. It qualifies as disobeying the officer.
Failing to Sign a Citation
If the police suspect you of committing a traffic infraction, they will require you to sign a citation in their presence. Many people refuse to do so, thinking that signing the citation is an admission of guilt. The truth is that the law requires you to sign the citation when an officer asks you to do so. It means that you could face criminal charges for failing to obey the officer.
Note that signing a citation only means that you admit to receiving a ticket. It doesn’t mean an admission of guilt. You will still have a chance to defend yourself.
Evading an Officer
Evading a police officer is also considered disobeying a police order to stop. Sometimes the police might notice something while you are driving and decide to pull you over. It could be that you are driving a vehicle similar to one they should investigate for a particular offense, or something is off about your car. If the officers are in a police vehicle, they will pursue you, hoping that you will stop at your most convenient.
Some people panic and decide to flee instead of stopping. Others escape because they have something to hide, while others run because they feel bothered. Fleeing from the police is a crime, regardless of your reasons. The only exception is if you had an emergency in the vehicle and had to rush to the hospital.
Remember that this is one way in which law enforcement officers can perform their duties. Failing to stop while a police car pursues you is considered as evading a police officer and could cause you to face criminal charges. The offense becomes even graver if you speed off to dodge the police car.
Driving/Going Through an Emergency Area
When the police respond to a call at a crime scene, the first thing they must do is mark off that area to preserve any evidence that might have been left behind. Going or driving through an area marked as an emergency area by the police is a serious offense.
Police officers do not have to protect a crime scene physically. With a clear marking, everyone should see that the marked-off area is out of bounds. Any interference with the crime scene might make it difficult for the police and investigators to gather sufficient evidence for solving a crime.
That is why members of the public are required to respect orders like those from the police. You must not drive or go through a marked crime scene even in the absence of authority.
You Can Defend Yourself
In California, disobeying a police officer is a misdemeanor crime, punishable by a maximum of six months in jail and a fine of not more than $1,000. However, you could avoid a conviction if you fight against your charges in a criminal court.
The police will arrest you, and a prosecutor will open charges against you for failing to obey a police order. With the right legal help, you might compel the court to dismiss your charges. Here are some of the defense strategies your attorney can use to help your situation:
You Didn’t Act Willfully
The main element of the crime of disobeying a police officer is that the defendant acted willfully. If your actions were not willful, then the court might not find you guilty as charged.
You willfully disobey a police officer if you act willingly or on purpose. That might not have been the case if you did not hear the officer’s order or the order was unclear. For instance, if the officer only signaled, and you mistook the stop signal for a signal to drive on, you may not be guilty of disobeying an officer.
The Officer Was Not Working at The Time
California residents are only required to obey an order from a police officer that is on duty. You may not know the police officers on duty at all times, but you can tell by their uniforms. An officer in uniform will be on duty and performing their duties.
Therefore, if the person that stopped your vehicle on a highway or stopped to ask for your identifying details in the streets was not in uniform, it might have been difficult for you to know whether or not the man was a police officer.
If you face charges for disobeying an officer for evading an unmarked police vehicle, you could also use this defense strategy.
Your Actions Were a Necessity
You could use this strategy if you can justify your actions. For instance, it could be that you had an emergency case in your car and had to rush to the hospital. Stopping the vehicle at the time would have worsened the situation. In that case, your actions would have been justifiable.
However, it is advisable to report to the nearest police station to avoid facing an arrest after that as soon as you handle the emergency. The police have no way of knowing our reasons for not obeying an order. Therefore, they will do everything possible to ensure that they investigate the matter and make an arrest.
Find an Experienced Van Nuys Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
If you face charges for disobeying a police officer in Van Nuys, CA, it could help to engage the services of an experienced criminal attorney. Disobeying an officer on duty is a severe offense whose conviction could change your life in several ways. Other than criminal penalties, you will have a damaging criminal record that could affect your social and career life after a conviction. That is why you need the best criminal defense services you can find. At Leah Legal, we have a complete team of criminal defense attorneys who are willing and ready to change the outcome of your situation. Call us at 818-484-1100 and allow us to study the details of your case.
Contributing to the delinquency of a minor occurs when an adult encourages a minor below eighteen years to take part in illegal activity. Such activities could include providing alcohol to minors or keeping the minor home during school days, making them truant. Under California law, this crime can result in fines and a jail term. This blog will help you understand more about contributing to the delinquency of a minor, possible punishment, and ways to defend yourself if you are facing these charges.
Contributing to the Delinquency of a Minor Defined
According to penal code 272, when an adult knowingly supports or helps a minor engage in forbidden acts of juvenile delinquency. Anyone below eighteen years is considered a minor under the law. Adults who encourage minors’ delinquent behaviors can be convicted regardless of how trivial the said act is. For instance, the law prohibits children from possessing alcohol. If an adult is found giving children alcohol or encouraging them to drink, they could be charged with this crime no matter how petty it may seem.
Different states have developed formative criminal statutes that prohibit and punish adults who encourage young adults to participate in illegal activities. In California, this crime is handled as a misdemeanor, while in states like Florida, it is a federal crime and carries severe penalties.
What are the Elements of Crime?
When an adult encourages a minor to commit an offense, they can be convicted under penal code 272. This statute prohibits adults from helping or encouraging a delinquent child to participate in a prohibited crime. To be convicted for this crime, the following must be true:
- The accused must be an adult above eighteen years
- The accused encouraged the young adult to commit the crime
- The adult knew that the child was below eighteen years
- The child’s behavior resulted from criminal negligence or general criminal intent
- The accused caused the child to become or remain a habitual truant, a delinquent, or a juvenile court dependent
Examples of Acts that Contribute to the Delinquency of a Minor
There are different acts that contribute to this crime, but they vary by state. Below are some examples of the activities that could lead to the detention of an adult if they allowed, encouraged, or facilitated a child to engage in:
- Buying alcoholic drinks for a minor
- Persuading a minor to commit a crime
- Giving or allowing the child to use illegal drugs
- Accompanying a minor as they commit a crime
- Allowing a minor to drive a vehicle without a valid driving license
- Having a child help you commit an offense, for example selling drugs, or shoplifting
- Providing a fake identification card to have a minor enter a club or an adult-only event
- Allowing children to drink alcohol or use drugs in your presence
- Allowing minors to engage in sexual activities
- Sending obscene materials or pornography to a child
- Allowing young adults to beg on the street
- Making minors habitual truants by keeping them out of school
Supplying Alcohol or Drugs to a Minor
If an adult is found supplying alcohol to a child below 21 years, they are likely to face misdemeanor charges. If the child causes a car accident or suffers great bodily injury as a result of the alcohol, the adult can face more serious penalties.
However, selling or providing minors with drugs like marijuana carry serious charges. Selling marijuana to an underage is convicted as a felony, and the accused can face up to 7 years in prison in addition to contributing to the delinquency of a minor and drug charges.
Making a Minor a Dependent of the Juvenile Court
There are different reasons that can cause a child to become a “dependent of the juvenile court” under California law. Being a “dependent of the juvenile court” means that the court will intervene and take full responsibility as their guardian. When this happens, the court removes the minor from their home and places them under their care. Some of the reasons that may cause this include:
- If the guardian leaves the children with no means of support
- If the children are victims of sexual abuse, child neglect, or child abuse
- If their siblings are subjected to abuse or neglect
- If they face cruelty from a member of their household
- If mistreatment from their guardian makes them suffer emotional damage
If you make a minor into a juvenile delinquent, it means that you encouraged or caused a minor to engage in an act that led to their conviction. Note that an adult can only be charged formally for contributing to the delinquency of a minor after they have been found guilty under California law.
Transporting or Luring a Minor Below 14 Years
California law prohibits the act of transporting or luring children below 14 years. Any adult above 21 years who lures or transports a child below 14 years with no pre-existing relationship could face charges of contributing to the delinquency of a minor in California.
There are various elements that must be present for you to be convicted for this crime. They include:
- You willingly communicated with a child below 14 years
- You were aware or should have reasonably known the child was below 14
- You intended to transport, lure, or persuade the minor away from their legal guardian without consent
- You intended to avoid their legal guardian’s consent
Only an adult above 21 years who is a stranger to the minor can face criminal charges of transporting or luring a minor. You also need to have no substantial relationship with the victim or create a relationship to lure them.
Who Can be Charged with the Offense of Contributing to the Delinquency of a Minor?
Under California law, only legal guardians, parents, or adults who had custody of the child at the time of the crime face the charges. The term “contribute” can be subjective; hence the judge has the liberty of deciding if you indeed contributed to the delinquency of a minor.
Minors do not have to engage in actual criminal activities for an adult to be convicted for contributing to the delinquency of a minor. If the minor thought of committing the crime, that is enough to have you convicted. For instance, if you incite a minor to engage in burglary and he begins hunting for the required tools but gets caught just after gathering the tools, but before committing the actual crime and tells the police the whole incident, you could face contributing to the delinquency of a minor charge if the police believe his story.
Exceptions of Contributing to the Delinquency of a Minor Law
Different states have various exceptions to the law, mostly in alcohol-related cases. Below are some exceptional examples related to the consumption of alcohol for various reasons:
- Consumption of alcohol for medical reasons — Available in 16 states
- Consumption of alcohol with parental consent at home — Available in 6 states
- Consumption of alcohol for culinary purposes (cooking with alcohol in catering school) — Available in 7 states
- Parental permission when a minor is with the legal guardian at a hotel that serves alcohol — Available in 11 states
- Consumption of alcohol for religious reasons (for instance, taking holy communion in church) — 25 states
- Consumption of alcohol during government research (taking part in a medical study) — Available in 4 states
Note that the court follows the CDM laws of the state that the crime took place, not where you reside.
Being Charged with Contributing to the Delinquency of a Minor
In California, contributing to the delinquency of a minor is charged as a misdemeanor; however, this depends on several factors, including any injuries sustained During the crime, the severity, and if the defendant has been convicted for a similar offense before, second-time offenders and those who encourage young adults to commit serious crimes like burglary are charged with a felony, and the punishments are more severe.
Penalties for Contributing to the Delinquency of a Minor
Ca penal code 272 is divided into two sections, namely:
- PC 272 (a) — This section handles the direct contribution to the delinquency of a minor.
- PC 272 (b) — This section focus on transporting or luring a minor
Penalties for violation of Penal code 272(a) include:
- Detainment in jail for one year
- Fines of $2,500
Penalties for violation of penal code 272(b) include:
- Detainment in jail for six months
- Fines of $1,000
Registration as a Sex Offender
If you are charged with transporting or luring a minor or contributing to the delinquency of a minor and your crime involved engaging in sexual conduct with the minor, you could be subjected to registering as a sex offender under PC 290.
This registration is mandatory for those who intended to engage in conduct for sexual gratification. If you are ordered by the court to register as a sex offender, you would be expected to register with your local police station every year and also update your address annually.
Possible Legal Defenses to Contributing to the Delinquency of a Minor
If you are facing charges for contributing to the delinquency of a minor, there are several legal defenses that you can use to fight your charges. However, any legal defense against these charges would require a thorough look at the circumstances and facts surrounding the case. Here are some of the most common defenses:
- You believed beyond reasonable doubt that they were not a minor — Some minors act and look more mature than their age. If you are able to prove to the prosecution that you had a reasonable belief they were not a child, you cannot be prosecuted for contributing to the delinquency of a minor. Remember one of the key elements of this crime is that the accused must have been aware that they were engaging a minor in a crime.
For instance, you sit next to a minor in a club and decide to buy them alcohol, not knowing that they used a fake ID to enter into the club. In such a case, you cannot be charged with contributing to the delinquency of a minor since the child concealed their actual age.
- False accusation — Being falsely accused by a minor is not uncommon. Some minors will accuse someone falsely to seek attention or take revenge. Other times, an adult can plan with the minor and make false allegations because they know this crime carries severe penalties. They could do this to win a child custody case or ruin your repetition. If you can prove that you were falsely accused, you cannot be convicted for contributing to the delinquency of a minor.
- The minor is difficult to control or has extreme behavioral disorders — Not all children are easy to handle; you could be a guardian to a nearly uncontrollable child. At times the court may charge the guardian of a minor who has been convicted in a juvenile court severally or a minor who is always a truant from school. They could accuse you of failing to provide care and supervision hence charging you with criminal negligence and contributing to the delinquency of a minor. If you can prove to the prosecution that your child is nearly uncontrollable, your charges may be dropped.
Note that California courts make exceptions for parents of children with behavioral disorders.
Offenses Related to Contributing to the Delinquency of a Minor
There are offenses that are mainly charged along with or together with contributing to the delinquency of a minor. Depending on your case, you may also be charged with:
- Providing a minor with alcohol (Business and Professions Code 25658) — Under this statute, it is illegal to furnish or sell alcoholic beverages to children below 21 years. If charged with California PC 272, it is a misdemeanor offense.
- Providing marijuana to a minor (Health and Safety Code 11361) — This statute makes it illegal for an adult to:
- Induce an underage to use marijuana,
- offer, give, or sell marijuana to a child
- Use or employ a child to give away or sell marijuana
When this charge is charged together with contributing to the delinquency of a minor, the adult could face felony charges.
- Sending harmful materials to underages (Penal code 288.2) — This statute prohibits adults from exhibiting, distributing, or sending obscene, lascivious, lewd, or harmful material to children below 18 years. Whether convicted with or alongside contributing to the delinquency of a minor, this offense is a felony under California law.
Frequently Asked Questions About Contributing to the Delinquency of a Minor
Can I be convicted for contributing to the delinquency of a minor if I offer my neighbor’s 11-year old a ride to school?
You cannot be charged with transporting or luring a minor under 14 years for offering them a ride to school. But, depending on your relationship with their parents, they could be offended and file charges against you. If this happens, it is upon the prosecution to determine if you had any criminal intent or intentionally avoided the parents’ consent.
Could I be charged with contributing to the delinquency of a minor if I let my young adult hold a party at home with alcoholic beverages?
Yes. You could face multiple charges, including giving alcohol to minors which is a different offense and contributing to the delinquency of a child. If the consumption of alcohol led the minors to commit a crime, your charge of contributing to the delinquency of a minor could carry severe punishment.
I got held up at work and could not pick my child from school before curfew. Could I be charged with contributing to the delinquency of a minor?
You could be charged with contributing to the delinquency of a minor if your child is found outside their home past curfew hours. The prosecution could accuse you of child negligence, and if this happens severally, your child could be taken away by Child Protective Services.
Can another minor be charged with contributing to the delinquency of a minor?
No. For instance, Mike (17) and Anthony (16) get fake ID cards and enter a club, but they get caught. They will both face similar charges for trying to conceal their age, but none of them will be charged with contributing to the delinquency of a minor since they are both minors.
What if I am a 21-years-old and got a 16-year-old girl pregnant?
Anyone below 18 years cannot legally consent to sexual activities in California. Having sex with a person below the age of consent is considered a crime that can be convicted as a misdemeanor or a felony.
Find a Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
Even if you do not commit a crime or illegal activity yourself, you might face serious penalties under penal code 272 if you encourage a minor to undertake the illegal act. If you are facing charges for contributing to the delinquency of a minor in Van Nuys, CA, our criminal defense attorneys at Leah Legal are ready to help defend you. Contact us today at 818-484-1100.
You may be conversant with the phrase ‘contempt of court’ by watching real-life court proceedings or a courtroom drama. But what exactly does the term mean? California PC 166 provides a general definition of contempt of court as engaging in any disrespectful or defiling conduct to the court process or acting in a way that insults the court’s dignity or authority. Often, contempt of court takes the form of acts or behavior that’s considered detrimental to the court’s capability to administer justice.
There Are Two Types of Contempt of Court
California contempt of court cases can be classified into two: criminal and civil contempt of court. When you fail to obey a court-issued order that benefits the opposing person (civil court order), you’ll be in civil contempt of court. Examples of actions that may lead to you being cited for civil contempt include:
- Failure to produce certain documents to the court.
- Failure to make child support payment despite the court directing you.
- Failure to adhere to the court-ordered child visitation schedule.
- Failing to attend court-ordered parenting classes.
- Failing to appear for a court hearing.
Criminal contempt of court involves committing any offense against the judge or court’s dignity or authority or doing any action that disrupts court proceedings. Conduct that can constitute criminal contempt of court include:
- Disrupting court proceedings.
- Refusing to be sworn in as a witness during a trial.
- Behaving disrespectfully during court proceedings, such as belligerent or loud or yelling at a judge/juror.
- Communicating with the jurors.
- Insulting the judge.
- Disobeying a court-issued stay-away, protective, or restraining
- Failing to show up in court whenever required.
- Publishing a false statement of a court proceeding.
- While testifying as an eyewitness, declining to answer questions when there’s no legal exception.
- Willfully disobeying the terms of a legal injunction.
- Disobeying any court-issued order.
The distinction between the definition of criminal and civil contempt isn’t always definite. A judge has broad discretion on how to categorize certain actions based on given factors. The different factors they consider when deciding whether to hold a contemnor in criminal or civil contempt include the severity of the contemnor’s conduct and the nature of the underlying court proceeding (civil or criminal).
Judges also have the power to decide who to hold in contempt of court. Generally, anyone can be subject to contempt charges, including witnesses, attorneys, parties to a proceeding, people around or in a proceeding, jurors, and staff or officers of the court itself.
Criminal and Civil Contempt Are Similar In Some Aspects
One of the similarities between criminal and civil contempt of court is that both may result in criminal and civil proceedings. Another similarity is that both cases may proceed independently of the case the contempt charges arose.
Most people believe that criminal contempt cases involve imposing criminal penalties, whereas civil contempt cases do not. This isn’t true. Regardless of its name, a civil contempt charge can result in criminal consequences, such as incarceration and fines, just like a criminal contempt of court case.
The Difference Between Criminal and Civil Contempt of Court
Criminal and civil contempt cases are different in terms of their consequences, the required burden of proof, defenses, presidential pardons, and objectives.
- Presidential pardons— if you’ve been accused of being in criminal contempt of court, the president may pardon you. This remedy is usually unavailable in cases of civil contempt.
- Due process legal rights— unlike civil contempt, criminal contempt is a criminal offense, so judges decide these kinds of cases in criminal proceedings. Therefore, if you’re charged with being in criminal contempt, you’re entitled to the due process legal protections availed to a person accused of any other crime. In other words, you have the same legal rights as a person charged with any other criminal offense. For instance, you have the right to an attorney (and for the court to appoint a lawyer for you if you can’t afford one) and to be presumed innocent until proven guilty. You also have the legal right to a jury trial and confront your accuser (victim) during the criminal proceedings.
- Defenses— if you face civil contempt charges, you may argue the impossibility defense when you’re entirely incapable of complying with the terms of the court-issued order. You can’t use this defense if accused of criminal contempt merely because criminal contempt involves an overt act, not a failure to act.
- The required burden of proof— civil contempt case can be proven by the standard of clear, convincing evidence, meaning the proof submitted has to show that it’s more likely than not that the defendant was indeed in contempt of court. Criminal contempt of court requires a higher standard of proof where the prosecutor must show beyond any reasonable doubt that the accused was in contempt of court for a conviction to occur.
- Consequences— usually, the punishment imposed in criminal contempt cases is final and can’t be lifted merely by promising to correct or not repeat the contemptuous conduct. Conversely, civil contempt can be conditional. In most cases, the judge can lift the imposed penalties and charges upon adherence to the court-issued order. For instance, if you’re detained for concealing evidence in a particular case, you may be set free right after you produce it and apologize to the court.
- Objectives— The penalties that a judge imposes for civil contempt are intended to force the offender to adhere to the issued court order and restore the rights of the wronged person. A civil contempt sanction ends when the case during which the contempt occurred is concluded or when the supposed offender adheres to the court-issued order. On the other hand, the penalties imposed for criminal contempt aim to punish the alleged offender for disrespecting the court’s dignity or authority and deter that kind of behavior. They can remain long after their case is resolved.
This difference can also relate to fines or other imposed penalties. If the fine or penalty was intended to reimburse another person, it’s civil contempt. And if it’s meant to punish the individual in contempt of court, it is criminal contempt.
Direct vs. indirect Contempt
Contempt can also be classified as indirect or direct. Direct contempt happens when an action occurs inside a courtroom. That is, you commit direct contempt if you commit an act in the judge’s presence or close to them. On the other hand, indirect contempt occurs when you commit an action outside of the courtroom. Generally, civil contempt occurs indirectly while criminal contempt occurs directly, although this isn’t always the case.
Like it is with other charges that may subject you to penalties, you want to defend the contempt of court charges against you with the assistance of a skilled criminal defense lawyer. Soon after you’re informed of your contempt of court charges, seek legal advice and help and start building an effective defense strategy. A solid defense strategy may have your charges reduced or dropped entirely.
Incarceration for contempt of court may start immediately before the contempt charges are adjudicated and the sentence decided. Based on the case and jurisdiction, the same judge who held you in contempt may be the one to preside over your contempt proceedings.
Criminal Contempt of Court Charges
While criminal contempt of court incorporates many actions, the most commonly committed act is violating a court-issued order. A court ruling can be any directive, instructions, or order given by a judge or court, requiring a person to take specific actions or abstain from doing given acts. The order, directive, or instructions can comprise acts outside the courtroom, like the requirement to obey a subpoena and an order concerning courtroom behavior. When a judge orders you to follow a given order, directive, or instructions, you must oblige. Failure to which, you may be held in contempt and subjected to criminal charges.
For the judge to convict you of criminal contempt for disobeying a court-issued order under PC 166, the prosecution has to prove these facts:
- A judge did issue a valid order.
- You were aware the judge had issued the order.
- You had the present capability to obey the terms of the order, but.
- You willfully failed to do so.
As to you knowing a court-issued order existed, the prosecutor must show that you were aware the court had issued a legal order, and you had the chance to read through a copy of the order, even if you didn’t do so. Note that anyone can be prosecuted for disobeying a court-issued order, including minors and adults. If you willfully failed to obey a court-issued order, it means you willingly or purposefully did so.
Criminal contempt is a misdemeanor offense. Punishment upon a conviction includes a county jail sentence of six months and a fine not exceeding 1,000 dollars. Based on the facts surrounding your case, the judge may order community service instead of a fine. Note that if charged with contempt of court when you have a pending case, or if you committed another crime while, at the same time, being in contempt, you may be convicted of contempt of court and the other charge.
Even though the standard penalties for criminal contempt are 1,000 dollars in fines and six months in jail, some situations can result in more severe consequences. These situations include when you:
- Possess/own a gun in violation of a court order.
- Violate a restraining order when you have previously been convicted of stalking.
- Disobey the terms of a court-issued domestic violence restraining order.
If any of the above factors apply in your case, you’ll still face misdemeanor charges, but you may face a county jail term of one year upon a conviction.
A second, third, or subsequent criminal contempt for violating a court order can be wobbler if the court order was a restraining order and:
- Your current violation happens within seven years of the previous violation.
- The violation entailed violent behavior or credible threats of violence.
- The protective order connected dependent adult or elder abuse, sexual injury upon a minor, and domestic violence.
A wobbler is a crime that the prosecution can charge as a felony or misdemeanor based on the facts of the case and the defendant’s criminal history. If convicted of a misdemeanor, you’ll be subject to a county jail sentence of one year. If convicted of a felony, the penalties you’ll face include 16 months or two or three years in prison.
Fortunately, contempt of court conviction generally doesn’t have any adverse immigration repercussions. Some crimes in California result in an alien defendant being labeled inadmissible or deported. Examples are aggravated felonies and crimes that involve moral turpitude. Contempt of court is neither an aggravated felony nor a crime of moral turpitude. Therefore, it won’t result in any immigration consequences.
A conviction of contempt of court will also not affect your firearm rights. California statute states that some criminal offenses like felonies will lead to the defendant losing their right to possess or own a firearm. Contempt of court isn’t among these offenses.
You Can Defend Yourself
We mentioned that if charged with criminal contempt, the prosecutor has the burden of proving beyond any reasonable doubt that you’re guilty. On the other hand, you as the defendant are allowed the same rights as a person facing any other criminal charges, including the right to legal counsel and to be presumed innocent until proven guilty. This means you can reach out to a skilled attorney to help prove your innocence. Common legal defenses your lawyer can argue if charged with contempt include:
- The violation wasn’t willful— remember we discussed that if you are accused of contempt of court for violating a court order, you must have willfully violated the order to be convicted. This means if your lawyer can successfully prove that you didn’t disobey an order willingly, you may not be found guilty.
- Your conduct wasn’t disorderly— contempt of court law outlines specific acts that constitute disorderly behaviors. This means your lawyer may be able to prove your innocence by arguing that your conduct didn’t rise to the level of being disorderly.
- False accusations— wrongful accusations are common under contempt of court law. This is particularly true in violating an order matter when a relationship has taken a wrong turn and one of the parties wants revenge. You shouldn’t be convicted if your lawyer shows that the victim unjustly blamed you.
Note that you want to fight to avoid a guilty verdict for contempt of court because a conviction will appear on your criminal record, and anyone will be able to see it if they conduct a criminal background check on you. However, even if you’ve been found guilty, you can have your conviction record expunged, so it doesn’t appear on background checks.
You are allowed to delete your conviction record if you successfully serve your jail sentence or comply with every probation condition, whichever applies. Apart from your conviction not appearing on background checks, an expungement also removes many challenges associated with a guilty verdict, like being unable to rent an apartment.
Contempt of Court May Affect Your Underlying Case
If you’ve been charged with contempt of court and have a pending case, it means you will face two separate charges. For instance, if you’re on trial for a drug crime and are accused of contempt of court, you’ll now be facing a drug crime charge and contempt of court charge. Even if you’re eventually found innocent of the drug crime, you’ll still face penalties for criminal contempt.
Contempt of court may have a slight effect on your underlying charges. For instance, if you’ve been charged with DUI and are out on bail with various conditions like IID installation, contempt of court charges for failing to appear in court may result in the judge finding another way to enforce the conditions. This means they may impose more restrictive conditions like the requirement to wear a Secure Continuous Remote Alcohol Monitor (SCRAM) or remain under house arrest with electronic monitoring.
Contempt of court may also see you facing more consequences than what your underlying charges carry. For instance, if the judge decides to impose a fine for contempt of court, you may have to pay the fine in addition to what the judge will impose for your underlying case if found guilty.
Contact a Van Nuys Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
If you’ve been accused of being in contempt of court, work with a skilled defense attorney to build a compelling defense strategy for your case. If your court order wasn’t criminal law-related, the attorney who handled your past case might not possess the expertise to help you effectively defend against the charges you face.
This means you have to seek help from a criminal law lawyer. At Leah Legal, we handle all kinds of criminal cases, including criminal contempt. We will listen to your side of the story and help you fight to prove your innocence and clear your name. Call us today at 818-484-1100 if you’ve been charged in Van Nuys, CA, to schedule a free initial consultation with one of our expert attorneys.
When accused of a felony, you will be looking at hefty fines and a lengthy prison term upon a conviction. But before it comes to that, you are allowed to defend yourself, prove your innocence and seek to have your charges dismissed before trial. Charge dismissals do not come easy, especially felony charges. No criminal defense attorney can guarantee a charge dismissal. However, no two cases are the same, and prosecutors do not have an option but dismiss some charges. Likewise, a judge may find that your legal rights were violated and dismiss your case. So how do you have the judge or prosecutor dismiss your charges?
The Primary Way of Having Your Felony Charges Dismissed is By Filing a Dismissal Motion Under PC 995
In California’s criminal process, a Penal Code 995 motion gives you the choice of requesting the trial judge to drop your felony criminal charges after your preliminary hearing, during which you have to respond to the criminal accusations against you. Simply put, this is a motion seeking a dismissal of criminal charges. It is brought after the preliminary hearing for felony cases.
Generally, when the prosecutor files felony charges against you, the jury may indict you, or you may be subject to a preliminary hearing during which a judge establishes whether there is sufficient evidence or probable cause that a felony was committed and you committed it. If the preliminary court judge finds you committed the crime, you will be held and be presented before the court for trial. At this point, your lawyer may file a motion under PC 995 to dismiss your charges. This motion seeks the trial court judge to drop part or all of the criminal charges against you. It applies where all counts are for felony offenses or include misdemeanor and felony charges. You cannot use it on purely misdemeanor charges because if they are not felony charges, the court will not conduct a preliminary hearing.
You can also file this motion to challenge special circumstances claims and a sentence enhancement request by the prosecutor. The motion depends on the transcript from your preliminary hearing. As we mentioned, this is the hearing where the judge decides whether there is probable cause to every fact of the crime in question or if special circumstances or enhancements exist. All charges, including special circumstances and sentence enhancements, have to be supported by facts. The judge presiding over your preliminary hearing must determine whether or not the facts are compelling enough to warrant a court trial.
If you believe the judge presiding over your preliminary hearing erroneously permitted your case to go to trial, you can file a Penal Code 995 motion to dismiss. This requests the trial court judge re-evaluate the decision of the preliminary hearing judge. That is, it is an appeal of the preliminary hearing judge’s decision to set the case for trial, and it is often referred to as a ‘motion to set aside information.’ Generally, the trial court judge will agree to your request if they determine there were not enough legal bases to take your case to trial.
When It Is Appropriate
There are many situations where a Penal Code 995 motion to dismiss is appropriate. But the most prevalent circumstances include Illegal commitment for trial and commitment without probable cause.
Commitment With No Probable Cause
Per the United States Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause, a judge must have probable cause to try a defendant for an offense. This means a judge will only try your case if the charges are fact-supported. These facts need not show that you are guilty beyond any reasonable doubt. Whether or not you are guilty beyond any reasonable doubt is a matter decided by the judge or jury. However, the facts should be adequate that any rational individual could have a strong and honest suspicion that you are indeed criminally liable for the charges against you.
Illegal Commitment for Trial
You are illegally committed if you are denied a significant legal right during your preliminary hearing, including but without limitation, the legal right to:
- Legal representation
- Advice that you can have legal representation
- Have your preliminary hearing held in one session
- Cross-examine and present witnessed during the hearing
Illegal commitment and commitment with no probable cause can manifest in many situations. The most prevalent of these situations include, without limitation:
- Procedural errors or missed deadlines— the prosecution has only 15 days from the date of your preliminary hearing to file the trial complaint (the information) against you. The trial complaint charges you with the counts seen to have probable cause to try you. If it does not file the complaint within fifteen days after the hearing, the judge presiding over your trial should grant your PC 995 motion.
- Failure to provide exculpatory proof or any other discovery— the Fourth Amendment Due Process Clause dictates that the prosecution must disclose all evidence favoring the accused. If it willfully fails to do so, the criminal charges ought to be dismissed.
- A Fatal finding of facts— at times, the preliminary hearing judge makes a factual finding that is inclined to indicate the accused’s innocence. An illustration is a finding that the key eyewitness lacked credibility or that the testimony was too incredible for a reasonable individual to believe. For example, an eyewitness may have failed to sufficiently identify the accused due to the distance from where the crime occurred and poor lighting. Or, the eyewitness may only have testified that the accused resembled the culprit. If that is the only proof supporting a criminal charge, the judge presiding over your preliminary hearing should not send the case to the trial court. If they do, it is a mistake. The trial court judge should agree to the PC 995 motion to dismiss.
- Insufficient proof— the prosecutor should submit facts that support all the elements of your crime, including:
- The basis for a finding of special circumstances
- Any grounds for a sentence increment
- All the elements of any misdemeanor charge
- All the facts of every felony charge
For instance, the prosecutor must demonstrate probable cause that you specifically intended to commit an offense and enough evidence of a component of the criminal offense in question. For instance, evidence that the stolen property was worth at least nine hundred and fifty dollars to accuse you of grand theft.
- Illegal evidence— the police should not acquire proof of an offense by breaking the state and federal laws on search and seizure. If any evidence or testimony in your case was obtained through an unlawful search, the trial court judge must grant your motion to dismiss. For instance, the preliminary judge should dismiss your drug possession case if the police entered your home with no valid warrant and found drugs, and the only proof of you possessing illegal drugs is from the unlawfully searched property. Should the judge incorrectly allow it to proceed to trial, your lawyer can bring a PC 995 motion.
- The preliminary hearing did not happen in one session— whereas many preliminary hearings are completed in one hour or less, some cases have more than one count, or the charges are intricate in that the hearing may last several days. ‘One session’ does not imply a single day or week. If your hearing must be prolonged over a given period, the judge presiding over your preliminary hearing must prioritize the hearing. If they put the hearing off to hold a one-week trial, for instance, you can seek a charge dismissal for the judge violating your procedural due process right.
The Procedure for a PC 995 Motion
Generally, a motion to dismiss under PC 995 is virtually always filed in trial courts with a different judge from the one who conducted the felony preliminary hearing and before any other pre-trial proceedings. Although this is legally unnecessary, this process is preferred over letting the judge who conducted the preliminary hearing hear a PC 995 motion.
This lets the PC 995 motion process check your preliminary hearing, with fresh people re-assessing the charges for apparent mistakes. However, note that the trial court that hears the 985 motion is not evaluating your preliminary hearing record as though it had heard the hearing itself. The trial court will afford all sensible inferences favoring the determination of the preliminary hearing judge.
However, there are rare instances where the trial court determines that the proof presented during the preliminary hearing was inadequate and the judge made a mistake in committing the accused for trial. This establishment would lead to the trial court judge vacating the complaint and dismissing the charges entirely.
The PC 995 motion hearing does not last long— usually not more than an hour. Your lawyer presents their arguments first, followed by the prosecution. Your lawyer will then be allowed to make closing arguments. The judge usually issues their decision soon after the end of the arguments. However, they may sometimes continue with the case to further consider the presented statements.
PC 995 Chance to Have Your Criminal Charges Dismissed
Therefore, through the PC 995 vehicle, defendants have the chance of having a judge dismiss their charges entirely without risking a trial by the jury. This is unique in the state’s criminal process.
Should the trial judge grant your motion under PC 995, they will dismiss the charges against you. However, the DA may appeal the judge’s decision. Pending the resolution of the appeal, the prosecution can:
- Choose to continue with a bench or jury trial on the remaining counts.
- Seek a continuance of the trial until the resolution of the appeal.
Alternatively, the prosecution may skip the appealing process and go ahead to refile charges on the dismissed counts except if factual findings were clearly made, which should have been detrimental to your case. If those counts are dismissed again, the prosecutor is prohibited from re-filing them for the third time.
If the charges against you are dismissed following a PC 995 motion, and you had paid bail, the court should either refund your bail amount within fifteen days or allocate the amount to your new charge if the DA refiles charges.
If the trial judge denies your motion, you could also appeal their decision. If your motion is based on a commitment without probable cause, you would have fifteen days to appeal the judge’s ruling, and if it is for an unlawful commitment, you would have sixty days from your arraignment to appeal. If you do not file the appeal or lose the appeal, your case will go to trial.
There Are Also Other Ways to Have Your Felony Charges Dismissed
There are also other ways you can have your felony charges dismissed. These include:
Pre-Trial Diversion Programs
Some crimes, especially those involving domestic violence, drugs, or DUI, can be diverted into pre-trial rehabilitation services. Whereas diversion program terms and conditions vary, they usually involve the accused entering a guilty plea, receiving a suspended sentence, and enrolling in the program. If you complete the program, the prosecutor will drop the charges against you. Most pre-trial diversion programs have strict requirements for eligibility. If you have any criminal record, you might not qualify. You also want to talk to your attorney before entering a pretrial diversion program. Should you fail to complete the program, your case can be sent back to court, having already pled guilty to the charges.
Agree to a Plea Deal
You can have your felony charges dismissed by accepting the prosecution’s plea deal that involves pleading guilty to misdemeanor charges instead. Plea deals are often an option when the DA is uncertain if they can substantiate their case. However, before pleading guilty to a misdemeanor to have your felony charges dismissed, you need to be advised by your lawyer because as much as doing so has advantages, it also has disadvantages.
The advantages to this plea deal include lower fines, fewer immigration problems, less possible incarceration period, less harsh probation terms, a higher chance of criminal record expungement, and less severe collateral consequences. The disadvantages include:
- An automatic criminal conviction,
- You will not defend against what might have been a weak case, and
- Waiving legal defenses that might have resulted in an acquittal at trial.
You need to make an informed decision about whether you should agree to the plea deal. Your lawyer can give you the insight you need to make the correct choice.
Cooperate with the Prosecution on a Different Case
You may have the chance to have your felony charges dismissed in exchange for your help. This could entail:
- Flipping on your co-defendant
- Testifying against another person in another case
- Cooperating with the police in collecting proof against a criminal associate
The D.A will only dismiss the charges against you if you have proof they can use against another person. This means this strategy is uncommon. The negotiations leading to this kind of arrangement can be extremely sensitive. If conducted correctly, you can have your charges dismissed and ensure you are protected after helping the prosecutor.
Deferred Entry of Judgment
California authorizes courts to form deferred entry of judgment programs. If yours is a nonviolent felony, you may qualify for this program. Deferred entry of judgment programs resembles pretrial diversion. You have to enter a guilty plea to enroll in the program. If you finish the program, the court will dismiss your charges. But if you do not finish, the court will sentence you depending on the charges against you.
Motion to Suppress Evidence
If the law enforcement officers violated your constitutional rights when investigating you, your lawyer could bring a motion to suppress the evidence. The judge might then exclude the proof the police gathered. Without the evidence, the prosecution may be forced to dismiss your felony charges for lack of sufficient proof to sustain a conviction or reduce them to a misdemeanor offense. The court may also suppress evidence for several reasons, including coerced confession and illegal search.
Find a Skilled Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
If you have been accused of a felony offense, have undergone a preliminary hearing, and your case is moved forward to the trial court, you want to consult with a knowledgeable defense attorney about your eligibility for a PC 995 motion to dismiss. Even if your request is eventually denied, filing it puts the prosecution and court on notice of the critical matters in your case and can usually influence a more favorable outcome for your case. Effective litigation during the PC 995 motion hearing is essential in attaining the best possible outcome in a felony criminal prosecution.
At Leah Legal, we will help you review your case and determine whether you are eligible for a PC 995 motion. Not only that. We will also help you file this motion and argue it aggressively to ensure we obtain you the most favorable results. If you do not qualify for the motion, we will use other avenues to seek your charges to be dismissed. We will be by your side throughout the criminal process for your case, giving you the legal advice and assistance you deserve. Call our experienced Van Nuys criminal defense lawyer at 818-484-1100 to schedule a consultation if charged with a crime in Van Nuys, CA.
In California, driving under the influence is one of the most common offenses. The court normally charges a first-time DUI as a misdemeanor offense. However, a DUI charge can have far-reaching consequences. The charge can affect your finances and employment prospects and tarnish your criminal record. Some DUI conviction consequences are short-term, while others have a long-term effect. Some of these consequences include temporary license suspension, fines, increased insurance premiums, and serving time in jail in some cases. Therefore, understanding the effects or consequences of a DUI conviction is critical. Consequences of a DUI conviction are:
You May Face Jail Time
The jail time you serve for a DUI conviction will depend on whether it is the first time you are charged with the offense and the seriousness of the offense. If the charge is your first DUI charge, the court can sentence you up to six months in jail. For a second DUI charge, the court can sentence you to a prison term of up to one year. For a third DUI conviction, the judge can sentence you to a maximum jail term of one year or sixteen months in state prison.
The court can sentence you to sixteen months to three years in state prison. When you cause bodily harm due to DUI, the prosecutors charge the crime as a wobbler in California. Therefore, the court can charge the DUI offense as a misdemeanor or a felony. When the court charges the DUI as a felony, the judge can sentence you to sixteen months to three years in state prison.
Monetary Consequences: Fines And Restitutions
For a first-time misdemeanor DUI, the fine ranges from $390 to $1,000. The court may also charge you additional fines and charges which can raise the total fines to $3,000 or more. For a second time charge, the fine ranges from $390 to $1,000. However, the fines may increase to $4,000 or more due to penalty assessment. For a third DUI charge, the fines range from $390 to $1,000. However, penalty assessment can substantially raise this amount to a total of $18,000. For a fourth and subsequent DUI misdemeanor charge within ten years, the fine ranges from $390 to $5,000 but the penalty assessments can raise this amount to $18,000.
You may also have to post bail if you are arrested for the offense. The authorities may also impound your vehicle, where you must pay for the towing and storage charges. If you caused property damage or injured a victim, the judge will order you to pay restitution.
Your License Suspension
If the authorities arrest you for a first-time DUI charge, the court can suspend your license for six months. Additionally, the Department of Motor Vehicle (DMV) will suspend your license for four months. If you refuse a BAC testing, the department increases the suspension to one year. However, you may qualify for a restricted driver’s license after thirty days. The DMV may suspend your license for two years for a second DUI conviction. However, you don’t lose your license immediately after the authorities arrest you for DUI. Rather you lose your driving privileges if you fail to request a DMV hearing or if you lose the hearing.
You must request the DMV hearing within ten days of your arrest. If you fail to do so, the department will automatically suspend your license. However, it only suspends your license if your BAC was 0.08% or above during the arrest. If the chemical tests subsequently show your BAC was below 0.08%, the department will not suspend your license. However, the DMV allows you to drive with a suspended license, provided you install an ignition interlock device in your car.
The DMV hearing and court hearing in a DUI charge do differ. The DMV hearing deals solely with your driving privilege. On the other hand, the court hearing determines whether or not you are guilty of the offense. Even if the DMV suspends your license, you can receive a restricted license to drive to work, school, or a California DUI school.
California has two types of restricted licenses. The IID restricted license and a normal restricted license.
- The IDD Restricted License
The IID stands for an ignition interlock device. The IID is a breathalyzer that prevents the car from starting if it detects alcohol in your breath. The DMV allows you to drive anywhere on a suspended license provided you have installed the IID. However, you have to complete DUI school and pay all fees for the department to issue you with the IID restricted license.
- Restricted License
A restricted license allows you to drive to work, school, and a California DUI school in California. However, you also have to file an SR 22 form to obtain the restricted license. The waiting time to receive your restricted license will depend on the suspension type. You can receive your restricted license immediately if the suspension is court-triggered. If the suspension is DMV triggered, you have to wait for thirty days. If the suspension originates from the court and the DMV, you’ll have to wait for thirty days.
The Court Can Sentence You To Probation
The court can sentence you to probation for three years, although the probation period can extend to five years for your first-time DUI charge. You also have to complete a three-month DUI school as part of the probation condition. You must also attend at least thirty hours of classes. If the BAC level was 0.08%, you must attend the DUI school for nine months and 60 hours of classes. The court can sentence you to three years of DUI probation for a second charge.
However, the period can increase to five years. You must also complete an eighteen- or thirty-month DUI school. For a third DUI conviction, the court can sentence you to three-to-five-year probation. You also have to complete a thirty-month DUI school. For a fourth and subsequent DUI charge, the judge can sentence you to three to five years’ probation. You also have to complete thirty months in a California DUI school.
- Terms Of A DUI Probation
A DUI probation allows you to stay out of prison by agreeing to abide by the set terms and conditions. The terms of probation usually include paying a fine and completing a DUI school. You must also agree not to drive with any amount of alcohol in your blood system during the probation period. If you fail to follow the probation conditions, the court can revoke your probation and sentence you to jail.
In general, the court imposes certain conditions on your probation. Some conditions include three to five years’ probation and non-commission of any criminal offenses while on probation. You must also agree to a DUI breath test or chemical test if the authorities arrest you on suspicion of DUI. In addition, you should not drive with any notable alcohol level in your system.
Under California’s “zero tolerance” law, it is a criminal offense to drive with any detectable level of alcohol in your system while on probation. If the authorities arrest you for drunk driving when on probation, the court can revoke your probation. However, you can avoid the revocation if you spend forty-eight hours in county jail.
- IID As A DUI Probation Condition
Another probation condition the court may impose is the installation of the IDD. The ignition interlock device will only allow the car to start if your breath is free of alcohol. The judge may require you to install the IID as a probation condition if you have a high BAC level, usually 0.15% or higher, at the time of your arrest. You may also have to install the IID if you refuse to undergo the chemical or breath test during the arrest.
The court can direct you to keep the device installed for four months to four years. The installation period will depend on whether the DUI charge is the first, second, or subsequent conviction. Whether the charge was a standard DUI or you caused injury due to drunk driving. The law also requires you to install the IID if the authorities arrest you driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol or both on a suspended license.
Insurance Premium Consequences
Your insurance premium can rise to 165% in California after a DUI conviction. Therefore, after the court charges you with a DUI conviction, your insurance premiums become more expensive. The insurance providers increase the premium because they consider you a high-risk client. However, some insurance companies offer a better deal even after being charged with a DUI offense. You should therefore shop around to find the company offering the best deal.
In California, the insurance companies will continue to charge high premiums for the duration of your probation. For example, if your probation period is three years, you will pay the high premium rates for three years. The insurance companies usually decrease the premium rates once your probation period is over. However, some insurance providers may take longer than the probation period to lower the insurance premiums. As a result, finding an insurance company willing to insure a high-risk driver can be challenging. But you can use the California Automobile Assigned Risk Plan (CAARP), a program that helps high-risk clients find companies willing to insure them.
- You Don’t Have To Report Your DUI Conviction To Your Insurer.
No law in California requires you to report a DUI conviction, arrest, or driver’s license suspension to your insurer. However, the law requires you to report any accidents you have been involved in, whether they are DUI-related or not. The insurance companies can find out about your DUI charges using various methods. For example, the insurance can run a background check when renewing your policy. They can also find out about the DUI conviction if you tell them during the insurance application process.
Your insurance company is against the law to cancel your policy before its expiration date after a DUI conviction. However, the insurance provider can cancel the policy or change the terms once it is up for renewal. The law also requires the insurance providers to remove the good driver discount for your policy after a DUI conviction.
- Will Your Premium Be Affected If The DUI Charge Is Expunged?
Expunging the conviction only removes it from your criminal record. However, the DUI will remain in your driving record for ten years. Therefore, the insurance companies will still charge a high premium since your driving records show a DUI conviction. However, the authorities’ erase your DUI records after ten years if you are not arrested for DUI within that time frame.
A Criminal Record For DUI Conviction In California
Another consequence of a DUI conviction in California is a ten-year criminal record. A criminal record is not pretty as anyone who conducts a background check will find the DUI criminal record. Under California law, a DUI is a severe offense that appears in a pre-employment background check. The DUI will also appear in your vehicle record check an employer may conduct.
- The Criminal Record Complicates Your Job Application And Rental Property Prospects
Many job applications often ask if you have ever been convicted of a crime. This question may pose a dilemma if you have a previous DUI conviction. Some employers will become skeptical when you check the box as they don’t know if the criminal history is a misdemeanor or a series of felonies. Some landlords also check your background before they rent out their property. Therefore, having a DUI conviction also affects your ability to live in certain areas.
Attend Alcoholic Anonymous
Another consequence of a DUI conviction is attending AA meetings even if you are not a drunkard. The judge may require you to attend Alcoholic Anonymous or AA meetings at least once a week. The court will also give you an attendance form to verify your presence at the meeting. The meeting director will have to sign off for every session you attend.
Attend Mothers Against Drunk Driving Meetings
The court may also direct you to attend Mothers Against Drunk Driving. In California, the court usually requires first-time offenders to attend the MADD meetings. At least one person in the meeting shares how drunk driving has affected their lives. The sessions may also include a video presentation or a slide show. A police driver may also share the effects of drunk driving. The purpose of the meeting is to sensitize you on the impact of drunk driving on the community at large.
Hospital And Morgue (HAM) Program
The court may also refer you to the Hospital and Morgue program run by the coroner’s office. Under the program, you will visit the hospital, especially the ER, for four hours. You will also visit the morgue for four hours. The visit aims to show you the impact of drunk driving, especially the injury and death drunk driving can cause. The HAM program may also include a PowerPoint presentation. You will also observe as the coroner processes the bodies. The processing consists of photographing, fingerprinting, and undressing the bodies. You will also observe the coroner perform the autopsy. In some cases, the court may require you to write a 1,000-word essay about your experience in the hospital and the morgue.
Consequences Of Felony DUI Conviction With Bodily Injury
You can face more severe consequences when you injure someone in a DUI accident. If charged as a felony, you could face a fine of $390 to $5,000. Penalty assessment could increase the fines to as much as $18,000. The court could also order you to pay restitution, which may run to thousands of dollars, to the victims. Additionally, the judge may sentence you to a jail term of sixteen to three years in state prison.
The authorities could also suspend your license for up to four years or permanently suspend your driver’s license. The court could also sentence you to a three or five-year probation thorough which you must abide by certain conditions. If you fail to comply with these conditions, the judge may revoke the probation. If you qualify for the restricted license, you have to install an ignition interlock device in your vehicle for three years. Your criminal record for the next ten years will indicate you are a convicted felon.
Call A Van Nuys Criminal Lawyer Near Me
A DUI conviction can have devastating effects. The conviction leads to hefty fines and fees. You can also land in prison. The conviction also affects your criminal record, and employment chances increase your car insurance premiums and give you a bad reputation. If you cause serious injury or death as a result of a DUI accident, you also affect the lives and livelihood of the victim.
Therefore, if you are charged with a DUI, you need to enlist the services of a well-experienced criminal lawyer. At Leah Legal, we have years of experience representing clients facing DUI charges. We fight to have your charges reduced. If you or your loved one is facing a DUI charge in Van Nuys, CA, do not hesitate to call us today at 818-484-1100 for a free consultation.
En el Estado de California los padres pueden disciplinar a sus hijos usando la fuerza física y no será delito, siempre y cuando dicha fuerza no sea excesiva. Pero, si la Fiscalía comprueba que sometió al niño a lesiones físicas inhumanas o crueles, que por el castigo el niño sufrió lesiones corporales graves, y que cuando ejecuto la acción no se encontraba disciplinando al menor de forma razonable, podrá ser declarado responsable de cometer abuso infantil.
En este sentido, si usted actualmente enfrenta cargos por abuso infantil en Van Nuys, CA, debe comunicarse inmediatamente con el bufete Leah Legal, nuestros profesionales le ayudaran a entender su situación legal y lo representarán durante el proceso, elaborando las estrategias de defensa adecuadas que ayuden a obtener un resultado favorable. ¡Llame ya!
¿Qué actos son considerados abusivos en el Estado de California?
En principio, debe señalarse que en el Estado de California los actos señalados a continuación pueden considerarse como abusivos: Patear, abofetear, golpear, empujar, asfixiar, sacudir, quemar, o lanzar algún objeto a un menor son actos totalmente prohibidos por la ley. En este sentido, cualquier acto que le ocasioné un daño a un menor y lo dejé en estado traumático “inhumano o cruel” entrará en la categoría de abuso.
Por su parte, la legislación de California no ha establecido una definición respecto al término de injusto o cruel. Pero, el jurado podrá interpretar el término de acuerdo a su sentido común, lo que les genera una ventaja y maniobra a estos para decidir cuándo un acto puede ocasionar daños y considerarse abusivo.
¿De qué trata el delito de abuso infantil?
Según lo indicado en la disposición 273 literal (d) del Código Penal del Estado de California, se considera un delito infligir castigos físicos a un menor de edad. De manera que, aunque los progenitores pueden utilizar la fuerza física para impartir disciplina a su hijo, se considera ilícito el uso de fuerza excesiva.
En este orden de ideas, el Fiscal deberá comprobar los siguientes elementos constitutivos a fin de que una persona pueda ser condenada por este hecho ilícito:
- El sujeto sometió con intención a un menor a lesiones físicas o castigos crueles.
- El castigo o la lesión provocada por el sujeto acusado genera que el menor sufriera lesiones corporales severas.
- Cuando el acusado actuó no se encontraba disciplinando al menor de forma razonable.
Para comprender con mayor facilidad los elementos del delito, es necesario aclarar ciertos términos:
- Según la normativa se puede definir como “niño” a todo sujeto que posea una edad inferior a los 18 años de edad.
- Afección física traumática se refiere a un daño corporal o herida inducida por el uso de la fuerza física, sea mínima o grave.
- El término de “castigo físico” se relaciona sólo con aquellos castigos corporales, y no los castigos emocionales.
- La afección traumática debe diferenciarse de una lesión. Puesto que, la afección traumática hace referencia a una herida que fue inducida por el uso de fuerza, sea leve o severa. Mientras que, la lesión se genera voluntariamente cuando la acción que la generó se realizó con intención. De forma que, el sujeto no tiene que tener el propósito de incumplir la normativa o dañar al menor. Se podrá considerar que un daño o castigó género un estado físico traumante cuando ocurren las condiciones señaladas a continuación: En primer lugar, que el estado de trauma fue el producto natural y esperado del daño, en segundo lugar, el daño fue el principal responsable del desarrollo del trastorno, y, en tercer lugar, si no se hubiera realizado el daño o castigo el trastorno no hubiera tenido lugar.
Ejemplos
María quien es la madre de Max se siente en la obligación de castigar a su hijo y le propina unos azotes. En el Estado de California, el dar azotes (usando un objeto) se considera legal. De forma que, la madre no sería considerada responsable de cometer abuso infantil. No obstante, si la madre golpeó de forma repetida a su hijo hasta el punto que este se desmayó, y le generó lesiones, podrá ser considerada responsable de este delito.
Otro ejemplo, es en el caso de Pedro quien tiene 15 años y sale de su vivienda luego del toque de queda. Por su acción, el padre al percatarse que Pedro se había escapado lo espera durante la noche y cuando llega a casa le da una abofeteada. No obstante, por desgracia Pedro se golpea en la cabeza con una puerta y es llevado al servicio médico para que sean tomados unos puntos. En esta situación, el padre no tenía como fin generar lesiones a su hijo. Sin embargo, podría sufrir acusaciones si hubiera planificado abofetearlo, pero supongamos que el propósito del padre era pegarle a la pared y producto de un error terminó golpeando a su hijo. Frente a esta situación, no se considera responsable, puesto que, no contaba con la intención de golpear a Pedro.
Se debe resaltar que el ilícito de abuso infantil se considera un delito grave que genera alteraciones en la vida de un sujeto. Es por ello, que es calificado como delito grave según la normativa de California, y son impuestas sanciones severas en razón de las disposiciones.
¿Los azotes pueden considerarse como abuso infantil?
Es importante señalar que los azotes en California, no se consideran un acto de abuso infantil siempre y cuando se realicen por motivos disciplinarios, y no sea excesivo al punto de generar daños. Ahora bien, las excepciones pueden ser aplicables ya sean azotes solo con la mano o con algún objeto, estos son completamente distintos. No obstante, es fundamental considerar que el tema es bastante polémico, y los estándares actuales que son aceptados pueden resultar inadmisibles en un futuro. De forma que, el jurado podrá decidir que el azotar a un menor con la mano desnuda o usando un objeto es una forma excesiva de imponer disciplina.
¿Qué señales pueden evidenciar abuso en los menores de edad?
Cuando un niño se encuentra abusado presenta características particulares que demuestran su condición, algunas de estas son:
- Señales que advierten el abandono de niños: El que un menor lleve ropa mal arreglada, sucia, o inadecuada para el tipo de clima es señal de abuso, por su parte, si se encuentra en un estado de falta de higiene como seria ir a clases sin bañarse, sin un corte de cabello adecuado, o mal olor corporal, presenta enfermedades no tratadas, y tiene plena libertad para acudir a sitios peligrosos para un niño se evidencia claramente que es víctima de abandono.
- Señales que comprueban el abuso emocional de los niños: Cuando un niño es asustado, retraído, o preocupado es un signo alarmante de abuso. Asimismo, muestra cambios en su comportamiento siendo extremadamente exigente, complaciente, pasivo o agresivo con los demás, no tiene un vínculo con sus padres o tutor, se comporta de manera inapropiada ya sea como adulto cuando está con otros menores, o como niño que realiza acciones para llamar la atención como chuparse el dedo, o hacer rabietas.
- Señales que demuestran el abuso sexual en menores de edad: Cuando un niño no puede sentarse y caminar con facilidad, se interesa por conductas sexuales inadecuadas a su edad, evita que una persona se le acerque sin motivo alguno, no desea cambiarse la vestimenta delante de otros o al realizar deportes, padece enfermedades de transmisión sexual, o se encuentra en embarazo en el caso de las jóvenes son claras señales de abuso sexual.
- Señales que evidencian maltratos físicos en niños: En caso de que el menor presente hematomas o heridas que no tienen explicación, cortes de manera irregular, o que se encuentre siempre alerta y atento en espera de algo desagradable son evidencias de maltrato físico. De igual forma, las lesiones pueden seguir un patrón ya sea como la marca de un cinturón o de la mano. Por su parte, el niño presenta conductas evasivas, siempre está aterrorizado cuando debe volver al hogar y oculta las heridas, lleva vestimenta inadaptada como sería camisetas largas en días de extremo calor, entre otros.
¿Qué sanciones pueden imponerse en caso de que una persona sea condenada por este ilícito?
En principio, el abuso de menores es calificado como un “wobbler” según la disposición 273 literal (d) PC, por lo cual, el fiscal podrá decidir si lo presenta como delito menor o grave según las circunstancias específicas del caso y teniendo en consideración si cuenta con antecedentes penales o no. Es importante señalar, que si el acusado es considerado responsable pasará largo tiempo en prisión, y si fue condenado anteriormente por perpetrar el mismo ilícito su pena aumentará. Sin embargo, esto no será aplicable si han transcurrido 10 años desde el momento que fue sentenciado por el delito previo, o si no fue sentenciado por algún ilícito grave en el transcurso de ese periodo.
Aunado a ello, la Corte podrá imponer sanciones adicionales como orden de restricción contra la víctima, asistir a programas de educación para padres, someterse a exámenes médicos de consumo de sustancias, entre otros.
Ahora bien, si el fiscal considera el hecho como un delito menor las penas a imponer serán:
- Prisión por un lapso no mayor a 1 año en una cárcel en el condado,
- Pago de multas por una suma no mayor a $1.000, y de igual forma, puede imponerse una multa de $6.000,
- Ilícito menor (sumario) de libertad condicional.
Por otra parte, si es calificado como delito grave, las sanciones que puede conllevar son:
- Pena privativa de libertad por 2, 4, 6 años como máximo,
- Pago de multas por un valor máximo de $6.000,
- Régimen de libertad condicional (formal) por ilícito grave.
Es importante señalar, que, si el sujeto fue acusado anteriormente por este delito, la condena aumentará 4 años siempre que ocurran las condiciones señaladas a continuación: El sujeto cumplió su condena previa en un lapso de 10 años, y el sujeto no fue detenido por perpetrar algún ilícito grave en los 10 años anteriores.
Igualmente, es común que los condenados por este delito sean puestos en un régimen de libertad condicional en vez de ir a prisión, sea porque el ilícito se calificó como delito menor o mayor, la Corte cuenta con la potestad de sentenciar al condenado a este régimen. Sin embargo, el sujeto deberá cumplir con las condiciones que le sean impuestas de forma obligatoria.
¿Se pueden usar en contra del acusado los ilícitos que perpetró anteriormente por maltrato infantil?
Frente a un caso relacionado con abuso infantil, los ilícitos anteriores de maltrato infantil podrán admitirse, aun si el hecho no generó una sentencia condenatoria. Ello es una excepción a la normativa de la prueba de California. Ya que, generalmente está prohibido usar condenas previas para sentenciar a un individuo por perpetrar un ilícito, y dichas evidencias se consideran perjudiciales. No obstante, las condenas previas pueden usarse para comprobar que el sujeto agresor tiene actitudes violentas en un caso donde hay sospechas de que un menor sufrió abuso. Pero, debe tenerse en cuenta que la Corte deberá realizar una convocatoria en la cual determinará si el valor probatorio está justificado.
En este sentido, deberá realizar una visita con anterioridad a que la Fiscalía presente las evidencias de los ilícitos anteriores por abuso de menores. Y el juez tendrá que considerar en el transcurso de la audiencia si dichas evidencias pueden perjudicar de forma excesiva al jurado, si hay una evidencia que resguarde las alegaciones previas, y cuál es el lapso de tiempo transcurrido entre los ilícitos previos y la acusación actual. De manera que, si el delito ocurrió en un tiempo de 10 años, la Fiscalía no podrá presentar las evidencias, y solo el juez admitirá las pruebas si considera que representan un interés para la justicia.
¿Se pueden usar evidencias de incidentes previos por abuso doméstico?
El fiscal puede usar evidencias por ilícitos previos relacionados con violencia doméstica, a fin de utilizarlos como base para las reclamaciones por abuso cometidas en contra de un niño en circunstancias particulares. En este sentido, la Fiscalía solo podrá realizarlo si se presentan las condiciones señaladas a continuación:
- El menor es hijo del sujeto acusado,
- El menor vive con el sujeto acusado, o vivió en el pasado,
- Los cargos por violencia doméstica se realizaron contra el cónyuge, pareja, padre, madre, hijo del sujeto acusado, o alguna persona con quien este último mantuvo una relación en los 5 años anteriores.
Para ello, el juez deberá realizar una audiencia en donde determinará si las evidencias previas por el caso de violencia doméstica se consideran adecuadas al caso. Asimismo, la autoridad judicial buscará si las evidencias son perjudiciales, o permiten establecer una conducta general de violencia.
Ejemplo: Max fue acusado de agredir al hijo de su pareja. Sin embargo, anteriormente fue detenido por el delito de violencia doméstica en contra de su cónyuge 3 años atrás. Luego, de reunirse nuevamente con su esposa, ésta retiró los cargos.
En este caso, la autoridad judicial que lleva el proceso actual contra Max decide incluir la agresión como evidencia luego de una vista. Puesto que, considera que existen pruebas suficientes que permiten establecer que Max agredió físicamente a su cónyuge en aquel momento y que las evidencias no serán perjudiciales para todo el jurado. Es fundamental destacar, que los ilícitos previos no son considerados suficientes por sí mismos para que el acusado sea condenado en el caso actual, sólo servirán como una prueba que el jurado evaluará.
¿Qué estrategias de defensa pueden utilizarse para desvirtuar una acusación por este ilícito?
Es común que los abogados usen diversas estrategias legales para desvirtuar una acusación por abuso infantil. Sin embargo, para elegir la defensa más idónea es necesario analizar las circunstancias del caso en particular, a fin de lograr un resultado favorable. Algunas de las estrategias empleadas por los profesionales del derecho son las siguientes:
- La lesión fue generada por un accidente: El acusado debió comportarse de manera voluntaria para que pueda ser declarado responsable por este hecho ilícito. En este sentido, la ley de California reconoce que el hecho pudo ser producto de un accidente. De forma que, si la lesión no se produjo con intención el sujeto no será condenado por el mismo.
- Otro hecho fue el que generó el maltrato: Es muy común, que un niño presente heridas producto de una caída lo cual no significa que los padres lo agredieron. De igual forma, el menor puede verse expuesto a sufrir acoso escolar, y tiene miedo a revelar la información. No obstante, existen profesionales que se ven obligados a denunciar una sospecha de abuso de menores como sería en el caso de los profesores, médicos, enfermeras, administradores escolares. Para ello, un buen abogado podrá solicitar una evaluación independiente de un médico que compruebe que su cliente fue injustamente acusado de generar el abuso a su hijo, y que las heridas fueron producto de otro hecho.
- El acusado castigaba al menor de acuerdo a la normativa: Según el ordenamiento jurídico de California, los progenitores cuentan con el derecho a usar castigos corporales para disciplinar a su hijo, incluso pueden usar objetos como una paleta o cinturón siempre que sean cumplidas las siguientes condiciones: Los azotes fueron razonables y no generaron lesiones corporales graves. No obstante, esta situación puede generar cargos por este delito si se le dejaron hematomas al menor y uno de los informantes obligatorios lo observó y reaccionó de manera exagerada.
¿Cómo puedo encontrar a un buen abogado especialista en casos abuso infantil cerca de mí?
El sufrir acusaciones por el delito de abuso infantil es un asunto serio, debido a las sanciones severas que pueden imponerse las cuales van desde pasar tiempo tras las rejas, pago de grandes cantidades en multas, sea impuesta una orden de protección, entre otras que considere el juez. Es por ello, que en el bufete Leah Legal le ofrecemos una asistencia legal oportuna, nuestro equipo de profesionales está altamente capacitados y elaborarán las estrategias idóneas según las circunstancias particulares de su caso.
No lo dude más, y si está en Van Nuys, CA, comuníquese ahora mismo con nosotros a través del siguiente número 818-484-1100, uno de los asesores le atenderá en breve. ¡Llame ahora mismo!
Prosecutorial misconduct is when a prosecutor violates the professional code of ethics or breaks the law during prosecution. This type of conduct is counterproductive to the goals of the Department of Justice because it makes it challenging for “justice to prevail.” Prosecutors have a duty imposed by their professional obligations and the United States constitution to ensure fairness during criminal litigation. Improper, unethical, or illegal acts and the failure of a prosecutor to act when required can cause wrongful conviction or unjustifiable punishment.
The law makes it mandatory for prosecutors to abide by the law and perform their duties expeditiously, consistently, and fairly. The experts must also protect and respect human dignity and advocate for human rights, subsequently ensuring the proper functioning of the criminal justice system. Because prosecutors have extensive control over all processes, from investigations and drafting charges to recommend the correct sentence following a conviction, any form of misconduct can hinder justice.
Prosecutorial Misconduct Defined
Prosecutorial misconduct is a broad term that refers to any unethical or illegal conduct by a prosecutor during a criminal case. This offense is different from malicious prosecution, where a prosecutor files a baseless lawsuit against a defendant. In prosecutorial misconduct, a prosecutor uses dishonest or unfair means to ensure a defendant’s conviction.
Prosecutors hold a position that wields a lot of power. As such, these positions do not come devoid of stricter responsibilities and higher standards of professional ethics. Misconduct attracts harsh disciplinary action and can result in a judge overturning a conviction to afford a defendant relief.
Other steps a judge can take after unveiling prosecutorial misconduct include:
- Ask jurors to disregard particular comments or evidence
- Grant a retrial under Penal Code 1181
The roles of a prosecutor are crucial during all stages of the criminal justice process. Irrespective of the phase where misconduct occurs, it can affect the outcome of a trial.
The main types of prosecutorial misconduct include:
- Withholding evidence that can clear a defendant’s name from fault (exculpatory evidence)
- Presenting fabricated evidence
- The use of improper arguments
- Using discriminatory tactics during jury selection
Withholding Evidence from the Defense
Exculpatory evidence, also referred to as “Brady material,” is any form of proof that can free a defendant from guilt or fault. Withholding exculpatory evidence violates the due process of a criminal case.
Evidence helps the court decide whether a defendant is guilty and the befitting punishment to impose. A prosecutor’s failure to provide proof that can free a defendant from blame can cause the conviction of an innocent person.
Brady violations are considered malicious forms of prosecutorial misconduct. This is because they prevent the jury from considering admissible evidence that supports the innocence of a defendant. If jurors cannot access this evidence, a defendant faces a greater likelihood of serving time for a crime they did not commit.
The Introduction of False Evidence
False evidence is forged, fabricated, doctored, or tainted proof. The evidence can disrupt the course of justice and leave an innocent person in jail or a guilty one roaming the streets.
For instance, a child is murdered, and the news hits news headlines. Pressure from the public makes it crucial for the prosecutors to find the perpetrator of the crime and convict them. Unfortunately, the only person who witnessed the crime is 50/50, whether she saw John or someone that looks like John.
If the prosecutor persuades the eyewitness to claim they are 100% sure they saw John leaving the crime scene, this constitutes false evidence. The testimony is a lie because the witness cannot confirm whether the person they saw was john or someone else.
Other common forms of false evidence a prosecutor can introduce are as follows:
- Hearsay statements
- Falsified character evidence
When a prosecutor deliberately introduces false evidence to get a conviction, the defendant qualifies for a retrial or dismissal of all charges. Also, it is an ethical violation for the prosecutor to intimidate witnesses brought forth by the defendant’s defense team. For instance, threatening a witness with deportation can make them fail to testify. The action is equally as harmful to the trial as introducing false evidence.
Improper Arguments
Improper arguments or assertions have the power to sway the court’s opinion in a manner unfair to the defendant. Prosecutors must refrain from making specific arguments during their opening or closing statements. Remember that a prosecutor’s words bear the weight of the government, and jurors are often inclined to believe the “government’s opinion” as opposed to what the evidence says.
Here are the most common types of improper arguments:
- Testifying on Behalf of an Absent Witness—all arguments made by a prosecutor must focus solely on the evidence presented during the trial. If a witness fails to show up, the prosecutor cannot testify on their behalf. Giving the testimony of an absent observer denies a defendant of their right to cross-examine the witness. Essentially, this leaves the jury with no choice but to make a judgment based solely on the version of the testimony presented by the prosecutor. Unfortunately, this version of the testimony will often point at a defendant’s guilt.
- Misstating the Law— another form of improper argument is misquoting the law. A false statement of the law misleads the jury into believing that a defendant violated a non-existent law.
- Arguing Facts Not in Evidence— like testifying for an absent witness, it is also unethical for a prosecutor to give arguments based on facts, not in evidence. Misguiding the jury with unsupported attributes also constitutes misconduct.
- The mischaracterization of Evidence—how a prosecutor characterizes evidence can have a powerful impact on the jury’s views. For instance, during the closing argument, a prosecutor can skew evidence and misguide the jury. The act is unfairly prejudiced against the defendant. Jurors are likely to depend on the image painted by the prosecutor and not the story told by the available evidence.
- Impugning the Defense—another common form of improper arguments by a prosecutor is challenging the defense or questioning the credibility of proof tabled by the defense team. Again, the misconduct attacks the defendant’s presumption of innocence and implies that the prosecutor can tell the accused is guilty, even without depending on the tabled evidence.
- Shifting the Burden of Proof— the prosecution bears the burden of proof. It is up to the prosecutor to convince the court that a defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt without making any ethical violations. Often, the state has more power, authority, and resources to prove a case. The “presumption of innocence” helps to counterbalance this power. It is unethical for the prosecutor to make a defendant appear guilty unless they can prove they are innocent.
- Arguing Inconsistent Theories of Prosecution—when a case involves more than one defendant, the arguments tabled by a prosecutor during each case should not conflict. For instance, if a gang of three “armed criminals” participated in a robbery and shot killed the night guard with a single bullet to the head, a prosecutor cannot claim that each gang member shot the guard. Evidence shows that there was a single assailant. Claiming that all the gang members shot the victim undermines fundamental prosecutorial fairness and the credibility of all the convictions.
- Appealing to Religious Authority—moreover, it is a professional violation for a prosecutor to appeal to religious authority, especially during a capital case. For example, a prosecutor cannot stand before the court to argue that the Bible calls for the death penalty if a person commits a particular crime. This type of argument can again interfere with juror’s idea of their responsibilities during criminal proceedings. The personal religious beliefs of the jurors could make them assume that the right thing to do is carry out “God’s will” and impose an unjustifiable death penalty.
- Presenting Personal Opinion—again, prosecutors speak with the government’s authority. Their statements have inherently more power than the statements of defense lawyers or even witnesses. When a prosecutor expresses their personal opinions about a defendant’s guilt, this can again misguide the jurors. They can interpret a case based on the prosecutor’s views and not the evidence.
Punishment for Prosecutorial Misconduct
Prosecutorial misconduct often has devastating effects on the life, future, and well-being of a defendant. Unfortunately, the penalty for the violation is not harsh, not to mention that courts have a history of favoring the prosecutor. In most cases, the court will rule that the misconduct stems from a “harmless error.”
There is no actual punishment for prosecutorial misconduct. However, a violation of professional and legal standards can force the judge to overturn a case and grant a defendant relief. The prosecutor can also be subjected to the bar complaint process.
Common Reasons for Prosecutorial Misconduct
The victims of prosecutorial misconduct often suffer irreparable damage, mainly when a case results in a wrongful conviction. While the negative repercussions of misconduct are apparent, the prosecutor will likely face no consequences.
The motives behind the actions are not universal and often vary from one case to another. In some cases, prosecutors are politically motivated to violate ethical standards, while others are blinded by their desire to ensure justice for the victims.
Here are three of the most common motives for prosecutorial misconduct:
Pressure to Convict
It is often beneficial when the public does not view prosecutors as “soft on crime.” A reputation of being lenient with “lawbreakers” almost guarantees negative consequences during re-election. Hence, the risk of prosecutorial misconduct increases during high-profile cases that attract media attention. With the public and government officials keeping close tabs on a case, this can lead to a prosecutor doing “whatever it takes” to obtain a conviction.
The urge to maintain a reputation of being “tough on crime” is one of the leading motivators of prosecutorial misconduct. Some prosecutors will ensure their re-election by withholding exculpatory evidence or presenting falsified evidence. According to recent studies in 2013, prosecutors often take more cases to trial than offer a reduced number of plea bargains, especially when running for re-election.
Career Suicide for Those That Report Misconduct
Often, professionals within the justice system thrive from maintaining pleasant relations with their colleagues. It is common practice for an attorney to use the cordial relationship with a prosecutor to obtain a favorable plea bargain. Consequently, reporting prosecutorial misconduct will likely result in “career suicide.” Even though comradely helps in creating and maintaining amicable working conditions, it also hinders lawyers from reporting misconduct without the risk of suffering negative consequences.
Professional Conduct Rule 8.3(a) of the American Bar Association tasks lawyers with reporting misconduct from other colleagues if they question their trustworthiness, honesty, or fitness. While this rule is clear, lawyers often fear retaliation from the legal community.
It takes a criminal attorney dedicated to upholding high ethical standards to break the norm and put justice over comradely. A reliable lawyer will file motions with the court to ensure a judgment is not passed based on a prosecutor’s illegal, unethical, or improper acts. Successful motions increase the odds of a judge reducing a defendant’s sentence, dismissing the charges, or vacating a conviction to ensure an innocent person does not end up serving time.
Lack of Consequences
Prosecutors accused of ethical violations will often not receive any sanctions. Even though a judge can dismiss a case or grant a retrial, this is as far as it goes regarding the consequences suffered by a prosecutor guilty of misconduct. Even in extreme cases, it is improbable for a prosecutor to be disbarred. It is safe to say the justice system is poorly equipped to conduct investigations and enforce disciplinary sanctions.
Generally, prosecutors have no fear of punishment. This gives them little motivation to maintain ethical practices, especially when the pros of securing a conviction are way higher than the cons of a possible sanction.
Prosecutorial misconduct robs defendants of their right to a fair trial during criminal proceedings. If you face charges for any crime, this is more reason for you to ensure you have a strong defense team in your corner. An experienced attorney will advocate for your rights and keep the prosecution from committing ethical violations just to obtain a conviction.
Appeals and Prosecutorial Misconduct
Proving that a prosecutor made ethical violations can be challenging but not impossible. A reliable lawyer can help you gather the much-needed evidence that shows a prosecutor manipulated evidence, refused to pursue other suspects, or opted for a witness notorious for giving false testimonies. A successful appeal in the court of appeals, Supreme Court, or any other higher appeals court can force a judge to dismiss a case or grant a retrial.
It is imperative to understand that a judge can only order a retrial if your defense attorney files a motion before the sentencing hearing. For this to happen, your attorney must prove two critical elements:
Prejudice
Your attorney must prove that prosecutorial misconduct was prejudiced against the defendant. Essentially, when a prosecutor is prejudiced, this conduct can impact the outcome of a trial. A prosecutor can be biased by:
- Making arguments based on facts not in evidence
- Making inflammatory comments to sway the views of the jury
- Expressing personal opinions
The court favors the accused only when the case, minus prosecutorial misconduct, raises doubt about their guilt. Often, an attorney can overturn a guilty verdict if the outcome of a case could be different without the ethical violations of a prosecutor. Therefore, you can expect the court to retain a guilty verdict if the evidence of guilt against the defendant is overwhelming.
Objection to Misconduct
It is often easier to prove prosecutorial misconduct and obtain a new trial if your attorney objected to a prosecutor’s ethical violations. Opposing when misconduct happens allows the judge to give the jury instructions to disregard the actions or comments of the prosecutor.
Also, you can obtain a new trial if you received inefficient help from your legal team. Note that proving that your legal team was ineffective and your lawyer did not object to misconduct can be difficult, making it imperative always to choose the best legal counsel the first time.
Prosecutorial misconduct can cripple your chances of clearing your name. Prosecutors hold positions that give them the ability to illegally erode defendants’ rights by withholding crucial evidence, presenting false evidence, or raising improper arguments to increase the odds of a conviction. A dependable criminal defense attorney can fight to ensure prosecutors do not violate professional, ethical standards, leading to a wrongful conviction or unwarranted social stigma.
Find a Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
At Leah Legal, we are committed to shedding light on systematic injustices and prosecutorial misconduct that lead to a defendant’s wrongful conviction in Van Nuys, CA. If the ethical violations by a prosecutor resulted in wrongful sentencing, turn to us for the much-needed legal counsel and representation. We are advocates of truth and justice and have the skills to bring injustice to light. Over the years, we have built a strong reputation for overturning wrongful convictions and securing the release of innocent persons from prison. Call us today at 818-484-1100 for a no-fee consultation and case evaluation.
When a person you know commits murder or is about to commit murder, you could face serious criminal charges if you try to help them in any way. California law requires you to cooperate with law enforcement officers in stopping a crime or arresting an offender. Thus, you are to report the crime immediately after learning about it, whether before or after its commission. Sadly, many people do not do so for various reasons. It could be that the offender forced you to help them, or that you did not know that the person was about, or had just committed a grave offense.
If you face charges for being an accessory for murder in Van Nuys, CA, it is essential to know what it entails and how to defend yourself in court. You also need proper legal representation and support to plan a solid defense against your charges. Talk to an experienced criminal defense attorney for help in fighting your charges.
What ‘Being an Accessory to Murder’ Means
People who commit serious criminal offenses like murder do not wake up and execute the offense one day. They take time to plan for it and only act when the plan is ready for execution. These people will likely tell one or more people about their plans consciously or unconsciously. Some offenders will probably speak about it after committing the offense, mainly to a close friend or family member. Sometimes they disclose their intentions or acts to seek help. For instance, the offender could need help accessing the victim’s home office or fleeing from the murder scene.
Once the police start investigating the crime, the offender will likely flee or lie low. They will also need help hiding the murder weapon or any discriminating evidence. Thus, the offender could seek the help of a family or friend and will likely disclose the fact that they have committed murder. Anyone who knowingly assists a felony offender before or after the execution of an offense is guilty of being an accessory to the felony and could face felony charges under California law.
Being an accessory to murder means assisting or helping a murder perpetrator before and/or after committing the offense. It does not necessarily mean that you were present during the offense’s execution or you participated in the crime. You could help the offender by allowing them to remain in your home as the police hunt intensifies. You could also face charges for assisting the offender in acquiring a weapon like a gun or getting away from the murder scene. Whatever you do to help another person commit murder will be considered a serious criminal offense, punishable by a lengthy prison time and hefty fines.
Being an accessory is a criminal offense under California laws, whereby a person helps in committing a felony. You could be an accessory in two ways:
Before the Fact
You become an accessory to murder before the fact if you assist in the planning and executing the murder. Anything you knowingly do to help a person commit murder will qualify as aiding before the fact. You could do this in many ways, including ferrying the perpetrator to the murder scene, luring the victim to the murder scene, helping the perpetrator acquire the murder weapon, obtaining information that could help the perpetrator plan for the murder, or simply helping with planning the murder.
Prosecutors charge the offense as aiding and abetting a crime, as under California PC 31. The law prohibits anyone from inciting, encouraging, aiding, or facilitating the execution of a crime. A person guilty of aiding and abetting the execution of a crime faces the same sentence as the offender.
After the Fact
An accessory to murder after the fact is anyone who helps or assists the defendant after they have already committed the offense. You could do this by hiding the perpetrator to make it hard for the police to arrest them, helping the defendant dispose of the murder weapon and other paraphernalia, helping with destroying evidence, cleaning the murder scene, or even knowingly lying to the police about the suspect’s whereabouts.
Being an accessory to murder after the fact is prosecuted under California PC 32. The law prohibits a person from knowingly concealing, aiding, or harboring a felon to protect them from an arrest, criminal trial, and conviction. A conviction under this law is a felony.
It is advisable to be very careful with your actions after learning that a person has committed a felony or is about to commit a felony. Protecting yourself will help you avoid the severe consequences of being an accessory to murder. The offense is mainly charged as a felony, punishable by several years in prison.
When the police arrest you for being an accessory to murder, a prosecutor will file criminal charges against you in a criminal court. During your trial, the prosecutor must prove all the elements of your offense beyond a reasonable doubt for the court to find you guilty.
These Elements for California PC 31 are:
- You knew that the perpetrator had an illegal plan
- You intentionally encouraged and/or facilitated the plan
- You aided, promoted, or instigated the crime
The court cannot find you guilty for being an accessory before the fact if the prosecutor cannot prove all three elements.
Elements for California PC 32 are:
Elements for being an accessory after the fact are slightly different and are:
- Another person committed murder or was facing murder charges
- You were aware that the person committed murder or was facing murder charges
- You hid or helped the person after he/she had committed the offense or after facing murder charges
- You did so to help the offender avoid police arrest, criminal trial, and conviction
Note that failing to testify in a murder trial does not make you an accessory to the offense.
When you aid or abet a crime, the person you are helping is the principal offender. Being an accessory before the murder can attract the same penalties as the murder itself. An accessory after the murder does not face charges for the underlying offense but a separate felony or misdemeanor.
Being an accessory before the murder could attract harsher penalties since you are treated the same way as the offender. That is why you need proper legal help to avoid a conviction if you face charges for being an accessory to murder.
California Murder
The law against murder in California is under PC 187. It is the unlawful killing of another person or fetus with malice aforethought. California law has two degrees of murder:
- First-degree murder happens when a person kills another when lying in wait, with premeditation or deliberation.
- Second-degree murder happens when a person intentionally kills another but does not think about or contemplate killing the person before committing the act.
First-degree murder is more severe and carries more severe penalties than second-degree murder. But both are severe felonies that could carry a life in prison penalty.
When charging a person with being an accessory to murder, the prosecutor must first establish that the other person murdered, whether in the first or second degree. One way you can challenge your charges for being an accessory is by proving in court that the other person did not murder in the first place. If that is true, you cannot be guilty of assisting them before or after the fact.
The Legal Consequences of Being an Accessory to Murder
You will likely face severe penalties if the court finds you guilty of assisting in the commission of murder.
As previously mentioned, California state prosecutes being an accessory to murder before the act as aiding or abetting murder. Assisting the commission of murder before its commission includes facilitating, inciting, encouraging, or helping in the execution of the crime. Thus, the law treats the accessory the same as the actual perpetrator. If convicted for this, you will face the same penalties as the offender.
If the actual perpetrator were found guilty of first-degree murder, you would likely face 25 years in prison to life for assisting in the execution of the murder before its commission. On the other hand, if the actual perpetrator received a conviction for second-degree murder, you will likely receive 15 years of prison time for helping them in the completion of the offense.
Being an accessory to murder before the fact is mainly a wobbler offense in California, as under California PC 32. A person who faces charges under this law conceals, harbors, or helps someone knowing that the person has committed murder. As a wobbler offense, the prosecutor has the discretion to charge you with a felony or misdemeanor, depending on the details of your crime.
If you receive a misdemeanor charge for being an accessory to murder after the crime, you will likely receive the following penalties upon conviction:
- A maximum of one year in jail
- A fine not exceeding $5,000
If you receive a felony charge under this law, you will likely receive the following penalties after conviction:
- A maximum of three years in prison
- A fine of not more than $5,000
You Can Defend Yourself Against The Charges
If you face charges for being an accessory to murder, it helps to know that you can defend yourself from your charges to avoid a conviction. You can do this with the help of a competent criminal defense attorney. Your attorney will develop strategies and plans to fight your charges and convince the jury to drop or reduce your charges. Some of the defense strategies that are allowed by the law, which your attorney can use in your favor, are:
Lack of Knowledge About The Crime
Being an accessory to a crime requires knowing that the offender will commit the crime or has already committed the crime. Without this knowledge, you will not be guilty as charged.
Being close friends or relatives with a person does not guarantee that you know all the plans they have, including plans to commit a crime. You could face arrest simply because you were hanging out with the offender right before and/or after they committed murder. The police will have assumed that you knew about the offense, which in the real sense, you did not know. In that case, the court will drop your charges.
Your attorney must demonstrate your lack of knowledge to the court. That will pose a challenge to the prosecutor in proving all the elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. Consequently, the court will dismiss your charges and order the police to set you free if that happens.
No Murder Occurred
Charges for being an accessory to murder can only be against another person if the principal has already been determined guilty of murder. If that is not the case, you cannot face charges under California PC 31 or PC 32.
It could be that the murder trial for the principal was recently concluded and that they were determined not guilty of murder. In that case, the court will drop your charges. You cannot be an accessory to a crime that did not happen in the first place. All elements of murder must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt for the principal to be found guilty and the accessory to face charges.
You Acted Under Duress
It is not unusual for a person to assist in committing a crime through force or threats of force. Murder is a serious offense. A person that desperately needs help to commit murder will use any possible means to find help, including using force or threats.
For instance, it could be that the perpetrator threatened you with severe bodily injury or death if you failed to help them obtain the murder weapon. Or the perpetrator forcefully caused you to drive them from the crime scene. In that case, you will not be guilty of being an accessory since you did not act voluntarily or knowingly.
If your defense is acceptable in court, the judge will dismiss your charges.
You Were Only a Bystander
If you face charges for being an accessory to murder under California PC 32, your attorney can demonstrate in court that you were not a part of the crime but only a bystander. The police could have arrested you at the crime scene on suspicion that you were part of the offense. By countering the prosecutor’s allegations, you will weaken his/her case against you and cause the court to dismiss your charges. Remember that being an accessory requires you to have harbored, concealed, or aided the felony. If none of that happened, you would not be guilty as charged.
You Are Falsely Accused
False accusations are not unusual in California. Some people face false charges for crimes they did not commit. Sometimes these people are not lucky enough to convince the court of their innocence and end up paying dearly for a crime they did not commit. If you face false accusations for aiding or abetting a murder, your competent criminal attorney could help you demonstrate your innocence in court.
It could be that the perpetrator is covering up for someone and wants you to take the fall for it, or they simply want you to bear the punishment for reasons like jealousy or revenge. Your attorney only needs to prove in court that you did not do that, which you are facing accusations for.
For instance, if you are facing allegations for obtaining the murder weapon on behalf of the perpetrator, your attorney can acquire evidence to demonstrate that someone else and not you sought the said weapon. Your communication with the perpetrator could also be used to prove the kind of relationship you had before the crime.
You Withdrew From Participating in the Crime
Your attorney can use this as a defense if you were a participant in the execution of the crime but withdrew shortly before its commission. In that case, you cannot be an accessory to the murder before the fact.
People change their minds at all times, especially when serious crimes are involved. Some people drop out of the plan right before its execution. They cannot be responsible if the remaining partners execute the plan.
However, you must demonstrate in court that you notified the other participants of your unwillingness to proceed with the plan. You also must have done everything possible to stop the crime from happening. If that is the case, the court will dismiss your charges.
Find a Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
If you or someone you know faces criminal charges for being an accessory to murder in Van Nuys, CA, you could find legal help in fighting your charges to avoid a conviction. Note that a sentence for being an accessory carries severe penalties in California. Fighting your charges could compel the court to dismiss or reduce your charges. You could try us at Leah Legal for professional legal defense services. We can walk you through the complex legal process and help you plan a solid defense against your charges. Call us at 818-484-1100 and let us work together to obtain a favorable outcome for your case.
Individuals in some situations undertake to carry out a crime. However, for some reason, they fail to pull off the crime. The question posed in this situation is, are the individuals criminally culpable?
Yes, they are. California’s criminal justice system does not only punish individuals who commit crimes. It also punishes the attempt to commit an offense. Taking action to carry out a crime, albeit unsuccessful, is an attempted crime and a criminal offense. Therefore, it is never a defense that you did not commit a crime just because it was unsuccessful. As you will see detailed in this article, an attempted crime attracts adverse consequences if convicted. Therefore, having a criminal defense attorney is pivotal for your defense in an attempted crime case.
Attempted Crimes Under Law
The word attempt points to a non-actualized crime. Prosecutors rely on intent and direct action towards committing the crime. It also follows that an accidental act does not amount to attempting to commit a crime. This is because accidental actions lack intent.
Under PC 664, you will only be found guilty of an attempted crime if it is proven that:
- You intended to commit a crime — Intent can be specific or general. Both are considered in an attempted crime charge. General intent refers to taking action without the intent to achieve a particular objective. On the other hand, if you take action intending to realize a precise result, your intention is categorized as specific.
Additionally, prosecutors could also introduce transferred intent. This intention is evident when you intend to commit a crime against one individual but end up hurting another.
For example, you plan and attempt to kidnap a lady and shoot and injure the husband in the process. In this case, you could face charges for the attempted kidnapping of the lady and attempted murder of the husband.
- You took direct action towards committing the crime — Direct action, in this case, encompasses explicit intention and an immediate step that rolls the plan to commit a crime in motion. Therefore, thinking, planning, or preparing to execute a crime is insufficient to support the attempted charge. There should be a subsequent, direct action.
- You failed to complete the crime — Failure to complete is the critical consideration under PC 664. Actualizing the crime results in charges under the specific law you violated. An attempt is a distinct and separate offense. That means you cannot be simultaneously charged for an attempt and the actualized crime.
All attempted crimes are prosecuted under PC 664 and not the specific statute of the target crime. However, the courts also consider the precise statute to determine whether the facts in your case match what the specific law prescribes as the elements to be proven for a conviction. Further, prosecutors, informed by the facts of the case, decide which charges to pursue. Some of the standard attempted crime charges include:
- Attempted murder — Attempting to kill another. The target crime is murder, an offense under PC 187. The attempt, however, is a violation of PC 664
- Attempted rape — Refers to the use of fraud, threats, or force to have non-consensual sex with the victim. Rape is a violation of PC 261
- Attempted robbery — Making an effort to take another’s property through force or fear. If you were successful, you would have faced robbery charges under PC 211
A defendant could argue that since I failed in actualizing a crime, I’m innocent. However, your actions in the attempted crime result in negative consequences to the victim(s). Therefore, punishing you for the attempt aims to deter other individuals from engaging in similar behavior and penalizes you for the trauma or harm caused to the victim(s).
The consensus in the criminal justice system is that any attempt to commit a crime warrants punishment to prevent individuals from avoiding criminal culpability because the crime was not actualized.
Possible Penalties For Violating PC 664
A conviction for an attempted crime results in fines and/or prison sentences. The penalties are half those prescribed under the specific statute of the target crime.
Here is a look at the penalties issued in the three common attempted crimes to better understand the provisions of PC 664.
Attempted Murder
Prosecutors have to prove whether your attempt to murder another is in the first or second degree.
If you willfully acted with the premeditation of killing the surviving victim, you will be charged with attempted first-degree murder. Murder is punishable by life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.
If the victim were a peace officer or a protected individual, you would serve a minimum of 15 years.
Attempting to commit first-degree murder results in up to nine years to life in prison with the possibility of parole upon conviction. Additionally, you will have to pay restitution and a fine of up to $5,000
Attempting to commit second-degree murder results in 5, 7, or 9 years. Under PC 187, committing a second-degree murder is an offense punishable by 20 years to life without the possibility of parole.
Attempted Rape
Should the DA pursue a felony rape charge under 261, a conviction results in eight years in prison and an additional three to five years in prison if the victim suffered significant bodily harm. Therefore an attempt to commit rape will result in a four-year prison sentence and an additional one and a half to two and a half years in prison if the victim suffered great bodily harm.
Under PC 261, if the victim is a minor below 18 years, a conviction results in an 11-year prison sentence, and 13 years if the minor was below 14 years at the time of the alleged offense. It, therefore, follows if you are convicted for attempted rape on a minor who is younger than 18 years of age, you will serve a five and a half prison sentence and six and a half years in prison if the minor was below 14 years.
Attempted Robbery
Robbery is a felony under PC 211, and a guilty conviction is punishable by harsh sentences. Penalties issued for attempted robbery are equally severe.
As is the case of murder, robbery too is either in the first or second degree. Robbery in the first degree occurs if any of the following three situations are true:
- The victim was a cable car, taxi, bus, subway, trackless trolley (or of similar transportation for hire) passenger or driver
- The incident took place immediately after or when the victim was using an ATM
- The robbery took place in an inhabited trailer, boat, or house
Second-degree robbery is any robbery that fails to meet the above criteria of first-degree robbery.
You will serve up to 18 months, two or three years in prison, and part with $5,000 in fines for attempting to commit first-degree robbery. If found guilty of attempting to commit second-degree robbery, you will be sentenced to one, five, or two and a half years in prison with a fine requirement not exceeding $5,000.
You could also face sentence enhancement if the victim suffered great bodily injury, you used a gun, or you have a strike in your criminal record for a previous offense.
Additional Consequences of an Attempted Crime Conviction
While time behind bars and fines are the immediate consequences most consider, they are not the only ones. A conviction results in adverse outcomes for your citizenship status and gun rights.
Should the crime you are accused of committing fall under the deportable offenses, and you have not achieved citizenship status, you will be deported to your country of origin and marked inadmissible. This means you will be denied re-entry to the US because deportable crimes are categorized under crimes involving moral turpitude and aggravated felonies.
Examples of crimes of moral turpitude include but are not limited to burglary, murder, embezzlement, perjury, robbery, and rape. Aggravated felonies, on the other hand, include murder, rape, and kidnapping.
Under California law, an attempt to commit the above offenses is equally a deportable offense.
Additionally, California law bars felons from owning or possessing guns. If you are convicted of a felony charge for attempting to commit a crime, you will lose your gun rights. Therefore, owning or possessing a gun will be an offense.
Fighting Attempted Crime Charges
The halving of penalties for the target crimes does not eliminate the severity of a conviction’s consequences. You, therefore, need to fight the charges to secure a not guilty conviction or reduced penalties should the jury find you guilty. Having an attorney for your defense increases the possibility of the best legal outcome for your case.
Defense strategies are case-specific. However, attorneys use common defenses to most attempted crimes. They include the following.
Lack of Intent to Commit a Crime
Prosecutors bear the burden of proof, and in this case, the DA should prove your intent for you to be found guilty. Failure to prove intent creates an opportunity to challenge the case under the lack of intent to commit said crime.
Abandonment of the Crime
Abandoning a crime points to you changing your mind to not proceed with actualizing the offense although you had intended to commit the offense. Your attorney should also demonstrate that your withdrawal was voluntary and not just because of the belief that you would be arrested.
Lack of Direct Action in Furtherance of the Offense
You are only guilty of an attempted crime if you took direct action to further the offense. Therefore, your attorney can challenge the DA’s case if the prosecutors fail to prove you took direct action. It can be argued you only thought or participated in the planning of the crime.
Legal Impossibility
California accepts legal impossibility and not factual impossibility defenses, with impossibility describing unexpected circumstances that prevented you from carrying out the crime.
Legal impossibility refers to a situation where a defendant believes his/her actions to be illegal when said action is not unlawful. Legal impossibility is founded on the principle that an act is not an offense unless a law exists prohibiting the act.
For example, a defendant has consensual relations with a lady he believes to be 18 years old. The defendant further believes he has committed an offense, attempted rape. In actuality, the lady is 24 years old, and there is no law prohibiting sexual relations between consenting adults. Therefore, the defendant cannot be found guilty because his belief is a legal impossibility.
Conversely, when a defendant fails to complete a crime because the facts are not as he/she believed them to be, this is a case of factual impossibility. For example, a defendant tries to rob another of his wallet. However, on putting his hand in the victim’s pocket, he discovers there is no wallet. The defendant cannot argue that he couldn’t steal the wallet because the victim was not carrying one.
What Offenses are Related to Attempted Crime?
Offenses similar to attempted crime but legally distinct include conspiracy, solicitation, and aiding & abetting. Here is a more detailed look at each crime.
- Conspiracy
Conspiracy (or solicitation) and attempt are often mistaken to mean attempted crime. The two are similar in certain situations and are related. However, each is legally distinct.
California law considers conspiracy, as any agreement arrived at by two or more persons with the intent to commit a crime and a party to the arrangement, takes an overt step in furtherance of the agreement but not the offense itself.
From the above definition, conspiracy requires several parties to agree to commit a crime, and at least one takes concrete action in furtherance of the agreement but not the offense itself. On the other hand, an attempt does require an overt act in furtherance of the crime.
For example, preparation is enough to further the agreement but not the crime. Therefore, preparation is substantial in determining your guilt but not enough in an attempt case.
Additionally, like an attempt, the suspects will not be charged with conspiracy but the crime itself if the offense is actualized. Conspiracy allegations are prosecuted under PC 182.
Conspiracy to commit a crime is punishable as a misdemeanor or a felony. Misdemeanor and felony offenders receive the penalties prescribed for the underlying offense. For example, if charged with a conspiracy to commit rape, you will serve up to eight years in prison, a penalty prescribed for violating PC 261.
- Solicitation
Soliciting is encouraging, requesting, or demanding an individual take part in criminal conduct with the intention to contribute or facilitate the commission of the crime. PC 653f makes it a crime to solicit another to commit an offense.
Common examples of solicitations include:
- Tasking another to collect stolen property
- Asking a witness to falsify their testimony under oath
- Requesting another to take part in a robbery
- Asking an individual to engage in sex in exchange for money
To prove solicitation, prosecutors must prove that:
- The accused requested another to commit an offense listed under PC 653f
- The defendant intended to commit the crime
- The requested party received communication from the accused asking for their participation in the crime
The penalties issued for solicitation depend on the offense the defendant requested another to commit.
For example, suppose the defendant is accused of soliciting another to commit murder. In that case, the solicitation is a felony punishable by up to nine years in prison and a potential fine not exceeding $10,000.
You will face misdemeanor charges for solicitation of the sale or distribution of controlled substances. A conviction results in a jail sentence not exceeding six months and a potential fine of no more than $1,000.
Should the DA pursue solicitation changes for any other offense listed under PC 653f other than the two listed above, you could face misdemeanor or felony penalties upon conviction. Misdemeanors are punishable by a 12-month jail sentence while up to three years in jail for a felony conviction.
- Aiding and Abetting
Aiding and abetting is a PC 31 violation. DAs pursue PC 31 violation charges for individuals who facilitate, encourage or assist in the commission of an offense. PC 31 punishes anyone who was in on the crime. Meaning any role you played in the commission of a crime is enough to institute criminal proceedings against you, no matter how insignificant. However, mere knowledge of the crime is not adequate for a conviction for aiding and abetting.
Some of the common examples of aiding and abetting include the following.
- Driving the getaway vehicle from the scene of the crime
- Serving as a lookout as your accomplices carry out the crime
- Keeping a vehicle’s engine running to enable a quick getaway after committing the crime.
Take note: aiding and abetting is a serious offense. If convicted, you will face similar penalties as those who participated in the crime.
Contact an Experienced Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
It is possible to be charged even if you did not commit the crime. The penalties are equally severe. Therefore, choosing the ideal attorney makes the difference in having a reasonable legal outcome. The Leah Legal team is experienced in handling criminal defense, including attempted crimes. Rely on us if you face charges for an attempted crime in Van Nuys. Contact our team today at 818-484-1100 for a free and confidential consultation.
Workplace sexual harassment can have a devastating impact on the alleged victim. It can affect an employee’s job performance, ability to keep their employment or move up the firm, and overall physical and mental well-being. While the workers can seek compensation by filing a civil claim, civil law does not criminalize the behavior. However, sometimes sexual harassment can become a crime. In this post, you will learn situations in which sexual harassment in the workplace can also be an offense and your options if charged with the crime in Van Nuys, California.
What Constitutes Workplace Sexual Harassment in California
California laws prohibit bosses and workers from sexually abusing an employee, independent contractor, volunteer, intern, or applicant.
Generally, workplace sexual harassment involves unwanted, inappropriate, or hostile behavior directed at an employee based on specific illegal reasons, including:
- Gender
- Sex
- Gender expression
- Gender identity
- Sexual orientation
- Marital status
- Childbirth
- Pregnancy
- Pregnancy-linked health conditions
The list above defines illegal motives but does not outline unlawful acts. Regrettably, there is no clear definition of which conduct constitutes sexual harassment. Instead, courts have defined this concept using general terms.
As a result, to clarify the matter, workplace sexual harassment can be classified into two:
- Quid pro quo
- Hostile work environment
Quid Pro Quo
The legal phrase means “this for that.” It happens when a person requests or demands sexual favor in return for a job benefit.
Generally, it can manifest in either of the following forms:
- A supervisor or employer offering a worker a benefit upon the worker agreeing to the sexual favor
- A supervisor or employee threatening a worker about work-related conduct, such as threats of being fired, unless the worker agrees to the sexual demands
Typically, quid pro cases involve uninvited sexual advances, commentary of the worker’s body and its sexual uses, or inappropriate discussions of explicit sexual conduct.
The defendant can commit the violations either impliedly or expressly. A mere hint at an employment benefit in return for a sexual favor is enough to constitute this form of sexual harassment.
Hostile Work Environment
Hostile work environment sexual abuse is too pervasive to create an abusive working environment. The harassment is illegal irrespective of whether driven by sexual desires or not. However, the conduct should be frequent, serious, or both.
Workplace sexual harassment only breaks laws if the act in question is abusive or objectively hostile. Usually, mildly offensive or a few irritating comments are not enough.
Additionally, sexual harassment should subjectively humiliate, distress, or offend the alleged victim. Individuals cannot argue that they experience this form of workplace sexual harassment if they deliberately invited it or were not emotionally affected.
To establish the employee suffered, they should prove at least one of the statements below:
- The conduct affected their emotional peacefulness at work
- The sexual abuse affected their normal job performance
- The harassment undermined or interfered with their well-being sense
While some courts suggest that one serious violation like rape is adequate to support a hostile work environment claim, the victims should prove repeated unlawful conduct instances in most cases. California courts use the following factors when determining whether the working environment is adequately abusive or hostile:
- The conduct’s severity — A severe act is more likely to be illegal than mild behavior. The more severe the act is, the less frequent it requires to happen to satisfy the “pervasive” conduct threshold.
- The behavior’s frequency — Even mild conduct can be illegal if they occur frequently enough.
- The conduct’s context
Gender Does Not Matter
Workplace sexual harassment law protects women and men equally (alongside any other gender identification). In other words, sexual abuse perpetrated by a man is illegal to a similar degree it would for a woman.
Additionally, sexual abuse is illegal even if the aggressor is the same gender as the alleged victim.
In layman’s language, the gender of the alleged victim and harasser is irrelevant. What matters is whether your underlying behavior broke the law.
When is Workplace Sexual Harassment an Offense?
While sexual harassment itself is not an offense, some sexually harassing behavior is criminal. Sexual harassment includes numerous acts, some of which break the law. For instance, it is not an offense to display photos of adults on your computer that other people find offensive in many situations. However, if you physically assault a colleague, it is both sexual harassment and an offense.
Rape by A Supervisor, Colleague, or Employer
Penal Code Section 261 defines rape as engaging in sexual intercourse with an individual to whom you are not married and without their consent. The act is achieved using either:
- Violence
- Application of force
- Menace
- Duress
In this context, sexual intercourse means penetration of the vagina or genitalia by the penis, regardless of how slight.
To consent, the other person should act voluntarily, freely, and understand the conduct’s nature. Please note that an individual who initially consented to sexual intercourse can change their mind during the behavior and no longer consent.
If found guilty, you will face up to eight years in California state prison and formal probation. You can also face additional five years in prison if the victim sustained great bodily injuries when committing the crime.
Sexual Assault or Battery
You commit sexual battery or assault when you touch somebody else’s intimate part against their will for either sexual abuse, sexual arousal, or sexual gratification purposes.
Touching means contacting the alleged victim’s intimate part either through clothing (can be yours or the victim’s) or directly. When it comes to workplace sexual harassment, criminal conduct could include groping, pinching, or severe non-consensual sexual actions by a supervisor or colleague.
An intimate part can be the anus, buttocks, sexual organs, groin, or female breast.
If no aggravating factors exist, you will face a misdemeanor that carries the following penalties:
- A six-month county jail sentence
- Three thousand dollars in fines
- Five-year informal probation that includes registration as a tier one sex offender for at least ten years, completion of a program tailored to aid those with sexual abuse challenges, and community service
If convicted of a felony, you will face the consequences and penalties below:
- Felony probation
- A maximum of four years in state prison and possibly consecutive and additional five years of imprisonment if the alleged victim suffers great bodily injuries
- $10,0000 in fine
- Registering as a tier III sex offender for life
False Imprisonment
There are cases where an individual restrains or holds their employee or colleague against their will, but the conduct does not lead to kidnapping charges. In this case, the defendant can be prosecuted with a lesser crime of false imprisonment per PC 237 or PC 237(a).
False imprisonment sounds like it cannot apply to workplace sexual harassment. However, it can occur. For instance, the harasser can intimidate the victim verbally or physically in an office, hotel room, or motor vehicle to subject them to offensive behavior.
The crime is either a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on whether you used violence, force, or menace to restrain the victim. Violence means applying physical force that is more than reasonably essential to restrain a person. On the other hand, menace means using physical or verbal threats of harm. The threat of harm can be implied or expressed.
A misdemeanor conviction carries up to a year in county jail and fines that do not exceed $1,000.
False imprisonment is charged as a felony when the crime involves menace or violence. A conviction attracts a three-year county jail sentence.
Workplace Stalking
PC 646.9 defines stalking as intentionally and maliciously harassing or following and making criminal threats to a person to a point the individual reasonably fears for their safety or that of their immediate family.
The behavior behind stalking can include sending repeated unsolicited messages and calls, physically following a victim, waiting for the alleged victim in your company parking lot, and trolling the victim on their social media platforms. Even a seemingly innocent gesture such as sending gifts can constitute stalking if the harasser’s conduct reasonably causes the victim to fear for their safety.
Stalking is a wobbler in California; the defendant can be prosecuted with either a felony or misdemeanor depending on the case circumstances.
A misdemeanor attracts the following potential penalties:
- Up to $1,000 in fine
- A year in jail
- Summary probation
If you have a previous stalking conviction, you will be charged with a felony. A conviction is punishable by five years in prison, $1,000 in fine and formal probation.
Pornography as a Crime
Generally, sexual harassment in the work environment involves offensive visuals. If the visual includes child pornography, the harasser can be guilty of breaking California child pornography laws.
PC 311 is the primary statute prohibiting sending, transporting, printing, duplicating, advertising, or possessing child pornography. Child pornography is any material or matter depicting sexual conduct by a minor.
A material or matter can be films, videotapes, slides, photos, or negatives.
Child pornography is a wobbler. If sentenced to a misdemeanor, you will spend one year in jail and a maximum fine of $2,500. On the other hand, a felony conviction carries a maximum of three (3) years in state prison.
A conviction can also result in:
- Loss of firearm rights
- Negative immigration consequences
- Registering as a sex offender
Indecent Exposure
A person can be charged with indecent exposure if they willfully expose their private parts in their workplace in the presence of a person that can be offended or annoyed.
To be convicted, you should act in a way that you intend to draw attention to your intimate parts for sexual gratification or to offend somebody else. The intent is the most significant factor in PC 314. That means you cannot be found guilty of indecent exposure if you were to expose your private parts in public that is out of view of your colleagues, employees, or employer.
If convicted of a misdemeanor indecent exposure, you will spend six months in jail, pay a fine of $1,000, and register as a sex offender for ten years under PC 290.
If you are either:
- Found guilty of your first PC 314 but have a previous conviction for lewd conduct with a child, or
- Convicted of PC 314 for a subsequent time,
you will face felony charges.
The crime is punishable by:
- Up to three years in prison
- A fine of $10,000
- A ten-year obligation to register as a sex offender
Steps to Take If You Are Falsely Accused of Workplace Sexual Harassment
When a worker reports a sexual harassment claim, the employer should investigate the matter. While the responsibility falls typically on the shoulders of the human resources department, an outside professional can handle the investigation if the firm does not have a dedicated human resource manager.
Some firms will elect to bring in a lawyer or a consultant, especially if the defendant is a senior manager or supervisor.
Depending on the seriousness of the sexual allegation, the organization can suspect the accused from work throughout the investigation duration.
However, what happens if you are innocent? False accusations happen. It can stem from jealousy, revenge, or a competitive individual determined to destroy your career because they want to be in your position. Here is what to do if you are falsely accused.
- Remain calm and do not retaliate — Although your initial instinct can be trying to defend yourself, defensive conduct during the investigation makes you look unethical. On the other hand, your accused can use retaliation to prove your guilt. Instead, remain calm and think of the steps to take.
- Review the company’s sexual harassment policy — Reviewing the policy illuminates whether your conduct is sexual abuse or not. Moreover, the policy should outline what occurs during your investigation. Understanding what to anticipate and who to consult with can help you prepare for any proceeding and restore your reputation.
- Consult with the human resource department — Speak with your human resource manager to see how you can settle the matter according to the organization’s policy. They will give you guidelines on defending yourself and sometimes mediate the allegations, mainly if they stem from a misunderstanding.
- Collect evidence — Write as many details about the encounter as you recall. Also, ensure that you present witness accounts and honest alibi that can establish your innocence. If you were somewhere else when the sexual abuse occurred, gather evidence for that. It can be witnesses, photos, parking tickets, and receipts.
- Cooperate with your investigation — Hindering investigation can make you look guilty. Instead, cooperate with the investigators and provide them with the details they ask you.
- Hire an experienced lawyer — While the human resources manager can guide you on what to expect during your investigation, they will not build your defense. Instead of self-representing yourself, consider hiring a skilled attorney. It is especially true if the allegation involves criminal charges. The lawyer can review your case, build a strong case defense, and advise you of your legal rights.
- Do not speak with any person involved in the criminal case — As a suspect, you should not talk with any person involved in the workplace sexual abuse incident, including the victim and their witnesses. You will gain little by discussing the occurrence. You also risk making incriminating statements. Law enforcers will interview all persons involved, and poorly-phrased comments can be used as evidence against you.
- Do not speak with the police — You should not talk to law enforcers unless your criminal defense lawyer is present. By refusing to speak to police officers, you force them to build their case against you. Additionally, it reduces your possibility of saying something that can coincidentally or inadvertently incriminate you.
Legal Defenses to Fight Workplace Sexual Abuse Charges
Your seasoned criminal defense lawyer will review the case and explore several paths in your defense. Discussed below are common defenses:
The Victim Gave Consent to the Sexual Conduct
Many sex offenses depend on this criminal fact. If you can establish that the penetration or sexual conduct was consensual, you cannot be convicted of any crime.
Since the prosecution should demonstrate that the alleged victim did not consent to the conduct, your attorney can cast doubt by suggesting the sexual contact did not violate the victim’s consent or will.
Please note that you cannot use consent as your defense if the victim was incapacitated or you acquired consent by coercion or force.
You Were Falsely Accused
Most sex crime charges are founded on false allegations. The victim can make false accusations due to revenge, to obtain leverage over you, or jealousy.
Proving Your Innocence
Sometimes you can fight the charge with proof of your innocence. It can take the form of DNA evidence or an alibi proving that you were somewhere else during the workplace sexual abuse.
Insufficient Evidence
It is the responsibility of the prosecution team to prove sexual harassment beyond any reasonable doubt. If the team does not have evidence to prove this standard of proof, it cannot find the defendant guilty.
Find Skilled Legal Representation Near Me
Many individuals recognize that workplace sexual harassment is inappropriate and can be grounds for civil lawsuits. However, sometimes these actions can result in criminal charges. If you have been charged with sexual harassment in your workplace, it would be wise that you consult with a qualified Van Nuys criminal defense lawyer regarding your legal rights and what to anticipate. At Legal Leah, our attorneys can review the case, challenge the evidence against you, beat criminal charges, and fight to clear your name and reputation. Call us today at 818-484-1100 for a confidential and free initial consultation.
Penal Code 245(a)(4) describes the crime of committing assault through the application of force likely to cause great bodily injury (GBI). The offense involves not just offensive or harmful touching but also intent to cause substantial harm. The prosecution can still have you convicted even if the “force” missed the victim or did not cause severe injuries. For instance, you are still guilty of violating Penal Code 245(a)(4) if you throw a knife at your friend but miss. The prosecution simply needs to prove your intent and present ability to cause GBI.
An assault by means likely to produce great bodily harm is a wobbler offense. The prosecution will always impose felony charges if a victim suffers significant bodily injury. Note that a felony charge attracts additional penalties under California’s Three Strikes Law. It is necessary to work with a skilled attorney who can help you protect your freedom and best interests.
Penal Code 245(a)(4) Defined
Penal Code 245(a)(4) makes it a crime to commit assault using means that can cause substantial injury. Essentially, the statute criminalizes the means employed by an assault perpetrator.
Under assault laws, “assault” is the offense of attempting to injure another person violently. Because bodily harm does not need to occur, you can be convicted of assault by merely throwing a crumpled paper at the alleged victim. However, you are likely to face charges under Penal Code 245(a)(4) if the means can cause substantial bodily injury or death.
Here are the elements the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt to charge you for violating Penal Code 245(a)(4):
- Your committed assault by unlawfully using force against the alleged victim
- You acted willfully or deliberately
- When you acted, you knew that any reasonable person would believe that your actions were capable of causing direct or probable application of force.
- You had the present ability to use force likely to cause great bodily harm
- Your actions were not aimed at self-defense or the defense of another
The prosecution can obtain a conviction by proving your intent, present ability, and means likely to cause great bodily harm. Again, it is not necessary to prove that you inflicted injury. You are guilty of an offense as long as the force used had a reasonable likelihood of causing substantial harm.
Let us have a look at some of the essential terms and phrases used to describe the statute:
Application of Force
The “application of force” describes any form of offensive or harmful touching. Under Penal Code 245(a)(4), the means used to touch an alleged victim must have the ability to cause significant injury.
Great bodily harm (GBI) does not necessarily need to be an injury that causes permanent impairment or disfigurement. Any of the following injuries constitute GBI:
- Broken nose
- Fractured bones
- Concussion or passing out
- Black eye bruises
- Contusions or severe swelling
- Bloody injury
- Burns, cuts, or wounds that cause heavy bleeding or permanent scarring
Willfully
The term “willfully” means acting on purpose or deliberately. However, you are still guilty of an offense even if you had no intentions of breaking the law or causing harm to another person.
Present Ability
Present ability is often established by considering the proximity between a victim and the assault perpetrator. For instance, it is impossible to face assault charges if a victim is too far to sustain any injury despite the weapon used or the amount of force applied by a defendant.
Also, the prosecution must establish the amount of force used. For instance, if you throw a knife lightly, the power used can show a lack of the present ability to cause GBI.
On the other hand, the prosecution can seek a conviction if your victim was within reasonable proximity and you used enough force to cause great bodily harm.
For example, Peter picks up a huge brick and angrily throws it at Andrew, standing just a few steps away. Andrew ducks the brick that hits a nearby tree, leaving a few broken branches and a massive mark on the bark. The evidence shows that Andrew would have suffered severe injury if he did not duck the brick.
This shows that even though the victim suffered no harm, Peter is guilty of assault by means likely to produce great bodily injury. The prosecution will consider the trier-of-facts in a case before deciding whether to impose misdemeanor or felony charges.
Aware That an Action Is Capable Of Causing Direct or Probable Application of Force
The above element emphasizes that it is not necessary to have the intent to commit a crime. It is enough to know that under the circumstances, your actions had a good chance of leading to the direct or probable application of force capable of causing great bodily harm.
Penalties For Violating Penal Code 245(a)(4)
Violating Penal Code 245(a)(4) is a wobbler offense that prosecutors can charge as a misdemeanor or felony based on the facts of a case and a defendant’s criminal history.
A misdemeanor conviction is punishable by:
- Incarceration for up to 1 year in county jail
- A fine not exceeding $10,000
If the prosecution imposes felony charges, a conviction could lead to the following penalties:
- A jail sentence in state prison for 2, 3, or 4 years
It is also essential to know that violent felonies, including a felony Penal Code 245(a)(4), are subject to California’s Three Strikes Law. The statute can significantly increase the jail time, especially for a defendant convicted of other felonies or violent crimes in the past.
Best Defenses To Fight Penal Code 245(a)(4) Charges
Assault by means likely to produce great bodily harm is a violent crime. Prosecutors will always seek to impose the maximum charges to promote public safety and deter others from similar actions. It remains imperative to work with a skilled and experienced criminal defense attorney who can devise a suitable defense strategy based on the facts of your case.
Here are some of the best defenses your lawyer can use to fight Penal Code 245(a)(4):
Self-Defense
One of the best defenses to see the court drop your charges is self-defense. Your attorney must demonstrate to the court that you had a reason to believe that you or someone else was faced with an impending threat of physical harm. Moreover, you must have used only enough force to protect yourself from danger.
Even if an incident involved self-defense, you are likely to lose the case if you used more force than required to neutralize your alleged attacker. For instance, you cannot justify stubbing your attacker five times because you were in fear of becoming a victim of domestic violence.
Insignificant Injury
Claiming that the victim did not suffer great bodily harm is not a complete defense. However, it can have you charged with a lesser offense or even a misdemeanor instead of a felony.
For example, Craig and Calvin are in a heated argument. Craig throws a slap at Calvin, who simply clicks and leaves for work. Calvin did not need to seek any medical care, which implies that Craig did not use force likely to cause great bodily harm. Depending on other facts of a case, Craig may still face simple assault charges.
A prosecutor could prove the element of GBI if the object or force applied could cause substantial injuries. This includes internal injuries, severe disfigurement, or significant loss of blood. If Craig did not use force that could produce any of these injuries, a competent attorney could help negotiate for a lesser charge.
No Assault
You do not have a case to answer if the prosecution cannot prove that you committed assault. One of the elements the prosecutor must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that a defendant committed an underlying assault. Charges under Penal Code 245(a)(4) only come in when the force used was sufficient to cause great bodily injury.
Therefore, the accused cannot face charges if the assault never happened.
For example, Grace and Ronald are in an argument when Robert opens a safe to remove divorce papers. He lifts the gun in the safe, pulls out the documents underneath, and hands them over to Grace before asking her to leave. He could have been angry when he possessed the gun, but an assault did not happen. There are no grounds to charge Ronald for violating Penal Code 245(a)(4) or any other statute.
No Intent
A critical element that the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that you had the “intent” to cause the victim physical harm. If this was not your intention, it could be challenging for the prosecution to obtain a conviction. You do not have to serve time for a purely accidental incident.
For example, Liam and Robert buy a ball and playfully decide to hit it on their way home. The path is deserted, so the boys see no harm in making hard kicks to throw the ball further down the road. Unfortunately, Jane enters the trail just before the ball hits her tummy. Jane suffers severe bruises and takes a few days off school to nurse her wounds.
Even though the victim suffered great bodily harm, the defendant had no intent to inflict injury. The incident was accidental, and while it is okay for the victim to seek restitution, it is unfair for the accused to serve time for assault by means likely to cause severe bodily harm.
Mistaken Identification
Sometimes, a defendant faces allegations based on mistaken identity. It could be that assault by means likely to cause great bodily harm happened in a deserted alley. Poor lighting, panic, or even cross-racial identification can lead a witness to mistake you for the actual perpetrator of a crime.
The defendant bears the burden of proof when arguing using the “mistaken identity” defense. Your attorney can help you prove that you did not commit assault by providing an alibi. If you were at work or partying with your friends at the time of an incident, it is evident that you were not the one committing assault along the deserted alley.
Related Offenses
Depending on the facts of a case, the prosecution can charge the following related offenses alongside or instead of assault with means likely to produce great bodily harm:
Simple Assault — Penal Code 240 PC
Sometimes, a skilled lawyer can present arguments that allow your charges to be reduced to simple assault. Simple assault is a lesser crime described as an unlawful “attempt” to injure another person violently.
The following are elements the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt to convict you of simple assault:
- You committed an act that can cause the direct or application of force against the victim
- Your actions were deliberate or willful
- You knew that your acts would cause a reasonable person to apprehend direct or possible harm through the application of force
- You had the present ability to injure your victim violently
Unlike Penal Code 245(a)(4), Penal Code 240 is a misdemeanor offense. It is punishable by:
- A jail term not exceeding 6 months
- A maximum fine of $1,000
Assault With a Deadly Weapon —Penal Code 245(a)(1)
Under Penal Code 245(a)(1), it is a crime to attack or attempt to attack another person using a deadly weapon. The term deadly weapon describes any object or weapon that can cause death or severe injury. This includes weapons like guns, knives, and other objects that can cause severe bleeding, permanent scarring, internal injuries, or disfigurement.
The elements of Penal Code 245(a)(1) are as follows:
- You committed an act that by nature can cause the direct or probable application of force against your victim
- You used a lethal weapon or applied force likely to cause great bodily harm
- Your actions were deliberate and willful
- You knew that your actions would cause any reasonable person to believe that they risked direct or probable force being applied against them.
- You had the present ability to use the lethal weapon or apply force likely to cause great bodily harm.
Again, the prosecution can have you convicted even if an incident does not lead to injuries. It is enough to establish that your actions were “likely” to cause substantial harm.
Violating Penal Code 245(a)(1) is a wobbler offense if the weapon used was anything else but a firearm. When charged as a misdemeanor, a conviction can lead to the following penalties:
- Imprisonment in county jail for up to 1 year
- A fine not exceeding $1,000
A felony conviction for assault with a deadly weapon is punishable by:
- Incarceration in state prison for up to 4 years
- A $10,000 maximum fine
Assault With A Firearm — Penal Code 245a2
Penal Code 245(a)(2) makes it a crime to commit assault using a firearm such as a shotgun, rifle, pistol, machine gun, or semiautomatic handgun. The term “using” a gun applies to anything, including pointing the firearm at your victim, pistol-whipping, striking or shooting, and missing the target.
For the prosecution to convict you of assault with a firearm, they must prove that the following is true beyond a reasonable doubt:
- You used a gun to perform an act that, by nature, can cause the direct or probable application of force against the victim
- Your actions were deliberate or willful
- You knew that your actions would cause any reasonable person to believe they were at risk of the probable or direct use of force
- At the time of an incident, you had the present ability to apply force against your victim using the firearm
Assault with a firearm is a wobbler offense if the defendant used a generic gun. A misdemeanor conviction is punishable by:
- Imprisonment in county jail for 6 months or 1 year
- A fine not exceeding $1,000
If you are convicted of a felony, the punishment will include:
- A state prison sentence for 2, 3, or 4 years
- A $10,000 maximum fine
Prosecutors always seek to impose felony charges when a defendant is accused of assault with a firearm. However, there are harsher felony penalties to expect when the firearm involved is not the usual generic gun.
When assault involves a machine gun, semi automatic firearm, .50 BMG rifle, or any other non-generic gun, a conviction attracts the following penalties:
- A state prison sentence for 3, 6, or 9 years when the firearm used is a semiautomatic gun
- Incarceration in state prison for 4, 8, or 12 years if the weapon used is an assault weapon, .50 BMG rifle, or machine gun.
Find an Assault Defense Attorney Near Me
California assault laws are complex. There is a thin line between different types of assault, and what seems like a “simple” incident could quickly leave you battling felony charges. Because of the severe and far-reaching repercussions of a conviction for violating Penal Code 245(a)(4), it is in your best interests to contact Leah Legal as soon as you are arrested. We will evaluate your case, provide meaningful advice and employ the best defense strategies to achieve the best possible outcome. If you face assault charges in Van Nuys, CA, call us at 818-484-1100 and let us give you a real chance at dodging the devastating and lifelong consequences of a Penal Code 245(a)(4) conviction.
Sexual assault of a child involves any criminal engagement or attempt to engage in sexual acts with a minor. It can be a misdemeanor or felony, depending on the nature of the sexual act. Aggravated sexual assault on a child is more serious. It considers the nature of the sexual act, the age of the minor, and the age difference between you and the minor at the time of the offense.
Aggravated sexual assault on a child is a felony, attracting a lengthy prison term and hefty court fines for the guilty. It is essential to understand the circumstances in which the law considers your actions aggravated and their consequences. Talk to a competent criminal attorney for more information and legal help when you face charges for aggravated sexual assault on a minor. Your attorney can help you fight your charges for a fair outcome.
Sexual Assault on a Child — What It Entails
Sexual assault occurs when a person deliberately touches another person without their consent for sexual purposes. It could also happen if the person physically forces or coerces another person to engage in a sexual act against the person’s will. Sexual assault is a form of sexual violence. It is a severe offense in California, especially if it involves minors or people incapable of giving consent, like the mentally challenged or unconscious.
California law highly protects minors (individuals aged below 18 years) as they cannot consent to sexual acts. Children do not understand the nature and consequences of sexual actions. That is why they are highly vulnerable to sexual abuse by adults who should be protecting them. California law provides hefty penalties for anyone guilty of sexually assaulting a minor, however lenient the abuse seems.
Engaging in or attempting to engage in sexual acts with a minor is prosecuted under California child molestation laws. You could face misdemeanor or felony charges for your actions, depending on the nature of the sexual act and the minor’s age. Sexual assault can take many forms, including oral copulation, rape, lascivious or lewd actions with a minor, or sending explicit or obscene materials to a minor.
The severeness of your penalties after a conviction for sexually assaulting a minor will depend on whether the act was simple or aggravated.
When Sexual Assault on a Minor Becomes Aggravated
An offense becomes aggravated in California if it has additional factors that make the crime more severe. The additional factors must increase the gravity of the offense. Aggravated factors make penalties harsher after conviction. A simple form of sexual assault on a minor can be prosecuted as a misdemeanor in California, attracting a maximum jail sentence of one year. But an aggravated form of the same offense is a straight felony, punishable by several years in prison.
California law against aggravated sexual assault on a minor is under California PC 269. The law provides various circumstances under which sexual assault on a child becomes aggravated. The legal definition of this offense provides specific elements of this offense. The prosecutor must prove that you are guilty of aggravated sexual assault on a minor beyond a reasonable doubt. These elements are:
- That you committed a specific act of sexual assault on a minor — We shall look into these particular sexual acts in greater detail below.
- The victim was 14 or younger at the time
- You were older than the victim by seven years or more
When a Minor is Below 14
The age of consent in California is set at 18. Anyone below 18 is considered a minor and incapable of consenting to sexual acts. While all minors receive state protection against sexual predators, special protection is given to younger children below 14. Anyone guilty of sexual acts with a minor aged 14 or younger is severely punished in California. Sexual acts against a victim below 14 are considered aggravated and are highly punished in California.
When the Defendant is More than Seven Years Older than The Victim
Sexual assault on a minor becomes aggravated if the minor is below 14 and the age difference between the minor and the defendant is seven years or more. For instance, a 47-year old man facing charges for having sexual relations with a 12-year old will face charges under this law.
Adults are expected to be at the forefront in protecting minors against abuse, especially sexual abuse. Any older adult engaging in sexual acts with a minor below 14 is highly penalized in California.
Specific Sexual Acts Listed Under This Statute
As previously mentioned, sexual assault can take many forms. Some acts are considered minor, while others are severe. Severe sexual acts committed against a minor make the offense aggravated and could lead to heftier penalties upon conviction. The specific sexual acts listed under this statute, which makes a sexual assault on a minor aggravated, include:
1. Rape — California PC 261
California law defines rape as using threats, force, or fraud to engage in sexual intercourse against the other person’s consent. Several acts constitute rape in California, including engaging in sexual acts:
- With someone incapable of consenting to the act because they are a minor or have a mental disorder
- Through violence, force, or coercion
- With someone that cannot give consent because they are highly intoxicated
- With someone unconscious of the act
Example: Sammy forcefully enters the house of his next-door neighbor Jessy. He frightens her daughter into having sexual intercourse with him, threatening to hurt her mother if she fought back or called for help. Sammy is guilty of aggravated sexual assault on a minor if Jessy’s daughter is below 14 and has an age difference of seven years or more with Sammy.
Rape is, more often than not, accomplished through violence, force, menace, duress, retribution, fear of physical injury, and fraud. The victim must be alive at the time of the offense for you to be guilty of rape.
It must also involve sexual intercourse, which means any penetration of the vagina or genitals by the male penis. Even a slight penetration counts as rape. Ejaculation is not required as proof of penetration.
The offender must have accomplished the act against the victim’s consent. Minors are incapable of consenting. Therefore, penetration of a minor’s vagina or genitalia by a male penis, accomplished through force or violence, will satisfy the elements of rape.
2. Gang Rape — California PC 264.1
Gang rape or rape in concert occurs when you commit rape in cahoots with another person. You will face charges under this statute if you and another person/people work together to engage in non-consensual sex with a particular person.
The elements of this offense are the same as those of California rape, but with an additional factor that requires the defendant to have worked in concert with another person. Working in concern with another person can happen in one of two ways:
- You committed the rape offense while another person assisted you
- You aided and abetted another person to commit the offense
Aiding and abetting means helping another person commit rape. You could be guilty of aiding and abetting another person to commit rape when you know that the person intends to commit the crime, they seek your assistance and you assist, facilitate or encourage them in actions or words.
The offense is referred to as gang rape because it involves multiple people teaming up together in the commission of rape. The prosecutor will prove the following elements for the court to find you guilty under this statute:
- That you committed an act of rape as defined under California PC 261
- You had accomplices
Gang rape is a severely punished offense in California. If you are guilty of gang-raping a minor below 14, you could receive up to fourteen years of prison time.
3. Sodomy — California PC 286
While sodomy is generally legal in California when it happens between two consenting adults, it is illegal when committed with a minor or accomplished through fear, force, and threats.
Sodomy occurs when a person establishes sexual contact between the penis and anus of another person. Violating sodomy laws attracts severe penalties upon conviction.
Even a slight penetration satisfies the elements of this offense.
Ejaculation is not needed as evidence of penetration.
Sodomy against a minor below 16 is a severe felony in California. It will lead to aggravated sexual assault charges against a minor. Your penalties could increase if you accomplish the act through violence, fear, or force.
Victims of sodomy also have a legal right to file a lawsuit against their offenders for compensation. Compensation can be used to cater to their medical bills, psychological counseling, lost wages, pain, and suffering.
4. Oral Copulation — California PC 287
Oral copulation with a child is a grave offense. It occurs when a person’s mouth copulates with the vagina, anus, or penis.
California PC 287 is a general law against oral copulation accomplished through violence, force, menace, fear, or coercion. The crime is a felony, punishable by eight years in prison. Oral copulation with a child is prosecuted in reference to state laws against statutory rape, which makes it a crime for anyone to have sexual relations with a minor, whether consensual or non-consensual.
Some instances of oral copulation with a child require graver penalties upon the conviction of an offender. For example, if the child is mentally disabled or intoxicated.
Punishment for oral copulation with a child also depends on the minor’s age and the age difference between the minor and the offender at the time of the offense. If the victim is younger than 16 and the defendant is older than 21, the offense is a straight felony, punishable by three years in prison.
But if the alleged victim is younger than 14 and the offender is ten years older than the victim, the offense is a felony, punishable by up to eight years of prison time.
A conviction under this statute comes with additional consequences like a mandatory requirement to register as a sex offender.
5. Forcible Sexual Penetration With a Foreign Object — California PC 289
California PC 289 makes it an offense for a person to penetrate the anus or vagina using a foreign object without the person’s consent and through force, threats, or fraud. The offense becomes aggravated sexual assault if the victim is a minor under 14.
Sexual penetration of a minor is already a severe offense in California. Using a foreign object, threats, or fear to accomplish the act aggravates the offense. The defendant’s actions must have intended to sexually abuse the victim or sexually arouse or gratify the defendant.
Even a slight penetration of the anal opening or genital of the victim counts as forcible sexual penetration.
Causing a minor to penetrate your anal opening or genitals or those of a third party also satisfies the elements of this offense.
Causing the minor to penetrate their anal opening or genital, however slightly, counts as an offense under this statute.
A foreign object means any object other than a sexual organ, including a body part. Penetration with a sexual organ is referred to as sexual intercourse. Thus, penetration using fingers will satisfy the elements of this offense.
California PC 289 is a straight felony, punishable by eight years in prison.
What Are the Consequences for Aggravated Sexual Assault on a Minor?
When the sexual assault becomes aggravated, the penalties are likely to increase for anyone guilty of the offense. Sexual assault on a minor is punished according to the underlying offense. For instance, oral copulation with a minor is punishable by eight years in prison. An aggravated form of this offense, whereby the victim is below 14 and their age difference with the offender is more than seven, will lead to more years in prison. Here are the likely penalties for anyone guilty of aggravated sexual assault on a minor in California:
Increased Prison Sentence
Aggravated sexual assault on a minor is a felony offense in California. The offense is punishable by imprisonment in state prison for fifteen-to-life of imprisonment. The exact length of your prison time will depend on your criminal history and the circumstances of your case.
The judge can decide to sentence you to felony probation in place of or together with prison time. In that case, you will be serving part of your sentence out of incarceration but under the supervision of a provision officer. The probation period lasts for between three to five years. The judge will give you a set of probation terms and conditions that you must abide by throughout the probation period. For instance, you must not commit any offense while on probation. You will be rearrested and sentenced to the full prison sentence if you violate any probation condition.
Registering in the Sex Offender Registry
Certain sex crimes in California carry a requirement to register in the sex offender registry as part of punishment after conviction. Aggravated sexual assault on a child is among them. The condition is under California PC 290. The sex offender registry is meant to monitor and keep track of sex offenders after they are released back into the community. It provides information to public members about convicted sex offenders, including their names, location, and past convictions.
Aggravated sexual assault on a child is a tier 3 offense in California. It carries a mandatory requirement for the defendant to register their name in the sex offender registry for life. Every year, you must submit your details to the registry without fail.
Failing to register in this registry is a severe offense, prosecuted according to the underlying offense. Since aggravated sexual assault on a child is a felony, you will face felony charges for failing to register, punishable by three years in prison. You will serve the three-year prison term consecutively with the prison term given for the underlying offense.
Consecutive Prison Sentences
You could face consecutive prison sentences if you are guilty under California PC 269. It applies mainly to defendants with more than one count of aggravated sexual assault on a minor. If the victim is more than one, you will face separate charges for every victim you assaulted. Also, if the victim is one person, but you assaulted them more than once, you will face separate charges for every instance.
If the judge imposes consecutive prison sentences on your case, you will serve one sentence after another until you ultimately serve your prison terms. You will be in prison longer than the law provides for this offense.
Find a Competent Van Nuys Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
Sexual assault on a minor is a serious offense, carrying a lengthy prison time and high court fines. Penalties increase significantly if you are guilty of aggravated sexual assault on a minor. You need competent legal services to fight your charges for a reduction or dismissal of your charges. If you or your loved one face similar charges in Van Nuys, CA, you could benefit from the skills and experience of our criminal attorneys at Leah Legal. We handle cases like these every day. Thus, we have strategies that could work to produce a fair outcome for your case. Call us at 818-484-1100 and let us study the details of your case.
Child abuse and child endangerment are commonly confused among many Americans. However, these two terms mean and describe distinct situations and are handled differently. As addressed under California Penal Code 273(a), child endangerment refers to a behavior where a person willfully permits or causes a child under eighteen years to suffer an injury. This statute seeks to punish parents and guardians and anyone who reasonably allows a child or their health to be in danger.
On the other hand, child abuse is the willful infliction of inhuman punishment on a child resulting in a traumatic condition. Child endangerment and abuse are serious offenses that attract severe and life-changing consequences in case of a conviction. In addition to jail time, your life may turn upside down owing to a conviction for these offenses. The best way to counter a child endangerment or abuse charge is by enlisting the services of a skilled criminal defense attorney.
The most straightforward way to understand the difference between child abuse and child endangerment is to review what California law says about each offense:
Child Abuse
California Penal Code 273(d) criminalizes child abuse which occurs when you deliberately inflict harm or corporal punishment on a child causing them a traumatic condition. Child abuse is one of the most severe and life-changing crimes with which you can be charged and convicted. Under this statute, any person convicted of child abuse risks spending significant time behind bars. Additionally, you may face additional consequences, including losing child custody and your job.
When proving your guilt for child abuse, the prosecution needs to prove these elements of the crime:
- You willfully inflicted inhuman punishment or physical injury on a minor. Regardless of the explanation for your actions, the prosecutor must prove that your conduct towards the child was intentional. Corporal injury is physical punishment that is likely to cause injury. Common examples of child abuse include choking, burning, pushing, kicking, slapping, punching, hitting, burning, and shaking, among others.
- The injury or punishment caused a child to suffer a traumatic physical condition. Under this statute, a traumatic condition is any wound or bodily injury resulting from a direct force application. Some examples of a traumatic condition include a concussion, a sprain, broken bones, or internal bleeding. The damage does not need to be severe to qualify as a traumatic condition when proving child abuse.
- When you acted, you were not disciplining the child. Parents are allowed to spank their children or impose any form of discipline as long as it is reasonable. If spanking is done reasonably and there is no use of excessive force, it cannot suffice as child abuse. When proving your guilt for child abuse, it must be clear that you did not intend to discipline your child when you acted reasonably. However, it is essential to understand that the issue of punishing a child is controversial and what is considered acceptable could change in the future.
When you face charges for child abuse, it is essential to remember that prior incidences of child abuse or corporal punishment can be used to enhance your sentence. However, the court conducts a hearing before the introduction of the evidence. At the hearing, the court will consider the following factors:
- Whether or not the evidence will cause prejudice from the jury.
- The time elapsed between the prior acts and the current child abuse charges. If allegations for past actions were brought more than ten years ago, the prosecution could not present them.
- Whether past allegations were backed up by sufficient evidence
In California, child abuse is treated as a wobbler. At their discretion, the prosecution could bring felony or misdemeanor charges. Some of the factors that could affect the prosecutor’s decision include your criminal history and other case circumstances. Most minor first offenses will attract misdemeanor charges punishable by a one-year jail sentence or a fine that does not exceed $6,000 and summary probation.
If your actions against the child were cruel, you are a repeat offender, or you cause injury to the victim, you will be charged with felony child abuse. A felony conviction under this statute will cause you to spend six years in state prison. Additionally, the court may require that you pay a $6,000 fine and felony probation.
The court may impose harsh conditions if you are sentenced to probation instead of prison time after a conviction under PC 273(d). Some of the probation conditions include regular check-ins with your probation officer, a restraining order to protect the victim, and mandatory enrollment in a child abusers treatment program. If you violate any probation terms, the court could hold a hearing to revoke your probation and reinstate prison time.
Defense Against Child Abuse Charges
Child abuse is one of the most severe domestic violence offenses, and a conviction could ruin your life. Therefore, it is crucial to focus on building a defense as soon as you learn about the charges. Common defenses to this charge include:
- Wrongful accusation. Law enforcement officers take reports of child abuse seriously, and they may arrest you even before carrying out the necessary investigations. The law focuses more on protecting the children and fails to consider the many incidences of false allegations resulting from anger, jealousy, or revenge. With the guidance of a knowledgeable attorney, you can prove that the allegations are false.
- The child’s injury is not a consequence of your actions. There are conducts that could be considered abusive to a child. However, for child abuse charges to suffice, your actions must have caused a traumatic condition for the child. Sometimes, an injury resulting from an accident could be reported as abuse. If you have a reasonable explanation for the cause of your child’s injury, you can evade a conviction under this statute.
- Injuries were accidental. You will be found guilty of child abuse if you intentionally caused the child to suffer a traumatic condition. If your child was injured through a genuine accident, you could not face a conviction under this statute.
Child Endangerment
It is a crime to put a child in a dangerous situation unlawfully. The crime of child endangerment is charged under California Penal Code 273(a), and the child does not need to suffer an injury for you to be charged and convicted under this statute. California law places a great emphasis on the protection of minors. This makes child endangerment a severe crime with life-changing penalties and consequences. If you are responsible for a minor and allow them to be put in a risky situation, you can be charged with child endangerment even when your actions did not directly harm the child.
Before obtaining a successful conviction under this statute, the prosecution must prove these elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
1) You Engaged In Any Of The Following Conduct
- Willfully inflicted unjustifiable, mental, or physical suffering on a minor.
- You permitted a child to suffer unjustifiable pain.
- While a child was under your care, you put them in a situation where their health would be endangered.
Under this statute, the term willful means that your actions were intentional. However, the prosecutor need not prove that you acted with an intent to harm the child. The only thing that needs to be clear is that you acted in a manner that put the child in a dangerous situation.
2) When You Permitted Or Caused A Child To Be Injured, You Were Criminally Negligent
For child endangerment, criminal negligence is more than the ordinary carelessness or a mistake of judgment. You act with criminal negligence under the following circumstances:
- You act in a reckless way that is different from how a reasonable person would act under similar circumstances.
- Your actions at the time disregarded human life and the safety of another person.
- A reasonable person would have known that acting the way you did could harm others.
Your behavior will amount to criminal negligence if your actions go against common sense, and the test will be whether or not a reasonable person would have done the same.
3) If You Are The Child’s Parent Or Guardian, You Were Not Disciplining The Child
As a parent or guardian, you have a right to discipline your child. However, when the form of punishment is not reasonable, and you put them in a situation where they could suffer unjustifiable harm, you can be arrested and charged with child endangerment. Unjustifiable pain or suffering any pain that is not necessary or is excessive under the circumstances.
4) You Acted In A Way That Was Likely To Produce Severe Bodily Injury Or Death
Child endangerment can be charged as a felony or a misdemeanor. For you to be charged with a felony, the prosecution must prove that your actions were capable of causing significant injury to the minor. Under this statute, great bodily injury is any substantial injury. While minor injuries may fail to meet the requirement, the jury determines the likelihood of severe physical injury depending on the circumstances of your case.
It is essential to understand that the child does not need to suffer the injury or death for you to be charged with a felony under this statute. The prosecutor only needs to show that significant bodily injury was a likely consequence of your actions.
Penalties for Child Endangerment
A conviction for child endangerment attracts serious legal consequences. Since the offense is a wobbler, your penalties will vary depending on the nature of your charges. If your actions did not create a risk of significant bodily injury, you would be charged with a misdemeanor. A misdemeanor violation of Penal Code 273(a) attracts the following penalties:
- A minimum jail sentence of up to six months.
- Fines not exceeding $1,000.
As an alternative to jail time, the court could sentence you to informal probation after a conviction for child endangerment. The minimum probation period for this offense is four years. While on probation, the court may impose the following conditions:
- Issue a restraining order against you. The protective order will require that you avoid contact with the alleged victim.
- You must complete a child abusers treatment program approved by the court.
- Order for you to undergo alcohol or drug abuse counseling if you acted while under the influence.
If you comply with the probation conditions, the court may grant you an early probation termination. Terminating your probation will release you from the obligations associated with the offense and allow you to apply for expungement.
If you are charged with felony child endangerment, a conviction may result in the following penalties:
- A prison sentence of two to six years.
- Fines of up to $10,000.
- Felony probation with similar or harsher conditions than those ordered for misdemeanor probation.
Penalties Enhancements for Child Endangerment
When charged as a felony, some situations could result in enhancement of penalties for child endangerment in California:
1. Great Bodily Injury Enhancement
If a child suffers serious injuries resulting from your negligent acts, you could receive additional prison time as follows:
- Three to six years if you inflicted the injury. The amount of time added to your sentence depends on the alleged victim’s age.
- A minimum of four years if the child died due to your actions.
2. Murder or Manslaughter
The prosecutor may file criminal charges for second-degree murder or manslaughter alongside child endangerment when a child dies due to negligent acts. These offenses carry severe legal consequences, and a conviction could cause you to spend a significant amount of time behind bars.
3. California Three Strikes Law
A conviction for felony child endangerment counts as a strike under California Three Strikes Law. If you have a strike in your record, you may face penalty enhancement in subsequent felony convictions. If you accumulate up to three strikes in your record, a conviction for a felony offense in California will attract a mandatory sentence of twenty-five years to life.
How Can I Defend Against PC 273(a) Charges?
While the charges for child endangerment are taken very seriously, it is possible to fight them and avoid the harsh consequences accompanying a conviction. With the guidance of a skilled criminal attorney, you can build a defense around these arguments:
- You Did not Act Willfully
One of the critical elements that must be clear when proving your guilt under this statute is that you acted willfully or with criminal negligence. By arguing that you did not act willfully, your attorney can create reasonable doubt in the prosecutor’s case and give you a chance to fight the charges.
- False Accusations
Child endangerment charges resulting from false accusations are a common occurrence in California. If you are undergoing a divorce or child custody battle, your child’s other parent may need to falsely accuse you of such a crime to have the upper hand in family court. In other cases, a child can make fake allegations due to manipulation by another person.
Whatever the explanation for false allegations, law enforcement officers will not want to be held accountable for ignoring possible harm to a minor. During your prosecution, you are responsible for showing that there is no basis for the allegations. To aid this defense, your attorney can interview all the witnesses and the alleged victim to reveal the truth of the events.
- You Were Disciplining Your Child
You can lawfully discipline your child through reasonable corporal punishment as a parent. Sometimes, a person who sees you engage in such an act could report you for child endangerment. With the guidance of a skilled attorney, you can argue that you were exercising your parental right to discipline the child.
- Mistake of Fact
Sometimes, you could be charged with child endangerment because a well-meaning individual misinterpreted a situation. Such incidents are made worse by the mama dory reporting policy, where some individuals in the society are tasked with reporting suspected child endangerment. If you can prove that the reporter was mistaken in what they saw and reported, you may be able to beat the charges.
Find a Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
Many people do not know the difference between child abuse and child abuse, and they tend to use these terms interchangeably. While both terms describe criminal activity against minors, they are different in definition and how the law handles them. You can face arrest and criminal charges for child endangerment if you put a minor in a position to be harmed. On the other hand, the crime of child abuse is brought upon individuals who inflict physical, sexual, or emotional injuries on a child.
Understanding the difference between these offenses will help you plan how to move forward with your defense if you face criminal charges under these statutes. Seeking and retaining the services of an experienced criminal defense attorney is a crucial step in fighting and beating child abuse or endangerment charges.
At Leah Legal, we understand the level of damage that a conviction under PC 273(a) or 273(d) could cause to your life. We will review your case and build a solid defense to help you fight the charges and avoid a conviction. We serve clients battling criminal charges in Van Nuys, CA. Contact us today at 818-484-1100 to discuss more details of your case.
Committing a drug-related offense often results in several outcomes for persons found guilty of the alleged charge. Notably, you may face harsh imprisonment sentences or pay expensive fines. Therefore, you want to raise strong defenses to support your case and avoid facing incarceration or other serious case outcomes. You will need to partner with a reliable criminal defense attorney who understands the value of conducting sufficient research and due diligence on your case. With Leah Legal, you will receive the best criminal defense services aimed at helping you avoid incarceration for concealing drugs in a false compartment. After reaching out to us, you will receive assistance round the clock to ensure you have a credible defense that matches up with the prosecutor’s case.
Understanding the Nature of the Offense
In California, the Health and Safety Code serves as the primary statutory provision for drug-related offenses. Thus, the information in the statute regarding concealing drugs under pretenses will be the prosecutor’s main source of information.
Understanding the definition of the crime is therefore essential. Section 11366.8 of the Health and Safety Code provides an in-depth definition of the offense and its elements. This way, you can better understand applying the regulations in formulating a proper defense for your benefit.
With an attorney’s help, you will also be better positioned to pre-empt the prosecutor’s advances and identify any shortcomings in their argument, which is useful in increasing the chances of a successful case outcome.
Elements of Crime for Concealing Drugs in a False Compartment
Criminal cases proceed based on the type of evidence presented and its quality. Therefore, criminal procedure guidelines place a lot of emphasis on producing highly credible evidence by the prosecutor. This is because the proof is heavily relied on to determine whether or not to convict you, which yields a lot of negative consequences.
Hence, the prosecutor carries the burden of proof to show that you are guilty of concealing drugs in a false compartment by relying on the elements of crime linked to the offense. This way, they will ensure that the standard of proof is sustained beyond a reasonable doubt, in line with the criminal law directives.
Learning about the various elements of the crime is helpful for you, too, because it serves as a guide map to determine the applicable arguments in your case. Your criminal defense attorney will be keen to identify any arising issues and develop counterarguments that align with your defenses.
The elements of the crime for concealing drugs in a false compartment range, depending on the Health and Safety Code relied upon. They are:
You Used, Controlled, or Possessed a False Compartment
Section 11366.8(a) of the Health and Safety Code provides that anyone found using, controlling, or possessing a false compartment may be suspected of the offense. Based on this, the provision forms the first element of crime related to having the false compartment within your control.
A false compartment includes any item that can contain or hold drugs for a reasonable time by enclosing it to prevent external factors from destroying the drugs. With this in mind, a false compartment may include a container, small to mid-sized space, or any box that can serve the purpose.
The prosecutor will rely on various elements of crime, depending on the case circumstances in question. For example, if you face accusations of possessing a false compartment, their evidence will show that you had the item within your person.
Alternatively, the prosecutor may have to prove that your possession consisted of exercising reasonable control of the false compartment, even if you did not have it on you. For example, having the item in your car at the time of arrest may also be sufficient to prove possession.
Secondly, where a case involves using a false compartment, the prosecutor’s evidence should be geared towards showing you the specific act. Using the false compartment means having drugs stored inside to conceal them from probable detection. Therefore, the case should take on a direction to show your effort to conceal the drugs using the item in question.
For example, video footage can form a primary evidential source if it is relevant to show you using the false compartment. Alternatively, any witness present as you tried to conceal the drugs may also testify against you to present details on the element.
Having control over the false compartment often goes hand in hand with possession, so the prosecutor may choose to combine both elements into one, depending on the facts. Nevertheless, due regard must still be paid to the different rules of evidence to ensure that the prosecution is fair.
You Intended to Smuggle, Store Transport, or Conceal Drugs
Secondly, the prosecutor should prove that you intended to move or hide the drugs in the false compartment for the offense to attract legal repercussions. Proving criminal intent is important in criminal cases, as intention distinguishes criminal acts from accidental or good faith actions. Therefore, you can expect the prosecutor to focus on establishing the factors in question adequately as they try to establish the fact in court.
If your case involved smuggling, the prosecutor would need to show the specific intentions you were involved in to ensure the offense succeeded. Smuggling involves trying to move with illegal items in unrestricted areas, meaning that if you were caught with the item, you would face repercussions. Hence, your actions should have shown that you tried to hide the drugs in question by using the false compartment as the main item to conceal them.
Evidence of you smuggling the drugs may also be available for use to your detriment in court. For example, if you tried to gain access to a plane with a small box of drugs, the prosecutor will rely on the proof sourced to show your intention.
Lastly, you should note that proving intention even where your actions were unsuccessful is acceptable in court. This is because the presiding judge is mostly interested in the criminal element of your intention to break the law. Hence, you cannot rely on the defense of not having moved the drugs, provided the prosecutor has shown that you intended to.
Similar factors like the intention to store, transport, and conceal the drugs also follow the same consideration pattern discussed above, depending on the case circumstances. For example, proving an intent to transport the drugs requires the prosecutor to show that you made plans to move them from one point to another. Alternatively, the prosecution team can show that you moved the drugs but were apprehended midway.
You Built, Designed, Installed, Altered, or Attached the False Compartment into a Car
Section 11366.8(b) of the Health and Safety Code further provides for additional offenses associated with concealing drugs in a false compartment, including building, designing, or attaching the compartment to a car. Parties found guilty of this are answerable because of the unlawful nature of attaching the false compartment in the vehicle. The act aims to help the accused party transport the drugs or hide them away from public scrutiny.
Subsequently, the evidential sources presented by the prosecutor should focus on showing the specific actions you undertook to complete the action. For example, if you face accusations of building a false compartment into the vehicle, the prosecution team should present evidence of the activity. They may do this by securely retrieving tools or devices to attach the compartment to your car. These include drills, screws, or even tape.
Altering your vehicle to make a provision for the false compartment also amounts to an offense, as you will have created a provision to hold the controlled substances. As a result, the investigating officers assigned to your case may have searched your car to determine whether the false compartment came about due to deliberate efforts to change its appearance. If so, you will be answerable to the charges.
Photographic exhibits are common evidential sources as the prosecutor presents this element of the crime. They are often an easier option than presenting the entire vehicle for inspection. Hence, you will receive copies of the photographs during the discovery period. To avoid facing charges unfairly, you want to ensure that the images were taken from your vehicle and not a similar-looking one.
You Built or Designed the False Compartment Intending to Smuggle Transport or Hide Drugs
Lastly, the prosecutor will also need to show that you undertook the building, attaching, or designing with a criminal intention. As mentioned, showing this element of the crime is essential to establish an accused person’s wrongdoings, and failure to do so may result in your acquittal.
Due to this, the prosecutor will rely on several factors to establish that criminal intent was present. For example, any prior purchases on tools used to fix, repair or build materials can be helpful information in helping establish your wrongdoing.
Thus, the investigation officers will try to retrieve any traces of your expenditures by tracking your card usage, receipts, and surveillance footage in stores you visited. Further, witness statements from any persons present while you made your purchase will also be factored in to determine intent.
Notably, establishing intent highly depends on the circumstantial evidence available in each case. Therefore, your attorney will advise you not to be surprised if the prosecutor develops a case based on actions that seem unrelated to the main issue in question. Instead, you can work with your criminal defense attorney to ensure your defenses align with the matter for adequate delivery of your counterargument.
Defenses Applicable for Concealing Drugs in a False Compartment
After the prosecutor finalizes presenting their case, you will have a chance to raise relevant defenses. This trial stage is essential in establishing the overall case development, as your defenses may introduce crucial points of consideration. Subsequently, you want to go through the crucial pointers with your attorney before appearing in court to help you establish the best arguments to introduce.
You should also note that not all defenses apply to your case, so you do not expect to use all in your case. Hence, making a detailed comparison between the points, you intend to put across, and the accusations you face is vital to developing a credible defense.
Some applicable defenses to your case include:
You Lacked the Intent to Conceal the Drugs
Having emphasized the importance of proving intention in any criminal case, you can rely on this defense to cast reasonable doubt on the prosecutor’s presentation. This would involve showing that the actions you are accused of are inaccurate based on their unintended nature. As a result, your criminal defense attorney can rely on several argument approaches to disprove the prosecutor, including labeling your actions as accidental.
Noteworthy, proving intention requires indicating the legal rules against what the accused is about to do, coupled with acts of impunity towards the regulations. Hence, your defense should show that you did not intend to conceal drugs or knowingly do it.
For example, if you were used as a mule to transport the controlled substances, you can explain your situation’s circumstances to help you prove your innocence. If so, you also need to identify the potential suspects of your actions, particularly those who lured you into performing the illegal activity on their behalf.
You Made a Confession After Coercion
Secondly, you can use the defense of coercion to show that you did not play a role in the offense, yet you were forced to admit to it. This counterargument is ideal where you have a strong alibi that proves you were utterly uninvolved in the alleged concealing of drugs in a false compartment.
For example, if you strongly believe that the investigation officers used false information to force you into admitting fault, you can inform your defense attorney, who will then help you raise the defense. Supporting your counterargument with evidential proof is always advisable, as it allows you to build credibility. Therefore, you can provide information on how the officers involved in the case forced you to give a false confession.
Even where you were actively involved in concealing drugs, investigating officers should not coerce you into making a false confession. Doing so violates criminal procedure rules that encourage a fair trial and holding an accused person innocent until proven guilty. Thus, the judge is likely to side with your version of events, provided you present sufficient evidence to support it.
Your Case Involved Entrapment
Some accused persons may face unfair criminal procedures if their case is built on entrapment. The process often involves tricking the arrested person into providing self-incriminating information at the expense of risking conviction. Consequently, you may face strict penalties based on the illegally obtained information, resulting in an impediment to justice.
When presenting on this defense, you want to be specific about the specific type of entrapment you suffered. Doing so will help eliminate possible avenues for the prosecutor to challenge your credibility during cross-examination. For example, if the entrapment involved police setting you up to conceal the drugs in a false compartment, you can raise this issue before the judge in the preliminary stages of your case and ensure it has been well addressed.
Moreover, some entrapment cases may involve members outside the law enforcement field in fraudulent operations. They may trick you into concealing the drugs on their behalf under the pretense that nothing harmful or illegal is inside. If you accept, you will have taken on partial blame for emerging legal issues. Thus, you want to present your case in the most credible way to ensure your point is delivered exhaustively.
Penalties for Concealing Drugs in a False Compartment
After listening to both sides, the judge holds the discretion to determine whether you are guilty or innocent of the charged offense. If found guilty, you may receive any of the following punishments, depending on the nature of your crime.
If you violate section 11366.8 (a) of the Health and Safety Code, You may spend one year in county jail. Alternatively, violating section 11366.8(b) may result in imprisonment for sixteen months, two or three years.
Contact a Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
Being accused of concealing drugs in a false compartment can be detrimental, primarily if found guilty. Your case may be tried as a felony or misdemeanor, resulting in potentially harsh punishments. Nevertheless, you can avoid this outcome by consulting an experienced criminal defense attorney knowledgeable of the laws. At Leah legal, you can expect to work with some of the best criminal defense attorneys dedicated to helping you raise strong defenses for your case. Our team comprises highly experienced persons with sufficient information to handle accusations of concealing drugs in a false compartment. If you or a loved one requires legal assistance in Van Nuys, California, call us at 818-484-1100.
Following a criminal charge can be challenging and confusing, not knowing what will occur next, particularly if you are a first-time defendant in Van Nuys. Luckily Assembly Bill 3234 (misdemeanor diversion program) can allow you to have the case erased or dismissed upon completing a court-imposed diversion program. It enables you to protect your name, professional license, employment, immigration status, and criminal record. This blog discusses different diversion programs you can consider, depending on the circumstances of your charges. Keep reading to learn whether you are eligible.
What is a Misdemeanor Diversion Program?
A misdemeanor diversion program allows an eligible defendant to avoid incarceration by undergoing treatment. Upon completing the program, the criminal case will be dismissed and your arrest record sealed as if it never occurred. Theoretically, first-time defendants have a great opportunity to qualify for the misdemeanor diversion programs.
It is not a must you enter a no contest or guilty plea to engage in a misdemeanor diversion program. Nevertheless, if you fail your program or commit another crime before your program period ends, your original charges pick up where they left off and can lead to a conviction.
Assembly Bill 3234 gives the judge the discretion to order diversion (apart from in specific cases), even when the prosecutor objects. In other words, the judge in the court prosecuting your misdemeanor case can offer you a diversion once they determine it is appropriate. The judge can suspend the criminal case for two years if you accept the diversion offer.
During this time, you should comply with terms and conditions imposed by the court based on your criminal history and case circumstances. Common conditions include:
- Performing community service
- Attending alcohol classes
- Drug treatment program
- Anger management
All defendants should pay restitution to the victim(s) who suffered losses. Additionally, they should adhere to the restraining or protective order issued in the criminal case.
However, if you are financially unable to pay the restitution, it will not be considered a legal ground to find you in violation of the diversion conditions.
Impact of a Misdemeanor Diversion Program on Federal Issues
Misdemeanor diversion programs have potentially significant effects on federal matters like licensure and immigration. Federal laws treat a guilty plea, even if later withdrawn under a diversion, as a conviction as opposed to California laws that deem judgment final following the sentencing phase of the criminal justice process.
A defendant who fails to complete their misdemeanor diversion, the absence of a guilty plea preserves their entitlement to litigate the charges in a jury trial if it becomes relevant.
Crimes Not Eligible for Misdemeanor Diversion Program
Not all misdemeanor offenses are qualified for diversion consideration under AB 3234. The diversion programs are unavailable for persons charged with:
- Domestic battery (PC 243(e)(1))
- Corporal injury to a spouse (PC 273.5)
- Stalking (PC 646.9)
- A California misdemeanor sex-related crime that requires the accused to register as a sex offender per PC 290
Presenting a Petition at the Trial Court
Just because you are eligible for a misdemeanor diversion program, it does not necessarily mean the judge has to grant it to you. You have to fight for it. Therefore, it is wise that you present an effective and persuasive petition that highlights mitigating factors about your criminal history, background, character, and other legal arguments and relevant facts supporting your diversion request.
Other Pretrial Diversion Programs
Are you worried that you could not be eligible for the misdemeanor diversion programs, particularly with a previous crime?
Well, there are other pretrial diversion programs for which you can qualify, namely:
- Drug diversion
- Military diversion
- Mental health diversion
Generally, pretrial diversion programs are tailored for defendants struggling with mental health conditions, post-traumatic stress disorder, and addiction. The accused person receives the help they require while simultaneously avoiding a criminal record and serving time. The state also benefits in that the District Attorney’s caseload is lighter, and space in jails is not wasted on individuals in need of assistance instead of punishment.
Drug Diversion
PC 1000 allows an eligible defendant charged with a low-level drug crime to have their criminal charges dismissed if they complete drug treatment.
Some of the crimes that allow defendants to engage in drug diversion include:
- Possession of controlled substances (HS 11350)
- Illegal possession of marijuana (HS 11357)
- Drug paraphernalia (HS 11364)
- Abetting or aiding the use of unlawful controlled substances (HS 11365)
- Methamphetamines and drug possession (HS 11377(a))
- Under the influence of controlled substances (HS 11550)
- Illegal cultivation of marijuana (HS 11358)
- Forging or altering a prescription to acquire drugs for personal use (HS 11368)
- Possessing or using nitrous oxide (PC 381)
The listed laws cover common controlled substances like heroin, cocaine, ecstasy, ketamine, marijuana, gamma-hydroxybutyric, peyote, methamphetamines, and prescription opioids like hydrocodone and codeine.
To qualify for this misdemeanor diversion program, all the statements below should be correct:
- Within five (5) years before you committed the charged crime, you have not been convicted of a criminal activity involving drugs apart from the crimes highlighted in PC 1000
- The crime did not involve an offense of threatened violence or actual violence
- There exists no proof of simultaneous violation associated with dangerous narcotics apart from the commission of the crimes highlighted in PC 1000
- You have no previous felony conviction within five (5) years before you committed the charged crime
How a Defendant is Referred to the Drug Pretrial Program
First, the prosecutor will review your case. The prosecution will advise you and your defense lawyer in writing if you look eligible for the misdemeanor diversion program.
Your notice of qualification from the prosecution will entail:
- An explanation of every procedure involved in the program
- Description of authorities and duties of the prosecutor, probation department, court, and the program
- A statement indicating that the prosecutor can terminate the pretrial program following your failure of treatment, commission of an offense that disqualifies you, or violation of program conditions
- Information that the judge will dismiss your charges after you complete the drug treatment
- A clarification of how you can answer any question about your arrest and drug treatment after completing your program
- A statement indicating that to obtain the program, you should plead not guilty to the criminal charge and waive your rights to a jury trial, a speedy trial, and a speedy preliminary hearing
Then the judge will schedule a court hearing to determine whether you qualify and consent to the diversion program. Before making this determination, the judge can require a probation officer to investigate your case. The assigned probation officer will consider your age, employment records, community ties, previous drug use, demonstrable motivation, educational background, and treatment history.
Please note that any statement you make to the probation department during the investigation will be inadmissible to verify your original charges. Instead, the court and the probation department will use the information to decide whether you will benefit from treatment, rehabilitation, or education. Then the judge will determine what form of rehabilitation, treatment, or education would be suitable.
You will be given a chance to consent to your participation. If you agree, you will plead not guilty to your criminal charges and then complete a jury trial, speedy trial, and speedy preliminary hearing.
The drug diversion program should be either:
- A program that offers services free of charge to the participant and has been considered effective and credible by the county drug program administrator and the court
- Certified by the county drug program administrator under Chapter 1.5 of Title 8 of the Penal Code
Generally, the program lasts between twelve months and eighteen months. Nevertheless, after showing a good cause, the judge can extend the time, allowing you to complete the program.
During the program, you will submit to a drug or alcohol test. The results are used to determine your adherence to the misdemeanor diversion program. Failing the drug test does not result in a new criminal charge but probable program termination.
Mental Health Diversion
Under Penal Code 1001.36, mental health diversion allows some defendants to receive mental health treatment after being charged with an offense. The program allows an eligible and willing person to postpone any action in their case, allowing the accused to engage in the treatment program. The defendant can request the program at any stage of their criminal case before sentencing.
The conditions below must be satisfied before you qualify for the program:
- You suffer from a condition highlighted in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders like schizoaffective disorder, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and PTSD.
- Your mental health condition played a considerable role in the crime committed.
- A qualified psychologist believes that you will respond to the treatment
- You consented to diversion and waived your entitlement to a speedy trial
- You agreed to abide by treatment as a term and condition of diversion
- The court believes that you will not pose a risk of danger to public safety
To prove the mental disorder, you should present proof of a diagnosis by an experienced psychologist. The professional will rely on evidence like your examination, arrest report, and medical records.
The court can conclude that the condition played a role in your crime commission if you exhibited any symptom of the mental disorder near or at the time of the crime. Generally, when making this determination, the court can review relevant evidence like police reports, witness statements, medical records, reports prepared by medical practitioners, a preliminary hearing transcript, and medical expert statements.
Finally, when determining whether the accused will not cause a public threat when treated in their community, the judge will consider the following factors:
- The district attorney’s opinion
- The criminal defense attorney’s opinion
- The mental health specialist’s opinion
- The accused history of the application of violence
- The defendant’s criminal record
- The seriousness of the crime in question
Typically, this misdemeanor diversion program lasts two years and can involve outpatient or inpatient treatment.
How Your Treatment Progress is Monitored
The agency providing your diversion treatment program should regularly present progress reports to the prosecutor, the court, and your defense lawyer.
If any of these events occur, the judge will schedule a hearing:
- You are prosecuted with a new California misdemeanor that demonstrates the application of violence
- You are facing a felony
- A psychologist recommends to the court that your diversion program performance is unsatisfactory or you are disabled
- You engage in a criminal act that makes you unfit for the diversion program
During the hearing, the judge determines whether:
- they should modify the treatment
- You ought to be referred to a county investigator for potential conservatorship proceedings
- They should reinstate your criminal proceeding
What Happens Once You Complete Your Treatment?
If you complete your program, the judge will dismiss your criminal charges during the diversion program period. You complete the program when you:
- Have abided by the diversion requirements
- Have avoided violation of new law unrelated to your mental health disorder
- Have a long-term mental health care plan
If you fail to complete the diversion, the judge will reinstate the proceedings against you.
Military Diversion
Military diversion is a pretrial diversion program under PC 1001.80 available as an alternative to serving time for misdemeanor crimes against active military members or veterans.
A defendant can be eligible for the diversion if, due to their military service, they suffer from:
- Military sexual trauma
- Substance abuse
- Mental health challenges
- PTSD
- Traumatic brain injury
You can find records that can prove your condition in:
- Separation physicals
- The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) compensation and pension package
- VA records
- Support letters from loved ones
- Letters and citations with combat experience and trauma
- A medical evaluation while on active duty
- Current medical records and medical expert’s opinions
- Letters from mental health professionals and caseworkers
Generally, military diversion is only available to first-time defendants. A defendant with a previous conviction for the same crime or charged with a less severe and nonviolent California felony will be referred to Veterans Court.
Some of the misdemeanors eligible for the diversion include:
- Drunk in public
- Disturbing the peace
- Assault
- Battery
- Driving under the influence
- Petty theft
- Indecent exposure
- Shoplifting
- Prostitution
- Driving with a blood alcohol concentration greater than 0.08%
How a Defendant Obtains Military Diversion
Your defense attorney will file a motion requesting the pretrial diversion from the trial court after the arraignment and before trial. Your motion should contain:
- A file with records that support your diagnosis or condition
- Letters from VA rep, caseworker, colleagues, and loved ones attesting to your military experience, character, and the trauma experienced.
- A recommended treatment plan by your therapist, medical expert, or psychologist
The court can then assess the matter before making the determination. If it agrees that you are eligible and you consent, you will undergo the military diversion program. Every criminal proceeding will be postponed for two (2) years while you receive treatment.
The court will evaluate whether you should engage in a community or federal-based treatment service program. Generally, preference is given to any program with a history of treating people with trauma as a result of military service, including programs run by:
- The United States Department of Veterans Affairs, or
- United States Department of Defense
If the court orders a mental health treatment service, it can refer you to a county mental health agency, as long as the authority accepts all the following responsibilities:
- Your treatment
- Filing reports to the court
- Coordination of suitable referrals to county veterans service officers
Terms for Military Diversion Participation
You should obey the following conditions ordered by the diversion program or the court:
- Counseling for substance abuse or domestic violence
- Attending treatment sessions
- Attending compulsory court hearings
- Random drug or alcohol testing
- Progress reports prepared by the agency administering your program
The authority responsible for your diversion program should submit your progress reports to the DA and the court every six (6) months.
Will Your Arrest Record be Sealed After Completing the Program?
After completing the treatment program, the court will dismiss your criminal charges. No person can use your criminal record without your consent to lead to denial of a license, certificate, benefit, or employment. You can truthfully respond to your previous criminal history questions that you were not diverted or arrested for the crime.
However, you should disclose your arrest when applying to become a law enforcer. Moreover, the Department of Justice (DOJ) can reveal your record in response to your law enforcer application request.
Find Qualified Legal Representation Near Me
Misdemeanor diversion programs provide an alternative to criminal prosecution where instead of you, the defendant going through the trial, the court diverts your criminal charges. The judge will postpone all proceedings while you undergo treatment. Once you complete the program, the court will dismiss your charges and seal your criminal record as though it never took place. If facing a misdemeanor, it is paramount that you consult with an experienced attorney; you could be eligible for a misdemeanor diversion program under AB 3234, depending on your case facts. Leah Legal is a seasoned law firm fighting for the freedom and rights of defendants in Van Nuys. We can help you determine whether a misdemeanor diversion program is the most effective legal strategy when you hire us. And if yes, ensure you obtain a program with the best possible terms and conditions. Please contact us at 818-484-1100 for a free case review.
In California, it is a crime for a person to help or assist another person accused of committing a felony to escape or avoid prosecution for their crimes. If you lie to the police to protect a criminal or destroy evidence of a felony offense, you could be arrested and charged under California Penal Code 32.
While you may not have been involved in the commission of the crime, offering your assistance to the offender attracts serious legal consequences. Whether you are charged with a felony or a misdemeanor under this statute, you risk facing imprisonment.
If you or your loved one faces an arrest and charges for being an accessory after the fact, you should not take the situation lightly. Fighting against the crime is challenging and will require the guidance of a knowledgeable criminal attorney. Your attorney will help you build a solid defense.
Accessory After the Fact in California
California Penal Code 32 defines accessory after the fact as the crime committed by any person who, after a felony is committed, conceals, aids, or harbors the perpetrator intending to help them avoid arrest, prosecution, or punishment for the offense. Acts such as giving a person a false alibi or helping them escape will make you criminally liable under this statute.
The issues surrounding being an accessory after the fact are simple and seek to punish individuals who commit acts that may seem innocent. In your attempt to help a friend or a family member avoid the harsh consequences of a felony conviction, you could find yourself in legal trouble.
Although the law is harsh on individuals who help criminals evade justice, the prosecution must prove the following elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt to secure a conviction under this statute:
Another Person Committed a Felony Offense
The first fact that needs to be clear before you are found guilty under PC 32 is that another person committed a felony. The parties who can be prosecuted for a crime are classified as either principals or accessories. The principal is the person who engages in the actual criminal activity. On the other hand, an accessory is a person involved in hiding the crime or evidence.
Understanding that a prosecutor will not charge you as an accessory for a misdemeanor or infraction is essential. Additionally, if the occurrence of an underlying crime is unclear, you will not be facing any charges. For example, if a person is charged with murder and you are accused of helping them flee the state, your conviction depends on whether the prosecutor can prove that a murder was committed. Your charges will also be dismissed if the murder defendant is cleared of wrongdoing.
You Knew About the Crime
Another element that the prosecution needs to establish during your trial under PC 32 is your knowledge about the crime. You could not be convicted for helping a criminal escape if you did not know that they just committed the crime. Therefore, it is must be clear that you know that the person you helped has either:
- Committed a felony
- Been charged with a felony charge
- Has been convicted of the felony
For example, if you give a desperate man a ride from the gas station to another town and you do not know that they have just been involved in a home invasion, you cannot be guilty of accessory after the fact.
After the Felony was Committed, you Concealed, Harbored, or Aided the Perpetrator
When establishing your liability under this statute, the prosecution must prove that you offered the perpetrator of a felony offense the assistance they needed to escape an arrest or a conviction for punishment. However, it is crucial to understand that if you knew of the crime before it happened and agreed to help them afterward, you could be charged with abetting a crime which is a more severe crime.
Some of the scenarios that could be viewed as an accessory to the fact include:
- Misleading or intentionally lying to the police on the whereabouts of a felon so you can buy them more time to escape.
- Giving a false alibi to another person when the police interrogate you.
- Helping a person leave town or flee after committing a felony.
- Assisting a criminal in hiding evidence that could be crucial in an arrest and prosecution for the alleged crimes.
- Destroying evidence related to the underlying felony.
You Aided or Harbored the Perpetrator Avoid Legal Consequences
Accessory after the fact can take many forms. Therefore, when providing your liability under this statute, the prosecutor must establish that you intended to help the alleged felon escape criminal consequences such as arrest, trial, and conviction for their crimes. However, it is essential to understand that refusing to testify against a friend facing charges for a felony will not make you an accessory after the fact.
While this move helps avoid keeping away critical evidence and preventing a conviction, it will not attract PC 32 charges.
After listening to all the evidence from the prosecution about your involvement in helping the criminal escape, the court may consider these additional factors before convicting you under this statute:
- Whether or not you were present at the scene. However, your presence at the scene does not determine guilt in accessory after the fact. It can give the court a better understanding of the evidence presented against you by the prosecution.
- Your relationship with the principal. Another factor that the court may look into when determining your guilt for being an accessory after the fact is whether you had a relationship with the principal before committing the crime. If you can prove that the principal is a stranger to you and your initial contact was when you helped them, you will have a better chance of beating criminal charges.
- Your proximity to the scene of the crime. The court will seek to understand where you were when the principal committed the crime. If you are found to have been lurking around the scene, your intention to help them may be more precise. Additionally, this may open the avenue for additional charges under PC 31.
- Your extent of knowledge of the alleged crime. As stated above, one of the critical elements of PC 32is your understanding of the crime. Therefore, your level of expertise in the rime could be vital to determining your guilt.
Since California law is stringent on individuals involved in felony offenses, the prosecution for accessory after the fact will also be aggressive. However, proving all these elements can be challenging for the prosecution. Therefore, retaining the services of a skilled defense attorney is vital if you face an arrest and charges under this statute.
Legal Penalties for Violation of California Penal Code 32
In California, accessory after the fact can be charged as a felony or a misdemeanor. Some of the factors that could help the prosecution determine how to charge your offense include:
- Your Criminal history. California law is often stringent on repeat offenders. A criminal record, especially for a serious felony, may indicate your contempt of the law and inability to rehabilitate. For this reason, the court could choose to charge you with a felony so they can ensure that you suffer the most severe punishment.
- Facts of your case. When determining the nature of your charges, the prosecution will investigate and analyze the factors around your case. This will include the nature of the felony offense that was committed and the extent of your role in helping the criminal. Assisting a person facing murder charges to flee the state is more serious than lying to the police about not knowing the person’s whereabouts.
When charged as a misdemeanor, violation of California PC 32 is punishable by:
- A maximum of one year in county jail.
- Fines that do not exceed $5,000.
- Misdemeanor probation.
On the other hand, a felony conviction under this statute attracts these penalties:
- A prison term that ranges from sixteen months to three years.
- Fines of up to $5,000.
- Felony probation.
Probation for Being an Accessory After the Fact
Whether you face a felony or misdemeanor conviction, there are times when the court could sentence you to probation. In California, probation is used as an alternative to spending time in jail or prison. Pronation could be formal or informal, depending on the nature of your conviction. However, it is essential to understand that not all criminal defendants facing charges under PC 32 are eligible for probation.
Your ability to receive probation often depends on negotiating with the prosecutor and attorney. In most cases, prosecutors accept probation for defendants who are first-time offenders. In this case, if your role in helping the felon is not severe, you may be eligible for probation. Although probation is not as harsh as jail time, there are conditions that you must follow. The requirements for felony probation are more severe than those of a misdemeanor, including:
- Regular check-ins with a court-appointed probation officer.
- Avoid involvement in additional criminal activity.
- Avoid association with particular individuals.
- Avoid drug use.
If you violate any of the above terms, your probation officer could report that fact to the court, which holds a probation violation hearing. The court will find you guilty or not guilty of the violation at this hearing. You will continue with probation if you are not guilty of the alleged offense. However, if the alleged violations are true, the court could resist the probation with harsher terms or revoke the probation. A probation revocation means that you must serve the prison sentence for your crime.
Defenses Against Penal Code 32 Charges
An arrest for being an accessory after the fact does not always result in a conviction. There are many strategies you can use to build a strong defense against the charges, including:
- You acted under duress or coercion. It is not uncommon to find a criminal offender threatening others to help them escape or evading an arrest. If you did not willfully assist the principal, you might have a chance to avoid a conviction. For example, after a person commits a robbery, they can hold a gun over your head and threaten to kill you if you do not give them a ride. In this case, your actions do not satisfy the criminal element of PC 32.
- No crime was committed. You are only guilty of being an accessory if it is clear that a felony was committed. If you can successfully argue that the underlying crime did not occur, the court could dismiss your charges.
- Lack of knowledge of the felony. A key crime element for PC 32 is that the defendant knew about the underlying felony. If you did not know that the person you helped had committed a crime and faced charges or punishment for the offense, the court could not find you guilty. Awareness that a co-principal had committed a crime is not enough to find you guilty of accessory to the alleged crimes.
- You lacked an intent to help the perpetrator. Your intention to aid a felon to escape the criminal consequences of their actions must be clear when you help them. However, if you unknowingly helped a person without knowing they were fleeing from authorities, you cannot be convicted for accessory after the fact.
- You were just a bystander. When police officers find you at the scene of a crime, and you fail to answer their questions, they could arrest you under the claims that you are aiding the criminals. However, if you can prove that you did not know about the crime or intent to help them, you cannot be convicted. Failing to give witness testimony to a crime is not an offense.
Is PC 32 Similar to Aiding and Abetting a Crime?
California PC 31 is an offense that occurs when a person encourages, facilitates, or aids the commission of a crime. Many people do not understand the difference between promoting a crime and being an accessory to the fact. One main difference between PC 31 and PC 32 is that a conviction for aiding a crime attracts similar penalties to the underlying offense. On the other hand, being an accessory to the fact is charged separately from the underlying crime.
When a prosecutor charges you with aiding or abetting a crime, the following elements must be clear:
- You knew of the perpetrator’s criminal plan. Prior knowledge of a crime is not necessary to prove guilty under PC 31. If you know of the illegal plan before it happens and encourages them or promote its occurrence at that point, you can be convicted under the liability theory.
- You intentionally facilitate or encourage the plan to commit a crime. Unlike accessory after the fact, where you are only involved in hiding or helping the criminal evade justice, aiding or abetting a criminal requires you to be involved before the actual crime occurs.
PC 32 is a stand-alone offense. However, if you encouraged the defendant to commit an underlying felony, the court will charge you with the same felony. The court’s reasoning behind your conviction is that you aided the crime.
One of the similarities between PC 31 and 32 is that your presence at the crime scene is not a necessary factor in securing the conviction. The most important thing the prosecution could look at is your conduct before the crime for encouraging a crime, and your behavior after the crime is you are an accessory after the fact.
It is essential to understand that if you aided the commission of the offense and still helped the criminal escape or hide evidence, you could face criminal charges under PC 31 or PC 32. If you are found guilty and face a conviction for abetting a criminal, the penalties you face will be as harsh as those of the actual criminal. Facing charges for helping and being an accessory after the fact could attract serious legal consequences. Therefore, seeking the guidance of a skilled attorney is crucial.
Find a Skilled Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
Assisting a felon to escape criminal prosecution is a crime that attracts an arrest and charges for being an accessory after the fact. A simple act such as giving a false alibi could attract an arrest and conviction under this statute. A conviction for violating California PC 32 can result in a lengthy prison sentence and hefty fines.
You could spend up to a year in jail for a misdemeanor conviction and a minimum of three years in state prison if the prosecutor charges you with a felony under this statute. Sometimes the court could find evidence to link you to the underlying felony and convict you under multiple statutes.
If you have been arrested and charged with being an accessory after the fact, it would be wise to hire and retain the services of a competent criminal defense lawyer. At Leah Legal, we have the knowledge and extensive experience defending against PC 32 and other related offenses in Van Nuys, CA. We will offer the legal guidance and representation you need to fight your charges and ensure a positive outcome in your case. Contact us today at 818-484-1100 to book an appointment and discuss the facts of your case.
An accessory before the fact is someone who encourages or helps another person commit a crime, either before the crime is committed or as it is being committed. In some states, the offense is charged as aiding and abetting. If you’re found guilty of being an accessory before the fact, you could face similar criminal consequences as the individual who commits the offense directly.
Fortunately, you can try to challenge the accusation of being an accessory before the fact through a solid legal defense. Some common defenses include demonstrating that you:
- Didn’t offer any assistance or help with a crime
- Were wrongfully accused
- Started to help with a crime but later stopped helping, and/or
- Were only present at the crime scene
It is important to note that being an accessory after the fact is not the same as being an accessory before the fact. Helping someone after they commit a crime, as opposed to helping them before or during the crime, makes you an accessory after the fact.
What Is An “Accessory Before The Fact”?
If you encourage or assist someone else to perpetrate an offense, then you could be charged with being an accessory before the fact. You could be charged with accessory to the offense if you contribute to the commission of the crime without actually perpetrating the offense. Some common examples of being an accessory before the fact include:
- Taking on the role of a “getaway” driver
- keeping watch while another person perpetrates a robbery
- Creating an alibi for an individual who has perpetrated a crime
- Sharing details with an individual you know would use them to perpetrate a crime
- keeping a car’s engine running
- Equipping someone with the tools they need to commit an offense
- Directing a vehicle towards a street while aware that the vehicle is about to be stolen, and/or
- Taking part in rape or kidnapping
It’s crucial to take into consideration that witnessing an offense being committed doesn’t constitute criminal intent and it does not subject you to conviction as an abettor or aider, irrespective of whether injury or damage could have been avoided if you had moved to prevent the offense in progress.
It should be noted that in some jurisdictions, you’re only subject to being an accessory before the fact if you’re not involved when the offense is perpetrated. In addition, while some states’ criminal codes stipulate that an accessory before the fact should provide encouragement or aid before the commission of an offense, other states’ laws stipulate that you can be charged with these offenses even if you assist while someone else is committing a crime.
It’s also worth noting that some jurisdictions indicate you’ll only face prosecution for this crime if you assist someone else in committing a felony crime as opposed to a misdemeanor. For instance, an individual will be convicted of being an accessory before the fact if she or he supports, assists, counsels, or promotes a principal offender in perpetrating a “felony” crime.
Is “Aiding And Abetting” The Same As “Being An Accessory Before The Fact”?
The state of California classifies an accessory crime as “aiding and abetting.” Today, regardless of whether they were present during the commission of the crime, the term “aider and abettor” is frequently used to describe principal offenders other than the perpetrators. The phrase “accessory before the fact” refers to people who assisted in the preparation of a crime or encouraged its execution. For instance, an individual who takes part in organizing or planning a bank robbery before it’s perpetrated is an “accessory before the fact.”
An individual who actively aids in the execution of an offense, even though they’re not involved in the main crime, is referred to as an “accomplice.” An “accomplice” is someone who acts as a getaway motorist or a lookout during a bank robbery. The phrase “accessory after the fact” refers to people who did not participate in the actual execution of the crime but instead deliberately helped the offender avoid being apprehended and prosecuted.
For instance, an individual who aids the principal offender of a bank robbery by concealing the stolen funds for the offender is known as an “accessory after the fact.” Under California statute, the prosecution must prove the following to effectively demonstrate you are an abettor or aider:
- Someone committed the crime
- You were aware of the offender’s premeditated plans before or during the offense
- You meant to help the offender carry out the crime, and
- Your actions or words contributed to the offender’s commission of the offense
What the Prosecution Must Establish
If you’re charged with being an accessory before the fact in committing or attempted execution of an offense, the prosecution should be able to demonstrate the following aspects beyond any reasonable doubt:
- You knew the offender intended to perpetrate the offense in question
- You intended to help, assist, or encourage the offender before, during, or after the offender committed the offense, and
- Your actions or encouragement helped the offender execute the offense
Instigating, promoting, or supporting a crime is enough to land you behind bars. The criteria used to separate a principal offender from an accessory are based on whether the accused independently participated in the crime’s commission, rather than simply offering some type of restricted assistance and encouragement, whether indirectly or directly.
Legal Defenses Against an Accessory Before the Fact Crime
If you’re accused of being an accessory before the fact, you could use a legal defense to fight the charges. Some popular defense arguments include demonstrating the following:
No Involvement
You cannot be charged with being an accessory before the fact if you didn’t promote, assist, or encourage the commission of the offense. Numerous ways could be misinterpreted as evidence of your involvement. For instance, imagine you’re in a vehicle with some acquaintances on your way to a beach party. The vehicle pulls over to a convenience shop to delay a clerk. You remain in the vehicle while he or she enters a store and perpetrates a robbery. You had no knowledge that this would take place, and you were not involved in the preparation or encouragement of the offense.
But you were “physically present” at the scene. Unfortunately, you were in the wrong place at the wrong moment. However, simply being there at the time of the offense is insufficient to establish intent. Your criminal defense lawyer could argue that you can’t be found guilty of being an accessory before the fact since you were unaware that the motorist had intended to engage in illegal activity.
False Accusation
Attempts to blame you are often made by offenders who want to escape responsibility for their wrongdoing. Being an accessory to a crime does not require tangible evidence; only witness testimony that you were involved in some way is required. Therefore, it is simple to accuse a person of being an accessory before the fact.
In addition, resentment, jealousy, and financial gain can be used as justifications for false allegations. For instance, a spouse who is enraged by his or her partner’s jealousy and infidelity in the relationship can make up evidence that he or she was complicit in rape to get revenge. If you were wrongfully accused of being someone who aided in perpetrating a crime, our lawyers would be able to demonstrate that you were wrongly accused, which would substantiate your innocence.
Duress
You can’t be found guilty of being an accessory before the fact if you were forced against your choice to assist someone in committing an offense under the imminent fear of serious physical injury or loss of life to yourself or another individual. This is referred to as “duress,” and it’s a legally admissible defense strategy in most criminal prosecutions. If your attorney can prove that you only participated in the commission or planning of the offense due to coercion or pressure by another individual, you could be cleared of these allegations.
However, you can’t claim duress if you were just scared of minor bodily harm, property destruction, or reputational damage. Furthermore, duress isn’t applicable as a defense strategy to murder, which demands the aspect of malicious intent or a pre-determined purpose to kill another person. For duress as a defense strategy to be effective in a defendant’s accessory before the fact case, the threats made against him or her must be “credible,” “immediate,” and include serious physical injury or loss of life.
No Duty to Act
In most cases, you are not required to stop an offense from happening just because you know it will be undertaken or are there when it’s being perpetrated. Otherwise, you’re not required by law to prevent an offense from occurring. A simple knowledge of the crime’s plan is usually not sufficient to find you guilty of being an accessory before the fact.
Withdrawal from Crime’s Participation
If your defense lawyer can demonstrate that your responsibility as an aider and abettor ceased before the execution of the charged offense, you could have a solid defense argument for not being an accessory before the fact. To count on this strategy, you should be able to show that you:
- Informed the other individuals participating in the offense of your plan to withdraw
- Tried everything in your control to prevent the offense from being perpetrated
The jury must determine whether you meet both of the elements beyond any reasonable doubt. It isn’t enough to merely withdraw from the offense. You would almost certainly have had to take affirmative actions to demonstrate an intent to deter, such as notifying a law enforcement officer that an offense was likely to be perpetrated. Please bear in mind that, while you can still mount a legal defense, the best defense would require the assistance of a professional criminal lawyer. A defense attorney would know what form of defense argument is best suited to the details of the case. Additionally, the lawyer-client relationship protects any contact with a criminal lawyer. A lawyer is not allowed to disclose conversations with clients without their approval under this bond.
Penalties for Being an Accessory Before the Fact
In most jurisdictions, if you’re an accessory before the fact, then you will face the same consequences as the individual who committed the underlying offense that you participated in committing. For instance, in California, you could receive a minimum of fifteen years in prison if you assist someone in robbing someone or some other facility.
Natural and Probable Consequences
The “natural and probable consequences” doctrines are foreseeable outcomes that a sensible individual would expect to occur if nothing exceptional happens. This implies that if you assist someone in committing a specific crime, like armed robbery, and that individual later displays or discharges a firearm meant to be utilized during the crime, you and the individual you assisted in the offense might both face charges relating to firearms. When the jury is asked to identify natural and probable consequences, they must take into account all relevant factors shown by the facts.
Accomplice Liability for Murder
The California Supreme Court has acknowledged that, under some conditions, an accessory to a crime could be subject to more severe punishment for offenses involving homicide than the principal offender. When an individual in a mental state required to be an accessory to crime convinces or aids another to murder, the combined effort of all parties, as well as that individual’s mens rea, determines that person’s culpability. If an accessory’s mens rea is more culpable than the other’s—the requisite purpose that must be established in the mind to perpetrate a crime—then his or her liability in the murder could be greater, even though the principal offender is judged the actual perpetrator.
Crimes Related to an Accessory Before the Fact
Accessory After The Fact
An “accessory after the fact” crime occurs when you assist another individual after he or she has committed a crime. In this case, assistance is provided after the actual defendant has committed a crime as opposed to during or before the crime. A few instances of how you can be an accessory after the fact include:
- Driving a getaway vehicle after a heist
- Granting an alibi to an acquaintance who has been accused of DUI, or
- Helping an accused avoid arrest
In general, the prosecution has the option of charging this offense as a felony or a misdemeanor. While different state laws differ on the specific punishment for the crime, it’s usually less serious than the punishment for being an accessory before the fact.
Frequently Asked Questions
Below are some of the most frequently asked questions about being an accessory before the fact.
Is It A Criminal Offense To Aid And Abet?
Technically speaking, helping someone else commit a crime is not an offense in itself. Rather, it is a legal argument that you participated in facilitating the wrongdoing. If you intentionally participate in the planning, carrying out, or encouragement of an offense, then you will be held responsible for being an aider and abettor.
Due to this, you could face charges for whatever offense or offenses you meant to perpetuate.
How Can The Prosecution Establish That I Was An Accessory Before The Fact?
The prosecution needs to show 3 things to establish that you’re guilty of being an accessory to the crime:
- That you were aware of the principal offender’s illegal intent
- You engaged in activities that were motivated by the desire to commit an offense or to aid in its commission
- Your activities did contribute to or encourage the crime to be committed
Can I Be Found Guilty Of Both Crimes If I Assist Someone In Committing One And They Go On To Commit Another In The Process?
There is no doubt that this is possible. The courts could grant the jury instructions known as the “natural and probable consequences” doctrines. This implies that you can face charges for any offenses perpetrated as a result of the intended offense if a sane individual could have predicted that the linked offense would transpire.
What Consequences Am I Subject To If I Am Charged With Being An Accessory Before The Fact?
In most cases, receiving an accessory or accomplice sentence carries the same penalty as committing the crime yourself. In fact, in some homicide-related cases, you may face greater responsibility than the actual perpetrator.
Find a Van Nuys Criminal Lawyer Near Me
Being an accessory before the fact in an infringement of California laws is a serious crime that can come from an innocent act of goodwill. Individuals who have never been in such trouble would find themselves facing criminal charges after believing their actions were the right thing by assisting their loved ones. If you’re found guilty of being an accessory before the fact, you will be subject to the same punishment as the principal offender. You do not have to face these charges alone. We at Leah Legal in Los Angeles can assist you in developing a strong defense against the allegations. Call us at 818-484-1100 to get in touch with us right away.
A California aggravated assault charge can come unexpectedly. Sometimes people who commit aggravated assaults do so even without realizing it. If you are confused about the charges against you, concerned about consequences, and are not certain about what you should do, keep on reading. This blog looks at assault charges and what makes a California assault aggravated.
Understanding California Assault Charges
An assault is defined as a deliberate effort to cause bodily harm to someone else or a hostile, threatening, or intimidating act or remark that gives the other person grounds to worry about being attacked. This offense does not entail any physical touch. Assault with a dangerous weapon or using force capable of causing significant bodily harm are known as felonies.
In California, anybody who perpetrates a simple assault is usually charged with a misdemeanor, while some assault offenses might be prosecuted as either a felony or a misdemeanor at the prosecution’s authority (these offenses are referred to as “wobblers”). If a simple assault charge is prosecuted as a felony offense, the court has the authority to lower the charges to a misdemeanor charge during the prosecution.
What is an Aggravated Assault?
An aggravated assault offense primarily bears a similar meaning as a regular criminal assault crime but with one exception: specific conditions have to be evident during the commissioning of this offense. These circumstances are referred to as “aggravating conditions,” which are generally variables that tend to enhance the offense’s gravity. Every state does have its set of regulations that define the sorts of factors that count as aggravating factors.
For instance, if an offender employs a dangerous weapon to perpetrate assault on someone’s victim, the lethal weapon is the kind of element that enhances the criminal counts to the aggravated form of this crime. Another circumstance that could turn a simple assault into an aggravated crime is when the offender injures their victim who is deemed to be a disadvantaged individual in a legal sense, for example:
- An infant
- An expectant woman
- An elderly person
Furthermore, assaulting a law enforcement officer is yet another factor that will elevate the basic elements of this offense to the level of an aggravated assault charge. This is applicable even if a law enforcement officer is not viewed as being particularly weak in a legal sense; instead, it is probably because they uphold the rule of law.
Finally, aggravated assault is classified as a felony in most states, rather than a misdemeanor. As a result, an accused who is found guilty of aggravated assault will probably be subjected to penalties usually reserved for felonies, such as paying hefty fines and/or spending a minimum of one year, or possibly longer, in jail.
Aggravating Factors in a California Assault Charge
An aggravated offense is one in which there were additional circumstances present at the time of the purported offense. These extra elements must have elevated the gravity of the assault for it to be considered aggravated. For example, if a dangerous weapon was used, an assault is considered an aggravated offense. The offenses in this situation can carry greater punishment.
When an offense is classified as “aggravated,” circumstances could get much worse. This is because aggravating circumstances raise the seriousness or liability of an offense, which means that the consequences of a conviction could be far more severe than they would be in the absence of aggravating circumstances.
Typically, aggravating circumstances have a damaging effect on the defendant. For example, if they are successfully prosecuted, they may result in a lengthy jail sentence. The Judicial Council as well as the Rules of the Court of California often establish and govern these elements. A defendant must be aware of the factors that can be used against them as well as how they could damage their case. They consist of:
Prior Convictions
If found guilty, a defendant who has a history of convictions could be subject to stiffer sentences from the court. If the offender has a history of more than 2 previous convictions, California’s Three Strikes rule can increase the severity of a fairly insignificant offense.
Leadership Roles and Complexity
A court could consider a crime to be aggravated when the accused plays a significant function in the act, like a leadership position. Courts in California have the authority to take such responsibilities into account as aggravating circumstances. If an offender participated in a high level of preparation or sophistication, the court could potentially impose stiffer penalties.
The Victim’s Vulnerability
If it is established that the accused’s victim was vulnerable, the court could impose tougher punishments. A victim could be vulnerable in comparison to the offender or in accordance with an objective measure. An aggravating element can be, for instance, a violent act or a deceitful plot against the young or elderly.
Weapons
An aggravating circumstance is one in which a deadly weapon was used or was in the offender’s possession at the time of the offense. The charges and punishments will probably be harsher if the criminal used a rifle to conduct the offense.
Assault versus Aggravated Assault
In light of the aforementioned details, it is understandable why aggravated assault counts are more serious than assault accusations. Aggravated assault indicates carelessness or a profound disregard for human life. Even though “aggravated assault” is not specifically defined under California law, the following offenses are more serious than simple assault charges:
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
As was already established, the felony crime of aggravated assault can be brought against an accused who utilizes a lethal weapon to assault someone else. The following are some categories of objects that could fit the criteria for “deadly weapons” under state law:
- Explosive objects
- Guns and other weapons
- Toxins, poisons, or other potentially harmful substances
- Knives, and other cutting tools
- Various weapons, like bats, clubs, brass knuckles, and nunchakus
- In some cases, an accused’s hands or feet if they have received particular training (for instance, serves in the army, has a career in boxing, or has a black belt in certain martial art)
In jurisdictions that classify assault and battery as distinct offenses, it may not be relevant if an offender used a false or real weapon to threaten their victim. Consider the situation where someone thought the accused was aiming a real firearm, but it was only a toy. If the offender purposefully tried to give the impression that they were brandishing a real firearm, they could still be prosecuted and found guilty of aggravated assault.
Assault On a Woman, a Child, Or a Law Enforcement Officer
Perpetrating assault and violence against someone who shows certain characteristics might elevate this offense to aggravated assault charges, which is considered a felony. In such cases, instead of concentrating on if a lethal weapon or any other tool was utilized, the offense becomes more severe depending on the nature of the individual who is hurt.
Once more, aggravated assault charges will be brought against anyone who assaults or batters a minor, an expectant woman, an older individual, or a law enforcement officer.
When a person is accused of engaging in an aggravated assault against any one of these individuals, they are certain to be subject to felony-level penalties, such as a prison term.
Additionally, the offense becomes a felony charge when any of the individuals mentioned in this provision are considered vulnerable, helpless, or suffer severe harm as a result of the accused’s actions. A court could take into account several elements while determining a fitting penalty, such as:
- How tall the victim is
- How much the victim weighs
- The gender of the victim; and
- The different capacities for self-defense or combat that both the offender and their victim have
Assault Using Corrosive Chemicals (Such as Vitriol, Caustic Acid, and Flammable Materials)
The offense of assault using caustic substances is described under California PEN 244. This code states that anybody who knowingly and maliciously dumps or tosses on another individual any vitriol, corrosive acid, flammable substance, or caustic substance of any kind, with the goal to damage or mar their body or flesh commits a felony crime under PEN 244.
The term “caustic chemical” refers to any material that can burn or damage living tissues. The word “vitriol” refers to a caustic chemical that includes sulfuric acid as well as other similar substances.
Additionally, the defendant must have acted purposely and deliberately to commit assault using caustic chemicals. This is the alleged mental state that must exist for the jury to find the offender guilty of breaking PEN 244.
According to California PEN 244, assault using caustic chemicals is a significant felony offense that might result in 2, 3, or 4 years in California state prison, fines of up to ten thousand dollars, and formal or felony probation.
Probation terms could entail regular sessions with a probationary officer, community service, as well as payment of compensation to the victim. The judge can also impose a protective order prohibiting you from being in contact with the victim as well as from being within a set distance from each other.
In contrast to several other more regular assault offenses, PEN 244 isn’t a “wobbler,” which means it can’t be downgraded to a misdemeanor charge.
Penalties For Aggravated Assault Charges
If you have been accused of aggravated assault, your case will usually be prosecuted as a felony offense, and you should expect to spend time in prison. Depending on how severe your action was and if you do have previous convictions, you may receive prison time instead of probation
The length of your sentence will increase with the severity of the offense. You might spend up to a year in the county Jail even when you receive probation for a criminal offense. An aggravated assault charge is a serious issue. If you have been charged with this offense or any other related crimes, you should consult with a knowledgeable attorney immediately.
Be sure to tell the lawyer everything so that they can begin to take action on your behalf to minimize the damage and present you in the best light possible.
If you inflicted harm to another individual, you will certainly be obliged to make reparations. For instance, if someone loses a considerable amount of cash as a result of your acts, prosecutors feel it’s their responsibility to ensure that the individual is reimbursed.
Anyone convicted of an offense in some California counties must additionally contribute to a fund known as the victim restitution fund. Every accused person who is found guilty in these counties contributes to a program that is set up for crime victims.
There are other alternatives, but they’re only accessible in exceptional circumstances. Aggravated assault is an act that could gravely hurt another person and displays disrespect for other people.
Prosecutors and judges disapprove of the conduct and harshly penalize it. You would need to demonstrate that your actions were exceptional and that they are not within the scope of behavior that the consequences of aggravated assault are intended to guard against.
To place you in the most ideal position possible, your lawyer would make that argument for you. If you work to obtain a deferred entry of the judgment or participate in another relevant program, you might be capable of averting a prison or jail sentence
Defending Yourself Against Aggravated Assault Charges
You should arrange a meeting with a lawyer who is experienced in dealing with this kind of charge and provide them with all of the details of your case. You must offer them “the bad, the good, as well as the ugly,” not just the details you deem important or that you believe would be helpful to you.
You must ensure that the lawyer has a complete understanding of what truly transpired in your criminal proceeding. There are arguments to defend against aggravated assault allegations, as there are many criminal charges, but your lawyer cannot conjure up those arguments out of pure nothingness.
The case’s events and situations serve as the basis for the defenses. Because of this, it’s crucial to provide your criminal defense lawyer with a thorough account of what took place so that they can make the argument on your behalf and ensure that every facet of your situation is taken into account. Make sure to state any defenses you may have if you can.
You should always have a lawyer present when speaking to the police. Particularly if it is a very major charge like aggravated assault, you should have prepared what you are going to be discussing with your counsel. It will be up to you and your lawyer to decide whether or not you both agree that speaking with law enforcement is in your best interests.
You should figure out what value you might obtain by talking. Working with the authorities is often not a good decision in matters involving the county or state. They do not exactly have a mechanism in place that encourages cooperation. In comparison to state settings, federal settings are more likely to benefit from cooperation.
It’s always a smart option to have your lawyer there when speaking with the authorities, although in most cases, it is safe to say that it’s not usually a good idea. If you are doubtful, you certainly want to ensure that you do not say anything. Inform the police that having your lawyer there will make you feel more at ease.
Do I Need Legal Representation for the Various Assault Charges?
With how often the word “attack” is referenced in mainstream culture, many individuals feel that assault is a basic, straightforward offense. This, nevertheless, is not a correct assumption. In reality, assault charges can be very complicated. The laws governing assault cases frequently differ between jurisdictions, and how they are applied can change depending on the specifics of a given case.
Therefore, hiring a competent criminal defense attorney for further professional counsel is extremely advised if you are fighting assault or aggravated assault charges. A skilled criminal defense lawyer will be equipped to conduct a legal investigation to determine whether you have any legal options for contesting the allegations against you.
Additionally, your attorney will be equipped to help you navigate the legal court system and even defend you before the court. Your attorney can also inform you of your constitutional protections as a defendant within legal provisions and ensure that your rights are upheld in court or when negotiating a plea bargain with the prosecution.
Last but not least, if the initial case has already closed and you want to either dispute the verdict or need counsel at your sentence hearing, your attorney can also help you with both legal processes.
Find an Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
If you or your loved one has been accused of aggravated assault in Van Nuys, CA, you can get in touch with our attorneys at Leah Legal for a consultation. Our lawyers are available to advise you regarding your possible defenses, the need for more independent research, plea negotiations, motion preparation, and the probable outcomes of the case. Because each issue is fact-specific, we handle every case on a case-by-case approach while keeping the client’s life circumstances and representation goals in mind. Call us today at 818-484-1100 to learn more about your options.
Courts in California do not wait for any person since they have a massive caseload and cannot postpone court hearings without creating a problem. To deter defendants from missing their scheduled court appearance, California makes it an offense tofail to appear in court. The crime carries jail time, fines, additional penalties, and a bench warrant. These penalties can occur concurrently with the penalties you received for your underlying criminal charges. If you have been charged with failure to appear, you should retain skilled legal representation to improve your chances of obtaining the most favorable case outcome.
A Brief Overview of Failure to Appear
Failure to appear in court means missing a scheduled court hearing.
Generally, it would help if you lawfully appeared in court when:
- You are subject to or receive a subpoena
- You promise to attend court in writing
- A judge orders you back to the court for criminal proceedings
- You are notified to show up in court
Defendants give written promises to attend court hearings after their release from police custody on their own recognizance.
When it comes to subpoenas, they apply to witnesses in court trials and hearings. A witness will obtain a subpoena notifying them that they should either:
- Bring specific documents to the court
- Show up in court to testify in a court hearing
Some of the instances the judge can order an individual back to a courthouse include:
- After the accused pleads guilty to criminal charges
- The judge orders the person to court for their sentencing hearing
Penalties and Consequences for FTA
Before convicting you of failure to appear, the prosecutor must prove the following elements of the crime beyond any reasonable doubt:
- You were charged with either a felony or a misdemeanor
- You were released from police custody on your own recognizance
- You intentionally failed to attend your scheduled court hearing or, as ordered
- The FTA was on purpose or with the intent of evading the court process
Failing to appear in court constitutes proof of the willingness not to attend. It is not a must that you intend to violate the law.
It is legally presumed that you planned to evade your court process if you deliberately failed to show up within fourteen days of the scheduled court appearance.
The consequences and penalties of FTA depend mainly on the statute you are charged with. Common statutes in California include:
PC 1320
The consequences of failure to appear under Penal Code Section 1320 PC depend on the crime you were initially convicted of or charged with.
If found guilty of or prosecuted for a misdemeanor, the FTA is a misdemeanor carrying six months in county jail. On the other hand, if sentenced for a California felony, the failure to appear is a felony that attracts three years in state prison or jail.
PC 1320.5
Failing to attend a court hearing per Penal Code Section 1320.5 is a California felony. The offense carries the following penalties:
- A maximum of three years in county jail or state prison
- $10,000 in fines
PC 853.7
Failure to appear is a California misdemeanor if prosecuted per Penal Code Section 853.7 PC. The crime attracts the following penalties:
- One thousand dollars in fines
- A six-month county jail sentence
Vehicle Code Section 40508
Failure to appear following a traffic ticket or citation is a California misdemeanor. It applies even when the underlying traffic violation is an infraction.
The statute subjects the defendant to one thousand dollars in fines and six months of incarceration.
Vehicle Code Section 40509.5
Vehicle Code Section 40509.5 allows additional penalties on motorists if they break VC 40508. The statute allows the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to hold the defendant’s driver’s license if they fail to show up in traffic court for their traffic citation or ticket.
The hold can:
- Remain effective until the driver pays the required fine or shows up in court, and
- Lead to suspension of the driver’s license.
Will FTA Have Adverse Immigration Consequences?
Typically, FTA does not carry negative immigration penalties.
For a defendant to be marked inadmissible in the United States or face deportation, the underlying crime should be:
- A crime of moral turpitude (CIMT)
- Domestic violence, aggravated felony
- Drug-related crimes, or
- Firearm crimes
That means if the crime for which you failed to appear includes one of these, then you are subject to immigration penalties.
Does FTA Affect a Defendant’s Firearm Rights?
A conviction resulting from FTA on its own does not affect the defendant’s firearm rights.
However, some felony and misdemeanor convictions will lead to the accused losing their entitlement to possess or purchase a gun. Additionally, some crimes carry a ten-year firearm ban.
Valid Excuses for Missing Your Court Hearing
Several excuses function as valid defenses to FTA charges. They include:
- The FTA was not intentional
- You did not intend to evade your court process
- The FTA happened because you did not sign an agreement to show up in court
- Was due to an emergency (It can be you suffered from a sudden medical condition or had to rush a loved one to the hospital)
The first three (3) excuses are effective because:
- They challenge the facts under the FTA statutes
- The prosecution team should establish these elements before convicting the defendant of an offense
Additional excuses can include:
- You did not know of the scheduled court hearing because the court mailed it to the wrong address
- You wrote an inaccurate date
- You were in police custody on a different matter
- You did not have the means to go to the court and were unable to notify the court of the inability to show up
Please note that you cannot use the following as legal defenses to FTA charges:
- You did not want to attend the scheduled court hearing
- You did not come because you believe you are innocent
- You had other matters to take care of
Bench Warrant
If a person fails to show up in court, the judge can issue a bench warrant (BW) authorizing the police to apprehend them and return them to court. It is always true if the court orders a defendant to personally attend court, regardless of whether the accused has permitted their criminal defense lawyer to represent them in their absence.
After you are in court, the judge can either detain you or release you with a warning, depending on:
- The circumstances that resulted in your warrant
- Whether you are a flight risk
- Your criminal history
If a defendant fails to attend their arraignment hearing, the arresting police officer should take them to the judge who issued the warrant. Nonetheless, upon the accused’s request, the law enforcer can take them before any judge in the county where they were arrested for setting the bail amount.
If you skip your sentencing hearing, you should appear before the judge who issued the warrant.
Generally, jurors and witnesses are subject to different regulations than accused people. If a jury member or witness fails to show up in court regarding a summons or subpoena, the judge will issue an FTA notice before issuing their bench warrant for the arrest. Nevertheless, suppose the judge believes that urgency requires the immediate presence of the witness or jurors is material to a criminal case. In that case, the judge can first issue a bench warrant instead of an FTA notice.
Like an arrest warrant, the police should serve a bench warrant within a reasonable time following its issuance. Otherwise, the law enforcers will violate your entitlement to a speedy trial, and you have a right to a case dismissal.
The police can serve a felony bench warrant at any time. On the contrary, law enforcers can only serve a misdemeanor warrant between 6 AM and 10 PM absent good cause.
The legal phrase “good cause” means a factual basis for believing that the nighttime intrusion is justified based on urgent circumstances. For instance, a judge can allow law enforcers to serve a bench warrant at the wee hours of the night if you have many outstanding warrants and have repeatedly disobeyed the California court process.
Bail and Arrest Issues As Far as Bench Warrants are Concerned
If a defendant has not posted bail yet and law enforcers believe that the court should raise the bail amount, they can request the court to increase it. It can occur if, for instance, you are charged with making criminal threats under PC 422, and the police do not believe that the set bail amount is enough to defend the alleged victim.
If the law enforcers convince the court to raise the amount in your presence, you will be detained until you post your new bail. If the court increases the bail while you are away, it will issue a bench warrant for the arrest.
If a defendant has posted their bail and they skip bail, the court will forfeit the bail and issue a bench warrant for the accused’s arrest.
How California Courts Enter the Bench Warrant in its System
Once the court issues the bench warrant, the court clerk orders the relevant authority to enter the warrant into the National Crime Information Center (NCIC).
If the appropriate authority fails to enter the warrant into their system, and the failure:
- stops your bail bond agent from returning you to police custody,
- stops the arrest, or
- leads to any release from police custody,
the judge should set aside your forfeiture and then exonerate your bail bond.
What Occurs If You Go to the Court?
If you go to the court instead of waiting to be arrested is the least embarrassing and most effective way to quash a bench warrant.
However, ensure your criminal defense attorney accompanies you. The judge might not trust you even with innocent and valid excuses for the FTA.
The attorney knows the effective steps, evidence, and arguments to use to persuade the judge to:
- Release the defendant on a lowered bail or own recognizance instead of incarceration, and
- Recall and quash the bench warrant
Some of the arguments your skilled warrant attorney can present include:
- You adhered to your probation terms and did not know that you are obligated to offer evidence to the court
- You did not know of the filed criminal charges or mistakenly thought the court had dismissed your charges
- While you bear the same name as the individual on the bench warrant, you are a victim of mistaken identity
How Long Does a BW Last?
California bench warrants do not expire. They are neither removed nor deleted after some time. Instead, they remain effective until:
- The individual named in it dies or is apprehended
- The judge recalls the warrant and clears it
If bench warrants expired, it would encourage dishonest and bad conduct. Defendants with active warrants would spend time lying or avoiding the court and later escape arrest.
Crimes Related to FTA
Discussed below are some of the crimes charged alongside or instead of FTA:
Violating a Restraining Order (Penal Code 273.6)
Under Penal Code 273.6, breaking the terms and conditions of a restraining order is an offense.
The crime is a misdemeanor punishable by a maximum of a year in county jail. If the offense involves violence, you will face a felony with three years of incarceration.
Contempt of Court
PC 166 bans contempt of court. Contempt of court can include:
- Refusing to be sworn in as a witness.
- Disobeying court orders.
- Being disruptive while court is in session.
Violation of PC 166 is a misdemeanor that carries up to one thousand dollars in fine and six months in county jail. In some cases, the judge can impose community service in place of fines.
Expunging a PC 1320 Conviction
Expungement is a post-conviction relief that releases the defendant from all disabilities and consequences of a conviction.
You are eligible to expunge the conviction provided you:
- Completed probation
- Are not currently:
- Charged with a crime
- Serving a sentence for a crime
- On probation for a crime
As far as expungement is concerned, completing probation means:
- Completing your probation terms and conditions
- Attending all scheduled court hearings
- You did not commit another crime while on probation
The California expungement process starts with filing a petition with the court. You can bring your petition in person, using a probation officer, or by your criminal defense lawyer.
Then the judge can either:
- Allow you to withdraw your plea of guilty or no contest and enter a plea of not guilty
- If you have been found guilty after a plea of not guilty, set aside your verdict of guilty
In either case, the judge will dismiss the accusations against you. Some of the benefits of expungement include:
- It makes it easier to acquire state professional licenses
- A potential employer cannot discriminate against you based on your expunged conviction
- An expunged conviction cannot be used to impeach your credibility as a witness in court
- In some cases, it helps you avoid immigration consequences like deportation
However, your expungement will not:
- Overturn your driver’s license revocation or suspension
- Restore your firearm rights
- End the obligation to register as a sex offender per PC 290
Also, your expunged conviction can still be considered a previous conviction when enhancing your sentencing.
Requesting a Continuance to Avoid Skipping Your Court Hearing
If a person wants to reschedule their court date, they should request a continuance (postponement).
To request the continuance at least ten days before the trial:
- Bring a request to postpone the trial (Form SC-150)
- Submit a letter to the court discussing why they require a change of the court date
- Pay a filing fee of $10
Remember to give or mail copies of the form to all parties named in your claim.
If the trial should happen in less than ten days:
- Take a filled Form SC-150 to the clerk’s office and request them to attach it to the file. Alternatively, attend the trial and ask the court for a continuance.
- Ensure your letter has reasonable reasons for filing the request late.
After sending your continuance request, the court will mail you an Order on Request to Postpone Trial (Form SC-152) indicating its decision on the request. They will also send a notice to all involved parties. If the judge reschedules the trial date, they will give you your new date.
If the judge fails to postpone your trial, the court hearing will be on the scheduled date. They will notify you why they denied your request.
If you fail to hear from the court, attend your scheduled court hearing.
Find Competent and Experienced Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
Life happens, and appointments are forgotten and missed. Probably, you have been detained in another jurisdiction, were not adequately notified of the court hearing, or had an emergency. Whatever your reason for the FTA, California courts take the matter seriously and can result in penalties and consequences like a bench warrant, additional charges, and fines. Fortunately, it is not too late to handle the matter if you have not been arrested.
The skilled legal team at Leah Legal can work with the judge to explain why you missed your scheduled court hearing, reschedule a new date, and have your BW cleared. For many years we have represented thousands of defendants in Van Nuys and can help you fight for your rights and freedom. Do not wait to act. Please contact us at 818-484-1100 while you still have available options.
Law enforcement officers require your cooperation to discharge their duties. Failing or refusing to abide by an order or directive by the police is an offense in California. A crime like tha could result in severe consequences, including time behind bars and payment of a hefty fine. You will also be left with a damaging criminal record that could affect your social and career life. Thus, if you face charges of disobeying the police, you will need the help of a competent criminal attorney to fight your charges in court. The prosecutor will table evidence against you to obtain a conviction. But your attorney can counter the prosecutor’s evidence to cause the judge to reduce or dismiss your charges. Talk to a skilled criminal attorney for more information and legal guidance.
What It Means to Disobey a Police Officer
The police are more responsible for maintaining law and order and public safety. They enforce the law and detect, prevent and investigate crimes. The police cannot do all that without cooperation from the members of the public. For instance, they rely on the information given by eyewitnesses to build cases against criminals. They also rely on tips from public members to know what is happening in various parts of the state. Without your cooperation, the police will not be able to carry out their mandate, and bad happenings could occur where you live, including increasing crime rates.
California Vehicle Code 2800 is the law that prohibits members of the public from failing or refusing to cooperate with the police in their discharge of duty. The law requires you to abide by any lawful directive or order given by the police. Violating this law could result in misdemeanor charges, punishable by time in jail and payment of fines.
Interpreting this law is critical in understanding what disobeying a police officer means and its legal implications. Like so many other laws in California, this statute is not as straightforward as it seems. So many actions or lack thereof could result in charges under this statute. Here are some of the examples of activities that could result in Charges under VC 2800:
Fleeing from an officer even after the officer has ordered you to stay still.
Not complying with a police officer’s order to come out of your car after a traffic stop.
Driving through a clearly-marked emergency area that the police have enclosed for crime investigation
It is necessary to understand a directive or order by the police to avoid making the mistake of disobeying an officer while the officer is on duty. You could seek clarification if you do not understand what the officer means. However, if the officer does not give any order, you will not be guilty under this statute if you fail to do what the officer wants you to do. You need the help of an experienced criminal attorney to convince the jury of your innocence and compel the judge to dismiss your charges.
You go through the trial when you face charges for disobeying a police officer in California. The prosecutor must prove the following elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt for the court to find you guilty as charged:
That you willfully failed or refused to obey a lawful directive, signal, or order of a police officer
The officer was in their distinctive uniform at the time and was performing their duty
Let us look at these elements in greater detail to understand the offense even better:
A Willful Act
The crime of disobeying an officer involves a willful act of failing or refusing to follow an officer’s lawful order, signal, or directive. A willful act is intentional, purposeful, or deliberate. It means you saw the officer’s sign or heard their order or direction, understood it but still failed, or refused to comply.
A willful act is not accidental but deliberate. Some people act willfully when they know the consequences of their actions. If the prosecutor proves your actions were intentional or deliberate in court, you could be sentenced under this statute.
The Officer Was On Duty
An officer on duty will have their uniform and could be in a designated area where police officers perform their duty.
The police uniform is distinctive, characteristic of only the police. You are legally expected to know a police officer by their uniform. Thus, you should have known that the person giving you an order, directive, or signal was a police officer going by their uniform.
Having a distinctive uniform does not mean that the officer was in full police uniform or was wearing it at a specific formal level. For instance, being in plain clothes but wearing a police cap is adequate. But being in plain clothes but only wearing a badge is insufficient to support these charges.
Additionally, the officer must be performing their duty when the offense occurred. Police officers work in various areas, depending on the need. For instance, a traffic officer will be on the road, checking to ensure that motors abide by all traffic rules. Sometimes police officers are in the streets, gathering information or maintaining law and order. Being in uniform could be an indication that the officer was performing their duty.
Note that you could still be charged under this statute for failing to obey an out-of-service legal order by a member of the Highway Patrol or a member of any recognized law enforcement agency in California. An out-of-service order comes when your vehicle is declared improperly equipped or unsafe to operate on public roads.
How To Fight Your Charges
It is always a trying moment when you face criminal charges in California. The possibility of receiving a conviction is stressful enough. You could spend time in jail, pay a hefty fine, and live with a life-altering criminal record. However, you are allowed to fight your charges to avoid a conviction. If you face charges under California VC 2800, your attorney can aggressively use various legal strategies to compel the judge to dismiss your charges. Some of these strategies are:
Your Actions Were Not Willful
Remember that Vehicle Code 2800 requires you to have acted willfully in disobeying a police officer. It means that you disobeyed the officer deliberately or on purpose. You would not be guilty of this offense if that were not the case.
Your attorney can argue that you did not see or hear the officer’s directive or order, which is why you failed to respond to the officer. You could not have seen the officer’s signal if you did not see them.
Or you did not understand the officer’s signal.
You could have thought that the officer was signaling someone else and not you. For instance, if you were driving and there were other drivers, it could have been easy to assume that the officer was speaking to another driver, not you.
The most crucial bit is convincing the jury that you did not disobey or deliberately ignore the officer. The judge will dismiss your charges if your defense is acceptable in court.
The Officer Was Not On Duty
California VC 2800 requires you to have disobeyed or ignored an officer while the officer is performing their duty. It is the only way you can face charges for disobeying an officer. If the officer was not working, then your charges will not hold.
Generally, police on duty are in their distinctive uniform. It is easy to tell that an officer is working by how they are dressed. If an officer was off duty and was probably taking a walk or relaxing in a restaurant downtown, you will not be charged for disobeying them.
The jury expects the prosecutor to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the officer was on duty when you committed the offense. Records must show that the officer was working at the time. The court will dismiss your charges if the prosecutor cannot prove that.
It Was a Crime of Necessity
A crime of necessity occurs when you have a good reason to violate the law. In this case, you must convince the jury that you disobeyed an officer on duty for a good reason. Your intention for using this defense is to avoid a guilty verdict even when you actually committed the said offense.
For instance, your attorney can argue that you had an emergency at the time and could not stop as the officer had ordered. It could be that you were rushing someone to the hospital or needed urgent medical care at the time. But, you must support your defense with evidence for the judge to drop your charges.
Mistaken Identity
Mistaken identity is a valid defense strategy in cases where the police mistakenly charge you with a crime someone else committed. It could be that the actual perpetrator looks like you, drives the same car as you, or you are friends. These mistakes happen all the time; sadly, some people pay for other people’s mistakes.
If an officer signaled a driver or gave an order or a directive while the driver was still in their car, it is possible that the officer did not see the driver very well. Thus, the officer will assume the vehicle’s owner, the driver, as the perpetrator. In that case, you must prove that you were not the driver at the time or were not driving on the route when the crime happened.
Your defense will weaken the prosecutor’s case since they cannot prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you disobeyed an officer.
Improper Conduct By The Police
Your attorney can use this strategy to convince the jury to dismiss all evidence gathered against you. The law guides the police on how they must carry themselves while discharging their duty. For instance, if an officer signals you to stop while driving. They must ensure that you have seen and understood the signal. Officers must always ensure that their orders and directives are simple and easy to understand by public members. If an officer is arresting you, they must follow the proper procedure, including reading your Miranda rights.
If you feel that one or more officers did not conduct themselves as they should, you can use that as a defense strategy to convince the court to dismiss your charges.
Penalties for Disobeying a Police Officer
If the prosecutor proves all elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt, the jury will declare you guilty of disobeying a police officer. You will receive a sentence and subsequent penalties as provided under the law.
California VC 2800 is a misdemeanor offense punishable by:
A maximum of six months in jail
Court fines no exceeding $1,000
The judge could be kind enough to award you misdemeanor probation in place of jail time. It means that you will serve your sentence out of incarceration and under the direct supervision of the court instead of a probation officer. Misdemeanor probation lasts for about a year, though it could be longer for some situations.
The judge will set probation terms and conditions by which you must abide through your probation. During this period, you will return to the court to give a progress report and demonstrate that you comply with all set conditions. Some of the conditions you could receive for this offense are:
Ensuring that you pay all court fines
Completing community service
Obeying all laws and ensuring you do not commit any crime while on probation.
If the judge feels you could benefit from counseling or any other form of therapy, you will be ordered to attend a specific program that aligns with your needs.
Participating in group counseling or therapy
Seeking gainful employment
Showing up on all court dates without fail.
It is vital to abide by all set probation conditions to avoid legal trouble. If the judge realizes that you have violated probation, they will summon you for a probation violation hearing to determine the violated conditions and your reason for violating them. From this hearing, the judge will make any of the following conclusions:
Reinstate your probation and give you a stern warning against further violations
Reinstate your probation but modify the terms and conditions by giving you stricter conditions
Revoke your probation and order you to serve the maximum required jail term for your offense
You are eligible for early termination of your probation. The law allows judges to terminate misdemeanor probation early on specific conditions. You can petition the judge to end your probation early if you complete the terms of your probation ahead of schedule, without violations. Remember that judges have total discretion in granting petitions like these. Therefore, there is no guarantee that the judge will grant your request.
You Can Have Your Conviction Record Expunged
A criminal conviction on your criminal record negatively affects various aspects of your life, including your social and career life. People find it hard to trust or associate with people with a criminal background. Potential employers conduct background checks on job seekers and will hesitate to hire anyone with a criminal record. Thus, a conviction for disobeying a police officer could affect your efforts to socialize or find suitable employment.
Fortunately for you, California allows people with a conviction record to apply for an expungement of that record. Expungement relieves you of the penalties and disabilities that come with the conviction. You can qualify for expungement after a sentence for disobeying an officer. But it would be best if you met the following conditions:
Complete your jail time or probation (whichever applies to your situation) — If you were sentenced to time in jail or the judge awarded misdemeanor probation, you must serve your term to the end before applying for expungement.
Remember that you must not have violated any probation condition for the court to accept your petition.
You should not have pending convictions or criminal cases — You will not qualify for expungement if you serve time for another offense or are on probation.
If you meet these criteria, you can petition the same court where the conviction occurred to have your conviction record expunged. The judge will review your case and check your probation report to make the final decision. Once your conviction is expunged, it will not be publicly available. It means that potential employers, landlords, and service providers like insurance companies will not use your criminal background against you. But, you are required to disclose the conviction when applying for public office.
Find a Competent Van Nuys Criminal Attorney Near Me
If you face criminal charges for disobeying a police officer in Van Nuys, it helps to work alongside a competent attorney to understand the nature and legal implications of your charges. Your attorney will guide you through the complex legal process, explaining your options and planning a solid defense against your charges. You will likely obtain a fair outcome for your case if you engage the support of a skilled criminal attorney. At Leah Legal, we do not rest until you are satisfied with the case’s outcome. Call us at 818-484-1100 and allow us to review your case for the best defense strategy.
Driving your vehicle on a suspended license in California is a criminal offense. The offense attracts severe penalties, jail terms, and further license suspension, among other great penalties. The penalties change based on several factors, like your past criminal conviction, whether you are a first-time offender, and whether you are a habitual offender.
Since the charges are severe, you want to seek legal help immediately after the police arrest you for driving on a suspended license. However, hiring a criminal defense attorney and defending yourself might be expensive. The attorney will help you fight the huge charges.
The attorney will also help you have your driver’s license reinstated. Note that you must meet the requirements and pay the legal fee. You can enjoy your driving privileges if you reinstate your driver’s license. The following are the consequences you will face when law enforcement officers arrest you while driving on a suspended license.
Possible Punishment and Penalties
Every subsection of VC 14601 carries different punishments. The court considers a series of factors, including the nature of the case and your past criminal history. The court will enhance the conviction if you drive a vehicle with a suspended license within seven years of the initial crime.
The penalties differ depending on the reasons behind the license suspension. Note that the punishment and penalties are strict for habitual offenders, vehicular manslaughter, and DUI cases. The possible penalties for driving on a suspended license include:
- When the court suspends the court due to a DUI offense, you will remain in a county jail for ten days to six months. You will also be fined between $300 and $1,000, and you will have to install an ID device in your vehicle.
- If DMV suspends your license for negligence actions like overspeeding and violating traffic rules, you will be fined between $300 and $1,000. You will also remain behind bars for between five days and six months.
- The IID devices were introduced to help minimize the cases of DUI. Therefore, once the DMV suspends your driving license, the law requires you to install the IID device. The device acts as a mini breathalyzer to ensure you do not operate the vehicle until you submit to an alcohol test.
What to Expect if Facing Charges for Driving on a Suspended License
The timeline set by the DMV to receive your driving privileges ranges from four weeks to one year. Apart from the suspension of your driver’s license, the law will require you to attend compulsory courses. Ensure you hire an attorney to help you fight the severe charges for violating VC 14601. The attorney will play a major role in helping you reinstate your driving privileges.
It would help if you were prepared to walk in and out of the court as your case proceeds. Remember, the DMV reinstates the driver’s driving privileges. The legal process for your reinstatement requires you to pay fines and provide proof of insurance. By working with a well-skilled lawyer, you understand the available options for driving on a suspended license. Ensure you disclose everything to your attorney, even if the court has already sealed your past criminal conviction.
Note that driving on a suspended license involves two main elements:
- The first element is that you operated a vehicle with a suspended license.
- The second element is that you knew you were driving on a suspended license.
Before the court imposes the penalties for violating VC 14601, the prosecutor must prove the elements of the crime. The DMV may suspend your license due to alcohol abuse and reckless driving. The same may occur when the driver has been declared negligent or incompetent to drive. The main common cause of the offense is reckless driving.
To avoid the hectic penalties for license suspension, you must reinstate your driving license with the DMV. Also, ensure you follow all the requirements while reinstating the license. Remember that license reinstatement requirements vary based on the reason for the suspension.
It would be best if you were also prepared to hire a criminal defense attorney. The attorney will help you fight the charge. Before you choose an attorney to work with, ensure you go for the best attorney. Who is the best criminal defense attorney? A well-skilled and experienced criminal defense attorney is highly favorable.
License Suspension for Certain Offenses
The DMV might suspend your license for certain crimes. The law prohibits you from operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of drugs. The specific offense that might lead to your license suspension includes reckless driving. The DMV might also suspend your license if you have a physical or mental condition.
So, when law enforcement officers find you driving a vehicle with a suspended license, you will face the penalties outlined. Speak with your attorney to help you learn and understand whether your offense meets the requirements for license suspension. If your license is suspended, the attorney will help you know what to do next.
License Suspension for Failure to Submit to Chemical Test
DMV may suspend your driver’s license when you refuse to submit for a chemical, breath, urine, or test. While serving probation, you might lose your license when you refuse to offer a chemical test. If you are below 21 years and have a BAC level above 0.01%, the Department of a Motor Vehicle may suspend your license when you are pulled over for drunk driving. If this is your case, you will face additional penalties for driving on suspended license charges.
License Suspension for General Cases
Under VC 14601.1, the law warns motorists from driving their vehicles when their driving privileges are suspended. The court can hold you guilty of the crime if you know you are operating the car on a suspended license. The statute also suggests that the department of motor vehicles issue you with a notice of license suspension. Your attorney can also help you understand the crimes classified as general offenses.
License Suspension for DUI Offenders
According to VC 14601.2, driving with a suspended license is a criminal offense. Although a DUI conviction itself can lead to license suspension, driving on a suspended license while under the influence of alcohol attracts severe charges. Therefore, a DUI charge leads to a license suspension in the following situations:
- Operating a vehicle with a BAC reading of above 0.08%
- Driving a car while under the influence of controlled substances
- DUI leading to injuries
License Suspension for Habitual Offenders
Who is a regular or habitual offender in California? The court might name you a habitual offender when the DMV suspends your license within a year of your initial license suspension. The court has several ways to punish you as a habitual offender. You might also become a habitual offender in a situation where you are driving on a suspended license and have an accident. So, you might face charges of being a habitual offender when you commit any of the following within a year:
- DMV had suspended your license, and you had committed other serious offenses like hit and run and DUI.
- The motor vehicle department suspended your license because you committed three less severe crimes, like speeding or running a stop sign.
- The DMV had suspended your license, but you had three other traffic accidents causing serious injuries.
- Your license was suspended, and you committed a combination of violating traffic rules and causing traffic accidents.
If you are a habitual offender, you risk facing serious penalties. A first-time offender faces the following penalties:
- Fine of up to $1,000
- 1-month jail term
- Probation for 36 months
Repeat offenders face the following penalties:
- Fine not exceeding $2,000
- Six months jail term
- Three years of probation
Remember, these penalties are in addition to your initial DUI penalties. You will also face additional penalties when the police arrest you while driving on a suspended license. But the habitual offender also has an opportunity to fight the charge. A good and well-experienced attorney can help you fight the charge. Also, the attorney can convince the court to reduce the charge to a less severe crime.
The Cost of Reinstating Your Driver’s License
Remember, a license suspension in California is a temporary revocation of your privileges to drive your car because of violating certain regulations and laws. Alternatively, the court will permanently revoke your license when you severely break the state’s laws.
Most cases are an accumulation of too many tickets or unpaid tickets. Tickets include moving violations, operating your vehicle while impaired, and causing accidents. Your license might even be suspended because of unpaid child support or taxes.
The law requires you to wait until the suspension duration elapses before you seek to reinstate your license. Primarily, the timeframe occurs as follows:
After the license suspension period elapses, you may pursue your license reinstatement.
In California, license reinstatement is not automatic, meaning the law requires you to apply for your driver’s license reinstatement and restore your privileges. You should also adhere to the licensing procedure, which differs according to the reasons for the license suspension.
How do you reinstate your suspended license? The first thing you want to do is examine the main reasons for your license suspension. In California, license reinstatement processes vary based on the nature of the case. You want to follow the following steps when reinstating your driver’s license:
Wait for the License Suspension Period to Pass
You have several possible ways to work out your suspension, but you can do nothing until the first four weeks of the suspension elapses. Remember that one month is compulsory, meaning you must adhere to the law. When you think the license suspension is illegal, you might ask for a hearing with the department of Motor Vehicles within the first ten days of obtaining the suspension order. The hearing will, however, not determine if you are guilty or innocent of a moving violation, but the department might agree to reverse the suspension for the time being.
Request for a Restricted License
What is a restricted license, and when should you obtain one? As you wait for the general license suspension, you or your attorney may apply and seek to obtain a restricted license. For you to obtain the license:
- Pay the required re-issuance fee
- Apply for the restricted license at DMV
- Show evidence of financial responsibility
Have Updated Auto Insurance and Submit the Necessary Document to the DMV Offices
The court cannot allow you to reinstate your license unless you have evidence of updated auto insurance. Alternatively, you want to submit the paperwork seeking to reinstate your license to the local DMV offices. You should also include legal auto insurance.
Pay the Legal Fee
The last step in reinstating your license is paying the necessary fee. Note the fee may vary based on the nature of the case. In California, the potential reinstatement fee is usually $55. DMV also charge reinstatement fee as follows:
- Court restriction $15
- Drug suspension $24
- Removing license restriction of $20
Also, the legal process for reinstating your license varies depending on the reasons behind your suspension. Ensure you work closely with your attorney to provide legal help throughout the legal process. Working alone will only worsen your case. A skilled and experienced attorney is the best choice.
Reinstating a Commercial Driving License After License Suspension
You can reinstate your commercial driving license in several ways. But it would help if you met the necessary conditions. So, you want to do the following:
- Clear your suspension license
- Appear for your DMV hearing
- Pay the necessary reinstatement fines and fees
- Attend the court classes as ordered
Although the law requires you to qualify for license reinstatement, the law requires you to serve the general period before you obtain your license. Clear off the fee. You can apply for a fresh license if your license has been degraded from commercial to non-commercial or regular.
Usually, the reinstatement fee varies based on the reinstatement request and the reason behind the disqualification. For example, removing the restrictions will cost $20, license re-issuance $55, court restriction $15, suspension by APS $100, and if you have a drug-related offense, you will pay $24.
The Cost of Hiring a Criminal Defense Attorney
The costs you incur while hiring a criminal defense attorney vary based on how they are experienced and the time taken to resolve your case. In many cases, the attorney charges per hour. Working with an attorney is much better than handling a criminal case alone. In many cases, the attorneys do not charge a consultation fee. However, the attorneys play a crucial part in ensuring you fight the charge. After investigating your case, the judge develops strong defense mechanisms to help fight the charge. In the driver’s license suspension case, the attorney might use the following defenses to defend your rights.
You were Unaware About License Suspension
Remember, before you face charges for driving on a suspended license, the prosecutor must prove you were aware of the license suspension. The crime will rotate around the aspect of knowledge. But your criminal defense attorney may argue you were unaware of the license suspension. If the DMV claims they emailed you, your criminal defense attorney may argue you had already changed your address by the time the DMV sent you the notice.
Invalid License Suspension
You only face charges for driving on a suspended license when the suspension is valid, meaning when the license suspension is invalid, you cannot face conviction for driving on a suspended license. So, let your attorney know about the charge earlier enough to have enough time to develop the defense.
Restricted License
After the DMV suspends your license, you might still acquire a restricted license. You must present valid reasons why you want to obtain the restricted license. When the Department of Motor Vehicles grants you a restricted license, you can comfortably drive to school or work. Also, you will be free to drive to any part the court has allowed you to. So, when your attorney claims you had a restricted license during your arrest, this can be a valid defense.
Plea Bargain
Sometimes the court may decide to reduce the charge to a less severe offense. A lesser crime may include driving without a valid license. Again, the prosecutor might reduce the crime to an infraction like a moving violation. But this must also occur when you do not have past criminal convictions. Ensure you work closely with your criminal defense attorney throughout the legal process.
Will Conviction for VC 14601 Affect My Immigration Status?
Fortunately, if you are an immigrant in California facing a charge for driving on a suspended license, the conviction will not impact your immigration status. Although other crimes attract deportation, driving on a suspended license charge will not attract deportation. Speak with your attorney to help you learn more about the possible penalties and punishment of an immigrant facing a charge for driving on a suspended license.
Contact a Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
When the police pull you over driving on a suspended license, you want to seek legal help as soon as possible. You have several options you can choose from, starting from plea scenarios and reduced charges. Your attorney can develop several defense strategies to help you fight the charge. A well-skilled and experienced attorney is highly recommended for your case outcome.
At Leah Legal, our attorneys have a track record of winning criminal cases like driving on a suspended license. We do everything possible to obtain the best case outcome, may it be a reduced charge, sentence, or dismissal of your case. Our attorneys have helped many people in Van Nuys, CA, facing a similar charge. Contact us today at 818-484-1100 for a free case evaluation.
Most criminal offenses are charged as either felonies or misdemeanors. These two categories are different in several ways — for instance, felony offenses carry harsher penalties that could even include a life sentence while misdemeanor offenses carry lesser penalties. In general, felony offenses are more severe crimes compared to misdemeanor offenses. This blog will help you understand how felonies and misdemeanors are different.
What is a Felony?
A felony is a criminal offense that is punishable by imprisonment for more than one year. The prosecution of felonies in California is handled by the district attorney in the county where the crime was committed. If the district attorney decides to pursue charges, the case will be presented to a grand jury, which will determine whether there is enough evidence to indict the defendant. If the grand jury decides to indict, the case will proceed to a trial.
Felony Degrees in California
There are five different felony degrees in California. The degree of the felony is determined by the facts and circumstances of the crime, as well as the criminal history of the offender. The five degrees of felonies are a first-degree felony, a second-degree felony, a third-degree felony, a fourth-degree felony, and a fifth-degree felony.
- First-degree felonies — These are the most serious felonies in California. They are punishable by a prison sentence of 25 years to life, a fine of up to $10,000, or both. Examples of first-degree felonies include murder, robbery, and rape.
- Second-degree felony — these offenses are punishable by a prison sentence of 2 to 20 years, a fine of up to $10,000, or both. Examples of second-degree felonies include manslaughter, kidnapping, and arson.
- Third-degree felony — these felonies are punishable by a prison sentence of 3 to 5 years, a fine of up to $10,000, or both. Examples of third-degree felonies include burglary, assault, and drug trafficking.
- Fourth-degree felony — these felonies are punishable by a prison sentence of up to 18 months, a fine of up to $5,000, or both. Examples of fourth-degree felonies include fraud and forgery.
- Fifth-degree felony — these felonies are punishable by a prison sentence of up to one year, a fine of up to $1,000, or both. Examples of fifth-degree felonies include theft and vandalism.
Federal Felonies
Federal felonies are the most serious type of crime that a person can be charged with within the United States. They are typically punishable by a prison sentence of more than one year, and can often result in a prison sentence of 20 years or more. Federal felonies can also be punishable by death.
Categories for Federal Felonies
Federal felonies are classified as follows:
- Class A — Class A felonies are the most serious type of felony offense. They typically involve violent crimes, such as murder, rape, and armed robbery.
- Class B — Class B felonies are less serious than Class A felonies, but are still considered to be very serious offenses. They typically involve crimes such as drug trafficking and burglary.
- Class C — Class C felonies are less serious than Class B felonies but are still considered to be serious offenses. They typically involve crimes such as fraud and embezzlement.
- Class D — Class D felonies are the least serious type of felony offense. They typically involve crimes such as petty theft and vandalism.
- Class E — A class E felony is a felony that is ranked as the lowest level of crime in federal Law. A class E felony is punishable by a maximum sentence of four years in prison.
The Three Strikes Felonies in California
The three strikes felonies in California are serious crimes that can lead to a prison sentence of 25 years to life. The three strikes law was enacted in 1994 and is intended to keep habitual offenders off the streets and deter people from committing serious crimes. The law applies to three types of felonies: violent felonies, serious felonies, and certain felonies that are considered to be “wobblers” (crimes that can be charged as either a felony or a misdemeanor). A person who is convicted of a third strike felony will receive a mandatory 25-year-to-life prison sentence.
What is a Misdemeanor?
A misdemeanor offense is a minor criminal offense that is punishable by a fine or imprisonment of up to one year. Misdemeanor offenses are considered less serious than felonies which is why they carry a shorter jail term.
Misdemeanor Degrees in California
There are three different misdemeanor degrees in California. Note that the degree of the misdemeanor is determined by the facts and circumstances of the crime, as well as the criminal history of the offender. The three degrees of a misdemeanor are:
- First-degree misdemeanor — these misdemeanors are punishable by a jail sentence of up to 6 months, a fine of up to $1,000, or both. Examples of first-degree misdemeanors include domestic violence and DUI.
- Second-degree misdemeanor — these misdemeanors are punishable by a jail sentence of up to 3 months, a fine of up to $500, or both. Examples of second-degree misdemeanors include trespassing and petty theft.
- Third-degree misdemeanor — these misdemeanors are punishable by a jail sentence of up to 30 days, a fine of up to $250, or both. Examples of third-degree misdemeanors include loitering and disorderly conduct.
Wobbler Offenses
A wobbler is a crime that can be charged and prosecuted as either a misdemeanor or a felony. The decision of whether to charge the offense as a misdemeanor or a felony rests with the prosecutor.
Wobblers can be either “straight” or “aggravated.” A straight wobbler is a crime that is punishable as either a misdemeanor or a felony. An aggravated wobbler is a crime that is punishable as a misdemeanor or a felony, but the felony penalties are enhanced. Some examples of wobblers include:
- Assault & Battery
- Burglary
- Criminal Threats
- Domestic Violence
- DUI
- Lewd Acts with a Child
- Manslaughter
- Resisting Arrest
- Robbery
- Stalking
- Vehicular Manslaughter
What is an Infraction?
An infraction is a minor violation of the law that is punishable by a fine or citation but not by jail time. There are three categories of infractions in California: moving violations, nonmoving violations, and parking violations. Moving violations are offenses that involve the operation of a vehicle, such as speeding or running a red light. Nonmoving violations are offenses that do not involve the operation of a vehicle, such as littering or jaywalking. Parking violations are offenses that involve the parking of a vehicle, such as parking in a handicapped spot or parking in a no-parking zone.
What is the difference between a Felony and a Misdemeanor?
There are differences between a felony and a misdemeanor conviction. For example:
- The punishment for a misdemeanor can be a fine of up to $1,000 and a jail sentence of up to one year while the punishment for a felony can be a fine of up to $10,000 and/or a prison sentence of more than one year.
- If the misdemeanor is your first offense, you may be able to get probation instead of jail time. However, getting felony probation can be complex although If the felony is your first offense, you may be able to get probation after serving a specific percentage of your sentencing. Note that not all felonies are eligible for probation.
- If convicted of a misdemeanor, you may be able to get a pardon while If convicted of a felony, you may not be able to get a pardon.
- If convicted of a misdemeanor, you may be able to get your charges dismissed. If convicted of a felony, you may be able to get your charges dismissed but the process is longer.
- Both felony and misdemeanor convictions can be expunged, but the process is different for each. A felony conviction can be expunged by having your record sealed, which means that it will not be accessible to the public. A misdemeanor conviction can be expunged by having the court order the record to be destroyed.
- A felony conviction is sealed in California by filing a petition with the court. A misdemeanor conviction is sealed by the court automatically sealing the record after the completion of the sentence.
- Misdemeanors are typically charged by the state in which you live while felonies can be charged by either the state or the federal government.
- The maximum amount of time between a trial and sentencing is six months while the maximum amount of time between a trial and sentencing is two years.
- The maximum amount of time between an arrest and trial for a misdemeanor is one year while the maximum amount of time between an arrest and trial for a felony is three years.
Other differences include:
- A felony is a more serious crime than a misdemeanor
- A felony conviction can result in a prison sentence, while a misdemeanor conviction typically only results in a county jail sentence
- A felony conviction can lead to the loss of certain civil rights, such as the right to vote or own a firearm
- A felony conviction can also lead to a loss of certain professional licenses
- A felony conviction will generally stay on your criminal record for life, while a misdemeanor conviction will typically only stay on your record for 7-10 years
- A felony conviction can make it difficult to find employment, housing, or obtain loans
- A felony conviction can lead to an increased sentence for future crimes
- A felony conviction can result in deportation for non-citizens
- A felony conviction can make it difficult to obtain a passport
- A felony conviction can impact your personal and professional reputation negatively
Felony vs. Misdemeanor Examples
Misdemeanor
Some of the common offenses charged as misdemeanors include:
- Trespassing
- Public intoxication
- Possession of a small amount of marijuana
- Reckless driving
- Vandalism
Felony
- Murder
- Rape
- Arson
- Robbery
- Burglary
- Assault with a deadly weapon
- Possession of a large amount of marijuana
- Manufacturing drugs
Punishment for Felonies vs. Misdemeanors
The major difference between misdemeanor and felony charges is that misdemeanor charges are typically less serious than felony charges, and are often handled less formally. For example, a misdemeanor charge may be handled in a lower court, such as a Municipal Court, rather than a higher court, such as a Superior Court.
Misdemeanor charges are also typically less serious than felony charges and are often punishable by a fine and/or a shorter jail sentence. For example, a misdemeanor charge of trespassing may be punishable by a fine of up to $1,000 and/or up to six months in jail, while a felony charge of burglary may be punishable by a fine of up to $10,000 and/or up to five years in prison.
What are the Effects of Felony and Misdemeanor Convictions?
There are several effects that both a felony and misdemeanor conviction has on a person’s future/life. These effects include:
- Misdemeanor and felony convictions can make it difficult for a person to find employment
- A person with a criminal record may be ineligible for certain types of housing
- A person with a criminal record may be ineligible for certain types of financial aid
- A person with a criminal record may be ineligible for certain types of government benefits
- A person with a criminal record may be ineligible to vote in some elections
- A person with a criminal record may be ineligible to serve on a jury
- A person with a criminal record may be ineligible to possess a firearm
- A person with a criminal record may be subject to increased penalties if convicted of another crime
- Some offenses may require an offender to register as a sex offender
- A person with a criminal record may be deported if they are not a U.S. citizen
Factors Used to Determine whether a Crime Should be Charged as a Felony or Misdemeanor
There are several factors that the court looks at before determining whether to charge an offense as a misdemeanor or felony. These factors include:
- The seriousness of the crime
- The criminal history of the defendant
- The defendant’s age
- The victim’s age
- The impact of the crime on the victim
- Whether there was the use of weapons during the commission of the crime
- The number of victims involved
- The amount of injury caused
- The premeditation involved and whether the offense was gang-related
- The jurisdiction in which the crime was committed
FAQs
Does felony classification affect sentencing?
Federal classification of felonies does affect sentencing in some ways. For example, federal law has different penalties for different types of felonies. The most serious federal felonies are classified as Class A, and they can be punishable by up to life in prison.
What are some differences between state and federal felonies?
Some differences between state and federal felonies include:
- The amount of jail time — A federal felony has a potential jail sentence that is almost always longer than a state felony.
- The types of crimes — Federal felonies are usually crimes that cross state lines, such as drug trafficking, whereas state felonies are usually more localized, such as burglary.
- The process — The federal felony process is usually more complicated and takes longer than the state felony process.
When Is a misdemeanor upgraded to a felony?
Misdemeanors are upgraded to felonies under certain circumstances. For example, if the misdemeanor is related to a serious crime, such as murder, rape, or armed robbery, it may be upgraded to a felony. Additionally, if you are charged with a misdemeanor charge of trespassing and you are found to have a weapon, the charge may be upgraded to a felony charge of armed trespass.
When is a felony charge reduced to a misdemeanor?
Some ways that a felony charge may be reduced to a misdemeanor include pleading guilty to a lesser charge, completing a rehabilitative program, or providing evidence that supports a lighter sentence. For example, if you are charged with a felony charge of burglary and the prosecutor can prove that you did not break into the home with the intent to commit a crime, the offense may be reduced and charged as a misdemeanor.
What are some of the misdemeanor facts in California?
- Misdemeanor charges in California are typically less serious than felony charges.
- Misdemeanor charges can sometimes be upgraded to felonies, depending on the circumstances of the case.
- Misdemeanor charges can result in jail time, but typically not more than one year.
- Misdemeanor charges can also result in fines, probation, and other penalties.
- Misdemeanor charges are typically handled in California’s Superior Courts.
What are the common felony facts?
- A felony charge is a more serious charge than a misdemeanor charge and can result in harsher penalties if convicted.
- A felony charge can be filed against an individual for various reasons, including but not limited to crimes such as murder, rape, robbery, and burglary.
- If an individual is convicted of a felony, they may face a prison sentence, fines, and/or other consequences such as the loss of their right to vote or own a firearm.
Find a Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
Regardless of the charges you are facing, it is important to have an experienced criminal defense attorney on your side. Our criminal defense attorneys at Leah Legal can help you navigate the criminal justice system, and protect your rights. Call us today at 818-484-1100 for a free initial consultation if you are in Van Nuys.
While the threshold blood alcohol concentration (BAC) for a drunk driving charge under Vehicle Code 23152 VC is 0.08%, an underage driver can face severe consequences if he/she has any amount of alcohol in his/her system. It is natural to worry when you receive information that your child is in legal custody for any alleged crime, but you have options.
If your child is under arrest for an alleged DUI (driving under the influence) offense, the police will not sympathize or pity him/her just because he/she is under 21. Retaining an attorney’s services is the only reliable way to protect your child’s best interest and reputation during this challenging and emotional moment after an arrest.
A skilled and experienced attorney will review your child’s DUI case to prepare well-thought-out defenses that can convince the prosecutor to drop or reduce the alleged charges. To that end, the sooner you hire a DUI attorney, the better the odds of beating the alleged DUI charge that has put your child in legal custody.
Helpful Tips On What to Do If Your Underage Child is Under Arrest for an Alleged DUI Offense
Most teenagers and 20-year-olds do not understand the impact of intoxicated driving. Apart from being one of the leading causes of most auto accidents, intoxicated driving is also a crime that can attract severe penalties upon conviction.
If your child is under arrest for an alleged DUI offense, it is on you as a parent to do everything necessary to protect his/her best interests. Instead of worrying about what the case could turn into or how it could be your fault as a parent, you should take the necessary steps to protect his/her best interests for the best possible outcome on the charge.
Below are helpful tips on what to do if your underage child is under arrest for an alleged DUI offense:
- Educate the Child on His/Her Legal Rights
The best way to protect your child’s best interests upon an arrest is by informing him/her of his/her legal rights. Regardless of age, every arrestee has several constitutional protections or legal rights that the arresting officer must respect, especially when interrogating a crime suspect.
Since police misconduct issues are not uncommon, it is important to educate your child on his/her legal rights as the alleged case continues through the legal justice system. Some of these constitutional protections include the right to:
- Humane treatment
- Stay free from sexual harassment
- Remain silent
- Stop answering the officer’s questions during an interrogation
- Speak or consult with a defense attorney privately
- Stay free from unreasonable searches
- Call someone to inform him/her of the current situation or arrest
- A reasonable bail or bond
Remember to inform your child that the police are not his/her friend during these stressful times, regardless of how friendly they seem. Hence, talking to them politely or trying to prove his/her innocence will not help.
- Educate Yourself on Various DUI Laws That Could be Apply to Your Underage Child’s Case
Another critical step to protecting your underage child’s best interests upon arrest for an alleged DUI offense is understanding DUI laws that could apply to his/her case and the consequences of violating these laws. Explained below are typically the three main categories of underage DUI laws that could apply to your child’s case, depending on his/her BAC level:
The ” Zero Tolerance ” Law
Since it is unlawful for someone under 21 years to drink or even sip alcohol, an underage motorist with any trace of alcohol in his/her system can still face a DUI charge. According to VC 23136, also known as the “zero tolerance” law, it is unlawful for anyone under the age of 21 years:
- To drive
- With a BAC of 0.01 percent or above
- After drinking an alcoholic beverage
Even small traces of alcohol in your system can raise your BAC to 0.01 percent. For that reason, the prosecutor could file a VC 23136 violation charge against your child even if the alcohol in his/her system was from any other source, not just an alcoholic drink.
Apart from alcohol, other potential sources of alcohol that can make your child guilty for the alleged “zero tolerance” DUI charge under VC 23136 include:
- Homeopathic medication
- Cough syrups
- Topical mouth-numbing gels
Typically, VC 23136 will apply to your child’s DUI case even if he/she was not impaired or intoxicated as long as his/her BAC was 0.01 percent or above. When determining the child’s BAC level, the officers will use a preliminary alcohol screening (PAS) device known as the breathalyzer.
A breathalyzer is a medium-sized hand-held device that uses a driver’s breath vapor to estimate the level or percentage of alcohol in his/her blood system after stopping at a sobriety checkpoint for a speedy DUI investigation. Although blowing a breathalyzer is optional for drivers aged 21 years and over, an underage motorist cannot refuse this roadside sobriety test.
Doing so can make the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) suspend your child’s driver’s license (DL) for up to one year. That is why it is crucial to educate yourself about what the alleged DUI charge your child is facing could turn into in the eyes of the law. Unlike a standard DUI charge, ” zero tolerance ” DUI is an infraction punishable by:
- Driver’s license suspension for up to one (1) year
- A fine of not more than $250
The Underage DUI Law
A violation of the underage DUI law will attract more severe penalties than a VC 23136 violation. Also known as the “underage DUI law,” VC 23140 is the statute that makes it illegal for a person aged 21 or below to drive or operate an automobile with a BAC of 0.05 percent or more in his/her system.
If you are older than 21 years old, driving with a BAC of 0.05 percent would not count as a DUI offense, which is why VC 23140 is known as underage DUI law.
Unlike VC 23136 violation “zero tolerance” DUI charge discussed above, VC 23140 violation charge is a crime in the eyes of the court. In most cases, if an underage motorist is under arrest for an alleged VC 23140 violation charge, the arresting officers will confirm his/her BAC level at the police station using a chemical test.
A post-arrest DUI chemical test could involve a blood test, urinalysis, or breath test. Reminding your child in police custody of the importance of cooperating with the officers during these BAC tests is critical to avoid making the alleged DUI case more severe.
Although the penalties for a conviction under VC 23140 do not attract a jail term, the penalties your child will face upon conviction will be more severe than what you would expect for a “zero tolerance” DUI charge conviction. Here are the penalties for underage DUI charge conviction under VC 23140:
- A fine not exceeding $300
- A one-year license suspension
- A self-sponsored three-month DUI course
The Standard ” Adult ” DUI Law
The BAC result of the breathalyzer or chemical test could also attract a standard DUI charge that an adult would face for the same offense. In addition to the prosecution for VC 23136 and VC 23140 violations, the prosecutor could also file a standard DUI charge against your child if his/her BAC level is 0.08 percent or higher.
Depending on the specific facts of your child’s case, your child could face any of the following standard “adult” DUI charges under VC 23152:
- Drunk Driving Charge
VC 23152(a) is the law that makes drunk driving or driving under the influence of alcohol illegal. That means if your child displays signs of intoxication, for example, slurred speech or watery eyes, the police can arrest him/her even if there is no evidence that his/her BAC is 0.08 percent or higher.
Generally speaking, this law will apply to your child’s DUI case if his/her mental and physical abilities are impaired, meaning the minor cannot drive a vehicle as a cautious sober driver would under similar circumstances. For a conviction for VC 23152(a) violation, the prosecutor must prove:
- Your child did drive a motor vehicle
- He/she was under the influence of alcohol while on the wheel
If it is your child’s first time DUI charge, a conviction for a drunk driving offense under VC 23152(a) will attract:
- A misdemeanor “summary” probation for three to five years
- Three to nine months of DUI school
- A fine ranging between $390 to $1,000
- Six-months driver’s license suspension
- Detention in the county jail for forty-eight hours to six months
- Driving with Excessive BAC Charge
Like a drunk driving charge, the offense of driving with excessive BAC is also a misdemeanor in the eyes of the law. According to VC 23152(b), also known as “per se” DUI law, it is unlawful for a motorist to operate a vehicle with a BAC of 0.08 percent or higher.
Unlike a drunk driving charge, for a conviction for VC 23152(b) violation, the prosecutor must convincingly prove that your child’s BAC was 0.08 percent or above at the time of the arrest. Upon conviction for VC 23152(b) violation, the penalties your child could face are identical to the ones listed above for a drunk driving charge conviction.
It is also worth noting that the penalties your child could face for a DUI charge conviction could increase or heighten if he/she has previous DUI offenses in his/her record or perhaps another person was killed or injured.
- Understand the Potential Long-Term Consequences Your Child Can Face Upon a Conviction for a DUI Charge
Undoubtedly, no parent would ever want their child to pay hefty fines or go to jail, but these are not the life-altering consequences of a DUI charge conviction. The actual threat to an underage motorist is that the rest of his/her life can change due to a single foolish mistake.
In addition to the jail term, hefty fines, and other penalties mentioned above, a DUI charge conviction can attract other life-altering consequences, including:
- College rejection — Nowadays, most schools and colleges will ask about criminal history as part of the admission criteria. That means a DUI conviction can affect your child’s eligibility to join a college to pursue his/her dreams.
- Employment challenges — During a job interview, an employer could ask about a criminal background, and many will look at a DUI charge conviction as an instant disqualification. That means a potential employer could skip over your child for an equally or less qualified job applicant with a clean criminal record.
- Financial hardship — On top of the criminal penalties, a DUI conviction can also result in hiked insurance rates. Also, if your child caused an accident, the court could require him/her to pay damages or restitution to the injured party in a civil lawsuit.
- Housing challenges — Since landlords will also look at your criminal record before they accept you as a tenant on their property, a DUI conviction can make it challenging for your child to secure housing or an apartment to live in.
It is natural and understandable to want to protect your son or daughter from these life-altering consequences of a DUI conviction. If your underage child is under arrest for an alleged DUI offense, there is much you can do to protect his/her best interests and legal rights.
Hiring an attorney should be your first step once you receive a call or a message that your child is in legal custody for an alleged DUI offense.
- Understand the Possible Defenses an Attorney Can Use to Challenge an Underage DUI Charge
There are several reliable defenses an experienced DUI attorney can apply to help your child challenge the alleged DUI charge for the best possible outcome. While every DUI case is different, below are some of the applicable defenses that can increase your child’s chances of obtaining the most favorable results on the alleged underage DUI charge:
- Your underage child was not driving
- Your underage child was not under the influence
- Your child’s breath and blood test results were erroneous
- Your child had “residual mouth alcohol,” which led to tainted results
- The arresting officers did not advise the child of his/her legal rights
- Your child’s arrest was unlawful
- The breathalyzer equipment was faulty
- The officer (s) doing the chemical blood or urine test did not follow the required DUI chemical test procedures
Although obtaining a dismissal of the alleged case is not guaranteed, a skilled and seasoned attorney will know the specific defenses and arguments that could work in your child’s favor for a lighter charge.
- Learn About Other Related Offenses the Prosecutor Could File Against Your Child if He/she is in Custody for an Alleged DUI Offense
Depending on the specific facts of your child’s DUI case, the prosecutor file any of the following related charges against him/her instead of or alongside the underlying DUI charge:
Underage Possession of Alcohol in a Vehicle
According to VC 23224, it is unlawful for a child aged 21 to drive or operate a vehicle containing an alcoholic beverage inside unless:
- The minor had his/her parent or any other adult onboard
- The alcohol container is sealed and unopened
A violation of this statute is a misdemeanor offense punishable by:
- A jail term of not more than six months
- A fine of not more than $1,000
- Driver’s license suspension for not more than a year
Possession of Marijuana While Driving
Although marijuana is partially legal, there are still strict regulations on who can possess, sell or transport this controlled substance. VC 23222(b) is the statute that makes it a criminal offense for any motorist:
- To have an ounce or less of marijuana or weed while driving on a highway or any public road
- And the motorist is not legally authorized to possess, transport, or sell the substance
A conviction for possession of marijuana while driving under VC 23222(b) is punishable by a fine of not more than $100.
Drinking and Smoking Marijuana While Driving
VC 23221 is the statute that makes it illegal for any motorist to drink alcohol or smoke marijuana while driving. A first-time violation of this statute is an infraction that could make your underage child pay a fine not exceeding $100 upon conviction.
Find a DUI Attorney Near Me
Despite our efforts as parents to educate and warn our children about the dangers and repercussions of drunk driving or impaired driving, not all will take heed. However, that is understandable for teenagers who are still learning through their mistakes.
If your child is under arrest for an alleged DUI offense in Van Nuys, the best step you can take to protect his/her best interest and legal rights is to contact an attorney. We at Leah Legal understand what a conviction for a DUI offense can do to your child’s life, even after serving his/her sentence.
We invite you to call us at 818-484-1100 to discuss your child’s DUI case with our attorneys. Our understanding attorneys will leave no stone unturned when preparing the best defense argument to challenge the DUI allegations your child is facing for the best possible outcome.
There are only a few things that are more scary and frustrating than receiving a phone call or, even worse, a visit notifying you that your child has been placed under arrest. If this ever happens to you, you want to understand the essential things regarding juvenile crime and detention and know what you should and should not do going forward, as it will significantly affect the outcome of your minor’s case and future.
Remind Your Child That They Do Not Have to and Should Not Talk to Law Enforcement Officers
Usually, juveniles do not entirely understand their legal rights when they have been placed under arrest. Your child is entitled to not speak to the police. However, police officers usually try to make children under arrest provide proof that backs the reasons for their detention before they can speak to their parents or a skilled lawyer. The police may interrogate your child at their school, where chances are low that they will be appropriately advised of their rights. They may also interrogate the minor at the station where there might be hidden tape recorders or cameras.
Do Not Argue With Law Enforcement
Remember, law enforcement officers owe the public the duty to uphold the rule of law and maintain peace and order. Per the Bureau of Justice Statistics, most children arrested are judged delinquent. Out of the judged delinquents, most confess to their offenses. If a police officer arrested your minor, they possibly have a valid reason.
Also, note that law enforcement officers are not on your side. Instead, they aim to maintain peace and order and enforce the law. At times you will see that the police department is oddly inherently understanding of juvenile behaviors. The police here might make compassionate remarks and recommendations based on family circumstances. However, do not engage or argue with them. Doing so may lead to a less favorable outcome for your child.
Hire a Defense Attorney for Your Child Immediately
Often, law enforcement officers tell parents whose children are under arrest that they do not need an attorney. They might say they only need to speak to your young one and derive the truth regarding the matter at hand. Although, if your minor is under arrest, the same rules apply for adult suspects, particularly Miranda rights, which state that anything your minor says can and will be used against them in juvenile delinquency court.
In California, a judge can appoint a public defender to a juvenile suspect. However, this occurs after the prosecutor has filed charges at the initial court hearing, known as the detention hearing. By this time, your child will have missed many key chances during the pre-filing and investigation stage. At that point, they could even avoid court entirely by working closely with a skilled juvenile defense attorney. That is why you want to hire a lawyer as soon as your child is arrested.
An experienced attorney may be capable of having your minor’s case rejected for filing, resolved informally, or even dropped. Some things the attorney can work on before your child’s case starts are:
- Requesting your minor’s release so that you can take them home.
- Talking with the probation department to block the filing of a petition against your young one and potentially provide informal child supervision without bringing charges.
- Suggesting a rehab program instead of child detention.
- Convincing the D.A to not file, dismiss, or reduce the charges against your child or prosecute the child informally without formal court proceedings
- If the case reaches the adjudication hearing stage, fight for the minor acquitted of all charges
Find Support
Should your child be placed under arrest, you will require support. However, there just is not much out here in the form of parenting support groups for parents whose minors have been incarcerated or arrested. Experts supposedly focus on parental engagements for parents of child offenders. However, parental engagement does not seem to involve emotional support. Meanwhile, groups for parents of child offenders appear to be only centered on the problem of finding justice. Finding justice is undoubtedly a critical goal. However, parents of children who have been arrested also require emotional support desperately.
Parenting a minor accused of an offense can be difficult and lonely. Parenting an adolescent, particularly one susceptible to risk-taking conduct, can be stressful and confusing. In this case, some parents will feel ashamed and pull out of supportive social groups. In other cases, communities might isolate the families dealing with a child offender. Regardless of your specific circumstances, it is helpful to converse with other parents with the same problem as you or those who have overcome their child’s arrest.
Many local groups in California offer support and other resources to parents dealing with juvenile-related issues such as incarceration, arrest, or reintegration once an incarcerated minor is set free. On the contrary, few national groups are providing emotional support to parents of incarcerated or arrested children. Nevertheless, it should be possible for you to find message boards and chat rooms where you can speak about the problems and find support and comfort from other parents who have experienced the same problems as you.
When it comes to your child, be proactive with their problems. If applicable, have them enroll in rehab or counseling for drug or alcohol issues. If the child was accused of an offense like vandalism, work hand in hand with the child’s lawyer to repair all the property they might have damaged. This will assist both legally and personally since the juvenile court judge will see that you are already doing what they would require.
Be Calm
You may be angry, and understandably so, at your child, the party that accused them of an offense, or the law enforcement officer who placed them under arrest. However, being angry will not help your teen. Even if you feel your child did something terrible and deserves to be punished, remember you could always punish them at home as you see appropriate and in a manner that will not affect their future. Furthermore, remember that sometimes people are falsely accused; thus, it will not hurt to hear their account of events first.
Know Your Teen’s Rights and Remind Them of the Same
Whereas juvenile delinquency courts function differently than adult courts, a suspected child offender’s legal rights are significantly the same. A juvenile who has been arrested has the following rights.
The Police Must Have Probable Cause to Search the Child
For a police officer to search your child and arrest them, they must have what is known as probable cause. Probable cause means the police should have enough reason to believe your child committed an offense. An exception is if you or any school official know of a crime and inform the police.
The Legal Right to Stay Silent
When a police officer arrests your child, the child should maintain that they will remain silent until they speak to their attorney. Ideally, you would have already told your child this before they were arrested. If not, you should remind them of their right to stay silent when you talk to them in person or on the phone.
It is essential to understand that any conversation you have with your child in the interrogation room may be recorded and submitted as proof in court. Do not discuss their case with them in the interrogation room unless the child’s lawyer is present.
Your Child Does Not Have the Right to Post Bail
Mostly in California, a child is released to their parents/guardian before the court determines their case. However, in some instances, if the judge deems it necessary, they can detain your child until all the evidence is scrutinized or until the judge reviews the charges. As a parent, your child does not have the right to bail and may be detained for an unspecified period. This is unlike in adult court, where the defendant can post bail to secure their release pending case resolution.
The Right to be Provided with Notice of Charges
Your minor must be notified of all the charges they face. There are terrifying stories of people being detained indefinitely without due process and without even hearing the charges of which they have been accused. These situations happen, but they are rare. And being detained without being notified of the charges is not something that usually happens to child offenders.
The Right to Legal Representation
As a guardian or parent, you ought to secure a skilled lawyer to represent your child in the court proceedings. That lawyer should understand juvenile delinquency laws, work or have worked in juvenile delinquency court, and understand the personalities and trends of the different juvenile court judges.
The Legal Right to Cross-Examine and Confront Witnesses
Although minors are not subjected to a court trial like adults, they have the legal right to cross-examine and confront witnesses. It is one of the ways the child can defend themself. And everyone else accused is entitled to defend themselves.
Charges Should be Proven Beyond Any Reasonable Doubt
For the judge to determine that a child committed an offense and deserves punishment, the prosecutor must prove beyond any reasonable doubt that the charges are accurate. It is the right of every juvenile accused of a crime to have the charges proven beyond any reasonable doubt. Should the investigation take an extended period, the child can be placed in a residential treatment center or detention facility until their charges are disproved or proven.
The Right Against Self-Incrimination
Children in juvenile delinquency court proceedings are entitled to invoke their 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination. This means no one can force a child to testify against themselves or say an incriminating statement that would later be used against them. In other words, the 5th amendment allows the minor to refuse to answer questions during the adjudication hearing to avoid accidentally confessing to the offense.
Other rights that your child has are:
- The right against unusual and cruel punishment.
- The Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial.
- The right to contact a lawyer when detained.
- The right to contact you when detained.
- The Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures.
- The child is not, however, entitled to a jury trial.
Comfort Your Child
If and when your young one is released from custody, discuss what transpired and ask them how they feel about it. Helping your child emotionally following an arrest can be difficult. You may be upset and want to express your disappointment. However, you should also let your child explain their side of the story. You may end up grasping key pieces of information that may assist you in fighting the charges the child faces. For instance, if a school official randomly searched your teen’s locker without reasonable suspicion, it is proof that the judge can withhold during the trial. Let the child know you may be angry, but you understand they are going through so much, and you only want to help them.
Encourage the Child to Stay Out of Trouble
You and your teen may be passing through a lot, but try to have them return to school as soon as possible and encourage them to work hard to improve their grades. This move may seem inconsequential, but it can help persuade the judges significantly. And if the minor is truant for an extended period after being released from detention, it may also hurt their case.
Obtain Documents That Can Be Helpful to the Child’s Case
After you have addressed the immediate matters involved with having your minor set free and obtained legal representation, you can take several other steps to help their case. Tracking down reference letters, report cards, and documents showing your child’s positive achievements can strengthen the minor’s case by demonstrating that they are a responsible and good citizen.
Always give these documents to your child’s legal counsel for assessment before presenting them in court. Remember that the more information your child’s lawyer has regarding your child’s educational, medical, and personal history, the more effectively they will advocate for the child. Ensure you inform the lawyer if the child has a mental illness or learning disability that may impact their behavior. If the minor has current accommodation at school or an education program, present copies of all these records at the detention hearing—even if the school no longer provides the services.
Additionally, providing a list of the minor’s present medications and info regarding the specific problems the drugs are being used to treat can be essential. Also, if there is anyone who might have information regarding what transpired in the case, for instance, probation officers, neighbors, employers, teachers, pastors, or coaches, it is helpful to provide the attorney with the full names and contact information for each of them. Also, provide the names of anyone who can serve as a character witness or voice support for your child.
Be Present for the Probation Interview
If you are notified that your minor is being transferred to juvenile hall, the probation department will call you to request background info about the minor. To ensure proper safety and care for your young one, you want to be available for the interview and provide the department with whatever information they need.
Generally, the interview is handled by phone. Informing the probation department of any disabilities, medications, special education services, and medical conditions your child requires could significantly benefit the minor if the probation officer decides that the youth should be detained in juvenile hall. However, in some instances, whatever you say during the interview may help persuade the probation officer that you can provide enough supervision and support so the minor does not have to be detained. Keep in mind that any information you give the probation officer regarding your child’s conduct is documented in a report submitted to the prosecutor and judge assigned to the minor’s case.
Ensure You Understand the Conditions or Release
Your child may be released from detention after the prosecutor files the case with various rules that should be followed pending the case resolution. Or, they may be required to follow given probation terms after their case is resolved. They want to adhere to all the conditions of probation or release to avoid further problems.
Whatever the specific conditions are for your child’s release or probation, ensure you evaluate them. If it would be impossible for the minor to comply with the ordered conditions or you do not understand something, inform the child’s lawyer.
Contact an Experienced Juvenile Delinquency Defense Attorney Near Me
Has your child been arrested for an offense in Van Nuys, CA? At Leah legal, we know how overwhelmed a parent can be when their child has been detained. Our knowledgeable juvenile crime lawyer will assist you in fighting to protect your child’s rights and seek the most favorable outcome for their case. We will first walk through what to expect from the juvenile justice system and what you can do to help your child prevail in their case. We have successfully represented child offenders in Van Nuys for several years. Call us for a complimentary case evaluation and consultation at 818-484-1100 to know more about how we can help your child when arrested.
Engaging in sexual conduct with a minor under 14 years old three or more times over at least three months will attract prosecution under Penal Code 288.5. This statute considers offenders as individuals residing in the same house as a minor or with regular access to the minor to engage in lewd conduct with the child.
Children are a significant part of the vulnerable population. That is why exposing a child to lewd behavior is a grave offense. Understanding the crime will prove beneficial in preparing your defense. It involves analyzing the crime as described under California law, the penalties you will likely face upon conviction, and the defenses you can raise to challenge the charges.
Continuous Sexual Abuse of a Child Under California Law
Continuous sexual abuse is related to lascivious or lewd acts with a child under 14 years, an offense under Penal Code 288. However, Penal Code 288.5 addresses the more grave crime of individuals with access to children sexually abusing minors.
PC 288.5 definition of continuous sexual abuse is when any individual with recurring access to a minor or who resides in the same home as the child, over a period of time, no less than three months, engages in three or more acts of lascivious or lewd behavior or substantial acts of sexual conduct with a minor aged 14 years or less at the time of the offense.
PC 288.5’s definition provides the elements of the crime for which prosecutors must prove beyond a reasonable doubt. Only then will a jury find you guilty.
- You resided in the same house as the minor or had recurring access to the child
- You engaged in three or more acts of lascivious or lewd conduct or substantial sexual conduct with the minor
- The three or more acts occurred over a period of no less than three months
- The minor was 14 or younger at the time of the incident
Here is a detailed look at the key elements.
Recurring Access
Recurring access is the ongoing ability of an individual to contact or approach a child, in this case, regularly. Recurring access does not require the defendant to have authority over the minor or have an ongoing relationship separate from the sexual activity with the minor.
For example, a neighbor repeatedly enters a minor’s home without the child’s parents’ knowledge and has sex with the child.
In this case, the neighbor has recurring access to the minor. This is so despite the parents’ not being aware of the neighbor’s access to their home or that the neighbor had no established relationship with the child.
Substantial Sexual Conduct
Penal Code 1203.066(b) defines substantial sexual conduct as the penetration of the victim’s or the offender’s rectum or vagina, the victim’s or offender’s penis, or a foreign object. These actions include oral copulation or masturbation of the offender or victim.
Oral copulation refers to contact between an individual’s mouth and another’s sexual organ or anus. Oral copulation does not require penetration of an intimate part.
Lascivious or Lewd Conduct
According to Penal Code 288(a), lewd or lascivious conduct is willfully touching a minor’s body with the intent of sexually arousing the child or the offender. Bare skin contact or contact with their private parts is not required to indicate lewd or lascivious conduct. The act is deemed to have occurred if:
- You touch any part of the child’s body, or
- You cause the moor to touch his/her own body, your body, or a third party’s body for sexual gratification
It is also lewd or lascivious if the contact is achieved through the child’s clothing.
Note: The law deems children incapable of giving consent. Therefore, it is not a defense to claim the child consented. This also extends to situations where the alleged victim is a minor (less than 18 years of age but older than 14 years old), even if you reasonably believed the minor was 18 or older at the time.
Legal Defenses You Can Raise
Common legal defenses have proven successful in challenging the prosecution’s case. They target the elements required to find you guilty and create reasonable doubt. Here is a look at each of them.
- No Recurring Access
Prosecutors bear the burden of proving you had recurring access to the child. Without substantially proving you had recurring access, your attorney can assert that you did not have regular access to the child. Thus, you cannot be guilty of continuous sexual abuse.
- Insufficient Evidence
Recall that PC 288.5 requires that there were substantial sexual acts with the child. Innocent physical contact with a child is not illegal. Thus defense attorneys demonstrate to the court that you made physical contact with the minor. However, the touch was not sexual.
Prosecutors bear the burden of proving that there was sexual conduct and that it occurred over at least three months. Without irrefutable evidence to substantiate their claim, defense attorneys will challenge the prosecution’s assertion of sexual behavior occurring within at least three months. This approach should cast sufficient doubt to warrant a reduction of the charges, if not a dismissal.
- False Accusations
It is possible that you were falsely accused of having continuous sexual conduct with a child. There are several reasons for these, namely:
- The child was confused about what transpired,
- The minor lied to have you kicked out of the house,
- The child’s parents or adults close to the child coached him/her to make false allegations, or
- The accusations are born of jealousy, anger, spite, or a need for revenge.
Whatever the motivation behind the false claims, this defense helps dismiss the charges.
- Police Misconduct
Without sufficient evidence, police officers could resort to coercive interrogation techniques to force you to confess to the accusations. These actions are a case of police misconduct and a violation of your rights. Your defense attorney will demonstrate to the court the techniques and enormous pressure you faced. Therefore, your confession was coerced and cannot be relied upon.
Penalties Under Penal Code 288.5
Continuous sexual abuse of a minor is a felony offense. Convictions result in 6, 12, or 16 years in prison. Further, the judge, pursuant to Senate Bill 145, will impose a sex offender registration requirement. You will renew the sex offender tag annually within a period the preceding judge will so order.
Convictions for continuous sexual abuse of a minor also attract a strike under California’s Three Strikes Law. You earn your first strike if the PC 288.5 violation is your first conviction. Your penalties remain as issued by the judge for this offense.
Your penalties will double if the PC 288.5 violation earns you a second strike on your record. You will serve twice the sentence issued upon conviction. If you have two prior strikes on your record and the conviction for continuous sexual abuse of a child earns a third strike, you face 25 years to life in prison for the current charge.
Impact on Immigration
Continuous sexual abuse of minors is a crime involving moral turpitude (CMT). Under immigration laws, a crime involving moral turpitude is a deportable offense. A conviction means you will be deported to your country of origin and marked inadmissible. Therefore, you will be denied re-entry to the U.S.
Impact of Gun Rights
PC 288.5 violations are felonies. Convicted felons cannot own, possess, purchase, or receive a gun. If found with one, you risk additional penalties since your actions violate PC 29800. If found guilty, you will face up to three years in prison.
Expunging Your Conviction
Expungements remove convictions from an individual’s criminal record, thus freeing them from the impairments of a sentence. You only qualify for an expungement if you did not serve a prison sentence for your offense. Further, you must complete your probation or jail term.
Since continuous sexual abuse of a minor is a felony, you do not qualify for an expungement of your criminal record. Therefore, any person who runs a background check will see your conviction.
Statute of Limitations
There is no set time limit under California’s Statute of Limitations for the District Attorney to institute criminal charges against individuals accused of engaging in continuous sexual abuse of a minor. Police officers will investigate the allegations, and prosecutors will seek a conviction even if the alleged victim, a minor at the time of the incident, is an adult.
Offenses Considered as Child Molestation
Child molestation laws address other inappropriate conduct with a minor. The offenses addressed below are related to continuous sexual acts with a minor. Therefore, prosecutors could pursue charges for these crimes as additional charges or alternatives to which a defendant should plead guilty in a plea bargain agreement. They are:
- Lewd acts with a child, a violation of PC 288
- Lewd conduct with a child achieved by the use of force or fear, a violation of PC 288(b)(1)
- Lewd acts with a minor, causing bodily harm, a crime under PC 288(i)
- Sexual acts with a child under ten years of age, an offense under PC 288.7
Each of these offenses has specific elements that prosecutors must prove. Further, each crime imposes particular penalties upon conviction. Here is a look at each crime in detail.
- Lewd or Lascivious Conduct With a Minor
Penal Code 288 makes it an offense to willfully engage in lewd behavior with a minor to gratify yourself, the child, or another individual sexually. Any acts, sexual or indecent, fall under lascivious conduct. Penal Code 288 specifically addresses lascivious or lewd conduct targeting minors 14 years or younger.
Prosecutors have to prove that:
- You willfully and lewdly touched a child’s body or caused the minor to touch his/her, your, or another individual’s body — Touch does not necessarily have to be bare skin contact. Indirect touch through clothing suffices. Additionally, touch is not limited to sexual organs. Any part of a child’s body is enough to warrant charges under PC 288, and
- You engaged in the conduct with an intent to appeal, arouse, or gratify the passion, lust, or sexual desires of the minor, yourself, or a third party.
PC 288 violations are specific intent crimes, meaning prosecutors must prove you had a specific intent to satisfy a sexual desire or arousal for the jury to find you guilty. Sexual intent is a question of fact for the jury to decide. They consider factors including:
- The nature of the touch
- The context in which the contact occurred
- The nature of the relationship between the minor and the perpetrator, and
- The lack of a reasonable or innocent explanation for the touch
Penalties for Lewd Conduct With a Child
The penalties under PC 288 vary depending on the circumstances of the case. Your criminal history, the minor’s age, and whether you used force or fear determine your punishment upon conviction.
Lewd Conduct With a Minor Without Force or Fear
If you did not use intimidatory tactics while engaging in lewd behavior with a minor 14 years of age or younger, your actions violate PC 288(a). This offense is a felony.
You will face 3, 6, or 8 years in prison and a maximum fine of $10,000 upon conviction.
Lewd Conduct With a Minor Involving Force or Fear
It is a violation of PC 288(b)(1) to use force, fear, violence, threats, or duress while engaging in lascivious behavior with a minor 14 years or younger.
- Fear — The courts consider both reasonable and unreasonable fear as experienced by the child.
- Violence — Courts consider whether the offender used any form of physical force intended to cause harm or threats of bodily injury to accomplish the crime.
- Duress — An examination of the totality of the case circumstances determines whether coercion occurred. The courts consider factors including the physical control of the victim, the threats of harm issued to the child, and the warnings to the child of possible harm to him/her or his/her family should the child tell anyone of the perpetrator’s actions.
Violations of PC 288(b)(1) are felonies punishable by a prison sentence of 5, 8, or 10 years and a maximum fine of $10,000.
Lewd Conduct With a Minor Resulting in Injuries
If you engage in lascivious behavior with a child 14 years of age or younger and the victim is injured, you will violate PC 288(i). The penalties for this offense increase significantly.
If you personally inflict physical harm on the child, you will face:
- A life sentence per PC 288(i),
- 25 years to life in prison as per PC 667.61(d)(7), and
- A five-year sentence enhancement for inflicting bodily harm per PC 12022.8
Convictions under Penal Code 288 impose a lifetime registration as a Tier Three sex offender.
- Sexual Conduct With a Minor Under 10 Years of Age,
Prosecutors will likely seek a conviction under PC 288.7 if you engage in sexual penetration or intercourse with a minor under ten years old.
A conviction is likely if the prosecutor proves that:
- You engaged in any of the following acts:
- Sodomy — The penetration of another’s anus by another individual’s penis,
- Sexual intercourse — Penetration of another’s vagina by the penis. Ejaculation is not necessary for the penetration to be deemed sexual intercourse,
- Oral copulation — Contact between a person’s mouth and another individual’s genitalia or anus, or
- Sexual penetration — Penetration of a person’s genitalia or anus by using a foreign object
- The child was ten years or younger a the time
- You were at least 18 years old at the time
PC 288.7 caps the victim’s age at ten years old. Therefore, prosecutors will opt for charges under PC 288 if the victim is ten years of age or older.
Sexual conduct is a strict liability offense. All prosecutors need to prove is that you engaged in any of the above-mentioned acts with a child ten years old or younger to secure your conviction.
Penalties for Sexual Conduct With a Minor Under 10
Convictions result in felony penalties. The penalties depend on the sexual act committed.
- Engaging in sodomy or sexual intercourse, a violation of PC 288.7(a), results in 25 years to life in prison.
- Engaging in sexual penetration or oral copulation, a violation of PC 288.7(b), results in 15 years to life in prison.
Further, you must register as a Tier-Three sex offender if convicted under PC 288.7. You retain the sex offender tag for life.
Note: Convictions for sexual conduct with minors under ten years of age are not expungable.
Contact a Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
Prosecutions and convictions for the continuous sexual abuse of a child impose life-changing consequences. Early intervention is key. At Leah Legal, we review the investigation reports and charges and present our findings to the Van Nuys prosecutors as a pre-filling intervention approach to have the charges reduced or dismissed. Should the prosecution proceed to trial, we will mount an ideal defense strategy to challenge the charges. Contact us today at 818-484-1100 for a review of your case.
In California, the crimes of assault and battery are often charged together. However, California law categorizes assault and battery as two different crimes. An assault and battery conviction can have significant repercussions, including jail terms and fines. If you face accusations of one or both of these offenses, you should not despair. Instead, you should challenge your charges and work to have them dismissed or reduced. You can only achieve this by seeking the services of a competent criminal defense attorney. An attorney will help you create the best defense to fight your charges.
The Difference Between Assault And Battery
Most people assume that the crimes of assault and battery are the same and often use the terms assault and battery interchangeably. However, while both assault and battery are offenses, they are not similar.
Typically, assault refers to an act of putting someone in a reasonable apprehension of harmful or offensive contact. On the other hand, battery refers to an action that inflicts harm or improper contact with another person. An assault is like an attempted battery, while a battery is a completed assault.
Assault Explained
Intentional actions that make someone else fear imminent physical harm or an attack amount to an assault. This action is an offense outlined under Penal Code 240 of California law. You could commit this offense even if your actions do not inflict physical harm to the victim. Penal Code 240 permits the police to arrest you without proving that the victim suffered bodily harm. Some of the actions that could amount to simple assault in California include:
- Throwing a glass at someone else
- Pushing someone else away from you in an argument
- Raising a fist at someone else and swinging
California law prohibits violence against other people. An act of trying to use force on someone else, intending to inflict harm on them, could lead to simple assault charges. The prosecutor could charge you even if you failed to inflict harm on the target person. If the prosecutor accuses you of simple assault, Penal Code 240 requires that the prosecutor prove the following elements:
- You did an act, which by its nature, would probably result in the application of force on another person.
- You did the act willfully.
- When you acted, you knew that your actions would lead a reasonable person to believe that the action would directly and probably result in applying force to that person.
- When you acted, you had the present ability to apply force to that person.
Use of force refers to any harmful or offensive touching. Under California laws, even a slight touch done rudely or offensively counts as a use of force. The touch needs to be direct. An indirect touch could also amount to an assault. For example, if you use an object to touch another person offensively, you could face assault charges. According to Penal Code 240, you do not need to apply force to face charges. You only need to take action with the potential of resulting in the application of force on the victim.
Willful action means acting intentionally or deliberately. However, the defendant does not need to have intended to break the law, inflict injury, or gain an undue advantage from the victim.
According to Penal Code 240, you do not need to have intended to apply force to another person to face charges under this statute. You only need to know that, under the circumstances, the application of force was likely a result of your actions.
Penalties For Simple Assault
Violation of Penal Code 240 in California is a misdemeanor offense. You could face these penalties:
- A fine that does not exceed $1,000
- Summary probation
- A jail term that does not exceed six months
You could face steeper penalties if you assault a victim that belongs to certain professional classes. You could face heightened punishment if you assault an individual engaged in carrying out their duties as:
- Process server
- Doctor or nurse providing emergency medical care
- Search and rescue member
- Animal control officer
- Peace officer (police or other law enforcement)
- Lifeguard
- Firefighter
- Emergency medical technical or paramedic
- Code enforcement officer
- Traffic officer
If you were aware or reasonably should have known that you assaulted a person that falls into the above category, then you could face these penalties:
- A fine that does not exceed $2,000
- A jail term that does not exceed one year
Your fine could also increase to $2,000 if you assaulted a parking control officer carrying out their duties.
Defenses To Penal Code 240 Charges
You could use the following defenses to contest your PC 240 charges in California:
No Willful Action
The prosecutor must provide sufficient evidence that you acted with a specific intent for you to face charges under PC 240. If the prosecutor fails to prove that you acted deliberately, your charges could be dismissed. The intent is the critical element of an assault case. You must intentionally interfere with someone else’s liberties or rights in a manner likely to inflict harm on them. The intent is determined when a reasonable person concludes that the actions could have inflicted injury to the victim.
This defense could only be valid where your actions were accidental or resulted from a misunderstanding. For example, you can accidentally trip on an object and push the victim. In this case, you can state that you did not act intentionally or on purpose.
You Lacked The Ability To Use Force
You can only be found guilty of violating Penal Code 240 if the prosecutor establishes that you have the present ability to apply force to the victim. Lacking the ability to use force on someone else is a defense that could sufficiently challenge your charges and result in a not-guilty verdict.
You Acted In Self-defense or Defense Of Others
This defense requires that your response match the perceived threat. It should be evident that your application of force on the victim was necessary to eliminate an imminent threat. Your attorney could argue as follows:
- You applied appropriate force, that is, no more force than was reasonably necessary to defend yourself or others against the perceived threat
- You believed you or the other person was facing an imminent danger of suffering bodily injury or unlawful touch.
- You believed the use of force was crucial to defend yourself or others against danger.
There are circumstances where you could use threatening words to protect yourself. However, no matter how offensive, words without action are not enough to justify an assault. For example, in the heat of an argument, you could shout at someone that you are going to shoot him/her. Your words do not amount to assault if no gun or other weapon is present or visible. Assault charges could apply if there was a gun or you took a step showing intent to carry out the threat.
False Accusation
It is common for the victim or witness to lie and falsely accuse you of assault. Their actions could be propagated by hatred, jealousy, or revenge for a perceived wrong. In other cases, a colleague could claim you assaulted them to eliminate competition from the workplace. If you consult an experienced attorney, the attorney will understand the motivation behind false allegations. Your attorney will present to the court the evidence that calls into question the validity of the witness or alleged victim.
Battery Explained
You could face battery charges according to PC 242 of California law, even if you barely came into contact with someone, provided the victim found your actions offensive. This act is a crime under California law, and battery charges can apply even if the person was not physically harmed. The crime of battery is defined under PC 242 as any willful and uninvited touching of another person. If the prosecutor accuses you of simple battery, the prosecutor must prove the following elements for you to face the charges:
- You touched another person.
- You did it willfully.
- In an offensive manner
You cannot face the charges if the prosecutor fails to establish the above elements. Under Penal Code 242, a battery charge does not require a violent beating. The prosecutor only needs to show that you were in unpleasantly close contact with the victim.
Touching Someone Else
The element of touching someone can only be valid if you make contact with another person. You do not need to hurt the person. The slightest touch can suffice for this conviction. You also need not make direct contact to face charges under this element. You risk committing battery if you use something to touch another person. Under California battery laws, touching any item tied closely to another person amounts to battery. For example, ripping off another person’s clothing is a form of battery.
Touching Someone Willfully
Willfully means that you decided to commit the crime, which led to the act of battery. Acting willfully does not necessarily mean you have a plan to harm the victim or to break the law. For example, you could pick up a lamp and toss it on the floor in an intense argument with another person. The lamp could hit the person’s leg in the process. In this case, you intended to toss the lamp in the person’s direction, even though you did not mean to hit or injure the person. You could face battery charges for this act because you were aware that the lamp could hit the person.
In An Offensive Manner
You can only face battery charges if your contact with another person is offensive. Any physical contact that is unpleasant, rude, violent, or offensive. Spitting at someone is one of the common forms of battery. Spitting at another person is objectively viewed as offensive, even if it does not hurt the person.
Examples Of Battery Offenses In California
- Approaching a woman you are interested in and taking her by her waist. You could be charged with a battery because of the unpleasant nature of the touch.
- Picking an object and throwing it at someone, hurting them in an intense argument. You could face battery charges because of hurling the object, which caused it to make unpleasant contact with someone else.
- For example, a parent is summoned to school because of their child’s behavior. Later the parent spits at the teacher after being upset by the teacher’s comments. The parent could face battery charges even if the saliva did not reach the teacher.
Aggravating Factors
Often, prosecutors prosecute simple battery as a misdemeanor. However, a battery conviction could lead to harsher penalties in some circumstances. These factors are known as aggravating factors and fall into three classes. The first class focuses on the nature of the battery victim. For example, you could face severe penalties if you commit battery on the following people:
- Traffic officer
- A firefighter
- Teacher
- Law enforcement officer
- Emergency medical technician
- Correctional officer
- Another member of a related public service occupation while actively doing their duties.
Second, if the alleged victim sustains serious physical injuries resulting from the crime, the prosecutor could handle your charges harshly, and you could face severe penalties. This aggravating factor seeks to determine the type of battery and its impact on the victim.
Lastly, this category focuses on the nature of the victim. You could face severe penalties if the victim is your spouse, ex-spouse, boyfriend, or ex-boyfriend. In addition, you could face domestic battery charges, which attract harsher penalties.
Penalties For Simple Battery
Often, in California, prosecutors charge a simple battery as a misdemeanor offense. However, this offense could also be charged as a felony when one or more aggravating factors are present. For example, battery perpetrated against a peace officer acting in the course of their duty or battery causing significant bodily injury could be charged as a felony.
If the prosecutor charges you with a misdemeanor, you could face these penalties:
- A fine that does not exceed $2,000
- Three years of a summary probation
- A jail term not exceeding one year in a county jail
If the prosecutor charges you with a misdemeanor domestic abuse battery, you could face these penalties:
- A fine that does not exceed $2,000
- Misdemeanor probation for three years
- A jail term of not more than one year in a county jail
If the prosecutor classifies the offense as felony battery against a peace officer that results in injury, you could face these penalties:
- A fine that does not exceed $10,000
- Formal probation for five years
- A jail term not exceeding three years in a state prison
If the prosecutor accuses you of felony battery that causes significant physical harm to someone else, you could face these penalties:
- A fine that does not exceed $10,000
- Formal probation of five years
- A jail term of 2, 3, or 4 years in a state prison
Also, pleading guilty or being charged with a misdemeanor battery could result in a permanent criminal record. The record could impact your life as you apply for school, jobs, and housing. This record could scare off potential landlords, employers, and teachers.
Defenses For Simple Battery
You can only fight simple battery charges by seeking the help of a professional criminal attorney. Some of the defenses you could present include the following:
You Did Not Act Maliciously
It is a serious crime for you to have malicious intent to commit battery under California Penal Code 242. However, you can only face the charges under this statute if you perpetrated the act willfully. You could allege that the act was accidental and that it was entirely unintentional.
You Acted In Self-Defense or Other People
This defense could be valid if the following factors are true:
- You used a reasonable amount of force that was necessary to protect you or the other person against harm
- You had reasonable belief that you or other people were in danger of sustaining bodily harm or unlawful touch
- You had a reasonable belief that immediate use of force was needed to protect yourself or other people against harm
Parental Right To Discipline A Child
In California, battery charges are often filed against parents in conjunction with Penal Code 273(d) child abuse. The parents’ actions against their children are often legal acts of discipline. You can counter your battery charges by alleging that you acted within your legal parental rights to discipline your child.
Crimes Charged Alongside Assault And Battery
Other crimes related to assault and battery in California include:
- Assault with a deadly weapon — Penal Code245(a)(1)
- Battery causing serious bodily injury — Penal Code 242
- Disturbing the peace — Penal Code 415
Find a Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
If you or a loved one faces allegations of assault or battery, you should immediately contact an expert Van Nuys criminal attorney to represent and defend your rights. At Leah Legal, our criminal defense attorneys have successfully defended numerous clients facing assault or battery charges. We are equipped with the expertise and skills required to get the most favorable results for you. Contact us today at 818-484-1100 to talk to one of our attorneys.
Facing a conspiracy to commit murder can result in serious penalties, so you want to defend yourself by working with an experienced criminal defense attorney. Typically, a conspiracy charge attracts the same penalties as someone charged with committing the offense. Due to this, you need to understand the legal provisions of the crime and establish a workable defense strategy. Thus, having an experienced legal team to guide you is essential.
At Leah Legal, we dedicate our time to elaborating on your case. We understand the uncertainties of a legal charge and your need to follow all court proceedings. Moreover, our team is well-equipped to specialize in your case, providing the attention to detail needed to persuade the judge of your innocence. Contact us for reliable assistance if you or a loved one requires criminal defense services in Van Nuys, California.
What Conspiracy to Commit Murder Entails
Facing arrest for conspiracy to commit murder can surprise you, especially because no conventional criminal action has occurred yet. Despite this, section 189 of the California Penal Code prohibits any type of agreement from committing murder and sets out penalties for anyone found guilty.
A Conspiracy to commit murder charge can raise several issues about when you may be guilty of the crime. The most commonly asked question is whether the charge applies only if you are present at the murder scene.
In response, judges have ruled that you may be guilty of conspiracy to commit murder even if you were not present at the scene. The rationale is that the judge focuses on whether you agreed to the crime, not the actual act of murder. Establishing this is important because your agreement implies forming a criminal intent to commit murder. Therefore, whether or not you proceed with the actions is a matter for later assessment.
You should also note that the presiding judge focuses on your involvement or association with other parties who agreed to murder. The consideration differs from other crimes, meaning that the prosecutor’s main goal is to establish your active participation in agreeing to the crime.
Thus, the three essential aspects relevant to a conspiracy charge revolve around making plans to kill someone and agreeing to participate. Thus, the presence of another party is necessary, and you must have spoken about committing murder. Although the prosecutor may not delve into the intricate details of how you intended to execute your plan, they should demonstrate that a plan was in place.
In some cases, evidence of your attempted murder may also be available. If so, the prosecutor is more likely to be successful in showing your guilty involvement. However, please note that you do not have to proceed with the planned actions to be guilty of a conspiracy charge. The prosecutor relies on the main elements of the crime to establish whether to present your matter for trial. In doing so, they will have identified the key areas to focus on towards showing your involvement.
Elements of the Crime
After the prosecutor officially files your matter, you will receive a trial date. A criminal trial allows the prosecutor to present their case against you as they attempt to show you are guilty of conspiracy to commit murder. Despite this, they must develop their case within a fair trial framework that aims to uphold your constitutional rights.
Firstly, the prosecutor should meet the burden of proof, which requires them to prove your case beyond a reasonable doubt. The requirement sets a high standard of evidence to ensure that if the judge finds you guilty, you do so for justifiable reasons.
Secondly, the prosecutor should prove you guilty of all elements of the crime. Without meeting this requirement, they will not have satisfied the high standard of proof for criminal cases. In return, the judge is less likely to issue a judgment against you, as the evidence is insufficient.
Having understood the importance of proving all elements of crime, you want to understand the various approaches that the prosecution team may take. This way, your criminal defense team can identify weaknesses in the prosecutor’s argument and raise them in the defense hearing.
The main elements of the crime for the prosecutor to prove are:
- You and Another Person/People Agreed to Kill Someone Intentionally
Firstly, the prosecutor must prove that you and the other suspects agreed to murder. The element is essential because it forms the basis for subsequent actions, attracting a conspiracy to commit a murder charge.
Usually, the prosecutor can present a case regardless of whether you made an express or implied agreement to commit the crime. Based on this, the prosecutor can retrieve evidence that may imply your agreement to participate. It includes appearing for subsequent meetings, participating in plans, and facilitating other offenders to purchase items to execute the crime with.
- As an Agreeing Partie, You Undertook Further Action to Actualize the Agreement
Secondly, the prosecutor should prove that you did not just agree to murder other suspects. They should demonstrate active steps towards promoting the idea to further their arguments against you. In doing this, they should target the specific action you participated in to actualize the agreement to commit murder.
- You Engaged in an Overt Act Related to the Agreement to Commit Murder
On top of showing that you participated in further action to promote the agreement, the prosecutor must focus on whether the action was overt. In this case, an overt action means any activity that demonstrates your intention to proceed with the murder. Overt actions often occur as you prepare to attack the victim, and you may participate as a group or individually.
What an Overt Act Entails
Since case circumstances differ from person to person, it is important to define what an overt act entails. Having a clear definition or examples, you can understand the possible defenses to apply to your case. Examples of overt acts considered in a conspiracy to commit murder case are:
Giving Someone Instructions on How to Commit Murder
Usually, planning to commit murder involves providing instructions on how to do it. This may involve explaining how to target the victim and the method to use in executing the offense. Additionally, the instructions can include details like dates, timelines, and clues to look out for when preparing for the crime.
Overall, the prosecutor focuses on the evidence available to show that you issued instructions. For example, the prosecution team could call on witnesses to reiterate the words you used when issuing instructions.
Additionally, they can retrieve text messages, emails, or any other communication means you used to deliver the instructions. The bottom line is that you should have directly involved yourself in action.
Purchasing a Lethal Weapon
Alternatively, the prosecutor can focus on showing that you purchased a lethal weapon to aid with the crime. Doing this is closely linked to murder because it demonstrates you are taking further action to actualize the plans you and others agree on.
Examples of lethal weapons that attract investigation officers and legal consequences include guns, pistols, rifles, knives, and machetes. In court, the prosecutor may produce receipts, surveillance footage, or witness statements detailing your purchases to cement your case further.
Moreover, they will establish a link between your purchase and the intention to murder by showing that you preserved the weapon for future use. This is in contrast to using the lethal weapon for other purposes unrelated to murder. For example, the prosecutor may need to prove that you did not buy a gun to participate in shooting activities for criminal purposes.
Renting a House or Room to Commit Murder
An overt act can also involve renting out a room or a house where you intend to commit murder. Your actions towards renting the house should show a direct link between the purchase/renting and the need to occupy a space to commit the crime.
Therefore, the investigating officers will source information that can serve as circumstantial evidence to demonstrate that you had a criminal intent to commit murder. Notably, you don’t have to purchase or rent the home yourself.
Third parties linked to you can also attract law enforcement officers’ attention, leading to your arrest. Subsequently, you should discuss the best options to avoid legal responsibility with your defense attorney.
Planning for the Targeted Victim to Appear at the Agreed Crime Scene
If you plan on how to target the intended during the conspiracy to commit murder, it also counts as an overt act. Targeting the victim may mean planning to isolate them if they are in a group to make your attack easier.
Additionally, targeting the victim may involve depriving them of their liberty by kidnapping them or threatening them to follow you. As mentioned, you do not need to have undertaken these actions yourself. However, the prosecutor should show your direct involvement in planning the events.
Purchasing or Renting a Getaway Vehicle
Many crimes involve obtaining a getaway car to help with your escape. The vehicles are especially handy after committing a serious offense and are likely to raise the alarm immediately after executing it. Thus, obtaining a getaway car can be a sign of working towards advancing your plans to commit murder.
Since the prosecution team works closely with investigation officers, they will retrieve information about where and how you obtained the car. Moreover, you can expect the prosecutor to present the car details to ensure it matches the description.
Defenses Applicable in a Conspiracy to Commit Murder Charge
A defense hearing follows the prosecutor’s main case. It allows you to raise counterarguments and cast reasonable doubt on the prosecutor’s case, which is important. Further, your defense hearing is critical because you can present a new set of evidential sources that could significantly change the course of the case. The following are defenses you can rely on to fight a conspiracy to commit murder charge:
You Withdrew Your Agreement to Commit Murder
Firstly, you may argue that you withdrew your agreement to commit murder. Thus, your defense should demonstrate that you did not intend to proceed with the offense and that you informed your counterparts about it.
Making an express withdrawal from the conspiracy to commit murder is necessary, so you want to provide evidential sources of this. Express withdrawal can be instrumental in solidifying your defense because it alerts other parties intending to do wrong that they can no longer depend on you. This way, investigation officers do not have any doubt about you still working with the other suspects.
The Prosecutor Did Not Present Evidence on Your Overt Act
Since overt acts are critical to showing that you involved yourself in a conspiracy to commit murder, the prosecutor must present sufficient evidence on it. Failure to do so reduces the credibility of their case, giving you a chance to cast reasonable doubt.
Subsequently, you may raise issues with the prosecutor’s approach, specifically the insufficient evidence to show your participation. Your defense lawyer can also target the inadmissibility or irrelevance of the prosecutor’s evidence to demonstrate the lacking nature of their case further.
If successful, the defense may not completely absolve you of criminal responsibility. Nevertheless, it may help secure a lenient sentence, which can be important for your case.
Your Case Involves Mistake of Fact
Sometimes, your words may need to be understood more as an intention you did not have. For example, if the investigation officer or complainant who reported your case acted based on insufficient information, they may cause your unfair arrest. They may do this if a mistake of fact occurs and they misunderstand your conversations with other parties accused of conspiracy to commit murder.
When raising your defense, your defense lawyer should ensure that your case demonstrates the error in fact, versus the actual events as they occurred. Subsequently, you will need to recount the facts from your perspective and provide evidence to support your claims. Doing this may be demanding, but building a strong case can increase your chances of securing an acquittal.
The mistake defense can also apply where you face unfair arrest based on mistaken identity. For example, if you share a name with one of the targeted suspects, the investigation officers may target you mistakenly, resulting in your trial. If so, you should raise the issue at the earliest opportunity to help you draw the court’s attention to the issue.
You Did Not Intend to Commit Murder
Further, you can defend yourself by stating that you did not intend to commit murder. The defense will raise issues with the prosecutor’s basic premise for your case. Thus, your legal team will conduct in-depth research to ensure they present a solid case to persuade the judge.
Usually, claiming that you did not intend to commit murder can change the course of your case significantly. For example, the judge may reduce murder to manslaughter penalties if your defense is compelling.
Alternatively, you may receive an acquittal if you show that you withdrew your participation in the agreement and did not intend to commit murder. Hence, combining this defense with the first discussed is beneficial, provided you support the arguments with sufficient evidence.
Penalties for Conspiracy to Commit Murder
If your defenses do not convince the judge of your innocence, they will find you guilty and schedule a sentencing hearing. During the court session, you will learn the penalties you face based on your case circumstances, among other considerations.
Notably, conspiracy to commit murder charges will attract the same charge as committing murder. Consequently, you may face first-degree penalties applicable in California. The judge may sentence you to twenty-five years to life detention in state prison.
However, you may be eligible for a sentence reduction if you prove that you did not intend to commit murder. You can do this by solidifying your defenses with credible evidence to dispute the prosecutor’s claims. If successful, the judge will issue a manslaughter penalty instead of first-degree penalties.
Manslaughter falls within the felony category and attracts a sentence of between three, six, or eleven years in state prison. Based on this, you need to consult your attorney on the best approach to show that you did not intend to kill, despite facing conspiracy to commit murder charges.
Contact a Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
When you or a loved one faces conspiracy to commit murder in Van Nuys, the first step should be contacting a criminal defense attorney to assist with the case. Doing so can raise your chances of a favorable case outcome because your attorney will help develop persuasive defenses. Moreover, having a legal team working on your case can help you view the case from a different perspective. Hence, you are better positioned to remember important facts that can be instrumental to your defenses.
With Leah Legal, you have access to a dedicated and experienced team equipped to handle your case. Our role is to provide guidance, research, and develop defenses for presentation in court. Further, we remain open to communicating with the prosecutor on your behalf and negotiating deals where possible. With our team working on your case, you can look forward to having a smooth criminal trial and better chances of a favorable outcome. For more information on conspiracy to commit murder charges, call us today at 818-484-1100.
In most cases, alleged victims seek justice through criminal accusations and convictions. While punishing someone who has caused another person pain could offer some comfort, not all cases should end in a conviction for the complainant to be compensated for an offender’s actions.
In some circumstances, a middle ground emerges in which the victim is fairly paid for damages via a civil compromise court action. A successful agreement usually means that there will be no additional criminal proceedings or measures to seek a conviction. This blog goes into greater detail about what a civil compromise means.
Understanding What Civil Compromise Means
A civil compromise is a judge’s consent to drop criminal charges in exchange for the accused paying the complainant for any losses or damages caused by their actions. Only judges have the power to approve a civil compromise. These agreements are common in certain types of cases, such as:
- Petty theft – California PC 484(a)
- Shoplifting – California PC 459.5
- Vandalism – California PC 594
- Embezzlement – California PC 503
- Other theft-related crimes
If the offense was a misdemeanor, civil compromises could be possible if the perpetrator agrees to compensate the complainant for the losses incurred. The complainant will need to show up in court to discuss the issue and let the judge know they’ve been fully compensated for the damages they incurred.
The complainant must then declare that they have no interest in pressing charges against the accused for the alleged offense. If the courts are pleased, the criminal allegations will be dropped. Misdemeanor offenses—not felonies—can be settled through civil compromises.
The prosecution team is not obligated to agree to a civil settlement. It is worth noting that even if the plaintiff gets compensation for the losses, the prosecutor may still press charges against the accused.
Requirements for a Civil Compromise
Civil agreements are only applicable when certain factors apply to the accused’s case. These are some of the conditions:
- The alleged offense against you should be one for which the victim has a civil recourse
- The alleged offense should not be against an ‘officer of justice.’ The law enforcement officer, in this case, is acting as a justice officer. The term “officer of justice” can refer to a law enforcement officer, a court clerk, a judge, a district attorney, or an attorney general, to name a few.
- The alleged crime against you does not involve the intention to perpetrate a felony. This essentially implies that a civil compromise is only permitted in infractions or misdemeanor cases. There are a few exceptions, such as when you are initially charged with a felony, but the case is later mitigated to a misdemeanor. This is admissible when the felony charges could be filed as a misdemeanor
- The offense charged against you is not an infringement of a domestic violence restraining order. This implies that there could be no civil agreement in any provisions of California PC 273.6
- The offense charged against you was not committed ‘riotously.’ The civil compromise act does not clearly define “riotously.” However, riotously refers to a crowd’s violent disturbance of the peace. These offenses include looting, rioting, and failing to disperse, to name a few
- You are charged with a crime that does not involve domestic violence. This covers offenses such as domestic battery against a cohabitant or spouse, inflicting corporal injury to a spouse, and others
- You were not charged with an offense against an elderly person. An elderly person is defined as anyone over 65 years old under criminal law. Common offenses against elderly persons are covered under California PC 368 d elder theft and California PC 368 b elder abuse
- The purported plaintiff appears before a judge or via declaration and indicates that he or she has been compensated for the alleged damages and doesn’t wish to press charges. Before going to trial, the alleged plaintiff should consent to the civil compromise
- The offense committed by you does not involve a minor as the alleged victim. These offenses include statutory rape, harassing or molesting a minor, contributing to a minor’s delinquency, and others
Civil Remedy
Civil compromises are only permitted where the injured party has a civil remedy against you for your alleged actions that resulted in the charges. A civil remedy implies that the alleged victim can seek monetary compensation for an offender’s actions in a civil court. Civil remedies are not always available to alleged victims in every case.
For instance, in a regular drunk in public case, there isn’t an alleged plaintiff who could seek monetary damages from the offender in civil court. As a result, the purported defendant is not eligible for a civil agreement.
Although there may occasionally be damages associated with the accused’s offense, the crime itself need not necessarily result in damages. In such circumstances, you have no option for a civil settlement. The most common scenario is a DUI resulting in property damage.
Even if the DUI is tied to damage to property, it is not an offense that necessitates the presence of an alleged victim. Therefore, even if the DUI is linked to damage to property for which the accused victim would often have legal recourse, a civil compromise isn’t permitted in DUI cases.
Civil Compromise and Felony Offenses
A civil compromise option does not apply if you’re accused of a felony. However, if the felony could be tried as a misdemeanor, then a civil compromise could be considered. This only applies if the judge or the prosecutor agrees to lower the felony charges to a misdemeanor before trial.
For instance, if you were initially accused of felony vandalism, civil compromise would not be an option. However, assume the prosecutor consents to lower the felony charges to a misdemeanor. In this case, you could be able to seek a civil compromise. This assumes all other requirements of civil compromise are satisfied. When a felony offense cannot be tried as a misdemeanor, your options for civil compromise could be impossible.
Agreement by the Alleged Victim
The most critical element of a civil settlement is that it is only possible if the purported victim agrees to drop the charges. This implies that the victim should appear before a judge or issue a written statement to the prosecutor stating that they do not want the file charges and that they have received compensation for their actions that resulted in criminal charges.
You should never approach the victim directly to persuade him or her to consent to a civil settlement. This behavior could result in additional charges against you, like intimidating the witness, contempt of court, violating a protective order, and other offenses. When you seek a civil compromise, you usually have some information that the victim would be eager to settle the matter and doesn’t want to press charges.
In this case, your lawyer can talk to the victim to find out if he or she is willing to settle out of court. If the alleged plaintiff agrees to a civil compromise, your criminal defense lawyer can draft an agreement for the victim on your behalf.
Also, you shouldn’t pay the victim for damages directly. Instead, if there is any payment, it should go to the victim through your defense lawyer or an agent of the criminal defense lawyer, such as a third party or an investigator.
Furthermore, restitution for losses does not need to be monetary and does not need to be paid to the supposed victim. Occasionally, the purported victim will request that any monetary damages be transferred to a 3rd party, for example, a shelter for the homeless, to victims of domestic abuse, or an animal shelter, etcetera.
If the purported victim informs the court that they have been “paid” or “satisfied,” the civil compromise is authorized to progress (assuming that every other element has been satisfied). The criminal offense of hit-and-run without injuries is considered a misdemeanor that bears a civil remedy for the purported victim.
Also, every other element of a civil compromise is fulfilled in hit-and-run without injury proceedings. However, a civil compromise alternative is not applicable in hit-and-run instances without injuries because of a specific exclusion the court cut out of the civil compromise act (Vehicle Code 20002(a)).
Dismissal Through Civil Compromise
If each element in Penal Code 1377 is satisfied, and the DA and judge concur, the accused’s criminal charges could be withdrawn under a civil compromise. In most circumstances, this is an excellent choice for offenders who face collateral concerns, like immigration ramifications for criminal charges.
Even though a civil settlement is permitted, it’s crucial to remember that the actions that initially prompted the criminal allegations might be the topic of collateral repercussions. In most cases, the collateral repercussions, if any, are significantly lessened against the accused.
For instance, if a person is a member of the armed forces and is accused of a crime that is afterward cleared using a civil compromise, the military can reprimand him for the purported behavior that gave rise to the initial criminal accusations.
However, in most cases, the offender will experience significantly fewer collateral repercussions because the criminal allegations were resolved through a civil compromise.
It’s crucial to realize that the civil compromise can be interpreted as an inferred admission of the purported act and that this implied admission can be employed against the accused in several situations, including their immigration case and prospects in the military.
Because of this, even if a civil compromise alternative is typically a viable substitute for an accused person to prevent collateral effects (and indictment), it isn’t always the ideal alternative. Because every case is unique, you should consult your criminal defense attorney before resorting to the civil compromise.
Problems with Double Jeopardy
If the civil compromise is accepted, the criminal counts will be dropped, and the prosecuting attorney will be prevented from prosecuting you again for actions that gave rise to it. This is not to say that another sovereign can not penalize you for that act (such as the immigration authorities).
Criminal defense lawyers cannot make civil claims settlements against a purported victim depending on their consent to the civil compromise. A case can only be dismissed by an entity that is allowed to prosecute people.
For instance, if the supposed victim decides to withdraw the charges against the accused, neither the accused nor the accused’s attorney may consent to waive civil actions against the claimed victim or impose the payment of compensation to the purported victim.
In other words, the defense lawyer cannot contact a potential plaintiff and propose covering the plaintiff’s losses only when the plaintiff consents to a civil settlement. In some circumstances, this can make it harder to reach a civil compromise.
What Advantages Do Civil Compromises Have?
A case settled by a civil compromise benefits all parties involved—the defendant, victims, and the court. A civil settlement favors the defendant by preventing a criminal charge and subsequent criminal record.
A civil compromise provides the victim with an assurance that they will be compensated for any losses they may have suffered.
A civil compromise is advantageous to the court since it makes it possible to handle lower-level matters more quickly and effectively when they don’t need to go through the entire criminal trial procedure.
Criminal proceedings could take a while to process, and compensation will be postponed for the duration except if a civil compromise is achieved.
What Categories of Cases are Not Eligible?
Civil compromises cannot always be used to resolve minor cases. California PC 1377 forbids the following offenses from being handled using civil compromises:
- Actions taken by or directed at a law enforcement officer while they are on duty
- Riotous Conduct
- If the act goes against an order of the court
- If there’s a deliberate intent to engage in a criminal act
- If the act occurred during a domestic violence incident,
- If the offense is perpetrated against an elderly person, under PC 368
- If the act is directed at a minor
A 2019 decision by the California State’s Appellate Court eliminated the possibility of a civil compromise for hit-and-run offenses under California VC 20002.
Because the prosecution is not obligated to consent to a civil agreement, it might not necessarily avert criminal prosecution.
Consider a scenario in which the prosecutor decides that, although a settlement through the civil compromise is viable, it’s in the best interests of justice to take criminal action against you. If so, the law does not forbid them from doing that.
Alternatives to Civil Compromise
After undergoing a diversion course, certain crimes mentioned above that aren’t subject to a civil compromise could be dropped. Diversion, or avoiding criminal indictment, is a process whereby the accused’s criminal allegations are dropped provided they complete a probationary sentence.
An alternative for a civil agreement, for instance, is not available in a prostitution issue due to the lack of a traditional victim.
However, if the accused completes their court-mandated “diversion” class, makes any necessary reparation to the purported victim, and refrains from being accused of another offense for a predetermined period (typically eighteen months), the DA might very well offer to drop the criminal charges.
There are some criminal cases where diversion isn’t viable.
California Laws Regarding Civil Compromise Authorization
Civil compromises are permitted under California PC 1378. According to this law, the court has discretion in deciding whether to offer the accused relief by dismissing a criminal charge in exchange for compensation and fulfillment of any monetary costs associated with their actions.
PC 1377 outlines the kinds of misdemeanor offenses that can’t be addressed in this manner. Experienced criminal defense attorneys can employ several tactics to secure a civil compromise.
Get in touch with an experienced legal team if you’ve been accused of a crime that might be eligible for a civil compromise so they can go through the specifics and advise you on what you need to do.
How Does a Motion for Civil Compromise Work?
A motion for civil compromise is confined to misdemeanor cases. However, it can be used for several offenses, including hit-and-run, shoplifting, and vandalism. If accepted, the case can be dismissed.
The California Penal Code sections 1378 and 1379 grant a judge the authority to dismiss a case if it’s in the best interests of justice. Depending on the case’s aggravating and mitigating factors, the court can rule against you if “paying off” the alleged victim would result in a favorable outcome for you.
Find a Van Nuys Criminal Attorney Near Me
If you are accused of any crime, you need to contact a criminal defense lawyer. If you’re a victim of a crime seeking a compromise, you also need to speak with your local prosecutor or any other attorney. Your attorney can let you know if the case is suited for civil compromise. If it is, they will guide and assist you throughout the procedures and counsel you.
At Leah Legal, we can guide you through the procedure and assist you to get the best result for your situation, such as a civil compromise with all of the advantages that come along with it. Our lawyers represent clients throughout Van Nuys, CA. Call us today at 818-484-1100.
Crimes that involve minors carry severe penalties. Contacting a minor with the intent to perpetrate a felony is a crime punishable under Section 288.3 of the California Penal Code. The majority of the offenses that can lead to this charge are sexual offenses. If you are facing charges involving a minor, you need to contact a seasoned criminal defense attorney as soon as possible.
What Does It Mean to Contact a Minor to Commit a Felony?
California law prohibits communicating with a child if the perpetrator has the specific intent to conduct any of the fifteen stated felonies with the youngster.
Contrary to similar charges, Section 288.3(a) makes contacting someone you reasonably presume to be a child illegal and even considers it unlawful to even try to contact a child to conduct certain felonies.
All unlawful communications are punished under California Penal Code 288.3 as efforts to conduct the intended or planned felony. If you perpetrate a crime for which there is a specified sentence or fine, you will be held accountable for the full term of imprisonment and fine. If you are found guilty of violating this penal code, you face a maximum of three years imprisonment and a $10,000 fine.
A second conviction for this offense carries an enhanced penalty of five years imprisonment under California Penal Code section 288.3(a). Since California Penal Code 288.3(a) constitutes a separate offense, you will also be subject to punishment for that underlying offense, which may include a prison term or fines. Any person convicted of a crime under Section 288.3(a) of the California Penal Code must register as a Sex Offender.
Evidence the Prosecution Must Present
In summary, the prosecuting attorney must demonstrate the following to establish guilt for contacting a minor to commit a felony under California Penal Code 288.3(a):
- You made an effort to contact a child
- You meant to commit a specified felony with that minor
- You were aware—or ought to have known—that he or she was a minor
- To further comprehend what the above elements entail, let’s look at them in more detail.
Communicated or Made Contact With
Under PC 288.1, the following interactions qualify as “communication” or “contact”:
- In-person contact
- communication through mail
- Any print-based method of communication, for example, “Missed Encounters” or a personal advertisement in a magazine or newspaper
- Contact made online or via email
- Communication by phone
- Communication using any type of radio or wire communications system
Any kind of contact or communication, whether direct or indirect, with a minor, is considered to be contact or communication with the minor.
A Minor
Anyone under the age of eighteen (18) is considered a minor. Contacting or communicating with a juvenile, or even attempting to do so, is illegal in California under PC 288.3.
This is crucial since sting operations with undercover cops who pose as minors (often conducted online) are a common method of enforcing this law.
Therefore, in many instances, a defendant does not contact a minor, but rather with somebody they thought was a minor.
Knew or Ought to Have Been Aware That They Were a Minor
PC 288.3 states that you cannot be found guilty except if you either were aware or should have been aware that the purported “victim” was a child. This indicates that, for instance, if the child clearly said that they weren’t under the age of 18 and you had no cause to suspect otherwise, you shouldn’t be charged for this act.
Underlying Offenses
If the prosecutor can show that you planned to perpetrate one of the crimes listed under California PC 288.3, then you would be convicted of contacting the minor with the purpose of committing a felony.
The underlying offenses include:
Kidnapping
In California, kidnapping is defined as the forcible and unlawful transportation of another individual across a significant distance without the victim’s permission. Kidnapping could also be done without resorting to physical violence or threats of violence or physical harm if:
- You’re kidnapping another person to conduct a sex offense against him or her
- your victim is below the age of fourteen (14)
- you employ misrepresentations or false promises to get your victim to come along with you
Rape
PC 261 defines Rape as the act of engaging in sexual activity without the other party’s permission.
This could indicate:
- That it’s perpetrated using violence, force, duress, threats, or fraud
- The victim’s incapacity to give consent (for instance, since they’re too inebriated or have physical or mental disabilities)
Child Endangerment
Cause, permit, or inflicting unjustified physical harm or emotional distress on a minor is considered child endangerment under Penal Code 273a.
Unlawful Sodomy Acts
A violation of California’s sodomy laws, PC 286, includes:
- Force somebody to perform anal sex (sodomy) against their will, or
- Engage in anal sex or sodomy with a child
- A lewd act with a minor under the age of 14
Lewd acts that involve a child are defined under PC 288 as touching a child on the body for sexual reasons. This statute solely covers lewd behavior done with a child under the age of 14.
Oral Copulation
It is against the law to do either of the following, according to California PEN 287:
- The practice of performing oral sex on someone without their consent (also referred to as “oral copulation using fear or force”); or
- Oral sexual activity with a minor where they have given their consent
Sending Harmful Materials to a Child
Sending “obscene” material to anybody under 18 years with the purpose of sexually stimulating yourself or the receiver, along to indulge in sexual acts with them is illegal under California’s “harmful material transmitted to seduce a minor” law.
The Use of a Foreign Object to Forcefully Perform a Sexual Act
California PEN 289 PC, forcible sexual penetration using a foreign item falls under one of two categories:
- Non Consensual penetration using a foreign item, perpetrated using violence, physical force, threats, fear, or d to the victim’s safety
- Consensual penetration of a minor below 18
Child Pornography
Possible child pornography acts in California that could form the basis of PC 288.3 contacting a kid with intent to conduct felony charges include:
- California PEN 311.1 & 311.2: transporting, Sending, producing, duplicating, or having in one’s possession with the aim of distributing it
- PEN 311.4 prohibits engaging a minor in the creation of child porn by hiring, using, coercing, or persuading them
- Possession or control of child pornography is punishable under PEN 311.11
Consequences of a Conviction Under Penal Code 288.3
The penalties for contacting or communicating with a person under 18 with the aim of committing a felony are similar to the penalties for the underlying act you are accused of intending to commit.
These are typically felonies. Penalties could include:
- Formal or felony probation
- Serve time in state prison
- Fines of not more than $10,000
Sentences are dependent on the nature of the original offense. Examples include:
- Penalties for communicating with a juvenile with the intention of engaging in forcible sodomy ranges from seven to thirteen years behind bars.
- For communicating with or contacting a child with the aim of perpetrating lewd acts on a minor under 14, the penalty is three, six, or eight years in prison.
- You could go to jail for anywhere between sixteen months to eight years if you make contact with a juvenile with the intention of engaging in consensual oral sexual activities with them.
- Additionally, if you had formerly been found guilty of violating PEN 288.3, the possible potential prison term will be extended by an extra and consecutive 5 years for any subsequent violation.
Registration Requirement for Sex Offenders
If you have been convicted of communicating with or contacting a minor with the intention of committing a felony, you would be mandated to register under the state’s Sex Offender Registration Act (PC 290). Generally, you would be categorized as a tier three sex offender, which mandates registration for the rest of your life.
In some instances, you could be obligated to register as a tier two sex offender, which carries a minimum registration term of 20 years. Tier one sex offenders are required to register for a minimum of 10 years. Under the California Sex Offender Registration Act, sex offenders should register with the local police in the jurisdiction where they currently reside. It is necessary to renew this registration:
- Each year, within five working days of your birthdate
- Each time you relocate
After being convicted of a felony under PC 288.3, you would also be found guilty of a felony charge for failing to register as a sex offender” if you don’t comply with these registration conditions. This offense could result in a 16-month, 2-year, or 3-year prison term.
How a Defense Attorney Can Defend Against This Charge
California voters approved a law prohibiting communicating with or contacting a minor to commit certain offenses in 2006. It was a provision of Proposition 83, commonly known as the Sexual Predator Punishment and Control Act.
Being charged with a sex crime can be a traumatic experience, and you shouldn’t attempt to handle it alone. A competent defense attorney specialized in the field of sex crimes can be of great assistance. They can assist you in determining whether the following legal defenses can apply to your case:
You Had No Intention of Committing the Underlying Offense
Perhaps you communicated with or contacted a juvenile, and had sexual or romantic feelings toward them. You might believe that you have infringed the provisions of California PC 288.3 in light of your action. The prosecution would not secure a conviction for “contacting a minor with the intention to commit a felony” unless they can show that the defendant intended to perpetrate one of the specified sex crimes.
Even if there was explicit sexual content in your conversations, the fact that you had contact with the juvenile doesn’t necessarily demonstrate your intention to perpetrate the crime. The fact that you made plans to meet with the minor doesn’t indicate that you did so with criminal intent, especially if the meeting point was scheduled to be at a public place.
You Had No Idea the Individual You Were Conversing With or Contacting Was a Minor
If there’s proof that you truly and reasonably believed the “alleged victim” was over the age of 18, then you and your defense lawyer could raise this legal argument.
Some examples of arguments that could support such an argument include:
- The alleged “victim” misrepresented their age to you
- You met the alleged victim in an environment where minors are not allowed, for example, a concert or a bar reserved for adults
- The ” alleged victim” behaved or seemed unusually mature.
You Fell Prey to Police Entrapment
Police entrapment comes into play when a defendant gives in to a law enforcement officer’s coercion and commits a crime they would otherwise not have committed. Entrapment could occur when police officers influence an individual to carry out a certain action through:
- Coercion
- Fraud
- Harassment
- Fleecing
- Making threats
- Flattery
After getting caught in an undercover sting operation, it is normal to face charges of contacting a juvenile with the intention of committing a felony. Undercover police officers can pose as juveniles to engage in aggressive internet flirtation with potential targets.
If this occurs to you, the entrapment argument can be used to claim that you’re not liable for conversing with a juvenile for criminal purposes.
Offenses Related to PC 288.3 Violation
If you’re convicted of contacting a minor with the intention to engage in a felony, you should be cognizant of the following related crimes:
Arranging to Meet With a Juvenile for Lewd Intentions
Provisions of PC 288.3 is quite similar to the crime of “arranging a meeting with a juvenile for lewd intentions.” This law, which was enacted concurrently with PC 288.3, declares it illegal to:
- Set up a meeting with a juvenile
- While driven by an abnormal or unnatural sexual interest in minors
- To expose you or the juvenile’s genital area
- Take part in lewd activities with a minor, at their meeting
Arranging to meet with a juvenile for lewd reasons, like speaking with a juvenile with the intention of committing a felony, is classified as an attempted crime that can be tried in court even if you never perpetrate the sexual activity with a kid.
Setting up a meeting with a juvenile for lewd intentions is classified as a misdemeanor crime. This offense carries a maximum sentence of one year in jail and a hefty fine of $5,000.
However, PC 288.4 is elevated to a felony with a four-year maximum term of imprisonment if:
- You are obligated to register as a sex offender due to a previous conviction for a sex crime
- You show up for the meeting with a juvenile
Arranging to meet a child for lewd reasons as an alternative to “contacting a juvenile with the intention to commit a felony could be an option in many circumstances.
This could be a preferable strategy since the latter offense can only be charged as a misdemeanor crime and has less severe penalties. It’s vital to remember that setting up a meeting with a juvenile for lewd intentions necessitates registering as a sex offender.
Statutory Rape (PC 261.5)
Consensual sexual contact with a juvenile constitutes the crime of “statutory rape,” according to California PC 261.5. Statutory rape is notable in that it does not fall under the category of underlying offenses that would justify charges of making contact or conversing with a juvenile to perpetrate a felony.
Therefore, the fact that your intention was only to have consensual sexual contact with the juvenile could be used as a legal argument against PC 288.4 allegations. This would imply that you’re not guilty of that offense.
The consequences for attempted statutory rape would be less significant than those for engaging a juvenile to commit a felony. The former offense can be charged as a misdemeanor crime or a wobbler depending on your age and the alleged victim’s.
Frequently Asked Questions About Contacting a Minor to Commit a Felony
Below are some of the most frequently asked questions about a PC 288.4 violation.
Can I be Found Guilty If the Juvenile Lied About Their Age?
You could be found guilty of this offense if you genuinely knew or had a good reason to believe that the victim was under the age of 18. This implies that even if the juvenile gave false details about their age but appeared to be less than 18 to a reasonable individual, you can still be found guilty of this offense.
What If the Juvenile Approached Me First With Plans to Engage in Sexual Activity?
A minor isn’t allowed to agree to any sexual contact in California since the state’s legal system views them as lacking the mental capacity to comprehend the implications of their actions. Therefore, the fact that a minor approached you initially is not a valid justification for the crime.
Find a Van Nuys Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
If you are facing charges of communicating with or contacting a juvenile with the intention to commit a felony, you should immediately engage a competent and experienced criminal defense lawyer. At Leah Legal in Van Nuys, we have a track record of successfully defending clients against these allegations. We will put out the utmost effort to resolve your matter in the best way possible. Call us right away at 818-484-1100 for a free consultation with no commitment.
Many people rely on their cars as their main means of everyday transportation. With such a strong dependency on vehicles, accidents are likely to occur. While some accidents can be attributed to simple negligence, those involving drunk drivers are almost always catastrophic. In this blog, we’ll analyze what makes a DUI hit-and-run different from a regular DUI offense.
An Overview of a Regular DUI Crime and a DUI Hit and Run Under California Law
California VC Section 20001 mandates that if a motorist is responsible for an accident that results in death or injury, he/she is required to pull over at the accident scene and provide his/her details to law enforcement, the other motorist, and any victims. If the motorist causes damage to property (including vehicles) due to his/her conduct and fails to stop at the accident scene, then he/she would be infringing the provisions of California VC 20001 and perpetrating a Hit and Run crime as per California VC 20002a.
It’s worth noting that a prosecution under California VC 20002 alone doesn’t evaluate whether the motorist was inebriated. Evidence that you fled the accident scene and the presence of actual damages resulting from the collision are the most important elements in this scenario.
On the other hand, provisions of California VC 23152 make it illegal if you’re behind the wheel while being impaired by alcohol, drugs, or both. Therefore, in every drunk driving case and conviction, the evidence that the motorist was inebriated by intoxicants is the most important element, unlike the California VC 20002 violation. The prosecution needs to demonstrate that the perpetrator’s blood had traceable amounts of substances that are illegal to have in your system while operating a vehicle. This can be done through investigations or findings from a drug recognition specialist.
Such substances include illegal drugs such as methamphetamine and in certain cases, legally medicinal medications like marijuana. In addition, the prosecution must present evidence that the accused’s blood alcohol content was above the legal limit at the time the incident occurred. California DUI laws mandate that you cannot operate a vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.08 percent or above, or 0.04 percent for commercial drivers. For motorists under 21, the BAC percentage shouldn’t be more than 0.01.
If a motorist is found to have been inebriated by alcohol or drugs while operating a motor vehicle and has broken both of the preceding provisions of the California vehicle code, they could be convicted of a DUI Hit and Run. If you’re found guilty, you would face harsh penalties such as driver’s license suspension, hefty fines, prison sentences, and mandatory attendance at DUI School.
What Happens in the Event of a DUI Accident
California law mandates that anyone responsible for an accident should pull over immediately at the scene. If the motorist didn’t stop, law enforcement would quickly locate and arrest the perpetrator. If the officers are successful in pulling over the driver, thorough examinations of the motorist should be conducted. This will help to determine that he or she was the individual responsible for the accident.
Some of these examinations include looking for and assessing blood stains on the accused’s vehicle, interviewing eyewitnesses to get their accounts of the accident, and reviewing surveillance footage from the accident site.
When speaking with law enforcement, victims, or anyone at the scene of an accident, you need to provide your details. The details necessary are the motorist’s name, current physical address, and the registration details of the automobile that caused the crash.
You should also provide essential support to the alleged victim like taking them to the hospital for medical assistance or dialing 911 for emergency assistance to the alleged victim. The motorist should be examined for traces of drugs or alcohol in his or her bloodstream. The chemical testing indicates whether the motorist was impaired while operating a vehicle.
If the incident causes damage to someone else’s property, you should pull over immediately. Track down and contact the owner, and provide him/her with your contact details. You can also leave a letter in an open location, like a damaged building or automobile. The letter should include your personal information as well as what happened. In line with California VC 20002, it’s a misdemeanor offense to flee the scene of an accident in which property has been damaged without first providing appropriate assistance.
It’s natural for the at-fault motorist to feel a great deal of anxiety and fear after an accident in which someone else’s property or body was harmed or even killed. It’s natural to feel this way, but getting in touch with your attorney right away can help you avoid criminal charges or being charged twice.
Elements of a Regular DUI and a DUI Hit and Run Under California Law
The jury instructions for DUI with an additional hit-and-run allegation provide that the court should determine beyond any reasonable doubt that the following is true:
- You operated the motor vehicle
- Driving while impaired by drugs, alcohol, or a combination of both
- While drunk driving, you also committed an illegal act or failed to discharge your legal obligations
- The victim suffered physical harm as a result of your illegal act or failing to carry out a legal obligation if there is any injury to the victim
“Legal duty” in this case refers to the requirements under the law to pull over and share information at the scene of an accident. This constitutes a hit-and-run crime.
To convict someone of DUI hit-and-run, the court should, according to the jury instructions, find the following elements true beyond any reasonable doubt:
- You were driving and got involved in the car accident
- The incident caused damage to another person’s property
- You were aware that you had caused the destruction of property in an accident or had reasonable cause to believe that such damage had occurred as a result of the nature of the incident
- You willfully failed to carry out one or all of the following legal duties:
- Stopping immediately at the accident scene
- Providing the owner or individual in charge of the destroyed property with your name and current dwelling address
- Providing the name and physical address of the vehicle owner that you were driving
Different Categories of DUI Hit-and-Run Crimes
Those accused of a DUI Hit and Run offense have firsthand accounts of what occurred. The motorists involved could not understand if they truly injured an individual or destroyed property, or could have caused the crash at a location where it’s illegal to stop. Possible reasons for accidents include not having a valid license, driving under the influence of alcohol, or fear of getting arrested. A DUI hit-and-run can be charged as a misdemeanor or a felony based on the circumstances.
A misdemeanor hit-and-run offense occurs when: (a) the incident was minor (no aggravating factors such as death), but the motorist at fault just opted to flee away unnoticed; (b) the motorist caused the accident as a result of drugs/alcohol impairment – even if he/she sustained no injury – but fled; or (c) the defendant fled after destroying someone’s property.
A DUI hit-and-run should involve people as opposed to the property to be classified as a felony. If an intoxicated motorist causes death or serious harm to another individual and then flees the crime scene, the driver has perpetrated a felony, irrespective of the worth of the property damaged or the severity of the victim’s injuries. For example, if a driver causes a small accident and then flees the scene, but it is later determined that the incident resulted in harm to other people, the motorist would be subject to felony DUI charges under California law.
If a person is injured in an accident and you flee the accident scene without rendering aid or reporting the incident, you can be charged with a felony under California Vehicle Code sections 20001, 23152, and 20002 for DUI Hit and Run.
Different DUI Hit and Run Penalties
If found criminally culpable of this crime, the jury will apply two laws to evaluate the convict’s forms of punishment. Penalties for causing serious bodily harm, including those that result in the disability or disfigurement of a person, are spelled out under Section 20001 of the California VC. Similarly, VC 20002 specifies the punishment for DUI Hit and Run that results in property damage. Penalties range from a misdemeanor to a felony, depending on the nature of the offense.
An Accident that Results in Injury
According to California law, you could face felony or misdemeanor penalties if the offense causes injury to any parties besides yourself. Injury severity and the defendant’s criminal history will determine the gravity of the charges.
The following penalties apply if you are found guilty of a misdemeanor offense under California Vehicle Code 20002 (b) (i):
- A sentence of not more than 12 months in jail
- Fines ranging from $1,000 to $10,000
- Both fines and a jail term
It’s important to note that your penalties could increase if you were intoxicated. They consist of reparations, informal probation that lasts no longer than three years, and two additional points that the DMV may add to your driving record. You may also be subject to a combination of any or all of these consequences. Conversely, if found guilty of a crime under this section, the fines are the same but the maximum jail time is increased to three years.
To avoid a conviction for the lesser offense of hit-and-run, your attorney could try to negotiate a civil compromise that would resolve the matter. If a settlement is reached, you’ll be responsible for covering all losses. As a result, the state will no longer pursue hit-and-run charges.
Even if the state dismisses the hit-and-run charges, a person convicted of DUI faces up to 3 years in prison, fines of $1,000 to $10,000, or both, and revocation or suspension of their driver’s license.
An Accident Resulting in Serious Bodily Harm or Death
According to California law, this type of DUI hit-and-run is punishable under VC 20001(b)(i). This is also a wobbler. Nevertheless, the severity of penalties and punishments increases depending on the severity of the crime.
If you are found guilty of DUI Hit & Run with Severe physical Injuries or a fatality (20001 (b)(ii)), you face the following penalties as part of a misdemeanor sentence: a minimum of three months and a maximum of twelve months behind bars, fines ranging from $1,0000 to $10,0000, or both fines and time in jail.
If you are found guilty of committing a DUI felony offense under California Vehicle Code 20001b (ii), you could receive a sentence of two, three, or four years in state prison, monetary fines ranging from $ 1,000 to $10,000, or both fines and the imprisonment sentence.
Do DUI Hit and Run Convictions Carry Additional Charges or Penalties?
When someone is found guilty of DUI Hit & Run, the DMV automatically adds 2 points to their driving record. If a person accumulates four points in one year, their license will be suspended for six months. Depending on the driving record, you could have your license suspended on top of other penalties for DUI Hit and Run.
The car insurance company has the right to revoke the insurance policy and/or raise your premiums if your vehicle is covered. Additionally, you’ll be responsible for paying the excess amount that’s not insured if the owner of the property you destroyed in the accident sues you.
Anyone who suffered injuries as a result of the accident can file a lawsuit against you if you are found to be at fault. When someone dies because of your actions, their loved ones can pursue legal action under civil law as well. This implies you need to pay a certain sum of money to the accident victim’s loved ones.
If you flee the scene of an accident in which someone was killed you will be charged with vehicular manslaughter under Section 191.5 of the penal code, and face an additional five years in prison.
Potential Defenses to a DUI Hit-and-Run Conviction
Defending against accusations filed under California VC sections 20001, 20002, or 23152 is dependent on the evidence given to the court. To refute the accusations against you, your lawyer will carefully review the evidence presented against you and pinpoint any errors in the prosecution’s case.
An experienced DUI lawyer can use the following legal arguments:
You Weren’t the One Behind the Wheel
If the lawyer can prove that somebody else was operating the car at the time of the accident, the charges against you will be dropped, because hit-and-run allegations are only legitimate if you had been driving the car.
You Weren’t Responsible for the Accident, as It Occurred Outside of Your Control
This is possible in the event of unconsciousness, i.e., if you caused the accident but passed out and were unable to adhere to the legal requirements, and then another car occupant drove the vehicle away. Additionally, it is not feasible to care for the victims as required by law. Furthermore, you wouldn’t be obligated to stop when a crowd of enraged people encircled your car and exiting would endanger your life;
You Didn’t Purposefully Disregard California VC 20001’s Requirement that You Share Personal Information
You didn’t willfully refuse to provide the information if, following the accident, you were incapacitated and someone in your immediate vicinity ended up taking you to the emergency room without disclosing personal details, which is required by law. You were unable to because of the current situation or circumstances
You Were Unaware that Any Damage Had Been Done Or If there Had Been an Accident
So, let’s say you’re behind the wheel and you rear-end someone’s car at a red light. As soon as you two come to a stop, you don’t see any damage. You then proceed to drive away.
After getting home, the other driver contacts the authorities to claim that their vehicle suffered damage during the accident. Your lawyer can assist in demonstrating to the judge that the allegations are not hit-and-run because you did not flee after knowing that you had caused the accident.
The circumstances are similar in the event of a physical injury. In many cases, an injury happens after the collision rather than before. For example, a car accident could only result in physical damage to the vehicle, but the victim might complain of pain several days later, and a doctor’s examination would later confirm that the pain was caused by the accident. Your defense attorney could assert that you were unaware of the victim’s injuries and you did not refuse to offer assistance.
If a blood or chemical test measuring your blood alcohol concentration shows that you weren’t intoxicated, your lawyer could try to have the charges against you reduced to hit-and-run.
Contact a Van Nuys DUI Lawyer
If you are facing a DUI Hit & Run or a regular DUI charge, you should know that there are alternatives available to assist you in getting your charges dismissed or reduced. If you work with us at Leah Legal, you have a better chance of having your case dropped or having the charges reduced. Call us at 818-484-1100 to speak with one of our knowledgeable criminal defense attorneys in Van Nuys.
When a person fails to exercise the level of care that a reasonably prudent person would use in similar circumstances and has a legal duty to take particular actions or precautions, resulting in harm to another person, it is considered criminal negligence. This type of criminal conduct is a form of recklessness and is often distinguished from other types, like intentional crimes or accidents.
In criminal negligence cases, a person must have a legal duty and not just a moral one. Additionally, criminal negligence is considered a serious crime and can result in significant fines, imprisonment, and other penalties.
Criminal Negligence Under California Law
Legally, criminal negligence is the failure to use ordinary care in circumstances where such failure is likely to result in death or great bodily injury. A conviction is conceivable if prosecutors can prove that:
- The defendant had a legal duty to use ordinary care.
- The defendant failed to use ordinary care.
- The defendant’s failure was a substantial factor in causing the harm.
- The harm caused was death or great bodily injury.
The state can pursue criminal negligence as a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on the circumstances of the case and the resulting harm. If convicted of a misdemeanor, a person can face up to one year in jail and fines, while a felony conviction can result in imprisonment for up to four years and fines.
Recklessness and Criminal Negligence
Recklessness and criminal negligence are legal terms describing a level of carelessness or disregard for the safety of others. However, they are not the same and have slightly different legal definitions.
Recklessness refers to a conscious disregard for the risk of harm to others. In other words, a person who acts recklessly knows his/her actions could cause harm but chooses to proceed anyway. Examples include:
- Driving at high speeds and weaving in and out of traffic.
- Playing with firearms or other weapons in a careless manner.
- Engaging in consensual sexual activity without disclosing a sexually transmitted infection.
Criminal negligence, on the other hand, refers to a failure to exercise reasonable care in a situation, resulting in the harm of another person. A person who acts with criminal negligence could not have intended to cause harm, but his/her actions are still reckless or careless.
Examples of criminally negligent behavior include:
- A property owner failing to fix a broken stairway that leads to someone falling and getting injured.
- A driver, while distracted, runs a red light and hits another vehicle.
- A company that fails to properly train its employees on safety procedures, thus leading to an accident.
- A company that does not properly maintain its equipment, leading to an accident in a work environment.
- A parent who leaves a child unattended in a car on a hot day.
- A nursing home that does not provide enough staff to care for residents properly, leading to neglect or abuse.
In summary, recklessness is a deliberate behavior, whereas criminal negligence is a failure to take appropriate precautions.
How Criminal Negligence Differs From Civil Negligence
Criminal negligence and civil negligence are two separate legal concepts that refer to different types of conduct and have distinct consequences.
Criminal negligence is a failure to exercise the level of care a reasonably prudent person would use in similar circumstances and is considered a form of criminal recklessness. It involves an individual who has a legal obligation to take specific actions or precautions and fails to do so, causing harm to another person. Criminal negligence is punishable under criminal laws and can result in fines, imprisonment, and other penalties.
On the other hand, civil negligence refers to a failure to exercise reasonable care that harms another person. It is a civil wrong that can result in a lawsuit and financial compensation for the victim. However, it does not involve criminal penalties.
Here are a few key differences between criminal negligence and civil negligence:
- Criminal negligence involves a criminal act and could result in criminal penalties like fines and imprisonment. In contrast, civil negligence is a civil wrong and can result in financial compensation to the victim.
- Civil negligence is proven in cases involving personal injury. A plaintiff must prove negligence by a preponderance of the evidence. This means showing that it is more likely than not that the defendant acted negligently. In contrast, criminal negligence is proven in criminal cases, where a prosecutor must prove that the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. This is a higher standard than used in a civil trial, meaning that the defendant’s actions were a gross deviation from the standard of care a reasonable person would have taken. Further, the action resulted in specific harm or injury.
- Criminal negligence requires intent or recklessness, while civil negligence only requires a failure to exercise reasonable care.
- Criminal negligence is enforced by the state, while civil negligence is enforced by the individuals or entities that have been wronged.
For the same event, a criminal and civil case can be brought. A criminal conviction does not bar a civil lawsuit and vice versa. Additionally, the facts and circumstances of each case will determine whether criminal or civil negligence applies.
How Criminal Negligence is Related to Intent
Criminal negligence is related to intent because it involves a failure to exercise the level of care a reasonably prudent person would use in similar circumstances. However, it does not require the intent to cause harm. It requires a higher degree of culpability than mere carelessness or inattention.
In contrast, intent refers to a person’s state of mind when committing a crime. It means that the person had the specific intention or purpose of committing the act that resulted in harm. For example, if a person intentionally starts a fire that causes damage or injury, they can be charged with arson, which is an intentional crime.
Therefore, criminal negligence differs from intentional crimes because it does not require the intent to cause harm. It requires a higher degree of culpability than mere carelessness or inattention.
The state could charge criminal negligence in addition to or in conjunction with an intentional crime, depending on the circumstances of the case.
Offenses that Could Potentially Result from Criminal Negligence
Below are examples of some of the crimes you could potentially face prosecution for:
a) Involuntary Manslaughter
Penal Code 192(b) defines the crime of involuntary manslaughter as the unlawful killing of another person without malice, which can occur in two ways:
- Committing a lawful act that might produce death in an illegal manner and with criminal negligence, or
- Committing a legal action in an unlawful manner or with criminal negligence.
In other words, it refers to the unintentional killing of another person due to criminal negligence or while committing a non-felony criminal act.
You are only guilty of involuntary manslaughter if prosecutors prove that your actions were a substantial factor in causing the victim’s death and that you acted with criminal negligence.
Involuntary manslaughter under Penal Code 192(b) is a felony punishable by 2, 3, or 4 years in prison.
b) Vehicular Homicide
Vehicular homicide, also known as vehicular manslaughter, involves the death of another person due to the defendant’s negligent or reckless driving.
There are two forms of vehicular homicide:
- Vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated is prosecutable under Penal Code 192(c) — It occurs when the defendant causes the death of another person while driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol or with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.08% or higher.
- Gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated per Penal Code 191.5(b) — This occurs when the defendant causes the death of another person while driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol or with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.08% or higher. Further, the defendant’s actions should be so reckless that they create a significant risk of death or great bodily injury.
Both forms of vehicular homicide are considered serious crimes and are punishable by a prison sentence of 2, 4, 6, or 10 years.
c) Child Endangerment
Penal Code 273(a) defines child abuse or child endangerment as the intentional or reckless infliction of physical injury or the deliberate or careless placing of a child in a situation in which their person or health is likely to be endangered.
It is also defined as the failure to provide care, supervision, or protection for a child, resulting in physical harm or great bodily injury, or allowing a child to be in a situation in which their person or health is likely to be endangered.
It is considered a wobbler offense, which means it can be charged as either a felony or a misdemeanor, depending on the circumstances of the case and the prosecutor’s discretion. A conviction for child abuse or child endangerment under Penal Code 273(a) could result in significant fines of up to $10,000, imprisonment of up to 6 years, and other penalties.
Best Defense Strategies in Criminal Negligence
When facing criminal negligence charges, there are several defense strategies a person or entity could use to challenge the prosecution’s case and avoid conviction. These strategies include:
a) Lack of Duty of Care
One of the defense strategies when facing criminal negligence charges is to argue that the person or entity did not have a legal duty to use a certain level of care. Therefore, the defendant cannot be held liable for criminal negligence.
This strategy can be effective when the person or entity does not have a legal obligation to take specific actions or precautions. Thus, the individual or company cannot be held responsible for any resulting harm.
For example, if a property owner is not aware of a dangerous condition on their property, they could not be held liable for criminal negligence if someone is injured as a result of that condition.
The duty of care can be imposed by law, contract, or voluntarily undertaking a task. A defense attorney must demonstrate that the defendant had no duty of care in their specific situation.
b) Compliance With Laws and Regulations
Another defense strategy when facing criminal negligence charges is to argue that the person or entity complied with all relevant laws and regulations.
This defense strategy can be effective in situations where the person or entity can demonstrate that they followed all relevant laws, regulations, and industry standards and that the failure to comply did not result in the victim’s harm.
For example, if a construction company can demonstrate that it was in compliance with all safety regulations and that the injuries suffered by a worker were the result of an unforeseeable event, the company could not be held liable for criminal negligence.
Compliance with laws and regulations is not always a guarantee of immunity from criminal negligence charges. The prosecution must prove that the defendant was not in compliance with the laws and regulations and that this non-compliance caused harm. Additionally, laws and ordinances can change over time.
An experienced criminal defense attorney will advise on the specific laws and regulations that apply to the person’s or entity’s situation and how to present the evidence of compliance in the most favorable light.
c) Reasonable Care
You could assert that you took all reasonable precautions and exercised the level of care that a reasonably prudent person would use in similar circumstances. You must demonstrate that you took all reasonable steps to prevent harm. However, the harm was caused by an unforeseeable event or events.
For example, if a driver can demonstrate that he/she was driving safely and obeying all traffic laws but was involved in an accident due to a sudden mechanical failure, the jury could find the driver is not liable for criminal negligence.
The standard of care is that of a reasonable person, and your defense attorney must demonstrate that your actions were reasonable given the circumstances.
d) Misunderstanding of the facts
Your attorney could also assert that the prosecution’s case is based on a misunderstanding of the facts and that the prosecutor does not have enough evidence to prove criminal negligence.
This defense strategy is effective when the prosecution misinterprets the facts or does not gather enough evidence to support his/her case.
For example, if the prosecution argues that you were aware of a dangerous condition but failed to take action, your attorney could assert that you were not aware of the condition.
Defense attorneys must present evidence that the prosecution’s case is based on a misunderstanding of the facts and that the prosecutors lack sufficient evidence to prove criminal negligence. Additionally, the defense must conduct an independent investigation to gather evidence supporting their case and refute the prosecution’s evidence.
e) Your Actions Were an Accident
In some situations, accidents are interpreted as criminal negligence. You must demonstrate to the jury that an unforeseeable event or circumstance caused the harm and that you took all reasonable precautions to prevent it.
For example, if a truck driver is involved in an accident due to a sudden mechanical failure, he could argue that the accident was unforeseeable. Thus, he/she is not liable for criminal negligence.
It is important to note that your attorney must present evidence that an unforeseeable event caused the harm and that the person or entity took all reasonable precautions to prevent it.
f) Unforeseeable Harm
Another defense strategy when facing criminal negligence charges is asserting that the harm caused was not reasonably foreseeable. Therefore, the person or entity cannot be held liable for criminal negligence.
This defense strategy is effective when you can demonstrate that an unforeseeable event or circumstance caused the harm and that you could not reasonably anticipate.
For example, if a factory owner can demonstrate that an explosion was caused by an unforeseeable event, like an act of sabotage, and that they had no way of preventing it, he/she is not liable for the accident. Thus, his/her actions do not meet the criminal negligence threshold.
It must be clear to the jury that the harm was unforeseeable and that the incident was not preventable. Additionally, even if the injury or loss is unforeseeable, you could still be liable for civil negligence. You could be liable to compensate the victim(s) for the harm.
g) No Knowledge
You are not liable for criminal negligence when you lack knowledge of the facts or circumstances that led to the harm.
You must demonstrate that you lacked knowledge of the facts or circumstances that caused the victim’s harm and that you took all reasonable precautions to prevent it.
Additionally, having no knowledge of the facts or circumstances that led to the harm is not always a guarantee of immunity from criminal negligence charges. Prosecutors should prove that you failed to meet your legal duty of care.
The specific defense strategy will depend on the facts and circumstances of the case and the laws you allegedly violated.
Contact a Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
Criminal negligence is a serious crime involving failure to use reasonable care to prevent reasonably foreseeable harm. It is punishable under criminal laws and can result in fines, imprisonment, and other penalties. When facing criminal negligence charges, it is crucial to have an experienced criminal defense attorney to advise on the best defense strategy.
If you or someone you know is facing criminal negligence charges, seek the advice of a qualified criminal defense attorney as soon as possible. A skilled attorney will evaluate the case, advise on the best defense strategy, and help navigate the criminal justice system. Contact Leah Legal at 818-484-1100 if you are facing charges in Van Nuys. We can help you understand your rights and options and work to achieve the best possible outcome for your case.
California assault laws criminalized the willful use of force or threats of violence against another person. If you assault a law enforcement officer, you could be arrested and charged under California Penal Code 241. Police officers are a protected group of individuals in California. Therefore, a crime against them will attract severe legal consequences after a conviction. A PC 241 conviction is a misdemeanor that attracts a jail sentence, fines, and sometimes probation.
Before your conviction, the prosecutor must prove all the elements of crime failure to which you have a chance to fight the charges and avoid a conviction. California laws on assault are complicated. Therefore, you must hire and retain a skilled criminal attorney to navigate the case. Your attorney can help protect your rights and build a defense to avoid the consequences of a criminal conviction.
What is Assault on a Police Officer?
The safety of peace officers is a priority in California. Therefore, it is illegal to use force or attempt to use violence against a police officer. When you face an arrest for assaulting an officer, the prosecution must prove these elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt to obtain a conviction:
You Engaged in an Act that Could Result in the Application of Force
The first element that must be clear when establishing guilt under PC 241 is the attempt to use force. Application of force, in this case, means that you touched the alleged victim offensively. Any slight touch done rudely could suffice as assault. However, you must understand that evidence of your intention to use force or physical injury is not necessary to prove an assault.
Your Actions Were Willful
Your offensive contact with a law enforcement officer is not considered assault if your actions were unintentional. Therefore, the prosecution has the burden to prove that you willfully touched the officer or acted in a way that could result in the application of force against them.
You Had the Present Ability to Apply Force to the Person
You cannot be found guilty of assault unless the prosecutor proves that you had the present ability to use force against the alleged victim. A defendant is considered to have a current ability to apply force if they can push through with their threats towards the victim.
You Knew that the Victim was a Police Officer
The most critical element of Penal Code 241 is proving the alleged victim’s identity. The definition of assault is the same for most assault crimes. However, the fact that your victim is a police officer dictates the nature of your charges. Before your conviction under this statute, the prosecution must prove your knowledge of the victim’s identity. You could face more severe charges and penalties if the police officer performed their lawful duties.
Sentencing and Punishment for Assault on a Police Officer
The prosecution will present physical and circumstantial evidence to support the elements of the crime and obtain a conviction in your case. If you are found guilty under this statute, you risk facing a one-year jail sentence and fines of up to $2,000. Sometimes, the court may sentence you to probation instead of jail.
Probation for Assault on a Police Officer
Probation is an alternative sentencing option the court uses to reduce crowding in jails. Instead of serving your one-year jail sentence for assaulting a law enforcement officer, the court can send you to misdemeanor probation. With this type of sentence, you will spend one to three years in community service.
Probation is not automatic for misdemeanor convictions. Your attorney must negotiate with the prosecution for the sentence. Often, the court will be willing to send you to probation if you are a first-time offender and there are no aggravating factors in Your case. If there is no evidence that you harmed the police officer, you will be sent to probation.
Serving probation allows you to avoid the stigma of spending time in jail. However, if the sentence does not suit your best interests, you can decline it and serve your jail sentence. While on probation, the court may require you to meet the following conditions:
- Pay court fines.
- Participate in group or individual therapy.
- Complete treatment programs like anger management.
- Participate in community service.
- Abstain from alcohol or drug use while on probation.
- Submit to random drug testing.
- Avoid engaging in criminal conduct.
If you violate any of these probation conditions, you could be arrested and charged with probation violation. At the probation violation hearing, the court determines whether or not you violated one of the terms. If you are found to have violated probation conditions. The court may impose more severe conditions or revoke the probation. A revocation of your probation would take you back to jail to serve the original or maximum sentence for your conviction.
Defenses Against California Penal Code 241(c) Charges
Assault on its own is a severe crime. Facing an arrest and criminal charges for assaulting a police officer is much more severe and will attract severe legal and collateral consequences. Therefore, you must be aggressive to fight the charges and avoid a conviction. The following are common defenses you can use against your charges:
No Willful Intent
You will only be found guilty of assaulting a police officer if the prosecutor can prove that you acted willfully. A willful action is something that you do intentionally. You can avoid a conviction by arguing that your contact with the officer was accidental. For example, if you interact with an officer and mistakenly touch them, your actions could be interpreted as an assault.
Self-Defense
In California, you have a right to defend yourself against physical attacks. This right applies even when the person attacking you is a police officer. For most assault cases, you can argue that you acted in self-defense. Self-defense is applicable in your case under the following conditions:
- You reasonably believed that you were in danger of severe bodily injury.
- You believed that the immediate use of force was necessary to defend yourself from harm.
- You only used reasonable force required to protect yourself and not harm the police officer.
When proving that your assault charges are based on an act of self-defense, you can file a pitchess motion. A pitchess motion is a request to inspect a police officer’s file for evidence of misconduct. The following are types of police records that are open to the public:
- A law enforcement officer uses force that results in the death or severe injury to another person.
- An officer committed sexual assault.
- A police officer shoots a gun at another person.
- An officer commits a dishonest act, such as filing false reports and perjury.
This fact can support your self-defense theory if there is a documented history of the officer’s misconduct.
The Alleged Victim was not a Police Officer
California Penal Code 241 seeks to prosecute individuals who assault law enforcement officers. While the definition is similar to simple assault, the victim’s identity worsens your situation. Therefore, you can fight your charges by arguing that the alleged victim was not a police officer or protected class member. Although this defense will not allow you to walk free, you will face the penalties for simple assault, which is a lesser offense.
Insufficient Evidence
In California, assault is an unlawful attempt coupled with the ability to commit a violent offense against another person. Before you face a conviction, the prosecution must prove all the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. The prosecutor established these elements by presenting both physical and circumstantial evidence. If one of the elements is not cleared or you cast reasonable doubt on the prosecutor’s case, you can argue a lack of insufficient evidence as your defense.
Violation of your Constitutional Rights
Even if you are suspected of committing a crime in California, you have constitutional rights that must be respected during the arrest, investigation, and prosecution. Unfortunately, some law enforcement officers ignore the rights by engaging in the following violations:
- Failure to read your Miranda rights. After a formal arrest, the police officer must read your rights which informs you of the right to remain silent and the right to obtain legal representation.
- Coerced confessions. Sometimes, the police officers may threaten you or your family members to force you into confessing to a crime you did not commit. If this is a factor in your case, you can claim a violation of your rights.
- Excessive use of force. Unless you resist arrest or threaten an officer’s safety, law enforcement must use only the necessary force to arrest you. Excessive force violates your right to be free from unreasonable searches.
If you can prove that any of these violations occurred during your investigation, you can file a motion to dismiss the evidence collected.
False Allegations
Evidence of physical violence or injuries is not necessary to prove that you assaulted another person. Therefore, it is not uncommon to fall victim to false allegations. For example, if you shout at a police officer, they can exaggerate the situation and accuse you of assault. With the guidance of a skilled criminal attorney, you can uncover the false allegations scheme and avoid the consequences of a conviction.
Mental Health Instability
Suffering from a mental disability does not exempt you from criminal responsibility. However, your criminal defense attorney can argue that you did not understand the nature and consequences of your actions toward the police officer. The court will carry out a thorough investigation to determine your mental state and confirm your claims. If you are found guilty of your charges and have a mental disability, the court can explore alternative sentencing and incorporate programs that help you with your mental health.
Expunging a Penal Code 241 Conviction
The consequences of a conviction for assaulting a police officer can affect your life long after serving your jail sentence and paying the fines. The collateral consequences may include difficulty obtaining employment and suspension of a professional license. Fortunately, there are ways through which you can avoid the disabilities associated with your conviction.
California Penal Code 1203.4 is a post-conviction relief that can release you from the penalties of your PC 241 conviction. You are eligible for expunging your record if you meet the following criteria:
- You have completed your probation. The court can sentence you to misdemeanor probation instead of jail for assaulting a law enforcement officer. Before petitioning the court for an expungement relief, you must have completed your probation term and followed through with probation conditions.
- You are not facing charges or serving a sentence for another crime.
Expressing your conviction will involve the following steps:
- Fill out the paperwork. With your criminal lawyer’s guidance, you must complete the paperwork to expunge your record. This can include indicating all information about your arrest and completion of probation.
- File for expungement. When you complete the paperwork, you will submit the petition to the court and await a response.
- Attend an expungement hearing. At the expungement hearing, the prosecution can dispute your petition by presenting counter-evidence why you don’t deserve the relief. The court can grant an expungement relief if you can hold down a job and have no additional convictions. You can review your application and reapply if the court denies your petition.
After a successful expungement of your PC 241 conviction, an employer cannot use the conviction to discriminate against you. Additionally, it will be easier to obtain a professional license. However, you must understand that an expungement does not erase the conviction on your record.
Plea Deals for Penal Code 241
A plea deal is an agreement between the criminal defendant and the prosecution where you plead guilty to a lesser offense in exchange for the dismissal of your underlying offense. Several plea options are available for defendants facing charges of assault on a police officer.
Depending on the facts of your case and the possibility of a conviction, a skilled criminal attorney will advise you on whether to accept a plea deal. Mostly, the prosecution will agree to sentence you for a reduced charge when their assault case against you is not strong, or they lack sufficient evidence to prove all the elements beyond a reasonable doubt.
A prosecutor could agree to dismiss your PC 241 charges if you plead guilty to the following:
Disturbing Peace
Under California Penal Code 415, disturbing peace involves acts like fighting in public, playing loud music, or using offensive language. If you fight in public and a police officer attempts to separate you, touching the officer offensively will attract assault charges. However, the prosecution could lack sufficient evidence to prove your actions were willful. In this case, you can negotiate with the prosecution to reduce your assault charge to disturbing peace.
The maximum sentence for disturbing the peace in California is 90 days in county jail and $400 in fines. This sentence is significantly lower than the one year in jail and $2,000 fines you will suffer for assaulting a police officer. Additionally, a PC 415 conviction may not affect your ability to obtain employment or a state license. Prosecutors are reluctant to reduce your charges. Therefore, having a skilled attorney to help you negotiate the deal is critical.
Misdemeanor Trespass
California PC 692 defines trespass as entering or remaining on another person’s property without permission. The most common acts prohibited under this statute include:
- Entering someone’s property with the intent to cause damage.
- Entering a building to interfere with business activities.
- Failure to leave private property after the owner asks you to do so.
- Occupying property without the owner’s consent.
If you have an altercation with a law enforcement officer while you attempted to trespass, you can negotiate a deal where you plead guilty to trespass, and your assault charge is dismissed. A conviction for misdemeanor trespass attracts a six months jail sentence and a fine that does not exceed $1,000.
Rioting
You can be charged with rioting if you willfully engage in a public riot. A riot involves two or more people disturbing public peace or threatening violence without legal authority. If you engage in conduct that could result in applying force against a law enforcement officer while rioting, the prosecution can reduce your assault charge to Penal Code 404. A conviction for rioting attracts a six months jail sentence and a $1,000 fine.
Find a Competent Criminal Lawyer Near Me.
Under California Penal Code 241, assault of a police officer involves an unlawful attempt with the present ability to inflict force or violence against a police officer. Assault can potentially cause serious bodily injury or death, making it a serious offense in California. When you couple this with assaulting a police officer, you will be looking at jail time and high fines. In addition to spending time in jail, a conviction for assaulting a law enforcement officer attracts severe collateral consequences.
Fortunately, not all arrests under this statute will result in a conviction. With the guidance of a skilled attorney, you can fight to have your charges reduced or dismissed. At Leah Legal, we offer expert legal advice to all our clients battling Penal Code charges in Van Nuys, CA. Call us today at 818-484-1100 to discuss the details of your case.
Drunk driving is a severe offense under California law. A conviction for drunk driving crimes attracts severe legal penalties and life-changing collateral consequences. In addition to spending time behind bars, having a DUI conviction on your record will impact your ability to obtain employment and professional licenses. This will have a significant impact on your livelihood.
Fortunately, there are several ways through which you can legally avoid the disabilities associated with your conviction. Expunging a criminal record is one of the most common forms of post-conviction relief, and it involves a change of your “guilty” verdict to “not guilty.” By filing a petition and attending your expungement hearing, you can convince the court to eliminate your liability toward the conviction.
After an expungement, employers, landlords, and licensing bodies cannot use the conviction against you. The laws around record expungement are complicated. Therefore, having competent legal guidance is critical.
Expunging a Drunk Driving Record in California
An expungement is a post-conviction relief that allows you to avoid the collateral consequences of a DUI conviction. Expunging the conviction involves foiling a petition in court and waiting for the court’s decisions. If the court finds it necessary, they will set aside the sentence.
Often, you can petition the court to expunge your DUI conviction if you meet the following criteria:
- You Have Completed your Probation
A probation sentence may be part of the legal penalties for your DUII conviction. In California, probation is an alternative to jail or prison time. Before you receive an expungement of your record, you must have completed your probation successfully. Successful completion of probation means that you have served the probation period.
DUI probation lasts three to five years, depending on the time you have served behind bars. Additionally, you must have followed through with all the probation conditions. Courts impose strict penalties that individuals who receive a state probation sentence must follow throughout the probation period. Probation conditions vary depending on your case circumstances.
- You did not Serve Time in State Prison
Different offenses fall under drunk driving laws. You can be convicted of a felony or misdemeanor drunk driving offense depending on the circumstances of your case and criminal history. For example, a simple first DUI offense is punishable by six months in jail. On the other hand, a conviction for DUI causing injury will attract a state prison sentence.
You must not have served time in prison when filing for an expungement. If you were sent to state prison, it should be for an offense punishable by jail time.
- You are not Facing Criminal Charges
You can only expunge a DUI conviction if you are not currently facing charges for another offense. Additionally, you must not be serving a jail sentence or probation for a different crime.
Early Probation Termination for DUI Expungement
The court will sentence you to misdemeanor probation for a typical DUI conviction. A requirement for an expungement relief in California is probation completion. You can petition the court for early termination if you have not completed your probation. After filing a petition under PC 1203.3, your attorney must convince the prosecution why you deserve the early termination.
The court has the discretion to terminate your probation at any time. However, you must have served at least one year of misdemeanor probation and eighteen months of felony probation. Before terminating your probation, the judge will consider your overall conduct on probation and the prosecution’s opinion. Additionally, your probation may be terminated if it gives you hardships.
DUI Expungement Process
Before you begin filing an expungement for your DUI record, you will need to gather documents and information about the offense and conviction you seek to expunge. You will follow this process for your expungement:
Hire a Lawyer
Expunging a DUI criminal record in California is complicated and time-consuming. There are many opportunities for an error, and some mistakes will result in denying your petition. Therefore, it is vital to have a skilled criminal lawyer who understands the process and can help you do it right on the first try.
File the Expungement Petition
When all the correct forms are filled, you can file your expungement petition with the court where the DUI conviction occurred. Depending on the court policies, you can mail or deliver the petition. After filing the petition, you must allow up to fifteen days for the prosecution to review your petition and decide on an objection. Therefore, the timely filing of your petition is critical.
Prepare and Attend your Expungement Hearing
Appearance for an expungement hearing is not mandatory for all cases. Your criminal lawyer will help you prepare. If the prosecution objects to the expungement, the court gives them a chance to provide reasons and evidence why they do not deserve the expungement.
Since there is no jury at an expungement hearing, the judge may consider the following factors when deciding on your petition:
- Your ability to hold a job. Often, a requirement to obtain and retain employment is attached to most release forms, including probation and parole. Therefore, the court will accept your petition if you have a stable job.
- Your criminal history. You have a high chance of receiving an expungement if you do not have additional convictions on your record.
- Whether or not you have completed your community service. You must have served your community service sentence before receiving an expungement of your record.
Depending on your eligibility for the expungement and filing the proper documents, the court can deny or grant the petition to expunge your DUI conviction.
Refile the Petition
If the judge grants your petition, your attorney can help you seal the case to protect it from the public. However, if the judge denies your DUI expungement petition, you can recheck your documents and correct the mistakes before filing another petition in six months.
Common reasons why the court can deny your expungement petition include the following:
- You do not meet the eligibility criteria. The most common reason the judge may deny your expungement petition is that you do not meet the requirements. This could include incomplete probation, probation violation, or you have served a state prison sentence. Before refiling the petition, you must meet the criteria if the reason is correctable.
- Errors in your petition. Before submitting an expungement petition to the court, you must ensure that all the necessary information is filed correctly. This includes the inflation on your arrest, conviction, and probation reports. Incorrect or missing information can be a basis for a petition denial.
- Probation violations. The court could deny your expungement if you violated a serious probation term.
- Outstanding restitution and fines. The court may sentence you to penalties and victim restitution for a DUI conviction. Failure to meet these requirements can cause the expungement to be denied.
Difference Between Expunging and Sealing Your DUI Record
Many people need help understanding the difference between expungement and sealing a record. According to Senate Bill 1203.4, sealing a record is an entirely different process from expunging a conviction. Sealing a record involves destroying the record and removing it from public access.
Unlike an expungement, where the conviction remains on record but cannot be used, a sealed arrest record is only accessible by the court and law enforcement. You may be eligible for a record sealing under the following circumstances:
- You were arrested, but the prosecutor did not file criminal charges against you.
- The court dismissed the charges before trial.
- The jury found you not guilty after trial.
- Your conviction was dismissed or overturned.
- You completed a diversion program or a different entry of judgment.
You can also seal a juvenile record for the same benefits as an adult criminal record. You can seal the juvenile record if:
- You are an adult, and the juvenile court released you at least five years before filing for record sealing.
- You have not been convicted of a moral turpitude crime as an adult. Crimes of moral turpitude involve immoral or dishonest behavior.
- There are no pending litigations based on your juvenile convictions.
A sealed conviction offers more benefits than expunging a criminal conviction. You can truthfully answer when asked about DUI arrests. Additionally, a sealed DUI arrest does not count as a prior if you are arrested for drunk driving in the future.
Fill out the Necessary Paperwork
Before beginning the expungement process, you must fill out different documents using your obtained information. If you have completed your probation, you can complete the petition to dismiss the misdemeanor. In cases where you have not completed your probation and seek an expungement, you can petition the court for an early probation termination.
If you wish to expunge a felony DUI conviction, you must file a petition under Penal Code 17(b)(3) to have the felony reduced to a misdemeanor before you proceed with a request for expungement. The forms you fill out are separate for each offense you want to expunge.
Benefits of Expunging Your Drunk Driving Conviction
Expungement is one of the most common ways to seek relief from the disabilities of your drunk driving conviction. You will enjoy the following benefits after a successful DUI expungement:
- Ease finding employment. A DUI conviction is a public record. Therefore, employers can find the conviction during a routine background check and use it to deny you employment opportunities. This is because drunk driving is reckless behavior, and the employer will not trust you to make safe decisions for others. However, if you expunge the conviction, the employers have no right to use it against you.
- Ease finding a place to live. Landlords check your criminal record before entering a tenancy agreement. If you expunge your DUI conviction, the conviction will not be used to deny you residency.
- Eligibility for a state license. If you are in a profession where a practice license is necessary, including doctors, lawyers, pharmacists, and nurses, a DUI conviction is detrimental to your career. When the licensing body receives notice of your conviction, they may seek to suspend or revoke your license. Additionally, having a DUI on your record makes it challenging to apply for you to obtain a new license. If the court grants you an expungement, you will be eligible for the license and public employment.
- You can act as a witness. When you face a criminal conviction in California, it won’t be easy to act as a reliable witness in another court case. The other side of the case can often attack your credibility based on the conviction. An expunged DUI conviction cannot be used to impeach your credibility.
- Personal satisfaction. Most people are not comfortable with having a DUI conviction on their record. The conviction will affect how people view you and how you relate with others. Expunging your conviction will give you a sense of relief and redemption from your past mistakes.
What Will a DUI Expungement not do for You?
Expunging your DUI offers numerous benefits. However, you must understand that this type of relief will not serve the following purposes:
Overturn your Driver’s License Suspension
Loss of your driver’s license is a severe consequence of a DUI conviction. After your conviction, you can suffer a revocation or suspension by the DMV or the court. Depending on the nature of your charges and your criminal history, a driver’s license suspension ranges from six months to five years.
If you are arrested and convicted of commercial DUI, you may lose your commercial driver’s license privileges for a lifetime. While expungement eliminates most disabilities of your DUI conviction, your license suspension will not be overturned. You must serve the entire suspension period or obtain a restricted license to continue operating in specific areas.
Decrease in Auto Insurance Rates
Your motor vehicle insurance provider will not take an arrest and conviction for DUI lightly. Often, driving while intoxicated is evidence of our reckless conduct. For this reason, the insurance company may require you to pay more for your insurance coverage or terminate your policy. Expunging your DUI conviction will not help decrease your rates.
Disclosure in Military Service
After expunging your DUI conviction, you are not obliged to mention the conviction to potential employers. Even when the employer finds the record, they cannot legally use it against you. However, you must disclose an expunged conviction when joining the military or law enforcement.
While you can still join the military with the expunged record, you may undergo more scrutiny than a person with a clean record. Failure to disclose a conviction when joining the military can result in a discharge.
Future Arrests
In California, drunk driving is a priorable offense. Therefore, having a DUI or wet recklessness on your record will increase the severity of your charges. The incarceration time, fines, and license suspension period are more for a second, third, and subsequent DUI offense. Expunging a DUI conviction will not bar the court from using the conviction as a prior in future DUI arrests and charges.
Can I Expunge a DUI After Probation Violation?
Completing probation is a significant part of obtaining an expungement for your DUI conviction. Therefore, if you violated your probation. There is a high chance of expungement petition denial. Typical forms of DUI probation violation include:
- Facing criminal charges while on probation.
- You served a prison sentence.
- You tested positive for alcohol or drugs.
- Failure to pay court fines and restitution.
- Failure to install an ignition interlock device on your vehicle.
The court will schedule a hearing to determine your case after a probation violation. The following factors may affect the judge’s decision to expunge your record after a probation violation:
- Your overall performance on probation. This may include your ability to follow through with other probation terms.
- The severity of your violation. Probation terms vary in severity. For example, violating probation through committing another crime does not carry the same weight as testing positive for alcohol. More severe violations will compel the judge to deny your expungement.
- Your criminal record. If you are a repeat offender or you have multiple DUI convictions on your record, the judge will use probation violation to deny your PC 1203.4 petition.
- Any positive evidence which shows that you deserve post-conviction relief.
Find a Competent Van Nuys Criminal Defense Lawyer Near Me
A DUI conviction has some of the most severe and life-changing consequences. After you have served your jail sentence and paid your fines, the conviction remains in your record, where it is accessible to potential employers and others who have an interest in your criminal history. You can avoid discrimination based on your DUI conviction by filing a petition to expunge it under California Penal Code 1203.4.
An expungement process begins by checking for eligibility and filing a petition in court where you were convicted. Although an expunged record still appears on your record, it carries less weight. If you want to be free of the disabilities of your conviction, seeking expungement is one of the easiest ways to obtain relief.
However, expunging a DUI conviction is a lengthy process that requires numerous paperwork and court appearances. Therefore, seeking the expert guidance of a criminal lawyer is essential. At Leah Legal, we offer competent legal advice and representation to all our clients undergoing the expungement process in Van Nuys, CA. Call us today at 818-484-1100 to discuss the details of your case.
Theft of credit card information occurs when there is an unauthorized acquisition and use of another person’s credit card information for fraudulent purposes. Most offenders obtain the card number, expiration date, and security code and use it for fraudulent means, including making unauthorized purchases or acquiring cash advances. Theft of credit card information occurs through various means, including skimming devices, data breaches, phishing scams, and physical theft of the card itself.
Theft of Credit Card Information Under California Law
Penal Code 484e deals with the unauthorized use of personal identifying information. This code makes it illegal to use another person’s personal identifying information, for example, their name, address, or credit card number, to commit fraud.
Criminal Acts Under Penal Code 484e
PC 484e covers a variety of criminal acts related to the unauthorized use of another person’s personal identifying information. Some examples of the actions covered under this code section include:
- Using someone else’s credit card information to make unauthorized purchases
- Stealing someone’s identity and using it to open bank accounts or obtain loans
- Impersonating another person online or over the phone to steal their personal information
- Selling another person’s personal identifying information to others for illegal purposes
The specific circumstances of each case will determine if it falls under the provisions of PC 484e. Additionally, it is worth noting that PC 484e specifically applies only to the unauthorized use of personal identifying information and does not cover other types of identity theft or fraud.
Elements Prosecutors Must Prove in a Penal Code 484e Violation Case
Prosecutors must prove several elements beyond a reasonable doubt to secure a conviction. These elements are:
- Use of personal identifying information — The defendant must have used another person’s personal information. The state should furnish the court with evidence linking the defendant with obtaining the victim’s name, credit card number, or Social Security number.
- Without authorization — The defendant must have used the personal identifying information without the victim’s permission.
- With the intent to defraud or deceive — The defendant must have used the personal identifying information to defraud or deceive someone. The state makes its case by demonstrating to the jury how the defendant made authorized purchases or opened bank accounts in the victim’s name.
- Resulting in harm — The defendant’s use of the personal identifying information must have resulted in harm or injury to the victim. For example, the defendant’s actions should have led to unauthorized charges on the victim’s credit card or a damaged credit score.
The jury will convict if the prosecutor proves these elements beyond a reasonable doubt. The exact penalty will depend on the circumstances of the case and the defendant’s criminal history.
Most Common Legal Defense Strategies
Several legal defense strategies can be used in cases involving the theft of credit card information. The ideal pick depends on the case’s specific circumstances. Some of the most common defense strategies include:
a) Lack of Intent
If you did not have the intent to defraud or deceive someone, you cannot be convicted of violating Penal Code 484e. This defense applies if you accidentally use someone else’s personal identifying information without realizing the consequences.
The lack of intent defense argues that you did not have the intent to defraud or deceive someone when you used another person’s personal identifying information. This is a critical element of the crime, and if the prosecution cannot prove that you had the intent to defraud or deceive, they cannot secure a conviction.
For example, if the defendant used a friend’s credit card information to purchase a product without realizing that it was illegal. They could argue that they did not intend to defraud or deceive. In this scenario, the defendant could not have known that his/her actions were illegal or in violation of Penal Code 484e.
Keep in mind that the lack of intent defense must be supported by evidence. It is not always successful in getting the charges dropped or reduced. An experienced criminal defense attorney can help evaluate this defense’s strength and advise if it is the best legal strategy.
b) Authorized Use
In some situations, you have permission to use the credit card. If so, you do not isolate PC 484e.
The authorized use defense asserts that you had permission to use the personal identifying information. If you can show that your accuser permitted you to use the credit card information, the prosecution will have failed to prove your guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
For example, if you used a family member’s credit card with their permission, you had the owner’s permission. Thus, you are not violating PC 484e, even if you used the card to make unauthorized purchases.
To successfully use the authorized use defense, you must provide evidence of the permission. You could submit emails or text messages permitting you to use the credit card. With the help of an experienced criminal defense attorney, you can gather and present this evidence to the court.
Note: Even with permission, a defendant could still be responsible for the unauthorized charges if he/she exceeded the terms of the approval. In these cases, the defendant could face civil liability. However, the defendant would not face criminal charges.
c) No Credit Card
A no credit card defense points to a situation where a defendant did not possess the credit card as claimed by the victim.
For example, if the defendant used someone else’s credit card information to make purchases online. However, he/she never physically had the card in his/her possession.
However, this defense may only be successful in some cases. PC 484e covers the unauthorized use of personal identifying information, not just credit card information. So even if the defendant did not have the credit card physically in their possession, if they used the information to defraud or deceive someone, he/she can still be charged under PC 484e.
The success of the no credit card defense depends on the specific circumstances of the case and the interpretation of the law by the court.
d) Mistaken Identity
Your accuser could mistake you for the actual perpetrator. In this case, asserting mistaken identity as a defense is applicable. You will have to show that they did not use the personal identifying information on the card.
For example, if someone else used the defendant’s computer or phone to commit the crime, the defendant could raise this defense.
You should provide evidence that another individual used personal identifying information. This requires providing witness statements, computer or phone records, or other physical evidence.
The aim here is to create a reasonable doubt. If this defense is successful, the court will drop the charges.
However, it is worth noting that proving mistaken identity can be challenging and requires a thorough investigation of the facts and evidence.
e) Insufficient Evidence
The court will dismiss your charges if the state lacks sufficient evidence to secure a conviction.
Asserting that the prosecution lacks sufficient evidence to convict suggests that prosecutors do not have adequate evidence to prove all of the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. This means that the prosecution must prove that you used someone else’s personal identifying information without authorization, with the intent to defraud or deceive, and that this resulted in harm or injury to the victim.
If the prosecution’s evidence is not strong enough to meet this standard, through your attorney, you can argue that there is insufficient evidence to support a conviction.
For example, if the prosecution does not have sufficient evidence to prove that you intended to defraud or deceive, or if the evidence linking the defendant to the crime is circumstantial, you can raise this defense.
It is worth pointing out that this defense is not a guarantee of acquittal. However, it can help to cast doubt on the prosecution’s case and increase the chances of a favorable outcome for the defendant.
Can Claiming Necessity be an Appropriate Defense?
The necessity defense is a legal defense applicable in some cases. Defense attorneys argue necessity when they seek to excuse an otherwise criminal behavior. Attorneys will assert that the defendant committed the crime because it was necessary to prevent more significant harm, such as in the case of an emergency.
In most cases, the necessity defense is unlikely to be successful. This is because using another person’s personal identifying information without their permission, even in an emergency, is still considered a criminal act under Penal Code 484e.
However, should you opt for this defense, you must show that you had no other legal options available. Further, the harm you sought to prevent was more significant than the harm caused by stealing or using credit card information. By doing so, you increase the chances of a favorable outcome.
It would be challenging to make this argument, as the unauthorized use of personal identifying information is considered a grave offense that can result in significant harm to the victim. However, remember that each case is unique, and the specific defense strategies will depend on the circumstances.
Penalties Under Penal Code 484e
Penalties for violating PC 484e vary depending on the circumstances of the case and the defendant’s criminal history.
A first-time violation of Penal Code 484e is generally considered a wobbler. You can either face misdemeanor or felony charges.
If charged as a misdemeanor, you can face up to one year in county jail and a fine of up to $1,000. If charged as a felony, you risk facing up to three years in prison and a fine of up to $10,000.
Repeat offenders or those who use personal identifying information to commit more serious crimes, like identity theft or fraud, could face more severe penalties, including longer prison sentences and higher fines.
Note: A conviction under Penal Code 484e can also result in other consequences, like a damaged credit score, difficulty obtaining credit in the future, and a criminal record. All these consequences make it more difficult to find employment or housing.
Related Crimes
Prosecutors could opt to charge you with additional crimes alongside PC 484e violations. In other situations, they could drop the crest card information theft charges and pursue any of the following crimes. Before deciding what charges you should face, prosecutors consider your criminal past and the circumstances of the case.
a) Fraudulent Use of a Credit Card – A Violation of PC 484g
Penal Code 484g makes it illegal to use a credit card with the intent to defraud or deceive someone.
Under Penal Code 484g, it is illegal to use a credit card that does not belong to you or to use someone else’s credit card information without their permission, with the intent to make purchases or obtain cash or goods. The law applies to physical credit cards and information acquired electronically.
To secure a conviction, prosecutors must prove the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
- The defendant used a credit card.
- The credit card did not belong to the defendant.
- The defendant used the credit card to defraud or deceive someone.
- The defendant knew that the credit card was not theirs or that they were not authorized to use it.
A defendant could be convicted under PC 484g even if they did not benefit financially from the fraudulent credit card use. The critical factor is that the defendant used the credit card with the intent to defraud or deceive someone.
In some cases, the prosecution could also need to prove that the defendant made a purchase or obtained cash or goods using a credit card. This will depend on the specific facts of the case and the language of the charging document.
Penalties for a PC 484g Violation
Penalties for violating Penal Code 484g vary depending on the circumstances of the case and the defendant’s criminal history.
A first-time violation is generally charged as a wobbler. This means you could face misdemeanor or felony penalties.
If charged with a misdemeanor, you risk facing up to one year in county jail and a fine of up to $1,000. If charged with committing a felony, you could face up to three years in prison and a fine of up to $10,000.
b) Publishing Credit Card Information – A PC 484j Violation
It is an offense under Penal Code 484j to publish or otherwise distribute someone else’s credit card information without his/her permission.
Under Penal Code 484j, publishing or distributing someone else’s credit card information is illegal. Sharing details, including the credit card number, expiration date, and security code, with the intent to defraud or deceive someone will result in criminal charges. This includes posting the information online, sending it through email or text, or selling it to others.
Penalties for a PC 484j Violation
Penal Code 484j violations are wobblers. Prosecutors can pursue misdemeanor or felony charges.
Should you face misdemeanor charges and the jury finds you guilty, you could face up to one year in jail and pay a fine of up to $1,000. Subsequently, if convicted on felony charges, the penalties increase to three years in prison and a fine of up to $10,000.
c) Petty Theft – PC 484 and 488
Penal Code 484 and Penal Code 488 make it illegal to steal property valued at $950 or less. This crime is often referred to as petty theft.
Under Penal Code 484 PC, it is illegal to take someone else’s property without their permission and with the intent to deprive them of the property permanently. This can include taking someone else’s property directly, like picking someone’s pocket or stealing their wallet. Indirect methods of stealing, for example, embezzlement or fraud, also count as actions that would result in charges under PC 484.
Penal Code 488 makes taking another person’s property valued at $950 or less. This crime is sometimes referred to as petty theft by larceny.
Penalties Under PC 484
Penalties for violating PC 484 and PC 488 vary depending on the circumstances of the case and the defendant’s criminal history.
A first-time violation of either law is generally charged as a misdemeanor. Convictions result in up to six months in county jail and a fine of up to $1,000.
Like the theft of credit card information, a conviction for the above-mentioned related offenses also poses significant and life-changing consequences if convicted. You risk adding new charges to your criminal record. A criminal record directly impacts your ability to secure housing, employment, credit, and favorable insurance rates.
Additionally, if you have prior theft convictions, the charges for a new petty theft offense can be elevated to a felony. Thus, resulting in up to three years in prison. You, therefore, need the assistance of a reputable and experienced criminal defense attorney.
Find an Experienced Van Nuys Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
If you are facing prosecution for a Penal Code 484e violation in Van Nuys, it is best to take immediate action and protect your rights. An experienced criminal defense attorney can help you navigate the legal process and defend yourself against the charges. At Leah Legal, our record speaks for itself. We have assisted and represented numerous clients charged with various offenses, including theft of credit card information, secure favorable outcomes. Contact us today at 818-484-1100 for a case assessment.
California law makes it a crime to evade or attempt to flee from a police officer who is actively pursuing you. While evading a law enforcement officer will always attract a criminal charge, you will be charged with a more serious crime if your act involves reckless driving and endangering the safety of others. California Vehicle Code 2800.2 on felony evading attracts severe and life-changing consequences.
However, before you face a conviction under this statute, the prosecution must prove that you fled from an officer. Additionally, it must be clear that you operated a vehicle with wanton disregard for the safety of others.
If you have been charged with felony evading an officer, you must speak with an experienced criminal lawyer. Your attorney will protect your rights and help you build a solid defense against your charges.
An Overview of California Vehicle Code 2800.2
There are many reasons why drivers evade police officers, including avoiding an arrest for a crime, avoiding a speeding ticket, or being in a hurry. If you fail to obey an officer’s order to stop your vehicle, you can be arrested and charged with evading. How you drive your car while fleeing from the officer will dictate the type of charges that the prosecution will bring against you.
If you are charged with felony evading an officer, the prosecution must establish the following elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt:
1. A Police Officer was Pursuing you
The first element that must be clear during your trial for violating VC 2800.2 is that the officer was actively pursuing you. You can only flee when an officer is pursuing you in a police vehicle or motorcycle. Additionally, you must be in a motor vehicle during the incident. Running away from a police officer on foot or on a bicycle does not constitute evading.
2. You Willfully Evaded the Police officer
You are only guilty of felony evading an officer if you intentionally speed away to avoid capture by the officer. Police officers stop you for various reasons. However, if you did not notice the officer’s attempts to get to you or stop your vehicle, there would be no evidence to prove that your actions were willful.
3. The Officer was Marked Distinctively
You are not obliged to stop your vehicle when a civilian flags you down. Therefore, you will be guilty of evading if there is sufficient evidence to ascertain that the officer was marked through the following:
- The officer’s vehicle had at least one red light lamp visible during the incident.
- You saw or should have seen the light.
- The vehicle was sounding an alarm while the officer pursued you.
- The officer’s car had another distinctive marking beside the siren. This could include flashing lights, a seal, or the name of the police department they represent.
- The officer wore a distinctive uniform. The police uniform has many components. However, during the prosecution of this offense, the officer doesn’t need to have a complete uniform. A single visible part of the uniform is enough to identify the officer.
4. You Drove a Vehicle with Wanton Disregard for Safety
The most critical element of felony evading an officer is how you operate your vehicle while fleeing. Your actions disregard the safety of other people and property if:
- You knew or should have known that your actions presented a significant risk to people and property. The court compares your conduct with that of a reasonable person to show your recklessness.
- You ignored the risk. Knowing that your actions can cause injury to another person and continue acting the same makes your conduct particularly serious.
If you commit up to three traffic violations while fleeing from a police officer, you can be charged with felony evading. This will be the case regardless of whether or not you pose a risk to others. You must understand that evading an officer while under drug or alcohol influence may not be enough to attract a conviction for felony evading.
Penalties for Felony Evading a Police Officer
If the prosecution can establish all the elements of reckless evading, you can be found guilty and convicted. Regardless of its name, a violation of Vehicle Code 2800.2 is a wobbler. A wobbler is a crime that can be charged as a felony or as a misdemeanor. The following factors may dictate the nature of your charges:
- Your criminal history. If you’re a repeat offender with a history of committing crimes against law enforcement officers, the slightest evidence of reckless behavior could prompt the prosecution to file felony charges against you. Being a repeat offender indicates your unwillingness to learn from your mistakes and be rehabilitated.
- Specific circumstances of your case. When you evade a police officer and drive your vehicle recklessly, the level of danger you pose to others can dictate the nature of your charge. In cases where you cause property damage or an injury to someone else, the prosecution can file felony charges.
- Your eligibility for probation. If you are eligible for a probation sentence instead of incarceration, the prosecution may be prompted to file misdemeanor charges under VC 2800.2.
- The strength of the prosecutor’s case. When the prosecution does not have strong evidence to support the charges they bring against you, they have a better chance of securing a misdemeanor conviction. Therefore, recharges are reserved when there is evidence to support the elements of the crime.
As a felony, evading a police officer is punishable by a prison sentence of sixteen months, two or three years. The court may also impose fines of up to $10,000.
Felony Probation for Evading a Police Officer
There are three sentencing options for a felony conviction in California:
- Prison time,
- Fines, and
- Probation.
Mostly, probation is an alternative to incarceration. If probation is part of your sentence, you will serve part of your sentence as a supervised community service sentence. Felony probation lasts for three to five years, depending on the specific facts of your case.
The court attaches strict conditions that you must follow while serving your probation, which include:
- Suspension of your driving privileges
- You must not engage in criminal activity while on probation
- Undergo drug and alcohol treatment
- Court-ordered mental health counseling
- Attend a driver retraining program.
You must follow all probation conditions, failure to which you will face the harsh consequences of a probation violation.
Legal Defenses Against VC 2800.2 Charges
A conviction for reckless evading of an officer attracts severe legal and collateral consequences, especially when charged as a felony. Therefore, you should be aggressive in fighting the charges. The first step in building a successful defense is hiring and retaining a knowledgeable attorney. Your lawyer will help protect you from forced confessions, harassment, and police misconduct throughout your arrest and interrogation.
There are many strategies and approaches that you can take in your case. The best possible outcome of your case is a dismissal of your charges or walking away with a not-guilty verdict. However, if the prosecution has a strong case, you can work to negotiate a plea for a lesser offense like California Vehicle Code 2800.1.
You can use the following defenses to fight your charges for felony evading:
Lack of Intent to Flee
One critical element that constitutes felony evading is your intent to flee from an officer pursuing you. You cannot be convicted under this statute unless your criminal intent is clear. For example, if you were pulled over in an unsafe neighborhood, your failure to stop could be associated with fear for your safety.
Another way you can explain away your lack of intent to flee from the officer is if you had a parent who needed emergency medical care in your vehicle. If you believed stopping the vehicle would endanger them, you may avoid a conviction for reckless evading. However, the lack of intent to evade does not justify violating traffic rules. Therefore, you may still be found guilty of reckless driving.
You did not Evade an Officer
Before you face a conviction for felony evading, the prosecution must prove you knew or should have known that the officer was in your pursuit. The law states that an officer’s vehicle and clothing must be marked for easy identification. If the officer who attempted to stop your vehicle was not marked distinctively, you would not be found guilty of violating VC 2800.2.
Insufficient Evidence to Prove that you Drove Recklessly
Your driving conduct is a critical determining factor of the statute under which the prosecutor files your evading charge. Clearly, you operated your vehicle recklessly and endangered other people while fleeing from the officer. In California, prosecutors file the most serious charges that the evidence they have against you can support.
Sometimes, the prosecuting attorney can file charges for felony evading without evidence to back the claim. In addition to reckless driving, you must have violated several other traffic rules for your offense to qualify as a violation under VC 2800.2. You can avoid a conviction under this statute by arguing that your conduct was not reckless.
Unlawful Stop
California law gives every person a right against unlawful traffic stops by the police. Before a law enforcement officer attempts to stop your vehicle, they should have probable cause that you were engaging in a criminal act. An officer can lawfully stop your vehicle if you are suspected of drunk driving or you reach a DUI checkpoint.
You can argue that you failed to stop the vehicle out of fear of police brutality or because you thought you were a victim of racial profiling. The illegal stop can override the alleged violation on your part.
Frequently Asked Questions on the Felony Evading of a Police Officer?
The moments following an arrest and charges for felony evading an officer can be challenging and confusing. The uncertainty surrounding the outcome of your case can take a toll on you. The following frequently asked questions will help you understand more about your crime, charges, and potential consequences:
- What is the difference between evading an officer and felony evading an officer?
California VC 2800.1 and PC 2800.2 involve fleeing from an officer. However, one factor differentiating the two crimes is your conduct while fleeing from the officer. You will be charged with felony evading if, while evading, you drive a vehicle recklessly and with disregard for the safety of other people. You do need to have caused injury to another person or property damage to be charged under this statute.
Another difference between evading and felony evading is the nature of the charges. While violation of VC 2800.1 is a misdemeanor, VC 2800.2 is a wobbler. This means that the offense can attract felony or misdemeanor charges depending on the specific factors of your case.
- What happens when I cause an accident while evading an officer?
When the prosecutor files VC 2800.2 charges against you, evidence of injury is unnecessary. Being reckless and placing other people or property at risk is enough to obtain a conviction. However, causing injury to another person while evading an officer is an aggravating factor in your case. This means you will receive a harsher sentence.
If you cause the death of another person while fleeing from an officer, the prosecution could charge you with vehicular manslaughter along with felony evading. If you are found guilty of both offenses, you may serve a sentence of up to 25 years in prison.
- Will a conviction for VC 2800.2 impact my driving privileges?
A conviction for reckless evading an officer will significantly impact your driver’s license. The court will impose a mandatory license suspension for up to one year for your first offense. If you cause injury to another person while violating VC 2800.2, your license suspension will be longer. If you hold a commercial driver’s license, or a subsequent conviction for felony evading an officer
The Department of Motor Vehicles will be notified of your arrest and will attempt to suspend your license before you appear in court for your trial under VC 2800.2. Your best bet at retaining your driving privileges at this stage is to schedule a DMV hearing to contest the suspension. In addition to a license suspension, the court may impound your vehicle, and you must pay the fees to release it.
- Will I lose my gun rights for felony evading?
VC 2800.1 can attract misdemeanor or felony charges. If you face a felony conviction, you risk losing your gun rights. California law allows most residents to purchase and possess firearms unless they are convicted felons. However, if you are convicted of felony evading, you will be stripped of this right.
An attempt to purchase or use a firearm after an arrest and charges for felons in firearm possession under California Penal Code 28900 meets the firearm ban.
- Can I be found guilty of felony evading if I was intoxicated?
Intoxication is not an excuse to violate the law. However, a conviction for reckless evading requires evidence that you intended to flee from the law enforcement officer. An intoxicated person may be incapable of formulating an intent to flee. While the intoxication argument may help you avoid charges for felony evading, you can be charged and convicted for drunk driving and VC 23152.
DUI is a misdemeanor that results in a jail sentence of up to six months. Compared to felony evading, facing charges for drunk driving is a favorable outcome.
- Can felony evading an officer be reduced to evading a police officer?
One of the defense strategies in your VC 2800.2 case is to fight for a reduced charge. If you are unsure that you will win your case and avoid a conviction under this statute, your attorney could negotiate a plea deal for VC 2800.1 with the prosecution. Entering a plea deal means you plead guilty to evading an officer, followed by dismissing your felony evading charges.
Since evading an officer is a misdemeanor, the longest you can spend in jail is one year. Sometimes, you can avoid incarceration through misdemeanor probation.
Find a Top-Notch Criminal Attorney Near Me
Anyone who flees from a police officer in a vehicle while driving with disregard for the safety of other people and property will be arrested and charged with felony evading an officer. The manner of driving and the danger you pose to others differentiate felony reckless evading from misdemeanor evading.
Reckless evading of an officer is a serious offense that attracts a mandatory jail sentence for anyone found guilty. The court may also impose hefty fines for the crime. In addition to incarceration and fines, a conviction for this offense will remain on your record, affecting your personal and professional life.
You will need to undergo other tedious court processes like expungement or seeking a certificate of rehabilitation to avoid the disabilities of your conviction. Fortunately, not all arrests under VC 2800.2 attract a conviction. With the guidance of a skilled criminal lawyer, you can fight to have charges dropped or reduced to the less serious Vehicle Code 2800.1. If you or your loved one faces charges for felony evading an officer in Van Nuys, CA, you will benefit from the expert legal guidance we offer at Leah Legal. Call us today at 818-484-1100 to discuss the details of your case.
Domestic violence-related convictions usually carry severe penalties. You could lose custody of your child or children or the ability to visit them at your partner’s. You could also be subject to prison or jail time, probation, or hefty fines, based on the severity and nature of your charges. If accused of domestic violence, it could be because you caused corporal injury to your spouse. But what exactly does “causing corporal injury to a spouse” mean? We explain this in this blog.
What It Means to Cause Corporal Injury to a Spouse
A “corporal injury refers to a physical or bodily wound inflicted by force, which leads to a traumatic condition. It generally means a verifiable or visible injury, whether severe or slight. The quantity of force used does not count. Additionally, whether the force was caused using a gun or any other weapon is immaterial. All that counts is the force that caused a traumatic condition on the victim’s body.
Therefore, causing corporal injury to a spouse means inflicting a bodily injury on an ex- or current intimate partner, and that injury leads to a traumatic condition.
Corporal injury examples include:
- Internal bleeding
- Concussions
- A laceration or cut
- Bruises
- A strained muscle or ligament sprain
- A bullet would
- A broken bone
- A body scratch
- Swelling
- A broken nose
- Injuries resulting from strangulation or suffocation
The following does not constitute a corporal injury
- Physical contact not resulting in any internal physical injuries or leave a mark
- Financial losses
- Property damage
- Emotional distress
- Post-traumatic stress due to the violence
Causing corporal injury to a spouse is a type of domestic violence crime in California, described under PC 273.5. The crime is also called domestic abuse, domestic violence, or spousal abuse, depending on who files the charges. The D.A. must provide irrefutable evidence that you acted willfully to hold you criminally liable for this crime. “Willfully” means you acted intentionally. You need not have meant to violate the law to be considered to have acted willfully.
The D.A. must also prove that you caused the victim to sustain a traumatic condition. A traumatic condition is any bodily harm inflicted through the direct use of physical force. The condition need not be severe. Any minor injury or wound suffices.
Lastly, the party that suffered the corporal injury must be an intimate partner, not just anyone else, to be convicted under PC 273.5. Your intimate partner can be an ex- or current spouse, fiance(e), cohabitant, registered domestic partner, child’s mother or father, or someone you are seriously dating or seriously dated in the past. Put otherwise, you should have or have had intimate relations with the hurt party.
Corporal Injury Vs. Domestic Battery
Although there are some similarities between a domestic battery and corporal injury upon a spouse, these charges differ in various ways, which could affect the way defendants are tried.
Domestic battery is also called spousal battery. It is described under PC 243e1 as willfully touching an intimate partner in an offensive or harmful way. Unlike cases of corporal injury, the domestic battery offense does not necessitate the victim being hurt in any way. All that matters is that the defendant made physical contact, regardless of how slight. For example, you can be charged with a domestic battery offense if you touch your partner’s skin, clothing, or an item in their hands, like a bag or purse.
Another difference is that while both crimes involve domestic violence, corporal injury upon an intimate partner is considered a wobbler. A wobbler is a crime the D.A. can charge as a felony or misdemeanor based on the case facts and the accused’s criminal history. On the other hand, a spousal battery violation is a straight misdemeanor. This means the D.A. can only prosecute it as a misdemeanor, not a felony.
You are likely to face charges of felony corporal injury to a spouse if the injury you inflicted on the victim is severe and you have previously been charged with domestic violence or any other aggressive conduct.
If charged with inflicting corporal injury on a spouse as a misdemeanor, you will be subject to a maximum fine of six thousand dollars, 12 months of a jail sentence, and summary probation. A felony conviction, which is much more severe, is punishable by a state prison sentence of two, three, or four years, a maximum fine of six thousand dollars, and felony probation. A conviction for a domestic battery crime could subject you to a fine of not more than two thousand dollars and a maximum of 12 months in jail.
Irrespective of the type of domestic violence crime you are accused of, the penalties are real and can be devastating. You need to contact a knowledgeable domestic violence criminal defense attorney who can fight to protect your legal rights and aggressively defend the charges against you.
What Else Could Happen If You Cause Corporal Injury to a Spouse?
Apart from the standard penalties mentioned above, you can face further consequences if you cause corporal injury to your spouse and certain factors apply to your case. For example, you may face more severe penalties if your past conviction was within the past seven years and it was for:
- 243(e) PC, battery upon a spouse
- 4 PC, sexual battery
- 245 PC, assault using a deadly weapon
- 5 PC, corporal injury upon a spouse
- 244 PC, battery/assault using caustic chemicals
- 243(d) PC, battery/assault resulting in severe bodily injury
- 5 PC, assaulting someone using a stun gun
If the past sentence is for battery on a spouse, your felony penalties will increase to up to four years in prison and a maximum fine of ten thousand dollars. And if the past sentence is for the other crimes listed above (apart from battery upon a spouse), your felony penalties may increase to two, four, or five years in prison and a maximum fine of ten thousand dollars.
If you severely injured the victim, you could face a significant bodily injury sentence enhancement per 12022.7 PC. This sentence enhancement will subject you to an additional, consecutive prison term of five, four, or three years.
And if your actions made the victim suffer significant bodily harm, the crime would be considered a strike and a serious felony. If found criminally liable for a serious felony and prosecuted for another felony later, it is deemed a second strike. In this case, your penalty period will be twice as long as the sentence otherwise required under the law. Two strike offenses on your record and a subsequent conviction of any felony can result in a prison term of between 25 years and life.
Probation Sentence for Causing Corporal Injury to a Spouse
Sometimes, a judge can suspend a defendant’s prison or jail sentence and grant them a probation term. In California, there are two types of probation based on the nature of the charge—felony or misdemeanor. The two types of probation are felony and summary probation.
Summary probation is informal, or misdemeanor probation and generally lasts between 12 and 36 months. Felony probation, also called formal probation, usually lasts longer (between three and five years). It could also include serving a maximum of 12 months in jail. The only cases where formal probation is generally granted are when it is the defendant’s first offense or substantial mitigating factors exist.
If sentenced to felony or misdemeanor probation for causing corporal injury to a spouse, the judge will require you to adhere to particular conditions, including:
- Serve at least fifteen days in jail if you were previously convicted in the last seven years for a crime involving domestic violence or assault or sixty days if you have two or several of these priors
- Adhering to a protective or restraining order that prohibits you from contacting the victim in question for a maximum of ten years
- Not breaking any laws
- Doing community service
- Paying restitution to the victim to compensate them for their counseling and other relevant costs
- Paying a maximum of five thousand dollars to a battered women’s shelter
If you violate any probation conditions, the judge schedules a hearing. And if the prosecutor proves your violation during this hearing, the judge may revoke your probation and then impose the maximum prison or jail sentence for causing corporal injury to a spouse or impose newer (usually harsher) conditions.
You May Also Face Immigration Consequences
Causing corporal injury to a spouse is a domestic violence offense under immigration laws. Consequently, it is deemed a deportable violation. In some instances, the offense also qualifies as an aggravated felony or a crime of moral turpitude. These two categories of crimes are inadmissible violations. Being sentenced for an inadmissible offense can subject you to the following consequences:
- You cannot apply to adjust your status (changing to legal from illegal immigration status) or for a green card.
- No chance of becoming a United States citizen.
- Denial of the right to reenter the U.S after leaving.
Los Angeles County Prosecutors Do Not Impose Sentence Enhancements
As of December 8, 2020, LA County Prosecutors no longer pursue sentence enhancement for anyone accused of causing corporal injury to a spouse. Therefore, if you are charged with breaking your intimate partner’s arm in LA, the D.A. cannot seek the significant bodily injury sentence enhancement under 12022.7 PC. Put otherwise, inflicting a bruise on an intimate partner is charged similarly to inflicting a severe injury.
Because LA County prosecutors no longer pursue the significant bodily injury sentence enhancement, you will not be subject to the enhanced consequences of an additional five, four, or three years in prison.
How You Can Defend Yourself
If accused of causing corporal injury to a spouse, it does not mean you are going straight to jail. A skilled lawyer can help you successfully fight your charges. Defense attorneys have various strategies they can apply to have the judge reduce or even dismiss charges of corporal injury to a spouse. Whereas not two cases are the same, there are common defenses that cut across all corporal injury cases.
One of the defenses you can argue based on your case is self-defense or the defense of another. This defense is most effective if you had reason to believe that you or another individual was in immediate danger of sustaining a physical injury and believed you needed to use force to stop the danger. Additionally, the force you had to use should not be more than you reasonably required to prevent the danger.
Another valid defense you can argue is that you did not act intentionally. You can only be guilty of causing corporal injury to a spouse if you purposely hurt the victim. That means accidental harm, whether or not it occurred during an argument, does not suffice. In this case, the judge may convict you of a less severe crime, like domestic battery.
You can also argue the false accusation defense. Police officers in California take domestic violence allegations seriously. Consequently, people are frequently falsely arrested based on wrongful accusations. The allegations could arise from jealousy, anger, or the need for revenge. Your lawyer can assist you in fighting wrongful accusations by interviewing the victim or subpoenaing their text messages, emails, or social media accounts. They can also conduct a comprehensive background check on the victim and interview their friends, colleagues, online contacts, family, and witnesses.
A detailed investigation often reveals that the accused has an ill motive. When your lawyer presents evidence in court, the judge may drop your charges or the prosecutor may agree to a plea deal.
Regardless of what defenses apply to your case, your lawyer may achieve the best possible outcome without a court trial. Court trials are expensive and time-consuming. They also allow judges the power to admit potentially stigmatizing information into evidence. However, court trials can sometimes be ideal, mainly if the D.A. is uncooperative.
Situations Where the Victim Refuses to Proceed with the Case
Sometimes the victim may decide they will not proceed with the case after filing a police report for corporal injury. When this happens in your case, it does not mean the prosecution will dismiss your charges there and then. The victim may say they have decided to drop all charges or refuse to testify during court proceedings. Sometimes the victim cannot be present in court during the proceedings. What happens in these scenarios?
When the victim decides to drop all charges, D.As often assume they do so because the defendant has coerced, threatened, or emotionally manipulated them. Consequently, the D.A. will likely carry on with the prosecution anyway.
But when the victim is reluctant, charges are usually challenging to prosecute as the victim will be uncooperative. Consequently, the defense attorney can often convince the D.A. to dismiss the charges or agree to a more favorable plea deal if the evidence they have is weak.
Sometimes the victim declines to testify during the trial. When this happens, the D.A. has the court’s subpoena power, meaning they can compel the victim to show up and testify, whether or not they are willing. The D.A. must personally issue the victim with the subpoena to show up. The judge may issue an arrest warrant against them if they still refuse.
Sometimes the victim or prosecution’s witness still cannot appear in court during the proceedings, for example, because they may have fled from the jurisdiction or gone into hiding. In this case, the prosecution will likely be incapable of proceeding with the case due to California’s hearsay rule, a crucial evidence rule. Per Evidence Code 1200a, hearsay evidence refers to a secondhand account of events or evidence made by someone else who is not a witness on the record to prove the matter in question.
For example, Eve tells her best friend, Alex, that her boyfriend, Eddy, broke her arm. Alex informs the police, and Eddy is placed under arrest and accused of causing corporal injury to their spouse. Eve disappears the day before the trial. Alex cannot testify that Eve said Eddy broke her arm, as that would only be hearsay.
If a witness makes a statement outside of court, it will be excluded from evidence because the defendant must have the opportunity to cross-examine any opposing witnesses. So, with few exceptions, hearsay statements are not admissible. That means the case often falls apart if the victim cannot testify in court, leading to the prosecution dismissing charges. Remember, if your case is dropped, you can seek to seal your arrest records.
Find an Experienced Domestic Violence Attorney Near Me
If accused of inflicting corporal injury on your spouse, you need to consult an experienced domestic violence attorney right away to increase the chances of avoiding severe penalties. If charged in Van Nuys, Los Angeles, CA, we at Leah Legal can provide expert counsel. We can examine your case facts and advise on the best defense approach.
Our domestic violence attorneys have decades of experience and will aggressively fight to defend your rights. We may be able to convince the prosecution to dismiss your case or reduce your charges to a lesser offense, like spousal battery. Call us at 818-484-1100 to discuss a possible course of action to obtain a positive outcome for your case.
Child abduction is a crime punishable under Penal Code 278. The law considers it a criminal offense to take, withhold, entice away, or conceal a child from their legal guardian or parent in violation of a court order or without valid permission. By this very definition, child abduction charges are not limited to strangers. Parents who take and withhold children in violation of custody orders could also face child abduction charges. Parents, stepparents, relatives, or guardians are some of the suspects in a child kidnapping.
Child Abduction by Parents of Family Members
Morally, the debate about child abduction ends with one question: Can you abduct your child if you are the parent, legal guardian, or family member, especially after a divorce?
While child abduction in moral conversations is open to interpretation, legally, you must adhere to the rules courts provide in custody orders. There are various reasons why parents, family members, or legal guardians abduct children. Some of the typical rationales include:
- Disagreements over custody or visitation arrangements — A frequent cause of parental child abduction is a dispute regarding custody or visitation agreements. Sometimes, the abductor feels they have been unfairly denied access to the child. They subsequently decide to take action by taking the child on their own.
- Fear of losing custody — Sometimes, a parent could abduct their child out of fear of losing custody. They could believe the other parent is unfit or the child is in danger. In this scenario, they could believe they had no other option but to take the child away.
- Parental alienation — Alienation occurs when one parent tries to turn the minor against the other parent. Sometimes, parents abduct their children to sever the child’s relationship with the other parent.
- Mental health issues — Parents could abduct their child due to mental health issues like depression or anxiety. They could feel that the child is the only aspect of their life that brings them happiness and may be unwilling to let go.
- Abuse or neglect — A parent or family member could abduct the child out of fear that the minor is being abused or neglected. They could believe the child is in danger and be unwilling to leave them with the other parent.
Note: Parental child abduction is a grave criminal offense. It can have enduring implications for the abductor and the child, irrespective of the motive.
What Makes Child Abduction an Offense?
The state has to prove the following as true to make its case:
- You physically took, withheld, or concealed a child by removing the child from the custodial parent’s care or failing to return the child after a visitation period. You become a custodial parent through a court order or by law.
- You did not have legal justification for taking, withholding, or concealing the child — Legal justification can include a court order granting custody or visitation rights to the defendant or consent from the legal custodian or parent.
- You acted with malicious intent — You acted willfully and with wrongful intent, meaning you knew your actions were illegal but took them anyway. Examples include acting to disturb, annoy, defraud, or injure another person.
Note: Child abduction is not a crime against the child. It is a crime against the parent from whom the minor was taken from.
Examples of actions that could result in prosecution under PC 278 include:
- A non-custodial parent takes their child from the legal custodian or parent without the parent’s consent or knowledge and keeps them hidden.
- A grandparent, relative, or family friend takes a child on a trip or outing without the legal custodian’s or parent’s consent.
- A parent violates a custody or visitation order and takes their child out of state or country without the legal custodian’s or court’s approval.
Child Abduction by Depriving the Right to Visitation or Custody
Under Penal Code 278.5, child abduction occurs when an individual deprives a parent of visitation or custodial rights.
You can be charged under this statute if you take, retain, entice away, withhold, or conceal a child to deprive a lawful caretaker of their right to custody or visitation of the child. The prosecution must prove that you intended to interfere with the legal custodian’s or parent’s custody or visitation rights.
Prosecutors have to prove the PC 278 elements outlined above with one variation: that you acted intending to deprive the legal custodian or parent of a right to visitation or custody.
Examples of actions that would result in prosecution under PC 278.5 include:
- A parent refuses to allow the other parent to exercise their court-ordered visitation rights, despite the court order’s requirement.
- A parent fails to return the child to their lawful custodian or parent after an agreed-upon period of custody or visitation time.
- A grandparent or other family member with no legal custody or visitation rights with the child refuses to return the child to their lawful custodian or parent after a visit.
- A parent relocates with the child without the other parent’s consent or without seeking court approval to do so. Therefore, he/she interferes with the other parent’s custodial rights.
Note: A minor or a youngster is somebody under 18.
Exceptions to Child Abduction
There is a limited exception to child abduction.
A parent can take or detain their child in violation of a custody or visitation agreement if he/she believes the child could suffer immediate bodily or emotional harm if left with the other parent or guardian. This exception is the “right of protective parent” recognized under Penal Code 278.7.
If a parent takes their child under this exception, they must immediately contact the District Attorney’s Child Abduction Unit and follow specific reporting instructions. Following the instructions carefully and accurately is essential to avoiding criminal charges. Failure to comply with the instructions could be interpreted as violating the custodial or visitation orders.
Child Abduction Vs. Kidnapping
People often mistake child abduction for kidnapping. However, the two are related but distinct offenses.
Family members or individuals with close relationships with the child are typically the ones who commit child abduction. The abductor often does not have the intention of physically harming the child.
Conversely, kidnapping entails the act of taking or restraining an individual against their will through the use of force, fear, or deceit. This offense could involve a ransom or other demands. Kidnapping can be perpetrated against individuals of any age. Further, the offender does not have to be a family member or close associate of the victim.
Kidnapping is considered a more severe offense compared to child abduction.
Defenses You Can Assert in a Child Abduction Case
There are several defenses you can raise in a child abduction case. They include the following:
a) Lack of Malicious Intent
A conviction for child abduction requires that you intend to deprive the kid’s lawful custodian or parent of their right to custody or visitation. The jury will likely return a not-guilty verdict if you did not have this intent.
An example of this situation is when a grandparent takes a child without the parent’s permission but with the motive of ensuring the child’s safety. He/she could not have had the necessary intent for a child abduction charge. In this case, the grandparent could argue that they acted in good faith. Furthermore, they can assert that he/she did not purposely deprive the parent of their custody or visitation rights.
b) You Had Lawful Custody
Asserting legal custody could serve as a legitimate defense if you had legal custody of the child or children when the supposed abduction happened. Having lawful custody means having the legal right to decide about the child’s care and custody. As a result, your activities do not violate the parent’s or guardian’s custody rights.
Merely having custody of the child is not enough to establish lawful custody. You must prove that you legally had the child during the alleged kidnapping. Furthermore, it must be evident that your actions were consistent with the terms of any applicable court order or legal agreement governing custody.
Some examples of evidence applicable in support of this defense include:
- A copy of the court order or legal agreement governing custody.
- Testimony from witnesses who can attest to your custody rights and the circumstances surrounding the alleged abduction.
- Documentation showing that you acted per the terms of the custody order or agreement. Examples include proof that you notified the other parent or guardian of your intent to take the child or that you returned the child as required by the order.
- Records or documentation showing that you had a good faith belief that your acts were consistent with the terms of the custody order or agreement, and
- Any other evidence that helps establish your actions as lawful and justified.
c) Emergency Circumstances
Under certain circumstances, a viable defense can be based on the alleged abductor acting out of necessity or emergency circumstances. The “necessity defense” or “emergency circumstances defense” can be invoked in these scenarios.
When asserting this defense, the alleged abductor should prove that they took the child due to a genuine belief that the child was in immediate danger. Additionally, it must be evident that no other practical alternatives were available to safeguard the child from harm.
This defense applies to cases where the child was in immediate danger of physical or emotional harm due to abuse, neglect, or other grave threats to their safety or well-being.
Additionally, the alleged abductor must also show:
- He/she believed in good faith that their actions were necessary to protect the child and
- He/she did not cause more harm than necessary to protect the child.
The defense bears the burden of proving that the defendant’s actions were justified under the circumstances.
d) You Were Falsely Accused
You can argue that you were wrongly accused of child abduction in the case. This defense is only successful if you demonstrate that the alleged victim’s accusations of child abduction are false.
This defense can be challenging to assert. Prosecutors will present witness testimony, documentation of custody arrangements, and other evidence to prove that you committed the child abduction crime. You must present your witnesses to disapprove of the prosecution’s version of events. However, an experienced attorney will provide the proper evidence for this defense.
In most cases, attorneys challenge the witnesses’ accounts, especially if there are inconsistencies in their testimonies. Alternatively, the attorney will argue that the evidence presented is circumstantial; therefore, the evidence does not definitively prove that a child abduction occurred.
This defense applies when an accuser makes false allegations in pursuit of revenge because of a jealous rage or to use the accusation/or conviction as leverage in a child custody battle.
e) The Parent or Legal Guardian in the Case Lost Custodial Rights
If a parent’s parental rights have been terminated due to neglect, abuse, or abandonment, taking a child away from that parent is not child abduction. The defendant could argue that they acted in the child’s best interests and that the other parent had no right to custody or visitation.
This defense requires evidence that the other parent lost parental rights due to neglect, abuse, or abandonment. The evidence includes court orders, child protective services reports, or other official documents demonstrating that the other parent had been found unfit to care for the child.
Penalties if Convicted of Child Abduction
Prosecutors decide which charges to pursue. You could face misdemeanor or felony violation charges based on the facts of your case.
If convicted of a misdemeanor offense, a conviction will likely result in the following punishments:
- A jail term of up to one year and/or
- A fine of up to $1,000
If convicted of a felony offense, a conviction will likely result in the following punishments:
- A 2, 3, or 4-year jail or prison sentence and/or
- A fine not exceeding $10,000
If you are convicted of abducting a child under PC 278.5, the misdemeanor penalties remain unchanged. However, imprisonment for a felony violation changes to 16 months, two, or three years, with a possible fine penalty of $10,000.
The Sentencing Hearing
The judge will evaluate different factors during the sentencing hearing to determine a suitable punishment. Judges consider factors including:
- The age and vulnerability of the child or children.
- The duration and severity of the abduction.
- The impact of the abduction on the child.
- The custodial parent, and
- The defendant’s criminal history and the likelihood of reoffending.
Judges also consider aggravating or mitigating circumstances. Aggravating circumstances inform a judge’s decision to increase the severity of the penalties. Conversely, mitigating factors can serve to lessen the severity of the sentence.
The following are some examples of aggravating circumstances:
- The length of the abduction.
- The child’s exposure to a significant risk of bodily injury or illness.
- Threats to inflict or inflicting physical harm on:
- The parent.
- The legal guardian of the child or.
- The child during the abduction.
- Substantially altering the name or appearance of the minor.
- Abandoning the child during the abduction.
- Previously threatening to abduct or previously abducting the child.
- Taking the minor out of the country.
- Failing to return the child to the lawful custodian.
- Denying the child appropriate education during the abduction.
Some of the mitigating factors judges consider include the following:
- Returning the child or children unharmed or
- Assisting in the child’s safe return.
Will a Conviction Affect My Immigration Status?
Yes, child abduction can have immigration consequences.
A conviction for child abduction can lead to deportation from the country for non-US citizens. Under federal immigration law, certain crimes, including child abduction, are considered “crimes of moral turpitude.” These crimes can make non-citizens inadmissible to the country or subject to removal proceedings.
Furthermore, even if the offense is not regarded as one involving moral turpitude, a conviction for child abduction could have immigration ramifications, for example, affecting your ability to acquire a visa or green card.
Federal Laws Against Child Abduction
There are federal laws in place that criminalize the abduction of children. The most significant of these laws are:
- The International Parental Kidnapping Crime Act (IPKCA) of 1993 — This law makes it a federal crime to remove a child from the United States or retain a child outside of the United States with the intent to obstruct the lawful exercise of parental rights.
- The Uniform Child Abduction Prevention Act (UCAPA) — It provides a framework for preventing child abduction and addressing the interstate jurisdictional issues that arise in child abduction cases.
Contact a Van Nuys Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
Child abduction is a grave offense that carries severe repercussions. It can devastate the child, the parents or legal guardians involved, and the broader community. It is best to familiarize yourself with the applicable laws and legal defenses to avoid unintentional violations. Additionally, doing so ensures that the child’s best interests are protected.
If you or someone you know is facing child abduction charges, seeking legal representation immediately is your best option. A skilled criminal defense attorney in Van Nuys can offer valuable advice and assistance throughout the legal proceedings, working diligently to safeguard your rights and interests. Contact Leah Legal at 818-484-1100 for more information.
If you face charges for elder abuse, it is crucial to understand the charges and the potential repercussions if the court finds you guilty. That will assist you in properly planning your defense, including gathering and compiling substantial evidence against your charges. The assistance of a criminal attorney could also help you secure a fair resolution in your case. Elder abuse is a serious crime, resulting in lengthy jail or prison sentences and heavy court fines. Fortunately, you can defend against your charges to prevent a conviction and the terrible repercussions that come with it. But first, let us look at how elder abuse is defined in California law.
The Legal Meaning of Elder Abuse
An “elder” is defined under California law as someone aged at least 65 years. Some senior citizens cannot care for themselves and must rely on others for their basic needs. That explains why senior citizens are especially exposed to disrespectful or damaging acts by those who are supposed to look after them. Some older adults are defenseless and unaware of how to seek assistance or report illegal activity against them. Elder abuse regulations under Penal Code 368 provide special protection for older adults. Individuals who perpetrate crimes against senior citizens face severe penalties under the law.
Laws against elder abuse do not define a specific crime or behavior. Under this statute, you could face prosecution for various acts or omissions against a person over the age of 65. Because elder abuse takes several forms, it is crucial to comprehend what constitutes a criminal offense under this legislation. Then, if you face charges of elder abuse, you will be prepared to defend yourself. You can seek the assistance and counsel of a qualified criminal attorney to better understand your options and obtain legal representation.
The following are some instances of conduct or omissions that could lead to elder abuse charges:
- Failing to feed your 90-year-old disabled father, who is unable to feed himself
- Making fun of an elderly patient under your care because they use a wheelchair and cannot defend themselves
- Fraudulently convincing your elderly mother to make you the sole beneficiary of their will
Elder abuse is a wobbler offense. It implies that, based on your criminal past and the circumstances of your case, the prosecutor can charge you with a felony or a misdemeanor.
An elder abuse charge is more lenient as a misdemeanor and will likely result in less severe sanctions if convicted. However, for the judge to find you guilty of a misdemeanor under this law, the prosecution must demonstrate the following facts beyond a reasonable doubt:
- That you purposefully and/or negligently caused a person over the age of 65 unreasonable mental and/or physical suffering
- Your actions or omissions could have affected that person’s health or put their life at risk.
- You were or should have been aware that the individual was a senior citizen.
Unjustifiable mental or bodily suffering means that the suffering or pain was not merited or was excessive in the circumstances.
A felony elder abuse charge is more severe and will result in harsher punishment if you are found guilty. However, for the judge to find you guilty of your charges, the prosecution must first prove the following elements:
- That you knowingly and/or negligently caused a person over the age of 65 unreasonable mental or physical pain
- Your actions or omissions would likely cause the victim’s death or serious bodily injury.
- You were or should have been aware that the victim was an older adult.
To understand this law better, let us discuss some of its elements in more detail:
The Abuse
Remember that elder abuse can manifest itself in a variety of ways. The following are examples of common forms of abuse that could result in charges under this law:
- Physical abuse — Described as inflicting unreasonable suffering and/or bodily injury on an older adult.
- Emotional abuse — Can take numerous forms, including mocking or physically isolating an older person.
- Endangering and neglect — Placing the victim in a situation that jeopardizes their safety or health.
- Financial exploitation — Referring to financial maltreatment or fraud against a senior. It involves utilizing deception to gain a financial advantage over an older adult.
Financial elder abuse differs from other types of elder abuse. If you face charges of financial elder abuse, the prosecution must demonstrate the following facts for the judge to declare you guilty:
- You face charges for a finance-related crime, like embezzlement, theft, or fraud.
- You committed the offense against a person aged at least 65
- You were the person in charge of the elder’s care; or
- You were or should have reasonably been aware that the victim was an elder.
Example: Paul, a staff member in a nursing home for older people, persuades one of his patients to lend him money. Paul has no intention of paying back the money. After receiving the money from his patient, Paul resigns and relocates to another town.
In this case, Paul is convicted of financial exploitation of an elder. He stole money from an older adult in his care. Even if no financial organizations, like banks, are involved in the abuse, taking even a small amount of money from an elder through fraud or theft is considered elder abuse.
Acting Willfully and/or with Criminal Negligence
It signifies that elder abuse is an intentional act or omission on your part. Criminal negligence means your actions were unreasonable enough to show a significant disregard for human life.
Example: James is his father’s primary caregiver. The father’s medical condition makes it impossible to care for himself. In such a situation, he must rely on James for all his needs, including nourishment. But James is not very fond of his father. He sometimes leaves his parents hungry and thirsty for days before they bring him something. The father was recently saved when he was on the edge of death.
The facts of the case demonstrate that James’ conduct meets the definition of criminal negligence.
The prosecution cannot establish criminal negligence unless the alleged perpetrator owes the alleged victim a duty of care.
In the preceding example, if James is just a neighbor who periodically delivers food and cares for a senior, he will not be criminally negligent if the elder eventually dies of hunger. It is because, as a neighbor, James has no obligation to care for his elderly neighbor.
The Investigation and Prosecution of Elder Abuse Allegations
Charges of elder abuse are serious. Disregarding the elderly brings criminal charges, penalties, and additional consequences that will affect your life in various ways. It could, for example, influence how you interact with others. People will not want to associate with you if they discover you are cruel to a helpless individual.
Special units and agencies in California investigate and prosecute reported occurrences of elder abuse. If you are arrested for elder abuse, these agencies must gather enough evidence against you to charge you in court. It implies that your case will be handled by a professionally trained prosecutor who will file charges against you in court.
When the police receive a report of probable elder abuse, they must act quickly to stop the abuse and secure the victim’s safety. They will arrest you immediately and refer your case to one of their special squads. The prosecutor will examine the contents of your case to decide whether to accept the case and press charges against you, reject the claim, or ask detectives to look into the subject further.
When determining which agency will investigate a suspected incidence of senior abuse, several considerations must be considered. Some of these elements are:
- The location where the abuse happened
- If the abuse is a misdemeanor or a felony
- The precise type of elder abuse (physical, emotional, mental, or financial)
Possible Penalties after an Elder Abuse Conviction
The penalty you will face if convicted will be determined by whether you committed a felony or a minor offense. A misdemeanor conviction for elder abuse carries the following penalties:
- Summary probation
- A maximum of one year in jail
- A maximum court fine of $6,000
- The requirement to pay restitution to the victim
A felony conviction could attract the following penalties:
- Felony probation
- A maximum of four years in prison and seven additional years if the alleged victim sustains an actual bodily injury
- A maximum of $10,000 in court fines
- The requirement to pay restitution to the victim
The judge can sentence you to probation for part or all of your prison/jail sentence. You will be obliged to follow particular probation conditions throughout your probation period. Following a conviction for elder abuse, you could face the following probation conditions:
- Not to violate any law while on probation
- To remain within the court’s jurisdiction
- To provide regular reports about your performance to the court if on summary probation
- To regularly meet with the probation officer for progress reports if on felony probation
- To undergo counseling therapy or drug treatment if necessary.
It would be best if you did not breach your probation; otherwise, you could face criminal charges and further penalties. If the court discovers that you have violated one or more probation requirements, the judge will issue a probation violation to assess the cause and consequences of your actions. The judge can decide the following during the hearing:
- Continue probation but with a stern warning against further violations
- Continue probation but with new and stricter probation conditions
- To discontinue probation and send you to jail/prison for the recommended period under the law
Other Consequences of Conviction for Elder Abuse
Any criminal conviction will result in a devastating criminal record that will impact your life in various ways. A criminal record, for example, will make it difficult for you to get an acceptable job even after you have served your jail/prison sentence. It will impact where you live and the services you can use. Before employing or leasing someone, most companies and landlords do background checks on them. You can lose various opportunities to find suitable employment or a community if you have a criminal record.
A criminal conviction for elder abuse will have an impact on your social life as well. If people find out that you abused an older citizen, they will likely treat you differently. You could lose friends, family, and even the opportunity to make new acquaintances. Restarting one’s life after serving time for elder abuse is difficult.
A conviction for elder abuse can also impact your immigration status. Some offenses have substantial immigration ramifications. A conviction for one of these crimes could result in deportation or make you inadmissible to the United States. Depending on the facts of your case, you could face substantial immigration repercussions if you are convicted under this law.
A felony conviction for elder abuse will also bar you from owning or purchasing a handgun. In California, convicted felons are not permitted to own or use weapons. If you already own a firearm, you will lose it if convicted.
How You Can Defend Yourself Against Elder Abuse Charges
Because of the severe ramifications of an elder abuse conviction, you must know that you can defend your accusations in court to prevent a conviction. You can do so with the assistance of an experienced criminal defense attorney. Fortunately, your criminal defense lawyer will have several legal defense methods to persuade the judge to dismiss or minimize your charges. The following are the most common of these strategies:
You Did Not Act Willfully
Remember that one of the prerequisites for elder abuse is that you committed a crime against an elder with intent. A willful act is done on purpose. You are not liable under this statute if you acted innocently or accidentally and caused mental or bodily anguish to an elder. Your defense attorney will endeavor to persuade the jury that your conduct was not criminal. If they are successful, the judge can dismiss your charges.
Your Actions Were in Self-Defense
In the circumstances involving abuse or violence, self-defense is a generally accepted legal defense technique. If you believe you or another person is in danger, you can use reasonable force against them. For example, if an elder attacks you first and you defend yourself reasonably, you are not guilty of elder abuse. However, your attorney must persuade the jury that you were in urgent danger at the time and only behaved in this manner to protect yourself from that risk. You are not guilty if this is the case.
You Face False Accusations
False charges for a serious crime like elder abuse are not rare. Someone can call the cops and make false accusations against you for motives like envy or a desire for vengeance. Suppose an angry neighbor or family member accuses you of elder abuse when you do all you can to care for an older adult. In that case, you can use this defense to avoid a criminal conviction. Remember that the district attorney must have enough evidence to prove all components of your crime beyond a reasonable doubt. The judge will clear you of all allegations if this does not occur.
Having Your Conviction Record Expunged
If you are guilty of elder abuse, you can have your criminal record wiped out to shield yourself from the negative consequences and disabilities of a criminal record. Remember that a criminal record will impact your life even after you finish your sentence.
Expungement is the process of deleting a specific conviction from your criminal record. It implies that anyone running a background check on you will be unaware of the sentence. As a result, it can protect you from future employers and landlords, who will likely treat you based on what they discover in your criminal history.
It would be best to petition the court where your conviction occurred to have your record expunged. To increase your chances of success, have your criminal attorney file a petition on your behalf. Also, ensure you have completed your jail or prison sentence and any probation.
To grant your motion, the judge will assess your performance while on probation or in jail/prison. You can apply for an early termination if you are still on probation. If your request is approved, you can file an expungement petition with the court.
Find a Skilled Van Nuys Criminal Defense Lawyer Near Me
Suppose you face charges for elder abuse in Van Nuys. In that case, it is necessary to consult with an experienced criminal attorney who can assist you in comprehending the legal ramifications of your charges. Remember that elder abuse can manifest itself in a variety of ways. Your attorney will assist you in determining whether your acts satisfy the elements of the offense. They will also help you navigate the legal system and understand your options for challenging the charges.
At Leah Legal, we handle all types of criminal matters. As a result, we have the knowledge and experience you require to navigate the criminal justice system successfully. We will also work with you to persuade the judge to reduce or dismiss your charges. For additional information on elder abuse charges and our services, please contact us at 818-484-1100.
Criminal offenses involving drugs are among the most serious ones the law forbids. They all center on controlled substances, including prescription pharmaceuticals and illicit drugs. Being under the influence of controlled substances is likewise prohibited, in addition to their possession and usage. Controlled substance use is typically a criminal charge with a jail sentence and a court fine. A conviction will also result in a criminal record, significantly affecting your life. Hiring the most excellent legal representation is vital if you face accusations of using a regulated substance and being under its influence. You can then defend yourself against the charges to prevent a conviction and its severe effects.
The Legal Meaning of Being Under the Influence of A Controlled Substance
Health & Safety Code (HS) 11550 prohibits being under the influence of controlled substances. Anyone caught while impaired by narcotics or some prescription drugs without a valid prescription violates the law. Even though the crime is only a misdemeanor, it carries serious repercussions that could have a long-lasting effect on your life. For example, having a drug-related conviction on your criminal record can make it more challenging to land a good job, establish lasting relationships, or locate a place to live. Thus, retaining the most excellent criminal defense attorney when detained on a drug-related allegation is crucial.
Knowing the legal significance and implications of the charges you face under HS 11550 is vital. An experienced criminal attorney can assist you with that. They can also help you determine your alternatives and the likelihood of successfully contesting the charge in court. The prosecutor must establish both elements of this offense for the court to declare you guilty. These components are:
- That you willfully or knowingly used a regulated substance or narcotic drug.
- You were knowingly under its influence at the time of the arrest.
The prosecutor must identify the narcotic or prohibited substance you are accused of using. Here are several scenarios where charges under this statute can be brought:
- Attending a concert while high on Vicodin.
- Stealing and using multiple prescription medications that leave you feeling faint, weak, and exhausted.
- Experiencing hallucinations and exhibiting strange behavior in public after snorting PCP.
The following statutes outline the regulated substances and narcotics that are prohibited by this law:
- Health & Safety Codes 11054 to 11058.
- Health & Safety Code 11019.
Here are the most common narcotics and controlled substances whose influence this law prohibits:
- Heroin.
- PCP.
- Methamphetamine.
- Codeine.
- Hydrocodone.
This particular law does not make it illegal to use marijuana when impaired. It is because marijuana possession and usage are explicitly controlled by different legislation.
To further comprehend the significance of this offense in legal terms, let us examine some of these components in more detail:
Willfully Using and Being Under the Influence
It is against the law to intentionally use narcotics or be under the influence of any other controlled substance. You must have used a regulated substance knowingly and voluntarily, knowing it would affect you. If you did not knowingly use a controlled substance, you are not guilty according to this legislation. For example, if someone coerced you into using a controlled substance or drugged you, you are not at fault.
Using a Controlled Substance
Under the terms of this statute, the use of a regulated substance should be current. It implies that you must have used the drug just before your arrest. You must still be affected by the medicine and have it in your system for your charges to stand in court. Even that can have varied meanings for various prosecutors and courts. In some situations, meeting the requirements of this statute is satisfied by ingesting a controlled substance 48 hours before the arrest. Other times, the prosecution will submit a strong case against you five days after using the controlled substance. It all depends on the court that will hear your case.
Some courts contend that the prosecution cannot establish current usage if drug withdrawal symptoms began before the arrest. Drug withdrawal symptoms are evidence that you have previously used a regulated substance. It is a valid legal defense for the acquittal of drug-related charges.
Being Under a Drug’s Influence
When under the influence of a regulated substance, various parts of your body experience its effects, including:
- The nervous system.
- Mental or brain condition.
- Physical and muscle condition.
The legal threshold for drug usage is lower under this act than for cases of DUI or public intoxication. You can be under the influence of even a small amount of narcotics or other restricted substances to satisfy the requirements of HS 11550. Chemical tests that demonstrate that you used a particular controlled substance are sufficient to support this allegation without the need for misconduct or intoxication.
When the police detain someone on allegations of drug usage, they typically consult a DRE (drug recognition expert) to determine whether the suspect is under the influence of a regulated drug. A DRE is a member of the police force who has received special training to identify drug-impaired drivers. The DRE will evaluate you using a twelve-step method and present the police with a report of their findings.
The following are the steps in the 12-step program:
- Administer a BAC test to determine how much alcohol is in your system. They will continue the evaluation if your level of impairment does not match the BAC readings.
- Doing preliminary examinations to rule out other substances and conditions.
- Interviewing the arresting officer to learn more about your actions and demeanor at the time of the arrest. You must respond to inquiries about your health and recent consumption of food, medications, and alcohol.
- Testing for vertical gaze nystagmus, HGN, and lack of convergence in an eye exam.
- Testing your divided attention through finger-to-nose, walk-and-turn tests, and stand-on-one-leg tests to assess your balance.
- Checking your vital indicators, like your blood pressure, temperature, and pulse.
- Performing a few tests in the dark to determine how big your pupils will be in various lighting scenarios. The test checks whether your pupils are normal, dilated, or constricted.
- Assessing your muscular tone because some drugs can make your muscles tense while others can make them lose and flaccid.
- Looking for injection sites that can point to the usage of a specific substance.
- They will read your Miranda rights and inquire about your prior drug or controlled substance use.
- Evaluating the outcome of the tests to determine whether you were under the influence of a regulated substance.
- Undertaking a toxicological evaluation to identify the specific drugs you have consumed. The results of the toxicological examination will serve as critical evidence for the prosecution.
How Prosecutors Prove Charges Under This Statute
If law enforcement officials believe you are using drugs or another controlled substance, they will make an arrest. They will then look into the matter and compile a report that the prosecutor will use to support your case in court. Once the prosecution has enough evidence to substantiate the charges, the prosecutor files charges against you in court. The prosecutors can rely on various types of evidence to demonstrate that you are guilty of being under the influence of a regulated substance. The prosecution can use the following primary forms of evidence against you:
The Testimony of Arresting Officers
Police are taught to look for behaviors in suspected offenders that could indicate drug use or intoxication. For the charges to stand in court, the arresting officers must have had reasonable suspicion to make the arrest. Here are some indicators that could have informed the police that you were impaired:
- Having a runny nose.
- Seizures or tremors.
- A chemical odor coming from your clothes, body, or breath.
- Extreme lethargy.
- Watery or bloodshot eyes.
- Lost physical coordination.
- Pinpoint pupils.
Any of those impartial indications could have caused the police arrest. The arresting officers can be called to the witness stand by the prosecution to describe what they saw in you and why they thought you could be under the influence.
Results of a Chemical Test
The police will make an arrest and request that you submit to chemical testing if they have reason to believe you have used a regulated substance. If you are suspected of being under the influence of alcohol, a breath test is typically given.
However, a breathalyzer cannot find narcotics in your bloodstream.
The police will then request that you do a blood test in that situation. The prosecution will use the results to prove that you were under the influence of drugs if they are positive for a specific regulated substance.
The following drugs, among others, can be found by the chemical testing the police conduct:
- Opioids.
- Methamphetamines, and
- Cocaine.
Remember that the burden of proof in criminal matters rests with the district attorney. They have to prove that you were under the influence of a particular regulated substance.
The Testimony of a DRE
After a drug-related arrest, the police will frequently use a DRE to confirm that you were, in fact, under the influence of a regulated substance. Police officers who have received special training in identifying the signs of drug intoxication typically work as DREs. A DRE officer can be called in to assist with the investigation once the police have stopped you and are looking into whether you were intoxicated. Remember that the DRE will use a twelve-step specialized procedure to determine if you are under the influence of a regulated substance.
The DRE will prepare a report that the prosecutor can use as proof to back up your charges if they determine that you are intoxicated at the conclusion of the process. The DRE can be called to testify during your trial by the prosecutor.
Fighting Your Charges HS 11550
For the jury to find you guilty, the prosecutor’s evidence must be convincing enough to establish each aspect of the crime. If not, the judge will find you innocent of all allegations. The legislation also allows you to challenge your charges and compel the court to drop or reduce them. For this reason, it is recommended that you hire a criminal attorney at the outset of the legal process. In addition to defending your rights and assisting you through the complex legal process, your attorney can employ several defense strategies to strengthen your case. Here are some examples of the most effective of these tactics:
You Had a Prescription
You are not allowed to be high on controlled substances, including some prescribed drugs, according to HS 11550. You can argue that you had a prescription for the medications in question if the symptoms you displayed after using the prescribed medicine led the authorities to stop and investigate you for being under the influence. The prescription could be presented in court as evidence by your attorney to refute the prosecution’s claims. Under this law, you are not guilty if the prescription is legitimate and only the prescribed drug was discovered in your system. Remember that only a qualified healthcare provider, like a naturopathic doctor, veterinarian, dentist, or doctor of medicine, can issue a prescription.
You Did Not Use Any Drugs
You can claim that you did not consume any drugs if you think the police were mistaken and that you were not intoxicated. Remember that the prosecution must establish without a doubt that you were drugged. You could not have been affected by drugs if you had not used any. Your attorney can use a negative drug test result to refute the prosecutor’s claims.
Additionally, something else, like an illness or other drugs, could have been the cause of the drug-like effects. To persuade the court to drop your accusations, your attorney can present evidence of the same to counter your charges.
The Intoxication Was Not Voluntary
Remember that to violate HS 11550, you must have used a regulated substance and been exposed to its effects on purpose. The court will drop your charges if that is not the case. In situations like this, involuntary intoxication is a generally accepted legal defense. It is possible that someone else drugged you or conned you into ingesting a specific substance. The court will drop your charges if your attorney can show that the drug use was done against your will or without your knowledge.
The Consequences of a Conviction Under HS 11550
Even a seemingly minor conviction for a crime should not be taken lightly. You will be left with a criminal record that will likely impact many aspects of your life, including your social and professional lives.
The primary penalty for breaking this law is a misdemeanor with a maximum jail sentence of one year. Probation can be substituted for incarceration by the judge. Additionally, you could be eligible for a drug diversion program that includes drug rehabilitation and counseling. These initiatives are intended for offenders committing non-violent drug-related crimes. If the judge orders you to one of these programs, you will complete your sentence without imprisonment.
If you are an immigrant, a DUI conviction can affect your immigration status. Deportation or being flagged as ineligible for entry into the United States could follow a conviction. Offenses or moral turpitude are typically those that are deportable. Nevertheless, depending on the specifics of your case, you can also be subject to serious immigration repercussions for some drug offenses.
Also, a conviction will result in a criminal record that can stick around for a long time. Criminal histories are typically accessible to the public. The sentence will be known to anyone running a background check on you. It can influence how others view you, particularly prospective employers and landlords. Even after serving your jail or probation term and changing your life, a conviction can still impact you for years.
As a result, consider applying for expungement as soon as you have finished serving your probation, imprisonment, or diversion sentence. A criminal conviction’s negative consequences and restrictions are removed through expungement. A criminal conviction is expunged from your record, making it inaccessible to anyone running a background check on you. But to be eligible for expungement, you must fulfill specific requirements. For example, you must satisfy the penalties the judge imposed on you during the sentencing process. Additionally, you need to show how the procedure will improve your life.
Find an Experienced Criminal Attorney Near Me
Do you or a loved one in Van Nuys face charges for being under the influence of a regulated substance?
If you seek the advice of a skilled criminal attorney, it can be very beneficial for you. A knowledgeable attorney will assist you in comprehending the significance of your charges, their legal implications, and how to prevent a guilty verdict. They will defend your rights and aid you in understanding your options. We at Leah Legal understand the anxiety of being accused of a crime. We are willing to assist you in navigating the challenging legal system. Using the most potent legal arguments, we can also defend your charges and persuade the judge to drop or reduce them. To learn more about your charges and our services, call us at 818-484-1100.
According to California law, Penal Code 459, burglary is entering a residential, commercial, or any other structure intending to commit petty theft, grand theft, or felony. You do not have to accomplish this act through violence, threat, force, or destruction. You only need to accomplish it by showing an intention to commit a felony or any offense that can be convicted as a felony. Burglary is a serious crime that attracts severe repercussions, including hefty fines, a tainted reputation, and jail or prison time. If you face burglary charges, you do not have to plead guilty before understanding the law and your options. You need to seek the services of a defense attorney to help you seek a fair sentence.
Elements Of Burglary
If the prosecutor accuses you of burglary, Penal Code 459 PC requires that he/she prove the following elements for you to face the charges:
- You entered a structure, locked vehicle, a building, or room within a building.
- You intended to commit theft or a felony when you entered that structure, vehicle, room, or building.
- The property you intended to steal or that you stole exceeded $950.
- The structure you entered was not a commercial building.
- The structure you entered was a commercial building, but you entered outside working hours.
Under Penal Code 459 PC, a building could be a wire chicken coop, a loading dock enclosed by a chain link fence, popcorn stands on wheels, or telephone booths. You are considered to have entered the building if part of your body or an object you are using penetrates the building’s outer boundary. This could include an attached second-floor boundary or a window screen. You do not need to commit a felony or theft to be guilty of burglary. Additionally, the burglary law could apply to a vehicle if there is proof of forced entry into a locked car.
Categories Of Burglary
Typically, burglary offenses fall into two major categories:
- First-degree burglary.
- Second-degree burglary.
First Degree Burglary
If you unlawfully enter another person’s recreational car, rented room, apartment, or home to steal or commit a felony once inside, you could be guilty under PC 460, a felony first-degree residential burglary. Under the law, entering someone else’s home by force is regarded as entering a residence. Therefore, you could be guilty of first-degree burglary even if you do not commit a felony while inside. You will have committed the offense the moment you enter the residence with the intent to commit a felony or theft.
You could have entered a home with the intention to commit rape, but you did not find your target person. In this situation, because you entered the home with the intention of committing a felony like rape under PC 261, you are guilty of PC 460 even though you did not accomplish the intended offense.
An Inhabited Dwelling Place Under Burglary Law
Under burglary law, a structure only qualifies as an inhabited dwelling place if a person lives there, even if it is temporary. A dwelling structure is inhabited if a person sleeps or has assets in the structure. The victim does not need to be physically home for you to face first-degree residential burglary charges. Most courts consider the following as inhabited dwelling places:
- Houseboats.
- Trailer homes.
- A vessel if a person lives in it.
- Recreational cars.
- Occupied motel rooms.
- Shared laundry rooms or home offices.
- Attached are structures like garages.
- A room inside a home or a guest house.
- Condominiums, townhomes, or apartments.
- Houses.
Additionally, you could break into someone else’s home with the intent to steal a piece of expensive jewelry, but dogs make you change your mind and leave. In this case, even though you did not steal, you are guilty of first-degree burglary since you broke into the residence with the intention of stealing.
Penalties For Violating Penal Code 460
The penalties for first-degree burglary usually depend on the facts of your charges. However, prosecutors often prosecute a violation of PC 460 as a felony. Some of the penalties you could face include:
- Felony or formal probation.
- A fine that does not exceed $10,000.
- A jail term of two years, four years, or six years in a state prison.
First-degree burglary is also considered a strike under the Three Strikes Law. It would be a severe and violent offense if somebody was at home when you entered. In this case, you could face more severe home invasion charges and serve 85% of the sentence.
First-degree burglary is usually regarded as a moral turpitude offense. In addition, you could face negative immigration repercussions if you are a non-citizen, including being inadmissible or deportation.
Second-Degree Burglary
Second-degree burglary constitutes all other aspects of the offense, including burglary in a commercial building and any structure that is not residential. Second-degree burglary attracts less punishment than first-degree burglary. Prosecutors always prosecute second-degree burglary as a wobbler. It is at the prosecutor’s discretion whether to charge you with a misdemeanor or a felony. The possible penalties you could face for a misdemeanor second-degree burglary include:
- A fine that does not exceed $1,000.
- A jail term that does not exceed one year in a county jail.
- Summary or misdemeanor probation.
If the prosecutor charges you with felony second-degree burglary, you could face the following penalties:
- A fine that does not exceed $10,000.
- A jail term of sixteen months, two years, or three years in a county jail.
- Felony probation.
How Burglary Differs From Shoplifting
Under Penal Code 459.5, you could be guilty of shoplifting if you do the following:
- Illegally entered a commercial building.
- Enter the building during working hours.
- With the intent to steal property amounting to $950 or less.
Generally, shoplifting is a subset of burglary, where you enter a commercial building intending to steal property amounting to $950 or less. The voter initiative Proposition 47 redefined the offense of shoplifting. Proposition 47 reduced the punishment for several minor crimes. Before the enactment of Prop 47 in 2014, most people found guilty of shoplifting were charged with second-degree burglary under PC 459.
Currently, if the prosecutor charges you with PC 459.5 shoplifting, you can only be charged with a misdemeanor unless the following is true:
- You have a prior charge for one of the serious offenses, including sex crimes against minors, murder, and rape.
- You are ordered to register as a sex offender for a previous sex crime charge.
If any of the above is true and you face shoplifting charges, you could face similar penalties as an offender who commits a second-degree burglary as outlined under PC 459.
Whether Your Prior Burglary Charge Be Reduced To Shoplifting
Your prior burglary charge can be reduced to shoplifting if you think you qualify for Prop 47. In this case, you must consult your criminal defense attorney, who understands Prop 47 and Penal Code 459.
Burglary Of a Safe Or Vault
You could violate PC 464 if you enter a building intending to commit an offense while inside, then use explosives or a torch to blow open a safe, vault, or any other secure place. If the prosecutor charges you with violating Penal Code 464, he/she is required to prove these elements:
- You entered a building.
- While inside the building, you tried opening a vault, safe, or secure place.
- You accomplished the crime using explosives or a torch.
- When you entered the building, you had a specific intent to commit this or other offenses.
For you to face charges under this law, it does not matter whether you entered during the day or night or whether the building was inhabited or uninhabited. On the other hand, you will not be guilty under this law if you only attempted to open the vault or safe without entering the building.
Prosecutors usually charge the violation of PC 464 as a felony. The possible penalties you could face include the following:
- A fine that does not exceed $10,000.
- A jail term that does not exceed seven years in a state prison.
The judge can also award you formal or felony probation instead of prison time.
The defenses you could present to challenge PC 464 charges include the following:
- You had no explosive or torch.
- There was no safe or vault.
- You had no intent to commit theft or other offense.
Possession of Burglary Tools
It is a crime under Penal Code 466 for anyone to possess burglary tools to break into a watercraft, vehicle, structure, or dwelling. Penal Code 466 requires the prosecutor to prove these elements for you to face charges under this statute:
- You possessed a burglary tool.
- You intended to use the tool to commit burglary under Penal Code 459 PC.
The objects that are regarded as tools under the law include:
- Spark plug chips.
- Master keys.
- Picklocks.
- Tension bars.
- Slide hammers.
- Vise grip pliers.
- Key bits.
A violation of PC 466 is usually charged as a misdemeanor. The penalties you could face include the following:
- A fine that does not exceed $1,000.
- A jail term that does not exceed six months in a county jail as opposed to a state prison.
A possession charge does not affect your gun rights. In some cases, however, a possession charge could cause you to lose your right to possess or own a gun, especially for offenses that are prosecuted as felonies.
A charge under Penal Code 466 does not affect your immigration status. However, some offenses could lead to deportation or being marked as inadmissible for a non-citizen, especially if you commit an aggravated felony.
Your criminal defense attorney can help you create defenses that you can use to contest your PC 466 charges. Some of the defenses that could be used include the following:
- The police obtained burglary tools through illegal search and seizure.
- You did not have burglary tools.
- No intent to commit an offense.
Defenses to Burglary Charges
The defenses you could present to challenge your burglary charges include the following:
You Were Intoxicated
You could use intoxication as a defense to your burglary charges because it interferes with your ability to form the required specific intent. However, it must be that another person drugged you. Voluntary intoxication is, however, not a valid defense.
Police Misconduct
At times, law enforcers are eager to handle a case. Usually, this leads them to engage in acts that violate their rights. The unlawful acts they could commit include:
- Coercing you to confess.
- Violating your Fourth Amendment right against illegal searches.
- Asking leading questions of witnesses during a line-up.
- Fabricating or planting evidence.
Your attorney could file a Pitchess motion if police misconduct is a possibility. If the court grants your petition, you could see if other people have previously made similar complaints about the police. The judge could drop the charges against you if you prove that the police engaged in a pattern of misconduct.
Factual Innocence
It is common for the police to arrest innocent people by mistake. Proving that you did not engage in burglary is often the best strategy to contest your PC 459 charges. The police could arrest you by mistake because of the following:
- Someone else is accusing you falsely to pursue revenge on you.
- When accused falsely by a person with mental problems.
- Misleading evidence — For example, your fingerprints being found at the crime scene when you had only visited there innocently and with valid reasons.
Because of the above reasons, you need to seek the services of a criminal defense attorney immediately after the police arrest and charge you with burglary. A skilled attorney can identify weaknesses in the prosecutor’s case even if the evidence appears convincing. A competent attorney can also persuade the prosecutor to dismiss or reduce the charges against you.
You Had The Victim’s Consent
You could claim that your entry was legal since you had the owner’s permission to enter the building or structure. This defense is usually valid in certain circumstances. For example, the owner could have previously permitted you to enter the building and never revoked the consent. Even if you erroneously believed that you had consent to enter the building, the belief in the owner’s consent could be sufficient to challenge the case, assuming that the belief was reasonable.
You are a Victim of Entrapment
You could allege someone else convinced you to commit burglary when you otherwise would not have. Entrapment can be hard to prove but can be a valid defense to your burglary charges if you provide sufficient evidence.
You Had No Intent
The burden of proof lies with the prosecutor to show that you intended to commit a felony or theft when you entered a building or structure. The court could drop the charges against you if the prosecutor fails to prove your intent to commit the crime. Someone, for example, could have dragged you into the building, and you only decided to take something while inside. In this case, your attorney could use the drugging reason to contest your charges.
Alibi
If the police did not arrest you at the crime scene, you could use an alibi as a defense to challenge your burglary charges. You can avoid a conviction if you can present witnesses or other evidence to prove that you were somewhere else, far from the crime scene.
Plea Negotiations
At times, a complete defense is not possible. Therefore, you could seek the services of a seasoned attorney with a strong reputation with the court and the prosecutors. The attorney could help you negotiate a plea in which you plead ‘’nolo contendere’’ to a charge that attracts a lesser punishment. For example, the prosecutor could accuse you of illegally breaking and entering the building, and he/she does not have evidence that you had a deadly weapon at the time. In this case, you could plead guilty to second-degree burglary instead of being convicted of first-degree burglary.
The Building Was Abandoned
You could allege that the building was abandoned and unoccupied. While the prosecutor could try to prove that someone still owned the building, you could claim that the building was not maintained. You could also allege that the owner abandoned it decades ago and does not pay the applicable taxes.
Open to Public Access
Illegal entry into a building or structure is one of the elements of burglary. This means you entered a building without the owner’s consent. However, a burglary conviction is not valid if it is in a public building like a store or hospital. Similarly, if you mistakenly believed that you had permission to enter the building, this also disqualifies the element of intent, thus dropping the burglary charges.
Find a Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
The laws surrounding the crime of burglary can be hard to understand. If you face first or second-degree burglary charges, you should consult an attorney who understands the courthouse, judges, and prosecutors. However, you do not have to figure out how to fight burglary charges alone. The penalties for committing burglary are incredibly severe, even if you did not steal anything upon entering a building or structure. Our criminal defense attorneys at Leah Legal can help you understand burglary charges and the potential penalties and navigate the justice system in Van Nuys, CA. Contact us at 818-484-1100 to speak to one of our attorneys.
Witness bribery is a grave offense that strikes at the very heart of the criminal justice system. It involves the act of unlawfully influencing, coercing, or manipulating witnesses in an attempt to obstruct justice, compromise the integrity of the legal process, and manipulate the outcome of a case.
Individuals facing criminal charges related to witness bribery find themselves in a highly precarious situation. The California legal system treats these offenses with utmost seriousness due to the potential harm they can cause to the pursuit of truth and justice. In this article, we explore the meaning of witness bribery, expected penalties, and how you can defend yourself.
The Meaning of Witness Bribery
Section 137 of the Penal Code defines what witness bribery is. According to section 137, this criminal offense occurs when a person unlawfully offers, gives, or promises something of value to witnesses or potential witnesses with the aim to alter or influence the testimony, statements, or actions of that witness in any legal proceeding.
Bribery can be committed directly or indirectly, and it encompasses various forms of inducement or reward, including but not limited to money, property, benefits, favors, or any other consideration. Witness bribery is a felony offense.
Upon conviction, it carries severe penalties. The specific penalties depend on the circumstances of the case, the amount or value of the bribe, and the potential impact on the legal proceeding.
Convictions for witness bribery may result in imprisonment, substantial fines, restitution, probation, and other negative consequences that can significantly impact an individual’s personal and professional life. The legal landscape surrounding witness bribery is complex; each case presents unique circumstances.
Suppose you are facing charges related to witness bribery in California. In that case, consulting a skilled criminal defense lawyer who can provide tailored advice and develop a solid defense strategy to protect your rights and interests is crucial.
What the Prosecution Must Prove
In a criminal lawsuit for bribery of a witness, the prosecution must prove certain elements to secure a conviction. Below, we list these elements:
- Making an offer, giving, or promising something of value.
- Intention to influence testimony or actions.
- Knowledge of witness status.
- Connection to a legal proceeding.
It is crucial to remember that the burden of proof lies with the prosecutor. If the prosecutor fails to prove any of these elements, the judge or jury may acquit the accused.
If you have been charged with witness bribery, it is essential to consult with a skilled criminal defense lawyer who can thoroughly analyze your case, challenge the prosecutor’s case, and protect your rights throughout the legal process. Below, we briefly analyze these elements:
Making an Offer, Giving, or Promising Something of Value
This element requires the prosecutor to establish that the accused provided or offered a benefit to witnesses or potential witnesses in the case. The ‘something of value’ can be in various forms and is not limited to monetary compensation.
It can include tangible assets such as money, property, gifts, or other material benefits. Additionally, it can involve intangible benefits such as favors, influence, promises of protection, or any form of consideration that may be enticing to the witness.
The prosecutor should present evidence demonstrating the accused’s direct or indirect involvement in the exchange or offer of something valuable to prove this element. This evidence can include witness testimony, surveillance footage, intercepted communications, financial documents, or any other relevant documentation supporting the claim.
It is worth noting that even the mere act of offering or promising something of value is sufficient to satisfy this element. The actual exchange or receipt of the benefit is not always necessary to establish witness bribery. What the court focuses on is the accused’s intent and actions to influence witnesses.
However, it is essential to remember that not all interactions or favors extended to a witness will amount to witness bribery. The context and intent behind the offer or promise are crucial. Genuine acts of goodwill, support, or ordinary gestures unrelated to influencing the witness’s testimony are generally not considered witness bribery.
To challenge this element, the defense may present evidence that disputes the intent to bribe the witness or provides an alternative explanation for the accused’s actions. A skilled criminal defense lawyer will analyze thoroughly the evidence, question the credibility of witness testimonies, and scrutinize the circumstances surrounding the alleged exchange of something of value.
Ultimately, the prosecutor bears the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused offered, gave, or promised something of value to the witness or potential witness. If there is reasonable doubt regarding this element, it can weaken the prosecution’s case and potentially lead to a favorable outcome for the accused.
Intention to Influence Testimony or Actions
This element requires the prosecutor to establish that the accused had an intention to influence, alter, or manipulate the witness’s behavior, statements, or testimony in a legal proceeding. To prove this element, the prosecutor must present evidence demonstrating the accused’s corrupt motive and purpose behind offering or promising something of value to the witness.
It is not enough to show that the accused had contact with the witness or engaged in general discussions; there must be evidence indicating an intention to influence the witness’s actions in the legal process. The prosecution may rely on various forms of evidence while proving this element.
They might present direct evidence, such as witness statements, recorded phone calls, or written communications, that explicitly reveal the accused’s aim to influence witnesses. Indirect evidence, such as the circumstances surrounding the offer, the timing of the communication, or the defendant’s relationship with the witness, can also infer intent.
The prosecutor must demonstrate that the accused specifically intended to sway the witness in a legal proceeding. This means that this element requires a connection between the alleged bribery and a pending or anticipated legal matter, such as a criminal trial, grand jury proceeding, or any other relevant legal proceeding where the testimony or actions of the witness would be significant.
Challenging this element of intent often involves scrutinizing the evidence the prosecution presents. A skilled defense attorney may explore alternative reasons for the accused’s actions, questioning whether there was a genuine intent or whether the interactions were misinterpreted or misconstrued.
The defense might also challenge the credibility of witness testimonies or argue that there is insufficient evidence to establish a corrupt intent. It is crucial to remember that the burden of proof lies with the prosecutor. If there is reasonable doubt regarding the intention to influence, it can weaken the prosecution’s case and potentially lead to a more favorable outcome for the accused.
Knowledge of Witness Status
This element requires the prosecutor to establish that the accused knew that the individual they offered, gave, or promised something of value was a witness or potential witness in a legal proceeding. To prove knowledge of witness status, the prosecution must present evidence demonstrating the accused’s awareness of the witness’s role and involvement in a legal matter.
This evidence can include communications, statements, or other interactions that indicate the accused’s knowledge of the witness’s status. The prosecution may rely on various types of evidence to establish this element.
They might present direct evidence, such as explicit statements or admissions by the accused acknowledging the status of the witness or discussing the legal proceeding. Indirect evidence, such as the context of the interactions between the accused and the witness or any prior knowledge of the witness’s involvement in the case, can also be used to infer the accused’s knowledge.
Notably, the element of knowledge requires that the accused was aware of the status of the witness during the alleged bribery or offer of something of value. This means that if the accused genuinely did not know or had no reason to know that the individual was a witness or potential witness, it may weaken the prosecution’s case regarding this element.
To challenge this element, the defense may examine the evidence the prosecution presents and explore the accused’s state of mind and awareness. The defense might argue that there was no knowledge of the witness’s status, highlight any lack of communication or information regarding the witness’s involvement, or present evidence that indicates a genuine lack of awareness.
Remember that the burden of proof lies with the prosecutor, who must establish the accused’s knowledge beyond a reasonable doubt. If there is reasonable doubt regarding the accused’s knowledge of the status of the witness, it can weaken the prosecution’s case.
Connection to a Legal Proceeding
This element requires the prosecutor to establish a link between the alleged bribery and a specific legal proceeding in which the witness’s testimony or actions are relevant. To prove this element, the prosecutor must present evidence demonstrating that the alleged bribery was directly related to a pending or anticipated legal matter.
This could include criminal lawsuits, grand jury proceedings, civil litigation, or other legal proceedings where the witness’s testimony or actions would have significance. The evidence the prosecution presents may include documentation of the ongoing legal matter, including court records, case filings, or subpoenas.
Additionally, the prosecutor may rely on witness statements or other testimonial evidence that establishes the relevance of the witness’s testimony or actions in the particular legal proceeding. Establishing the connection to a legal proceeding is crucial because it demonstrates that the accused’s actions were aimed at influencing the outcome of that specific case.
It establishes the motive behind the bribery, showing that the accused intended to obstruct justice, manipulate testimony, or compromise the integrity of the legal process. To challenge this element, the defense may scrutinize the evidence the prosecution presents and assess whether a substantial connection to a legal proceeding has been sufficiently established.
The defense might argue that there is a lack of evidence demonstrating the direct link connecting the bribery to the pending or anticipated legal matter. They may also explore alternative explanations for the accused’s actions, questioning whether the actions were unrelated to the legal proceeding or lacked any specific influence on the case.
Ultimately, the burden of proof lies with the prosecutor, who must establish the connection to a legal proceeding. If there is reasonable doubt regarding the connection, it can weaken the prosecution’s case.
The Punishments for Witness Bribery
Witness bribery is a serious offense in California, and it carries significant penalties upon conviction. The specific punishments for this criminal offense can vary depending on the case’s circumstances, the amount or value of the bribe, and the impact on the legal proceeding.
In California, bribery of a witness is generally classified as a felony offense. Below, we list the potential penalties:
- Imprisonment — A conviction for bribery of a witness can result in an imprisonment term not exceeding four years, depending on the offense’s severity.
- Fines — The court can impose huge fines for bribery of a witness as part of the penalty. The fine can vary based on the case’s specific circumstances, but it will not exceed $10,000.
- Restitution — The judge may order the convicted individual to pay restitution to the victim or affected parties. Restitution is intended to compensate for any financial or other losses suffered as a result of the bribery.
- Probation — In some cases, the court may impose probation as an alternative to imprisonment or in addition to a prison sentence. While on probation, the convicted individual must adhere to specific conditions and may be subject to supervision by a probation officer.
- Other consequences — Being convicted for bribery of a witness can result in various collateral consequences, including damage to one’s reputation, limitations on future employment prospects, loss of civil rights, and other legal consequences.
Note that the penalties for witness bribery can be enhanced if certain aggravating factors are present. For example, suppose the bribery involves a substantial amount of money and interferes with a high-profile or sensitive legal case or jeopardizes the safety or well-being of the individuals involved. In such cases, the court may impose more severe penalties.
If you have been charged with witness bribery in California, consulting with a skilled criminal defense lawyer is crucial. They can provide specific information and guidance tailored to your case and help protect your rights.
Defending Criminal Charges of Witness Bribery
When facing criminal charges of witness bribery, there are several legal defenses that a defendant may consider. It is essential to consult with a qualified attorney who can assess the specific details of your case and determine the most appropriate defense strategy.
Below, we discuss briefly the potential defenses you can consider:
- No intent — Bribery requires intent to influence the testimony of the witness or actions. If the prosecution can demonstrate that the defendant did not have the specific intention or that the actions were misinterpreted, it may undermine the prosecution’s case.
- Lack of knowledge — If the accused did not know that the individual being offered or promised something of value was a witness or potential witness, it might weaken the prosecution’s case. Lack of knowledge can be a defense if the defendant can prove that the accused had no reason to know the witness’s status.
- No evidence — The defense may challenge the evidence the prosecution presents. They may question the witness’s credibility, dispute the authenticity or admissibility of evidence, or show inconsistencies or gaps in the prosecution’s case.
- Entrapment — If it can be demonstrated that the defendant was coerced or induced by the police or another party to commit the act of bribery, the defendant may be acquitted.
- Duress or coercion — If the accused can show that they were forced or threatened into committing the act of bribery and had no reasonable alternative, it may serve as a defense.
- Lack of evidence of an official proceeding — Witness bribery generally requires a connection to a legal proceeding. If it can be shown that there was no pending or anticipated legal matter at the time of the alleged bribery, it may weaken the prosecution’s case.
- Mistaken identity — The defendant may use this defense if they can provide evidence that they were wrongly identified as the person committing the bribery or were not present during the alleged incident, it can serve as a defense.
Note that each case is unique, and these defenses’ viability depends on the specific facts and circumstances of your case. To apply any of these defenses, you must thoroughly analyze all the evidence the prosecution presents. Consulting with a skilled criminal defense lawyer is crucial to develop a solid defense strategy specific to your situation and to protect your rights throughout the legal process.
Find a Van Nuys Criminal Defense Lawyer Near Me
We urge you to seek legal representation promptly if you have been charged with witness bribery. Our experienced attorneys at Leah Legal in Los Angeles are committed to providing diligent and dedicated representation, fighting for your rights, and helping you navigate various legal complexities that can arise to achieve a favorable outcome in your case.
Remember, when it comes to witness bribery charges, you do not have to face them alone. We are here to stand by your side and provide guidance through this challenging time. Call us today at 818-484-1100 for a free consultation.
The offense of battery against a peace officer or police officer is a serious accusation in California, attracting misdemeanor or felony charges. It involves touching a peace officer or police officer offensively, resulting in a violation of their space. Upon facing arrest and detention, the prosecutor will inform you of the charges to help you prepare for the upcoming defense. Handling a criminal case requires being fully prepared, so you should consider working with an experienced criminal defense attorney.
The Nature of the Battery on a Peace or Police Office Offense
Committing battery on a peace officer is prohibited under Sections 243(b) and 243(c) of the California Penal Code. You risk facing arrest for the crime if you willfully touch a peace officer or police officer in a way that causes offense or harm to them.
Since battery is an offense by itself, the arresting officers can include a report on your actions to commit battery on the peace officer in question. For example, your case may involve hitting, slapping, or pushing the officer, among many other actions amounting to battery.
After you face arrest, the prosecutor may file a misdemeanor or felony charge against you, depending on the circumstances. For example, repeat offenders are more likely to face felony penalties if found guilty, resulting in harsher case outcomes. Despite this, many cases proceed to trial under misdemeanor charges, so you need to consult your defense attorney on the likely case trajectory for you.
Elements of Crime for the Prosecutor to Prove
Since your case falls within the criminal category, the prosecutor is responsible for preparing a lawsuit against you. The law imposes the burden of proof on the prosecution team because they represent the alleging party. As a result, the prosecutor must prove that you are guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and subsequently qualify for the assigned penalties.
During the case presentation, the prosecutor must have sufficient evidence of the accusations they raise to help them persuade the court of your guilt. Additionally, you must remain keen throughout their case presentation to pick up on any contradictory evidence in your case. In doing so, you and your defense attorney are better equipped to flag the discrepancies, allowing you to challenge the prosecutor’s case. The main elements of a crime that the prosecutor must prove are:
- You Attacked a peace Officer or Any Other Person Protected Under Duty
The prosecutor must begin their case by identifying the victim, particularly in their role as a peace officer or police officer. The law also protects any other person performing their duties in line with providing emergency, medical, and peacekeeping services.
Showing that the person in question was a police officer is straightforward for the prosecutor, as they only need to provide the person’s registration details. The prosecution team can also present the person’s badge, working records, and attestation attesting to their position in their department.
Similarly, the prosecutor can establish that the person in question was a peace officer by providing their qualifications and assignment to the roles. For example, they may partner with the alleged victim to provide documents establishing their position as a peace officer or obtain a formal letter from the officer’s department.
If your case involves battery on a protected person other than a peace officer or police officer, the prosecutor should elaborate on their specific role to strengthen their case. Your defense attorney will inform you of all the possible parties who may fall within this category in preparation for your defense. They include:
- Persons Working in the Probation Department
If you attack a probation officer or any other person in the probation department, you will face the same charge as attacking a peace or police officer. The justification for this is that they both promote justice and compliance with the law. Therefore, any attack on them violates their protection in the roles they serve.
The prosecutor can show that the alleged victim was an employee in the California probation department by obtaining their employment letter, a certification from their superior, and a spreadsheet indicating their daily roles. Additionally, the victim’s testimony is important evidence in your case, so you can expect them to testify in court.
- Paramedics and Emergency Medical Technicians
Additionally, EMTs or paramedics also fall within the protected category of people because of the nature of their services. As medical emergency service providers, their safety should always come first as they undertake their duties. Committing battery against them is a serious violation of the penal code provisions, warranting a criminal case against you.
- Officers Working in Custodial Roles
When you attack an officer maintaining custody in a police station or jail, you face charges under Section 243. The custodial officer’s role is to ensure that all detained persons remain in custody until their release on bail/bond or after their jail sentence.
You may have committed battery against the officer to try and escape the detention center, warranting more scrutiny and possible charges. If the investigating officers determine that you engaged in additional criminal offenses on top of attacking the officer, your case may involve different counts of charges. For example, escaping from police custody after committing battery is unlawful, leading to other legal implications.
- Officers Working in the California Highway Patrol
Traffic and highway patrol officers work towards promoting security and compliance with the law on the road, making them equivalent to peace officers and police officers in this context. Battery against them may involve physical touch using your vehicle as you try to intimidate them and escape the police highway stop. Although your actions may not cause serious injury to them, you are still liable for the offense if you did it to offend or harm them.
- Firefighters and Lifeguards
While lifeguards and firefighters work in the emergency response department, they have protected persons, and any battery on them is a criminal offense. While you may have justifications for attacking the person in question, the prosecutor can argue that your actions exposed the parties to harm, warranting your arrest. You will nevertheless have a chance to raise your defenses after the prosecutor rests their case.
- You Wilfully Touched the Victim Intending to Harm or Offend Them
Having established that the victim in question is an officer or a protected person in their duties, the prosecution team should show that your actions were willful. A wilful and intentional act is one that you commit on purpose and are fully aware of the effects you may cause.
Since the prosecutor must demonstrate your mental position to show that you acted purposefully, they often rely on circumstantial evidence. For example, if they can show that you crept up on the officer before battering them, they will have demonstrated that your actions were intentional.
The prosecution team can also demonstrate a willful and intentional act through the events that followed your attack. If you did not show remorse for your actions, it displays your intent to commit them, establishing the prosecutor’s position.
When showing that you touched the victim, the prosecutor must demonstrate that you came into physical contact with them. Doing so is critical for the prosecutor’s case because it distinguishes your actions from assault. An assault case involves similar elements to battery, except that the offender does not come into direct or indirect contact with the targeted victim.
The law allows the prosecutor to establish their case even if you only touched the victim slightly, as long as there was physical contact. Indirect contact with the victim is also a valid reason for the prosecutor to establish your case, and your defense attorney will note this technicality when preparing your defense. Indirect contact may come from throwing an object at the victim to harm or offend them instead of using your body to attack.
Although the minimum requirement is physical touch, the prosecutor should further establish your intention by showing that you acted rudely or angrily. Without this distinction, you can argue that the contact was innocent and that you did not intend any harm to the victim.
You, therefore, need to remain alert during the trial proceedings to determine whether the prosecutor mentions these important details. You can, however, worry less about grasping all the prosecutor’s argument points by working closely with your defense attorney.
- You Ought to Have Known the Victim’s Role as a Peace or Police Officer During Your Attack
The prosecutor will close their case by establishing that you should have reasonably known about your victim’s identity when you committed battery on them. Your knowledge of their role as an officer or a protected person performing their functions is important because it further shows your intention to break the law.
Identifying a peace officer should be fairly straightforward, especially because they wear uniforms to distinguish themselves from civilians. Similarly, emergency service providers have uniforms to show their roles, making it important for the general public to respect their presence.
The prosecutor’s evidence should demonstrate that the victim wore their uniform, meaning you should have known their identity and refrained from the attack. They may use photographs, surveillance footage, and witness testimonies to show that the person’s identity was identifiable.
Even if the protected person, peace officer, or police officer did not have their uniform on, they should have identified themselves to stop you from committing battery. For example, a police officer in civilian clothing can present their badge for verification. Other protected individuals may identify themselves with any confirmation, making you aware of their role.
The prosecutor’s goal in court is to show that you still proceeded with the battery even after learning of the victim’s identity. Their role as officers distinguishes the offense from a typical battery case involving any other civilian member, justifying the current proceedings.
Defenses for Committing Battery on a Peace or Police Officer
After the prosecutor rests their case, your criminal defense attorney can proceed with your defense case. The primary goal of raising defenses is to cast reasonable doubt on the prosecutor’s case and to justify your actions where relevant.
Although you may explore various defense arguments to persuade the court to acquit or reduce your sentence, not all are applicable. Based on this, you must carefully assess your case facts and circumstances to ensure your defenses strongly support your position. With an experienced defense attorney’s help, you can expect to present persuasive and justifiable counterarguments. They include:
You Committed Battery in Self-Defense
Relying on self-defense as a counter-argument for the defendant’s case can effectively persuade the judge to find you ‘not guilty.’ However, the defense requires that you meet a specific threshold that the law imposes on all people who commit violence to protect themselves.
Although you intend to avert harm when acting in self-defense, you must ensure that you are reasonably at risk of injury from the perpetrator. Based on this, you must genuinely fear for your safety, pushing you to retaliate to protect yourself.
Additionally, you must have considered an escape plan to avert the danger you believed in before resorting to violence. The law introduces this requirement to reduce the likelihood of violence, often putting both parties at risk of serious injuries. When presenting the defense, the judge wants to see the attempts to escape before committing battery.
The last threshold to meet is that you must have used violence proportional to the harm you faced. If the peace officer or police officer used physical force against you, you should not retaliate by using a weapon or other harmful objects to cause harm. If your defense meets all the requirements, you have a good chance of avoiding punishment.
The Victim was Not An Officer on Duty
Alternatively, you may argue that the victim is not a peace officer or police officer on duty, meaning that the charges you face are invalid. You can establish this position by showing that they were dismissed from their role or on sabbatical when the alleged offense occurred.
With your criminal defense attorney’s help, you can obtain all relevant documents to support this position. They will also help you ascertain that the officer’s contract or role was not a factor to consider by calling on witnesses and presenting the relevant documents in court during proceedings.
You Did Not Intend to Cause Harm
While you may have physically touched the peace officer or police officer, you can also argue that you did not do it intentionally to harm or offend them. You can justify your action by showing that the events were accidental. For example, if you tripped and accidentally pushed the officer, you can present evidence that you did not foresee the actions and did not mean to cause harm.
Penalties for Committing Battery On a Peace Officer or Police Officer
If the prosecutor’s case is stronger than the defenses you present, the judge finds you guilty of the offense. You will thus learn of the penalties you face during the sentencing hearing following your defense hearing.
Many battery cases against peace or police officers attract misdemeanor charges, resulting in penalties. If so, you will face a jail sentence of up to one year or a fine payment order of up to $2000.
Felony charges apply if your offense resulted in physically harming the victim, especially if you used excessive force to commit the battery. The prosecutor will also check your criminal history to determine whether you have previously faced a similar charge. If you are a repeat offender, you are also likely to face felony charges and penalties. They include a jail sentence of up to three years, a fine of up to $10,000, or both.
The presiding judge exercises discretion when issuing the penalties, and they may adjust them to give the minimum, moderate, or maximum sentence. To do this, they rely on your case facts to assess the circumstances and any aggravating or mitigating elements.
Contact a Van Nuys Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
Facing criminal charges for battering a peace officer or police officer is a criminal offense prohibited under the Penal Code. Violating the restrictions can therefore attract serious penalties, including jail sentences if the prosecutor successfully proves your case. You can counter their accusations against you by working with an experienced criminal defense attorney with experience defending similar claims. Thanks to their help, you can look forward to better chances of a favorable case outcome, including avoiding a jail sentence.
At Leah Legal, we offer high-quality criminal defense services tailored to your case’s needs. Our team has worked with hundreds of parties facing charges for committing battery on a peace officer over the years, giving them the skills and experience they need. We are also ready to represent you in court during hearings to ensure the judge and jury understand your position. We aim to provide all relevant evidence to aid your case effectively and persuade the judge to issue a positive outcome. If you or a loved one is facing battery on a peace officer or police officer in Van Nuys, California, call us today at 818-484-1100.
Many believe you must have committed a wrongful act to be accused of a criminal offense. But that is not true. You could be charged with a crime under California law even if you did not commit any wrongful acts. An example of this offense is the possession of burglary tools.
However, possessing burglary tools is not always a crime under the law. In some situations, you could face charges for possessing burglary tools; in others, no charges are warranted. So when does possessing burglary tools become a crime? Read along to find the answer in this blog.
When Possessing Burglary Tools Becomes a Crime
California PC 466 prohibits anybody from possessing particular tools proven to be items regularly used to break into homes, cars, or any other structures. However, possessing these tools is not unlawful in itself. It only becomes illegal when there is sufficient evidence to demonstrate criminal intent.
Essentially, the prosecution must demonstrate that you had a burglary tool in your possession or altered, made, or tried to alter or make one for the judge to find you guilty of violating PC 466. It must also prove that when you possessed the tool, you intended to commit the burglary offense, criminalized under PC 459.
Penal Code 466 sets down over fifteen types of items that are prevalently used to gain access or entry to a structure or car illegally, that is, burglary tools. These include slide hammers, vise grip pliers, key bits, picklocks, tension bars, spark plug chips, master keys, screwdrivers, crowbars, floor-safe door pullers, slim jims, tubular lock picks, lock pick guns, water-pump pliers, porcelain or ceramic spark plug chips, sledgehammers, crows, and bump keys.
Also, apart from the tools mentioned under PC 466, the law states that other instruments or tools that can accomplish unauthorized entry can be deemed burglary tools. Put otherwise, any other tool or instrument resembling those mentioned under the law qualifies as a burglary tool. Most tools that hobbyists or handymen may have in workshops or garages fit this description.
Possession Must Be Combined With Criminal or Felonious Intent for a Conviction to Occur
Simply having burglary tools is not sufficient to warrant prosecution. PC 466 states that, apart from having the tools, you must have a felonious or criminal intention to be convicted. That means an intention to commit the burglary offense.
You commit burglary if you enter a car, building, or structure with the specific intent to perpetrate petty theft or a felony once inside. And note that you can be convicted of burglary whether or not you succeeded in committing petty theft or a felony.
For example, if you are caught in a building or vehicle without the owner’s permission and have any burglary tools, intent to perpetrate the burglary offense or other offenses might be proven.
Criminal or Felonious Intent Can Be Inferred From Objects In Your Vehicle
A police officer can pull you over for breaking a traffic law, and if they see burglary instruments in plain sight or have probable cause to search your vehicle and find these tools, it will trigger some suspicion. However, evidence of your felonious or criminal intention can be solidified if the law enforcement officer further finds binoculars, ski masks, a building’s blueprint, keys, masking tape, dark clothing, and restraint equipment. These other instruments are generally used for surreptitiously approaching a building or car, knowing where to head once you enter the building or car, and restraining anybody unfortunately present at the scene.
Another example of criminal or felonious intent is when an officer observes a man putting on dark clothing and a hood on a hot night and carrying gloves, box cutters, a picklock, a wire, and a rock, looking into cars or homes, trying to force open a garage or window, or tapping on cars or house windows with the rock. However, the prosecution would likely need more evidence to prove criminal intent if the person was discovered merely walking by the roadside with the box cutters.
You Could Also Be Found Guilty of Possessing Burglary Tools Based On Circumstantial Evidence
Proving intent can be difficult for the prosecution. How will the prosecutor prove what you were thinking? To do this, they often rely on circumstantial evidence rather than direct evidence. Circumstantial evidence refers to a series or inference of evidence resulting in a reasonable deduction.
Put otherwise; because you probably will not send a text message or leave a note saying you intend to use a burglary tool to break into a building to steal or commit a felony, the prosecution will have to use other evidence that tends to prove what your intent was.
Examples of circumstantial evidence include fingerprints discovered on a gun used to execute a robbery offense, damage to a suspected hit-and-run perpetrator’s vehicle that concludes it was involved in a collision and that it struck the victim’s vehicle, gunshot residue discovered on an alleged shooter’s hand, or being caught in possession of a burglary tool and the blueprints of a building. The law does not differentiate between circumstantial and direct evidence for the finder of fact to consider.
How to Fight Charges for Possessing Burglary Tools
Although charges for possessing burglary tools are serious, there is a way you can fight them and avoid a conviction. The legal defenses you can use to fight the charges against you are:
- You did not intend to violate PC 459, burglary law.
- You did not possess any burglary tools.
- Law enforcement found the burglary tools through an illegal search and seizure.
- You do have a criminal history.
Remember, you are guilty of possessing burglary tools only if you intend to perpetrate burglary. You can therefore fight the prosecution’s case by saying you never acted with this intention. Merely having any of the burglary tools in your possession is not enough reason to show intent. If you had any of the other accessories that could be used for lookout, surveillance, restraining individuals, or showing a building’s layout, criminal or felonious intent could then be inferred.
Also, note that you would only be convicted if you had the burglary tool. That means an item mentioned under the law or any similar object. Therefore, it is valid to argue that you did not possess a burglary tool or any similar object or tool.
You could argue that what you had was not a burglary tool because it is not itemized under 466 PC and is not used to break into a car or building. You could further argue that the item you had is used as a common household accessory or for harmless activities. For example, as much as cell phones, binoculars, or masking tape can be considered burglary tools, they can also be used for harmless activities.
Lastly, authorities frequently charge this offense after searching a person and seizing evidence. However, law enforcement officers can only search someone or seize their property if they have a valid search warrant.
And if they do not have a warrant, they should have a valid reason for lacking one. If the police seized burglary tools from you during an illegal search and seizure or if their search exceeded the scope of their warrant, the judge can order that the tools be removed from evidence. This may result in your charges being dismissed or reduced.
Punishment You Can Face for Possessing Burglary Tools
Possession of burglary tools is considered a misdemeanor violation under the law. The crime carries custody in jail for a maximum of six months, informal probation for not more than three years, and a fine of up to one thousand dollars.
Most defendants face both burglary and possession of burglary tools charges. Burglary is classified as second or first-degree and could be a felony or misdemeanor. If the court finds you guilty of both charges, it will generally sentence you on the burglary charges and stay the PC 466 conviction.
The good news is that a conviction for possessing burglary tools will not affect your immigration status. In California, some offenses lead to an immigrant being labeled inadmissible or deported. An example is a conviction for a crime of moral turpitude or an aggravated felony. Possessing burglary tools does not fall under any of these categories of crimes.
A conviction for possessing burglary tools will also not harm your firearm rights. In certain cases, a California criminal conviction causes an accused person to lose their right to possess or own a firearm. An example is an offense prosecuted as a felony. Possessing burglary tools will, however, not result in the loss of your firearm rights.
Another good thing is that you can have your record expunged if convicted of possessing burglary tools. Even though a conviction under PC 466 does not usually have the same restrictions or obstacles on job seeking, housing, and civil liberties, it could still be used to decide whether you are promoted, hired, or can acquire a lease.
According to PC 1203.4, you may successfully expunge your criminal conviction, provided you never served time in prison. Because violating 466 PC is deemed a misdemeanor offense with no prison term imposed, being convicted under this law should qualify you for a record expungement if you further satisfy these other requirements:
- You completed probation or your jail sentence, whichever the judge imposed.
- You do not have pending criminal charges.
- You have not committed another violation.
An expungement clears a conviction from a criminal record. Your court-related records will not be destroyed, and the expungement will remain on police databases, even though they are inaccessible to the public.
This process is beneficial as no public member, including landlords, private employers, boyfriends, girlfriends, or anybody other than government agencies or law enforcement, will ever view that you have been found guilty of the crime. It also removes most of the challenges linked to a conviction, such as difficulty renting an apartment, enrolling in college, securing loans or employment, et cetera.
You can petition for an expungement on the date your probation term elapses. There is one exception where the judge did not impose probation. In this case, you must file your petition 12 months from your conviction date.
Other Violations Related to Possession of Burglary Tools
Three crimes are related to VC 466 violations, possessing burglary tools. They are Penal Code Section 602, trespass; Penal Code 16590, possession of prohibited weapons; and illegal acts with ignitions and keys.
You commit trespass when you enter or remain on another person’s property without authorization or the right to do so. If you trespass intending to commit the burglary offense and have a burglary tool or tools, you can be prosecuted under PC 466 and PC 602.
PC 16590, possessing prohibited weapons, prohibits selling, manufacturing, and possessing particular dangerous weapons. These weapons include short-barreled shotguns and brass knuckles. Some prohibited or dangerous weapons qualify as burglary tools. Therefore, if you are caught possessing a prohibited weapon that qualifies as a burglary tool, you could simultaneously be charged under PC 16590 and PC 466.
Lastly, several California statutes make certain acts with ignitions and keys unlawful. Some of them include:
- Penal Code Section 466.9, using or possessing code grabbing tool to disarm a vehicle’s security alarm system—under 466.9 PC, you are prohibited from possessing or using a tool that can disarm an automobile’s alarm if used or meant to be utilized to steal or gain illegal entry into the car. These tools capture the signal and play it back to disarm it. Violating this law is considered a misdemeanor, carrying not more than six months in custody and up to one thousand dollars in fines.
- Penal Code Section 466.8, illegal manufacturing of commercial or residential keys—even though you can sell, make, or give away keys for a business or home by a technique involving an on-site inspection, the law mandates you to remain with a receipt containing the name and identifying details of the key recipient for two years together with their signature. This law does not apply to the manufacturing of duplicate keys. Violating this law is considered a misdemeanor with a jail term of up to six months and up to one thousand dollars in fines.
- Penal Code Section PC 466.7, illegal possession of motor vehicle keys—you cannot have the keys to another person’s vehicle without authorization, provided you intend to break into or steal it. Doing so will be a misdemeanor offense with consequences including six months in custody and up to $1,000 in fines per PC 466.7.
- Penal Code Section 466.65, possessing tools for bypassing motorcycle ignition—it is easier to make away with motorcycles than passenger vehicles due to their weight and size. However, even if motorcycles are light enough, some devices can start them without the usual keys. If you sell, lend, give away, or possess a tool that could bypass the usual ignition procedure and start the bike, you are guilty of violating PC 466.65.
This law also applies to Allen wrenches, electrical tape, wire cutters, or other devices that could be used for stealing motorcycles. If you possess or lend these tools with the intent to steal a motorcycle, you will also face misdemeanor charges under this law. Consequences include not more than six months in custody and up to $1000 in fines.
- Penal Code Section 466.5, making or possessing automobile master keys—it is lawful to possess motor vehicle wheel lock master keys or automobile master keys provided you do not have criminal intent. Selling, advertising for sale, or manufacturing these items is an offense unless the user or buyer uses them for work. Put otherwise; know the individual to whom you are selling the keys, or you may be found guilty and face a fine of not more than $1000 and six months in custody under PC 466.5.
- Penal Code Section 466.1, providing or selling floor safe door pullers, tension bars, or lock picks—floor safe door pullers, tension bars, or lock picks are meant to be utilized to gain entry, lawfully or otherwise, into cars or buildings.
California law mandates that you keep a transaction receipt for a year if you give away, sell, or permit somebody to borrow these items. The receipt must have the name, address, telephone number, and signature of the individual to whom you gave or sold the items. Failure to do so will trigger misdemeanor charges carrying a jail sentence of six months, up to a thousand dollars in fines, or misdemeanor probation for up to three years per PC 466.1.
Find an Experienced Theft Crimes Defense Attorney Near Me
If you are under investigation or prosecution for possessing burglary tools, calling an experienced theft crime defense lawyer as soon as possible for help is the most appropriate step. These charges may not seem severe, but the collateral consequences could be more severe than you imagine.
This is because this crime is essentially an attempted burglary by nature. In the sense that had the police not arrested you, you would have broken into a building or structure with the tools you had to steal. To the eyes of the general public, it implies you are a thief, and this could hold you back more than any jail time, probation, or fines ever could.
At Leah Legal, we have successfully defended hundreds of cases involving the possession of burglary tools. Our initial consultation is cost-free, and we are readily available to answer any of your questions. Contact us today at 818-484-1100 if you are charged in Van Nuys, CA, and we will be pleased to help you obtain the best possible outcome.
Child endangerment involves putting a child’s well-being and safety at risk. You could face charges under PC 273(a) even if the minor did not suffer any physical injury. The focus is on the potential harm posed by your actions.
Child endangerment falls under the category of domestic violence, making the consequences of a conviction severe. The level of risk you pose to the child will influence the charges against you. If convicted, the impact on your freedom and future can be devastating.
When facing an arrest and charges under PC 273(a), seeking legal help is crucial. The choice of your legal representation can make all the difference between spending significant time behind bars or having the case dismissed and walking away free. A skilled attorney can protect your rights and secure a favorable case outcome.
How Does California Law Define Child Endangerment?
Child endangerment is a matter taken seriously in California’s legal system. Understanding its definition under Penal Code § 273a(a) is crucial to avoiding severe legal consequences. Let’s delve into the elements of this crime, the legal definitions involved, and real-life examples for better comprehension.
The “Elements Of The Crime” Of Child Endangerment
To convict you under Penal Code 273a(a), a prosecutor must prove specific elements beyond a reasonable doubt. These elements are like building blocks for their case. The key elements are:
You willfully engaged in one of these actions:
- Inflicted unjustifiable physical pain or mental suffering on a child willingly.
- Caused or willingly allowed a child to suffer unjustifiable physical pain or mental suffering.
- Caused or permitted injury to a child’s person or health while having custody of them.
- Put a child in a situation where their person or health is at risk while in your custody.
- You acted with criminal negligence when causing or permitting the child’s suffering, injury, or endangerment.
If you are the child’s parent, your actions were not reasonably disciplining the child.
The Legal Definition Of “Willfully”
Under California law, an act is “willful” if done intentionally, regardless of intent to break the law or cause harm. For example, consider Eva, a working mom with a two-year-old son, and her new boyfriend, Hiram. Although Eva didn’t mean to harm her child, she willingly let Hiram, who turned out to be violent, take care of him. This resulted in child endangerment charges for Eva.
Unjustifiable Physical Pain Or Mental Suffering
“Unjustifiable physical pain or mental suffering” refers to pain or suffering that is excessive or unnecessary given the circumstances. Actions resulting in undue pain or suffering fall under child endangerment.
The Legal Meaning Of “Criminal Negligence”
Criminal negligence goes beyond ordinary carelessness, inattention, or errors in judgment. To be criminally negligent, you must act recklessly, deviating significantly from how an ordinarily careful person would act in the same situation.
Your actions should display disregard for human life or indifference to the consequences, and a reasonable person in a similar situation would have foreseen harm resulting from such behavior.
Examples Of Criminal Negligence
Edward convinced his 14-year-old neighbor, Jason, to play “Russian Roulette,” resulting in Jason’s death. Edward’s act of providing a loaded gun to a child and encouraging him to pull the trigger was criminally negligent.
Brian ran a methamphetamine lab in his home, where his 6-year-old stepson lived part-time. Allowing a young child to be exposed to dangerous chemicals was criminally negligent.
However, it’s essential to recognize that not all actions that harm a child are considered criminally negligent. Acts resulting from ordinary carelessness, inattention, or mistakes in judgment are not classified as criminal negligence.
For example, Isabel left her four small children home alone while she went to a bar, leading to a tragic fire that killed her two-year-old. While Isabel’s actions were grossly negligent, they might not be criminally negligent since a reasonable person might not have foreseen the harm from her actions.
The Legal Definition Of “Great Bodily Injury”
In child endangerment cases, prosecutors may seek felony charges if the child faced a situation likely to cause “great bodily injury” or death. “Great bodily injury” refers to significant physical harm, excluding minor or trivial injuries.
Prosecutors focus on whether the child was placed in a situation likely to lead to injury, not whether the injury occurred.
What Are The Penalties For A 273a PC Violation?
Child endangerment is a serious offense in California, and understanding the possible penalties for violating Penal Code 273a(a) is essential to comprehending the legal consequences you might face.
Misdemeanor Penalties
If you are convicted of child endangerment as a misdemeanor, you could face the following penalties:
- A maximum of one year in county jail.
- Fines of up to $1,000.
Misdemeanor Probation
Sometimes, a judge may grant misdemeanor probation instead of jail time. If you receive misdemeanor probation, you must adhere to specific conditions set by the court. These conditions may include:
- Completing parenting classes. The court could order you to complete specific programs, including parenting or anger management courses.
- Attending counseling or therapy sessions.
- Obeying a restraining order prohibiting contact with the child. Violating these orders can lead to further legal complications.
- Complying with child custody orders. As the endangered child’s parents, the court may require that you follow specific child custody arrangements to ensure the safety and well-being of the child.
- Reporting to a probation officer at scheduled intervals. During these check-ins, the officer will assess your compliance with the probation terms and monitor your progress.
- Avoiding engaging in any further criminal activities. Committing any new offense during probation can lead to additional charges and harsher consequences.
Misdemeanor probation offers the opportunity to avoid jail time but also demands strict adherence to the court’s requirements. Failure to comply with probation terms can result in probation violation charges, leading to potential jail time or other penalties.
Felony Penalties
Felony child endangerment charges often arise when your actions result in significant harm or injury to the child or when certain aggravating factors are present. Child endangerment can be charged as a felony, leading to harsher penalties, including imprisonment for two, four, or six years.
Great Bodily Injury Enhancement
If the child involved in the endangerment case suffered “great bodily injury,” the prosecution may seek a “great bodily injury enhancement.” This enhancement can lead to increased penalties upon conviction, including an additional three to six years in state prison. The determination of “great bodily injury” is based on the severity and significance of the injuries sustained by the child.
Manslaughter Or Murder Penalties
In the most severe instances of child endangerment, where the child’s death occurs due to your actions, manslaughter or murder charges may apply. These charges carry far more severe penalties, including lengthy prison sentences and, in extreme cases, even life imprisonment.
Child Endangerment And California’s “Three Strikes” Law
Child endangerment offenses can also be “strikes” under California’s “Three Strikes” law. This law mandates harsher penalties for individuals with prior serious or violent felony convictions. A “strike” on your record could lead to more severe consequences if you are charged with any future criminal offense.
How Do I Fight The Charges In Court?
When facing child endangerment charges, you have legal rights and potential defenses to fight these charges in court. Below are various strategies you can use to defend yourself against allegations of child endangerment:
Someone Else Endangered the Child
Law enforcement and prosecutors often hastily attribute blame without fully investigating all potential parties involved in the child’s welfare. If you could prove that someone else, not you, was responsible for endangering the child, the court could not convict you of a PC 273a violation.
You want to gather pertinent evidence and reliable witnesses who can corroborate your claim for a positive outcome in your defense. The court can then examine your evidence and the circumstances surrounding your case. If your evidence proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the child was exposed to danger by someone else, the court will exonerate you from any criminal liability.
“Mistake of Fact”
Child endangerment accusations against you may arise due to a “mistake of fact.” Mistakes can occur when circumstances are unclear or details are not fully understood. Your attorney could argue that you misinterpreted a situation, leading to the alleged endangerment of the child.
Also, California’s mandatory reporting law further complicates child endangerment cases. This law requires professionals, such as doctors, teachers, and clergy, to report any suspected child endangerment to the authorities. Consequently, they may feel compelled to report even the slightest suspicion, potentially triggering an investigation and subsequent charges.
You must provide compelling evidence and build a comprehensive case to demonstrate that your actions were based on a genuine misunderstanding. Your attorney may interview witnesses and examine records, such as medical or school reports, to substantiate your version of events.
False Accusations
It is not uncommon for criminal cases to originate from false allegations made by a child or another individual, either out of manipulation, anger, or to cover up their misconduct. False accusations can arise during contentious situations such as divorce or when new partners enter the picture.
In such emotionally charged contexts, children might be influenced to make untrue statements against one parent as a means of retaliation or to gain favor with the other parent. Additionally, caretakers or individuals close to the child may level false accusations to divert attention from their own abusive behavior. Regardless of the motivations behind false accusations, the consequences can be severe, leading to arrests and child endangerment charges.
California law recognizes the concept of “innocent until proven guilty,” and the prosecution must demonstrate your guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. By countering false accusations with a compelling defense, you can effectively cast doubt on the prosecution’s case and assert your innocence.
You Were Reasonably Disciplining Your Child
California law recognizes a parent’s right to discipline their child through “reasonable” corporal punishment. Corporal punishment involves physical discipline, such as spanking, using a belt or paddle, sending the child to bed without supper, or confining them to their room.
If you are facing child endangerment charges, your defense attorney may argue that your actions were within the bounds of acceptable discipline and did not constitute child endangerment.
For example, Betty, a mother, takes her five-year-old son shopping for school clothes. While they are in the dressing room, the child throws a tantrum. Feeling frustrated, Betty uses a belt she brought along and smacks the child across the back of his bare thighs. A sales clerk witnesses this incident and becomes concerned, prompting them to call the store’s security guard, who then contacts the police. Betty is subsequently arrested and charged with child endangerment.
In this scenario, Betty’s defense attorney can argue that her actions were not criminal but rather a form of discipline. The defense may emphasize that Betty was dealing with a challenging situation, and under the circumstances, her actions were a reasonable attempt to discipline her child.
The defense will work to present evidence that supports the claim of reasonable discipline. This could involve testimonies from witnesses who attest to Betty’s generally good parenting skills and her love and care for the child.
The court will evaluate the case, considering whether Betty’s actions were reasonable and appropriate within the context of disciplining a young child. The defense must demonstrate that the discipline was not excessive, unjustifiable, or harmful to the child’s well-being.
The Act Was Not Willful or Did Not Amount to Criminal Negligence
The prosecution must establish that you acted willfully and with criminal negligence to secure your conviction for a PC 273a violation. A willful act is done purposefully and intentionally, with full awareness of its potential consequences.
Criminal negligence goes beyond ordinary carelessness or mistakes in judgment. It involves acting recklessly in a way that substantially deviates from how a reasonable and prudent person would act in similar circumstances. The act must display disregard for human life or indifference to the potential harm it may cause.
A strong defense can challenge these elements and argue that the act was not willful or did not amount to criminal negligence.
For example, Kate cooks dinner while watching her 3-year-old daughter. When the phone rings, Kate momentarily leaves the room to answer the call, placing her knife on the cutting board. During her absence, her curious daughter picks up the knife, cutting several of her fingers to the bone.
Kate’s defense attorney may argue that the act was not willful or criminally negligent. While Kate’s actions could be considered negligent, they may not meet the standard of criminal negligence. A reasonable person might assume that a three-year-old would not pick up a knife from the counter in the short time it took to answer the phone.
Are There Other Charges Filed In Connection With Child Endangerment?
Several related offenses could be charged alongside or instead of child endangerment, including:
Child Abuse, California PC 273d
Penal Code 273d makes it a crime to direct physical abuse at a minor, even if the injury is not severe. To secure a conviction, there must be some form of injury to the child, no matter how slight, triggered by physical abuse.
In California, child abuse is a “wobbler” offense. So the prosecution could charge you with a misdemeanor or a felony. For misdemeanor child abuse, sentencing could include up to one year in jail and a fine of up to $6,000. Felony child abuse can lead to a sentence of two, four, or six years in prison and a fine of up to $6,000.
Failure To Provide Care (Child Neglect), California PC 270
A failure to provide care charge, also known as child neglect, arises when a parent or guardian fails to provide physical necessities such as food, shelter, clothing, or medical care to their child. However, if the inability to provide such necessities is through no fault of the parent or guardian, they are not guilty of this crime.
PC 270 is charged as a misdemeanor and can result in up to one year in jail and a fine of $2,000. In certain situations, it can be charged as a felony, which may lead to a state prison sentence of one year and a day.
Lewd Acts With A Minor, California PC 288
Penal Code 288 addresses lewd acts with a minor, which involve improper touching of a minor child for sexual purposes. Lewd acts with a minor apply to children under 14 or 14 to 15 years old if the perpetrator is at least ten years older than the child.
Possible penalties for lewd acts with a minor vary depending on factors such as the victim’s age, the age difference between the perpetrator and the victim, and whether the perpetrator was the child’s caretaker.
A conviction for lewd acts with a minor can lead to significant prison time and a fine of up to $10,000.
Driving Under The Influence (DUI) with a Child in the Car
In California, driving under the influence (DUI) laws apply to operating a vehicle while impaired by drugs and alcohol. Child endangerment charges can be added to the DUI offense when a child is in the car, leading to enhanced penalties. The DUI penalties depend on the number of prior DUI convictions, and the presence of a child can result in additional days added to the jail sentence.
California law also requires drivers with young children to use child restraint systems, further emphasizing the importance of child safety during travel.
Charges Involving The Death Of A Child
In tragic cases where a child dies due to endangerment, additional charges may be filed in addition to or instead of child endangerment. These charges include:
- Child Abuse Resulting in Death to a Child Under 8, California PC 273ab. This offense involves causing injuries to a child under the age of eight that result in death, paralysis, or coma. A conviction can lead to 25 years or life in state prison.
- Murder, PC 187. Killing a child with the intent to kill is charged as murder. Depending on the circumstances, it can be first-degree or second-degree murder, with penalties ranging from 15 years to life in state prison.
- Involuntary Manslaughter, California PC 192(b). When criminal negligence leads to a child’s death, it can be charged as involuntary manslaughter, carrying penalties that do not involve malice.
Furnishing Dangerous Fireworks To A Minor
California Health & Safety Code 12702 criminalizes selling, giving, or delivering dangerous fireworks to minors under 18. This misdemeanor offense can lead to up to one year in county jail and a $500 to $1,000 fine.
Relinquishing A Vehicle To A Minor, California PC 193.8a
Penal Code 193.8a makes it a crime to furnish or relinquish a motor vehicle to a minor who is not safe or legal to drive. This offense includes intoxicated minors, those not properly licensed, or those with a history of unsafe or reckless driving. PC 193.8a can be charged as a misdemeanor or an infraction, with a penalty of up to six months in county jail for a misdemeanor.
Find a Criminal Lawyer Near Me
If you or someone you know is facing a child endangerment investigation in Van Nuys, contacting a reputable defense lawyer could be your smartest move. At Leah Legal, we will closely examine your situation and strategize the best course of action, which may include negotiating with the prosecutors to secure the most favorable result for you. Call us at 818-484-1100 today if you need further assistance or guidance. We are here to lend a helping hand and provide the support you need during this challenging time.
The California sex offender law allows judges to order defendants to register as sex offenders if they engage in voluntary sexual activities with adolescent victims aged between 14 and 17 years. The judicial system considers the ages of both the victim and the perpetrator. Anyone who engages in sexual activity with a minor who isn’t of legal consent can face statutory rape charges. Sex offenders are often subject to sex offender registration, jail time, and court fines. Once released back into society, both the state and the general public can identify, track down, and be cautious of sex offenders.
The registration provides crucial information regarding convictions for sex crimes to the general public, as well as local and federal authorities. This law has been modified multiple times to suit the LGBTQ community. Therefore, if you’re a part of the LGBTQ group and you’re being accused of a sex crime, it’s important to know the implications of the newly passed amendment from a legal standpoint and how to defend yourself.
Understanding California’s Sex Offender Laws
California sex crimes are among the most severely punished offenses. They grossly violate the dignity of the victim. Individuals convicted for certain sexual-related crimes are required to register their full name and address in the sex offender registry, according to PEN 290.
It requires individuals to provide their identifying details to the local law enforcement department yearly. Sexual offenders have to sign up within 5 days of their birthdate and within 5 days of relocating. The goal is to let everyone know that there’s a sex offender in their midst, such as law enforcement at both federal and local levels and the public at large.
The registration requirements are significantly impacted by the nature of the underlying sex crime. Once Senate Bill 384 gets approved, California will implement a three-tier system for registering sex offenders beginning in January 2021. Most sexual offenses no longer mandate life registration for those found guilty.
The judge may order you to be listed under one of the following tiers, based on the type of crime you commit:
- Tier 1—you have to register for 10 years following your sentence as part of the registration requirement. This group features individuals who have been convicted for low-level sex crimes such as sexual battery and indecent exposure
- Tier 2—this entails registering with the sex offender registry for not less than 20 years. People who commit mid-level sex crimes, such as lascivious or lewd behavior with someone under the age of 18 or sodomy with a child, fall under this category
- Tier 3—if you match the requirements for this category, you’ll have to permanently enroll your details in the sex offender registry. This category primarily consists of individuals who have committed several sex crimes as well as more serious ones such as rape, sexual offenses against minors under 10, or trafficking children for sexual purposes
If the court sentences you for a sexual crime that carries a requirement for sex offender registration, you need to understand the expectations outlined under California PEN 290 and the necessary steps to fulfill your obligations under the law. Another option is to consult with and get assistance from an experienced criminal attorney.
California Sex Offender Law and The LGBTQ Community
California is regarded as one of the most liberal jurisdictions in the country when it comes to LGBTQ rights. In the 1970s, members of the LGBTQ group gained widespread recognition, and relationships between people of the same sexual orientation became legal in 1976. However, the community has long experienced prejudice, forcing them to remain silent about their sexual desires and keep their relationships hidden from the general public.
The state of California took a step further in 2003, introducing anti-discrimination laws based on gender expression, gender identity, and sexual orientation. Since then, transgender people are allowed to change their gender identity in all official documents without the necessity for medical care. Conversion therapy with children does not always necessitate the guidance of mental health specialists.
California’s laws are increasingly being amended to include the LGBTQ population. For example, California Governor Gavin Newsom adopted a new law in September 2021 to update one that allows courts to pinpoint certain sexual offenders if they engaged in consensual oral or anal intercourse with teenagers aged 14 years or above. The earlier regulation, known as statutory rape, prohibited any vaginal sexual acts involving a minor. However, it does prohibit circumstances in which an adult engages in oral or anal intercourse with an underage with their permission.
Historically, statutory rape statutes have targeted male offenders accused of engaging in sexual activities with female juveniles. This new amendment does not take into account the sexual orientation of the perpetrator or victim. When obtaining a conviction, the prosecutor will consider the child’s age, the age disparity between the child and the offender, and the specifics of the sexual activity.
Most people feel that the earlier sex offender laws prejudiced young LGBTQ individuals who had consensual intercourse with youngsters their age or younger. These people believe that judges ordering juveniles to be listed as sex offenders are unethical. Heterosexual offenders committing the same or very similar offenses, on the other hand, are not obligated to register. Since this provision allows for at least a ten-year age difference between the offender and the victim, there’s still much disagreement about the old sex offender statute.
Old sex offender laws have been criticized for being too lenient on pedophiles, regardless of who they apply to. The statutory rape statute is known to apply in situations where two young individuals fall in love and one of them turns eighteen years slightly before the other. Opponents of the old law argue that older persons over the age of eighteen who are involved in sexual activities with minors 14 years or older ought to be prosecuted.
Provisions of the Older Sex Offender Registration Statute
The state of California has long maintained legislation against sexual offenders. A criminal court magistrate could require a defendant to be listed as a sex offender if he or she had consensual sex with a minor between the ages of 14 and 17. The rule also applies where the age difference between the accused and the victim is less than ten years. The minimum age for obtaining consent in the state of California is 18.
Consequently, adults who indulge in sexual activities with minors under the age of 18 can be charged with statutory rape in several jurisdictions. That section of the underlying legislation remains unchanged. Nonetheless, the new amendment makes adjustments to the need to file as a sex offender. A judge’s ruling requiring you to be listed as a sex offender can last for a lifetime.
The New Amendment
The new revisions to the sex offender legislation took effect with the enactment of SB 145 into law. The new law doesn’t change California’s minimum age of consent for sexual activities. Furthermore, nothing changes when a child under the age of 13 is a victim of a sex crime.
The amendments expand the law’s requirements to include anal and oral intercourse alongside vaginal sex. The new rule allows the judges to penalize homosexuals who indulge in sexual activities with minors who are not less than 10 years older than them. Prosecutors and judges can consider matters involving young individuals participating in consensual sexual conduct, irrespective of the juvenile’s sexual orientation. All statutory rape cases can now be assessed individually.
The new amendments are contentious because of the nature of the topic it addresses. However, some individuals support the modifications. California welcomes all individuals, including members of the LGBTQ community. As a result, regardless of their appearance, preference, or identity, all Californians are obligated to be treated equally and fairly by the state’s legislation and court system. The major objective of this law is to protect minors from participating in sexual behaviors to which they don’t have consent. As a result, it should protect them against anyone who might take advantage of their innocence.
However, some critics of the new amendments argue that the ten-year age gap required between sexual offenders and their victims under the law is too lenient. Some argue that the age disparity promotes predatory conduct and that until other legal adjustments are made, most offenders would go unpunished.
It’s critical to recognize that substantial incidents of statutory rape are unlikely to go unpunished. The courts and prosecution team will deal with each case individually, based on the circumstances. As a result, people who perpetrate sex crimes against children are likely to face the repercussions that they deserve.
Expectations From the New Amendments
With the enactment of SB 145, magistrates have the discretion to make decisions in cases involving consensual vaginal sexual activities between an underage person and a young adult. If a perpetrator is no more than ten years older than the victim and engages in sexual relations with a juvenile between the ages of 14 and 17, the court can order the perpetrator to be listed in the state sex offender registry. The proposed revisions include consensual unions between same-sex young individuals when one is a child and the other can qualify as an adult.
Furthermore, the proposed changes broaden the scope of the magistrate’s discretion to include cases involving oral and anal intercourse. Before the modification, irrespective of whether the sexual acts were consenting or not, every adult who engaged in oral or anal sexual contact with a minor aged 14 to 17 was obligated to sign up in the registry.
The change takes into account different kinds of relationships that individuals currently experience, including heterosexual and homosexual relationships. It seems absurd to require homosexuals to automatically register after participating in consenting sexual behavior with a child. The old law was seen as discriminatory towards the LGBTQ community since legal systems had complete discretion in circumstances involving vaginal sex as opposed to oral or anal sex.
For example, if a 21-year-old individual engages in sexual behavior with a 17-year-old person, it is evident that statutory rape has occurred. However, according to the old statute, even if the perpetrator is found guilty of sexual behavior with a child, the court has complete discretion to either allow or deny the perpetrator’s registration as a sex offender. Even if the sexual activity was consensual, a 21-year-old person having oral or anal sex with a 17-year-old child would send the perpetrator straight to the state’s sex registry.
With the recent amendment, magistrates can consider each case on its own merits, determining whether or not the offense warrants an obligation for registration as a sex offender. The amendment doesn’t alter the necessity for anyone who has had sexual contact with a child under the age of 14 years to register.
Registering as a sex crime offender is a life-changing commitment. Your full name, address, and various other details, such as your photo, are all uploaded to the registry and can be accessed by anyone conducting a background check on you. This can affect both your professional and social lives.
It can also have an impact on how other people treat you. For example, if a prospective employer conducts background checks on candidates, they could reject your application even if you match all of the other criteria. Landlords can decline to lease to you or rent their properties if you have a conviction record of a sexual crime. If you’re facing charges for a sex-related crime, you should seek legal counsel and assistance to avoid being listed as a sexual offender.
Are Sex Offender Registration Obligations Applicable to Offenses Committed Before the Enactment of the Law?
Sex offender registration is applicable to all sex crime offenders, which includes those found guilty of registering offenses before the enactment of the new amendments or the adoption of sex offender registration requirements into a specific jurisdiction’s program. States are specifically bound to register sex offenders who stay in the criminal justice system as offenders, registrants, or supervisees, or who get back into the system after being convicted of another offense, whether or not the new offense is a sexual-related crime.
Are There Exceptions That Allow Certain Sexual Offenders To Be Removed From The Registry Earlier Than Others?
The Sex Offender Registration Act grants authorities the ability to reduce the registration time of sexual offenders in two distinct cases:
- A tier I sex crime offender with a clean record could have their period of registration lowered from fifteen to ten years.
- A sex crime offender who is forced to file for life registration as a result of a judgment of juvenile delinquency could have the registration revoked when they have maintained a clean record for 25 years and have not been convicted of any new crimes.
A sex offender has to meet all of the following requirements to maintain a clean record:
- Not have been found guilty of any crime for which a sentence of incarceration lasting longer than 1 year is issued.
- Not be found guilty of any sexual crime, regardless of the punishment.
- Maintain good conduct during any terms of probation, parole, or supervised release that might be required.
- Complete a court-ordered therapy program approved by the Attorney General or the local government.
How Frequently Does A Registered Sex Crime Offender Need to Verify Their Registration Details?
The registration demands that a sex crime offender show up in person, make it possible for the local authority to capture their photograph, and confirm the details in each state in which the sex offender must file a registration at least:
- Every year for tier I sex offenders.
- Once every 6 months for tier II sex offenders.
- Every 3 months for tier III sex offenders.
How Long Do Offenders Have To Register?
The minimum mandatory period of sex offender registration for a tier I sex offender is 15 years, 25 years for a tier II sex offender, and a lifetime registration for a tier III sex offender. The registration term starts once you’re released from jail for a sex crime conviction to imprisonment for the registration crime. For sex crime offenders who were not incarcerated, the period of registration starts at the time of conviction for the sex crime.
Find a Van Nuys Criminal Attorney Near Me
If you are convicted of a sexual offense, you may be required to register as a sex offender. However, the outcome of your case depends on the specific details and circumstances involved. If you are part of the LGBT community, you need to stay informed about the recent updates to the sex offender registry and understand how they can potentially impact your sentence.
Do not hesitate to get in contact with our attorneys at Leah Legal in Van Nuys. Our team of experienced criminal defense attorneys will thoroughly investigate the specific details of your situation to contest the sexual offense charges that are at the core of the matter, as well as the requirement for sex crime offenders to be registered. Our goal is to reach a fair resolution for your issue. Call us today at 818-484-1100.
Clemency is leniency or mercy. It is usually referred to as executive clemency. Executive clemency is the power of the governor in state convictions or the president in federal criminal cases to pardon, grant commutation, reprieve, or amnesty to someone found guilty of a criminal offense.
There are several reasons for exercising executive clemency, including actual doubts regarding the offender’s guilt, humanitarian reasons like the illness of an aged inmate, an evident excessive sentence, to clear the criminal record of somebody who has proved public service or rehabilitation, or because the offender is the governor’s or president’s personal or political friend.
In California, any convicted offender can request executive clemency from the governor, even those sentenced to life imprisonment or death.
How Executive Clemency Works
When all other avenues to appeal a case have been pursued and have not yielded any fruit, applying for executive clemency might be an ideal option for a convicted offender who seeks post-conviction relief. When seeking executive clemency, the convicted person petitions the president for a federal violation or the governor for a state crime to request partial or full forgiveness of their criminal actions.
There are five kinds of clemency requests: restoration of civil rights, reprieves, sentence commutations, amnesty, and legal pardons.
- A commutation of a sentence does not grant the petitioner full forgiveness. Instead, it reduces the severity or length of their legal punishment. With commutations of sentences, the president or governor can also make an offender qualify for parole.
- A reprieve also does not cancel a convicted offender’s sentence. Instead, it postpones it. A reprieve is granted mainly in cases that involve capital punishment.
- Legal pardons grant the convicted person full forgiveness for the offenses they committed and the accompanying lawful punishment. But pardons, like reprieves and sentence commutations, do not delete the offender’s conviction but simply void or alter their sentence.
- Amnesty differs from the abovementioned clemency types in that it is a request to remove all legal records of the petitioner’s crime.
- Restoration of civil rights is another type of executive clemency that, if awarded, restores the civil rights the applicant lost when they were found guilty. These rights include, among others, the legal right to own or possess a gun, vote, hold government office, serve on a jury, et cetera.
How To Obtain Executive Clemency in California
To obtain executive clemency, you must apply for it, and to apply, you must:
- Inform the prosecutor of the state county (or counties if you seek clemency for multiple violations and were convicted in different counties) where you were prosecuted and convicted and sign an affidavit declaring you did so.
- Fill out and send a signed, notarized application of clemency to the governor’s office.
You can download both forms from the state governor’s website.
Notifying The D.A.
Before you apply for executive clemency, you must serve the D.A. with notice of intent to apply for executive clemency. You should send the notice to the district attorneys of all the counties where you were convicted. The notice form is provided alongside a downloadable executive clemency application form. You must use this form since it has a section for the district attorney to acknowledge receiving the notice.
You must send the notice to the D.A. before submitting your clemency application to the governor’s office. You must swear a notarized affidavit that the district attorney was informed of your intent to apply for clemency. You must submit the affidavit to the governor’s office and, with it, your executive clemency application. You must sign the affidavit in a notary’s presence.
You can find qualified notaries on the webpage of the Secretary of State. The district attorney will mail an acknowledgment of receipt of the notice to the Office of the Governor.
The governor must give the district attorney at least ten days’ notice before they can decide on your executive clemency application. One exception is when there is immediate danger of your death or your imprisonment term is within ten days of its expiration.
Even though it is unnecessary, it is recommended that you send the notice via a channel that provides evidence of receipt, for example, certified mail.
Once you have notified the prosecutor, they might submit a recommendation in writing to the state governor against or for executive clemency. The district attorney will additionally make reasonable attempts to inform the victim or victims of the violation or violations related to your application. The victim or victims and their families might also submit their recommendations to the state governor.
Applying for Clemency
Requesting executive clemency is a straightforward process. But you have to provide the following:
- The reason or reasons why you seek executive clemency.
- A listing of all of your convictions and circumstances.
- A statement on why you believe the governor should grant executive clemency.
- A statement of the reimbursement, if any, you paid to anyone for helping with obtaining executive clemency.
It is worth repeating that your application should be notarized. You should then send it via certified or regular mail to:
Governor’s Office
Attn: Legal Affairs
State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814
You can notarize the application simultaneously with your affidavit of notice to the district attorney.
Not that no fee applies when applying for executive clemency. You may have to pay attorney’s fees if you hire an attorney to help obtain executive clemency, but you will not pay any application fee. And if you paid attorney’s fees, you must disclose them during your application.
What Happens Once the State Governor Receives Your Application for Executive Clemency?
Once you have applied for executive mercy or leniency, the state governor is entitled not to agree to or even consider your request. But if they do, they will likely refer the request to the BPH (Board of Parole Hearings). The BPH’s role is to evaluate the circumstances surrounding the application and suggest the ideal course of action. It will conduct a comprehensive probe and present its recommendations to the state governor regarding whether they should grant the request. The recommendations often include a summary of the crime, usually prepared by the district attorney.
During the board’s investigations, it may interview witnesses and victims (sometimes with help from local law enforcement from the area where the crime occurred) and take testimony under oath. Additionally, it may review a brief statement regarding the facts surrounding your case. The statement is usually given by the criminal court that convicted you.
The governor could also give the clemency application to the police and other relevant agencies for recommendations and investigations. They may also request more information from you based on what the Board of Parole Hearings recommends and reports.
Remember, the governor does not need to ask for the Board of Parole’s review or the reviews of other agencies.
The Board of Parole Meeting
If the state governor asks for a review of your application, the Board of Parole will perform a comprehensive investigation. When it completes its investigation, it will present its case to the Executive Board during a public meeting. You will be told when the Executive Board will decide on your case. You will be allowed to submit more information, although you will not be allowed to be present at the meeting.
The public, for example, victims, their families, and the community, will be allowed to air their opinions for five minutes each. Once the meeting ends, the Board of Parole will present its investigation findings and recommendations to the state governor. It will also inform you about the meeting’s outcome.
Note that if you have two or several past convictions for felony offenses, the governor must have the support of a majority of the supreme court justices before extending clemency. Therefore, in this case, if the state governor is willing to grant clemency, they must refer your request to the Supreme Court. However, the governor does not have to solicit the court’s permission and might ignore or decline the petition.
If the governor sends your application to the Supreme Court, it is considered a court proceeding. For the judge to grant clemency, at least four justices must agree to your petition. The president of the Supreme Court will write to the governor regarding the court’s recommendations.
When Is Executive Clemency Granted and When Is It Denied?
No stipulated factors are required for granting clemency under California law. The California Constitution grants absolute powers to the governor to exercise this power. The only restriction is the need for the approval of a majority of the justices of the California Supreme Court where an applicant has more than one conviction for felony offenses.
The factors the governor will consider once they have received your application for executive clemency include:
- The reasons for asking for clemency.
- The type of criminal offense for which you were convicted—the governor cannot grant you executive mercy if your crime is a military offense, a violation under the criminal statutes of another country or state, or a violation of federal law. As mentioned, you will petition the president for executive clemency if you violated federal law.
- The seriousness of your criminal conviction; for example, was the victim injured?
- The sentence imposed.
- Your age when you committed the violation and at the time of applying for executive clemency.
- The number of years of your sentence you have served.
- Your rehabilitation record.
- Any gang memberships.
- The fairness of the conviction.
- Your behavior while in prison or jail.
- The education you acquired while in incarceration, including teaching a class or being a tutor for others.
- The impact that granting executive clemency will have on the community or victim. That is, whether you pose any danger to the victim or community.
- A show of remorse for your crime.
- Public opinion about your crime.
- Evidence of victim restitution or efforts to right the wrongs.
- The D.A.’s and victim’s opinions regarding changing, shortening, or ending the sentence, which often includes an assessment of community safety if you are released.
- Whether you were subject to intimate partner violence.
- Whether you will have a place to live and a job if you are released.
- Any other elements that may be relevant, like criminal history or the likelihood of reoffending.
How Intimate Partner Violence Affects a Clemency Application
California law permits the Board of Parole to look at whether a convicted offender faced intimate partner violence and its impacts, which are described as evidence of the effects and nature of mental, emotional, or physical abuse against the behavior, perceptions, or beliefs of intimate partner violence victims if it seems that the criminal conduct was the consequence of the victimization.
For executive clemency purposes, an intimate or romantic partner refers to a former or current spouse, fiance, fiancee, cohabitant, domestic partner, girlfriend, boyfriend, or the father or mother of the convicted offender’s child.
Reasons you may be deemed subject to intimate violence include, among others, that you were a victim of an offense under these state domestic violence statutes:
- 273.5 PC, corporal injury to a cohabitant or spouse, or
- 243e1 PC, domestic battery.
Obtaining Clemency Is Not Easy
Executive clemency is rarely awarded. It is often granted in cases where there are actual doubts regarding the offender’s guilt, for humanitarian reasons like the illness of an aged inmate, an apparent excessive sentence, to clear the criminal record of somebody who has proved public service or rehabilitation, or because the offense is the governor’s or president’s personal or political friend.
Some forms of clemency, like sentence commutation, are granted only when it is evident that even though the offender was criminally liable for an offense, the imposed punishment was too severe, generally due to:
- Evidence of romantic or intimate partner abuse, such as battering.
- The offender’s young age during the commission of the crime.
- Statutes that were highly strict during sentence.
What Happens Next After Your Application Is Granted?
Since it is unnecessary that the governor even looks into an executive clemency application, stating how long it will take to grant clemency is impossible.
But after the governor grants your application, the parole board or prison, whichever is applicable, starts executing the new sentencing terms. The disposition and application are filed in the secretary of state’s office and then reported to the legislature before becoming public records. Particular details, for example, the contact address, are edited before publicizing the information.
The Office of the Governor will inform the Department of Justice (DOJ) that you have been granted executive clemency. The DOJ then notifies the FBI. These agencies then update their databases to reflect that you have been granted executive clemency for your conviction.
How a Lawyer Can Help You Obtain Clemency
If you are applying for executive clemency, you want to do so with a lawyer in your corner. There are several ways in which an experienced lawyer can assist you with your application. The following are only some of them:
- Conducting a preliminary background check on you. Conducting a preliminary background check can be challenging if you are not in contact with an attorney. Having a lawyer do a preliminary background check means you will know what to expect before applying for clemency.
- Having a lawyer search for your convictions in counties and the date they occurred—committing an error regarding this information may lead to the governor not considering your application. Lawyers understand how to conduct legal research and where to find the necessary details.
- Help complete your clemency petition. When you retain a lawyer, they can complete a clemency application on your behalf. For example, they can send out questionnaires to some clients to help them collect information, which they use to complete the application for you. Questionnaires may include questions regarding pending charges, incarceration, victims, and demographic details about yourself that can help complete the questions and categories on the application form. The questionnaire provides a straightforward way of answering questions about yourself and enables you to fill out the complicated application.
- With a lawyer representing you, you will have somebody in your corner who can communicate with victims, state lawyers, and the parole board on your behalf. You will not need to worry about understanding the legal process or talking to people.
- A lawyer will help you with any relevant proceedings. With a lawyer by your side, you can assure yourself that you have the best chance of being granted executive clemency. Clemency lawyers understand the system and process more comprehensively than anything or anyone else and will make you feel at ease when navigating these two aspects.
Find a Post-Conviction Relief Lawyer Near Me Experienced In Executive Clemency Matters
When you apply for executive clemency, your initial request may be your only opportunity. If the application is denied, you may have no legal right to file an appeal, and there may be no legal remedy once the denial happens because executive clemency is not a constitutional right but an act of mercy. We at Leah Legal can assist you in preparing and collecting all the documents and evidence necessary to develop a compelling case for executive clemency during your application.
Remember that, in the end; executive clemency is an act of compassion by the California governor and not a legal right to which you are entitled. Make your request stand out from others by hiring a reputable, skilled, and knowledgeable lawyer to assist you in seeking that second chance. If you are applying for executive clemency in Van Nuys, call us at 818-484-1100 for a complimentary consultation and evaluation of your eligibility to do so.
Stealing from a locked vehicle is prohibited under California law and is considered an offense known as “auto burglary.” If you have been charged with California auto burglary, there are several important things you should know about the statutes under PC 459. The first and most crucial step in defending yourself and protecting your rights, just like in any criminal case, is to seek the assistance of a professional criminal defense attorney. This blog delves deeper into the legal consequences of auto burglary.
An Overview of Auto Burglary
California auto burglary is considered a subcategory within the general offense of burglary. It falls under the provisions of PC 459 and involves both breaking into automobiles (auto burglary) and breaking into structures or vehicles to commit felony crimes other than stealing.
Auto burglary can be described as forced entry into a vehicle that is locked to steal the vehicle (also referred to as “grand theft auto”), stealing property from the automobile (petty theft/grand theft), or committing any felony crime while inside the automobile.
The following are the defining factors, or main elements, of the offense that need to be proven to be true to secure a conviction for auto burglary:
You Entered the Locked Vehicle
The provisions of California PC 459 specify that the vehicle’s doors or trunk should be locked. This means that to be found guilty of the allegations of auto burglary, you need to make some kind of alteration to the vehicle’s physical condition, such as breaking into it.
Therefore, whether or not the automobile’s door was locked is a key factor in an auto burglary case. If the car’s trunk was locked and you are accused of stealing something from it, that also serves as a locked vehicle. According to California’s law regarding auto burglary, the following are some examples of activities that can be considered “breaking into a locked vehicle”:
- Shattering a locked vehicle’s window to gain access to it.
- Gaining access to a vehicle without the permission of the owner by reaching through the open window and unlocking the door.
- Using a crowbar to get into a locked trunk.
“Entering” the Vehicle
The term “enter” refers to the action of a person’s body accessing a motor vehicle. It is also considered entering an automobile if an object under your control enters the vehicle. This constitutes an entry by you.
In other words, auto burglary can be committed by simply reaching through the window or by placing an object into an automobile without opening the door and getting one’s complete body inside.
You Intended to Perpetrate Petty Theft or a Felony Offense
You would be considered to have “entered” an automobile if any object under your control or a part of your body enters the automobile. The intention to engage in theft or a felony crime while inside the car is an essential component of California auto burglary.
If you illegally gained access to an automobile with no intention of perpetrating a felony or petty theft, you could face charges for a different offense instead of auto burglary. Auto burglary can also be defined as having the intent to carry out petty theft, a California misdemeanor offense, in addition to a felony. Petty theft can be defined as illegally taking anything from its rightful owner that is worth less than $950.
If you entered another individual’s locked automobile with no intention of stealing anything or perpetrating a California felony, you won’t be convicted of auto burglary. However, you are not required to have committed theft or a felony crime to be charged with auto burglary. All that counts is that you got into the vehicle intending to commit theft or a felony.
Definitions of Key Terms Used
To successfully defend yourself in court, you should be familiar with the phrases used in an auto burglary crime’s elements. These terms are explained below:
Vehicle
The provisions of California VC 670 define a vehicle as any device through which an individual or property can be moved, drawn, or propelled upon a roadway, except when the device is moved solely by human power or runs solely on stationary tracks or rails.
Cars, motorcycles, trucks, electric vehicles, and other equipment that fall under this classification count as vehicles under California law. Train cars, bicycles, skateboards, scooters, and other non-motorized objects that aren’t allowed on the highway don’t qualify as vehicles.
Locked
California law considers a vehicle to be locked if there’s proof that it has been accessed with force. As a result, for an action to be classified as auto burglary, there has to be proof of forceful entry.
Grand Theft
Grand theft (or grand larceny) occurs under PEN 487 if the labor, money, or personal or real property stolen is worth more than $950. Grand theft can also be committed if the property in question is a vehicle. If you forcefully access an automobile intending to steal it, you could face grand theft charges along with auto burglary.
Petty Theft
Petty theft (or petty larceny) is defined under PEN 490 as where the value of the labor, money, real property, or personal property stolen doesn’t exceed $950. If you forcefully gain access to an automobile to steal a wallet containing no more than $950, you could face petty larceny charges along with auto burglary.
Legal Penalties for California Auto Burglary
California auto burglary is classified as a “second-degree” crime, which means it’s a less serious type of burglary. Second-degree burglary is considered a “wobbler” offense, which means that the charges can be classified as either a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on the details of the case and your prior criminal record.
If you’re found guilty of a misdemeanor auto burglary, you could be sentenced to a maximum of one year in jail. On the other hand, if you’re found guilty of felony auto burglary, you could spend 16 months, two years, or three years in prison.
However, there is an exception to the norm that California auto burglary is considered a second-degree offense. If you forcefully entered an inhabited “trailer coach” intending to carry out theft or a felony crime, you could have perpetrated first-degree burglary.
Breaking into an occupied trailer coach is a serious crime. The sentence could include serving two, four, or six years in prison.
How to Defend Yourself Against the Charges
When it comes to your legal defense, rest assured that your attorney can present various compelling arguments based on the specific details of your case. With their expertise, they will be able to effectively challenge any accusations on your behalf. Some of these defenses include:
The Automobile Was Not Locked
Being able to prove that the vehicle’s doors or trunk were not locked is one of the most effective strategies to fight an auto burglary allegation. This argument is crucial since the trunk or doors of the automobile should be locked for an auto burglary offense to occur.
For instance, if you “pop” a closed trunk to access an unlocked car door and pull the latch, you won’t be convicted of auto burglary. The determination of whether or not the vehicle was locked, as well as the proof required to establish it was or was not, can be quite sophisticated. It is worth emphasizing that an auto burglary arrest doesn’t always end in a conviction.
Threats or Duress
If you committed auto burglary under duress because someone endangered your life or the lives of those you care about, you might not be convicted of the crime. You would have a valid defense if someone held a pistol to your head and told you to shatter a car window and steal stuff inside.
You Had No Intention Of Committing A Felony
The prosecutor should be able to demonstrate that you had the intention to perpetrate a felony or theft once inside the automobile. Your lawyer might be able to demonstrate that you had no intention of committing an offense once inside the automobile, and you could be able to get your auto burglary allegations dropped or reduced.
Insufficient Evidence
The legal argument of insufficient proof is linked to the other legal arguments discussed above. According to California statute, a jury shouldn’t find you guilty of the crime unless the prosecution can prove beyond any reasonable doubt that your acts conformed to the definition of auto burglary.
Assume there’s some circumstantial proof indicating your intention to take something inside the vehicle when you break into it, but no proof confirming that fact beyond any reasonable doubt. In this case, a defense lawyer may be able to assist you in arguing that the proof is insufficient to sustain a conviction.
False Identification
Your attorney could be able to show that you were mistakenly identified as the perpetrator of the crime. It is not unusual for a witness to misidentify someone, especially at night. If you were not involved in the act and were mistakenly identified as the offender, you would not be found guilty of auto burglary.
Crime Associated with Auto Burglary
Auto burglary is a serious offense that encompasses a range of criminal activities. These crimes, which involve breaking into vehicles to steal or vandalize, are a growing concern for both vehicle owners and law enforcement. The following are some of the offenses related to auto burglary:
Burglary
California auto burglary is classified as a subcategory of California burglary statutes. Both auto burglary and regular burglary are defined by the same law, PEN 459.
Burglary is described as entering any structure or habitation (including apartments, houses, stores, tents, boats, and outbuildings) to steal or commit another offense.
In general, burglary qualifies as first-degree if the property accessed is inhabited, that is, someone lives there. If this isn’t the case (as it applies to most auto burglary cases), then it’s considered second-degree burglary.
First-degree burglary is considered a felony, punishable by two, four, or six years in prison. A second-degree burglary crime is a wobbler. If convicted as a misdemeanor, the penalty is no more than twelve months in jail.
Second-degree burglary, as a felony crime, can result in the following penalties:
- Probation time with no more than one year behind bars.
- Sixteen months, two or three years behind bars.
If you carry out burglary and use explosives or a torch to unlock a vault, safe, or other secure facility inside the structure, you would have violated the provisions of PEN 464 burglary of a vault or safe also referred to as burglary using explosives. This is always a crime that can result in three, five, or seven years in jail.
Grand Theft Auto
California’s “grand theft auto” law makes it illegal to take another individual’s vehicle without obtaining the owner’s permission. The main motivation for someone breaking into a vehicle is to steal it. As a result, it’s not unexpected that grand theft auto is frequently charged alongside auto burglary. You can be accused of auto burglary by forcefully entering into a vehicle and stealing it, and later committing grand theft auto.
Grand theft auto is considered a wobbler crime. If the prosecution believes you planned to keep the vehicle permanently, you are more likely to face felony charges. You are more likely to face misdemeanor charges if the allegations suggest you were only temporarily using the car also known as joyriding.
Petty Theft/Grand Theft
Grand theft or petty theft is another offense that is often charged alongside auto burglary. Grand theft is defined under PC 487 as the act of stealing another person’s property if it is either:
- More than or equal to $950.
- Taken straight from the owner’s custody.
- The item falls under several specified categories, such as firearms or automobiles.
California law considers grand theft a wobbler crime, which means the prosecution can file for misdemeanor or felony charges.
Any other type of theft is classified as petty theft, which is a misdemeanor. You will likely face charges for auto burglary as well as either petty theft or grand theft, based on the nature and value of the item that was taken, if the allegation is that you broke into another individual’s vehicle to steal personal belongings that were in the vehicle, like a wallet or purse, a computer, laptop, computer, cell phone, or stereo equipment.
Take note that breaking into a vehicle is more serious compared to committing petty theft. A petty theft charge that includes an allegation of auto burglary is likely to become a felony offense.
Therefore, if you find yourself in such a situation, it’s essential to hire a lawyer who has specific experience defending clients against auto burglary charges. Your attorney can assist you in having the charges lowered or completely withdrawn.
Tampering With the Vehicle
Vehicle tampering, under VC 10852, is an offense that can be committed when the following events take place:
- Intentionally tampering with or destroying an automobile or its parts.
- Removing or breaking any component of a motor vehicle without the permission of the owner.
Tampering with a vehicle is considered a misdemeanor crime. The fact that tampering with an automobile is a less serious offense than breaking into a car makes it a helpful charge reduction option.
For instance, if the prosecutor can demonstrate that you forcefully entered an automobile but has very little tangible proof to show that you meant to engage in the theft or a felony crime while you were inside the automobile, they will have a hard time proving their case. Your lawyer can negotiate a plea deal that reduces the charges against you from auto burglary to tampering with the vehicle.
Looting
If you’re detained for auto burglary when a state of emergency is in effect, you could also face charges for looting. Looting is classified as a violation of PC 459 under California PC 463, and it can occur during a riot, flood, earthquake, or any other man-made or natural disaster. As a result of the facts surrounding the case, looting is considered to be a more serious crime than burglary. If you’re found guilty of looting, the court can sentence you to no more than three years behind bars.
What Defines A “Locked” Vehicle In Terms Of Auto Burglary?
An automobile is considered locked when its components interconnect or interlace in a way that requires some force to break the seal before the vehicle can be accessed. For instance, if chains are wrapped around the unsecured doors of a trailer coach without using a padlock, the trailer coach is not considered to be locked. This is because it is still possible to enter the vehicle without applying force.
Find a Burglary Defense Lawyer Near Me
Being accused of breaking into a vehicle can be a stressful experience. If you’re accused of auto burglary, you can contact one of the experienced Van Nuys attorneys at Leah Legal in Van Nuys. Our team has successfully defended clients accused of auto burglary crimes. If you or a loved one is facing such allegations, it is crucial to contact a knowledgeable member of our legal team without delay. Call us now at 818-484-1100.
We usually associate extortion crimes with high-profile victims like prominent and wealthy individuals or public figures. However, this crime does not target any particular group of people. In California, extortion happens when someone uses illegal threats or physical force to coerce another person into giving up something they own or into doing something else. If you are convicted of extortion, you could face lengthy jail time among other penalties. Read on to learn more.
The Definition of Extortion
Both California state law and federal law criminalize threatening or extorting a public official to coerce them into giving up an item of value or to exert influence over them. People who are accused of these crimes should understand the allegations against them and the potential consequences of a conviction.
Extortion in California
Extortion is illegal in California when someone engages in one or more of the following acts:
- Utilizes force or makes threats of using force to persuade someone to hand over property or money.
- As a public servant carrying out their duty on behalf of the general public to persuade someone else to give them property or money.
- Forces or threatens to utilize force to coerce a public official into carrying out a certain duty.
The threatened individual must also feel obliged to comply with the suggested action. The offender must intend to coerce the alleged victim into giving the offender money, anything valuable, or the agreement to perform a particular act. Additionally, the accused must also issue threats against either of the following:
- Threaten to wrongfully harm or injure the victim, another person, or the alleged victim’s property.
- Accuse them, or a member of their family, of committing a crime.
- Reveal a secret or create a controversy for them or a member of their family.
Every one of these components has a unique language with particular legal significance.
Threaten
California law does not require that the defendant cause the victim harm. Simply threatening to hurt them is sufficient. Threats of any kind, no matter how subdued, could be considered extortion.
Injury
The injury threatened or caused has to be unlawful, which means that the accused must lack the legal capacity to take any action.
Secret
California law provides a detailed definition of a secret. It’s something that the general public doesn’t know about, but it could cause damage to the plaintiff’s reputation. This secret needs to be the kind that would motivate someone to forgo money or other valuables or take formal action to keep it a secret.
An Official Act
Official acts are those that public officials commit while acting within the bounds of their position. Extortion could be committed, for instance, when a person tries to sway a congressperson’s vote.
A Performed Act
According to California law, a conviction for extortion requires the commission of the coerced act. The victim has to actually make the payment or carry out the action, rather than just promising to do so.
What Distinguishes Blackmail from Extortion?
Extortion and blackmail are both considered similar crimes under state law, although blackmail is more commonly known to the public. That is not to imply that extortion and blackmail are identical. As previously said, extortion entails using fear, coercion, or force, to persuade someone to offer you money, a property, or to perform a task for you.
In contrast, blackmail entails forcing someone to perform an action or offer something in return for you to maintain a secret. It is important to note that while blackmail is a kind of extortion, not every kind of extortion is deemed to be blackmail.
For instance, if you threatened to expose someone’s images demonstrating that they’re having an extramarital affair, that would be considered blackmail, however threatening to harm that person wouldn’t be considered blackmail, even though both of these actions fall under section 518 of the Penal Code.
Examples of Extortion
Extortion can take many forms, and all of them are punishable under the law. Some examples entail threatening to:
- Destroy a treasured Picasso painting when somebody refuses to surrender their precious stones.
- Expose evidence of a prosecuting attorney’s affair if she presses charges against you.
- Publish someone’s nude images when they don’t agree to have sexual intercourse with you, this is called sextortion.
- Accuse your ex-partner of rape when they fail to lend you their vehicle.
- Provide the police with proof that a suspect was involved in a criminal act when they do not hand over the title to their home.
- Taking someone’s child and giving threats to harm them more when they don’t pay their ransom (Take note that these instances can also involve other accusations including wrongful imprisonment, aggravated mayhem, kidnapping, aggravated battery, and torture).
- Get someone arrested using a fake warrant if they fail to pay you the money they owe.
The Penalties for Extortion in California
Punishments for extortion vary according to the specific charges brought against the perpetrator.
Felony Extortion
In California, extortion is often prosecuted as a felony offense. Extortion is a felony that carries a fine of $10,000 and a maximum prison sentence of 2, 3, or 4 years.
Misdemeanor Extortion
Extortion could also be charged as a misdemeanor if the accused creates fake documentation to suggest it’s a court order or is created to convince the alleged victim that it is real and that the offender intends to obtain property or a valuable item using that document. If found guilty, the offender faces a $10,000 fine and a maximum jail sentence of six months.
Attempted Extortion
When extortion is attempted but not carried out in its entirety, the perpetrator might be charged with attempted extortion. It could happen when the victim defied the coercion and did not comply.
It is possible to receive a felony or misdemeanor charge for an attempted extortion. If you are found guilty of committing a misdemeanor, you might face up to a year in jail and a monetary penalty of no less than $1,000.
The alternative sentencing for the offender is summary probation. For a felony attempted extortion, the potential sentences include felony probation, a maximum fine of $10,000, and 16 months, 2 years, or 3 years in jail.
Federal Extortion
Federal authorities can also file extortion charges. These accusations have a greater likelihood to be made when extortion or threats were made utilizing a method of interstate trade, for example using mail, email, phone, text message, or another wireless or wireless connection. Several types of extortion are also explicitly forbidden by federal law:
- Threats made against the head of state and his or her successors.
- Blackmail.
- Extortion by United States officials or personnel.
- Interstate communications.
- Bribes from public sector personnel.
- Sending threatening letters from a foreign country.
- Extortion and threats directed at foreign dignitaries, guests, or people under international protection.
- Sending threatening letters by mail.
- Obtaining extortionate proceeds.
- Threats made against former heads of state and other individuals.
Penalties for Attempted Extortion in California
In California, the majority of attempted crimes result in a punishment equal to half of the actual crime’s term. Extortion attempts are an unusual exception, and in cases where they are unsuccessful, charges are brought under Penal Code Section 524.
This offense is a wobbler, which means it has two possible classifications: misdemeanor or felony. The maximum punishment for a misdemeanor charge is a year in prison and a fine of one thousand dollars. The maximum punishment for a felony offense is 3 years behind bars and a fine of ten thousand dollars.
The court may decide to increase your prison term by a further period of imprisonment if the following conditions are met:
- The plaintiff or victim was mentally ill or incapacitated.
- A gang benefited from the extortion.
- The victim or accuser was a senior citizen.
Under Penal Code section 622, also known as the “Three Strikes Law,” a person could receive a strike when convicted of extortion to benefit a gang. If you’ve already been convicted of a felony, you risk spending at least 25 years in prison.
A conviction for extortion may result in felony probation rather than incarceration if you don’t have an extensive criminal history. During your probationary period, you will be subject to some restrictions and regulations that the court will order you to obey, including:
- Regularly meet with your probation officer assigned by the court.
- Participate in community service.
- Provide the victim with restitution.
- Promise not to break any laws.
Throughout your probation, your probation officer chosen by the court will keep an eye on you to make sure you’re following the rules. If you break any of the aforementioned rules, the officer could inform the judge, who will then determine whether to end, modify, or restore your probation under similar conditions.
When the court chooses to end the probationary period, you will spend the maximum amount of time granted under Penal Code 518 behind bars. As a result, if you have any questions about what you’re supposed to do or not while on felony probation, it’s crucial to ask your lawyer for clarification.
It is important to note that a charge of extortion by threatening letter, which is brought under section 523 of the Penal Code, is deemed complete regardless of whether the victim pays or conducts a service. That’s because this crime makes it illegal to write a letter of intimidation for the sake of extortion.
Defenses Against Extortion Charges
If you’ve been charged with extortion, you have the right to dispute the charges, as with other crimes. To reduce the potential punishment you face, negotiating a plea deal is occasionally the most sensible course of action. In some situations, you might want to enter a not-guilty plea.
A knowledgeable lawyer can review the exact extortion statute you are suspected of breaking, the proof presented against you, along other pertinent data to figure out the best line of action for your case.
There are situations in which the person who is being charged with committing the offense is, in fact, the victim. For instance, a man going through a contentious divorce with his spouse could say that she was threatening to accuse him of domestic abuse if he refused to allow her custody of their children, yet in actuality, he lied so she could lose custody. It is common practice to use false accusations as a defense against extortion allegations.
If you’ve been charged with successfully blackmailing another person and they haven’t paid up, you can use that as evidence that the extortion attempts were futile. Even if you are found guilty, the charges against you may be reduced from a felony to a misdemeanor if you can successfully use this argument.
This argument will not be effective if the threats were communicated to the victim via a letter since it is against the law to write and send threats, regardless of whether the recipient pays.
The lack of sufficient proof is another typical defense to criminal accusations. It could be challenging for the prosecutor to win the case when the only proof of your guilt is the statement of the individual you allegedly tried to blackmail. This is especially true if you do not have a previous record of other individuals making similar accusations against you.
Your blackmail defense lawyer can assist you in avoiding being victimized by police who could falsely claim that they possess more proof than they have to coerce you into confessing.
Having proof that no threats were made is another effective defense. According to PC Section 518, you will not be guilty if you just let someone know that you plan to tell others about their affair without requesting that they take any action to stop you.
To the same extent, threatening to sue someone who fails to pay your debt isn’t considered extortion but rather the exercise of your rights under the law. In a similar vein, if you’ve got a friend who has a track record of breaking into residences, you are not committing a crime when you simply threaten to report them to the authorities if they breach the law again.
However, extortion happens if you threaten to call the authorities on someone you know if he or she does not steal anything for you the next time they break into someone’s house.
Frequently Asked Questions On Extortion
People in general who are being held in prison by the law or who are the subject of an inquiry into an extortion allegation frequently have some questions to better understand their situation and what to anticipate as the case develops. The following are just a few of the often-asked questions about extortion:
Can I Be Deported After Being Convicted Of Extortion?
Extortion “counts” as a crime of moral turpitude, therefore a conviction could result in serious immigration repercussions, including deportation. Extortion is considered a crime of moral turpitude since it involves dishonest, vile, or depraved conduct that would startle a decent and moral person.
My Classmate Threatened to Bring Up My Shoplifting Incident To The Authorities If I Failed to Steal Something For Him. Could He Be Found Guilty Under Penal Code 518?
Even while your classmate should disclose any criminal conduct to the relevant officials, coercing you to do something illegal to get stuff could be considered extortion under Penal Code 518. You could still be prosecuted and found guilty of the claimed shoplifting crime under Penal Code 459.5 once he reports the matter to the authorities.
How to Respond If You Are Being Investigated for Alleged Extortion
What you do after learning that you are being investigated as a possible extortion perpetrator is crucial to the result of the matter. Following these guidelines will help you avoid more legal trouble:
Remain Silent
It is best to keep quiet during police interrogation, even when you know the claims against you are false. If a law enforcement official has the intention of obtaining potentially damning details about you, they may pretend to act nice toward you.
Therefore, it would be wise to keep quiet throughout the investigation until the officer specifically asks for your name and address.
Pay Attention to What the Police Officer Does to You
The way an officer treats you while conducting an inquiry could violate your legal rights. You should inform your lawyer if the police make an attempt or employ force to get you to provide information because such behavior is forbidden. The prosecutor can decide to dismiss the alleged accusations if the officer engaged in unlawful conduct while the case was being investigated.
Consult a Criminal Defense Attorney
among the most beneficial actions you can do if you are being investigated or arrested for extortion would be to retain legal counsel. Your defense lawyer will serve as your legal advisor and advocate within the complex and intricate procedure, which is unquestionably not meant to favor you.
Find a Skilled Extortion Attorney Near Me
If you are being accused of extortion, you shouldn’t take chances with your legal counsel. Blackmail is a serious crime that entails jail time and other serious repercussions that may make it difficult for you to get employment in the future.
The attorneys at Leah Legal in Van Nuys recognize that this is likely an incredibly challenging moment for you and your loved ones. Our attorneys are well-versed in the process of law and are available to help you get a favorable outcome for your case. Call us today at 818-484-1100 to get started on your defense.
Older individuals, often deemed vulnerable, are subject to abuse, especially in nursing homes. Prosecutors aggressively pursue any mistreatment inflicted upon the elderly due to their susceptibility to various forms of abuse, like physical harm, emotional distress, financial exploitation, or neglect.
The objective is to hold wrongdoers accountable, deter potential perpetrators, and protect older adults. Reporting mechanisms and investigative services are also established to support and safeguard vulnerable elderly individuals.
An allegation of abuse, especially when the victims are seniors, is grave. The potential penalties imposed are equally consequential.
What is the Legal Position on Nursing Home Abuse?
Seniors are individuals aged 65 years and older. The California Welfare and Institutions Code, particularly within Chapter 11 of the Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act, is designed to protect this age group against abuse and exploitation.
Per the law, seniors are dependent adults. Dependent adults are individuals aged 18 to 64 residing in California. They have physical or mental limitations that hinder their ability to perform regular activities or safeguard their rights. This definition includes those with physical or developmental disabilities and those whose abilities have diminished due to age.
Moreover, a dependent adult also covers individuals aged 18 to 64 admitted as inpatients to 24-hour health facilities, as defined in specific sections of the Health and Safety Code.
Nursing home abuse occurs when a victim aged 65 or older experiences one or more of the following forms of mistreatment in a nursing home or assisted living facility:
Physical Abuse
Physical abuse involves the deliberate use of force to cause bodily harm or pain to another person. In the context of elder abuse or nursing home abuse, it refers to intentional acts that harm or cause suffering to an elderly or dependent adult. This includes:
- Deliberately causing unjustifiable pain or suffering to an elderly resident.
- Unlawfully restraining them or false imprisonment.
- Improperly administering medications or engaging in sexual abuse.
Neglect
In nursing homes, neglect occurs when caregivers or responsible individuals do not meet the fundamental needs of elderly residents. These needs include food, water, hygiene, shelter, medical care, and protection from harm. Neglect can result in:
- Physical and emotional harm.
- Malnutrition.
- Injuries, and
- A decline in the overall health and quality of life for the victim of the neglect.
Emotional Abuse
Emotional abuse pertains to actions or behaviors that inflict emotional distress, pain, or suffering on an elderly or dependent adult. This mistreatment could involve verbal threats, isolation, insults, humiliation, intimidation, or any conduct that undermines the individual’s emotional well-being and self-esteem.
Emotional abuse can have severe and enduring impacts on the victim, affecting their mental health, self-esteem, and overall quality of life.
Financial Abuse
Financial abuse occurs when an elderly resident’s money or property is mismanaged. This occurs in violation of laws related to theft, embezzlement, or other financial misconduct. It is deemed to have occurred when a person or entity does any of the following:
- Takes, hides, acquires, misappropriates, or keeps personal or real property of an elder or dependent adult for wrongful use or with the intent to defraud, or both.
- Aids in taking, hiding, acquiring, misappropriating, or keeping personal or real property of an elder or dependent adult for wrongful use or with the intent to defraud, or both.
- Takes, hides, acquires, misappropriates, or keeps, or aids in taking, hiding, acquiring, misappropriating, or keeping personal or real property of an elder or dependent adult through undue influence, as defined in Section 15610.70
Investigations of Nursing Home Abuse
Nursing homes in California are subject to oversight and investigations conducted by several agencies and entities to ensure compliance with state regulations and the well-being of residents. These key organizations include:
- Local Ombudsman
Long-Term Care Ombudsman Programs advocate for residents’ rights and well-being, addressing complaints related to care quality and living conditions within nursing homes.
The California Department of Aging operates the Ombudsman program. When the Ombudsman receives a complaint about nursing home elder abuse, an investigation is initiated. During this investigation, the local Ombudsman will communicate with several parties, including:
- The resident who is the alleged victim — The Ombudsman will engage with the elderly resident who is the alleged victim to gather information and address their concerns.
- The nursing home’s staff — Interviews with the nursing home’s staff members could be conducted to obtain their perspectives and insights into the situation.
- The nursing home’s administration — Discussions with the nursing home’s administration can provide further context and information related to the complaint.
Additionally, the Ombudsman typically conducts an on-site investigation by visiting the nursing home. This allows them to assess the conditions, speak directly with residents and staff, and gather evidence to determine the validity of the complaint.
When the Ombudsman identifies a legitimate complaint concerning nursing home elder abuse, they will forward the case to the California Department of Public Health.
Note: Mandated reporters, those individuals with a legal obligation to report known or suspected child or elder abuse, are responsible for notifying the appropriate authorities. This obligation extends to staff and administrators in nursing homes, who are recognized as mandated reporters. Their reporting duties include two vital steps:
- Reporting to the local ombudsman’s office — Mandated reporters often find it necessary to report elder abuse cases to the Ombudsman’s office.
- Reporting to a local law enforcement agency — In addition, mandated reporters are usually obligated to report known or suspected elder abuse cases to their local law enforcement agency. This step assumes utmost importance when elder abuse scenarios could involve criminal activities or pose immediate threats to the affected elderly individuals.
- California Department of Public Health (CDPH)
Responsible for licensing and regulating healthcare facilities, CDPH conducts routine inspections and investigations to ensure facilities adhere to state laws and regulations.
Upon receiving cases from the Ombudsman, the California Department of Public Health commences its investigation and could take the following actions:
- Pursue civil penalties — CDPH could seek civil penalties against the nursing home or the implicated nursing home employee as part of its efforts to address regulatory non-compliance and ensure resident safety.
- Refer the case for criminal investigation — In more grave cases or those involving potential violations, CDPH will refer the case to the local district attorney’s office or the California Attorney General’s Bureau of Medi-Cal Fraud and Elder Abuse for a criminal investigation. This step is aimed at addressing instances of nursing home abuse that may necessitate legal action and prosecution.
- California Attorney General’s Office
The AG’s office is tasked with investigating cases of abuse, neglect, and fraud in healthcare facilities. They could then take legal action against those involved in wrongdoing, depending on their findings. The AG’s office, in its preparation for the abuse case, will involve other departments, namely:
- California Department of Aging — Overseeing aging-related programs and services, including Adult Protective Services (APS), this department investigates allegations of abuse and neglect among dependent adults and seniors.
- Medicare and Medicaid Programs — Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) at the federal level conduct regular inspections and quality assessments of nursing homes participating in Medicare and Medicaid. They provide information on care quality through the Nursing Home Compare website.
- Local law enforcement agencies — Local law enforcement also plays a role in investigating criminal cases of abuse or neglect in nursing homes, including physical and sexual abuse or financial exploitation.
Penalties You Will Likely Face if Found Guilty of Elder Abuse
Penalties for nursing home abuse vary based on the unique circumstances of each case. The severity of the abuse, the resulting harm to the elderly resident, and the presence of criminal elements all factor into determining the appropriate penalties.
- If the Case Involved a Risk of Death or Great Bodily Injury
When nursing home abuse involving circumstances likely to cause great bodily harm or death occurs, it is considered a “wobbler” offense. This means the prosecutor can file charges for this crime as either a misdemeanor or a felony.
The decision on how to file nursing home abuse charges is based on several factors, including:
- The facts of the case.
- Your criminal history.
If nursing home abuse in these conditions is charged as a misdemeanor, the potential penalties include:
- Summary or misdemeanor probation instead of a jail sentence.
- Jail sentence of up to one year in jail.
- A maximum fine of $6,000.
For felony nursing home abuse in these circumstances, the potential penalties are:
- Formal or felony probation instead of a prison sentence.
- 2, 3, or 4 years in prison.
- A maximum fine of $10,000.
If the victim of felony nursing home abuse suffers great bodily injury, you will also face an additional term in prison:
- Three years if the victim is under 70 years old.
- Five years if the victim is 70 or older.
If the victim dies as a result of the abuse, you will face an additional prison term of:
- Five years if the victim was under 70.
- Seven years if they were 70 or older.
- If There Was No Risk of Death or Great Bodily Injury
Cases of elder abuse involving physical, emotional, or neglect, when they are not likely to result in great bodily injury or death, are categorized as misdemeanors.
The penalties associated with these misdemeanor offenses are as follows:
For a first offense:
- A potential sentence of up to six (6) months in jail.
- A fine of up to $1,000 or both.
For second and subsequent offenses:
- A potential sentence of up to one year in county jail.
- A maximum fine of $2,000 or both.
- Financial Abuse of a Senior
Financial elder abuse committed by caretakers in a nursing home is categorized as a misdemeanor. These crimes occur when the value of the money or property taken is no more than $950. The potential penalties for this misdemeanor are:
- Up to one year in jail.
- A maximum fine of $1,000 or both.
However, when the value of the money or property taken in nursing home elder fraud exceeds $950, it becomes a “wobbler” offense. In these cases, the felony penalties for this more serious offense include:
- Two, three, or four years in jail.
- A fine of up to $10,000 or both.
Defenses Applicable in Nursing Home Abuse Cases
Facing nursing home abuse charges is serious. Having a proficient criminal defense attorney is vital to building a robust defense and attaining the most favorable result. Attorneys can employ various defenses, including:
- False Accusations
Misconceptions about the emotional well-being of seniors in nursing homes are not uncommon. It is often assumed that unhappiness or dissatisfaction in an elderly individual signifies abuse. However, this assumption can be misleading.
Seniors, like individuals of any age, can experience unhappiness for various reasons unrelated to abuse. These assumptions can potentially lead to false accusations, which can have grave consequences for both the accused and the elderly individual in question.
The vulnerabilities associated with aging, like changes in bone density and muscle mass, make seniors more susceptible to physical issues like bruising, falls, and fractures. Additionally, cognitive conditions like dementia can affect their ability to distinguish reality from fiction. This can lead to situations where their emotional state is misunderstood, underscoring the need for careful assessments.
Accusations of elder abuse in nursing homes can be intricate. Colleagues and staff could also make accusations for reasons like diverting attention from their misconduct or addressing workplace conflicts. This complexity emphasizes the importance of impartial and comprehensive investigations to validate such claims.
- Mistaken Identity
Undoubtedly, nursing home elder abuse is a harsh reality, and determining the culprits behind these acts can be a complex challenge.
An added layer of complexity in these cases arises from the widespread issue of memory loss among seniors, particularly those in nursing homes. It is not uncommon for individuals grappling with conditions like dementia to misidentify a caregiver or someone from their past as the alleged perpetrator.
This confusion amplifies the intricacy of investigations.
If the investigations were lacking, you have grounds to challenge the entire case, especially when there is no evidence to corroborate the allegation. Furthermore, nursing home abuse cases can take a distressing turn when financial losses or the disappearance of personal belongings surface while a caregiver is on duty.
The complexities associated with these scenarios could cast doubt on the accuracy of the accusations. Your attorney will conduct an independent, comprehensive, unbiased investigation to ascertain the truth. Any contradictions in support of the reported allegations will be presented as evidence to challenge the case.
- Insufficient Evidence
This defense is critical in challenging the prosecution’s case. Your attorney will assert that the available evidence is insufficient to establish your guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
This defense involves a meticulous analysis of the evidence, including witness credibility, the reliability of physical evidence, and the quality of the investigation. Its primary goal is to cast doubt on the accusations and secure an acquittal when there is insufficient proof to support the allegations.
The burden of proof rests squarely on the prosecution to prove their case. When this burden cannot be met, and there is a lack of substantial evidence to substantiate the accusations, you are entitled to acquittal.
Furthermore, in cases involving nursing home owners, the defense attorney could argue that the owner should not be held guilty of elder abuse charges in the absence of concrete evidence.
This evidence should demonstrate their knowledge or involvement in the abuse. Criminal liability typically depends on proving that you were aware of or were directly complicit in unlawful actions. Without this evidence, the owner should not face guilt.
Civil Lawsuits For Nursing Home Abuse
Civil lawsuits for nursing home abuse offer a legal remedy for victims or their families to pursue compensation when elder abuse or neglect has occurred in a nursing home or assisted living facility. These lawsuits can be directed at various responsible parties, including:
- Caregivers at nursing homes — These are individuals working directly with elderly residents. They include nurses, certified nursing assistants, and other staff members. If they have engaged in abusive or negligent conduct, they can be held accountable for their actions.
- Administrators and supervisors — Persons responsible for overseeing nursing home staff members, including administrators and supervisors, can also be legally liable if they have been negligent in their duties or permitted abuse to occur under their supervision.
- Owners or operators — In some cases, owners or operators of the nursing home could be implicated in the legal proceedings. This is particularly pertinent if there is evidence of systemic issues, inadequate oversight, or a pattern of abuse within the nursing home facility.
In cases of nursing home abuse, a victim who is mentally competent to make legal decisions can typically file a nursing home abuse lawsuit independently. However, if the victim is unable to do so due to physical or mental limitations, the victim’s family or a designated representative can step in and take legal action on their behalf.
Two standard methods of representing an abused nursing home resident when they are unable to do so themselves include:
- Power of Attorney (POA) — If the nursing home resident has previously granted a durable power of attorney to a trusted individual, that person can act on their behalf in legal matters, including filing a lawsuit. A durable power of attorney remains in effect even if the nursing home resident becomes incapacitated.
- Court-appointed guardianship — In cases where there is no existing power of attorney or if the abuse has rendered the resident incapacitated, a family member or another concerned party could petition the court to become the legal guardian of the abused individual. Once appointed as a guardian, they have the legal authority to make decisions on the resident’s behalf, including pursuing a nursing home abuse lawsuit.
Resolving a nursing home abuse lawsuit can be a time-consuming process, often taking several years if it proceeds to trial. Sometimes, an attorney could seek an out-of-court settlement with the wrongdoer(s) and their insurance company to expedite resolution. If a satisfactory settlement cannot be reached, the lawsuit will proceed to trial, where a jury will hear the evidence and decide.
In addition to seeking damages for the harm suffered, legal action in nursing home abuse cases could also aim to obtain an injunction. The injunction is a court order prohibiting the nursing home from engaging in dangerous or abusive practices. This injunction protects current and future residents of the facility from harm.
Contact a Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
If you have been accused of nursing home abuse or are facing prosecution for the offense in Van Nuys, Leah Legal is ready to assist. Call us at 818-484-1100. We will guide and represent you throughout the process.
Few allegations are as serious and life-altering as those involving negligent homicide. Negligent homicide, often a lesser-known cousin of more widely recognized crimes like murder and voluntary manslaughter, poses its own set of legal challenges.
In this article, we will discuss the definition and elements of negligent homicide, the distinction between negligent homicide, murder, and voluntary manslaughter, and the critical factors shaping such cases’ outcomes. We will also explore the legal defenses available to those accused of negligent homicide and, most importantly, the pivotal role an adept attorney can play in securing the best possible outcome.
What is Negligent Homicide?
Negligent homicide, within the context of California law, represents a distinctive category of criminal offense that arises from unintentional yet reckless actions leading to the death of another person. Unlike more deliberate forms of homicide, such as murder or voluntary manslaughter, negligent homicide involves a lack of intent to cause harm.
Instead, the focus is on the defendant’s failure to exercise reasonable care or caution, resulting in a tragic outcome. Some people may also refer to this offense as “involuntary manslaughter.”
Distinguishing Between Murder, Voluntary Manslaughter, and Negligent Homicide
In California, the legal landscape surrounding homicide encompasses nuanced differences that hinge on intent, circumstances, and degrees of culpability. Murder involves the deliberate killing of another person with malice aforethought. This malice signifies a conscious intention to cause fatal harm or serious injury. First-degree murder may involve premeditation, while second-degree murder lacks premeditation but remains an intentional act.
Voluntary manslaughter, though still intentional, deviates from murder in terms of malice aforethought. This offense typically occurs in the heat of passion or during a sudden quarrel. The presence of provocation or the absence of premeditation distinguishes voluntary manslaughter from murder.
Negligent homicide diverges fundamentally from both murder and voluntary manslaughter due to its lack of intent. Instead, it results from the defendant’s failure to exercise reasonable care, displaying a reckless disregard for the safety of others. Negligent homicide cases hinge on proving negligence as a substantial factor in causing the death.
What the Prosecutor Must Prove to be Convicted of Negligent Homicide
In a negligent homicide case in California, the prosecutor must establish specific elements to secure a conviction. These elements define the nature and extent of the defendant’s negligence, linking it directly to the resulting fatality.
To succeed in a prosecution for negligent homicide, the following key elements must be proven:
- Negligence.
- Causation.
Successfully proving these elements is essential for the prosecutor to secure a conviction for negligent homicide. Here is a brief discussion of each of these elements:
Negligence
Negligence is a central and critical element in cases involving negligent homicide in California. It forms the foundation upon which the prosecution builds its case, alleging that the defendant’s failure to exercise reasonable care resulted in the tragic loss of life.
In a legal context, negligence refers to the failure to exercise the degree of care that a reasonably prudent person would under similar circumstances. It involves a breach of the duty of care owed to others, leading to foreseeable harm.
The standard for determining negligence often revolves around the hypothetical “reasonable person.” This is an objective standard, considering what a reasonably prudent person would do in the same situation. The defendant’s conduct is compared to what a person with ordinary prudence would do.
The concept of foreseeability is inherent in negligence cases. The prosecution may need to demonstrate that the harm resulting from the defendant’s negligence was reasonably foreseeable. If the consequences were unforeseeable, it might weaken the argument for negligence.
A duty of care is a legal obligation to act with a level of care and consideration for the safety of others. In negligent homicide cases, the prosecution must establish that the defendant owed a duty of care to the victim, and this duty was breached through negligent actions.
In some cases, mere negligence may not be enough. The prosecution might need to prove gross negligence, indicating a more severe departure from the standard of care. Gross negligence involves a reckless disregard for the safety of others.
Proving negligence can be complex, involving carefully examining the incident’s circumstances. Factors such as the defendant’s knowledge, awareness of risks, and the presence of any mitigating factors can influence the assessment of negligence.
Causation
Causation is a crucial element in negligent homicide cases, which is pivotal in connecting the defendant’s actions to the tragic outcome of a person’s death. Establishing causation is essential for the prosecution to attribute legal responsibility to the defendant and secure a conviction.
Causation in negligent homicide cases requires the prosecution to demonstrate a direct link between the defendant’s negligent actions and the death of the victim. It is not enough to merely prove negligence; there must be compelling evidence that the defendant’s conduct was a substantial factor in causing the fatality.
Courts often use the “substantial factor” test to assess causation. This test considers whether the defendant’s actions were a significant and essential factor in bringing about the death. If the death would not have occurred but for the defendant’s negligence, it strengthens the argument for causation.
The foreseeability of harm is an integral component of causation. The prosecution may need to establish that the harm resulting from the defendant’s negligent actions was reasonably foreseeable. If the consequences were unforeseeable, it could weaken the argument for causation.
Causation also considers the timing and proximity of the defendant’s actions to the resulting death. The closer in time and more direct the causal link, the stronger the argument for causation.
In some cases, there might be multiple causes contributing to a death. The prosecution must demonstrate that the defendant’s negligence was a substantial and necessary factor, even if other factors were present.
Causation is often framed in terms of the “but for” test. This means that “but for” the defendant’s negligent actions, the death would not have occurred. Establishing this direct connection reinforces the argument for causation.
Expert testimony may be utilized to establish the causal link between the defendant’s negligence and the death. Experts can provide insights into the cause of death, the impact of the defendant’s actions, and the foreseeability of harm.
Successfully proving causation is imperative for the prosecution in negligent homicide cases. For the defendant, defense strategies may involve challenging the strength of the causal link, presenting evidence of intervening causes, or disputing the foreseeability of harm. Legal representation is essential to navigate these complexities and ensure a fair and thorough examination of causation in the legal proceedings.
What are the Penalties for Negligent Homicide?
The penalties for negligent homicide in California can vary depending on several factors, including the degree of the offense, the specific circumstances of the case, and the presence of any aggravating or mitigating factors. In California, negligent homicide is categorized as a class 4 felony.
Upon conviction, you may face the following punishments:
- An imprisonment term of up to four years.
- A fine of up to $10,000.
Sometimes, the judge may sentence you to probation instead of imprisonment. The probation term may range between three to five years.
Legal Defenses in Negligent Homicide Cases
Legal defenses in negligent homicide cases aim to challenge the prosecution’s case by disputing elements such as negligence, causation, or establishing affirmative defenses. The specific strategy depends on the circumstances of the case.
Here are common legal defenses in negligent homicide cases:
- Lack of negligence.
- Intervening cause.
- Affirmative defenses.
Successfully using these defenses requires a comprehensive understanding of the facts surrounding the case, the applicable law, and strategic legal expertise. Individuals facing charges of negligent homicide should seek the guidance of an experienced criminal defense attorney who can assess the case’s specific details and develop a defense strategy tailored to the circumstances.
Below, we briefly discuss each of these defenses:
Lack of Negligence
The defense of lack of negligence is a critical aspect of a legal strategy in negligent homicide cases. This defense aims to challenge the prosecution’s assertion that the defendant failed to exercise reasonable care, a central element in establishing negligent homicide.
Negligence is often defined as a failure to exercise the level of care that a reasonably prudent person would under similar circumstances. The defense of lack of negligence involves arguing that the defendant did, in fact, exercise reasonable care and that their actions were consistent with what would be expected of a person in a similar situation.
The defense may present evidence and arguments focusing on the incident’s specific factual circumstances. This could include details about the defendant’s actions, decisions, and awareness of the situation.
Expert witnesses may be called upon to provide testimony supporting the defense’s position. For example, an expert in the relevant field may testify that the defendant’s actions were in line with industry standards or were reasonable given the circumstances.
If there are established protocols or procedures in the context of the incident, the defense may argue that the defendant adhered to these standards. This could involve demonstrating that the defendant followed established safety guidelines or professional standards.
The defense may also contend that the harm resulting from the defendant’s actions was not foreseeable. If the defendant could not reasonably anticipate the potential harm, it may weaken the argument for negligence.
Legal precedents and case law may be cited to support the defense’s position. If there are similar cases where actions akin to those of the defendant were deemed reasonable and not negligent, it could bolster the defense.
Detailed documentation or records related to the defendant’s actions may serve as evidence in support of the lack of negligence defense. This could include logs, reports, or other records demonstrating adherence to established practices.
Successfully employing the defense of lack of negligence requires a thorough examination of the facts and circumstances of the case. It involves presenting a compelling argument that the defendant’s actions were reasonable and in accordance with the standard of care expected in the given situation. Legal representation by an experienced criminal defense attorney is crucial to building and presenting a strong defense strategy tailored to the case’s specific details.
Intervening Cause
The defense of intervening cause is a legal strategy that aims to disrupt the chain of causation between the defendant’s actions and the resulting death in a negligent homicide case. An intervening cause is an independent event that occurs after the defendant’s alleged negligence and contributes to the harm or death.
This defense argues that the intervening cause, rather than the defendant’s actions, is the primary reason for the tragic outcome. The defense of intervening cause challenges the prosecution’s argument regarding causation. It contends that the harm would not have occurred “but for” the intervening cause, and therefore, the defendant’s actions should not be deemed the primary or sole cause of the death.
A vital aspect of this defense is the argument that the intervening cause was unforeseeable. If the defendant could not have reasonably anticipated the intervening cause, it strengthens the defense’s position that the chain of causation should be broken.
In legal terms, an intervening cause may be referred to as a superseding cause, meaning it supersedes the defendant’s actions as the dominant or responsible factor for the harm. Some examples of intervening causes might include the sudden onset of a medical emergency, the actions of a third party, or an unpredictable environmental event. Each of these events, if truly unforeseeable, can potentially serve as a basis for the defense.
The defense may call upon expert witnesses to testify about the nature of the intervening cause and its impact on the outcome. Expert opinions can be crucial in establishing that the intervening cause was significant and unforeseeable.
Proximate cause analysis involves examining the legal concept of foreseeability and whether the defendant’s actions were a proximate cause of the harm. The defense may argue that the intervening cause disrupted the proximate cause connection.
Suppose the defense successfully establishes the presence of a significant and unforeseeable intervening cause. In that case, it may impact the legal responsibility attributed to the defendant, potentially leading to a reduction of charges or an acquittal.
Affirmative Defenses
Affirmative defenses in the context of negligent homicide cases involve the assertion that, even if the defendant’s actions led to a fatality, there are legally recognized justifications or excuses that mitigate or negate criminal liability. Unlike general defenses that challenge the prosecution’s evidence, affirmative defenses involve acknowledging the defendant’s actions but provide a legal justification for those actions.
Here are some common affirmative defenses in negligent homicide cases:
- Self-defense or defense of others — This affirmative defense argues that the defendant’s actions were justified because they were acting in self-defense or defense of others.
- Accident — The defense of accident involves asserting that the death resulted from an unintentional, unforeseeable event. It contends that the defendant did not act with criminal negligence but that the incident occurred without the requisite criminal intent.
- Necessity — Necessity as an affirmative defense argues that the defendant’s actions were necessary to prevent greater harm. This defense asserts that, given the circumstances, the defendant had no reasonable alternative but to act as they did to avoid a more severe outcome.
- Duress — If the defendant can show that they acted under duress or the threat of immediate harm, it may serve as an affirmative defense. This defense contends that the defendant had no real choice but to act as they did due to external pressures or coercion.
- Involuntary intoxication — In cases where the defendant was involuntarily intoxicated (e.g., someone slipped a drug into their drink), the defense may argue that the defendant’s impaired state negates the necessary mental state for criminal liability.
- Mental incapacity — Affirmative defenses related to mental incapacity, such as insanity or diminished capacity, may be invoked. These defenses argue that the defendant lacked the mental capacity to form the requisite intent or understand the consequences of their actions.
- Consent — In some cases, particularly those involving risky activities, the defense of consent may be raised. This asserts that the victim knowingly and willingly accepted the risk associated with the defendant’s actions.
- Good Samaritan laws — Some jurisdictions have Good Samaritan laws that provide legal protection to individuals who, in good faith, attempt to render assistance or rescue someone in distress. This can serve as an affirmative defense for actions taken to prevent harm or save a life.
The availability and success of affirmative defenses can vary based on the case’s specific facts. Building a solid affirmative defense often requires a thorough understanding of the law, persuasive legal arguments, and compelling evidence. Individuals facing charges of negligent homicide should consult with an experienced criminal defense attorney to explore potential affirmative defenses tailored to their specific circumstances.
Find a Van Nuys Criminal Defense Lawyer Near Me
In the face of negligent homicide allegations, securing the services of an experienced criminal defense attorney becomes not just advisable but imperative. A skilled attorney serves as a guide, navigating the complexities of the legal system, challenging evidence, and tirelessly advocating for your rights and future.
At Leah Legal in Van Nuys, we stand ready to be your allies in this challenging journey. Our seasoned legal professionals bring a wealth of experience in defending individuals facing negligent homicide charges. We understand the gravity of the situation and are committed to crafting a defense strategy tailored to the unique circumstances of your case. Call us at 818-484-1100 for a free consultation.
The abuse and illicit distribution of prescription medications have become a pressing concern in today’s society, and Xanax, a commonly prescribed medication for anxiety and panic disorders, is no exception. While Xanax serves as a valuable drug in managing these mental health conditions when used as directed under a physician’s care, it has also found its way into the illicit drug market, leading to a surge in drug crimes involving this medication. This article aims to illuminate the substantial legal consequences that individuals may encounter when they misuse Xanax, particularly under the laws of California.
Understanding Xanax and Its Medical Uses
Xanax, the brand name for alprazolam, is a medication that falls under the category of benzodiazepines. It’s primarily prescribed to treat anxiety disorders, panic disorders, and occasionally used in the management of certain other conditions. As a central nervous system (CNS) depressant, Xanax works by enhancing the activity of a neurotransmitter called gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in the brain. This, in turn, helps to reduce abnormal excitement and activity within the brain, leading to a calming and anxiety-reducing effect.
Common Drug Offenses Involving Xanax
Below are some of the most prevalent drug offenses involving Xanax in California:
Possession of Xanax Without a Prescription
Due to its potential for abuse and dependence, Xanax is classified as a Schedule IV controlled substance under the federal Controlled Substances Act. In the United States, prescription medications like Xanax can only be legally obtained with a valid prescription from a licensed healthcare provider. This prescription serves as a crucial safeguard to ensure that individuals who use Xanax receive appropriate medical supervision and dosages tailored to their specific needs. A healthcare provider assesses the patient’s medical history, symptoms, and potential risks before prescribing Xanax.
Legal Consequences
Possessing Xanax without a valid prescription is a violation of federal and state drug laws. The legal consequences of such possession can vary depending on several factors, including the quantity of Xanax in possession, and prior criminal history. In California, for example, Xanax possession without a prescription may result in misdemeanor charges. A conviction for possession of Xanax without a prescription can lead to imprisonment of up to 6 months, fines of $1,000, and/or informal probation.
Xanax Distribution and Sale
Distribution and sale of Xanax, outside the boundaries of legitimate pharmaceutical channels, involve providing the medication to individuals without valid prescriptions or engaging in the illicit drug trade. This can encompass various activities, such as selling Xanax to others and distributing it in exchange for money or other goods.
California, like other states, has laws governing the distribution and sale of controlled substances, including Xanax. These laws are designed to deter illegal drug trade, protect public health, and ensure that prescription medications are used safely and responsibly. Engaging in the distribution and sale of Xanax without proper authorization constitutes a violation of these laws, resulting in serious legal consequences.
Common Legal Consequences for Xanax Distribution and Sale
Individuals involved in the distribution and sale of Xanax in California may face a range of legal consequences, which can vary depending on several factors, including the quantity of Xanax involved, the presence of aggravating factors, and prior criminal history.
Depending on the severity of the offense, the distribution and sale of Xanax can lead to felony charges, which carry more severe penalties. Felony charges can result from factors like large quantities of Xanax, involvement in organized drug rings, or prior drug-related convictions. Conviction for distribution and sale of Xanax can lead to imprisonment of up to 3 years and maximum fines of $10,000. In some cases, individuals may be placed on probation, requiring regular check-ins with a probation officer and adherence to specific conditions, such as attending drug education or rehabilitation programs.
Xanax Manufacturing
Manufacturing Xanax involves the unlawful production of counterfeit Xanax pills or the unauthorized synthesis of alprazolam. Counterfeit Xanax pills are often designed to mimic the appearance of genuine prescription Xanax, creating a false sense of authenticity for unsuspecting individuals. The illegal synthesis of alprazolam occurs in clandestine laboratories, where the drug’s chemical composition is replicated without adherence to pharmaceutical quality and safety standards.
In California, the manufacturing of controlled substances like Xanax is strictly regulated by federal and state laws. Xanax is classified as a Schedule IV controlled substance under federal law, indicating its recognized medical value but also its potential for abuse and dependence. Engaging in the manufacturing of Xanax is a violation of these laws and can lead to severe legal consequences.
Legal Consequences for Xanax Manufacturing
Individuals involved in Xanax manufacturing face a range of legal consequences, which can vary depending on factors such as the scale of the operation, the quantity of counterfeit pills or synthesized alprazolam, and prior criminal history. Xanax manufacturing is often treated as a felony offense, which carries 3 years imprisonment, and a maximum fine of $10,000.
Aggravating Factors
Aggravating factors, in the context of criminal law, are circumstances or elements of a case that make the offense more serious or increase the severity of penalties. These factors are taken into consideration during legal proceedings and can result in harsher sentences for individuals who are found guilty of the underlying offense. In Xanax-related cases, aggravating factors can include various elements that, when present, contribute to a more severe legal outcome.
Common Aggravating Factors in Xanax Cases include:
- Possession of Large Quantities — One of the primary aggravating factors in Xanax cases is the possession of a significant quantity of the medication. Large quantities may suggest an intent to distribute, sell, or traffic Xanax, which can lead to more severe charges and penalties.
- Possession with Intent to Distribute — When individuals are found in possession of Xanax, and there is evidence to suggest that they intended to distribute or sell the medication, the charges can be escalated. Intent to distribute often results in felony charges with heavier penalties.
- Firearms and Weapons — Possession of Xanax while armed with firearms or other weapons is another significant aggravating factor. This combination can result in additional charges related to firearm possession and may lead to enhanced penalties.
- Prior Criminal Record — A prior criminal record, especially one that includes drug-related offenses, can be considered an aggravating factor in Xanax cases. Courts may impose harsher sentences for repeat offenders.
- Distribution Near Schools or Minors — If Xanax distribution or possession occurs near schools, playgrounds, or areas frequented by minors, it can lead to increased penalties due to concerns about the potential impact on vulnerable populations.
- Involvement in Organized Crime — When Xanax-related offenses are connected to organized criminal enterprises or drug trafficking operations, it can result in more severe charges and penalties.
- Injury or Death — If the misuse or distribution of Xanax leads to injury or death, the legal consequences can become extremely serious, potentially including charges of manslaughter or homicide.
Consequences of Aggravating Factors in Xanax Cases
The presence of aggravating factors can significantly impact the outcome of Xanax-related cases. The consequences can include:
Felony Charges
Aggravating factors often lead to felony charges, which carry more severe penalties than misdemeanors.
Increased Sentences
Defendants convicted with the presence of aggravating factors may receive longer prison sentences and heavier fines.
Loss of Rights
Convictions with aggravating factors can result in the loss of certain rights, such as the right to possess firearms.
Enhanced Probation or Parole Conditions
Probation or parole conditions may be more stringent for individuals with aggravating factors in their cases.
Building a Defense Strategy for Xanax-Related Charges
To mount an effective legal defense against these charges, it’s essential to understand the strategies and considerations involved. They include:
Negating the Elements of the Offense
To secure a conviction, the prosecution must prove that you committed every element of the charged offense beyond a reasonable doubt. Your defense strategy may involve challenging one or more elements of the offense, such as:
- Possession — You can argue that you did not possess the Xanax or that it was not in your control.
- Intent — If you are facing distribution or trafficking charges, you can assert that you did not have the intent to distribute or traffic Xanax.
- Knowledge — You may claim that you were unaware of the presence of Xanax, especially in cases where the medication was discovered in a shared space.
Unlawful Search and Seizure
The Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures. If law enforcement violated your Fourth Amendment rights during the investigation, your attorney may file a motion to suppress evidence obtained through an unlawful search or seizure. If successful, this could result in crucial evidence being excluded from the case, potentially leading to a dismissal or favorable plea bargain.
Chain of Custody Issues
Maintaining the integrity of evidence is essential in criminal cases. Your defense attorney will investigate the chain of custody to ensure that the Xanax seized by law enforcement was properly handled and preserved. Any lapses in the chain of custody could cast doubt on the authenticity and admissibility of the evidence.
Valid Prescription
If you were charged with Xanax possession without a valid prescription, presenting evidence of a legitimate prescription can be a strong defense. Your attorney will work to establish that you were using the medication under a doctor’s care and according to the prescribed dosage.
Medical Necessity
In some cases, individuals may possess Xanax out of medical necessity to treat a legitimate medical condition. Your defense may involve demonstrating that you had a legitimate medical need for Xanax, which can be a valid defense, particularly in possession cases.
Entrapment
If you were induced or pressured by law enforcement or an informant to commit Xanax-related offenses that you would not have otherwise committed, you may have an entrapment defense. This involves showing that you were coerced into the illegal activity.
Witness Credibility
If the prosecution’s case relies on witness testimony, your attorney may challenge the credibility of witnesses, such as informants or undercover agents. Establishing inconsistencies in their statements or demonstrating bias can weaken the prosecution’s case.
Related Offenses
Some offenses are in most cases charged together with or along with drug crimes involving Xanax. These offenses include:
Driving Under the Influence of Xanax
In California, DUI laws apply to the operation of motor vehicles under the influence of drugs, including prescription medications like Xanax. The legal limit for drugs, including prescription drugs, is “any amount that impairs your ability to drive safely.” This means that even if you have a valid prescription for Xanax, you can still be charged with a DUI if your ability to drive is impaired.
Penalties for Driving Under the Influence of Xanax in California
If you are arrested and convicted of driving under the influence of Xanax in California, you may face a range of penalties, which can vary depending on factors such as prior DUI convictions and the specific circumstances of your case. Common penalties for a first-time DUI offense involving Xanax can include License suspension, fines of up to $1,000, and probation. Note that a first-time DUI conviction typically doesn’t result in significant jail time, but it is possible, especially if there are aggravating factors.
Prescription Fraud
California Health and Safety Code section 11173 makes it unlawful to obtain or attempt to obtain a controlled substance, such as Xanax, by fraud, deceit, misrepresentation, subterfuge, or alteration of a prescription. This includes actions such as:
- Forging a prescription for Xanax.
- Altering the quantity or dosage of Xanax on a legitimate prescription.
- Using a stolen or counterfeit prescription pad to obtain Xanax.
It’s crucial to recognize that these actions are illegal, even if the individual committing them does not intend to distribute or sell the obtained Xanax.
Penalties for Xanax Prescription Fraud in California
The penalties for Xanax prescription fraud in California can be severe and may include both criminal and civil consequences:
Criminal charges for Xanax prescription fraud can result in misdemeanor or felony charges, depending on the specific circumstances of the case and the defendant’s prior criminal history.
- Misdemeanor charges may lead to penalties such as up to one year in county jail, fines, and probation.
- Felony charges can result in more substantial penalties, including state prison sentences, fines, and probation.
Possession of Drug Paraphernalia
California Health and Safety Code section 11364 prohibits the possession, sale, manufacture, or distribution of drug paraphernalia. Under this law, drug paraphernalia includes any items or equipment primarily intended for use in planting, cultivating, harvesting, processing, preparing, testing, analyzing, packaging, storing, concealing, or inhaling a controlled substance.
Common examples of drug paraphernalia may include:
- Pipes and bongs for smoking or inhaling substances.
- Needles or syringes for injecting drugs.
- Scales for weighing drugs.
- Containers or bags for storing or packaging drugs.
- Materials for manufacturing or processing controlled substances.
It’s essential to note that the intent to use these items for illicit drug-related activities is a key factor in determining whether an individual violates drug paraphernalia laws.
Penalties for Possession of Drug Paraphernalia
The penalties for possession of drug paraphernalia in California can vary depending on the specific circumstances of the case and whether the defendant has prior convictions. Common penalties for a first-time offense are charged as a misdemeanor and the penalties may include:
- Up to six months in county jail.
- Fines of up to $1,000.
For subsequent convictions or when related to specific drug offenses, the penalties can be more severe, potentially leading to felony charges and longer periods of incarceration.
Frequently Asked Questions About Drug Crimes Involving Xanax
We have compiled a list of frequently asked questions and answers to help you understand the topic better.
Can I Expunge Xanax-Related Convictions from My Record in California?
In some cases, it may be possible to expunge Xanax-related convictions from your record, but eligibility depends on factors like:
- Completion of Probation — In most cases, you must have completed probation or parole associated with the conviction. This includes fulfilling all terms and conditions set by the court, such as attending counseling or community service.
- No New Convictions — You must not have been convicted of any new crimes since the Xanax-related conviction you wish to expunge.
- Waiting Period — There may be a waiting period before you can apply for expungement, typically one year from the date of your conviction or the end of your probation, whichever is later.
- Misdemeanor or Felony —The eligibility criteria may vary based on whether the Xanax-related conviction was for a misdemeanor or felony offense. Felony offenses are often not eligible for expungement.
Can I Face Federal Charges for Xanax-Related Crimes in California?
Yes, especially in cases involving manufacturing and trafficking or large-scale distribution, federal authorities may become involved, leading to federal charges.
What Are the Legal Limits for Xanax-Related DUI in California?
California does not have specific legal limits for Xanax or other prescription drugs. DUI charges are often based on evidence of impairment rather than specific blood concentration levels.
Find a Van Nuys Criminal Defense Lawyer Near Me
If you or someone you know is facing Xanax-related drug charges, it is essential to seek legal counsel immediately. At Leah Legal in Van Nuys, we believe in a personalized approach to every case. We take the time to listen to your unique circumstances and develop a strategic defense tailored to your specific situation. Whether it’s challenging the evidence against you, negotiating for reduced charges, or exploring alternative sentencing options, we will advocate for your best interests. Call us today at 818-484-1100.
If you or someone you know is a student facing charges of school misconduct, it is crucial to have legal representation during the disciplinary hearing. The outcome of such proceedings can have significant consequences for the student’s future. To protect your rights and ensure a fair process, you should enlist the services of an experienced lawyer as soon as possible. If an unfavorable verdict is reached, the lawyer has the option to file a motion to review the case and strive to achieve a favorable outcome for the student. This blog explores Title IX proceedings in educational institutions, shedding light on how colleges and universities handle such matters.
An Overview of Title IX Proceedings
Title IX ensures equal treatment for all individuals in educational programs and activities. It prohibits any form of sex-based discrimination and guarantees that no one is excluded or denied benefits on these grounds. This legislation helps promote equality and provides opportunities for everyone in the United States.
Federal agencies should adhere to Title IX’s nondiscrimination mandate when providing grants of financial assistance. The U. S. Department of Education specifically provides financial assistance to a variety of educational institutions and eligible entities, ensuring strict compliance with this regulation.
The U. S. Department of Education has recently implemented significant changes to the Title IX regulations, marking an important milestone in updating and improving its implementation after more than 40 years. This notice-and-comment rulemaking process signifies a commitment to enhance the effectiveness of Title IX rules.
After reviewing a significant number of public comments, the U. S. Department of Education officially implemented the final Title IX regulations on May 6, 2020. The Department’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) is now enforcing these regulations, which can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations at 34 CFR Part 106.
Title IX covers various types of discrimination, including unequal athletic opportunities, sexual harassment, sex-based discrimination in STEM programs and courses, and discrimination based on pregnancy. The Office for Civil Rights (OCR) addresses a more comprehensive list of issues under Title IX. Title IX not only protects individuals from retaliation for filing a complaint or advocating for their rights under Title IX, but it also prohibits employment discrimination based on sex.
It is important to note that complaints regarding employment discrimination are typically referred to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) after being filed with the Office for Civil Rights (OCR).
Sexual Harassment Under Title IX Regulations
The US Department of Education has implemented a rule that defines sexual harassment, ensuring that all forms of misconduct based on sex are included. By doing so, they are prioritizing equal access to education, which is the fundamental purpose of Title IX.
These regulations provide a clear definition of sexual harassment as misconduct based on sex, covering a wide range of actions. It’s crucial to note that these actions are considered unacceptable not only on campus but also at off-campus events and activities where the institution maintains significant control.
These actions include the following:
- An employee using someone’s participation in unwelcome sexual conduct as a condition for providing educational benefits or aid. This behavior should be condemned and addressed in the workplace.
- The definition of sexual assault has expanded to encompass various forms, including domestic violence, stalking, and dating violence, based on gender. This broader definition is based on vital legislations like the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act and the Jeanne Clery Act.
- Unacceptable behavior, such as sexual harassment or discrimination, can hinder a person’s ability to engage in educational programs. Dropping and addressing all forms of misconduct ensures equal access for every individual involved.
The US Department of Education has acknowledged the unique characteristics of educational environments, which can differ from traditional workplaces. Therefore, they have adopted a more specific definition of actionable sexual harassment to safeguard the First Amendment rights of all people involved. Determining whether conduct is based on sex doesn’t need an investigation into the subjective motives of the defendant.
When it comes to cases involving references to gender or sexual conduct, these facts alone can establish that the conduct is indeed “based on sex.” It’s important to note that, according to the preamble of the regulations, even if a recipient is unable to take action under the US Department of Education’s actionable sexual harassment definition, they still have the authority to address issues like harassing behavior through their non-Title IX regulations or codes of conduct.
Sexual Accusations
Sexual assault cases can have devastating consequences for students. The pressure from the government on colleges and institutions to enforce Title IX investigations and punishments only adds to the gravity of these situations. Failure to comply with Title IX regulations can result in the loss of vital federal funding, creating tension between institutions and the government.
The way college administrators handle Title IX proceedings without forensic expertise is concerning. Without specialized knowledge, there is a risk that cases involving sexual misconduct may not be thoroughly investigated, leading to unjust rulings. It is alarming that a simple accusation could have severe consequences for the students involved, resulting in a grave injustice. To ensure fairness and protect individuals from wrongful convictions, it’s crucial to incorporate legal expertise and proper forensic training into these proceedings.
Failure to comply with disciplinary rules can have serious consequences, including being registered as a sex offender and potentially facing imprisonment. Students should understand their constitutional rights and avoid making contradictory statements that may incriminate themselves. By respecting these guidelines, students can protect themselves from potential legal ramifications.
When discussing sexual assault cases, the topics of location and consent often come into question. Different institutions may have varying interpretations of what constitutes consent. However, taking a common-sense approach reveals that the reality of these situations is often more significant than one could initially assume.
Consent is another crucial aspect when engaging in sexual activities, and universities are increasingly recognizing its importance. By defining consent as an affirmative and conscious decision, they emphasize the need for clear and mutually understandable communication. This includes both non-verbal and verbal cues that demonstrate a willingness to participate.
It’s crucial to note that silence, passivity, or a lack of resistance shouldn’t be mistaken for consent. True consent necessitates active participation and clear communication from all parties involved. Both individuals should express their intentions and have a mutual understanding of the nature, extent, and purpose of any measure taken.
The Disciplinary Procedures
When it comes to disciplinary procedures, universities and colleges have the freedom to design their own systems. However, they should adhere to federal regulations. In Title IX cases, it is essential to have a system that is fair, efficient, thorough, and impartial. Both parties should have equal opportunities to present proof and call witnesses, ensuring a balanced process.
Title IX complaints are treated with the utmost seriousness and should be thoroughly investigated within sixty days of being filed. In some cases, if a witness is unavailable, the time limit could be extended. Upon receiving notification of the complaint, the accused should reach out to Title IX investigators to engage in a discussion about the case and evaluate the allegations. While legal counsel can offer guidance, it’s important to note that they cannot speak on behalf of the defendant. A thorough investigation will be conducted to address any concerns that have been fairly raised.
During the investigation, the investigators will conduct a thorough evaluation of both the complaints and any evidence provided by the reporting student. They will also assess the arguments presented by the accused and conduct inquiries into the reporting party. Once these steps are completed, they will review the final investigative report, which will include a comprehensive summary of all the evidence presented. Title IX investigators are committed to conducting a fair and thorough evaluation process.
The purpose of the report is to ascertain whether the alleged violations indeed occurred. If an educational institution suspects you of a crime, they will engage law enforcement, initiating a criminal investigation. As part of this procedure, there might be a recorded phone conversation between the victim and the accused. Once the investigation concludes, you will be notified about the subsequent steps.
In a Title IX investigation, the standard of proof differs from that in criminal prosecutions. While courts require proof beyond a reasonable doubt, Title IX investigations rely on a “preponderance of evidence” standard. This means that even if the hearing board is only slightly more convinced than not that the claims are true (50. 01% persuaded), you could face consequences. The final report is then submitted to the Title IX investigator, who will propose an appropriate penalty based on this evidence.
In cases of investigations, both the victim and accused students receive separate copies of the report via email. Consequences for misconduct can vary, ranging from class exclusion to probation, which may include community service, counseling, and restitution. Other potential outcomes include warnings, expulsion, deferred suspension for a specified period (such as a semester or a year), or removal from a group or school housing.
When a Recipient is Accountable for Sexual Violence or Harassment
Recipients should treat sexual harassment allegations seriously and respond appropriately. Merely being aware of such allegations is not enough. Intentional discrimination occurs when there is a deliberate indifference towards addressing the reported claims. Recipients cannot neglect or ignore the need to respond if they’re aware of or should have been aware of the harassment.
The obligation to respond under Title IX is only activated when the recipient has actual knowledge of the alleged conduct. This means that the recipient should have received notice from their Title IX coordinator or an official with the authority to take corrective measures on behalf of the recipient.
Notice occurs whenever a Title IX official or coordinator with authority receives information or becomes aware of a possible violation or incident. These include the following:
- The recipient hears about sexual harassment or receives allegations of sexual harassment from a victim or a third party like the victim’s parent, peer, or friend.
- Witnesses the harassment.
- Receives information by any other means.
- Receives a verbal or written complaint about harassment or allegations of the act.
Anyone can make a report, even if they are not the victim. If the recipient of the report has followed all required protocols or taken appropriate action based on the available information, they would not be held responsible. However, it’s important to note that the accused person can still face additional allegations of harassment.
Title IX Regulations and Rights
Title IX guarantees vital rights to students and staff against sexual harassment and gender discrimination and prohibits retribution. These protections extend to transgender individuals, as well as males and females. Additionally, Title IXa8 ensures that parenting learners are safeguarded by requiring educational institutions to provide equal opportunities for father-son and mother-daughter programs or services. This commitment ensures equal access for all.
The legislation ensures a fair and inclusive environment by prohibiting any form of discrimination or harassment that could result from an allegation. Examples of illegal retaliatory treatment include the following:
- Certain actions or violations can lead to expulsion or suspension from an institution or program.
- Denying participation in athletics, reassigning to less desirable positions on sports teams, or reducing the time spent participating in sports.
- Reducing your grades in academic courses.
- Harassment in school or the sports field.
How a Defense Attorney Can Help
Having competent legal counsel is crucial when it comes to Title IX proceedings. Given the potential for criminal allegations and punishments, it is essential to have proper representation to ensure a fair process. There are several reasons why you may need legal counsel:
Confidentiality
Navigating Title IX disciplinary proceedings can be overwhelming, especially without proper guidance. While there could be Title IX advisors available to assist you, it is important to note that they are employed by the institution and could form biased opinions that do not align with your best interests. Exercise caution when sharing information, as it could be used against you in a Title IX case or even in a court of law.
It is advisable to seek external support to ensure that your rights are protected throughout the process. Rest assured that any concerns you have should be kept strictly between you and your defense attorney. Your attorney has a professional duty to maintain confidentiality, ensuring that all information shared remains private.
Counseling and Defending
Ensuring that your institution’s Title IX policy meets the standards set by the federal government is crucial. It’s not enough to understand the general rules. You should address any potential unfairness in the policy. Additionally, it’s important to keep in mind that there could be variations in the specifications of Title IX policies for private and public educational institutions.
If you encounter an unjust policy or unfair procedure within an institution, you can rely on your attorney to take action. They can file a lawsuit against the institution and protect their rights by submitting a “litigation hold” note to the college or university. This strategic move will prevent any disciplinary actions or investigations from taking place while your case is being addressed. Rest assured that there are legal measures available to safeguard your interests, so you can stay confident in seeking justice.
Getting Ready for Legal Proceedings
When facing a Title IX case, it is crucial to enlist the services of a defense lawyer. They can offer guidance throughout the process, ensuring that any statements you make are not unintentionally used against you. If you’re uncertain about your next steps or find yourself in a challenging situation, you reach out to a Title IX defense lawyer. They will help you develop a strong defense strategy while ensuring that you avoid making any self-incriminating remarks.
A lawyer will guide you through the details of the allegations, ensuring that you understand what you are up against. If you are unfamiliar with the institution’s policies, they will help you navigate Title IX proceedings. Although they won’t directly defend you, a lawyer can assist in developing a strategic plan, gathering evidence and statements, and acting as your legal advisor throughout the entire process.
Find a Title IX Lawyer Near Me
At Leah Legal in Van Nuys, we understand the complexities involved in disciplinary systems within educational institutions and the serious nature of Title IX violations. Our team of attorneys has extensive experience handling such cases with the utmost effectiveness. If you are a student, faculty member, or parent facing a Title IX investigation or disciplinary proceeding, you should seek the guidance of an experienced attorney without delay.
We are ready to assist you in preparing your defense and providing the necessary support throughout the process. Our team of attorneys will work diligently to have the claims made against you dismissed, preserving your clean record. We know how important it is to make sure your future isn’t affected by what happens on college or university grounds. Call us today at 818-484-1100.
Gamma Hydroxybutyrate, also abbreviated as GHB, is a CNS (central nervous system) drug that doctors prescribe mainly to patients with sleep disorders. Although it is a prescription medication, GHB is often abused and used unlawfully, especially in nightclubs, due to its effects once it is in your system.
Due to its odorless and colorless nature, it is easy for someone with malicious intentions to mix it with your drink, making you unconscious. Because of this and other serious side effects this drug causes, law enforcement officers and prosecutors treat GHB-related drug offenses harshly.
If you are under arrest for a crime that involves GHB, you could be at risk of misdemeanor or felony charges, depending on the facts of your case. The best way to protect your best interest and increase your odds of obtaining a favorable outcome if you are in this situation is to retain the services of a defense attorney.
Read on to understand what GHB is in the eyes of the law and the various crimes that involve this drug.
What is a GHB?
Also commonly known as “G,” “Liquid X,” or “Liquid E,” GHB is a controlled drug substance that falls under both Schedule III and Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act. Drugs classified as Schedule I have no known medical benefit and are very likely to cause dependence and abuse because of their side effects.
On the other hand, Schedule III drugs are those that have less abuse and dependence potential than Schedule II and Schedule I drugs, but they have medically accepted uses. GHB falls under both Schedule III and Schedule I controlled drug substances because the FDA (Federal Drug Administration) approved Xyrem (a GHB-made drug) to help patients with medical issues such as:
- Sleep disorders.
- Narcolepsy.
Although GHB can help patients with these medical conditions, it produces severe side effects that make it prone to abuse and illegal use. Some of these severe side effects include the following:
- Vomiting.
- Dizziness.
- Loss of consciousness.
- Muscle spasms.
- Sweating.
- Comma.
- Hallucinations.
- Amnesia.
Because of the severe side effects associated with this drug, many criminals, particularly sex predators, use it to make their targets or victims semi-unconscious and lose control of their bodies. Regardless of whether you had the intent to use the drug to commit a sex crime or any other offense, a charge that involves GHB could result in severe consequences, including several years of incarceration and hefty fines.
If you are under investigation or charged with a crime that involves GHB, a skilled and experienced defense attorney can help you stay on the safe side of the law.
An Overview of Drug-Related Offenses that Involve GHB
There are various drug-related crimes that the prosecutor could file against you when GHB is involved. The specific offense the prosecutor will file against you will depend on the circumstances and facts of your unique drug case. Below is a brief overview of some of these crimes:
Possession of GHB
The prosecutor could charge you under Health and Safety Code (HS) 11350 or 11377 if you had GHB in your possession without an approved medical prescription. Specifically, HS 11377 makes it a crime to have a controlled drug substance in your possession without a valid prescription. On the other hand, HS 11350 makes it a crime to have any controlled substance in your possession, including GHB.
If you have a valid medical prescription from a licensed doctor to use Xyrem to treat your illness, the prosecutor will not have any charges against you under any of these statutes. To secure a guilty verdict against you for illegal possession of the drug GHB, the prosecutor must prove the following facts at trial:
- You had GHB in your possession without a valid prescription.
- You were aware of the substance’s presence.
- You were aware the substance in question was GHB, a controlled drug substance.
- The quantity of the substance was sufficient for personal use.
Whether the prosecutor files your offense under HS 11350 or HS 11377, you could avoid conviction if the prosecutor cannot prove the above facts to the court beyond a reasonable doubt. However, if you are guilty of the offense, you should expect the following misdemeanor penalties:
- A jail term of up to one (1) year.
- A fine not exceeding $1,000.
However, GHB possession could attract felony charges and penalties if the prosecutor can prove with proper evidence that you have a criminal record for severe offenses like sex crimes, murder, or vehicular manslaughter. In this case, a felony conviction will carry the following possible penalties:
- A jail term of sixteen (16) months, two (2) years, or three (3) years.
- A fine not exceeding $10,000.
Possession of GHB for Sale
According to HS 11351 and HS 11378, it is illegal to have a controlled drug substance, including GHB, in your possession with the criminal intent or motive to sell it. For the sake of these statutes, having a drug substance in your “possession” means you either had it physically in your pockets, bags, or vehicle, or it was in a place or room that you had control over.
To secure a conviction against you under either of these statutes, the prosecutor must prove the following elements of the crime:
- You illegally had GHB in your possession and were aware of its presence.
- You were aware of the drug’s nature as an unlawful or controlled drug substance.
- The quantity you had in your possession was enough to sell.
- You had the criminal intent or motive to sell the substance.
Since there is no way to know whether you had the criminal motive to sell the drug, the prosecutor will rely on the following circumstantial evidence to prove this critical element of the crime:
- The amount of drug you had in your possession was more than you would need for medical or recreational use.
- You had ready cash to make it easier to sell or distribute the substance.
- You had a dangerous weapon, like a gun or any other dangerous weapon for self-defense, when doing your sales.
- You were at a location where transactions involving illegal drugs are rampant.
If the prosecution team cannot prove these facts, your attorney could convince the judge to reduce your charges to a lighter offense with less severe penalties. However, when the prosecutor proves the above facts beyond a reasonable doubt, you should expect felony penalties upon conviction. When charged under HS 11351, GHB possession for sale will attract the following penalties:
- Two (2), three (3), or four (4) years of jail time.
- Up to $20,000 maximum fine.
However, when the prosecutor files your charges under HS 11378, your sentence upon conviction will be lighter, including:
- A fine not exceeding $10,000.
- A jail term of sixteen (16) months, two (2) years, or three (3) years.
Sales and Transportation of GHB
HS 11352 and HS 11379 make it a crime to traffic controlled drug substances, including GHB. To obtain a conviction against you for trafficking GHB, the prosecutor must prove that you did either of the following:
- Sold GHB.
- Transported GHB.
- Furnished GHB.
- Imported GHB.
- Administered GHB.
- Gave GHB away.
Once the prosecutor proves that you did or offered to engage in either of the above illegal acts, he/she must further prove that you were aware of the drug’s presence and that it was in a usable amount.
In many cases, the prosecution team relies on evidence obtained by police officers through undercover and sting operations to build a case against you for the illegal sale and transportation of GHB. Whether the prosecutor files your drug trafficking case under HS 11379 or HS 11352 will depend on the facts and circumstances of your unique case.
If you are guilty of illegal sales or transportation of GHB under HS 11352, you will receive the following felony penalties:
- Three (3), four (4), or five (5) years behind bars.
- A fine not exceeding $20,000.
However, when the prosecutor files your case under HS 11379, your penalties upon conviction at trial will include the following:
- A fine not exceeding $10,000.
- Two (2), three (3), or four (4) years of detention in the state prison.
It is worth noting that your jail sentence could increase to up to nine (9) years if the prosecutor can prove that you transported or imported GHB across two or more county borders with the motive or intent to sell or distribute it. Also, note that the judge will likely impose the harshest sentence available for this offense if the prosecutor can prove that you were aware of or should have known the following:
- The recipient of the drug had a conviction for a violent felony on his/her criminal record.
- The recipient of the drug was pregnant.
- The recipient of the drug was under medical treatment for a drug use problem or a mental disorder.
Possession of GHB While Armed
According to HS 11370.1, it is a crime to have controlled drug substances in your possession while armed with an operable and loaded firearm. Although not strictly limited to the possession of GHB only, an HS 11370.1 violation is a severe offense in the eyes of the law. However, like any other offense, a conviction is not automatic after an arrest.
Here are elements the prosecutor must prove during your case trial to secure a conviction against you under this statute:
- You had GHB in your possession.
- You were of the substance’s presence.
- You were aware the substance was a controlled drug substance.
- You had an operable and loaded firearm in your possession.
A conviction for an HS 11370.1 violation will attract a jail term of two (2), three (3), or four (4) years and a fine not exceeding $10,000 because it is a felony.
Being Under the influence of GHB
The prosecutor can charge you under HS 11550 if you are under the influence of GHB without a medical prescription. Even if you have a valid medical prescription, the prosecutor can still charge you under this statute if you use the drug beyond the required scope of this prescription. A conviction for an HS 11550 violation requires the prosecutor to prove the following facts at trial:
- You willfully ingested or used GHB, meaning no one coerced you to use the substance.
- You were under the influence of GHB, meaning your brain functions and nervous system were affected by the substance.
Since it is a misdemeanor offense, a conviction under this statute will attract a jail sentence of up to one (1) year and a fine not exceeding $500.
Driving Under the Influence of GHB
Another common crime that involves GHB is driving under the influence of drugs, also abbreviated as DUID. If you are under arrest for driving or operating a vehicle under the influence of GHB, you could face misdemeanor penalties upon conviction, regardless of whether you had a prescription for the substance or not.
However, the prosecutor presiding over your case must prove the following facts beyond a reasonable doubt:
- You were driving.
- You had GHB in your blood.
- The substance impaired your ability to drive a vehicle like a cautious driver would under the same circumstances.
During your case trial, the prosecutor can summon a drug recognition expert (DRE) to testify that you had GHB in your system. For a first-time offense, a conviction for DUID under Vehicle Code (VC) 23152(f) will not attract jail time. Instead, the court could sentence you to an informal probation and require you to pay fines.
However, when you are a repeat offender, your subsequent conviction for a VC 23152(f) violation will attract a jail term of up to six (6) months. On the other hand, if it is your fourth-time DUID offense, the prosecutor will file your case as a felony, carrying a jail term of three (3) years and a fine not exceeding $5,000 upon conviction.
In addition to these hefty fines, a VC 23152(f) violation conviction can make you lose your driving privileges because the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) will suspend your driver’s license.
Eligibility for a Drug Diversion When Charged With a Crime That Involves GHB
If you are under arrest or charged with a low-level drug possession offense, like possession of GHB under HS 11350, you could qualify for a drug diversion program under:
- Penal Code (PC) 1000.
- Proposition (Prop) 36.
- Drug court.
Generally speaking, a drug diversion is an alternative sentencing option that allows you to undergo drug counseling and therapy sessions instead of a jail term when charged with a low-level or non-severe drug possession offense.
Once you complete the court-approved counseling or rehabilitation program successfully without breaching the necessary terms, the court could dismiss your charges, meaning they will not appear on your record. However, to qualify for a drug diversion under PC 1000 or Prop 36, you have to plead guilty to HS 11350 charges.
It is worth noting that you will not qualify for a drug diversion program if any of the following facts are true:
- You have a prior conviction record for HS 11351 violation.
- You have a previous history of parole or probation violation.
- Five years are not over since your last enrollment in a drug diversion program.
- You have prior felony convictions on your record within the past five years.
You will depend on your defense attorney to convince the court that you are an excellent candidate for drug diversion if you are under arrest or charged with a crime involving GHB.
Defenses That Your Attorney Could Use to Challenge Any of the Above GHB-related Drug Charges
With proper legal defenses, you could avoid or reduce the possible consequences of a conviction for any of the above GHB-related drug offenses. Below are common and viable defenses your defense attorney will apply at trial to challenge your GHB-related drug charge:
- You have a valid medical prescription to use the drug.
- You were unaware the drug substance in question was in your possession.
- You did not have the criminal intent or motive to sell the substance.
- You were not under the influence.
- You are a victim of entrapment by the police.
- You are a victim of unlawful or warrantless searches by the police.
- You are a victim of mistaken identity.
- The prosecutor’s evidence against you is insufficient.
- Your urine or blood test results were inaccurate or tainted.
The specific defenses your defense attorney will use to challenge your GHB-related drug charge will depend on the facts of your case. However, with proper arguments and evidence, some of these defenses could work in your favor to secure a dismissal of your charges or a lighter offense.
Find a Van Nuys Defense Attorney Near Me
You cannot risk dealing with the prosecutor and judge alone if you are under arrest or charged with a crime that involves GHB. At Leah Legal, we can intervene and help you challenge your GHB-related drug charges for the best attainable outcome.
We invite you to call us at 818-484-1100 to schedule your initial obligation-free appointment with our skilled and seasoned defense attorneys, wherever you are in Van Nuys.
Legal proceedings can be intricate for those unfamiliar with the system due to the involvement of various parties and processes. It is common for individuals facing criminal charges to opt for legal representation to navigate these complexities and safeguard their rights. Criminal defense attorneys play a pivotal role by offering guidance and presenting a defense. They also negotiate plea deals and assist clients in comprehending and navigating legal procedures.
Interestingly, even individuals with prior experience in the criminal arrest process find it complex and require assistance. This underscores the importance of reviewing the process’s overview to help you navigate it better. It is crucial to understand the ins and outs of the system to ensure a smoother experience.
The Categories of Offenses under California Law
The criminal process varies based on whether the offense is classified as an infraction, misdemeanor, or felony.
Infractions
Infractions are the least severe type of criminal violation. They involve minor infractions of the law that are not considered crimes. Examples include:
- Traffic violations like speeding (a violation of VC 22350) or running a red light (a violation of VC 21453).
- Jaywalking, and
- Other regulatory offenses.
Penalties for infractions usually lead to fines or non-criminal consequences, namely imprisonment or probation. In some instances, citations or tickets could be issued instead of arrest. Most fines do not exceed $250.
Misdemeanor
Misdemeanors, which fall between infractions and felonies in severity, are criminal offenses. Examples include:
- Simple assault — A violation of Penal Code 240.
- Petty theft — A violation of Penal Code 484(a).
- Disorderly conduct — A violation of Penal Code 647 and
- Specific drug possessions, for example, possession of a controlled substance — A violation of Health & Safety Code 11350(a).
Convictions for misdemeanors could result in penalties, for example, fines, probation, or community service. In more serious cases, there is also the possibility of a short jail sentence, usually less than one year.
Felonies
Felonies are the most grave category of criminal offenses. They are often linked to significant harm to individuals or society. Examples include:
- Robbery.
- Murder.
- Kidnapping.
- Drug trafficking and
- Certain types of fraud.
Felony convictions entail severe consequences, including:
- Substantial fines.
- Extended imprisonment (over one year).
- Probation, and
- Potential long-term impacts on rights, for example, voting or firearm possession restrictions.
The Criminal Court Process
If you are charged with an infraction, you do not have the right to a jury trial. Instead, trials are conducted as “bench trials” before a judge. While hiring an attorney is an option for addressing the matter, the state is not obligated to provide a public defender if you cannot afford a defense attorney.
Misdemeanors and felonies have different processes. Let us look at each case.
Criminal Court Process for Misdemeanors
In California, misdemeanors follow a well-organized court process. The process involves a clear sequence of steps, namely:
Investigation and Arrest
It begins with a law enforcement investigation, possibly leading to an arrest if there is enough evidence and probable cause.
Investigations could start either due to:
- Suspicions of wrongdoing — Authorities act on received information or observed circumstances. This prompts an investigation, or
- When law enforcement witnesses a person breaking the law — Officers witnessing a crime can lead to an immediate arrest or trigger further investigation.
In the investigation stage, law enforcement conducts interviews and executes search warrants to gather evidence. It is crucial to understand that the Fifth Amendment protects you if you are contacted for an interview during this stage. This means you can remain silent and not be compelled to incriminate yourself.
Additionally, you have the right to assert your Sixth Amendment rights during police interviews and after being arrested. When you assert your Sixth Amendment right to counsel, it means you can request the presence of your attorney during any questioning by law enforcement.
Note: Law enforcement officers read your Miranda rights before conducting a custodial interrogation. This is to apprise you of your constitutional rights under the Fifth Amendment. Miranda rights apply specifically when you are in custody (not free to leave) and facing police questioning.
The subsequent procedural step involves the booking process upon law enforcement officers establishing sufficient grounds for your arrest. Your personal details, including your name, address, and date of birth, are recorded here. The capture of fingerprints and photographs accompanies the details. Simultaneously, information regarding the charges against you is documented.
The law allows bail release if it deems it fit. Bail is a financial arrangement that allows your temporary release under specified conditions while you await trial.
The court determines the bail amount, considering the severity of charges, flight risk, and community ties. By posting bail, you secure release with the understanding that you will participate in all court proceedings. Compliance with the court’s conditions results in the return of the bail amount following the case conclusion.
Alternatively, you could experience release on your own recognizance. This process permits freedom without the need to post bail. The courts rely on your commitment to attend all scheduled court hearings. The decision to release on your own recognizance considers factors including the nature of charges, community ties, and personal history.
Arraignment
Post-arrest, the accused appears before a judge for arraignment. Here, the charges are formally presented, and a plea is entered.
During your arraignment, you are mandated to declare one of three fundamental pleas.
- Guilty Plea
A plea of guilt is an unequivocal admission of the offense. Pleading guilty propels the case swiftly into the sentencing phase, where the court discloses the prescribed punishment.
- Not-guilty Plea
Pleading not guilty means asserting your innocence in the crime. This triggers the commencement of a trial. During the trial, the prosecution is expected to present compelling evidence to establish the charges beyond a reasonable doubt. The outcome of the case can lead to an acquittal or a conviction.
An acquittal, if achieved, ensures the absence of a recorded conviction. However, a guilty verdict during trial invokes the penalties stipulated under the violated law.
- No Contest
You can also plead no contest. The “no contest” plea is legally called “nolo contendere.” Pleading no contest means neither admitting nor denying the charges but embracing the consequences as if you were guilty. Like a guilty plea, this plea moves the case to the sentencing phase, resulting in the accused being considered convicted.
Pre-Trial Process
This phase involves various pre-trial proceedings, for example, evidence exchange and potential negotiations for plea deals.
It is at the pre-trial stage that many cases are resolved. Various legal processes and negotiations unfold. They allow accused individuals to seek resolutions before advancing to a full trial. Several common outcomes define this significant pre-trial phase, including:
- Plea bargains — You and your legal representation can negotiate with the prosecution for a plea bargain. This involves agreeing to plead guilty to a reduced charge or lessening the charges in exchange for a lighter sentence. This will enable you to resolve your case without needing a trial.
- Dismissal of charges — Another potential outcome is the dismissal of charges. The prosecution could opt for dismissal if evidence is insufficient or legal issues arise. Conversely, motions filed by your defense team can also lead to the dismissal of charges.
- Pre-trial diversion programs — You could be eligible for pretrial diversion programs, especially relevant for first-time offenders or those facing non-violent charges. These programs often include rehabilitation or community service. A successful completion could result in the dismissal of charges.
- Legal motions — You and your legal representative can file legal motions during the pre-trial phase. These motions can address issues related to evidence, witness testimony, or other legal intricacies. Resolving these motions becomes crucial to shaping the trajectory of your case.
The duration of the pre-trial process is inherently flexible. In some instances, it could extend up to 45 days. However, this timeframe is subject to variation based on factors like the complexity of your case, the volume of evidence, and the intricacies of legal motions.
Discovery, as part of the pretrial process, plays a crucial role. At this stage, the prosecution and defense actively collect and exchange information, evidence, and relevant documents on the case.
Trial
The case proceeds to trial if your attorney and the prosecution do not resolve. Both sides present their cases, witnesses testify, and a judge or jury determines guilt or innocence.
The Sixth Amendment guarantees your right to a speedy trial. The constitutional provision emphasizes the importance of a timely resolution of criminal charges.
Two primary trial processes, bench trials and jury trials, offer distinct approaches to adjudicating legal matters:
- Bench Trials
In a bench trial, the case is solely heard and decided by a judge, eliminating the involvement of a jury. The judge is responsible for determining both legal and factual questions. This includes:
- Evaluating evidence.
- Listening to witness testimony and
- Considering legal arguments from both the prosecution and defense.
Ultimately, the judge renders a verdict. Bench trials are typically chosen when intricate legal issues require meticulous consideration and the judge is perceived as better suited to make impartial decisions.
- Jury Trials
In contrast, a jury trial involves selecting a group of individuals, known as the jury, to participate in the proceedings and reach a verdict. The jury’s role is to decide factual questions. The judge, on the other hand, oversees legal matters and ensures adherence to legal procedures. The jury listens to witness testimonies throughout the trial and reviews the presented evidence. Further, following instructions from the judge, the jury engages in deliberations to reach a unanimous or majority decision.
Criminal Court Process for Felonies
Felonies are more severe offenses. Convictions can result in fines up to $10,000 or life imprisonment. Despite some similarities with misdemeanor court processes, notable deviations exist due to these offenses’ distinct nature and severity. Let us look at the court process in detail.
Investigation and Arrest
While the investigation and arrest process for felonies mirrors that of misdemeanors, a key distinction emerges. It is more likely that you will remain in custody after a felony arrest. This likelihood is notably higher, given the heightened severity of felony charges.
Arraignment
Unlike misdemeanor cases, felonies are subjected to two hearings:
- The first occurs at the commencement of criminal proceedings.
- The other occurs following the preliminary hearing.
In felony cases, similar to misdemeanors, prosecutors generally adhere to a 48-hour window to arraign an individual post-arrest. This window excludes weekends and holidays from the calculation.
Note: Delays beyond this period do not automatically imply police misconduct. However, it could be grounds to challenge your case. The 48-hour rule is in place to ensure the prompt presentation of the accused before a court, thus safeguarding their rights.
Practical considerations acknowledge exceptions and justifiable delays. Arraignments take place within a few weeks to a few months post-arrest, accommodating the intricacies of legal processes.
Like misdemeanor cases, the arraignment is the inaugural court appearance in felony cases. Here, the charges are formally presented.
Preliminary Hearing
The preliminary hearing, commonly known as a “prelim” or a “probable cause hearing,” takes place before a judge. Here, the prosecutor presents evidence relevant to the charged crime, and the judge addresses two key questions:
- Is there probable cause to believe that a crime occurred?
- Is there probable cause to believe that you committed that crime?
These questions determine whether there is a reasonable basis to proceed with criminal charges. If the judge affirms probable cause after the preliminary hearing, the case proceeds to the trial court for further pretrial proceedings and, eventually, trial.
Conversely, certain charges will be dismissed if the judge finds a lack of probable cause for a charge. The prosecution will then have the option to:
- Refile charges with additional evidence.
- Negotiate a plea deal or
- Choose to drop the charges altogether.
The specific outcomes hinge on legal procedures, the prosecutor’s decisions, and other case-specific factors.
Second Arraignment
A second arraignment should happen within ten days. This follow-up arrangement is similar to the first one. It is at this hearing that you will enter a plea.
Pre-Trial and Trial Process
The pre-trial and trial processes for felony cases have steps similar to misdemeanor proceedings. However, the key differentiator here is time. Felony cases tend to draw out the timeline. So, you will go through the steps outlined above, but they are at a more measured pace when dealing with felony charges.
Your Post-Trial Options
After the conclusion of a criminal trial involving either a misdemeanor or felony offense, several courses of action are available:
Motion For a New Trial
You can pursue this recourse in instances of significant legal errors or the discovery of new evidence that could impact the verdict. It serves as a post-trial option to request a fresh start.
The acceptable grounds for a new trial include:
- If a guilty verdict is tainted by jury misconduct,
- Prosecutorial misconduct.
- An error of law by the court, or
- Insufficient evidence.
To do so, file a motion before the judge pronounces judgment, usually during a California sentencing hearing. If the judge grants the motion, the new trial begins with a clean slate. It erases the previous trial as if it never happened.
Attendance at a Sentencing Hearing
When a judge renders a verdict, a sentencing hearing is scheduled. At this stage, the judge determines the appropriate punishment. This stage allows the defendant, their legal counsel, and prosecutors to present arguments about sentencing.
During sentencing, the judge evaluates both mitigating and aggravating circumstances. Mitigating factors could lessen the punishment’s severity. On the other hand, aggravating factors contribute to a more severe sentence. The objective is to achieve a fair and equitable outcome by carefully considering the unique details and circumstances of the case.
Filing An Appeal
In cases where there are legal grounds to challenge the verdict or aspects of the trial, you can file an appeal. This formal request entails seeking a higher court’s review of the decision to assess whether any errors occurred during the trial.
Filing an appeal does not mean initiating a new trial. Instead, it involves the higher court reviewing the lower court’s decision to identify potential legal errors. The appellate process does not include reexamining evidence but concentrates on legal procedures and interpretations. A successful appeal could result in:
- Modifications to the previous decision.
- A retrial, or
- Other appropriate legal remedies, depending on the specifics of the case.
Contact an Experienced Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
The court process is undeniably intricate. It is advisable to seek the services of a Van Nuys criminal defense attorney to navigate this complexity and increase the chances of securing the best legal outcome in a criminal case.
At Leah Legal, our expertise is pivotal in preventing pitfalls while navigating the criminal justice system. We will help you strategically guide the legal system. Additionally, we will provide a strong and tailored defense for your specific situation. All our efforts aim to secure the best legal outcome in your criminal case, whether it is an infraction, misdemeanor, or felony. Contact us at 818-484-1100 to schedule a free case evaluation.
People are increasingly using dating apps to interact and meet with new people. However, the convenience and anonymity of these apps also bring a higher risk of rape. While these occurrences are not exclusive to Tinder, incidents of rape on dating apps, commonly referred to as Tinder rape or dating app rape, are becoming more prevalent.
When an individual exploits dating apps and sites to lure their victim into a risky situation and subsequently commits a sexual assault, it is commonly referred to as “Tinder rape.” This blog takes a look at how dating apps can lead to Tinder rape charges.
The Risks of Meet-Ups on Dating Apps
If you’re a busy person, you’ve probably considered online dating. The reason behind this is that individuals who lead busy lives sometimes struggle to prioritize face-to-face meetings and dates. Due to its many benefits, many individuals choose to date online. Dating apps not only save you time by allowing you to browse through hundreds of accounts, but it also makes meeting new people and going on in-person dates easier.
On dating sites, users use language to express their identities and desires. Based on your preferences, you may match with one or more people. That’s how finding the right mate becomes simple. However, not all of the information you read online is reliable. Some people frequently upload false information about themselves as well as what they like on dating websites.
Some even post old or fake pictures of themselves online to trick potential partners. It can be difficult to get to know the individual you are conversing with when you register and begin looking for a hookup. That remains an issue, even though the majority of dating sites claim to have strict verification requirements.
Upon registering on the dating app, you’re matched with a select group of individuals who fit your criteria as well as those who are looking for someone with your qualifications. After finding a match, you begin communicating, exchanging details, and arranging to meet in person. Certain first dates—usually those featuring couples who have been sincere with one another from the start—go extremely well.
However, what happens if the individual you were anticipating for your date does not show up? That might be an issue if you found out during your initial meeting that they had initially misled you about how they looked. Some people become too invested in their relationships to look back after they discover they’ve been deceived. Imagine discovering, after engaging in sexual activity, that someone had deceived you.
Even after enrolling, some dating websites guarantee instant hookups. On the same day that you register, you can connect with a possible mate. These types of dating applications are likely to draw in more violent offenders and predators. Either party can’t meet each other and discover anything about the other in only a few hours. Sadly, the anonymous nature of internet dating applications is exploited by con artists and sexual offenders. They employ it to trick gullible people into falling into their trap.
To mitigate the dangers associated with meeting people through dating apps, consider implementing the following measures:
- Meetings should always take place in public settings, and it is important to notify someone of your plans
- Never leave personal items or beverages unattended
- Embrace your gut feeling. If something seems strange or uneasy, end the meeting immediately
- Consider your safety and avoid sharing your personal information or location
- If you believe that you’re in danger, call the police immediately
Consent is crucial to any sex-related activity. If an individual refuses to give consent, it is essential to respect their decision. Engaging in sexual activity without consent can result in serious consequences, including potential allegations of rape.
Possible Rape Charges for Using a Tinder Dating App
When individuals meet and have sex after interacting online, the lies they publish on dating websites turn into a serious crime. Many people lie about their age, and such lies can occasionally cause serious issues. Accurately determining an individual’s age through internet discussion can be challenging. That’s why most people lie about how old they are in the hopes of getting away with the case.
Before you physically interact with a potential companion, consider their age if you’re an adult seriously searching for an intimate companion online. The reason for this is that the individual may turn out not to be an adult as he or she claims, you could be charged with rape.
Adults are permitted to register on most dating platforms and communicate with other members. However, children have managed to get access to these online dating websites. To register and set up profiles, they utilize fictitious credentials. When conversing with someone, you can initially think that you’re interacting with a legitimate adult, even though they are a minor.
If you had sex with the individual in question, you would still be held accountable for statutory rape allegations, even if you could prove you thought they were lying about how old they were. It is legally required that you have verification of the other person’s age before having intercourse with an unknown person.
Serious statutory rape charges arise from having sex with a person between the age of fourteen and eighteen. Even if the accused victim gave their consent for the sexual actions, you could still be charged. The prosecution must provide evidence that you engaged in sexual activity with a child. However, “good faith belief” is a defense your lawyer can use to refute the accusations. Your counsel must prove that you genuinely believed the other person was a legitimate adult for the court to approve your defense. They might have presented you with a fictitious ID to verify their age.
It’s difficult to determine someone’s actual age just by glancing at them. A layperson could perceive people between the ages of fifteen and twenty-five as being identical. Certain adults could pass for teens with ease. Some teenagers could also pass for youthful adults with ease. While using the “good faith belief” defense to get leniency, you still need to persuade the jury and judge that your belief in the other person’s age is reasonable for any adult. It is also expected of you to provide evidence for your conclusion that the person was an adult. In this instance, your justifications ought to go beyond appearance.
If you are charged with statutory rape and the prosecution has solid proof against you, it will be difficult to win the case. Having intercourse with someone you encounter online may also result in charges of rape. That can occur if the other individual claims you had sex with them without their permission or against their consent. Any age of the victim could result in rape charges.
Occasionally, the exhilaration of meeting someone new can get to the point where one makes rash judgments that could lead to false accusations on the road. For instance, if your initial encounter turns into a wild night of partying and you both have sex but the other is too drunk to give their consent, they could report you for rape.
To have sexual relations with someone else, you need their express agreement. A person has the right to report you for rape if they indicate they don’t want to have sex, but you pressure them into it. It is legally impossible for someone under the influence of drugs or alcohol to give consent to sexual conduct. If you have sexual relations with them, you’ll be charged with rape.
How to Prevent Charges of Tinder Rape Following a Match
Most people take precautions these days to avoid becoming rape victims. However, regrettably, exaggerated statements do occur, and anything that transpires in private could be exploited against you. Therefore, it is wise to strive to avoid misunderstanding and becoming the target of unfounded allegations.
You cannot presume that someone you are interacting with has good intentions if you aren’t familiar with them. You just have what you viewed on someone’s Tinder profile to go on when you meet them.
By keeping an eye out for warning signs, you can foresee issues and steer clear of meetings in the following situations:
- You were both intoxicated
- The individual exhibits symptoms of emotional anguish or mental illness.
- There is a chance of blackmail
Another thing to consider is whether the other individual disclosed a tumultuous or intermittent past relationship. Damaged claims can occasionally result from someone trying to hide infidelity. They can say they were sexually attacked rather than admitting to adultery.
Penalties of Tinder Rape Charges
In the unfortunate event that someone you interacted with on a dating app accuses you of sexual misconduct, it is important to understand the potential consequences. The prosecutor will investigate the allegations and present a case in court. If you are convicted, you could face severe consequences and other potentially devastating consequences. To be fully prepared for any allegations that may arise from online dating, it is crucial to be aware of the associated penalties.
Rape Penalties
Rape is often classified as a direct felony and is punishable by the following:
- Felony probation
- Sentence of 3, 6, or 8 years
- An obligation to sign up for the national sex offender registry
- An additional 3 to 5 years should the claimed victim have suffered serious physical harm
Statutory Rape Legal Consequences
Statutory rape is considered a wobbler crime, meaning that the prosecutor has the discretion to file charges as either a felony or a misdemeanor based on the details of the case. When prosecuting statutory rape, prosecutors typically employ three strategies. The severity of the charges, whether felony or misdemeanor, will determine the consequences you may face.
If the perpetrator is no more than 3 years older than the alleged minor victim, statutory rape is considered a misdemeanor violation. However, if the supposed minor victim is younger compared to the accused person by more than 3 years, it can be classified as either a misdemeanor crime or a felony crime.
If the alleged victim of the accused is under the age of sixteen and the offender is 21 years or older, the offense can be classified as either a misdemeanor or a felony. It is important to note that a felony punishment under this classification is generally more severe than that under the 2nd category.
When determining how to charge you, the prosecutor would also take into account the severity of the case and your criminal history. Penalties for a misdemeanor could include the following:
- Misdemeanor probation
- One year behind bars
- Hefty cash fines not exceeding $1,000
A conviction for a felony crime could lead to the following consequences:
- Felony probation
- $10,000 in fines
- Two, three, or sixteen months in prison
Protecting Yourself Against Tinder Rape Charges
Trying to defend yourself against Tinder rape charges can be challenging. It is crucial that you fully understand the allegations made against you and explore any possible legal arguments that may be in your favor.
Here are some tactics to defend yourself against Tinder rape charges:
Gathering Evidence
To effectively defend yourself against Tinder rape charges, it is crucial to gather evidence as a first step. Here are a few examples of the types of proof that could strengthen your case:
- Communication logs. Gather all correspondence you have exchanged with the victim, including emails and messages. These logs could be utilized to establish whether any claimed misconduct was consented to or if the claims are false
- If there were additional witnesses to the incident scene or individuals with details of the circumstances being investigated, their statements could be valuable in supporting your defense
- Audio or video recordings can serve as evidence of an occurrence and can help challenge the victim’s version of events if they exist
- A witness with expertise in a specific field, such as DNA or forensics, may give testimony on scientific or technical matters relevant to your case
This evidence can be destroyed or lost over time, so it should be collected promptly.
Seek Legal Counsel
The initial step in fighting rape charges while using dating apps is to seek legal counsel. Engaging the services of a defense lawyer can provide you with several advantages:
- A lawyer can assist you in understanding the specific accusations made against you as well as the potential consequences of a conviction
- To obtain information and develop a defense plan for your specific circumstances, an impartial investigation of the case will be conducted
- Engaging in negotiations with the prosecutor, a lawyer may attempt to obtain a plea agreement or have the charges dropped
- Representation in court. A qualified professional can argue on your behalf and provide evidence in support of you during legal proceedings.
- Defend your rights. A lawyer will defend your legal rights throughout court proceedings
You stand a better chance of effectively defending yourself if you seek legal counsel as soon as possible. By obtaining the assistance of a professional defense lawyer, you will be guided through the court system and gain a better understanding of your rights and options. Moreover, they can provide valuable counsel on the most suitable course of action for your situation.
Avoid Speaking With Police Officers Without Legal Counsel
If you are accused of Tinder rape charges, you should refrain from speaking to the law enforcers without legal counsel. Engaging in conversation with law enforcement without your attorney present could be damaging to your lawsuit for these reasons:
- You run the risk of incriminating yourself, even if you had no intention of doing so
- There is a possibility of misunderstanding the circumstances when you lack legal counsel. Without proper representation, you may not have a complete understanding of the accusations against you or how the court system works. Additionally, there is a risk of unintentionally mentioning something that could undermine your argument
- The authorities may employ various strategies, including lying and manipulation, to coerce you into saying things that go against your better judgment
In addition to providing you with legal advice, an attorney can protect your rights if you are being questioned or interrogated. In court, anything you say to the police officers could be utilized against you.
Get Ready for Trial
To be ready, you should do the following:
- Understand the allegations against you. To gain insight into the prosecution’s position and create a defense plan, carefully review the charges and accompanying documentation.
- Examine the evidence. Carefully examine all the information that has been gathered, considering any footage, statements, or additional proof that could potentially be used in court against you.
- Assemble your defense. Support your lawyer in assembling your defense, including any supporting documentation or witnesses.
- Rehearse your testimonial. If you anticipate taking the stand, it is recommended to rehearse your statement with your lawyer. This will ensure that you’re prepared to respond to questions effectively in court
- Make a positive impression on the jury and the judge by choosing appropriate clothing for the occasion
Contact a Sex Crimes Defense Lawyer Near Me
If you or some you know is facing Tinder rape charges, it’s important to contact a sex crime defense lawyer promptly. A knowledgeable lawyer can help you navigate the court system, understand the accusations made against you, and explore possible defenses. We at Leah Legal in Van Nuys can help defend you if you’re facing rape allegations. Contact us today at 818-484-1100.
Have you ever heard of the term “sexual grooming” and wondered what it means, especially in child abuse cases? This phrase often surfaces in news stories and legal discussions, but people do not fully understand it.
In California, sexual grooming manifests in various forms, such as physical, emotional, online, community-based, peer, and authority figure grooming. Each form exploits different environments and relationships.
The statutes criminalizing sexual grooming, such as the Federal Child Pornography Law, Penal Code 272, Penal Code 288, Penal Code 288.3, and Penal Code 288.4, harshly punish the heinous act.
If you or a family member are facing charges for sexual grooming, you want to retain an experienced lawyer. With the help of a defense lawyer, you could build solid defenses and fight the child abuse allegations.
An Overview of sexual grooming
Sexual grooming is a process used by perpetrators to gain the trust of a child, with the ultimate goal of sexual exploitation. This deceptive practice involves an adult establishing a connection with a child, often through manipulation, kindness, or coercion, to create an emotional bond. This bond then becomes a tool for exploiting the child sexually.
The process is often subtle and gradual, making it challenging to detect early on. It involves a series of stages, starting with targeting the victim, gaining trust, filling a need, isolating the child, sexualizing the relationship, and maintaining control. The abuser often appears charming and trustworthy, which can deceive not only the child but also the caregivers or parents.
To the outside world, the abuser’s actions might seem good or benevolent. They might engage in community activities, be active in schools, or be well-respected members of society. This facade not only helps them get close to children but also makes it hard for others to believe the child if they disclose the abuse.
Sexual grooming has also extended to online platforms. Here, the perpetrators use the anonymity and accessibility of the internet to connect with and exploit children. They may pose as peers, offer gifts or attention, and use the privacy of digital communication to initiate and escalate inappropriate interactions.
Statutes that criminalize sexual grooming include:
- Federal Child Pornography Law (18 U.S.C. § 2251)
- Child Molestation, Penal Code 288
- Contacting a Minor to Commit a Felony, Penal Code 3
- Arranging a Meeting with a Child for Lewd Purposes, Penal Code 288.4
Indicators of Sexual Grooming
Identifying sexual grooming can be challenging due to its secretive nature. However, certain indicators can signal that a child might be the grooming target. These include:
Excessive Attention and Gifts
A common tactic groomers use is lavishing the child with attention, affection, and gifts. This might include toys, money, or other items that appeal to the child. The intention is to create a bond and a sense of obligation or secrecy between the groomer and the child.
Isolation Tactics
Groomers often try to isolate the child from their peers or family members. They may create situations where they can be alone with the child, encouraging them to keep secrets or spend more time away from others. By doing so, they can groom the child without the detection of other adults.
Inappropriate Communication
Inappropriate communication includes conversations that are sexual, but it can start more innocently, with the perpetrator sharing personal or intimate information to encourage the child to do the same. Over time, the communication may become more explicitly sexual.
Special Treatment
The child might receive special treatment from the abuser, such as preferential attention or leniency. This sets the child apart from their peers, creating a ‘special’ relationship that can be exploited.
Testing Boundaries
Groomers often test boundaries with inappropriate jokes, physical contact, or showing the child pornographic material. These actions are designed to satisfy the sexual urge of the perpetrator before moving on to a real sexual act. This physical contact could include intentionally touching the minor’s genitalia and lingering touches.
Changes in Child’s Behavior
A child undergoing grooming may exhibit sudden changes in behavior. This can include withdrawal, mood swings, secretive behavior, or unexplained fearfulness around certain individuals.
Online Behavior
With the rise of digital communication, groomers often use social media, chat apps, or online gaming to connect with children. Signs include the child spending excessive time online, being secretive about their online activities, or receiving gifts (like gaming credits) from unknown sources.
Types of Sexual Grooming in California
Sexual grooming in California manifests in several forms, each with unique characteristics but sharing the common goal of manipulating and exploiting minors. Understanding these types can aid in recognizing and preventing abuse.
1. Physical Grooming
This involves direct, in-person interaction. The groomer might create situations to be alone with the child, such as offering to babysit, driving them to activities, or hosting sleepovers. Physical grooming often starts with a non-sexual touch that gradually becomes more invasive.
2. Emotional Grooming
Emotional grooming targets the child’s psychological needs. The groomer may position themselves as a mentor, confidante, or the only person who truly understands the child. This creates an emotional dependency that can be exploited.
3. Online Grooming
Online groomers use the internet to target victims. They may use social media, chat rooms, or online gaming to connect with children. They create a sense of intimacy and secrecy through private messages, often escalating to sending or requesting inappropriate images or videos.
4. Community-Based Grooming
Here, groomers take advantage of their status within a community, such as a school, church, or sports team, to gain trust and access to children. They may use their position to single out a child for special treatment or attention.
5. Peer Grooming
Sometimes, groomers are close in age to the victim. This type of grooming can occur in schools or social groups, where the perpetrator uses their influence or popularity to exploit a peer.
6. Grooming by Authority Figures
In these cases, the groomer is in a position of authority over the child, such as a teacher, coach, or family member. They abuse their power to create a situation where the child feels compelled to comply with their demands.
Places in Which Sexual Grooming of a Minor Occurs
Sexual grooming can occur in a variety of environments, each offering different opportunities for groomers to exploit. You want to know where this crime occurs to help identify and prevent grooming behaviors.
In the Home
Often, grooming begins in the child’s own home. The perpetrator might be a family member, a close family friend, or someone with regular access to the home, like a babysitter or a neighbor. The familiarity and trust associated with home environments make it easier for the groomer to manipulate the child without raising suspicion.
Schools and Educational Settings
Schools, daycares, and after-school programs are common settings for grooming. Abusers may include teachers, coaches, staff members, caregivers, or older students. They may use their authority or influence to build a relationship with the minor, often singling them out for special attention or privileges.
Online and Digital Platforms
The internet has become a significant venue for sexual grooming. Predators use social media, chat rooms, online forums, and gaming platforms to connect with potential victims. The perpetrator will create fake profiles to disguise their identity and intentions, making it challenging to detect their real motives.
Community and Recreational Centers
Places like sports clubs, religious institutions, community centers, and youth groups can be settings for grooming. The perpetrators in these environments may use their position to gain a child’s or parent’s trust, often under the guise of mentorship or guidance.
Public Spaces
Public areas like parks, malls, and playgrounds can also be sites for grooming activities. Groomers may use these spaces to observe and approach children, often attempting to initiate a conversation or offering to buy them something.
Events and Gatherings
Social events, parties, and gatherings, where adults and children interact can also provide opportunities for perpetrators to establish connections with children. They might use these events to get closer to the child and their family.
What are Some Grooming Behaviors?
Groomers often exhibit patterns of behavior that may appear benign at first, are manipulative, and are aimed at exploiting the child. They include the following:
Establishing Trust and Rapport
Groomers often begin by building a relationship with the child. This might involve sharing secrets, showing understanding of the minor’s emotional or psychological issues, or being a figure of authority or mentorship. The aim is to establish a bond that makes the child feel special and understood.
Filling a Need
Many groomers identify and fill a void in the child’s life. This could be emotional, like providing attention and affection, or material, like gifts and money. By fulfilling these needs, the groomer positions themselves as indispensable in the minor’s life.
Isolation
A critical step in grooming is isolating the child from their family and peers. The groomer may encourage the child to keep secrets or spend more time alone with them, creating a private world that excludes others.
Introduction to Touch and Sexual Topics
The gradual introduction of sexual topics and inappropriate touch is a common grooming behavior. It might start with discussions about sex or showing the child pornographic material, progressing to physical touch that becomes increasingly sexual over time.
Pushing Boundaries
Groomers test and push boundaries to see how much they can manipulate the child. This might involve breaking rules, like staying up late or encouraging the child to engage in behaviors they are uncomfortable with.
Or even walking in on the minor while they are bathing or toileting or even leaving the bathroom door open while the abuser is toileting. The perpetrator might also ask the minor to participate in activities requiring removing clothes.
Creating Dependency and Loyalty
The groomer often creates a sense of dependency and loyalty in the child. They shower the child with gifts and money. This can make the child feel like they owe the groomer something or are partners.
Manipulation and Control
Groomers use tactics like guilt, shame, or even threats to maintain control over the child. This can lead to the child feeling trapped and unable to disclose the abuse.
Secrecy and Threats
Maintaining secrecy is vital for the groomer. They might threaten the child that they could harm their parents or use manipulation to ensure that the child does not reveal the nature of their relationship.
The Goal of Grooming
Sexual groomers groom minors to manipulate or exploit them for sensual purposes. While the specific objectives can vary, they generally revolve around the following:
Minor’s Secrecy and Control
The primary goal of grooming is to gain control over the victim and ensure secrecy. The groomer will manipulate the child into believing that their relationship is normal, special, or necessary. This control is psychological, making it difficult for the child to recognize the abuse or to speak out against the groomer.
Sexual Exploitation
Sexual grooming is often aimed at preparing the child for sexual exploitation. The groomer gradually breaks down the child’s reserved nature and normalizes sexual behavior, paving the way for abuse. This exploitation is not always immediate; it can be a long-term goal that the groomer works towards.
Power and Dominance
For some groomers, the act of grooming is less about sexual gratification and more about the sense of power and dominance they gain from manipulating and controlling a child. They derive satisfaction from the ability to deceive, control, and exploit the innocence of their victim.
Avoiding Detection
Perpetrators often aim to carry out their abuse without being detected. They use secretive and manipulative tactics, carefully constructing their actions so as not to raise suspicions. This includes creating a persona that appears trustworthy and caring to outsiders.
To Satisfy Themselves Emotionally
In some cases, groomers seek emotional gratification from their relationship with the minor. They might see the child as a companion or a romantic interest, blurring the lines between a predatory relationship and a consensual one. The abuser enjoys it when they can prepare a child to participate in sexual acts without anyone around the minor noticing.
Sexual Grooming Procedure
The most common procedure followed by a sexual groomer while grooming a minor includes the following:
Targeting the Victim
Groomers often seek out vulnerable children who may need attention or affection. This could be due to various factors, such as familial neglect, emotional vulnerability, or social isolation. The perpetrator identifies a child who they believe will be receptive to their advances and unlikely to disclose the abuse.
Gaining Trust and Access
The groomer begins to establish a relationship with the child, often through seemingly innocent means. They may take on roles that put them close to children, like becoming a coach, mentor, or family friend. The groomer gains the child’s and their parent’s or guardian’s trust.
Filling a Need
The perpetrator identifies and fulfills the child’s emotional or material needs to establish their plans further. This could be in gifts, attention, affection, or even fulfilling a role the child misses, like a father figure or a trusted confidant.
Isolating the Child
After the perpetrator establishes themselves as the most trusted person in the minor’s life, they work to isolate the child from their usual support network. This could involve arranging alone time with the child, encouraging secrets, or creating situations that alienate them from their friends and family.
Sexualizing the Relationship
At this stage, the groomer begins introducing sexual elements into the relationship. This might start with inappropriate jokes, touching the child’s genitalia, showing pornography, or discussing sexual topics, gradually desensitizing the child to sexual content and behavior.
Maintaining Control
Once the sexual abuse begins, the groomer uses various tactics to maintain control and ensure the child’s silence. This can include manipulation, threats, guilt, or even professing love and affection to confuse the child and prevent disclosure.
Execution and Exploitation
Here, the actual sexual exploitation of the child occurs. The groomer has built an environment of trust and secrecy, allowing them to abuse the child while minimizing the risk of being discovered.
What the Prosecutor Must Prove in Court
The prosecution must prove the following for you to be convicted of sexual grooming:
Communication Records
One of the most direct forms of evidence in grooming cases is the record of communication between the alleged groomer and the minor. This includes text messages, emails, social media interactions, and digital communication. These records can reveal the nature of the relationship, showcasing any progression from seemingly innocent interaction to sexually explicit content.
Expert Testimony
Expert witnesses play a pivotal role in grooming cases. These experts, often psychologists or child behavior specialists, can provide insight into the patterns and effects of grooming. Their testimony can help the court understand how groomers manipulate and exploit their victims and the psychological impact on the child.
Documentation of Gifts or Favors
Groomers often use gifts or favors to gain the trust of their victims. Documentation of these receipts, the child’s testimony about receiving these gifts, or witness accounts can be used to support the grooming allegations. This evidence can demonstrate the groomer’s attempts to establish and maintain a relationship with the child.
Witness Testimony
Testimonies from individuals who observed the alleged groomer’s behavior can be highly influential. This may include family members, teachers, neighbors, or anyone who noticed unusual interactions between the accused and the child.
Records of Your Online Interactions
Prosecutors may present chat logs, online profiles, and internet history to demonstrate the accused’s attempts to contact and groom the child. This includes showing any grooming behaviors that occurred through digital platforms.
CCTV Footage
Video footage from surveillance or security cameras can provide tangible evidence of the accused’s interactions with the child. This might include footage showing meetings, locations, or situations that support the grooming allegations.
Behavioral Evidence
Changes in the child’s behavior or emotional state, as observed by people close to them, can support the grooming claim. This includes shifts in mood, secrecy, withdrawal, or distress following interactions with the accused.
Find a Criminal Lawyer Near Me
Facing charges of sexual grooming can be a challenging and distressing experience. If you find yourself in this situation, you want to seek professional legal assistance immediately.
At Leah Legal, we understand the sensitivity of child abuse cases and recognize the impact a conviction could have on your life. Therefore, our team of experienced criminal lawyers is equipped to build strong defenses that could lead to the dismissal of charges or a reduction in penalties. Contact us today at 814-484-1100 so we can start working on your case.
Crimes committed by minors under the age of 18 are the main focus of the California juvenile delinquent court system. Although juveniles could still face serious consequences for certain offenses, the emphasis in the juvenile court system is on rehabilitation rather than punishment, unlike the adult criminal system. Violent crimes committed by minors carry significant weight in the eyes of the juvenile court and can lead to severe and long-lasting consequences. This blog explores how juveniles are prosecuted for violent offenses in California.
California’s Juvenile Crime Prosecution
California law considers individuals under the age of eighteen as minors. As a result, if individuals break the law, they will be prosecuted in juvenile court. However, there are certain situations where they can face adult charges. The main distinctions between a juvenile court and an adult criminal court include the ability to seal a juvenile record, the types of punishments imposed, the long-term consequences of a conviction, and the trial procedures used.
The main objective of the juvenile justice system is to help children undergo rehabilitation and personal growth. In contrast, the primary goal of an adult court is to punish offenders. The juvenile justice system and the law provide minors with the opportunity to change their behavior and become law-abiding adults. According to California law, minors cannot be tried in adult court.
Adolescents who are under the age of eighteen are typically under the jurisdiction of a juvenile court. However, in certain cases, the juvenile justice system could have authority over individuals under the age of twelve and up to the age of 25, depending on the severity of the offense.
Senate Bill (SB) 1391
In 2018, SB 1391 was passed, superseding the Prop 21 legislation. Previously, individuals under the age of 14 could face adult charges. However, with the enactment of Senate Bill 1391, you can only be tried as an adult in court if you are 16 years of age or older.
According to SB 1391, offenses committed while under the age of sixteen cannot be charged as an adult. Previously, serious and violent crimes committed by individuals aged 14 or older could have led to adult prosecution.
As per this law, you will only be subject to adult prosecution if you:
- Have reached the age of sixteen.
- Committed the crime when you were younger than sixteen, but you weren’t caught until you were older than eighteen.
- Are older than sixteen and the prosecution feels that your case should be sent to an adult court.
In the past, if you were 16 or older and committed a crime, you could have been prosecuted as an adult. Additionally, if you were fourteen or fifteen years old and involved in violent acts, you might have also faced an adult trial.
Prop 21
In 2000, voters approved California Prop 21, also known as the Juvenile Justice Initiative. This program aimed to reduce the high rate of youth offenses, particularly those associated with gang involvement. Under this rule, the prosecution has the option to charge a minor as an adult, regardless of their age. The Act also specifies certain offenses that require juvenile offenders to be prosecuted as adults. These include violent crimes such as murder, specific sexual offenses, and other serious and violent offenses.
Violent Offenses for Which a Juvenile Can Be Referred for Adult Prosecution
To be charged in an adult court, the crime committed must fall under one of the following categories. These offenses could also be classified as violent crimes under WIC 707(b).
- Kidnapping to rob someone.
- Kidnapping with intent to harm.
- Forced sexual interaction.
- Kidnapping for monetary gain.
- A lascivious or lewd act with the threat of force, violence, or significant bodily harm committed against a child under the age of fourteen.
- Threats of violent acts, serious bodily harm, or coercive oral copulation.
- Forceful or violent rapes or those in which physical harm is threatened.
- Sodomy using physical force, aggression, or threats of harm.
- Arson intended to cause significant physical harm or to target inhabited places.
- Assault with a weapon or potentially harmful object.
- Attempted murder.
- Robbery.
- Assault involving a high risk of serious physical harm.
- Aggravated mayhem.
- Murder.
- Detonating a gadget with the intention of murder.
- Voluntary manslaughter.
- Kidnapping to sexually abuse the victim.
- Drive-by-shooting.
- Carjacking.
- Certain offenses against individuals aged sixty years or older.
- Threatening or buying off a witness.
- Manufacturing, blending, or selling a half-ounce or greater quantity of an illicit substance.
- Using a weapon in an occupied or populated structure.
- Making use of a weapon that California PC 16590a explicitly prohibits.
Procedures for Charging a Juvenile Before an Adult Court for Violent Crimes
The prosecutor’s office has two options when a youngster is charged with a WIC 707(b) crime: they can either file a petition with the juvenile court asking for a “fitness hearing,” where the judge determines whether the child is qualified to face charges in the juvenile court.
In situations where minors under 16 years old are charged with WIC 707(b) crimes, hate crimes, crimes against victims who are over 65, or crimes allegedly associated with gang affiliation, the prosecution could opt to “direct file” the proceedings in adult court.
Juvenile courts typically prioritize helping children improve rather than punishing them. Before considering charging a minor in adult court, several factors must be considered. There are various approaches you can take to achieve this:
The prosecution has the option to file the case directly in an adult court or request a “fitness” hearing in juvenile court. In the latter scenario, child court judges have the authority to charge a juvenile as an adult if they determine that rehabilitation is not suitable. This includes charging eligible juveniles as adults for certain serious felonies without delay.
If neither of the previously specified procedures was completed before the matter was brought before the adult court, the court could dismiss the offender’s case. To ensure that the proper procedures are followed, parents or other close family members of the youngster should speak with an experienced juvenile criminal defense lawyer.
Detention Hearing
In juvenile justice proceedings, bail is not available. Instead, minors have detention hearings, where the court decides whether to keep them in a juvenile detention center or release them to their parents while the juvenile court case is pending.
The detention hearing aims to determine the best course of action for the physical custody of the juvenile. Typically, the purpose is to decide whether the minor should remain in juvenile custody for the duration of the trial or be allowed to return home with their family.
The seriousness of the offense, any prior convictions, and the parent’s capacity to provide a suitable and stable environment with appropriate supervision are typical factors that affect a person’s detention status. It’s important to note that the detention hearing must occur within 48 hours of the offender’s incarceration in this case. Any further delay would violate California’s juvenile statutes and the child’s rights.
This deadline highlights the importance of hiring a juvenile attorney as soon as possible, as there is no bail in the juvenile court system. Ensuring the prompt release of a child cannot be guaranteed, making it essential to have an attorney who is familiar with California’s juvenile rules and regulations.
Certain violent offenses are eligible to be heard in the juvenile delinquent court, even though they could be transferred directly to the adult criminal court without a direct filing or a fitness hearing. Unlike in the adult court system, a child accused of a crime cannot post bail to secure their release while the case is pending.
During the juvenile’s arraignment, the judge will decide whether to grant a speedy discharge or to keep the child in jail until the case is resolved.
Situations That Allow the Prosecutor to File A Fitness Hearing
A petition for a suitability hearing should only be filed in dire circumstances. If it is not necessary, the decision will inevitably be made in favor of the minor offender. It’s crucial to keep in mind that minors have legal protections and shouldn’t face punishment unless necessary.
The prosecutor is only required to begin the proceedings in the following situations:
- The accused minor, aged 14 or older, is charged with violating WIC 707(b).
- The defendant has been accused of a crime and is at least 16 years old.
- The minor is at least sixteen years old and allegedly has committed a crime in the past that led to them being placed under court supervision.
- The minor has committed two or more offenses since turning fourteen.
If the matter does not fall into one of the three categories listed above, it could not be appropriate for the prosecutor to file the motion. A strong defense from your defense attorney can help you argue for your child to receive rehabilitation instead of punishment.
How A Fitness Hearing Works
The court could, at its discretion or the prosecutor’s request, hold a fitness hearing after the detention hearing. Fitness hearings are usually conducted in criminal courts to hear and make decisions regarding your loved one’s case.
After the hearing, your child’s case might be transferred to a regular criminal court, or they might go to trial in a juvenile court. If your loved one is charged with a violent or serious crime (any offense covered under WIC 707(b)), they are likely to appear at a fitness hearing.
In some cases involving juveniles and violence, prosecutors have the option to transfer them directly to adult courts. However, it is always possible for a minor to receive the protection of a juvenile court. These hearings are necessary as a result.
Prosecutors only request a fitness hearing when it is necessary. Due to legal protections for children, your child will not face disciplinary punishment unless it is truly necessary or unavoidable.
The prosecutor can request a fitness hearing in the following situations:
- If the major offense was committed by your loved one when they were 14 years of age or older.
- The child became a ward of the court at the age of 14, committed at least two more serious felonies at the same age, and then committed a grave felony when he was at least sixteen.
- If they were at least 16 years old at the time of their arrest and faced significant felony charges.
If the circumstances in your case do not warrant a fitness hearing, it is unjust for the prosecutor to file a motion for one. A dedicated criminal defense lawyer can stand by your side, supporting you in your pursuit of therapy and recovery rather than punishment.
Depending on how the hearing goes, your loved one could or could not be charged with a crime as an adult. The court must consider the prosecution’s claims and supporting documentation to make a decision. To make a fair decision, they must also listen to your testimony and consider any evidence you or your child could have. The judge should also take into account the juvenile’s past misbehavior, as well as the type and seriousness of the underlying crime.
The court will consider the following elements when deciding how to proceed with a fitness hearing:
- If the child has the opportunity to receive assistance before benefiting from the protections of the juvenile justice system.
- How well the juvenile has recovered from prior attempts at rehabilitation.
- The types of crimes the minor has committed in the past, as well as the possibility that they could commit new ones in the future.
- The details and seriousness of the offense that led to the petition.
- The type of underlying crime and its level of sophistication.
The main goals of the fitness hearing are to determine if the minor’s offense falls under the jurisdiction of the juvenile justice system and whether they are eligible for assistance if the case is handled by a juvenile court. The judge could require the prosecutor to file the lawsuit in court if necessary.
Judgment and Disposition
However, the adjudication hearing will take place if the fitness hearing is either dismissed or concludes under California juvenile law. This hearing serves as the juvenile version of a “trial.” California juveniles do not have the right to a jury trial. Instead, a juvenile court adjudicator makes the final decision. At this stage, it is crucial to seek the assistance of a juvenile defense lawyer.
The outcome of the juvenile’s case is declared during the disposition phase, which is the final stage. Unfortunately, the juvenile’s involvement with the California juvenile court system might not be concluded. Typically, the juvenile will receive a probationary term, which is less severe than an adult sentence. Under probation, adolescents can attend school, live with family, receive treatment, or make reparations for damages, depending on the offense.
In other cases, the child could be placed in state custody as a Ward of the State/Court until they reach the age of eighteen. In some of the worst circumstances, they could be detained until they turn 25. Juveniles in juvenile court are considered guilty of committing an alleged offense, but they are not found guilty as individuals if the juvenile court judge determines that the criminal accusations are well-founded.
Therefore, there is no conviction to expunge. However, several circumstances can make this process impossible. Nevertheless, individuals who have completed the juvenile program often request to have their criminal records sealed.
Certain violent offenses could remain in the juvenile delinquent court, even though they can be transferred directly to adult courts without the need for fitness hearings or direct filings. Unlike in the adult court system, a juvenile accused of a crime cannot post bail to secure their release while the case is pending.
During the arraignment of the juvenile, the judge will decide whether to keep the kid in jail until the case is resolved or to release them with strict conditions so they can go back home. This decision will largely rely on the remarks and advice given by the probation officer.
Consequences That A Minor Could Face
If juveniles are found guilty in adult courts, they will face severe consequences. The most severe outcome for a young person convicted in juvenile court is that they could be kept in custody by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Department of Juvenile Facilities until the age of 25.
However, depending on the seriousness of the crime, a minor charged in adult court can face the same penalties as an adult, such as life in jail without the possibility of parole. It is important to note that the death sentence could never be applied to a minor.
Minors accused of serious crimes in the juvenile court system are granted many of the same rights and benefits as adult criminals. This includes the opportunity to review the evidence against them, the right to invite witnesses to testify, and the right to discovery. Having an experienced juvenile defense lawyer could be essential, especially in situations where the charges could have been brought due to the youngster resorting to violence in self-defense.
Find A Van Nuys Juvenile Attorney Near Me
If someone you care about is accused of a serious crime, it is normal to feel overwhelmed with emotions. This situation can become more complicated if the prosecution wants to move the case to an adult court due to the seriousness of the crime. In such cases, it’s crucial to find a professional lawyer who can defend the rights of the accused. At Leah Legal, we specialize in representing minors in criminal defense cases in Van Nuys, California. Our priority is to do everything we can to protect your child’s well-being. Give us a call today at 818-484-1100.
Community programs play a vital role in addressing juvenile delinquency by preventing delinquent behavior, intervening early when necessary, and supporting the rehabilitation and reintegration of youth into society. These programs empower youth to make constructive choices, overcome challenges, and build brighter futures by offering positive alternatives, support, and resources. In this blog, we will explore community programs’ role in addressing juvenile delinquency.
Understanding Juvenile Community-Based Corrections
Juvenile community-based corrections programs are designed to provide rehabilitative interventions for youth involved in the justice system. Unlike traditional incarceration, which often aggravates underlying issues and increases the likelihood of reoffending, community-based corrections focus on addressing the root causes of delinquent behavior while keeping youth connected to their families, schools, and communities. These programs emphasize accountability, skill-building, and positive reinforcement, aiming to promote personal responsibility and facilitate successful reintegration into society.
Key Components of Juvenile Community-Based Corrections Programs
Here are the key components of juvenile community-based corrections programs:
Individualized Treatment Plans
Each youth in a community-based corrections program receives a personalized treatment plan tailored to their unique needs, strengths, and challenges. These plans may include counseling, educational support, vocational training, substance abuse treatment, and mental health services, among other interventions.
Case Management and Supervision
Case managers are critical in overseeing the progress of youth enrolled in community-based corrections programs. They provide ongoing support, monitor compliance with program requirements, and connect youth with resources and services in the community. Through regular meetings and check-ins, case managers help youth stay on track and address any obstacles they may encounter.
Restorative Justice Practices
Restorative justice principles are often incorporated into community-based corrections programs, emphasizing accountability, victim-offender dialogue, and community involvement. Through restorative justice practices such as victim-offender mediation, restitution, and community service, youth are encouraged to take responsibility for their actions, make amends for harm caused, and repair relationships with those affected by their behavior.
Education and Skill Development
Education is a cornerstone of juvenile community-based corrections programs, providing youth with the knowledge and skills they need to succeed. These programs offer academic support, GED preparation, vocational training, and life skills workshops to help youth build a foundation for future success and employment.
Family Involvement
Family engagement is essential for the success of community-based corrections programs. By involving parents and caregivers in the rehabilitation process, these programs strengthen family bonds, improve communication, and provide a supportive network for youth transitioning back into the community. Family counseling, parenting classes, and support groups are common components of family involvement initiatives.
Juvenile Community-Based Corrections Programs
Below is an overview of juvenile community-based corrections programs, highlighting their objectives, key components, and impact on youth and communities.
District Attorney’s Truancy Abatement Program (TAP)
In 1994, recognizing the effects of truancy on academic achievement, juvenile crime rates, and future opportunities for students, the District Attorney’s office launched the Truancy Abatement Program (TAP). The program was established as a proactive response to address truancy at its roots and prevent the escalation of delinquent behavior among youth.
Objectives of TAP
From its inception, the District Attorney’s TAP has been guided by the following objectives:
Early Intervention
TAP aims to intervene early with students demonstrating patterns of truancy, identifying underlying issues, and providing support to address barriers to attendance.
Prevention
TAP seeks to prevent the negative consequences associated with truancy, including academic underachievement, juvenile delinquency, and future involvement in the criminal justice system.
Collaboration
TAP fosters collaboration among schools, law enforcement agencies, community organizations, and families to create a unified approach to addressing truancy and promoting regular school attendance.
Accountability
TAP holds students and parents/guardians accountable for attendance, implements strategies to monitor attendance, provides incentives for improvement, and enforces consequences for continued truancy.
The Fresh Lifelines For Youth Program (FLY)
Founded in 2000, FLY emerged in response to the critical need for effective interventions to address the underlying issues driving youth involvement in the justice system. With a vision of breaking the cycle of incarceration and empowering youth to reach their full potential, FLY began its journey to transform the lives of at-risk youth in California.
Objectives of FLY
The following core objectives guide the Fresh Lifelines For Youth Program (FLY):
Rehabilitation
FLY aims to provide youth with the tools, resources, and support they need to address the underlying issues contributing to their involvement in the justice system and make positive changes in their lives.
Empowerment
FLY seeks to empower youth to become agents of change in their communities by fostering leadership skills, self-confidence, and a sense of purpose and belonging.
Education and Skill-Building
FLY prioritizes education and skill-building, offering academic support, life skills workshops, vocational training, and mentorship opportunities to help youth achieve their educational and career goals.
Community Engagement
FLY emphasizes the importance of community involvement and collaboration, working closely with schools, law enforcement agencies, nonprofits, and other stakeholders to provide comprehensive support to youth and their families.
FLY’s Law Program
Founded as a part of the broader Fresh Lifelines for Youth (FLY) organization, FLY’s Law Program emerged from a recognition of the critical need to equip at-risk youth with legal knowledge and advocacy skills. The program was conceived as a response to the challenges faced by youth involved in the juvenile justice system, aiming to demystify the legal process, promote awareness of rights and responsibilities, and foster civic engagement among youth.
Objectives of FLY’s Law Program
The following core objectives guide FLY’s Law Program:
Legal Education
The program aims to provide youth with a comprehensive understanding of the legal system, including their rights, responsibilities, and the consequences of their actions.
Advocacy Skills
FLY’s Law Program seeks to empower youth with advocacy skills, including communication, negotiation, critical thinking, and problem-solving, enabling them to effectively navigate legal proceedings and advocate for themselves and others.
Civic Engagement
FLY’s Law Program promotes civic engagement and community involvement among youth, encouraging them to become informed and active participants in the legal and democratic processes.
Prevention of Recidivism
By educating youth about the legal consequences of delinquent behavior and providing them with alternatives to involvement in the justice system, FLY’s Law Program aims to prevent recidivism and promote positive behavior change.
Key Components of FLY’s Law Program
FLY’s Law Program incorporates several key components to achieve its objectives:
Legal Workshops
The program offers interactive workshops led by legal professionals, covering topics such as criminal law, juvenile rights, court procedures, and conflict resolution.
Mock Trial Competitions
FLY’s Law Program organizes mock trial competitions where youth have the opportunity to apply their legal knowledge and advocacy skills in a simulated courtroom setting.
Legal Clinics
The program provides access to legal clinics staffed by volunteer attorneys, who offer pro bono legal advice and assistance to youth facing legal challenges or seeking information about their rights.
Youth Leadership Councils
FLY’s Law Program facilitates youth leadership councils where participants can discuss legal issues, develop advocacy campaigns, and become advocates for change in their communities.
Courtroom Observation
The program arranges courtroom observation opportunities, allowing youth to witness real legal proceedings and gain firsthand insight into the justice system’s workings.
Victim-Offender Mediation program
Originating in the restorative justice movement, this program was developed as a collaborative effort between criminal justice professionals, community leaders, and advocates for victims’ rights. The program was designed to provide a structured and supportive framework for victims and offenders to engage in constructive dialogue, address the harm caused by the offense, and work toward resolution and healing.
Objectives of the Victim-Offender Mediation Program
The following core objectives guide the Victim-Offender Mediation Program:
Facilitating Dialogue
The program aims to facilitate open and honest dialogue between victims and offenders, providing a safe and supportive environment for both parties to express their perspectives, emotions, and concerns.
Repairing Harm
By acknowledging the impact of the offense on the victim and the community, the program seeks to identify ways to repair the harm caused and restore relationships to the extent possible.
Promoting Accountability
The program encourages offenders to take responsibility for their actions, acknowledge the consequences of their behavior, and commit to making amends to the victim and affected parties.
Empowering Victims
Through the mediation process, victims are given a voice and an opportunity to express their needs, preferences, and desires for resolution, empowering them to play an active role in the justice process.
Key Components of the Victim-Offender Mediation Program
The Victim-Offender Mediation Program incorporates several key components to achieve its objectives:
Preparation and Facilitation
Trained mediators facilitate the mediation process, guiding participants through structured discussions and helping to establish ground rules and goals for the session.
Voluntary Participation
Participation in the mediation process is voluntary for both victims and offenders, ensuring that all parties enter into the process willingly and without coercion.
Victim-Centered Approach
The program adopts a victim-centered approach, prioritizing the needs, concerns, and preferences of the victim throughout the mediation process.
Confidentiality
Mediation sessions are conducted in a confidential setting, allowing participants to speak freely and openly without fear of reprisal or judgment.
Agreement and Follow-Up
If agreement is reached during mediation, a formal agreement outlining the terms of restitution, apology, or other reparative actions is drafted and signed by all parties.
Follow-up meetings may be conducted to monitor compliance with the agreement and address any issues or concerns that arise.
Leadership Program
Leadership programs play a pivotal role in fostering leadership qualities and nurturing the next generation of leaders. They offer a structured environment for participants to explore their strengths, develop essential skills, and gain practical experience in leadership roles. Moreover, these programs promote collaboration, critical thinking, empathy, and resilience, equipping individuals with the tools they need to navigate complex challenges and drive positive change in their spheres of influence.
Key Components of Leadership Programs
Below are some of the key components of the leadership program:
Skill Development
Leadership programs focus on developing a diverse range of leadership skills, including communication, problem-solving, decision-making, conflict resolution, and strategic planning. Through workshops, seminars, and experiential learning opportunities, participants enhance their abilities to lead effectively in various contexts.
Mentorship and Coaching
Mentorship and coaching play a crucial role in leadership programs, providing participants with guidance, support, and feedback from experienced leaders. Mentors and coaches serve as role models, advisors, and advocates, helping participants navigate challenges, set goals, and achieve their full potential.
Practical Experience
Leadership programs often incorporate hands-on experiences, such as internships, community projects, and leadership roles within organizations or clubs. These opportunities allow participants to apply their skills in real-world settings, gain valuable insights, and make tangible contributions to their communities.
Networking and Collaboration
Leadership programs facilitate networking and collaboration among participants, fostering connections, partnerships, and opportunities for collaboration. By engaging with peers from diverse backgrounds and disciplines, participants broaden their perspectives, build support networks, and forge lasting relationships.
Personal Growth and Reflection
Leadership programs encourage personal growth and reflection, providing opportunities for self-assessment, goal-setting, and ongoing learning. Through activities such as journaling, self-assessment tools, and group discussions, participants gain insights into their strengths, values, and areas for development, fostering a continuous process of growth and self-improvement.
The Youth Advocacy For Educational Rights Project (Project YEA)
Project YEA emerged from a recognition of the pervasive inequities within the education system and the need for dedicated advocacy to address these disparities. Founded by a coalition of educators, activists, and youth leaders, Project YEA was established as a grassroots initiative to amplify the voices of young people and advocate for policies and practices that prioritize educational equity and social justice.
Objectives of Project YEA
The Youth Advocacy For Educational Rights Project (Project YEA) is guided by the following core objectives:
Empowering Youth Voices
Project YEA aims to empower youth to become advocates for their educational rights and active participants in shaping their learning environments.
Promoting Educational Equity
Project YEA advocates for policies and practices that promote educational equity, including access to high-quality education, culturally responsive curriculum, and support services for marginalized and underserved communities.
Addressing Systemic Barriers
Project YEA works to identify and address systemic barriers to educational access and success, including disparities in school funding, disciplinary practices, access to advanced coursework, and resources for students with disabilities or English language learners.
Providing Support and Resources
Project YEA provides support and resources to youth and their families, including information about educational rights, advocacy training, mentorship opportunities, and access to legal assistance when needed.
Key Components of Project YEA
Below are some key components of the YEA program:
Youth Leadership Development
Project YEA offers leadership development opportunities for youth, including training in advocacy skills, public speaking, community organizing, and grassroots mobilization.
Policy Advocacy
Project YEA engages in policy advocacy at the local, state, and national levels, advocating for legislative and policy changes that advance educational equity and support the needs of underserved youth.
Community Engagement
Project YEA fosters community engagement and collaboration, partnering with schools, community organizations, policymakers, and other stakeholders to address systemic challenges and promote positive change.
Legal Support and Advocacy
Project YEA provides legal support and advocacy for youth and families facing educational barriers, including issues related to special education services, school discipline, discrimination, and access to educational resources.
Youth-Led Initiatives
Project YEA supports youth-led initiatives and campaigns aimed at addressing specific educational issues, raising awareness, and mobilizing communities to take action.
Community-Based Alternatives After Adjudication
Community-based alternatives before adjudication encompass a diverse range of programs and interventions designed to divert youth away from the formal juvenile justice system and towards more rehabilitative and supportive pathways. These alternatives often involve collaboration between law enforcement, social services, schools, community organizations, and other stakeholders to provide comprehensive support and resources to at-risk youth and their families.
One example of a community-based alternative before adjudication is diversion programs, which offer eligible youth the opportunity to participate in community service, counseling, restorative justice practices, or other rehabilitative interventions instead of facing formal charges. These programs aim to address the root causes of delinquent behavior, such as family dysfunction, substance abuse, mental health issues, or lack of educational opportunities, while holding youth accountable for their actions and promoting positive behavior change.
Community-Based Alternatives After Adjudication
Community-based alternatives after adjudication encompass a wide range of programs and interventions aimed at supporting youth as they navigate the aftermath of their involvement in the justice system. These alternatives leverage community resources, support networks, and collaborative partnerships to provide comprehensive and holistic support to youth and their families.
One prominent example of a community-based alternative after adjudication is probation or supervised release. Instead of serving time in detention facilities, youth are placed on probation under the supervision of probation officers who monitor their compliance with court-ordered conditions and provide support, guidance, and resources to help them successfully reintegrate into the community. Probation may involve participation in counseling, educational programs, community service, or other rehabilitative interventions tailored to the individual needs of the youth.
Another example is community-based treatment programs, which offer specialized services to address the underlying issues contributing to delinquent behavior, such as substance abuse, mental health disorders, or trauma. These programs provide counseling, therapy, life skills training, educational support, and other resources to help youth overcome challenges, develop positive coping strategies, and build a foundation for long-term success.
Find a Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
If you or a loved one is struggling with juvenile delinquency, there are community programs and resources available to provide support and assistance. Whether you’re a young individual facing challenges or a family member concerned about a loved one’s behavior, reaching out for help is the first step towards finding solutions and creating positive change.
At Leah Legal, we are dedicated to providing knowledgeable guidance to ensure that you or your loved one receives the support and representation needed to navigate through the juvenile justice system. From exploring alternative sentencing options to providing legal representation in court, our Van Nuys defense attorneys are here to support you every step of the way. Call us today at 818-484-1100.
You know how unpleasant an arrest is if it has happened to you or witnessed it happening to someone else. If you are a crime suspect, the police will likely catch you off guard when they knock on your door with a warrant. Most arrestees are caught by surprise because they were unaware of an active arrest or bench warrant against them.
No law enforcement officer will notify you that a judge has issued an arrest warrant for your arrest. You must inquire about the warrant and take the necessary measures to prevent an embarrassing arrest.
However, how do you determine whether you have an active warrant against you?
You must partner with a competent criminal attorney to educate you and walk you through the process.
Legal Definition of a Warrant
As the name suggests, an arrest warrant is an official document issued by a presiding judge to the police, permitting them to arrest a suspect named in the document. Judges issue warrants for several reasons. The primary one is if you or someone titled in the formal authorization is suspected of engaging in a criminal act.
Concerning the arrest reasons, the formal document will outline the strict procedures the law enforcers must abide by while conducting the arrest, and the bail figure you, the arrestee, will part with after the arrest to exit jail pending trial.
California has two primary forms of warrants: arrest warrants and bench warrants. Arrest warrants are issued when you are suspected of a crime. In contrast, bench warrants are issued for contempt of court, including failure to appear as scheduled, refusal to pay court financial fines, or violation of court instructions.
Authorities will not inform you of a pending warrant. Typically, you will be unaware of the warrant until the arrest happens, which can be embarrassing. Therefore, when you suspect an active warrant is out there for your arrest, you must speak to your attorney for guidance and to prevent the matter from escalating.
Before delving into how to tell if there is an active warrant for arrest, discussing the various forms of warrants in detail is critical.
Arrest Warrants
A judge issues a warrant of arrest when authorities have compelling evidence that you are engaging in criminal activity. When the judge grants the police this formal document, it marks the commencement of your case. The document authorizes police to arrest and detain you for a suspected crime committed without the presence of police officers.
A judge or magistrate issues this official document if there is solid proof presented by the prosecutor or police of suspected criminal activity by an individual or after a grand jury accusation or indictment. A valid document must have:
- The suspect’s name.
- The alleged criminal violation.
- Warrant issuance time.
- The location where the warrant was issued.
- Title and sign of the issued magistrate or judge.
- Name of the court where the formal document was issued.
After the issuance of the official document, there will be no time restriction on when to execute it if it is for a felony crime. When the crime is a misdemeanor, police should execute the warrant between 6 AM and 10 PM unless the arrest happens in public, the presiding judge instructs otherwise, or you are already in custody.
The warrant remains active until you are apprehended and detained or the judge quashes it after discovering exonerating proof. Other warrants will expire if the statute of limitations lapses before your arrest.
You must know that the law requires the police to have a valid warrant before making an arrest. Besides, you, the suspect, can request to examine the warrant to establish its validity if law enforcement visits you for an arrest.
For the enforcers to obtain the warrant, they must present an affidavit before the judge. The document is delivered under oath and comprises sufficient and factual details indicating that the party mentioned in the arrest authorization committed a crime.
An affidavit is a written declaration submitted to the court with truthful information that the party making the allegations, in this case, the police, insists the details are accurate. The document also contains the accuser’s signature and statement showing they are ready for prosecution if the court discovers the allegations are false.
If the affidavit details are not compelling to the judge, the court will not issue the warrant. Also, if there are no witnesses to the crime alleged in the affidavit, the judge declines to grant the warrant.
Bench Warrants
Otherwise called body attachment, judges issue bench warrants when you are in contempt of court. A judge issues this warrant in the following situations:
- When you skip scheduled court hearings or an evolution or progress report proceeding,
- When you fail to pay imposed financial fines.
- When you disregard court orders.
- When you refuse to pay for a traffic ticket or citation.
- Failure to pay child support.
- Refusal to show up in court on a summons.
- Probation breach.
It is worth understanding that the officers should not utilize excessive force or lethal weapons when executing an arrest or bench warrant unless circumstances force them to do so. Besides, you must know that bench warrants have no expiration duration. They stay active until a judge recalls them or you present yourself in court. Bench warrants remain outstanding indefinitely despite the duration lapsed since their issuance or your current location.
Failure to Appear (FTA) Warrant
A common form of bench warrant judges issue is the FTA warrant. If your skipping of court hearings was deliberate or you do not have any valid reason for not showing up, you risk criminal counts and the withdrawal of your driving privileges. Willful or intentional FTA is the refusal to appear before a judge within two weeks of the planned court hearing.
A breach of a jotted promise to be present in court is a misdemeanor. When the prosecutor proves all the elements of the offense, you risk spending at most half a year behind bars. When you obtain a pretrial discharge from custody for a misdemeanor offense but fail to show up for trial, the offense is a misdemeanor that attracts at most six months of jail incarceration. However, when the baseline offense is a felony, FTA can attract either misdemeanor counts that attract twelve months of imprisonment or a felony count punishable by no more than 36 months.
Refusal to Pay for Warrants
Another type of bench warrant is the refusal to pay for warrants after failing to pay court financial fines within the stipulated duration. Intentional or willful refusal to pay is a misdemeanor or infraction contingent on the case’s facts. The offense attracts $300 in civil valuations, driving privilege suspension for thirty days, and probation.
Search Warrants
Search warrants do not authorize police to make arrests. Instead, they permit the authorities to search the person, car, residence, business premises, or any specified area in the warrant alleging illegal activity or substances. These warrants state the places and properties subject to the search. Besides, they mention the factual foundation for the warrant and give a timeframe within which authorities should execute the search.
Typically, these are executed immediately and are only valid for ten days. The time for execution is between 7 AM and 10 PM unless the judge instructs otherwise.
The presiding judge reissues it if probable cause exists to search a person or property and the warrant has lapsed.
- Search Warrant Grounds
Judges issue search warrants for several reasons, including:
- The property in question, like merchandise in a store, was stolen.
- The property in question was used in the commission of a crime.
- The item being searched is proof of a crime.
The police must present an affidavit with probable cause to the judge to convince them to issue a search warrant. Therefore, the warrant will be invalid and unenforceable if the affidavit presented to the judge is not hinged on probable cause or if the warrant does not explicitly describe the location of the property to be searched.
Even when a warrant is valid on the face, police can sometimes contravene the law when they seize property not mentioned in the official document authorizing the search. When police disregard a valid search warrant and gather evidence to charge you with a crime, your defense attorney can file a motion to suppress evidence in court if the proof was obtained illegally or outside the stipulations of the warrant.
- Search Warrant Exceptions
Even though proof obtained outside the search warrant is often inadmissible in court, exceptions exist when the court admits such evidence. These exceptions are:
- The officers searching were acting in good faith and reasonably believed the warrant was valid, even if judicial mistakes prevented its issuance.
- There are exigent circumstances like police avoiding the destruction of proof or escape of the suspect.
- The proof is in plain view of law enforcement.
- No-Knock Search Warrant
Law enforcement can enter your property without ringing the doorbell, announcing themselves, or knocking when the judge issues them a no-knock search warrant. The judge issues this form of warrant if they believe police revealing themselves would enable the occupants or suspects on the property to flee, destroy evidence, arm themselves, or endanger the lives of others.
Ways to Check if you have an Outstanding Arrest Warrant
Police execute arrest warrants without warning, which can be embarrassing, especially if the arrest happens in the presence of your coworkers or family. An outstanding warrant for your arrest allows officers to arrest you at any moment without allowing you to explain the situation to your loved ones. So, learning about an active warrant before the officers see you is vital. Doing so gives you time to explain your situation to the family to avoid humiliation and organize your defense.
The common ways you can check out an active warrant against you are:
Look Up Your Name in the Relevant County Sheriff’s Superior Court’s Website
The internet has simplified the process of obtaining information. You can run a search from the comfort of your living room. Therefore, if you have engaged in any criminal activity like domestic violence and believe the victim reported the matter to the authorities, you should check if there is a pending arrest warrant against you. Also, if someone witnessed you commit a crime and can identify you, then you should suspect there is an outstanding warrant for your arrest.
When the court has issued law enforcement with an arrest warrant, you should find the information on the website of the relevant court that issued the warrant or the sheriff’s department in the area where the crime happened. Visit these sites to find out whether there is an arrest document in your name. Learning about the warrant early helps you prepare adequately, including enlisting the services of a defense attorney.
How do you search?
Type your name on California arrests and click search. On the other hand, you can run the search on the Superior Court’s site by searching for arrest warrants. After, you should type your official name, birth date, and driver’s license number for accurate details.
Run a Criminal Background Check
Running a background check on your criminal record is also a way of knowing if you have an active warrant. Here, you will find more information than just an outstanding arrest warrant. All the details about your school, attendance date, prior convictions, negative information on your credit statement, criminal records, and pending arrest warrants will be shown here.
The familiar parties that run background reviews are potential employers and property managers. However, you can do background checks on yourself. If you have little information on how to do it, you can appoint someone else to do it for you.
From the outcome of the search, you can tell if there is an outstanding warrant. You can also find it if you are on the wanted list of law enforcement or a crime suspect.
You can find this information online because once the judge grants the warrant, the clerk enters the details on the court’s website, meaning all police and law enforcers have access to the details and can execute the arrest if they spot you.
Call the Local Police Department or the Federal Court
If you want to answer questions from the magistrate or police, you can call them to inquire about an arrest warrant. However, if you are cynical about it, have a third-party contact or visit the offices for the details.
When you call any of these offices, they will ask for your official name and age. They will then scan the details in the national database and give you the necessary information.
Call Your Criminal Defense Attorney
If you do not want to find out about the warrant yourself, you can enlist an attorney to do it for you. Registered criminal defense attorneys have access to databases, some of which are unavailable to the general public. Therefore, you will find accurate information about an impending arrest by hiring an attorney.
Additionally, an attorney will explain your situation and the process you should expect if there is an outstanding warrant.
Action to Take if there is an Outstanding Arrest Warrant
Many crime suspects go to great lengths to avoid arrests, including skipping town. After all, the arrest record will show up in your history and negatively affect many areas of your life. Nevertheless, running away escalates the issue because you become a deserter, and it becomes obvious you are guilty of the alleged crime. Therefore, do not be tempted to run. Stay calm and contact a criminal defense attorney for guidance.
Your legal representative will establish the reason for the warrant and the severity of the counts and then decide the way forward. Your attorney should inquire about law enforcement’s proof and corroborate that the warrant is yours. You could be wrong to think that a warrant for an arrest is yours when it is not. Therefore, an attorney should do their homework on the warrant and learn everything about it. Please do not contact the court or police without confirming it is your warrant.
After your attorney confirms that an arrest warrant is yours, they will establish the charge you face. If the warrant is not for the crime you committed, the attorney will present you in court to clear your name. That way, you will not spend time behind bars. Nevertheless, when the charges against you are accurate, the attorney will inquire about the bail set for the warrant and post it to obtain a pretrial release.
Conversely, if an outstanding bench warrant is against you, your attorney must present you before a judge to quash it. The defense lawyer can appear for you if you skipped scheduled hearings or refused to make payment linked to a misdemeanor crime. The move to appear on your behalf prevents the judge from detaining you when you appear in person.
If you have an active warrant, bench, or arrest, lay low and let your attorney have it recalled or quashed. Have the attorney handle the warrant soon to avoid further implications.
Find a Competent Criminal Attorney Near Me
If you have engaged in a criminal violation and suspect a warrant is out for your arrest, confirm if the warrant exists to avoid an unpleasant arrest. Luckily, you can easily find the information from anywhere today. However, hiring an attorney for the work is best to gather accurate information about the warrant. At Leah Legal, we can establish if there is an outstanding warrant and defend you in the trial. Call us at 818-484-1100 to schedule a meeting in Van Nuys, CA.
A restraining order is issued by the civil court, requiring one person not to harass or harm another person. Police officers enforce the restraining orders. A restraining order prohibits the alleged abuser from making physical contact or communicating with the protected person.
Depending on the type of abuse or harassment, the court can issue a domestic, civil harassment, or workplace violence restraining order. Many people who seek protection from restraining orders or are served with one may be unsure of the way forward to protect their rights.
Common questions may linger in your mind, including how different court orders differ. Another question that most people ask is what the restraining order will do and the process of obtaining one. If you are served with a restraining order or seek the protection offered by these orders, you must seek competent legal insight.
The following are some frequently asked questions about restraining orders in California:
What is a Restraining Order?
A restraining order is a court order you can request to protect yourself or another person from harassment, threats, and violence. In addition to protection, the restraining orders limit contact between the restrained persona and the protected person through terms like:
- Stay Away Orders
When a restraining order is issued, the restrained person is prohibited from contacting the protected person. Contact, in this case, could include physical contact and electronic communication. Additionally, the court could stipulate a distance within which the restrained person should not come close to the protected person.
- Residence Exclusions
If you seek a domestic violence restraining order against a spouse or cohabitant, the court could order the restrained person to move out of the shared residence.
- Personal Conduct Orders
The provision for personal conduct on the restraining orders prevents destructive behaviors and contact between the involved parties.
What Types of Restraining Orders are Available?
The court can issue four restraining order types to protect a person from harassment or violence. Each type of restraining order has a different approach and dictates certain conduct from the restrained person. The relationship between the protected person and the restrained person could significantly impact the type of order that the court will issue. The different types of restraining orders include:
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Domestic violence is a serious offense that involves causing harm to a loved one. This could include an elder in our home, a cohabitant, a spouse, or your child. The court issues a domestic violence restraining order to protect the victims of domestic violence. With this type of restraining order, you can be protected from criminal threats, violence, or harassment.
Often, victims of domestic violence are individuals who suffer crimes like domestic battery, child abuse, and inflicting corporal injury on a spouse, among others. The court can issue an emergency protective order for immediate protection of the domestic violence victim while a hearing and evidence to warrant a permanent restraining order are being gathered.
The domestic violence restraining order prohibits all forms of contact between the restrained and protected person. Contact, in this case, could include physical interaction or electronic communication. Obtaining a domestic violence restraining order requires the victim to report the domestic violence incident to the police.
If the responding officers see the need for immediate protection, you can receive an emergency protective order. Before obtaining the permanent order, you must prove that another person abused or threatened you or your minor child. Additionally, it must be clear that the alleged abuser was a domestic partner or a close relative.
Civil Harassment Restraining Order (CHRO)
Under the California legal system, a civil harassment restraining order is issued to protect someone from harassment, threats, and violence from a person with whom they do not have a close relationship. You can seek this type of restraining order if your neighbor, friend, or roommate harasses or threatens you.
For this court order, harassment involves unlawful sexual violence, credible threats of violence, and conduct that annoys another person. Like in a domestic violence restraining order, the language in a civil harassment restraining order requires the restrained person to avoid physical contact and communication with the protected person.
If the threat of violence is grave, the court may also order that the restrained person surrender their firearms and avoid purchasing additional ones during the duration of the restraining order. A CHRO can offer protection for up to five years and could be subject to renewal if the threat still exists.
Before obtaining a CHRO, you must fill out some judicial council forms and attend a hearing where you will prove that you are a victim of harassment and threats. If a CHRO is issued against you, you must attend the hearing, where you can defend yourself against the order.
Workplace Violence Restraining Order
In California, an employer can request a restraining order to protect one or more employees from harassment, stalking, and violence. Often, these types of orders are necessary when abuse in the form of threats or actual violence arises at the workplace. An employer is the only party allowed to seek this restraining order.
The provisions of the workplace violence restraining order require the restrained person to stay away from the protected person, both at work and outside of work. The workplace violence restraining order can protect independent contractors, part-time workers, full-time employees, and volunteers.
The employer must fill out several court forms when requesting a workplace violence restraining order. These forms will detail the exact nature of the alleged abuse that an employee has experienced. After receiving these forms, the judge determines whether there is a need for a temporary restraining order. A hearing is held within two to three weeks for a permanent restraining order to offer long-term protection.
Elder Abuse Restraining Order
An elder is an individual over sixty-five years old. In most cases, these individuals depend on others for daily care. The court can issue an elder abuse restraining order to prevent someone from abusing or neglecting an elder. Abuse, in this case, could be physical, emotional, or financial.
An elder abuse restraining order can prevent the abuser from neglecting the elder, causing them harm, or taking their money without consent. An elder can file a restraining order for personal protection, and others can file it for them.
Can I Obtain a Restraining Order for my Child?
Yes. If a minor is in danger of harm by a relative or another person, they can enjoy protection from a restraining order. The process of obtaining a restraining order for a minor involves gathering evidence of violence and harassment and presenting it to the court with a petition for protection.
The court can issue a restraining order for a minor if there is evidence to show an existing relationship between the minor and the alleged abuser.
What Evidence Do I Need for a Restraining Order in California?
The restraining order program is an essential tool in ensuring the safety of individuals who have suffered abuse and harassment from their close relatives, workmates, caregivers, or even strangers. Since the restraining order mandates no contact between an abuser and the protected person, the pattern of abuse can be stopped.
Regardless of the type of order, the person who seeks a restraining order has the burden to prove that they are suffering abuse or that their safety is at stake. Evidence you can use to support your case includes:
- A police Report
Most instances of abuse are reported to law enforcement officers. When the officers respond to such calls, they will write a report about the incident. This report can contain information about the alleged abuse and can be used to warrant a restraining order.
- Medical Records
Restraining orders can be obtained even when there is no physical violence. The judge issues restraining orders to protect the victims of verbal threats. However, if you suffered injuries from the abuse, seeking medical attention is essential. If your injuries are consistent with abuse, you will be in a better position to receive the restraining order.
- Written Documentation
If you have suffered a pattern of abuse and have documented the incidents in a diary, you can present the information to the court. This could give the judge a reason to issue a restraining order for your protection.
- Witness Statements
Having a witness testify to the account of events where you suffered abuse or threats could be critical in your journey to obtain a restraining order in California. Friends or family who notice injuries consistent with abuse on you can also testify in your restraining order hearing.
How Long Does It Take to Obtain a Restraining Order?
You will obtain a restraining order against another person by filing a request with the court. The court can issue an emergency restraining order if you are in immediate danger. This type of order offers immediate protection and lasts up to seven days. While you enjoy the protection of the emergency restraining order, you can seek a temporary restraining order, which prohibits contact between you and your abuser for up to twenty-five days.
The court will then hold a hearing where you and the restrained person must present evidence. If the judge sees the need for continued protection, they will issue a permanent restraining order, which offers protection for up to five years. Restraining orders are renewable. Therefore, if the threat of harm still exists after five years, you can petition the court to renew the order.
What is the Cost of Obtaining a Restraining Order?
Due to the severity of the incidents that warrant restraining orders, there is no filing fee for a restraining order in California. This helps ensure that all individuals can enjoy the protection the order offers. Additionally, a lack of filing fees prevents delays that could arise during the processing of payments.
However, obtaining a restraining order is a complex task. Therefore, you will need a competent restraining order attorney for legal guidance. This means that you will incur some legal fees for the success of the process. Sometimes, there are additional fees to deliver the restraining order. If you are of low income or a victim of severe domestic violence, the court may offer you a waiver for this fee.
What Happens at a Restraining Order Hearing in California?
When a request for a restraining order is filed, the judge will hold a hearing where the alleged abuser and the petitioner must attend. At the restraining order hearing, each party involved can give their account of events.
When the petitioner is done giving their account, the alleged abuser will be allowed to defend themselves against the order. The court will require evidence from both sides to support each account. In addition to giving a personal testimony, you can present a witness to support your account.
In most cases, the petitioner and their attorney will push for the restraining order to be imposed under the harshest conditions. On the other hand, the restrained person will work to prove to the court that the restraining order is unnecessary.
At the end of this hearing, the judge will determine whether there is a need for a restraining order and how long it should last. Whether you are seeking or fighting against a restraining order, you can increase your chances of winning a restraining order through the following steps:
- Organize Your Evidence Correctly
You must present sufficient evidence to the court to show a need for a restraining order or prove that the order is necessary. Organizing your evidence before the hearing is critical.
- Prepare For the Hearing
Preparation for a restraining order hearing involves determining how you will present evidence to avoid self-incrimination. Seeking legal guidance while you prepare for the hearing would significantly impact its outcome.
- Find third-party witnesses
Without witness testimony, a restraining order hearing will be based on the testimony of the alleged victim and abuser. However, having third-party witnesses could increase your credibility.
What should I do if a Restraining Order is Issued Against Me?
Being served with a restraining order can come as a surprise. Your first instinct may be to panic due to the fear of the uncertainty and outcome of the situation on your criminal record. You should take the following steps if you are served with the restraining order:
- Follow the Order
Even when unsure of what you did to warrant a restraining order, you should not contact the person who filed for the order. This is because no contact is a primary condition of the restraining orders. In addition to avoiding no contact, you must follow other conditions listed on the order.
- Contact an Attorney
When you are served with a restraining order, hiring and retaining a reliable restraining order attorney is critical. Your lawyer will help you understand more details of the order and represent you at the restraining order hearing.
- Gather Evidence and Prepare for the Hearing
The restraining order the sheriff’s department served you will include a date you must appear in court for the hearing. Therefore, you must start preparing for the restraining order hearing.
Can you Cancel a Restraining Order?
Yes. A restraining order is issued when the protected person is at risk of harm from the restraining person. If there is a change of circumstances, the restraining order can be withdrawn or modified. You will not be required to keep a restraining order that you no longer need. Therefore, if you or your family are no longer in danger, you can request the court withdraw it.
You will need attorney guidance when requesting modification or cancellation of the restraining order. The judge will review your request before deciding to modify or cancel the restraining order.
What Constitutes a Violation of a Restraining Order?
A restraining order comes with terms and conditions that the restrained person must follow while the order is valid. Under California law, violation of a restraining order is a crime charged under Penal Code 273.6. When you are cited for violating the restraining order, the prosecution can file a felony or misdemeanor charge, depending on the case circumstances and the type of condition you violated.
As a misdemeanor, violation of a restraining order is punishable by a year in county jail and up to $1,000 in fines. A felony conviction, on the other hand, could result in a three-year prison sentence and penalties that do not exceed $10,000.
Find a Competent Restraining Orders Attorney Near Me
In California, the court issues restraining orders to protect victims of harassment. This could range from domestic violence to civil harassment and workplace harassment. When filing for a restraining order, you must have firm evidence and testimony to prove the need for legal protection offered by these court orders.
If you are in immediate danger, the court may issue an emergency protective order to keep you safe while you attend a hearing for your permanent restraining order. If another person seeks a restraining order against you, you must attend a restraining order hearing where you can defend yourself. If the order is granted, you must follow all the conditions imposed by the order to avoid criminal charges for violation of a restraining order.
At Leah Legal, we offer expert legal guidance to individuals seeking a restraining order or fighting against one in Van Nuys, CA. Contact us at 818-484-1100 for much-needed legal insight.
Sexting in and of itself is not a bad thing. Adding a dash of creativity and excitement can spice up your relationship. However, it is crucial to understand the nuances of California law regarding sexting. The state is serious about sexting with children. What begins as a private conversation could result in jail time, hefty fines, or possibly being classified as a sexual offender. Things worsen if your sexting turns into harassment, stalking, or privacy issues. For this reason, when you sext, make sure all parties are consenting adults and maintain those boundaries to avoid any potentially disastrous consequences. This article explores circumstances under which sexting is a crime under CA law.
What is Sexting Per California Law?
California has clear regulations regarding sexting. It all depends on who is involved.
Adults who are willing can openly share these explicit pictures and messages. Sexting turns into a criminal activity when a minor is involved. California law shields minors from situations like these. Therefore, this is applicable even if they consented. It is against the law to send, receive, or own naked photos of minors via sexting.
Minors, too, are not immune to the law. They can face criminal penalties when they send texts to one another.
Furthermore, if someone uses sexting to harass or threaten another person, that falls under California’s invasion of privacy and stalking laws, adding another layer of legal trouble.
To be considered valid, consent requires the voluntary participation of every activity. This agreement requires essential elements to be achieved, namely:
- The decision to take part must be of free will
- There should be no use of coercion, compulsions, or manipulation.
Consent is an ongoing process that applies at every stage of the interaction. If either party feels uncomfortable or wants to revoke their consent, consent is assumed to have been withdrawn. This means you should stop immediately.
Possession of Explicit Material Obtained From Minors
Investigators will look into whether you saved explicit photos of a minor or received them through sexting. Prosecutors will analyze digital evidence, like your electronic devices and messaging history, to figure out how you received explicit material involving a minor. The findings will also explain whether you kept or shared the material.
Saving explicit photos of a minor obtained through sexting can lead to serious legal trouble, including charges related to possessing child pornography. Similarly, depending on the situation, you could face consequences for distributing or receiving sexually explicit material involving a minor.
Per Penal Code 311, any visual representation of sexually explicit behavior involving a juvenile is considered child pornography. It encompasses any kind of media that depicts minors in sexual poses or actions. This includes pictures, movies, or digital images. Furthermore, it is also a crime to manufacture, distribute, own, or access child pornography.
Sending Harmful Material to a Child
You will also face prosecution even if the content does not directly involve the child. Sharing explicit images, videos, or other pornographic materials with them is a crime. Specifically, you will face charges under Penal Code 288.2.
Penal Code 288.2 addresses sending sexually explicit material to a child.
The burden of proof for prosecutors is to demonstrate that you’ve sent sexually related content to the child. They must show that you sent, showed, or offered to show it to the child. Most importantly, they must show that you were aware, or reasonably should have been, that the recipient was a minor.
The prosecution must persuade the judge or jury that you did not only use the information to arouse the minor or yourself. They must demonstrate that you planned to coerce the child into engaging in sexual behavior, even if it was just a light sexual touch. The degree of explicitness in the content determines how harsh the penalty will be.
When you send sexually explicit material to a minor, the law is not solely concerned about the arousal this material could cause. It also prohibits using this material to groom or coax a minor into sexual activity.
That is where “seduction” comes in. Prosecutors must show that you intended to use the explicit material not only for sexual gratification but also to influence the minor into some form of sexual act, whether it is intercourse, oral copulation, or even basic sexual contact.
Sexting to Threaten, Harass, or Annoy
Sometimes, people deliberately threaten, harass, or offend others by using sexual texts, photographs, or videos. They achieve this by sending communications to frighten, intimidate, or upset the recipient.
Threats could include expressing the desire to do harm or damage. However, harassment is defined as sending inappropriate sexual content again and again against the victim’s insistence on stopping.
Sending someone unsolicited, explicit texts or photographs repeatedly to annoy or irritate them is considered annoying behavior. If prosecutors prove annoyance, you risk facing additional charges for violating Penal Code 653m.
Penal Code 653m makes it an offense to intentionally annoy, harass, or threaten someone else with a phone or electronic device. This includes:
- Speaking to the victim indecently
- Threatening to cause them harm or damage their property, or
- Calling them repeatedly to irritate or harass them.
If you allow someone else to use your phone or other device for these activities, you risk facing prosecution for a Penal Code 653m violation.
Stalking and its Connection to Sexting
Stalking occurs when someone repeatedly and uninvitedly focuses on another individual, similar to an obsession. It is an extremely frightening experience. Stalking involves actions that gradually make the victim feel uneasy and unsafe. It goes beyond a casual greeting or coincidence. Gradually, these actions take several forms. They include:
- The stalker pursuing the victim
- He/she bombards them with unsolicited calls or messages, or
- The stalker violates the victim’s privacy by tracking their online activities.
Most stalkers do this to frighten and exert control over the victim, thereby inducing fear in the victim.
Stalking is a different crime from making annoying phone calls. However, they share similar characteristics, namely making unrelenting phone calls, messages, or emails, even after the victim expressly asks them to stop.
Sometimes, stalkers appear in person at the victim’s house, place of employment, or other frequented locations. In addition, stalkers use technology to locate their target or send unsolicited presents and threats. If the prosecution proves you engaged in these activities, you could face penalties outlined under Penal Code 646.9.
Consequences Imposed on Sexting Offenders Upon Being Found Guilty
The repercussions of sexting vary depending on your circumstances. California prosecutes these instances under broader crimes such as:
- Distributing harmful material to a minor — It is a crime under Penal Code 288.2
- Child pornography — It is a violation of Penal Code 311
- Stalking — It is a violation of Penal Code 646.9
- Annoying or harassing electronic communications — It is a crime under Penal Code 653m
The problem is that because these statutes are “wobblers,” prosecutors may choose to prosecute you with a misdemeanor or a felony based on the circumstances of your case. They consider the following criteria to determine which charges to pursue:
- Age of participants — You will likely have a more serious case if the content is explicit or if a minor participates, particularly a very young individual.
- The messages’ contents — Sharing sexually suggestive content is one thing, but sharing explicit content can make charges far more severe.
- Your past criminal activity — Prior transgressions, particularly sexual acts, can result in a felony charge and conviction.
A misdemeanor conviction carries:
- A potential six months to one year in county jail,
- A fine of up to $1,000, and
- Community service
However, the possible repercussions increase significantly if your case is prosecuted as a felony. You could face:
- Formal probation
- A significant fine of up to $10,000 and
- 3 to 5 years in state prison
It could be necessary for you to register as a sexual offender in certain situations, which can have long-term repercussions. Individuals convicted of felony violations could be required to register as sex offenders.
The seriousness of the offense and the estimated risk of reoffending determine the levels that California’s sex offender registration system assigns. Even though registration is not the typical punishment for sexting cases, it could apply in some situations.
California’s sex offender registry has three categories: “Tier 1,” “Tier 2,” and “Tier 3.”
The lowest risk category, Tier 1, requires registration for ten years. Misdemeanors or less serious felonies involving sexting, that is, incidents involving older teenagers or less explicit content, usually fall under this category.
Registration is valid for 20 years for adults. Tier 2 is a medium-risk category. Here, you will come across felony sexting cases with somewhat explicit content or a broader variety of minors’ ages involved.
The highest-risk offenders reside in Tier 3, where offenders must register for life. This level is only applicable to the most serious sexual offenses. Even felonies, including sexting, are unlikely to fall under this category. In most cases, repeat offenders or those who use violence to commit felonies fall under this category.
Consequences on Juvenile Offenders
California has a two-pronged approach that takes into account both:
- The potential harm and
- The reality of addressing minors who sext.
For example, consider a letter or photo exchange between two teenagers. The situation becomes more serious the younger they are and the more explicit the information. Spreading these texts or images to others, especially adults can significantly increase the possible repercussions. The judicial system in California does, however, recognize that minors are still learning how to navigate challenging social situations. The juvenile court intervenes in this situation.
The juvenile court usually hears cases involving teens accused of sexting. Rehab takes precedence over punishment in this case. Judges could impose repercussions rather than harsh sentences to help the children understand the seriousness of their conduct and steer clear of them in the future. These repercussions could consist of:
- Counseling sessions — A therapist can provide advice on how to comprehend the risks of sexting and how to establish healthy communication skills.
- Curfews — Tighter curfews could prevent people from using social media after midnight when sexting is more common.
- Community service — Teens can evaluate their behavior and contribute constructively to their community by participating in community service.
Civil Implications
Recall that the effects of sexting go beyond the person who sent it. Because of shared content, victims could experience psychological pain, social embarrassment, or even cyberbullying. The court system is aware of this harm. Victims of sexting, particularly minors, occasionally bring civil lawsuits against the alleged offender. These legal actions could ask for damages for:
- Emotional distress — Anxiety, shame, and despair are among the psychological effects of sexting.
- Additional damages — Shared sexting content may cause reputational damage or missed opportunities for school and work.
Revenge Porn and Sexting
Retaliation porn and sexting frequently go hand in hand. While sexting can begin innocently, especially when it comes to teenagers, it can quickly turn into revenge porn. Once exchanged in confidence, explicit images or messages can spread maliciously and without the victim’s permission.
Retaliation porn can have long-lasting and severe effects on the victim. He/she experiences an incredible emotional toll that causes embarrassment, nervousness, and even depression. Social repercussions can be just as dire. Threats of bullying, social exclusion, and damage to an individual’s reputation can materialize.
The way revenge porn undermines the victim’s control over formerly private images or chats is what makes it so damaging. It becomes difficult to remove them once they are on the internet. The victim’s potential for future relationships, job advancement, and general mental health all suffer as a result. That is why revenge porn results in charges under Penal Code 647(j)(4).
Prosecutors aggressively pursue revenge porn charges under Penal Code 647(j)(4) because of the potential harm they have on victims. Like every legal issue, some requirements must be fulfilled to secure a conviction, namely:
- Private sexual image — The image or video must show nudity or a sexual act to qualify as private. This means the image or video should show an intimate part of the body of an identifiable person. This could be the victim’s genitals, anus, or female breasts. Alternatively, the material could be of the victim engaged in oral copulation, sexual intercourse, sodomy, sexual penetration, or masturbation.
- Non-consensual disclosure — Prosecutors should show you shared the photos or videos without the victim’s approval, even if they were first shot with the victim’s authorization. Since trust is a two-way street, this regulation ensures that private exchanges stay that way.
- Prosecutors must prove your intent to distribute to cause harm — This entails proving that you shared these photos or videos deliberately to embarrass the victim, cause emotional pain, or harm their reputation. It must also be evident that the victim suffered emotional damage.
- Identifiable person — It must be evident that the victim is in the picture or video.
There are instances in which you would be found not guilty of revenge pornography. These include:
- Consent to distribute—If the victim allowed you to share the photos with someone or a specific platform, they could have ended up elsewhere. This could make the case’s “non-consensual disclosure” element more difficult to handle. However, the permission should be free and not coerced.
- Unintentional disclosure — It is possible that you sent the pictures to the incorrect individual by mistake. Refuting “an intention to inflict harm” could be possible if you can demonstrate this, for example, using recipient information and timestamps. Here, the emphasis would be on an honest error rather than malevolent intent.
- Reporting illegal activity — Consider extremely unsettling, like evidence of child sex abuse. The law acknowledges the critical need to expose these acts. In those cases, sharing private photos as proof is essential to holding offenders accountable.
- Following a court order — There are instances when you must assist the legal system. You must cooperate with a court subpoena or order to submit evidence, including personal photos.
Keep in mind that revenge porn is dependent on malicious intent.
Penalties for Revenge Porn
Revenge porn is a misdemeanor violation. It is punishable by:
- A jail sentence of up to 6 months and/or
- A maximum fine of $1,000
These penalties could increase if the following issues are true:
- You have prior convictions of revenge porn
- The victim was a child
If so, your penalties increase to:
- A jail sentence of up to one year and/or
- A fine of up to $2,000
Find a Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
Sexting could be an exciting experience. However, it is essential to realize that it is hard to take it back once something is out there. Think through the possible consequences before sending the picture. What begins as a lighthearted snapshot could become an unanticipated cause of worry.
If you face sexting charges, you should seek advice from an experienced criminal defense lawyer. Experienced attorneys can clarify your rights, evaluate your situation, and recommend the best course of action. Call the Leah Legal team at 818-484-1100 for further assistance regarding sexting or related charges in Van Nuys, CA. Our team is ready to take up your case.
Since the Industrial Revolution, criminal prosecution has moved from the police interrogating everybody present at a crime scene to utilizing forensic science to determine what transpired and who the potential suspect is.
Forensic science goes a long way in legal processes, especially in cases involving manslaughter and murder. It helps solve cases and bring justice to victims and their families. One of the main advantages of forensics is its objectivity. Unlike witness testimony, which can be subjective and influenced by several factors, forensic evidence depends on scientific techniques, making it a more credible and reliable form of evidence in court.
This blog discusses forensic science’s critical role in solving criminal cases and why it is an indispensable tool.
What Forensic Science Means
Forensic science is the application of physical and natural scientific techniques during a crime-solving investigation. It involves collecting, analyzing, and interpreting physical evidence discovered at crime scenes. The evidence can be critical in determining a suspect’s innocence or guilt and providing key insights into the case facts. Equipment is utilized to analyze the evidence to link a suspect to an offense and the victim involved.
A forensic scientist will review physical evidence collected at the scene of the crime, like DNA, drugs, tire tracks, blood, firearm residue, clothing fibers, and other chemicals. They will then administer tests in a lab to analyze and interpret the data so the prosecution can present it before the court.
Forensic science involves various study areas, each focusing on specific evidence analysis. Forensic pathologists, for example, conduct autopsies to establish the manner or cause of death. However, forensic engineers analyze materials to determine the sources of materials or defects related to the offense.
Forensic scientists can assist police in tracking down even the most slippery perpetrators by utilizing high-tech equipment.
Forensic science—a combination of technology, chemistry, and biology—has transformed how crime scenes are interpreted and evidence assessed in criminal investigations. This scientific technology has enabled the judicial system and law enforcement officers to unravel the truth that could otherwise stay hidden, resulting in just rulings and accurate conclusions.
An Impartial Witness That Is Forensic Science
Forensic science gives an objective, impartial narrative of an offense. It provides facts that human witnesses may distort, forget, or overlook. As far as solving manslaughter, murder, and other criminal cases is concerned, forensic science is indispensable. Forensic evidence, be it fingerprints, ballistics, or DNA, can disprove or prove links between a victim, suspect, and crime scene.
The Relationship Between Criminal Investigations and Forensic Science
Forensic science is also called criminalistics. It is a relatively new field in the broader landscape of taught sciences. Generally, forensic scientists or experts are tasked with analyzing evidence from various crime scenes to generate objective findings that can be utilized in court. There are especially multiple specialties under the forensic science umbrella, each possibly being utilized differently to build a compelling case against suspects.
The link between criminal investigations and forensics is critical. It may make all the difference between prosecuting a criminal and absolving an innocent individual of wrongful sentencing.
Forensic science gives the prosecution evidence it could use to have a suspect convicted even when eyewitnesses are not available. The prosecution can use forensic experts during initial crime scene investigations, collecting the evidence for thorough analysis in a lab. Then, the experts perform specialized tests on the evidence per the current testing standards to ensure the evidence meets the court’s requirements.
Various forensic science techniques and experts may be utilized to determine facts that can be admitted in court. The essential relationship between the law and forensics ensures exonerations and convictions happen without injustice or bias.
Additionally, forensic science is regulated by scientific protocols and legal procedures supported by professional communities like the American Academy of Forensic Sciences. Police officers might lack a complete understanding or background on the importance of criminal investigations. That is why the need for forensic experts continues to rise, leading to the need for interdisciplinary forensic study programs countrywide.
Forensic Science Challenges
Although forensic science techniques have proven to be invaluable tools, they are not error-free. Interpreting forensic evidence depends primarily on human judgment and expertise, which are bound to have errors. It is critical to understand that, whereas fingerprint or DNA evidence can be compelling, it is only a piece of the puzzle in an intricate criminal investigation.
There have been cases whereby misunderstanding or misusing forensic evidence has resulted in wrongful convictions. This is, therefore, a reminder that whereas forensic science can reveal the truth, its misuse may also lead to doubts and injustices.
Forensic Science Techniques
Forensic science incorporates various techniques to collect, analyze, and interpret evidence. Prevalent techniques utilized in murder, manslaughter, and other multiple cases in California include the following:
Tool Mark and Ballistics Analysis
Tool mark and ballistic analysis entails examining ammunition, firearms, and the markings left on casings and bullets to establish their link and connect them to the murder. By comparing the markings, forensic scientists can establish whether a given weapon was utilized in the murder, giving critical evidence for connecting the suspect to the weapon and the crime scene.
Fingerprint Analysis
Fingerprinting has been used for identification for over a century. Everyone’s fingerprints have a distinctive pattern of ridges, making them highly reliable evidence.
That said, analyzing fingerprints is another critical forensic science technique. It entails gathering and comparing fingerprints discovered at the crime scene with the suspect’s. Analyzing fingerprints can establish whether the suspect was at the crime scene and connect them to the murder. Where a suspect is yet to be determined, forensic scientists can match the fingerprints discovered at the crime scene to those in the fingerprint database, helping investigators narrow their list of suspects quickly.
Carbon Dot Powders
Fingerprint analysis is essential for analyzing many murder scenes. However, there are several reasons why it might be challenging to see fingerprints clearly, including high toxicity, low contrast, or low sensitivity. Forensic scientists have developed a fluorescent carbon dot powder that they can apply to fingerprints to make them fluorescent under UV light. This has subsequently made it easier to analyze fingerprints. Carbon dot powders make fingerprints glow orange, yellow, or red.
DNA Analysis
DNA profiling is a prevalent forensic science technique used to identify suspects in murder, manslaughter, and other criminal cases. It has been instrumental in identifying murder suspects and exonerating the innocent.
Forensic scientists gather DNA evidence from the crime scene, including bodily fluids, skin cells, or hair, and then they analyze and compare it to the suspect’s DNA to establish if they were present at the crime scene. The distinctiveness of DNA profiles, coupled with technological advancements, has made DNA evidence highly powerful in establishing a perpetrator’s identity.
Physical Evidence Matching
The matching of physical evidence may range from an easy task, such as matching a torn piece of cloth to the cloth from which the piece came. Forensic experts could also use scientific testing to look for and find different types of physical evidence, including bodily fluids such as semen, urine, blood, ballistics, tire tracks, fingerprints, shoe prints, glove prints, broken glass, tool impressions, trace evidence of gunshot residue or fire debris, et cetera. Forensic experts conduct two kinds of analysis: accidental characteristics and class characteristics.
Accidental characteristics refer to unique marks and features that form on an object due to wear and tear. The physical evidence-matching process requires more expertise with objects such as broken glass and plastic fragments. Some processes even require microscopic examination and photographic overlay comparison.
Class characteristics involve various items such as tool impressions, show prints, glove prints, and tire prints. Forensic scientists can categorize and sort out these objects depending on pattern, model, size, and type. If, for example, a shoe print belongs to a given class, forensic experts will narrow their search to individuals with shoes that fall under that class category.
Toxicology Testing
Toxicology testing aims to determine whether the murder incident involved controlled substances or other toxins. Forensic scientists analyze the victim’s bodily tissues and fluids to determine whether any substances are present. Toxicology reports can disclose the specific drugs or poisons that might have played a role in a victim’s demise.
Forensic Pathology
Forensic pathology is another critical subset of forensic science that involves examining a victim’s body to establish the manner and cause of death. This field of forensic science is especially relevant in manslaughter and murder cases, assisting in piecing together the events leading to the victim’s death.
Forensic pathologists establish the manner and cause of death by examining medical records, conducting autopsies, and analyzing evidence. The manner of death means the circumstances under which the death occurred, like natural, accidental, suicidal, or homicide. In contrast, the cause of death is the injury or medical condition that resulted in the individual’s demise.
Autopsies are the primary tool forensic pathologists use to establish the manner and cause of death. During the autopsy process, the pathologist assesses the body to find any indications of injury, disease, or trauma. They might draw samples for toxicology and other lab testing. The autopsy findings are then utilized to establish the cause of death and generate evidence for criminal investigations.
Digital Forensics
The digital forensic technique is relatively new to forensic science. However, this technique is increasingly critical in murder and manslaughter investigations. It entails forensic scientists analyzing digital devices like computers, cameras, and smartphones to collect evidence that may be utilized to unravel the case.
Digital forensics science relies on the concept of the digital footprint. We may not know it, but everything we do online leaves a trace. You leave a paper trail every time you tweet, shop online, or log in to a website. Everyone has a digital record of their internet activity on the World Wide Web.
To identify a criminal suspect, computer forensic experts can collect the suspect’s data online, analyze it, and generate solid evidence linking the suspect to the crime. The experts may request a cyber investigator to recover all the deleted files, crack encrypted passwords, restore damaged hard drives, determine the source of a security breach, et cetera.
The tools utilized may be complex to do these tasks efficiently. Analysis tools across various communication platforms and devices, data scrapers, packet scrapers, file viewers, and data capture tools are some of the tools digital forensic experts use.
BPA (Bloodstain Pattern Analysis)
BPA is an emerging forensic science technology. It involves reconstructing a crime scene by analyzing blood and bloodstains. The technology can approximate the origin of a bloodletting incident, providing critical insights into what happened at a crime scene.
At a suspected murder scene, bloodstain pattern analysis can provide police with more information. For example, BPA can establish whether a deadly gunshot resulted from homicide or suicide. Alternatively, if an accused person has argued self-defense, a bloodstain pattern analysis may show whether a struggle occurred.
Proteomes
For years, forensic experts have relied heavily on DNA analysis to identify a victim or suspect. However, technological advancements in detecting proteins have made proteomes a critical forensic science technique. Proteomes refer to a full set of proteins an organism produces.
Forensic scientists can detect proteomes in bones, blood, tissues, and other biological materials. They analyze these proteomes to find the answers they need, like linking a sample of severely degraded body fluid to a suspect or whether the victim came into contact with an undetectable venom. Proteomes and DNA differ in one aspect. The difference is that proteomes change with time, giving forensic scientists valuable insight into victims’ age and other environmental elements at the time of their death that cannot be detected via other methods.
Nanotechnology
Molecular and atomic technology has been incorporated into forensics. Examining forensic evidence at this precise level can offer forensic scientists insights that were not accessible before. Nanosensors are used to analyze the presence of illicit drugs, biological agents, and explosive material at the molecular level. Particular advancements in the previous years have included forensic scientists’ ability to examine the presence of polymer and carbon-based nanomaterials to draw conclusions and help investigators.
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
While artificial intelligence has been utilized in several other fields for years, it is quite new to forensic science. This is mainly because all the analysis and evidence must be admissible in court. However, the latest technological advancements have enabled artificial intelligence to be used successfully in all forensic components of criminal cases. Whereas artificial intelligence is most frequently utilized in digital forensics, it is increasingly utilized to analyze murder crime scenes, draw conclusions from photograph comparisons, compare fingerprint data, et cetera.
Foldscope
The Foldscope refers to a tiny, disposable, affordable paper microscope that has been in use since 2014 and just recently found its way into the forensic science field. Because of its low cost and portability, forensic scientists use this paper microscope while out in the field to make instant determinations regarding forensic samples like soil, hail, and blood.
Even though the conclusions obtained from Foldscope are preliminary, they assist the police in the early stages of the investigation and hasten the discovery process. Utilizing a Foldscope while in the field can ease the workload for forensic labs, which are usually backlogged and may take considerable time to produce results.
What the Future Holds for Forensic Science In Solving Murder Cases
Advancements in forensic science, like digital forensics, continue to define the criminal investigation landscape. These technologies promise even more detailed and accurate evidence in manslaughter and murder cases. However, they also need careful interpretation and handling to ensure everyone involved receives the justice they deserve.
Other Crimes That Could Use Forensic Science
Apart from murder, other offenses that can be solved by forensic science include drug crimes and sex crimes. In drug offenses, forensic science helps establish the chemical composition of a controlled substance.
This enables law enforcement to determine whether a suspect possessed, manufactured, or sold a controlled substance. If the results of the forensic analysis come back positive, the prosecution can use them to charge a suspect with the relevant drug offense.
Forensic science techniques can also determine the controlled substance that led to a victim’s demise in cases of death due to narcotics. It can also help narrow down the suspect who had the drug involved in the victim’s murder.
In sexual offense cases, for example, rape and sodomy, the victim’s DNA could be utilized to find and penalize the perpetrator.
Contact a Skilled Criminal Lawyer Near Me
In general, forensic science evidence has proven indispensable in ensuring fair and unbiased administration of justice, particularly in murder and manslaughter cases. It assists in establishing the truth, removing doubt, and providing closure to the victims’ families. By capitalizing on the power of science and technology, forensic evidence has become invaluable for solving murder cases and increasing safety in our society.
At Leah Legal, our team of experienced attorneys is here to help you. We can assist in ensuring you undergo an impartial trial process with the most favorable outcome. We review all evidence, including forensic evidence. Contact us at 818-484-1100 if you have been charged in Van Nuys for a free consultation.
Domestic violence adversely impacts relationships. It cuts across age, gender, or sexual orientation and also affects people from all social and economic backgrounds. An intimate partner often perpetrates this abuse by exerting power and control through physical violence, emotional manipulation, and financial abuse. While the physical consequences are severe, the emotional and psychological scars can persist long-term. Not only do victims of violence suffer, but so do their families and communities. Prosecutors aggressively pursue convictions for individuals accused of domestic violence as a way to deter and punish offenders because of the harm they allegedly inflict on the victims. However, an equally aggressive criminal defense attorney will be invaluable in fighting the charges.
Domestic Violence Under California Law
Penal Code 13700 defines domestic violence as abuse against an intimate partner. This violence applies regardless of the victim’s gender, age, or disability.
Per this code, intimate partners can be:
- Cohabitants
- Spouses
- individuals with whom you have had a child
- Someone you have dated or been engaged to
The main focus of domestic violence cases is the relationship between the abuser and the victim.
Abuse includes actions that result in bodily harm or threats that cause your intimate partner to worry about their safety. This concern informed California’s zero-tolerance policy regarding domestic abuse.
What Happens to the Children When Parents Are Involved in a Domestic Violence Dispute?
Children are a concern, too, in domestic violence cases. The court gives the child’s welfare top priority when domestic violence and child custody issues intersect. Following a domestic violence issue, the child needs to have a safe environment. The courts could need to determine which party should have custody of the child. This means that the courts could consider people other than the biological parents as potential custodians when deciding who gets custody.
The security and protection of the child come first. The court carefully assesses how domestic abuse affects the child, taking into account both physical and psychological trauma. This assessment establishes the safest living situation, which might not include either of the biological parents.
Siblings can be quite important. According to the court, potential custodians could be full or half-siblings, particularly those exhibiting stability and maturity. Important elements are the sibling’s bond with the child and their capacity to provide a loving atmosphere.
Additionally, grandparents on both sides of the family are considered. It is crucial that the grandparents have a preexisting relationship with the child and can create a secure and nurturing atmosphere. Similarly, if judged appropriately, aunts and uncles with close relationships with the child may be considered for custody.
Though it occurs less frequently than examining closer relatives, the court may, in exceptional circumstances, consider more distant relatives, such as cousins.
Forms of Domestic Violence
There are various forms of domestic violence. These categories address violence against multiple victims. Let us explore them.
- Gender-based Violence (GBV)
Gender-based violence includes any physical, psychological, sexual, or financial act that targets a person because of their gender identity to control and dehumanize the victim. Although GBV primarily affects women and girls, it is necessary to point out that anyone can be impacted. Victims could include men, boys, transgender people, and non-binary people. GBV can happen in romantic relationships or not, taking many different forms.
Penal Code 273.5 deals with intimate relationship violence. It safeguards partners in relationships, spouses, cohabitants, and fiancés. This emphasis is consistent with a fundamental aspect of gender-based violence, which is the offenders’ tendency to target victims that they know or have known well.
At the heart of GBV cases are corporal injuries. A corporal injury is a physical injury that another person inflicts on another. This phrase refers to a variety of wounds, ranging from little cuts and bruises to severe fractures and internal hemorrhages. The severity of the injury is not the only factor determining its classification as a corporal injury. The type of harm is what makes a difference. When we talk about corporal injury, it refers to physical harm to the body, not psychological or emotional suffering. Moreover, the harm must have been caused by someone else. Self-harm or accidents do not qualify.
Some examples include:
- A black eye from a punch
- An arm break sustained from being shoved and falling
- A kick that causes internal blood
Violations of PEN 273.5 are punishable by:
- A jail sentence of up to 1 year in county jail and/or
- A maximum fine of $6,000 if convicted of a misdemeanor.
If you are convicted of a felony violation, the penalties include:
- An imprisonment sentence of 2, 3, or 4 years in state prison and/or
- A fine of up to $6,000
Additionally, you risk facing battery charges under PC 243(e)(1) if you are accused of gender-based violence. PC 243(e)(1) addresses unwelcome physical contact that you make with a close spouse. This law provision outlines the requirements for an act to qualify as battery. The victim must not have requested or consented to the physical touch.
Unintentional bumps or brushes are not considered battery. You must touch the victim with willfulness or purpose. This demonstrates intentionality. Additionally, the law requires the prosecution to prove that the victim did not consent to the touching. The lack of consent makes the contact a crime.
Battery is a misdemeanor violation. Convictions are punishable by:
- A jail sentence of up to one year
- A maximum fine of $2,000
- Domestic Violence on a Disabled Person
Domestic abuse of a disabled person is a significant betrayal of trust and a serious criminal offense. People with disabilities are notably more susceptible to abuse in close personal interactions. Research indicates that their likelihood of experiencing domestic abuse is two to three times higher than that of the non-disabled population.
Abuse can take many different forms. These include:
- Physical violence — Examples include pushing, hitting, and grabbing
- Verbal abuse — This can include threats, insults, and humiliation
- Emotional abuse — Examples include isolation and controlling behavior
- Neglect — Withholding medication, denying access to assistance
- Withholding or damaging assistive devices like wheelchairs, communication aids
- Financial abuse
- Sexual abuse
For victims with disabilities, leaving the abuse or reporting it might be tough. Reliance on the abuser for everyday care leads to a challenging and intricate circumstance. The fear of losing one’s independence or necessary services can be a powerful barrier to victims wanting to leave the abuser.
PC 368(b) makes it a crime to deliberately mistreat or jeopardize an elderly or dependent adult, including individuals with physical or mental impairments that impair their capacity to carry out routine tasks. The prosecution needs to prove several crucial elements in a PC 368(b) violation case, including:
- Knowledge of disability — You had to be aware of the victim’s disability or have had good reason to suspect it.
- Willful endangerment or harm — If you have caused or permitted the victim to suffer or put them in a condition that jeopardizes their health or safety, then you committed willful harm or endangerment.
The particulars of the incident are also crucial. They include:
- Severity of abuse — PC 368(b) addresses a variety of situations, ranging from grossly violent neglect to aggressive behavior. The abuse’s severity will have a significant impact on the case.
- Nature of the disability — The victim’s particular disability will impact the assessment of the case due to its particular limitations.
Domestic abuse against an adult disabled person carries severe penalties under Penal Code 368(b). Below is a summary of the possible consequences:
Misdemeanor Charges
Misdemeanor convictions have serious ramifications, even if they are less serious than felonies. You risk facing the following once convicted:
- Summary probation
- A year in jail, and
- A fine of up to $6,000
Repeat offenders may be subject to a higher fine of up to $10,000.
Felony Charges
Felony charges are punishable by more harsh punishments. A conviction carries:
- A maximum penalty of $6,000 in fines
- A year in county jail, or both.
The severity of the harm you cause to the disabled victim may also result in harsher punishments. You risk serving more time in jail if the victim sustains serious physical harm. For victims under 70, this is three years. For victims over 70, it is five years.
The consequences are worse if the victim passes away as a result of the abuse. If the victim was older than 70, you might have to serve an extra five years in prison. Otherwise, you would have to serve seven years.
- Child Abuse
Child abuse is a serious crime that includes acts like physical assault, neglect, and sexual and emotional abuse that harm a child’s physical or mental health. The California Penal Code handles child abuse in several parts. One of these sections is PC 273d. This law focuses exclusively on corporal punishment that causes traumatic harm.
PC 273d distinguishes corporal punishment from fair discipline. While fair discipline encourages long-term beneficial behavior change through teaching and reinforcement, corporal punishment tries to accomplish immediate deterrence through pain.
The prosecution must prove several crucial elements before filing a charge under PC 273d. They have to show that:
- You caused the punishment on purpose, or you acted willingly.
- The punishment was cruel, and it involved a higher degree of force than what is deemed appropriate for the age and behavior of the child.
- There was traumatic harm from corporal punishment that necessitated medical attention or had long-term health effects on the child.
Situations such as the following could result in charges under PC 273d:
- Striking a child with a belt forcefully enough to cause severe contusions or bruises.
- Striking a child so hard on the head that they fall and sustain a concussion.
- If you shake a newborn hard enough, it can damage their brains.
Since PC 273d is a “wobbler,” the prosecution could file charges as either a misdemeanor or a felony. Your criminal past and the extent of the harm are crucial considerations in this choice.
If you are convicted of misdemeanor charges, you will face the following penalties:
- Summary probation instead of jail time
- A maximum of 1 year in county jail and/or
- A maximum fine of $6,000
If you are convicted of felony charges, you will face the following penalties:
- Formal probation instead of jail time
- 2, 4, or 6 years in jail — If you have a prior conviction of child abuse within ten years, you will face an additional four years and/or
- A maximum fine of $6,000
There are other types of child abuse, even if PC 273d only addresses one. While PC 273d does not apply to neglect or emotional abuse, other Penal Code sections allow for prosecution. The following are the other forms of abuse:
Child Neglect
Penal Code 270 addresses the deliberate neglect of a child’s basic requirements, like clothing, food, shelter, or required medical attention.
A conviction for child neglect could result in either misdemeanor or felony charges. Convictions result in the following penalties:
For misdemeanors, you risk facing:
- Up to one year in jail and/or
- A fine of up to $2,000
For felonies, you risk facing:
- Up to one year in jail, or one year and a day in prison, and/or
- A fine of up to $2,000
Child Endangerment
PC 273a addresses a wider variety of circumstances in which a parent or caregiver puts a child’s welfare, health, or safety at risk. For instance, under PC 273a, leaving a small child unattended close to a pool may constitute endangerment.
You could face misdemeanor or felony charges for endangering a child.
For misdemeanors, you risk facing:
- Up to 6 months in jail and/or
- A fine of up to $1,000
For felonies, you risk facing:
- 2, 4, or 6 years in prison, and/or
- A fine of up to $10,000
- Elder Abuse
Elder abuse is a serious social problem that primarily affects people over 60. Elder abuse can take many different forms, all of which hurt or jeopardize the welfare of the elderly. Some of the common forms of elder abuse include the following:
- Physical abuse — This refers to violent behaviors against elders, like pushing, grasping, hitting, or any other kind of bodily injury.
- Neglect — This is the caregivers’ inability to meet the elders’ basic needs, for example, by failing to provide food, drink, shelter, or healthcare.
- Emotional or psychological abuse — This type of abuse can take the form of shouting, threatening, demeaning, or isolating an elderly person from their loved ones.
- Financial abuse — This abuse occurs when someone takes advantage of an elderly person’s financial resources for their benefit. Examples of this abuse include stealing cash or property, abusing credit cards or bank accounts, or forcing modifications to financial documents like wills.
- Sexual abuse — This is any unwelcome sexual action or contact with an elderly person.
Elder abuse is a serious offense that hurts or puts elderly and dependent persons at risk. This abuse is the focus of California Penal Code 368. This law safeguards against several types of exploitation while acknowledging the vulnerability of these populations.
PC 368 protects two different groups:
- Older People — Those 65 or older fall under this category. It recognizes that because of possible impairments in physical or cognitive ability, this age group may be particularly vulnerable to abuse.
- Dependent adults — People who are 18 to 64 years old and have physical or mental impairments that make it difficult for them to go about their everyday lives or defend their legal rights fall under this group. These restrictions could result from physical infirmities, mental health conditions, or intellectual deficiencies.
According to the degree of the injury caused, PC 368 distinguishes between misdemeanor and felony elder abuse.
Elements of Elder Abuse Misdemeanor
Prosecutors must prove the following:
- You acted with criminal negligence, displaying reckless disdain for the possible repercussions, or you had to have intentionally caused the abuse.
- Your acts must have resulted in the elderly victim experiencing unreasonable or unjustifiable physical or mental distress.
- Your actions must have put the elder’s health or life in danger.
- You must have known or had a reasonable suspicion that you knew that the victim was older than sixty-five.
Elements of Elder Abuse in Felony
Misdemeanors and felonies are comparable in certain aspects, although felonies involve more serious circumstances, which include the following:
- The abuse needs to be deliberate or the result of criminal carelessness, just like in misdemeanors.
- The elderly victim had to have experienced either bodily or mental anguish as a result of the abuse.
- Unlike misdemeanors, your conduct has to have caused the elder serious bodily injury or even death, or at least a strong likelihood of doing so.
- You needed to know or have a reasonable suspicion that you knew that the victim was older than 65.
Elder Abuse Penalties
Misdemeanor convictions for elder abuse result in:
- A year in county jail
- Up to $6,000, with a potential increase to $10,000 for subsequent offenses
- The court could order you to compensate the victim for any financial losses or medical expenses resulting from the abuse.
On the other hand, felony convictions for elder abuse result in:
- Up to four years in a state prison
- Up to $10,000 in fines
- Like misdemeanors, the courts could order you to pay restitution to compensate the victim.
Felony cases involving great bodily injury or death can lead to even harsher sentences due to potential enhancements.
Find a Domestic Violence Defense Attorney Near Me
Having legal representation is essential in domestic violence situations because of their complexity, especially when it comes to cases involving disability, child abuse, or elder abuse. Although the information above offers a basic idea of the crimes, remember that every circumstance is different. Thus, speaking with an experienced criminal defense lawyer who will help you develop a strong defense plan and a clear grasp of your legal rights is crucial.
If you or someone you know is charged with domestic abuse in Van Nuys, California, contact Leah Legal for a free consultation at 818-484-1100. We are committed to defending your legal rights and assisting you during court proceedings.
Eyewitness testimony holds a powerful position in criminal cases. The vivid recollection of a witness can often sway a jury more than forensic evidence. However, the reliability of such testimony is frequently questioned due to various psychological and situational factors that can impair memory. As a defendant facing criminal charges, understanding how eyewitness testimony can influence your case can equip you with better defense strategies. You also want to have a skilled criminal defense attorney by your side.
Eyewitness Testimony Effect On Criminal Cases
Eyewitness testimony significantly impacts criminal cases. Jurors often find it compelling because it seems straightforward. It involves someone who witnessed the event and is recounting their experience, evoking a strong emotional response and leading jurors to believe in its accuracy.
However, human memory is fallible. Research indicates that eyewitness testimony can be flawed and influenced by various factors, potentially leading to wrongful convictions. Approximately 70% of wrongful convictions overturned by DNA evidence in the United States each year are due to eyewitness misidentification.
These statistics show the potential for error; hence, the importance of scrutinizing eyewitness testimony in criminal cases.
Factors That Could Cause Eyewitness Mistakes
Eyewitness mistakes can result from psychological and situational factors, distorting memory and leading to inaccurate testimony, which can have serious consequences in criminal cases. Understanding these factors aids defendants in avoiding wrongful imprisonment and assists judges in making unbiased judgments.
Stress Or Anxiety
During a crime, high levels of stress or anxiety can impair a witness’s ability to accurately recall details. Stress prompts the release of cortisol, a hormone that affects cognitive functions, including memory. The “Yerkes-Dodson Law” indicates that moderate stress can enhance memory, but excessive stress can impair accurate recall.
According to credible studies, high-stress conditions significantly reduce the accuracy of eyewitness identifications and recall of event details. In simulated crime scenarios, participants under high stress were less likely to correctly identify a suspect compared to those under low stress.
The Presence Of A Dangerous Weapon
The presence of a dangerous weapon during a crime can significantly impair a witness’s ability to accurately recall and identify the perpetrator. This phenomenon is known as the “weapon focus effect.” When a weapon is present, witnesses tend to focus their attention on the weapon rather than on the perpetrator’s face, leading to less accurate descriptions and identifications.
A study on human behavior indicates that the presence of a weapon diminishes the precision of eyewitness descriptions and identifications. A meta-analysis of several studies revealed that witnesses exposed to a weapon were significantly less likely to identify the perpetrator correctly.
The weapon focus effect arises from the heightened perceived threat level associated with the presence of a weapon, which draws the witness’s attention to the most menacing aspect of the situation—the weapon. This narrowed focus distracts from other crucial details, like the perpetrator’s physical characteristics.
Their Level Of Confidence
Confidence in a witness’s testimony is often seen as indicating its accuracy. However, studies have shown that confidence doesn’t always correlate with accuracy. This misconception can lead jurors to give too much weight to confident testimony, possibly resulting in wrongful convictions.
Research into the relationship between eyewitness confidence and accuracy has found that post-identification feedback can greatly boost a witness’s confidence. Participants in the study who received confirming feedback about their identification, regardless of its accuracy, showed higher confidence in their memory, even when their identification was wrong.
Another study supporting these findings shows that witnesses who receive confirming feedback not only become more confident but also tend to remember the identification process as easier and their view of the perpetrator as clearer than it actually was.
In a comprehensive review, the National Academy of Sciences highlighted the potential dangers of using witness confidence as an indicator of accuracy. The review stressed that confidence can be influenced by various factors, such as the lineup’s nature, interactions with law enforcement, and post-event information, all of which can distort the witness’s memory and confidence.
Jurors often equate high confidence with high accuracy, a phenomenon known as the “confidence-accuracy relationship.” This can be misleading because even highly confident witnesses can be mistaken. Educating jurors about the weak correlation between confidence and accuracy is crucial to reducing the risk of wrongful convictions resulting from misidentifications.
Different Racial Identification
Eyewitnesses are generally less accurate when identifying individuals of a different race. This phenomenon, known as the “cross-race effect” or “own-race bias,” indicates that people are better at recognizing faces of their own race than those of other races. This bias can lead to higher rates of misidentification in cases involving cross-racial witnesses.
The cross-race effect has been extensively studied and confirmed by psychological research. A meta-analysis reviewed 39 studies on cross-racial identification and found a significant decrease in accuracy when witnesses identified individuals of a different race compared to their own. The studies showed that witnesses were 1.56 times more likely to make an incorrect identification when the suspect was of a different race .
The cross-race effect is influenced by social categorization processes. When participants were primed to think about race, their ability to recognize cross-racial faces decreased, suggesting that racial categorization itself can impair facial recognition accuracy.
The implications of the cross-race effect goes a long way in criminal justice. A review by the Innocence Project found that cross-racial misidentification has been a contributing factor in many wrongful convictions. For example, in cases where DNA evidence later exonerated the defendant, a significant proportion involved cross-racial identifications.
Courts and law enforcement agencies have recognized the impact of the cross-race effect and have taken steps to mitigate its influence. Some jurisdictions provide jurors with instructions about the potential for cross-racial identification errors. Additionally, experts on eyewitness identification may testify about the cross-race effect to educate jurors on its potential impact.
Choosing Under Pressure
The circumstances under which a witness is asked to identify a suspect can significantly impact the accuracy of their identification. High-pressure situations, such as lineups conducted with urgency or under coercion, can lead to mistaken identifications.
It has been found that suggestive lineup procedures, where the suspect stands out as the most likely perpetrator, can increase the likelihood of a witness choosing the suspect, even if they are innocent.
Moreover, lineup administrators’ behavior can influence witness decisions. When lineup administrators indicate their belief in the suspect’s guilt, witnesses are more likely to choose the suspect, regardless of their actual guilt. This can lead to false identifications and wrongful convictions.
In response to these concerns, some jurisdictions have implemented double-blind lineup procedures, where the lineup administrator does not know the identity of the suspect. This helps prevent unintentional cues that could influence the witness’s decision.
Influence Of Facts
Eyewitness memory can be influenced by post-event information, which can distort their recollection of the original event. This phenomenon, known as the “misinformation effect,” highlights the malleability of memory and its susceptibility to external influences.
Elizabeth Loftus, a renowned scientist, demonstrated the power of post-event information in shaping eyewitness memory. In her study, participants watched a video of a car accident and were then asked questions about the event. Participants who were asked, “How fast were the cars going when they smashed into each other?” reported higher estimates of speed compared to those asked, “How fast were the cars going when they hit each other?” This subtle change in wording influenced participants’ memory of the event, leading to inaccurate recollections.
Furthermore, her study showed that misinformation presented after the event can alter eyewitness testimony. Participants who were exposed to misleading information about a simulated robbery were more likely to incorporate that misinformation into their accounts, even when explicitly told it was false.
Psychological Transference
Psychological transference occurs when a witness subconsciously transfers feelings or memories associated with one person onto another. This can result in the witness mistakenly identifying an innocent person as the perpetrator because that person somehow reminds them of the actual offender or another significant individual in their life.
One of the landmark cases illustrating psychological transference is that of a memory expert who was mistakenly identified as a rapist. The victim had seen the memory expert on television shortly before the assault and, due to the stressful nature of the attack, her mind associated him with the crime. This case shows how transference can occur even when the witness has no intentional malice or deceit.
The phenomenon is supported by the concept of source monitoring errors. Source monitoring refers to the process of determining the origins of our memories, knowledge, or beliefs. An error occurs when a person attributes a memory to the wrong source. For example, a witness might correctly remember a face seen previously but incorrectly recall the context in which it was seen, leading to a wrongful identification.
In a study done by Cornell University, participants were shown a video of a staged robbery and later asked to identify the perpetrator from a lineup. Some participants mistakenly identified an innocent bystander who was present in the video but not involved in the crime, illustrating how familiarity with a face can lead to transference.
Psychological transference can have serious implications in criminal cases, as it can lead to the conviction of innocent individuals based on flawed eyewitness identification.
Multiple Culprits
When a crime involves multiple perpetrators, eyewitness identification becomes more complex and prone to errors. The presence of multiple culprits can overwhelm the cognitive processes of a witness, leading to confusion and inaccuracies in recalling specific details about each individual involved.
During a study to investigate the challenges associated with identifying multiple culprits, participants witnessed a simulated crime involving two perpetrators and were later asked to identify them from a lineup. The results showed a significant decrease in identification accuracy when multiple suspects were involved compared to crimes with a single perpetrator. Witnesses often conflated the actions and appearances of the culprits, leading to misidentifications.
In high-stress situations, cognitive overload occurs, reducing the clarity and accuracy of memory. Witnesses may remember the crime’s general aspects but struggle to distinguish the individual characteristics of each perpetrator.
The phenomenon known as “memory blending” can occur when multiple individuals are involved in a crime. Witnesses might inadvertently combine features from different culprits into a single composite image, which can lead to the misidentification of innocent individuals who share some characteristics with the actual perpetrators.
Eyewitnesses Interaction Levels With Various People
High levels of interaction and familiarity generally lead to more accurate identifications, while brief or superficial interactions can increase the likelihood of errors. Witnesses who have prior interaction with a suspect are more likely to make accurate identifications compared to those who have only seen the suspect briefly. Familiarity with the suspect allows witnesses to encode more detailed and distinctive features, enhancing their ability to recognize the suspect later.
Conversely, when a witness has limited interaction with the suspect, their memory of the perpetrator’s features may be less detailed and more prone to errors.
Additionally, the nature of the interaction can impact memory. Interactions involving emotional or stressful encounters are more likely to be remembered inaccurately due to the heightened stress interfering with cognitive processing. In contrast, neutral or positive interactions result in more accurate recollections.
Moreover, post-event interactions with other witnesses, law enforcement, or media can contaminate an eyewitness’s memory. This phenomenon, known as “memory conformity,” occurs when witnesses discuss the event with others and incorporate their recollections into their own memory.
The Effect of Eyewitness Testimony on Juries
Eyewitness testimony holds significant sway over juries, often being perceived as compelling and credible evidence. However, the persuasive power of eyewitness accounts can lead to problematic outcomes, especially when the testimony is inaccurate or flawed.
Jurors often prioritize eyewitness testimony, even when contradicted by other evidence, leading to potential biases in verdicts. They tend to believe confident witnesses, despite confidence not always aligning with accuracy. Moreover, Jurors often overlook the challenges of eyewitness memory, leading to an overreliance on testimony despite its potential flaws.
Expert testimony about eyewitness reliability helps jurors critically evaluate testimony, reducing wrongful convictions based on flawed accounts.
Also, legal reforms have been proposed to mitigate the impact of eyewitness testimony by providing instructions, standardizing procedures, and allowing expert witnesses to testify on reliability.
How Does The Law Protect You?
The legal system incorporates various safeguards to protect individuals from the potential inaccuracies of eyewitness testimony. These measures aim to minimize wrongful convictions by ensuring that eyewitness evidence is collected, presented, and evaluated with the utmost care and scientific rigor.
Standardized Lineup Procedures
Law enforcement agencies have adopted standardized procedures for conducting lineups to reduce the risk of misidentification. These procedures often include using double-blind lineups, where the officer conducting the lineup does not know the identity of the suspect, thus preventing any unintentional cues. Sequential lineups, where witnesses view one suspect at a time rather than all at once, are also recommended to reduce comparison-based identifications.
Sequential lineups significantly decrease false identifications compared to simultaneous lineups, helping witnesses focus on the suspect’s memory rather than making comparisons.
Jury Instructions on Eyewitness Testimony
Courts may provide jurors with specific instructions regarding the potential unreliability of eyewitness testimony. These instructions are designed to inform jurors about factors that can affect memory accuracy, such as stress, lighting conditions, and the presence of a weapon.
In California, the Judicial Council of California Criminal Jury Instructions (CALCRIM) includes instructions on evaluating eyewitness identification. CALCRIM No. 315 outlines various factors jurors should consider, such as the witness’s opportunity to observe the perpetrator, the accuracy of the witness’s prior description, and any discrepancies between the witness’s testimony and other evidence presented at trial.
Expert Testimony
Expert witnesses can be called to educate the jury about the science of memory and the factors that affect the reliability of eyewitness testimony. These experts can explain complex psychological concepts in a way that jurors can understand, helping them make more informed decisions.
Expert testimony markedly enhances jurors’ comprehension of the constraints of eyewitness identification, prompting more critical evaluations of such evidence.
Pretrial Hearings
Judges can hold pretrial hearings to determine the admissibility of eyewitness testimony. During these hearings, the defense can challenge the reliability of the identification process and present evidence of suggestive procedures or other factors that could have led to a misidentification.
The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Manson v. Brathwaite (1977) established the criteria for evaluating the admissibility of eyewitness testimony. The court emphasized the importance of assessing the totality of circumstances, including the witness’s opportunity to view the suspect, the degree of attention, and the time between the crime and the identification.
Recording Identification Procedures
Some jurisdictions mandate recording identification procedures to ensure transparency. Video or audio recordings offer an objective record, allowing courts to review procedural fairness and the absence of undue influence.
For example, the New Jersey Supreme Court in State v. Henderson (2011) mandated that all identification procedures be recorded when feasible. This ruling aimed to enhance the reliability of eyewitness evidence by providing a clear record of how identifications were conducted.
Post-Conviction Relief
Wrongfully convicted individuals have avenues for seeking post-conviction relief, including DNA testing and appeals based on new evidence. Organizations like the Innocence Project work to exonerate individuals who have been wrongfully convicted based on faulty eyewitness testimony and other flawed evidence.
Since its founding, the Innocence Project has exonerated over 375 individuals in the United States, many convicted due to faulty eyewitness identifications.
These legal protections are crucial for ensuring that the criminal justice system remains fair and just. By implementing rigorous procedures and allowing for the critical evaluation of eyewitness testimony, the law aims to prevent wrongful convictions and uphold the rights of defendants.
Find a Competent Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
Eyewitness testimony, while compelling, can be flawed, and having a skilled attorney can make all the difference. At Leah Legal, we specialize in criminal defense and understand the repercussions of challenging eyewitness accounts. With our experience and dedication, we will work tirelessly to protect your rights and build a strong defense.
If you are in Van Nuys and need expert legal representation, contact our office at 818-484-1100 for a consultation. Our team is committed to providing the highest quality defense to ensure the best possible outcome for your case.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Sex crimes involving minors carry hefty penalties in California. Perpetrators, who in most cases are adults, face lengthy prison sentences, hefty court fines, and other life-changing consequences after a conviction. Meeting or arranging to meet with a minor to engage in a sex-related offense is one such crime whose conviction can significantly impact your life. But you can fight your charges with the assistance of a competent criminal lawyer if you face false accusations, do not know that the victim is a minor, or are a victim of police entrapment. Your attorney can use the best solid defense techniques to obtain a favorable outcome for the case.
Legal Meaning of PC 288.3
PC 288.3 prohibits establishing contact with a minor (an individual below 18) to commit a sex-related felony. You contact a minor when you establish communication with them. This law requires you to know that the person you communicate with is a minor. It also requires that the felony you intend to commit involves a minor. This grave offense can result in life-changing consequences, hence the need for the prosecutor to prove all elements beyond any reasonable doubt. It is the only way the court will give a guilty verdict in your case.
The elements of a crime provide its legal meaning. When prosecuting charges under PC 288.3, the district attorney must prove the following:
- You contacted or established communication with a minor, directly or indirectly, or attempted to do so
- You established or attempted to establish this communication to commit a sex-related felony with the minor
- You knew or should have reasonably known that the individual you were communicating or attempting to communicate with was a minor (below 18)
Proof of communication between you and the alleged minor is crucial in such cases. The prosecutor will still have a solid case against you, even if the communication was unsuccessful. What matters is that you established communication or attempted to do so, your criminal intent, and the fact that the alleged victim was a minor.
This law specifies the sex-related felonies that you can face prosecution for. They are as follows:
- Kidnapping for Sex Crime
Kidnapping occurs when you forcefully, or through fear, move another person over a significant distance against their will. There is usually no requirement to use force or fear when the crime involves a minor. You could use misrepresentation or false promises to convince the minor to accompany you.
- Rape, PC 261
You commit rape when you engage in sexual intercourse with another person against the person’s consent. You can accomplish the act through violence, force, threats, coercion, or fraud.
- Illegal Sodomy
PC 286 makes sodomy a crime when you engage in the act with a minor or commit the act against the other person’s consent.
- Lewd Acts
PC 288 makes it unlawful to engage in lewd or lascivious activities with a child. The offense occurs when you touch a minor for sexual purposes. The touch can be on any part of their body. It is a graver offense if the alleged victim is a minor under 14.
- Oral Copulation
PC 287 prohibits engaging in oral sex through fear or force and against the victim’s consent. The crime carries more severe penalties if the alleged victim is a minor.
- Forcible Penetration Using a Foreign Object
Under PC 289, you commit this crime when you use a foreign object to sexually penetrate a minor. Typically, this offense is committed against the victim’s consent. But it is a grave offense when committed against a minor, even with consent.
- Child Pornography
You are guilty under PC. 288.3 if you contact a child with the intent to commit child pornography. Child pornography is defined under different statutes, including PC 311.2, PC 311.4, and PC 311.11. PC 311.2 prohibits transporting, sending, processing, producing, and duplicating child pornographic material for distribution or sale. PC 311.4 prohibits employing, hiring, persuading, using, or forcing a minor to engage in the filming or production of pornographic materials. PC 311.11 prohibits controlling or processing child pornographic material.
The Knowledge
PC 288.3 requires you to know that the person you are communicating with is a minor. This could be true if you knew the alleged victim before the crime. For example, if the victim is your neighbor, a relative, or a student at your school, you could know their age. The prosecutor will still file charges if they believe that you should have reasonably known that the victim is a minor. This reasonable knowledge occurs if you have information that could help determine their age.
Proving knowledge is challenging for prosecutors, which allows you to challenge your charges during the trial. A skilled attorney can argue that you believed the victim to be of legal age to fight your charges.
Penalties if Convicted Under PC 288.3
If a jury trial finds you guilty of meeting a minor or attempting to meet a minor to commit a sex offense under PC 288.3, you will face the same penalties as those given for the sex offense you planned to commit with the minor. Typically, felony sex crimes are punishable by:
- Felony probation
- A maximum of $10,000 in court fines
- A prison sentence
Additionally, if there is a previous conviction under PC 288.3 on your record, the judge could increase your prison sentence by five years.
A PC 288.3 violation also carries a requirement to register in the sex offender registry under PC 290. The judge can order you to register under Tier Three, meaning a lifetime requirement to register. If required to register under Tier 2, you will register for at least twenty years.
The exact prison sentence you face upon conviction depends on the underlying sex crime. Here are some possible sentences you could receive:
- Seven to thirteen years in prison if you planned to commit sodomy on a minor
- Three, six, or eight years in prison for contacting a minor under 14 to commit lewd or lascivious acts on them
- Sixteen months to eight years for intending to engage in oral sex with the minor.
Legal Meaning of PC 288.4
You violate PC 288.4 when you organize to meet a minor with a plan to engage in sexual acts at that meeting. The crime is also referred to as soliciting a minor. It is a wobbler carrying a maximum prison sentence of four years and a requirement to register in the sex offender registry. The sexual acts you intend to commit when you meet a minor can include any of the following:
- Exposing your genitals, rectal area, or public area or having the child do the same
- Engaging in lewd or lascivious acts with the minor, including touching their body for sexual arousal or gratification
Note: You are guilty under PC 288.4 even though you did not engage in the intended sexual acts with the victim. You are also guilty even if the meeting did not occur, as long as you organized the meeting with a minor. However, the district attorney must prove the facts of this crime for a guilty verdict. These facts are as follows:
- You organized to meet a minor or anyone you believed was a minor
- You organized the meeting due to an abnormal or unnatural sex-related interest in children
- You planned to engage in a sex-related act with the minor, like exposing your private parts, causing the minor to expose their private parts, or lewd activities with the minor.
Remember that a minor is any individual below 18. People become adults when they turn eighteen, after the first second of their birthdate. Meeting or organizing to meet a sexually mature teenager is a grave violation of this crime, even if the teenager initiated communication with you.
Additionally, it is an offense to organize to meet with somebody you believe is a minor, even if they are not. This is a crucial aspect of this law since most arrests and charges occur after a sting operation involving undercover law enforcement officers who sometimes pose as children.
The district attorney must also prove your motivation to meet the minor, which is an abnormal or unusual sex-related interest in minors. They can use evidence from your prior arrests and convictions related to your relationships with children. The prosecutor can also use your previous conversations, emails, texts, or phone calls to prove this motivation. However, if your motive to organize a meeting is non-sex-related, the court will not find you guilty under PC 288.4. But you should prove this in court so the judge can dismiss your charges.
Lastly, the plan to engage in sexual acts is a crucial element of this crime. The district attorney must prove your intention to expose your private parts, cause the minor to expose their private parts, or engage in lascivious or lewd activities with the child. Remember that lewd acts with a minor include touching the minor’s body parts for sexual excitement, arousal, or gratification.
The court will drop your charges if the prosecutor cannot prove these elements beyond any reasonable doubt.
Enhanced Penalties for Attending the Meeting
PC 288.4 prohibits organizing to meet with a child for sexual or lewd purposes. Criminal court judges will give you an enhanced sentence if you attend the meeting. However, for the enhanced sentence to apply, the district attorney must demonstrate all the elements under PC 288.4, including that you attended the meeting at the planned time. The enhancement applies even in cases where the defendant does not engage in the planned sexual acts with the minor. What matters is the fact that you attended the meeting.
Possible Penalties if Convicted under PC 288.4
PC 288.4 is a wobbler, meaning the district attorney can prosecute it as a misdemeanor or felony offense. Your charges will mainly depend on the facts of your case and your criminal history. Prosecutors mostly charge this offense as a misdemeanor, which is punishable by the following:
- Misdemeanor probation
- A maximum jail sentence of one year
- A maximum of $5000 in court fines
The prosecutor can file felony charges against you if there is a previous sex-related conviction on your criminal record that carries a requirement to register in the sex offender registry. Examples of crimes carrying this requirement include rape, sexual battery, oral copulation through force or fear, forcible sexual penetration using a foreign object, or indecent exposure.
If the district attorney brings felony charges, you will likely receive these penalties after a conviction:
- Felony probation
- A prison sentence of sixteen months, two or three years
- A maximum of $10,000 in fines
A felony charge will also occur if you go to an arranged meeting with a child for sex-related acts. For the enhanced sentence, the judge could sentence you to the following:
- Felony probation
- A maximum of $10,000 in court fines
- A prison sentence of two, three, or four years
The Requirement to Register as a Sex Offender
PC 288.4 also requires registration in the sex offender registry under PC 290. If the court finds you guilty of a misdemeanor under this statute, you could be required to register under Tier 1. This means you must register every year for ten years. However, you could be required to register under Tier 3 if you are guilty of a felony. This means registering for a lifetime.
Fighting Your Charges Under PC 288.3 and PC 288.4
PC 288.3 and PC 288.4 carry severe penalties for anyone found guilty of meeting or arranging to meet with a child for sex purposes. However, you can change the outcome of your case with the assistance of a competent criminal defense lawyer. Criminal attorneys use a wide range of legal defense techniques on their client’s behalf for a fair resolution of criminal cases. Here are some of the best strategies your lawyer can use in your case:
You Did Not Know That The Victim Was a Minor
PC 288.3 requires you to have known that the individual you were planning to meet was a minor. The court will drop your charges if the prosecutor cannot prove beyond any reasonable doubt that you had this knowledge. Your lawyer can argue that the alleged victim lied about their age, and you could not tell their actual age from the conversation or your previous meetings.
However, you cannot use this defense strategy if facing charges under PC 288.4 since the requirement here is planning to meet with somebody you know or believe is a minor.
You Did Not Intend to Commit a Sexual Offense
PC 288.3 requires you to plan to meet with a child to commit a sex-related felony. PC 288.4 requires you to organize to meet a child to engage in sex-related acts. The district attorney must demonstrate this intent so the jury can deliver a guilty verdict. But your lawyer can challenge your intent for a favorable outcome.
Remember that proving a person’s intent is a severe challenge for prosecutors. It is difficult to tell a person’s intention from their current or previous behavior or communications. A skilled attorney only needs to create doubt in the prosecutor’s case to gain an advantage. If they are successful, the court will drop your charges.
You Are a Victim of Police Entrapment
Police entrapment happens when the police cause a defendant to commit a crime they would otherwise not have committed under different circumstances. Since it is difficult to arrest individuals who engage in sexual acts with minors in acts of crime, the police use traps and tricks to obtain evidence and make arrests. They can pose as victims to gauge the behavior of a suspected offender. If the offender falls into their traps, they make an arrest.
However, you can cite police entrapment to convince the court to dismiss our charges if you can prove that you only committed the offense because of the entrapment.
This defense strategy may not work if you face charges under PC 288.4. If a police officer poses as a minor and tells you their exact age, you will face prosecution if you go ahead with the planned meeting even after learning that the person you intend to engage in sexual acts with is a minor.
Find an Experienced Criminal Defense Lawyer Near Me
Do you face criminal charges in Van Nuys for meeting or arranging to meet with a child for sexual acts?
A conviction under PC 288.3 or PC 288.4 can have life-changing consequences. However, you can fight for a favorable outcome with the assistance of a skilled criminal attorney.
At Leah Legal, we will help you understand your legal situation and options. We will also help you navigate the complex legal process successfully. We will defend your rights and plan a solid defense against your charges for the best possible outcome for the case. Contact us at 818-484-1100 to better understand your legal situation and our services.
Oxycodone is a potent pain medication. It is also a controlled substance in California. Despite having valid medical applications, the DEA has classified it as a Schedule II substance due to its significant potential for misuse and dependence. Stricter laws governing the prescription of opioids have resulted from the opioid epidemic, which highlighted these hazards.
It is against the law to possess oxycodone without a valid prescription, according to Health and Safety Code Section 11350. All banned substances are subject to this law, which carries heavy fines and jail time as punishment for breaking it. There are, however, some exceptions, like when you have oxycodone and have the prescription holder’s express permission to transport it or dispose of it legally.
Understanding OxyContin
In 1916, chemists extracted the alkaloid thebaine from opium poppies to create oxycodone. Following its introduction into medicine, this semi-synthetic opioid proved to be a more effective analgesic. But like all opioids, it carried the same inherent risk of dependence.
The introduction of OxyContin by Purdue Pharma in the 1990s was a crucial turning point in the history of oxycodone in the late 20th century. This brand-named oxycodone formulation was intended for controlled release. OxyContin offered long-lasting pain relief over 12 hours, in contrast to conventional oxycodone, which required frequent dosage. This innovation, achieved through a controlled-release mechanism within the pill, significantly benefited chronic pain patients.
However, there was a risk associated with the extended-release function, which offered improved pain control. The euphoric properties of OxyContin pose a risk for misuse, and Purdue Pharma’s controversial marketing practices led to the opioid crisis in the country.
What are the Effects of OxyContin that Make it a Controlled Substance?
Several critical factors contribute to OxyContin’s status as a controlled substance.
- High potential for addiction and dependence — Similar to other opioids, OxyContin causes both pain relief and euphoria by interacting with the brain’s reward system. This could lead to compulsive drug use and dependence, necessitating higher dosages to achieve the desired result.
- Potential for abuse and misuse — There is potential for misuse of the extended-release function, which is intended to provide long-term pain relief. OxyContin can produce a faster and more potent high when crushed, snorted, or injected, which greatly raises the danger of overdosage. OxyContin overdoses claim so many lives.
- Risk of respiratory depression — OxyContin could result in respiratory depression, which could be fatal. The medication can cause breathing to slow down, which, if not treated right away, could be fatal. This danger is especially concerning for people who already have respiratory conditions or who use OxyContin in combination with other depressants like alcohol or benzodiazepines.
- Serious side effects — Beyond just relieving pain, OxyContin can have several unsettling side effects. Constipation, nausea, fatigue, and cognitive decline are a few of these. When these side effects are severe, they can significantly negatively influence a person’s daily activities and general health.
While OxyContin, when taken appropriately and under a doctor’s supervision, can be useful for managing moderate to severe pain, its propensity for abuse and dangerous adverse effects makes its use safe and responsible and requires stringent control.
Unlike traditional medications requiring frequent dosing, OxyContin provides sustained relief with a single pill, significantly improving patient adherence. However, the drug also had an unexpected side effect.
The human body becomes tolerant to opioids, including OxyContin, over time. With repeated use, a dose initially helpful in treating pain may no longer be so. The controlled-release pill’s gradual delivery of medication could not be enough to control pain as tolerance increases.
This is more than just a physical pain. Like other opioids, OxyContin affects the brain’s reward system to provide both pain relief and exhilaration. Some users could develop a stronger craving for the drug’s euphoric effects as their tolerance to pain relief increases. This desire could serve as a strong incentive for abuse. Some users could alter the medication, crushing tablets, for example, to overcome tolerance or satisfy urges. This greatly increases the risk of overdosing. This results in a quicker and more intense high. Some users feel pressured to alter the medicine because of the controlled-release mechanism, which was meant to provide better pain relief and convenience.
Potential Dangers Associated With the Different Methods People Use to Take Oxycontin
OxyContin is intended for oral consumption as prescribed by a doctor. However, some people abuse OxyContin by using risky techniques that can result in overdose, addiction, and other health issues. These detrimental behaviors are as follows:
- Intravenous (IV) injection — You can avoid the digestive tract by dissolving and injecting whole or crushed OxyContin straight into your bloodstream. This technique produces an intense, quick high that significantly raises the danger of infection and overdose. Furthermore, there is a significant chance of developing serious diseases while injecting non-sterile chemicals.
- Transnasal or snorting — OxyContin’s controlled-release mechanism is destroyed when it is crushed and snorted, producing a quicker, more potent high. This procedure could irritate your nasal passages and introduce dangerous fillers into your lungs, which may result in respiratory issues.
- Inhaling — Breathing in crushed OxyContin is especially dangerous and can seriously harm your lungs. You should not inhale the fillers or other inactive substances in the pills as they can cause irritation or scarring to your lung tissue.
California Law on OxyContin
The legal possession of OxyContin is contingent upon possessing a valid prescription. Possession refers to more than just physically holding the drug. It could also include:
- Keeping OxyContin tablets on your person or hiding them in a car or house.
- Managing OxyContin prescribed to another individual without that person’s consent or knowledge.
However, if you have a legitimate prescription from an authorized medical practitioner, you can lawfully possess it.
You could face misdemeanor charges for violating Health and Safety Code Section 11350. You risk facing the following penalties if the courts find you guilty of the crime:
- If this is your first offense, you could spend up to a year in county jail.
- The court could impose a more significant fine, but you could receive one of at least $1,000.
The court could occasionally provide you with alternatives to jail time, such as:
- Probation — Rehab is one of the conditions of probation. It could involve community service or drug treatment requirements.
- Drug diversion programs — You can avoid prosecution if you are eligible and complete a drug treatment program.
The severity of your sentence may vary depending on several factors. You could be charged with a felony in certain circumstances, including:
You Have Prior Convictions for a Violent or Serious Felony
In California, having OxyContin without a prescription is usually a misdemeanor. It is possible to convert this charge to a felony if you have a history of severe or significant felonies.
The seriousness of your prior conviction affects how likely you are to face felonies. According to Penal Code 667.5(c), severe felonies that are not violent, like grand theft auto, are less serious than violent ones, including assault with a dangerous weapon. This differentiation reflects the higher chance of recidivism and possible risks that come with violent offenses.
The particulars surrounding your OxyContin possession acquisition also play a role in the prosecutor’s choice. An increased likelihood of a felony prosecution arises if your present offense seems related to your previous felony. For example, a prior conviction for drug trafficking and the subsequent discovery of a significant quantity of OxyContin indicate a return to drug activity and may result in a more severe prosecution.
For sentence purposes, violent felonies are different from severe crimes. According to PC 667.5(c), violent felonies are offenses that directly include violence or the threat of violence against another person. However, serious felonies are a broader category that includes crimes that may or may not involve the use of violence. Examples include grand theft auto, embezzlement, and some drug-related crimes.
Offenses classified as “violent felonies” under Penal Code 667.5 have a substantial impact on sentencing selections. Examples listed in PC 667.5(c) consist of:
- Murder or voluntary manslaughter
- Arson
- Mayhem, which is intentionally inflicting permanent injury)
- Rape
- Sodomy and oral copulation under certain circumstances
- Robbery
- Lewd acts on a child under 14
- Felonies punishable by death or life imprisonment
- Felonies involving firearms
- Certain types of kidnapping
- Assault with intent to commit a specific felony
You are a Registered Sex Offender
If you are on the California sex offender registry and have a history of sexual misdeeds, the situation becomes considerably worse. In this instance, regardless of the amount, having OxyContin without a prescription usually results in the offense being considered a felony. Prosecutors prefer felony charges because they aim to address worries about sexual offenders’ impact on public safety as well as the possibility that drug use could exacerbate these dangers.
Possession of a Significant Quantity of OxyContin
The amount of OxyContin you possess has a big impact on what charges the prosecutor will bring. Having a significant quantity, especially without a prescription, raises the possibility of distribution or sale, which are crimes. Someone found in possession of hundreds of OxyContin pills, for instance, is treated with greater suspicion than someone who just has a small number for personal use.
Large amounts of OxyContin might be cause for concern for prosecutors as they may indicate possible distribution. However, suspicion does not equate to guilt.
Documentation is essential if you hold a substantial amount of OxyContin for a legitimate reason. This can show legitimate intent. The documentation includes:
- Valid prescriptions — If a licensed doctor writes a valid prescription, it dispels suspicions of illicit activities. This is particularly true when it comes to chronic pain management, which calls for a higher quantity. It unequivocally demonstrates a valid medical need.
- Supporting medical records — You can support your claim of personal use with medical records that show a chronic ailment that requires a high OxyContin dosage. These offer unbiased evidence of your medical condition, making it more difficult for the prosecution to contest your prescription’s need.
- Medical practitioner Credentials — Showing your credentials and permissions allays suspicions if you are a licensed medical practitioner, like, a doctor or pharmacist, with the authority to handle OxyContin
Recall that the prosecution has the burden of proof. A high quantity could indicate possible distribution. However, the prosecution must show that your intent was clear and unmistakable. Your evidence may cast doubt on their case, which could result in reduced charges or a dismissal.
Possession of OxyContin for Sale
Under HS 11351, OxyContin sales are subject to strict regulations. This law focuses on the illegal possession, procurement, and sale of prohibited narcotics, including OxyContin. According to this code, selling OxyContin without a prescription or proper license is a felony. The purpose of this law is to safeguard public safety and fight the illegal drug trade.
In addition to dealing with illicit distribution on the streets, HS 11351 also covers it in professional settings. For example, you may be charged under this law if you are a physician who prescribes OxyContin outside the accepted parameters of your medical practice. Only authorized professionals and legitimate medical purposes may prescribe prohibited medications like OxyContin, according to HS 11351.
The illegal possession of any controlled substance for sale, including OxyContin, is punishable by severe consequences under HS 11351. There are severe repercussions for a conviction under this law, including:
- Imprisonment — The length of your prison stay will depend on the details of your case, including the quantity of OxyContin involved and any past criminal activity. The maximum sentence for county jail is two to four years.
- Significant fines — Penalties for convictions are frequently severe, sometimes exceeding $20,000.
- Probation with conditions — The court could decide to use probation rather than jail in specific circumstances. However, there is a good chance this probation will come with stringent requirements, like mandated drug treatment programs.
Conviction for a felony under HS 11351 carries consequences that go beyond the short term. It could seriously hinder your chances of landing a job, finding a place to live, and getting several professional licenses.
Federal Charges for OxyContin
Since larger drug trafficking organizations are the focus of federal law enforcement, simple possession of OxyContin usually falls within state jurisdiction. Nonetheless, the following situations would result in you facing federal charges:
- Large quantities — Under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), federal authorities could investigate if you are in possession of a substantial amount of OxyContin, even if you do not intend to sell it. Large amounts imply the possibility of interstate distribution, which is illegal under federal law.
- Crossing state lines — Federal charges under the CSA could arise from the transportation of any quantity of OxyContin across state boundaries, even for personal use.
- Manufacturing or distribution — Federal law enforcement will become involved if you produce or distribute OxyContin. Even when these situations occur within a single state, the CSA expressly covers the manufacturing and distribution of restricted substances.
Title 21 of the U.S. Code, or the Controlled Substances Act, is the primary federal legislation on OxyContin. Unless received directly from a registered medical professional or with a valid prescription, Section 844 of the Controlled Substances Act forbids the possession of controlled narcotics like OxyContin. This section mainly pertains to situations where there is a demonstrable intent to distribute the drug in large amounts.
There are severe consequences for violating Section 844 of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) concerning OxyContin (oxycodone). However, the severity of the penalties depends on several important factors:
- Quantity — A critical factor is the quantity of OxyContin used. The potential for misuse and dependence is the basis for the CSA’s scheduling of prohibited substances. Greater doses of OxyContin, a Schedule II substance, are punishable by more severe consequences.
- Intent to distribute — This is a crucial consideration. Penalties for personal use are less severe than those for possession with the intention of selling.
- Criminal history — Sentences for prior drug offenses may be more severe.
Possible Penalties
For the first violation, simple possession of a small quantity of OxyContin for personal use carries the following penalties:
- Up to a year in jail
- A fine of at least $1,000
For possession with intent to distribute, the penalties increase if the amount or additional evidence points to a desire to distribute:
Mandatory minimum penalties are dependent on OxyContin dosage, with maximum terms of 40 years in prison and fines of up to $5,000.
Find a Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
When used appropriately and under a doctor’s supervision, OxyContin provides significant relief for people suffering from chronic pain. However, its potential for misuse and addiction necessitates a clear understanding of the legal implications surrounding OxyContin.
OxyContin’s propensity for abuse leads to its classification as a restricted substance. Because of this, there are strict laws governing its possession and sale to stop abuse and addiction. It is not a good idea to handle the legal system’s intricacies by yourself if you are facing criminal charges in Van Nuys due to OxyContin use.
An accomplished criminal defense lawyer could be your most valuable ally in an OxyContin case. At Leah Legal, we will thoroughly examine the particulars of your case. Our team will determine viable defenses in light of the facts and California law and vigorously work to achieve the best result. Even seemingly insignificant transgressions can have long-term effects. Call us today at 818-484-1100.
Cybercrime is an unlawful action committed using electronic devices or internet services. It is a growing problem as most individuals conduct their lives online. While these offenses might not have physical consequences for the alleged victims, they could have severe impacts, like damage to reputation, businesses, and the economy, mainly when committed against unsophisticated people using basic methods and tools. Consequently, California has strict laws regulating this criminal activity. Please continue reading this article to learn about different types of cybercrimes, their penalties, and how to beat your criminal charges.
Internet Fraud
Fraud is deceiving a person to obtain something they value. Internet fraud is a blanket term describing different fraud offenses, including the following:
- Non-delivery merchandise fraud
- Advance fee fraud
- Work-at-home scam where a company has lucrative job offers that can be completed remotely but requires applicants to pay registration fees before work begins, but the firms and the jobs are nonexistent.
- A fraudulent sale transaction where a person sells products on Instagram that are different from what the seller represents them to be.
- Identity theft
Fraud is a catch-all offense that is prosecuted in federal court. To be convicted of this federal crime, the prosecution must prove the facts of the criminal activity below:
- The defendant had a plan or intention to commit fraud.
- The accused intended to defraud a person.
- The defendant used an electronic communication device to execute the scheme.
Please note that the prosecution does not have to verify that the plans to defraud were successful.
If you are found guilty of internet fraud under the federal statute, you risk paying fines and spending up to a twenty-year sentence in federal prison.
Phishing Crime
Phishing is a cybercrime that targets people via electronic media. Typically, the defendant pretends to be a person the victim knows to win their trust. It is classified into the following categories:
- Identity theft
- Credit card fraud
Identity Theft
You can be guilty of identity theft if you obtain another person’s personal details over email. PC 530.5 bans the following types of conduct:
- Willfully acquiring somebody else’s personal identifying details and using them for unlawful purposes without the individual’s consent
- Obtaining or having possession of somebody else’s personal identifying details, without that individual’s permission and intending to defraud
- Selling, offering, or transferring the personal identifying details of somebody else, knowing that the defendant will use the details to commit fraud
Identity theft is a wobbler. If convicted, the penalties you face will depend on the specific conduct and whether you have a previous conviction. A misdemeanor attracts a fine of one thousand dollars, a year in county jail, and misdemeanor probation. On the other hand, a felony carries three years in state prison, a ten-thousand-dollar fine, and formal probation.
Navigating the complexities of identity theft criminal charges requires robust defense strategies. Here are three effective defenses your attorney could use to dispute the allegations based on your case facts:
- Absence of intent to defraud — This defense focuses on establishing that you did not use another person’s personal information to gain illegally or with a fraudulent motive. For this defense to be effective, you should prove it using witness statements or communication records. Also, proving a person misinterpreted your conduct can undermine the allegations.
- The victim consented to the conduct — The defense is valid when there exists an understanding or agreement between the defendant and the individual whose details were used, permitting the use of the information for specific purposes. You can present evidence like the written agreement, text messages, witness testimonies, or emails to support the defense.
- You are a victim of false accusation — It is not uncommon for a person to falsely accuse another when attempting to get them in trouble out of vengeance or anger. Sometimes, strangers can find a person online and target them to avoid financial constraints or debts.
Credit Card Fraud
Credit card fraud involves using the internet or email to collect another person’s credit card number and then using it to make illegal purchases.
The penalties you would face under PC 484e depend on whether the prosecution files the charge as petty theft or grand theft.
Grand theft is a wobbler that carries one year, sixteen months, two years, or three years of incarceration. On the other hand, petty theft is a misdemeanor punishable by six (6) months in jail and fines of $1,000.
You can challenge these criminal charges by raising strong defense strategies that can work to lower or dismiss your charges. They include the following:
- You did not intend to defraud — To be guilty of this crime, you must have acted with the intention of defrauding. In other words, proving you did not have the requisite intent is a legal defense.
- You do not have a credit card — PC 484e applies to debit and credit cards and does not entail items like property or cash. Consequently, it is a defense for you to claim that while you might have stolen or taken something, it was not a credit or debit card.
- Necessity — Also known as guilt with explanation, the necessity defense involves the accused person attempting to avoid guilt by proving they had a good reason to violate the law. In this case, you can argue that you violated the law due to an emergency.
- You had the cardholder’s consent — You only break this law if you act without the cardholder’s permission. You can urge that you reasonably believed you had the consent to purchase using the credit card, but it was a misunderstanding.
Defamation Laws
Defamation is the invasion of another individual’s reputation. It consists of fabricating false statements intended to hurt the alleged victim’s reputation. Please note that defamation is not a criminal offense in California.
When suing a person for defamation, you must meet the following criteria:
- False publication — During the case, you, the plaintiff, should verify that the liable party’s remarks were false.
- Willful publication of statements of fact — Defamation is an intentional tort. Therefore, it should be apparent that the responsible party’s conduct was intentional. In this context, the general public refers to contact with a third party who knows the message and can use it against the victim. You do not have to disseminate a willful publication to many people. Passing personal details to one individual is also defamation.
- The publication led to damage —A publication of information fits the definition if it results in injuries or special damages.
- Unprivileged publication— A remark is deemed defamation, provided it is unprivileged. A privileged publication includes publication committed in the right discharge of formal duty and judicial hearing.
Hacking Offense
Hacking becomes criminal when you access another person’s computer without their consent.
California Penal Code 502c is the law prohibiting unauthorized computer access. It makes it unlawful to:
- Intentionally access a computer, network, or system without authorization
- Access a computer to conceive or execute any scheme to defraud, deceive, or extort
- Intentionally facilitate access to a computer device intending to acquire data, money, or property
- Wrongfully obtain data, money, or property
Breaching this law is a wobbler (the prosecution can file it as a felony or misdemeanor, depending on the case facts).
Hacking becomes a felony if any of the following case facts apply:
- The crime caused damages or losses exceeding $950.
- You engaged in identity theft.
- You hacked a government agency’s computer.
- You engaged in hacking for financial gain.
A felony charge can lead to sixteen months, two (2), or three (3) years in state prison.
Hacking a person’s social media platform to snoop around would lead to a misdemeanor. On the other hand, hacking a governmental agency’s database to steal identities or to inflict major disruptions can result in felony charges.
A misdemeanor conviction is punishable by a year in county jail.
Fighting Hacking Criminal Charges
While the federal government takes cybercrime seriously, a skilled defense lawyer can develop a successful defense for you. The attorney understands that each criminal case is unique and will examine the case facts to find legal strategies to reduce or dismiss the charges. Common strategies they can use include the following:
- Lack of intent — The prosecutor must prove that you deliberately and knowingly hacked a computer. That means you are innocent if there was no intent. For instance, you can claim that you inadvertently clicked on an email attachment that released malware onto a computer network.
- Illegal search and seizure
Stalking Offense
PC 646.9a is California’s stalking statute. It prohibits following, harassing, and threatening another individual. With the widespread usage of the internet, most individuals utilize the web to stalk their alleged victim(s). Since the internet makes it problematic to regulate, you could be prosecuted for cyberstalking for different reasons.
Before convicting a suspect of cyberstalking, the prosecution team must demonstrate that:
- The defendant made serious threats that caused the alleged victim or their relatives to fear
- The accused intentionally and maliciously harassed the victim.
- The suspect committed the threats via the web or an electronic device.
Stalking is a wobbler. When deciding the nature of your criminal charges, the prosecution will consider the following:
- Your criminal record
- Whether the victim had a protective order against you
- Whether your criminal behavior is connected to domestic violence
As a California misdemeanor, cyberstalking attracts a year of incarceration and fines not exceeding a thousand dollars. On the contrary, a felony attracts five years, formal probation, and fines.
Some of the legal defenses that you and your attorney can use to fight the criminal charges include the following:
- Mistaken identity — Unless the alleged victim is technologically savvy, it can be challenging to identify a cyberstalker. While an individual might suspect you of stalking them, without any actual evidence, you cannot be convicted of the offense.
- First Amendment right — You can also use the 1st Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which safeguards the right to free speech, as your defense.
- You did not make any serious threats — Threats made against an alleged victim must be credible, and you, the defendant, must be able to execute them. That means if you cannot carry out your threat, then you cannot be guilty of cyberstalking.
Child Pornography
Child pornography refers to materials like photographs, film, negatives, and videotapes depicting sexual acts like sexual penetration, anal intercourse, oral copulation, or masturbation by a child below 18.
Penal Code Section 311 PC bans producing, duplicating, sending, printing, possessing, and advertising child pornography. You could face criminal prosecution for convincing an underage child to engage in the production of child porn.
Before the court convicts you of this crime, the prosecution team must prove the following:
- You knew the material was showing minors participating in sexual behavior during the crime commission.
- You intentionally possessed, advertised, printed, or transported materials showing a juvenile below 18 participating in sexual conduct.
Some child pornography laws say that you only violate the law if the pornographic materials in question are obscene. Something becomes obscene when:
- It describes or shows sexual acts offensively.
- A reasonable individual would argue that it does not have artistic, political, scientific, or literary value.
- A rational adult would say that it appeals to a prurient interest (a morbid or shameful interest in excretion, sex, or nudity).
Based on the facts of the case, the crime can be prosecuted as a felony or misdemeanor. A misdemeanor attracts one (1) year in county jail and fines between one thousand dollars and two thousand five hundred dollars. A felony is punishable by three (3) years of incarceration.
Upon your conviction, the judge could also require you to register as a sex offender.
It is also a crime involving moral turpitude. Therefore, an immigrant can face adverse immigration consequences.
Finally, you risk losing your gun rights if convicted of a felony. California law bans felons from possessing, owning, and buying firearms.
Please note that you can expunge your conviction as long as you complete your jail sentence or probation. Expungement relieves you of the negative consequences of the conviction, offering you a fresh start. Post-conviction relief can help secure employment, affordable housing, and educational opportunities, as well as allow obtaining state professional licenses with ease.
Legal Defenses
Listed below are defenses and legal arguments that have proven effective with the prosecution team, juries, and judges:
- The materials do not satisfy the definition of California child porn.
- You did not act knowingly. (You can be sure that you clicked the wrong link, mistyped a search term, downloaded a file containing malware that downloaded child porn to your computer, or thought you were watching porn consisting of adults but had underage children).
- The materials serve legitimate purposes because you were engaging in scientific, educational, or medical activities.
- Law enforcers found the material through an illegal search and seizure.
- The police entrapped you.
Bullying Law
Bullying is harassing, threatening, intimidating, or humiliating someone. If the conduct occurs through electronic means, it is called cyberbullying.
Cyberbullying can take numerous forms, including the following:
- Disseminating lies online about someone
- Creating a false profile to impersonate or mock someone else
- Sending hate comments, emails, or texts
- Encouraging other internet users to bully an individual
Indirect electronic harassment is different from cyberstalking under PC 646.9 in that with the latter, the accused is the one who personally stalks or harasses the alleged victim. With cyberbullying, per PC 653.2, the accused is only required to post information on the web, encouraging others to stalk or harass the victim.
Before convicting you, the prosecution must prove the following facts about the crime:
- You used electronic communication devices to publish, distribute, hyperlink, email, or make available for downloading personal identifying details or a message with a harassing characteristic about somebody else.
- You acted so without the victim’s consent.
- You acted so intending to place the victim in reasonable fear for their safety or that of their family.
- You acted so to cause another person unwarranted physical contact, harassment, or injury.
- The message or personal identifying details you shared could generate or incite injury, harassment, or unwarranted physical contact.
Cyberbullying is a misdemeanor. It is punishable by the following potential penalties:
- Summary or misdemeanor probation
- A year in county jail
- $1,000 in fine
Legal Defenses
Legal strategies against cyberbullying are associated with the complex intent requirements of the offenses. Remember, you could only be found guilty if you planned to place the victim under reasonable fear and to cause another person(s) to harass, injure, or make unwanted physical contact with the victim.
It is easy for funny or casual comments to be misimplemented online. However, unless you had the required criminal intent, you cannot be convicted of cyberbullying, even when your posts led a person to harass another.
Find an Experienced Criminal Defense Lawyer Near Me
As the internet and electronic devices become more accessible, most people commit cybercrime because they can hide their identities and feel anonymous. However, you risk facing severe criminal charges if you are accused. Whether you are under investigation or charged with any cybercrime, you should first contact an experienced Van Nuys-based defense attorney. As soon as Leah Legal starts representing you, we can protect your legal rights and handle all communication with the prosecution team. We can also collect and review case evidence to develop an effective legal defense to help you obtain the most favorable case outcome. Please contact us at 818-484-1100 to schedule your case review.
Possession of crystal meth can lead to felony or misdemeanor charges, based on your criminal history and the facts of your case. A misdemeanor is punishable by a one-year jail sentence or a fine of up to $1,000, while a felony carries a three-year jail sentence. These and other consequences of a drug-related conviction under HS 11377 are life-changing.
Fortunately, you can challenge your charges in court for a fair outcome with the help of a skilled criminal defense attorney. Thus, you must find a competent attorney right after your arrest to gather evidence and plan a defense against the charges. Your attorney will ensure you understand your case’s details, options, and the best strategies for a favorable outcome. Here are crucial details about HS 11377 you must know to develop the right fighting strategy:
The Legal Definition of Possession of Meth
HS 11377 prohibits the possession of meth for personal use. However, being arrested and charged under this statute does not automatically make you guilty. The DA must demonstrate all the elements of this offense for a court to deliver a guilty verdict after your trial. These elements are as follows:
- That the police found you with crystal meth
- You knew about the meth in your property
- You knew that possession of that substance was regulated under the law ( this will apply even if you are unaware of the specific nature of the substance)
- You had a sufficient amount of the substance to use it as a drug, not a residue or mere traces of the substance
Let us look at each of these elements in detail to ensure you understand your charges better:
Possession of Meth
Remember that HS 11377 prohibits possession of meth. Thus, the district attorney should demonstrate you possessed the substance to obtain a guilty verdict. Possessing a drug goes beyond having the drugs in your vehicle, pockets, or hands. There are three types of possession when it comes to drug-related charges.
You have actual possession of meth if the police find the substance on your person. This could mean you are holding the drugs or have put them in something you wear or carry.
You can constructively possess the substance if the drugs are in a different location from you, but you have absolute control over them. This could mean that you have the drugs in a locker away from your home, or someone else is keeping them for you.
You can jointly possess meth if the drugs belong to you and another person or people. This means that more than one person is in control of the substance.
The DA must prove one or more of these for the court to find you guilty.
Knowledge About the Nature and Presence of Methamphetamine
Charges under HS 11377 are incomplete unless you know that you have a controlled substance. The DA must prove your knowledge of the substance’s presence and that it was a controlled drug. However, you need not know the actual name of the substance or its chemical composition as long as you know its nature as a controlled substance.
The court will drop your charges if you lack this knowledge during the arrest.
The Substance in Usable Quantity
The quantity of drugs you have also matters for charges under HS 11377. The DA must demonstrate that the quantity of the substance was usable, not a residue of the substance or the drug in mere traces. However, a usable amount does not mean that it should be enough to make you high. However, it should be enough to snort, smoke, or swallow.
Simple Possession of Meth Vs. Possession of Meth for Sale
Possession of crystal meth is prohibited under two separate statutes in California. You can face charges for simple possession under HS 11377 or possession of meth for sale under HS 11378. The difference between the two is in your intent. These two violations are treated differently. The first is a misdemeanor, while the second is a felony offense. Simple possession means you only have enough of the substance for your use. Possession of meth for sale is a rather grave felony with more stringent penalties, including a hefty fine and a lengthy prison sentence.
The DA must determine the actual charge to file against you once the police arrest you for possession of meth. Their decision is usually based on the following:
- Statements you make before or after arrest. For example, suppose you disclose your intent to sell the substance, and another person overhears your conversation. In that case, the DA can use them as witnesses to demonstrate your charges under HS 11377.
- The quantity of substance you had can determine your charges. The DA will file charges under HS 11377 if the substance is enough for one person’s consumption. However, if you have more of the substance than you require for your use, the prosecutor could deduce that you intend to sell.
- The substance’s packaging could also help the prosecutor determine the correct charge. For example, if you had the drug in small baggies or bindles, it indicates your intent to sell. But a single baggie or bottle shows you only had enough for use.
- The prosecutor can also consider what else the officers recovered in your property or person during the arrest. If they found drug-related paraphernalia, like needles, straws, or pipes, it could serve as evidence of possession of methamphetamine for sale. However, having a single bundle of the substance without any other paraphernalia proves simple possession.
People Exempt From Persecution Under HS 11377
Methamphetamine is a Schedule II substance under California law. This makes it one of the most dangerous drugs because of its high potential for addiction and abuse. That is why the possession, distribution, sale, and manufacture of meth are highly regulated. However, since the drug has some medicinal value, licensed medics are safe from persecution under this statute, provided they hold a valid license and have a reason to possess the substance.
Thus, the judge can drop your charges if you demonstrate you are a veterinarian, doctor, or pharmacist and possess meth according to federal and state law.
Other Substances Prohibited under Health and Safety Code 11377
HS 11377 makes simple possession of several drugs unlawful, including methamphetamine. The other drugs banned under this law include these:
- Ecstasy
- GHB
- PCP
- Ketamine
The penalties for simple possession of these other drugs are the same as those provided for the simple possession of meth.
Possible Penalties for Simple Possession of Meth
HS 11377 is primarily a misdemeanor offense, punishable by the following:
- A one-year jail term
- A court fine of $1,000
However, the prosecutor can bring felony charges against you under the following circumstances:
- If you have a conviction for a severe felony like sexual violence, murder, gross vehicular manslaughter, or sex crime with a minor aged 14 or younger in your record
- If you have a conviction in your record for a sex crime that requires you to register as a sex offender
In this case, your penalties could include 16 months, two (2) or three (3) years in prison.
If you possess more than a kilogram of the substance, you could be subject to sentencing enhancement. Depending on the exact quantity of the drug, the judge could add between three and fifteen years to your prison sentence. The sentencing enhancement will apply even though the DA cannot prove your intention to distribute or sell the substance.
Drug Diversion
You can qualify for rehabilitation and treatment through drug diversion if your charge for possessing meth is a misdemeanor. People eligible for diversion programs can avoid jail sentences if they complete rehabilitation and treatment as the judge recommends. However, you must meet the criteria for the prosecutor to recommend drug diversion instead of a trial. The criteria include the following requirements:
- You must be a first-time or second-time offender
- The crime should be non-violent
- The details of your case must show that you had just enough of the substance for your use.
- You must enter a guilty plea.
Depending on the details of your case, the prosecutor can recommend drug diversion under Prop 36, PC 100, or drug court. The court will drop your charges once you complete the program and are completely rehabilitated. However, if you are unsuccessful in this program, the court will continue the case as it should have been from the beginning. You risk a drug conviction if you fail the drug diversion.
Note: You are not qualified for drug diversion treatment if you face charges for selling methamphetamine or possessing methamphetamine for sale.
Fighting Charges for Possession of Meth
Being arrested for possession of meth does not automatically result in a guilty verdict. The criminal justice system requires you to undergo a fair trial, whereby a jury hears testimonies and reviews evidence to determine whether you are guilty. This means you can fight your charges to influence the result of the case. However, you need the assistance of a skilled criminal attorney to prepare well for trial. Your attorney will help you gather and organize evidence and develop a solid fighting strategy that could compel the court to drop or reduce the charges. Here are some of the best defense strategies your attorney can use to obtain a favorable outcome for your case:
You Had a Prescription
HS 11377 prohibits the illegal possession of meth. Having a legal prescription makes your actions legal, meaning you are innocent under this law. However, you must show a valid prescription so the court can drop your charges.
A valid prescription must be up-to-date and provide details of the quantity of substance you can obtain or possess. It must also show why you need the prescription and be issued by an authorized healthcare professional, like a doctor, pharmacist, or veterinarian. The court will drop your charges if your attorney can demonstrate all this.
You Did Not Know About The Drug’s Presence In Your Property or Person
If the police find meth that is under your control, the DA must demonstrate your knowledge about the drug’s presence to obtain a guilty verdict. You are not guilty if you did not knowingly possess the drug. Someone could have planted the substance in your bag, jacket, vehicle, or home without your knowledge. A skilled attorney will ensure you are not convicted for a crime you did not knowingly commit.
The Police Violated Your Rights
The law guides the police in conducting themselves when arresting suspected offenders or investigating crimes. For example, the police must have probable cause to stop and investigate a person for drug possession. They must also read and grant your Miranda rights before obtaining your statement. If you need counsel and cannot afford a private attorney, the police must provide a public defender for legal representation.
If the police violated your rights, your attorney can use that violation to fight for a favorable outcome for your case. For example, the judge can dismiss your charges if you were arrested without a valid probable cause. The judge can also dismiss your statements if the police obtained them after violating your right to counsel.
You Are a Victim of Police Entrapment
People who knowingly commit drug crimes do so in secret, making it difficult for law enforcement officers to arrest them in an act of crime. This prompts officers to use tricks and strategies to arrest the perpetrators and obtain credible evidence. Sometimes, the police use entrapment to arrest a suspected offender in the act of crime. However, this can cause problems for the officers and the prosecution.
If the police entrapped you, and your attorney can prove that you only committed the crime because of police entrapment, you have a valid defense. The judge will dismiss your charges if you convince them that you only acted the way you did because the police tricked, coerced, or forced you.
The Police Conducted an Illegal Search and Seizure
Sometimes, the police make illegal searches and seizures because waiting for a search and seizure warrant could cause them to lose evidence. However, the law prohibits unlawful searches. You can fight evidence against you by stating that the police obtained it through an illegal search. This could count if the officer did not obtain a search and seizure warrant or exceeded the limitations of their warrant. The law requires judges to dismiss evidence obtained after violating a defendant’s rights. This could leave the prosecutor without sufficient evidence for a guilty verdict.
You Were Disposing of the Meth
Your skilled attorney can also argue that you had the meth because you were disposing of it. Although being in unlawful possession of meth is a crime, the judge can dismiss your charges if your intention was good. You can state that you came across the drugs by chance and were trying to dispose of them. Alternatively, you can argue that you were about to destroy the drugs after changing your mind about using or selling them. The judge can dismiss your charges if you convince them of your good intentions.
Possession of Meth and Related offenses
Several drug crimes under the law are closely related to possession of methamphetamine. The most common of these crimes are:
HS 11350
This law prohibits the possession of a regulated substance. It is a misdemeanor offense punishable by a maximum of one year in jail. HS 11350 mainly applies in cases where a person has controlled substances for personal use. If the substances are more than you can consume, the prosecutor can file charges for drug trafficking or possession for the sale of controlled substances.
HS 11351
This law prohibits possession of a regulated substance for sale. The amount of drugs should be more than you need for personal use for the prosecutor to file charges under this statute. A violation of hS 11351 is a felony, punishable by a maximum of four years in prison.
HS 11352
This law prohibits transport for the sale of a controlled substance. The prosecutor must demonstrate your intent to sell the drugs to obtain a conviction. If they are successful, you will likely receive a maximum of nine years in prison for a felony conviction.
Find a Skilled Criminal Defense Lawyer Near Me
Simple possession of meth is a grave offense that could result in severe penalties and other consequences. In addition to a hefty fine and a lengthy jail sentence after conviction, you are left with a life-altering criminal record. This could complicate making friends, finding a job, or renting a house. Fighting your charges improves your chances of obtaining a favorable outcome.
At Leah Legal, we handle all types of drug cases. Our competent defense attorneys understand the law enough to help you comprehend your legal position, options, and the right defense strategies for the best outcome for your Van Nuys case. We know how damaging a drug conviction will be to your life. We can use our skills and experience to reduce or dismiss your charges. Contact us at 818-484-1100 to discuss your case and our services in detail.
The Red Flag Law of California, also called the Gun Violence Restraining Order (GVRO), enables an individual to seek the court’s intervention against you if he/she believes you are dangerous to yourself or others. The individual can also write a petition asking the court to dispossess you of firearms, especially if you seem like a threat. The court will then consider the evidence provided, and if the court finds sufficient cause, it will grant an order that the firearms be seized for a certain period.
What is the procedure for red-flag laws? Who can request a red-flag order? How can I protect myself in the face of the GVRO? These are some of the questions the information below will answer. Keep on reading to better understand these laws.
An Overview of Red Flag Laws
Red flag laws aim at preventing gun violence by allowing the victim to act when someone shows signs of being a threat. Individuals who perceive someone as being a threat to another or have other disturbing tendencies can go to court and request that you, the perceived aggressor, surrender your guns for some time.
These laws allow people to act fast in conflict-filled situations to prevent them from escalating since these conflicts can turn tragic. The applicant to the GVRO has to present his/her concerns to a judge and give him/her evidence, after which the judge could issue an order to temporarily remove firearms. This approach enables the victim or applicant to deal with possible risks from the onset, thus minimizing the likelihood of serious incidents like fatalities or serious bodily injuries.
It would seem that granting a Gun Violence Restraining Order would violate your Second Amendment rights, the right to bear arms. However, red flag laws do not violate your rights since they help ensure everyone around you is safe. The orders are temporary and reversible through the court. This allows you to address the perceived threats while protecting your freedoms.
Concerns about the constitutionality of red flag laws are common. Some claim these laws compromise the Second Amendment and the Constitution’s due process clause. The fear is that red flag laws could allow firearms to be taken away without adequate evidence and a fair trial, thus leading to unjust infringements on rights and unlawful seizure of property. On the other hand, the proponents argue that these laws are necessary to prevent danger in the near future. They point out that these laws include safeguards, like judicial review and the ability for individuals to contest the orders, to protect constitutional rights.
However, these constitutional issues do not mean that it is misguided for the state to guarantee temporary protection to endangered persons. Weapons pose a threat to human life, and red-flag laws are a necessary intervention for threats. These laws assist in preventing catastrophes, including suicides or other violent episodes, by allowing people displaying this behavior to be relieved of firearms for some time. The problem lies in the fact that there is always a conflict between the protection of people’s liberties and the need to avoid violence, and in this case, the protection of constitutionally guaranteed rights is also a priority.
Who Can Apply for a Gun Violence Restraining Order?
In California, different people can apply for a gun violence restraining order. These include the following:
- Spouses, domestic partners, parents, children, and other close relatives who think a particular relative is dangerous could apply.
- An employer can apply for an order if the employee exhibits threatening behavior.
- Police officers can petition based on observations of antisocial behavior that threatens society.
- People living in the same household, such as flatmates or partners, can apply for a GVRO if they observe egregious conduct.
- A school teacher or principal can apply for an order if the student seems dangerous. If granted, this order would remove all firearms from the minor’s home or an environment to which the child has access.
The red flag law addresses two main scenarios:
- When a person threatens to commit suicide or harm other people — In case of self-harm indicators, authorized persons can request the court to temporarily take away firearms.
- If a person uses abusive language or violent actions toward other people, the petitioner can apply for the temporary removal of the latter’s guns — The law in this situation would mitigate imminent risks by temporarily disarming persons who are considered dangerous and, in the process, increasing safety for oneself and others in society.
In California, the courts consider several factors to determine whether they should grant a Gun Violence Restraining Order. These factors help determine if you pose a serious threat, especially when you have firearms. These factors include:
- Evidence of a serious threat — In this case, the petitioner must provide compelling reasons to justify posing a threat of violence.
- Risk factors — The court considers several risk factors, like threats you have issued within the last year or more or any violent actions, severe mental illness, dangerous use of firearms, violence, or cruelty to animals.
- Detailed information on the threat — The petition must also provide details of the threat and why you should not have access to firearms. General or vague concerns do not generally qualify as legal concerns.
- The immediacy of the threat — The evidence must prove that the danger exists or is looming. The court needs evidence of past conduct, but there must be a clear and present danger.
- Connection to firearms — The court evaluates your interaction with firearms, whether you own, have, or have access to weapons, and how you have used the guns (are you a responsible gun owner?). This evaluation assists in determining the possible danger that comes with their firearm use.
If a judge grants a restraining order against you, they can impose several key restrictions, namely:
- You will not be allowed to possess any firearms at all
- You cannot have any gun in your possession or under your control
- You will be unable to purchase new firearms
- You are required not to have any guns on you
- You cannot possess or obtain firearms or ammunition in particular circumstances
Employer Liability for Gun Violence
Employers have a vital responsibility to maintain a safe workplace, especially regarding the risk of firearm-related incidents. If you possess credible evidence suggesting that an employee may commit firearm violence, you must seek a Gun Violence Restraining Order (GVRO). This obligation becomes even more urgent if an employee requests a restraining order due to concerns about another employee’s behavior.
Negligence plays a significant role in these situations. If you fail to pursue a GVRO despite being aware of potential threats, your inaction can be viewed as negligent. This indicates that you did not fulfill your duty to ensure a safe work environment. In the unfortunate event of violence, where someone suffers injuries because of the employee in question, you could become legally accountable.
If an injured party decides to take legal action, they must prove that your negligence contributed to their injuries. Establishing this connection is crucial for the lawsuit’s success. The injured party must demonstrate how your failure to seek a GVRO directly led to the harm they experienced. Only by proving this link can the individual seek compensation for their damages and hold you responsible for your role in the incident.
Emergency vs. Non-Emergency Gun Violence Restraining Orders
Judges in California can issue two types of GVROs:
- The emergency GVRO and
- The non-emergency GVRO
Each type corresponds to the level of threat you pose if you have access to firearms, depending on the urgency and severity of the situation.
Emergency Gun Violence Restraining Orders
When there is an immediate and urgent danger, judges issue an emergency Gun Violence Restraining Order. The police usually request these orders when they believe you are a clear and present danger to yourself or others. Because of the urgency, judges can easily give you an emergency GVRO without your presence in an ex-parte hearing. These temporary orders usually take about 21 days, during which police officers take all your guns, if any.
This action is deemed necessary to avert a situation where the victim could suffer harm while simultaneously creating an opportunity to evaluate the incident more closely. Emergency GVROs work on short notice to prevent dangerous situations and ensure that firearms are removed from those who might become aggressive or reckless.
Non-Emergency Gun Violence Restraining Orders
Judges issue non-emergency GVROs whenever there is a threat to an individual’s life, but the threat is not imminent. These orders are usually sought by family or household members or the police who have witnessed suspicious conduct. In non-emergency situations, the court sets up a hearing where you can attend and fight the issuance of the GVRO. The judge looks at the evidence presented and hears the arguments, then determines if there is a need to issue a GVRO.
If the judge approves the order, it can be valid for up to one year and can be renewed if the risk remains high. It also makes sure that the court avoids any violence while at the same time observing your rights to procedural justice.
Who is Responsible for Taking Possession of the Firearms?
A court that issues a protective order usually orders that law enforcement serve the order on the person named in it. The process ensures that you are officially informed of the restrictions. This procedure depends on law enforcement agencies, which do not charge fees for serving the order. It is a service that provides you with no cost, a means to get access to legal protections without putting you under a financial burden.
When the protective order is issued, you must immediately hand over any firearms you have to the police. This requirement is necessary to keep the protected party safe and to avoid the threat of violence or intimidation. The police must secure these firearms, and that is a critical aspect of enforcing the order.
If law enforcement cannot serve the protective order, you need to. If you must, you should sell or transfer your firearms to a licensed dealer or return them to the police. This usually has to happen within 24 hours. This helps keep firearms away from people who may be a danger and reaffirms the protective nature of the court’s order. However, it is also a matter of public safety.
How to Challenge a Gun Violence Restraining Order
If you have a gun violence restraining order against you, you need to know that you have the right to contest it. You can best challenge the order when you follow the process below:
Learn More on the GVRO Issued Against You
When the court issues a Gun Violence Restraining Order (GVRO), it sends you a formal notice. It also serves several purposes. It clearly outlines the reasons for the order and helps you understand the circumstances that brought about this legal action. The notice also sets a time frame for the GVRO to remain in effect. Knowing how long the order lasts is essential because it tells you how long you are restricted in your rights.
The notice also describes the particular limitations on your ability to possess firearms. These limitations are significant because they dictate what you can no longer do. You must understand these restrictions. Any violation can have dire legal consequences. Reading the notice carefully allows you to review the evidence against you and your options going forward.
Attend the Court Hearing
The court will set a hearing date to decide whether the GVRO should remain in force. You have to be present at this hearing to defend yourself, to explain your version of events, to present the proof, and to deny the accusations. Your absence can result in the court extending the GVRO or making it permanent.
Collect Evidence to Support Your Claim
You can only challenge the order with convincing evidence that makes your case. Gather any material evidence, including character references, proof of sanity, and documents that will negate the allegations against you or any other witnesses who can attest to your conduct and character. Fact-based evidence will help you present a strong case in court.
Seek an Attorney’s Assistance
Choose a lawyer that specializes in firearms laws or restraining orders. An experienced attorney can explain your legal options, defend you in the hearing, and present a compelling case on your behalf. They can also help you collect evidence and develop an effective legal argument that can help you fight the Gun Violence Restraining Order.
Build a Persuasive Case
Be ready to provide adequate reasons why you are harmless to yourself and others and how the GVRO should not be in force in your case. Make sure that when presenting your case, you speak logically and calmly and present your case in a structured manner. Do not act emotionally or aggressively because this can hurt your credibility.
Request a Termination Hearing
You should seek a termination hearing if you think the GVRO was issued because of false information. This means that before the expiry of this order, you have a chance to persuade the court not to grant the order. In this hearing, however, you are supposed to provide sufficient reasons why the GVRO should be terminated early.
Comply With All Court Orders
When you are before the court to challenge the GVRO, you must observe all the conditions provided by the court. This entails giving up any weapons and not buying any more weapons. Contempt of court is a criminal offense, which is another reason why you should adhere to the court’s order. Failing to follow the court’s orders can result in criminal penalties, weakening your case.
Find a GVRO Defense Attorney Near Me
Being served with a gun violence restraining order can be pretty overwhelming, primarily if it is based on false information or comes from unexpected sources like family members. These situations can be very stressful, and it becomes difficult to remain calm and composed.
Preparing well for a GVRO hearing and having a sound strategy helps you make your case. An experienced attorney can be of great help in this process. Your attorney will review the evidence brought against you, identify any inaccuracies or false claims, and then develop a plan to address these issues effectively. This is important because disproving the false information can go a long way in changing the entire course of the case. In court, your attorney will represent you and work to tell your side of the story. He/she will argue your case and provide evidence to support your claims. An attorney’s efforts help ensure that your case is considered on its merit and not based on some emotional or procedural issues that may arise.
At Leah Legal, we strive to provide our Van Nuys clients with the best legal advice and representation. Our support will alleviate the stress of navigating the legal system alone. Call us at 818-484-1100 to speak to one of our team members for a free consultation.
You can use the duress defense to argue that you were compelled or forced to commit the crime you are charged with. This legal defense can enable you to have your charges dismissed if you can prove that you were coerced to commit a crime because you were threatened or your life was at risk. You should know how to use this defense to obtain a positive outcome and the consequences it could have on your case once you go to trial.
The legal process can be overwhelming. Therefore, you want to hire a competent criminal attorney who will help you prove without a reasonable doubt that you were coerced into committing the crime you are being accused of. Your lawyer will also evaluate the details of your case, establish the right defense strategy, and represent your interests in court to have your charges dismissed.
An Overview of Duress Defense
Committing a crime under duress in California means committing a crime after being compelled to commit it due to threats or physical force from someone else. The threat has to be imminent and place you in reasonable fear of being killed or causing the death of a loved one if you do not follow the orders given. This means that general fear or stress is insufficient to justify your actions; there has to be something threatening in front of you, such as a gun.
For the duress defense to be effective, you should prove that you had no other option but to commit the crime. Otherwise, the judge could dismiss this defense if you had an option not to commit the crime or to escape. The threat also has to be actual and imminent at the time the crime was being committed.
What You Should Prove for a Successful Duress Defense Claim
The use of duress as a defense to a crime is governed by legal elements. These elements should be provided to show that you were forced to act and had no choice but to commit the crime. They include the following:
- You must have been in a situation where you were at an immediate risk of being killed or physically harmed. The threat you faced could not have been obscured or related to harm you could have experienced in the future. The threat has to be imminent.
For example, if a person is being threatened with a gun pointed at them that they will be killed instantly if they do not engage in a burglary crime, then this would be enough to encompass the aspect of duress. However, when the danger is not immediate or can be prevented, the defense of duress cannot be used.
- A reasonable person in your shoes must have thought the threat would be effected. You should prove that your fear that the threat will be carried out was genuine and realistic under the circumstances for duress defense to be applicable in your defense. However, if you had an irrational or unfounded fear, you would not convince the jury that you committed the crime under duress. The judge will examine the odds of another person having the same kind of fear you had given the same circumstances.
- There was no reasonable way you could have avoided the crime. The duress defense is not applicable if you could have safely retreated, requested assistance, or declined to obey without risking harm.
You cannot use the duress defense if you voluntarily exposed yourself to danger or if you could have avoided the crime. You should prove that you had no reasonable way to avoid the threat or escape the situation without committing the crime.
- The duress was connected to the crime. You can use the duress defense if you only committed the crime because you were coerced. You have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the crime was committed only because of imminent danger against you. Your lawyer could argue that you had no option but to commit the offense. The defense would not be applicable if you had the free will to commit the crime.
Definition of Terms
Imminent Danger
Imminent danger refers to a threat that is immediate and one that you cannot avoid. In California, duress can only be used as a defense if you were put in a position where you were likely to be exposed to imminent serious physical violence or killed. The danger must be immediate and not a threat to be faced in the future or a possibility of a threat.
For example, if you were threatened and the perpetrator told you, “Go ahead and commit this crime, or else I will kill you on the spot,” then that would be considered an imminent threat. However, if the perpetrator said, “If you do not commit this offense today, I will hurt you next week,” the defense of duress would probably not be admitted because the threat is not imminent.
Imminent danger also means you have no time to think or turn to someone else for assistance. This means that the duress defense would not be invoked where there was a chance of not causing harm without committing the crime.
Reasonable Fear
To use the duress defense, the fear that you must have had has to be objective and rational. You must have believed that harm or death would be inflicted on you or a loved one if you did not do as you were compelled to do. The fear cannot be imagined or exaggerated; it has to be authentic and real-time.
For your fear to be deemed authentic and warranted, the court will use objectivity to determine the reasonableness of your fear. The court will also examine whether another person would have felt the same fear as you and acted in the same manner considering your circumstances. If the fear was not reasonable, then the duress plea will not work.
Burden of Proof
If you are to rely on duress as your defense, you will have to prove it. You should prove that it is more likely than not that you committed the crime because of an imminent danger. You should also convince the jury that you are innocent beyond reasonable doubt and present evidence supporting your defense of duress.
Therefore, you have to introduce evidence that would make the jury believe that you had no other option but to commit the crime, that the threat was imminent and credible, and that the life-threatening fear was reasonable. If you cannot fulfill this burden, the duress defense will fail, and you could be convicted of the crime.
No Way to Avoid the Crime
In a duress defense, you should demonstrate that there was no way you could have evaded the threat without committing the crime. You must also have no practical means of escaping the threat or harm. This means you could not have escaped safely, called the police, or done something else to protect yourself from harm.
If there were any chance for you to avoid committing the crime, like looking for assistance or a way to escape, then the duress defense would not apply. The court will scrutinize whether you had no choice but to submit to the demand under threat.
Being Coerced
In a duress defense, you must prove that someone forced you into committing the act by threatening you with serious bodily harm or a death threat. When force or threat is used to compel you into committing a crime against your will, it is known as coercion. Coercion is about the force that one applies, making it impossible for you to resist the force and do otherwise.
Example of a Crime Committed under Duress Case Scenario
Jane, a taxi driver on standby waiting for her client, is approached by two men. Peter, holding a gun against her and Jimmy. Peter tells Jane to drive them to a nearby bank. When they arrive at the bank, they push Jane forward and tell her that she must help them carry the money they will steal to the car, and if she refuses, she will be shot.
Here, Jane could defend herself by arguing that she was compelled to aid in a bank robbery.
The Limitation of Duress Defense
While the duress defense can be powerful, it comes with significant limitations. In California, duress defense cannot be pleaded in certain circumstances. They include the following:
You Placed Yourself In A Threatening Situation
You may be unable to use duress if you knowingly placed yourself in a risky situation or mixed with people who would force you into committing the crime. The court may decide that you should have predicted the risks, so you cannot use coercion as a defense.
You are Facing Murder Charges
In California, duress cannot be used as a defense when facing murder charges. Even if you were forced to kill someone due to threats of harm, the law does not recognize duress as a reason for killing another person.
Duress Defense in a Civil Trial
The defense of duress can apply in some civil cases. For example, if you signed a contract due to force or threat, you can argue that the contract is not valid. In such cases, duress can be used to seek annulment or rescission of the contract because you were compelled to enter into it. When the defense of duress is used in civil cases, it is said to be economic duress.
Advantages of Attempting to Have the Charges Against You Withdrawn
When you are charged with a criminal offense, the best thing that can happen is for the charges to be dismissed. This is only possible when you successfully establish your duress defense. Some of the advantages of having your charges dismissed include the following:
Avoiding a Criminal Record
If you are acquitted, you avoid a criminal record. A conviction can follow you for the rest of your life, affecting employment opportunities, housing, and relationships.
Freedom from Penalties
Through the dismissal of your charges, you are not likely to face the consequences that accompany a conviction, including imprisonment, fines, and probation.
Preserving Your Reputation
A criminal conviction is often made publicly, which could ruin your reputation among your friends, coworkers, and family. Having your charges dismissed could assist in clearing your name, especially if the charges were made public.
Emotional Relief
The stress of a criminal case can damage your mental and emotional well-being. Having the charges dropped can provide relief, as you will be free from legal and personal repercussions.
Defenses Related to Duress
While self-defense and necessity defenses aim to excuse criminal behavior under extreme circumstances, they are distinct from the duress defense in crucial ways.
Necessity
Necessity involves committing a crime to avoid more significant harm that results from natural forces or events and not due to the influence of another person. For example, if you invade someone else’s compound to avoid a fire, you can legally argue that it was necessary to do so. Here, it is not threats from another person but circumstances that cannot be controlled from the outside, making you commit the crime.
Self- Defense
Self-defense comes into play when you commit a crime with the intent of protecting your own life or that of another person. When you are forced to commit a crime under duress, self-defense enables you to use force to defend yourself and others.
For example, if someone challenges you to a fight and you overpower them and end up inflicting serious injuries on them, the self-defense argument comes in handy to explain why you had to do so. Also, the force used in self-defense has to be reasonable and proportional to the threat posed.
How Your Criminal Defense Lawyer Can Assist
Your criminal defense lawyer can help in the following ways:
Objectively Evaluate the Circumstances of Your Case
A defense attorney is responsible for an impartial assessment of the circumstances of your case. This is because, under pressure, it is easy to make wrong decisions emotionally rather than stick to the facts, which an attorney will help present.
This objectivity is important when establishing if the legal definition of duress under California law will apply to your case. The legal defense of duress is stated in California Penal Code Section 26 to the effect that you are not legally guilty of a crime if you were compelled to commit the act by force or fear in ascertaining that you would be killed or subjected to great bodily harm.
Your attorney will examine police reports, witness statements, and any other evidence to ensure these statutory conditions have been fulfilled. This professional detachment from the case ensures that no stone is left unturned and that the defense strategy is objective and factual rather than an emotionally charged reaction.
Investigate Your Situation
Another aspect of a proper duress defense is building the evidence that proves that you need to act under duress in order to present a proper defense. Your lawyer will then investigate your case fully to establish all facts that relate to your case.
In California, to properly claim duress, you have to prove that you were threatened with imminent and serious harm and were left with no other viable choice but to perform the act in question, all the while acting out of fear for your life or for serious bodily injury. This is provided for under California Penal Code Section 26.
Your attorney will gather and review evidence, including:
- Witness testimonies: The people who may have personally witnessed or heard of the coercion can give you more details about the pressure that you had.
- Physical evidence: Any communication that you, as the victim, received, whether through written text in the form of threatening text messages or threatening emails or phone conversations such as the one in question, where the respondent left a threatening voicemail message on your cell phone, can go a long way toward showing the level of coercion that you had to endure.
- Circumstantial evidence: The relationship between you and the person applying pressure will be considered contextual factors to help you build a defense.
Furthermore, your attorney may work with expert witnesses such as psychologists who will explain how fear and a feared imminent action may influence the capacity to act willingly. This is very important in an effort to convince the court that your actions were not voluntary but as a result of an imminent danger.
Find a Van Nuys Defense Lawyer Near Me
If you are facing criminal charges due to coercion, you should retain the services of an experienced criminal defense lawyer who can effectively use the “duress defense” strategy. At Leah Legal in Van Nuys, we have lawyers who specialize in handling cases of clients under duress.
We will assess your case and collect all the evidence that will enable us to defend your case so that the charges against you can be dropped or reduced. Contact us today at 818-484-1100 to learn how we can legally protect you.
Being charged with participation in terrorism or terrorist threats is a severe crime. Terrorism is criminal both at the state and federal levels. Since terrorist attacks or the fear of them is so high, anybody charged with the offense has a lot at stake. For one, they will have difficulty dealing with the police and facing a fair court trial. Call a criminal defense attorney for help if you face terrorism accusations.
Defining the Crime of Terrorism
Terrorism refers to attacking civilian or government targets in pursuit of criminal goals. It also means using violence or threatening violence against government officials or civilians. Terrorism is a broad term referring to acts that might constitute different crimes. Acts for which the court may convict you of or charge you with terrorism include the following:
- Mass destruction
- Violence
- Chemical attacks
- Biological attacks
- Hijacking
- Poisoning
- Detonating or building bombs
- Assassination
- Spreading radioactive materials
- Possessing bomb manufacturing materials
- Transmitting, sharing, or possessing plans for perpetrating a terrorist act
- Possessing chemical or biological weapons
- Providing logistical or financial help to somebody who perpetrates a terrorist attack.
Terrorist acts generally lead to federal-level charges. Federal laws on terrorism are described under 18 U.S.C. Chapter 113B. Examples of instances considered terrorism under this law include:
- Assassinating a government employee
- Using explosives to attack an embassy
- Destroying an aircraft
- Providing support to terrorist organizations
- Using biological, nuclear, chemical, or radiological weapons on a group of people
- Bombing a public place
- Kidnapping any government official
- Harboring a terrorist
Federal and state legislatures have recently intensified tools to prosecute and prevent terrorism. The lawmakers have also enhanced the consequences. Today, these consequences include life in prison and capital punishment sentences.
A key element of terrorism accusations is the intention of spreading fear to have individuals change their conduct. You need not harm anyone for the court to find you guilty of terrorism. Making terrorist threats can suffice. Terrorist threats entail threatening to hurt a person to achieve a political goal.
Note that there is a difference between a criminal threat and a terrorist threat. A criminal threat aims to lead to significant bodily harm or death to someone else. A person could make the threats in writing or by word of mouth. They could also make them by email, phone, or other electronic communication devices. The judge could find you guilty of criminal threats even if you did not intend to fulfill those threats.
Terrorist threats involve threatening to perpetrate a violent act to endanger other people. A person must make these threats with reckless disregard for the harm it would cause. For example, if you joke about having a bomb on a plane, you can be guilty of terrorist threats.
Aiding and abetting a terrorist culprit or terrorist act is also a crime. If the authorities catch you doing so, you can also face charges. The same will apply if the police catch you planning a terror attack. A federal terrorism conviction is very severe. It may mean life in prison or, in other cases, capital punishment.
The Patriot Act
The Patriot Act refers to a statute the U.S. Congress passed in response to the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. President George H. W. Bush signed this act into law on Oct. 26, 2001. After the passage of this act, the country’s terrorism statutes changed. Consequently, federal agencies received more resources to prosecute the charges.
The act has various provisions. These provisions aim to improve the capability of authorities to probe terrorist activities. The Patriot Act’s key provisions include:
- Money laundering. The Patriot Act contains a provision to fight money laundering. The Act also fights the financing of terror groups and terrorist activities.
- Immigration: This Act averts the entry of terror suspects into the country. If a person has already entered, the provision allows their deportation.
- Intelligence gathering: This Act allows intelligence bodies to share information with police agencies. The police can also gather intelligence on suspected terrorists and their activities.
- Searches: The Patriot Act allows the police to search property without a warrant. The police need not first secure a warrant if they have reason to suspect terrorist activity.
- Surveillance: The police can monitor suspected terrorists’ conversations through electronic surveillance. This entails monitoring electronic communications like emails. It also involves wiretapping and using trap-and-trace devices and pen registers.
The Act also includes provisions that increase the consequences of terrorism crimes. In particular cases, these penalties might apply retroactively.
Critics of this Act assert that it violates civil liberties and people’s privacy rights. They also argue that some of its provisions are broad and open to abuse. For example, under the 4th Amendment, the police cannot search your home without a warrant. Usually, the police must present probable cause in court that you committed criminal activity to secure a warrant. The Patriot Act allows police officers to search your property if it does not have that warrant. The Act says they can do this provided they leave notice that they were there.
Here is a scenario. Say you donated to an organization deemed connected to a potential terrorist organization. In that case, the authorities may stroll through your home while you are away. They will then leave a notification about the search behind. While they are there, they might notice what appears to be child pornography. These could be photos of your child playing naked in a kiddy pool. They could then utilize that as evidence to expand their investigation. They could then seize other possessions. For example, they could take your computer to search for more illegal materials. They might even check your local library to find out what books you have read or checked out.
Conversely, the supporters of the Act argue that it is necessary to help combat terrorism. They assert that the provisions are well-balanced. That is, they safeguard people’s rights while ensuring national safety.
The Hertzberg-Alarcon California Prevention of Terrorism Act
As we have seen, terrorism is mainly a federal offense. However, California, too, has laws combating crime. The California terrorism law is PC Section 11415 through Section 11419. It is prevalently called the Hertzberg-Alarcon California Prevention of Terrorism Act.
The law describes terrorism as acts involving using weapons of mass destruction. Weapons of mass destruction include biological, chemical, radiological, or nuclear weapons. Its primary aim is to forbid:
- The use,
- Possession,
- Production,
- manufacture, or
- Threatened use of weapons of mass destruction to commit terrorist activity.
The law also prohibits the deliberate or threatened use of commercial or industrial chemicals as weapons against animals or persons.
The Hertzberg-Alarcon California Prevention of Terrorism Act forbids carrying, possessing, producing, manufacturing, or using these weapons:
- Blood agents, for example, hydrogen cyanide
- Blister agents, including mustards and incapacitating chemicals
- Nerve agents like Sarin
- Biological weapons, such as bacteria or viruses that are weaponized
- Choking agents like phosgene
- Vectors (chemicals or living things) that can convey toxins
- Nuclear or radiological agents
The law may not apply to the following parties:
- Pharmacists, licensed medical practitioners, veterinarians, or physicians authorized to dispense a prescription.
- Research institutions, pharmaceutical corporations, universities, or
- Anyone possessing a prohibited agent per a legal prescription under federal law.
Types of the Terrorism Offense
There are two types of terrorism charges: international terrorism and domestic terrorism.
International terrorism incorporates violent acts or acts dangerous to people’s lives that occur outside the United States territorial jurisdiction but which still violate or would violate the United States’ criminal laws if perpetrated within the United States jurisdiction. These acts could include:
- Mass destruction,
- Intimidation,
- Assassination,
- Coercion, and
- Kidnapping to impact civilian or public life or intimidate government policy.
Terrorists perpetrate the above acts to achieve an impact on the public or government. These acts also traditionally go beyond national boundaries in terms of the intended victims of coercion.
Domestic terrorism is an occurrence that happens within the U.S. territorial jurisdiction. It entails violent acts that violate the U.S.’s criminal laws or are hazardous to human life. These acts could include:
- Mass destruction,
- Assassination,
- Intimidation, and
- Kidnapping to intimidate private or public officials.
Entities or groups that could become targets of domestic terrorism are, among others:
- Political organizations
- Religious groups
- Federal, private, or state buildings
- Ethnic groups
- Public Utilities
- Natural resources
- Civilian populations
Several factors have contributed to the evolution of both international and domestic terrorism. Some of these factors include:
- Social media and the Internet. Domestic and international terrorists have developed a strong presence on social media platforms. They have achieved this through online images, publications, videos, and messaging platforms. This enables the groups to recruit and radicalize individuals willing to take part in extremist messaging.
- Lone offenders. Terrorism has evolved from conspiracies by large groups to lone-offender terrorist attacks. These individuals usually radicalize other people online and mobilize violence swiftly. A lone offender has no guidance or group affiliation, making it difficult to identify, disrupt, or investigate them. The authorities rely on tips from the general public to detect these attacks or threats.
Authorities have expanded their resources using Patriot Act provisions and other federal laws. Now, They have more capabilities to prosecute individuals accused of domestic terrorism. The Hertzberg-Alarcon California Prevention of Terrorism Act has also helped.
The surveillance and enforcement powers granted to federal organizations and agencies to fight organized crime and drug trafficking cases are currently available to combat domestic terrorism. Any violent act intended to intimidate civilians or governments into changing or abandoning their conduct may be considered terrorism.
Federal Consequences of Terrorism
Federal and state agents often work together to combat terrorism. Even so, terrorism charges are primarily a federal court issue. That means the DOJ (Department of Justice) will collaborate with other agencies in these matters. These agencies include the FBI and the DHS (Department of Homeland Security). You may also have to deal with the CIA (Central Security Agency) and NSA (National Security Agency) in the course of your terrorism prosecution.
Federal prosecuting attorneys boost their careers by prevailing in high-profile cases like this. If they succeed in obtaining a conviction, you may be subject to:
- Excessive fines
- Damage to your reputation
- Damage to your immigration status, which includes denial of entry to particular countries
- Passport revocation
- Loss of privileges to fly
- Revocation of your professional license
- Seizing or freezing of your bank account
- Placement on a terrorist watchlist
- Life imprisonment without the possibility of parole
- Capital punishment
If you indirectly or directly financed terrorist activities, you can be subject to a federal prison sentence of up to twenty years.
If you helped conceal or provided support to a terrorist plot, you may be subject to up to fifteen years in federal prison. If death resulted from an action of a person you concealed or aided, you can face life imprisonment in federal prison.
Apart from criminal penalties, you can also face civilian consequences if accused of terrorism in the United States. Any municipality, business, or person that suffered property damage or personal injuries because of your terrorism act can sue you. If the complainant prevails in a civil lawsuit, the court will charge you three times the compensable damages determined by the court. You will also be required to pay attorney’s fees and court costs.
If found guilty of terrorism, you will earn a permanent felony criminal record. If the authorities ever release you from incarceration, you will most likely have difficulty securing employment and renting an apartment. Your felony terrorism conviction is viewable via a background check, which can result in your community ostracizing you.
Penalties of Terrorism in California
Many terrorism charges lead to federal prosecution, as illustrated above. The charges are based on the specific situation and the outcome of the terrorist act committed. However, California’s terrorism statute also severely punishes the crime. The punishment for using or possessing weapons of mass destruction includes the following under California law:
- Suppose you used a weapon of mass destruction against seeds, crops, or animals such that it could cause a major loss in value or widespread damage to the crops or animals. In that case, you may be subject to a state prison sentence of four, eight, or twelve years and a fine not exceeding one hundred thousand U.S. dollars.
- If you used a weapon of mass destruction in such a manner that it might damage the source of drinking water or food supply, you would face a prison sentence of twelve, eight, or five years and a fine not exceeding one hundred thousand U.S. dollars.
- If you used a weapon of mass destruction against someone else in a manner that could cause demise or significant bodily harm, you might face life in prison with no possibility of parole.
- If the judge convicts you of using a weapon of mass destruction against someone else in a manner that could cause disabling injury or illness, you may be subject to life in prison.
- You may be subject to a state prison sentence of twelve, eight, or four years if the judge convicts you of possessing, developing, manufacturing, producing, transferring, acquiring, or retaining a weapon of mass destruction.
Defending Against Terrorism Accusations
Terrorism allegations are a severe matter, and the local community and the general public are often quick to conclude that the defendant is criminally liable even before they have had a chance to defend themselves. However, remember that just because you are subject to charges does not mean you are criminally liable. Every defendant is innocent until proven guilty, and there are instances of false accusations and mistaken identity that may have led to your arrest and charges.
An attorney can help you defend against your terrorism charges. Some of the defenses they may argue include the following:
- The government has accused you wrongfully or
- It is a case of mistaken identity
- You did not make terrorist threats
- There is not sufficient evidence to convict you
- Someone has accused you because they are out for revenge
Your attorney can argue several other defenses to help clear your name. Remember, for the judge to convict you of terrorism, the prosecution must prove all the elements of the crime beyond any reasonable doubt. An attorney knowledgeable in terrorism charges will rigorously investigate your case to build the most compelling strategy to beat the charges you face and secure your freedom.
Find a Terrorism Charges Defense Attorney Near Me
If the prosecution has accused you of terrorism in California, you will face the full extent of the law. The federal, state, and local law will be on your neck. Aggressive federal prosecuting attorneys will do all they can to lock you up in these cases. And make no mistake, they may succeed because they have unlimited resources. Do not talk to anyone to protect your rights until you consult a skilled defense lawyer.
At Leah Legal, our trial attorneys have won several intricate cases in federal court. No one will intimidate us. We will provide the necessary expert counsel to achieve the best possible outcome. If the prosecution has accused you of terrorism in Van Nuys, CA, do not hesitate to seek help. Contact us at 818-484-1100 today for a consultation to learn more and a case evaluation.
Being arrested or under investigation as an offender or suspect in a child molestation case can undoubtedly be an intimidating and scary situation. While child molestation generally refers to a variety of offenses, the potential consequences of any of these offenses’ convictions can be detrimental to your life. In addition to the possible lengthy jail sentence and unaffordable fines, a guilty verdict for a child molestation offense could tarnish your professional reputation. Consulting with a defense attorney if you are under investigation as an offender in a child molestation case is a brilliant idea.
The attorney you hire will investigate your unique case thoroughly to build solid defenses that can assist you in convincing the court to drop or reduce your charges.
An Overview of Crimes that Could Qualify as Child Molestation
Generally speaking, child molestation is an umbrella name for several sexual-related crimes against children. Child molestation statutes make it illegal to engage in or attempt to engage in any sexual act with a minor (any person aged below eighteen years). Depending on the nature and facts of your unique case, child molestation allegations could attract misdemeanor or felony charges.
Unfortunately, if you have a child molestation-related offense, you cannot challenge the criminal charge by arguing the minor consented to the act. In the eyes of the law, minors are incapable of consent, meaning they are not mentally capable of understanding the implications of their choices and decisions.
You will need the services of an aggressive attorney to build defenses that can help you challenge the alleged charge for the best possible judgment. Here is a brief overview of various sex-related crimes that could qualify as child molestation:
Oral Copulation With a Minor
Penal Code (PC) 287 is the statute that makes it unlawful to engage in oral copulation with a minor. According to PC 287, oral copulation is any contact, regardless of how slight, between the mouth of one individual and the anus, penis, or vagina of another individual.
To secure a guilty verdict under PC 287, the prosecution team will bear the burden of proving the following facts to the court:
- You engaged in an act of oral copulation with someone else
- The person was under the age of eighteen years
The prosecutor does not have to prove that you penetrated or ejaculated on the person to secure a PC 287 violation conviction against you. A PC 287 violation conviction could attract a jail sentence of up to three years or formal probation when the prosecutor files your offense as a felony since it is a wobbler.
However, if your offense is a misdemeanor, your penalties include up to one year of jail sentence or informal probation.
Lascivious Acts With a Child
Also commonly referred to as child molestation, engaging in lascivious or lewd acts or conduct with a child is an offense under Penal Code 288. According to this law, it is unlawful to willfully touch any part of a child’s body, either through the clothes or on the bare skin, or cause him/her to touch your body for sexual arousal or gratification.
The sentence you will face upon conviction will depend on the specifics of your case. If the minor involved is under fourteen (14) years old, your sentence upon receiving a guilty verdict for a PC 288 violation will include up to eight (8) years of jail sentence and a fine not exceeding $10,000.
However, if your offense involves using threat, force, or fear to coerce the minor to engage in lascivious acts with you, your sentence after conviction could include up to ten (10) years of jail sentence and a fine amounting to up to $10,000.
Sending Obscene Material to Seduce a Minor
According to Penal Code 288.2, it is unlawful to exhibit, distribute, send, or display obscene materials to a minor with the intent to engage in either of the following with him/her:
- Oral copulation
- Sodomy
- Sexual contact
- Sexual intercourse
Depending on the nature and circumstances of your unique case, the prosecutor could file your PC 288.2 charge as either a misdemeanor or felony since it qualifies as a wobbler offense. A misdemeanor PC 288.2 violation conviction is punishable by:
- Up to one (1) year of jail time
- A fine amounting to up to $1,000
However, if your PC 288.2 charge is a felony, a conviction will attract a jail term of up to three (3) years and a fine not exceeding $10,000.
Contacting a Minor With the Intent to Commit Felony
PC 288.3 makes it a crime to contact a minor with the criminal intent to engage in a sex offense or other serious felony involving a child. Below are examples of underlying felony offenses the prosecution team can use to support his/her PC 288.3 case against you:
- Kidnapping
- Rape
- Sodomy
- Child endangerment
To secure a PC 288.3 violation, the prosecution team must provide adequate evidence to show the court that you were aware or should have reasonably known the person was under eighteen. When the prosecutor secures a guilty verdict against you, your penalties will include:
In most cases, the prosecutor will file this charge as a felony, carrying the following potential legal penalties:
- Up to $10,000 maximum fine
- An imprisonment term of up to thirteen (13) years
- Felony probation
Annoying or Molesting a Child
PC 647.6 makes it a criminal offense to molest or annoy a child aged under eighteen years. Specifically, this statute makes it illegal to engage in any conduct that irritates, disturbs, or annoys a minor for sexual reasons.
Remember that the prosecutor could secure a PC 647.6 violation conviction against you even if your conduct did not annoy or irritate the alleged child. What matters for a conviction under this statute is whether your conduct would irritate a standard sober person and intrude on the child’s security and privacy.
Unlike most sex offenses, the prosecutor can secure a conviction against you under PC 647.6, even if there was no physical contact between you and the child’s body. A PC 647.6 violation is chargeable as a wobbler, which could result in felony or felony penalties upon conviction.
The prosecutor is more likely to file your PC 647.6 offense, a felony, when you illegally enter an inhabited part of any building, a trailer couch, or an inhabited dwelling to annoy, harass, or molest a minor. A felony PC 647.6 violation conviction will attract the following potential punishment:
- Up to three years of jail time
- A fine amounting to up to $10,000
- Felony or formal probation
However, when your PC 647.6 charge is a misdemeanor, you should anticipate the following legal penalties after conviction:
- Detention in the county jail for up to one (1) year
- A fine amounting to up to $5,000
- Misdemeanor or informal probation
Continuous Sexual Abuse of a Child
If the sexual abuse against the minor is ongoing, the prosecution team could file continuous sexual abuse of minor charges against you under PC 288.5. According to this statute, you commit continuous sexual abuse of a child offense if you:
- Engage in three (3) or more instances of sexual abuse against a minor within a three-month duration, and you
- Live on the same premises with him/her or have recurring access to him/her
The prosecution team will file this charge as a felony, and your sentence upon conviction could include an imprisonment term of up to sixteen (16) years.
Statutory Rape
Statutory rape is the offense you commit when you engage or participate in sexual intercourse with a minor whom you are not legally married to. According to penal code 261.5, the prosecution team can secure a guilty verdict against you for a statutory rape charge even if the minor consented to the sexual intercourse or he/she initiated the act because they are incapable of consent.
Generally speaking, the prosecution team could file this offense as either a misdemeanor or felony based on the facts listed below:
- As long as you are not three (3) years older than the victim, the prosecution team will file your statutory rape charge as a misdemeanor
- If you are three (3) years older than the victim, the prosecutor will file your statutory rape as either a felony or misdemeanor
- If you are twenty-one (21) years of age or older, and the victim is below sixteen (16) years at the time of the offense, the prosecutor will file your PC 261.5 offense as either a felony or misdemeanor
When charged with a misdemeanor statutory rape offense, your penalties upon receiving a guilty verdict under this statute will include:
- A fine not exceeding $1,000
- Up to one (1) year of custody in the county jail
- Informal probation
However, when the prosecution files felony PC 261.5 charges against you, a conviction could carry the following legal penalties:
- A jail sentence of not more than (3) years unless you are twenty-one (21) years of age or older and the victim was sixteen at the time of the offense. In this situation, a PC 261.5 violation conviction will carry a jail sentence of not more than four years
- Up to $10,000 maximum fine
- Formal probation
Possession of Child Pornography
PC 311.11 makes it illegal to commit child pornography in your possession. According to this statute, a child is anyone aged below eighteen years, and “child pornography” could be any material that shows sexual conduct or acts with a minor. Depending on the facts and circumstances of your unique case, a PC 311.11 charge conviction could carry either felony or misdemeanor penalties.
If the prosecution team files your offense as a felony, a PC 311.11 violation conviction is punishable by:
- Detention in the county jail for not more than one (1) year
- Up to a maximum of $2,500 fine
However, if your charge is a felony, the penalties you can expect when the court convicts you include a maximum $2,500 fine and a jail sentence of not more than three years.
In addition to these legal penalties, a guilty verdict for any sexual-related offense will likely lead to the following collateral consequences:
- A legal obligation to register and re-register as a convicted sex offender
- Deportation when you are a non-citizen, regardless of your stay here
- A criminal record
Sexual Acts With a Child Under 10
According to PC 288.7, it is a criminal offense to engage in sexual intercourse, sodomy, oral copulation, or penetration with a minor under the age of ten (10) years. Below are a few examples of behaviors or acts that could attract PC 288.7 charges:
- A man aged 25 years having sexual intercourse with a nine-year-old girl
- A 36-year-old teacher sodomizing a 7-year-old boy
- A 19-year-old boy penetrating an 8-year-old girl on her vagina with his penis
- A 40-year-old woman forcing a 9-year-old boy to lick her vagina
For the sake of PC 288.7, oral copulation means any contact between the adult’s genitals or anus with the child’s mouth. It is worth noting that the court could convict you under this law even if you are biologically related to the child.
Since it is a felony, you should anticipate harsh and life-changing penalties upon conviction, including up to twenty-five (25) years of detention in the state prison.
Remember, like any other sexual offense, a guilty verdict for any sexually related offense where a child is a victim could attract other detrimental consequences that could affect your quality of life even after your case is over. Examples of these consequences include:
- Deportation for non-citizens
- Inclusion in the national sex offender registry
Defenses to Child Molestation-Related Charges
Any child molestation-related offense is serious and could attract life-altering consequences upon conviction. However, with the legal assistance of a skilled attorney, you could convince the judge or jury to reduce or dismiss your entire case.
Here are examples of viable legal defenses your criminal defense attorney could apply to aid you in securing a favorable outcome at trial if you have child molestation-related charges:
- You are a victim of entrapment
- The police coerced you to commit the offense
- You thought the alleged victim was over eighteen years old (mistake of fact)
- You were lawfully insane at the time of the offense
- The prosecutor’s evidence against you is unclear or insufficient
- The alleged victim is not a minor
- You did contact the victim, but the contact was not sexual
Will I Qualify for Expungement After a Conviction for a Child Molestation-Related Offense?
A conviction for any child molestation-related offense will remain on your criminal record unless you secure an expungement. With a criminal record for a child molestation-related case, it can be extremely challenging to do the following:
- Secure an apartment or house to live in because most landlords will not allow people with criminal records to live on their property
- Qualify for reliable employment because most employers nowadays conduct a background check on job applicants before recruiting them
- Secure a professional license to offer your services, especially if your career involves working with children or vulnerable groups of people
- Secure admission to university or college
- Join a professional organization
However, you do not have to live your entire life with a criminal record after serving your sentence for any child molestation-related offense. With the legal help of your attorney, you could qualify for expungement under Penal Code 1203.4. An expungement will eliminate all the disabilities and consequences caused by a conviction because it gives you a clean criminal record.
After an expungement, you can confidently say you do not have a conviction record when asked about your criminal history. If your offense is a misdemeanor and you have completed your probation and jail term, you could be eligible for an expungement.
Conversely, if you served your sentence in the state prison due to a felony conviction for a child molestation-related offense, you will not qualify for expungement unless under certain circumstances. For example, if you served your time in the state prison but would qualify to serve your sentence in a county jail under 2011’s Proposition (Prop) 47, you could be eligible for expungement.
While you can file your expungement petition alone, your odds of qualifying for this post-conviction relief will be higher when you have a skilled attorney as your legal voice. If you are not an excellent candidate for expungement, your attorney can explore other post-conviction relief options to help you avoid the detrimental consequences associated with a conviction. Examples of these post-conviction relief options include:
- Obtaining a Governor’s pardon
- Obtaining a Certificate of Rehabilitation (COR)
Find a Reliable Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
Child molestation-related charges could have life-altering implications in your life, even after serving your sentence. Aside from jail time, a conviction for any of these offenses could affect your professional life and reputation in the community.
If you are looking for a reliable attorney to help you challenge child molestation allegations in Van Nuys, our attorneys at Leah Legal can provide the necessary legal assistance. Call us at 818-484-1100 to discuss the details of your unique case with our understanding and reputable defense attorneys.
Being accused of a crime can impact your whole life. If the offense is also a hate crime enhancement, it is much more severe under California law. If you are charged with a felony because of someone else’s race, color, religion, sex, nationality, or because they have a disability or are gay, you could be subject to harsh penalties.
This blog explains what to expect if accused of hate crime enhancement in felony cases. You also learn the elements that the prosecution must prove in court.
An Overview of a Hate Crime Enhancement
In California, a hate crime enhancement is an additional penalty added to a conviction if you commit a felony against someone else motivated by prejudice or bias towards their characteristics. These characteristics are:
- Race or ethnicity, for example, color, ethnic background, and ancestry
- Religion, including certain practices like atheism and agnosticism, observance, and religious belief
- Sexual orientation under California Penal Code 422.56(h)., such as bisexuality, homosexuality, or heterosexuality
- Gender
- Disability Nationality, including national origin, county, or citizenship
- This includes physical or mental disability per Government Code 12926(j) and (m) provisions
California requires that hate crime enhancements apply to both misdemeanors and felonies, but under Penal Code 422.75, the exact enhancements vary by the severity of the crime. The prosecutor must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you (the accused) acted with intent to do so based on bias against a protected characteristic.
Hate crime enhancements differ from other sentence modifications. They are based solely on the violence or severity of the act because of the intent to discriminate or intimidate. For example, if a misdemeanor crime is proven to have involved hate motivation, Penal Code 422.7 allows a wobbler charge to be brought, which could raise the crime to a felony with a possible one-year jail sentence.
In contrast, felony hate crimes, based on the facts of the case, such as the nature of the crime, result in one or three more years in state prison.
Hate crime enhancements serve to punish individual offenders but also to send a signal to the broader legal system that it is, in a significant way, going to be trying to protect communities of minorities from acts of prejudice.
This policy is rooted in Penal Code sections 422.7 and 422.75. It centers around the idea that if someone commits a crime because they want to scare people or violate their rights just because of their race, religion, or other characteristics, then not only have they broken the law but also undermined community values. So, their action is an offense against the entire fraternity.
What the Prosecutor Must Prove Beyond a Reasonable Doubt
The US Constitution guarantees you a fair hearing and trial procedure. This is because the prosecutor must demonstrate all elements of the felony hate crime before the court can enhance the punishment. In all criminal cases, the burden of proof lies with the prosecutor. They must present enough evidence against you to demonstrate your actions in court.
Your lawyer can help prepare court hearings where you might receive sentence enhancement. The lawyer should guide you through what the prosecutor must show for the court to enhance your sentence. These are:
You Are a Convicted Felon
The hate crime penalty enhancement applies only if you first committed a felony offense. Felonies in California are typically more severe crimes and carry incarceration in state prison, a hefty fine, and sometimes a lifelong criminal record.
Violent crimes like assault, battery, or property crimes that result in extensive damage are common felonies, as are certain theft offenses. When these acts are aggravated by prejudice, they harm the victim and threaten the community’s dignity and safety.
The crime of conviction of a felony under California PC 422.55 requires that the prosecution prove each element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. The case can then move forward to decide whether the crime was hate-motivated.
Prosecutors usually present evidence that includes witness testimonies, documentation of physical harm or property damage, and, in some cases, the defendant’s previous actions or associations, which can show intent.
You Committed a Felony Hate Crime
Once the prosecution has proven that you committed a felony, they must prove that the felony was hate-motivated. In California, an offense becomes a hate crime if it is committed because of bias against a particular characteristic protected by law, such as race, religion, sexual orientation, national origin, or gender. California Penal Code Section 422.55 mentions that any criminal act done due to bias is a hate crime.
To prove you committed the felony, the prosecutor must also prove that you did so because of a preconceived, unlawful prejudice against the victim’s protected attribute.
Typically, prosecutors establish that hate served as the motive behind the crime by demonstrating, through such evidence as:
- The defendant’s state of mind when the crime occurred
- The defendant’s intent when the felony happened
- What did the defendant mean when they perpetrated the crime?
This could be things you have said, symbols or signs that have been used, or past incidents that suggest a history of bias.
For example, in racially motivated attack cases, racial slurs or derogatory language recorded at the crime can be strong evidence of bias. Sometimes, the crime is linked to a hate motive by associations with known hate groups or with paraphernalia of hate.
The prosecution bears the burden of demonstrating a direct connection between what you did and an illegal prejudice.
In addition, the designation of a crime as hate-motivated focuses attention on the emotional impact on the victim and the victim’s community. The fact that hate crime is brought in as a context often persuades judges and juries to prefer harsher penalties because a court perceives it as an attack on the community fabric of unity and tolerance.
Your Felony Hate Crime Was Based on an Unlawful Bias
To prove a hate crime enhancement, the prosecution must show that you acted out of an unlawful discriminatory bias. This element makes the difference between a felony and a hate crime. Per California PC 422.55, the prosecutor must show that your conduct was beyond just being criminal but also done with the intent to harm someone of one of these protected traits.
To prove bias, you must look at all your actions, words, and affiliations leading up to the crime.
For example, any statements made during or before the offense are direct evidence of discriminatory intent, which still requires proof of bias. Similarly, if there was a history of behavior indicative of a pattern of discrimination or hatred, it could also contribute to the proposition that your felony was done out of bias.
It could be affiliations with hate groups, ownership of discriminatory paraphernalia, or even participation in past hate-related incidents. For example, if a racial bias crime is involved, the use of slurs or symbols of hate in the commission of the crime can be strong evidence that the crime was motivated by illegal bias.
If the prosecution demonstrates that your actions were based on illegal bias, it intensifies the crime’s severity. It gives the court a reason to impose enhanced penalties to deter future offenses.
Possible Sentence Enhancements Upon Conviction
When a felony is designated a hate crime in California, the court may impose enhanced penalties to address the prejudice underlying the offense. These hate crime enhancements make the consequences for the accused far more severe than for typical felonies.
The nature of these enhancements depends upon the circumstances of the crime, prior offenses, and the level of harm inflicted. Most common sentencing enhancements involve more prison time, harsher probation conditions, and financial burdens.
Prison Sentence Enhancements
In California, if you commit a hate crime as part of a felony, it can lead to a much longer prison sentence. If prosecutors can prove you targeted your victim based on their race, religion, sexual orientation, or some other protected characteristic, Penal Code 422.75 adds up to three extra years to your sentence.
The enhancements can be applied to a wide variety of underlying felonies, from assault to more serious violent offenses. If you are convicted, your underlying felony is made more severe by these enhancements, and you could spend longer in prison. This additional penalty is intended to demonstrate the impact of hate-motivated acts and reflect the crime’s severity and societal harm.
Probation Penalties
If you are found guilty of a felony hate crime, probation is likely. It may be in addition to prison time or instead of it. However, if you receive probation for such a conviction, you are subject to far stricter requirements than probation for other felonies.
In California, courts can impose stringent conditions on people’s behavior while they are serving terms of supervised release, often because these institutions view hate-motivated misdeeds as especially serious.
As part of your probation, the court could require you to report to a probation officer, attend counseling regularly, or complete anger management classes focused on addressing hate-related biases. You may also have to complete several community service hours, often tailored to address the community impacted by your actions.
Failure to comply with these probation terms could lead to immediate consequences, including a potential return to prison to serve the remainder of your sentence.
Compliance with Electronic Monitoring
If you are convicted of a felony hate crime, you may be required to submit to electronic monitoring as a condition of your probation. Judges use this condition to monitor your compliance and guarantee that you do not violate certain conditions on your mobility.
Electronic monitoring, especially via an ankle bracelet, allows the authorities to monitor one in real time. However, limitations usually accompany it on where one is allowed to go and with whom one is allowed to talk, especially where the case involves hate crimes, due to concerns about seeing the victim and preventing the recurrence of similar incidents.
Electronic monitoring is a tool for prevention and compliance. For example, if your sentence contains exclusion zones, such as a certain neighborhood, school, or religious place, the device can notify authorities when you violate such areas.
Courts consider electronic monitoring a compromise between imprisonment and probation. It lets you move around, but with certain restrictions. Failing to comply with electronic monitoring rules can lead to immediate consequences, including the revocation of probation and additional jail time.
Regular Meetings With Your Probation Officer
One of the most common conditions of probation for a hate crime sentence is meeting with your probation officer regularly. These mandatory check-ins will hold you accountable and stay aligned with all aspects of your probation terms.
At these meetings, your probation officer will review your compliance with restrictions, such as:
- Curfews
- Travel limitations
- Community service or restitution orders
The frequency of these sessions will depend on the details of your probation, but they will be weekly or monthly.
These meetings are not only for oversight. Probation officers help you navigate probation successfully, offer support and guidance, and provide resources. For example, if you experience problems meeting any particular conditions, such as a job, using substances, or following recommended behavioral counseling, your probation officer can refer you to the right support services.
Missed meetings or violations reported during the sessions can result in stricter penalties, including revoking your probation. An outcome like this could lead to incarceration, and that is why you should view these meetings as necessary for your freedom and your successful rehabilitation.
Fines and Court Fees
Paying court fines and fees is a basic requirement of your sentencing. The financial penalties imposed are for things like administrative costs, costs to run the court, and sometimes even costs of programs needed while on probation.
Court fines can be hefty, particularly for hate crimes that aim to reflect the gravity of the offense and deter further offenses. If the court enhances your sentence, the odds are that these fines will also increase accordingly to reflect the aggravated nature of the offense.
Meeting these financial obligations on time is of the essence. Failing to complete probation can result in potential violations, attracting additional fines, fees, or penalties. Payment deadlines are often spelled out in courts, and, in some cases, courts even allow payment plans to help ease the financial burden. However, ignoring these fines can turn the manageable conditions into significant legal problems.
In addition, some jurisdictions charge interest on unpaid fees, which generates additional amounts owed over time. Keeping up with these financial responsibilities demonstrates a commitment to complying with your sentence, which can be viewed positively by the court and your probation officer.
Compliance with Community Supervision Orders
Another part of your probation is complying with community supervision orders. Compliance helps keep you accountable and your rehabilitation. Community supervision means you serve part of your sentence outside of prison but are under strict conditions with almost constant supervision by a probation officer.
The orders contained in these orders are typically a variety of obligations, all designed to address the nature of your offense and your circumstances, promote lawful behavior, and prevent future offenses.
You are expected to follow every order under community supervision. You may be ordered to do community service, attend counseling, be employed, and follow curfews. Community supervision for those with a hate crime conviction is often substance abuse assessments, anger management courses, or bias rehabilitation programs.
If you miss scheduled check-ins, don’t show up for drug tests, or don’t follow treatment programs, you can jeopardize your probation and face serious consequences, including additional penalties or revocation of your supervised release.
Obeying these orders in full shows the court and your probation officer that you are willing to change and are accountable, which may be helpful when you petition for sentence adjustments or early release.
Compensation to the Victims
In addition to being a financial obligation, paying restitution to the victims is a legal and moral obligation that demonstrates your responsibility for the injury you have caused after the crime commission. Restitution is intended to offset victims’ direct losses incurred, including:
- Medical costs
- Counseling charges
- Repairs to property
- Other finances related to the crime
Unlike a simple fine, restitution is personal. It connects the harm inflicted with your duty to make amends, even if they are only partial.
Failure to comply with restitution orders can have serious consequences. If payments are missed or refused, the court may take actions such as extending probation, enforcing wage garnishments, or potentially revoking your supervised release.
Courts see restitution as a form of accountability and an essential part of rehabilitation.
Speak with a Reputable Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
A felony hate crime fueled by bias or prejudice against persons of a particular characteristic attracts a hate crime penalty enhancement. California’s strict sentencing enhancements are designed to punish and signal a zero-tolerance approach toward crimes fueled by discrimination.
If you or a loved one is facing felony hate crime charges in Van Nuys, our team at Leah Legal is ready to defend you. We will inform you of your rights, build a strong defense, and be by your side through every step of your case. Call us today at 818-484-1100.
A first-time criminal conviction, especially a misdemeanor, may lead to jail, fines, and other consequences, including a permanent record. Courts recognize that many first-time offenders struggle with drug addictions or mental health issues that often contribute to their behavior.
In California, there are pretrial diversion programs for first-time defendants. These programs help these defendants avoid a criminal conviction and prevent reoffending. If you complete a diversion program successfully, the court can dismiss the charges and seal your criminal record. If you do not complete the diversion program, your case will continue.
This blog will look at the different types of special diversion programs available in California that can help protect your reputation, professional license, immigration status, and job.
California’s Special Diversion Programs Explained
“Diversion” refers to programs that help move a criminal case out of the formal justice system. These programs allow qualified defendants to avoid a criminal conviction by completing a program that addresses the problems that caused their arrest, like drug addictions, alcohol abuse, or anger issues.
These programs are commonly known as pretrial diversion programs or pretrial intervention programs. A judge orders a diversion program and requires participants to achieve specific goals or tasks within a set timeframe. Each program fits the individual’s situation, considering the type of crime, criminal history, and personal circumstances.
For example, in a DUI case, a diversion program might ask you to:
- Go to Alcoholics Anonymous meetings
- Take a drunk-driving class in California
- Do community service
- Observe specific license restrictions
A judge can dismiss your case after you finish the program and relieve you of other legal problems. You can also ask to have the arrest record removed after completing a misdemeanor diversion.
This program aims to prevent repeat offenses by keeping non-violent offenders out of jail and helping them stay employed. Since a first-time misdemeanor conviction can significantly affect one’s life, the diversion program enables one to remain on track and shows that one does not pose a danger to society.
Diversion programs are not given automatically; your defense attorney must request them as part of your defense plan. You must prove to the court that you qualify for the program.
Typically, diversion programs may include:
- Educational classes
- Rehabilitation
- Counseling
- Support groups
- Restraining orders
- Community service
- Anger management therapy
- Restitution payments
- Curfews
- Programs for veterans
- Mental health programs
If you complete the diversion program, the prosecutor or court will likely dismiss your criminal charges. There will be no conviction on your record or any criminal history. This process occurs “pre-prosecution,” allowing you to enter a diversion program without needing to plead guilty, no contest, or not guilty.
However, if you do not finish the diversion program, most states’ laws declare that your case will proceed as if the diversion never happened. It means the court could charge you for the alleged offense. You might also face a guilty plea, a criminal conviction, jail time, and a criminal record.
The Function of Diversion Programs
Misdemeanor diversion programs serve multiple purposes. They aim to:
- Reduce the number of low-risk cases in busy courts
- Prevent the negative impacts of a criminal conviction
- Help with jail and prison overcrowding
- Assist offenders in resolving the underlying problems that contributed to their actions.
- Lower the rate of repeat offenses
What are the Criteria for Eligibility?
In most jurisdictions, diversion is usually available only for first-time offenders with non-violent misdemeanor offenses. Also, entering a diversion program may require consent from the alleged victim, prosecutor, or judge.
Not every misdemeanor offense qualifies for diversion. The diversion programs are not available for individuals charged with:
- Domestic battery (PC 243(e)(1)).
- Corporal injury to a spouse (PC 273.5).
- Stalking (PC 646.9).
- Any California misdemeanor sex crime that requires registration as a sex offender under PC 290.
Types of Special Diversion Programs in California
California has three main pretrial diversion programs that cater to different defendants based on their charges.
- Drug Diversion Program Under Penal Code (PEN) 1000
PEN 1000, or the “Deferred Entry of Judgment” (DEJ), offers a pretrial diversion program for simple possession offenses. This program lets non-violent offenders in California receive education and rehabilitation instead of jail time. Since January 1, 2018, the PC 1000 program has been officially recognized as a pretrial diversion program.
You can plead not guilty to qualifying charges and engage in drug treatment. Completing the program will lead to the court dismissing your charges. If you do not complete it, you will be automatically found guilty. You have the right to a trial with a judge or a California bench trial.
You can enter the pretrial diversion program (PEN 1000) for these offenses:
- Possession of a toxic substance for huffing — PC 381.
- Business and professions code 4060.
- Possession of controlled substances — HSC 11350.
- Unlawful possession of cannabis — HSC 11357.
- Possession of paraphernalia — HSC 11364.
- Unlawful activation of cannabis — HSC 11358.
- Aiding and abetting the usage of illegal controlled substances — HSC 11365.
- Using forged prescriptions to acquire medication for personal use — HSC 11368.
- Possession of methamphetamine for personal use — HSC 11377.
- Illegal possession of prescription sedatives — HSC 11375b.
- Being under the influence of controlled substances — HSC 11550.
- Having a container full of marijuana in your vehicle — VEH 23222.
The controlled substances involved include marijuana, cocaine, ecstasy, and heroin.
How Does a Drug Diversion Work
Pretrial diversion programs need to have certain features:
- They must offer free services to participants, and the court and county drug program administrators must find them practical and reliable.
- The county drug program administrator must certify the program, following Chapter 1.5 of Title 8 of the California Penal Code, starting with PC 1211.
You can request a referral to any certified program in any county. A pretrial diversion lasts between 12 and 18 months, but the court may extend this time if there is a valid reason to complete an approved drug treatment program.
The court has the authority to stop your participation in the PEN 1000 pretrial diversion for specific reasons:
- If the court convicts you of a crime that shows violent behavior,
- If you do not complete drug treatment or follow program rules
- If the court convicts you of a felony.
The judge, probation department, or prosecutor can file a motion to end your participation. The court will hold a hearing to decide this matter. If the court finds you guilty of any offenses or you are not meeting program expectations, your original case will proceed.
Qualifying for a Drug Diversion Program
The prosecuting attorney will review the case to see if you are eligible for a drug diversion program. You and your lawyer will receive written notice about your eligibility.
This notice will include:
- A clear outline of the drug diversion program process
- An overview of the duties and responsibilities of the prosecutor, probation department, and court in this process
- A requirement for you to plead not guilty to the accusations
- A waiver of your right to a quick trial or speedy preliminary hearings and jury trial
- Information stating that if you finish the drug treatment and receive positive recommendations from the diversion program authority, the court will drop your charges
- Note that the program can end if you do not follow the treatment rules or commit a new offense that disqualifies you
- Details about your rights regarding your criminal record, how to respond to questions about your arrest, and the drug diversion after completing the diversion program.
The presiding judge may ask the probation officials to look into your situation. The probation official will review factors like your age, past drug use or possession, and your education. Based on this, the probation department will inform the court about your eligibility, and then the court will decide.
2. Mental Health Diversion Under PC 1001.36
In California, Mental Health Diversion (MDC) allows you to receive mental health treatment if you face criminal charges. MDC is a pretrial diversion program described in PC 1001.36. It allows you to delay the case to participate in a treatment program. The presiding judge can order this treatment at any point before your sentencing.
Eligibility for Mental Health Diversion
In California, both misdemeanor and felony defendants can participate in mental health diversion programs. To qualify, you must meet these criteria:
- You have a mental health condition
- Your mental health issue significantly contributed to the crime you are charged with.
- A qualified mental health professional believes you would benefit from treatment.
- You agree to participate in the diversion program and forfeit your right to a quick trial.
- You commit to following the treatment plan as part of the diversion.
- The court believes you will not pose a serious threat to public safety.
To be eligible for PC 1001.36 diversion, you need to have one of these conditions:
- Post-traumatic stress disorder
- Bipolar disorder
- Schizoaffective disorder
- Schizophrenia
You cannot qualify for mental health diversion if you have these conditions:
- Pedophilia
- Antisocial personality disorder
- Borderline personality disorder
You can show you have a mental disorder by providing a recent diagnosis from a qualified mental health professional. The professional may use the following information:
- Arrest reports
- Your examination results
- Your medical records
You must convince the court that your mental disorder was a major factor in the charges you are facing to be eligible for a mental health diversion. Additionally, you can establish this if you showed symptoms of the disorder when the crime occurred. In making this decision, the court will look at all trustworthy and relevant evidence, such as:
- Medical reports
- Records from a qualified medical expert
- Police reports
- Statements from witnesses
- Transcripts from preliminary hearings
- Statements from your mental health treatment provider
- Penal Code 1001.36 Treatment Period
According to PC 1001.36, mental health diversion lasts up to two years. It may include both outpatient and inpatient care. Before the court approves a rehabilitation program, it may consider:
- The community’s best interests
- The defense’s request
- The defendant’s needs
- The prosecution’s request
Mental Health Diversion Payment
Funding for mental health treatment is available from both public and private sources. If private treatment is too expensive, the judge may direct you to a county mental health agency or a collaborative court. Once you finish the treatment program, the judge will drop your charges. You will complete the program if you meet the following:
- Follow the diversion requirements
- Have a long-term mental health care plan
- Have largely avoided new legal issues not related to your mental health condition.
- Military Diversion or Veterans Diversion Under PC 1001.81
Active duty military members and California veterans with trauma or mental health challenges can take part in military diversion. This program offers an alternative to jail time for misdemeanor charges against these individuals.
To qualify for military diversion under PC 1001.81, you do not need to plead guilty or no contest. The court can pause the criminal case so you can join an education and rehabilitation program. You should agree to give up your right to a quick trial. The judge will drop your charges once you finish the military diversion program. The criminal case will continue if you do not complete the diversion program.
Eligibility for Veterans Diversion
You may qualify for military diversion if you experience any of the following due to your military service:
- Mental health issues
- Traumatic brain injury
- Post-traumatic stress disorder
- Military sexual trauma
- Substance abuse
You can gather evidence for your condition from these records:
- Separation physicals
- The Department of Veterans Affairs or VA compensation and pension package
- VA records
- Support letters from friends and family
- Letters and citations regarding combat experience and trauma
- A medical evaluation during active duty
- Current medical records and opinions from medical experts
- Letters from mental health professionals and caseworkers.
Typically, military diversion is available only to first-time offenders. Typically, military diversion is available only to first-time offenders. However, if you face charges for a minor, non-violent felony or have a previous conviction for the same offense, the court will direct you to a veteran’s court.
Crimes That Qualify You for Military Diversion
You can qualify for military diversion if you face a misdemeanor charge, including:
- Disturbing the peace — Penal Code 415
- Drunk in public — Penal Code 647f
- Driving under the influence — VC 23152(a) and driving with a BAC of 0.08% — VC 23152(b)
- Drug possession — HS 11350
- Assault — Penal Code 240
- Battery — Penal Code 242
How a Defendant Can Obtain Military Diversion
After the arraignment and before the trial, your defense lawyer will submit a motion to the trial court asking for pretrial diversion. This motion should include:
- Documents that support your diagnosis or condition.
- Letters from your VA representative, caseworker, colleagues, and family members speak to your military background, character, and the trauma you have faced.
- A treatment plan suggested by your therapist, medical expert, or psychologist.
The courts will review this information before making a decision. If the court finds you eligible and agrees, you will enter the military diversion program. The court will delay all criminal proceedings for two years while you receive treatment.
The court will decide if you must join a community or federal treatment program. Usually, the court prefers programs that have helped those with military-related trauma. These include programs managed by:
- The United States Department of Veterans Affairs, or
- The United States Department of Defense
If the court requires mental health treatment, it may send you to a county mental health agency, provided that the agency agrees to take on these tasks:
- Your treatment
- Sending reports to the court
- Coordinating appropriate referrals to county veterans service officers.
Terms for Military Diversion Participation
You must follow these rules set by the diversion program or the court:
- Attend counseling for substance abuse
- Go to treatment sessions
- Be present at required court hearings
- Undergo random drug or alcohol tests
The agency managing your program will prepare progress reports. The authority in charge of your diversion program must send these reports to the DA and the court every six months.
Treatment Options in Military Diversion
Judges will decide if you can join a community-based or federal treatment program. The courts will prioritize programs that have successfully helped defendants with military-related trauma.
You may also join programs run by the U.S. Department of Defense or the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. The selected treatment program and the court can work with these departments to improve the services and benefits available to veterans.
Military diversion programs typically last between 12 to 24 months. According to the law, the diversion period for your criminal case cannot exceed two years. Your regular case will continue if you do not complete the military diversion.
Find a Criminal Attorney Near Me
Being arrested for a misdemeanor offense does not always lead to a court conviction. If you qualify for a special diversion program in Van Nuys, you can avoid a sentence, criminal record, potential jail time, and other adverse effects of a criminal charge. A skilled attorney could guide you through misdemeanor diversion programs and assess your eligibility. We at Leah Legal have a highly-rated defense criminal defense team ready to assist you in achieving a positive result for your case. Contact us at 818-484-1100 to speak with one of our attorneys.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Fentanyl is one of the most dangerous drugs around today. The Controlled Substances Act lists it as a Schedule II substance because of its high potency for abuse and addiction. Fentanyl is a prescription drug recommended to patients suffering severe pain, especially those fighting cancer or those recovering from open surgery. However, its prolonged use or abuse can result in grave issues, including addictions and other mental and social-related problems.
The use, distribution, sale, and purchase of fentanyl are highly regulated in California. Stringent repercussions exist for those found in illegal possession of the substance. You will also face grave charges for selling, distributing, or trafficking the drug against the law.
A lot of information about fentanyl remains unknown to most people. If interested, a skilled criminal defense attorney can assist you with the information you need to understand fentanyl-related laws. They can also help you navigate the complex legal process involved if facing charges for possession, sale, distribution, or trafficking of fentanyl.
Here is some of the information you need to know about fentanyl:
The Type of Drug Fentanyl Is
Fentanyl is a strong synthetic painkiller. It works almost the same as morphine but is more than a hundred times more powerful. This makes it a popular drug, primarily for people in excruciating pain. However, the drug’s strength is what makes it very dangerous since even small doses of it can cause death.
Fentanyl is a legal drug prescribed by licensed professionals like dentists, physicians, veterinarians, and podiatrists. Its regulation is necessary to ensure that those who consume fentanyl use it safely to avoid the drug’s severe side effects.
Under the Controlled Substances Act, fentanyl falls under Schedule II drugs, which are the second most dangerous drugs in the country. You can use it safely to manage pain, especially if you are a cancer patient or are recovering from a severe surgery. Medical professionals who prescribe fentanyl prescribe it as an injection, lozenge, nasal spray, sublingual file, or patch, depending on the underlying medical issue that requires the drug as part of treatment.
You can use fentanyl safely and effectively to manage pain by following the instructions given by your healthcare provider. However, this is a highly addictive drug. Its usage puts you at risk of addiction, abuse, or overdose. You must follow the prescription strictly and use it under your doctor’s prescription to avoid these issues.
Sadly, there are illegally produced drugs on the market today that people are selling as pills, powders, or blotted papers. Some drug manufacturers mix fentanyl with methamphetamine, cocaine, or heroin, making it highly lethal. You risk overdosing or losing your life after consuming this illegal product, even in small quantities. Cases of deaths and overdoses regarding the use or abuse of fentanyl are on the rise. This necessitates information to ensure people are aware of how dangerous the drug is.
The Dangers of the Fake Fentanyl on the Market
Fentanyl is one of the drugs you should carefully use in California because of the fake fentanyl on the market. You risk purchasing or using a fake drug if you buy from an unauthorized seller or dealer. Additionally, you risk becoming addicted to a dangerous drug if you use fentanyl without a valid prescription.
The Drug Enforcement Administration is aware of the entry of illegally manufactured and fake fentanyl pills into the market. Some illegal drug manufacturers distribute fentanyl pills laced with deadly synthetic opioids. This information should caution you to be careful when handling fake prescription pills, as you could unknowingly buy or even consume lethal drugs.
Fake fentanyl is also more affordable than other regulated drugs like cocaine and heroin. This makes it popular among the homeless, especially those who already battle various drug abuse disorders. Fake fentanyl is also readily available than some expensive drugs. Most fentanyl addicts who die in California lose their lives to overdosing or other complications resulting from the use of fake fentanyl.
While some of these illegal substances are manufactured within the state, most of them are imported by dangerous drug cartels. Imported rugs are relatively cheaper than locally manufactured ones, making them more popular with the homeless and drug addicts.
Fentanyl Possession and Trafficking in California
Drug trafficking is a global problem involving the manufacture, cultivation, sale, and distribution of illicit drugs, including fentanyl. It is a severely punished offense, with exact penalties depending on the type of drug and the case details. Since fentanyl is among the most dangerous regulated drugs in California, trafficking it can result in life-changing consequences, including imprisonment for years and a hefty court fine. Trafficking fentanyl is a straight felony whose conviction will leave you with a damaging criminal record that will affect you for life.
Fentanyl laws in California apply to those who are found in illegal possession of the drug or found guilty of selling, importing, administering, furnishing, transporting, or giving away the drug without proper authorization. A conviction for trafficking fentanyl is punishable by imprisonment for three to five years. You can also face a similar penalty for attempting to traffic the drug. Transporting fentanyl between counties is also a severe felony punishable by imprisonment for three to nine years.
Some of the most common fentanyl laws in California include the following:
Illegal Possession of Fentanyl
These laws apply to anyone found possessing the drug without a valid license. If you are a healthcare provider, you need a permit to possess and prescribe fentanyl to patients who can benefit from the drug. The illegal possession of the drug is prosecuted under HS 11350. You can face charges under this law for having any amount of fentanyl without a legal permit. If you are a patient and are using the drug for its medicinal use, you are not allowed to keep it since your healthcare provider should administer it from the clinic.
Simple possession of fentanyl, whereby you only have enough of the drug for your use, is a misdemeanor, punishable by a year in jail and a $1,000 court fine. Your penalties will be stiffer if you are a second or subsequent offender.
Possession of fentanyl for sale is prohibited under HS 11351. You can face charges under this statute for having more drugs than you can consume. A large amount of drugs could indicate an intent to sell, distribute, or give away the drug. Charges under this statute can also arise if you are found in possession of packaging supplies or any other drug paraphernalia besides fentanyl.
Possession for sale is a graver offense than simple possession. You will likely face felony charges, with a possible prison sentence of up to four years.
Sale or Transportation of Fentanyl
HS 11352 prohibits the sale, distribution, or trafficking of a regulated substance in California. A violation of this law is a grave felony. You can face charges for selling, giving away, furnishing, transporting, importing, or administering fentanyl. You will likely face a prison sentence of up to nine years if convicted under this statute. The judge will enhance your sentence if you transport the substance across multiple counties.
Penalty Enhancement for Fentanyl Trafficking Convictions
If you face a drug-related charge, the judge can enhance your sentence if there are aggravating factors in your case. An aggravating factor is any circumstance that worsens your case, including selling or administering a drug to a minor, involving a child in drug trafficking, possession of a substantial amount of a regulated substance, or committing a drug crime using a dangerous weapon. When the judge enhances your penalty, they will increase your prison sentence and court fine, meaning you will serve a longer sentence than the law provides for the underlying offense.
Typically, judges penalize fentanyl-related offenders according to the details of their cases. The judge will consider the amount of the drug involved in your crime to determine the proper sentence for you. If the drug in your possession is a small amount for a one-time use, the prosecutor will file a lenient misdemeanor charge. However, if the drug is more than one person needs for a one-time use, your charges will become stiffer.
When prosecuting drug trafficking charges, the district attorney will consider the amount of drug involved. The judge will also consider this factor when sentencing the offender. For example, if you face charges for trafficking less than a kilogram of the drug, the judge can sentence you to a maximum of nine years. However, they will increase or enhance our penalty if the drug is more than a kilogram. According to HS 11370.4, the judge will improve your sentence this way:
- An additional three years to your sentence if your case involves more than a kilogram of fentanyl
- An additional five years if you were dealing with four kilograms of fentanyl or more
- An additional ten years if you sold, furnished, transported, or distributed ten kilograms or more of fentanyl.
- An additional fifteen years for cases involving twenty or more kilograms of fentanyl
- An additional twenty years to your sentence for dealing in 40 kilograms or more of fentanyl
- An additional 25 years for cases involving over 80 kilos of fentanyl
Additionally, the judge will enhance your sentence if you are found trafficking the drug within one thousand feet of a protected zone, like a school or children’s playground. In this case, you could receive an additional two years to your underlying sentence.
The prosecutor can also charge you with other grave felonies in addition to fentanyl trafficking charges, including money laundering, drug manufacturing, or drug possession.
How to Change the Outcome of Your Fentanyl-Related Case
A fentanyl-related charge is grave because fentanyl is a dangerous and lethal drug. The government has strict regulations for this and many other lethal drugs to keep Californians safe from drug abuse, addiction, and overdose. Thus, you will likely face severe charges for illegal possession, trafficking, sale, or distribution of the substance, punishable by a lengthy jail or prison sentence and a hefty fine.
If you face a grave felony charge for the sale or trafficking of fentanyl and you would like a favorable outcome, you must engage the assistance of a skilled criminal attorney. Hiring an attorney should be the first thing you do right after your arrest. They can review your case to determine your legal situation and the best fighting strategies.
Fortunately, you can fight your charges or defend your actions in the trial. After reviewing the prosecutor’s case and your evidence, testimony, or statements, the judge’s verdict will come. Thus, you must prepare wells or your defense if you want to change the outcome of your case.
Criminal defense attorneys can use different legal defense strategies to compel judges to rule favorably in criminal cases, regardless of the gravity of your charges. Here are some of the strategies your attorney can use in your case:
The Police Made a Mistake During Your Arrest or Case Investigation
Your defense team can cite police mistakes when arresting or investigating your case to weaken the prosecutor’s case. For example, they can cite that the police did not have probable cause for your arrest. The police must follow particular guidelines when arresting a person for a drug-related charge. For example, they need to show probable cause for stopping, investigating, and arresting you for a fentanyl-related charge. The judge can dismiss your charges if the arresting officer cannot demonstrate probable cause.
Your attorney can also push for a case dismissal if the officers arrested or searched you without a valid warrant. The police must first obtain a warrant from a judge to arrest or search a person for drugs. After your arrest, the officer must read your Miranda rights, including your right not to incriminate yourself and an attorney. If no legal guidelines are followed, the judge will dismiss your charges.
You Did Not Have Criminal Intent
Your defense team can also fight some of the elements in your case, like your intent, to compel the court to drop or reduce your charges. In most drug-related cases, the prosecutor must demonstrate that a defendant acted with criminal intent. For example, you need criminal intent to forge a prescription to obtain fentanyl unlawfully. You also need a criminal intent to involve a minor in the sale or trafficking of fentanyl. Intent is a critical element in most fentanyl-related cases. The judge will dismiss your charges if your attorney demonstrates that you did not act with criminal intent.
You Did Not Know About the Drugs
Knowledge is also a critical element of most drug-related crimes. The law requires the prosecutor to demonstrate that the perpetrator acted knowingly in obtaining, selling, or trafficking dangerous substances. You must have known about the drugs in your possession or the nature of the rugs in your possession for the court to give a guilty verdict in your case. If this is not the case, the judge can dismiss your charges.
An aggressive attorney can fight this by demonstrating your innocence to the jury. They can argue that someone else planted the drugs in your person or vehicle or you were tricked into transporting or selling the substances. The court will dismiss your charges if there is no compelling evidence that you know about the drugs or the drug’s nature.
You Face False Accusations
If you are falsely accused of possessing, selling, or trafficking fentanyl, a competent criminal defense attorney can help protect you from an unfair conviction. They need to present evidence and fight some of the prosecutor’s evidence to convince the court of your innocence. Your attorney can skillfully use your alibi to achieve this. They can also bring in witnesses to testify in your favor. Your attorney can also demonstrate your relationship with your accuser, which could have resulted in the false accusations. The judge will dismiss your charges if your defense is successful.
Accepting A Plea Bargain
Your defense team can also accept a plea bargain for a more lenient resolution of your case. For example, if your trafficking charge is reduced to a misdemeanor, the judge can agree to a probation sentence or drug diversion. The latter will allow you to receive treatment and rehabilitation for a fresh start. This is a better result than spending years behind bars with a damaging criminal record.
Find Competent Criminal Defense Services Near Me
If you face a fentanyl-related charge in Van Nuys, the consequences of your conviction will be grave if the court finds you guilty. This is because fentanyl is a dangerous drug with a high potency for dependence and abuse. It is also among the leading cases of drug overdoses in California.
However, our skilled Leah Legal attorneys can assist you in fighting for a reasonable outcome. We will begin by ensuring you understand all there is about fentanyl, fentanyl laws, and the possible outcomes of your case. We will also discuss your options, rights, and the right defense strategies. You can compel the judge to reduce or drop your charges with our assistance. Contact us at 818-484-1100 to discuss your options and how we can help you.
California law allows you to file a lawsuit if you lose a loved one due to someone else’s negligence. However, a wrongful death lawsuit is not only a means of holding the responsible party accountable. It also allows you to recover relief from the financial consequences and emotional pain that accompany the loss of your loved one. This claim compensates you for economic losses, including funeral expenses, lost income, and other financial ramifications that will impact your family’s future. Understanding the process of filing a wrongful death claim can significantly affect the outcome of your case. Knowing what damages you can claim and the deadlines involved increases your chances of getting fair compensation.
What exactly is a wrongful death settlement? The information below explains it at length.
What is a Wrongful Death Lawsuit and Settlement?
Personal injury claims for wrongful death are a type of lawsuit that allows surviving family members to sue for damages if someone dies due to another’s negligence or wrongful actions. Unlike most personal injury cases, in which the injured party seeks to recover damages, a wrongful death action is brought by the deceased’s survivors, specifically a spouse, children, or parents. The aim is to secure financial compensation for the emotional and financial toll on the family caused by the loss.
Wrongful death claims can result in settlements. However, not for all cases. The outcome depends on:
- The strength of the evidence
- The clarity of the liability
- How both parties approach the situation
Many cases are settled outside of court because all parties avoid the time and costs associated with a trial. Settlements usually cover economic losses and non-economic damages caused by death.
In California, a wrongful death claim can be filed by only a specific group. These include the
- Surviving spouse
- Children
- In some cases, the parents of the deceased
Further, in some cases, others who were financially dependent on the decedent, like domestic partners, may qualify. However, distant relatives or friends are not entitled to file.
When multiple eligible parties are involved, they should be brought into one lawsuit. This simplifies the process and ensures that all those affected by the losses are represented and can be compensated. Consolidation of the claims prevents the defendant from having to defend multiple lawsuits concerning the same incident. It also eliminates the risk of conflicting rulings.
Proving Your Wrongful Death Claim
If you file a wrongful death lawsuit, you have to show that the defendant’s actions or negligence resulted in your loved one’s death. To succeed, you need to establish several key elements: These are:
- Duty of care
- Breach of the duty of care
- Causation
- Damages
Duty of Care
You need to prove that the defendant owed a duty of care to the deceased. This duty arises in different circumstances, such as when someone:
- Drives on the road
- Provides medical care
- Owns property
For instance, a driver is meant to obey the traffic law, drive responsibly, and avoid endangering other road users. The same goes for doctors. They have to provide competent care to their patients.
Breach of the Duty of Care
After establishing that the duty of care existed, you must prove that the defendant breached this duty. It could be through engaging in negligent acts, recklessness, or intentional misconduct. For example, if a driver runs a red light, his/her action constitutes a breach of a duty of care. Drivers have a legal obligation to drive safely.
Likewise, if a doctor makes a mistake and a patient dies, the doctor has failed his/her duty to provide proper medical care.
Causation
You also have to show that the defendant’s actions caused the death or that the defendant’s actions were a substantial factor in causing the death. It is not enough to show that the defendant was negligent. You have to connect the defendant’s behavior to the fatal outcome.
Expert testimony is often critical in establishing causation. For example, an accident reconstruction expert could tell the jury that the defendant’s negligent driving was responsible for the fatal collision. On the other hand, a medical expert might prove death from a doctor’s mistake.
Damages
Finally, you have to prove how much damage your family suffered because of the loss. Damages in wrongful death cases typically fall into two categories: economic and non-economic
Economic damages include tangible financial losses like:
- Medical bill
- Funeral expenses
- Lost income
These losses can be substantial if your loved one was the primary breadwinner.
On the other hand, non-economic damages are compensation for intangible losses such as:
- Emotional pain
- Suffering
- Loss of companionship
These damages are more difficult to quantify. However, they can be significant and can greatly affect your life.
You will need evidence, including medical records, accident reports, witness testimonies, and expert opinions, to help you build a strong case. California’s two-year statute of limitations for wrongful death claims needs to be met as well. You may lose your right to seek compensation if you fail to file within this timeframe.
After you and the defendant present your evidence, a jury will decide on whether the defendant is liable. If the defendant is found liable, the survivors will be awarded damages.
In some cases, wrongful death lawsuits are settled before going to trial. The defendant could offer a settlement to avoid the trial cost and the uncertainty of appearing in court. Any settlement offer needs to fully compensate you for your losses. Therefore, you should consult with a personal injury attorney to ensure that.
Average Wrongful Death Settlement Amounts in California
The settlement amount for a wrongful death lawsuit in California depends primarily on the case’s specifics. For some cases, where there is little litigation, the wrongful death claims may settle for around $10,000, which is about the same as the insurance policy limit. However, more complex or high-stakes cases will result in a settlement of six to seven figures.
If a case is likely to go to trial, defendants understand that trials present the potential for much more significant verdicts. Thus, they end up settling for a higher amount to avoid the uncertainty and costs of litigation.
Several recent wrongful death settlements in California illustrate this variation:
- After a fatal pedestrian accident involving a commercial truck in Harder et al. v. Golden State Portables et al., the result was a $5 million settlement.
- A $5.3 million settlement was awarded in a use of police force case, Sommers v. City of Santa Clara, et al.
- In one case where an off-duty police officer caused a fatal car accident in the Dominguez v. City of San Diego case, a settlement of $10 million was reached.
- In a hotel, a wrongful death caused by exposure to Legionnaires Disease resulted in a $3 million settlement for the family of diseased Winfield.
Key Factors That Influence Your Wrongful Death Settlement Value
Several factors can affect the amount you could receive in a wrongful death case, some of which will increase the value and others decrease it.
Some of the critical factors that increase the value of a wrongful death settlement include the following:
- Medical expenses — The total compensation increases if you incurred significant medical costs in treating the victim before his/her death
- Victim’s community role — The settlement value increases if a victim is prominent or plays a significant role in their community because their absence is felt more widely
- Victim’s age — The longer the life expectancy, the greater the victim’s earning potential. Thus, the higher the settlement.
- Victim’s dependents — The settlement may be more significant if the deceased supported a spouse, children, or other dependents.
- Pain and suffering — If the victim suffered physical or emotional pain before passing, the settlement could be increased to reflect those damages.
On the other hand, some factors decrease the amount payable in a wrongful death settlement, namely:
- Victim’s contribution to the accident — The settlement can be reduced in proportion to the victim’s fault in the accident. California is a pure comparative negligence state. This means that the jury will apportion fault to both the defendant and you, the plaintiff. Under this doctrine, you can recover damages even if you were partially at fault. You will receive an award proportionate to the defendant’s assigned fault.
- The victim’s age — The settlement is lower for victims with short life expectancies. Thus, older victims receive lower settlements.
- Victim’s family size — The financial and emotional loss is less painful for a smaller family or a lack of dependents. Therefore, you will likely receive a significantly smaller amount than if the deceased had a bigger family.
- Victim’s isolation — If the victim had no social connections or led an isolated life, in these cases, the perceptual impact of the loss of life may be low and result in less settlement.
- Victim’s criminal history — A criminal background might negatively affect the settlement because it suggests that the victim contributed to their death.
Changes to the Damage Caps in California
Specific damage caps are imposed on wrongful death cases involving medical malpractice. These caps are outlined under the Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act (MICRA), dating back to the 1970s. The first version of MICRA capped noneconomic damages at $250,000. It did not matter how bad the injury was or how much the family had lost. This cap applied. However, as the healthcare and living expenses soared over the years, the cap became increasingly controversial. California lawmakers passed Assembly Bill 35 (AB 35) of 2022 to address these concerns. The new law substantially increased the damage caps and addressed long-standing concerns over fairness in compensation.
Assembly Bill 35 raised the cap for wrongful death cases involving medical malpractice to $500,000 in January 2023. In 2033, the cap will be $1 million and grow by $50,000 annually, increasing by 2% annually. This change is a more realistic compensation framework considering the rising cost of living and the long-term effect of losing a loved one.
In 2023, the noneconomic damage cap for nonfatal medical malpractice cases rose from $250,000 to $350,000. As with the wrongful death cap, this will increase by $40,000 annually until 2033, when it reaches $750,000, and then by 2% each year. Moreover, these adjustments ensure that medical malpractice victims see their damages calculated based on their suffering, even if they live but suffer from permanent injuries.
It is worth noting that AB 35 introduces a more nuanced approach by creating three distinct categories of defendants, each with its cap for noneconomic damages:
- Healthcare providers like doctors
- Healthcare institutions like hospitals
- Unaffiliated providers or institutions like independent contractors or separate entities
However, each defendant category has its damage cap. This allows plaintiffs to claim different amounts depending on the defendant. This guarantees that the collective implications of what was done will be prorated in addressing the matter when the responsibility ante is shared by many.
AB 35 also allows for periodic payments for future economic damages, moving from a $50,000 threshold to a new minimum of $250,000. This change allows for structured compensation during that time for families in ongoing financial hardship related to medical malpractice or wrongful death. In a case that causes economic damage, plaintiffs can now get a stable, long-term source of financial support to pay for future medical care, lost wages, or continuing personal expenses.
Moreover, Assembly Bill 35 caps attorneys’ contingency fees. This ensures that more of the settlement or award goes to the plaintiffs. If the case is settled before it begins in formal litigation, attorneys can get up to 25% of the settlement amount. In cases where litigation is inevitable, the fee could rise to 33%. This compensation system ensures that attorneys get fairly compensated for their work but protects plaintiffs from steep legal costs that could reduce their recovery.
The law also includes protections for healthcare providers. It allows them to make statements about fault before litigation without those statements being used against them in court. It makes it more likely that more candid conversations about the possibility of a mistake will get resolved quicker or settled faster. The idea is to offer these protections for more transparency in the medical field and a higher likelihood of out-of-court settlements. This reduces both the burden on the plaintiffs and the burden on the medical system.
Though AB 35’s changes are steps forward, they apply only to medical malpractice cases. Caps do not apply to wrongful death claims arising from other types of negligence, including accidents, product liability, and so on. In these cases, California law permits juries to decide what the amount should be based on the facts of the case, ensuring the actual amount of the victim’s loss is considered.
Payment of Wrongful Death Settlements
California’s response time for wrongful death demand letters is usually 40 days. However, complex cases may take longer. Many settle in three months. Negotiations may fail, in which case the case moves to trial, a time-consuming and expensive process.
When deciding whether to take a lump sum or a structured settlement, it is important to weigh the pros and cons of each. A lump sum provides immediate access to funds that can be flexible in use, including investing the amount. However, there is also the chance of mismanaging it, and part of the settlement could be taxable, especially if it covers medical expenses that were previously deducted.
On the other hand, a structured settlement provides guaranteed periodic payments for an extended period. It can also offer tax advantages and prevent impulsive spending. However, the settlement may be worth less, in total, than a lump sum when interest rates are low. Plus, once the terms are settled, they are difficult to change if your financial situation changes.
Wrongful death settlements are typically not taxed since they compensate for non-economic damages, like pain and suffering or loss of companionship. If, however, you previously deducted medical expenses related to the deceased’s illness or injury and the settlement reimburses those costs, you may be subject to tax. The IRS prohibits double deductions for expenses already written off.
With these complexities, you must consult a tax professional to understand your settlement’s tax implications fully. They will advise you and offer solutions suited to your circumstances.
Find a Wrongful Death Attorney Near Me
A wrongful death lawsuit is fraught with legal complexities. The procedural difficulties of building a strong case and negotiating settlements can feel daunting. An experienced personal injury attorney will guide you through each step, maximizing your chances of a good outcome.
You can effectively address every aspect of your case with the right legal expertise. Attorneys will gather evidence and work on the necessary paperwork. They will ensure they file the case within the set deadlines and represent your interests in court and the out-of-court settlement negotiations. This will greatly increase your chance of getting fair compensation.
If you have been a victim of a wrongful death in Van Nuys, contact Leah Legal for a consultation. We are committed to protecting your rights and achieving the best possible resolution. Contact us at 818-484-1100 for more information.
Having fake or counterfeit money violates both state and federal law. Possession with intent to defraud is a crime, which means you could be criminally liable whether you knowingly carry counterfeit money or receive it in a deal without knowledge. Law enforcement agencies actively pursue counterfeiters to safeguard the nation’s currency. Failing to handle the situation properly could get you into legal trouble, even if you accidentally have counterfeit money. When given a suspicious bill, check for security features like the watermark or color-shifting ink and report the case to the authorities should you identify counterfeit currency. Not knowing that the currency is fake often does not serve as a defense. Therefore, staying informed and acting promptly will protect you from unnecessary legal exposure.
What Actions Would Lead to a Conviction for Possessing Counterfeit Money?
To use counterfeit money means purposely using fake money to deceive someone. The key element is the intent to defraud. The state will secure a conviction if prosecutors prove the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
- You had fake money in your possession
- You were aware that the money was counterfeit at the time of use or attempted use
- You tried to purchase goods or services using counterfeit money as if it were real
- You intended to mislead or deceive someone by trying to pass off the counterfeit money as genuine
Proving these elements requires prosecutors to show that you acted deliberately, knowing that the money was fake and intent on getting something of value for nothing from another. Without evidence of intent or knowledge, your conviction will be difficult.
Let us examine each element in detail.
You Had The Fake Money in Your Possession
Possessing fake money is critical in presuming to use or attempting to use counterfeit money. Counterfeit money is fake money that looks and feels like genuine currency notes in appearance and texture. People often try to replicate the official design elements like embossing and watermarks found on authentic currency, but counterfeit notes usually fall short. Counterfeit money usually has physical differences, like paper texture, inconsistent colors, or repeated serial numbers.
Prosecutors must present evidence to prove possession. Some of the key evidence could include:
- Counterfeit notes — Notes that have been seized are key evidence prosecutors can introduce in court. Law enforcement officers document these items once they are seized. Often, a proper chain of custody is maintained from seizure to court.
- Surveillance footage — This could show you possessing or using counterfeit money.
- Witness testimony — In some cases, prosecutors could introduce witnesses to testify to your involvement. In other cases, the prosecution could rely on forensic analysis. Experts have analyzed the seized bills, and they could show that they are counterfeit since basic security features are missing or altered.
Moreover, ownership is critical in this context. If you are found in possession of counterfeit money on your person, in your car, or at your home, especially if you attempted to use it, for example, if you tried to pay for a coffee with the fake money, your actions will bolster the prosecution’s argument.
Combined, these elements will provide the much-needed basis for proving the possession charge beyond a reasonable doubt.
You Were Aware That Money Was Counterfeit
The state must prove that you knew you were using or trying to use counterfeit money to show that you are criminally liable. Your awareness regarding the money’s counterfeit nature helps differentiate between possession and intentional fraud. When prosecutors demonstrate someone’s awareness, they analyze various aspects of your behavior and the circumstances surrounding the case.
How you act during a transaction reveals your awareness. If you use fake money in areas where people do not scrutinize as much, for example, in busy shops or for small purchases, prosecutors will argue that you knew the bills were fake. If you had equipment for counterfeiting or other items related to counterfeiting, that circumstantial evidence supports the claim that you knew the money was counterfeit. Furthermore, a history or proof of prior dealings with counterfeit money will also bolster the prosecution’s case against you.
Moreover, witness testimonies may establish your awareness. If the witness heard you say the money was fake or you planned to pass it off as genuine, their testimony becomes significant. Besides, whether you attempted to flee, discard the money, or suspiciously deny possession, your reaction can all show guilty knowledge.
Using the Fake Currency and Intending to Defraud
In possession of counterfeit money cases, prosecutors must prove two critical elements under intent:
- The act of presenting a currency note as genuine during a transaction
- Your intent to deceive
Using fake currency to buy something means you do not just have counterfeit money but actively engage in fraudulent conduct. Using this counterfeit money directly links you to the crime. You intended to use this counterfeit money for personal gains.
It is equally important to show your intent to deceive, the mens rea, or guilty mind. Prosecutors must show you knowingly attempted to pass the money as legitimate. You intended to mislead the recipient and benefit under false pretense. Your intent to defraud will show that your actions were not accidental or out of ignorance but rather a purposeful attempt to deceive.
Under both federal and state law, intent is key in dealing with the possession of counterfeit money. It is not illegal to have counterfeit money. However, having counterfeit money with the intention to defraud is unlawful. If you have counterfeit money on you but do not know it is fake or have no intention of using it, you are not violating any law. However, proving a lack of intent may be complicated.
When police find someone with counterfeits, it makes them naturally suspicious. They want to know whether this possession is linked to fraudulent activities. The officers may ask what your intentions are regarding the counterfeit money. Since money is used for transactions, it is natural for the officers to assume that you want it for a transaction. They would thus infer an intent to defraud, so you could be charged with intent to commit fraud unless you give them a valid reason for having the counterfeit money, for example, receiving it unknowingly and thus not having the chance to report it.
The situation in which the fake money was found is important in giving rise to their suspicion. If you are found with a counterfeiting apparatus or in a situation where you try to use it, it would significantly heighten the suspicion of criminal intent.
In these cases, the law enforcement officers will usually interrogate you about whether you knew the cash was counterfeit and your aim. They might initiate an investigation to uncover evidence of fraud and would examine your statement or your actions in the past. If you had no idea the money was fake, you are often advised to report this to the authorities to avoid any implication of fraudulent intent.
Federal Laws on Counterfeiting and Related Offenses
The U.S. government has passed strict laws against counterfeiting that protect foreign and domestic financial systems. The regulations address the production and circulation of counterfeit currency and the possession of instruments that can be used to make counterfeit currency and financial instruments.
The key federal laws regarding counterfeiting are:
Forging, counterfeiting, or altering U.S. obligations or securities with intent to defraud (18 U.S.C. § 471)
You will go to jail if you create or alter any American financial instrument intending to deceive another. Counterfeited items under this category include:
- Currency paper — This refers to paper money that consists of different denominations, for example, $1, $5, $10, $20, $50, and $100
- Government paper — This category includes treasury bills (T-bills), treasury bonds, and treasury notes
- Certificates of Indebtedness — These include documents representing U.S. government debt obligations
Passing, Uttering, or Publishing Counterfeit Currency
18 U.S.C. § 472 makes it a crime to use fake money in transactions, with a focus on paper currency.
While checks and money orders can be counterfeited, different statutes address them more specifically unless they imitate U.S. currency or securities intending to defraud.
Having Tools or Making Tools For Counterfeiting Money
It is illegal under 18 U.S.C. § 474 to have or make tools to counterfeit. These tools include:
- Printing plates — Templates used for printing fake money physically or digitally
- High-quality printers — These devices are capable of producing counterfeit money
- Digital counterfeiting tools — These are equipment or software used to make digital copies of U.S. currency, including scanners or editing software
Making Imitative Obligations or Securities of the United States
18 U.S.C. § 475 prohibits the creation of items that may be mistaken for U.S. currency or securities to avoid deception. You will be criminally liable under this statute if you make:
- Promotional items — These are fake bills or bonds you use for advertising, which may confuse consumers.
- Replica currency for films or collectibles — This currency is made to look like real currency and has non-currency uses. It may be counterfeit if it resembles the currency so closely that it is likely to mislead someone.
Counterfeiting Foreign Securities
18 U.S.C. § 481 applies to the counterfeiting of foreign financial instruments in the U.S. These include:
- Foreign banknotes — Currency from other nations, like the euro, pound, and yen.
- Foreign bonds and securities — These are financial instruments issued by foreign governments and corporations.
Creating Unauthorized Coin-Like Tokens
Under 18 U.S.C. § 489, it is illegal to counterfeit U.S. items without the Treasury’s permission. These include:
- Coin-like tokens — Tokens that resemble U.S. coins and are made of metal.
- Medals or souvenirs — These are coin-shaped items not made for transaction purposes but capable of confusing transactions.
Penalties For Possessing Counterfeit Money
Possession of counterfeit money is a white-collar crime. The penalties for this crime vary depending on the specifics of the offense. Using counterfeit funds to try and deceive falls under forgery, and this crime is “wobbler.” Prosecutors can pursue the offense as either a misdemeanor or felony, depending on the value of the counterfeit money, the extent of the fraud, and your criminal history.
- If you are convicted of a misdemeanor, you could be sentenced to a maximum of one year in county jail.
- If you are convicted of a felony, you could face a sentence of up to three years in state prison.
Counterfeiting, making or manufacturing counterfeit money, is often prosecuted under federal law, especially under 18 U.S.C. § 471 and § 472.
A conviction for counterfeiting may result in up to 20 years in federal prison.
Moreover, fines can reach $250,000, showing the seriousness with which the federal government treats threats to the currency’s legitimacy.
If you are convicted for using or counterfeiting money, you could face other sanctions beyond the punishment mentioned, which include:
- You might be sentenced to probation with strict terms after serving time or instead of jail time. Probation might involve frequent meetings with a probation officer, community service, and limits on travel or association.
- Criminal fines add another financial penalty, which is charged based on the crime and depends on the amount of gain from the fraud.
- Often, the courts will order restitution, which requires the offender to repay the victim or the state for any sustained financial losses, compensating for the economic harm.
- Professional consequences, particularly the probability of losing your licenses or certificates, especially if you were involved in the crime. This could prevent you from future work or drastically limit your ability to work in a preferred field, like law, medicine, or finance.
- If you are convicted, you will have a permanent criminal record. This can make it challenging to find a job, secure housing, and vote in some places, not to mention the social stigma associated with being convicted.
Defenses You Can Use to Fight Possession of Counterfeit Money Charges
If you are facing charges of possessing counterfeit currency, there are various defenses that you can raise to challenge the prosecution’s case. Some of the common defenses attorneys use include the following:
Lack of Knowledge
You can argue that you were unaware that the money was counterfeit. For example, if you received the counterfeit money in a normal transaction, you received the note as a change from a legitimate business or were gifted. Argumentatively, it is reasonable to say that you had no reason to suspect it was fake.
Remember, prosecutors must prove you realized the money was fake, so showing you were unaware can create reasonable doubt. The argument is particularly strong if the counterfeit money looked so real that a reasonable person could not tell they were not real currency.
Lack of Intent to Defraud
Another critical element that prosecutors must establish is your intent to defraud. If you had no intention to deceive anyone, you can assert that you possessed or used the counterfeit money for a legitimate purpose. For example, you could have used the counterfeit money to:
- Educate others
- Teach someone a lesson about fake money
- Be used as movie props
If you can demonstrate that you did not mean to deceive anyone, the prosecution may fail to prove the requisite criminal intent to secure your conviction.
Mistake of Fact
When you assert a mistake of fact defense, you argue that you were unaware the currency was fake because you thought it was real. If you received the fake currency in good faith from a trusted source or from a transaction where you had no reason to suspect anything was amiss, this defense will work in your favor.
You must show that, in those circumstances, it was reasonable for you to believe that the money was genuine, that is, whether you were wrong about the money not being honest. The defense may benefit from pointing to the nature of the fake notes and their resemblance to genuine notes.
Chain of Custody Issues
When law enforcement agencies seize evidence, there should be a proper chain of custody, which indicates that the evidence was handled and documented appropriately. If the chain of custody is broken or the counterfeit currency is mishandled, it may affect its authenticity or connection to you. Evidence can be tampered with or lost along the line.
For example, if the police do not correctly oversee the counterfeit bills from the seizure, your attorney could argue that the counterfeit evidence was tampered with, lost, or switched.
Find a Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
When you are accused of having counterfeit money, you risk facing severe legal consequences, that may include felony charges, jail time, hefty fines, and a permanent criminal record. This conviction will impact various aspects of your life, including your work and personal freedoms. However, if you have an experienced criminal defense lawyer by your side, you can increase your chances of securing an outcome in your favor.
Contact Leah Legal if you have been accused of dealing with counterfeit currency in Van Nuys. We have expertise in handling counterfeiting cases and will work to protect your rights and seek the best possible resolution for you. Call 818-484-1100 for a free, no-obligation consultation.
When a juvenile engages in crime, the law is lenient to ensure they receive a second chance to transform their behavior and attitude. The juvenile justice system advocates for treatment and rehabilitation rather than punishment, even for severe crimes. Generally, juvenile offenders are placed on probation under strict conditions, like mandatory school attendance, drug and alcohol treatment, and rehabilitation. Sometimes, it is difficult for them to abide by all the court-issued conditions, constituting a probation violation.
Probation violation is a grave matter. Juvenile court judges do not take it lightly. There should be consequences if a juvenile violates one or more probation conditions. Judges’ action depends on the type of probation the juvenile is in and the gravity of the violation. The judge can revoke the minor’s probation and take them into custody. Alternatively, they could resume the minor’s criminal charges that resulted in probation.
If your loved one has violated probation, you need the help of a skilled criminal attorney to understand what will likely happen to them. An attorney will also help fight for a favorable outcome in their case.
Consequences of Violating Non-Wardship Probation
Juvenile courts have many options when determining the proper dispositions for juvenile offenders. Non-wardship probation is usually a prevalent disposition for minors who have committed lenient charges and could benefit from treatment and rehabilitation. These juveniles are placed under the supervision of a probation department. The department appoints an officer to work closely with the minor throughout their probation, offering guidance and ensuring that the minor does not violate any court-issued probation conditions.
When the system places a minor on probation, there must be some conditions by which the minor will abide. In this probation, the department sets these conditions based on the underlying violation and the changes expected from the minor. For example, the probation officer can order the minor to continue schooling, observe a particular curfew, or avoid going to some places or meeting with some people. The officer will see that the minor remembers and abides by these conditions throughout their probation.
Generally, a non-wardship probation lasts for up to six months. The department will evaluate the minor’s progress through reports from the probation officer to determine if the system has achieved the desired results. Remember that the minor serves this kind of probation in their home, with their parents or guardians. The probation officer must work around the minor’s parents, guardians, and other family members to ensure the department meets its probation goals.
Minors who qualify for non-wardship probation are first-time and low-level offenders. The probation department must determine the minor’s suitability to serve probation with their parents. If the minor qualifies for non-wardship probation, the department will take action before referring the minor’s case to a prosecutor for filing. Instead of taking the minor through the juvenile justice system, the department tries informal probation and evaluates its effectiveness.
During probation, the probation department expects the minor to do the following:
- To participate in group or individual counseling for behavior modification
- To enroll in and complete an educational program (this depends on how old the juvenile is)
- To undergo drug or alcohol treatment
- To stop using drugs and alcohol
- To engage in community service
- To meet regularly with their probation officer
- Not to engage in any crime during the probation period
- To comply with a particular curfew
- To pay restitution to victims of their crime
- Not to associate with specific people or visit specified locations
- To submit to random drug tests and searches
Remember that the probation department sets conditions based on the underlying violation. Thus, this is not an exhaustive list of all the probation conditions your loved one could receive.
Minors are advised against violating any given probation conditions, which have grave consequences. The probation officer could refer your loved one’s case to the prosecutor for filing if they violate non-wardship probation. When this happens, the minor is subjected to a lengthy and stressful court process that could result in grave consequences.
Example: A 14-year-old Susan is accused of robbery, together with her older friends. After the arrest of Susan and her friends, the probation department chooses to place Susan on non-wardship probation instead of pursuing charges against her. However, she is ordered not to communicate with any of her associates or visit the places she previously visited as part of her probation conditions. However, Susan violates her probation conditions when her older associates are released on bail pending criminal trial. The probation department resolves to pursue Susan’s case through the juvenile justice system.
The nature of probation violations determines the kind of action the probation department takes. If the violation is minor, the department can issue a warning and allow the minor to continue probation. However, if the violation is grave or the minor fails to abide by all their probation conditions, the probation department can refer the case to a juvenile court.
Consequences of Violating Deferred Entry of Judgement
Deferred entry of judgment is a type of probation whereby the court defers judgment on a minor to allow them to undergo treatment and rehabilitation, then proceed with the case once the treatment or rehabilitation is over. In this kind of probation, a juvenile offender does not complete the legal processes within the juvenile justice system. The judge suspends the determination of their case until it is necessary to continue. If the minor completes the treatment or rehabilitation program as ordered, the judge will dismiss all their charges. This means the judge will not pursue the legal matter further.
However, suppose the juvenile violates their probation by failing to enroll, complete, or abide by the conditions of the treatment or rehabilitation program. In that case, the judge will continue their case from where they left off.
This probation works very well in cases where there is hope to rehabilitate a minor. For example, if a child engages in a crime for the first time or commits a lenient offense, the judge could opt for rehabilitation and treatment instead of taking them through a lengthy court process.
However, the juvenile must first admit wrongdoing to qualify for this probation. Although juvenile offenders do not plead guilty in the juvenile justice system, they must at least admit to the allegations presented in court by the prosecutor in the filed petition. Then, the judge, with the assistance of the prosecutor and the probation department, will consider the individual needs of the juvenile. For example, suppose the juvenile’s criminal actions are due to a drug or alcohol problem. In that case, the judge will require them to enter and complete a treatment and rehabilitation program before the court decides on their case.
Some juveniles are required to enter an anger management program or complete a counseling program, depending on the underlying issue. If the juvenile completes the program, their probation will be complete, and the judge can continue or discontinue their case, depending on their performance. In most cases, successful completion of this program is marked by a favorable report from the probation department. An officer is mandated to ensure that the minor follows through with the court requirements. They must provide a report after probation, from which the judge will determine the next course of action.
Typically, this probation lasts for up to six months. If the minor complies with the terms of their probation, the judge will dismiss the petition against them. Additionally, the judge can seal their juvenile records to ensure they do not appear during a background check. This will protect the minor from all disabilities and the negative impacts of having a criminal record.
Deferred entry of judgment works very well when juvenile offenders understand its benefits and commit to making it work. However, this does not always happen; sometimes, juveniles violate their probation. Your loved one can violate this probation in many ways, including the following:
- Failing to register in the court-ordered treatment or rehabilitation program
- Registering but failing to commit to the program
- Registering and committing to the program but failing to complete the required term
The consequences of these violations can be severe or lenient, depending on the type of violation and the underlying criminal charges. The judge could revoke the probation if the probation department reports that your loved one did not register for or commit to the treatment or rehabilitation program. When this happens, the juvenile’s case will continue from where it was left off. Since the juvenile will have admitted to criminal acts, the judge will continue the case by considering the appropriate dispositions for the juvenile’s behavior. The judge will not be lenient when determining the proper disposition, which could result in detention.
Violating probation will also cause the judge to change their mind about dismissing the juvenile’s case. This means that you and your loved one must go through the lengthy, complex, and tedious legal process as you await the final judgment on your child’s case.
If the judge finds out or suspects that the probation violation was partly or entirely your fault as a parent or guardian, they could declare your loved one a ward of the court. This means you will lose your responsibility towards your child to the court. The court will make critical decisions regarding your child, including where they will live and school. Alternatively, the judge can send your child to formal probation once they violate an informal probation or the conditions for deferred entry of judgment.
Consequences of Violating Formal Probation
In the juvenile justice system, the court imposes formal probation after reviewing the evidence against the minor and considering the minor’s defense. In most cases, judges use formal probation as a disposition after hearing and concluding the petition against a juvenile offender. Probation is one of the oldest rehabilitation or correction programs courts use for juvenile and adult offenders. It includes serving a sentence outside confinement but under strict probation conditions. The conditions minors on formal probation receive are usually geared toward behavior and attitude change rather than punishing their behavior.
After hearing a juvenile’s case, the court judge must decide what to do with the minor. If the allegations are unsubstantiated or the minor fights the petition successfully, the judge will dismiss the case and send the minor to their parents. However, the judge decides their proper disposition if there is compelling evidence that the minor engaged in a crime. Judges use formal probation to allow minors to serve their time at home, with their parents, and while continuing schooling. However, the judge, or probation department, sets probation conditions to which the minor must adhere during this probation.
For example, the court could order the juvenile to continue schooling, undergo counseling and therapy, submit to random alcohol or drug tests, or engage in any criminal activity during probation. Some of these conditions are too strict for the minor to follow through. For example, a juvenile may struggle to stay away from their friends or favorite places. If they are fighting an addiction, they could relapse one or two times during their probation. These constitute probation violations, which are considered grave offenses.
When serving formal probation from home, a juvenile cannot leave except when attending school or a particular event. If their probation conditions are too strict to follow, they will likely face the following consequences:
- The judge could continue probation but add more strict probation conditions to the minor
- The judge could immediately remove the juvenile from their home and confinement to a probation camp, juvenile hall, or a facility under the Division of Juvenile Justice.
Strict probation conditions will worsen the juvenile’s situation. Sending the juvenile to a detention facility is also the most extreme disposition for any juvenile offender. Generally, the consequences of probation violation are grave, especially for a minor. However, you can help your loved one by ensuring they have proper legal representation throughout all court processes. In addition to representing your child’s interests in court, an attorney will ensure that the court’s final decision is favorable for your loved one.
How Juvenile Probation Violation Hearings Are Conducted
Before sending a minor to probation, the probation department must prepare the minor well with information to ensure they understand what probation means and entails. The minor is given the probation conditions, which an officer explains to ensure they know their meaning. The probation officer also conducts a home visit to ensure that it will be possible for the minor to abide by all probation conditions. For example, the minor’s parents and immediate family must be willing and ready to support the minor in achieving effective behavior and attitude change and meeting the probation goals.
Parents must inform the probation officer immediately when a probation violation occurs. The officer can take immediate action based on the nature of the violation and the underlying criminal charge. For example, if the violation is minor, the probation officer can warn the minor against further violations. However, they must inform the prosecutor or judge about major violations for further action.
If the violation occurs on informal probation, the probation officer must inform the prosecutor to ensure they file a petition against the minor in court. The judge must be notified immediately if the violation occurs on a deferred judgment or formal probation entry.
The judge will hold a hearing to determine the circumstances and consequences of the violation. The minor is allowed to defend their action or inactions during this hearing. Although the prosecutor bears the burden of proof in cases like these, the juvenile can fight the prosecutor’s evidence and statement to trigger a positive reaction from the judge. They can also present mitigating factors through their attorney to push for a more lenient outcome.
After the hearing, the probation department will make a report recommending the right course of action the court must take against the minor. The department must consider the nature of the underlying criminal charges, the violation, and the minor’s needs. If the officer feels the minor will benefit more from detention than probation, they recommend it to the court. However, if they think that detention is too harsh for the minor, they could suggest that the court give the minor another chance at probation.
If the probation department’s recommendation is unfavorable for your loved one, you can appeal the decision through your attorney.
Find a Competent Criminal Attorney Near Me
Does your loved one face charges in Van Nuys for violating their juvenile probation?
You can benefit significantly from a skilled criminal attorney’s advice, support, and assistance. An attorney will ensure you understand the gravity of the violation, its possible consequences, and your child’s options. They will also fight by your side to push for a favorable outcome.
At Leah Legal, we have extensive experience handling juvenile probation violation cases. We can help you push for a favorable outcome in your loved one’s case. We will ensure you understand what is at stake and utilize our best defense strategies to protect your child’s best interests. Call us at 818-484-1100 for more information about your case and our services.
Testimonies are critical for uncovering the truth and ensuring justice is delivered. When a victim or witness does not want to testify, it interrupts the court process, and serious consequences follow. When you receive a subpoena asking you to testify and refuse to do so without a proper legal justification, this failure usually amounts to contempt of court. Contempt of court is deemed a misdemeanor offense. It may attract severe penalties as the courts view compliance with subpoenas as a legal duty.
The law recognizes that certain situations, like being emotionally distressed or scared, might make it difficult for someone to testify. However, these issues do not automatically exempt you from your duty to appear in court.
So, what happens if you, as the victim or eyewitness, choose not to testify? Continue reading to learn more.
Must Victims and Witnesses Testify?
Witnesses and victims must testify if subpoenaed. Most importantly, if they fail to testify, there will be consequences. Failure to testify can result in a charge of contempt of court.
While some victims may have fears concerning trauma or safety, they must comply unless there is a valid legal reason to refuse. If the victim refuses to testify without justification, they could face contempt charges, which can result in fines or jail time until they testify or the court disposes of the issue.
Witnesses are also legally bound to testify once subpoenaed. You can be held in contempt and penalized if you refuse to testify. Victims and witnesses may invoke the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. It offers important protections, prohibiting the government from forcing people to testify and incriminate themselves. There are also legal privileges that could relieve a witness from the obligation to testify, such as:
- Attorney-client privilege
- Spousal privilege
- Medical confidentiality
If you refuse to testify because you are worried about your safety, then the courts may offer solutions, including retaining anonymity or holding closed sessions.
What the Prosecution Must Prove in a Contempt of Court Case
When charged with contempt of court, the court often considers certain acts that undermine its authority or disrupt the legal process. You can be charged with contempt for any action that obstructs the court’s ability to operate. These include:
- Misbehaving, showing contempt, or insolent behavior — These refer to any conduct that disrespects the dignity or authority of the court. You can face contempt charges for verbal abuse, inappropriate dressing that aims to disrupt proceedings, or any behavior that disrupts court business.
- Interrupting court proceedings — If you create a disturbance, make noise in the court, or interfere with court proceedings physically, you may be charged with contempt of court. This includes disturbances outside the courtroom but in places immediately adjacent to the courtroom, like hallways or the lobby, during the proceeding.
- Willful disobedience of a lawful court order — This is one of the most relevant examples, particularly in the context of a refusal to testify. You could be held in contempt if the court has ordered you to testify, show up for a hearing, or take another action and you intentionally disobey that order. Disobedience also includes failing to show up in court when subpoenaed.
- Unlawfully refusing to be sworn in or answer questions — If you are an important witness and refuse to take an oath or answer a question directly related to the case, the court could find you guilty of contempt. However, you can refuse to swear in or answer a question for a valid legal reason. One example of a good legal reason is the Constitution’s Fifth Amendment.
- Publishing false or misleading reports — If you do so, you may be held in contempt of court. When you hinder judicial proceedings, you hurt the integrity of the judicial process and undermine the fair administration of justice.
To prove you are guilty of contempt, prosecutors have to prove the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
- You knew you disobeyed court orders or the rules against proper court behavior — This means you understood what the court required from you, whether to appear in court, testify, or respect the court’s dignity.
- You acted willfully or purposely — If you violate any law, the state must show that you did so with willful intent to disobey. A slight misstep or oversight with no intent to disobey the court would probably not result in contempt unless the negligence is extreme.
- In cases like the publication of false reports, a connection must be established between the act and the ability of the court to proceed. The prosecution will show how your actions may have harmed the court’s authority or interfered with the judicial process.
Penalties for Contempt of Court
Contempt of court can have serious consequences, depending on whether it is a civil or criminal contempt of court.
You can face civil contempt penalties if you refuse to testify or comply with a court order. Civil contempt is used to enforce compliance. The court can fine you or put you in jail until you follow its order. These penalties are designed not to penalize you but to force you to follow the court order.
On the other hand, criminal contempt refers to punitive acts for willfully disobeying the court or disrespecting it. If the court finds that you have committed criminal contempt, then you could face:
- Fines of up to $1,000 for each act
- A jail sentence of up to five days for each act
Unlike civil contempt, criminal contempt penalties do not persuade you to stop your actions. They serve as punishment. You serve the sentence irrespective of whether you comply.
If you are found in contempt of court, the outcomes may not just incur fines or face jail time. The conviction will affect other areas of your life.
In civil contempt cases, the courts may order you to pay the other party’s lawyer’s fees. The court may require you to pay the other party’s attorney fees. The courts often see these fees as an additional way to compel compliance with the orders and other penalties.
A contempt charge can make you lose credibility if you are a witness or a party in a criminal case. Juries might consider you less trustworthy. Moreover, judges might scrutinize your actions more closely or show less leniency in the future. If you lose your credibility, it can hurt you in this case and future cases.
If you are on trial, the opposing counsel may use your contempt charge to intensify cross-examination and challenge your motives and integrity to undermine your testimony. Moreover, being in contempt can influence a judge’s decision, especially in a criminal case and sentencing.
You can also face the consequences of contempt outside the courtroom, especially if your conviction is public. Your reputation, career, or relationships could suffer. Furthermore, the financial and emotional burden of dealing with the consequences of contempt can be overwhelming, making the situation even more challenging.
Defenses to Contempt of Court Charges
If you are facing contempt of court charges, you have several defenses you can use to fight the charges. These defenses help establish that your actions were justified or protected under the law. Here are some of the defenses to consider:
Non-Willful Violation
You can argue that you could not comply with a court order because of circumstances beyond your control or an honest misunderstanding of what the order meant. This defense relies on presenting evidence to demonstrate your inability to comply.
For example, if a sickness or injury prevented you from attending court, you can present medical records to support your claim. Proving your unintentional non-compliance will challenge the prosecution’s assertion that you willfully defied the court.
Irrelevant Line of Inquiry
Another defense involves telling the court you declined to answer specific questions during your testimony because they were irrelevant. Courts generally require testimony to be directly related to the issues in the case. If the information sought is irrelevant or not linked to the case, you can argue your refusal to answer was justifiable. This defense often requires extensive legal analysis as it proves that the questions must not affect the case significantly.
When you focus on the rules of evidence and demonstrate the lack of relevance, you can show how the questions asked were immaterial and strengthen your reasons for refusing.
Protected by Legal Privilege
Legal privileges keep confidential communications between a lawyer and client from being disclosed in court. For instance, attorney-client privilege protects your conversations with your lawyer, while spousal privilege may prevent you from being compelled to give testimony against your spouse. Furthermore, doctor-patient confidentiality may prevent sensitive information from being divulged.
If you refuse to comply with court orders based on one of these privileges, you must show that the communication falls under its scope and has not been waived. Using this defense requires good knowledge of privilege and how it applies to you.
Fifth Amendment Protection
The U.S. Fifth Amendment protects against self-incrimination. This right allows you to refuse to answer questions or provide testimony that could expose you to criminal charges. If you believe that an answer you would give would lead to evidence that would be used against you, you have every right to remain silent.
This right applies to criminal trials, depositions, and even civil cases where your testimony might be used in a later criminal case. Invoking the Fifth Amendment does not mean you are guilty. It means you are not compelled to give evidence that prosecutors will use against you.
Importantly, this right is personal. While you can refuse to testify about your actions, you cannot invoke the Fifth to protect others.
In cases where your testimony could lead to criminal charges, the Fifth Amendment allows you to shield yourself. However, this right has limitations. If you have already been granted immunity, this does not apply, as the government can compel you to testify without the risk of prosecution for that testimony. Moreover, you cannot invoke the Fifth Amendment to avoid answering questions that would not expose you to criminal liability.
Are Victims of Sexual Assault and Domestic Violence Required to Testify?
If you have been sexually assaulted or abused by a partner, the law offers protections to help keep you safe while things are resolved legally. According to California Civil Code Section 1219, if you are asked to testify in a case where you are a victim of a crime, you cannot be jailed or placed in custody for contempt. This protection acknowledges the trauma you may have experienced and seeks to prevent the legal system from exacerbating your suffering.
If you do not testify, the court makes fining you an option. Most likely, before taking these measures, the court will require you to see a domestic violence counselor. This step helps provide you with the support and help you need to understand the legal implications of your decision. It allows you to consider all your options in a safe and supportive environment without pressure or judgment.
These protections apply specifically to testimony related to the crime you experienced. You may still face legal consequences if you do not testify on unrelated matters or fail to abide by other court orders.
California courts try to make the system less intimidating. You can ease your anxiety and discomfort by going into closed sessions, having an advocate with you, or testifying remotely. These options ensure you feel supported while still participating in the legal process.
In this situation, you should contact a counselor and an attorney who can help you understand your rights and options. They can help you with your process without compromising your well-being.
Challenges in Domestic Violence Prosecutions
In domestic violence cases or similar crimes that occur behind closed doors, your testimony as a victim or key witness can be essential. Without any bystanders, your firsthand account often provides the most direct insight into what happened. If you do not want to testify, it can challenge the prosecution’s ability to make his/her case. Nonetheless, prosecutors can rely on alternative evidence to make their case.
Most of the time, physical evidence is the foundation of these cases. This can include:
- Pictures of your injuries
- Medical records documenting treatment
- Damaged property
- Weapons involved in the incident
- Forensic evidence like DNA or fingerprints linking the accused to the offense
This tangible evidence can help paint a picture even without your direct account.
Another important resource is the testimony from a police officer. Officers at the scene can describe what they observed, including your state. Their reports will include your statement or that of the suspect. Statements you made in the heat of the moment, also known as excited utterances, may be admissible as an exception to the hearsay rule. These statements can help the court see your immediate state of mind.
Audio and video will provide what you said and did at the scene. These recordings often show how urgent or scared you felt during or after the event, which could strengthen the case.
Furthermore, your neighbor, family member, and friend’s testimony could all contribute to the narrative. Even if they did not witness the crime in question, their evidence of prior incidents, injuries, or worrying behavior from the accused could back the claim. This assists the court in better understanding the circumstances and dynamics at play.
Moreover, statements you made to emergency services, first responders, or others, especially when made under stress or right after the event, might come under some hearsay exceptions. These statements may contain critical proof about the crime, even if you are not called to testify at trial.
Ultimately, the prosecutor must decide whether to proceed without your testimony. This is decided based on how likely they are to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt. While your testimony can be instrumental, the prosecutor can make do with other evidence and witnesses.
Find a Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
Deciding not to testify as a witness or victim may seem simple, but it can carry significant legal implications. Depending on the circumstances, a court may issue a subpoena ordering you to testify, and failure to do so may result in a penalty or charge of contempt. Also, refusing to testify may hurt a case, and depending on the situation, there may be criminal prosecution or civil suit. It can be quite challenging to deal with this alone. It will be best to have an experienced lawyer working with you to understand your rights or obligations and develop strategies to help you. An attorney can investigate your case, tell you whether exemptions or privileges apply, and represent you in court. They can also ensure that you are fully aware of the consequences of your decision to refuse or comply.
If you are debating whether to testify or are facing contempt of court charges for refusing to testify, turn to Leah Legal for experienced and customized guidance and assistance. Our Van Nuys team will help you navigate this challenging process while preserving your rights and advancing your best interests. Contact us today at 818-484-1100 and schedule a consultation to ensure you are prepared for every legal step.
You can face serious repercussions under California law if you drive under the influence of drugs or alcohol. However, the stakes will be exponentially higher if your offense leads to a fatality. A DUI that causes the death of another person can attract a charge of DUI manslaughter. This severe crime attracts penalties as severe as a lifetime in custody to a few years in state prison. The laws for DUI manslaughter are strict since the state does not leave room for leniency, particularly if gross negligence is involved. The potential punishment reflects the severity of the offense. You should seek legal guidance if you face DUI manslaughter charges or are trying to figure out the complicated vehicular manslaughter laws.
Types Of DUI Manslaughter Offenses In California
The law recognizes two kinds of DUI manslaughter offenses, which include:
- Gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated, and
- Vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated
Each of the above crimes attracts its own legal repercussions and reflects various degrees of culpability. The main distinction between the two crimes lies in the degree of negligence attributed to the motorist’s actions that, in turn, influence the sentencing. It is important for you to know whether your case involves ordinary or gross negligence. This is crucial because it directly impacts the possible period of incarceration and the additional repercussions. The repercussions can be long-term records, probation, and fines. The courts deal harshly with DUI manslaughter; thus, you should not take your charges lightly.
Gross Vehicular Manslaughter While Intoxicated
The offense of gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated is outlined under Penal Code Section 191.5(a). If the prosecutor accuses you of violating this law, the prosecutor should prove these elements:
- You drove a car while under the influence of alcohol or drugs.
- You committed another offense while driving. The offense can be an infraction violation of traffic law, a misdemeanor, or an otherwise unlawful act, which can cause death.
- You committed the offense of gross negligence.
- Another person died because of your gross negligence.
The law requires that the prosecutor prove the above elements beyond a reasonable doubt. Most prosecutors attempt to pursue the more severe crimes until it becomes evident that you only acted in ordinary negligence. The prosecutor can do this with the anticipation that you will agree to a plea bargain to avoid the repercussions of the more serious manslaughter offense.
You will face the following penalties if you are guilty of gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated:
- A fine that does not exceed $10,000
- A jail term of four years, six years, or ten years in a state prison
- Felony or formal probation
However, your state prison sentence can be enhanced to 15 years to life imprisonment if you have a past conviction for any of the following crimes:
- Gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated under Penal Code 191.5(a)
- Vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated under Penal Code 191.5(c)
- Gross vehicular manslaughter under Penal Code 192(c)
- Vehicular manslaughter while operating a boat under Penal Code 192.5(a) or (b)
- Driving while intoxicated with drugs or alcohol under Vehicle Code 23152
- DUI causing injury under Vehicle Code 23153
Gross Negligence
During your conviction, gross negligence can be a significant determinant of the judge’s punishment. Under the California Criminal Jury Instructions (CALCRM), gross negligence is defined in different ways. Gross negligence goes beyond mistake in judgment, ordinary carelessness, or inattention. You can act with gross negligence when:
- You act in a reckless way, which poses a danger of death or significant bodily harm
- You should have been aware that acting the way you did would pose danger
You can be considered to have acted with gross negligence if you acted differently from how a reasonable individual would act under the same circumstances. You will face gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated charges if gross negligence is evident. In this case, you will face a jail term that does not exceed ten years in a state prison or life imprisonment if you have a previous conviction record. On the other hand, you will face vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated if gross negligence does not exist. In this case, you will face a jail term that does not exceed four years in a state prison.
Ordinary Negligence
Ordinary negligence means not paying attention, a lapse in judgment, or carelessness. It also means that the driver failed to use reasonable care to prevent harm to someone else, just like a reasonable person would do in the same situation. For example, a motorist can lose concentration on the road by making a phone call while driving under the influence. This is sufficient to cause them to hit and kill someone else. Vehicular manslaughter, while intoxicated, charges can apply because the negligent behavior caused death.
Other Legal Repercussions
Apart from fines and a prison term, a conviction of gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated will attract a mandatory driver’s license suspension for at least three years. The California Department of Motor Vehicles enforces this law. You will face additional criminal charges and further penalties if you continue driving during suspension.
A conviction for gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated is also considered a “strike,” according to California Three Strikes Law. Under this law, your penalties for subsequent felony charges will be increased significantly. This will include a life sentence for a third strike or doubling your prison sentence for a second strike. The most heavily punished DUI crime in California is gross gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated. You must mount a strong defense because of the life-changing repercussions of a conviction.
Vehicular Manslaughter While Intoxicated
The elements of vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated are similar to those for gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated but without gross negligence. The courts normally charge this offense as a wobbler. In this case, you can face misdemeanor or felony charges. Most prosecutors tend to rely on the following factors when determining how to charge a wobbler:
- Your criminal record
- The facts of the crime you committed
Penal Code 191.5(b) covers the offense of vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated without gross negligence. This crime attracts lesser penalties than the equivalent of gross negligence. However, you will still face considerable repercussions because the law handles DUI-related fatalities with seriousness. Your penalties will be lighter but still impactful if the court convicts you of a misdemeanor. A misdemeanor charge will attract a jail term that does not exceed one year in a county jail. A one-year jail term can still disrupt your life significantly, even if it is less severe than a prison term. It will affect your personal relationships and employment. You could also face a fine that does not exceed $1,000 if you are guilty of this crime. This penalty can also include other court fees and extra financial penalties related to probation requirements.
The court will enhance your penalties if it convicts you of a felony. A felony conviction will attract a jail term of 16 months, two years, or four years in a state prison. The exact sentence you will face depends on the presence of aggravating factors like:
- Whether you have a past DUI crime conviction or
- A high blood alcohol concentration at the time
You can also face a fine that does not exceed $10,000. This amount can also include extra fees to cover victim restitution payments and court expenses.
Additional Punishment And Probation
Apart from potential fines and jail terms, a felony vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated conviction can lead to formal probation. You could be ordered to report regularly to the probation officer if the court grants you probation. You will also be required to attend DUI education programs.
A felony conviction will also attract a driver’s license suspension for a minimum period of one year. Your license will only be reinstated if you fulfill DMV requirements, including installing an ignition interlock device (IID).
Penalties under Penal Code 191.5(b) are lesser than those for gross vehicular manslaughter, but they remain life-changing.
Additional Legal and Financial Repercussions of DUI Manslaughter
Besides probation, fines, and incarceration, a DUI manslaughter conviction can attract various long-lasting legal and financial effects, which can go beyond the courtroom. They include:
Insurance and Employment Effects
You will face increased insurance premiums if the court convicts you of DUI manslaughter. Most insurance companies often deny policy renewal for people with severe traffic and DUI cases. You can be advised to pursue coverage through high-risk insurance providers. Unfortunately, this is always accompanied by higher costs.
A felony DUI manslaughter charge can negatively influence your professional life beyond the direct legal and financial penalties. Most prospective employers carry out background checks on prospective employees. A felony conviction can deny you a job opportunity, especially in fields requiring a commercial driving license, professional license, or security clearance.
Restitution And Civil Liability
The court can order you to pay restitution to the family of the deceased if the judge convicts you of DUI manslaughter. Restitution is compensation for the financial losses linked to the death of the victim, like lost income and funeral expenses. Fines are different from restitution payments. Restitution payments can impose a great financial burden on you.
The family of the decedent can petition you for the wrongful death of their loved one, apart from criminal penalties. This civil action aims to pursue compensation for loss of companionship, emotional distress, and other damages not covered by restitution. Civil lawsuits often lead to significant financial judgments that legal fees and lengthy court hearings can further compound.
Ignition Interlock Devices
You will be required to install an IID in your car upon qualifying for license reinstatement. The IID prevents your vehicle from starting if you have not provided a breath sample free of alcohol. You will incur substantial money to install and maintain the IID.
Other DUI Murders In California
Fatal accidents associated with DUI can be charged as murder instead of vehicular manslaughter. According to the law, these murders are referred to as “Watson murders.”
“Watson Murder” – DUI Causing Death In California
A Watson murder is usually considered second-degree murder under California law. You will face this charge if you have a previous DUI conviction and you kill another person while driving under the influence. The court can charge DUI as murder when the prosecutor proves that:
- You have at least one previous conviction for driving while intoxicated
- You enrolled in California DUI school or were read a “Watson admonition” in connection with the previous crime
A “Watson admonition” is a warning the court gives you if you are convicted of driving while intoxicated. The warning advises you that DUI is extremely hazardous to your life and that another conviction will attract murder charges.
You will face a second-degree DUI murder charge if you are guilty of DUI murder. This offense attracts the following penalties:
- A fine that does not exceed $10,000
- A jail term of 15 years to life in a state prison
- A “strike” on your record under California’s “Three Strikes” law
A strike will attract double the sentence if you commit a subsequent crime. You will face a mandatory sentence of 25 years to life if you have two or more strikes and commit another strike felony.
You will face additional and consecutive jail terms if there are other survivors of the accident. In this case, the judge will impose on you a jail term of three to six years for each victim who sustained great bodily injury.
Defenses Against DUI Manslaughter Charges
You should explore viable defense strategies if the prosecutor accuses you of DUI manslaughter. This will make a big difference in the outcome of your case. The law permits you to fight these charges on several grounds, particularly when proving causation, negligence, and intoxication. The following are some of the defense strategies you can employ:
Fighting Intoxication Evidence
Your legal team can evaluate the validity of the breathalyzer test results or the outcome of the blood test. The tests are always subject to strict regulatory standards. Any mistake in the procedure used, like inappropriate handling or calibration, can cast doubt on the accuracy of the results. If you are convicted because of a faulty DUI test outcome, your legal team can allege that the test did not accurately reflect your blood alcohol concentration during the accident.
Your defense attorney can also give an alternative argument for apparent intoxication. Sometimes, signs linked with intoxication, like unsteady movement or slurred speech, can be caused by factors like shock and fatigue. Your attorney can weaken the prosecutor’s case if he/she proves that your action was consistent with something other than intoxication.
Challenging The Cause Of Death
Your defense attorney can provide evidence of an alternative cause of death. In DUI manslaughter charges, the law requires the prosecutor to establish a direct association between your actions and the death of another person. Your legal team can claim that you are not solely liable if other factors contributed to the death. Some of the factors can be:
- The actions of the other motorists or the deceased
- Bad weather, and
- Poor road conditions
Your legal team can allege external factors or mechanical failure caused the accident that led to the victim’s death. In this case, they can claim that your car had a mechanical problem like brake failure. They can also argue that another external factor, which was beyond your control, caused the accident and death. In most situations, evidence that these factors were present can positively influence the charges and possible punishment.
Challenging Negligence
If the prosecutor accuses you of gross vehicular manslaughter, he/she must provide enough evidence that your actions amounted to gross negligence. Your actions can encompass reckless disregard for human life. Your attorney can allege that you acted with ordinary negligence but did not show the degree of recklessness sufficient for a gross negligence conviction. The court can reduce your offense to a lesser offense that attracts lesser penalties if your attorney convinces the judge.
The law acknowledges that emergencies, at times, require fast decisions to be made. Your legal team can also claim that you caused the accident that led to the death of another person while responding to an emergency. They can allege that your actions were not negligent; it was a reasonable response to an emergency hazard like swerving to avoid hitting an animal. The judge can drop or reduce your charges if your attorney convinces them.
Find A Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
Facing DUI manslaughter charges can have far-reaching effects on your life that can include imprisonment, hefty penalties, and probation. The decedent’s family members can also file a civil lawsuit against you to seek compensation for the wrongful death of their loved one. With a DUI manslaughter conviction on your record, it can be challenging to secure employment or housing because most employers and landlords perform background checks on employees and tenants.
When you face Watson murder charges, your first action should be to contact an experienced criminal defense attorney to help you create a defense for your charges. We have experienced attorneys at Leah Legal who can evaluate your charges and help you develop the best defense strategy in Van Nuys, CA. Contact us at 818-484-1100 to speak to one of our attorneys.
Being under arrest or charged with a crime can be a confusing and overwhelming experience for anyone. However, you do not have to worry since you are presumed innocent until proven guilty. Figuring out how to have the alleged charges dropped by the prosecutor before the trial should be your priority. That is where the services of a defense attorney become vital to stand a chance of securing a favorable outcome.
It is not about being lucky, but instead, it is about knowing the right steps to take to challenge the criminal allegations you are up against. From leveraging exculpatory evidence and engaging in plea negotiations to entering a diversion program, all these are viable legal defenses your defense attorney could apply to convince the prosecutor to drop your charges.
Understanding the Process of Having Your Charges Dropped by the Prosecutor
An arrest is often unexpected, even in most cases. However, if the police recently arrested you as a suspect in a criminal case, you are not alone. Unfortunately, many circumstances could lead to your arrest, including false accusations, being at the wrong place at the right time, or perhaps you committed a mistake.
While being arrested or charged with a crime can be a stressful and daunting experience, it is possible to avoid the trial and possible sentence associated with the crime by working with an attorney to convince the prosecutor to drop the case. While every case is different, retaining the services of an attorney as soon as possible could help.
A seasoned attorney will analyze your case facts to know the best defense strategy to convince the prosecution team to drop your charges.
What it Means to Have the Alleged Criminal Charge Dropped by the Prosecutor
Although convincing the court to drop your case is challenging, it is not impossible. Having a skilled attorney in your corner is key during these challenging times to secure a favorable outcome. Convincing the prosecutor to drop your charge is one of the favorable outcomes your defense attorney can help you secure. Here is what it means to have your charges dropped in the eyes of the court:
- Once the prosecutor drops your case, you will receive your freedom if you are still in legal custody
- The prosecutor could drop your felony or misdemeanor charge after filing the case
- The alleged charge will not proceed to the trial phase of the legal justice system, meaning you will not receive penalties for the charge
- The prosecutor will no longer pursue the alleged charge once he/she drops the case
- A dropped charge does not automatically mean that your case will permanently disappear from the legal justice system
- The prosecutor could decide to reinstate your charges once he/she finds new evidence against you
- You will not be required to attend any more court date
Notably, according to Clean Slate Laws passed under Senate Bill (SB) 731, you could qualify to have your charges sealed if the prosecutor did not secure a conviction against you. Once your case is sealed, it will no longer appear when someone conducts a background check on you.
Legal Grounds for Having Your Charges Dropped
The success of having your charges dropped will depend on the evidence the prosecutor has against you. Below are viable legal grounds your attorney could use to help you convince the prosecutor to drop your charges:
Providing Exculpatory Evidence
Presenting new exculpatory evidence that contradicts or weakens the prosecutor’s case against you or proves your innocence could work in your favor to secure a dismissal of the alleged charge. The prosecutor will likely drop your case because he/she knows that your attorney will present the new evidence at trial, weakening his/her case against you.
However, if the prosecutor believes he/she has adequate evidence against you, he/she could fail to drop your case, meaning you will have to challenge the allegations you are up against at trial. Below are examples of exculpatory evidence that could work in your favor to secure a favorable outcome:
- Testimonies or DNA evidence that prove you are not at the crime scene, also commonly known as alibi defense
- Evidence to show that another person committed the alleged offense
- Your past communications or voice recordings with the alleged victim that show you are not the offender in the alleged criminal case
Your defense attorney can help you collect and present new exculpatory evidence to convince the prosecution team to drop your charges.
Engaging in Diversion Programs
In some cases, pretrial diversion programs could be available. The prosecution team will drop your charges once you complete the recommended diversion program. While the diversion programs usually differ, they will generally follow the following steps:
- You or your attorney and the prosecution team must agree to use the pretrial diversion programs to resolve the charges you are up against
- You have to enter a guilty plea to the charges you are up against
- The judge will suspend the possible sentence for your violation
- You will engage in the recommended diversion program
- Once you complete the program without any violation, the prosecutor will drop your charges
When you refuse to complete the recommended diversion program, your case will go straight to the sentencing phase of the criminal court process, and you will not have a chance to present legal defenses. However, not every defendant qualifies for a diversion program. Whether or not you will qualify for a diversion program will depend on the following factors:
- Your criminal record
- The severity of your charges
For example, most first-time offenders charged with non-violent criminal offenses will likely qualify for a diversion program. In most cases, you will qualify for a diversion program if your offense involves the following:
- Alcohol abuse
- Drug abuse or possession
- Domestic violence
- Mental health issues
Taking a Favorable Plea Deal
Another common way to have your charges dropped is by taking a plea deal. The prosecutor could agree to drop your charges when you enter a guilty plea to a different or lighter charge. Entering a plea deal negotiation is wise if you have multiple pending charges.
For example, if you have pending domestic violence (DV) and misdemeanor drug possession charges, the prosecutor could drop the DV case when you enter a guilty plea for the drug possession charge. That means your penalties for a drug possession charge conviction will be lighter than the sentence you would receive upon a conviction for a DV charge or both crimes.
The prosecutor could decide whether to accept your plea offer request or not, depending on the facts of your case. If the prosecutor denies your plea deal request, you must challenge the allegations you are up against at trial.
Presenting a Strong Legal Defense
The prosecutor can also drop the charges you are up against if your defense attorney has strong legal defenses in your favor. Examples of legal defenses that could work in your favor to convince the prosecutor to drop your case include the following:
- You have an alibi
- You were acting in self-defense
- You are a victim of mistaken identity
- You are a victim of false allegations
- There was a mistake of fact
- You were coerced to commit the offense
- The police violated your constitutional rights by conducting an unlawful search on your premises
- The police lacked probable cause to arrest you
If your attorney can prove to the prosecutor that one or more of these legal defenses could raise doubt on his/her case against you, he/she could drop your case. For example, if you are in legal custody as a suspect in an aggravated assault case, your attorney could argue that you acted in self-defense to protect yourself or a loved one from imminent harm.
Testifying Against a Different Defendant
Depending on your case circumstances, your attorney could recommend that you testify on a different defendant to convince the prosecutor to drop your case. This defense strategy could work in your favor if the charges you are up against involve several defendants.
Using this legal ground to secure a dismissal of your charges could also require you to be one of the prosecutor’s key witnesses in his/her case against the other defendant. While it could seem simple, using this legal ground to convince the prosecutor to drop the criminal charges you are up against is not as simple as it looks.
You need the services of a seasoned and aggressive defense attorney for this legal defense to work in your favor.
Arguing That Your Case Has Procedural Issues
Like any other citizen, you have constitutional rights you ought to protect. For example, here are a few of your constitutional rights:
- Right to stay free from illegal search and seizure
- Right to remain silent to avoid self-incrimination
- Right to seek the services of an attorney
- Right to have a speedy trial
- Right to be informed of your Miranda rights when the police take you into legal custody
If the arresting officers violated your constitutional rights during the arrest, the prosecutor could drop your case.
The Victim and Eyewitness of the Offense Are Problematic or Uncooperative
In most cases, the prosecutor will heavily rely on the testimonies of witnesses and victims of the offense. Fortunately, an experienced attorney understands that and will do his/her best to discredit these witnesses. If there are inconsistencies in their testimonies, their story keeps changing, or they are uncooperative with the prosecutor, the prosecutor could be willing to drop your case.
These issues are more common in DV cases. If the prosecutor detects that the victim and eyewitnesses are unreliable and likely to be discredited by the court, he/she could be willing to drop the charges you are up against rather than lose the case at trial.
Challenging the Sufficiency of the Prosecutors Evidence
Keen examination and analysis of the prosecutor’s evidence against you is critical. A thorough analysis of your case could help your defense attorney unearth vital evidence that could weaken the prosecutor’s case against you.
By pointing out the weaknesses and flaws in the prosecutor’s case against you, your attorney can convince him/her to drop your case. Otherwise, even if the prosecutor decides to continue with the charge, the court will not convict you if he/she cannot prove the allegations you are up against are true beyond a reasonable doubt for a conviction at trial.
Tips That Can Increase Your Odds of Having Your Case Dropped by the Prosecutor
Below are helpful tips that can increase your odds of having your case dropped by the prosecutor to avoid the detrimental consequences of a conviction:
Cooperate With the Prosecutor
Even if you believe the allegations you are up against are true, cooperating with the law enforcement officers and the prosecutor is important. Agreeing to cooperate as a witness or provide the prosecutor with information that can help in the ongoing investigations in a criminal case could result in a lenient charge.
Generally, the prosecutor could agree to drop your charges in exchange for cooperation, mainly if your case involves more significant criminal activity or multiple parties. However, you should consult with your attorney before you disclose any information to the prosecutor to avoid disclosing any incriminating information that could reduce your odds of securing a favorable outcome.
Demonstrate You are a Person of Commendable Character
The prosecutor could be more inclined to drop the charges you are up against if your attorney can prove you are a person of commendable character. Letters from religious leaders, employers, family members, or community members could act as evidence to prove you are a person of excellent and commendable character.
Proving that you have strong ties to the community and are less likely to re-offend could convince the prosecutor that continuing the case would not serve justice and drop it.
Hiring a Skilled Defense Attorney
The services of an attorney are critical if you want to increase your odds of having your charges dropped by the prosecutor. A skilled and seasoned attorney can aid you in navigating the complexities of the legal justice system and engage in well-planned negotiations with the prosecutor to secure a favorable outcome.
For example, when you have pending sexual assault charges, your attorney can keenly evaluate the prosecutor’s case against you to unearth weaknesses in his/her case and prepare appropriate legal defenses.
Whether your attorney decides to file pretrial motions, challenge the allegations, or negotiate a favorable plea deal, having a reliable and skilled defense attorney in your corner increases your chances of having your case dropped by the prosecutor.
How Dropped Charge Differs from Case Dismissal
While both end with the prosecution going away during the pretrial stage of the legal justice system, having your case dropped and dismissed has different meanings in the eyes of the law. If you have pending criminal charges, with the legal assistance of your attorney, you can convince the prosecutor to drop the case.
As mentioned above, a charge dropped by the prosecutor could be reinstated or refiled. That could be possible if the arresting officers have discovered new incriminating evidence. When that happens, your criminal case will begin all over again.
However, if you want to secure a dismissal of the case, the judge must decide whether that is possible. Depending on the facts of your case, the court could dismiss your case with or without prejudice. A criminal charge dismissed without prejudice could be refiled later. However, those dismissed with prejudice cannot be refiled when they are based on an identical set of facts and claims.
What Could Make the Prosecutor Drop My Charges?
Prosecutors are less likely to drop criminal charges, but they could be convinced to do so if your attorney shows them that:
- They do not have enough evidence to secure a conviction against you
- Pursuing the charges or going through the court process is a waste of resources and time
- You are likely to receive a not guilty verdict at trial
- You are willing to secure a plea bargain offer to end the case quickly and free up the resources of the D.A’s office
- The charges are minor, and you do not have a criminal record, which makes you an excellent candidate for a case resolution outside of the court system
The key to securing a favorable outcome when charged with any criminal offense is hiring a skilled and seasoned defense attorney to act as your legal voice during the prosecution process. With the legal assistance of an experienced attorney, your case does not have to reach the trial phase of the court process. Your attorney will scrutinize your case to know the best defenses to convince the prosecutor to drop your charges.
Find a Defense Attorney Near Me
Although the prosecutor can refile your charges later when new substantial evidence is discovered, working with your attorney to convince him/her to drop your charges is a good idea. Our attorneys at Leah Legal understand the legal complexities of the court system, particularly the trial. If you are under arrest or charged with any criminal offense, we can work to help you convince the prosecutor to drop your case.
Call us at 818-484-1100 to schedule your first consultation with us wherever you are in Van Nuys.
A hit-and-run in California occurs when you are involved in an accident while driving, and you flee the scene without waiting for the police, offering assistance to the injured persons, or leaving your contact details. The law requires drivers to stop and wait for the police if they are involved in an accident, even if they did not cause it. Leaving an accident scene without being cleared by the police or leaving your contact details can result in criminal charges.
The statute of limitations for hit-and-run accidents allows the police to gather evidence and prosecute anyone guilty of hit-and-run within a particular period. It also allows the injured to file a civil lawsuit against responsible parties to recover compensation. The statute of limitations for criminal cases ranges from one to six years, depending on whether there was property damage, severe injury, or death.
Understanding statutes of limitations is critical for proper planning. You can talk to a skilled criminal defense attorney if you face hit-and-run charges to know what to expect within the timelines provided under the law.
Hit-and-Run Charges and Statutes of Limitations
A hit-and-run occurs when a driver in an accident leaves the scene without being cleared by the police, offering assistance, or leaving their contact information. Anyone can face hit-and-run charges, even if they did not cause the accident. Stopping to help or talk to the police helps ensure that the injured persons are safe and helps the police with the accident investigation. When you flee, it becomes difficult for the police to know what happened. The police also assume you are hiding something, like another crime like DUI or the cause of the accident.
Prosecutors in California charge hit-and-run as a misdemeanor or felony, depending on the case details. You will face a misdemeanor charge if the accident you fled from only resulted in property damage. You will likely receive six months in jail and a $1000 court fine for fleeing the accident scene, even if you were not responsible for the accident. A hit-and-run conviction for a misdemeanor can also result in probation and earn you two points on your driving record, which can result in other penalties by the DMV.
A felony charge after a hit-and-run accident will occur if the accident results in an injury or death. Remember that the charge occurs when you flee the scene without assisting the injured or sharing your details, even if you did not cause the accident. A conviction for a felony is punishable by a maximum of four years in prison and a fine of up to $10,000. The judge can also order you to pay restitution to the accident victim.
The legal requirement for anyone involved in an accident in California is to stop, offer assistance, call the police, and share information with others in the accident. A conviction for hit-and-run results in life-changing consequences, including harsh penalties and a damaging criminal record that affects various aspects of your life even after completing your sentence. However, you can fight the charges to avoid a conviction.
Preparing for defense is critical once you understand how much you will likely lose after a conviction for hit-and-run. Although the police can arrest and charge you for the crime immediately after fleeing the scene, the prosecutor has between one and six years to file a criminal case against you.
Typically, they have one year to file a hit-and-run case if the accident did not result in serious injury. However, if the accident resulted in a minor injury, the statutes of limitations allow prosecutors up to three years to prepare and file a case against a defendant. They have up to six years to file a case against you if the accident resulted in a grave injury or death. Remember that this applies regardless of your involvement in the accident.
The prosecutor can file charges against you before the statute of limitations expires. This means you should prepare well for the complex legal processes and defense. Once the legal process starts, you can talk to a skilled criminal defense attorney to understand what to expect and how to fight your charges. An attorney will also ensure you know your rights and options for a smooth process and a favorable outcome in your case.
The Meaning of Statutes of Limitations
The statute of limitations is the law that provides timelines within which a prosecutor must file a criminal case or a plaintiff must bring a civil suit against a negligent party. This timeline is different for different cases in California. The timeline allows the prosecutor to prepare a case before filing it. They must have substantial evidence to support the allegations and obtain a conviction during the trial. The timeline also allows plaintiffs to prepare and file their cases against negligent individuals to receive compensation for their damages.
Although a hit-and-run is a criminal matter, statute limitations provide timelines for the prosecutor to bring a case against a person suspected of fleeing an accident scene. Although you can be arrested and charged within hours of fleeing from an accident scene, the timeline allows the prosecutor enough time to gather evidence to ensure they have a solid case against you. The statute of limitations also considers other pending matters the prosecutor must complete before handling your case and the likelihood that you were not arrested after fleeing the accident scene.
If you are involved in an accident that results in property damage, the prosecutor has up to one year to gather evidence, interview eyewitnesses, and file your case in court. If you fled the scene without leaving your contact details, the prosecutor must find you, investigate the case, and gather evidence before filing the matter with a criminal court. If the one-year deadline elapses before this is done, the prosecutor loses the right to file the case.
Statutes of limitation protect alleged offenders from prosecution or civil suits regarding matters that happened long ago. This eliminates the need for defendants to defend themselves against cases where evidence was lost or destroyed and witnesses were unavailable. Sometimes, memories fade away, and what is left is insufficient to obtain a conviction or compel for a case dismissal. Thus, this law promotes fairness in the criminal justice system by promptly handling all criminal or civil cases. They also benefit plaintiffs and victims of criminal acts since justice is served in good time.
The statute of limitations protects defendants from stale claims. It sets the timeline for legal action against anyone believed to have committed a crime. This way, a defendant will not face criminal charges or civil lawsuits in a matter that happened so many years ago. After some time, people forget the facts of a case. Criminals change to become responsible and law-abiding citizens. Evidence is lost or degraded. It becomes impossible to obtain a favorable result when a case takes long to conclude.
These deadlines also encourage prompt action in legal matters. Without deadlines, judges, prosecutors, criminal defense attorneys, the police, and anyone else involved in a case will relax. They will not see the need to complete cases promptly. The timeline encourages plaintiffs and victims of crime to pursue cases promptly. The statute of limitations eliminates any unnecessary delays preventing the legal system from functioning as it should.
It also reduces litigation costs considerably. When cases drag on for years, plaintiffs and defendants pay more to retain legal counsel and continue the court processes. The statute of limitations puts a deadline to ensure that cases are filed and concluded within a particular time. This reduces the time you need to pay legal fees and other costs associated with criminal or civil cases.
What To Do Within The Given Timeline
In criminal cases, the prosecutor bears the burden of proof. They must demonstrate a case beyond a reasonable doubt for the court to deliver a guilty verdict. To meet this burden, prosecutors must work hard to obtain irrefutable evidence. They must also follow the required filing guidelines to avoid losing the case. It takes some time for a prosecutor to assemble a case, complete with evidence, for filing. Although they can file cases within a day or two of the crime, they sometimes must prepare a solid case against the defendant.
You must take advantage of this time to prepare your defense well. In most cases, prosecutors will need time to prepare for a trial. That is why the law pushes for a pretrial release before a trial. This is when you must prepare well for your defense to avoid the severe consequences of a hit-and-run. Remember that if you fled the accident scene, there is a possibility that the judge will find you guilty of hit-and-run. Since it is difficult to predict the outcome of a criminal case, you must plan your defense well.
You can hire an attorney for advice and guidance through the complex legal process, as well as for defense. Defense attorneys are legal experts in criminal cases. They understand the statute of limitation and can help you take advantage of it to obtain a favorable result in your case. They will also help you navigate the complex processes as you prepare for the trial.
You should also gather evidence to fight your charges during the trial. Since knowing exactly when the prosecutor will file your case is difficult, you must act immediately after learning about the charges against you. You can collect evidence from the accident scene or prepare testimony to counter the prosecutor’s claims. You can also interview eyewitnesses and accident experts to testify on your behalf. Doing this as early as possible ensures you are well-prepared for the trial once it starts.
The period before the prosecutor files your case is also the time to determine the kind of evidence the prosecutor has against you. This helps you prepare well for your defense. Although the prosecutor bears the burden of proof in criminal cases, you can provide more proof to counter their allegations and gain the upper hand. Your attorney will use the discovery process to determine the strength of evidence against you. Then, they will build your defense based on their findings.
This can also be an excellent time to negotiate for a reasonable resolution with the prosecutor. Before filing your case, the prosecutor can be open to a plea bargain, whereby you plead guilty to another crime to avoid facing trial for hit-and-run. Plea deals benefit the prosecution and defense teams. The prosecutor must not continue the case once you accept a plea deal. It also allows you to obtain a more reasonable outcome in your case. Your attorney will consider the evidence against you and possible penalties if you are convicted when advising you to take or reject a plea deal.
The type of Defense To Build Within the Given Timeline
Being charged with hit-and-run does not automatically make you guilty. Criminal trials are fairly conducted to allow defendants to fight their charges or defend their actions for a reasonable outcome. Although the prosecutor bears the burden of proof, you can also table evidence and present your defense in court. You should take advantage of the period before the prosecutor files your case to prepare your defense. You can do this with the assistance of your criminal attorney. Here are some of the strategies your attorney can use to obtain a favorable result:
You Lack Knowledge About the Accident
It is possible to be involved in an accident and not realize it immediately. If this happened in your case, you can argue that you did not know you were involved in the accident in the first place. You could have hit something or someone and not realized it. Or, you could have assumed that another motorist was responsible for the accident. If your experienced attorney convinces the court of your lack of knowledge, it will dismiss your charges.
There Was No Accident
If you failed to stop because of no injury or property damage, you can argue that an accident did not occur. Remember that hit-and-run charges apply in cases where you flee from an accident scene without offering or calling for help. If there was no accident in the first place, the court will not find you guilty.
You Are Mistakenly Accused
In most cases, hit-and-run perpetrators are arrested hours, days, or months after an accident. The police rely on eyewitness accounts or surveillance footage to trace a driver who commits a hit-and-run. This can take a very long time and still not yield accurate results.
If an eyewitness describes your vehicle or physical appearance, you can use this defense strategy if you are not the perpetrator. Someone else with a similar car as you or with the same physical appearance as you could be the perpetrator. Your attorney can provide evidence, like your alibi, to counter the allegations.
Statute of Limitations for Civil Hit-and-Run Cases
People who have incurred damages in a hit-and-run accident can file civil suits against negligent parties to obtain compensation for their losses. Civil cases are conducted differently from criminal cases in California. Thus, their statute of limitations will be different.
A plaintiff who has suffered damages in a hit-and-run accident has two years from the accident date to bring a civil suit against a negligent party. The negligent party can be anyone involved in the accident, particularly the one who fled from the accident scene to avoid liability.
Within two years, plaintiffs must determine and find the responsible party, prepare a lawsuit, and file it in a civil court. The plaintiff must have evidence to support their claim and all the damages they include in that claim.
Understanding the statute of limitations for civil claims benefits you (the defendant) in many ways. It helps you fight the case if the plaintiff files it after the expiration of the statute of limitations. Remember that courts cannot accept or hear cases filed after two years.
This knowledge also allows you to negotiate an out-of-court settlement before the plaintiff files the case. Settling the matter out of court saves you time and money and will enable you to negotiate a more reasonable settlement. Working with a reliable attorney with your best interest in mind will likely result in a favorable outcome.
Find a Competent Criminal Attorney Near Me
Do you or your loved one face hit-and-run charges in Van Nuys?
A hit-and-run is a grave crime whose penalties include a lengthy prison sentence and a hefty court fine. It also results in a grave criminal record that can affect your professional and social lives for years. Working on your defense is advisable to counter the allegations and push for a favorable result. You can avoid a conviction and its severe consequences if you work well on your defense.
At Leah Legal, we can help you understand your charges and options and develop your defense. We can also explain the statute of limitations and how it can impact your case. We can take advantage of the given timelines to achieve a favorable result. Call us at 818-484-1100 to learn more about your case and our services.
Theft laws in California classify crimes depending on the monetary value of stolen property and the surrounding circumstances. These laws mainly categorize theft into petty and grand theft, with specific penalties and legal definitions. Knowing these differences is helpful for anyone facing theft charges as it affects the severity of the charges. It can also help you learn the possible outcomes of the court procedures and how to defend yourself against the charges.
Petty Theft Under California Laws
Petty theft is defined under California law as stealing property worth $950 or less. This crime is defined under Penal Code 484 and usually involves the theft of items of low financial worth. Petty theft is considered a misdemeanor, and its penalties are less serious than more severe theft crimes.
Examples of Acts That are Considered Petty Theft
Examples of petty theft include:
- Stealing products from a business where the total value is less than $950.
- Taking someone else’s belongings—such as phones, wallets, or clothes—without their consent, as long as the value is under $950.
- Dining or staying at a hotel and walking away without settling the bill provided the amount owed is no more than $950.
Grand Theft Under California Law
Grand theft has a broad definition, which means various situations can be covered by California’s grand theft laws (Penal Code Section 487).
According to Penal Code 487, grand theft happens when the total cost of the stolen goods is more than $950. This kind of theft may also be prosecuted regardless of the item’s value, particularly if the stolen commodities are firearms or vehicles. Depending on the case’s specifics and the defendant’s prior criminal record, grand theft might be treated as a felony or misdemeanor.
Common Types of Grand Theft
The following types can illustrate grand theft:
Grand Theft By Larceny
To secure a conviction, a prosecutor must demonstrate to a jury that all components of the crime are present. The crime of Grand Theft By Larceny consists of four key elements:
- You took possession of property valued at $950 or more that belongs to someone else.
- You did not have permission to take that property.
- You moved the property and retained it for a specific duration.
At the time of taking the property, you intended to either:
- Deprive the actual owner from enjoying it
- Keep it permanently
If someone steals items valued at $950 or more, it can be considered grand theft by larceny. This law applies even if the items were only moved a short distance and held for a brief time.
Grand Theft Through False Pretense
Grand theft by false pretense (Penal Code 532) consists of three key components:
- You intentionally deceived someone with a false statement.
- This deception was aimed at convincing the person to allow you to take their property worth $950 or more.
- The individual believed your deception and permitted you to take their property.
In simpler terms, the prosecutor must demonstrate that you intended to mislead someone into giving you their property and that the victim genuinely believed your false claim.
Hearsay and unreliable testimonies often arise in these cases. California law acknowledges that individuals may enter into agreements, later regret their decision, and then accuse the other party of fraud.
Due to this, prosecutors must meet specific evidence standards. They need to provide:
- A false document or “false token” (which can include anything like a forged check or contract)
- Witnesses to support the claim of “false pretense.”
Grand Theft By Trick
Grand theft by trick consists of five key elements:
- You knowingly and intentionally acquired property worth $950 or more that belongs to someone else.
- You used deception or fraud to obtain it.
- The owner did not intend to give you ownership of the property.
- You retained the property for a specific period, even if it was short.
At the time of taking the property, you intended to either:
- Keep it permanently
- Keep it long enough to significantly deprive the rightful owner of its enjoyment or value.
Grand theft by trick is quite similar to grand theft by false pretense. The key distinction is that in grand theft by false pretense, the property owner permits the defendant to take possession and ownership of it.
In contrast, with grand theft by trick, the defendant gains possession of the property but plans to keep it unlawfully. For example, Matt needs to fix his car. His friend Sam offers to drive it to the repair shop, and Matt agrees to let him take it. However, instead of going to the shop, Sam keeps the car and hides it in a garage in a nearby town.
Since Sam misled Matt about his intentions to gain permission to take the vehicle and keep it for a while, this situation could be classified as grand theft by trick.
Grand Theft Through Embezzlement
The crime of grand theft through embezzlement (Penal Code 503) consists of four key elements:
- You were given $950 or more in property by its owner.
- The property owner placed you in a position of trust.
- You took or used that property dishonestly for your benefit.
At the time of taking the property, you intended to either:
- Keep the property permanently, or
- Retain it long enough to significantly deprive the rightful owner of its enjoyment or value.
That means that even if you intended to return the property, you could still be charged with embezzlement.
For example, Dwayne is a treasurer for his local homeowners’ association. When his wife faces $6,000 in medical expenses from a recent surgery, Dwayne transfers $6,000 from the association’s funds to his account to cover the bills, planning to repay the HOA when he receives his next paycheck.
Despite his intention to return the money, Dwayne could still be found guilty of grand theft through embezzlement in this situation.
Main Differences Between Grand and Petty Theft
Here are the main differences between grand and petty theft:
Intent and Outcomes
Both petty and grand theft require the intention to steal, but grand theft is often taken more seriously due to the higher cost of those stolen goods and the possibility of more planning involved. The outcomes also differ greatly; grand theft can result in harsher legal consequences, such as longer prison sentences and higher fines, reflecting the more significant harm caused to victims.
Property Classification
The theft of some items is automatically considered grand theft, no matter what was stolen. These items are:
- Vehicles
- Firearms
- Livestock
Method of Theft
How a crime is committed can determine whether it is labeled petty or grand theft. For example, theft cases involving fraud, embezzlement, or identity theft may result in grand theft accusations.
Criminal History
The legal implications for grand and petty theft differ significantly depending on the individual’s criminal history. In some places, an accused previously convicted of a theft crime may face accusations of “petty theft with a prior conviction.” These charges can escalate a new petty theft accusation to a felony.
A petty theft can result in more severe charges if you have a history of theft convictions. Prior felony convictions for grand theft attract harsh consequences, like extended prison sentences and significant fines. Furthermore, under “three strikes” laws, individuals with repeated felony offenses may face life imprisonment.
Sentencing and Court Process
The legal system treats petty and grand theft differently due to their different classifications and severity. Petty theft is classified as a misdemeanor and is typically tried in lower courts, leading to quicker resolutions.
First-time offenders usually have the chance to negotiate for alternative sentences or plead guilty for lesser penalties. Doing this allows them to skip long trials and minimize the number of court visits needed.
Grand theft is categorized as a felony, distinguishing it from petty theft, and involves more complex legal procedures. The person accused may need to participate in preliminary hearings to assess whether there is sufficient evidence for a trial. In deciding on a sentence, the court takes into account:
- The defendant’s criminal history
- The value of the stolen goods
- Any additional aggravating factors.
Grand juries or formal hearings may be held in grand theft lawsuits involving large sums of money or the public interest.
Legal Consequences of Grand and Petty Theft
The following are the legal penalties for grand and petty theft:
Penalties for Petty Theft
In California, petty theft is considered a misdemeanor offense. The consequences include:
- A maximum of six months in jail.
- A fine reaching $1,000
- A combination of both.
When the stolen item is worth $50 or less, the prosecutor can classify it as an infraction, assuming the offender has no previous theft convictions. A petty theft infraction may result in a fine of $250. (California Penal Code Section 490)
Penalties for Petty Theft with a Previous Conviction
A petty theft involving stolen property worth $950 or less can be classified as a felony or a misdemeanor (known as a “wobbler”) if the offender has certain prior convictions. These include:
- At least one previous petty theft or theft-related conviction that resulted in imprisonment
- A prior conviction for a serious or violent crime, any registerable sex offense, or embezzlement from a dependent adult or someone aged 65 or older.
According to California PC 666 and California Prop 47, a misdemeanor can lead to a maximum jail sentence of one year, while a felony may result in imprisonment for:
- 16 months
- Two years
- Three years.
Enhanced Legal Consequences for Repeat Offenders
California has stricter penalties for those who repeatedly commit crimes. According to Penal Code Section 666, a petty theft charge can be upgraded to a felony if the individual has three or more previous theft convictions that resulted in jail time. A felony charge for petty theft leads to harsher outcomes, such as increased jail sentences and more significant fines.
Legal Penalties for Grand Theft Under California Law
Grand theft could be prosecuted as a felony or misdemeanor, based on the facts of the matter and the defendant’s prior criminal history. The penalties include the following:
- For grand theft charges prosecuted as a misdemeanor, you will face a maximum sentence of one year in jail.
- For grand theft charged as a felony: a sentence of 16 months, two years, or three years in jail.
Certain types of grand theft, like grand theft of a firearm, are always considered felonies and can result in a state prison sentence of 16 months, two years, or three years.
Effects on the Defendant
The consequences of petty theft and grand theft can include several factors:
Immediate Legal Consequences of the Charges
The legal consequences of theft charges differ significantly between grand and petty theft. In petty theft cases, those accused may experience a brief incarceration period or be released on bail or their own recognizance.
On the other hand, grand theft charges may lead to extended pre-trial custody periods, increased bail rates, and more complicated legal proceedings due to the seriousness of the offense.
Impact on Professional and Personal Life
Theft convictions can have severe consequences. A petty theft conviction may make it difficult to secure work, especially in fields that demand financial transactions.
Grand theft has far more severe repercussions, which could include:
- Future job restrictions
- Loss of professional licenses
- Damage to one’s reputation.
Both charges can strain your relationships and lead to civil lawsuits for victim compensation.
Prosecuting Theft Charges
A petty theft charge is usually resolved through a plea bargain or diversion programs that allow defendants to avoid criminal records, provided they complete the program successfully. These matters generally demand less proof and are conducted more swiftly in court.
On the other hand, grand theft matters typically proceed to trial and demand a higher level of proof. The prosecution should provide strong and clear evidence regarding the cost of the items and the intention of committing theft.
Requirements For Evidence
To successfully prosecute someone for petty theft, evidence must indicate that the person deliberately took goods of little value without permission. These include:
- Video footage
- Witnesses’ statements
- The retrieval of stolen items.
For grand theft, the evidence must prove the act and intention of stealing and that the property has a greater value. Expert witnesses should meet the strict conditions for a felony charge. These include:
- Evaluate the values
- Submit thorough financial documentation.
- Provide additional significant proof.
Defending Against Theft Accusations
When facing allegations of petty or grand theft, the defense usually seeks to refute the prosecution’s evidence relating to the intent behind the theft and the worth of the items. For example, in petty theft cases, the defense may claim that the defendant wrongly believed the item was theirs, indicating a lack of intent.
In grand theft lawsuits, defense attorneys may contend that the estimated worth of the items was inaccurate and did not reach the felony limit. They can also show that the accused genuinely believed they had permission to take the property.
Several factors can influence how effective your defense is, including:
- The strength of the prosecution’s evidence.
- The reliability of the witnesses and defendant.
- The circumstances behind the alleged crime.
Additionally, the defendant’s past criminal record and relevant state laws can greatly impact your case. A solid defense strategy can uncover flaws in the prosecution’s claims, such as:
- Missing surveillance videos
- Contradictory testimony from witnesses
What Is The Statute Of Limitations For Misdemeanor and Felony Theft Crimes?
When a defendant faces charges for a theft offense classified as a misdemeanor, the statute of limitations (SOL) is generally one year. That means the prosecutor must file charges within one year of the incident. If charges are not filed within the specified time, the prosecutor cannot handle them afterward.
Examples of theft offenses in California that are often classified as misdemeanors include:
- Petty theft under Penal Code 484(a),
- Shoplifting as per Penal Code 459.5 PC,
- Receiving stolen property valued at $950 or less under Penal Code 496(a).
According to Penal Code 801, theft-related crimes have a statute of limitations of three years. This indicates that the prosecutor must file charges within three years of the crime. If they fail to do so within this period, they can no longer pursue charges afterward.
Examples of theft offenses in California that are often charged as felonies include:
- Grand theft of a firearm valued over $950 under Penal Code 487(d)(1),
- First-degree burglary as defined by Penal Code 459 PC, and
- Robbery under Penal Code 211.
Contact a Theft Crimes Defense Law Firm Near Me
Recognizing the differences between petty and grand theft can aid in grasping the implications if you are confronted with charges. Petty theft is a misdemeanor that involves stealing items of minimal value and typically results in lighter penalties. Grand theft, on the other hand, is a felony that involves more valuable or important objects and carries greater legal and societal consequences. Additionally, prior criminal histories or aggravating elements can result in additional punishments.
If you or a loved one faces petty or grand theft charges in Van Nuys, you should contact a skilled theft crime attorney. At Leah Legal, we create defense strategies catering to each theft case’s specific details. We aim to defend your rights and secure the best possible outcomes. Contact our office immediately for professional assistance with petty or grand theft charges. Call us at 818-484-1100. We are committed to supporting you, keeping you informed, and advocating for your rights throughout the legal process.
A false allegation of committing a sex crime is one of the most serious claims anyone can make against you. If someone has falsely accused you of committing this offense, you should treat the accusations with seriousness, even if you know you are innocent.
The consequences of such charges are harsh. For example, a criminal record can affect your life permanently, and your reputation may suffer irreparable harm even if you are acquitted. You should act to protect yourself emotionally, legally, and socially. In California, there are specific steps you can take to protect your rights and seek justice. You can take these recommended actions if someone falsely accuses you of a sex crime.
Contact a Criminal Defense Lawyer
Consulting with a lawyer is one of the best ways to protect yourself when you are dealing with false accusations related to any sex crime charge. While you might consider handling the situation yourself, having an experienced attorney will make the process smoother. Your lawyer will be familiar with California sex crime laws and can use that expertise to your advantage. They will help you analyze the legal aspects of the crime you are wrongly accused of and clarify the regulations surrounding the false allegations against you.
In many cases where a defendant is dealing with false accusations, two main steps are typically involved. The first step is to contest the false claims in court. The second step may include seeking compensation from the individual who made the false accusation through a lawsuit. Your attorney will guide you through both processes and assist you in formulating a strategy to address each phase of your case.
People often hesitate to hire a lawyer due to concerns about legal fees or the belief that they can manage false accusations independently. This delay can be damaging to those wrongfully accused. You should start collecting evidence and building your case as early as possible. Waiting too long to consult with an attorney may result in losing crucial time and evidence. Witnesses might forget details or become unavailable to testify. The earlier you talk to a lawyer about your situation, the better your chances of proving your innocence.
Remain Calm
If someone falsely accuses you of a sex crime, you may naturally feel the urge to fight back and defend yourself. However, reacting impulsively and angrily can hurt your case. Remember that even if you feel justified in your response, it may provide the opposing side with more evidence to use against you. For example, acting out in anger, despite feeling justified, could lead a judge to view you as an unfit parent in child custody battles, potentially jeopardizing your custody or visitation rights in the future.
If someone wrongfully accuses you, you must stay calm and carefully consider how you respond. Avoid speaking to the police or answering questions without a defense attorney present. It may be tempting to explain your side and clear your name, but waiting for your attorney before engaging with law enforcement is wiser. Police are skilled at obtaining confessions, even incorrect ones, and they may pressure you to give up your right to remain silent without your lawyer. Stand your ground and inform the police that you will not talk without your attorney. This approach will significantly benefit your legal defense.
Learn About the Allegations Against You
Next, you should learn about the allegations against you. It may involve:
- Identifying the specific sex offenses you are accused of,
- Spotting any inconsistencies in the claims.
- Determining when and where these offenses are said to have occurred,
- Choosing the most effective legal defense strategy for your situation.
- Gathering any missing information related to the accusations.
- If a police report exists, make sure to obtain a copy.
Collect Evidence to Counter the False Claims
Once you consult a lawyer, you can start working closely with them to gather evidence supporting your position. It is advisable to maintain detailed records since they will help you to demonstrate your actions and statements. You must present evidence in court to establish your innocence and show that the accusations against you are unfounded or misrepresented.
After facing false accusations, we suggest keeping a journal. You can use a physical notebook or a notes app on your phone. Be thorough in documenting all interactions with the person making the false claims. Record the dates of emails, phone calls, texts, and details of any face-to-face meetings. Additionally, you should avoid meeting with the accuser alone; always have a third party present.
Avoid direct communication if the relationship with the person making the false claims has turned hostile. Have your attorney manage all interactions with that individual. This approach helps to minimize the risk of being falsely accused of further misconduct. Keep all receipts from various stores, restaurants, or other places to help with your alibi.
If someone posts about the case on social media, take screenshots immediately. You can also jot down details you remember about past interactions with the accuser. Note any witnesses present during the alleged incident, as they may assist in proving your innocence.
Challenge the Credibility of the Accuser
After consulting with your attorney, you will work together to create a plan to address the false accusations against you. This plan will vary based on several factors, including the nature of the allegations and whether the case is in civil or criminal court. However, a key part of any effective strategy is questioning the accuser’s credibility. If someone has claimed you sexually abused or assaulted them, your attorney can cross-examine them before the court.
Does the accuser have a history of telling lies? Do they have ulterior motives for making these accusations? For example, is your spouse alleging that you committed these acts to gain sole custody of your children? In such cases, your attorney will likely want your spouse to testify under oath and pose relevant questions.
By knowing what the accuser wants to gain from their false claims, you and your attorney can work on demonstrating that the accuser is not trustworthy. Your attorney can ask specific questions highlighting the accuser’s unreliability to judges and juries.
Find Your Witnesses and Provide Evidence Supporting Your Defense
Besides disputing the claims made by those who have wrongfully accused you, you should find your witnesses. Just as the accuser can present witnesses against you, you have the right to bring forth individuals who can confirm your innocence or highlight how the accuser has falsely accused you.
For example, if you have a witness who can testify under oath that you were dining together at the time of the alleged incident, that can help your case significantly. Additionally, you might find text messages, video footage, or emails that counter the accusations and demonstrate your innocence. In such cases, your attorney can call witnesses who support the evidence showing you did not commit the actions you are falsely accused of.
Remember that defendants do not have to prove their innocence; they only need to cast reasonable doubt on the statements made by the accuser. Your attorney can assist you in dismantling the prosecution’s case by exposing inaccuracies.
Prepare Your Legal Defense
Following these steps will help you create a solid legal defense strategy. You should customize this strategy to fit your situation, interests, and case specifics. There are several common defense strategies that your sex crime defense attorney can use, including:
- Alibi.
- Consent.
You can use more than one of these strategies in a single case.
Alibi
A strong strategy is to present an alibi, a defense that shows you were with someone else or in a different location when the crime supposedly occurred.
For example, if someone claims you committed sexual assault at 8:30 p.m. on a Sunday, but you were grocery shopping with your brother at that time, it would be impossible for you to have committed the act. Your brother can serve as a witness to support your alibi, and there may also be video evidence confirming your whereabouts during the incident.
Documenting everything you remember about the event while the details are still precise is advisable. Providing your defense attorney with information that undermines the accuser’s and prosecutor’s claims will be highly beneficial.
Consent
Many allegations of sexual crimes involve acts that did occur but were consensual. When someone falsely asserts that there was no consent, they are suggesting that the sexual act was a crime. Demonstrating that consent was present can be challenging. Your defense team can use various types of evidence to establish consent, including:
- Text messages and other communications exchanged between you and the accuser before and after the incident that indicate consent.
- Witnesses who learned about the incident can provide testimonies.
- Previous interactions in your relationship.
Misidentification
A less common but effective defense is that the accuser has mistakenly identified you as their attacker. The accuser’s account may be accurate in such situations, but you were not involved.
Seek Compensation for False Accusations
Making false accusations against someone is illegal. Depending on the specifics of your case, you can pursue financial compensation by filing a defamation lawsuit against the individual responsible. Defamation is a written or spoken statement that intentionally harms another person’s reputation.
California has laws to protect individuals and businesses from false claims that can damage their standing. To successfully file a defamation lawsuit, you must demonstrate that the statements made against you were intended to incite disdain towards you or your business.
Defamation is not classified as a crime; instead, it is a civil offense that allows the victim to seek financial compensation from the responsible party. If the defamatory statement is published in a newspaper, on a website, on posters, or in any other medium, it is termed libel. However, if the defamation occurs through spoken words, it is called slander.
Pursue a Defamation Lawsuit
Defamation occurs when a person deliberately makes a false statement that damages your reputation. If you have been accused of a sexual offense, you might have grounds to sue your accuser for defamation, provided you can prove that the claim was false and made with intent.
You Can Take Some Tests
In cases of sexual offenses, there may be evidence that can show someone’s guilt. You should prove that you are not guilty. Depending on your situation, undergoing scientific tests can help confirm your innocence. Find out what evidence has been collected and compare yourself against it to show that you are not responsible.
DNA evidence is specifically compelling, so having your DNA tested and available can provide a solid defense. You would not present your DNA test in court to prove your innocence if you were guilty. Consult your lawyer about the necessary tests to support your case and complete them.
Follow Your Attorney’s Advice
You should follow the guidance of your defense team. Emotions may run high during this period, but you are under scrutiny by the court and prosecution. If your lawyers advise you to avoid specific individuals until after your trial, follow their advice.
Being wrongfully accused of a sexual crime is distressing and may lead you to consider doing actions that are not in your best interest. You should stick to their guidelines to protect yourself from unnecessary complications.
What Should I Not Do If Accused Of a Sex Crime?
If you are falsely accused of a sexual crime, there are several actions you should avoid:
Do Not Ignore The Allegations Just Because They Are Untrue
While dismissing the accusations may be tempting and hoping they fade away since you know you are innocent, this is not advisable. Sexual assault allegations can lead to severe and lasting repercussions. It is crucial to take proactive steps as soon as you become aware of the charges to safeguard yourself.
Do Not Let Your Emotions Overwhelm You
Being falsely accused of sexual assault can understandably make you angry, but it is necessary to manage your emotions. Be cautious about what you say and do in public, as the court could use any emotional outburst against you. Avoid the accuser and their friends, family, or colleagues to prevent potential confrontations. If complete avoidance is impossible, do your best to keep your distance in close quarters.
Specific actions may give the impression that the false accusations are valid. Other actions could result in criminal charges for:
- Witness tampering,
- Destruction of evidence,
- Obstruction of justice, or
- Breaching a restraining order.
You should also avoid:
- Doing nothing and hoping the situation resolves itself.
- Destroying evidence that could support the false claims.
- Leaving the state or country.
Why Do People Falsely Accuse Others of Committing Sex Crimes?
Someone can falsely accuse you of a sex crime for different reasons, such as:
Revenge
Accusations related to sexual crimes can quickly tarnish someone’s reputation and disrupt their life. One common scenario for false accusations is when a jealous partner seeks revenge. Knowing how seriously society reacts to sex crime allegations, an ex-lover might use these claims to bring you humiliation and shame.
Mistaken Identity
Sex crimes are often shocking and traumatic events that happen suddenly. After being sexually assaulted, victims may struggle to recall specific details about the perpetrator, which could lead them to misidentify the perpetrator in a photo lineup.
Victim’s Age
Statutory rape, known as unlawful sexual intercourse in California, occurs when an adult engages in sexual activity with someone under the legal age, regardless of consent. Accusations can arise when an adult is dating a minor. For instance, a 19-year-old who has sex with his 17-year-old girlfriend could face misdemeanor charges for statutory rape, even if she agreed to the encounter.
Family Law Issues
Allegations of sex crimes can also surface during custody disputes. One parent might accuse the other of child molestation to gain full custody of their children. An attorney can gather evidence from the accuser to highlight their animosity and the false nature of the claims.
Consequences of a Sex Crime Conviction
Many individuals convicted of these sex crimes face prison sentences and fines. Besides these legal penalties, there are additional repercussions, including:
- Inability to vote while incarcerated,
- A possible restriction on owning firearms,
- Mandatory sex offender registration.
- You lose the ability to clear the conviction from your record.
Sex offender registration is accessible to the public, which can limit your job prospects.
Find a Sex Crimes Defense Attorney Near Me
California follows the principle of presumption of innocence, meaning you are considered innocent until proven guilty. You should know you have the right to a fair trial if you are wrongfully accused. You can have legal representation, choose to remain silent, and contest any evidence against you. Remember that the legal system is designed to safeguard your rights, and you do not have to navigate this situation by yourself.
If you have been falsely accused of sexual assault, Leah Legal is ready to offer expert legal assistance and protect your rights. Our skilled criminal lawyers in Van Nuys will support you throughout the legal process, help you create a solid defense, and fight for your innocence.
Contact us today at 818-484-1100 for a private consultation and take the first step toward restoring your reputation.

Our experience is both deep and wide as to practice areas and is focused exclusively on criminal defense. We are fully familiarized with the specifics of local court processes and even have detailed knowledge of the tendencies of specific judges, prosecuting attorneys, and “expert witnesses” frequently called in by DAs.

We do not hesitate to take on your case based on what kind of charge you face. We handle both felonies and misdemeanors, DUI, drug crime, theft, assault & battery, sex crime, and other charges. No case is too big, too small, too easy, or too hard for us to invest our time in it.

We take the time to thoroughly investigate the details of every case. This means doing our own “homework” and not just relying on the police report or the prosecution’s version of events. We probe for any weaknesses in the evidence to be brought against you and identify any mitigating factors in your favor.

We adhere to a high “work ethic.” Criminal defense is not a 9-to-5 endeavor. It often takes long, unpredictable hours to best serve our clients, and we take that duty too seriously to stop short of whatever it takes, and however long it takes, to get the job done.

Leah or another experienced associate will always handle your case. We do not play the law mill game. A “law mill” in legal talk is a law firm that takes on excessively high numbers of clients all at once and then assigns most of them to inexperienced lawyers. This gains them extra work but is bad for the clients. We always handle your case personally and give you the representation you deserve.

Leah Legal brings you the skills of a trial lawyer and negotiator together. This means your chances of a pre-trial dismissal, a plea deal that reduces your charge and/or sentence, or an acquittal are all increased. These two skills complement each other, for only when the prosecution fears going to trial against you do they become more willing to negotiate.

We keep ourselves constantly accessible to our clients at all times. We share our cell phone numbers with you and we let you know how to contact us for a fast response and keep you informed of new developments as soon as they occur. Communication is key in winning legal battles, and we always keep multiple lines of communication open.

Leah Legal brings you the highest caliber of legal representation but does not charge you exorbitant rates. We keep ourselves affordable and always let our fees be known upfront from the beginning.
At Leah Legal, we have extensive experience in presenting convincing arguments in court, in finding evidence and witnesses in your favor, in calling our own “expert” witnesses to counter those brought in by the prosecution, and in exposing the weaknesses in the case brought against you.
Most cases don’t even go to trial, but because of Leah Legal’s strong reputation at this phase, you are more likely to get a dismissal or favorable plea at the arraignment or preliminary hearing.
If a jury trial commences, we will always fight for an acquittal as the first option. We never give up before the battle has even begun, like some so-called defense attorneys. However, we also understand the realities you are facing and know when and how to negotiate for a reduced charge/sentence instead of risking a conviction with a sentence at or close to the maximums.
Thus, it is possible to “win” a case even when a conviction cannot realistically be avoided. This might mean getting a DUI charge reduced to wet reckless, getting jail time exchanged for community service and probation, or receiving a lighter fine.
By excluding or undermining the reliability of the prosecution’s evidence and witnesses from early in the process, we build a foundation for winning the best possible outcome to every case. It can be the difference between a conviction and an acquittal or between a harsh sentence and a much lighter one.
If no plea deal takes place at the arraignment, and you plead “not guilty,” then your case moves toward trial. But first, your defense attorney will have another chance to fight for you at your preliminary hearing.
Here, the defense finally gets access to the police report and all other evidence given already to the prosecution. This is the “discovery” process, and it better equips us to fight and win your case.
The prosecutor will unveil his or her evidence at the preliminary hearing and seek to persuade the judge that not only was the alleged crime actually committed but that you are very likely the one who committed it. The judge must then decide if this evidence is weighty enough for you to be “held to answer” in a jury trial. If not, the case will be dismissed. This may happen if the witnesses against you are not deemed “credible” or if existing evidence is too heavily “conflicting.”
The defense will be given not only the evidence being used against you but also any evidence deemed “exculpatory,” meaning seemingly in your favor. It is your right to have such evidence, if it exists, revealed to your defense attorney at the preliminary hearing, and a failure to do so can get your case dismissed.
Note that we at Leah Legal will take this opportunity to seek to have evidence declared inadmissible in court if it was obtained unlawfully. And we will cross-examine witnesses of the prosecution, pinning them down to a single, unchangeable “story.” The preliminary hearing is like a miniature trial to determine if there will be an actual trial. The burden of proof is lower, but what happens here can determine what evidence the jury will see and strongly influence how your case is ultimately resolved.
The preliminary hearing can end in a dismissal, a plea deal, or a trial date. But you only have a right to a preliminary hearing if it is a felony charge. With misdemeanors, you would go straight from the arraignment to pre-trial, after which a trial will take place if the case cannot be resolved without one.
We can begin building you a solid case long before your arraignment (initial court date), but the arraignment is clearly a critical moment in the overall legal process.
Here, you will be formally read the charge against you by the presiding judge. At this point, you will have to enter a plea of “guilty,” “no contest,” or “not guilty.” It is also at this point that bail will be set if you were not already bailed out earlier.
Understand that your arraignment is not an actual trial as such. But having your lawyer present at the arraignment can greatly affect how your case proceeds. It is possible that violations of your rights will be cited by your defense attorney, which will then lead to evidence against you being thrown out of court and your case being dismissed. It is also possible a favorable plea agreement can be worked out and agreed to at this point, avoiding the need to actually go to trial.
At Leah Legal, we know how to use the time between your arrest and arraignment wisely to maximize your chances of a win without ever going to trial.
Normally, the DA will trust the police report and file the charges it supports. At this point he or she will make a formal “complaint” detailing the charge against you.
In some cases, the DA may decide to drop the charges if the evidence seems too weak, or will even agree to a plea bargain to reduce the charges. Thus, already, the legal wheels are beginning to turn, and it pays to have a skilled California defense attorney on scene to press for dismissal or reduction of charges.
We can assist you from the moment of the arrest, or if you fear you may soon be arrested and/or charged, even before this occurs. Leah Legal can provide you with critical and timely advice on each next step at this critical juncture and help you begin preparing your defense as early as possible. Under certain circumstances we are able to speak with the investigating detective and or the prosecutor and prevent a filing altogether. When this is not possible, we are often able to prevent an embarrassing arrest by arranging for you to go to the police station to be booked at a certain designated time.
After the arrest, the police report and other information will be handed over to the prosecutor, often a DA. The case will be reviewed to decide if there is enough evidence that the alleged crime even took place and if the defendant is likely the perpetrator.
Leah has boundless passion for her work, and lots of energy. I admire and endorse this lawyer.
Criminal defense is about defending rights. And everyone has rights. Yet when you have been charged with a crime and are swept up in the criminal justice system, you quickly learn that nobody is as interested in defending your rights as you are, and you cannot do it alone. For fierce, uncompromising criminal defense call Leah Legal now!
When you or someone you know and love are suddenly arrested on criminal charges in Los Angeles or throughout Southern California, you have an immediate “emergency” on your hands. You are likely in a situation you have never been in before, such that confusion and uncertainty can run rife.
And if you are more familiar with the legal process because you are facing a repeat charge, that only means that the stakes will be that much higher as to potential sentencing, and there will still be legal surprises that can “ambush” you absent an experienced criminal defense attorney who has seen it all before.
Leah Legal Criminal Defense Law Office has been serving the L.A. and Southern California Area for years with top-tier legal advice and representation across a wide range of practice areas. Attorney Leah Naparstek, who graduated law school with high honors, has accumulated deep hands-on experience in criminal, DUI, and immigration law over the last decade. She has earned admission to numerous bars and law associations and has earned the respect of colleagues and clients alike.
But in the end, what matters most about Leah Legal is that we are passionate about helping people in need, and we are a law firm that is dedicated unreservedly to fighting for you and your best interests. From day one, we work tirelessly and creatively in forming the best possible defense strategy for your case and in undermining the arguments and evidences of the prosecution. We always insist on obtaining the best possible outcome for our client in every case we take on.
According to Penal Code 459.5 PC, shoplifting involves entering a commercial establishment intending to steal property worth $950 or less during working hours. Courts often charge shoplifting as a misdemeanor in California. However, if an individual is accused of shoplifting, the presence of some factors can significantly enhance the severity of the crime, escalating it to a felony. The judge can impose a jail term of several years if this happens. This is a repercussion that you should not take lightly; consult a skilled criminal defense attorney immediately if you face shoplifting charges.
Proposition 36, passed in 2024, allows certain theft offenses under $950 to be charged as felonies if the defendant has two prior theft or drug convictions.
Shoplifting Under California Law
According to Penal Code 459.5, shoplifting is knowingly entering a commercial establishment during working hours to commit theft. This differs from burglary, which involves entering a business establishment after working hours or when no one is present. Once you understand these legal definitions, you can feel more informed about your situation. The intent to steal under the law is chargeable as the real act of stealing. In this case, you can face shoplifting charges if you intend to steal, even if you did not succeed in stealing anything. You can face charges even if the security officers catch you before leaving the store. The judge considers the defendant’s intent, not just their actions.
Circumstances Where Shoplifting Can Be A Felony
In California, shoplifting can be a felony if any of the following circumstances apply:
- Prior Criminal Convictions
The district attorney can decide to file felony shoplifting charges if you have been previously convicted of either:
- Solicitation under Penal Code 187
- Attempted murder
- Murder
- Gross vehicular manslaughter under PC 191.5
The District Attorney’s discretion can add an element of uncertainty to your case. Other prior convictions that can lead to felony shoplifting charges include:
- Any violent or serious felony punishable by life in prison or death
- Any sex crime committed through threats, violence, or force
- Any sex crime against a child under 14 years old
- Possession of a weapon of mass destruction
- A sex offense requiring sex offender registration
- Any other felony punishable by death or life imprisonment
- The Value of Stolen Goods Exceeds $950
The value of goods stolen, whether above or below $950, differentiates petty theft, often considered misdemeanor shoplifting, from grand theft. Your Penal Code 459.5 offense will no longer be considered shoplifting if you enter a store and steal jewelry, electronics, or other assets exceeding $950. Instead, you will face grand theft charges, which attract severe penalties, including felony charges.
Grand theft is covered under California Penal Code 487. An individual can commit grand theft by embezzlement, trick, pretense, or larceny.
Grand Theft By Embezzlement
Grand theft by embezzlement does not involve stealing property but misusing or taking advantage of property entrusted to you for personal gain. The elements of theft by embezzlement are outlined under the Jury Instruction ‘’CALCRIM’’ 1806. If the prosecutor accuses you of this offense, the prosecutor must prove the following elements:
- You were entrusted with a particular asset by the owner of that asset
- The owner of the asset put you in a position of trust concerning the asset
- You used or took that asset fraudulently for your benefit
- You intended to deprive the owner of their property, either temporarily or permanently
Grand Theft By Trick
The elements of grand theft by trick are covered in the Jury Instruction ‘’CALCRIM’’ 1805. If the prosecutor accuses you of this offense, the prosecutor must prove the following elements:
- You took another person’s property and knew it was owned by someone else.
- You used deceit or fraud to obtain property or to make the owner allow you to take over their property.
- You took over the property, intending to deprive the owner of the property permanently, or you took over the property from the owner for a significant period and deprived them of the enjoyment of the property.
- The owner of the property did not intend to transfer ownership of the property to you.
Grand Theft By False Pretenses
Grand theft by false pretense involves taking another person’s property through deception. If the prosecutor accuses you of grand theft by false pretenses, he/she must prove the following elements:
- You intentionally and willingly deceived another person by telling them lies
- You used pretense to convince that person to allow you to take over their property
- The person believed your lies and allowed you to take over their property
Grand Theft By Larceny
Larceny is a combination of shoplifting & burglary-related offenses. The prosecutor must prove the following elements for you to face grand theft by larceny charges:
- You took the property that belonged to another person
- You had no consent from the owner
- You intended to deprive the owner of the property permanently or temporarily
- You moved the property for some distance and kept it for a while
If the prosecutor claims that you executed grand theft under any of the above theories, the jury does not have to agree on which theft you committed. The jury should only agree that you took another person’s property in any of the above ways. However, they must agree unanimously on whether you committed petty theft or grand theft. You will face a lesser crime of petty theft if they disagree that you engaged in grand theft but agree that you committed theft.
Wage Theft
An employer can be guilty of wage theft if he/she deliberately fail to pay their employee. This offense is often charged as grand theft if the employer withholds:
- Wage that exceeds $950 from their employee within one year
- Wage that exceeds $2,350 from one employee and at least one other employee within one year
Penalties For Grand Theft
The prosecutor can decide to file Penal Code 487 charges against you as misdemeanor or felony charges. He/she will base their decision on your criminal record and the circumstances of your case. You can face a jail term that does not exceed one year if the jury convicts you of a misdemeanor. On the other hand, you could face the following penalties if the jury convicts you of a felony:
- A jail term of 16 months, two years, or three years
- Felony probation with a jail term that does not exceed one year
The court can also order you to pay restitution to reimburse the victim for the losses incurred. You risk deportation if you are a non-citizen. Your career license can also be suspended or revoked depending on your profession.
Penalties For Grand Theft Using A Gun
You can face felony charges if you are guilty of grand theft of a firearm, also referred to as grand theft of a firearm. This offense can attract a jail term of 16 months, two years, or three years in a state prison.
Under Penal Code 1192.7(c), grand theft of firearms is often treated as a serious felony. In this case, grand theft firearm is a strike crime according to California’s three-strikes law.
Penalty Enhancements
You will face an additional and consecutive prison sentence if your grand theft charges are felonies and the property you stole is worth the following:
- An additional jail term that does not exceed one year if the property you stole exceeds $50,000
- An additional jail term that does not exceed two years if the property you stole exceeds $200,000
- An additional jail term that does not exceed three years if the property you stole exceeds $1,000,000
- An additional jail term that does not exceed four years if the property you stole exceeds $3,000,000, plus one year for every additional property loss of $3,000,000
The judge will aggregate the value of all property stolen during a series of thefts committed as part of a single scheme or plan.
Retail Theft Charges
Retail theft offenses under Penal Code 496.6 differ from possession of shoplifted retail property exceeding $950 with the intent to return, exchange, or sell it. This crime is known as illegal deprivation of a retail business opportunity. The courts often treat this offense as a wobbler. You can face a jail term that does not exceed one year if the jury convicts you of a misdemeanor. On the other hand, felony charges can attract a jail term of 16 months, two years, or three years. The judge can also impose a restraining order against you for two years, preventing you from entering the retail establishment where you were convicted of stealing from
- Organized Retail Theft – Penal Code 490.4
Other situations that can lead to felony shoplifting charges include organized retail theft. This can occur when several people act together to steal merchandise. Retail theft has been a concern for most businesses because California has experienced increased organized retail theft. Large-scale reselling of stolen property, coordinated theft rings, and high-profile smash-and-grab cases have prompted the authorities to introduce harsher penalties.
The purpose of these new laws is to curb offenses, but also impose tougher penalties on perpetrators. It is important to understand the legal changes and possible repercussions of revised retail theft laws if you are charged under them.
Additionally, an allegation does not automatically lead to a conviction; an experienced criminal defense attorney can develop a strong defense to make a difference.
Effective January 1, 2025, the new laws enhanced the penalties significantly for organized retail theft and expanded what is deemed a felony crime. Crucial changes included:
Tighter Vehicle Theft Laws
The justice system removed the so-called ‘’locked door loophole, permitting judges to charge you with vehicle burglary regardless of whether the vehicle was locked. It also permits several car break-ins to be aggregated to reach felony status.
Criminalizing Possession Of Stolen Goods
You can face a jail term that does not exceed three years if you have stolen property exceeding $950 and the prosecutor feels you intended to exchange or sell it. The judge will sentence you even if you did not steal the goods.
Retail Theft Restraining Orders
Judges can ban convicted people from entering certain retail shops for a period that does not exceed two years. The purpose of this is to curb repeat crimes.
Enhanced Sentences For Organized Theft Rings
You can face steeper penalties if you engage in large-scale resale of stolen goods. The court can impose an additional year in prison if your stolen merchandise exceeds $50,000, with even tougher punishment for higher amounts.
Aggregation Of Theft Amounts
Prosecutors can combine the value of property stolen from several incidents or people to surpass the $950 felony grand theft threshold. In this case, smaller, separate thefts, once regarded as misdemeanors, can attract felony charges when combined.
The new laws can be applied in the following situations:
Possession Of Questionable Goods
You can face charges for possessing stolen goods if you unknowingly buy stolen goods in bulk at a flea market. In this case, the judge will impose severe punishment even if you did not commit the theft yourself.
Coordinated Theft Ring
If two or more individuals plan and commit theft where the stolen goods are resold online, they can face additional punishment even if they stole the goods individually.
Multiple Store Thefts
You can face felony charges if you steal merchandise worth $400 from three different retailers over several weeks, and if the goods exceed $950.
Penalties For Engaging In Organized Retail Theft
Courts in California currently impose harsher penalties on organized retail theft. You can face felony charges if the merchandise you stole exceeds $950. Felony charges will attract a jail term of 16 months, two years, or three years under Penal Code 490.4. You can also face enhanced penalties depending on the nature of your theft, such as prior offense, use of conspiracy, or force to commit several thefts. A felony conviction will remain on your permanent record, impacting future immigration status and chances of employment.
Sentence Enhancement
You can face an enhanced sentence if you are guilty of participating in large-scale organized theft operations. The court can impose an additional one-year sentence enhancement if the goods you stole exceed $50,000. On the other hand, you can face an additional two years in prison if the goods you stole exceed $100,000.
Restraining Orders
The judge can issue a restraining order preventing you from entering specific retail stores for a period that does not exceed two years. You will face additional criminal charges and penalties if you violate a retail theft restraining order. The court can impose this order at its discretion, and the order applies even if you have not been charged with aggressive or violent behavior.
Defenses To Shoplifting Charges
Shoplifting can appear like a minor crime, but the law allows shoplifting to be charged as a felony under several circumstances. Securing the services of a competent criminal defense attorney can be an advantage because prosecutors often look for reasons to charge this offense as a felony. Your attorney will review your case and develop an effective defense strategy against your charges. Some of the defenses you can present include:
Coerced Confession
Sometimes, law enforcement officers can use overbearing methods to coerce an involuntary confession of shoplifting. Some of the unlawful or improper interrogation methods can include:
- Making false promises of leniency in exchange for a confession
- Beating you
- Depriving you of sleep, water, or food
- Continuing to ask you questions even after requesting an attorney
The above tactics can be so severe that an innocent person can admit to a crime he/she did not commit. The judge can drop your case or exclude your confession from the evidence if your attorney convinces the judge that you were coerced to confess.
Entrapment By Law Enforcement Officers
Entrapment defense can be a valid defense in cases where you would not have committed the alleged crime were it not for the coercion, threats, or harassment by the police. Entrapment happens when an undercover policeman persuades you to commit shoplifting. This defense can be admissible in court if you prove it by a preponderance of the evidence.
False Allegations
It is common for people to be convicted because of false accusations. Anger, revenge, jealousy, or attempts to cover up one’s criminal involvement are why someone can falsely accuse you of shoplifting.
Find A Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
Usually, shoplifting is a misdemeanor offense under California law. However, under certain circumstances, shoplifting can be a felony offense. You could face felony grand theft charges if you shoplift items worth over $950. Grand theft is a felony offense that can be charged as a misdemeanor or felony. Felony charges can also apply if you have prior convictions for serious crimes.
Felony offenses attract severe charges, including jail time and hefty fines. Contact a reliable attorney immediately when you face shoplifting charges. Your attorney can help you create a defense to fight your charges and ensure the offense does not become a felony. For reliable legal guidance and defense in Van Nuys, you can count on Leah Legal. Call us at 818-484-1100 to speak to one of our attorneys.
Expungement is a legal tool you can use after a conviction to erase the conviction record from your criminal record. Since these records are usually publicly available, erasing a sentence makes it unavailable for anyone running a background check on you. People who treat others according to their criminal past will not have anything to hold against you after expungement. It is an opportunity to start all over again after engaging in crime and serving your whole sentence. However, this tool has eligibility criteria. Not everyone with a criminal record can successfully expunge it.
In California, you can only expunge misdemeanors and some felonies. Other felonies that cannot be expunged will remain on your criminal record for years, affecting various aspects of your life, including your social and professional activities. A skilled attorney can help you determine your eligibility for expungement after a felony conviction. If you are eligible, they will start the process and fight with you until you are free of the disabilities and adverse effects of a criminal record.
The Consequences of a Felony Record
Under the California Penal Code, crimes are categorized into infractions, misdemeanors, and felonies. Felonies are the most severe and most punished compared to infractions and misdemeanors. Although a felony conviction can result in a lengthy prison sentence, payment of a hefty fine, and other life-changing consequences, it leaves you with a damaging criminal record. Your record remains tainted even after you have served your whole sentence and transformed your life. Unfortunately, criminal records are publicly accessible. Your relatives, friends, employer, business partners, and even strangers can find out about the conviction after running a background check on you. This can impact how others perceive you.
Here are some of the ways a felony record can affect your life:
- It can impact your ability to find a job, as most employers conduct background checks on potential employees before making a hiring decision. A felony record can easily disqualify you from some professions, like the health and legal professions. If you can find a job, it could be challenging to advance in your career.
- A felony record will affect your ability to find housing and all related services. Landlords also run background checks before renting or leasing their properties. A mortgage company will also hesitate to approve your loan request because of your severe criminal record.
Eligibility for public housing is also affected by a felony record, since housing authorities generally deny tenancy based on an applicant’s criminal history.
- A felony record can affect some of your civil rights, like the right to serve as a jury, the right to vote, and the right to possess or own a firearm. Although you can successfully restore some of these rights after a particular period, the process is lengthy and tedious.
- A felony record, specifically for a violent crime, will likely affect your child custody rights. You could be denied custody and only be allowed a limited time to see your children.
- It can also affect your immigration status if you are a non-citizen. This can result in deportation or being deemed inadmissible to the United States.
- A felony record can also affect your eligibility for financial aid or student loans and could also make it difficult to gain admission to an institution of higher learning.
- It can result in a suspension or revocation of your professional license, affecting your career path and leaving you without a livelihood.
These are some of the reasons why you should consider your eligibility for expungement when planning for your case’s defense. It can help you determine the best defense strategies to use to obtain a favorable outcome in your case, one that will not result in a damaging criminal record that will continue to affect your life years after serving your sentence.
The Benefits of Expungement
Expungement entails the removal of a criminal conviction from your criminal record, effectively erasing it as if the conviction had never occurred. You can apply for expungement immediately after completing your sentence for the underlying offense. This way, you can start life on a clean slate before so much time is lost. Once the record is expunged, landlords, employers, insurance companies, and other people who run background checks on potential employees or clients will not find anything to hold against you. The expungement process eliminates all the adverse effects and disabilities of a conviction. Here are its benefits in detail:
- You can easily find work and start life afresh after serving your sentence and paying all court fines.
- You can enroll in an institution of higher learning with minimal restrictions.
- You will no longer deal with the stigma of having a criminal record
- You can easily find a house to rent or lease, and access financing with minimal restrictions
- You can start or expand your family through adoption
- Your insurance will not be affected
Criminal Records You Can Expunge
Although expungement aims to help a person start life on a clean slate after engaging in crime, it is not available for everyone with a criminal record. Only specific criminal records are eligible for expungement in California. They include the following:
- Juvenile criminal records
- Criminal charges that the court dismissed or dropped
- All arrest records
- All infractions
- Simple misdemeanor crimes
- Non-violent related crimes
To proceed with the lengthy court process, you must first determine your eligibility for expungement. A skilled attorney can help you with that. Once you file for expungement, the court will consider your petition before holding a hearing. The judge will consider several factors to grant your petition, including your performance on probation (if your sentence included it) and the nature of the crime.
If you have a felony conviction in your criminal record, it can be difficult, but not impossible, to expunge it. Remember that felonies are the gravest crimes under California penal law. Some felonies are more severe than others and are even more difficult to expunge. Your eligibility to expunge a felony will depend on the nature of the felony and the sentence you received after conviction. Felonies that result in prison sentences are the most difficult to expunge.
Felonies You Cannot Expunge
If you are convicted of a severe or violent felony, you will likely be ineligible for expungement. Examples of felonies you cannot expunge include the following:
Rape, PC 261
Rape is considered a violent felony, committed when you use threats, force, or fraud to engage in sexual acts with another person against the person’s will. It is punishable by up to eight years in prison and carries a requirement to register as a sex offender under the sex offender registry. Suppose a prosecutor proves beyond a reasonable doubt that you committed rape, and you receive a prison sentence during sentencing. In that case, you will be ineligible for expungement after completing your prison sentence.
Murder, PC 187
This, too, is a violent felony committed when you unlawfully cause the death of another person. First-degree murder is the premeditated killing of another person without a justifiable cause. It carries a prison sentence of 25 years to life in prison upon conviction. Second-degree murder occurs without premeditation, but it results in the unjustifiable death of another person. It is punishable by fifteen years to life in prison. If a prosecutor proves beyond a reasonable doubt that you committed murder, you will not be able to expunge the conviction from your criminal record.
Assault Using a Deadly Weapon, and Resulting in Severe Injury, PC 245(a)(4)
As defined under Penal Code (PC) 240, assault is generally a misdemeanor offense. Assault with a deadly weapon is a wobbler, meaning that prosecutors charge it as a felony or misdemeanor. However, an assault with a dangerous weapon that results in a severe injury is a violent felony, punishable by up to four years in jail. If the prosecutor has compelling evidence against you, and they obtain a conviction, you will not be able to expunge that conviction record.
Arson, PC 451
Arson is a violent felony committed when you willfully and maliciously set fire to a structure, property, or forest land. Charges apply even if only a small part of the structure or property gets burned. You can also face arson charges for counseling, aiding, or procuring an act of arson. The offense is punishable by up to nine years in jail, and a conviction cannot be expunged from the record.
Terrorism, PC 422
Acts of terrorism are taken very seriously in California. Charges can range from misdemeanors to felonies, depending on the circumstances of a case. Prosecutors mainly consider the defendant’s intent, the nature of the threat or act of terrorism, and the resulting harm when filing charges. If you engage in terrorism using weapons of mass destruction, and people are injured in the process, the prosecutor will file felony charges against you. The punishment for this offense can range from 25 years to life in prison. This is a violent felony that does not qualify for expungement.
Capital Crimes
Capital crimes are offenses under California penal law that carry the possibility of the death penalty. They include the following:
- First-degree murder under exceptional circumstances, including murder for financial gain, the murder of multiple people, having a prior murder conviction, murder after torture, murder using an explosive or poison, or a gang-related murder
- Treason, or the act of betraying one’s state
- Sabotage that results in the death of one or more people
- Perjury that causes innocent people to face execution
- Trainwrecking or causing a train wreck that kills one or more people
- Committing a deadly assault while serving a life sentence
What To Do To Avoid a Conviction Record that is Ineligible for Expungement
A felony conviction is life-changing, especially for a felony you cannot expunge from your criminal record. Its conviction record remains in your background for years, affecting all aspects of your life. If you face charges for a felony that cannot be expunged, you should speak to a skilled attorney about your options. Your best strategy will be to avoid the conviction in the first place. Therefore, you need this information at the beginning of your legal process. It will help you make informed decisions that lead to a favorable outcome. Here are some of the strategies you can apply, with the help of your attorney, to avoid a conviction for a violent felony or a felony you cannot expunge:
Hire the Right Legal Representation
An arrest for a violent felony will likely result in confusion, stress, and anxiety. It can be tough to make rational decisions in that state. Seeking legal help should be your first move to ensure you understand the nature and gravity of your charges, your options, and possible outcomes.
The proper legal representation will be from a skilled and experienced attorney. Carefully choose an attorney who understands the penal law and has experience handling your charges. You can ask for referrals from family or friends, or conduct a quick online search.
The right attorney must be available to work on your case and your defense for the period you need their help. A present attorney will provide the guidance and support you need during the most challenging situation. They will also be available to seek legal avenues and strategies that will result in a more favorable outcome in your case.
Your attorney should also understand your exact needs and work towards fulfilling them. They should tailor your defense according to your specific needs, which include avoiding a conviction that will be difficult or impossible to expunge.
Explore Your Legal Options
It is essential to act promptly after your arrest to ensure you have sufficient time to explore all your options. This will increase your chances of a favorable outcome. Discuss these options with our attorney and take the time to consider each one and its likely outcome.
For example, your attorney can consider filing a pretrial motion if it seems favorable in your case. They can file a motion to dismiss evidence that was illegally obtained by the police or a motion to dismiss your case due to procedural errors, constitutional violations, or insufficient evidence. A motion to exclude evidence can work if the compelling evidence in your case was illegally obtained or is relevant to the matter.
Entering a Plea Deal
Your attorney can negotiate a plea deal with the prosecutor that can result in reduced charges or a lighter sentence. The prosecutor will likely accept the agreement if they lack sufficient evidence to obtain a conviction, or you have cooperated with them or the police throughout the case investigation. Once you enter a plea deal, you will plead guilty to a lesser offense, a conviction for which you can expunge after serving your sentence. If this works, you will wait until you have completed probation or the punishment given during sentencing to file a petition to expunge the conviction record. Your attorney can help you with this process.
Using Defense Strategies During the Trial
This, too, can help in avoiding a conviction that will be impossible or difficult to expunge. Since criminal trials are conducted fairly, you are allowed to use various defense strategies to fight your charges or weaken the prosecutor’s case against you. The kinds of strategies your attorney will use will depend on your charges and available evidence.
For example, if you face charges for a violent felony, you can argue, and support your argument with evidence, that your actions were accidental and not willful. For example, if you cause an accident that results in the death of another person and can prove that your actions were accidental, you cannot be found guilty of murder. The judge can dismiss or reduce your charges based on the evidence available.
If you face false accusations, your skilled attorney can use your alibi or interview witnesses to demonstrate your innocence to the court. If this works, the judge will dismiss your charges.
You can also demonstrate that you acted under duress. This can work if someone else forced you to commit a grave felony, like rape or assault with a deadly weapon. A skilled attorney will gather, prepare, and present compelling evidence to ensure you do not pay heavily for a crime you did not willingly commit.
Some defense strategies can compel the judge to dismiss your charges, while others can result in reduced charges. This is precisely what you need to avoid a conviction that will be impossible to expunge.
Find a Competent Criminal Attorney Near Me
Felonies are the most severely punished crimes in the state of California. In addition to the criminal penalties you receive during sentencing, they leave you with a severe criminal background that can affect your ability to find work or housing, make new friends, or find credit or insurance at reasonable rates. This record can stay for years, making your life more difficult with every passing year. Expungement offers you relief from the damaging effects and disabilities of a severe criminal record. However, it is unavailable for some felonies.
At Leah Legal, we understand how difficult it is to learn that the felony for which you face charges cannot be expunged. However, we can work with you to find a more reasonable outcome after your arrest in Van Nuys. We can utilize our best defense strategies and legal techniques to help you avoid a conviction that cannot be expunged. Call us at 818-484-1100 to learn more about this and our services.
I endorse this lawyer. I studied with her and she always demonstrated the capacity to handle legal matters with ease but a great understanding of human relations, with a firm grip in negotiations that makes her a very good attorney in the Criminal Defense area. She graduated with honors in our class, Summa Cum Laude. She is a good litigator but also a good negotiator. She will know when to litigate your case or advise you to reach a good plea bargain for you.
Leah’s got a lot of guts. That’s right: guts! She’s tough as nails and doesn’t give up. She is indeed a wonder woman of sorts; ask her for her story if you hire her. It’s amazing indeed. She cares for her cilents and get results. I endorse her without reservation.
I endorse this lawyer. A more compassionate and committed attorney would be hard to find. Leah, approaches every case with equal parts professionalism and humanity. If you want to be treated like a number, go someplace else. If you want to be treated like the most important client in the world, call Leah.
I am endorsing Leah because I have seen how much she cares about her clients and how hard she works for them. We have done several cases together and her dedication and professionalism was impressive.
Hiring a criminal defense attorney after an arrest for a misdemeanor or felony can make a significant difference in the outcome of your case. While it is true that you don’t need to retain a lawyer after an arrest, doing so may mean the difference between going to jail or not! Defendants who choose to represent themselves or allow a public defender to represent them are often unsatisfied with the results.
Defendants who are convicted of their alleged crimes can face a wide variety of consequences, including jail/prison time, expensive fines and fees, mandatory counseling, restitution payments, community service, and others depending on the crime involved. For example, drivers convicted of DUI may be required to have an interlock ignition device installed on their vehicles. Individuals who are found guilty of domestic violence may be prevented from returning to their homes or having regular contact with their children.
An arrest for any misdemeanor or felony is very serious. Individuals who are under arrest often try to make excuses or talk their way out of an arrest. This is a big mistake! Remember that prosecutors take criminal offenses very seriously. Be polite but keep your mouth shut and contact an attorney as soon as possible. Don’t take chances with your freedom and your rights after an arrest – contact Leah Legal today at 818-484-1100 for a free consultation.
Most public defenders are excellent lawyers with the best of intentions, but they are generally overwhelmed with their caseloads and do not have the time to give each client the attention they deserve. In fact, defendants typically get to speak with their public defender for only a moment or two before each court appearance. What’s more, it’s common for a different public defender to show up every time you appear in court. Your public defender will protect your basic rights but won’t go the extra mile in finding ways to beat your case or get your charges reduced. Furthermore, if you are facing an administrative suspension of your license by the DMV, your public defender cannot provide you with any guidance about how to protect your driving privileges.
An experienced criminal defense lawyer can often find ways to beat your case that might not be obvious to you. These include defenses of a technical, scientific, or legal nature, which prosecutors will certainly NOT point out for you. If there’s no way to beat your case or get it dismissed, your criminal defense attorney may be able to get your charges reduced and get you the best possible deal under the circumstances. Also, your lawyer can appear in court on your behalf and take care of all the necessary paperwork and bureaucratic aspects associated with your case.
You have several important rights after an arrest. These include the right to remain silent if questioned by law enforcement officials, the right to a phone call, and the right to legal representation.
A false allegation of committing a sex crime is one of the most serious claims anyone can make against you. If someone has falsely accused you of committing this offense, you should treat the accusations with seriousness, even if you know you are innocent.
The consequences of such charges are harsh. For example, a criminal record can affect your life permanently, and your reputation may suffer irreparable harm even if you are acquitted. You should act to protect yourself emotionally, legally, and socially. In California, there are specific steps you can take to protect your rights and seek justice. You can take these recommended actions if someone falsely accuses you of a sex crime.
Contact a Criminal Defense Lawyer
Consulting with a lawyer is one of the best ways to protect yourself when you are dealing with false accusations related to any sex crime charge. While you might consider handling the situation yourself, having an experienced attorney will make the process smoother. Your lawyer will be familiar with California sex crime laws and can use that expertise to your advantage. They will help you analyze the legal aspects of the crime you are wrongly accused of and clarify the regulations surrounding the false allegations against you.
In many cases where a defendant is dealing with false accusations, two main steps are typically involved. The first step is to contest the false claims in court. The second step may include seeking compensation from the individual who made the false accusation through a lawsuit. Your attorney will guide you through both processes and assist you in formulating a strategy to address each phase of your case.
People often hesitate to hire a lawyer due to concerns about legal fees or the belief that they can manage false accusations independently. This delay can be damaging to those wrongfully accused. You should start collecting evidence and building your case as early as possible. Waiting too long to consult with an attorney may result in losing crucial time and evidence. Witnesses might forget details or become unavailable to testify. The earlier you talk to a lawyer about your situation, the better your chances of proving your innocence.
Remain Calm
If someone falsely accuses you of a sex crime, you may naturally feel the urge to fight back and defend yourself. However, reacting impulsively and angrily can hurt your case. Remember that even if you feel justified in your response, it may provide the opposing side with more evidence to use against you. For example, acting out in anger, despite feeling justified, could lead a judge to view you as an unfit parent in child custody battles, potentially jeopardizing your custody or visitation rights in the future.
If someone wrongfully accuses you, you must stay calm and carefully consider how you respond. Avoid speaking to the police or answering questions without a defense attorney present. It may be tempting to explain your side and clear your name, but waiting for your attorney before engaging with law enforcement is wiser. Police are skilled at obtaining confessions, even incorrect ones, and they may pressure you to give up your right to remain silent without your lawyer. Stand your ground and inform the police that you will not talk without your attorney. This approach will significantly benefit your legal defense.
Learn About the Allegations Against You
Next, you should learn about the allegations against you. It may involve:
- Identifying the specific sex offenses you are accused of,
- Spotting any inconsistencies in the claims.
- Determining when and where these offenses are said to have occurred,
- Choosing the most effective legal defense strategy for your situation.
- Gathering any missing information related to the accusations.
- If a police report exists, make sure to obtain a copy.
Collect Evidence to Counter the False Claims
Once you consult a lawyer, you can start working closely with them to gather evidence supporting your position. It is advisable to maintain detailed records since they will help you to demonstrate your actions and statements. You must present evidence in court to establish your innocence and show that the accusations against you are unfounded or misrepresented.
After facing false accusations, we suggest keeping a journal. You can use a physical notebook or a notes app on your phone. Be thorough in documenting all interactions with the person making the false claims. Record the dates of emails, phone calls, texts, and details of any face-to-face meetings. Additionally, you should avoid meeting with the accuser alone; always have a third party present.
Avoid direct communication if the relationship with the person making the false claims has turned hostile. Have your attorney manage all interactions with that individual. This approach helps to minimize the risk of being falsely accused of further misconduct. Keep all receipts from various stores, restaurants, or other places to help with your alibi.
If someone posts about the case on social media, take screenshots immediately. You can also jot down details you remember about past interactions with the accuser. Note any witnesses present during the alleged incident, as they may assist in proving your innocence.
Challenge the Credibility of the Accuser
After consulting with your attorney, you will work together to create a plan to address the false accusations against you. This plan will vary based on several factors, including the nature of the allegations and whether the case is in civil or criminal court. However, a key part of any effective strategy is questioning the accuser’s credibility. If someone has claimed you sexually abused or assaulted them, your attorney can cross-examine them before the court.
Does the accuser have a history of telling lies? Do they have ulterior motives for making these accusations? For example, is your spouse alleging that you committed these acts to gain sole custody of your children? In such cases, your attorney will likely want your spouse to testify under oath and pose relevant questions.
By knowing what the accuser wants to gain from their false claims, you and your attorney can work on demonstrating that the accuser is not trustworthy. Your attorney can ask specific questions highlighting the accuser’s unreliability to judges and juries.
Find Your Witnesses and Provide Evidence Supporting Your Defense
Besides disputing the claims made by those who have wrongfully accused you, you should find your witnesses. Just as the accuser can present witnesses against you, you have the right to bring forth individuals who can confirm your innocence or highlight how the accuser has falsely accused you.
For example, if you have a witness who can testify under oath that you were dining together at the time of the alleged incident, that can help your case significantly. Additionally, you might find text messages, video footage, or emails that counter the accusations and demonstrate your innocence. In such cases, your attorney can call witnesses who support the evidence showing you did not commit the actions you are falsely accused of.
Remember that defendants do not have to prove their innocence; they only need to cast reasonable doubt on the statements made by the accuser. Your attorney can assist you in dismantling the prosecution’s case by exposing inaccuracies.
Prepare Your Legal Defense
Following these steps will help you create a solid legal defense strategy. You should customize this strategy to fit your situation, interests, and case specifics. There are several common defense strategies that your sex crime defense attorney can use, including:
- Alibi.
- Consent.
You can use more than one of these strategies in a single case.
Alibi
A strong strategy is to present an alibi, a defense that shows you were with someone else or in a different location when the crime supposedly occurred.
For example, if someone claims you committed sexual assault at 8:30 p.m. on a Sunday, but you were grocery shopping with your brother at that time, it would be impossible for you to have committed the act. Your brother can serve as a witness to support your alibi, and there may also be video evidence confirming your whereabouts during the incident.
Documenting everything you remember about the event while the details are still precise is advisable. Providing your defense attorney with information that undermines the accuser’s and prosecutor’s claims will be highly beneficial.
Consent
Many allegations of sexual crimes involve acts that did occur but were consensual. When someone falsely asserts that there was no consent, they are suggesting that the sexual act was a crime. Demonstrating that consent was present can be challenging. Your defense team can use various types of evidence to establish consent, including:
- Text messages and other communications exchanged between you and the accuser before and after the incident that indicate consent.
- Witnesses who learned about the incident can provide testimonies.
- Previous interactions in your relationship.
Misidentification
A less common but effective defense is that the accuser has mistakenly identified you as their attacker. The accuser’s account may be accurate in such situations, but you were not involved.
Seek Compensation for False Accusations
Making false accusations against someone is illegal. Depending on the specifics of your case, you can pursue financial compensation by filing a defamation lawsuit against the individual responsible. Defamation is a written or spoken statement that intentionally harms another person’s reputation.
California has laws to protect individuals and businesses from false claims that can damage their standing. To successfully file a defamation lawsuit, you must demonstrate that the statements made against you were intended to incite disdain towards you or your business.
Defamation is not classified as a crime; instead, it is a civil offense that allows the victim to seek financial compensation from the responsible party. If the defamatory statement is published in a newspaper, on a website, on posters, or in any other medium, it is termed libel. However, if the defamation occurs through spoken words, it is called slander.
Pursue a Defamation Lawsuit
Defamation occurs when a person deliberately makes a false statement that damages your reputation. If you have been accused of a sexual offense, you might have grounds to sue your accuser for defamation, provided you can prove that the claim was false and made with intent.
You Can Take Some Tests
In cases of sexual offenses, there may be evidence that can show someone’s guilt. You should prove that you are not guilty. Depending on your situation, undergoing scientific tests can help confirm your innocence. Find out what evidence has been collected and compare yourself against it to show that you are not responsible.
DNA evidence is specifically compelling, so having your DNA tested and available can provide a solid defense. You would not present your DNA test in court to prove your innocence if you were guilty. Consult your lawyer about the necessary tests to support your case and complete them.
Follow Your Attorney’s Advice
You should follow the guidance of your defense team. Emotions may run high during this period, but you are under scrutiny by the court and prosecution. If your lawyers advise you to avoid specific individuals until after your trial, follow their advice.
Being wrongfully accused of a sexual crime is distressing and may lead you to consider doing actions that are not in your best interest. You should stick to their guidelines to protect yourself from unnecessary complications.
What Should I Not Do If Accused Of a Sex Crime?
If you are falsely accused of a sexual crime, there are several actions you should avoid:
Do Not Ignore The Allegations Just Because They Are Untrue
While dismissing the accusations may be tempting and hoping they fade away since you know you are innocent, this is not advisable. Sexual assault allegations can lead to severe and lasting repercussions. It is crucial to take proactive steps as soon as you become aware of the charges to safeguard yourself.
Do Not Let Your Emotions Overwhelm You
Being falsely accused of sexual assault can understandably make you angry, but it is necessary to manage your emotions. Be cautious about what you say and do in public, as the court could use any emotional outburst against you. Avoid the accuser and their friends, family, or colleagues to prevent potential confrontations. If complete avoidance is impossible, do your best to keep your distance in close quarters.
Specific actions may give the impression that the false accusations are valid. Other actions could result in criminal charges for:
- Witness tampering,
- Destruction of evidence,
- Obstruction of justice, or
- Breaching a restraining order.
You should also avoid:
- Doing nothing and hoping the situation resolves itself.
- Destroying evidence that could support the false claims.
- Leaving the state or country.
Why Do People Falsely Accuse Others of Committing Sex Crimes?
Someone can falsely accuse you of a sex crime for different reasons, such as:
Revenge
Accusations related to sexual crimes can quickly tarnish someone’s reputation and disrupt their life. One common scenario for false accusations is when a jealous partner seeks revenge. Knowing how seriously society reacts to sex crime allegations, an ex-lover might use these claims to bring you humiliation and shame.
Mistaken Identity
Sex crimes are often shocking and traumatic events that happen suddenly. After being sexually assaulted, victims may struggle to recall specific details about the perpetrator, which could lead them to misidentify the perpetrator in a photo lineup.
Victim’s Age
Statutory rape, known as unlawful sexual intercourse in California, occurs when an adult engages in sexual activity with someone under the legal age, regardless of consent. Accusations can arise when an adult is dating a minor. For instance, a 19-year-old who has sex with his 17-year-old girlfriend could face misdemeanor charges for statutory rape, even if she agreed to the encounter.
Family Law Issues
Allegations of sex crimes can also surface during custody disputes. One parent might accuse the other of child molestation to gain full custody of their children. An attorney can gather evidence from the accuser to highlight their animosity and the false nature of the claims.
Consequences of a Sex Crime Conviction
Many individuals convicted of these sex crimes face prison sentences and fines. Besides these legal penalties, there are additional repercussions, including:
- Inability to vote while incarcerated,
- A possible restriction on owning firearms,
- Mandatory sex offender registration.
- You lose the ability to clear the conviction from your record.
Sex offender registration is accessible to the public, which can limit your job prospects.
Find a Sex Crimes Defense Attorney Near Me
California follows the principle of presumption of innocence, meaning you are considered innocent until proven guilty. You should know you have the right to a fair trial if you are wrongfully accused. You can have legal representation, choose to remain silent, and contest any evidence against you. Remember that the legal system is designed to safeguard your rights, and you do not have to navigate this situation by yourself.
If you have been falsely accused of sexual assault, Leah Legal is ready to offer expert legal assistance and protect your rights. Our skilled criminal lawyers in Van Nuys will support you throughout the legal process, help you create a solid defense, and fight for your innocence.
Contact us today at 818-484-1100 for a private consultation and take the first step toward restoring your reputation.
En California los actos de agresión y amenaza cometidos en contra de otro son rigurosamente regulados por las Estado a través de diferentes leyes, pero cuando quien emite el maltrato y quien lo recibe sostienen o sostuvieron en el pasado un tipo de relación íntima bien sea desprendida de un matrimonio, de una relación de hecho, del supuesto de ser o haber sido novios, de vivir o haber convivido juntos o por tener un hijo en común, o cuando las partes comparten vínculos de sangre o derivados del matrimonio, dicho acto de maltrato o amenaza es considerado “violencia doméstica”, lo que corresponde a un delito que puede materializarse al emitir cualquier de acto violento ya sea físico emocional o psicológico en contra de las personas mencionadas.
El delito en estudio a su vez está compuesto por varias subcategorías de conductas criminales, tales como lo son: La lesión corporal a algún cónyuge, las amenazas criminales, el abuso de adultos mayores, la transgresión a una orden de protección dictada por la corte, la porno venganza y la negligencia infantil, las cuales poseen características y esencia propia que las distinguen y que a su vez generan consecuencias diferentes a nivel penal, pero que de forma general se resumen a la imposición de altas multas y el encarcelamiento de quien sea el causante de una situación de esta índole.
Si está inmerso en una situación de violencia doméstica y requiere asesoría jurídica en Van Nuys, CA, un abogado de la reconocida firma Leah Legal, puede brindarle toda la información que amerita, y en caso de que sea acusado por perpetrar tal delito, el mismo puede asumir su defensa e indicarle qué acciones desplegar con el propósito de demostrar su inocencia ante al Juez, o al menos lograr que se dicte una sentencia reducida a su favor que represente la imposición de sanciones menos restrictivas.
¿Según la legislación de California qué se entiende por Violencia Doméstica?
De acuerdo a lo consagrado por el segmento 13700 del Código Penal, es todo maltrato o amenaza de maltrato ejercida por un individuo en contra de otro con quien sostiene o sostuvo en el pasado cualquier tipo de relación íntima o posee un vínculo derivado de la sangre o del matrimonio.
Dicho de otra manera un individuo debe enfrentar cargos por violencia doméstica cuando comete cualquier tipo de abuso en contra de alguna pareja íntima
Cuando se habla de relación íntima, esto abarca:
- El esposo actual o el anterior.
- La pareja con quien se mantiene una unión estable de hecho que esté registrada o la anterior.
- Algún prometido actual o uno anterior.
- Cualquier pareja de índole romántica de la actualidad o anterior.
- Cualquier persona con quien el imputado tenga un hijo.
- Cualquier persona con quien esté saliendo el imputado o haya salido en el pasado.
No obstante el Código de Familia del Estado, contiene un listado más amplio de personas calificadas como víctimas de un acto relacionado con violencia doméstica, el cual no se limita únicamente a parejas íntimas sino que incluye:
- Hijos del imputado.
- Toda persona vinculada con el imputado por lazos sanguíneos o derivados del matrimonio (consanguinidad o afinidad), hasta el segundo grado, tales como: hermanos (as), medios hermanos (as), hermanastros (as), abuelos (as), nietos (as), tíos (as). Sobrinos (as).
Por otro lado, se habla de abuso, cuando un sujeto de manera intencional o imprudente hace uso o amenaza cómo usar fuerza física en contra de cualquiera de las personas antes mencionadas.
Tal abuso puede presentarse cuando un sujeto causa o trata de causar a otro, lesiones físicas, lo agrede sexualmente, la hace sentir temor razonable por ser lesionado gravemente al emitir amenazas de causar daños, lo acosa, acecha, amenaza, golpea, perturba la paz, o destruye sus bienes personales.
Por ende un sujeto no debe recibir un golpe para que considere que el mismo fue maltratado, ya que el maltrato abarca el nivel tanto físico, como el emocional y también el psicológico y normalmente los perpetradores de este tipo de delitos suelen usar una combinación de varios tipos de maltratos para mantener el control sobre sus víctimas
Por último se debe tener en cuenta que la violencia doméstica en sí es una categoría específica que abarca varios tipos de conductas criminales, reguladas por normativas diferentes y que además son castigadas de forma distinta de acuerdo a la gravedad y alcance del delito cometido y de las circunstancias de hecho involucradas en el mismo.
¿Cuáles conductas delictivas se consideran Violencia Doméstica?
Dentro de los delitos que integran esta categoría pueden mencionarse:
Poner en riesgo a algún niño
Es un delito consagrado en el apartado 273 a PC el cual establece que es un crimen exponer de manera intencional a un menor cuya edad está por debajo de los 18 años a padecer sufrimiento, dolor o un riesgo injustificable.
En este sentido, un sujeto puede enfrentar cargos de esta índole cuando somete a un niño al riesgo injustificable de sufrir daño, a pesar de que el mismo en realidad nunca llegue a sufrir tal daño. Además en estos casos pueden formularse cargos en contra de cualquier adulto que tenga a su cargo a una persona cuya edad esté por debajo de los 18 años y no solo en contra de los padres.
En relación a lo anterior, el Juez puede emitir un veredicto de culpabilidad contra un imputado por este delito, cuando la fiscalía logra evidenciar:
- Que el imputado hizo lo siguiente:
- Infringió de manera intencional dolor de naturaleza física o algún tipo de sufrimiento mental irrazonable a un menor.
- Ocasionó o permitió de manera intencional, que algún menor padezca dolor físico o sufrimiento de índole mental injustificable.
- Ocasionó o permitió de manera intencional, que se dañara la salud o persona de un niño que tenía bajo su cargo o a su custodia.
- Ocasionó o permitió de manera intencional, que un niño que tenía bajo su cargo o su custodia fuera puesto en una circunstancia que ponía en riesgo su persona o su salud.
- Que el imputado actuó con negligencia criminal cuando ocasionó o permitió que un niño a su cargo sufriera una lesión o estuviera expuesto a un riesgo.
- En caso de que el imputado sea padre del menor, no lo estaba disciplinando de forma razonable.
- Para que el delito sea procesado como grave, la fiscalía debe demostrar que el imputado actuó en una situación que podría acarrear lesiones físicas graves o la muerte del menor. (No se exige que el menor haya sufrido una lesión o la muerte sino que dicho resultado probablemente haya podido configurarse en virtud de las circunstancias)
Lesión corporal contra algún cónyuge
De acuerdo al apartado 273.5 PC, es un crimen ocasionar de forma intencional lesiones físicas a alguna pareja.
Para que un sujeto sea procesado por este delito, deben configurarse las siguientes situaciones:
- Que la víctima sea la pareja del imputado.
- Que el acto de agresión haya ocasionado alguna lesión.
- Que el imputado haya actuado intencionalmente.
De acuerdo a esta normativa la víctima puede ser cualquier pareja íntima actual o del pasado del perpetrador, independientemente de que estén o no unidos por lazos matrimoniales.
Abuso de adultos mayores
Es una conducta delictiva estipulada en la sección 368 PC, en la que incurre un sujeto cuando abusaba física o emocionalmente, actúa con negligencia o explota financieramente a una persona cuya edad es de 65 años o más.
A tales efectos el abuso puede ser:
- De naturaleza física, por ejemplo cuando se impone dolor o lesiones irrazonables a la víctima.
- Emocional, que puede representarse en aislamiento o burlas.
- Negligencia y exposición al peligro, que implica poner a un adulto mayor en riesgo exponiendo su seguridad y salud.
- Explotación financiera, también denominado fraude de adultos mayores o abuso financiero de adultos mayores.
Por otro lado para que alguien sea condenado por incurrir en este tipo de conducta la fiscalía debe demostrar:
- Que el imputado actuando de forma intencional de manera negligentemente criminal expuso a un adulto mayor a sufrir dolor físico o dolor mental insensato..
- Que su conducta pudo haber representado un peligro para la salud o la vida de la víctima.
- Que el imputado tenía conocimiento o debió haberlo tenido sobre que la víctima tenía una edad que igualaba o superaba los 65 años.
- Para que el delito sea procesado como grave, la fiscalía debe demostrar que el imputado actuó en una situación que podría acarrear lesiones físicas graves o la muerte de la víctima
Para comprender mejor el contexto es importante señalar que la negligencia, implica una falta de atención o diligencia reflejada por un individuo al desplegar una acción. En el escenario específico del delito en cuestión, tal negligencia se representa en exponer a un riesgo de forma deliberada a un adulto mayor.
Mientras que la explotación de índole financiera se refiere al uso de manera indebida e ilícita de recursos financieros pertenecientes a un adulto mayor
Finalmente, es importante aclarar que este tipo de delito entra dentro de la categoría de violencia doméstica bien sea cuando el abuso, negligencia, o explotación financiera, proviene de un hijo o de un cónyuge.
Amenazas criminales
Corresponde a un acto ilícito tipificado por el apartado 422 PC, en el que incurre una persona cuando emite en contra de otra, una amenaza de ocasionar la muerte o alguna lesión física de gran magnitud con el propósito (y en realidad de se cumple el propósito) de hacerle sentir un miedo justificable y sostenido en cuanto a la seguridad propia o de los integrantes de su núcleo familiar.
Para que un sujeto sea determinado culpable por este delito en la corte, la fiscalía está obligada a demostrar:
- Que el imputado de forma intencional amenazó a la víctima con matarla o herirla de gravedad.
- Que su propósito era que su manifestación ya sea oral, escrita o notificada por medios electrónicos fuera percibida como una advertencia.
- Que la advertencia emitida por el imputado, era inequívoca inmediata, incondicional y específica y por lo tanto hacía creer que su ejecución sería inmediata.
- Que la supuesta víctima sentía temor sensato en cuanto a la propia seguridad o la de los integrantes de su grupo familiar.
Para que un delito de esta índole sea catalogado como de violencia doméstica la supuesta víctima debe ser una pareja íntima o una persona relacionada con el perpetrador por lazos de sangre o afinidad.
Además se debe tener claro que no se exige que ocurra algún contacto físico entre el imputado y la víctima para que dicho imputado sea declarado culpable por emitir una amenaza criminal, ya que no se requiere que la amenaza efectivamente sea ejecutada ni que quien la emite este en capacidad de ejecutarla o al menor le intención de hacerlo, ya que lo que esta normativa busca castigar es el perjuicio psicológico ocasionado a la víctima como consecuencia del temor sensato que le provocó la amenaza y no si hubo lugar a algún daño físico.
Violación a una orden judicial de restricción
También conocida como orden de protección, es aquella dictada por la corte a favor de una víctima de violencia doméstica, con el propósito de protegerla del abuso o amenazas de abuso emitido por una persona con quien comparte un vínculo cercano, es decir que sea una pareja íntima actual o del pasado o que comparta algún vínculo de afinidad o consanguinidad señalado por la ley.
Una orden de esta índole impone al sujeto restringido, es decir a quien comete o amenaza con cometer el acto de abuso, el cumplimiento de ciertas condiciones tales:
- Abstenerse de ponerse en contacto con la víctima.
- Abstenerse de acercarse a la casa de la víctima.
- Abstenerse de poseer armas de fuego.
- Subordinarse al cumplimiento de determinada orden judicial de custodia y visitas.
- Pagar la manutención correspondiente a los hijos.
- Pagar una manutención correspondiente al cónyuge o una pareja de hecho
- Completar un programa sobre maltrato.
- Abstenerse de cambiar las pólizas de seguro.
- Realizar el pago de determinadas cuentas.
Ahora bien, en relación al delito en estudio, según la norma 273.6 PC, el mismo se comete cuando el sujeto denominado como restringido por una orden de protección infringe los parámetros establecidos en la misma por el Juez.
Para que un sujeto se procesado por este delito, la fiscalía debe demostrar:
- Que un Juez competente emitió una Orden judicial de esta índole a favor de la víctima.
- El imputado conocía la existencia de la orden judicial, dado que fue notificado por la corte al recibir un duplicado de tal instrumento o al ser informado por un oficial competente sobre la misma.
- Que los parámetros establecidos por el Juez en la orden judicial son justos y sensatos, de forma tal que el sujeto restringido está en posibilidad de cumplirlos.
- Que el imputado de forma intencional transgredió una orden de protección.
¿Cómo sanciona la ley los delitos mencionados?
Los delitos señalados en el segmento anterior son penados de la siguiente forma:
Poner en riesgo a algún niño
Como delito menor acarrea:
- Prisión por 6 meses.
- Multa no mayor a 1.000$
Cuando se expone el menor a la muerte o al posible padecimiento de una lesión física grave el delito se convierte en un wobbler (independientemente de que no ocurra dicha muerte o lesión física), es decir puede ser procesado como delito menor o grave de acuerdo al criterio del fiscal previo estudio del caso:
Si se formulan cargos por delito grave conlleva:
- Prisión por 2, 4 o 5 años.
- Multa no mayor a 10.000$.
Observaciones: Se puede dictar una sentencia adicional de prisión de tres a seis años cuando el menor (víctima) sufre un daño corporal causado de forma personal y real por el imputado, pero cuando el menor muere como consecuencia de la actuación negligentemente criminal del imputado puede imponer una pena adicional de cuatro años.
Lesión corporal contra algún cónyuge
Al igual que en el caso anterior es considerado un wobbler por ende:
Como delito menor acarrea:
- Prisión por 1 año.
- Multa no mayor a 6.000$
Si se formulan cargos por delito grave conlleva:
- Prisión por 2 o 4 años.
- Multa no mayor a 6.000$.
Abuso de adultos mayores
Como delito menor acarrea:
- Prisión por 1 año.
- Multa no mayor a 6.000$
- Indemnización a la víctima.
Si se formulan cargos por delito grave conlleva:
- Prisión por máximo 4 años.
- Multa no mayor a 10.000$.
- Indemnización a la víctima.
Observación: Si se trata de un crimen grave que provoca graves lesiones físicas a la víctima, el imputado debe ser castigado con una pena adicional de 7 años de prisión.
Amenazas criminales
Es considerado un wobbler que como delito menor acarrea
- Prisión por máximo 1 año
- Multa no mayor a 1.000$.
Como delito grave conlleva:
- Prisión por máximo 3 años.
- Multa no mayor a 10.000$.
Observación: Cuando el imputado emplea un arma mortal o considera peligrosa para manifestar la amenaza debe imponerse un año extra de prisión.
Violación a una orden judicial de restricción
Como delito menor acarrea:
- Prisión por 1 año.
- Multa no mayor a 1.000$
Como delito grave conlleva:
- Prisión por máximo 3 años.
- Multa no mayor a 10.000$.
Donde encontrar asesoría de un abogado experto violencia doméstica cerca de mí
Si enfrenta actualmente un caso vinculado con Violencia Doméstica en Van Nuys, CA un abogado de la reconocida firma Leah Legal, puede brindarle la colaboración y asesoría que tanto requiere en estos momentos que de seguro le generan grave tensión y esteros al no saber qué ocurrirá con su futuro, solo debe llamar cuanto antes al 818-484-1100 y solicitar una cita durante la que comenzará a recibir asesoría jurídica de un experto que se encargará de estudiar a fondo su situación y si usted lo decide también se ocupara de recaudar el material probatorio suficiente para convencer al Juez de dictar un veredicto beneficioso para usted.
Aquellos individuos que son ancianos y los adultos que se encuentran en condición de dependencia pertenecen a un grupo particular de individuos a los que las leyes les otorgan especial protección en California, y la razón es que estos se encuentran en estado de vulnerabilidad, porque son incapaces de dar satisfacción a sus necesidades más básicas por sí mismos, por ello, quedan expuestos de manera frecuente a ser victimizados por malos tratos que pueden provenir de sus familiares o cuidadores, que son los que tienen legalmente la responsabilidad para cuidarlos y satisfacer todo aquello que necesiten.
A los efectos de la determinación de quienes forman parte de estos grupos especialmente protegidos, se considera anciano un sujeto que haya llegado a la edad de 65 años o que la haya superado, en cambio los adultos dependientes son aquellos individuos entre los 18 y los 64 años que se ven impedidos de poder satisfacer sus necesidades primarias de manera efectiva, por lo que necesitan ser cuidados por otros individuos que las satisfagan por ellos. Lo que ocurre con esta clase de individuos es que suelen ser las víctimas más fáciles de sufrir maltratos físicos o psicológicos, abusos económicos, ser dejados en estado de abandono, ser secuestrados, sufrir de aislamiento o de negligencia, conductas que lamentablemente se producen con cierta frecuencia, y a esta conclusión hemos podido llegar cuando ha podido observarse el crecimiento exponencial de los casos que se procesan todos los días con base en esta clase de cargos ante las Cortes.
Existe una cantidad de señales y de parámetros de los que es posible deducir que un anciano o adulto dependiente está siendo abusado o maltratado a nivel psicológico o físico y cualquier sujeto que pueda darse cuenta de que esta situación está ocurriendo, tiene la obligación de denunciarlo ante las autoridades competentes, para que tal situación sea investigada, con la finalidad de determinar la realidad de dicha situación y verificar el estado en que se encuentra el individuo bajo cuidado de otros.
Sin embargo, por tratarse de una conducta ilícita tipificada en el Código Penal, si un sujeto es encontrado responsable por haber llevado a cabo la misma, podrá ser condenado a cumplir determinadas sanciones, entre las que se incluyen ser encarcelado y pagar costosas multas, además de adquirir un récord criminal que constarán en un registro público que puede ser consultado por cualquier interesado que se dedique a reclutar empleados, conceder créditos o becas, rentar inmuebles y hasta otorgar licencias profesionales, y tener este tipo de antecedentes puede hacer que sea discriminado y excluido de inmediato de cualquier proceso de selección, debido a que esta clase de antecedentes lo van a señalar como un delincuente, siendo repudiado y hasta excluido por la propia sociedad.
¿A quién puedo pedir la asistencia jurídica que necesito?
En el escenario de que usted haya sido acusado en Van Nuys CA, por haber cometido la conducta ilícita que consiste en abusar de adultos que son dependientes o de ancianos, lo primero que debe hacer es calmarse y luego contactar con abogados criminalistas experimentados, que tengan las credenciales que se necesitan para analizar el caso y escoger los argumentos defensivos más oportunos para lograr que usted sea exculpado, o en el peor de los supuestos, llevar a cabo unas negociaciones beneficiosas con la representación fiscal, para mejorar su situación ante la Corte. Y en Leah Legal tenemos precisamente a los profesionales que usted necesita. Recuerde que todo individuo se presume inocente mientras no sea posible demostrar lo contrario, por lo que recibir una acusación no implica que necesariamente el imputado va a ser encontrado responsable, en particular si desde las fases tempranas del procedimiento usted cuenta con la asesoría jurídica de criminalistas experimentados, por lo que no debe tardar en ponerse en contacto con nuestra firma a la brevedad posible.
¿Cómo están tipificadas las conductas de abusos contra ancianos o adultos que son dependientes?
Se trata de una conducta ilegal que se encuentra encuadrada dentro de una categoría muy específica de hechos ilícitos que son denominados de manera general como violencia doméstica, cuya regulación se encuentra en el artículo 368 del Código Penal de California, donde se establece que cualquier individuo que incurra en dicha conducta ilegal de manera intencionada o facilite el hecho de que a un anciano o adulto que sea dependiente le sea causado un sufrimiento psicológico o dolor corporal que sea injustificable será declarado responsable por tal conducta.
Esta actividad ilícita puede llevarse a cabo de forma continuada, esto es, que se cometa en múltiples ocasiones en contra del anciano o del adulto dependiente, o puede ser que ocurra de manera aislada, normalmente llevada a cabo por el cuidador que debe brindarle los cuidados que requiere, o por un familiar de la presunta víctima. Aunque es posible que el cuidador sea al mismo tiempo un familiar, no son lo mismo, y tanto unos como otros pueden ejecutar esta clase de conductas ilícitas.
Algunos ejemplos de esta clase de actividades ilegales son:
- El cuidador de un anciano de 91 años de edad, que al mismo tiempo es su hijo, encierra al padre en una habitación, negándose a darle sus alimentos.
- Un individuo de 86 años es convencido con engaños por su cuidador para que le traspase la propiedad sobre su auto.
Con relación a las conductas que podrían calificarse como hechos ilícitos de abuso cometidos en perjuicio de adultos dependiente so ancianos, podemos mencionar:
- Llevar a cabo en su perjuicio manipulaciones de tipo económico o que constituyan un fraude.
- Abstenerse de proporcionarle al individuo bajo cuidado la medicación que necesita.
- Colocarlos en situaciones riesgosas para su vida o su seguridad de manera intencionada.
- Abusar de manera psicológica o verbal del individuo bajo cuidado.
- Ocasionar sufrimientos corporales al individuo bajo cuidado.
¿A quiénes se consideran legalmente como ancianos?
Los ancianos son aquellos sujetos que han llegado a cumplir una edad que sea igual o que supere los 65 años, quienes son sujetos especialmente protegidos por la legislación, ya que son calificados como pertenecientes a un grupo que se considera vulnerable.
¿A quiénes se consideran adultos dependientes?
A todos aquellos cuya edad oscile entre los 18 y los 64 años, que sufren de una específica discapacidad mental o física, la cual les impide poder dar satisfacción a sus necesidades más básicas por sí mismos, por lo que tampoco pueden protegerse o ser capaces de exigir que sus derechos sean respetados, de modo que están expuestos de manera vulnerable a situaciones en las que potencialmente pueden ser objeto de abusos por parte de otros, y por ello las leyes los rodean de un sistema especial de protección.
¿Qué conductas son consideradas como abusos en ancianos o en adultos que son dependientes?
- Abusos físicos: tiene lugar cuando se causan lesiones que son irrazonables o se causa dolor en la presunta víctima.
- Abuso emocional: cuando el procesado ocasiona sufrimientos mentales o psicológicos en la presunta víctima, empleando para ello amenazas, humillaciones o gritos.
- Negligencia: es colocar a la presunta víctima en una situación riesgosa que pueda afectar a su seguridad, su salud o su vida.
- Explotación financiera: es una actividad ilícita por medio de la que el procesado hace propios o utiliza de manera indebida bienes, propiedades o dinero que pertenecen a la presunta víctima.
- Abandono: cuando el cuidador deja a la presunta víctima sola, sin prestarle la asistencia que debe.
- Aislamiento: cuando de manera intencionada se impide que la presunta víctima reciba llamadas telefónicas, visitas o correo.
- Influencia indebida: que se verifica si el procesado ha utilizado la excesiva persuasión sobre la presunta víctima, convenciéndolo de actuar de determinada manera o para abstenerse de realizar una actividad de la manera en que es apropiada.
- Abuso sexual: es que la presunta víctima sea violada o sufra agresiones sexuales.
¿De qué manera se inician las investigaciones penales por esta clase de conductas ilícitas?
En California existen varias instituciones, agencias u oficinas que tienen como competencia la recepción de las denuncias en caso de que se sospeche de un abuso de esta clase, así como de investigarlos y procesarlos para que se formulen las acusaciones correspondientes. Es posible que la denuncia la formule un agente de policía, pero también pueden efectuarse por medio de llamadas por teléfono que pueden ser anónimas o no, como por parte de los médicos, doctores o enfermeros de la presunta víctima, amigos y hasta familiares de la misma.
Cuando se realiza una denuncia, el organismo correspondiente procederá a estudiar los hechos, con el objetivo de determinar si existen méritos para un enjuiciamiento, con la formulación de la acusación correspondiente o si se debe designar a un funcionario para que haga seguimiento e investigue si la denuncia es real.
La determinación de cuál oficina, agencia o institución es la que debe procesar e investigar cada denuncia concreta se hará en función de los siguientes criterios:
- El lugar en el que se ha llevado a cabo el presunto abuso denunciado.
- Si el hecho punible es de naturaleza mayor o menor.
- El tipo de abusos que supuestamente han sido cometidos.
¿Existen hechos de los que podría deducirse que algún anciano o un adulto que es dependiente, está sufriendo de esta clase de abusos?
Existen señales visibles que podrían hacernos suponer que un anciano o un adulto que es dependiente por razones mentales o físicas, está siendo abusado, entre las que se encuentran:
Señales de abusos físicos:
- Huesos o dientes rotos, marcas de piel, abrasiones o moretones.
- Sensibilidad palpable cuando la presunta víctima es tocada o lesiones corporales.
- Deshidratación.
- Desnutrición.
Señales de un abuso financiero:
- Cambios observables en los documentos del patrimonio o en los títulos sobre propiedades de la presunta víctima que son inesperados o sospechosos.
- Pérdida de la posesión de bienes u objetos.
- Falta dinero en las cuentas bancarias
- Realización de operaciones bancarias o financieras que resulten sospechosas.
Señales derivadas del comportamiento del anciano o adulto dependiente:
- Excusas sin sentido.
- Miedo a expresarse.
- Señales de depresión.
- Demostraciones de ira.
- Señales de confusión.
- Señales de agitación.
Señales en las conductas de un cuidador o familiar:
- Que éstos abusen en el consumo de alcohol, drogas o tengan conductas de juego.
- Que se explique de manera contradictoria un determinado incidente sufrido por la presunta víctima.
- Excluir al anciano o adulto dependiente de sus normales actividades sociales.
- Ser indiferente o tener rencor en perjuicio de la presunta víctima.
- Impedir que la presunta víctima hable por ella misma.
¿Quiénes tienen la obligación de denunciar esta clase de abusos?
Esta obligación de informar o de denunciar sobre posibles hechos de abuso la tienen aquellos sujetos que mantienen contactos directos con la presunta víctima o con su cuidador, de acuerdo con las leyes.
En función de lo que acabamos de mencionar, entre los individuos que tienen esta obligación legal la tienen:
- Asesores financieros, así como los empleados de bancos o entidades financieras.
- Oficiales policiales.
- Trabajadores sociales.
- Proveedores de atención médica.
- Familiares de la presunta víctima.
¿Cuáles son los extremos que debe demostrar la representación fiscal para que un procesado sea acusado por esta conducta ilícita?
En orden a que un procesado sea declarado responsable por esta clase de abusos ilegales, es necesario que la representación fiscal demuestre la concurrencia de determinados hechos al caso concreto, que son denominados elementos de la conducta criminal, y en caso de que no sea posible demostrar la existencia de tan sólo uno de ellos, hará que la Corte desestime la acusación.
Con relación a la conducta ilícita de abuso a la que nos estamos refiriendo, la demostración de tales elementos dependerá de cómo se desea comprobar que este hecho ilícito fue ejecutado, esto es, si se trata de un delito mayor o menor. Esto nos indica que esta clase de abuso constituye un wobbler, de modo que será la representación fiscal la que debe escoger cómo va a ser procesado, dependiendo de los elementos que sea posible demostrar en la Corte.
Cuando la representación fiscal decida procesarlo como delito menor, tendrá que demostrar que:
- El procesado de manera intencionada o llevando a cabo una conducta conocida como negligencia grave, permitió que la presunta víctima fuera expuesta a un sufrimiento psicológico o corporal que sea irrazonable.
- Que tales acciones representaron un riesgo para la vida, el bienestar o la salud de la presunta víctima.
- El procesado sabía o debió haber sabido que el sujeto perjudicado ya había alcanzado los 65 años o más, o se trata de un adulto que sufre de una condición física o mental que lo hace ser dependiente.
Resulta importante aclarar el sentido legal de algunos de los términos empleados en la descripción de los elementos constitutivos:
Intención
Esto significa que el procesado llevó a cabo su actuación de forma voluntaria, es decir, adrede, con conocimiento de lo que estaba realizando, por lo que se excluyen actos accidentales.
Negligencia grave
También llamada negligencia criminal, supone que el procesado ha llevado a cabo una clase de conducta descuidada que supera o sobrepasa un descuido simple u ordinario, por lo que el procesado tiene un comportamiento que puede calificarse como insensato, que exhibe absoluto desprecio por la vida y la seguridad de otros. Ahora bien, con relación a este elemento, es necesario aclarar que la representación fiscal no podrá probar que existió este tipo de negligencia grave, a menos que pueda demostrar que el procesado tuvo una obligación de actuar establecida por las leyes.
Dolor o sufrimiento irrazonables
Esto quiere decir que el sufrimiento o el dolor causados en perjuicio de la víctima tienen que ser considerado innecesario o excesivo, en función de la situación que se haya presentado.
En caso de que la representación fiscal haya decidido procesarlo como delito mayor, es necesario demostrar que:
- El procesado de manera intencionada o exhibiendo negligencia criminal o grave, logró exponer a la presunta víctima a un sufrimiento psicológico o a un dolor físico que sea irrazonable.
- Las acciones del procesado potencialmente pudieron causar daños físicos graves e incluso la muerte de la presunta víctima.
- El procesado sabía, o debió haber sabido, que la presunta víctima tenía una edad de por lo menos 65 años.
Junto con lo anterior, si la acusación es por causa de abuso financiero, el representante fiscal tiene que demostrar que:
- El procesado llevó a cabo una conducta ilícita de clase financiera, como puede ser un fraude, una malversación o un robo.
- La propiedad o el bien que ha sido robado, malversado o defraudado era propiedad de un sujeto cuya edad era por lo menos de 65 años.
- El procesado tenía la obligación de cuidar a la presunta víctima o tenía conocimiento de que la presunta víctima era un anciano.
¿Qué sanciones son las que podrían imponerse a un procesado que sea declarado responsable en esta clase de conductas ilícitas?
La determinación de las penas que se podrían aplicar a un procesado que sea declarado responsable de cometer esta clase de abusos dependerá de la calificación que la representación fiscal le haya dado a los hechos, en caso de que el mismo posea historial criminal y de las características en que ocurrieron los hechos.
En este sentido, si es calificado como delito menor, las sanciones a las que se expone el acusado son:
- Libertad condicional informal o sumaria o
- Pena de prisión que puede llegar al máximo de un año, y/o
- Multas por un monto que puede ascender a $ 6.000,00, y/o
- Imposición de la obligación de indemnización a la presunta víctima, y/o
- Imposición de asistir obligatoriamente a un programa de asesoramiento.
Pero si la calificación del hecho es como delito mayor, las penalidades a las que se expone el procesado serán:
- Libertad condicional bajo régimen de control o formal o
- Pena de prisión que puede llegar al máximo de cuatro años, y/o
- Multas por un monto que puede ascender a $ 10.000,00, y/o
- Imposición de la obligación de indemnización a la presunta víctima, y/o
- Imposición de asistir obligatoriamente a un programa de asesoramiento.
En caso de que la presunta víctima sufriera de lesiones físicas calificadas como graves por causa del abuso, las leyes prevén una mejora o incremento de las sanciones, que será cumplido de manera adicional y consecutiva, que puede llegar a los 7 años de prisión.
¿Existen otras consecuencias que puedan derivarse de una convicción de esta clase?
Además de adquirir un récord criminal que puede afectar muy negativamente su vida profesional, social, familiar y personal, si el procesado declarado responsable de este hecho punible no es un ciudadano de los Estados Unidos, es muy posible que su situación migratoria cambie sustancialmente si la condena se fundamenta en un abuso en el que se haya visto involucrada la depravación moral, porque de acuerdo con la Ley de Inmigración, los individuos que ejecuten un crimen que pueda calificarse de vileza moral serán sometidos a un procedimiento de deportación, de modo que serán devueltos a su país de origen, e incluso que sean declarados inadmisibles, aunque su permanencia previa en el país haya sido legal, hayan tenido hijos en este territorio o sean propietarios de inmuebles en el país.
Otro efecto, en caso de que la condena se haya fundamentado en un delito mayor, es que el convicto será privado de su derecho a adquirir, portar o poseer un arma de fuego.
Además, es posible que la víctima o su representante legal interpongan una demanda civil con base en el Código sobre Bienestar e Instituciones, artículo 15600, para reclamar una indemnización por daños compensatorios e incluso por daños punitivos.
¿Hay hechos ilícitos que se relacionan con esta clase de abusos?
- 242 PC – Agresión.
- 422 PC – Amenazas criminales.
- 261 PC – Violación.
¿Existen estrategias defensivas de uso común para impugnar un cargo por esta clase de abusos?
La elección de la estrategia defensiva que sea la más adecuada para el caso siempre debe ser realizada por un criminalista especializado, porque sólo un profesional con la experiencia que se requiere podrá determinar cuál argumento podría ser más eficaz, dependiendo de las características en las que ocurrieron los hechos, no obstante, entre las estrategias más empleadas, se encuentran:
- El procesado no tuvo la intención que este hecho ilícito requiere.
- La acusación es falsa.
- El procesado fue erróneamente identificado.
- Ausencia de evidencias que sean suficientes para justificar una condena.
Contratar al abogado en abusos de ancianos o de adultos que son dependientes cerca de mí
En Van Nuys CA, esta es una clase de acusación que se investiga y se sanciona con mucha severidad, de manera que si usted en la actualidad está enfrentando una acusación por haber abusado de algún anciano o de algún adulto que sea dependiente y que se encuentre bajo su cuidado, necesita de la ayuda jurídica de abogados especializados en el área, y entre los mejores se encuentran los que tenemos a su disposición en Leah Legal, porque conocen estos procedimientos y manejan las herramientas jurídicas con las que será posible mejorar su situación judicial ante la Corte, demostrando su inocencia, o en el peor de los supuestos, logrando un acuerdo con la representación fiscal para minimizar los efectos que un cargo de esta naturaleza puede tener en su vida.
¡A qué está esperando para contactarnos y recibir la mejor ayuda legal disponible! Llámenos por el 818-484-1100 agende una cita para que se reúna con uno de nuestros abogados criminalistas a discutir sus opciones legales.
En el Estado de California, cuando un sujeto ejecuta patrones de conducta persistentes de acoso, sea con el propósito de molestar a otro, enviándole cartas o mensajes de texto no queridos, o amenazando de forma creíble de ocasionar un daño a su persona o a su familia cercana, podrá ser acusado por acecho.
En este sentido, este ilícito puede ser calificado como delito menor o mayor según las circunstancias particulares del caso y si el acusado cuenta o no con antecedentes criminales, y como consecuencia de ello sufrirá sanciones como: pasar tiempo en prisión, pago de multas por grandes cantidades. Asimismo podrá ser objeto de una orden de protección la cual será emitida en su contra y en la cual se le prohibirá mantener comunicación con la víctima. Por otra parte, en su vida personal tendrá consecuencias negativas debido al estigma social que genera una condena por este delito, y perderá su derecho a poseer y comprar armas de fuego.
Es por todo ello, que si usted actualmente es acusado por el delito de acecho y se encuentra en Van Nuys, CA, debe ponerse en contacto con el bufete Leah Legal, ya que cuentan con los mejores profesionales quienes le ayudarán a resolver su caso. ¡Llame inmediatamente!
¿Cómo establece la normativa de California el acecho?
En principio, las normas que regulan el acecho se dictaron en una primera oportunidad por la Legislatura del Estado de California en 1900, debido a dos situaciones de acecho en las cuales se vieron involucradas dos actrices reconocidas. El primer hecho fue Theresa Saldana quien fue apuñalada, y la víctima del segundo hecho fue Rebecca Schaeffer, la cual resultó asesinada.
Gracias a estos casos se dio el inicio de la normativa 646.9 establecida en el Código Penal, donde se considera como un ilícito acosar, seguir, o amenazar a otro sujeto, hasta el momento que esta persona tema razonablemente por su seguridad o la seguridad de su grupo familiar cercano.
Al respecto, es importante señalar que el ilícito de acecho no se considera una acción de solo una oportunidad, sino que hace referencia a patrones de conductas. Siendo así, podrá implicar la combinación de conductas delictivas y ciertas acciones que, aisladamente, no parecen amenazadoras. En este sentido, el ilícito se puede perpetrar de diferentes maneras y no solo se limita al tener un contacto personal, puesto que las actividades llevadas a cabo por llamadas repetitivas, mensajes frecuentes, redes sociales, pueden generar acecho cuando el sujeto a quien se dirigen los considera amenazantes.
Algunos ejemplos de conductas que pueden generar que un sujeto sea acusado por el delito de acecho son los siguientes:
- Llamar de forma constante a otro sujeto, enviarle mensajes, y correos de manera reiterada.
- Enviar flores, regalos, y tarjetas no deseadas por una persona frecuentemente.
- Recoger información personal de un individuo como intento para conocer más acerca de su vida privada. Como podría ser, conocer su ubicación, sitios que usualmente frecuenta, sujetos con los que suele reunirse, o cualquier información que se considere personal.
- Manejar en diversas ocasiones por el lugar donde labora el sujeto.
¿En qué circunstancias el acecho puede ser investigado y acusado como un ilícito relacionado con violencia doméstica?
Frente al caso de que el individuo que llevó a cabo la acusación sea la pareja, cónyuge, alguien con quien el acusado compartió casa en su pasado, padre o madre de sus hijos, su caso se encontrará regulado por las normativas de violencia doméstica del Estado de California.
Esto ocurre, porque muchos de los escenarios de acecho se presentan luego de terminar una relación amorosa, cuando una parte sigue comunicándose y acosando a la otra, aun cuando se le pide que no continúe con esta conducta. Al respecto se debe señalar que, aunque el solo contactar a alguien no se considera una acción ilícita (siempre que no fuera emitida una orden de protección o restricción), si el contacto es persistente y con amenazas, podrá conllevar un cargo por el delito de acecho.
En este sentido, cuando una persona sufre acecho, los agentes policiales lo alientan para que obtenga la orden de protección por referirse a actos de violencia doméstica. Si se le concede, el autor del acecho no podrá ejercer ningún contacto directo, indirecto, o futuro con el sujeto protegido.
¿Qué elementos constitutivos debe demostrar el fiscal para que el acusado sea condenado por acecho?
A fin de que el acusado sea considerado responsable por este delito, la Fiscalía tendrá que comprobar la concurrencia de los siguientes elementos:
- Que el sujeto maliciosa y deliberadamente acoso, o siguió repetidamente a otro individuo,
- Que el sujeto ejecuta amenazas creíbles con el fin de dejar al individuo en un estado de temor razonable de su propia seguridad, o la seguridad de su núcleo familiar cercano.
En relación a ello, se deben aclarar los siguientes puntos:
- Un individuo ejecuta una acción deliberada cuando la realiza voluntariamente, aun si no tiene el propósito de violentar la normativa.
- Un individuo actúa de forma maliciosa, cuando con intención lleva a cabo un delito, o realiza su acción con el fin ilícito de molestar, herir, o dañar a otro.
- No hay un estándar que permita establecer cuál es la frecuencia de acuerdo a la cual un sujeto actúa de manera repetitiva, ya que dependerá de las situaciones. No obstante, la conducta repetida tiene que ser irrazonable. Por otra parte, repetidamente en acecho quiere decir, que su conducta se presentó en varias oportunidades.
- Respecto al acoso, se produce cuando un sujeto participa conscientemente y deliberadamente en líneas de conducta, contra un sujeto en particular, para causar alarma, molestia, terror, sin ningún fin legítimo.
- Líneas de conducta son 2 o más acciones que se presentan en un tiempo, aunque sea muy breve, y que comprueban la continuidad de un fin.
- Las amenazas creíbles son aquellas que se realizan con el fin de que la víctima tema por su propia seguridad, o la seguridad de su grupo familiar cercado, donde el sujeto que realiza la amenaza, se cree capaz de realizarla, sin importar si cuenta con la intención verdadera de llevarla a cabo.
Es importante destacar, que estas amenazas pueden ejecutarse de distintas maneras, sea de manera electrónica, oral, escrita, aunque también se pueden dar implícitamente en patrones de conducta. Por ejemplo, cuando un sujeto sigue a otro repetidamente, sin mencionar una palabra, o cuando le deja artículos para que sean considerados mensajes. Esto quiere decir, en distintos momentos deja notas amenazadoras en la vivienda donde reside su ex-esposa.
- En relación al propósito de dejar a la persona afectada en temor razonable, el Tribunal decidirá este asunto, al momento que analice las circunstancias y hechos que rodean el caso.
El Tribunal ha señalado que cuando la amenaza se realiza con el fin de generar temor, se está haciendo referencia a una amenaza verdadera. De forma que, las declaraciones políticas en las que exageran, declaraciones en broma, no se consideran una verdadera amenaza.
- Otro aspecto fundamental, es que el delito no necesita que el fin del acechador, sienta temor por su integridad personal debido a que se considerara acecho si le genera temor en relación a su grupo familiar cercano.
En este sentido, se considera núcleo familiar cercano: Padre, hijo, nieto, hermano, cónyuge, o cualquier familiar que viva continuamente en su hogar.
¿Qué debe demostrar la víctima del delito de acecho en un procedimiento realizado en la Corte civil?
La víctima del delito de acecho podrá presentar una demanda contra el acusado ante los tribunales civiles, a fin de que responda por los daños ocasionados.
Es por ello, que la víctima del delito deberá demostrar:
- Que el acusado participó en patrones de conducta donde tenía el propósito de alarmar, acosar o seguir a la víctima.
- Como producto de dicho comportamiento, la víctima sintió temor por su propia seguridad o la de su grupo familiar cercano.
- Que el acusado, como acechador realizó:
– Amenazas creíbles en contra de la seguridad de la persona afectada o la de su grupo familiar, y no detuvo sus conductas de acoso luego de que la víctima se lo pidiera.
– Incumplió lo establecido en la orden de restricción con su conducta.
En caso de que la persona afectada logre demostrar lo antes enunciado, podrá reclamar una indemnización punitiva y compensatoria por los daños sufridos.
¿Qué sanciones pueden imponerse a una persona condenada por acecho?
Debe señalarse que el delito de acecho se considera un “wobbler”, por lo tanto, podrá ser juzgado como un ilícito mayor o ilícito menor teniendo en consideración las circunstancias particulares del caso y si el sujeto cuenta con antecedentes criminales.
En caso de que el acusado sea condenado por el ilícito de acecho como un ilícito menor, las penas que se podrán aplicar son las siguientes:
- Pena privativa de libertad por un periodo máximo de un año, en una cárcel del condado.
- Régimen de libertad condicional informal.
- Multas por $1.000 como cantidad máxima.
De igual forma, es probable que le sea impuesto asesoramiento o confinamiento por un periodo determinado en algún hospital o institución mental, y que sea emitida una orden en la cual se le prohíbe mantener alguna comunicación o contacto cercano con la persona afectada.
Ahora bien, si el acusado es condenado por el ilícito de acecho como un ilícito mayor, le serán impuestas estas sanciones:
- Pena privativa de libertad por un tiempo de dieciséis meses como mínimo y cinco años como máximo, en una prisión estatal.
- Régimen de libertad condicional formal.
- Multas por un valor que no exceda los $1.000.
También, es probable que le sea impuesto confinamiento y asesoramiento en un hospital o institución mental, y que sea emitida una orden en la que se le prohíbe tener alguna comunicación o contacto cercano con la víctima.
Nota: Si la autoridad judicial establece que el ilícito de acecho fue causado por una gratificación sexual, el sujeto acusado tendrá el deber de registrarse como un “delincuente sexual” según lo establecido en la norma 290 PC.
¿Bajo qué escenarios el delito de acecho es calificado inmediatamente como un ilícito mayor?
Hay dos escenarios particulares en los cuales el ilícito de acecho se procesa como un ilícito mayor y son los siguientes:
- Que el ilícito de acecho constituya un incumplimiento a lo establecido en la orden dictada por la Corte.
- Que el sujeto fuera condenado con anterioridad por acecho. Aun si la persona afectada es nueva, o no se refiere al mismo sujeto que acecho con anterioridad.
¿Es posible eliminar una sentencia condenatoria por el delito de acecho de los antecedentes criminales?
Un sujeto condenado por el ilícito de acecho puede intentar eliminar la condena de sus antecedentes criminales.
Esta eliminación borra todas las penas impuestas producto de la condena, siendo un beneficio para el sujeto debido a que no tendrá que revelar dicha información a sus futuros empleadores.
Ahora bien, para poder solicitar la eliminación de una condena por acecho como delito mayor o menor, el solicitante tendrá que cumplir con los siguientes requisitos:
- Terminar de forma satisfactoria el régimen de libertad condicional,
- No ser acusado actualmente por perpetrar un delito, no encontrarse bajo régimen de libertad condicional, o cumpliendo condena por algún ilícito.
Lo que significa que, cuando la persona termine su tiempo de libertad condicional o su pena en la cárcel (de acuerdo a su caso), podrá intentar eliminar su condena por acecho.
¿Qué repercusiones adicionales conlleva el ser condenado por acecho?
Aunado a las sanciones señaladas anteriormente, una sentencia por este ilícito también podrá conllevar estas consecuencias:
Derechos relacionados con armas de fuego
Al respecto, se debe señalar que recibir una condena por el delito de acecho como ilícito mayor generará efectos en relación al derecho de amas del condenado. Lo que quiere decir, que el sujeto tiene que renunciar a su derecho de poseer y adquirir armas.
Migratorias
El que una persona sea condenada por perpetrar este ilícito le genera consecuencias migratorias, debido a que la normativa de inmigración del pais establece que ciertas condenas pueden generar la deportación si el sujeto no es un ciudadano. De igual manera, podrá ser declarado como inadmisible.
Al respecto, los delitos que generan estas consecuencias son: delitos mayores agravados, relacionados con drogas, con armas de fuego, o violencia doméstica.
Según los hechos del caso, el recibir acusación por el ilícito de acecho como un ilícito mayor puede llegar a ser agravado, y como consecuencia sufrir repercusiones en el estatus migratorio.
¿Qué estrategias de defensa pueden usarse para desvirtuar una acusación por acecho?
Algunas estrategias legales que emplean los abogados para desvirtuar una acusación por este ilícito, son las siguientes:
- Fue acusado falsamente: En diversas oportunidades, los sentimientos de rabia, venganza, o celos generan motivos por los cuales un sujeto realiza falsas acusaciones, esto con la intención de dañar o lastimar a otro individuo.
De hecho, este delito se alega comúnmente en casos de separación, o en una pelea por la patria potestad de los menores, o como producto de alguna relación amorosa que no sirvió. Frente a estos escenarios, un abogado podrá alegar que las acusaciones llevadas a cabo contra su cliente son falsas, debido a que tiene pruebas de que la víctima lo usó como una represalia.
- El acusado participaba en actividades protegidas constitucionalmente: Si el acusado participaba en actividades consagradas por la constitución como sería el protestar, no existe la probabilidad de que sea declarado responsable de acecho.
Esta situación suele presentarse en escenarios donde alguno de los manifestantes es detenido por molestar o seguir a un individuo o empresa contra quien se dirige la protesta. Es importante acotar que una simple molestia no será suficiente para presentar cargos por este ilícito, debido a que la persona está ejerciendo sus derechos.
- El acusado no tenía el propósito de generar temor: Según esta defensa, si bien el acusado pudo realizar una amenaza, con esta no quería generar temor. Un ejemplo podría ser que amenazara a otro individuo con realizarle cosquillas.
- El acusado fue erróneamente identificado : En muchas oportunidades ocurre que un sujeto acecha a otro, y permanece oculta su identidad para la víctima. Es por ello, que la persona afectada estando afectada y atemorizada, puede equivocarse e identificar erróneamente al individuo que la acecha.
¿Cómo puedo contactar un buen abogado con experiencia en el área cerca de mí?
Finalmente, las penas que pueden imponerse como producto de una sentencia condenatoria por el ilícito de acecho son bastante severas, y el estigma social que genera será una situación complicada de sobrellevar.
Es por ello, que si usted se encuentra acusado por el delito de acecho es fundamental que contrate a un buen abogado, que le ayude a llevar su caso y lo represente durante todo el proceso, puesto que representará una ventaja y aumentará las posibilidades de que el caso pueda desestimarse, o se logre un acuerdo entre las partes.
No lo dude más, y si reside en Van Nuys, CA, comuníquese con el bufete Leah Legal, nuestro equipo de profesionales están plenamente capacitados y cuenta con la experiencia necesaria en este tipo de asuntos. Podrán ayudarle a entender su situación y elaborarán las estrategias que sean idóneas para su caso.
Comuníquese ahora mismo al número telefónico 818-484-1100, y un experto le agendará una cita y lo atenderá en la brevedad posible. Recuerde que nuestra prioridad es la defensa de sus intereses y derechos. ¡Llame ya!
Toda relación entre parejas suele cursar por etapas difíciles rodeadas de fuertes discusiones, pero en California cuando este tipo de discusiones se salen de control y dan cabida al contacto físico violento se configura lo que se conoce como delito de agresión doméstica o conyugal.
Tal delito engloba el empleo de violencia física o fuerza contra algún cónyuge, prometido o novio bien sea actual o anterior, así como contra cualquier padre de un hijo que tengan en común el autor del crimen y la víctima.
Lamentablemente este corresponde a uno de los crímenes perteneciente a la categoría de delitos de violencia doméstica que cursan con mayor frecuencia ante los tribunales del Estado en la actualidad, el cual puede ser penado con encarcelamiento, obligación de tomar clases sobre violencia doméstica, pago de altas multas, entre otras sanciones.
Cualquier persona está expuesta a la posibilidad de ser acusada por Agresión Doméstica en Van Nuys, CA, sobre todo tomando en cuenta que este es un delito que surge sin la necesidad de que la supuesta víctima resulte lastimada, por ende un simple apretón de muñeca durante una acalorada discusión que pasó del plano verbal al físico puede dar lugar a cargos de este tipo. Si actualmente está cursando este tipo de situación, un abogado certificado del bufete Leah Legal puede ser ese aliado que tanto necesita para despejar todas sus dudas y acompañarlo en todo el procedimiento judicial. Tome en cuenta que no hay mayor tranquilidad que dejar los problemas legales en manos de un experto y en este reconocido gremio contamos no solo con años de experiencia que evidencian nuestros conocimientos y compromiso, sino con un historial de casos similares ganados que habla por sí solo, sobre todo porque nos esmeramos por hacer que nuestros clientes salgan bien parados y sientan que sus derechos efectivamente han sido garantizados.
¿De acuerdo al ordenamiento jurídico de California que es una agresión doméstica?
Es una conducta delictiva perteneciente a la clasificación de delitos sobre violencia doméstica, tipificada en el segmento 243 literal e (1) concerniente al Código Penal, el cual se configura cuando un sujeto ejecuta algún tipo de agresión bien sea contra el cónyuge, sujeto con quien cohabita, el padre de alguno de sus hijos, su ex cónyuge, prometido (a), o cualquier persona con quien tenga o haya tenido una relación de compromiso o noviazgo.
Dicho en otras palabras, una agresión de esta magnitud corresponde al uso por parte del involucrado, bien sea de violencia o fuerza física en contra de cualquier pareja actual o del pasado.
Se debe tener muy en cuenta que este delito se configura sin la necesidad de que la víctima sufra ningún tipo de dolor o lesión física, simplemente se exige que el involucrado haya hecho uso de fuerza o de violencia en contra de esta.
Ejemplos
Son situaciones donde alguna persona se expone enfrentar cargos basados en agresión doméstica las que se mencionan adelante:
- Un joven que durante una fuerte discusión toma a su novia fuertemente por el brazo. En este supuesto si bien la novia no sufrió ninguna lesión corporal, el contacto ejercido por el joven en su contra es considerado violento u ofensivo y por ende debe ser acusado por incurrir en agresión doméstica.
- Una chica que durante una discusión que sostiene con su prometido, motivada por la ira del momento lo cachetea. En este caso de igual manera el prometido no sufrió ningún daño grave, pero el contacto físico ejercido por la chica se considera grosero y violento, y por ende debe ser procesada por incurrir en agresión doméstica.
- Una pareja de ex cónyuges, que tienen en común una hija menor de edad y sostienen una fuerte discusión en la cual la mujer le manifiesta que no lo dejara ver más su hija, por lo cual el hombre se ofusca y la empuja sin ocasionar ningún tipo de lesión o daño. En este escenario el hombre puede ser acusado por incurrir en agresión doméstica.
¿De acuerdo al ordenamiento jurídico de California que debe ocurrir con el fin de que una persona sea procesada por incurrir en agresión doméstica?
Existen varias circunstancias que deben presentarse de manera simultánea para que una persona acusada pueda ser declarada como culpable de agresión doméstica, cuya carga de la prueba corresponde a la fiscalía, es decir que si esta víctima no logra demostrar todos y cada uno de los elementos establecidos el caso debe ser descartado.
Tales elementos son:
- El imputado de manera intencional tocó bien sea de forma ofensiva o dañina a la víctima.
- La víctima correspondía a su pareja íntima.
- La actuación del imputado no fue en su legítima defensa o la de cualquier otro.
A continuación puede observar a que se refieren específicamente tales elementos:
El imputado de manera intencional toco bien sea de forma ofensiva o dañina a la víctima
La palabra intencional, hace referencia a ejecutar un acto de manera voluntaria, es decir adrede. En tal sentido la ley no exige que la finalidad del imputado al ejecutar el acto haya sido precisamente vulnerar la normativa legal o dañar a la víctima.
Por otro lado, cuando se hace mención de que el imputado debe haber tocado a la víctima de manera ofensiva o dañina, esto no abarca que la fiscalía debe comprobar que la misma sufrió a consecuencia del acto una lesión física o daño, dado que cualquier contacto sin importar lo pequeño o irrelevante que sea es suficiente para que un sujeto enfrente cargos de esta magnitud, solo basta con que el mismo haya sido propiciado de forma violenta, brusca o con enojo por parte del imputado y no se requiere que la víctima sufra una marca permanente. Sin embargo se debe tener claro que un sujeto puede ser condenado por este crimen incluso si no toco a la víctima de forma directa, sino de manera indirecta es decir que toco cualquier instrumento o persona, que como resultado tocó a la supuesta víctima.
La víctima correspondía a su pareja íntima
En concordancia con la norma en estudio una pareja íntima puede ser:
- Un cónyuge o ex cónyuge.
- Una persona con quien el imputado convive.
- Un prometido actual o anterior.
- Un padre de alguno de los hijos del imputado.
- Una persona con quien el imputado sostiene o sostuvo, cualquier clase de relación ya sea íntima, de citas o sexual
Observaciones:
- Las partes que conforman una pareja intima pueden ser pertenecientes a un mismo sexo, o a sexos opuestos.
- Cuando se habla de personas que conviven juntas, esto involucra personas que si bien no están relacionadas, viven en el mismo sitio durante un lapso de tiempo relevante y como consecuencia se presume que existe determinada permanencia en cuanto a la relación.
- Una persona está en posibilidad de convivir con una cantidad igual o superior a dos personas durante un mismo lapso de tiempo.
- Cuando se habla de relaciones de pareja, esto involucra asociaciones comunes e íntimas donde se brinda afecto o participaciones sexuales entre las partes, sin importar las consideraciones económicas.
La actuación del imputado no fue en su legítima defensa o la de cualquier otro
Se habla de legítima defensa cuando el imputado comete el acto de agresión con el propósito de repeler para el mismo o para otro un peligro inminente de sufrir cualquier lesión física o de ser tocado ilegalmente, siempre y cuando la fuerza empleada no sea desproporcionada o exagerada en cuanto al peligro al cual supuestamente estaba expuesto.
¿Qué debe hacer un sujeto en caso de ser detenido por la autoridad por incurrir en agresión doméstica?
En caso de que sujeto sea detenido como sospechoso de propiciar un acto de agresión doméstica, lo más recomendable es que mantenga la calma y tome las siguientes acciones:
Permanecer el silencio: Un sujeto detenido por supuestamente incurrir en agresión doméstica debe evitar responder a las preguntas emitidas tanto por parte de los agentes de policía, como de los medios informativos, siempre que no cuente con la presencia de su abogado. Esto evitará que emita declaraciones que posteriormente puedan ser usadas en su contra y por ende autoincriminarse.
Ponerse en contacto con un abogado especialista en el tema: Un abogado con una trayectoria comprobable en casos vinculados con agresión doméstica puede ayudar significativamente a establecer una defensa oportuna dirigida a desvirtuar los cargos presentados una vez examinado el caso.
Evitar contactar a la presunta víctima: Si es el caso que el imputado y la supuesta víctima comparten una misma residencia, lo más pertinente para el imputado es buscar cuanto antes un sitio diferente para vivir.
Colaborar con el abogado a cargo del caso: Para que un imputado por cargos de agresión doméstica salga bien parado ante la corte es vital que siga cuidadosamente todas las instrucciones que le sean dadas por el abogado a cargo de su defensa, y que mantenga una fluida comunicación con el mismo en cuanto a todos los detalles por mínimo que sean que estén relacionados con el caso, ya que esto ayudará significativamente en cuanto a la recopilación de material probatorio pertinente para respaldar la defensa.
¿Según el ordenamiento jurídico de California como se castiga una agresión doméstica?
Este tipo de conducta delictiva, es considerada como menor en California, y puede ser castigada de la siguiente forma:
- Con encarcelamiento que no exceda de un año y que debe llevarse a cabo en alguna cárcel correspondiente al condado y/o
- Con el desembolso por concepto de multa que no exceda de los 2.000$
- Puede imponerse un régimen de libertad provisional sumaria como medida alternativa al encarcelamiento.
Si el Juez decide imponer la libertad provisional sumaria, el acusado debe sujetarse al cumplimiento de un programa especial para agresores también conocido como clases por violencia doméstica.
Además es probable que el Juez dicte una orden legal de protección debido a violencia doméstica, en la cual le ordena al imputado abstenerse de amenazar, dañar o hostigar a la víctima.
Observaciones:
En el escenario de que se imponga la libertad provisional sumaria, el condenado debe sujetarse al cumplimiento de una serie de parámetros designados por el tribunal, cuya transgresión dará lugar a que este sea remitido a la cárcel.
El propósito perseguido por un régimen de libertad provisional es resguardar tanto a la colectividad como a la supuesta víctima, mientras se intenta rehabilitar al condenado por violencia doméstica. Dicha sanción puede ser dictada por un Juez por medio de la sentencia respectiva a un caso o como parte de un convenio de culpabilidad establecido entre el abogado defensor y la fiscalía.
Por último se debe considerar que generalmente la libertad provisional sumaria no implica que el condenado sea encarcelado, pero en el supuesto de que la fiscalía emita esta medida con la obligación de cumplir tiempo de encarcelamiento, el mismo será mucho más breve que el establecido en concordancia con una sentencia de encarcelamiento máxima correspondiente a un delito menor.
¿Se desprende alguna otra consecuencia de una condena basada en agresión doméstica?
Aparte de las penas correspondientes, una condena fundada en agresión doméstica puede dar lugar a que un sujeto sea excluido de varios tipos de trabajo, como lo son aquellos vinculados con cuidado bien sea de niños o enfermos.
Por otro lado, una condena de este tipo puede repercutir negativamente sobre los derechos de armas de un sujeto, al acarrear para este la pérdida del derecho de tener y comprar armas.
Por último, las consecuencias pueden tornarse aún más graves cuando el imputado es un inmigrante, independientemente de que su estadía en el territorio de los EEUU sea legal y sus documentos estén en regla. Esto se debe a que una agresión doméstica es un crimen catalogado como violencia doméstica, que de acuerdo a las leyes federales puede conducir a un procedimiento de deportación en el cual no vale de nada exponer que el imputado posee propiedades en el interior del País o hijos menores nacidos en el mismo.
¿Qué sucede cuando la supuesta víctima desea retirar la acusación efectuada?
En ciertos escenarios de casos tramitados debido a violencia doméstica, quien se dirige ante la autoridad competente para formalizar una acusación de esta índole, posteriormente desiste con respecto a la prestación de cargos, e incluso es posible que niegue lo sucedido afirmando que nunca pasó. Frente a tal situación la fiscalía suele darle continuidad al caso sin importar que la presunta víctima ahora niegue los hechos. Esto se justifica en que la fiscalía suele asumir que una víctima está procediendo a retirar los cargos únicamente porque ha recibido cualquier tipo de amenaza por parte del imputado o ambos han solucionado de forma conjunta sus problemas y por tal motivo ya no es su deseo verla encarcelada.
Ahora bien es sumamente importante destacar que la fiscalía tramita de forma seria los casos vinculados con violencia doméstica, y suelen dar por sentado que es muy probable que la víctima asista días después ante la autoridad para retirar la acusación presentada contra su pareja debido a la influencia ejercida por esta última. No obstante la decisión final sobre si los cargos deben ser retirados o si se les debe dar continuidad recae exclusivamente sobre el fiscal encargado del caso.
¿De qué manera puede alguien desvirtuar una acusación formal basada en agresión doméstica?
Son múltiples las formas de defensa que un imputado por agresión doméstica puede adoptar con el propósito de hacerle frente a una acusación formal. No obstante lo principal es que tal imputado reciba la asesoría de un buen abogado con sólidos conocimientos en cuanto al tema, capacitado para orientarlo sobre qué acciones poner en curso, a que forma de defensa acogerse, y como usar las pruebas existentes u obtener nuevas para persuadir al Juez de que lo más sensato es dictar un fallo de inocencia, o una pena no tan estricta.
Tome en cuenta que la intervención de un abogado calificado puede ayudarle a permanecer alejado de la cárcel y desistir de ser representado por uno es una situación que sin duda alguna puede conllevar a resultados legales devastadores.
Comúnmente las formas de defensa usadas son:
- El imputado actuó en su propia defensa o la de otro.
- El imputado no actuó de forma deliberada.
- El imputado fue víctima de una acusación falsa.
- Las evidencias son insuficientes.
¿Qué otras conductas delictivas tipificadas por la ley se relacionan con una agresión doméstica?
Entre los delitos que guardan mayor relación con la agresión doméstica, hasta el punto de llegar a confundirse, están:
Delito | Fundamento jurídico | Descripción |
Amenazas criminales | Segmento 422 – Código Penal | Consiste en emitir amenazas de causar daños o el fallecimiento en contra de otro. |
Lesión corporal al cónyuge | Segmento 273.5 – Código | Se refiere al uso de violencia o fuerza en contra de una pareja íntima bien sea actual o anterior, que arroje como resultado el padecimiento de una lesión física para la víctima |
Abuso infantil | Segmento 273 – Código Penal | Consiste en propiciar fuertes castigos o lesiones físicas a algún menor. |
Encontrar un abogado con sólidos conocimiento en agresión doméstica cerca de mí
Si se le acusó formalmente por incurrir en Agresión Doméstica en Van Nuys, CA, un abogado certificado del bufete Leah Legal puede analizar su caso y asistirlo durante todo el procedimiento legal, evaluando la acusación formulada por la fiscalía e identificando las posibles debilidades existentes en la misma con el propósito de atacar con pruebas irrefutables que logren desestimarla.
Llame de forma inmediata al 818-484-1100 y pida que se le aparte una consulta con un abogado para que comience a ser asesorado, lo mejor de todo es que podrá relajar su mente al estar seguro de que su situación jurídica estará en manos de un experto que trabajara arduamente por proteger sus intereses y dejarlo bien parado ante la corte.
Con frecuencia los sujetos suelen manifestar que llevarán a cabo determinado acto sin tomar en cuenta los problemas que sus palabras les podrían traer incluso a nivel legal. Al respecto en el territorio de California se considera ilegal que un sujeto emita amenazas criminales contra otro u otros sujetos, incluso si se trata de su cónyuge, parientes, o pareja sentimental. Considere que dichas amenazas se refieren a lesionar a otro o causarle la muerte.
Con frecuencia las amenazas criminales surgen en casos de abuso doméstico donde la víctima se expone a una situación de temor al sentir que su vida y estabilidad, así como la de sus parientes está expuesta a peligro inminente.
Esta alude a una conducta criminal que es regulada con bastante rigurosidad de acuerdo a la leyes vigentes en el Estado, por ende quien se atreva a incurrir en la misma puede ser sancionado con penas de encarcelamiento y/o el pago de multas, todo ello tomando en cuenta que se trata de un crimen procesado como menor o como una felonía de acuerdo a las circunstancias específicas del caso.
No obstante, se debe tomar en cuenta que antes de que un Juez declare culpable al imputado, se debe dar inicio a un procedimiento judicial. El proceso inicia mediante la presentación de una acusación contra el acusado por parte de la fiscalía, y luego se dará inicio a un juicio donde el fiscal deberá demostrar que efectivamente el acusado cometió el acto que se le imputa, para lo cual debe consignar evidencia suficiente que deje en claro que incurrió en cada uno de los elementos exigidos por la ley para que su conducta sea cataloga como emitir amenazas criminales. Pero a la vez, el acusado podrá demostrar su inocencia, mediante la consignación de evidencia, pero para ello se recomienda que esté asesorado y representado por un abogado especialista en la materia que logre demostrar su inocencia ante el Juez.
Si está ubicado en Van Nuys, CA y enfrenta una acusación por emitir Amenazas Criminales, es importante que consulte su caso a la brevedad posible con un abogado de Leah Legal. Dicho abogado despejara la mayoría de sus dudas y si usted lo decide lo acompañará durante este difícil proceso ocupándose de reunir las pruebas que demuestren su inocencia, de armar una táctica de defensa sólida y de llevarla ante la corte, para finalmente convencer al Juez de que usted es inocente.
¿A qué se refiere el crimen de amenazas criminales?
Un sujeto comete este crimen cuando de modo específico y creíble emite la amenaza de atentar contra la vida de otro o de producirle lesiones serias, lo que lleva a ese otro a sentir razonablemente que su vida y seguridad, la perteneciente a sus parientes o quienes lo rodean está expuesta a peligro. Al respecto la amenaza se puede emitir de forma verbal, escrita o a través de medios electrónicos que faciliten la comunicación.
Un elemento muy importante para que se entienda configurado este crimen, es que el receptor de la amenaza, de modo razonable considere que quien emitió la amenaza tenía la intención clara de materializar la misma, puesto que emitió la misma de modo creíble.
Son ejemplos de este crimen, los siguientes escenarios:
- Un sujeto que llama a su ex cónyuge, para amenazarla al decirle que tenga mucho cuidado, porque la está vigilando de cerca, conoce todos sus pasos y muy pronto tendrá que asumir las consecuencias y pagar todo.
- Una mujer que amenaza a su expareja con matarla por medio de un correo electrónico.
- Un sujeto que hace llegar una carta a la casa de los padres de su expareja, amenazando con matarlos a todos.
¿Qué debe ocurrir para que un sujeto sea declarado culpable por este crimen?
Muchas veces sucede que un sujeto afirma que ejecutará cierta acción y que ello pueda crear un mal entendido al ser escuchado por otro. Es precisamente ello lo que dificulta que un sujeto sea condenado por este tipo de crimen. Por ende para que efectivamente un Juez emita una condena contra un acusado, la fiscalía está obligada a demostrar más allá de toda duda razonable que se configuraron una serie de elementos, los cuales se indican adelante:
- El imputado emitió una amenaza ya sea de muerte o de propiciar lesiones serias contra otro.
- La amenaza fue emitida por medio de una vía escrita, verbal o electrónica.
- La manifestación fue emitida con el propósito de que su receptor se sintiera amenazado.
- La amenaza se emitió de modo específico, intencional e inmediato.
- La amenaza hizo que su receptor sintiera miedo respecto a su seguridad y vida o la de sus parientes.
Ahora bien, para que tenga una mejor comprensión del tema, se explicarán ciertos aspectos relativos a los elementos mencionados:
El imputado emitió una amenaza ya sea de muerte o de propiciar lesiones serias contra otro
Cuando se hace referencia a lesiones graves quiere decir que las mismas deben ser significativas o sustanciales, por ende cuando la magnitud de una lesión no supera la de un daño irrelevante o moderado el crimen no debe ser considerado una amenaza criminal. Son ejemplos de lesiones graves, los cortes que ameritan cirugía, las laceraciones, las fracturas óseas, los hematomas oculares, entre otras.
Ahora bien, debe saber que las amenazas criminales pueden estar dirigidas contra múltiples personas, y no obligatoriamente contra una sola, lo único requerido es que quien emite la amenaza tenga el propósito de ocasionar daños físicos a las víctimas. Ello ya que una amenaza criminal puede ser emitida contra un sujeto en específico o contra un grupo o integrantes de un grupo familiar.
La amenaza fue emitida por medio de una vía escrita, verbal o electrónica
Uno de los requisitos que debe cumplir una amenaza criminal es que la misma debe haber sido emitida a través de un medio escrito tal como una nota, de forma verbal es decir hablando, o por medio de alguna vía electrónica. Ello a su vez significa que no se requiere que quien emite la amenaza y quien la recibe se encuentren en el mismo territorio o ubicación
Aunado a lo anterior, debe considerar que la comunicación no verbal, o los gestos como es exhibir un puño no es suficiente para que un sujeto haga frente a cargos por emitir amenazas criminales. Pero cuando un gesto va acompañado de una afirmación verbal como lo es mostrar el puño y ofrecer una golpiza, dicho acto si es suficiente para fundar una acusación por amenazas criminales.
Por otro lado, la comunicación por vías electrónicas abarca mensajes por medio de correos electrónicos, pero también un mensaje de texto, mensajes a través de redes sociales y muchos otros, capaces de ser enviados a través de fax, computadoras, teléfonos e incluso videos. Considere, que cuando la amenaza se emite por un mensaje de texto, se considera evidencia escrita de la amenaza lo que hace más fácil justificar una condena.
La manifestación fue emitida con el propósito de que su receptor se sintiera amenazado
Entre los elementos constitutivos de este crimen está el miedo o el temor que debe sentir la víctima respecto a su seguridad o la de sus familiares. Para que alguna amenaza criminal se considere como tal, y quien la emitió sea declarado responsable se requiere que el miedo o temor sea real, sostenido y razonable.
Al respecto, el temor real alude a que quien resulta amenazado sienta temor real por su seguridad o la de sus parientes, por ende este elemento se analiza a partir del criterio del sujeto que fue amenazado. Cuando la amenaza ocasiona que un sujeto adquiera un arma o se mantenga oculto temporalmente significa que efectivamente la víctima tomó como cierta la amenaza. Cosa que no ocurre cuando el receptor de la amenaza continúa con su rutina normal, al restarle importancia o dar por falsas las amenazas, ello significa que no siente temor real y por ende no deben presentarse cargos por amenazas criminales contra el emisor.
Aunado a lo anterior es indispensable que el temor sea sensato. Esto es importante dado que de acuerdo a ello, cualquier sujeto sensato que atraviese una situación similar a la que experimentó la víctima al recibir una amenaza debía haber sentido temor por su propia seguridad o la de sus parientes. Es decir, la amenaza no debe ser insensata o absurda.
Por otro lado, cuando se hace referencia a temor sostenido, quiere decir un estado mental que se extiende en el tiempo, lo que significa que no es momentáneo, fugaz o transitorio. Sin embargo, las diferentes cortes consideran que dado que no existe un periodo mínimo de tiempo para ser catalogado como sostenido, es suficiente con que un sujeto víctima de amenazas haya sentido temor por instantes para presumirse que se configuró temor sostenido sobre tal sujeto. Esto último significa que la decisión sobre si existió o no temor sostenido va a depender de las circunstancias específicas del caso.
La amenaza se emitió de modo específico, intencional e inmediato
Para que una amenaza sea considerada criminal se requiere que cubra ciertos requisitos: que sea inmediata, intencional y específica, de tal modo que hagan pensar que probablemente serán materializadas. Sin embargo, hay excepciones para ciertas amenazas que conllevan cierta condición y aun así son consideradas criminales.
Muchas veces, esta clase de amenazas se toman como formas de extorsión o de chantaje. Por ende, cuando la amenaza lleva alguna condición que expone un propósito y exhibe la probabilidad de ser materializada si no se cumple la condición, la amenaza será tomada como criminal.
La amenaza hizo que su receptor sintiera miedo respecto a su seguridad y vida o la de sus parientes
Se requiere que la manifestación hecha por parte del sujeto que hizo la amenaza, haya sido comunicada de modo tal que su receptor la tome como una amenaza, ello sin tomar en cuenta si quien la emite tiene la capacidad de materializarla o si dicha afirmación se hizo en serio.
¿Cuáles sanciones se imponen para castigar a sujetos condenados por emitir amenazas criminales?
En primer lugar debe considerar que este crimen se procesa como un wobbler en California lo que quiere decir que la fiscalía puede presentar cargos por un crimen menor o una felonía, una vez estudiado el caso, sus consecuencias y los expedientes penales del imputado.
De modo general las penas que pueden imponerse por la comisión de este tipo de crimen son: encarcelamiento y pago de multas, cuya severidad va a depender de la calificación que se le dé al crimen.
Al respecto, cuando el imputado hace frente a cargos por un crimen menor, las penas que pueden imponerse son:
- Encarcelamiento que no supere un año.
- Pagar una multa que no supere la cantidad de 1.000,00 dólares.
- Tomar clases de manejo de ira.
- Hacer trabajo social.
Mientras que, cuando un sujeto hace frente a cargos por una felonía y resulta condenado, las penas disponibles son:
- Encarcelamiento por 16 meses, 2 años o 3 años que se debe cumplir en una entidad estatal.
- Pagar una multa que no supere la cantidad de 10.000,00 dólares.
- Cuando el crimen se comete usando cualquier clase de arma considerada peligrosa o mortal, es probable que se agregue un año adicional y consecutivo a la condena.
Por otro lado, cuando el sujeto acusado emite múltiples amenazas criminales, es probable que reciba una sentencia por cada una de forma separada. Esto solo ocurre cuando se prueba que un acusado en todo tiempo pudo haber reflexionado previa la ejecución de cada crimen y que además, cada ofensa causó el riesgo de ocasionar daños. Así por ejemplo, cuando un sujeto manifiesta alguna amenaza contra varios sujetos, cada amenaza debe ser tomada por separado.
Además de lo anterior, se debe acotar que existen sanciones adicionales, las cuales se pueden anexar a la condena, dado que las amenazas criminales se tratan de crímenes considerados de vileza moral, lo que significa que el crimen se considera un acto extremadamente ofensivo, por ende incurrir en él puede llevar a que un sujeto sea sancionado con:
- Suspensión de su credencial profesional.
- Deportación (Cuando se trata de un no ciudadano de los EEUU)
- Expulsión.
- Disciplina profesional.
¿Se puede luchar contra cargos por amenazas criminales?
Si, para que un sujeto acusado por infringir la ley al emitir amenazas criminales finalmente sea condenado es necesario que se siga todo un proceso. Lo primero es que la fiscalía debe presentar una acusación, pero no basta con ello para que alguien sea declarado culpable.
Se debe desarrollar un juicio, donde la fiscalía debe consignar evidencias que demuestren que el acusado incurrió en cada uno de los elementos señalados por la ley. Pero el acusado también podrá presentar pruebas y una estrategia de defensa que dejen sin efecto la acusación del fiscal. Ahora bien, para esto último es sumamente importante que intervenga un abogado que cuente con sólidos conocimientos en la materia, no solo para que analice el caso y obtenga pruebas, sino para que arme una estrategia de defensa sólida que demuestre la inocencia de su representado ante el Juez.
Al respecto, debe saber que son innumerables las defensas que un sujeto puede usar para dejar sin efecto la acusación levantada por el fiscal, pero para que la misma finalmente surta efectos y el acusado sea absuelto de los cargos que se le imputan es importante elegir la adecuada al caso en específico, lo que hace aún más importante la intervención de un buen abogado que estudie la situación.
Las defensas que se usan con mayor frecuencia en estos casos son:
- Insuficiencia probatoria.
- La amenaza emitida resulta vaga o ambigua.
- Quien recibió la amenaza no sintió ningún tipo de temor.
- La amenaza nunca fue emitida.
¿Dónde puedo encontrar a un abogado especialista en Amenazas Criminales cerca de mí?
Como habrá alcanzado a entender, emitir una amenaza contra otro bien sea de matarlo o de lesionarlo de gravedad, puede hacer que usted finalmente sea llevado ante la corte en calidad de acusado por emitir amenazas criminales. Lo peor de todo es que si es declarado culpable deberá pasar un tiempo en la cárcel y quizás pagar alguna multa.
No obstante todo esto puede ser evitado, si cuanto antes se pone en contacto con un abogado especialista en la materia para que analice su caso y lo asesore. Dicho abogado puede asumir su defensa y ocuparse de demostrar su inocencia.
Si está ubicado en Van Nuys, CA y enfrenta una acusación por emitir Amenazas Criminales, es importante que consulte su caso lo antes posible con un abogado de Leah Legal. Dicho abogado despejara la mayoría de sus dudas y si usted lo decide lo acompañará durante este difícil proceso ocupándose de reunir las pruebas que demuestren su inocencia, de armar una táctica de defensa sólida y de llevarla ante la corte, para finalmente convencer al Juez de que usted es inocente.
Para concretar una cita y empezar a recibir asesoría, solo debe tomar su celular y marcar el 818-484-1100, allí será atendido y se le asignará una fecha para que asista y consulte su caso con un experto.
Es indudable que una de las conductas ilícitas más dañinas son las lesiones físicas o corporales, porque ocasionan daños en los individuos, y en algunas ocasiones, esos daños pueden ser irreversibles, pero cuando existe una relación de tipo sentimental entre el autor y su víctima, entramos dentro de la esfera de los crímenes que se relacionan con la violencia doméstica, y está tipificado en una regulación legal distinta, que es el artículo 273.5 del Código Penal de California.
Esta disposición establece que es una conducta ilícita ocasionar lesiones físicas no sólo al actual cónyuge, sino también a quien haya sido cónyuge en el pasado del agresor, y dentro de esta categoría igualmente se incluyen aquellos individuos que conviven y mantienen una relación estable de tipo sentimental, a los que son o fueron novios en el pasado, y hasta el padre o la madre de un hijo del agresor, y se castiga con prolongadas penas en prisión y multas judiciales costosas, que normalmente vendrán acompañadas de una medida de protección judicial dictada por un Juez, que se conoce como orden de restricción o de alejamiento.
Encontrar la asistencia legal más conveniente
Cualquier hecho punible relacionado con violencia doméstica es considerado como algo muy serio, pero si se trata de aquel que conduce a ocasionar lesiones físicas en perjuicio de un cónyuge o ex cónyuge, pareja estable, novia(o) o progenitor de un hijo del agresor, entonces nos estamos refiriendo a una conducta que en Van Nuys CA, es catalogada como muy grave, no sólo por los daños que puede haber recibido la víctima, sino porque se trata de una conducta que atenta contra la unidad familiar y contra la sociedad, por lo que se persigue y se castiga con mucha severidad, de modo que si usted ha sido acusado de ocasionar lesiones corporales a su cónyuge o a un individuo con el que actualmente o en el pasado tuvo una relación de tipo sentimental, no se lo tome a la ligera, porque las consecuencias pueden ser desastrosas para su vida personal, familiar y hasta laboral y profesional.
Es por ello, que debe ponerse en contacto de inmediato con un profesional del derecho, especializado en este tipo de conductas calificadas como ilícitas, para que se ponga a trabajar en su favor de inmediato, y eso puede obtenerlo con los abogados criminalistas que laboran para Leah Legal, cuyos conocimientos podrán lograr una minimización de la acusación, y puede ser que hasta sea desechado el cargo, en función ciertas características que pudieran estar presentes en su caso.
¿Cómo están reguladas las lesiones corporales en perjuicio del cónyuge del ofensor?
En términos generales, la disposición 273.5 está dividida en varias secciones que vamos a tratar de explicar. La sección (a) dispone que cualquier sujeto que de manera intencionada inflija lesiones corporales que resulten en una condición traumática a una víctima de las que se describen en la sección (b), es responsable de un crimen grave que es severamente castigado.
Es del dominio común que esta es una de las principales normas que regulan la violencia doméstica en California, y para que se entienda configurada la conducta se requiere que sea causada una lesión real. Esta sección es similar a la regulación establecida en la disposición 243(e)1 del Código Penal, que contempla el asalto doméstico.
¿Quién se considera un compañero íntimo?
La regulación no está referida exclusivamente a los cónyuges, sino también a los que se conocen como compañeros o parejas íntimas, que puede estar referido a:
- El actual cónyuge o el ex cónyuge del acusado,
- La actual pareja de hecho que se encuentre registrada o que lo fue antes del acusado,
- El conviviente o ex conviviente del acusado,
- El(la) prometido(a) actual o anterior del acusado
- Un individuo con el cual el acusado tiene, o solía tener, una relación de pareja seria,
- El(la) novio(a) del procesado, o
- El padre o la madre del hijo del procesado.
Se trata de una conducta delictual que sólo puede ser cometida en perjuicio de un individuo con el cual el agresor tiene actualmente, o tuvo en el pasado, una relación sentimental, que no necesariamente tiene que haber sido conyugal.
Como ejemplos de lesiones corporales en perjuicio de una pareja o ex pareja sentimental, podemos mencionar:
- Un sujeto hace presión sobre uno de los brazos de su ex novia, con tanta fuerza como para dejarle moretones.
- Una dama da un empujón al novio, quien cae hacia un exhibidor de vidrio, y como resultado de ello, el novio resulta con cortes en los brazos y las manos.
- Un individuo golpea y patea a su novio, dejando al novio con un brazo roto.
Este tipo de conducta tiene diferentes denominaciones legales, además de ser considerado un crimen de violencia doméstica, entre las cuales se incluyen:
Lesión corporal o física contra un cónyuge,
Lesión corporal o física contra una pareja íntima,
Lesión corporal contra el cónyuge o conviviente,
Violencia doméstica,
Abuso doméstico,
¿Cuáles son los hechos que se requieren demostrar para que se entienda configurada esta conducta ilícita?
Para que sea declarado responsable un procesado por este tipo de hecho punible, la Fiscalía tiene que demostrar los siguientes elementos constitutivos:
- El procesado inflige intencionalmente una lesión física,
- En perjuicio de su actual o anterior pareja íntima, y
- La lesión física ocasionada deja como secuela una condición traumática.
Para que se pueda entender mejor el significado de algunos términos empleados por la norma, explicaremos algunos de ellos:
Voluntariamente
Un sujeto actúa de manera voluntaria cuando realiza alguna acción de manera intencionada, sin que ello necesariamente signifique que el sujeto ha querido infringir las leyes. Ejemplo: durante una discusión sobre la custodia de los hijos, Robin toma del brazo a Mary y se lo tuerce. La intención de Robin fue simplemente intimidarla, pero usó más fuerza de la que Mary podía soportar y le dislocó el hombro.
Es probable que Robin no tuviera el propósito de ocasionar a Mary lesiones que fueran tan graves. Pero actuó de manera voluntaria cuando le torció el brazo. Por lo tanto, puede ser declarado responsable de esta conducta ilícita.
Lesiones corporales
Lesiones son daños, mientras que el término corporal se refiere al cuerpo humano, por tanto, las lesiones corporales son las que se sufren en el cuerpo físico de los seres humanos, por el contrario a lo que es una lesión psicológica o mental.
Condición traumática
Una condición traumática se define como cualquier herida u otra lesión corporal causada por haber aplicado de manera directa una fuerza física. Lo que no se requiere es que el resultado de la lesión sea grave, puesto que una herida o una lesión menor es suficiente. No obstante, la lesión no necesariamente tiene que estar a la vista, ya que pueden causarse lesiones internas, que igualmente incapacitan y hasta deben ser tratadas médicamente.
Para que podamos tener una idea de lo que se considera una condición traumática a los efectos de esta regulación legal, podemos mencionar:
- Huesos rotos,
- Conmoción cerebral,
- Hemorragias internas,
- Esguinces
- Hematomas, o
- Lesiones que pueden derivar de un estrangulamiento o de una asfixia.
Es importante resaltar que una condición traumática debe ser el resultado de una fuerza física que ha sido ejercida directamente sobre la presunta víctima, y para que un sujeto pueda ser declarado responsable por esta conducta, la Fiscalía tiene que demostrar que las acciones del imputado fueron las que causaron que la víctima sufriera tal condición traumática.
Ahora bien, para que la condición traumática sea el resultado de unas lesiones, se requiere que:
- Tal condición traumática tuvo que ser un resultado natural y previsible de una lesión;
- Tal lesión fue la causa sustancial y directa de una condición traumática; y
- Tal condición no se habría presentado si no hubiera ocurrido una lesión.
Pensemos que Jennie se entera por una amiga que su prometido James ha tenidos citas y salidas con otra dama. Jennie confronta a James en su vivienda, llegando a una agria discusión, como resultado de la cual Jennie le da varios empujones a James.
James se da media vuelta para irse y dejar a Jennie sola, pero en ese momento se tropieza y cae encima de una mesilla que tiene una lámpara encima, resultando que los vidrios de la lámpara le causan cortadas en las manos y los brazos.
Ahora bien, Jannie no podría ser declarada responsable por la condición traumática de James, ya que la misma fue ocasionada mientras él se alejaba y no fue producto de una acción directa de Jannie, como que ella lo hubiera empujado.
Compañero o pareja íntima
La disposición 273.5 del Código Penal, requiere que se haya causado una lesión a una pareja íntima. Para los propósitos de esta sección, compañero o pareja íntima incluye a un actual o anterior:
- Cónyuge,
- Parejas de hecho registradas,
- Novio o novia con quien se reside,
- Progenitor de un hijo del agresor,
- Un individuo con el cual el agresor tiene o tuvo una relación de noviazgo seria.
De hecho, existen factores que pueden determinar si una pareja, heterosexual o del mismo sexo, porque las leyes no hacen distinciones al respecto, tienen una relación de convivencia de tipo sentimental, entre los cuales están:
- Que mantengan relaciones sexuales y comparten la misma residencia,
- Se dividen los gastos de manutención,
- Usan de manera conjunta una propiedad,
- La pareja socialmente se ha presentado como que tienen una relación estable o seria,
- La pareja ha permanecido junta de manera continua, y
- La pareja ha permanecido junta por bastante tiempo.
Otro aspecto que se debe resaltar es que, para los propósitos de las leyes sobre violencia doméstica de California, es posible que un procesado tenga más de una relación sentimental al mismo tiempo, esto es, que tenga varias parejas.
Pensemos que Joan y Maureen rentan una vivienda juntas, porque mantienen una relación sentimental, pero Joan tiempo después comienza una relación romántica con Audrey y decide convivir también con ella, pero continúa manteniendo relaciones sentimentales con Maureen. Entonces puede ser que Joan se quede varias noches a la semana en la vivienda con Maureen, y otras noches las pase con Audrey, ya que tiene llaves de los dos departamentos y usa la dirección de la vivienda que rentó con Maureen como su dirección de correos.
En este escenario, aunque principalmente Joan convive con Maureen, se entiende que también convive o cohabita con Audrey.
¿Qué penalizaciones son las que pueden imponerse con base en la disposición 273.5 PC?
Se debe advertir que este tipo de conductas delictivas son calificadas como un wobbler, de manera que la Fiscalía tiene la posibilidad de elegir que sean procesados como felonías o como delitos menores, para lo cual se tomarán en consideración aspectos como que el procesado posea antecedentes criminales y cuáles fueron las circunstancias que rodearon los hechos.
Es muy posible que la acusación sea imputada como una felonía si concurren las siguientes circunstancias:
- La lesión ocasionada a la pareja íntima es muy grave, y/o
- El procesado posee un récord por denuncias sobre violencia doméstica o de otras conductas que son agresivas.
Si la Fiscalía escoge procesar la conducta como un delito menor, las sanciones que se pueden imponer son:
- Libertad condicional informal o sumaria, o
- Privación de libertad hasta el máximo de un año en la cárcel, y/o
- Multa judicial cuyo máximo puede alcanzar los $6.000,00.
En cambio, si la Fiscalía decide procesar la conducta ilícita como felonía, se impondrán estas condenas:
- Libertad condicional bajo régimen de control o formal, o
- Privación de libertad que puede llegar a un máximo de cuatro años en la cárcel, y/o
- Multa judicial cuyo máximo puede alcanzar los $6.000,00.
¿Qué ocurre cuando el procesado tiene antecedentes previos por felonías?
Como hemos indicado antes, esta conducta ilícita es calificada como wobbler, pero si además el procesado posee condenas previas por casos de violencia doméstica o de agresión, los castigos como felonía se incrementarán si se demuestra que en los 7 años previos el imputado ha recibido condenas por:
- 273.5 PC – Lesiones corporales a un cónyuge,
- 243(d) PC – Agresión o Asalto que causó lesiones físicas graves,
- 244 PC – Agresión o Asalto empleando químicos cáusticos,
- 244.5 PC – Asalto con armas eléctricas,
- 245 PC – Asalto empleando armas mortales,
- 243.4 PC – Agresiones Sexuales
Dependiendo de cuál haya sido la naturaleza de la conducta por la que haya sido condenado el procesado previamente, será incrementada la sanción por causar lesiones físicas a un cónyuge o pareja sentimental actual o anterior, de la siguiente manera:
Si fue agresión al cónyuge del Código Penal 243 (e), se impondrán los siguientes castigos por la nueva lesión:
- Prisión hasta por 4 años, y/o
- Multa judicial cuyo máximo puede alcanzar los $ 10.000,00
En caso de que la condena previa haya sido por otro asalto y agresión o lesiones corporales, siempre que la víctima no haya sido el cónyuge o pareja del imputado, las penas que se imponen son:
- Prisión hasta por 5 años, y/o
- Multa judicial cuyo máximo puede alcanzar los $ 10.000,00
¿Qué sucede cuando las lesiones ocasionadas al cónyuge pueden calificarse como una gran lesión corporal?
En este escenario, se podrá imponer la mejora o incremento de la sentencia que prevé el artículo 12022.7 del Código Penal, que se tendrá que cumplir de manera adicional y consecutiva a los castigos por el crimen subyacente, que puede llegar a ser hasta de cinco años de privación de libertad.
¿Existen otras consecuencias asociadas a una condena de esta clase?
Sí. En caso de que la conducta ilícita haya sido procesada como una felonía, el imputado podría ser sometido a un proceso de deportación, por considerar que se ha cometido un crimen de vileza moral, y podría llegar a ser declarado inadmisible y no podría entrar nuevamente al país. Con la misma calificación de felonía, también se convierte en un strike, bajo la regulación establecida en la Ley de los Tres Delitos y Fuera de California, e igualmente puede privarse al imputado de su derecho a portar, poseer o adquirir armas de fuego en este Estado.
¿Cuáles son las defensas que más se usan frente a una acusación como ésta?
Existen muchos argumentos, estrategias y líneas defensivas que permitirán a un imputado impugnar unos cargos de esta naturaleza, pero la elección de la que resulte más apropiada, en función de los hechos, tiene que hacerla un abogado criminalista experimentado, porque sólo él podrá medir las consecuencias de los alegatos defensivos que se escojan, no obstante, entre las más usadas, se encuentran:
- El acusado actuaba en defensa propia o en defensa de un tercero,
- El acusado no lastimó intencionadamente a la víctima,
- El procesado fue acusado falsamente.
Contratar al abogado en lesión corporal a un cónyuge cerca de mí
Ser imputado por unos cargos como estos puede ser un calvario para el procesado en Van Nuys CA, y si no está seguro de la eficacia de los argumentos defensivos alegados, es posible que tenga que sufrir las consecuencias nefastas de una sentencia que lo condenará a mucho tiempo en la cárcel y al pago de costosas multas judiciales, por ello, el mejor consejo que le podemos dar es que se ponga en contacto de inmediato con Leah Legal, a través del 818-484-1100 y compruebe que será atendido de inmediato por un profesional experimentado, que aclarará todas sus interrogantes y le explicará las opciones legales de las que se puede hacer uso en su caso.
Cuando un progenitor o un representante legal evade de manera intencional en California sus responsabilidades de dar a un menor de edad que se encuentre a su cuidado los bienes y servicios que resultan esenciales para su normal subsistencia, como un lugar en el que vivir, los alimentos que necesita, los medicamentos para tratar sus dolencias o su vestimenta, esta omisión es calificada como un hecho punible que está tipificado con el nombre de negligencia infantil.
La principal razón del Estado de California, que justifica la regulación de dicha conducta ilícita por medio de diferentes leyes, se encuentra en el hecho reconocido comúnmente que un menor de edad no tiene la aptitud y capacidades que se necesitan para poder proveer a sus necesidades esenciales. Debido a esto, es estrictamente necesario crear e imponer regulaciones que están pensadas para poder salvaguardar y garantizar su protección en todas las áreas en que sea necesario. Además, tenemos el hecho de que todas estas experiencias pueden causar en los menores traumas que los van a acompañar por toda su vida, de modo que cuando son expuestos a malos tratos, en particular de tipo emocional o psicológico, se trata de una situación que va a tener repercusiones negativas que pueden acompañarlo para siempre.
La Ley que tipifica esta conducta ilícita establece castigos bastante severos a los progenitores que no cumplen con estos deberes, bien sea por medio de omisiones o acciones, con relación a aquellos menores de edad que se encuentran bajo su cuidado, de modo que ser declarado responsable de negligencia infantil podría suponer que el condenado por ello deba cumplir sanciones de privación de libertad en una institución carcelaria y pagar costosas multas judiciales.
Sin embargo, cuando ocurren este tipo de conductas, los peores efectos de los mismos son percibidos por los menores, quienes podrían incluso ser alejados de su residencia, en caso de que la Oficina de Protección Infantil, que es conocida por las siglas CPS, haya brindado a los progenitores y agotado todos aquellos programas que permiten que un menor de edad pueda ser mantenido al lado de su familia y no se hubiere obtenido ningún tipo de progreso, de modo que lo más conveniente para su protección y bienestar, en atención al principio del interés superior del menor, será colocarlo en hogares de crianza.
¿Dónde puedo encontrar la asesoría legal necesaria?
Se trata de situaciones que normalmente resultan ser muy complejas, en particular por estar involucrados menores de edad, de modo que ser acusado por este hecho punible usualmente iniciará una cantidad extensa de procedimientos ante las Cortes en Van Nuys CA, y el presunto responsable necesita poder establecer una defensa idónea, con la que sea posible rebatir los cargos que le sean formulados por la representación fiscal, para impedir que sea condenado por este hecho ilícito. Es por ello que una estrategia defensiva eficaz requiere del concurso abogados especializados en esta clase de procedimientos, que sean capaces de darle a su cliente el asesoramiento que sea necesario en cada una de las fases y etapas de los mismos, y que sean capaces de exponer las evidencias con las que se cuenta de una manera eficiente ante la Corte y los jurados, con la finalidad de llevar a su convencimiento que lo correcto es que se dicte una decisión de no culpabilidad, o en el peor de los escenarios, que las sanciones que puedan imponerse sean las más leves. En este sentido, en Leah Legal contamos con abogados profesionales especialmente capacitados y con la suficiente experiencia para lograrlo en su favor, por lo que tiene que contactarnos de inmediato, para ponernos de lleno a trabajar en su caso, sin que tenga importancia lo complicado que pueda parecer la situación para usted, pues toda situación, por negativa que parezca, podría ser revertida a su favor, así que no piense que todo está perdido, deje que los verdaderos profesionales se encarguen de su defensa, ya que procuraremos restablecer todo aquellos que está en riesgo, que no sólo incluye su libertad, sino también sus relaciones personales y familiares, y sobre todo, el bienestar del menor.
¿Cómo está definido este tipo de negligencia?
La negligencia infantil se trata de uno de los muchos tipos de conductas ilícitas que se encuentran enumeradas dentro de la clasificación de crímenes de violencia doméstica, y su regulación general se encuentra en la disposición 270 del Código Penal de California.
La regulación específica de esta conducta dispone que cuando un progenitor o responsable de un menor de edad, esto es, que no ha cumplido aún los dieciocho años o que no se ha emancipado, evade intencionadamente y sin poseer la justificación legal necesaria, los deberes de proveerle de un sitio para vivir, servicios médicos, medicamentos, ropa y alimentos, junto con cualquier otro tipo de servicio correctivo que el menor necesite, tendrá que responder ante una Corte Penal por haber cometido una conducta criminal.
Este tipo de negligencia se encuentra clasificado en dos clases:
- Negligencia severa: tiene lugar cuando el padre o progenitor se abstiene de proporcionar al menor la debida protección que necesita para impedir que sufra de condiciones como severa desnutrición, o cuando el acusado es el causante o permite intencionadamente que la salud del menor sea puesta en peligro o riesgo.
- Negligencia general: ocurre cuando un progenitor o responsable evade intencionadamente cumplir con sus deberes de proveer al menor de edad de un sitio para vivir, servicios médicos, medicamentos, ropa y alimentos, y en este escenario carece de importancia que dicho menor no haya sufrido daño alguno por causa de dicha evasión, porque podría ser que otro individuo de forma voluntaria haya protegido al menor de estas fallas, aunque no sea su responsabilidad.
Como escenarios que constituyen ejemplos de esta clase de situación de negligencia infantil, podemos mencionar:
- Cuando un progenitor tiene una situación económicamente estable, no obstante omite cumplir con el deber de darle los alimentos que necesitan sus dos hijos de 6 y 8 años de edad.
- Cuando un progenitor no se interesa por proveer a sus hijos de la vestimenta adecuada o de que realice las buenas prácticas de higiene.
- Cuando un progenitor tiene a su cargo a un niño de 3 años de edad y al enfermarse, no procura encontrar la asistencia médica que necesita.
- En pleno invierno, un progenitor no se preocupa por proporcionarle a sus hijos la vestimenta adecuada para protegerlo del frío.
¿Cuáles son los hechos que debe demostrar la representación fiscal para que una Corte encuentre al procesado responsable por negligencia infantil?
La representación fiscal logrará que el procesado sea declarado responsable por este hecho ilícito si es capaz de demostrar ante el Tribunal la concurrencia de los que han sido llamados elementos constitutivos de esta conducta ilícita, que para el hecho específico de la negligencia infantil son:
- El acusado es el progenitor de un menor de edad.
- El acusado no procuró cubrir de forma idónea las necesidades que tuvo su hijo.
- El acusado actuó de manera intencionada, sin tener una justificación legal para ello.
Con la finalidad de entender de mejor manera el significado legal de algunos de los términos a los que se ha hecho mención, vamos a explicar con mayor profundidad lo que implican algunos de ellos.
Padre o progenitor
Según lo dispuesto en el artículo 270 PC, antes mencionado, la palabra padre o progenitor incluye a los legales, los adoptivos, los padres de crianza de forma temporal, así como otro individuo que se haya presentado como tal. Pero también incluye al cónyuge o pareja estable legalmente registrada actual de una dama que sea madre, por el tiempo que conviva con ella, se trate de su hijo o no, por lo que los padrastros o madrastras están incluidos en la definición.
Se encuentran excluidos de esta definición todos aquellos padres o progenitores que por causa de una orden de una Corte fueron privados de los derechos y deberes parentales con relación a un menor de edad.
Menor
A los efectos de la disposición 270 PC comentada, un menor será cualquier individuo que no haya alcanzado aún los dieciocho años de edad. Pero algo importante a considerar es que este artículo también protege a los que se encuentran por nacer, por lo que si ya existe un embarazo, los progenitores o padres están obligados a satisfacer todas las necesidades que el embarazo requiera.
Necesidades
Se refiere a todas las obligaciones que se relacionan con proveer de un sitio para vivir, servicios médicos, medicamentos, los cuidados necesarios para que se recupere, ropa y alimentos.
Cuando hacemos referencia a los cuidados necesarios para que el menor requiera para que se recupere, y pueden ser de todo tipo de naturaleza, incluso los religiosos y espirituales, como oraciones o prácticas religiosas.
Intencionadamente
Se entiende que un individuo actúa intencionadamente cuando sus actos u omisiones se realizan de manera voluntaria, esto es, a propósito o adrede.
En términos más sencillos, para que se entienda configurada una negligencia infantil, es necesario que el padre o progenitor haya omitido satisfacer las necesidades del menor a propósito, no obstante haber tenido los medios para ello, por tanto, si la omisión del cumplimiento de dichos deberes fue consecuencia de un acto que escapaba de la voluntad del sujeto, como por ejemplo, haber sufrido un accidente que lo dejó incapacitado temporal o permanentemente para trabajar, no podría ser declarado responsable por este hecho punible.
Justificación legal
Hay que aclarar que una justificación legal se trata de un escenario en el que, según lo establecido en las leyes, un individuo se encuentra exonerado del cumplimiento de un determinado deber u obligación. En otras palabras, se trata de un escenario establecido en las leyes que permite a un padre o progenitor incumplir sus deberes con relación a un niño.
Por otra parte, la disposición 270 PC que estamos comentando, establece que todo padre o progenitor siente la obligación de realizar todo aquello que pueda considerar sensato o razonable para satisfacer las necesidades que tiene cualquier menor que se encuentre bajo su cargo.
Sin embargo, un padre o progenitor puede tener una justificación legal en la que basar su omisión de cumplir con ese deber u obligación en el caso de que se hayan presentado circunstancias que sean absolutamente ajenas a su voluntad y que tengan como consecuencia haber perdido la capacidad para obtener el dinero que se necesita o los ingresos que normalmente tenía, o los activos con los que contaba para poder satisfacer las necesidades de un menor.
Ahora bien, la regulación establecida en la norma es clara cuando establece que no puede considerarse como una justificación legal que el padre o progenitor del menor se haya quedado sin los medios económicos necesarios para satisfacer todo lo que necesita su hijo, porque haya empleado de manera poco razonable su dinero en otros fines, como comprarse un auto deportivo o una nueva casa, o que permanece desempleado y no busca diligentemente una actividad económica con la que obtener los ingresos que son necesarios para cumplir con la obligación de manutención que tiene respecto al menor de edad. Respecto a esta regulación, las leyes presumen en estos escenarios que no hay una justificación legal, de modo que le corresponde al procesado demostrar que la justificación legal existe, con los medios probatorios que las leyes ponen a su alcance.
Veamos algunos ejemplos de este tipo de escenarios
- Una situación en la que se entiende verificada la conducta ilícita de negligencia infantil ocurre cuando un padre o progenitor, teniendo una buena posición económica, debido a que ostenta un cargo de gerencia que está bien remunerado, dentro de una organización de una compañía prestigiosa, voluntariamente incumple con los deberes de manutención y satisfacción de las necesidades de sus hijos de garantizarles un sitio para vivir, servicios médicos, medicamentos, ropa y alimentos, porque se gasta el dinero en ropa de marca costosa para sí mismo, o se compra un auto costoso, o adquiere una vivienda lujosa.
- Al contrario del escenario anterior, un individuo no podría ser declarado responsable de una negligencia infantil si ha perdido su empleo por causa de haber sufrido una lesión y no tiene otros ingresos que le permitan cumplir con su obligación de manutención, incluso, aunque diariamente acuda a postularse a toda clase de ofertas laborales, por lo que ha tenido que solicitar la ayuda asistencial social que provee el Estado, de modo que no tiene los medios económicos que le permitan cubrir las necesidades de brindar un sitio para vivir, servicios médicos, medicamentos, ropa y alimentos a su hijo menor de edad. Ante una situación como esta, no puede declararse al individuo responsable penalmente, debido a que su incumplimiento no fue voluntario ni intencionado, de modo que existe una justificación legal para el mismo.
¿Cuáles son los hechos observables que pueden presuponer que el menor de edad es víctima de una negligencia infantil?
Hay muchas señales de alerta sobre esta situación, encontrándose entre las más comunes las siguientes:
- El niño normalmente exhibe una conducta enojada, de frustración, o muestra mal comportamiento de manera habitual.
- El niño no se viste de forma adecuada, que se encuentre en buenas condiciones.
- El menor muestra heridas de tipo físico, o se encuentra enfermo y es obvio que no ha recibido la atención médica que necesita.
- El niño muestra una altura o un peso que es inferior al normal para la edad que tiene.
- El niño normalmente pide o roba dinero.
- El niño se muestra constantemente agotado o cansado.
- El menor sufre de sed o de hambre hasta el límite de llegar a robar o pedir comida.
- Resulta obvio que el niño consume drogas o bebidas alcohólicas.
- El niño manifieste que en su casa no tiene a nadie que se preocupe por su cuidado personal en su casa.
- El niño tiene una apariencia física poco apropiada, no muestra las debidas condiciones de higiene o su cuerpo desprende mal olor.
- Es evidente que el niño no recibe los servicios médicos ni dentales que requiere.
- El niño se ausenta en muchas oportunidades de la escuela, sin la debida justificación, o cambia de escuela muy frecuentemente.
¿Cuáles son los hechos observables que pueden presuponer que el padre o progenitor está llevando a cabo una negligencia infantil con relación a un niño que se encuentra bajo su cuidado?
También hay determinadas señales de alerta de las que podría deducirse que el padre o progenitor de un menor de edad no está cumpliendo con su deber de proveer de un sitio para vivir, servicios médicos, medicamentos, ropa y alimentos, de modo que está ejecutando la conducta de negligencia infantil. Entre estas señales de alerta se encuentran:
- El padre, así como aquel que tiene la obligación de proveer para cubrir las necesidades del menor es consumidor habitual de sustancias estupefacientes o de bebidas alcohólicas.
- El padre, así como aquel que tiene la obligación de proveer para cubrir las necesidades del menor exhibe conductas irracionales.
- El padre, así como aquel que tiene la obligación de proveer para cubrir las necesidades del menor exhibe poco o ningún interés por el bienestar del menor o muestra una constante depresión.
- El padre, así como aquel que tiene la obligación de proveer para cubrir las necesidades del menor exhibe una total indiferencia con relación a su hijo.
¿Cómo se sanciona el incumplimiento de lo dispuesto en el artículo 270 del Código Penal de California?
Llevar a cabo una acción ilícita de negligencia infantil no sólo conduce a la imposición de castigos de tipo penal, sino que es muy probable que se impongan sanciones o medidas de tipo administrativo. Pero con relación a las sanciones del tipo penal, debemos informar que las posibles penas que se pueden imponer al procesado que sea declarado responsable de esta conducta ilícita, que es calificada como un delito menor, son:
- Privación de libertad en una institución carcelaria hasta por un tiempo máximo de 1 año, en una cárcel del condado.
- Multas judiciales, cuyo valor puede alcanzar $2.000,00.
Es muy raro que ocurra, pero pueden presentarse circunstancias especiales que pueden hacer que este tipo de conductas sean procesadas como una conducta más seria. Entre los escenarios en los que ello puede ocurrir se encuentra el hecho de que un padre o progenitor se niegue voluntariamente a proveer a un menor de un sitio para vivir, servicios médicos, medicamentos, ropa y alimentos, no obstante haber sido declarado padre de un niño por una decisión judicial. En estos casos, en la resolución de una demanda civil por establecimiento de paternidad, un Juez decide que un individuo es realmente el progenitor de un menor, y aunque existe una decisión judicial que así los determina, el declarado padre se rehúsa voluntariamente a dar cumplimiento a sus deberes con relación a su hijo.
En estos casos, las penalizaciones que se pueden imponer al procesado
- Privación de libertad en una institución carcelaria hasta por un tiempo máximo de 1 año, en una cárcel del condado.
- Privación de libertad en una institución carcelaria de 1 año y 1 día que deberá cumplirse en una cárcel estatal
- Multas judiciales, cuyo valor puede alcanzar $2.000,00.
¿Existen otras consecuencias que se puedan derivar de una condena por negligencia infantil?
En primer lugar, una negligencia infantil no está clasificada como un crimen de vileza oral, de modo que no producirá efectos en la condición migratoria del procesado, pero en los casos en que esta conducta sea castigada como grave, podrá tener efectos en el derecho del procesado a adquirir, poseer o portar armas, cosa que no ocurre si es procesada como delito menor.
¿Qué medidas se pueden adoptar con relación al menor de edad?
Es posible que la Oficina de Servicios Infantiles o CPS pueda decidir apartar al niño que ha sido expuesto a este tipo de negligencia de su hogar, en particular, cuando el descuido de sus progenitores o padres es inusualmente grave, aunque su primera meta debe ser tratar que el menor se mantenga junto a sus familiares. En caso de que llegue a determinarse que esto no es posible, porque perjudica al niño, entonces será colocado en hogares sustitutos.
¿Hay conductas criminales que se relacionan con la negligencia infantil?
- 273(a) PC – Peligro infantil.
- 1 PC – Ausencia de vigilancia sobre la asistencia del niño a clases.
- 273(d) – Abuso infantil.
¿Cuáles son los argumentos defensivos más usados en estos casos?
Cualquiera sea la forma negligencia de la que se esté acusando al procesado, siempre existirá un argumento defensivo que puede ser empleado para combatir los cargos, pero deben ser escogidos por abogados defensores especializados, que sabrán cuál resulta ser la defensa idónea para el caso concreto, sin embargo entre los argumentos que más se emplean, podemos mencionar:
- Ausencia de intencionalidad.
- El procesado posee una justificación legal.
- El procesado desconocía que el menor necesitaba atención médica.
- Las evidencias consignadas resultan insuficientes para demostrar los cargos.
Contratar a los abogados especializados en negligencia infantil cerca de mí
Si la representación fiscal en Van Nuys CA, ha levantado cargos en su contra por negligencia infantil, es posible que usted se sienta abrumado y hasta intimidado por las consecuencias que ello puede tener en su vida y en la de su hijo, por eso lo recomendable es que los hechos sean analizado por un experto, quien tendrá una mejor perspectiva y muchos mayores conocimientos para encontrar una solución viable, que le permita minimizar estas consecuencias negativas, por lo que debe ponerse en contacto con Leah Legal, lo más pronto posible y dejar que los verdaderos profesionales se encarguen del asunto.
¡Realmente podemos ser de inestimable ayuda, porque contamos con los abogados expertos que usted necesita! Llámenos por el 818-484-1100 y agende una primera cita totalmente gratis, para que nos exponga los hechos y le asesoraremos de la manera más conveniente.
Es lamentable que, en el estado de California, todos los días se incrementen los dígitos de sujetos que se ejecutan conductas ilícitas relacionadas con lo que se denomina violencia doméstica. En estos escenarios, en los que suele existir una relación de tipo cercano entre el que ataca y el que es agredido, resulta necesario y hasta prudente, que sean tomadas ciertas medidas con las que se evite que el atacante vaya a tener una segunda oportunidad para volver a agredir a ese individuo con el que mantiene una estrecha relación, lo que le podría ocasionar a este último, daños aún mayores, a los que previamente se le habían infringido. Es con ocasión de la prevención de estas nuevas situaciones de riesgo en medio de violencia doméstica, que la Ley en California establece ciertos mecanismos de protección, de naturaleza judicial, para poder dictar medidas que tienen como objetivo proteger a los presuntos individuos que fueron objeto de la agresión, bajo un escenario de violencia familiar. Una de estas medidas es que un Juez dicte una orden de restricción o de protección, que tiene naturaleza judicial, y que reciben igualmente el nombre de órdenes o medidas para el alejamiento. Aunque esta clase de medidas judiciales de protección igualmente pueden ser empleadas por sujetos que no tienen sanas intenciones, con relación al individuo en contra del cual son dictadas, quien recibe el nombre de individuo restringido, pudiendo encontrarnos ante el escenario de una venganza que es ejecutada en su contra, o por causa de que esté pendiente un arreglo o un procedimiento sobre divorcio, manutención o custodia, y se quiera utilizar esta clase de medidas como una medida para presionar al sujeto en contra de quien se dicta a que acceda a determinados términos. En este escenario, el sujeto restringido habrá sido la víctima de mentiras y subterfugios hábilmente argumentados ante una Corte, para que esta clase de protecciones judiciales sean dictadas en su contra y hacerlo quedar mal, y es también lamentable decir que, en muchos casos, son usadas con esa finalidad.
Una orden de alejamiento, restricción o protección es una medida dictada dentro del sistema legal en California, por un Tribunal que tenga competencia para ello, y por medio de ellas es posible prohibirle al individuo restringido que lleve a cabo determinadas actividades en perjuicio del individuo protegido, entre las cuáles podemos mencionar, el abuso psicológico o físico del sujeto protegido, así como acosarlo, amenazarlo o acecharlo.
Según las disposiciones legales que rigen estas cuestiones hay cuatro tipos de estas órdenes de restricción, protección o alejamiento, clasificadas de acuerdo a las causas en que tuvieron que ser fundamentadas:
- Fundadas en violencia doméstica.
- Fundadas por abusos de adultos que son dependientes o de ancianos.
- Fundadas en acoso civil.
- Fundadas en violencia dentro del sitio en el que se ejerce la actividad laboral.
En cuanto a la vigente de una orden de restricción, protección o alejamiento, la misma va a depender de la clase de orden que haya sido necesario dictar por el Juez, y con base en su durabilidad, existen tres clases:
- Orden de restricción, protección o alejamiento en caso de emergencia.
- Orden de restricción, protección o alejamiento de naturaleza temporal.
- Orden de restricción, protección o alejamiento de naturaleza definitiva.
Cuando el sujeto restringido no dé cumplimiento a una cualesquiera de este tipo de órdenes, luego de haber sido notificado de su existencia, podrán presentarse cargos en su contra, por haber violado lo establecido en el artículo 273.6 del Código Penal, que es la norma que tipifica como una conducta delictual el hecho de que el sujeto restringido haga caso omiso de esta clase de órdenes de naturaleza judicial, que es sancionada con largas penas de prisión y cuantiosas multas, exigiendo para ello dos condiciones, que son: que la medida haya sido dictada por el Juez con la debida competencia para hacerlo, y que el individuo restringido hubiere sido debidamente notificado de la existencia de la misma en su contra.
¿Dónde conseguir la asesoría legal adecuada?
Ninguno de los escenarios en los que un Juez decide que debe ser dictada una medida de esta clase es agradable en Van Nuys, CA, y porque cuando se emiten las órdenes de restricción, protección o alejamiento, eso significa que al individuo restringido le serán impuestas una cantidad de condiciones y de obligaciones que debe acatar, bajo riesgo de ser acusado por violar tales medidas, lo que implica que tendrá que cumplir obligaciones de hacer o de abstenerse de hacer, entre las que puede encontrarse que tenga que abandonar su actual residencia, a lo que se juntan todos los efectos que eso puede tener, que incluyen la posibilidad cierta y real de perder el trabajo, en el supuesto de que se trate de una medida de protección por violencia dentro del sitio de labores. Imagine que usted sea notificado de que en su contra ha sido dictada una de estas medidas y que usted no sea responsable de ninguna actividad que lo justifique. No se trata de un asunto que se va a resolver por sí sólo, de manera que necesitará la asesoría legal más adecuada, que sólo los abogados especializados en esta clase de medidas de protección pueden ofrecerle, como los que podrá encontrar en Leah Legal, porque contamos con los profesionales más calificados en esta área de práctica legal, que no sólo tienen conocimiento del procedimiento a seguir, sino de las estrategias con las que es posible que la severidad de tales medidas sea disminuida y hasta que sea revocada, en el supuesto de que ello sea posible legalmente, por ello, para impedir que su vida se torne en un completo desastre, y tenga que correr riesgos que son innecesarios y que agraven su posición frente a la Corte, lo que tiene que hacer inmediatamente en ponerse en contacto con nuestras oficinas, y tendrá al alcance de su mano la asistencia legal que usted requiere.
¿En qué consiste una orden o medida de restricción, protección o alejamiento?
Consiste en una decisión judicial cuyo objeto es la protección de un sujeto de las probables acciones molestas e hirientes que podrían ser ejecutadas en su perjuicio por otro individuo, al que llamaremos restringido, cuyas actividades podrían llegar a representar un peligro contra la seguridad, la integridad y la vida del individuo que resultó beneficiado con la medida de protección, para impedir que sea amenazado y que llegue a tener un temor razonable, o se vea abusado psicológica o físicamente o sea víctima de acechos o de acosos por parte del sujeto restringido.
Entre los términos o condiciones que se podrían incluir en esta clase de medidas de protección general se encuentran:
- Orden que se relaciona con las conductas personales de un sujeto, como abstenerse de realizar ciertas conductas personales: esto es, que se impiden al sujeto restringido, realizar determinadas actividades, entre las que se encuentran la agresión en cualquier forma al sujeto protegido, dañar sus propiedades personales, amenazarlo, acosarlo, enviarle correos o mensajes electrónicos y efectuarle llamadas por teléfono. En el supuesto de que el individuo restringido no cumpla con estas obligaciones, podrá ser castigado conforme a lo que dispone la norma 273.5 del Código Penal, por violación de órdenes de restricción.
- Orden de alejamiento, lo que supone que el individuo restringido debe mantenerse a determinada distancia del sujeto que haya sido protegido con dicha orden, o sus familiares más próximos, así como del lugar en el que se encuentra empleado, de su casa, o de cualquier sitio que concretamente sea muy frecuentado por el sujeto protegido, bajo pena de que sean impuestas las sanciones a las que antes hemos hechos referencia, con la misma base legal.
- Orden de ser excluido de su lugar de residencia, en cumplimiento de este tipo de órdenes, el sujeto restringido debe mudarse del sitio en el que reside el individuo protegido, aunque conviva con éste y se trate de su residencia también, con el objetivo de evitar que vuelvan a presentarse ocasiones en las que surjan nuevos riesgos o peligros para el individuo que ha sido beneficiado con la protección de la orden.
¿Qué diferencias existen entre una orden de alejamiento, de restricción o de protección?
Tal como enumeramos antes, las normas en este Estado establecen 4 clases diferentes de esta clase de orden, en función de la causa que los haya originado:
- Por violencia en el sitio de labores.
- Por acoso civil.
- Por haber abusado de adultos que son dependientes o de ancianos.
- Por violencia doméstica.
Por violencia en el sitio de labores
Cualquier persona tiene derecho a solicitar una medida de protección, restricción o alejamiento, por sufrir de conductas o actos violentos en su sitio de labores, en los escenarios en los que:
- El solicitante sea el empleador o patrono,
- El individuo que requiere de protección corre un riesgo inmediato o puede ser abusado en su sitio de labores o corre una amenaza a su integridad física o mental que es creíble, es un empleado del solicitante.
En estos escenarios, los empleados no tienen capacidad para solicitar que sean dictadas esta clase de medidas, de modo que si está actualmente sufriendo de algún tipo de violencia que proviene de un colaborador o compañero en el lugar en el que trabaja, lo que deberá solicitar es:
- Pedir que se dicte una medida de restricción, protección o alejamiento con base en un acoso civil, a menos que,
- Entre ambas personas exista algún tipo de relación, bien sea de naturaleza familiar o íntima, en cuyo caso, lo que corresponde es solicitar que se dicte una medida de restricción, protección o alejamiento con base violencia doméstica.
Por acoso civil
Cualquier persona tiene derecho a pedir que se dicte en su favor una medida de restricción o de protección en casos de acoso civil cuando:
- El solicitante ha sido víctima de actividades de amenazas, abusos, acechos o acosos que provienen de otro individuo.
- El solicitante de la protección no mantiene alguna clase de relación de tipo cercano con el sujeto que va a ser restringido con la orden, de la manera en que se exigen en aquellos supuestos en los que las medidas de protección, restricción o alejamiento son emitidas por ocurrir entre los involucrados violencia doméstica.
Por haber abusado de adultos que son dependientes o de ancianos
Cualquier sujeto está en el derecho de pedir que se dicte una medida de restricción, protección o de alejamiento en caso de que se tenga la sospecha cierta de que ha ocurrido un abuso de adultos que son dependientes o de que ha ocurrido un maltrato a ancianos en caso de que:
- El individuo que deba ser protegido ya tenga 65 años o más de edad cumplidos, o que tenga desde los 18 hasta los 64, pero se encuentre sufriendo de un tipo de discapacidad, bien sea mental o física, que lo hace ser dependiente de otros para poder cubrir sus necesidades básicas, e incluso que no tenga la posibilidad de hacer que sus derechos sean respetados por otros.
- El individuo que deba ser protegido ha pasado por privaciones en lo que a sus necesidades se refiere, por daños físicos, por negligencia o directamente ha sido víctima de algún abuso proveniente de aquel que tiene una obligación legal de cuidar de él.
Por violencia doméstica
Una persona que se sienta amenazada en su ambiente doméstico puede solicitar este tipo de protección por esta clase de violencia, en caso de que sea capaz de demostrar que:
- El sujeto restringido ha cometido actos de abuso en perjuicio de aquel que pide que le sea concedida la protección,
- El sujeto protegido mantiene una relación de tipo cercano e íntima con el sujeto que va a ser restringido.
Tener una relación que sea de tipo cercano o íntima quiere decir que las dos personas en la actualidad son cónyuges o fueron cónyuges con anterioridad y hoy están divorciados, o se trata de una pareja de las denominadas estables o de hecho, cuya característica es la convivencia en común, o lo fueron antes, habiendo llegado a convivir en la misma residencia, o que actualmente se encuentran prometidos o están en una relación de noviazgo, o si tan sólo están saliendo juntos o lo hicieron antes, teniendo una finalidad íntima o romántica, o se trata de una pareja que posee hijos en común, o poseen una relación próxima de parentesco, bien se trate de origen consanguíneo o por causa de matrimonio.
Como la disposición se establece distinción alguna al respecto, esta normativa es aplicable, tanto si se trata de parejas heterosexuales o conformadas por individuos que poseen el mismo sexo.
¿Qué contenido puede tener una medida de restricción, protección o alejamiento?
Debemos tener en consideración que este tipo de órdenes tienen naturaleza judicial, de modo que deben ser emitidas por jueces que tengan la competencia necesaria en ese sentido, con el propósito de que se impida al individuo restringido poder llevar a cabo alguna clase de conducta del tipo agresiva o maliciosa, bien sea psicológica o física, en perjuicio del sujeto que ha sido protegido con esta clase de medidas. Es por ello que las mismas van a contener una cantidad de obligaciones condiciones que tienen la intención de impedir que el individuo que haya sido restringido pueda entrar nuevamente en comunicación con la persona protegida, así como con los familiares más próximos de éste, incluyendo a los hijos.
Por decirlo de otra manera, el individuo que sea restringido tiene la obligación de cumplir con los términos o condiciones, que pueden incluir ciertas prohibiciones, como, por ejemplo:
- Asistir de manera obligatoria a programas o talleres para el control de ira, la racionalización de emociones, así como de reeducación conductual, en especial si es un sujeto que sea reincidente en esta clase de actividades.
- Es bastante probable que sus visitas en el futuro a un hijo, tengan que ser realizadas bajo la supervisión del departamento que tiene la competencia para ello.
- Es bastante posible que tenga que cambiar de residencia.
- Se le va a prohibir adquirir o portar personalmente un arma de fuego de cualquier naturaleza.
- Seguramente le será prohibido concurrir a determinados lugares, o llevar a cabo determinadas actividades.
- Probablemente, la emisión de una orden o medida de esta naturaleza afecte la condición migratoria del sujeto restringido, en el escenario de que no sea ciudadano estadounidense.
¿Existe alguna especie de procedimiento que sea anterior a que se emita una medida de dicte una medida de restricción, protección o alejamiento?
En teoría, el primer paso consiste en que la presunta persona que se sienta amenazada se presente en persona en un Tribunal, para hacer del conocimiento del Juez que posee un razonable o fundado temor por su seguridad e integridad, por causa de que ha sido objeto de actividades tales como acecho, acoso, ha sufrido de lesiones emocionales o físicas, o ha recibido amenazas creíbles de parte de otro sujeto, con quien actualmente o con anterioridad estuvo casado, o mantuvo una relación íntima o sentimental, posee un hijo en común, de manera que siente que está siendo víctima de una conducta ilícita que califica como violencia doméstica, resultando creíble que esas mismas situaciones se volverán a presentar en el futuro muy próximo. Lo siguiente es que tenga que completar un formato de solicitud que se debe consignar en la Secretaría del Tribunal, siendo éste el procedimiento anterior para que sea dictada una medida de restricción, protección o alejamiento, que también se conoce con el nombre de TRO, en beneficio del solicitante. Se debe aclarar que no se exige que la presunta víctima muestre pruebas de que haya sido objeto de abusos físicos para convencer al Tribunal de la existencia de una amenaza que es inmediata e inminente, porque con el simple abuso psicológico o emocional bastará.
Pero decimos, en teoría, porque es posible que este primer paso podría estar precedido porque se haya emitido una medida de restricción, protección o alejamiento de emergencia, conocida con el nombre de EPO, con base en un escenario en el que agentes de policía asisten a una determinada residencia, en respuesta a una denuncia por una presunta actividad de violencia doméstica. Al hacerse presentes en el sitio, dada la experiencia que poseen, llegan a la conclusión de que un individuo, usualmente el marido, especialmente si existen niños en el hogar, no debe quedarse en esa residencia, y se pondrán en contacto con un Juez en turno, pidiéndole que se emita una medida de restricción, protección o alejamiento de emergencia para que el marido se vea obligado a dejar la residencia. Pero estas medidas de emergencia tienen carácter temporal, como máximo de siete días, así que los agentes policiales le recomendarán al individuo en beneficio del cual fue dictada la medida que asista lo más pronto posible ante un Tribunal a solicitar la dicte una medida de restricción, protección o alejamiento de mayor duración o TRO, con base en tal actuación policial y en informe del que se pueden deducir fundados indicios de que hubo violencia doméstica.
Al presentar la solicitud de una TRO, junto con el formulario en el que debe constar toda la información correspondiente, hay que realizar una explicación con todo detalle de las razones que le hacen pensar al solicitante que se encuentra en un peligro razonable de sufrir las consecuencias de una conducta ilícita por violencia doméstica y tiene que cancelar una tasa judicial de tramitación de la solicitud. En caso de que el Tribunal decida dictar la misma, tendrá una duración que no va a exceder los 25 días.
Es importante que las personas sepan que esta clase de medidas son emitidas inaudita parte, lo que significa que no se va a escuchar lo que tenga que decir el sujeto restringido, porque no se encontrará presente. Luego será fijada una oportunidad a la que las partes podrán asistir con sus representantes legales, en la que se expondrán los argumentos y las evidencias necesarias para que el juez considere si resulta necesario extender la TRO a una PRO, esto es una dicte una medida de restricción, protección o alejamiento definitiva, que, a pesar del nombre que tiene, sólo podrá extenderse de 3 a 5 años, en función de las características propias de los hechos, y si transcurrido ese lapso, todavía existen circunstancias que así lo justifiquen, debidamente demostradas ante el Tribunal, el lapso de una PRO puede ser extendido por un período de duración igual.
Cuando tiene lugar esa audiencia para que el Juez decida si se encuentra justificado que se dicta una PRO, el individuo al que se pretende restringir de manera definitiva, junto con sus abogados representantes podrán utilizar todos los argumentos que las leyes permiten, con la finalidad de evitar que se dicte una medida de tal naturaleza, ya que los efectos de la misma podrían ser tener que buscar una residencia definitiva en otro lugar, evitar que visite a su hijo y hasta modificar drásticamente el estatus migratorio del sujeto restringido.
¿Cuál es la sanción que se impone en caso de incumplir una medida de restricción, protección o alejamiento?
Tal incumplimiento constituye en sí mismo un hecho ilícito menor sancionado con:
- Cárcel por un máximo de 1 año,
- Multa judicial que puede alcanzar $1.000.
Pero, si el incumplimiento de la medida de restricción, protección o alejamiento involucró actos de violencia y es la segunda oportunidad en la que la medida es incumplida por el individuo restringido, aunque no se trate del mismo individuo protegido, la conducta ilícita calificará como wobbler, de modo que si la representación fiscal decida juzgarlo como una conducta ilícita mayor, entonces las sanciones serán:
- Cárcel por un máximo de 3 años,
- Multa judicial que puede alcanzar $10.000.
¿Se pueden combatir las medidas de medida de restricción, protección o alejamiento?
Sí, pero eso debe realizarse en la audiencia fijada por el Tribunal para discutir sobre la conversión de una TRO en una PRO, esto es, con carácter definitivo. Es en ese momento en que el sujeto al que se pretende restringir de manera definitiva debe tener la asistencia jurídica de abogados conocedores de estas materias, que puedan convencer al juez que no es necesario que se dicte una medida de restricción, protección o alejamiento definitiva, por cuando no existen motivos legales que lo justifiquen, pudiendo alegarse, entre otros argumentos:
- Insuficiencia de las evidencias.
- Las motivaciones del sujeto protegido en realidad son otras muy distintas, y se está aprovechando de esta medida judicial en su propio beneficio, para quitarle la custodia de un hijo al individuo restringido o poder llegar a un mejor acuerdo en un procedimiento de divorcio, o incluso que, por pura venganza o celos, lo que desea es que sea deportado del país.
- El individuo restringido jamás tuvo el propósito de ocasionar temor o miedo en el solicitante de la TRO.
Contactar con abogados especializados en medidas de restricción, protección o alejamiento cerca de mí
Créanos cuando le decimos que sabemos lo que significa en Van Nuys CA que seamos restringidos con esta clase de medidos u órdenes, porque eso nos va a trastocar el modo en el que estábamos acostumbrados a vivir. Por ello, si usted ha sido notificado para que asista a una audiencia en la que se va a determinar si debe ser restringido definitivamente por medio de una PRO, estamos en capacidad de ofrecerle los conejos de los mejores profesionales legales de Leah Legal, quienes harán todo lo posible por convencer al Tribunal de que ello no es necesario, con los argumentos legales que se adecúen más a los hechos.
¡No tiene tiempo que perder, llámenos de inmediato! Recuerde que estos procedimientos se tramitan muy rápidamente, así que haga contacto con nuestras oficinas por el 818-484-1100 para que comencemos a ayudarle lo más pronto posible.
Si se refiere a la protección de los menores de edad, la normativa del Estado de California resulta muy severa. Puesto que, son personas sumamente vulnerables que necesitan de protección, atención, y preocupación.
Existen diversas situaciones que pueden ocasionar cargos en el ámbito penal por dejar en un escenario peligroso a un menor. No obstante, en la mayoría de los casos la acusación se basa en un hecho falso o malinterpretación donde se vio afectado el acusado. Desgraciadamente, esto no disuade a la Fiscalía y seguirá con el caso fundamentándose en la norma 273 (a) PC.
Según la normativa dejar en peligro a los niños menores de dieciocho años es exhibirlo de forma deliberada a sufrimiento, dolor, o riesgos no justificados. Aun si el menor no es dañado de forma física, la persona será acusada de exponer al menor a riesgos indebidos de generar daños. Algunos ejemplos de esta situación es dejar a un menor bajo el cuidado de alguien inestable y abusivo, no prestarle ayuda médica cuando el niño está enfermo o lo requiere, entre otras,
Si actualmente reside en Van Nuys, CA, y enfrenta cargos por peligro infantil no dude en comunicarse con el bufete Leah Legal, ya que ponemos a su disposición un equipo de abogados que lo asesorarán y que cuentan con experiencia en el área. Recuerde que tener asistencia legal marcará la diferencia entre permanecer tiempo tras las rejas, o continuar con su vida normalmente.
¿En qué consiste el peligro para los niños en el Estado de California?
Todo sujeto puede sufrir acusación por un ilícito, no solo los progenitores. Generalmente, los adultos son responsables del cuidado y protección de los menores de edad (menores de dieciocho años). En relación, a cuando un individuo puede ser considerado responsable del delito de peligro infantil sufrirá cargos si: Permite o causa de manera intencional que un niño sufra angustia mental o física injustificada, o por su parte, permite o genera de manera intencional que un joven sea lesionado, herido, o dejado en condiciones peligrosas.
Ciertos ejemplos de esta situación, en la cual el sujeto sufrirá cargos por peligro infantil son los siguientes:
- Dejar armas de fuego cargadas, o cualquier artículo considerado peligroso en un sitio de fácil alcance para un menor.
- Dejar un niño con alguna cuidadora que posea historial de abuso infantil.
- Realizarle un tatuaje a un niño, se considera una violación a la disposición 653 PC.
- No brindarle atención médica cuando el menor esté enfermo o lo requiera.
¿Qué elementos debe demostrar la Fiscalía para que un sujeto sea acusado de peligro infantil?
En principio, el fiscal tiene que demostrar los elementos constitutivos del ilícito para que una persona sea condenada por peligro infantil. Estos elementos son:
- El sujeto causó de manera intencional una angustia emocional o corporal injustificable a un menor,
- Permitir o causar de manera intencional que se afecta la salud o la persona de un menor, cuando se encuentra bajo sus cuidados,
- Autorizar o causar de forma intencional que un menor sea dejado en alguna condición, en la que su salud o persona del niño sea amenazado, cuando se encuentra bajo su custodia o cuidados,
- Cuando el acusado permitió o dejó que el menor sufriera, se encontrara en peligro, o fuera dañado, será responsable de cometer negligencia criminal.
Ahora bien, para entender los elementos con mayor facilidad se desglosaron sus términos más importantes.
En relación, a generar que un menor sea dejado en situaciones peligrosas se presenta el siguiente ejemplo: Max quien es padre de un bebe de apenas dos años, y lo deja dentro de su automóvil en su silla, mientras que él se dirige a un restaurante olvidándose que el niño se encontraba allí sin ninguna razón. No obstante, en el ambiente hacen elevadas temperaturas debido a que se encuentra en pleno verano.
Frente a este escenario, aun cuando el padre no le generó daño al menor, tenía conocimiento de que estaban en verano y es un ambiente caluroso. Por lo tanto, dejar a su hijo encerrado dentro del automóvil lo dejaría en peligro inminente, y podría sufrir grandes daños físicos o incluso la muerte.
¿Qué se entiende por voluntariamente?
El término voluntario es aquel acto intencionado que se llevó a cabo con un fin u objetivo. No obstante, no significa que el sujeto acusado tenía el propósito de generar daños a otra persona o incumplir la normativa. Sino que es culpable de ejecutar un acto voluntario para ejercer un daño.
Por ejemplo: María, labora como camarera en un restaurante. Anteriormente mantuvo una relación con un hombre, y de esa unión nació una niña quien actualmente tiene 1 año. Max es su nueva pareja, y se mudó a su vivienda hace poco tiempo. Desde que vive con ambas, María deja a la beba con su novio, y nota que con el pasar del tiempo su hija empieza a sufrir accidentes, que le ocasionaron quemaduras, moretones, y hasta una fractura en el brazo. No obstante, María continúa trabajando y dejando a la niña al cuidado de Max. Un día, su pareja golpeó tan fuerte a la niña que le ocasionó la muerte inmediatamente, y la madre no estaba presente.
En este escenario, Max se considerará responsable de agresión generando la muerte a un menor sancionado en el artículo 273 ab(a) PC. Mientras que, María será culpable de peligro infantil puesto que, aun cuando no tenía el propósito de herir o lesionar a la niña o incumplir la ley, voluntariamente accedió a que su pareja se encargara de ella.
Padecer de forma injustificada sufrimiento emocional o físico
Se refiere a cualquier sufrimiento o dolor generado a un menor por cualquiera de los factores señalados a continuación.
- Negligencia criminal: Esta acción implica más que un simple descuido, error, o falta de debida atención. Puesto que, cuando alguien lleva a cabo la negligencia criminal, es porque actúa de forma imprudente y es distinto a como actuaría alguien común en un mismo escenario, Que la conducta de este individuo demuestra un desprecio por la vida de los demás, o indiferencia de los efectos de sus conductas, y que un sujeto razonable conocía que actuar o accionar de tal forma generaría con seguridad un daño a otro. En resumen, cuando la conducta es severa, irrazonable, e irresponsable desafiando todo sentido común, pueden estar en presencia de una negligencia criminal.
Por ejemplo: Daniel, es un niño de seis años que sufre hiperactividad y es hijo de Lucia. Un día cualquiera, Daniel corre hacia una calle transitada ignorando a su madre quien le pide que pare. Lucia finalmente logra atraparlo y lo sostiene cuando intentaba huir, lanzándolo al suelo y ocasionándole fuertes lesiones en su cuerpo.
En este caso, aun cuando Lucia le generó lesiones al niño, su acción fue justificable y razonable ya que su propósito era prevenir que Daniel sufriera lesiones severas, Como resultado, es imposible que la madre sea considerada responsable de colocar a su hijo en peligro.
Obligación de demostrar por parte del fiscal
Para que la acusación del fiscal prospere y el sujeto pueda ser acusado de peligro infantil, es necesario que se demuestre lo siguiente:
- El acusado género con intención un sufrimiento mental o dolor corporal injustificado a un niño,
- El acusado género sufrimiento y dolor a través de negligencia criminal,
- El hecho que involucró al menor se llevó a cabo cuando el acusado se encontraba presente.
Ahora bien, este hecho ilícito puede ser accionado en contra de un padre, madre, que confió a su hijo menor a una persona conociendo que es agresiva, descuidada, y negligente. Por su parte, permitir que el niño tenga fácil acceso a armas, instrumentos peligrosos, drogas, puede ser un hecho muy peligroso para este.
La acusación por dejar en peligro a un niño se puede presentar por conductas dirigidas en presencia del menor o hacia este, y son: condiciones inseguras para la vida, conducción imprudente, posesión, venta, y uso de sustancias prohibidas. Otro ejemplo que dejaría a un menor en peligro, es cuando el padre deja al niño solo dentro de un coche en un día caluroso.
Algunos ejemplos de negligencia criminal
Las siguientes situaciones se fundamentan en algunos casos reales ocurridos en California, en donde el sujeto acusado se consideró responsable por negligencia criminal, hecho que ocurrió en el primer caso, puesto que existían pruebas. Mientras que, el segundo escenario el acusado por falta de evidencias no se consideró responsable de peligro infantil.
- Si existieron evidencias de negligencia criminal: Pedro, es un hombre de veinte años de edad, y es vecino de Max quien acaba de cumplir quince años. Pedro, reta a su vecino para que participe en el juego de ruleta rusa, quien acepta sin problema. Es allí, cuando Pedro deja el rifle cargado, acciona el cilindro y le da el arma a Max, una vez que este jala el gatillo se dispara el rifle, y lo asesina. Aun cuando Max se disparó a sí mismo, Pedro se considerará responsable, porque entregó a un menor un arma cargada, y lo animó para que jalara el gatillo.
- No existieron evidencias de negligencia criminal: En este caso, no se considera negligencia si el hecho resultó por un descuido, un error, o falta de la debida atención, sin considerar las consecuencias. Ejemplo: María dejó a cuatro hijos con edades entre los tres y siete años en la vivienda completamente solos, mientras asistía a un restaurante con amigos. Tiempo después se ocasionó un incendio, y un vecino al percatarse pudo salvar a tres de sus hijos menores, pero el más pequeño murió producto del accidente. María fue irresponsable, no obstante, no se considera negligencia criminal, puesto que, un sujeto razonable no hubiera podido prever el daño que ocasionan sus acciones, y como consecuencia, no se considerará responsable de peligro infantil.
¿A qué se refiere el término de gran daño corporal?
De acuerdo a la normativa del Estado de California, este término se requiere para cualquier clase de lesión física severa. De manera que, la lesión menor, insignificante o moreton, no se considerará como un daño corporal grave. En todo caso, será el jurado quien decidirá según el caso si la lesión es severa o leve, y como resultado el fiscal tratará de sacar a relucir el tema cuando posea oportunidad.
No obstante, es importante acotar que el punto no hace referencia a si el menor resultó o no herido, sino si fue dejado en una situación de peligro donde pudiera sufrir daños. En este sentido, es posible que la Fiscalía presente una acusación si el menor sufre lesiones graves.
¿Qué sanciones son aplicables a una persona que perpetró el delito de peligro infantil?
Las sanciones, penas, y condenas serán distintas. No obstante, en gran parte de los casos se señalan de acuerdo a si la conducta del acusado dejó al menor en una situación de peligro donde pudo sufrir daños físicos graves o incluso la muerte.
Penas por un delito menor
En relación a la infracción ocurre cuando la conducta del acusado no genera peligro para el menor de lesiones físicas graves o la muerte. El ilícito de dejar en peligro a un menor se encuentra tipificado en el artículo 273(a) del Código Penal, y establece como sanción si es calificado como delito menor las siguientes: Prisión por un periodo de 6 meses en la cárcel del condado, pago de multas por cantidades que no superen los $1.000.
Régimen de libertad condicional por delito menor
La Corte puede condenar a una persona que cometió este delito, a quedar sometido al beneficio de libertad condicional. La infracción será considerada delito menor en caso de que el acto del sujeto no genere un peligro de daños físicos graves o la muerte del menor.
A este beneficio se le conoce también como régimen de libertad condicional informal. Una corte podrá señalar un lapso mínimo de 4 años bajo este régimen por una sentencia condenatoria de peligro infantil. De igual manera, el régimen de libertad condicional incluirá que: El afectado se encuentre protegido de otras acciones violentas a través de una orden de alejamiento o protección. Se podrá incluir la cláusula para que el agresor esté alejado de la víctima, aun cuando el hogar o casa del menor sea el mismo que el del sujeto acusado, se puede aplicar la orden.
Debido a la gravedad de las amenazas contra los menores y las sanciones a imponer por este ilícito, los individuos considerados responsables quedan sometidos a ciertos requisitos que deberán cumplir mientras se encuentren bajo libertad condicional. Este régimen comprende determinados elementos de acuerdo a la norma 273a (c) PC, y se necesita de un plazo de 48 meses como mínimo bajo libertad condicional, una orden de alejamiento o protección hacia la victima para que no sufra amenazas o actos violentos, como seria la exclusión del hogar común, un año de terapia a fin de reeducar a los abusadores de menores que fuera aprobado, y en caso de que la violación o infracción se perpetrara cuando el sujeto estaba bajo los efectos de sustancias o alcohol deberá inhibirse de consumir dichas sustancias mientras se encuentre bajo el régimen, puesto que, podrá quedar sujeto a pruebas aleatorias de drogas. Pero, si se logra determinar que alguno de los criterios no es de interés para la justicia, podrá ser eliminado.
Penas por un delito grave
En caso de que exista riesgos de daños corporales graves o la muerte de un menor, el delito pasará a ser un “wobbler”, es decir, quedará a discreción del fiscal calificarla por un delito de acuerdo a estos criterios: Detalles de cada uno de los cargos, los antecedentes criminales del acusado. Si es considerado como delito grave las penas serán las siguientes: Multas por una cantidad máxima de $10.000, prisión por 2, 4, 6 años en una cárcel del Estado. De forma alternativa, la autoridad judicial podrá imponer al sujeto 4 años como mínimo bajo un régimen de libertad condicional formal por un ilícito grave.
Incremento de las penas por generar daños corporales
Un sujeto podría sufrir un incremento de las penas aunado a las sanciones antes mencionadas, si el menor sufre daños importantes como consecuencia de su negligencia criminal. El aumento de las penas se basa en imponer penas adicionales y consecutivas en la cárcel del Estado: Si el individuo genera directa y verdaderamente daños físicos severos al niño será sancionado con 3 y hasta 6 años de prisión adicionales. Por su parte, de acuerdo a la edad del menor y de la severidad de los daños, o si este muere producto de la negligencia criminal del sujeto, el agresor sufrirá penas de 4 años adicionales en la cárcel.
Peligro infantil y la Ley de los Tres Strikes en el Estado de California
De acuerdo a lo señalado en esta normativa, una sentencia condenatoria por peligro infantil será considerada como un “strike”. En caso de que el niño sufriera lesiones graves se tendrá un primer strike. Si el individuo cuenta con antecedentes criminales y se acusa por otro ilícito, se le impondrá el doble de las penas por el ilícito posterior (segundo strike). Si el sujeto perpetra un tercer strike, se les condenará a 25 años de prisión hasta cadena perpetua que deberá cumplir en una cárcel del Estado.
Penas por cometer asesinato u homicidio
Si el menor muere producto de la situación de peligro, la Fiscalía podrá establecer más cargos en el ámbito penal. Alguno de estos seria por homicidio involuntario de acuerdo a la norma 192 (b) PC, homicidio voluntario de acuerdo a la disposición 192 (a) PC, o en última instancia asesinato en 2do grado señalado en la norma 189 PC.
¿Qué pruebas son importantes en un caso de peligro infantil?
- Estado actual de la vivienda: De igual forma, la condición de la vivienda es una evidencia. Puesto que, si no cuenta con inodoros que sirvan, no hay suficiente comida, el menor duerme en condiciones deplorables, no tiene ropa adecuada, no asiste a la escuela, el padre o madre será acusado de cometer negligencia criminal.
- Declaración o confesión del acusado: La principal evidencia es la declaración hecha por el sujeto respecto a que utilizó demasiada fuerza con el niño, o que lo estaba disciplinado de una manera excesiva. Es común, que el acusado alegue que la pareja abusó del menor, pero que han permitido que este continúe bajo los cuidados del agresor, dejando al niño en una situación de peligro.
- Historial clínico o médico: El fiscal analizará el registro médico del menor a fin de descubrir si éste tenía un historial clínico o médico de lesiones o contusiones sospechosas, o en caso de que el menor tuviera dolencias anteriores, a fin de probar la situación de peligro en el que fue dejado. Ahora bien, el registro puede comprobar que un padre o cuidador presentó razones injustificadas de las lesiones. El abuso incluye quemaduras, heridas, moretones, en especial en las zonas íntimas.
- Estado físico del menor: Es considerada una prueba fundamental. Un médico puede presentar su testimonio de que las lesiones no se pudieron ocasionar según lo narrado por el sujeto. Por ejemplo, que el experto señala que los daños o lesiones internas que tenía el menor se originaron por algún instrumento en particular, o porque fue lanzado contra el piso, en vez de ser producto de una caída.
¿Cómo puedo obtener ayuda legal de un abogado especialista en peligro infantil cerca de mí?
En caso de que una persona sea considerada responsable de poner en peligro a un menor de edad, es un escenario complicado. Puesto que, podrá enfrentar consecuencias desfavorables como pasar tiempo en prisión, o el tener que pagar grandes cantidades por multas. Además, le será impuesta una orden de protección, lo que implica que no podrá acercarse a este y si viven en el mismo lugar deberá mudarse. Todo ello, se realiza con la intención de brindarle protección al menor para que no sufra nuevos actos de peligro o violencia.
En este sentido, si usted actualmente reside en Van Nuys, CA, y se encuentra acusado por el delito de peligro infantil no dude en comunicarse con nuestro equipo legal. En el bufete Leah Legal le podemos brindar la ayuda de un buen abogado que se encargará de demostrar que las lesiones no se generaron por su culpa, que no se dieron por negligencia criminal de su parte, o lo realizó para prevenir una lesión más severa. Aunado a ello, se encargarán de elaborar las estrategias de defensa que más se adecuen a su caso.
No lo piense más, y llame ahora mismo al siguiente número de teléfono 818-484-1100, uno de nuestros asesores le atenderá de forma inmediata. ¡Llame ya!
La posibilidad cada día mayor que tienen toda la población a acceder a internet y a las llamadas redes sociales y los contenido no en todos los casos son edificantes o beneficiosos, los datos a los que los individuos pueden tener acceso son muy valiosos en muchos sentidos distintos y ser reconocido en un medio como el de redes sociales y que tus contenidos se viralicen es una publicidad que no tiene precio, y representa una enorme ventaja que influye incluso en las ingresos económicos de los individuos que adquieren fama en ese medio. Pero ¿se te ha ocurrido pensar qué es lo que ocurriría si se usan determinadas informaciones o datos de un individuo son utilizados para causarle daño? La contestación a esta reflexión es una incógnita convertida en todo debate de mucha importancia sobre la facilidad del acceso a internet y la irresponsabilidad de muchos que en vez de buscar distracción o información, tienen el propósito de causar daños a otros por causa de venganzas, celos o de odio.
Mucho países, siendo los Estados Unidos piñonero en el asunto, han creado normas con las que se busca brindar protección a aquellos individuos que fueron perjudicados por otros que lograron exponer por medio de internet sus datos más íntimos o han subido fake news con el único propósito de dañar el honor y la reputación e incluso generar odio en su contra. En el caso del Código Penal en California, esta regulación se encuentra en el artículo 653.2, donde se prohíbe difundir o compartir datos o información teniendo como finalidad dañar a otro, molestarlo o hacerlo sentir amenazado, por supuesto, sin que hubiera dado su consentimiento para ello.
¿Cómo encontrar la asistencia legal necesaria?
Las autoridades de Van Nuys CA no se toman a la ligera las denuncias por publicación de información sensible que afecte a un individuo y que lo haya perjudicado, de modo que si esa actividad ha sido ejecutada en su contra, aquel que lo haya llevado a cabo, perjudicando su buen nombre y su reputación, perturbando totalmente su tranquilidad, necesitará de los consejos legales de abogados especializados como los de Leah Legal, quienes le explicarán y lo pondrán a tanto de la forma en que son procesados estos casos, y pondrán en práctica las estrategia y los argumentos que sean necesarios para que el responsable reciba el castigo que merece.
Ahora bien, puede ser que, por el contrario, usted haya sido acusado de haber ejecutado esta conducta, cuando en realidad se trató de una filtración por accidente, o su propósito nunca fue ocasionar daños, igualmente necesitará de los servicios de criminalistas especializados que tengan el conocimiento que se necesita para armar una defensa sólida que le permita salir lo mejor librado de una imputación de esta naturaleza. Lo único que debe hacer es ponerse en contacto con nuestras oficinas y de inmediato nos reuniremos con usted para aclarar sus dudas.
¿Cómo se configura la conducta ilícita de publicar datos dañosos por medio de internet?
De acuerdo con las leyes en California, se entiende que esta conducta punible es ejecutada cuando un sujeto, por medio de dispositivos electrónicos, postea, difunde o publica información de otro sujeto que es sensible, con el propósito de que sea acosado, dañado o afectado por ésta. Otro nombre por el que es conocida esta conducta es el acoso cibernético de modo indirecto, porque para que se entienda ejecutado, se requiere que un sujeto asedie a otro utilizando medios electrónicos.
Al utilizar la palabra acoso, nos referimos a una conducta que asume un individuo contra otro, teniendo el firme propósito de privarlo de su tranquilidad, molestarlo o atacarlo. En este sentido, se califica como asedio, porque conduce a la exposición de información o datos delicados o íntimos de un individuo para causar estragos en su reputación, así como trastornar su tranquilidad, usando para ello el internet por medios electrónicos.
Para resumir, si un sujeto decide difundir por medio de redes sociales datos o informaciones que se relacionan con otro, sin haber tenido previamente su aprobación, con un claro enfoque de acoso, amenaza o de daño, e incluso para infundirle terror, se expone a ser acusado por haber cometido esta conducta ilícita.
¿Cuáles son los elementos con los que se entiende constituida esta conducta ilegal?
Con el propósito de que un sujeto que haya violado una norma penal sea encontrado responsable de hacer cometido una conducta ilícita, es obligación de la representación de la Fiscalía probar por encima de cualquier duda que sea razonable, que el imputado ha llevado a cabo tal conducta demostrando que ejecutó los hechos que constituyen los elementos de la conducta ilegal. Para el caso concreto de la conducta regulada en la disposición 653.2 antes mencionado, es necesario probar que el imputado:
- Difundió o publicó información íntima de otro sujeto, por medios electrónicos en internet.
- No tuvo el consentimiento previo del individuo perjudicado al momento de postear sus datos.
- La finalidad de dicha actividad fue perturbar, intimidar, acechar o dañar al perjudicado.
- El perjudicado ha reconocido que sufrió de acosos, sintió dolor o miedo cuando sus datos fueron expuestos.
Expliquemos estos elementos para poder comprender la regulación legal:
El imputado difundió o publicó información íntima de otro sujeto, por medios electrónicos en internet
Es necesario que existan evidencias de que los datos o información compartida en las redes sociales, por comunidades web o por correos electrónicos, se trate de datos personales de otro individuo, la cual se mantenía oculta y no deseaba que se conociera, y que la misma haya sido publicada y puesta a disposición de un público indeterminado, siendo transmitida por medios electrónicos como una computadora, un fax, un teléfono celular, o cualquiera de los medios electrónicos disponibles para ello.
No tuvo el consentimiento previo del individuo perjudicado al momento de portear sus datos
Este elemento resulta absolutamente importante, porque si el imputado comparte ciertos datos de otro sujeto, teniendo consentimiento para ello, no podrá ser encontrado responsable por esta conducta ilícita. Es necesario que el procesado haya difundido determinados datos de otro sujeto sin haber tenido el consentimiento de éste para ello, por lo que habrá ejecutado una conducta ilícita cibernética indirecta.
La finalidad de dicha actividad fue perturbar, intimidar, acechar o daña al perjudicado
Es necesario que la representación fiscal pruebe que la conducta del imputado fue maliciosa, esto es, que tenía como finalidad incitar a otros al odio en perjuicio del perjudicado, que pretendiera aterrorizar, amenazar, molestar o causar daño. Esto es crucial para que el acusado sea encontrado responsable por esta conducta ilícita. No obstante, hay que tener en consideración que aunque el perpetrador que no haya tenido la intención de causar daños a otro, si efectivamente los causó en perjuicio de otro, de todas formas se podrán presentar cargos y que el imputado sea condenado.
El perjudicado ha reconocido que sufrió de acosos, sintió dolor o miedo cuando sus datos fueron expuestos
En este escenario, el individuo perjudicado que al observar sus datos expuestos por internet pudo sentirse acosado, tener miedo o sentirse amenazado, esto es, la representación fiscal tiene que demostrar que la finalidad de la conducta ilícita logró consolidarse cuando los datos fueron difundidos por medio de la web, logrando actividades de acecho, acoso, intimidación o amedrentamiento en perjuicio de otro, y debido a ello, efectivamente la víctima sintió temor real. En caso de que este elemento no se pueda demostrar, lo más probable es que la acusación sea desestimada.
El trabajo que tiene la representación fiscal para demostrar la ejecución de esta conducta delictual es bastante arduo, porque tiene que demostrar que el imputado llevó a cabo con su conducta todos los elementos antes mencionados, y los abogados defensores tienen que preparar sus defensas sólidas, con argumentos y estrategias que logren debilitar el caso amado por la Fiscalía, pudiendo lograr en muchas ocasiones que la Corte deseche la acusación, por ello es muy importante tener abogados criminalistas especializados, mejor preparados y que puedan inteligentemente desgastar la posición fiscal y debilita la acusación en contra de sus defendidos.
¿Acecho cibernético y violencia doméstica se relacionan?
Los estudios han demostrado que el ochenta por ciento de estos escenarios, entre el perpetrador y el sujeto perjudicado poseen una relación personal bastante próxima, y este tipo de conductas ilícitas de acosos cibernético ocurren luego de que una relación personal se ha roto, generándose un sentimiento de odio, de venganzas o de rabias que pueden trascender en el tiempo. Por ello el acecho cibernético entra dentro de la categoría de los crímenes que califican como violencia doméstica. No obstante, hay que recordar que existe otro veinte por ciento de casos en los que no existe ninguna clase de relación personal próxima, y de todas maneras son igualmente procesados.
Cuando entre el perpetrador y el perjudicado existió una relación o vínculo de naturaleza íntima, inclusive sexual, o que han tenido un hijo en común, o convivieron en una relación de pareja estable de hecho, estuvieron comprometidos o tuvieron una relación similar, entonces esta conducta ilícita se califica como violencia doméstica, siempre que sea posible comprobar que efectivamente existió en el pasado ese tipo de relación y que uno de ellos compartió por medios electrónicos datos que sean sensibles que se relacionan con el otro miembro de la pareja, con el objetivo de causarle daños, atemorizarla o apenarla, afectando su buen nombre y reputación.
Para resumir, cuando un sujeto comparte información o datos sobre la pareja que tiene actualmente o que tuvo en el pasado, por un medio electrónico, sin tener el consentimiento previo del sujeto perjudicado, con el propósito de causarle temor o dolo, habrá cometido un crimen relacionado con violencia doméstica, y es necesario que contrate abogados especializados en el área de violencia doméstica, que con sus conocimientos y sus consejos le ayuden a sortear los peligros legales que se derivan de esta clase de situaciones, porque la justicia no suele ser benevolente con esta clase de conductas ilegales.
Veámoslo con un ejemplo:
George y Anna sostuvieron una bastante larga relación de tipo íntimo, pero por cualquiera que sea la razón, se terminó, y Anna ha comenzado a verse con otro hombre, quien se ha convertido en su nueva pareja íntima y le ha propuesto matrimonio. Cuando George se entera, siente furia y mucha rabia, lo cual le lleva a tomar la decisión de compartir dentro de las redes sociales videos, fotografías e incluso mensajes del tiempo en el que mantenían su relación sentimental, y se atreve a hacer comentarios sobre la fidelidad y la reputación de Anna en los post que comparte, teniendo como finalidad que los individuos que también pueden acceder a esas publicaciones para que la acosen o la juzguen por supuestas conductas no leales, de modo que Anna se siente atemorizada y hasta avergonzada de cara a su nueva relación íntima con su actual prometido. Frente a este escenario, George puede ser acusado por acecho cibernético indirecto por internet en perjuicio de su ex pareja, que sigue calificando como un crimen de violencia doméstica, corriendo gran riesgo de ser condenado por ello.
¿Cuáles son las penas que se imponen al imputado que sea declarado responsable de esta conducta ilegal?
Tanto la actividad de acoso como de violencia doméstica son penalizadas con mucha gravedad, aunque en la mayor parte de los supuestos son calificados como delitos menores. Quizás la peor sanción sea la que proviene de la misma sociedad, que en las propias redes sociales castiga a aquellos que ejecutan esta clase de conductas ilícitas, convirtiéndolos en parias que son apartados de la comunidad. Otra sanción que es muy usual es que el convicto tenga que asistir obligatoriamente a una cantidad de programas o talleres para manejo y control de la ira o de conductas parecidas, pero por lo que respecta a las sanciones, el ciberacoso indirecto son:
- Cárcel hasta por un año,
- Multas judiciales que pueden ascender a los $ 1.000,
- O una combinación de ambas sanciones.
Ahora bien, en lugar de tener que pasar un tiempo en la cárcel, el convicto podría ser beneficiado con una libertad condicional informal, que tiene una subsistencia de tres años, y para ello será necesario que los abogados defensores se destaquen en los argumentos y estrategias defensivas, para poder convencer a la Corte de que sus defendidos se merecen este beneficio, en especial atacando con éxito los argumentos de la representación fiscal, demostrando la existencia de circunstancias atenuantes, pero en estos casos, es necesario que el convicto se comprometa a observar una cantidad de obligaciones que se incluirán por el Juez en el régimen de libertad vigilada, entre los que pueden encontrarse:
- Asistencia obligatoria a terapias, talleres o programas que lo ayuden a manejar situaciones conflictivas y sus emociones.
- Realizar actividades de servicios comunitarios.
- Presentarse a las citas ante la Corte que hayan sido fijadas en su calendario.
- Pagar multas y los gastos asociados a su proceso judicial.
- Cumplir los términos que se hayan incluido dentro de una orden para la protección o de restricción que haya sido librada por la Corte, evitar tener contacto alguno con el perjudicado, si ha sido dictada la misma.
Hay que tener en cuenta que si el convicto obtiene este tipo de beneficios, y no da cumplimiento a alguna de las obligaciones que le hayan sido impuestas, de inmediato corre el riesgo de que dicho beneficio le sea revocado, en cuyo caso será enviado a prisión, a cumplir la pena correspondiente por esta conducta ilícita. Pero esto quedará a la discrecionalidad del Tribunal, que analizará los hechos en una audiencia de violación de libertad y si se llega a la convicción de que la violación fue producto de un accidente, es probable que el beneficio no sea revocado, pero es necesario el trabajos de buenos abogados defensores.
¿Cuáles son los crímenes que se relacionan con el ciberacoso indirecto?
Hay algunas conductas ilícitas que pueden relacionarse con el ciberacoso indirecto, porque tienen algunas características bastante parecidas, entre las cuales se puede mencionar:
- Efectuar llamadas telefónicas que son molestas. Esta conducta es ejecutada cuando un sujeto hace llamadas continuas llenas de contenido obsceno, con el propósito de ocasionar temor o de molestar, por medio de una línea telefónica, usando mensajes de voz o algo parecido. Esta conducta está prohibida por el artículo 653 PC, sancionado con cárcel por un lapso que puede llegar a los seis meses y una multa judicial que puede ascender a $1.000. Es posible obtener un régimen de libertad vigilada, asumiendo las obligaciones de presentación, así como de asistir obligatoriamente a programas, talleres, grupos o tratamientos para rehabilitación para el manejo de conflictos o de ira.
- Pornovenganza. Se trata de una conducta ilícita cuando un sujeto comparte videos, imágenes o fotografías con contenido sexual explícito, sin haber tenido el permiso previo de los individuos involucrados en dicho contenido compartido, con el objetivo de ocasionar angustia emocional y hasta dolor en el sujeto perjudicado. Esta conducta está prohibida en el artículo 647(j)(4) del Código Penal, y se castiga con prisión hasta por seis meses, y multas judiciales que pueden alcanzar $1.000.
- Ofensas por medio de internet. Es una conducta ilícita que consiste en realizar comentarios de naturaleza ofensiva por medios electrónicos. Lo normal es que no se presenten de manera exclusiva, sino que sean acompañadas de otras acciones ilícitas como postear información que es dañina, difamación, o pornovenganza, entre otras.
Aunque todas las conductas ilícitas que hemos mencionado son calificadas como delitos menores, hay que tener en consideración que si un sujeto es imputado por varios cargos al mismo tiempo, las sanciones podrían incrementarse sustancialmente, de modo que su vida futura se verá muy complicada.
¿En que se distingue una amenaza criminal de un acoso cibernético?
Es usual que estas dos conductas ilícitas se comparen, y hasta es posible que se confundan, pero en realidad, aunque tienen algunas similitudes, existen diferencias entre ellas extremadamente marcadas, por lo que se trata de hechos ilícitos que son únicos y distintos.
La amenaza criminal es una conducta ilícita que produce más alarma, porque el individuo perjudicado normalmente sentirá temor hasta de ser asesinado, además los contenidos de las amenazas normalmente son más violentos. Otro aspecto interesante, y que lo diferencia del acoso cibernético es que el medio para transmitir las amenazas puede ser de distinta naturaleza, puede ser verbal, escrita, e incluso electrónica, y hasta puede ser proferida de manera personal o por medio de otro sujeto, de modo que se puede hacer de forma directa o indirecta.
En cambio el acoso cibernético normalmente trata sobe comentarios que tienen la finalidad de avergonzar o causar daños al buen nombre o a la reputación de un individuo, en este caso el temor es hacia ridículo público, por lo que el perjudicado no sentirá temor por su integridad física o su vida y el único medio por el que puede ser ejecutada esta conducta ilícita es por internet.
¿Cuáles son las líneas defensivas de uso común para impugnar un cargo de esta naturaleza?
En verdad, hay muchas líneas defensivas que los abogados criminalistas especializados en esta área de práctica conocen y saben cómo utilizar para librar a sus patrocinados de los efectos de una condena por un crimen de ciberacoso indirecto, pero deben ser ellos los que escojan la que resulte más adecuada, dependiendo del estudio pormenorizado de los hechos y luego de haber establecido las circunstancias específicas que pueden justificar una gran base de defensa. Sin embargo, podemos decir que entre las líneas defensivas más usadas en esta área de práctica legal se encuentran:
- El imputado ha sido víctima de una acusación falsa.
- Las evidencias en contra del imputado son insuficientes.
- La actividad de divulgación de información no fue por su voluntad, sino que fue producto de un accidente o un error.
- El imputado fue víctima de malas prácticas policiales,
- Nunca estuvo en la mente del imputado la intención de ocasionar daños o angustias.
Contratar abogados experimentados en acoso cibernético indirecto cerca de mí
Esta clase de conductas ilícitas son fuertemente perseguidas y sancionadas en Van Nuys CA, de manera que si usted ha sido acusado de cometer acoso cibernético indirecto en perjuicio de otro individuo, y resulta que nunca tuvo la intención de llevar a cabo dicha conducta, o usted ha sido confundido con otro individuo que fue quien realmente la llevó a cabo, o todo fue producto de un lamentable accidente, necesita los consejos legales que sólo verdaderos abogados especializados en esta área de práctica legal pueden ofrecerle y los tiene a su alcance en Leah legal, esperando porque usted haga contacto con nuestras oficinas.
¡Tenemos los conocimientos y la experiencia que usted necesita para salir bien librado de un procedimiento penal de esta naturaleza! Llámenos, sin ningún compromiso por el 818-484-1100 y consulte con los verdaderos expertos.
La legislación de California es bastante estricta cuando se trata de proteger los derechos de los menores, dado que los mismos son considerados personas incapaces para defenderse por sí solas y por ende deben de recibir amparo especial por parte del Estado.
Al respecto son muchos los crímenes que pueden cometerse contra los menores. Cuando una persona toma a un menor y lo oculta en un sitio que se encuentra apartado de su tutor o representante legal sin que él mismo haya concedido su aprobación o haya dado algún tipo de aprobación, dicha persona se expone a la posibilidad de enfrentar cargos basados en la sustracción de un menor.
No obstante debe tomar en cuenta que el hecho de que una persona sea acusada por cometer este tipo de crimen no quiere decir que de modo obligatorio va a ser declarada culpable, puesto que muchas veces pueden ocurrir o situaciones que llevan a que un inocente sea procesado por un crimen que no cometió. Afortunadamente todo ello puede ser demostrado ante la corte por un buen abogado, que cuente con amplios conocimientos en la materia cuya experiencia le ayude a demostrar su inocencia para lo cual se puede valer de una amplia diversidad de defensas legales.
Si usted, o cualquier cercano a usted, se encuentra en condición de acusado por Sustracción de Menores en Van Nuys, CA, es vital que consulte su caso con un abogado que lo oriente y se encargue de todo el procedimiento jurídico al que se va a enfrentar ante la corte. Al respecto los mejores abogados pueden conseguirlos en la firma Leah Legal, sólo debe acudir a sus oficinas o ponerse en contacto llamando a sus canales de atención telefónica.
Tenga la plena seguridad de que contactar a un abogado de la mencionada firma es la mejor solución que puede tomar para que sus problemas legales estén en manos de un experto que trabaja día y noche para conseguir los resultados más favorables para usted. Llevan ya varios años ofreciendo sus servicios de asistencia legal y su trayectoria de casos ganados es intachable.
¿Qué se entiende como sustraer a un menor?
De acuerdo al ordenamiento jurídico de California sustraer a un menor es un crimen que se encuentra consagrado por la normativa 278 PC (Código Penal), Tome en cuenta que muchas veces este tipo de crimen se denomina también secuestro parental.
Incurre en este crimen una persona que sin tener derecho a custodia toma, atrae, retiene u oculta a un menor, de sus tutores legales o de sus padres, sin contar con su consentimiento, todo ello de modo malintencionado.
Al respecto deben aclararse las siguientes cuestiones:
- Una persona posee derecho de custodia sobre un menor de dos modos:
- Conforme a la legislación: Esto ocurre cuando los padres de algún menor gozan de pleno derecho sobre el mismo, sin ningún tipo de restricción impuesta por el tribunal.
- Conforme al dictamen de una medida judicial: En ocasiones sucede que una persona logra obtener el derecho de custodia sobre un menor cuando un tribunal expida una orden, que indica dicha medida, Ello se configura principalmente cuando los padres de un menor litigan el derecho de custodia sobre el menor, cuando se lleva a cabo a cabo un procedimiento de adopción y cuando el tribunal designa algún tutor legal.
- Entre los derechos y obligaciones que tiene un tutor o padre sobre un menor están ocuparse de sus cuidados, tener a cargo su custodia y controlar al mismo.
- En California se considera menor a toda aquella persona cuya edad esté por debajo de los 18 años.
- En este tipo de casos inclusive cuando un menor acepta irse con el acusado, dicho acusado debe ser declarado culpable por sustraer a un menor, dado que de acuerdo a la ley los menores no tienen capacidad para dar su consentimiento.
Son ejemplos de casos donde una persona incurre en sustraer menores los mencionados adelante:
- Un padre que se encuentra divorciado, y quien si tener derecho de paternidad orden de visitas, o una orden respectiva a la custodia se lleva a un niño a un sitio alejado sin comentarle nada a nadie.
- Una mujer que lleva a una sobrina a un sitio distinto con el propósito de alejarla de sus respectivos padres.
¿Cuáles son los elementos del crimen?
Para que una persona acusada pase a ser condenada por sustraer a un menor bajo la normativa 278 PC, un fiscal competente debe demostrar que ocurrió todo lo siguiente:
- El acusado de modo malicioso retuvo o tomó a un menor de su padre o tutor legal.
- Dicho menor corresponde a una persona cuya edad está por debajo de los 18 años.
- El acusado no tenía ningún tipo de derecho sobre la custodia del menor en el momento en el que actuó.
- La intención del acusado era ocultar o retener al menor de su padre o tutor.
¿Quiénes pueden ser acusados bajo la normativa 278 PC?
Usualmente se piensa que solo incurren de sustracción de un menor los padres o los parientes de un menor, pero la realidad es que se trata de un crimen que puede ser cometido por cualquiera que se atreva a apartar a un menor de sus padres o tutores legales, independientemente de que se trate de alguien externo a la familia.
Por lo general cuando este crimen es cometido por cualquier de los padres del menor, se debe a que él mismo ha sido restringido de su derecho de custodia sobre el menor, por decisión del Juez a través del dictamen de una orden judicial que debe contemplar las reglas a las que el mismo debe atenerse.
Por otro lado, cuando la persona que comete este crimen se trata de alguien externo al entorno familiar de un menor, lo hace con el mero objetivo de obtener alguna clase de ventaja no merecida e ilícita, por ejemplo mediante una extorsión con la finalidad de pedir rescate, situación que se configura con bastante frecuencia. Otra situación que también ocurre con mucha regularidad es que personas que instauran un proceso para adoptar un menor no cubren los requisitos exigidos por una institución encargada de tal proceso y por ende deciden tomar al niño para alejarlo de su respectivo tutor.
¿Cuáles consecuencias legales puede enfrentar una persona por infringir la norma 278 PC?
Lo primero que debe saber es que sustraer menores es considerado un crimen wobbler en California, lo que significa que el mismo puede ser juzgado como crimen menor o grave dependiendo de las circunstancias del caso, dicha decisión corresponde al fiscal una vez que se ha evaluado que dio lugar al crimen, cuál fue su alcance y si el imputado cuenta con registros penales por crímenes anteriores.
Continuando, cuando una persona enfrenta cargos bajo la norma 278 PC por un crimen menor, puede ser sancionado del siguiente modo:
- Con encarcelamiento que no se extienda más allá de un año.
- Con la obligación de pagar hasta 1.000$ por multa.
Mientras, que cuando los cargos se fundan en la comisión de un crimen grave las penas aplicables son:
- Encarcelamiento que no se extienda más allá de cuatro años y que debe ser cumplido en una cárcel estatal.
- La obligación de pagar hasta 10.000$ por multa.
Aunado a lo anterior, cuando quien comete el crimen se trata de uno de los padres de un menor el mismo se expone a la posibilidad de que le sean restringido el derecho de visita respecto al menor y que inclusive el tribunal expida una orden de alejamiento que le impida establecer cualquier tipo de contacto con el mismo.
Por otro lado el culpable, también deberá realizar el pago de todos los gastos en que los padres o el tutor haya incurrido con la finalidad de identificar la ubicación del menor y recuperarlo, Lo cual también resulta aplicable cuando los agentes de la policía u otro tipo de autoridad han tenido que intervenir.
¿Qué otras consecuencias pueden desprenderse de una infracción a la normativa 278 PC?
Además de la imposición de las penas anteriormente descritas, una condena bajo la norma 278 PC puede dar lugar a las siguientes consecuencias jurídicas, que repercuten de modo directo y significativo sobre la vida de una persona:
- Repercusión sobre la situación migratoria
Cuando un sujeto es condenado por un crimen grave bajo la normativa 278 PC y desafortunadamente se trata de un no ciudadano de los Estados Unidos el mismo se expone a la posibilidad de ser deportado o declarado como inadmisible en el país.
Al respecto, debe saber que las leyes sobre migración vigentes en el país no son nada flexibles, por lo tanto no es válido para un sujeto que enfrente tal situación alegar que tiene hijos menores de edad que nacieron en tal territorio o que posee bienes en el mismo, puesto que ello no logra evadir la medida.
- Pérdida de los derechos de adquirir y de poseer armas
Cuando un sujeto es condenado por un crimen grave bajo la normativa 278 PC el mismo de modo automático perderá sus derechos tanto para comprar como para tener armas.
¿Cuáles situaciones pueden incidir sobre la determinación de un Juez?
El tribunal sólo podrá expedir una condena en contra de un acusado cuando el mismo acuda a determinada audiencia con el objeto de escuchar sus alegatos frente a un fiscal, un juez y su respectivo abogado defensor.
Tal audiencia es realizada con la finalidad de que un Juez concrete que sentencia debe ser expedida, para ello tomará en cuenta ciertos factores. Se debe tomar en cuenta que existen ciertos crímenes para los que hay factores capaces de incidir sobre dicha determinación, dichos factores son:
La presencia de factores atenuantes:
Son aquellos que contribuyen a que una sentencia sea disminuida, entre ellos se pueden mencionar:
- Devolver a un menor junto a su tutor legal o padres, sin que sufran ninguna clase de herida y con anticipación a que sea expedida una orden judicial en contra suya.
- Brindar su ayuda a las autoridades competentes para que un menor sea regresado ileso a su respectivo hogar.
La presencia de factores agravantes:
Son aquellos que más bien repercuten de modo negativo sobre las circunstancias de un acusado, puesto que ellos hacen que seas más grave la ejecución de un crimen y que por ende se incremente la sentencia, algunos de ellos son:
- Trasladar a un menor fuera del territorio del Estado o país.
- No proceder a realizar la devolución del menor una vez procesado un arresto.
- Modificar el aspecto físico de un menor o sus documentos de identidad.
- Poner en riesgo la vida de un menor, o exponerlo a padecer algún tipo de lesión, enfermedad.
- Haber amenazado bien sea al propio menor, a su respectivo tutor legal o a sus padres, al indicar que era capaz de atentar contra la integridad o vida del menor en cuestión.
- Ser reincidente en la ejecución de esta clase de crímenes.
¿Qué estrategias de defensa puede emplear una persona con la finalidad de dejar sin efecto una acusación bajo la normativa 278 PC?
Todo tutor legal o padre que tenga derecho de custodia respecto a algún menor tiene la potestad de realizar su traslado a un sitio sin notificar el mismo a nadie. Pero ello únicamente cuando su propósito no sea poner en marcha un crimen o acción ilegal.
Ahora bien todo aquel que resulte acusado por infringir la normativa 278 PC, debe saber que desde el momento en que sea presentada la acusación en su contra hará frente a un proceso judicial en el que se debe demostrar su culpabilidad para posteriormente condenarlo, para ello debe demostrar el fiscal que incurrió en ciertos elementos exigidos de modo obligatorio por la ley. No obstante, a la vez dicho acusado tendrá pleno derecho de contar con la asistencia y representación de un abogado especialista en el área penal que se ocupe de su caso y de demostrar su inocencia, para lo cual es válido emplear determinadas estrategias de defensa, que deben adaptarse a la situación en particular, para que las mismas tengan un efecto favorable sobre el criterio del Juez que termine por absolver al acusado del crimen imputado, o al menos lo impulsen a dictar una sentencia disminuida que abarque la imposición de sanciones más flexibles.
Continuando con lo anterior, pueden mencionarse como estrategias de defensa comúnmente usadas para estos casos las siguientes:
El acusado fue blanco de una acusación falsa:
Aunque le parezca algo un poco descabellado, muchas veces una persona es acusada falsamente ante la autoridad competente por cometer un crimen. Esta acción normalmente es desplegada por personas que movidas por sentimientos como el rencor, la ira y los celos deciden acudir ante los organismos encargados y acusar a otro de un crimen que realmente no cometió con el firme propósito de perjudicar.
En estos casos es vital la intervención de un abogado preparado, que logre demostrar mediante la consignación de pruebas irrefutables, como lo es la presentación de testigos tal situación.
El acusado en realidad poseía derecho sobre la custodia del menor:
Recuerde que para que una persona sea acusada bajo la normativa 278 PC, la ley exige como elemento fundamental que dicha persona no tenga ningún tipo de derecho sobre la custodia del menor. Ya que de no ser así la misma tiene pleno derecho de trasladar al mismo sin notificar tal situación y no podría afirmarse que el mismo está cometiendo un crimen.
El acusado solo buscaba brindar protección al menor
En ocasiones ocurre que una persona solo esconde o traslada a un menor porque considera de forma sensata que sus padres o su tutor legal representan un peligro para la vida e integridad del menor. No obstante, para que esta estrategia de defensa tenga validez es vital que un abogado presente pruebas sólidas que dejan en evidencia tal situación.
¿Qué delitos se relacionan con sustraer menores?
Existe una amplia variedad de crímenes que guardan semejanza con el contemplado por la normativa 278 PC:
- Segmento 278.5 PC, relacionado con la privación de custodia de menores.
- Segmento 236 PC, relacionado con un encarcelamiento falso.
- Segmento 272 PC, relacionado con la privación de custodia de menores. El incentivar y contribuir con conductas criminales respecto a un menor.
¿Cómo consultar mi caso con algún abogado experto en Sustracción de Menores cerca de mí?
Como habrá alcanzado a entender que ser acusado bajo la norma 278 PC no es cosa de juegos, sino todo lo contrario es importante darle a la situación la importancia que se merece y que consulte su caso con un abogado especialista en el área penal, para de esa forma evitar ser condenado por un crimen.
Si usted, o cualquier cercano a usted, se encuentra en condición de acusado por Sustracción de Menores en Van Nuys, CA, es vital que consulte su caso con un abogado que lo oriente y se encargue de todo el procedimiento jurídico al que se va a enfrentar ante la corte. Al respecto los mejores abogados pueden conseguirlos en la firma Leah Legal, sólo debe acudir a sus oficinas o ponerse en contacto llamando al 818-484-1100, donde será atendido y se le asignará una fecha para que consulte su caso.
Con la evolución de la informática y las redes sociales se ha visto un incremento considerable en delitos relacionados a medios de difusión electrónica como las páginas web, redes sociales, correo electrónico, entre otros.
En esta clasificación encontramos un delito que ha tomado mucha importancia en los últimos años y es la Porno venganza, la cual se considera ejecutada cuando un individuo comparte en la internet videos o fotografías de otro con la finalidad de causar angustia y dolor, es considerado un ilícito perteneciente a la violencia doméstica porque es muy común que el victimario ha tenido una relación amorosa con la víctima.
Incurrir en este ilícito puede conllevar a sanciones muy severas aún cuando es considerado un delito menor, pero recuerde que si tiene récord criminal asociados a ilícitos sexuales puede verse envuelto en una situación judicial compleja. Es por eso que nuestra principal recomendación es que si se ve envuelto en una acusación de este tipo contacte inmediatamente un abogado penalista que defiende sus derechos y arme estrategias de defensa que le permitan salir lo mejor parado posible de la situación. Si esta en Van Nuys y requiere la asesoría legal de profesionales especializados en el área penal no dude más y comuníquese con nuestra firma Leah Legal contamos con profesionales capacitados en el área penal contamos con una larga y comprobable experiencia en esta área de práctica , nuestra prioridad será investigar, crear estrategias defensivas y lograr resultados favorables que le brinden tranquilidad.
¿Quien legisla la Venganza con pornografía?
Este ilícito está regulado por el Código Penal de California en la sección 647j4 y nos indica que es un ilícito la distribución de imágenes o videos de índole sexual, es decir, en actos de penetración, masturbación, etc además sus identidades pueden ser reconocibles y se muestran expuestas sus partes íntimas, esto con la finalidad de causar dolor y angustia a una de las partes involucradas. Es necesario saber que es un elemento muy importante que el video o las imágenes se realizaron con la intención de mantenerse en privado y que nadie dio el consentimiento para ser distribuidas
Veamos unos escenarios que entienden ejecutada esta acción:
- Ana y Peter tienen una relación desde hace 6 meses y les gusta grabarse mientras tienen intimidad, un día Ana descubre que Peter le fue infiel y en un arranque de rabia sube los videos de sus encuentros íntimos en una red social, sabiendo que eso ocasionaría angustia y dolor a Peter.
- Jhon graba sus encuentros sexuales con diferentes chicas y lo postea en una pagina de videos pornograficos sin el consentimiento de las involucradas a sabiendas que esto sería angustiante y penoso para ellas
- Mike suele tomar fotos de las chicas en el cambiador del colegio y luego las publica en páginas web.
No tiene importancia si la persona afectada dio o no su autorización para que las imagenes o videos fueran obtenidos, puesto que está implícito que el uso de dicho material era privado y no se autoriza su distribución, por lo expuesto se deja en evidencia que lo que se castiga es la distribución o difusión pública de dicho contenido mediante medios electrónicos sin que haya una autorización por parte de los involucrados para dicha difusión.
Este tipo de ilícito se ha hecho muy notorio en los últimos años esto se debe a que existe una facilidad de hacer viral contenido que pueda causar pena, enojo o angustia a terceros y en el caso de las parejas que terminan y una de las partes se siente engañado o dolido a causa de la ruptura estas plataformas digitales dan espacio a la venganza ya que al ser seguidas o usadas por muchas personas son la plataforma perfecta para ocasionar un daño a otra, esto se debe a que se puede distribuir rápidamente una imagen o video.
La relación de este crimen y la violencia doméstica se debe a que normalmente quien lo ejecuta tiene o pudo haber tenido una relación sentimental con la víctima y lo hace con la firme intención de causarle angustia, vergüenza y humillarlo mediante la difusión de material sexual que debía permanecer en privado.
Cuando existe intencionalidad se considera que la persona que ejecuta el ilícito está en conocimiento de lo que sus acciones ocasionan en la víctima, incluso sabe que está incurriendo en una actividad delictiva, esto debe estar presente en la ejecución del ilícito. Otro punto importante es que aunque la grabación haya sido obtenida de forma legítima y consensuada no puede usarse este argumento de forma defensiva, porque el crimen no es grabar o fotografiar el delito es ejecutado una vez se distribuye públicamente un contenido que debía permanecer entre los involucrados, como puede ver son 2 acciones muy diferentes.
¿Cuáles elementos deben estar presentes para entenderse ejecutado este ilícito según la legislación?
Para que la Corte Penal acepte el inicio de un juicio en relación a cualquier delito o crimen ejecutado debe comprobar que durante la ejecución del mismo se dieron hechos específicos a los cuales conocemos como elementos constitutivos del crimen, estos están dictaminado por las leyes que regulan cada ilícito incluido en el Código penal del estado, veamos a continuación cuales son los elementos a comprobar en relación a una acusación por Porno Venganza:
- El implicado poseía fotografias o material audiovisual referentes al cuerpo de la victima, especificamente sus zonas intimas, donde inclusive se puede observar teniendo relaciones sexuales, masturbación o cualquier otro tipo de comportamiento de indole sexual, y además se puede reconocer claramente a la victima dentro de los mismos.
- Existía un acuerdo implícito que dejaba claro que las fotografías o grabaciones de video era para uso privado, es decir aún cuando hubo consentimiento de los involucrados para dejar ese registro esto no implica necesariamente que se podían difundir al público.
- El implicado actuó maliciosamente, pues estaba consciente de que al compartir dicho material en redes sociales iba a ocasionar disgusto, vergüenza o humillación en la víctima.
- La parte afectada realmente se sintió avergonzada o humillada al momento de ser distribuido ese material.
En referencia a lo anterior debemos aclarar que se incurre en este delito si y sólo si las imágenes o los vídeos distribuidos tienen contenido de índole sexual explícito, es decir no solo se castiga el hecho de querer humillar o ridiculizar a alguien en las redes sociales o exponer contenido de otra persona en páginas web, el contenido compartido debe ser de carácter sexual para que se ejecute la Porno venganza, de esa acción específica es que proviene su nombre. Por ejemplo si Jack decide postear una imagen en Facebook de su ex novia durmiendo con una expresión facial fea o vergonzosa no puede ser acusado bajo el estatuto 647j4 pues en lo publicado no se observa nada de índole sexual.
¿Cuales situaciones no son consideradas como porno venganza?
Hay situaciones que pareciera se está ejecutando el ilícito pero la realidad es que no es realmente venganza con pornografia, veamos algunas que no pueden ser consideradas de ese modo:
- Las website que tienen contenido sexualmente explícito donde comúnmente se difunden vídeos y fotografías referidas a venganza con pornografia y que son enviadas por terceros, ellos solo la postean.
- No puede ser aplicado el artículo 647j4 a aquellos terceros que redistribuyen videos o imágenes les fueron enviadas y no son obtenidos por ellos mismos.
- Del mismo modo no pueden ser acusados bajo este estatuto los hackers o piratas informáticos que a través de sus medios vulneran cuentas de correos o celulares y luego de acceder a la información la difunden y en ella se incluye el contenido sexual explícito.
Hay que aclarar que con respecto al último punto aún cuando no se formularán cargos de porno venganza, quien vulnere cuentas electrónicas (Correo, redes sociales, etc) de otro puede ser acusado de otros crímenes que se califican como ilícitos informáticos.
¿A que se refiere la ley cuando se habla de “una parte íntima de otro individuo” y que sea “identificable”?
Cuando en el estatuto 647j4 se habla de partes íntimas se refiere al área genital de un individuo, es decir vulva o pene, ano y senos femeninos. En cuanto a este último se refiere específicamente cuando se muestran sus senos en su totalidad es decir que sea visible la aureola.
En cuanto a la expresión “identificable” la legislación se refiere a la posibilidad de que cualquier persona que vea el video o la imagen pueda reconocer claramente a la víctima. En este se incluyen características particulares como tatuajes o lunares poco comunes.
¿Qué se considera Difusión intencional?
Se entiende como distribución intencional cuando un individuo difunde o distribuye imágenes o videos con la intención que se visualice o que se difundan en varios lugares, también se refiere cuando con toda la intención de que se difundan el individuo se las hace llegar a un tercero para cumplir con su objetivo principal.
En relación a los medios de difusión son aceptados como tal la entrega directa del material, osea en persona y en físico mediante el uso de pendrives, computadores personales, CDs entre otros, también son considerados medios de difusión las redes sociales, correo electrónico, mensajes de texto multimedia y postearlas en páginas de contenido explicito para adultos, estos no son excluyentes y pueden ser incluidas otras a discreción de las autoridades y los hechos específicos en cada caso en particular.
¿Qué situaciones impiden una sentencia condenatoria en relación a este ilícito?
Si bien estamos hablando de un delito donde exponer, distribuir o difundir imágenes o videos sexualmente explícitos es castigado por las autoridades, la legislación estipula unas excepciones que no permiten que aunque el implicado haya dado a conocer las imágenes no puede ni debe ser acusado. Veamos a continuación cuales son estas:
- Si el implicado mostró las imágenes porque las mismas están asociadas a una denuncia luego de un acto delictivo.
- Si el implicado mostró las imágenes como parte de pruebas en un proceso penal y el acto fue demandado por las autoridades pertinentes.
- Si el implicado mostró las imágenes en un procedimiento público cuya legalidad fue otorgada por las autoridades.
¿Que incluye el Proyecto Legislativo AB 602?
Es un proyecto de ley que busca regular los llamados “videos de sexo falso” , o sea videos e imágenes de indole sexual que se modifican para hacer creer a quien los vea que una persona ha sido participe del mismo. De ser aprobada busca el objetivo de amparar a las víctimas de quienes realizan estos inescrupulosos casos y darle el derecho de presentar una demanda en contra del o de los individuos que los realizó, de igual forma castigará a quien los distribuye y difunde.
Ahora bien para que la presunta víctima goce de este derecho es imperativo comprobar lo siguiente:
- El afectado que aparece en los videos o fotografías no autorizó su aparición en el mismo.
- El afectado no dio consentimiento para que dicho contenido fuera creado o distribuido al público.
Este tipo de contenido se conoce en el ambito informatico y legal como “Falsificación profunda” estas se crean a partir de videos o fotografías y mediante programas de edición computarizados se modifica el rostro original que aparece en el mismo y se le coloca el rostro de la víctima, estos actos se suelen cometer comúnmente contra personas del mundo del entretenimiento y su contenido es de índole sexual, ya que generan mucho morbo y por lo tanto su difusión es lucrativo, obviamente sin la autorización del afectado.
¿Cuáles son los castigos que se suelen imponer los tribunales por la comisión de este ilícito?
Este ilícito se considera un delito menor, sin embargo un individuo que haya cometido el mismo se enfrentará a una serie de sanciones que igualmente cambiarán su vida y engrosarán su prontuario delictivo. Veamos a continuación las penalidades que suelen imponerse en este tipo de casos:
- Pena privativa de libertad hasta por 6 meses en una prisión del condado,
- Régimen condicional informal,
- Cancelación por concepto de multas por un monto máximo de $1,000usd.
Se pueden presentar aumentos de sentencia de hasta 1 año de privativa de libertad hasta en una prisión del condado y un aumento de multa hasta por $2,000usd bajo los siguientes hechos:
- Posee antecedentes criminales relacionados con este ilícito, osea, es reincidente pues ha sido acusado por venganza con pornografia en años anteriores, no importa si la víctima sea o no la misma se considera una infracción previa.
- La persona afectada no cumple la mayoría de edad, es decir es menor de 18 años.
Debe tener en cuenta que en estos casos la victima esta en el derecho de presentar una demanda civil para solicitar pago de compensación por los perjuicios morales y económicos causados por la acción ejecutada por el implicado, la misma prospera indiferentemente de que el implicado haya sido condenado o no en un juicio penal por el mismo hecho. Hay que recalcar que la carga de pruebas en este procedimiento queda en manos de la parte acusadora y que se debe comprobar sin dejar dudas, con pruebas, que en efecto el acusado es responsable de la difusión o distribución del contenido sexual y que el demandante no dio consentimiento alguno para eso y cuya acción causó daño emocional a la víctima.
¿Que otros delitos suelen relacionarse a la Venganza con Pornografía?
En el ámbito judicial suele ser común que se relacionen diferentes conductas delictivas entre sí, esto se debe a que cuentan con características similares o porque cuando se incurre en una se puede estar incurriendo en otra al mismo tiempo. Veamos cuales están relacionadas con el ilícito en cuestión:
- Espiar mientras se merodea. 647(i)CP.
- Legislación Federal sobre el voyeurismo (1801 18 USC).
- Invasión a la privacidad 647(J)CP.
¿Qué líneas defensivas están disponibles para hacerle frente a una acusación?
Sin importar a qué tipo de acusación se enfrenta un individuo o la calificación que se le da al ilícito cometido la constitución del país otorga el derecho inalienable a la defensa, ya que esta ley es federal, el estado de California la adopta sin condiciones, esto quiere decir que cualquier persona que enfrenta una acusación ante la Corte tiene la posibilidad de defenderse de lo que se le acusa. De esto parte que existan líneas de defensa que comúnmente son usadas en los procesos penales, cual es la más idónea para usted ya dependerá del tipo de acusaciones que pesan en su contra y las pruebas a las que usted puede acceder, por esto se hace necesario contratar representación legal de calidad y oportuna, con experiencia en el área criminal y en este caso particular en violencia doméstica, ya que el mismo deberá realizar un análisis exhaustivo y una investigación que permita armar las estrategias que le darán mayor posibilidad de éxito. Veamos a continuación las que más se usan para estas acusaciones en específico:
- El implicado sufrió una vulneración de sus medios electrónicos, esto se refiere a que quizás usted no tuvo intención real de difundir el contenido en cuestión, sino que alguien hackeo o robo sus cuentas y procedió a distribuir las imágenes o videos que consiguió.
- El implicado no tenía intención de causar daño emocional o angustia a la persona afectada, quizás pensó que sería una broma o que la otra persona no se sentiría ofendida o avergonzada.
- La víctima si dió autorización para la distribución de las imágenes o videos
¿Dónde encontrar un abogado especialista en violencia doméstica cerca de mi?
La violencia doméstica es algo que se toma muy en serio por las autoridades judiciales del estado, igual pasa con la privacidad e intimidad de la población es por eso que se considera ilícito exponer imágenes o videos de contenido sexual explícito que involucren personas que no han dado su consentimiento para dicha difusión.
Si se encuentra enfrentando este tipo de acusaciones y está en el área de Van Nuys, CA. no dude en comunicarse con la mejor firma de abogados del estado Leah Legal, contamos con los mejores profesionales del derecho y estamos a su disposición para crear estrategias que permitan mejorar su situación legal. No espere más tiempo y comuníquese a través del número telefónico 818-484-1100 y deje todo en nuestras manos!
Se ha podido establecer que en California, hay varias señales de comportamiento que podrían ser la base de los cargos por conductas ilícitas de naturaleza sexual. La gravedad de cada hecho ilícito y la seriedad de la pena impuesta difieren porque, si bien todas las conductas ilícitas se consideran hechos punibles graves, existen circunstancias agravantes si en su comisión se recurre a la violencia, la extorsión o las amenazas, como la edad que tenía el sujeto en cuyo perjuicio fueron perpetradas.
Una vez más, cada hechos ilícito se castiga de acuerdo con su gravedad, pero casi todos ellos conllevan distintas penas de prisión, todas ellas bastante prolongadas, se imponen multas judiciales por cuantiosas cantidades y, en casi todos los escenarios, el sujeto declaró responsable es obligado a registrarse como delincuente sexual en una base con datos creada a tal efecto, de acuerdo con la Ley Megan, que consiste en un registro con datos que son conocidos en todo el país, lo que significa que el convicto vive con los efectos de las acciones que perpetró durante considerable tiempo y vivirá constante expuesto al escarnio público, ya que ese registro es de consulta pública, así que se encuentra a la vista de todo aquel que tenga interés en consultarlo y conocer si sus vecinos se encuentran en el mismo.
¿Cómo conseguir la asistencia legal más oportuna?
Si usted vive en el condado de Van Nuys CA, y actualmente está enfrentando una acusación por un crimen de naturaleza sexual, déjenos decirle que se encuentra en una situación bastante seria, para la cual va a necesitar toda la ayuda legal de criminalistas profesionales especializados y experimentados, porque no se trata de un escenario del que sea sencillo salir indemne, por las graves consecuencias que se pueden derivar del mismo, empezando por la ruina total de su buen nombre y su reputación, el rompimiento de lazos familiares, la pérdida de su empleo y su exclusión absoluta de su grupo social, por lo no hablar de la posibilidad de que usted sea removido del país, por causa de un proceso de deportación que lo devolverá a su país de origen y lo declarará inadmisible, en caso de que no sea un ciudadano de los EEUU, aunque su permanencia en el territorio sea legal. Pero muchos de estos perniciosos efectos podían ser evitados con la asistencia legal de abogados especializados y experimentados en esta área de ejercicio legal y en Leah Legal contamos con los mejores, porque dados sus conocimientos y experiencia, podrán hacer un análisis pormenorizado de las circunstancias en que ocurrieron los hechos que se le atribuyen y encontrarán las debilidades en las evidencias de la representación de la Fiscalía, utilizando los argumentos y las estrategias con las que sea posible disminuir la severidad de la acusación, y si en su detención se dieron ciertos supuestos que la hagan ilegal, hasta sería posible obtener que la Corte deseche su caso, o en el mejor de los supuesto, demostrar su absoluta inocencia, pero eso sólo será posible si se pone en comunicación con nuestras oficinas lo antes posible, y mientras al proceso se encuentra en sus fases iniciales, mucho mejor, porque eso nos permite un rango de acción mucho mayor. Así que la mejor estrategia para usted es que nos llame inmediatamente.
¿Qué conductas ilícitas de naturaleza sexual son comunes en California?
Como hemos mencionado antes, hay muchas conductas ilícitas de naturaleza sexual, pero lo que vamos a hacer ahora es una enumeración de aquellas que resultan más comunes en Van Nuys CA:
- Violación
- Sodomía
- Exposición indecente
- Agresión sexual
- Cópula oral por la fuerza.
- Pornografía infantil.
- Prostitución y solicitación.
A continuación profundizaremos en cada una de estas conductas ilegales para entender sus definiciones legales y las maneras en que son sancionadas:
Violación
El más grave y socialmente condenado de todas las conductas ilícitas de naturaleza sexual. Se regula en la disposición 264 PC y se ejecuta si un individuo fuerza a otro a otra a sostener relaciones sexuales por medio de las amenazas o fuerza. Igualmente se entiende que existe violación en el escenario en el que se sostiene una relación sexual con otro sujeto que no se encuentra consiente, o que carece de capacidad para poder entender la naturaleza de tal actividad.
Sin embargo, para que no existan vacíos en la ley y poder sancionar a los perpetradores según la gravedad del hecho ilícito, la violación se clasifica según el tipo de víctima y la situación, a continuación explicaremos los tipos:
Violación estatutaria: si bien se todas estas conductas son reprobables, la peor de todas es la que asume la forma de cometer abusos sexuales en perjuicio de un menor o niño.
Violación conyugal: parece muy ilógico que la víctima tenga relaciones sexuales con el perpetrador a través de una relación marital, pero se puede permitir la calificación de violación en estos escenarios, cuando la relación sexual se realiza sin el consentimiento de uno de los cónyuges.
Violación en perjuicio de un acompañante: ocurre en el escenario en el que el sujeto perjudicado sólo está saliendo o simplemente se encuentra en compañía del perpetrador dado que no existe una relación afectiva previa.
Hay que señalar que, al igual que con cualquier actividad ilegal, ciertos elementos deben estar presentes para que un tribunal encuentre un caso válido, y estos elementos son:
- Es necesario que haya ocurrido una penetración, por mínima que haya sido, para que se considere como violación.
- Nunca existió un consentimiento legal por el sujeto perjudicado.
- El sujeto perjudicado se encontraba bajo la influencia de una droga o de alcohol, lo que le impedía conocer lo que estaba pasando
- El sujeto perjudicado sufre de alguna discapacidad mental que le impide comprender lo que estaba ocurriendo.
Este hecho ilícito es especialmente repudiable socialmente, cualquiera haya sido el contexto en el que haya ocurrido, y por lo que atañe a las leyes, ocurre exactamente lo mismo, según la cual será calificado directamente como felonía, independientemente de las circunstancias de los hechos, y no se contemplan atenuantes.
Las sanciones que enfrenta un imputado por un cargo de violación dependerán del tipo de violación en el que encuadren los hechos que le han sido imputados, así que veamos cuáles son:
Violación estatutaria: un máximo de ocho años de prisión, que puede aumentarse a 13 años si un menor resulta herido o muerto. Debe estar registrado en el registro de delincuentes sexuales de por vida.
Violación de un cónyuge o pareja: siete años de cárcel, y es posible una condena adicional de cinco años si el perjudicado sufrió lesiones físicas o muere. Debe estar registrado en el registro de delincuentes sexuales para toda su vida.
Como ya hemos comentado, no existen atenuantes para estos hechos ilícitos, y resulta muy difícil reducir la pena o conceder beneficios procesales al convicto cuando ha podido comprobarse que efectivamente la violación fue llevada a cabo.
Sodomía
Se considera cometido cuando los genitales de un individuo entran en contacto con el ano de otro. Está regulado en el artículo 286 PC. Hay que comprender que el Código no presume que se obtenga el consentimiento si el sujeto afectado se trata del cónyuge, o la pareja de hecho o permanente del perpetrador, de modo que para obtener que el caso sea desechado, la mejor estrategia consiste en demostrar que tal consentimientos efectivamente existió, no sólo antes, sino durante el momento en que el contacto se realizó. No obstante, este argumento defensivo no será utilizable en caso de que el individuo perjudicado estuviera inconsciente. Al referirse a la inconsciencia, la ley prevé casos especiales:
- El contacto de naturaleza sexual se produjo cuando el sujeto perjudicado dormía.
- El afectado no pudo conocer o no tuvo conocimiento del acto que se estaba realizando.
- El afectado desconocía a qué tipo de actividad sexual estaba siendo sometida y fue engañado con ese propósito.
Asimismo, algunas personas son consideradas incapaces de consentir y por tanto, se considera directamente hecho ilícito realizar con ellas las siguientes actividades, aunque consientan, y estas son:
- Los niños o menores.
- El perjudicado se encontró bajo la influencia de alcohol o de drogas.
- La persona afectada se encuentra discapacitada mentalmente o sufre de un trastorno mental.
- La persona afectada tiene o tuvo para ese momento alguna discapacidad física.
No obstante, se debe asegurar que el acusado sepa que la víctima se encontraba incapacitada para darse cuenta de lo que ha sucedido, y si esto efectivamente se verifica, el imputado será acusado de sodomía y sancionado.
Como muchos otros hechos ilícitos, la sodomía califica como wobbler, así que la Fiscalía decide si es procesado como hecho punible menor o como felonía, dependiendo de la forma en que ocurrieron los hechos, o si el imputado poseen antecedentes criminales. Si el procesado es encontrado responsable de sodomía como un hecho punible menor, las sanciones serán:
- Pena de prisión hasta por un año.
- Multa judicial que puede ascender a los $1.000.
- Obligación de registrarse como delincuente sexual de nivel 1, esto es, por un lapso de diez años
No obstante, si es procesado como felonía, las sanciones son:
- Pena de prisión hasta por tres años.
- Multa judicial que puede ascender a los $10.000.
- Obligación de registrarse como delincuente sexual de nivel 1, esto es, por un lapso de diez años.
Dado que cada caso es único debido a sus circunstancias específicas, estas penas pueden reducirse o aumentarse según las características que hayan concurrido con los hechos y también la evidencia presentada por ambas partes.
Exposición indecente
Esto se describe en el artículo 314 PC y se comete cuando un sujeto expone sus partes íntimas desnudas a otro, para obtener gratificación sexual, ofendiéndola o molestándola de esa forma. Por causa de la redacción general de esta norma, es posible que sea interpretada genéricamente, de modo que toda exhibición que moleste u ofenda a un tercero, independientemente de las circunstancias, será ilícita. Algunas situaciones que podrían ejemplificar este comportamiento podrían ser:
- Judy estaba caminando por una plaza repentinamente un hombre salió detrás de un gran árbol, se quitó los pantalones y le mostró su pene.
- Había unas chicas en el campus, de repente vino un chico y abrió su abrigo y reveló su cuerpo desnudo.
- Varios niños se encuentran jugando en un patio, cuando una mujer se levanta el abrigo para mostrar sus desnudos genitales.
Si el individuo que llevó a cabo la conducta ilícita lo hizo luego de invadir la propiedad privada, esto es, sin tener la autorización para ello, se califica como una felonía. Otra circunstancia que agrava el hecho es que el imputado haya sido imputado y condenado previamente por la misma conducta ilícita antes, por lo que será castigado con mayor severidad y por un período más prolongado de tiempo. Como se trata de un wobbler, la representación fiscal decidirá si lo procesa como hecho punible menor o como felonía. En el escenario de que lo procese como hecho punible menor, las penas serán:
- Permanecer en prisión hasta por seis meses.
- Multa judicial que puede ascender a los $1.000.
- Obligación de registrarse como delincuente sexual de nivel 1, esto es, por un lapso de diez años
Pero, si es procesado como felonía, entonces las sanciones son:
- Pena de prisión hasta por tres años.
- Multa judicial que puede ascender a los $10.000.
- Obligación de registrarse como delincuente sexual de nivel 1, esto es, por un lapso de diez años.
Se debe recordar que los infractores reincidentes o múltiples recibirán sentencias más severas por el mismo tipo de hechos ilícitos.
Agresión sexual
Se encuentra regulada en artículo 243.4 PC, definiéndola como hacer contacto o tocar los genitales, el ano, o los senos, en el caso de una dama, sin haber tenido su consentimiento previo para obtener una gratificación sexual. Puede confundirse con una violación, pero una agresión sexual se diferencia de una violación en que no tiene por qué haber penetración para que se entienda como ejecutado, por lo si se lleva a cabo una agresión sexual no significa que se ha llevado a cabo una violación. Otra diferencia obvia es que la conducta de violación tiene mayores consecuencias en lo que al castigo se refiere.
Cuando hablamos de sanciones, lo primero que se debe tener en cuenta es que la agresión sexual un wobbler, de modo que serla el fiscal quien decide procesarlos como un hechos ilícito menor o como una felonía. En el escenario de que sea procesado como hecho punible menor las penas serán:
- Pena de prisión hasta por un año.
- Multa judicial que puede ascender a los $2.000.
- Obligación de registrarse como delincuente sexual de nivel 1, esto es, por un lapso de diez años
En cambio, si es procesado como felonía, las sanciones son:
- Pena de prisión hasta por cuatro años.
- Multa judicial que puede alcanzar $10.000.
- Obligación de registrarse como delincuente sexual de nivel 3, esto es, para toda la vida
Además, se debe considerar que con los hechos pueden concurrir algunas circunstancias que pueden agravar o disminuir las sanciones, lo que tendrá un sustancial efecto en las penas que se impondrán al convicto, por lo que resulta importante tener abogados defensores que con base en las evidencias su disposición, construya una defensa sólida y sea capaz de rebatir los argumentos en contra de su defendido que esgrima la representación fiscal.
Cópula oral por la fuerza
Se rige y castiga por la sección 287 del Código Penal, entendiéndose ejecutado cuando la boca de una persona entra en contacto con los genitales o el ano del sujeto en perjuicio se lleva a cabo esta conducta, se debe usar el abuso, las amenazas o la fuerza, venciendo la resistencia de mismo para oponerse que tal actividad sea ejecutada, como en el ejemplo en el cual una joven asiste a la festividad de una fraternidad universitaria y uno de los miembros de dicho grupo la acosa de tal manera que pudo ser capaz de encerrarla en una habitación y amenazarla con una navaja y decirle que le iban a desfigurar la cara si ella no permitirse que le practique sexo oral, en este supuesto la a la joven no lo quedó otro recurso que aceptar lo que el perpetrador la obligó a hacer por el fundado temor a ser perjudicada. Un ejemplo adicional podría ser que, luego de un especialmente agotador día de trabajo, por las tareas asignadas en una clase especialmente difícil, la misma joven acepta la invitación que le hace su compañero de estudios para ir a tomarse unas cervezas, no obstante el compañero, mientras ella se descuida, le pone alguna sustancia en el trago con la finalidad de drogarla, dejándola inconsciente, llevándosela a algún sitio apartado, procede a practicarse sexo oral o introduce en la boca de ella su pene.
Como se puede ver, para entender que se ha cometido un hechos ilícito, debe existir contacto entre la boca y los órganos genitales del sujeto en perjuicio del cual se llevó a cabo, o viceversa, haciendo uso de amenazas o fuerza o amenazas, o empleando el alcohol o las drogas o porque el individuo perjudicado no posee la capacidad mental que se requiere para poder tomar. Independientemente de sus circunstancias específicas, las sanciones en caso de un imputado sea declarado responsable son bastante graves, porque esta conducta ilícita califica como wobbler, lo que significa que la representación fiscal puede elegir si es procesado como felonía o como un hecho punible menor, dependiendo de los antecedentes criminales del acusado y de las circunstancias en las que ocurrieron los hechos. Si el fiscal decide procesarlo como hecho punible menor, las sanciones serán.
- Pena de prisión hasta por tres años.
- Multa judicial que puede ascender a los $3.000.
- Obligación de registrarse como delincuente sexual de nivel 1, esto es, por un lapso de diez años
En cambio, si es procesado como felonía, las sanciones son:
- Pena de prisión hasta por ocho años.
- Multa judicial que puede alcanzar $10.000.
- Obligación de registrarse como delincuente sexual de nivel 3, esto es, para toda la vida
Al igual que con otros hechos ilícitos, hay que recordar que así como existen circunstancias atenuantes, también existen circunstancias agravantes, de modo que la representación fiscal hará todo esfuerzo por demostrar la existencia de agravantes, para que le sean impuestas sanciones más graves al procesado.
Pornografía infantil
Es probablemente el hecho ilícito más condenado socialmente. Está definido y sancionado en la disposición 311 del Código Penal de California, que lo considera ejecutado cuando el imputado conserva en su poder fotografías o videos en los que un menor de edad exhiben una conducta sexual explícita, los comparte con otros o los produce, así como coacciona y obliga a niños para que participen en la producción en la que se observa que existen actividades sexuales explícitas con el propósito de compartirlas o venderlas. Cabe señalar que no se consideran a los efectos de esta conducta criminal las fotografías del primer baño de un bebé o fotos divertidas de la familia, donde el objetivo es recordar los primeros momentos graciosos de los niños o los momentos de entretenimiento o diversión, porque el hecho ilícito debe considerarse cometido con un claro propósito sexual o indecente y capaz de ofender a los demás. Para este caso, la representación fiscal puede calificarlo como una felonía o un hecho ilícito menor, en función de la manera en que hayan ocurrido los hechos, o si el imputado tiene antecedentes penales, por lo que se trata de un wobbler y las sanciones, en caso de que sea calificado como hecho punible menor, serán:
- Pena de prisión hasta por un año.
- Multa judicial que se encontrará entre los $1.000 y los $2.500.
- Obligación de registrarse como delincuente sexual de nivel 1, esto es, por un lapso de diez años.
En el escenario de que la representación fiscal decida procesarlo como felonía, las sanciones que se imponen son:
- Pena de prisión hasta por tres años.
- Multa judicial que puede alcanzar $10.000.
- Obligación de registrarse como delincuente sexual de nivel 3, esto es, para toda la vida
Hay que tener en consideración que, tal como ocurre con la mayoría de los hechos ilícitos, existen factores agravantes que aumentan considerablemente o aumentan las sanciones de la sentencia que se recibe, como en el escenario de que el convicto ha cometido otras conductas ilícitas en el momento del incidente ilegal o si otro individuo resultó herido o muerto durante la ejecución del hecho punible.
Prostitución y solicitación
Es la más antigua y la más denunciada, se dice que es contra la ley que alguien intercambie servicios sexuales a cambio de cualquier clase de beneficio económico o de dinero. Según las normas, resulta ilegal no sólo ofrecer dar servicios sexuales, sino también pedirlos, esto es, si un sujeto se encuentra con alguien en un establecimiento nocturno y este individuo ofrece pagarle $70 por tener sexo oral, en caso de que el otro sujeto acepte, ambos sujetos serán imputados con esta conducta ilícita. Ahora bien, la prostitución y la solicitación se califican como hechos ilícitos menores, de modo que las penas no son tan severas, aunque pueden representar hasta seis meses de prisión o una multa judicial que puede alcanzar $1,000, y si se trata de que alguno de los sujetos o ambos sean reincidentes, las penas se impondrán de manera conjunta.
¿Existen argumentos defensivos para combatir una acusación de esta naturaleza?
- Existió consentimiento legalmente expresado de manera previa al acto.
- Las evidencias en contra del procesado son insuficientes.
- El imputado es víctima de una falsa acusación.
- El imputado fue identificado erróneamente.
- No existió penetración de ningún tipo.
Encontrar los consejos legales de abogados especializados en conductas ilícitas de naturaleza sexual cerca de mí
Usted tiene que evitar por todos los medios posibles las terribles consecuencias que acarrea una convicción de esta naturaleza en Van Nuys CA, con unos antecedentes penales que le arruinarán completamente su futuro en todo sentido, personal, profesional y social, e incluso pueden llevarlo a ser deportado del país, en caso de no ser ciudadano, por eso necesita los conejos de abogados experimentados como los que tenemos en Leah Legal, que podrán examinar a profundidad los hechos y determinar sus opciones legales para disminuir las consecuencias que acarrean unos cargos como éstos.
¡Mientras más pronto se comunique con nosotros, mejores serán sus posibilidades! Comuníquese con nuestra firma legal por el 818-484-1100 y obtenga la ayuda legal que necesita de inmediato.
El ilícito de agresión sexual se sanciona fuertemente en California, se encuentra señalado en la norma 243.4 del Código Penal, y se refiere a tocar los genitales o partes íntimas de otro sujeto, sin su voluntad, para obtener una gratificación sexual o para excitarse. Es importante señalar, que se considera como parte intima o privada: El ano, ingle, glúteos, senos, y genitales. Además, si después de la agresión sexual ocurre una relación sexual sin consentimiento de la víctima, se estará cometiendo una violación.
Por su parte, al ser un delito grave podrá ser calificado como un ilícito menor o mayor según las características del caso, y si el acusado posee o no antecedentes penales lo que conlleva prisión por un largo periodo, el pago de multas, y el deber de registrarse como un delincuente sexual. En este último caso, sufrirá un estigma social que afectará su vida personal y laboral, ya que es sumamente grave que un sujeto sea condenado por un delito sexual.
Algunos ejemplos de este ilícito son tocar de forma sexual y sin consentimiento los senos de una joven, o tocar las nalgas o partes íntimas de otro sin autorización. En este escenario se calificará como un delito menor. Mientras que, el tomar a un sujeto usando la fuerza y meter las manos en sus partes íntimas, manipular a una persona con enfermedad mental para que se masturbe frente al agresor, o convencer a algún paciente de acariciar el miembro del terapeuta diciendo que de esta forma superará sus problemas, se calificaran como delito mayor.
Por todo lo antes mencionado, y si usted sufre cargos por agresión sexual en Van Nuys, California, es importante que busque asistencia jurídica por parte de un abogado con experiencia en delitos sexuales que pueda analizar su caso, y elabore los argumentos de defensa que se adecuen al mismo. En el bufete Leah Legal, le ofrecemos nuestros servicios y podremos acompañarlo en el transcurso de todo el proceso judicial, solo debe comunicarse de manera inmediata con uno de nuestros asesores.
¿De qué trata el delito de agresión sexual?
Este hecho ilícito se encuentra tipificado en la disposición 243.4 del Código Penal y se constituye cuando un individuo toca las partes íntimas o privadas de otro, sin tener su consentimiento, y con el fin de obtener gratificación o deseo sexual. A distinción de la violación en el Estado de California de acuerdo a la norma 261 PC, el ilícito de agresión sexual no tiene como requisito que el abusador haya penetrado realmente a la víctima, o existiera alguna relación sexual. De igual modo, debe considerarse que, si la persona afectada mantenía relaciones íntimas con el acusado por un periodo considerable, el delito señalado anteriormente se califica como delito menor.
Ejemplos:
- Pedro, quien es odontólogo, se aproxima a los senos de una de sus pacientes para tomar un instrumento dental. No obstante, lo realiza con intención para obtener gratificación sexual, ante este escenario, Pedro podría sufrir acusaciones por agresión sexual calificado como un ilícito menor.
- Ana y Juan viven juntos, y mantiene relaciones sexuales desde un tiempo atrás. Después de una pelea, Ana se acerca a su pareja y le toca su miembro por encima de la ropa como intento para lograr el sexo. Juan, le pide que pare, pero la mujer se niega rotundamente. Frente a esta situación, Ana podría sufrir cargos por cometer agresión sexual calificado como ilícito menor.
La agresión sexual agravada se encuentra tipificada de igual forma en la misma disposición 243.4 PC, y ocurre cuando se sigue la definición antes señalada, y la persona afectada es: Restringida de forma ilegal, por el propio agresor o por otro individuo, se encuentra institucionalizada para tomar algún tratamiento médico o esta incapacitada o discapacitada medicamente, no tiene plena consciencia sobre la acción que el autor realizo respecto a los tocamientos son falsos puesto que no tienen fines profesionales, es coaccionada a masturbarse o realizar tocamientos a las partes íntimas del acusado, de algún cómplice o individuo en las situaciones antes mencionadas. Y en el caso de esta última, la legislación reconoce el ilícito si el denunciante fue obligado a realizar tocamientos a sus partes privadas de otro, en vez de las propias.
Ejemplos:
- Max sujeta de forma ilegal a Ana, y le obliga para que toque su miembro con el apoyo de otro sujeto. En esta situación, Max podría enfrentar cargos por este ilícito.
- Max se encuentra en un tren repleto de personas, y se encuentra junto a Ana, este toma las manos de la mujer y las pone sobre su miembro sin la autorización de esta.
La normativa que regula este delito normalmente necesita que el presunto agresor toque las partes privadas o íntimas de la persona afectada y no sea en caso contrario. Ya que, en esta situación, el hombre no podrá ser acusado por el ilícito en California siempre debe ocurrir alguna acción de las antes mencionadas. En todo caso, podrá enfrentar cargos por otros hechos ilícitos diferentes como sería el de agresión según lo dispuesto en la norma 242 PC.
¿Qué sanciones o penas son impuestas por el ilícito de agresión sexual?
El ilícito de agresión sexual se considera un “wobbler” en razón del Código Penal, en este sentido, según las circunstancias ocurridas en el caso, la severidad de las acciones cometidas, y del historial criminal del acusado, será calificado como un ilícito menor o mayor.
Si es calificado como delito menor según la disposición 243.4 literal (a) y 243.4 literal (d) se le sancionará con las siguientes penas: Prisión por un lapso de 364 días en una prisión del condado, y pago de multas por una cantidad que no exceda de los $2.000. Por otra parte, si se considera un delito mayor de acuerdo a las mismas disposiciones se le impondrá como pena: Prisión por 2,3,4, años de cárcel estatal, y el pago de multas por una cantidad de $10.000 como máximo. De igual forma, podrá ser procesado con otro ilícito si posee una sentencia anterior por agresión sexual y ejecuta cualquier acción de las normas señaladas sobre un niño menor de dieciocho años.
En caso de que se sancione por delito menor de acuerdo a la disposición 243.4 (e) (1) PC. Se le impondrá las siguientes sanciones: Prisión por un periodo de seis meses, pago de multas de hasta $2.000. No obstante, si el afectado era un empleado o trabajador del acusado, se enfrentará a una multa de $3.000.
¿Es necesario registrarse como un delincuente sexual según el Código Penal?
Aunado a las penas que se imponen, el acusado tendrá la obligación de registrarse como un delincuente sexual en un caso relacionado con agresión sexual. Dicha obligación se realiza una vez en toda la vida y necesita que el acusado proporcione la dirección de la vivienda, sitio de empleo, o cualquier información que permita identificarlo a la agencia local una vez por año, o cada treinta y noventa días si es de manera transitoria. Asimismo, la obligación de registrarse como delincuente sexual al asistir a un campus universitario. Si se cambia de residencia a California y el estado de procedencia le exige registrarse como tal, es posible que deba hacerlo en el Estado de California.
¿Cuáles son los elementos del ilícito que debe probar el fiscal para que una persona sea condenada por agresión sexual?
En principio, se debe señalar que la acción de tocar a otro individuo sin su autorización y con el fin de obtener satisfacción sexual, es conocido como el ilícito de agresión sexual. La Fiscalía tiene que demostrar los elementos del ilícito para que una persona reciba una sentencia condenatoria por el mismo. Y estos elementos son los siguientes: El sujeto acusado confinó de forma ilegal a otro, tocó las partes privadas del afectado contra su voluntad, con el fin de obtener gratificación o placer sexual.
La agresión sexual se describe como una conducta sexual negativa, no obstante, la lesión y conducta se encuentran en el extremo inferior de los ilícitos sexuales. Por ello, el jurado y los jueces deben estar dispuestos a aceptar que el agresor perpetró un ilícito cuando existan dudas razonables relacionadas con las evidencias. La acusación será desestimada si faltan algunos de los elementos señalados anteriormente.
Para comprender mejor cada uno de los términos que se señalan en la terminología jurídica, procederemos a analizarlos uno a uno.
- Tocar: Se refiere a tener un contacto con otro sujeto. Si se califica como un ilícito menor por agresión sexual, implicara que el acusado mantuvo contacto con los genitales o pates privadas de la persona afectada, sea de manera directa tocándolas o indirecta por medio de la vestimenta.
Por ejemplo: Max es encargado de cuidar un centro de adultos que padecen enfermedades mentales. Este sujeto le obliga a María, una reclusa que padece de enfermedades de salud mental, que toque su miembro sobre la ropa, y esta lo realiza. En este caso, se clasificará como una agresión sexual agravada. No obstante, para que pueda enfrentar cargos por este hecho ilícito, es necesario que toque la carne desnuda del afectado. Si se toca el cuerpo de la mujer simplemente por medio de la vestimenta, no será considerado una agresión sexual.
Otro escenario que puede ocurrir, es en el caso de Max y María del ejemplo anterior. Aquí Max aprovechándose de María toca sus senos por medio de la ropa. Pero, no podrá ser condenado por agresión sexual, ya que, el toque ocurrió únicamente por encima de la vestimenta, y aunque María no tiene capacidad y se encuentra institucionalizada, solo podrá enfrentar cargos por agresión sexual como delito menor.
- Partes íntimas o privadas: Se pueden incluir los senos de la mujer, o las partes íntimas como ingle, ano, aparato sexual, glúteos.
- En contra de la voluntad del afectado: Si el acusado toca a otro sujeto sin su consentimiento, se considera que está violando la normativa y perpetrando una agresión sexual. Para que exista autorización, el individuo debe actuar de forma voluntaria y libre teniendo plena consciencia sobre el carácter del acto para el cual da su permiso.
Como resultado, si la persona afectada presta su autorización igualmente podrá enfrentarse cargos por agresión sexual agravada. También, si el acusado actuó de manera fraudulenta, esto quiere decir, que afirmó falsamente que dichos tocamientos tienen un fin profesional, esto anulará el permiso. En este sentido, un sujeto no puede prestar su autorización si fue engañado, y no comprende sobre la naturaleza del acto que está consintiendo.
- Explotación sexual: Si se perpetra este hecho ilícito con el fin de ocasionar abuso sexual, es decir, humillar, herir, asustar, o dañar a la presunta víctima en sus partes íntimas. Este delito será el producto de diversos contactos sexuales con dicho objetivo o aun si no se motivó de forma personal para obtener placer o disfrute sexual.
- Retención de manera ilegal: Se estará reteniendo ilegalmente a un sujeto al controlar su libertad a través de actos, palabras, o autoridad, o si es restringido en contra de su voluntad. No obstante, se necesita que se use más que fuerza física para mantener un contacto sexual.
Por ejemplo: Max es profesor universitario, e invita a Ana quien es su alumna para que ingrese a una de las aulas que se encuentran solas, posteriormente cierra la puerta e impide la salida colocando una mesa. Max invita a su alumna y le toca los senos y los glúteos que fueron expuestos por medio de la vestimenta y luego de que esta se movía por el sitio. En este caso, Max sujeto a la mujer de manera ilegal perpetrando una agresión sexual, además uso más que fuerza física mínima para poder aprovecharse de la condición de profesor universitario, y creo una situación para bloquear el paso aprovechándose del nerviosismo de Ana, quien le manifestó que se mantuviera alejada de ella cuando caminaba por el sitio tratando de huir.
- Cómplices: Se considera cómplice al sujeto instigador o ayudante. Este será procesado de igual manera y sufrirá las mismas sanciones que el autor del delito. Es decir, si alguien ayuda a otro a perpetrar este delito, se considerará cómplice. Es importante acotar, que esta persona conocía que el autor principal se estaba comportando criminalmente, y ayudo, planeo, permitió, promovió o incito a que fuera llevada una agresión sexual.
¿Qué puede hacer un sujeto que es arrestado por el ilícito de agresión sexual?
Lo primordial es comunicarse con un abogado experto en delitos sexuales. Asimismo, es fundamental que se realicen al pie de la letra las siguientes recomendaciones:
- No dar declaraciones a los agentes policiales. Puesto que, una palabra puede arruinar todo el caso, para ello, el acusado puede valerse de los derechos de Miranda permitiéndole guardar silencio.
- Prepararse para sufrir los cargos con pruebas y testimonios que desmienten lo presentado por el fiscal. Es posible, que deba realizarse una prueba psicológica.
- Estudiar en compañía de un buen abogado el caso para conocer cuáles son los derechos que posee, así como el contenido de la normativa.
¿Se puede reclamar los daños y perjuicios luego de sufrir una agresión sexual?
Esto si es posible, ya que la víctima del ilícito tiene la opción de levantar una demanda civil en contra del presunto agresor y pedir que sea indemnizado por el daño o perjuicio ocasionado producto del delito. La reclamación es distinta a los cargos penales que se imponen contra el acusado. La carga probatoria en el ámbito civil de comprobar que el sujeto perpetró la agresión y que como producto se dieron daños reales. Algunos ejemplos de los daños que ocurren son: pérdida de empleo, gastos médicos, disminución de las ganancias, daños en bienes o propiedades, sufrimientos, entre otros.
¿Cuál es la diferencia entre una violación y una agresión sexual?
En principio, una agresión sexual se refiere al contacto no deseado y forzado, ya sea tocar o besar las partes privadas del afectado. Mientras que, la violación se refiere a la consumación del acto sexual y ocurre cuando: La persona no presta su autorización por discapacidades físicas o mentales, esta intoxicada por alcohol, drogas, se encuentra inconsciente, fue sometida a mantener relaciones sexuales en contra de su voluntad usando la coacción, fuerza o amenazas, el agresor perpetro una acción de fraude.
Es importante acotar, que en todo ilícito de violación se presenta una agresión sexual, pero no toda agresión sexual conlleva a una violación.
¿Qué otros ilícitos se relacionan con una agresión sexual?
Se pueden presentar ciertos ilícitos que tienen vinculación con agresión sexual, sea porque es acusado junto con este ilícito, o porque se imputan otros delitos en vez de enfrentar cargos por agresión sexual. Algunos de los más comunes son los siguientes:
- Violación: El ilícito ocurre cuando un sujeto mantiene relaciones sexuales sin el consentimiento de la otra persona, usando el engaño, amenazas, coacción, y se considera un incumplimiento a la normativa de violación del Estado.
- Exposición indecente: El delito se encuentra regulado en la disposición 314 PC, y se refiere al acto de mostrar las partes íntimas o genitales a otro sujeto para obtener alguna satisfacción sexual o solo para molestarla.
- Agresión: De acuerdo a la normativa de agresión en su disposición 242 PC, se define la agresión como el toque no invitado o deseado hacia una persona, el cual puede ser o no de índole sexual.
¿Qué argumentos de defensa puede utilizar una persona que fue acusada por agresión sexual?
Cuando un sujeto es acusado por el delito de agresión sexual, es importante que cuente con la representación de un buen abogado experto en defensa criminal quien se encargara de elaborar los argumentos que más se adecuen al caso. Entre los argumentos más comunes se encuentran las siguientes:
- No existen evidencias suficientes: Un profesional del derecho con experiencia podrá cuestionar las evidencias presentadas por el fiscal y exponer que estas no son suficientes para fundamental la acusación por agresión sexual presentada contra su defendido.
- El contacto que ocurrió no fue de índole sexual: El sujeto podrá ser considerado responsable del ilícito si toco a otro en el genital o parte privada sin tener su autorización, y con el propósito de obtener deseo o abuso sexual. No obstante, golpear alguna parte intima mientras se sostiene una discusión o pelea no puede considerarse como violencia sexual.
- Existió el consentimiento: El acusado no será considerado responsable del ilícito si el tocamiento sucedió con un individuo adulto con fines sexuales, y teniendo su consentimiento y conociendo sobre la naturaleza del acto. Por ejemplo: Max y María mantienen una cita, pero la mujer no desea que Max coloque sus manos dentro de las bragas, no obstante, no se lo manifiesta ni le pide que deje de hacerlo. Max razonablemente cree que María dio su autorización para realizar la acción. Posteriormente, la mujer acusa a Max de cometer agresión sexual, pero la acusación no prospera debido a que se pudo persuadir a los miembros del jurado de que este no conocía que no se dio consentimiento para el contacto.
- Falsas acusaciones: No resulta difícil pensar que, por motivos de enojo, ira, venganza, o de odio, un sujeto denuncie a otro por el ilícito de agresión sexual. Generalmente, sucede con ex parejas, que se conocen y quieren generar un daño en la reputación del acusado. Es por ello, que se requiere de un abogado que pueda determinar si la acusación presentada en contra de su cliente es verdadera o falsa.
¿Cómo puedo comunicarme con un abogado experto en delitos sexuales cerca de mí?
En caso de enfrentar algún cargo por agresión sexual o cualquier otro tipo de ilícito que se relacione con este, es necesario contar con un buen abogado que posea experiencia en el área. En el bufete Leah Legal nos preocupamos por velar por sus derechos constitucionales y por cuidar su reputación.
El sufrir una acusación por el ilícito de agresión sexual genera consecuencias desfavorables en el ámbito laboral y personal de las personas. Si requiere de nuestra ayuda podrá conseguir una representación legal idónea en Van Nuys, California. Ya que, contamos con un equipo de expertos altamente capacitados y con conocimientos en la materia.
Trabajaremos arduamente en su caso y lo acompañaremos en cada etapa del proceso. Asimismo, le brindaremos la información necesaria para que entienda el contenido de la normativa que rige el delito usando argumentos sólidos basados en hechos. Llame inmediatamente al siguiente número 818-484-1100, y será atendido lo más pronto posible.
Hay individuos a los que ejecutar conductas de tipo sexual en público los emociona, los excita, porque lo consideran actos de rebeldía. No obstante, los que hacen esto, deben conocer que existe una regulación para este tipo de conductas que las considera ilícitas, calificadas como crímenes de naturaleza sexual en California, entre los que se encuentra las conductas lascivas, y está tipificada en el Código Penal, en la disposición 647(a). Esta norma establece la prohibición de llevar a cabo en público cualquier acto de naturaleza sexual, que puede ser presenciado por otros individuos a los que les pudiera parecer molesto u ofensivo, y esto suele ocurrir con mucha frecuencia si quien potencialmente la sufre es una persona extraña o alguien con quien el perpetrador no lleva una relación íntima o de tipo sentimental, de modo que tal actividad perturbaría su tranquilidad.
¿Cómo encontrar la asesoría jurídica necesaria?
Ser acusado en Van Nuys CA, por la ejecución en público de conductas lascivas, es algo que debe ser tomado muy en serio, porque las consecuencias de que prospere una acusación de esta clase pueden afectar desastrosamente su vida hacia el futuro, no sólo por las penalidades que podrían serle impuestas a usted o a un familiar, sino que podría sufrir consecuencias insospechadas a nivel personal, familiar, social y hasta profesional, ya que poseer unos antecedentes de esa clase va a limitar mucho sus posibilidades de avanzar en la vida, y hasta ocasionar que pierda la custodia de sus hijos, en incluso ser tomado en consideración para fallar en su contra en un juicio por divorcio ante una corte civil, por no mencionar la posibilidad de perder sus posibilidades de conseguir un nuevo empleo, o conservar el que tiene, y hasta perder su licencia profesional, en el caso de que la tenga, e incluso que se le prohíba la realización de determinadas labores como trabajar con niños o con personas discapacitadas, ejercer la medicina, la enfermería e incluso el derecho. Por eso, tiene que asegurarse de conseguir la asesoría jurídica más calificada y experimentada y en Leah Legal podemos ofrecerle exactamente la ayuda jurídica que usted necesita en este tipo de acusaciones, porque somos profesionales especializados en mejorar la situación procesal en la que se encuentran nuestros defendidos, ya que conocemos las estrategias y los argumentos oportunos para demostrar que no existen evidencias suficientes para considerarlo responsable de los hechos que le han sido imputados, y de que usted no tiene ninguna clase de responsabilidad en los mismos, así como que en el peor de los escenarios, saben cómo negociar con la representación fiscal para llegar a un arreglo que lo beneficie, pero debe llamarnos de inmediato, porque mientras el procedimiento se encuentre en las etapas iniciales, mejores serán sus oportunidades y trabajaremos mejor en su favor.
¿Qué se entiende por conductas lascivas?
Un sujeto ejecuta esta conducta ilícita cuando toca o hace contacto con sus propias partes íntimas o con las de otro sujeto, teniendo un interés de naturaleza sexual, para excitarse, para satisfacerse sexualmente o para ofender a otro. Cuando hacemos mención de partes íntimas, nos estamos refiriendo a un órgano sexual, las nalgas o los pechos de una dama. La norma también sanciona el hecho de solicitarle a otro que tome parte en actividades de ese tipo.
¿Qué debe demostrarse para declarar responsable al imputado por este hecho punible?
Cuando un sujeto es detenido bajo sospecha de haber ejecutado esta conducta ilícita, la fiscalía formulará la respectiva acusación y con ello se dará inicio al proceso judicial. Igualmente, para declarar responsable al imputado en una Corte, la Fiscalía está en la obligación de probar que en los hechos concurrieron los elementos que se necesitan para que se entienda configurada esta conducta delictual, más allá de una duda razonable, y estos elementos se desprenden de la regulación contenida en la disposición 647(a) del Código Penal, que son:
El imputado sabía que el otro individuo estaba presente
La Fiscalía tiene que probar que el imputado sabía de la existencia de otro individuo en el sitio en el que se ejecutaron las conductas lascivas. En este escenario, si dos individuos están tocándose sus partes sexuales en un lugar público, como una plaza o un parque, es posible que otro sujeto pase por allí y los vea, porque aunque se piense que no habrá nadie, se trata de un lugar que es público, por el que podría pasar cualquier individuo que presencie los hechos y se pueda sentir ofendido. En este supuesto, el imputado no puede argumentar en el proceso que no tenía conocimiento de que otros individuos podrían presenciar los hechos como defensa para no ser declarado responsable.
Sin embargo, si tales hechos son ejecutados en un sitio en el que existe la expectativa de que habría una mayor privacidad, como en el interior de un auto, y un individuo llega a asomarse por una ventana y observa el hecho, ya será más cuesta arriba para la Fiscalía demostrar este requisito exigido por la conducta penal.
El imputado tuvo la intencionalidad de llevar a cabo esta actividad
Uno de los elementos fundamentales para que se entienda ejecutada esta conducta es que el imputado haya actuado de modo intencionado, por ello es necesario demostrarlo para que la decisión sea de su culpabilidad en los hechos. Al momento de evaluar si un imputado llevó a cabo una actividad como esta con toda intención, se toman en cuenta determinadas circunstancias, como cuál fue el comportamiento que tuvo antes de los hechos o mientras lo estaba llevando a cabo. En este escenario, el imputado puede haberle propuesto a otro individuo que le toque sus partes sexuales en un sitio público, o cuando sea posible demostrar que pudo ver que otros individuos se encontraban presentes en ese sitio en el mismo momento en que estaba ejecutando las conductas lascivas y de todas maneras siguió adelante, es bastante claro que su actividad fue totalmente voluntaria y que no le importó que otros sujetos pudieran observarlo.
El imputado llevó a cabo un contacto o toque físico cuya naturaleza es sexual
Otro elemento que resulta fundamental de demostrar es que efectivamente hubo un contacto o toque físico, que puede haber realizado el imputado sobre él mismo o en otro individuo, o que haya solicitado a otro que le tocara con intencionalidad sexual sus partes privadas. Esto se demuestra no sólo con la atención que el imputado le haya puesto a la actividad, sino que el contexto de ésta tiene que haber sido sexual. En este escenario, si un sujeto se encuentra en una playa tocando y rascando sus genitales porque tiene escozor en esa área corporal, no sería posible que sea encontrado responsable, porque su conducta, si bien resulta inapropiada, no fue de naturaleza sexual.
La actividad tuvo propósito sexual
La Fiscalía debe probar que el imputado ejecutó los actos lascivos con un propósito sexual, esto es, que la finalidad de la misma fue excitarse, satisfacerse sexualmente o dar ese tipo de satisfacción a otro, o que su intención era ofender o molestar a otro mientras realizaba esa actividad. No obstante, la gratificación sexual o la excitación no es algo sencillo de demostrar, de manera que se necesitan pruebas muy fuertes de que esa fue la motivación de su actividad.
En este caso, existen ciertos factores de los que podría evidenciarse dicha finalidad, como que el imputado haya alcanzado el orgasmo tras la ejecución de los actos lascivos, o que lo estaba disfrutando. Otro elemento que la Fiscalía revisará serán los antecedentes criminales del imputado, para poder demostrar si con anterioridad había llevado a cabo crímenes de naturaleza sexual, lo que inmediatamente sugerirá a la Corte que la verdadera finalidad de tal conducta llevada a cabo por el imputado era sexual.
El sitio en el que se perpetró la conducta ilícita era público
Llevar a cabo actos lascivos en un sitio público se relaciona con la intencionalidad que requiere este tipo legal para que se configure la conducta ilícita. Respecto a esto, un sitio público es aquel al que cualquier sujeto puede tener acceso, o que se encuentra expuesto al público, como pueden ser librerías, probadores en una tienda, calles, estacionamientos, plazas, parques, zonas comunes de una edificación residencial, gimnasios. Este es uno de los elementos más sencillos de probar por la Fiscalía.
Es por ello que ejecutar unos actos lascivos en un sitio que normalmente se considera privado, como puede ser en una oficina, un cuarto en un hotel o en una vivienda, no puede ser la base para una acusación por esta clase de conductas ilícitas y el imputado no podría ser encontrado responsable de la misma. No obstante, si se trata de un sitio privado que está expuesto a que lo vea o a que sea observado por cualquiera que vaya pasando por la calle, como unas ventanas de una edificación que estén abiertas y faciliten ver hacia el interior, entonces es posible que se verifique este requisito.
Hay que recordar que, a pesar de que la Fiscalía lograra demostrar este requisito del hecho punible, se requiere que todos los demás requisitos o elementos sean demostrados. De modo que, aunque un individuo haya ejecutado actos lascivos, de una evidente naturaleza sexual que podrían ser vistos por otros en un sitio público, sus abogados defensores podrán impugnar los alegatos de la Fiscalía, exponiendo la real causa de la conducta desarrollada por el imputado.
La actividad se realizó en presencia de otro individuo que podría sentirse molesto u ofendido
Llevar a cabo una actividad sexual explícita en un sitio público sólo es considerado ilícito cuando el imputado sabía o existía una causa razonable para haber sabido, que otros individuos podrían encontrarse en los alrededores que pudieran sentirse molestos u ofendidos por su conducta. Se trata de un requisito que es bastante sencillo de probar cuando el perpetrador induce a otro sujeto que realice cualquier acto lascivo en el cuerpo del solicitante o en sí mismo.
El hecho de que los individuos que hayan podido observar los actos lascivos se hayan sentido molestos u ofendidos es algo bastante subjetivo, porque no todos van a reaccionar de la misma manera, de modo que, ciertos sujetos podrían considerar tal conducta como ofensiva, en particular cuando se está ejecutando en un lugar que es público, mientras que otros podrían resultar indiferentes frente a esta clase de conductas. Es por esto que la Fiscalía tratará de presentar ante la corte las declaraciones de los que pudieron presenciar los hechos, con lo cual podrá probar que hubo individuos alrededor del lugar en que ocurrieron los actos lascivos, pero también tendrá que probar que éstos se sintieron molestos u ofendidos, porque de no ser así, lo más probable es que se apliquen menores sanciones.
El imputado no podrá ser encontrado responsable de ejecutar actos lascivos si no hubo ningún individuo en los alrededores del lugar en que los llevó a cabo, o tuvo motivos razonables que lo hicieran concluir que no sería visto por nadie, o que ninguno de los que pudieran haberlos presenciado se habría sentido molestos u ofendidos. Este es el escenario en el cual un sujeto estaba en un área solitaria y aislada de una plaza o un parque.
¿Cuáles son las sanciones que se pueden imponer al imputado por actos lascivos?
La calificación de los actos lascivos, de acuerdo con la ley es como delito menor, y en caso de que el imputado sea declarado responsable por los mismos, las sanciones que una Corte podría imponerle son:
- Prisión hasta por un lapso de seis meses,
- Multa judicial por una cantidad que puede ascender a los $ 1.000,
- O ambas sanciones de manera conjunta.
Aunque existe la posibilidad de que sea condenado a libertad condicional o vigilada, en vez de enviarlo a una prisión, en el escenario de que la conducta explícitamente sexual realizada por el imputado no haya sido calificada como muy seria, pero si éste es el caso, el imputado tiene que estar dispuesto a cumplir con todas las obligaciones que le sean impuestas por la Corte, entre las cuales se incluirá pagar las multas, asistir de forma obligatoria a terapias o talleres de ayuda psicológica, someterse de forma voluntaria a pruebas sobre VIH, y no volverse a acercar al sitio en el que los hechos tuvieron lugar, entre otras. En caso de no cumplir con las obligaciones que le sean impuestas, el convicto corre el riesgo de que la Corte decida suspender el beneficio y enviarlo a cumplir la sanción de prisión.
Es cierto que ser declarado responsable por actos lascivos no obliga a los convictos a tener que registrarse como ofensores sexuales en el registro respectivo, pero esta obligación podría ser impuesta en el escenario de que el procesado sea imputado por otros cargos de forma conjunta, que involucren otros crímenes de naturaleza sexual, como pueden ser la cópula oral por la fuerza, una penetración de tipo sexual forzada, violación, o una exposición indecente, dependiendo de otras características que hayan concurrido en los hechos.
Otro aspecto que se debe resaltar es que normalmente la Fiscalía presenta cargos conjuntos, cuando se formulan cargos a un sujeto por actos lascivos, porque normalmente también acusará al imputado por una exposición indecente, y es una estrategia que la Fiscalía emplea para incrementar las probabilidades de que el imputado sea encontrado responsable. La razón de ello es que la conducta de exposición indecente es una convicción que exige que el imputado encontrado responsable se registre como ofensor sexual, de modo que la estrategia es obligar al procesado a declararse responsable de actos lascivos con la promesa de que la acusación de exposición indecente será retirada, y normalmente los procesados aceptan ese trato para impedir tener que registrarse como ofensores sexuales.
¿Existen otros efectos que se puedan derivar de una convicción por actos lascivos en público?
Desde el punto de vista personal, su vida no solo será afectada por tener que cumplir las sanciones que le imponga la Corte al convicto, sino que su buen nombre y su reputación se verán arruinados por adquirir unos antecedentes criminales de los que se dejará constancia en un registro que normalmente es consultado por los reclutadores de empleos, las instituciones bancarias, los arrendadores de viviendas, las instituciones universitarias y las oficinas que conceden las licencias para ejercer una profesión, de modo que sus posibilidades futuras se verán muy afectadas, porque tener un récord criminal por una conducta ilícita de naturaleza sexual hará que sea excluido de inmediato de cualquier procedimiento de selección y será considerado un individuo indecente con el que nadie querrá tener negocios.
Este tipo de antecedentes, además, impedirá que el procesado pueda ejercer determinadas profesiones, como las que se relacionan con la educación, la medicina o las leyes, y cualquier otro gremio de profesionales probablemente tampoco lo acepte como integrante de la misma, porque tener antecedentes criminales, en particular, de naturaleza sexual, inmediatamente lo calificará como un individuo que tendrá una mala conducta profesional, que en cualquier momento podría avergonzar a todo el gremio.
En caso de que ya posea una licencia para ejercer una profesión, podría ser sometido a un procedimiento disciplinario para suspenderle dicha licencia, con lo cual el sujeto perderá su fuente de ingresos.
En un nivel persona, en la mayoría de los supuestos, el convicto que no sea ciudadano de los Estados Unidos no corre el riesgo de ser sometido a un procedimiento de deportación y ser declarado inadmisible, no obstante, para la ejecución de esta clase de conductas ilícitas se requiere algo que en la Ley de Inmigración de este país califican como vileza moral, por lo que debe procurar que las sanciones que se le impongan sean las menos graves posibles, porque si resulta que los actos lascivos son calificados como serios, entonces entrarían dentro de la definición de la vileza moral, pudiendo ser deportados a su país de origen, sin posibilidad de poder regresar, perdiendo el contacto con su familia, y no podría alegarse como circunstancia que impida la deportación, que el convicto tiene hijos norteamericanos, o que es propietario de bienes en el país.
Otro efecto personal es que una condena de esta clase podría conducir a que el convicto pierda la custodia sobre sus hijos, lo cual es sumamente grave, y si está en proceso de divorcio, la Corte Civil podría inclinarse en su contra en la demanda, debido a la reputación que deriva de tener antecedentes criminales por crímenes de naturaleza sexual.
¿Hay conductas ilícitas que se relacionan con los actos lascivos en público?
- 314 PC – Exposición indecente.
- 288 PC – Actos lascivos que involucran menores de edad.
- 602 PC – Invasión o traspaso en una propiedad ajena.
- 647(d) PC – Merodear o deambular alrededor de baños públicos.
- 415 PC – Alterar el orden público.
¿Existen estrategias defensivas para combatir una acusación por actos lascivos en público?
Una buena estrategia debe ser el producto del trabajo de abogados especializados en esta clase de conductas ilícitas, quienes podrán examinar los hechos que se le imputan al procesado y, en función de sus características, estarán en posibilidad de seleccionar aquella línea defensiva que resulte más eficaz, dado que cada caso es único y no todas las estrategias tendrán los mismos resultados, dependiendo de las circunstancias propias de los hechos. Es por ello que los procesados deben asegurarse de contratar a verdaderos abogados especializados y experimentados en la manera en que se procesan los hechos ilícitos de naturaleza sexual.
No obstante, de modo general, podemos decir que entre las estrategias defensivas de uso más común, se encuentran:
- Las acusaciones en contra del imputado son falsas.
- El imputado jamás tuvo una intención de tipo sexual, como tampoco quiso ofender a nadie.
- El imputado se encontraba en un sitio privado.
- El procedimiento de su detención, así como en la investigación, registro e incautación, fueron ilegales, porque se violaron los derechos constitucionales del mismo.
- El imputado sufre un trastorno de tipo psicológico que lo hace tener una conducta sexual de tipo compulsivo,
Conseguir abogados especializados en actos lascivos en público cerca de mí
En el escenario de que usted o un allegado actualmente esté enfrentándose a una acusación por esta clase de conducta ilícita en Van Nuys CA, va a necesitar la asesoría jurídica más oportuna y adecuada a su situación, y esos profesionales jurídicos los encontrará en Leah Legal, porque tenemos la experiencia y las credenciales necesarias para ayudarlo a salir lo más airoso posible de una acusación como ésta, realizando las diligencias que sean necesarias para exculparlo de la acusación, impugnando las evidencias que tenga la Fiscalía en su contra, con argumentos legales contundentes, que podrían impedir eventualmente una condena.
¡Somos especialistas en esta clase de procedimientos y podemos ayudarle jurídicamente a salir de un aprieto como éste! Lo único que debe hacer es ponerse en contacto con nuestra firma legal por el 818-484-1100 y de inmediato comenzaremos a trabajar en su favor.
Algunas personas creen que si mantienen relaciones de tipo sexual con otro individuo que aún no es mayor de edad, es decir, que es menor de 18 años, contando con su consentimiento no estarían incurriendo en ningún delito, pero esto no es de esa forma, ya que, según lo establecido en la ley un menor no cuenta con la capacidad para proporcionar tal consentimiento. Es por ello, que incluso si el menor deseaba participar en el acto sexual con la persona mayor, el adulto se consideraría culpable de este delito. Lo que lo llevaría a lidiar con ciertas sanciones.
Si usted se encuentra en Van Nuys, CA, y está siendo acusado de incurrir en el delito de estupro, es necesario que cuente con apoyo profesional. En nuestro escritorio jurídico Leah Legal nos especializamos en el área, y contamos con una amplia experiencia en delitos sexuales, por lo cual podemos brindarle la ayuda que usted requiere para obtener el mejor resultado posible en relación a su caso.
¿Qué se conoce como estupro según las normas legales de California?
Según lo señalado en legislación del Estado de California los actos de estupro son considerados como delitos de carácter sexual, los cuales pueden ser cometidos por toda persona que mantenga relaciones de tipo sexuales con otra persona que tenga una edad inferior a los dieciocho años. Para esta ley no resulta relevante si el menor proporcionó su consentimiento previamente a la consumación del acto, puesto que, según lo indicado de la legislación, debe presumirse que el menor no posee la capacidad legal requerida para dar su consentimiento.
Cabe señalar que, las personas adquieren la capacidad para dar su consentimiento para participar en actos sexuales una vez que alcanza la mayoría de edad, es decir, cuando cumple 18 años, puesto que desde que alcanza esa edad en adelante según las leyes se considera que cuenta con la capacidad de expresar su consentimiento.
Lo cual implica que, si una persona no cuenta con la edad mínima de 18 años, entonces no cuenta con la capacidad de consentimiento, por lo cual, no puede consentir de forma legal su participación en actos sexuales, no obstante, a la regla que se menciona de le pueden aplicar excepciones, tales como:
- Los menores de edad que consiguieron una emancipación por parte de algún tribunal competente.
- Los menores de edad que se encuentran casados, siempre que mantengan relaciones de tipo sexual con el cónyuge.
Cuando se presentan situaciones como las antes descritas, la ley permite a esos menores de edad proporcionar su consentimiento para participar en actos sexuales.
Ejemplos:
Las situaciones que se describen a continuación son ejemplos de formas en las que se puede incurrir en el delito de estupro.
- Una chica de 19 años que cursa la secundaria mantiene relaciones de tipo sexual con uno de sus compañeros que solo tiene 17 años.
- Un profesor de ciencias de un colegio mantiene relaciones de tipo sexual con una alumna que tiene 15 años de edad.
Cabe señalar que, las diferencias de edades existentes entre los supuestos culpables y los menores se consideran como elementos empleados para determinar de qué manera serán juzgados los delitos cometidos, así como el grado de severidad de las sanciones. Por ejemplo, si el acusado tiene 21 años o más y la presunta víctima posee una edad inferior a 16 años, puede ser impuesta sanciones de mayor severidad.
Además, gracias a que los menores actualmente inician su vida sexual y a experimentar en ella desde una edad muy temprana, es posible afirmar que diariamente se comete el delito de estupro, incluso cuando las dos personas involucradas tienen una edad menor a 18 años, ya que, según este supuesto se busca condenar la acción de mantener relaciones de tipo sexual con una persona que no posee la capacidad para proporcionar su consentimiento de forma legal para practicar los actos de este tipo, por no tener la edad requerida.
¿Qué elementos deben ser probados por el fiscal con el fin de que una persona sea declarada culpable de estupro por un juez?
La ley señala tres elementos que constituyen este delito, los cuales el fiscal debe probar de manera obligatoria, con el fin de que una persona sea condenada por la comisión de este ilícito. Lo que quiere decir que, si la fiscala consigue reunir las evidencias necesaria para probar que la persona mientras perpetrar el delito cometió sin excepción todos los elementos, esta puede ser hallada culpable, mientras que, si la Fiscalía no consigue recabar las pruebas para demostrar la ocurrencia de dichos elementos, entonces la persona no se considerará responsable del delito de estupro, puesto que el caso tendrá que descartarse.
Los elementos que deben ser probados son:
- La persona involucrada mantuvo relaciones de tipo sexual con otra, sin ser relevante el alcance de la penetración, es decir, si la penetración fue profunda o leve, ya que de igual manera se considera configurado el acto sexual. Cabe señalar que, en este sentido tampoco es necesario que existiera una eyaculación.
- Que las personas involucradas en el acto sexual no se encuentren unidas por algún lazo matrimonial en el momento en que se realizó el acto.
- Que la presunta víctima contaba con menos de 18 años en el momento en que fue consumado el acto sexual.
En cuanto a este tema, es necesario destacar que no se considera como un requisito necesario para que una persona se condenada por el delito de estupro, que el fiscal presente pruebas de que se empleó la fuerza con el fin de consumar el acto sexual, ni que la presunta víctima no haya otorgado su consentimiento para participar en el acto de carácter sexual. Lo cual puede considerarse como un aspecto diferenciador entre los delitos por violación y el estupro, ya que en los primero si es requerida la ausencia del consentimiento de la persona agraviada para involucrarse en un acto sexual.
Lo mencionado evidencia que es posible que se formulen cargos de tipo penal, aunque entre los involucrados haya un vínculo amoroso o afectivo, puesto que lo relevante para efectos de esta ley en cuanto a una sentencia como culpable o inocente son las edades de las personas involucradas.
¿Se puede acusar a un joven menor de edad por estupro?
Esto si es posible en California, ya que, en caso de que los involucrados no posean dieciochos años se podrá tener por consumado el estupro. Esta situación puede parecer descabellada, puesto que, el sujeto al igual que la víctima según la normativa del Estado no poseen la edad requerida para prestar un consentimiento legal.
Sin embargo, se tiene que considerar que en California la Fiscalía no le da prioridad a aquellos casos en los que se ve involucrados menores de edad quienes mantuvieron relaciones sexuales, pero, no quiere decir que no se presente tal hecho. No obstante, lo que sí es necesario aclarar es que el ilícito no será procesado por el Tribunal Penal de Adultos, sino por el Tribunal de Menores debido a la edad que tiene el autor del delito.
¿Cómo se determina de forma legal la edad de una persona?
Según lo señalado por las normas legales del Estado, se considera que una persona suma un año más a su edad cuando son las 12:01 am del día correspondiente a la fecha del cumpleaños, significa que, luego de que ha pasado un minuto de la medianoche correspondiente al día en que se celebra su cumpleaños.
Para que este tema pueda ser comprendido en su totalidad, se emplearán un ejemplo:
David cuenta con 20 años de edad, mientras que su actual novia solo tiene 17 años, ambos desean mantener relaciones de tipo sexual, sin embargo, creen que lo más prudente es esperar hasta que ella cumpla 18 años, el cumpleaños de la chica en 6 de diciembre, por lo cual deciden salir el 5 de diciembre y luego de que el calendario marque que es 6 de ese mes van mantener relaciones sexuales por primera vez. En este ejemplo David no estaría incurriendo en estupro, puesto que su pareja no era una menor al momento de mantener relaciones íntimas, por lo que contaba con la capacidad para ofrecer su autorización.
Es necesario resaltar que en cuanto a este tema las leyes frecuentemente son muy severas, tanto así que han llegado a señalar que una persona incurre en este delito incluso llevar a cabo actos sexuales con otra persona faltando solo 1 minuto para tener la mayoría de edad, es decir, 18 años.
¿Qué estrategias de defensa pueden emplearse frente a una acusación por estupro?
El que se logren obtener resultados favorables en un caso relacionado con estupro dependerá en gran parte de si el acusado contrata a un buen abogado que lo represente, ya que, este profesional es quien posee los conocimientos idóneos y cuenta con una trayectoria considerable que le permite estudiar el caso, e identificar cuáles son las debilidades que presenta la acusación del fiscal, asimismo, podrá encontrar las pruebas necesarias que le garanticen desvirtuar los alegatos presentados contra su cliente.
De igual forma, no se debe considerar a una acusación como una sentencia condenatoria, ya que, aunque es un escenario complicado la participación oportuna de un profesional del derecho marcará la diferencia entre pasar un tiempo considerable en prisión o lograr persuadir al juez de que las acciones imputadas no fueron cometidas por el acusado o que el imponga penas menos severas.
A fin de entender con mayor claridad los argumentos de defensa que emplean los abogados en estos casos mencionaremos algunos:
- El sujeto actuó de buena fe creyendo que el afectado era mayor de edad.
- El sujeto fue acusado falsamente.
- No se consumó el acto sexual entre el menor y el acusado.
¿Qué penas se pueden imponer como castigo a una persona condenada por estupro?
Se debe señalar que, la diferencia de edad entre el autor del ilícito y el joven menor de edad es tomada en consideración a fin de señalar la manera en que se procesa el hecho y la gravedad de las sanciones.
En este sentido, el estupro se considera un “wobbler”, es decir, se puede calificar como un delito menor o mayor considerando los factores señalados a continuación:
- Si el sujeto acusado no posee una edad superior a 3 años respecto al menor en el instante que se consumó el hecho, este tendrá que procesarse como un delito menor.
- Si el sujeto acusado posee una edad superior a 3 años respecto al menor en el instante que se consumó el hecho, este deberá ser procesado como un delito mayor.
- Si el sujeto acusado posee una edad igual o mayor a 21 años y el menor tiene una edad inferior a los 16 años en el instante que se consumó el estupro, este tendrá que ser calificado como “wobbler” pero las sanciones a imponer serán mayores.
Aunado a los factores antes mencionados, a fin de establecer qué calificación recibirá el delito, la Fiscalía tendrá que analizar las circunstancias particulares del caso, y si el sujeto posee o no antecedentes penales.
En relación a las sanciones a imponer en caso de que el estupro se califique como delito menor son las siguientes:
- Prisión por un periodo máximo de 1 año, que deberá cumplir en una cárcel del condado.
- Régimen de libertad condicional como delito menor.
- Pago de multas por un valor que no supere los $1.000.
Por su parte, si el estupro se considera un delito mayor, se podrán imponer las siguientes penas:
- Pena privativa de libertad de 16 meses, 2, 3 años, salvo que el acusado posea una edad igual o mayor a 21 años y el menor posea una edad inferior a 16 años, puesto que, en este escenario la pena aumentará a 2, 3, 4 años de cárcel.
- Régimen de libertad condicional formal o informal, acompañado de prisión por 1 año en una cárcel del condado.
- Pago de multas por un valor máximo de $10.000.
Se debe tener presente que, una sentencia condenatoria por este delito no genera que el sujeto deba registrarse como delincuente sexual.
Asimismo, en el Estado no se da la Ley de Romeo y Julieta según la cual es considerado legal que una persona menor de edad mantenga relaciones sexuales con otro individuo siempre que tenga una edad cercana entre ambos. Esto ocurre ya que, en el Estado se considera delito mantener relaciones de índole sexual con cualquier joven menor de edad, sin considerar si ambas partes involucradas cuentan con menos de 18 años. En relación a ello, la única disposición que considera la proximidad de edad entre el menor y el acusado es la que señala la diferencia de edad igual o menor a 3 años para que el delito se califique como menor.
¿Es posible imponer sanciones en el ámbito civil por el delito de estupro?
Una persona que sea condenada por estupro cuenta con la posibilidad de recibir sanciones en el ámbito civil. En este caso, las penas a imponer serán multas de tipo no penal, es decir, el Tribunal le podrá establecer al sujeto el tener que pagar a la víctima una cantidad adicional a las sanciones penales. Sin embargo, estas sanciones civiles sólo se podrán imponer cuando el acusado es un individuo con una edad superior a 18 años.
En relación a lo anterior, la cantidad exacta a imponer en las sanciones civiles dependerá de la diferencia de edades que tengan los involucrados (menor y acusado). A fin de brindar una idea respecto a las graves sanciones que se pueden aplicar en el ámbito civil son las siguientes:
- De $2.000 si la discrepancia de edad entre los involucrados es menor a 2 años.
- De $5.000 si la discrepancia de edad entre los involucrados es igual a 2 años.
- De $10.000 si la discrepancia de edad entre los involucrados es igual o mayor a 3 años.
- De $25.000 si el sujeto acusado posee una edad igual o mayor a 21 años y el afectado tiene menos de 16 años al instante que se consumó el acto sexual.
De igual forma, se debe tener presente que, si el afectado considera que sufrió algún daño producto del estupro cuenta con el derecho a presentarse ante el juez correspondiente y elevar una demanda civil por el hecho, para ello, no necesitará que el demandado sea considerado culpable ante los Tribunales Penales.
En todo caso, si nueve integrantes de los doce que forman el jurado creen factible que el acusado perpetró el delito, lo pueden obligar a que pague los daños y perjuicios demandados por el afectado, sin considerar si fue declarado inocente en el juicio penal con jurado, o cuando no se presentaran cargos.
Respecto a los gastos que puede recuperar la víctima como daños compensatorios destacan: Asesorías psicológicas, facturas médicas, salarios que dejó de percibir, daños generados por sufrimiento o cualquier daño no material, entre otros.
¿Cómo puedo comunicarme con un abogado con experiencia en casos de estupro cerca de mí?
En caso de que usted resida en Van Nuys, CA, y actualmente sufra cargos por estupro es necesario que se comunique con un buen abogado. En el escritorio jurídico Leah Legal, podemos brindarle la atención que su situación legal requiere, ya que, poseemos un equipo de profesionales altamente capacitados y con trayectoria en la resolución de este tipo de situaciones.
Nuestros abogados no solo se encargarán de velar por la protección de sus derechos e intereses, sino que lo representarán durante todo el proceso tratando de obtener un resultado favorable. Si desea obtener una primera cita solo debe comunicarse al siguiente número telefónico 818-484-1100, y un asesor lo atenderá en la brevedad posible. ¡Llame ya!
Leah Legal is one of the highly-rated criminal defense firms around Los Angeles, California. Our attorneys are professionals in dealing with assault & battery cases. We analyze your case and stage a strong defense with the goal of a case dismissal or reduced penalties. In this article, you will find a detailed overview of the assault and battery offenses and how you can contact our attorneys for a free consultation.
Definition of Assault and Battery under California Law
Battery and assault involve inflicting threats/ force to harm or causing actual harm to another person. There is a thin line between the two and different states treat them differently. The two are completely different crimes under California law. The law under the penal code 240 PC defines assault as any action that leads to physical injuries or unconsented touching on another individual. On the other hand, the penal code 242 PC defines battery as the action of actually inflicting violence or force on somebody else.
Assault
This is the intentional act which puts another person in fear or suspicion of immediate harm. Assault, therefore, includes the threat of harm and doesn’t necessarily require actual harm to occur. Since assault may occur accidentally, most people often refer to it as simply ‘an attempted assault’.
The perpetrator must have had the intention to cause fear to another individual for a case to qualify as an assault. Assault doesn’t require actual bodily harm, any fear that substantiates to be a threat is an assault. Additionally, assault requires an act to be taken further than the threat of harm. These acts include approaching a person who has their fists raised, using a weapon to scare off someone, or trying to push a person into a crowded street.
Without an action being taken, the case is not treated as an assault. For instance, if a man with a reputation of being mean and violent approaches a woman, that is not an assault since she is merely scared by his reputation. In addition, words are not sufficient. Stating a threat is not enough to bring about assault charges unless an additional action that creates fear of harm accompanies the words.
Battery
A battery is the completion of an assault. A battery is defined as offensive or harmful touching of another person without their consent. Since assault involves mere threat and battery is the actual harming, the two crimes are often charged together.
Unlike assault charges, battery requires that the perpetrator had intentions of committing the act. For example, if a person accidentally knocks a shopper with a grocery cart while in the mall, this will not be a battery. However, if the person’s actions were as a result of criminal recklessness, it qualifies to be a battery.
The act of battery does not require severe injury or traumatization to the victim. All forms of touching which the victim finds offensive or harmful are sufficient to be considered battery. A classic battery case that doesn’t cause pain or injury is when the victim is spat on by the perpetrator. In such a circumstance, the defendant is not held accountable for offensive contact only because of the relative insensitiveness of the victim. The standard of offensiveness is determined from an ordinary individual’s perspective.
Types of Assault and Battery
The seriousness of the threat and the circumstances surrounding it will make the charge of assault either a felony or a misdemeanor. The federal law categorizes assault as a felony that is punished by ten years imprisonment, while as a misdemeanor, it attracts a one-year sentence.
Penalties for assault depend on the circumstances surrounding the crime and your criminal history. If the assault doesn’t involve a weapon, it is treated as a misdemeanor. However, the penalties rapidly escalate if weapons are used. For example, a first-degree assault involving a deadly weapon that causes serious injuries can lead to long jail terms with very heavy fines. In other cases, the prosecution tries to find out whether the victim was a vulnerable member of society. They include expectant mothers, the elderly, and persons living with disability or minors. If any of these is involved, then expect heftier charges. In most cases, the prosecution attempts to combine two or more charges to tie to the assault. This is in the plunge of increasing your jail term. However, some of these related charges carry very light charges and in most cases, your defense tries to tie your case to such offenses to help reduce the expected penalties. Some of the cases that are associated with assault may include:
Assault of a Law Enforcement Officer/Emergency Personnel
The penalties for California assault are more severe if the victim is in the administrative arm of the government. Higher penalties are given especially if the person was on duty. Some of the recognized professionals under this law may include a peace officer, firefighter, lifeguard, doctor or traffic officer. For example, if a traffic marshal is trying to control the traffic and he accidentally hits your car using his tool, then you alight the car and attack them, then you are viable for a battery charge.
If the victim falls under any of these categories and you were aware of the same, the jail sentence increases to a year or a maximum fine to two thousand dollars. Additionally, the maximum assault fine increases to two thousand dollars if your victim is a parking control officer in the line of duty.
Assault using a Deadly Weapon under Penal code 245(a)
If the assault was conducted using a weapon or other forceful means that may cause bodily injury, one is charged with ADW under Penal Code 245(a) (1). The assault is considered a wobbler.
If treated as a misdemeanor, a one-year jail term in a county jail is given. While as a felony, you are sentenced to either two, three or four years in state prison.
PC 244 Assault with Caustic Chemicals
Assault with caustic chemicals is one of the most serious forms of California assault and is dictated under the Penal Code 244 PC. Assault with caustic chemicals involves throwing or placing any kind of caustic chemical on someone else’s body with an intention of injuring or disfiguring them.
Disturbing the Peace under PC 415
Under the California PC 415, ‘disturbing the peace laws’ criminalizes the following:
- Fighting a person in public
- Making noise that is unreasonable and disturbing to others
- Directing words that are provocative to another individual in public
Disturbing peace is a low level misdemeanor or even an infraction with the discretion of the prosecution. If found guilty, you will serve a maximum jail term of 90 days. If you suffer an assault charge, and there is insufficient proof against you, then the prosecution lowers the charge to peace disturbance. This will be to the defendant’s advantage since the consequences are relatively light compared to those of assault.
Assaulting a public official under Penal code 217.1(a)
The offense of assaulting public officials in California is criminalized under the California law. The attack can either be a revenge scheme or intimidation to the officer while carrying out his or her duty. You must not necessarily be the one executing the intimidations, even by sending a person to intimidate another party makes you guilty. On the peripheral, the executor of the orders is charged with conspiracy.
Examples of public officials are prosecutors, judges, and the local and federal officers of state. Under California law, assaulting a public officer is treated as a wobbler. If treated as a misdemeanor, the potential sentence is up to one year. If taken as a felony, a sentence of sixteen months, two or three years in state prison is given.
Simple Battery
Under the California Penal Code section 242, a simple battery is a battery that doesn’t cause any serious injury and isn’t committed against a law enforcement officer or any other protected person. Being a light allegation, it is mostly considered as a misdemeanor. Potential penalties include
- Misdemeanor probation
- Up to 6 months in county jail and/or
- A fine of up to two thousand dollars
Some of the common California offenses that are closely related to PC 242 battery may include:
PC 243(e) (1) Domestic Battery
A domestic battery involves any of the following people:
- Your spouse or a former spouse
- Your cohabitant or former cohabitant
- A person you are dating or used to date
- The mother or father of your children
A domestic battery is a misdemeanor and attracts a two thousand dollars fine or a jail sentence of up to one year in county jail.
PC 243(d) Battery Causing Serious Bodily Injury
If your battery offense causes serious injury to the victim, you are charged with aggravated battery. In the California laws, aggravated battery is treated as a wobbler, making it either a misdemeanor or a felony.
The misdemeanor penalty for this offense is a maximum of one year in county jail. If charged as a felony, it can lead to two, three or four years in prison.
Aggravated Assault and Battery
The defendant may be charged with aggravated assault and battery, an elevation of assault and battery if they are particularly egregious. This is meant to criminalize conduct that is highly offensive in society. It may apply to cases where deadly weapons are used or when a victim is a vulnerable person like an expectant woman, an elderly person, or a minor.
Additional Consequences for Battery in California
Battery victims can sue their offender for damages. It is not necessary that the defendant is found guilty with the offense. Provided you had battery charges, then other related civil offenses fall in your basket. The California law treats civil crimes with utmost seriousness and if found guilty in correlation to a battery, the penalties increase, mainly because civil trials don’t need extensive prove. What the plaintiff simply needs to prove is that the battery happened using the prevalence of the available evidence. To prove liability for battery, the plaintiff, using a prevalence must prove the following:
- The defendant touched the plaintiff with intentions of harming them
- The touching was unconsented
- The plaintiff underwent harm or offense by the defendant’s conduct and
- Any reasonable person in the plaintiff’s position would have found the touching offensive
What the Prosecution has to Prove
Assault Charges
In order for the defendant to be convicted with an assault under PC 240, all the following must be true:
- The defendant’s action was likely to lead to the use of force against an individual
- The defendant acted willfully
- When the defendant performed the act, he had the capability to apply force to the other individual
Battery Charges
In order for the defendant to be convicted of battery, the following must be true
- The defendant’s acts were unlawful or unauthorized
- There was contact between the defendant and another person
- The defendant’s actions resulted in some offensive form of conduct or harm
Possible Defenses
Assault
- You are not in a position to exert force on anyone
For a case to qualify for assault in California, someone must be able to force the victim for them to be charged. If he or she is unable to do so, then they are innocent of assault.
For example, when Ken fights with Brian, they are immediately separated and Ken swings his fists in Brian’s direction from a distance. Ken is innocent for swinging his fists because of the distance between them.
- Self-defense or you were defending someone else
For this defense to work, the following conditions must be satisfied
- You believed reasonably that you or another individual was in danger of bodily harm or being unlawfully touched
- You believed reasonably that immediate action was needed for defense against the danger and
- You used reasonable force that was necessary for defense against the danger
- You did not Act Willfully
You are not guilty under PEN 240 if you did not willfully attempt to use force against another individual. Your actions may have been accidental or a result of a misunderstanding. They may have been misinterpreted by the supposed victim. If it is this way, you and your attorney should ensure that the full story is out.
- You were Falsely Accused
The penal code 240 PC doesn’t necessitate the need for a victim to get an actual injury. Therefore, it is easy for one person to condemn the other person for committing assault out of anger, jealousy or desire for revenge.
Battery
- You were defending yourself or someone else
This form of defense applies only if the following thresholds are met:
- You believe that you almost suffered injuries to the body or unconsented touching
- You believed reasonably that using force immediately was necessary for defense against the danger
- You applied the required force for defense
For example, Jack and his apartment manager have a bad relationship. The manager confronts him one day and pokes his chest. Jack reiterates by pushing the manager who slips and injures his head. Although the manager just poked his chest, Jack can still contest the battery charges by claiming that he did all that as a form of self-defense. He should claim and prove that the manager was unlawfully touching him and pushing him away was his only option.
- You acted unwillingly
You must not have had the intentions of harming someone, but you need to have acted by will for you to be found guilty of battery. If it was unintentional, you may use the ‘accident excuse’ as your defense.
For example, if you unintentionally push someone or hit them with a tool. In such a situation, the prosecution may call for battery charges, but you should plead innocent of that offense if your act wasn’t intentional.
- Parental Right to Discipline a Child
Sometimes, parents get battery charges after disciplining their children. This is tied under PC 273(d) on child abuse under California law. Such cases that involve disciplining of children by parents are mostly weightless since it is just a mere attempt to discipline the alleged victim. Just like charges of child abuse, you may be able to defend yourself off battery charges by showing you were exercising the parental right to discipline your child. Parents are allowed by the law to use light physical punishments to discipline their children provided that the force used is reasonable.
Find an Assault and Battery Attorney Near Me
Assault and battery crimes are complicated cases in California. It is important for you to hire experienced attorneys to argue your case and fight for your freedom. At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we specialize in helping people charged with battery and/or assault in Los Angeles, California. Call us today at 818-484-1100 and speak to one of our highly-experienced legal experts concerning your assault and battery case today.
SIMPLE ASSAULT – CALIFORNIA PC 240
The crime of assault is oftentimes heard together with the crime of battery even though the two are not the same at all. While the crime of battery is the unlawful harmful or offensive touching of or contact with another person, California Penal Code section 240 defines the crime of assault as “an unlawful attempt, coupled with a present ability, to commit a violent injury on the person of another.” In simple words, battery is the actual act of unlawfully hurting someone while assault is the attempt to do so.
In order to be found guilty of committing an assault, there are several elements that must be met by the prosecution:
Elements of Assault
- The person has to have done some act that would probably result in applying force against another person,
- The person has to have done this act willfully,
- When the person did this act, he or she knew certain facts that would give a reasonable person to think the act would probably result in the application of force against the other person, and
- The person had the present ability to use force against the other person.
Willfully – What does it mean for a person to commit an act willfully? It means that he or she did the act on purpose. What it does not mean, however, is that the person had the intention to break the law or hurt someone else. There is NO requirement of intent to cause injury.
Application of Force – What the Code means by “application of force” or “applying force” against another person is a touching in a harmful or offensive manner. It is enough if the touching is done in a rude or angry way even though the touching is very slight. The touching can also be indirect by causing an object or another person to touch someone. And finally, the touching does not have to cause pain or injury of any kind; all that is required is that there was a good chance that the touching could have caused pain or injury.
Penalties for Assault
There are several different types of assaults, but California Penal Code section 240 specifically refers to simple assault, as discussed above. Simple assault is a misdemeanor crime for which the potential penalties can include informal (summary) probation, a maximum of six months in county jail, and/or a maximum fine of $1,000.
Under certain circumstances the consequences become more severe. Pursuant to PC 241(c), if the assault is committed against certain officials or those of a particular profession, and the person committing the assault knew or should have known of the status of that particular person, the fines can go up to a maximum of $2,000 and the county jail time can go up to a maximum of one year. Some of these professions include peace officers, firefighters, EMTs or paramedics, lifeguards and traffic officers, among others.
Defenses for Assault
An assault charge on your record can be increasingly detrimental to your future. The appearance of a misdemeanor on a background search for employment or any other purpose is already a significant hurdle in and of itself. The specific charge of assault, however, can be very difficult to deal with. Assumptions will frequently be made in reference to your nature or character because of the assumed “violence” aspect of assault. This, even though realistically your assault charge may have nothing to do with violent behavior.
In order to fight an assault charge the Criminal Defense Law Office of Leah Legal can utilize various defenses to your benefit. A defense attorney’s task is to break down the alleged crime and examine the facts. The goal would be to show any one of the following:
Self-Defense/Defense of Others – The circumstances warranted your reasonable belief that your or someone else’s immediate well-being was in danger, and thus the actions you took were unavoidable. In order for this defense to apply, your attorney must show that you did not use force in the alleged assault in excess of what could be reasonably assumed as necessary within the circumstances. An example for this defense would be: Yvette has had an ongoing problem with her neighbor Emily for quite some time. One day Yvette is outside Emily’s apartment and Emily pushes Yvette up against the second floor railing until she is hanging over. Yvette pushes Emily off of her and Emily slips on the welcome mat in front of her door hitting her head on the coffee table. Yvette can utilize a defense revolving around her necessity for self-defense due to the fact that Emily initiated an unlawful touching of Yvette. Yvette’s pushing Emily back is a legal and reasonable response to Emily’s actions. An exception to this defense is that you cannot claim that your actions stem from self-defense simply based on speech. Regardless of how hateful or offensive, words do not justify the infliction of any sort of force on another. The only time that the self-defense legal defense may be utilized is when you had a reasonable belief that you or someone else was in danger of either injury or unlawful touching.
No Capability to Use Force – A key aspect of a successful assault conviction that must be present for the prosecutor to win is that the defendant must possess the capability to inflict some sort of force upon the alleged victim. If the defendant was unable to inflict some sort of force upon the victim then the assault could not have taken place and therefore the charges must be dropped. Here is an example that illustrates this: Janice and Samantha were at a superbowl party together. After a fair amount of drinking they began to argue. As the situation escalated the other partygoers realized the situation and separated the two. From outside Samantha swung her fists toward Janice. However, because Samantha was not in the immediate vicinity of Janice there was no imminent danger. Therefore, no assault crime was committed.
Lack of Willfulness – You did not intentionally act to inflict harm on another. If there was no “willful intention to inflict harm” a good attorney can use this stance to argue your case. It is entirely possible that you accidentally inflicted an injury on another after you felt you were in danger, and if that is the case the Criminal Defense Law Office of Leah Legal can help. Having an aggressive attorney by your side can insure that the truth and both sides of the story are fairly represented to both the jury and the prosecutor.
Being Falsely Accused – Under 240 PC, since there is no requirement for injury it is very easy to falsely accuse another of assault. Attorney Naparstek has come across many such situations with a variety of underlying causes and complications and is readily able to build a case in your support. She can interview witness and procure character references to present to the prosecutor, as well as gather evidence to support your case. All in an attempt to successfully reveal the truth.
Related Offenses
Battery – California PC 242
Assault charges are often brought about in conjunction with a variety of other charges. As mentioned above, assault charges often are partnered with battery charges. In contrast to an assault charge, a requirement of the use of force or violence exists for the validity of a battery case. While there is not a necessity for the existence of bodily injury, there must be use of force and a willful and unlawful touching (harmful or offensive).
Assault With a Deadly Weapon – California PC 245(a)(1)
If the your alleged actions included the use of a knife, a gun, a cinderblock, a bat, or any other form of weapon or force that has the potential to inflict serious bodily harm, you may be charged with a violation of Penal Code 245(a)(1). This charge can be a misdemeanor or a felony – otherwise known as a “wobbler” – depending on the prosecution’s discretion. It is a “234” crime, which means that the felony jail sentence can be two, three, or four years. When charged as a misdemeanor the jail sentence would be a maximum of one year.
Disturbing The Peace – California PC 415
Another charge that often accompanies an assault case is disturbing the peace. You may be in violation of PC 415 if you speak in a fashion so as to evoke anger or a fight from another person in a public place, get into a fight publicly or cause others to be disturbed as a direct result of your noise. PC 415 is a low level misdemeanor in California and can sometimes be charged as only an infraction. In many cases where the prosecution’s evidence is lacking, an assault charge may be negotiated down to a PC 415. If convicted of a PC 415 the county jail sentence is a maximum of 90 days.
ASSAULT ON A PUBLIC OFFICIAL – CALIFORNIA PC 217.1(A)
The crime of assault on public official, like several other variations of assault, is a wobbler crime. This means that it can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony depending on how the prosecution decides to file it. The prosecutor will look to the seriousness of the facts of the case as well the defendant’s prior criminal history, if any, in deciding how to file. If charged as a felony the potential consequences for a charge of assault on a public official under Penal Code secition 217.1(a) can be extremely serious. In order to understand why this is, it’s important to look at what constitutes an assault on a public official. Under California’s Penal Code section 217.1(a), in order for someone to be found guilty of committing an assault on a public official, the prosecution must prove the following elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt:
Elements of Assault on a Public Official
- The person committed an assault with a deadly weapon or by means of force likely to cause great bodily injury,
- The person committed an assault of the person of a government official, former government official, or the immediate family of any of these officials, and
- The person acted in retaliation for or to prevent the performance of the victim’s official duties.
Let try to understand this by using an example: Defendant Dan is charged with having committed serious crimes and is in jail awaiting trial. He has a public defender who is working very hard on his defense and who has tried to negotiate a very good deal for him with the prosecutor. Defendant Dan is angry because he feels that his public defender is not doing a good enough job on his behalf. When they next meet in court, Defendant Dan tries to attack his public defender by ramming his handcuffed hands into his attorney.
In looking at this as it relates to the crime of assault on a public official pursuant to Penal Code 217.1 (a), an assault was committed because Defendant Dan had the present ability to commit a violent act on his attorney, and he unlawfully attempted to do so. The metal handcuffs were either intended to be a deadly weapon and the public defender qualifies as a public official. Finally, the attack was in retaliation for what Defendant Dan believed was his attorney’s failure to properly advocate on his behalf. All of the elements for assault on a public official have been met. Remember, it was not necessary for Defendant Dan to have actually caused injury to his public defender. The assault in and of itself was enough to constitute guilt of assault on a public official.
Assault – (for a more detailed discussion see section on Assault)
- The person has to have done some act that would probably result in applying force against another person.
- The person has to have done this act willfully.
- When the person did this act, he or she knew certain facts that a reasonable person would think would probably result in the application of force against another.
- The person had the present ability to use force against the other person.
Willfully – As discussed in the section on “assault”, a willful act is one that is done on purpose. What it does not mean, however, is that the person had the intention to break the law or hurt someone else. There is NO requirement of intent to cause injury.
Applying Force Against Another Person – This generally means touching another in a harmful or offensive manner. It is enough if the touching is done in a rude or angry way even though the touching is very slight. The touching can also be indirect by causing an object or another person to touch someone. And finally, the touching does not have to cause pain or injury of any kind; all that is required is that there was a good chance that the touching could have caused pain or injury.
Public Official – Our legislature recognizes that the important policies and decisions that our public officials frequently have to make don’t always sit well with everyone. When widely publicized and controversial policies come to light they often creates anger and resentment – sometimes to the point where an official can be in danger of being attacked physically. This is the reason a conviction of assault on a public official can lead to such serious penalties. If you allegedly assaulted the President or Vice President, the Governor, a federal, state or local justice, judge or juror, a commissioner, referee or other judicial officer, the secretary or director of any executive agency (federal or state), a federal or state elected official, a mayor, city council member, county supervisor, sheriff, peace officer or chief of police, a prosecutor, a public defender, or any of the aforementioned’s family members you may face charges of assault against as public official.
Immediate Family – Immediate family” means spouse, child, stepchild, brother, stepbrother, sister, stepsister, mother, stepmother, father, or stepfather.
Why Is Assault On A Public Official Different?
A significant difference between assault on a public official and other forms of assault is that motive must be present for a crime to have been committed under Penal Code section 217.1 (a). The only way to be convicted of this crime is if the assault is committed on the public official in an attempt to hinder the public officials’ ability to carry out their official duties and/or obligations. If, however, the assault on the public offical was not committed to hinder the official or to retaliate against them because of an action they took to further a duty, you cannot be convicted of assault on a public official. That is not to say that you can’t and won’t be convicted of another crime. Should you assault a public official but without the intentions of obstructing the abilities and duties of their public position you can still be convicted of assault with a deadly weapon (ADW) or a simple assault – depending upon the circumstances and specifics of the case.
Penalties for Assault on a Public Official
As mentioned above, the charge of assault on a public official is considered a “wobbler”. When a charge is considered a wobbler it means that assault on a public official can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony depending upon the discretion of the prosecution as well as the specific circumstances of the case.
If convicted of a misdemeanor violation of Penal Code section 217.1 (a) assault on a public official you can face summary probation, a maximum of one year in county jail, and/or a maximum fine of $1000.
If convicted of a felony violation of Penal Code section 217.1 (a) assault on a public official you can face felony probation, either 16 months, two years or three years state prison but served in county jail, and/or a maximum fine of $10,000.
Defenses for Assault on a Public Official
When adopting a defense for an assault on a public official the Criminal Defense Law Office of Van Nuys Criminal Attorney will examine the case in its entirety and evaluate the specific circumstances that are lacking in the prosecutors case. If all of the elements are not proven, a case can be dismissed or reduced to a less serious charge. There are several common defenses including the lack of ability to inflict harm. Should you attempt to assault a public official in a situation where you possessed no realistic ability to inflict that harm, regardless of your intentions, you are not guilty of a violation of Penal Code section 217.1 (a).
Other defenses may include self defense – wherein your actions were because you reasonably believed that the official was unlawfully acting in a forceful and dangerous manner towards you. Also, as discussed above, another defense is the lack of intent to obstruct the duties of the public official.
ASSAULT WITH A DEADLY WEAPON – CALIFORNIA PC 245(a)(1)
One of the more serious types of assault crimes is assault with a deadly weapon, often referred to as an ADW. California Penal Code section 245(a)(1) describes the crime of assault with a deadly weapon as follows: “Any person who commits an assault upon the person of another with a deadly weapon or instrument other than a firearm shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three, or four years, or in a county jail for not exceeding one year, or by a fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars, or by both the fine and imprisonment.”
As we see from the language of the Penal Code, assault with a deadly weapon can be considered a felony in the state of California. As such, being charged with assault with a deadly weapon can be extremely serious and should be treated as such. If someone is found in violation of Penal Code 245(a)(1) a prison term and even a strike on your record are real possibilities. It is therefore very crucial to find an experienced attorney, such as the Criminal Defense Office of Leah Legal when you have been accused of these charges.
Under California PC 245(a)(1), in order to be found guilty of committing an ADW, there are several elements that must be met by the prosecution:
Elements of Assault With A Deadly Weapon
- The person has to have done some act with a deadly weapon that would probably result in applying force against another person, OR
- The person has to have done some act that would probably result in applying force to another person and the force was likely to cause great bodily injury,
- The person has to have done this act willfully.
- When the person did this act, he or she knew certain facts that a reasonable person would think would probably result in the application of force against another.
- The person had the present ability to use force with a deadly weapon against the other person, or the force would likely bring about great bodily injury.
Deadly Weapon – When PC Code 245(a)(1) talks about a deadly weapon, it means anything that could be used in a way to bring about death or great bodily injury. Objects or instruments that we know are very deadly by their nature are guns and knives. But a deadly weapon can also mean any object, instrument or weapon that is used in a way that it is capable of causing death or great bodily injury. This can include a brick, bat, tool, violent pet or even a car or other vehicle! A vehicle by its nature is not meant to be a deadly weapon, but if it is used to intentionally ram into another person and cause him or her great bodily injury or death, it is considered a deadly weapon. For example: Joe was driving down the street when someone cut him off. He became exceedingly angry and as they approached a red light and the car ahead came to a stop, he hit the gas pedal ramming his car into theirs. By using his vehicle as a means to inflict great bodily harm, this constitutes the crime of assault with a deadly weapon.
Great Bodily Injury – Remember though, that an assault with a deadly weapon can be accomplished either by a deadly weapon or by force likely to bring about great bodily injury. So this means that we don’t even need a weapon to accomplish this. An assault causing great bodily injury by using enough force with one’s bare hands is enough to be considered an assault with a deadly weapon if the great bodily injury or harm is a substantial or significant injury. An example of this would be a professional wrestler who throws someone else to the ground without their consent. This would be considered assault with a deadly weapon because the wrestler is more skillful than an ordinary person, and his wrestling with another is likely to cause great bodily harm.
Willfully – What does it mean for a person to commit an act willfully? It means that he or she did the act on purpose. What it does not mean, however, is that the person had the intention to break the law or hurt someone else. There is NO requirement of intent to cause injury. Simply intent to act upon the other person.
Application of Force – What does the Code mean by application of force or applying force against another person? It means touching in a harmful or offensive manner. It is enough if the touching is done in a rude or angry way even though the touching is very slight. The touching can also be indirect by causing an object or another person to touch someone. And finally, the touching does not have to cause pain or injury of any kind; all that is required is that there was a good chance that the touching could have caused pain or injury.
Penalties for Assault
Assault with a deadly weapon can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony depending on the facts of the case and the discretion of the prosecutor. This means that the crime of assault with a deadly weapon is considered a “wobbler”. Penalties will vary from case to case dependent on the specific circumstances. For instance, the penalty for an assault with a deadly weapon charge in a case where a gun was utilized by a previous violent offender may be different, and perhaps more serious, than that of a case in which a first time offender is being charged and the weapon is a knife. The prosecution will also take into consideration who the victim is and how serious the injury was. If the victim was a firefighter who was very severely injured, for example, the penalties will be harsher.
Potential consequences for assault with a deadly weapon when charged as a felony can include formal probation, two, three or four years in state prison, and/or a maximum fine of $10,000.
Potential consequences for assault with a deadly weapon when charged as a misdemeanor can include summary or informal probation, a maximum of one year in county jail, and a maximum of $1.000.
If the assault with a deadly weapon involves a firearm or semiautomatic firearm, the penalties can increase to longer prison terms.
In addition, if an assault with a deadly weapon involved a firearm or caused great bodily harm or was committed against a police officer, the penalties can include it being a strike. The potential for a strike is very serious and very crucial to take into consideration while deciding which strategies to use during an assault with a deadly weapon case. If someone has a strike and is then later charged with a felony, he or she can face twice the sentence for the subsequent felony. When someone reaches three strike convictions, he or she faces 25 years to life in state prison.
Defenses for Assault
A successful defense for an ADW case can be tricky but the Criminal Law Office of Leah Leah has been handling cases such as these for many years. Some possible defenses include:
- There was a lack of a deadly weapon or the force likely to cause great bodily injury
- You acted in self defense or in defense of someone else
- You didn’t act willfully or you lackedthe requisite intent to commit the violation
- This was a false accusation. If this is the case, your attorney must conduct interviews of witnesses who can help bring the truth to light.
Related Offenses
Assault, California PC 240 – The crime of assault as “an unlawful attempt, coupled with a present ability, to commit a violent injury on the person of another.” The offense of assault is almost exactly like an assault with a deadly weapon, except that there is no requirement of deadly weapons or force likely to cause great bodily harm.
Battery, California PC 242 – Assault charges often are partnered with battery charges. In contrast with an assault charge, a requirement of the use of force or violence exists for the validity of a battery case. While there is not a necessity for the existence of bodily injury, there must be use of force and successful unlawful touching (harmfully or offensively).
Disturbing The Peace, California PC 415 – Another charge that often accompanies an assault case is disturbing the peace. You may be in violation of PC 415 if you speak in a way that instigates a fight with another person in public, if you get into a fight publicly, or if you cause others to be disturbed as a result of your noise.
ASSAULT WITH CAUSTIC CHEMICALS – CALIFORNIA PC 244
Assault with caustic chemicals is an extremely serious offense and should be treated as such. In the state of California assault with caustic chemicals is charged as a felony that has exceedingly harsh consequences.
Under California PC 244, in order for someone to be found guilty of committing an assault with caustic chemicals, the prosecution must prove the following beyond a reasonable doubt:
Elements of Assault with Caustic Chemicals
- A person placed or threw, or caused to be placed or thrown, acid or a flammable substance upon the person of the alleged victim,
- The person acted willfully and maliciously, and
- The person acted with the intent to injure or disfigure the body of the alleged victim.
To be successfully convicted of assault with caustic chemicals under California Penal Code section 244 several aspects must be present. The elements in the Code are defined and explained as follows:
Caustic Chemicals – The chemicals referred to under Penal Code 244 as “caustic chemicals” include sulfuric acid, nitric acid, gasoline, bleach, potassium hydroxide, sodium hydroxide, hydrochloric acid, or flammable liquids with a flashpoint of 150 degrees Fahrenheit or less.
Willfully – What the code means by “willfully” is that the person did the act willingly or on purpose.
Maliciously – The element of “malice” is met when a person intentionally does a wrongful act or when he or she acts with the unlawful intent to disturb, defraud, annoy, or injure someone else.
Here is an example that will clarify: Jenn and Hannah are in chemistry lab at school. Jenn decides to add an ingredient to the beaker, however, she added the chemicals in the wrong order. Hannah leans over the beaker to investigate as to what went wrong and the chemical gasses pour over onto her face badly injuring her. Under Penal Code section 244 assault with caustic chemicals, this would not rise to the level of assault with caustic chemicals because of the fact that this was an accident. Jenn’s intentions were not to cause bodily harm to Hannah; Jenn accidently added the ingredients improperly which resulted in a chemical gas with which Hannah was injured. They were simply involved in an unfortunate accident involving dangerous chemicals. Neither willful nor malicious intent are present in this situation.
An example that does illustrate the intent and malice in this crime is this: Daniel is dating Troy’s ex-girlfriend. Daniel is unhappy with the fact that Troy is still in his girlfriend’s life so he asks Troy to meet him at the park to have a discussion. Troy and Daniel talk for a little while when Daniel becomes angry. He reaches into his car and grabs a canister of gasoline pouring it all over Troy. Daniel tries to light a match but Troy gets away. This is an example of assault with a caustic chemical Penal Code section 244. Daniel intentionally or purposely threw gasoline on Troy. Daniel’s intentions were malicious because he unlawfully intended to inflict great bodily harm whether or not he was successful.
If either of the above elements is found lacking, there cannot be a conviction of assault with caustic chemicals under California Penal Code section 244. Be aware, however, that the crime can be a simple assault or another variation of the charge of assault.
Assault With Caustic Chemicals vs. Assault With a Deadly Weapon (ADW)
How does assault with caustic chemicals compare to assault with a deadly weapon? Let us be clear that assault with caustic chemicals does NOT require that there be bodily injury. There must merely be proof that the intent to cause injury existed at the time of the incident. Herein lies the difference between the two. While assault with a deadly weapon requires the existence of great bodily harm, for assault with caustic chemicals to exist there need not be bodily injury. All that is needed is for the chemical to intentionally and maliciously come into contact with the alleged victim’s person. This is true even if the amount of chemical that comes into contact with the alleged victim is insufficient to cause substantial harm. The injuries are not pertinent; the intention to injure is the focus.
Penalties For Assault With Caustic Chemicals
If you are charged with a violation of Penal Code section 244 you are being charged with a felony. It is a 2,3,4 crime which means that if you are convicted it carries a possibility of two years in state prison, three years in state prison, or four years in state prison, depending upon the discretion of the prosecution and the specifics of the case. Additionally, you may receive a fine of maximum of $10,000. Another potential penalty is formal probation.
Defenses For Assault With Caustic Chemicals
There are many avenues that the Criminal Law Office of Leah Legal can explore in developing a defense for an assault with caustic chemicals case. Obviously every case is different and the specific defense adopted will be tailored to your needs as a client. Your attorneyl will break down the specifics of your case and build a defense based on the facts and/or lack thereof. However, just to give you a general idea of what to expect when creating a defense with your attorney, common aspects to be present in a successful legal defense for such a case include:
Absence of Willful and Malicious Intent – Since the most important element of assault with caustic chemical is that the act must be committed willfully and maliciously, you may have a solid defense if these aspects are missing. If you did not willfully or maliciously bring a dangerous chemical into contact with the alleged victim you are not guilty. You must have willfully and maliciously utilized the dangerous chemical and brought it into contact with the alleged victim. Regardless of the seriousness of the injury resulting from the chemical, regardless of the presence of negligence or lack thereof, if you were not willfully malicious in your actions you cannot be convicted for assault with a caustic chemical under Penal Code section 244.
No Intent to Injure or Disfigure – Similar to the first defense of there being no willful or malicious intent, if you didn’t intend to cause the alleged victim bodily harm you are not guilty under Penal Code section 244 for assault with a caustic chemical. You cannot be convicted of assault with caustic chemicals if you did not intend to cause injury or disfigurement with a dangerous chemical.
Self-Defense/Defense of Others – If you did, in fact, willfully and maliciously intend to cause harm to another person by using a dangerous chemical, however you did so under the reasonable belief that your life or the life of someone else was in danger, or that you or someone else were in danger of being seriously injured in an unlawful manner, you cannot be found not guilty of assault with caustic chemicals under California’s Penal Code section 244. Here is an example of self-defense: Sam and Chris are cleaning the house. Chris accuses Sam of stealing from him and an argument ensues. Chris reaches for a baseball bat in the corner and swings it at Sam. Sam grabs a bottle of bleach from under the sink and pours it on Chris badly injuring him. Sam is not guilty of assault with a caustic chemical because his actions were justified and necessary within the parameters of self-defense. Chris attacked Sam with a bat and Sam defended himself with bleach.
Leah Legal Can Help!!!
If you or a loved one has any questions regarding the crime of assault with caustic chemicals or any of the assault crimes, please do not hesitate to call us. The Criminal Law Office of Van Nuys Criminal Attorney deals with cases such as these on a daily basis and understands that being charged in the criminal courts can have much greater and more far-reaching and devastating effects on your life than those laid out in the Penal Code. Call us so that you won’t have to face the charges alone.
BATTERY – CALIFORNIA PC 242
The crime of simple battery is a misdemeanor crime that is oftentimes heard together with the crime of assault. In reality the two are not the same crime at all. While the crime of assault is the unlawful attempt to commit a violent injury on someone else, California Penal Code section 242 defines the crime of battery as “any willful and unlawful use of force or violence upon the person of another.” In simple words, battery is the actual act of unlawfully hurting someone while assault is merely the attempt to do so. Battery, as defined by Penal Code section 242, is also referred to as simple battery.
In order to be found guilty of committing a battery, there are several elements that must be proven by the prosecution beyond a reasonable doubt:
Elements of Battery
- The person has to have harmfully or offensively touched another person, and
- The force was willful and unlawful.
Touching – What California Penal Code section 242 means by touching is actually more than what it sounds like. In addition to directly making contact with another person, such as by punching or kicking them, a touching also includes indirect contact. What does this mean? This means that causing another person to commit the touching on someone else or even causing an object to touch the other person is sufficient. If someone paints on someone else’s clothing, the paintbrush on the shirt or dress or pants can constitute a touching.
Harmful or Offensive – This is where the crime of battery gets really interesting. Penal Code section 242 merely requires that there be physical contact. There does not have to be an injury! This means that if, as mentioned above, someone touches another by painting something on his or her clothing, this can be a battery because the touching was offensive. Another example of touching someone else in an offensive manner would be by spitting on them. While spitting does not necessary rise to the level of a harmful touching, it would definitely qualify as the offensive or invasive touching necessary for a battery because it is rude and disrespectful to spit on someone. A further manner in which there can be a harmful or offensive touching is if you initiate a harmful or offensive touching to something that is connected to the person. If someone, for example, if someone is walking with a cane, and you push that cane from underneath them without actually touching a part of their body, this can be a battery.
Willfully – What does it mean for a person to commit an act willfully? It means that the person did the act intentionally or on purpose. Even if you didn’t mean to break the law or cause an injury to someone else, as long as you purposely committed the act you can be convicted of a battery. If Susan gets into an argument with Jessica and gets frustrated and throws an object against a wall but it misses and strikes Jessica instead, this is a willful act. She didn’t mean to strike her friend, but she did mean to throw the object.
Penalties for Battery
There are several variations of battery that you can be charged with depending upon the facts of your case. The penalties for each vary:
Simple battery (PC 242), as discussed above, is a misdemeanor crime that does not result in serious harm to another person. The potential penalties for this crime include informal or summary probation, a maximum of six months in county jail, and/or a maximum fine of $2,000.
Sexual battery (PC 243.4) is when someone unlawfully and willfully touches someone else in an unwanted intimate way, and the unlawful willful touching was inflicted in a harmful, offensive manner. Sexual battery is a wobbler, which means that it may be charged as either a felony or a misdemeanor at the prosecutor’s discretion and depending upon circumstances of the case. A misdemeanor sexual battery under Penal Code 243.4 can include a maximum of six months in county jail or one year in county jail. If convicted of felony sexual battery under Penal Code 243.4, you could face two years, three years or four years in state prison. Being convicted of sexual battery as either a misdemeanor or felony will result in the requirement of registering as a sexual offender.
Elder Abuse (PC 368) is abuse inflicted upon a person aged 65 and over. This crime can be charged as both Penal Code section 368 and Penal Code section 242. The crime of elder abuse is considered a “wobbler”, which means that it can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony depending upon the circumstances of the case as well by discretion of the prosecution. If convicted as a felony, potential penalties are two, three or fours years in state prison and a maximum fine of $6,000.
Domestic Battery (243[e][1]) is a type of battery that is committed against a spouse or former spouse, cohabitant or former cohabitant, fiancé or former fiancé, someone you’re dating or the parent of your child. This crime is a misdemeanor that carries a potential one-year in county jail, a maximum fine of $2,000 and a requisite domestic violence program.
Battery Causing Serious Bodily Injury (PC 243(d)) is when the battery that you commit causes serious injury to the victim. A serious bodily injury is one that results in any type of serious physical impairment, such as a broken bone. This crime is also known as aggravated battery and carries harsher consequences than simple battery. If charged as a misdemeanor, Penal Code 243(d) carries up to one year in county jail. If charged as a felony, you may be facing two, three or four years in state prison.
Battery on a Peace Officer (PC 243[b] and 243[c][2]) is the crime of battery committed against people of a certain occupation. Some of these occupations include, but are not limited to, peace officers, firefighters, lifeguards, security officers, process servers, animal control officers and doctors or nurses providing emergency care. Penalties increase to one-year county jail if there are no injuries, and 16 months, two years or three years if the crime becomes a felony.
Defenses for Battery
No one wants to be charged with a violent crime such as battery – much less convicted! Having a conviction on your record can cause significant and negative ramifications in your life that go far deeper than the actual penalties and fines. The Criminal Defense Law Office of Van Nuys Criminal Attorney will work hard on your behalf. Attorney Leah Naparstek is a seasoned criminal defense attorney who deals with crimes such as California battery cases on a daily basis. She will examine your case in its entirety and build a defense based on your specific circumstances.
Self-Defense/Defense of Others – One of the most common defenses is self-defense or the defense of others. This defense can be asserted when you reasonably believed you or someone else was in immediate danger of being touched unlawfully or suffering an injury, and you reasonably believed that you needed to use immediate force to defend yourself or someone else from harm. Please note that you cannot have used more force than necessary in defense. If Dan offensively tickles Sam, Sam’s pushing him away could be accepted as reasonable self-defense, while punching him in the face would not be.
Lack of Willfulness – Since one of the elements needed to prove battery is that the touching needs to be done on purpose, a defense would be to show that the act happened accidentally.
Parental Right to Discipline – There are many situations wherein parents are charged with child abuse (Penal Code section 273[d]), which is essentially a battery against a child. A defense against this type of battery charge would be to show that the parents acted well within their rights as parents to discipline their child – as long as the force wasn’t too extreme under the circumstances.
Battery causing serious bodily injury, Penal Code section 243(d), also referred to as aggravated battery, is a variation of simple battery (Penal Code section 242). The difference between the two is that with battery causing serious bodily injury your actions must have caused substantial bodily harm to the alleged victim. By the same token, in order for someone to be charged with battery causing serious bodily injury, he or she must first be in violation of Penal Code section 242, a simple battery.
Let’s review what constitutes a simple battery. In order to be found guilty of committing a battery, there are several elements that must be proven by the prosecution beyond a reasonable doubt:
Elements of Battery
- The person has to have harmfully or offensively touched another person
- The force was willful and unlawful.
For a successful conviction of a violation of aggravated battery Penal Code section 243(d), these two critical elements must be met. But in addition to the battery, the battery must have inflicted a serious bodily injury. So, in order to be found guilty of committing an aggravated battery, here are the elements that must be proven by the prosecution beyond a reasonable doubt:
Additional Element for Battery Causing Serious Bodily Injury
- The person has to have committed a simple battery (including a willful, unlawful, harmful or offensive touching), AND
- The victim suffered serious bodily injury as a result of the force used.
Here is more of an in-depth explanation for these elements:
Touching – What Penal Code section 243(d) means by touching includes even the most minor physical contact with another person, be it a direct or indirect contact. Making contact with another person, including through his or her clothing, is enough for a touching. And as long as the touching or contact causes an injury, it becomes an aggravated battery. Causing another person to commit the touching on someone else or even causing an object to touch the other person is sufficient as long as an injury results.
Harmful or Offensive – Penal Code section 243(d) requires that the touching be accomplished in a harmful or offensive manner. This includes any type of contact that is mean, disrespectful, rude, angry or violent, as long as the touching results in an injury. An example where the harmful or offensive element would NOT be met would be in a situation where Dan is so happy to see his friend Al after so many years and he shakes his hand and breaks it. While this is a willful touching that caused an injury, the handshake was done in friendship and cannot be considered harmful or offensive. Another harmful or offensive touching is when you use an offensive touching to something that is connected to the person. If someone, for example, is walking with a cane, and you push that cane from underneath them without actually touching a part of their body but causing them injury, this can be an aggravated battery under PC 243(d).
Willfully – What does it mean for a person to commit an act willfully? It means that the person did the act intentionally or on purpose. Even if you didn’t mean to break the law or cause an injury to someone else, as long as you purposely committed the act you can be convicted of a battery. If Susan gets into an argument with Jessica and gets frustrated and throws an object against a wall but it strikes Jessica and injures her, this is a willful act for aggravated battery. She didn’t mean to strike her friend, but she did mean to throw the object.
Serious Bodily Injury – According to California Jury Instructions CALCRIM 925, the legal definition of serious bodily injury is a “serious impairment of physical condition”. Such an injury may include, but is not limited to, loss of consciousness, concussion, bone fracture, protracted loss or impairment of function of any bodily member or organ, a wound requiring extensive suturing, and serious disfigurement. However, there can be a serious bodily injury that doesn’t fall into any of the above types and there can also be an injury that does fall into one of the types but isn’t that serious! As you can imagine, determining whether an injury is serious is not always a clear and straightforward question. Each particular case must be presented to a jury who looks at all of the evidence and decides whether or not there was serious bodily injury.
Lets say Dan and Glenn play hockey together on opposing teams. Dan’s team won and he and Glenn were outside talking after the game. Glenn was upset that Dan’s team won because he believed that Dan’s team had cheated. He storms out of the locker room and nudges Dan’s shoulder with his own, which causes Dan to lose his footing and slip on the damp locker room floor. When he falls, he hits his head on the locker and is knocked out with a concussion. Even though Dan is fine the very next day, Glenn could be charged and possibly convicted of a violation of Penal Code section 243(d) battery causing serious bodily injury if the jury finds that this concussion was a serious impairment.
Penalties for Battery
PC 243(d) battery causing serious bodily injury or aggravated battery is considered a “wobbler” crime and can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony depending on what the prosecutor decides. This means that it can wobble up to a felony or wobble down to a misdemeanor. What the prosecution looks at in making this determination is the seriousness of the facts of the case and the whether or not the defendant has a prior criminal history. Penalties will vary from case to case contingent on the specific circumstances. For instance, the penalty for a battery causing serious injury charge in a case where a gun was utilized by a previous violent offender may be different, and perhaps more serious, than that of a case in which a first time offender is being charged and the weapon is a pocket knife.
Penalties for an aggravated battery charged as a misdemeanor under Penal Code section 243(d) can include a maximum of one year in county jail and a maximum fine of $1,000. If convicted of a felony aggravated battery under Penal Code section 243(d), you could face felony probation, two years, three years or four years in county jail, and/or a maximum fine of $10,000. In addition to these penalties for an aggravated battery charged as a felony, you now cannot own firearms in the state of California.
Sentence Enhancement
Various crimes carry different sentence enhancements in certain situations wherein the normal circumstances of a specific crime has been exceeded and where the maximum penalty described within a specific Penal Code is too lenient for the crime committed. A sentence enhancement for Penal Code section 243(d) battery causing serious injury can be imposed when the jury finds that “great bodily injury” is present. The enhancement is an additional three to six years in state prison in addition to the penalty for aggravated battery.
While there is just a slight difference in the words serious bodily injury and great bodily injury, it can clearly make a huge difference in your sentence. Great bodily injury is defined as a significant or substantial physical injury and has a much higher injury threshold than serious bodily injury, which as defined above is a “serious impairment of physical condition”. In order to be convicted of a violation of Penal Code section 243(d) there must be a serious injury present such as a concussion or broken bone. However for a sentence enhancement for great bodily injury to be applicable there must be a more significant injury present.
Using the same example as above with hockey players Dan and Glenn: Glenn nudges Dan’s shoulder with his own which causes Dan to lose his footing and slip on the damp locker room floor. Here, however, in addition to Dan hitting his head and having a concussion, he also breaks his neck and is paralyzed for life. Glenn could now be charged and convicted of a violation of Penal Code section 243(d) assault causing serious bodily injury, AND receive a sentence enhancement for great bodily injury due to the magnitude of Dan’s injury.
Defenses for Battery Causing Serious Bodily Injury
When adopting a defense for battery causing serious injury case Ms. Naparstek will examine the case in its entirety and evaluate the specific elements that may be lacking in the prosecutors case. There are several common defenses that can be adopted.
Self Defense – Should you cause serious bodily harm upon another person in self-defense you cannot be found guilty of a violation of Penal Code section 243(d). However, you must have had a reasonable and justifiable fear that you or someone else was in immediate danger. Self-defense also requires that you had a reasonable belief that force was necessary to defend against that immediate danger and that you used only the force necessary to defend against it.
Non-Serious Injury – You cannot be charged with a violation of Penal Code section 243(d) if the injury caused was not actually serious. While the use of force inflicted does not need to be substantial, the injury caused by the force must be serious in order to be applicable for an aggravated battery.
Accidental Battery – Another defense is if the alleged aggravated battery was committed accidently. If you did not intentionally inflict force against another causing serious bodily injury you cannot be convicted of a violation of Penal Code section 243(d). Note, however, that you can still be charged and convicted of a simple battery if you cause harm to another regardless of the lack of intention. The difference with aggravated battery is that you must have intentionally and willfully inflicted force on another with the intention of causing that harm.
Battery On A Peace Officer – California Pc 243(B), 243(C)(2)
Battery on a peace officer is a very serious crime which can carry severe penalties. Most of the time it is charged as a misdemeanor. Under Penal Code sections 243(b) and 243(c)(2) there are several elements which must be proven by the prosecutor beyond a reasonable doubt in order for there to be a conviction of the crime of battery on a peace officer.
Elements of Battery on a Peace Officer
- The person has to have harmfully or offensively touched a peace officer or another protected person
- The touching was willful and unlawful
- When the defendant acted, he or she knew or should have reasonable known that the victim was a peace officer who was performing his or her duties
Let’s get into more detail about each and every element required for this crime:
Harmful or Offensive – Like all of the other types of battery, battery on a peace officer requires a harmful or offensive touching. And, as with the other battery crimes, Penal Code sections 243(b) and 243(c)(2) merely require that there be physical contact. There does not have to be an injury! This means that if someone unlawfully touches an officer or another protected person by slapping or shoving him without causing injury, this qualifies because the touching was offensive.
Willfully – What does it mean for a person to commit an act willfully? It means that the person did the act intentionally or on purpose. Even if you didn’t mean to break the law or cause an injury to a peace officer, as long as you purposely committed the act you can be convicted of a battery on a peace officer. If Sharon gets into an argument with a bailiff outside of the courtroom and gets frustrated and throws an object against the wall and it strikes the bailiff instead, this is considered a willful act. She didn’t mean to strike the bailiff, but she did mean to throw the object.
Peace Officer – What the Code means by battery on a peace officer is battery on anyone who is employed as a peace officer by a law enforcement agency. This could be police officers, Transit police, harbor police and sheriff department police, just to name a few. It can also refer to police officers who are in distinct police clothing working as security guards in private companies. But it doesn’t stop there! The laws for Penal Code sections 243(b) and 243(c)(2) also encompass many other types of professionals and public officers who don’t fall under the category of law enforcement but do fall under the category of protected person. Some include, but are not limited to EMTs, firefighters, lifeguards, security guards, animal control officers and doctors or nurses giving emergency care.
Knew or Should Have Reasonably Known – You can only be found guilty of committing a battery on a peace officer if you knew or should have known that the person was, in fact, a peace officer or another protected person. Now how can a person know if the alleged victim is part of such a protected class? What is examined first and foremost is whether the person is wearing a uniform or the type of clothing that gives away his/her status. When a female police officer is wearing cutoff shirts and a t-shirt in a store, it would unreasonable for someone involved in a scuffle with her to know that she is a policewoman.
Performing His or Her Duties – What does Penal Code section 243(b) and 243(c)(2) mean by the requirement that the peace officer be performing his or her duties when the alleged battery occurs? Just as is sounds. If Carson gets into a fight with Larry the lifeguard at a resort when they are both on vacation, and Larry the lifeguard was punched in the stomach, Carson cannot be convicted of Penal Code sections 243(b) and 243(c)(2) battery on a peace officer because it is clear that Larry was not performing his lifeguarding duties when the alleged battery occurred. Of course, Carson can be convicted of a simple battery if all the other elements for battery are met.
Penalties for Battery on a Peace Officer
Battery on a peace officer is filed as a misdemeanor. If convicted of a violation of Penal Code section 243(b) battery on a peace officer you could potentially receive summary probation, spend a maximum of one year in county jail and/or pay a maximum fine of $2,000.
If the battery on a peace officer results in an injury for which the peace officer needs professional medical treatment, it is a wobbler charge under Penal Code section 243(c). This means that you can be charged with either a misdemeanor or a felony at the discretion of the prosecutor. The prosecutor will look at all of the circumstances surrounding the case as well as the defendant’s prior criminal history, if any, and then decide how to file it. If the alleged battery of a peace officer results in an injury that requires that the officer be sent to the hospital for professional medical treatment, you could be on the hook for a felony battery on a peace officer. Be aware, though, that just because the officer doesn’t seek professional medical help for his injury does not mean that he didn’t receive a serious injury – it can still be filed as a felony.
When battery on a peace officer causing injuries is charged as a misdemeanor, the penalties are the same as battery on a peace officer without injuries. The only difference is that the maximum fine is now increased to $10,000 if the victim is a peace officer.
When battery on a peace officer causing injuries is charged as a felony, the possible consequences include felony probation, sixteen months, two years or three years to be served in county jail, and/or a maximum of $10,000.
Defenses for Battery on a Peace Officer
No one wants to be charged with a crime such as battery on a peace officer, much less convicted of one. Fighting these charges alone can be very scary and can have devastating effects on your life for a very long time. You need a competent and experienced attorney by your side working with you every step of the way. The Criminal Law Office of Van Nuys Criminal Attorney will aim to try and avoid these ramifications and will fight hard on your behalf.
Self-Defense – Should you inflict harm on a peace officer in self-defense or defense of others you are not in violation of Penal Code sections 243(b) or 243(c)(2). However, you must have a reasonable and justifiable belief that you or someone else was in immediate danger of receiving an unlawful touching or physical injury. This doesn’t include offensive words because words do not cause physical injuries. You also had to have had a reasonable belief that the force you used against the peace officer or protected person was necessary to defend yourself or another from that danger. Finally, you can only have used enough force that was reasonably necessary to protect yourself or another. If the force was clearly excessive, self-defense will not work in your case.
An example that illustrates how this defense can be used: Jessica is driving down the street in Hollywood. She is pulled over for no reason. The officer tells her to exit her vehicle and she repeatedly asks for a reason why but receives no response. Before Jessica can even open the door the officer yanks open the door and grabs her by the arm. Jessica pushes the officer away and the officer falls into his car. Jessica is not guilty of battery on a peace officer in violation of Penal Code sections 243(b) or 243 (c)(2) because the alleged battery on the peace officer was committed as an act of self-defense.
Lack of Willfulness – Since one of the elements needed to prove battery on a peace officer is that the touching needs to be done on purpose, a defense would be to show that the act happened accidentally.
Officer Wasn’t Engaged in His/Her Duties – Another possibly applicable defense is that the peace officer was not on duty. If the peace officer you allegedly committed battery against was not currently acting within his/her duties as a peace officer than you cannot be charged with a violation of Penal Code section 243(b) or 243(c)(2). In order to be convicted of battery against a police officer you must inflict injury upon a peace officer while they are acting out their duties as a peace officer. Additionally, when a peace officer arrests someone unlawfully, engages in police brutality or engages in an unlawful search and seizure, he or she is NOT considered to be performing their duties.
A domestic battery charge under Penal Code section 243(e)(1), is similar to that of a simple battery charge, with the alleged victim being the defendant’s intimate partner or cohabitant. In order for domestic battery Penal Code section 243(e)(1) to apply, the alleged victim and alleged defendant must be in or must have been in some sort of intimate or romantic relationship prior to the incident, or they must be current or former cohabitants within the residence. Domestic battery is a situation in which someone harmfully or offensively touched someone else in a willful and unlawful manner. As in simple battery, there is no requirement that injury be present as a result of the touching.
Here are all of the elements for Penal Code section 243(e)(1) domestic battery that must be proved by the prosecution beyond a reasonable doubt in order for there to be a conviction:
Elements of Domestic Battery
- The person has to have harmfully or offensively touched another person,
- The force was willful and unlawful, and
- The person that was touched was a current or former intimate partner
Touching – What Penal Code section 243(e)(1) means by touching is directly making contact with an intimate partner or cohabitant, such as by punching or kicking them, as well as indirect contact. This means that causing another person to commit the touching on an intimate partner or even causing an object to touch is sufficient.
Harmful or Offensive – Penal Code section 243(e)(1) merely requires that there be physical contact. There does not have to be an injury! This means that if someone touches an intimate partner or cohabitant by painting something on an article of clothing that he or she is wearing, this can be a domestic battery because the touching was offensive.
Another example of touching in an offensive manner is spitting. While spitting does not necessary rise to the level of a harmful touching, it definitely qualifies as an offensive or invasive touching necessary for domestic battery because it is rude and disrespectful to spit.
A further manner in which there could be a harmful or offensive touching in California is if you use offensive touch to something that is connected to the person. If, for example, an intimate partner or cohabitant is leaning on a stick, and you push the stick from underneath them without actually touching a part of their body, this could be grounds for a domestic battery.
Willfully – Willfully means that the person did the act intentionally or on purpose. Even if you didn’t mean to break the law or cause an injury to an intimate partner or cohabitant, as long as you purposely committed the act you can be convicted of domestic battery. If Bob got into an argument with his wife Jessica and became frustrated and threw his cellphone against a wall but it struck Jessica instead, this was a willful act. He didn’t mean to strike his wife, but he did mean to throw the object.
Intimate Partner – The person against whom you allegedly committed a battery must be someone you are or were engaged in an intimate relationship with. This could a husband or a wife (spouse), a person you are engaged to (fiancé), the parent of your child, someone you are currently dating or previously dated, or someone who you are living with (cohabitant). The term dating means frequent, intimate associations with someone that are primarily characterized by the expectation of affection or sexual involvement rather than financial considerations.
Under Penal Code section 243(e)(1), cohabitants refer to two unrelated persons living together for a substantial period of time, resulting in some permanency of the relationship. Factors that may determine whether people are cohabitating include, but are not limited to, sexual relations while sharing the same residence, sharing of income or expenses, joint use or ownership of property, the parties holding themselves out as husband and wife or domestic partners, the continuity of the relationship and the length of the relationship. Be aware that a person can cohabit simultaneously with two or more people at different locations during the same time frame if he or she maintains substantial relationships with each person and lives with each for significant periods.
Here is a domestic battery example: Rudy is renting a room from Daisy and the two begin dating shortly thereafter. One night the two of them get into a heated discussion about rent payment and Rudy becomes extremely upset. Rudy pushes Daisy and knocks her into a wall. This situation qualifies as a violation of domestic battery under Penal Code section 243 (e)(1) because Rudy and Daisy were cohabitants and were involved in a romantic relationship. Rudy willfully and unlawfully touched Daisy in a harmful manner by pushing her. Even if Daisy had suffered no injuries as a result of Rudy’s harmful touching, it would still be considered a domestic battery because injury is not required in order to be convicted of a violation of Penal Code section 243(e)(1).
Penalties for Domestic Battery
Domestic battery is charged as a misdemeanor and carries penalties of informal probation and/or a maximum of one year in county jail and a maximum fine of $2,000. Oftentimes the judge will suspend the sentence and grant probation together with the requirement that you complete a minimum of a 52 weeks batterer’s program. The judge can also order you to cover all of the victim’s costs incurred as a result of the crime, as well as pay a hefty fine to a battered women’s shelter. If you are convicted of Penal Code section 243(e)(1) for a second time or more, the judge will likely order you to spend a minimum of 48 hours in jail.
The crime of domestic battery carries further penalties for anyone who is dealing with immigration issues. Under federal law, the crime of domestic violence is one for which you can be deported if you are convicted. It is crucial you consult with an attorney such as Leah Naparstek of the Criminal Law Office of Leah Legal, who is experienced in both criminal defense and immigration consequences, before pleading guilty to a charge of domestic violence.
Defenses for Domestic Battery
No one wants to be charged with a crime such as domestic battery – much less be convicted! Having a conviction on your record can cause significant ramifications for you that go far deeper than the actual penalties and fines. The Criminal Defense Law Office of Leah Legal will work hard on your behalf. Attorney Leah Naparstek is an experienced criminal defense attorney who deals with California domestic battery cases on a regular basis. She will examine your case in its entirety and build a defense based on your specific circumstances.
Self Defense/Defense of Others – One of the most common defenses is self defense or defense of others. This defense can be asserted when you reasonably believed that you or someone else was in immediate danger of being touched unlawfully or suffering an injury, and you reasonably believed that you needed to use immediate force on an intimate partner or cohabitant to defend yourself or someone else from harm. Please note that you cannot have used more force than necessary in defense. If Donna offensively pushes Sam’s arm, Sam’s pushing her away in return could be accepted as reasonable self-defense, while punching her in the face would probably not be.
Lack of Willfulness – Since one of the elements needed to prove domestic battery is that the touching was done on purpose, a defense would be to show that the act happened accidentally. Gretchen is at a party with her boyfriend Noah. Gretchen befriends another guy that she just met that night and is having a conversation with him. She is laughing and having a good time when her boyfriend Noah comes over. Noah trips and falls and grabs Gretchen for balance. Instead of steadying himself he pulls her down with him. This does not rise to the level of domestic battery because the harmful touching of Gretchen was accidental.
Being Falsely Accused – False accusations of domestic violence often result when people in intimate or dating relationships get into arguments that spiral out of control because of anger, jealousy, vindictiveness and the desire for revenge. If this is the case, it can be very difficult to prove that in reality you were not guilty of committing the crime. Gretchen throws a party with her boyfriend Noah at their house. Gretchen befriends another man and is having a conversation with him. She is laughing and having a good time when her boyfriend Noah notices and gets upset. He is insanely jealous so he scratches himself on the cheek and calls the police once everyone leaves and tells them that Gretchen assaulted him in a drunken rage. The police examine Noah’s face and upon seeing the scratch they arrest her for domestic battery.
In the event you were falsely accused, you need a tough advocate such as Van Nuys Criminal Attorney at your side to help question witnesses and gather the evidence necessary to prove your innocence.
Domestic Violence & what you need to know
California law defines domestic violence as a criminal act between parties who are involved in a family or intimate relationship. This can include spouses, former spouses, cohabitants, former cohabitants, parents who share a child together, and dating partners. It may come as a surprise to know that many domestic violence victims are male, in spite of the widespread misconception that domestic violence victims are almost always female.
Domestic violence covers a wide range of abuse, including child endangerment, which is a separate charge. Any threatening or violent act, even if the accused did not intend to harm or compromise the safety and security of the victim, could be grounds for prosecution under California domestic violence laws.
Mandatory Arrest In California
Being that California is a mandatory arrest state when it comes to domestic violence, police are obligated to make an arrest if there is sufficient probable cause to do so. What this means is that if probable cause exists the arresting officer has no discretion as to whether to arrest you or not. If you are arrested for domestic violence, do not apologize to the alleged victim or make any statements to the police. Even if you are completely innocent, you cannot “talk your way” out of your situation once the police arrive on the scene. By speaking you are only helping the police find probable cause to arrest you…and it is not your job to make their job easier!
In the past, police officers could only make an arrest if they actually witnessed an act of domestic violence. Since the 1980’s, however, the law has allowed that the presence of visible injuries such as bruises or black eyes was sufficient probable cause to make an arrest. In more recent years, the mere assertion by a party that a domestic partner threatened or intimidated them can trigger an arrest. The courts defend this by arguing that probable cause involves something less than certainty but more than suspicion, and to the degree that a law enforcement official suspects that someone may be guilty of domestic violence, they have the right to make an arrest.
Types Of Domestic Violence Crimes
Domestic violence is a general term for a number of different crimes occurring between people in intimate relationships. The most common type involves battery, which is defined by California Penal Code Section 242 as the “willful and unlawful use of force or violence against the person of another”. Penal Code Section 243(e) states that when battery takes place between intimate parties it can be classified as domestic violence. Prosecutors can seek a conviction under Section 242(d) if the violence involved “serious bodily injury”; if there is a “corporal injury resulting in a traumatic condition” the relevant part of the Code is Section 273.5.
Domestic Violence Penalties
Courts in California take allegations of domestic violence extremely seriously. Certain domestic violence convictions can put an offender behind bars for up to four years and result in up to $6,000 in fines. Other less serious convictions can still result in prison terms of up to one year and fines of up to $2,000. Additional consequences may include mandatory counseling, losing the right to return home or to see one’s children, or parole or probation. The charges can be filed as a felony or misdemeanor depending on whether the victim sustained injuries, if prior abuse was reported or if the individual being charged has a criminal record.
Domestic Violence Defenses
Self-defense is the most common kind of defense in domestic violence cases. This means that you acted or threatened to act violently in order to protect yourself. Other common defenses in domestic violence cases include but are not limited to insufficient proof, the wrong suspect being arrested, the fact that the other partner consented to the violence or the allegations made against the defendant are deliberately false. Regardless of the specific facts in your case, you should speak with your domestic violence lawyer about your case before deciding on an approach to your criminal defense. You have nothing to gain and everything to lose from attempting to make excuses or explain yourself to police.
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we understand that relationships can be complex and are often times difficult. People argue and arguments frequently escalate. An unfounded charge of domestic violence can ruin more than just your reputation – it can put you behind bars for years and keep you from seeing your loved ones. Remember – if you are charged with a domestic violence crime, do not speak directly to the police or detectives. Nothing you can say will help you and can and will only be used against you. Even when the evidence against you may be overwhelming, a good domestic violence lawyer can often get your charges – and the consequences – significantly reduced. We can also help if you have been served with an emergency restraining order or protective order. Call Leah Legal today to schedule a free consultation about your domestic violence case.
For an attorney who will help you navigate through this difficult, emotionally charged process please call (818) 484-1100 for a free initial consultation.
In addition to the well known crime of trespass, the state of California has another crime of trespass called aggravated trespass. Aggravated trespass, under California Penal Code section 601, happens when you threaten to injure someone in a serious manner and you then unlawfully enter that individual’s home or place of employment within 30 days of making the threat with the intention of carrying out the threat that you made. Aggravated trespass is sometimes referred to as either felony trespass or trespass after making threats and is often closely connected with instances of domestic violence. It is also a crime that is frequently committed together with cases of stalking.
In order for the prosecution to be able to secure a conviction against someone for the crime of aggravated trespass under Penal Code section 601, he or she must be able to prove the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt.
Elements of Trespass
- A person made a credible threat to inflict serious bodily injury upon another person,
- The person intended to place the individual that was threatened in reasonable fear for his or her safety, or the safety of his or her immediate family member(s), and
- Within thirty days of making this threat, the person unlawfully entered into the residence of the individual’s home, or the real property next to the individual’s home, or the workplace of the individual’s home with the intent to execute the threat against the target of the threat.
Credible Threat – What California Penal Code section 601 means by reasonable threat is any type of threat that gives the alleged victim a reasonable belief that their safety or the safety of their immediate family member is in danger. The threat itself doesn’t have to be verbal. It can also be a written threat via letter, text, or email, or it can be a threat implicit in someone’s conduct or behavior. Daniel and Courtney broke up because Daniel had feelings for someone else. Courtney texted Daniel saying that she was going to get back at him for breaking her heart and that if she couldn’t have him no one could. Several days later Daniel was at the movies with his new girlfriend. As they were leaving, Courtney was walking in and she saw them. Upset, she pulled a switchblade out of her pocket and waved it at him. That night she showed up at his house and broke in while he was sleeping. Courtney may be charged with of a violation of Penal Code section 601 because she made a threat that would lead Daniel to believe that his or his new girlfriend’s life was in danger by both texting that she was going to get back at him and by her actions of brandishing the pocketknife at him. A reasonable person could infer from both of these actions that she threatened him. She then acted on that threat by breaking into his house in the attempt to inflict harm upon him.
Serious Bodily Injury – Serious bodily injury can mean causing someone damage to their physical condition in various different ways, including breaking or fracturing bones, causing a concussion or loss of consciousness, disfiguring someone, causing wounds that require surgery or stitches, or harming someone’s organs. Example: Jasmine and Sarah get into an argument after a heated game of basketball. Jasmine accuses Sarah of cheating and tells her she’ll do whatever it takes to get back at her. The next week while Sarah is asleep Jasmine breaks into her house and throws acid on her. Jasmine is guilty of a violation of Penal Code section 601 aggravated trespass because she made a threat that would lead a reasonable person to believe that their life or the life of someone else was in danger, and she acted on that threat by breaking into her house in an attempt to cause serious bodily harm.
Residence/Workplace – It is noteworthy to stress that a person cannot be convicted of violating of Penal Code section 601 aggravated trespass if he or she enters his or her own home or own workplace with the intention of carrying out a threat. If, for example, Victor is Robert’s boss and Victor tells Robert that he will not be working on the assignment he has spent months preparing for, and instead the new girl will take it over. Robert gets extremely upset and tells Victor that he is going to kill him for screwing him over. The next day at work Robert stabs Victor. Robert cannot be convicted of a violation of aggravated trespass pursuant to Penal Code section 601 because he did not trespass in order to carry out his threat. Note, however, that he can be convicted of other crimes in this instance, including assault with a deadly weapon or attempted murder.
Penalties for Aggravated Trespass
Even though as discussed above aggravated trespass is sometimes referred to as “felony trespass”, it is still a wobbler crime and can be charged as either a misdemeanor or felony crime. Whether it is charged as a felony or misdemeanor is at the discretion of the prosecution and largely depends on the seriousness of circumstances of the case as well the defendant’s criminal history. If you are convicted of a misdemeanor aggravated trespass Penal Code section 601, you are facing a one-year maximum in county jail and a maximum of $2,000 in fines. You may also be given misdemeanor or summary probation.
However, if you are convicted of aggravated trespass Penal Code section 601 as a felony, you are facing 16 months, two years or a maximum of three years served in county jail under the realignment program in the state of California. You can also be sentenced to a maximum of $10,000 in fines and formal probation. Perhaps most notable is that whether you are convicted of a misdemeanor or felony of this crime you will end up with a criminal record. The conviction will show up on criminal background checks and may prevent you from obtaining future employment.
Defenses for Aggravated Trespass
There are various offenses that the Criminal Law Office of Van Nuys Criminal Attorney can adopt when dealing with your aggravated trespass case.
Unreasonable Threat – The threat made against the alleged victim was not a reasonable or credible threat that would lead one to believe that their life of that of their family or loved ones was in danger.
No Intent to Carry Out Threat – Another defense for aggravated trespass Penal Code section 601 is if you had no intention of carrying out the threat that you made against the person. For instance, Tito made a joke about killing David if he won the poker game. David did not realize that this was just a joke and went to the police to report a threat. However, because Tito was joking and had no intentions of carrying out the threat he made, David was not in danger even though he was fearful after the statement was made.
No Intent to Carry Out Threat in Residence or Workplace – When you entered the residence or the workplace, you never intended to act upon a threat that you made earlier. You did not intend on acting upon the threat when you entered the person’s home or workplace. Example: Tammy and Patricia went out for drinks one night. After several drinks Patricia became extremely inebriated. Tammy told Patricia that she should stop drinking and go home. Patricia became angry and told Tammy she was going to kill her tomorrow at work. The next day when Patricia showed up at Tammy’s work Tammy called the police because she was afraid that Patricia was going to act on the threat she had made the night before. However, before the police arrived Patricia apologized to Tammy. Patricia had no intentions of acting on the threat she had made the night before when she came to Tammy’s work therefore she cannot be convicted of a violation of aggravated trespass under Penal Code section 601.
No Knowledge of Person’s Residence or Workplace – You may not have known that you were entering of the workplace of the person that you threatened.
Child abduction is a potentially serious criminal offense. It is frequently confused with the crime of kidnapping, but they are legally distinct. If charged with the crime of child abduction, it is in the defendant’s best interest to immediately retain the services of a knowledgeable and experienced law firm like Leah Legal. We have the ability to give you the best possible defense in a court of law.
What is Child Abduction?
Child abduction is the unlawful confining or taking away (also known as asportation) of a victim under the age of 18. This is done against the will of the victim and/or the victim’s legal guardians. The act of confining said victim can also include detaining and/or concealing them. Child abduction does not necessarily consist of a forceful act as the perpetrator may entice the child away. In this scenario, the child willingly goes with the perpetrator, although it is under a false pretense and is still considered to be child abduction under California law.
It is specifically delineated under California Penal Code 278 PC. It can also be referred to as “child theft” or “non-custodial detainment”. Penal Code 278 PC is violated if a person willfully and maliciously takes away or hides a child from their legal guardian. The person committing the crime must have no right of custody over the child.
The crucial issue at the heart of any child abduction case is the question of right of custody. This is the legal concept by which a parent has physical care, control, and custody of a child under their supervision. Please note that under California law, a parent is automatically a legal guardian unless their parental rights have been limited or otherwise revoked. Right of custody can be granted to a person by way of a court order, such as a court-appointed legal guardian or an adopted parent.
Essentially, custody of a child includes a variety of legal obligations that must be followed. Willfully violating another person’s obligations by taking away or hiding the child from them will trigger a charge of Penal Code 278 PC. Please note that a charge of child abduction does not necessarily include moving the victim any distance from their legal guardian. Willfully hiding the child may be enough to trigger a charge.
What are the Two Types of Child Abductions?
Child abduction crimes can be essentially distilled down into two types:
- Abduction by a family member. This is also known as parental child abduction if the offending party is the parent of said child. This usually occurs when one or both parents have had their custodial and parental rights revoked or curtailed as a result of a judge’s ruling in family court.
- Abduction by a stranger. Although these types of abductions garner a tremendous amount of media coverage and sensationalized stories, they actually make up a small percentage of abductions nationwide. The vast majority of child abduction cases are perpetrated by a family member, either immediate or extended.
Revocation of parental rights is usually the result of child neglect and/or abuse. Even if the perpetrator is the biological parent of the child in question (which grants them a natural right to custody), the process of having parental rights revoked or limited suspends this right. It is important to note that though family court is a civil-circuit court, the judge’s orders are still legally binding and do carry legal consequences if violated. Due to a variety of factors, a family court judge can essentially determine a parent’s right of custody.
Abduction by a stranger is rarer. When it does happen, it is usually as a form of extortion to extract a ransom from the legal guardians. In some cases, it occurs when the perpetrator wants to adopt a child but does not go through the usual legal avenues and instead steals a child from the lawful legal guardians.
Is Child Abduction a Misdemeanor or Felony?
Child abduction is a criminal offense because it is part of the California Penal Code. This means that a prosecuting agency, usually the county District Attorney (DA), will pursue charges against the defendant. If said defendant does not plead out, then the case will go to trial in a criminal-circuit court in front of a jury.
Child abduction is the kind of criminal offense that is colloquially referred to as a wobbler. This means that depending on the specifics of the case, and the defendant’s potential criminal history, it can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony. Ultimately the DA will decide on how to pursue the charges.
If convicted of misdemeanor child abduction, then the defendant may face up to one year in a county correctional facility and a fine of up to $1,000. If the defendant is convicted of felony child abduction, then they may face two, three, or four years in a California state prison and a fine of up to $10,000.
The sentence for the crime would be determined by a judge at a sentencing hearing. There are various factors that may either increase or decrease the potential sentence. If the child was returned without any harm and the defendant worked with law enforcement to return the child, then these would be considered mitigating factors. These mitigating factors would generally result in a lighter sentence.
If behavior during the commission of the crime causes the judge to impose a harsher sentence, these are known as aggravating factors. In child abduction convictions, some aggravating factors include not returning the child, the child possibly being harmed or injured, the threat of violence against the victim or legal guardian, the actual use of violence against the victim or legal guardian, fleeing the country with the child, and changing the appearance of the child in an attempt to evade capture. If any of these aggravating factors are met, then the judge will likely impose the harshest sentence possible.
Because searching for a child is expensive for law enforcement, the judge may also order the defendant to reimburse the prosecuting entity and/or victim for any costs that may have accumulated due to the manhunt.
What is Parental Child Abduction?
Parental child abduction is the most common type of child abduction. It has a separate charge and is formally delineated under California Penal Code 278.5 PC. The formal charge is “deprivation of custody of a child or right to visitation”. This offense is considered less serious than child abduction because in these cases the perpetrator has some legal basis to claim the right to custody of the child.
Penal Code 278.5 frequently occurs during divorces that have become hostile and embittered. If there is a formal custody agreement as a result of the divorce settlement, then it means it was signed off on by the family court judge. In doing so, the judge granted right of custody to each parent with stipulations.
That means that if it is one parent’s designated visitation time and the other parent forcefully takes away or hides the child, then they are in violation of the custody agreement and in violation of the right of custody stipulations. These types of abductions can be perpetrated for any number of reasons, but are most usually a form of vengeance against a former spouse.
There are unfortunate cases in which one parent abducted a child or the children and fled the country with them. A court order from a judge is the most effective preventative measure against these types of child abductions. It can contain various provisions, including:
- Prohibiting either parent from traveling internationally with the child.
- Requiring that either parent provides specific dates for the beginning and end of a visit.
- Requiring one parent, usually the one without primary custody, to have supervised visits.
- Requiring one or both parents to get approval from the judge to travel internationally with the child.
- Requiring the court or a third party that is neutral to keep the relevant documents, including passport, for the child.
It is also prudent to implement a Children’s Passport Issuance Alert Program (CPIAP). This will alert either parent if an application for a child’s United States passport has been filed.
The punishment for violating Penal Code 278.5 is nearly the same as violating Penal Code 278 (child abduction), except that when convicted as a felony the defendant may face 16 months, two years, or three years as opposed to two, three, or four years in a state penitentiary.
Other Charges Related to Child Abduction
Kidnapping and child abduction are related charges, although they are legally distinct and kidnapping is a great deal more serious. Child abduction can legally be considered a type of kidnapping. However, the crucial difference is that kidnapping is treated as a criminal offense against the person being kidnapped whereas child abduction is considered a criminal offense against both the child and the legal guardians of said child.
Kidnapping is delineated in sections 207 to 209.5 of California Penal Code and it occurs when the perpetrator uses force or threats to move the victim (either an adult or a child) a “substantial distance”. This substantial distance is formally defined as moving the victim to another country, state, county, or elsewhere in the same county. Furthermore, using “force or fear” means that the perpetrator actually used violence or threatened the victim with imminent violence. This is, for example, very distinct from a charge of child abduction, whereby the perpetrator may merely entice or conceal the child.
A kidnapping charge can become “aggravated kidnapping” if the following conditions are met:
- The victim is less than 14 years old.
- A ransom is demanded.
- The perpetrator inflicts death or bodily harm on the victim.
- The kidnapping occurs during the commission of a carjacking (California Penal Code 215 PC).
A simple kidnapping charge can result in a sentence of up to 8 years in a state penitentiary. However, aggravated kidnapping is an extremely serious crime, and can carry a sentence of 5 years to life.
Furthermore, child abduction charges sometimes include the confinement of the victim. This could potentially trigger the related charge of false imprisonment (California Penal Code 236 PC). This crime is committed when the perpetrator knowingly limits and/or inhibits another person’s freedom and/or their ability to move.
A simple false imprisonment charge is a misdemeanor. However, if the perpetrator uses any form of violence, as well as fraud and/or deceit, then it can rise to the level of felony false imprisonment. This crime can carry a sentence of up to 3 years in a state penitentiary.
A charge known as “contributing to the delinquency of a minor” (California Penal Code 272 PC) can be pressed against the perpetrator if they have no substantial relationship with the child that they abduct. If the perpetrator makes the attempt to establish a relationship for the purpose of persuading, enticing, luring, or transporting (or attempting of any of these actions), then they may be found guilty of Penal Code 272 PC.
The perpetrator must also have willfully avoided the consent of the child’s legal guardians for the charge to apply. The DA can pursue it as a misdemeanor or even as an infraction. Under California law, an infraction is the least serious offense that a citizen can commit. It only consists of a fine and no possibility of incarceration and/or probation. Traffic tickets, for example, are examples of infractions.
If the defendant wishes to plead out with the DA and accept a lesser charge, then contributing to the delinquency of a minor is the most frequent charge that they accept. It is a common tactic by defense attorneys and may be the best course of action, depending on the specifics of the case and the evidence that the DA may have.
Possible Legal Defenses to a Child Abduction Charge
As mentioned above, the single most important factor in a child abduction case is the right to custody: who has the right to custody and when? These are the specifics of the case that will be extensively examined. If the defendant is a legal guardian to the child, then the defense team can argue that they had every legal right to take the child (or children) without the other parent’s consent. It is well within any parent’s right to take their children anywhere they please without having to inform anyone, as long as they were not taking the children with criminal intent or for some criminal purpose.
In these scenarios, however, the defendant may still face the less serious charge of contributing to the delinquency of a minor (California Penal Code 272 PC) if, in the process of moving their children, they physically harmed the children, severely emotionally abused the children, and/or were guilty of criminal negligence. This negligence occurs when the parent in question fails to provide the child with basic needs, including shelter, food, clothing, and medical care.
The defense may also argue that the defendant took the child from someone who had no legal custodial right over the child. In this scenario, the person who initially had the child was not the legal guardian of the child. If this is the case, then Penal Code 278 cannot be violated and the crime of child abduction never took place. This is a tricky defense, however, and depending on the specific circumstances of the case, it may still make the defendant vulnerable to other charges (like kidnapping).
In order to secure a conviction for child abduction, the DA must prove that the defendant acted maliciously. If the defendant had a reasonable belief that the child’s legal guardian may inflict harm on the child and that this harm was imminent, they could successfully argue that they had the legal right to remove the child from the possibility of said harm.
In fact, the DA has to prove every element of the case “beyond a reasonable doubt”. As a result, a frequently successful defense tactic is to cast doubts in the minds of the jurors by attacking specifics of the DA’s case. This may include poking holes and undermining eyewitness testimony. The defense may also make the convincing argument that the defendant is a victim of false accusations. If there is a contentious divorce related to the child abduction charges, this is a powerful argument to make. The defense can tell the jury that the defendant is merely the victim of a vendetta by their former spouse.
In certain cases, there may not be enough evidence to secure a conviction. The DA may know this and will try to offer the defendant a deal, but a skilled defense attorney could potentially see through that and advise their client on how best to proceed. If the attorney feels that the DA’s case is weak enough, they may push for a trial and secure an acquittal.
How to Find a Criminal Lawyer Near Me
Facing criminal charges can be a terrifying experience. Most people never have to go through it. If you are one of the unlucky ones, however, then you need a defense team in your corner that can give you the best legal counsel available. There are so many traps and potential pitfalls and you need someone like Van Nuys Criminal Attorney; we have the requisite experience, knowledge, and verve. If you are in Los Angeles or Southern California and are facing these charges, then call our Los Angeles Criminal Lawyer at 818-484-1100. Tell us your side of the story and let’s get started today!
California Penal Code section 273(d) covers the crime of inflicting physical punishment on a child and is generally referred to as child abuse. Child abuse is an extremely serious offense and is treated very unforgivingly within the justice system. In order to be convicted you must have acted willfully and intentionally to harm a child. Additionally, you must have actually harmed the child, causing him or her trauma, and the harm that you inflicted has to have been done in a manner that was not a part of reasonable discipline of the child. Spanking your child is not illegal; even spanking your child with an object can also not be considered illegal. However, spanking your child with or without an object is not legal if the spanking was not reasonable discipline. Also, if you spank your child with or without an object – for no reason – you are not within your rights to discipline your child. It is these differences that separate discipline from child abuse under Penal Code section 273(d).
In order for someone to be convicted of child abuse, the prosecution has to be able to prove each and every element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.
Elements of Child Abuse
- The person willfully inflicted cruel or inhuman corporal (physical) punishment or injury on a child,
- The infliction of the punishment or injury resulted in a traumatic condition to the child.
Willfully – This means that the person did the act intentionally or on purpose. Even if you didn’t mean to break the law or cause injury to a child, as long as you purposely committed the act you can be convicted of child abuse. Carolyn is 12 years old. She comes home from school five minutes late and her stepmother becomes extremely angry. She throws her backpack out of the car and it strikes Carolyn leaving a bruise on her arm. Her stepmother has willfully committed the act because while she may not have intended to strike Carolyn she did intend to throw her backpack.
Child – For the purpose of this code section a child is any person under the age of 18 years. As soon as his or her 18th birthday begins he is no longer considered a “child”. Don’t be fooled by size though! The under 18 rule holds true even if a parent or stepparent is smaller in size than the minor child.
Traumatic Condition – What is the meaning of a traumatic condition? Penal Code section 273(d) defines a traumatic condition as a wound or other bodily injury, whether minor or serious, caused by the direct application of physical force. The injury causes a traumatic condition if the traumatic condition is the natural and probable consequence of the injury, if the injury was a direct and substantial factor in causing the condition, and if the condition would not have occurred without the injury.
Be aware in assessing whether or not a traumatic condition has resulted that there doesn’t have to be a major wound or scarring as the word trauma might insinuate. In fact, any condition as minor as a cut or a scratch rises to the level of traumatic condition for the purpose of this statute.
Cruel or Inhuman Corporal Punishment – Any type of physical punishment such as choking, pushing, hitting, kicking, slapping, punching, shaking, or throwing something at a child can be considered cruel and inhuman punishment. Reasonable spanking to discipline is different.
Prior Acts of Child Abuse May Be Admissible – When you are being prosecuted for the crime of child abuse under Penal Code section 273(d), the prosecutor may seek to introduce prior accusations that you committed child abuse – even if you were never actually convicted of such crime. The prosecutor can even try to admit prior domestic violence accusations or charges to show that you have a propensity towards violence! This is a very narrow exception to the general rule that prior acts evidence is not admissible in a current criminal case because it can be too prejudicial for the jury. Before such evidence is allowed in, however, the judge will consider how prejudicial such information might be to the jury and how long ago the alleged prior act occurred. It is extremely crucial that you have an experienced attorney at this juncture of your case to convince the judge not to allow such evidence.
Penalties for Child Abuse
The crime of child abuse under Penal Code section 273(d) is considered a wobbler. This means that you can be charged with either a misdemeanor or a felony child abuse crime depending on the seriousness of the case and whether or not you have a prior criminal history. This decision is made at the prosecutor’s discretion. Whether charged as a misdemeanor or felony, child abuse is a serious offense and is treated as such within the justice system. If convicted of misdemeanor child abuse you are facing a maximum of one year in county jail and a maximum fine of $6,000. If convicted of child abuse as a felony, you can receive get a maximum sentence of two four, or six years in county jail. There is also a maximum fine of $6,000. Furthermore, if you are convicted of child abuse wherein the child suffered a very serious injury, you will now have a strike on your record.
Probation can be imposed for either misdemeanor or felony charges. This can be instead of the other penalties or in addition to them. Probation will likely be for a minimum of three years with the requirement that you attend a minimum 52-week counseling program for child abuse. The judge may also order a criminal protective order which means that you will have to stay away from the alleged child victim.
The judge will also take into consideration whether or not you were previously convicted of California Penal Code 273(d). If you have any priors that occurred less than ten years ago or if you served jail time for any other felony crime in the past ten years you can receive a sentence enhancement of an additional 4 years.
Defenses for Child Abuse
Your reputation, freedom, family life and professional career are all on the line when you are convicted of a child abuse crime. Child abuse charges require both urgency and sensitivity because aside from the penalties, having your child taken away from you is nothing short of devastating. It is therefore crucial that you have a competent and compassionate defense attorney as your voice. Leah Naparstek of the Criminal Law Office of Van Nuys Criminal Attorney is not only an attorney; she is a mother, confidante, and advocate for you and your child’s rights during the case proceedings. Here are several common defenses that can be utlized:
Injury Caused by Something Other Than Abuse – If the injury detailed within the allegation of child abuse was a result of something other than child abuse you cannot be charged with a violation of Penal Code section 273(d). If this is the case Attorney Leah Naparstek can present evidence of it being an accident to the prosecutor and judge. Children play and fall and wrestle with one another and are constantly getting hurt. Example: Samantha and Emily were at the park playing on the jungle gym. Samantha jumped onto Emily’s back and Emily fell into the jungle gym hitting her eye. The next morning she woke up with a black eye. At school the teacher asked her what happened and she told her the story. The teacher sent her to the counselor where Emily explained the story again. Both the teacher and counselor thought the story was untrue and they called child protective services. A social worker came and determined that Emily was unsafe; she was placed in a foster home and her stepfather was arrested. Her stepfather did nothing wrong, and the story that Emily told the teacher, counselor, and the social worker was disregarded. Emily’s stepfather cannot be convicted of child abuse because Emily’s injuries came from an accident on the playground not him. A good lawyer must find the evidence to prove his innocence by questioning relevant witnesses and by thoroughly investigating the incident.
Injury Was an Accident – This defense applies when a parent causes an injury to a child but the act was not willful, rather it was the result of an accident caused by the parent. The accident, however, can not have occurred because of extremely aggressive behavior on the part of the parent. Example: Toby and his mother were at the playground. Toby was going down the slide over and over, running to the top of the slide and throwing himself down it. At the top of the slide he lost his balance and fell down the slide. Toby’s mom grabbed him so he wouldn’t fall and accidently scratched him. This is not a case of child abuse, Toby’s mother did not intend on injuring him. It was simply an accident.
False Accusations – Being falsely accused of child abuse under Penal Code section 273(d) is very common – especially in cases where there are divorce and custody issues. Jealousy, anger and even revenge can precipitate a charge of child abuse. If you did not inflict abuse upon a child and the allegations were made falsely, your attorney can present the actual facts in order to prove your innocence.
Parent Discipline – If you are acting within your rights to discipline your child, you cannot be convicted of child abuse. Child abuse only exists when the punishments are cruel or unusual. When Daniel is throwing a temper tantrum at the store, his mother grabbed him by his arm and smacked him lightly on his rear end telling him to stop. Daniel squirmed around trying to get his arm out of his mother’s grasp. The next day at school Daniels teacher asked him how he got the bruise on his arm and he tells her his mom did it. Child protective services were called and his mother was charged. She cannot be convicted of child abuse because it is not illegal to spank your child and the bruise was a result of Daniels squirming trying to get away from his mother. His mother was within her rights to discipline him.
The crime of child endangerment under California Penal Code section 273a is similar to child abuse but specifically refers to the infliction of mental suffering upon a child or allowing a child to be in a situation that is inherently dangerous. Be advised that the child does not have to actually suffer harm. If a child has access to a loaded gun in your home you can be charged with child endangerment under Penal Code section 273a even if the child wasn’t injured and never even touched the gun. If you’re driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs with a child in your car and you get pulled over, you can be charged with not only a DUI but also child endangerment. This is true even if there was no accident and the child was not hurt. Just the fact that a child was put in an inherently dangerous situation is sufficient for the charge. As can be expected, prosecutors take cases involving children very seriously because child victims are particularly vulnerable. Consequences can be very devastating. Like many crimes, child endangerment is a wobbler crime and can be charged as a misdemeanor or felony. If you are convicted of felony child endangerment charge, you could go to state prison and even receive a strike on your record. But far more devastating is that your child can be taken from you and put in a foster home.
At the same time, child endangerment under Penal Code section 273a is one of those crimes that many innocent people are accused of – and tragically many of them convicted. It could be that someone else other than you had responsibility for the child at the time. If could also be that someone else might have created the danger for the child and you weren’t even aware of it. It could even be that you actually took ample steps to protect the child but the police are blowing the incident way out of proportion.
Let us now take a look at the elements of the crime. In order for the prosecution to secure a conviction of child endangerment, he or she must prove the following elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.
Elements of Child Endangerment
- A person willfully inflicted physical, mental or emotional harm to a child, or
- The person willfully caused or allowed a child to suffer physically, mentally or emotionally for no justifiable reason, and acted with criminal negligence, or
- The person willfully caused harm to a child in their care, and acted with criminal negligence, or
- The person willfully caused a child to be put in a dangerous situation, and acted with criminal negligence.
In addition to one of the above elements, the person must not have acted while he or she was reasonable disciplining his or her child. Also, if the crime is charged as a felony, the prosecution must show that the person acted in a way that was likely to cause the child great bodily harm or death.
Willfully – This means that the act was done intentionally or on purpose. What it does not mean, however, is that the person acted with the intent to break the law or cause harm to the child.
Criminal Negligence – Criminal negligence is an act that is so reckless and shows such a lack of concern for human life that an ordinary reasonable person would never have acted this way in the same situation.
Physical, Mental or Emotional Harm With No Justifiable Reason – This means that the harm or suffering that the person inflicted upon the child wasn’t reasonably necessary and was extreme under the circumstances. If a mother runs and pushes her child to the ground out of the way of oncoming traffic while he was crossing the street, and the child breaks his arm as a result, this is considered physical harm that is most likely reasonably necessary to save his life. This would not be considered child endangerment under Penal Code section 273a.
Great Bodily Harm – The type of harm that amounts to great bodily harm of a child is decided on the basis of each individual case. As mentioned above, the child doesn’t actually have to suffer from an injury. Rather, the issue is whether or not the act placed the child in a situation where he or she was likely to suffer harm. Obviously, the more serious the harm or injury to the child, the more seriously the charges will be filed.
Penalties for Child Endangerment
Penalties and sentencing for a conviction of a violation of Penal Code section 273a vary from case to case and very much look to whether the person who committed the act of endangering a child did so with the risk of causing the child great bodily harm or death. If the circumstances included the risk of death or great bodily harm to a child than the crime is considered a wobbler in the state of California. This means that it can be charged as a misdemeanor or a felony. The prosecutor will look to the specific facts and circumstances surrounding the incident, as well as the defendant’s prior criminal history in determining how to file the case.
Great Bodily Harm or Death Present
If the circumstances surrounding your case show that the child was in danger of great bodily harm or death the case may be considered a wobbler. This means that the prosecution may charge you with either a felony or a misdemeanor depending upon the circumstances surrounding the case. If charged with felony child endangerment you may face two years in state prison, four years in state prison, or six years in state prison, a maximum fine of $10,000, and/or a minimum of four years on formal probation which would include the mandatory probation conditions that are explained below under misdemeanor probation. A conviction of felony child endangerment will also result in a strike on your record. Furthermore, if the child was actually injured and not merely at risk for great bodily harm you could receive an additional and consecutive prison term of three to six years. If the child was killed either because of your criminal negligence or your abuse you could face an additional and consecutive four years in state prison. Be aware that in this situation it is quite possible that you could also be charged with murder or manslaughter.
No Bodily Harm Present
If you are convicted of a violation of child endangerment under Penal Code section 273a where there was no risk of bodily injury then it is likely that your crime will be a misdemeanor. Misdemeanor child endangerment charges carry the possibility of a maximum of 6 months in county jail, a maximum fine of $1,000, and/or informal misdemeanor probation for a minimum of four years. If you are on misdemeanor probation you might face additional probationary conditions, which include protective orders to protect the victim by barring you from having any contact, completion of a child abuser treatment program, and alcohol and substance abuse classes if alcohol or drugs played a part in the original crime.
Defenses for Child Endangerment
While this particular crime carries quite severe consequences, there are several defenses that the Criminal Law Office of Van Nuys Criminal Attorney can adopt while defending a case such as child endangerment under Penal Code section 273a.
False Accusations – The most common defense is false accusation. We oftentimes see in child endangerment cases that false accusations are made because of anger, jealousy or the desire for revenge. It is a well-known occurrence during custody disputes and other such family court battles that one of the parties brings about false accusations against another in an attempt to get a leg up in the court case. If that happens, your attorney can investigate, collect and present all such exculpatory evidence to the prosecution and the judge.
Lack of Willfulness – Another defense that may be used is that the endangerment to the child was not done intentionally. Accidents do happen – however unfortunate they may be – and the mere existence of an accident does not necessarily mean you are guilty of a violation of Penal Code section 273a. Should a child be injured or harmed in some way by accident and through no willful intent of your own, you cannot be charged with child endangerment because a successful conviction for the violation of Penal Code section 273a can only occur if you acted willfully and intentionally to inflict harm on the child.
Parent Discipline – If the alleged act of abuse was an action taken within your reasonable right as a parent to discipline your own child you cannot be charged with child endangerment. A parent or guardian has a legal right to discipline their child. However, the right to discipline your child does not grant you the right to mistreat or abuse your child under the guise of disciplinary action. If Ms. Naparstek can provide evidence showing that the alleged act of child endangerment was actually within a reasonable disciplinary measure taken then you cannot be convicted of a violation of child endangerment Penal Code section 273a.
There are many different types of loving parents in the world. Some parents discipline their children in a soft, forgiving and patient manner, whereas certain others ascribe to the philosophy that stern discipline is a better approach. Either way is acceptable in the State of California, as a parent is generally allowed to raise a child in whatever manner he or she chooses as long as long as the child is not abused or endangered. Whatever the viewpoint in parenting, however, a parent may never fail to provide their child or children with the basic necessities of care. In the event of such absence of care toward your child, you may be charged with the crime of child neglect, or “failure to provide” ua
There are many different types of loving parents in the world. Some parents discipline their children in a soft, forgiving and patient manner, whereas certain others ascribe to the philosophy that stern discipline is a better approach. Either way is acceptable in the State of California, as a parent is generally allowed to raise a child in whatever manner he or she chooses as long as long as the child is not abused or endangered. Whatever the viewpoint in parenting, however, a parent may never fail to provide their child or children with the basic necessities of care. In the event of such absence of care toward your child, you may be charged with the crime of child neglect, or “failure to provide” under California Penal Code section 270 PC. In contrast to the similar crimes of child endangerment and child abuse, the crime of child neglect under Penal Code section 270 is one that can be committed by a parent who has hardly any contact or absolutely no contact with the child whatsoever. Failure to provide for a child or neglect of a child is committed when you, the parent or legal guardian of a minor child under the age of eighteen, willfully and intentionally fails to provide basic necessities for your child.
In order to be convicted of the crime of Penal Code section 270, the prosecution must establish and prove beyond a reasonable doubt the following elements of the crime:
Elements of Child Neglect
- The person charged with the crime is the parent of the child,
- The child is a minor, under the age of eighteen, and
- The parent willfully and unlawfully failed to provide necessities of care for the child.
Parent – What the Penal Code is referring to by “parent” is even an unmarried or divorced mother or father of a child who may not have any custody rights to the child. If your case goes to trial, and the jury hears that the child was born to the mother during the time she was living with someone, the jury is permitted to make the presumption that that “someone” is the father of the child. This is even true if the mother had multiple partners at the time that could theoretically also be the father of the child.
Necessities – Under the California Penal Code section 270 crime of child neglect, necessities include food, shelter, clothing or medical care for the child. This also includes spiritual or religious care, which can mean providing alternative medical care for the child if that is in line with the parents’ beliefs. Here is an example that makes it clearer: Robin and Carolyn are twelve years old. Their stepfather tells them that they must sleep outside in the backyard because they didn’t do their chores properly. He makes them sleep on the ground with no blankets. He tells them that they have to shower with the hose and that they will only receive one meal a day. This is an example of Penal Code section 270 child neglect on both the part of the mother and stepfather. They both had the ability to provide all of the necessities and chose to withhold them from both children in a cruel and unusual manner.
Willfully – This means intentionally or on purpose.
Unlawfully – One of the elements of Penal Code section 270 for child neglect is that there be no lawful excuse for having failed to provide necessities for a child. This means that if you have the ability you must try and find gainful employment so that you earn sufficient amount of money to pay for the necessities for your children. The failure to provide is not unlawful if you put forth a reasonable effort to find employment but are unsuccessful. Be aware that if you do have the money for your child’s necessities but choose to spend it on other things, the failure to provide will be considered unlawful. Example: Frankie has two sons. He and his wife divorced and his wife was granted full custody. Frankie was recently fired from his job and is searching for new employment. He loses his car and home and is staying in homeless shelters. His ex-wife, however, does not believe him and she takes him to court where he is eventually charged with failure to provide. During the court proceedings he was able to obtain gainful employment, but he chose to fly to Vegas and go on a drinking and gambling binge instead of providing for his children. This behavior is unlawful as it pertains to Penal Code section 270.
Additionally, you are not excused from your responsibilities of providing for your children when the other parent has the ability to do so. Even if the child is currently being cared for, you are still responsible for taking care of your child. Here is an example which depicts this scenario: Example: Frankie has two sons. He and his wife divorced and his wife was granted full custody. Frankie was recently fired from his job and is searching for new employment. He loses his car and home and is staying in homeless shelters. His wife takes over the full responsibility of making sure everything is taken care of for their children. She supports them alone for a while but she soon meets another man and gets married. The man she marries is wealthy and the children want for nothing. Frankie now feels no need to contribute as the children were well taken care of. He believed that he had no legal obligation, however, his ex-wife knew otherwise. She takes him to court and he was charged and convicted of a violation of Penal Code section 270.
Penalties for Child Neglect
Failure to provide/child neglect under Penal Code section 270 is considered a wobbler crime. This means that the prosecution can file your case as either a misdemeanor or a felony depending on the specific facts and circumstances involved. If you are convicted of a violation of Penal Code section 270, you may receive a maximum of one year in county jail, summary probation, and a maximum fine of $2,000. Penalties can be increased if there are previous cases in which you have been charged and convicted of a violation of child neglect.
Defenses for Child Neglect
If you or a loved one is being investigated for having committed the crime of child neglect under Penal Code section 270, or if you have already been charged with the crime, it is imperative that you seek help immediately. As a compassionate and aggressive criminal defense attorney, Leah Naparstek of the Criminal Law Office of Van Nuys Criminal Attorney has handled such cases and understands both the sensitive and urgent nature of this type of crime. Ms. Naparstek is held in high regard throughout the court system as an advocate who is dedicated and passionate about each and every one of her cases. There are several possible defenses for the crime of child neglect pursuant to Penal Code section 270, depending on the specific facts surrounding your case.
Lawful Excuse – Sometimes people find themselves in the midst of money problems…and there is no law stating that one can never struggle financially! Therefore, if you simply cannot provide for your child you are not guilty of a violation of Penal Code section 270.
Lack of Willfulness – In order to be convicted of a violation of child neglect under Penal Code 270, you must have acted willfully. You cannot be charged simply on the basis of lack of ability. You can, however, be charged if you choose to spend on things other than your children when you have the ability to care for them. If you can provide for your children and willfully and intentionally choose not to then you can be convicted under this Penal Code section. Example: Frankie has two sons. He and his wife divorced and his wife was granted full custody. Frankie was recently fired from his job and is searching for new employment. He loses his car and home and is staying in homeless shelters. His ex-wife, however, does not believe him and she takes him to court where he was eventually charged with failure to provide. Frankie hires an attorney and his attorney is able to advocate on his behalf, providing the prosecution and judge with proof that he was both unemployed and homeless, after trying diligently to look for work. In this case, it is likely that the charges will be dropped because of lack of willfulness.
Under California Penal Code section 270 PC. In contrast to the similar crimes of child endangerment and child abuse, the crime of child neglect under Penal Code section 270 is one that can be committed by a parent who has hardly any contact or absolutely no contact with the child whatsoever. Failure to provide for a child or neglect of a child is committed when you, the parent or legal guardian of a minor child under the age of eighteen, willfully and intentionally fails to provide basic necessities for your child.
In order to be convicted of the crime of Penal Code section 270, the prosecution must establish and prove beyond a reasonable doubt the following elements of the crime:
When Charged with Corporal Injury, You Need an Experienced Criminal Defense Attorney
Facing charges of corporal injury in California means you are looking at serious jail time and a criminal record that will affect the rest of your life. You need to contact a criminal defense lawyer immediately to ensure your rights and freedom are protected.
There is a mandatory arrest involved with domestic violence in the state of California. This mandatory arrest means if the officers at the scene believe there is probable cause, it is their discretion whether to arrest you or not. If you find yourself in this situation, your best course of action is not to speak. You will not be able to talk you way out of an arrest and will only make your case stronger for the prosecution. The only statement you should make is to request the presence of your attorney.
An experienced criminal defense attorney understands California law and will know how to examine all the circumstances involved in your case to reduce or possibly dismiss the charges. There are ways to help you fight alleged corporal injury charges and show the court your case does not contain all elements required to convict you under California Penal Code 273.5.
Corporal Injury Defined Under Penal Code 273.5
In order for you to be convicted of corporal injury under California Penal Code 273.5 there are elements your case must present. You must have willfully inflicted harm to your spouse, cohabitant, former spouse, or former cohabitant. An injury inflicted to the father or mother of a child is also covered under this penal code, and damages must have resulted in a traumatic condition.
If you are found guilty of inflicting these injuries, the case could result in a felony conviction. The potential punishment of a felony conviction means:
- You will be imprisoned for a term of two, three or four years in a state prison
- You could be facing up to one year in a county jail
- You could be fined up to six thousand dollars
- You could face both time in jail and a fine
For you to be found guilty of these charges, the prosecution will have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you:
- Acted in a willful manner to inflict the injuries
- Injuries were inflicted on your ex-spouse, spouse, or the parent of your child
- Caused injuries that have been defined as ‘traumatic’
- Were not acting in self-defense of yourself or others
Criminal charges have different consequences in the California court system, and you will want a knowledgeable attorney working with you to receive the best defense. All cases are unique, and your attorney will work with you to present all the facts and circumstances, so you receive a fair judgment.
Legal Explanation of Corporal Injury
Under the California Penal Code 273.5, a corporal injury is considered a general intent crime. This intent was to make physical contact or hit another person. Several elements must be proved in order for the prosecution to convict one of corporal injury.
The first element to prove a corporal injury crime occurred is to show you willfully, and with purpose committed the act. A direct and physical contact must have happened to satisfy this element under the law.
The injury must be the result of a direct strike, hit or another physical impact to another. Should a person become injured while attempting to escape another, does not satisfy the element necessary for a corporal injury conviction as no direct application of force occurred.
An example of this situation would be if you were in an altercation with your partner which had become quite heated. During the incident, you pushed your partner in frustration but didn’t cause harm. If your partner then turns from you and begins walking away but falls or trips which ends up in bruises or cuts, it is not your fault. The result of the injuries is because they fell or tripped while walking away, not because you pushed them.
The second element which must be established is that the two parties involved are cohabitants. This element defines two people living in the same home who are in a stable relationship. The relationship must be intended as long-term and in a manner similar to that of a married couple. This relationship is determined by these conditions:
- The parties are sharing financial responsibilities
- There has been a consummation of the relationship while living in the same residence
- The parties share ownership of the residence
- Statements have been made indicating the two are in a married type relationship or that they consider themselves to be domestic partners
There are other conditions which can exist for two people to be considered cohabitants under the corporal injury conviction:
- If a person is living in two separate households and is in a relationship with cohabitants of each residence and is maintaining a continuous residence in each of the homes
- A relationship is also considered when both parties share the parenting of a child. It also applies even if the parent has lost parental rights after a child is born. This situation is only valid after the birth and not during pregnancy
The third element which must exist for a corporal injury conviction is that the injuries sustained are defined as traumatic. Traumatic is considered an injury or wound to the cohabitant involved, including internal injuries that resulted from the force. This force can also include traces of attempting to suffocate or strangle the victim. The term ‘traumatic condition’ does not mean injury cannot be minor, it is defined as:
- A probable and natural injury occurred when force was applied by direct, physical contact, and that the party inflicting said injury knew the consequences of the strike or action
- The injury would not exist if direct, physical contact had not happened
- The intentional infliction of force resulted in a broken nose, a concussion, bruise, sprain, internal bleeding or injuries caused by attempted strangulation or suffocation
If these elements exist and you are charged under California PC 273.5, you could also face additional charges:
- Attempted infliction of corporal injury on a spouse
- Misdemeanor battery charges
- Simple assault
You will need the help of an experienced attorney to look at your case and built the best defense possible. These charges are serious under California law and will follow you the rest of your life if allowed to become part of your criminal record. Protect your ability to find suitable employment, housing and your rights with the best criminal defense attorney in Los Angeles, CA.
Defenses Against Corporal Injury Charges
There are several different routes your defense attorney can take to help you with corporal injury (domestic violence) charges:
- Accidental- Arguments between partners can become heated and result in actions that were not intentional. You may have made contact with your partner in a physical matter that resulted in an injury, but you did not do so willfully. This contact was not intentional, and you did not set out to cause harm. It is not a crime when an injury occurs when you accidentally touched your partner during a heated argument.
- Self Defense- Domestic violence can be a two-way street. Your partner could have become threatening, and you felt your only means of defense was to strike. If this is the case, your attorney can show you were protecting yourself, or another from harm. There are situations during a domestic incident where the alleged victim began the altercation, and the charged has had to physically restrain the victim in order to prevent injury to themselves. A self-defense plea could be entered by your attorney to fight corporal injury charges in this type of case.
- California self-defense laws protect you from being found guilty when it is proven you’ve had to defend yourself. Your legal defense would show you reasonably believed you were in danger of being seriously harmed or killed and you had to use force to protect yourself. The “stand your ground laws” in California state you are under no obligation to try and escape or run if you are able to protect yourself during an attack.
- Accusations are False- If the relationship between you and your partner has deteriorated enough; they might make false allegations against you as a means of punishment. They may allege that you’ve committed an act of violence against them in hopes of getting the upper hand in other legal matters such as the divorce proceedings. Corporal injury or domestic violence charges will significantly hinder your case during divorce proceedings or child custody issues. Your defense attorney will prove to the court there are ulterior motives to the victim’s charge to prevent you from becoming convicted in this case.
Possible Penalties if Convicted of Corporal Injury
Under the California Penal Code 273.5, a corporal injury on a spouse is considered a Wobbler Offense. This charge means the crime you are charged with can fall under a misdemeanor or felony conviction depending on the nature of the act. Determining how your case will be either a felony or misdemeanor depends on the specific facts presented, how severe the injuries are that were inflicted, and if you have a previous criminal history.
Contact a criminal defense attorney immediately if you are facing charges of corporal injury as you will want a proactive approach in your defense. An experienced attorney will know how to aggressively fight these charges to have them either reduced or dismissed.
If you are convicted of corporal injury as a misdemeanor, you could be facing up to a year of jail time in a county facility. This sentence could also include a fine of up to $6,000. Along with the conviction, there are additional punishments that can be imposed:
Restitution or compensation of the victim’s injuries or counseling if determined it is required. The victim may also request reimbursement for other issues resulting from the act
52-Weeks of counseling is required under California law if you are found guilty of corporal injury. This counseling is a program for batterer’s, and you may also be required to perform some type of community service
A protective order may be placed on you to prevent any contact with the victim. This order can be enforced for up to ten years
If you are found guilty of corporal injury and convicted as a felony act, your punishment will be much harsher than if charged as a misdemeanor. This conviction could mean a two, three, or four year sentence in a state prison along with fines up to $6,000. If the courts find you have a previous criminal record including, sexual battery, battery or another form of aggravated assault, your sentence can be extended to five years in state prison.
If your victim has suffered serious injury, you could face additional punishment. Great bodily harm inflicted on a victim increases the prison time with an additional three, four, or five years added to original sentencing.
The court has options with your sentencing if convicted of corporal injury on a spouse and it falls under a felony conviction. The punishment will be determined by the specific circumstances involving your case and guided by the California Rules of Court (CRC). The three main rules they will consider for sentencing are CRC 4.414, 4.421, and 4.423. These are the criteria used by the courts to decide if you are eligible for probation or should be sentenced.
The criminal justice system in California is complex, and you need an attorney familiar with the courts, laws, and rules that will impact your case. Contact your defense attorney as soon as possible to receive the best possible outcome.
Conviction of Corporal Injury Effects Immigration Status
Under California PC 273.5 it is considered this violation is a crime of moral turpitude, in other words, one showing moral corruption or wickedness. If you are found guilty and convicted of corporal injury, you can lose your right to re-enter the country once you leave. You could also lose your ability to become a U.S. citizen and be denied the right to apply for a green card.
These loses could seriously impact your future and the future of your family. You will need a criminal defense attorney working with you to protect your rights and freedom.
Probation Versus Jail Time
The courts can impose a sentence of probation to you if found guilty rather than sending you to jail. This determination will be gained by following the California Rules of Court and other factors specific to your charges. Probation will allow you to live in your own home where you can continue to go to school or work.
There are rules you will be forced to follow while under probation. If you fail to follow the conditions set up under your probation, you will face the maximum sentence allowed for the crime. Some of the terms you may be asked to comply with are:
- Donating up to $5,000 to a battered women’s shelter
- Compensating or paying restitution to the victim
- Completing a set number of hours performing community service acts
- Complete a 52-week batterer’s program
- Report to your probation officer as specified in court terms
- Do not commit any further misdemeanor or felony offenses
- Refrain from having contact with the victim
The court will determine the length of your probation at sentencing. If charged as a misdemeanor, your probation could last up to three years. Felony convictions with a probation sentence could last up to five years. A felony conviction usually includes a one-year jail sentence which is then followed with up to five years of probation.
If you fail to comply with all the terms set up for your probation, you will have to attend a probation violation hearing where the judge can impose the maximum sentence for your crime.
Van Nuys Criminal Attorney Criminal Defense is your best defense when facing charges of corporal injury. She is an aggressive and experienced attorney who will represent you whether charged with a minor misdemeanor or a felony. Her bar associations include California Bar, American Bar, Los Angeles County Bar, San Fernando Valley Bar, Criminal Courts Bar and Private Defenders of California, so you can rest assured she has the knowledge and experience to provide you the best defense possible.
The defense team at Leah Legal understand how the nature of relationships can sometimes become difficult. We are also familiar with situations that have gotten out of control and can threaten a person’s future.
If you or a loved one find yourself behind bars due to a domestic violence incident, contact our Los Angeles Criminal Lawyer immediately at 818-484-1100. You can also contact us with any questions you may have regarding a legal situation through our contact form and schedule an appointment to make sure your constitutional rights are protected.
The crime of criminal threats under Penal Code section 422 was originally called terrorist threats. Under this Penal Code section a threat becomes a crime when you threaten to kill or hurt a person or someone who is close to that person. When your intention is to put someone in fear of being hurt or killed and you actually do put them in sustained fear of being hurt or killed, you can be charged with criminal threats under Penal Code section 422. Sustained fear means that the person is in fear for a certain period of time, more than a brief moment or two. The crime of criminal threats is quite a serious crime; it is a wobbler crime and can be filed as either a felony or a misdemeanor. As a felony, you can get up to three years in jail or prison and it also counts as a strike. What this ultimately means is that if you are convicted of the crime of criminal threats, it can contribute to a possible life sentence in prison.
Should you be charged with a violation of Penal Code section 422 the prosecutor must prove each and every one of the elements that comprise the crime of criminal threats beyond a reasonable doubt in order for you to be convicted. If the prosecution is unable to prove each of the following you can not be successfully convicted of a violation of Penal Code section 422 PC for making criminal threats. Much more goes into the definition of criminal threats than simply saying something threatening.
Elements of Criminal Threats
- A person willfully threatened to commit a crime resulting in death or great bodily harm to another person,
- The person made the threat with the specific intent that the statement, made verbally, in writing, or by means of an electronic communication device, be taken as a threat,
- The person may or may not have had an intent of actually carrying out the threat,
- The threatening statement on its face and under the circumstances in which it was made, was so unequivocal, unconditional, immediate and specific as to convey to the victim a gravity of purpose and an immediate prospect of execution, and
- The threatening statement caused the victim to reasonably be put in sustained fear for his or her own safety or for his or her immediate family’s safety.
Here is a closer look and a better understanding of some of the above terms and elements.
Death or Great Bodily Harm – What the code means by this is that you don’t have to be specific in the manner you threaten to seriously hurt or kill someone. It is sufficient to simply threaten to kill someone or cause them great bodily harm or injury. Further, the level of harm for great bodily harm must be a substantial level of harm; slight harm or minor harm is not enough.
To Another – The threat can be made to one person or to a group of people. It is also important to note that the actual threat can be made to another person via a third party, and not directly by the defendant.
Verbally, In Writing, or Electronic Communication Device – The threats made against someone else have to be communicated with words by any of these devices. If you simply gesture to someone in a threatening way, without the accompaniment of words, it is not sufficient for this crime. Threatening someone via electronic communication devices include phones, computers, videos, fax machines, texts or even whatsapp messages.
Fear – The victim must have been placed in actual, reasonable and sustained fear. What does this mean? Actual fear means that someone was actually afraid for their life or safety, or that of their family. If someone is scared enough to go out and buy a gun as a result of the threat, it is probably evidence that they were actually scared. Reasonable fear is fear from a threat that an ordinary reasonable person would feel. And, you don’t have to have the ability to carry out the threat immediately – it is enough that the victim reasonably believes that you could carry it out immediately. Sustained fear is fear that goes beyond a mere fleeting moment of fear. The code doesn’t define a specific amount of time; what suffices for “sustained fear” is usually decided on the basis of each specific situation.
Unconditional Threats – While the code delineates threats as having to be unconditional, threats that are made conditionally, as in “I’ll kill you if you don’t give me the car by next week”, can be considered threats for the purpose of Penal Code section 422 if the victim reasonably believes that this will happen.
Penalties for Criminal Threats
Making criminal threats is a very serious offense that carries severe penalties. Under Penal Code section 422, this crime is considered a wobbler and can be filed as a misdemeanor or a felony depending upon the circumstances of each specific case and the criminal history of the defendant. It is up to the discretion of the prosecutor. If charged and convicted of misdemeanor criminal threats you may be facing a maximum of one year in county jail and a maximum fine of $1,000. If charged and convicted of felony criminal threats you can be sentenced to a maximum of three years state prison time and a maximum fine of up to $10,000. If convicted of felony criminal threats under Penal Code section 422, you will also receive a strike, as it is a crime conditionally stipulated within the California Three Strikes Law. Also, if you utilized a dangerous weapon while making criminal threats, you can receive an additional and consecutive one year in state prison. Finally, if the threats were made on multiple occasions or against more than one person you could potentially be charged with the consequences of criminal threats for each individual threat that you made.
Defenses for Criminal Threats
There are many different defenses that the Criminal Law Office of Van Nuys Criminal Attorney can adopt when defending your case. Some common defenses include:
False Accusations – If your attorney can prove that the allegations of your making criminal threats was based on someone trying to set you up, this can be a valid defense. Sometimes people who are angry or jealous of someone else will falsely accuse them of making criminal threats. This is especially common during domestic disputes.
Free Speech – The crime of making criminal threats doesn’t apply to speech that is protected under the Constitution, as long as the intent of the speech was not meant to instill fear in someone else.
Fear Not Sustained – As discussed above, the fear must be for more than a fleeting moment or two. If your attorney is able to show the court that the fear lasted for a very short moment and couldn’t possibly cause any reasonable fear, you might be off the hook for this crime. Example: Sam and Louie get into an argument. Louie threatens to kill Sam if he doesn’t leave him alone. Sam leaves out of fear for his life. Weeks pass and Sam and Louie run into each other at the grocery store. They speak about their previous argument and apologize to each other; however, in the process of rehashing Louie becomes angry again and leaves. The next day Sam goes to the police station to get a restraining order because he is afraid that Louie is going to hurt him. Louie cannot be charged with criminal threats because Sam was only fearful momentarily and had no sustained fear for his life. Moreover, at the time the threat was made he left the situation and was not fearful until three weeks later when no additional threat was made.
Fear Was Unreasonable – This defense can work if an attorney is able to show that either the fear was not real or that it was unreasonable for the alleged victim to be afraid. Also, if the victim wasn’t placed in fear from the threat because he or she thought it was a joke, or thought that you couldn’t really carry out the threat, there is no case. Example: Brandon and Daniel are best friends. They went on a snowboarding trip and got into an argument. Daniel told Brandon that he was going to nuke Brandon’s house. Brandon went to the police station to take out an emergency restraining order claiming to be fearful for his life, however, Daniel cannot be convicted of a violation of Penal Code section 422 because there is no way that Brandon could reasonably be fearful for his life. Obviously Daniel has no ability to access nuclear bombs to “nuke” Brandon’s house and Brandon could have no reasonable fear for his life.
Threat Was Vague – A threat that is vague can be a defense if there are no additional circumstances surrounding the threat that could help clarify the ambiguity of the threat. Be aware however, that if a threat was vague but the surrounding circumstances of the situation make the threat clear, vagueness can not be a defense.
Threat Not Immediate – If the victim had no sense of when you might actually execute the threat, the vagueness as to time would serve as a defense.
The crime of elder or senior abuse as described in California Penal Code section 368 is any type of unjustifiable pain or suffering that is caused to someone aged 65 or older. With this particular crime many of the victims are abused or neglected by family members or caregivers. The crime of Penal Code section 368 elder abuse encompasses both physical and emotional abuse and can even include the exploiting of an elderly person financially, by manipulating or tricking them into giving you something of value or money. If you taunt or ridicule an elderly person, you can be charged with the crime of elder abuse, Penal Code section 368. If you are in charge of caring for an elderly parent and you leave them without care or assistance, you can also be charged with this crime. Elder abuse is looked upon as an extremely egregious crime because of the very fact that the victim is older and is often very vulnerable. In many instances, seniors are ill or confused and have to depend on others for their physical and emotional needs. Because of this helplessness, defenselessness and lack of ability to care for and protect themselves, elders receive a special protection in state of California and the crime tends to be prosecuted and punished more severely than when the victim is not a senior.
Many courts have special units with specially trained prosecutors that handle certain elder abuse cases. In order for the prosecution to attain a conviction of elder abuse, he or she must prove the following elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt:
Elements of Elder Abuse
- A person willfully causes or permits any elder or dependent adult to suffer, or inflicts upon the elder unjustifiable physical pain or mental suffering, or,
- A person who is responsible for caring for an elder or dependent adult, willfully causes another person to injure or harm the elder, or
- A person willfully causes or permits the elder or dependent adult to be placed in a situation wherein his or her health is endangered.
- The person knew that the victim was an elder or dependent adult, and
- Misdemeanor – The person’s conduct occurred under circumstances likely to hurt or endanger the elder person’s health
- Felony – The person’s conduct occurred under circumstances likely to produce great bodily harm or death.
Willfully – This means that the act was done on purpose or intentionally. But be aware that elder abuse under Penal Code section 368 can also be committed with criminal negligence. This means that your actions were more than just regular negligence or a mistake; it means that you acted in a way that showed a total disregard for the life of the elder person. Furthermore, in order for the there to be criminal negligence for the crime of elder abuse, the person had to have had a legal duty to care for the elder and acted with criminal negligence to cause the harm or death.
Unjustifiable Physical Pain – This is any intentional injury inflicted upon someone aged 65 or older such as punching, hitting, kicking, scratching, beating, throwing down, or grabbing, etc. Example: Robert, aged 69, is in a physical rehabilitation facility in the hospital after having a stroke. He moves very slowly and must request help with almost everything he does. The nurses get tired of dealing with him and start to ignore him. Robert presses the nurse call button over and over again because he needs help and when the nurse finally responds she slaps him across the face. This is elderly abuse because the nurse intentionally inflicted physical force against Robert with the intention of causing harm.
Mental Suffering – This includes any intentional mental or emotional abuse inflicted upon someone aged 65 or older, which may include forcing an elderly person to be isolated or made fun of. An example depicting this: Sam lives with his grandfather who is paralyzed from the waist down. Sam locks his grandfather in a room in the basement in the dark all day and night only opening the door to give his grandfather his meals because he doesn’t want to take the time necessary to care for him adequately. This is elder abuse because Sam is intentionally inflicting cruel and unusual harm on his grandfather through inadequate care and unlivable conditions.
Endangerment or Neglect – This means not attending to the elderly person’s needs. It could include causing an elder person them to be uncared for, withholding food or medications, or any situation in which the elderly person’s safety is in jeopardy. Example: Alexander works at a nursing home and cares for several patients on his own. He often ignores the patients calling for him to be cleaned up or fed so that he can hang out and relax in his office alone. This is elder abuse because Alexander is intentionally withholding necessary care from elders in a cruel and willful manner.
Financial Exploitation – As mentioned above, the crime of elder abuse under Penal Code section 368 can also be taking advantage of an elderly person in order to obtain a financial gain. Sharon takes care of an elderly woman with Alzheimer’s disease. Sharon knows that the woman often forgets things. Sharon takes her to the bank because the woman needs to withdraw money to pay her bills. Two hours later Sharon asks the woman if she needs to go to the bank to withdraw money for her bills. She takes the money and assures her that she is making the monthly payments, but instead she pockets the money. Aside from possibly being charged with other crimes, she can be charged with elder abuse because Sharon knowingly took advantage of the woman’s memory problems to get money from her.
Penalties for Elder Abuse
Elder abuse under Penal Code section 368 is considered a wobbler. If a charge is considered a wobbler, it means that you can be charged with either a misdemeanor or a felony depending upon the facts and circumstances of the case and whether or not you have a prior criminal history. The prosecution takes all of this into account when preparing the case to be filed. Elder abuse is a serious offense and is treated very harshly within the justice system. If convicted of elder abuse as a felony you may be sentenced to two to four years in state prison and an additional three to seven years if the senior dies from the injuries you caused, or if he or she suffers great bodily injury. There is also a potential for a strike. The judge may also impose a maximum of $10,000 in fines, as well as restitution. You may also receive formal probation and an order to attend counseling.
If you are convicted of elder abuse as a misdemeanor you can face a maximum of one year in county jail, informal probation, a maximum fine of $6,000 for a first offense. The judge can also order that you pay restitution and attend counseling sessions.
Defenses for Elder Abuse
It’s important to be aware that many people charged with elder abuse are actually innocent of the alleged crime. Because of the fact that many seniors are confused and mentally debilitated, there are oftentimes claims of elder abuse when nothing, in fact, occurred. Family disagreements, mistrustfulness or jealousy also causes unfounded reports of elder abuse to be made. As such, it is crucial that you speak with a California criminal defense lawyer if you are charged with the crime of elder abuse.
At the Criminal Defense Law Office of Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, your case will be examined and evaluated in its entirety to see if any appropriate defenses apply. There are several common defenses that Attorney Leah Naparstek can utilize, including but not limited to false allegations, insufficient evidence to prove elder abuse beyond a reasonable doubt, and mistaken identity.
Lack of Willfulness – If the actions that gave rise to the elder abuse charge were accidental and not willful, the charges cannot stand.
False Allegations – The elder abuse laws cover a wide variety of circumstances so it is not uncommon for false allegations to be made, especially. If this is the case, your attorney will present the true facts of the case to the prosecutor and judge and defend your innocence.
Evidence is Insufficient – If the prosecutor cannot prove each and every element of the crime of elder abuse beyond a reasonable doubt, you cannot be convicted. Often your attorney can present evidence that weakens the prosecutor’s case and shows that the elements have not been met.
Mistaken Identity – Another common occurrence within elder abuse cases are situations where identities are mistaken for the alleged accuser. Example: Daniel is an elderly man who lives at home alone. He receives daily care through a caretaker agency. The agency sends a caretaker every day to assist Daniel, however the same person is not always sent. One of the caretakers does not treat him well and Daniel informs the agency. However, he cannot remember the name of the person that specifically took care of him the day he was mistreated. A caretaker who is believed to have been assigned to him that day is charged with Penal Code section 368, however he is not the one responsible for the abuse. These types of situations occur often with elder abuse cases.
If you have been charged with the very serious crime of “false imprisonment” in the Los Angeles Area or anywhere in Southern California, you can’t afford to entrust you case to any but the most experienced lawyers in this very specific practice area.
The severity of a false imprisonment charge, and of related charges, varies greatly from case to case – some are misdemeanors and some felonies. But they all create a permanent criminal record upon conviction and may subject you to jail or prison time, fines, years of probation, and other serious penalties.
At Leah Legal, we have fought and defeated false imprisonment charges numerous times in the past for our clients. We understand the details of PC 236, PC 237, and other relevant California statutes; and we are fully familiar with the courtroom dynamics and processes involved in these types of cases.
Contact Leah Legal today by calling 818-484-1100 anytime 24/7, and we will give you a free legal consultation on the details of your case. The sooner you call, the sooner we can get started building you a strong defense!
What Is “False Imprisonment” In California?
The term “false imprisonment” might seem to those who hear it for the first time to refer to being convicted and imprison for something you did not do or to being illegally detained by the police. But that’s not at all what it means.
Instead, false imprisonment refers to a defendant who allegedly illegally detained or “imprisoned” another person, even if for only a brief period of time. Some kind of force, threat, or other action has to have been taken so as to hold a person against his or her will in a particular location.
There are several statutes in the California Penal Code to do with false imprisonment, and there are other offenses very closely related to this crime. We will look at PC 236, PC 237, PC 210, and other relevant statutes below.
False Imprisonment Under PC 236
A PC 236 false imprisonment violation is defined as an “unlawful violation of another person’s personal liberty.”
The prosecution must prove that the defendant illegally “restrained, detained, or confined” someone without his/her consent. This must have been done with intent – otherwise, it’s accidental and not false imprisonment.
In most cases, false imprisonment is a misdemeanor offense in California, but it can also be a felony. PC 236 is basically a misdemeanor, while PC 237a can be either misdemeanor or felony.
A PC 236 violation is punishable by a year in county jail, a fine of up to a thousand dollars, or both.
Also note that you can be sued under civil law for false imprisonment, on top of any criminal case and/or penalties that may apply.
In defending against false imprisonment charges, we at Leah Legal use a variety of effective defense strategies, depending on the details of each case.
Here are some of the most common defenses we use:
- The detainment was lawful. If you were a witness to a crime, under California law, you can take “reasonable” actions to detain the criminal until police arrive to arrest him or her. Citizen’s arrest under PC 837 is not false imprisonment if done “in good faith.” And by the same token, if you reported someone to police, and he/she was then arrested but it turned out to be a false charge – it’s a mistake, not false imprisonment. And even if you lied to get someone arrested, that’s filing a false police report but not false imprisonment.
- Acting “In Good Faith.” Even if you forcibly or otherwise detained someone or restrained someone, IF it can be shown that person was likely to soon become a danger to himself or to other people, you acted “in good faith” and are not guilty. But your reasons for the detention must be “reasonable” and your methods acceptable.
- Voluntary presence of “victim.” Sometimes, people make a false imprisonment charge against another person, when in fact, nothing was done to actually force them to stay somewhere or go somewhere against their own will.
- Lack of intent. You cannot have falsely imprisoned someone, legally defined, without intentionally committing such actions as caused him/her to be detained against his/her will. You don’t have to have intended the detainment as such, but the act that led to it cannot have been accidental.
- Parental disciplinary rights. No one can be said to have falsely imprisoned his/her child or a child he/she had custody over because of not allowing the child to go out of the house or “grounding” the child as a disciplinary measure.
False Imprisonment Under PC 237a
The basic difference between PC 236 and PC 237a false imprisonment charges is that with the latter, an element of violence, menace, threat, deceit or fraud was involved and used in “forcing” the detainment of the victim.
And PC 237b adds yet stiffer penalties should a 237a style false imprisonment have been committed against an elderly person or dependent adult.
For the most part, PC 237 false imprisonment is much more likely to be a felony than PC 236, though this is not an absolute rule. False imprisonment involving violence, threat, or deceit stands between kidnapping and “ordinary” false imprisonment in the California Penal Code in level of severity.
Note that you do not have to have done any of the following to be convicted under PC 237a:
- Committed “actual violence,” as in physical force being applied that did or could cause physical injury or death to the victim.
- Physically restrained, detained, or confined the victim.
- Verbalized or issued a threat or waved a firearm or other deadly weapon at the victim
All of the above are possible and common enough means of committing false imprisonment, but remember that merely taking such actions as make someone else “reasonably fear” for their physical safety – or for that of another person – can be a means of committing a “violent” kind of false imprisonment.
Plus, use of deceit or fraud to “trick” the other person into staying somewhere or going somewhere they would not otherwise have been willing to stay/go is another type of false imprisonment.
Note that some form of “force” has to be used for any type of false imprisonment charge to hold. But some form of “violence” or “fraud” has to have been used for a felony level false imprisonment charge to hold.
Also, realize that some felony level false imprisonment charges differ from “kidnapping” only in that the victim was not moved. Kidnapping requires forced movement, at least for a short distance, of the victim, while that is not part of the elements of the crime of false imprisonment.
A misdemeanor level false imprisonment (often PC 236) is punishable, remember, by a year in county jail and/or a $1,000 fine. Felony false imprisonment (often PC 237) is punishable by from 16 months to 3 years in state prison
PC 210, False Imprisonment of a Hostage
Under California Penal Code Section 210.5, false imprisonment of another person so as to avoid capture/arrest by police is addressed. This is a special form of false imprisonment that involves the taking of a “hostage.”
The same elements of the basic crime of false imprisonment (PC 236), detainment of another person illegally, purposefully, and without his/her consent; and the added element of use of violence, threat, or deceit added for felony level false imprisonment in PC 237a are still present. But now, under PC 210.5, the false imprisonment is used to protect the perpetrator from imminent arrest by law enforcement.
The hostage is used as a “human shield,” with threat of physical harm or death being inflicted on the victim unless police back off and allow the perpetrator to escape. The life or well being of the victim (or victims) is then used as a “bargaining chip,” a tool to help the criminal make his or her getaway.
Normally, PC 210.5 false imprisonment of a hostage greatly increases the risk of harm to the victim(s). And it’s very easy for PC 210.5 to slip into kidnapping since as soon as the hostage taker forcibly moves the hostage (not at all uncommon) it becomes kidnapping according to California’s legal distinction here.
To defend against the charge of false imprisonment of a hostage, we can use a number of strategies, including these:
- There was not false imprisonment at all – the same defense arguments used against PC 236 above could sometimes be used here. Consent of the “victim” is especially commonly used against PC 210.5 among these options.
- There was no imminent arrest involved, so there was no attempt to avoid arrest by means of false imprisonment, even if false imprisonment did in fact occur. This distinction could greatly lessen any sentence.
- No increased risk of harm to the victim existed because all threats were empty. You lacked the ability to carry them out.
- You were under duress. It may be that another person threatened to kill or harm you unless you put the victim under false imprisonment. Thus, the crime would be done to escape personal harm rather than to escape arrest.
- Self defense. The alleged victim threatened to harm or kill you, and you imprisoned him or her to prevent that threat from being carried out.
- Defense of others. You detained the “victim” because he or she was about to harm another person or him/her self – or you had a reasonable belief that that was so. Or, it could be your accomplice in crime would have harmed or killed the victim, so you took charge of the hostage instead simply to prevent that worse fate.
Under PC 236 and PC 237, a misdemeanor gets you only jail time for one year, and a felony gets you up to 3 years in state prison. But PC 210.5 is always a felony crime. And it can be punished by 3 to 8 years in state prison.
The PC 210.5 false imprisonment of a hostage law was first passed in 1987. It was meant to create enhanced penalties for hostage taking over against lesser forms of false imprisonment – and it certainly does just that.
You don’t want to face any false imprisonment charge without the benefit of a well seasoned defense attorney with a deep understanding of this practice area. But PC 210.5 is especially severe and you should insist on the best possible defense available.
Other Related Offenses
Very briefly, we want to mention other related offenses that often come up instead of or in addition to the charge of false imprisonment (in all of its various forms):
- PC 209 – Kidnapping. It is merely the act of moving the victim that distinguishes kidnapping from false imprisonment, and the movement need not be far if it substantially effected the risk to the victim or the kidnapper’s ability to potentially escape.
- PC 209.5 – Kidnapping during a carjacking. This is a special class of kidnapping. It may be possible that false imprisonment will be charged instead if the victims were not moved in the heisted car.
- PC 242 – battery. It’s not uncommon for those falsely imprisoned to also suffer assault and battery.
- PC 12022.7 – great bodily injury enhancement. If severe bodily harm was inflicted on the victim, 3 to 6 extra years can be added to any prison term.
- PC 187 – murder. If the victim was killed after being held hostage, both murder and PC 210.5 false imprisonment will be charged.
Contact Us Today For Immediate Help!
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we have deep experience and well honed expertise in defending against false imprisonment, and similar charges, in Los Angeles and Southern California courts.
We will know how to build you a solid defense and how to win the best possible outcome to your case, be that a dismissal, acquittal, or reduced charge and/or sentence.
Contact our criminal defense attorney anytime 24/7/365 by calling 818-484-1100, for a free, no obligation consultation. We will be happy to assist you and can give you immediate legal help on your false imprisonment defense or other case-type.
Kidnapping charges are not nearly as rare in California as one might suppose, and many instances of kidnapping do not fit the prototypical scenario most people have in mind when they hear the word “kidnapping.”
At Leah Legal, we understand that kidnapping allegations often come up in connection with other criminal charges, and that many of these allegations are trumped up or badly exaggerated.
When you hear you are being formally charged with kidnapping, it’s easy to despair and fear the worst. But we at Leah Legal have defeated these types of charges time and again and won the best possible outcome for our clients.
Do not hesitate to contact Leah Legal 24/7 by calling 818-484-1100, and we will give you a free consultation on your kidnapping defense case.
How Is Kidnapping Defined in California?
California’s penal code has several statutes dealing with kidnapping, specifically located at PC 207, 208, 209, and 209.5.
Basically, any form of restraint imposed on a person, any force or violence (or threat of violence) used to move a person physically from one location to another and/or to hold them there – without their consent, constitutes an act of kidnapping.
Under PC 207, this basic definition is used to define “simple kidnapping.” Whereas, other statutes define and assign penalties to “aggravated kidnapping.”
Aggravated kidnapping can be accomplished by fraud, as well as by force/fear. Kidnapping someone less then fourteen years old, holding a person for ransom, inflicting bodily injury (or death) on a kidnapping victim, or committing a kidnapping during a carjack operation will turn “ordinary” kidnapping into aggravated kidnapping.
What Must the Prosecutor Prove?
To gain a “guilty” verdict in a kidnapping case, the prosecution must prove the following elements of the crime beyond all reasonable doubt:
- You move a person.
- You moved that person without his/her consent.
- You used force, fear, or fraud to accomplish the moving.
Moving the Victim
Note that you don’t have to move a person a great distance for it to count as kidnapping. It merely must be counted by the court as a “substantial” distance.
The measurement of “substantial” seems to vary from case to case, but factors often taken into account include: actual measured distance moved, whether the moving added risk of physical harm to the victim, and whether the moving lessened to chances of the perpetrator getting caught.
But you can’t have a kidnapping charge tacked on if the other, underlying offense already covered the moving of the victim. So, moving a driver out of a car in order to steal (carjack) the vehicle is just part of carjacking. But, forcing the victim to drive the car to a remote location before forcing him/her out of the car adds a kidnapping charge to the carjacking charge.
Without Consent
In order for kidnapping to take place, there must be a demonstrable lack of consent on the part of the person being moved. If a verbal protest, struggle, or other action was done to try to prevent the movement, that serves to prove lack of consent.
But the fact force, fear, or fraud was used would also already involve the element of lack of consent.
Plus, in the case of children and the mentally handicapped, kidnapping can still take place even though these persons are not considered capable of giving “legal consent.”
Finally, note that if consent is initially given but later withdrawn, then kidnapping begins at the point of the withdrawal of consent to be moved.
By Force, Fear, or Fraud
The application of physical force to a victim to move him or her can be accomplished by restraint (tying up or handcuffing, for example), grabbing and dragging or pushing, by beating one into submission, or numerous other ways.
The use of a threat to inflict physical harm or to use force to move the victim also makes it count as kidnapping. A firearm, knife, or other weapon may have been used OR a threat of imminent violence to that individual or his/her family member may have been issued.
Note that the only force necessary in the case of kidnapped children is that force necessary to physically take them away. And fear need not have been used since small children might easily be deceived into compliance.
If fraud (deceit) is used to kidnap someone under the age of 14, to get someone out of state so they can be sold into slavery, or to take someone into California from another state – it is an aggravated offense.
In general, fraud by itself as the only means of kidnapping is rare except in aggravated offenses such as the instances mentioned above.
Possible Penalties For a Kidnapping Conviction
Kidnapping is a felony offense under California law, but the severity of punishment still varies substantially based on the details of the incident and the defendant’s past criminal record (if any).
Since kidnapping is a “continuing offense,” you can only be charged with a single act of kidnapping even if you moved the victim multiple times.
Simple kidnapping (PC 207 or 208), can get you 3 to 8 years in state prison plus a fine as high as $10,000.
Aggravated kidnapping, where a child under 14 is the victim, where ransom was demanded, or where robbery or sex crimes were also involved is punishable by 5 to 11 years in state prison.
If the kidnapping took place during a carjacking OR if the victim died or was exposed to serious risk of death OR if the victim suffered bodily injury of the risk of serious bodily injury, then you can get life in prison without parole as the penalty.
Finally, note that kidnapping is a “strike” on the defendant’s criminal record, if convicted, under our state’s Three Strikes Law. A second strike will double your prison term, while a third strike can be punished by 25 years to life in state prison.
Common Defense Strategies
At Leah Legal, we have deep experience in defending against kidnapping charges in L.A. Area and Southern California courts. We know how to build you the best possible defense and how to argue your case effectively both pretrial and in-court.
We customize each and every defense to the exact facts and circumstances of the case. We never use a “cookie cutter” approach. Nonetheless, there are certainly major “defense types” that come up again and again, and win again and again when used in the right way at the right time, against kidnapping charges.
Here are some of our most commonly used defense strategies in kidnapping defense cases:
- Consent Was NOT Lacking
There are instances in which a person might be accused of kidnapping, but in fact, the “victim” gave consent to be moved.
Maybe two people go for a car ride without any specific destination agreed upon (“out cruising.”) Even if you moved someone a great distance and he/she suddenly wants to go home when he/she realizes where he/she is at – perhaps, after sleeping in the car for hours on end – it’s not kidnapping necessarily.
If you had consent, did not continue once consent was removed, and didn’t use fraud to trick the person into “consenting,” you are innocent.
- Not Sufficient Distance Moved
If you did not move the victim a “substantial” distance, did not move them so as to increase the risk or bodily harm to them or decrease the risk of getting caught by yourself, then, it wouldn’t count as kidnapping.
Of course, some other criminal allegation may well still apply, but at least eliminating the kidnapping charge can greatly reduce your sentence, if you can’t avoid conviction completely.
- You Were “Merely Present”
If a friend of yours or person you were with suddenly commits kidnapping without your prior knowledge or approval, you cannot be guilty of the crime yourself simply because you were present.
But, if you aided or abetted the kidnapping crime, you can be convicted for that. If you knew of the plan, encouraged or helped it along, or neglected a legal duty to prevent a kidnapping crime where possible, then that’s assisting in kidnapping. But otherwise, it’s not – you were just in the wrong place at the wrong time.
- Insufficient Evidence to Convict.
If your case comes down to a mere accusation by one person with no real evidence that the crime ever occurred or that you were its perpetrator, you will be acquitted for lack of sufficient evidence to convict.
Sometimes, a false accusation of kidnapping is made on purpose; other times, a misunderstanding results in kidnapping charges being filed. But unless the prosecution meets the high standard of “beyond all reasonable doubt” on all elements of the crime, you cannot be convicted.
- Parental Rights
A parent with legal custody over his/her child has the right to travel with that child. Failing to notify the other parent before heading out a trip with your kid may be inconsiderate, but it does not count legally as “kidnapping.”
It’s possible that a violation of a child custody or visitation rights court order could have occurred, but that’s still not kidnapping.
However, if the child was taken along by a parent intending to commit a crime, the parental right defense against kidnapping will likely not hold up anymore.
- Statutory Exceptions
If a child under the age of 14 is taken and/or hidden in order to keep that child from an imminent danger of bodily harm, it is a statutory exception to the normal kidnapping laws, and you are not guilty.
Also, if you place someone you saw commit a felony crime, know for sure committed such a crime, or had good reason to think committed a felony – under “citizen’s arrest,” that’s a second statutory exception to what would otherwise be kidnapping.
Related Offenses
There are a number of other criminal charges that are frequently charged instead of or along with the charge of simple kidnapping. These include the following:
- Kidnapping while carjacking (PC 209.5). If you move a victim more than what was absolutely necessary to simply commit the carjacking, move him/her a substantial distance from the “carjack point,” and increase his/her risk of bodily harm in the process, you can be charged with PC 209.5. This crime can get you life in prison with no possibility of parole.
- Kidnapping plus extortion (PC 210). When someone kidnaps and then demands ransom money, extorts money by threats of harm to the victim, or tries to collect the reward money by returning the victim as if he had rescued him, the penalty is 2 to 4 years in state prison.
- False imprisonment (PC 236). False imprisonment is a lesser included offense under kidnapping, but it can be charged separately too in place of kidnapping. PC 236 is often a plea bargain charge reduction, as it is punished much more leniently than kidnapping.
- Child abduction (PC 278). When someone without custody over a child tries to keep that child from his or her parent or legal guardian, it is child abduction. You can be charged with child abduction and kidnapping at the same time, but a child abduction charge by itself is not as severely punished as is a kidnapping charge.
- Deprivation of child-custody orders (PC 278.5). This is similar to PC 278 but can be charged against someone whether or not they have custody over a child. It is a violation of the child custody or visitation rights of a parent or other legal guardian.
Contact Us Today for Immediate Assistance!
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we have a long track record of defeating kidnapping charges or of getting such charges substantially reduced in a favorable plea deal.
We consistently win the best possible outcome for our clients in Los Angeles and beyond, even in “the tough cases” that so many other law firms simply turn away.
If you are facing kidnapping charges in Los Angeles or anywhere in Southern California, do not hesitate to contact us 24/7/365 by calling 818-484-1100 for a free legal consultation and immediate attention to your case!
Legal Defense When Charged with Posting Harmful Information on the Internet
The California legislature passed a law in 2008 which makes it illegal to post harmful information on the internet. Penal Code 653.2 states it is a crime to post about other people on the internet in a way that will cause them harm.
If you, or someone you know, have been charged with this type of posting, you are facing criminal charges under the California computer crime laws. Contact a criminal defense attorney to protect your rights and ensure you receive a fair prosecution.
Posting harmful information on the internet is crime known as ‘indirect cyber-harassment’ or ‘indirect electronic harassment.’ It is committed by using an electronic device to post information about a person that may cause them harm, such as a third party harassing him or her.
There are two types of electronic harassment; indirect and direct:
Indirect electronic harassment is covered under Penal Code 653.2 and refers to the posting of information on the world web that will encourage others to stalk or harass another person.
Direct electronic harassment or cyberstalking is covered under Penal Code 646.9 and refers to the person posting the material to be the one personally stalking another
Definition of Indirect Electronic Harassment under California Penal Code 653.2
California Penal Code 653.2 defines indirect electronic harassment as follows:
- By use of an electronic device, you communicated through email or hyperlink to distribute and make available to others for downloading, personal identifying information about another person. The material communicated is of a harassing nature and could cause harm to the individual to whom it pertains
- The material was distributed through an electronic device without the permission of the individual
- You distributed the material with the intent to place the individual in reasonable fear for his or her safety, or that of their immediate family
- You communicated the material through electronic device onto the internet to cause the individual unwanted physical contact, harassment, or injury
- The information you posted is personal in content and identifies the individual and is likely to incite or produce unwelcome harassment, injury, or physical contact
Under California law, the word harassment is defined as knowingly and willfully taking a course of action or conduct that is directed at another individual for which any reasonable person would feel their safety is at risk. Harassment is an act found by any reasonable person to be seriously terrorizing, seriously tormenting, seriously annoying, or seriously alarming for no legitimate reason.
To be charged with posting harmful information on the internet, you could have used any one of these devices. These are considered to be ‘electronic communication devices’ under California law:
- Fax machine
- Telephone
- Video recorder
- Cell phone
- Personal data assistant
- Computer
- Internet phone
- Internet web pages or sites
If you’ve been charged with posting harmful information on the internet using an electronic device, you will need the help of a criminal attorney. You can be found guilty of indirect cyber harassment even if the individual you were targeting is not annoyed or harassed by another. The intended victim does not even have to be aware of the fact that you have distributed the material on the internet. This crime is much different than a criminal threat where the intended victim needs to be reasonably afraid for their safety as a result of the threat.
Consequences for Posting Harmful Material Electronically
Under California Penal Code 653.2, indirect cyber harassment is classified as a misdemeanor. A misdemeanor is considered a crime with a maximum sentence of one year in county jail. It is less serious than a felony but more serious than an infraction. There are two categories in which misdemeanors fall:
Standard
California misdemeanors are punishable up to six months in jail with a possible fine of up to $1,000.
Gross
Aggravated or gross misdemeanors are punishable up to one year in jail with a possible fine of up to $1,000 or more.
California classifies some crimes as ‘wobbler’ offenses. If convicted of a wobbler crime, the prosecutor can charge you with either a felony or a misdemeanor. How your ‘intent’ is established when you posted the harmful material on the internet will determine how your legal defense will be handled. You will need an experienced criminal attorney on your side to ensure your rights are protected if you have been charged with harmful postings on the internet.
Defense Against Posting Harmful Material on the Internet
If it has been proven your intent was harmful towards another when you posted the material, you can only be found guilty if you intended to put the individual in reasonable fear of their safety, or their family. You must also be guilty of intending to cause a third party injury, unwanted physical contact, or harassment in order for the prosecution to successfully convict of the charges.
The internet is full of humor, stories, and comments. Some of your communications could be misunderstood and result in the third party causing harm to an individual. If the material you posted was not done with the intent to cause harm, you could not be held responsible for the posting.
There are guidelines to follow when using the internet, social media and email in the United States. These guidelines are actually laws under the federal government, and it is suggested you check your state laws as they will either be the same or have additional conditions.
Cyberstalking and cyber harassment
Making a serious threat of violence against another person is illegal. Sometimes it is hard to distinguish if the threat is serious or not, and if it is unclear, it could be considered free speech and therefore not illegal. Online harassment is sometimes mistaken for free speech messages.
Cyberstalking is an illegal action and involves repeatedly harassing another person. A person is protected against cyberstalking and stalking when it makes them feel as though their life is in danger or the life of their family members. The police will investigate any reports received from someone who feels they are the victim of cyberstalking or stalking. If they find there is a potential threat, they will prosecute the offender.
Unauthorized access and hacking
Unauthorized access is defined as hacking by gaining access to a server, computer, cell phone, or another electronic device without owner permission. Hacking can range from highly sophisticated coding to breaking into a server to damage data to discovering one’s password and using it to log onto their account without permission. This act is a federal crime under both state and federal laws.
If convicted of hacking, you could face up to twenty years in prison and face a possible fine of $15,000. You can also be convicted of hacking when you illegally intercept communications or information on the internet, known as wiretapping. Breaking into someone’s email or their social media accounts such as Twitter or Facebook is considered hacking and punishable under both state and federal laws.
If not charged as hacking, these invasions could also be referred to as ‘invasion of privacy.’ This act is also a crime under state and federal laws, and if convicted, you could face up to fifteen years in prison. Under the same category of invading one’s privacy is ransomware. This act involves installing software remotely to another’s computer to allow you the ability to download or destroy the data. This computer crime is punishable under your state and federal laws. If you or someone you know has been charged with a computer crime, you need to contact a criminal defense attorney to protect your future and your rights.
Jamming a cell phone or wi-fi
Another electronic device or computer crime is illegally blocking or jamming another’s cell phone, wi-fi connection.
Consumer rights and online shopping
Posting false or misleading information on the internet in the form of advertisement is as much against the laws as it would be to the printed world. The trouble with misleading online information is it goes a step further than in the printed world. For example, if as a business owner, you ‘like’ another company’s comment and it is proven to be false, you can be held responsible.
Blame can also be placed on your company if you have an affiliate relationship with another business and you post an endorsement or review of its products without stating your affiliation. Contact a criminal defense attorney if you or your business is facing charges for posting any form of information on the internet which has been discovered by the law to be illegal. A defense against these charges is critical to the reputation of your company and your future.
Social media posting
It is illegal to distribute or use another’s content without permission. Facebook and Twitter have Terms of Service that allow you to retweet or ‘share,’ so these sights make it possible to post other’s material. Posting of someone’s material that is not protected under those terms is considered illegal.
It is illegal to adapt, re-use, or take someone else’s content without their permission. You must obtain the creator’s permission before posting their material on your site. It is also suggested you link to their website. If you post without their permission, they will have the right to press charges against you.
An employer cannot restrict their employee’s use of social media as long as it is done on their own time. Posting negative comments; however, regarding your employer on social media does allow them to fire you legally. You are allowed to attempt to rally your fellow workers together regarding work-related issues. It is your legal right to try and join your co-workers to better benefits or pay.
You are not legally allowed to post serious threats to kidnap or harm another on social media. If convicted of this form of a post, you could face up to five years in prison. It must be proven you made an actual ‘threat’ and were not posting an expression. Having a criminal defense attorney on your side will help to make sure you receive fair prosecution.
The government cannot block you from commenting, viewing, or responding to their posts if they have set up social media accounts. Another rule regarding posting harmful material on the internet is social media sites or websites are not liable for comments or posts made by their users. Two exceptions to this rule include any site knowing about facilitation of sex trafficking of children and intellectual property infringement.
Personal data rights
In 2020, California has a law going into place, which is expected to go nationwide that will give you the ‘right to be forgotten.’ This right will allow you to see and delete the data a company has on you. Hacking, stealing, or improperly using someone’s personally identifiable information will be considered identity theft and punishable under the law.
Personal data collected by companies on the internet with regards to your personal information will be determined by their company policies. An example would be Facebook’s privacy policy as it states what can’t and what can be done with your data. This policy establishes a contract, so when you agree to their terms, you can use their site. If Facebook violates their policy, or someone hacks their system, you may be due monetary compensation. Contact a criminal defense attorney if you believe your rights have been violated, and your personal data has been compromised.
Revenge porn occurs when you agree to have nude pictures taken of you to post on the internet along with the understanding it will stay private. When these pictures are later posted online to cause harm, it becomes an illegal act and will be punishable by the law. Depending on the state you live in, people have the right to post presentable photos they have taken in public places. If the person doesn’t have a reasonable expectation of privacy, and the photo or picture is taken in a public area, you are allowed to post on the internet as long as you are not doing so for profit.
Information that is considered ‘public’ can be posted online. If the information is not ‘public,’ then it could be a violation of privacy. If you post material online which has not been determined as private, you could be facing criminal charges.
Is it legal to send spam or junk emails?
It is legal to send junk emails and spam as long as the company includes a physical address from the originating point, the advertisement identifies itself as an ad, includes a way to ‘opt-out’ of future messages, and is not abusive or deceptive in nature.
Your rights to create content and post on the internet
Copyright laws apply to the internet, but the rules are tricky when it comes to social media. When you have personally created material such as written a blog, updated your status, taken a photo, or written any original material, it means you own the copyright to this material. With the copyright being yours, it is your right to decide what happens with this material and what others can or cannot do with it.
Personal writings have to be substantial in length in order to receive copyright protection. This rule makes most tweets too short to qualify. If you take a photo from your camera, it is normally considered to be your property, and you own the copyright, but you do have to ensure the photo does not violate privacy laws. Social media sites, such as Facebook do state in their Terms of Use that you give up your right to other users to share your content. These terms do not mean you’ve given up ownership, so you are able to pull the content from the site if you do not like how it is being used
Why You Need Criminal Defense When Charged with Posting Harmful Material
You need a criminal defense attorney working with you to either help get the charges dismissed or earn you an acquittal. To obtain an acquittal, all the evidence brought against you has to be uncredible, and the judge will completely clear you of charges. The law is a complicated process, and you will need someone on your side who understands the courts and the legal system.
Contacting a Posting Harmful Information on the Internet Lawyer Near Me
If you or someone you know has been charged for posting harmful material on the internet, you need legal representation. Call our Los Angeles Criminal Attorney 818-484-1100 and speak to a team member with Van Nuys Criminal Attorney. We have the experience and knowledge of working in the criminal law system to help you through this difficult challenge. Look further through our website to see a full list of legal issues we can help you with to protect your rights and your future.
This country’s members of the military go through unique personal, physical, and psychological challenges due to the nature of their work. These challenges may make them commit crimes that they otherwise wouldn’t have committed if they were in their normal state. California legislators and court systems have put this into consideration, and thus they have allowed for military diversion programs as alternative sentencing to these members instead of jail. If you’re a member of the military and your psychological problems have led you to commit an offense, you possibly may not be put in jail/prison but a military diversion program instead.
However, certain rules determine whether you go into military diversion or jail. For one, it needs to be proven that you suffer from certain conditions for you to qualify for diversion programs. For this, you will need a competent lawyer who is conversant with military rules and operations to help you out. The attorney may be able to successfully present his/her arguments as to why you need a military diversion and not jail. At Leah Legal, we have experienced military criminal defense lawyers who would fight to ensure you get the best possible outcome for your case. If you are a military member in Los Angeles and have been arrested, CA, do not hesitate to call us. This article focuses on what military diversion entails.
The Definition of Military Diversion
Penal Code (PC) 1001.80 defines military diversion as a special form of pretrial diversion. A Military diversion is a sentencing option that is an alternative to jail time for a misdemeanor conviction against active military members or veterans. You don’t have to enter a no-contest or guilty plea for you to obtain a military diversion. Instead, what happens is that the court postpones the proceedings while you participate in an education and treatment program.
After completing the education and treatment program, the charges you are facing will be dropped. If you fail to complete this program, the court will resume the criminal proceedings against you. Also, California offers a similar program of mental health diversion whereby a participant can also have his/her charges dropped and their criminal record sealed.
Conditions that Qualify a Defendant to Join Military Diversion Program
You may be eligible for military diversion in case, because of your military service, you suffer from:
- Military sexual trauma
- Substance abuse
- Traumatic brain injury (TBI)
- Mental health issues
- Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
The problems mentioned above must have occurred due to your military services. Also, note that military diversion option is usually available only to first offenders. In case you have been previously convicted of the same crime you are facing now, you will be sent to a Veteran’s Court. This court provides a higher level of structure as well as supervision compared to military diversion. We shall discuss it in detail later in the article.
As we said earlier, a military diversion program will be an option for you only if you are facing misdemeanor charges. Typical misdemeanor crimes that affect veterans or military members include but not restricted to:
- DUI
- Misdemeanor assault & battery
- Narcotic possession
There is usually a process involved for you to be approved for military diversion. First, your criminal defense lawyer has to request the court if it could get the diversion. Then, the court might or might not require doing an evaluation to assist it in reaching a decision. In case the court approves that you are eligible, and provided you consent, you’ll be put in a pretrial military diversion program. Then, criminal proceedings against you will be suspended for not more than two years as you receive treatment.
Treatment Programs You Can Use
The judge evaluates whether you ought to be directed to join a community or federal-based treatment program. Preference is given to those treatment programs with a track record of effectively treating persons suffering from trauma because of their military services. Examples of these programs are those run by the U.S Department of Veterans Affairs or the U.S Department of Defense. The treatment program you are ordered into, and the court may team up with the U.S Department of Veterans Affairs to maximize services and benefits provided to veterans.
If you are ordered to undergo treatment for mental health, the court might also refer you to a reputable mental health facility in the county. This is provided the facility is willing to accept accountability for:
- Your treatment
- Filing of progressive reports in court
- Coordination of suitable referral to veterans service officers in the county
Other Terms for Participation
You have to comply with all conditions the diversion program you are assigned, or the court imposes. These conditions include, among others:
- You have to attend treatment sessions
- You must undergo counseling for substance abuse or domestic violence (as appropriate)
- You have to agree to random drug/alcohol testing
- The agency running the program must prepare progress reports
The agencies/agency running your assigned program will give the reports on your progress to the prosecutor and court not less often than after every six months. Generally, any military diversion program lasts twelve to twenty-four months. As the law provides, criminal court proceedings against you can only be postponed for a maximum of two years.
Note that military diversion can be terminated before you complete it. As earlier mentioned, the responsible agencies or agency will be filing reports with the prosecuting attorney and court on your progress at least after six months. After the court goes through the reports, it might, at any point, convene a hearing should it appear that:
- You aren’t performing satisfactorily in that program, or
- You aren’t benefiting in any way from the services and treatment the military diversion program provides
If the judge determines that the treatment isn’t working, he/she may end the diversion, then resume the criminal court proceedings against you.
Your Arrest Record Will Be Sealed Should You Complete Your Military Diversion Program
After you complete your treatment program, the charges against you will be dropped. When this happens, no authority or person may use your record of diversion or arrest without your permission in any manner that could cause a denial of benefits, certificates, licenses, or employment. Therefore, when responding to any question concerning your previous criminal record, you can honestly indicate that you weren’t arrested or ordered into a diversion program for the crime.
However, we have an exception when you’re applying to be a peace enforcement officer. Here, you must disclose that you were arrested when answering the direct question in the application or questionnaire for the position of a peace enforcement officer. Also, the Justice Department may disclose the record in reply to your application request.
Also worth noting is that if you were arrested for drunk or drugged driving and your license got suspended, it will not necessarily be returned after you have completed the program. Even though military diversion covers misdemeanor DUI offenses, completing the diversion program doesn’t prevent the DMV from taking administrative actions. One of these actions includes suspending your license.
PTSD Can be a Legal Criminal Defense
In an applicable case, a criminal defense lawyer can raise post-traumatic stress disorder as a valid defense to an offense. A PTSD defense falls within the insanity defense. Also, an attorney can raise PTSD as proof of mitigation. Even though mitigation is not a complete defense, it may help you receive a lenient treatment, especially during felony sentencing.
- PTSD as an insanity defense
You can enter a not guilty plea on the grounds of insanity. That is, your attorney can argue that you committed the offense when you were legally insane. For a defendant to be considered legally insane, it means that during the commission of the crime, he/she:
- Didn’t comprehend the nature of his/her act
- Couldn’t distinguish between what is right or wrong
You have to prove that you were insane by a preponderance of the evidence. By this, it means that you have to make the jury think it’s more likely than not that you were insane during the commission of the offense. If you successfully show this, then you will be taken to a mental hospital where you will be committed and receive treatment rather than going to prison.
- PTSD as evidence of mitigation
Even if post-traumatic stress disorder cannot be applied as a valid defense under the context of insanity, it may still be used as mitigation proof. When used as evidence of mitigation, you will have to prove that due to emotional trauma, you shouldn’t be blamed for your conduct. You should show that you would have acted otherwise were it not for the trauma. After this argument, the court may be persuaded to sentence you to reduced jail time. Or, it may sentence you to a treatment program or probation instead of jail.
Post-Conviction Treatment In Lieu of Jail (PC1170.9)
PC 1170.9 and PC 1001.80 are similar. The only difference between these two is that PC 1170.9 applies after the defendant in question has entered a guilty or no contest plea to an offense or the court has found him/her guilty. Like PC 1001.80, PC 1170.9 permits the court to convict veterans or active military members to treatment in lieu of jail or prison. Also, the offense must have been as a result of TBI, sexual trauma, PTSD, mental health issues, or substance abuse arising because of their serving in the U.S military.
Before, PC 1170.9 was limited only to combat military veterans. However, in 2010, this law was amended to get rid of the requirement to be a combat veteran. PC 1170.9 works in a way that if you fall within it, a hearing has to be held to determine if you are eligible. If the court rules that you qualify for the alternative sentencing, you will then face a treatment program sentence instead of prison or jail.
Treatment programs under Penal Code 1170.9 last for a duration that doesn’t surpass that which you would’ve spent in custody. Certain defendants get sentenced to probation under PC 1170.9 and ordered to enroll in a residential program of treatment. If this happens to you, you will receive sentence credits for the actual period you spent in that residential treatment.
For you to be eligible for enrolment into a treatment program under PC 1170.9, you have to qualify for a probation sentence. Due to this requirement, Penal Code 1170.9 isn’t an option in certain types of cases. For instance, cases that involve violent felony offenses and serious felonies in California do not carry a probation sentence as a punishment. As a result, these crimes won’t apply under PC 1170.9.
Even if you technically qualify for probation, alternative sentencing under Penal Code 1170.9 isn’t an option unless the court actually sentences you to probation.
Veteran’s Courts
Recently, several court systems in California counties have established special veteran’s courts. Examples of court systems that instituted veteran’s courts include the Superior Courts in San Bernardino, Orange, Los Angeles, and Ventura Counties. The design of veteran’s courts is similar to that of any other collaborative court, for example, homeless court and drug court. These courts strive to resolve fundamental problems like mental health problems and substance abuse that result in crime, to begin with. Veteran’s courts and military diversion are similar, but veteran’s courts provide quite a higher magnitude of supervision and structure.
Generally, veteran’s courts only take on nonviolent offenders. But, the Combat Veteran’s Court in Orange County, which is also the first one of its type in California, takes on violent offenders sometimes.
How Veteran’s Courts Work
After a veteran has been admitted into the court’s program, he/she is allowed to have a group of participants. These participants include the judge, defense attorney, Veterans Administration caseworker, and prosecutor. These team members are supposed to work together on designing ways and assisting the veteran in question through an all-inclusive treatment plan. If the veteran completes the program successfully, his/her charges are usually dismissed under PC 1170.9.
Another critical point to note is that the veteran might have the mechanisms to cope and systems to support them. These may enable them to productively and positively mingle with mainstream society.
Alternative Sentences for Felony Charges
Even if you aren’t facing misdemeanor charges, you may still get relief for the felony charges against you. Under PC 1170.9, one may be eligible for an alternative sentence when facing DUI charges or a felony.
California law dictates that any former or current member of any branch of the United States Military who might be suffering from the following
- TBI
- PTSD
- Military sexual trauma
- Mental health issues, or
- Substance abuse due to their military services and get charged with an offense are entitled to an alternative sentence.
In Los Angeles, the veteran’s court that has been established allows several felonies and DUI charges that qualify to be accorded special treatment. The veteran’s court program is an intense one and requires a full commitment. However, if the defendant is successful, his/her charges will be reduced, and the case may even be dismissed.
Here are a few of the advantages of participating and completing a veteran’s court program:
- You will have a higher chance of getting probation
- The felony charges you are facing may be reduced to a misdemeanor
- Receiving treatment in lieu of jail or prison time for given crimes
- Probation conditions may be considered satisfied early (except for restitution), and probation may be terminated earlier than expected
- A veteran’s court program may permit the court to dismiss penalties, restore your rights, or vacate the conviction for given crimes
Is Military Diversion Program the Best for You?
It is no doubt that military diversion programs are a useful tool for several members of the military, including veterans. However, before you decide if the diversion is the right option for you, have to consider a few things. These include the facts of the charges against you, proof you or the prosecution has, and your past criminal history. In certain cases, diversion might not be the best for you.
At Leah Legal, before advising you on what to do, we will first do a comprehensive investigation to determine whether military diversion is appropriate for alternative sentencing. We will employ proactive measures to assist you in determining the required steps that will prevent you from having a conviction on your record. Reach out to us for a consultation where we will discuss whether or not a military diversion program is the best option for your situation.
Find a Military Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
As we have seen, you don’t automatically qualify for military diversion until you have proven yourself before the court that you deserve it. The best person to help you do this is a criminal defense attorney. The lawyer you choose may be the difference between getting the treatment you need and going to jail/prison. Apart from getting treatment, your arrest record will be sealed once you complete your assigned military diversion program successfully. If you are a military member or veteran in Los Angeles and have been arrested, call Leah Legal at 818-484-1100. Our attorneys will evaluate your case and inform you whether or not you qualify for military diversion.
The state has put a lot of effort in dealing with domestic violence cases. One of the state’s measures is providing an opportunity to place a restraining order on domestic violence perpetrators. Partners undergoing domestic violence can seek an emergency protective order once they suspect that their partner poses a danger to their lives. You should find legal help straight away to get relevant legal guidance while seeking or contesting against an emergency protective order. At Leah Legal, we offer credible legal services to anyone seeking assistance in getting an emergency protective order or seeking any legal services related to domestic violence in Los Angeles.
Definition of Emergency Protective Order in California and How it Works
An Emergency Protective Order, which is commonly abbreviated as EPO, is a legal order issued to a person who is reasonably believed to be in immediate danger in a domestic violence case. After a request by a law enforcement officer, the order is issued any time through a phone call to the judge.
The order goes into effect once it has been issued by the judge and lasts for seven calendar days or five business days, whichever comes later. The restraining order intends to protect the requester long enough until he or she applies for a domestic restraining order in court.
Everything to do with Emergency Protective Order is described under the California Family Code sections 6250 – 6253. Under this statute, the applicant or requester must meet specific grounds that define that he or she was in immediate danger of domestic violence. A person can consider getting an EPO if the following are true:
- The person is in present or immediate danger of domestic violence based on previous domestic violence allegation and recent incidents of abuse or threat
- The person seeking the order is a child in immediate or present danger of abuse by a family or household member
- The person is in immediate and present danger of abduction by a parent or relative
- The person seeking the restraining order is an elder or dependent adult in immediate and present danger of abuse as defined in Section 15610.07
Apart from the kind of people seeking the emergency protective order, it is meant to prevent an occurrence or recurrence of child abduction, child abuse, domestic violence, or abuse of a dependent adult.
The restraining order is meant to protect a person from abuse as defined under Family Code 6203. Under this statute, abuse is defined as:
- Physically trying to hurt another person either physically or recklessly
- Sexual assault
- Making another person to reasonably be afraid of his or her safety or being seriously hurt
- Engaging in behaviors such as hitting someone, threatening, stalking, harassing, and disturbing the peace of the other person
Please note, physical abuse is not limited to hitting. It can involve other activities such as pulling the hair of a partner, shoving, throwing things, scaring, and keeping him or her from going. It can also include physical harm to a family pet.
You should also note that abuse in domestic violence does not have to be physical. It can also involve verbal, psychological, or emotional harassment.
How the Emergency Protective Order is Implemented
Emergency protective orders can be useful in cases where victims fear for themselves or to their children. The rule allows victims to keep potential or known abusers away from them or from a home that they both reside in. The order can also do the following:
- Prohibit the abuser or offender from trying to contact you in any way unless certain types of communication are expressly allowed
- Prohibits the abuser from seeking or doing further violence to the EPO recipient
- Requires the offender to stay a particular distance away from the victim’s house, workplace, or school if the victim is a child
- Prohibits the offender from contacting the alleged victim’s children whether or not they have been subjected to violence
- Require the offender to officially relocate to a new place if he or she is sharing a home with the victim
- Take custody of the children involved in the violence for the days that it last
Please note, certain items or standards of an emergency protective order might not be included depending on the specific situation. The judge usually decides on the conditions of the protective order based on the extent or circumstances surrounding the officer’s information.
People that are Protected by the Emergency Protective Order
You should learn about the eligibility for an Emergency Protective Order to determine whether you suit best in requesting one. Most people would argue that it is suitable for spouses and children involved in domestic violence, but it covers many more people than you think. Under the Family Code section 6211, parties eligible for EPO should have some relationship with the alleged abuser. The following are the few people that might request an order against an alleged abuser:
- A current or former spouse
- A current or former cohabitant
- A person who the respondent would have been dating or had an engagement in a relationship
- A person who the respondent had a child with
- A child of a party subject to an action
- Any other person related to the perpetrator through an affinity within the second degree
Provision of Emergency Protective Order Under Family Code Section 6252
Family Code section 6252 provides the specific orders provided by the judge. An emergency protective order may have different rules as described below:
- A protective order as defined under Family Code section 6218
- An order providing temporary care and control of a minor child or an endangered person and the restrained person
- An order providing authorization of the welfare and institution Code, including the provision of temporary care or control of an endangered child or a minor whose family, household, parents, or guardian have an order sought for
- An order that determines the temporary care of a minor or child in danger of abduction
Inclusions in the Emergency Protective Order
Once the judge provides an emergency protective order, specific aspects should be included to determine its viability and ensure that it is enforced. The order should include the following:
- A statement that highlights the elements needed to be asserted by the order
- The date and time that the order will last
- The address of the superior court for the county or district which the endangered person or child in danger of abduction resides
- A statement that is printed in English and Spanish
The statement provided in the order should give the following statement:
- To the Person Seeking Protection: The order will only last until the date and time stated above. If you intend to continue the protection, you will have to apply for an order from the court at the address provided above. You can seek advice from an attorney to clarify any matter connected with the application. The attorney should be consulted immediately to help you respond to the application
- To the Restrained Person: The order will only last until the date and time provided. The protected person may seek a permanent restraining order from the court. You are at liberty of seeking the help of an attorney to help you respond to the application
If the person seeking the restraining order is a child, the order’s statement will be different from the one provided for a spouse or cohabitant. In this case, the statement will be printed in English and Spanish and will go as follows:
“The order will last only until the date and time provided above. You can apply for a permanent restraining order under the Family Code Section 213.5 of the Welfare and Institution Code from the court address noted above. You can seek advice from an attorney in relation to the application and for a permanent restraining order.”
If the child in question is in danger of abduction, the following statement will be printed in English and Spanish.
“This order will last until the date and time provided above. You can apply for a child custody order from the court, using the court address provided above. You are at liberty of seeking advice from an attorney to any matter related to the application to help you respond to the application.”
Weight Consequences of an Emergency Protective Order
You should not underestimate the kind of danger that might result from seeking an order, especially if you seek it against a law enforcement officer. There are potential professional consequences such as duty restriction, removal from specialized units, or suspension. Therefore, there is a possibility of incurring fierce resistance from the respective person when attempting to get an order.
Your lawyer may not have a full awareness of the kind of consequences of a protective order. Perhaps the abuser is well known or has influence in the legal system and might end up influencing the outcomes of the order. You might also be denied the order if you do not conform to a traditional feminist’s standards or the expectation of a mother. Other aspects might have your request for an Emergency Protective Order rejected. This includes:
- Being considered as a stereotype
- Engagement in a same-sex relationship
- Being an officer
In that case, you must carefully consider the following:
- Whether or not the batterer will opinion of your action to obtain an order is aggressive or hostile
- The kind of action that will result in retaliation of the batterer
- Whether or not the action will make you lose your control in a relationship
- Whether or not your action will provoke a stalking behavior or a serious attempt on your life
- The kind of reaction that the abuser will have to try and pressure you into dropping the order
- Whether or not the local law enforcement will enforce an order placed against a fellow officer
- Whether you will accusation from the court of using the order as leverage in a custody or divorce battle
- The kind of reaction that the abuser will have if the information about the order is made public
As much as it is essential to evaluate the above-stated aspects, you should seek the order if it is for your safety or that of your loved ones. There might be consequences in seeking a restraining order against a police or law enforcement officer. You should not be worried about this since the state has the responsibility of protecting you from any threats that might follow.
Limitations of Emergency Protective Order
Although an emergency protective is essential to a domestic violence victim, there are certain limitations that it has compared to your goal. In that case, the emergency protective order cannot do the following:
- End your domestic partnership or help in your divorce
- Establish the parentage of your child with the person you seek a protective order against unless you agree to the descent of the children in question and allow the court to solve the issue
Violation of a Emergency Protective Order
Violating an Emergency protective order can attract severe consequences as provided by California statutes. It might attract civil or criminal consequences depending on the circumstances surrounding the case.
If you are facing criminal consequences, the prosecutor must prove certain elements when convicting you of violating an Emergency Protective Order. These elements are as follows:
- A valid protective order existed
- The defendant knew that the protective order existed and its terms
- The defendant intentionally violated the terms provided in the order
The consequences for violating the restraining order are as follows:
- Citations of contempt of court
- Criminal charges under PC 273.6. This includes a county jail sentence for a maximum of one year, a maximum fine of $1,000, or both. This applies if you are convicted as a misdemeanor. You might be charged with a wobbler if you are facing a second conviction, or you were involved in the act of violence. The potential felony consequences include custody in state prison for a maximum of three years and a fine of up to $1,000
- Loss of certain rights such as child visitation
Contesting an Emergency Protective Order in Court
You can have the emergency protective order removed or have its terms modified through a petition in the court. If you intend to modify the EPO terms, you can have conditions related to your communication, contact, and a certain distance from the protected person modified.
If you want to change or terminate the order, you should file a request in court before the date provided in the Emergency Protective Order expires. You can do this as the person protected or restrained by the order.
Please note that you might be required to pay a filing fee associated with the motion. You need to confirm with the court early to determine the amount required for the payment. You should also notify the court that you want to be heard and the register should settle on a date that is as soon as possible. Since you have seven calendar or five working days until the order expires, you should file your petition before these days are done.
You might also need appropriate evidence to help the court determine whether to modify or lift the emergency protective order depending on the circumstances of the case. The kind of evidence that the court might consider are:
- Documents such as pay stubs and completion of a rehabilitation program if the order was ordered due to anger management issues
- Statements that are given by other people such as oral testimony and a written affidavit from people who believe that the order was wrongfully done
- Evidence related to child visitation or custody if it suits your case
- Any records from a probation or parole officer if the person’s criminal background is the issue
The person subjected to the restraining order should provide proof of good behavior to support the evidence presented to the court. This includes evidence that shows compliance with the existing terms of the order or evidence that proves that the order is not necessary.
If the judge decides to end the Order, you need to fill items 1 and 2 of Form DV-400, make three copies and return them to the court clerk.
If the clerk prepares the form on your behalf, you should carefully review it to ensure that it matches with the orders from the judge. The judge will sign the new order, where the clerk will keep the original copy and give you return copies with a stamp indicating that it has been filed.
Find a Domestic Violence Attorney Near Me
There are many emotional burdens when there is an unfair restraining order placed against you. If that is the case, hiring a domestic violence attorney would be the best decision when trying to remove an Emergency Protective Order placed against you. At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we have successfully and passionately represented clients in courts for domestic violence and restraining orders. We will work tirelessly to create the best defense strategies needed for your case. For more information, contact us at 818-484-1100 for a no-obligation consultation and immediate assistance when you need it most.
There are two main types of restraining orders in California, which are the permanent and temporary restraining orders. Permanent restraining orders seek to protect victims of certain crimes such as sexual assault, stalking, child abuse, harassment, domestic abuse, and other related offenses. According to California PC 273.6, it is a criminal offense to violate a restraining order’s conditions. If you are charged for violating the terms of a restraining order in Van Nuys, Leah Legal can assist you in fighting the charges.
The Meaning of a Permanent Restraining Order
Issuing a permanent restraining order against you may affect your life in many ways. You may no longer have the right to tour the place you enjoy. You may not be able to visit your family, as well. This order may also come with conditions that affect how you interact with other people.
In some instances, the court may recommend supervised visitations with your children. The recommendation may cost you money because every time you intend to visit your children, you would have to hire a person to supervise the visitation. The court may prohibit you from interacting with your children if you cannot afford a paid visitation. For others and this reason, you must contact a competent attorney after receiving a notice for a protective order.
How long a restraining order lasts may vary depending on the circumstances of the case. A permanent restraining order may last for many weeks to several years or even for the rest of your life. To have a permanent restraining order granted, the petitioner should have conclusive evidence of physical harm, harassment, or threats. Upon issuing a permanent restraining order, it would be against the law for the abuser to contact the petitioner.
Restraining orders may include stay-away orders, move away orders, or personal conduct orders. A personal conduct order prohibits the restrained person from engaging in specific actions. The actions include communicating with the victim, attacking, and stalking. Violation of the conditions of a restraining order may form a basis for arresting the restrained person. The order also prevents all forms of contacting the protected person either in person or using social media or phone.
The restrained person may have to keep a certain distance from the protected person if a stay-away order is a condition of the restraining order. For instance, the court may advise the restrained person to maintain at least 100 yards away from the protected person.
A restrained person would be required to move away from the protected person if a move away order is a condition of the restraining order. This will help prevent the protected person from bumping into the restrained person by mistake.
The abuser might have to stay miles away from the petitioner. If you violate the terms of the permanent restraining order, and the victim notifies the court, the judge might impose tougher measures. However, a victim must have ample evidence to indicate that you violated the restraining order. The evidence may be in the form of text messages, photographs, emails, or other documents. If the restrained person resides in the same place as the victim, they may have to relocate after the issuance of a permanent restraining order.
Conditions for Getting a Permanent Restraining Order
In California, a victim has to prove that the alleged abuser has committed certain acts against him or her. It should be evident that the victim had a certain relationship with the abuser before the petition for a permanent restraining order was considered. For a California court to consider a restraining order case, it needs to meet the following conditions:
- It should be evident that the abuser had abused or threatened to abuse the victim.
- The victim and the abuser must be in a close relationship, such as former or current cohabitant, current or former girlfriend or boyfriend, spouse or partner, a person whom the victim has had a child with, close relative, or a divorced partner.
- If the abuser qualifies to all these conditions, a victim may file for a permanent restraining order. If a victim does not qualify to file a permanent restraining order against the abuser, he or she may file for another type of restraining order as outlined under California law.
The Process of Getting a Permanent Restraining Order
The victim might have to visit the court to get a permanent protective order against an abuser or prospective abuser. Once the court accepts the filing, the victim gets a notice regarding when the case will commence. The victim has to attend the case proceedings on the said date, day, and time to avoid dismissing the case.
The alleged abuser also receives notice of the restraining order requiring him or her to appear at the restraining order hearing. If an abuser fails to show up for the hearing, the turn of events may favor the victim. Without the opposition from the alleged abuser, the victim can monopolize the hearing. It is easy for the victim to convince the judge to issue a permanent restraining order against you if you are not present to give your side of the story.
A permanent restraining order hearing is necessary either to make a restraining order permanent or to lengthen a temporary restraining order. The court may first issue a temporary restraining order if a victim applies for a restraining order against an abuser. The abuser, who is the perpetrator, may have a chance to argue against or oppose the order during the hearing.
It is important to contact a criminal lawyer before the final hearing of the restraining order. Your lawyer may help you through the hearing and use his or her expertise to argue against the restraining order conditions. You should immediately contact a lawyer once you notice that someone has filed a restraining order against you.
If you do not attend the restraining order hearing, you will not have an opportunity to exercise this right. If the court validates the victim’s petition, it may issue a permanent restraining order against you immediately.
Effects of Permanent Restraining Order
Permanent restraining orders and temporary restraining orders have equal effects on an abuser; they only differ based on their effective periods. Barring physical contact is not enough to ensure that an abuser does not affect the victim’s life further. A permanent restraining order also gives an abuser extra conditions as follows:
- The restrained person to fulfill any spousal court orders, partner, or child support
- The restrained person to take back certain personal property items following the restraining order
- The restrained person has to get a new residence if he or she resides in the victim’s home
- The restrained person should not make any investment or spending decisions to harm the victim’s shared financial situation.
- The restrained person should not make any changes to shared insurance plans
- The restrained person transfers the ownership of any cell phone plans that the victim uses to the victim’s name
- The restrained person stays away from the victim’s place of work, children’s schools, and the victim’s residence
Restrictions from Owning a Gun
You may be forced to immediately relinquish any gun that you may have to either a state-recognized gun dealer or law enforcers after issuing a permanent restraining order against you. According to California’s law, certain people have a legal right to own firearms. However, for people who are regarded as dangerous to society, this right does not apply.
Consequences of Violating the Permanent Restraining Order
You will be guilty of violating a permanent restraining order if you fail to abide by the conditions of a restraining order. For the violation to be valid, the prosecutor must prove that you were aware of the order and had full knowledge about the order conditions.
The actions that may have been regarded as a violation of the order may not be charged if the judge who gave the restraining order made relevant mistakes during the filing process. The prosecutor may charge you with a violation under PC 273.6 alongside any other additional crime you commit.
It is against the law in California for a restrained individual to violate what the orders dictate. The violation is punishable, depending on several factors. The judge may be more lenient in the case of a first violation. For a violation of a permanent restraining order, the court may rule the crime as either a misdemeanor or a felony. In most cases, the first violation of a permanent restraining order is a misdemeanor punishable by jail time of not more than one year. The court may also require you to pay a fine not exceeding $1,000. In some instances, you might get a penalty of both jail time and fine.
You may face more severe penalties if the prosecutor assigns felony charges to the crime of violating a permanent restraining order. The penalties may include a three-year jail term in state prison and a fine not exceeding $ 10,000. However, a permanent restraining order does not affect your immigration status. Crimes of moral turpitude may render a person inadmissible into the United States or lead to deportation. The violation will not lead to deportation if you merely violate a permanent restraining order without committing an aggravated felony.
Lifting a Permanent Restraining Order
At times, a permanent restraining order can be lifted under California law. A restrained person may be required to follow a particular process that does not violate this order before the request is granted. A permanent restraining order must be lifted through a court process because it was put in place by the court. This order may not be enforced forever; it may only be enforced for some specific period. Once the period elapses, the order may expire if a victim does not ask for extension or renewal. A restrained person subjected to this order may file a motion to have a restraining order terminated. The motion must include information such as:
- Any reasons for removing or lifting the restraining order
- The date the court affected the restraining order
The names of the parties involved
The reasons for having the order lifted should show that the parties involved want to have contact with one another. It should also indicate that the person who filed a motion agrees to have the order lifted, and he or she is not being forced to request lifting. After a hearing, the judge may look into available evidence and then decide whether to deny or accept to lift the order.
Types of Permanent Restraining Orders
There are several types of permanent restraining orders. The type of permanent order depends on the victim involved and the form of harassment made by the abuser. The court may issue a restraining order for:
Elder Abuse
For an elder abuse restraining order to take effect, physical abuse does not need to have occurred. An elder abuse permanent order is different from other forms of restraining orders because it aims at preventing elder abuse. Financial abuse can trigger a restraining order to protect an elder. Financial abuse is the poor spending of an elderly person’s finances, usually by a caregiver or a close relative. The ways of committing financial abuse against an elder include faking the elder’s signature on bank documents and stealing the elder’s money or properties. Elder abuse may also comprise of neglecting or abandoning an elder.
Civil Harassment
The court may issue this order if you engage in any type of violence against a victim. The order may also apply in case of a valid threat of violence. This is the most common form of a restraining order. The court may issue this harassment under certain circumstances. If you show a pattern of behavior that scares, harasses, or annoys a person, the court may impose this form of a restraining order.
Workplace Violence
This order may apply if an employee has been experiencing a pattern of conduct or occurrences, which would make a normal person fear his well-being or safety. California employers may request a workplace violence restraining order on behalf of their employees. It should be evident that the employee is suffering in the workplace because of a credible threat of violence, physical abuse, stalking, or serious harassment. The employee may apply for a regular civil harassment restraining order if he or she does not qualify for a workplace restraining order.
Domestic Violence
You may have a qualifying domestic relationship with the victim if you are registered domestic partners, closely related, married, divorced, living together, or separated. A person closely related to you includes your child, brother, grandparent, sister, or parent. There should be a qualifying domestic relationship between the perpetrator and the victim for a domestic violence permanent restraining order to apply. Valid evidence of emotional abuse, the threat of abuse, or physical abuse should exist. A qualifying relationship refers to a personal relationship between a perpetrator and the victim, outlined by the domestic violence statute in California.
Defenses to Violation of a Permanent Restraining Order Charges
Some of the defenses you and your attorney can apply if the prosecutor accuses you of violating a permanent restraining order include:
You did not Act Intentionally
For you to be guilty of violating a permanent restraining order, you should prove that you acted on purpose. Your attorney can defend you by stating that even if you violated the restraining order’s conditions, you did not do it on purpose. You can’t be liable if it is evident that you did not act willfully; you may have committed the violation accidentally.
The Order was not Lawful
There must have been a valid basis for the judge to issue a restraining order against you. You can only be guilty of a permanent restraining order violation if the order had been lawfully issued. It should have been evident that you were threatening, risking the well being of the victim, or harassing the victim. If a legal basis for issuing the order did not exist, there would be no basis for your conviction. It should be apparent that the court gave you a chance to give your side of events against the permanent restraining order during the hearing.
Offense Related to Violation of a Permanent Restraining Order
The prosecutor may charge you with the related crimes alongside the offense of violation of a restraining order. The related crimes include:
Criminal Threats
California PC 422 describes the crime of criminal threats. Your threat must be specific and explicit for you to face criminal threat charges. You may be guilty of this crime if you threaten to kill or harm another person physically. Your threat should make the target or the victim experience intense fear.
Other crimes related to the offense of violation of a restraining order include vandalism, contempt of court, and stalking.
Find a Domestic Violence Attorney Near Me
Have you just received a notice of a permanent restraining order against you? You may not have to accept all the conditions of the order if you hire a lawyer. You should contact an experienced domestic violence attorney immediately. For the legal representation in Van Nuys, contact Van Nuys Criminal Attorney at 818-484-1100 and speak to one of our attorneys.
Domestic violence temporary restraining orders are meant to prevent the reoccurrence of domestic violence acts and also to provide enough time for the involved parties to resolve whatever is causing the violence. For instance, you could be issued with this kind of order if the court believes that you are a danger to someone else and that person needs protection against you before the court hears your case. If you have been issued with a temporary restraining order, you should follow its terms and conditions to the latter, or you risk facing charges for violation of a restraining order.
Having a restraining order against you might throw you into confusion, driving you to not adhere to its requirements. You may convince yourself that the person who obtained the order wasn’t fair, leading you even to contact them and ask why they had to do it. This will only develop more problems. In this state of confusion, what you need to do is talk to a restraining order criminal attorney, to give you further advice. If you are in Van Nuys, you can reach out to the attorneys at the Leah Legal law firm. We understand that having a restraining order against you may be troubling, but we will provide legal guidance and attempt to obtain the best possible solution.
Overview of Restraining Orders
A restraining order is also known as a protective order. A person may file a domestic violence temporary restraining order against you if you have threatened to abuse or have abused them. This order will protect them by preventing you from carrying out your threats or committing further abuse. Usually, these kinds of restraining orders are filed by a person with whom you have a close relationship. They include your spouse, registered domestic partner, co-habitant, ex-co-habitant, ex-spouse, boyfriend/girlfriend, ex-boyfriend, or ex-girlfriend. Your child can also seek a restraining order against you on their own provided they are twelve years old or above. Someone else may also file a domestic violence temporary restraining order on your child’s behalf.
A person you’re related to within the second degree of consanguinity or affinity can also file a domestic violence restraining order against you. This includes your:
- Mother-in-law or mother
- Father-in-law or father
- Legally adopted child or stepchild
- Sister-in-law or sister
- Grandparent-in-law or grandparent
- Stepparent
- Grandchild-in-law or grandchild
- Son-in-law
- Brother-in-law or brother
- Daughter-in-law
The in-law has to be through a current marriage. The person filing the restraining order may also request that the order protects other household or family members against you.
The Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) Process
For an individual to obtain a protective order against you, they have to present themselves in court and complete the necessary paperwork explaining to the court what transpired and why they need a protective order. After filling out the papers, the clerk of the court will give them a date when they will return to court for a hearing. If the victim is facing immediate threat and requires protection instantly, they can request for a TRO. The order will remain valid for between twenty and twenty-five days, or up to the time a court hearing will be conducted, which is usually in three weeks. The hearing determines whether or not a permanent restraining order should be issued.
Note that the person can request the court to issue a TRO against you without notifying you or without you being present. Most judges will issue the TRO if sufficient facts show the need for it.
The person seeking the TRO against you must have the TRO, and court papers served to you within five days of the scheduled hearing. The reason why you should be served with the papers is to let you know that someone has filed a petition against you. It’s after you have been personally served with the TRO that it will be in full effect. This means that there has to be evidence that you were personally served with the TRO.
Note that the TRO should not be served through any other means except in person. If it’s served through other means, the judge won’t issue a PRO. For instance, if you are served through the mail, that TRO will be considered invalid. And if you are taken to court for violating an order that wasn’t served properly, you can always argue that it was invalid. Usually, the protective order papers are served by a process server or police officer.
Generally, temporary protective order papers include the date & time the hearing will occur, an account of the requested action, and any other document the victim may have presented in court to support their petition. After being served, you will generally have between ten and twenty days prior to the date of the hearing to submit your response to the victim’s statements.
For you to be issued with a restraining order, you must have engaged in a given extent of threatening behavior that has affected the victim or by which there is reasonable cause to believe the victim might be affected. Domestic violence restraining orders are inclined to include indications of psychological, physical, or emotional abuse.
If the victim lives in California, but you reside in a different state, the court might not have personal jurisdiction over you since you are an out-of-California resident. This means the court might not be capable of granting a restraining order against you. There are various ways, however, that a court can have jurisdiction over you if you live outside California. They include:
- If you have a substantial connection to California. It could be that you regularly travel to California to visit the victim, to see your extended family, for business, or you resided in California and recently fled
- If the victim files their petition and you get served with the court petition while still in California, it’s another way a judge can have jurisdiction.
- One of the acts of abuse occurred in California. It could be that you made harassing phone calls or sent threatening messages from a different state, but the victim answered the calls or read the messages while in California. The court could rule that the abuse occurred to the victim while they were in their state of residence. It might also be possible that you were in California when you abused the victim but have since left for another state.
However, note that even if the above scenarios do not apply to the victim, it does not necessarily mean they cannot get a restraining order against you. If they file the order, they may be granted their request on consent or the court may be able to find other circumstances that permit the victim’s request to be granted.
Note that if the courts in California decline to grant the victim’s request, the victim can still file for the restraining order in the court in the state you reside in. However, they are unlikely to do so since they have to file the petition in person and appear in court a couple of times, which might be challenging if your state of residence is far away.
What a Domestic Violence Temporary Restraining Order May Require Of You
If the judge has issued a domestic violence temporary protective order against you, you may be required to do this:
- Not to threaten, follow, abuse, assault, sexually assault, harass, stalk the victim, or damage their property or disturb their peace
- Make contact, either indirectly or directly on the phone or through other means
Other requirements include:
- Granting the victim the exclusive possession, control, or care of any animals that you, the victim, or your child owns, and that you should keep your distance from and shouldn’t hurt the animal
- Vacating the home that you and the victim live in even if you’re the home’s owner or are the tenant
- Paying alimony (if you’re married) and child support
- Granting the victim temporary ownership or possession of items you own jointly, for instance, a computer, car, second home, etc. The court may also order you to pay the ongoing debts that are linked to those things
- Paying back the money the victim lost for not going to work or any other costs like shelter, medical, dental, legal, or counseling fees that stemmed from the abuse
- Paying the victim’s lawyer fees if the victim is incapable of paying them and you earn much more than the victim does
- Attending a batterer’s treatment program or any other counseling programs
- Transferring a shared mobile phone account to the victim’s name alone, so they keep their existing wireless phone number and the wireless numbers of any minor child in their care
- Giving the victim temporary child visitation & custody. The court may decide where the minors will live, how they will spend their time with either parent (including when, where, and whether or not that time is supervised), and who will make critical decisions that affect them. Note that any support, custody or visitation order that’s made within a domestic violence protective order will continue to be in effect even when the restraining order period ends.
- Attending anger management classes. You may also be required to attend parenting classes if minors were involved in the situation leading to the protective order. These classes may be required for as long as the court issuing the order thinks is appropriate for you.
- Granting anything else the victim asks for that the court agrees to.
The Punishment You Will Face If You Violate a Restraining Order
Mostly, violating a protective order is a misdemeanor offense in California. This crime is punished by up to $1000 in fines and a county jail sentence of up to a year. In other cases, however, the crime of violation of a protective order can also be a wobbler. It turns into a wobbler if it’s your second conviction for violating a restraining order, and your violation involved an act of violence. Wobblers are offenses that the prosecution can charge as a felony or misdemeanor. If you’re convicted of a felony, you will face up to $10000 in fines and a state prison sentence of up to three years.
Fortunately, if you are an immigrant, being convicted for violating a protective order won’t affect your immigration status. We have cases when being convicted of a criminal offense leads to an alien defendant to be inadmissible or be deported, for instance, when you get sentenced for an aggravated felony. However, violation of a restraining order isn’t an offense that would lead to inadmissibility or deportation.
Another good news is that you can always have your record of violation of a restraining order crime expunged. This is the case provided that you complete your probation sentence or jail term successfully, depending on which sentence was imposed on you.
How a Domestic Violence Restraining Order Will Affect Your Gun Rights
If you own a firearm, you will likely be required to sell it, store it with the police, or part with it for as long as the restraining order is in effect. Also, you are likely to be prohibited from purchasing other firearms for the period the protective order is still active.
And if you are found guilty of violating the terms of a restraining order, you may be denied the right to possess or own a gun completely. But this is the case if you are only found guilty of a felony violation of protective order. California law outlines that felons can’t possess or own a gun, meaning you will be stripped of your firearm rights.
What to Do If Served With a Protective Order
If you’ve been issued with a temporary protective order, it’s critical that you:
- Adhere to the TRO terms and conditions— read through the order carefully and ensure you comprehend all the conditions therein. Regardless of how unfair the order appears to be to you, complete adherence to it will reduce the likelihood of a more permanent protective order being served.
- Contact an experienced restraining order defense lawyer as soon as possible— your lawyer will assess the facts surrounding the protective order and advise whether or not you’re a danger to the victim. Additionally, the judge may see your hiring of a lawyer as a gesture of good faith. Also, if you believe the order is invalid, talk to your lawyer to give you further direction.
Fighting a Domestic Violence TRO
Respond to the Victim’s Statements—here you will have the chance to tell the judge your side of the story and also prove why you didn’t and don’t pose a threat of harassment or violence to the victim. Have your lawyer review your response before filing it to make sure your statements show you only have the victim’s best interest at heart.
Tell the court your version of the story during the compulsory hearing, in which the judge will examine the TRO papers and determine whether to grant the PRO or not. Stay calm and follow your lawyer’s instructions to the latter. Any emotional outburst may undermine your case.
In case the temporary restraining order turns to a permanent restraining order despite the efforts to challenge it, continue adhering to all the conditions provided in the PRO. Usually, a PRO is not indeed permanent. It may last from several weeks to a few years. Full adherence to the TRO provisions decreases the likelihood of renewal or enforcement of a PRO.
Legal Defenses to a Violation of Protective Order Charge
If you are accused of violating the terms & conditions of a protective order, you will be allowed to defend yourself. Successfully challenging accusations of a protective order violation in the state of California revolve around the facts surrounding the case. Below are the common legal defenses your lawyer can argue in court on your behalf:
You didn’t have the intention of violating the order — If your lawyer can prove that you violated the order accidentally, due to mental deficiency, or because of an understanding, the judge may dismiss the allegations against you.
The order wasn’t properly served — as we saw earlier in this article, there are strict rules regarding how a protective order should be served. In case your lawyer can demonstrate the required rules to serve the order were not met, you shouldn’t be convicted of the crime of violating it.
There is inadequate proof to prove you are guilty — the prosecutor has to establish, beyond any doubt that you violated the terms of the protective order for you to be convicted. If your lawyer can successfully cast reasonable doubt on your case by showing that the proof against you isn’t sufficient or reliable, then you shouldn’t be convicted.
Find a Restraining Order Criminal Attorney Near Me
A restraining order can restrict you from doing a lot of things, especially with the person you love. Before taking further action that you regret, you should talk to an excellent criminal attorney who understands restraining orders. At the Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we have successfully helped clients throughout Van Nuys that have restraining order issues. We will review the facts surrounding the issuance of the order and help you figure out the next steps. Not only will we figure out what to do, but we will also defend you if you have been accused of violating a restraining order. Call us now at 818-484-1100 for a cost-free consultation for your case.
If someone who you don’t trust has compromising images or videos of you, it can feel like your life is falling apart. You may fear losing your reputation to such a degree that you’ll do just about anything to keep that person from releasing these pornographic materials onto the internet. However, you have a number of different options at your disposal to eliminate or mitigate the threat that revenge porn presents to your well-being. Before you take action, you’ll need to learn more about revenge porn and how it affects victims of domestic violence.
What is Revenge Porn?
When you’re in an intimate relationship with someone, you might exchange pornographic images or videos with that person over text messages or through a social media private messaging service. In addition, you may consent to your partner’s wish to film you while you perform sexual acts. While both of these types of pornographic media are obtained through consensual means, unless you consent to have these images or videos shared, it’s your partner’s responsibility to keep them private.
Some relationships, however, end badly, and if your partner still has compromising images or video footage of you after you break up, it’s natural to be concerned about what might happen to this pornographic media. You may be even more concerned if you’ve heard of revenge porn, which is, unfortunately, still highly popular around the world.
Revenge porn is when a former partner shares pornographic images or videos of you on the internet. While your former partner may only initially share this explicit media with one or two people, it’s incredibly easy to copy and save videos and images, and sharing media has become easier than ever in the social media age. In some cases, your former partner may upload compromising images or videos of you to websites that are specifically set up for amateur pornographic videos; in this instance, media depicting you nude or performing sex acts can very rapidly be shared between individuals all over the world.
In recent years, measures have been taken to crack down on the prevalence of revenge porn, but you can’t count on these initiatives to protect you from a former partner or spouse who wants to harm you by sharing intimate images or videos. If you want to make sure that your life won’t be destroyed by revenge porn, you’ll need to be proactive and take matters into your own hands.
How is Revenge Porn Related to Domestic Violence?
Revenge porn is bad enough when it is shared at the culmination of an otherwise healthy, consensual sexual relationship. However, this already dark practice has an even darker side that can show itself when a relationship is unhealthy; some partners may use revenge porn as a form of blackmail.
While most intimate relationships start positively, there’s no telling how a romantic partnership might progress. Over time, each person’s true self comes to the surface, and if your partner ends up being immature or traumatized, they may start to abuse you. Naturally, you’d want to escape from a physically or emotionally abusive relationship, but most people who abuse their partners are obsessive and insecure; they will use any means at their disposal to keep you trapped in a relationship with them.
If you made the seemingly harmless mistake of sharing naked or sexually explicit photos or videos with your partner at some point in your relationship, they might start threatening to share these photos with your friends, coworkers, or family. Since the effectiveness of this type of blackmail vanishes as soon as your partner actually follows through with their threat and shares the compromising material, this situation is, in some ways, preferable to the mass sharing of pornographic images of you without any warning. However, being trapped in a relationship with a sword of humiliation dangling over your head is a horror that no one should have to experience, and if your partner ends up sharing your revenge porn anyway, you’ll have endured the worst type of suffering that this cruel and childish practice can inflict.
If your partner continues to threaten to release your pornographic images and videos to the public, you may stay in a relationship with them out of fear that your reputation and career will be ruined. If you end up mustering the courage to walk away, however, it’s likely that they’ll share the compromising material, and then you’ll need to understand the effects that this type of pornography can have and how you can mitigate the effects of this potentially life-ruining act.
What Are the Effects of Revenge Porn?
When you’ve become a victim of revenge porn, you may start to fear showing your face in public. After all, anyone on the street could have seen you in a compromising situation that was only meant to be viewed by your committed partner, and you may start to become paranoid that close friends who have assured you that they’d never look at your revenge porn are lying to you.
While it’s unlikely that an employer would fire you due to circumstances that are beyond your control, you may start to feel so uncomfortable at work that you quit. Coworkers may get the wrong impression about you and make unwanted sexual advances, and even your family and close friends may suffer from being associated with your new notoriety.
Revenge porn can put an extreme strain on your personal relationship, and it can easily turn a previously outgoing person into an agoraphobic. Where revenge porn has the most serious impact, however, is on your romantic life; you may be afraid ever to date anyone again, and if you do seek out love, you may be worried that the person sitting across from you at a restaurant table or next to you in a movie theater has already seen a side of you that you only want to share with people who you trust.
Is Revenge Porn Illegal?
There’s no question that revenge porn is immoral; anyone who uploads or knowingly views this type of pornography has no standard of decency, and revenge porn has no place in an enlightened society. However, is revenge porn actually illegal?
According to the Cyber Rights Initiative, revenge porn is now illegal in 40 states. More and more states are following suit as state-level legislators become informed about the immensely negative impact that this type of pornography has on men and women around the country. In addition, Senator Kamala Harris of California has introduced a new bill to the Senate floor titled S.2162 or the “Enough Act.”
This bill has not yet been ratified into law, but if it were, it would make the distribution of revenge pornography a federal crime punishable by jail time in federal prison. At this point, however, victims of revenge pornography will need to rely on the individual laws that are present in their home states. Not all cases of dissemination of revenge pornography are prosecutable, but many are; to learn more, reach out to a qualified revenge porn lawyer in your state.
While not all states have laws on revenge porn, every state has made domestic abuse illegal in one way or another. In some cases, blackmail via revenge porn or distribution of revenge porn may be considered to be a form of domestic violence in and of itself, but most victims of revenge porn have also been exposed to other forms of domestic violence. If you’re concerned that you don’t have a case when it comes to revenge porn due to state law or other extenuating circumstances, you may still be able to level charges of domestic violence against your partner.
In the state of California, for instance, you can receive immediate protection from your partner if you have been the victim of domestic violence. If a law enforcement officer is summoned to your home on a domestic violence call and they determine that domestic violence has, in fact, taken place, they can issue you with an Emergency Protective Order (EPO). This order requires that your partner vacate the premises and have no contact with you for seven days, and during this time, you can work with the court to receive a more permanent restraining order.
You may also be able to take other forms of legal action against a partner who has abused you or distributed revenge pornography depicting your image. Consult with your revenge porn attorney to learn more about your options.
How Do Social Media Platforms View Revenge Porn?
As the scourge of revenge pornography has received more and more national attention, social media platforms have begun to take stronger stances against this phenomenon. In 2015, Google, Facebook, Twitter and a number of other big tech platforms teamed up to provide their users with tools to help remove revenge porn from the internet. All of the major social media platforms also now have stringent rules against revenge porn; if administrators or algorithms find revenge pornography on Twitter, for instance, it is immediately flagged for deletion.
In most cases, the best way to get help with removing revenge porn from big tech platforms is to reach out to customer service representatives from each platform. They will be alerted to the presence of revenge porn, and they will follow their policies to remove the offending material. Keep in mind, however, that it may be impossible to remove every copy of your compromising material from every social media platform on which it has been shared; while all of the major social media platforms stand united in their condemnation of revenge pornography, since this type of material is so easy to share, it is hard to eradicate it completely.
As you work with social media platforms to remove compromising material, keep in mind that these tech companies don’t seek out the presence of revenge porn on their own. You’ll need to find instances of revenge porn and alert the company, and social media companies also don’t take responsibility for the presence of revenge porn on their platforms. Instead, the responsibility for the presence of revenge porn on social media always lies with the person who posted or shared it, which means that you most likely won’t be able to sue a social media company for hosting revenge porn in which you’re depicted.
On the other hand, if you’re able to successfully assert that you own the copyright to compromising material, social media companies will most likely be forced to take stringent measures to remove revenge porn. To do so, however, you’ll need to prove that you took the videos or shot the pictures in question, or you’ll need to gain the cooperation of the person who produced the pornographic material.
How Do You Protect Yourself from Revenge Porn?
The best way to protect yourself from the potentially negative ramifications of revenge porn is to avoid generating any pornographic images or videos that bear your image. If you are photographed or filmed without your consent, that’s another matter, but in the case of consensual pornography, the ultimate reason why you’ve found yourself in this situation is that you allowed another person to gain access to personally compromising material.
For the same reason that you don’t hand out your credit cards or social security number to strangers, you should be very careful when you generate pornographic material. You may feel like you can trust a person that you’re in an intimate relationship with, but things can change quickly. It’s only reasonable to share pornographic material if you’ve been in a mature, committed relationship with someone for a number of years, which explains why the overwhelming majority of instances of revenge porn are generated from short-term or non-committed relationships.
Once you’ve made the choice to share sexually explicit images or videos of yourself with another person, there’s no way to prevent these images from becoming public. It used to be the case that if you shared pornographic material with another person, they’d have to make physical copies of it if they wanted to share it. These days, however, a person can make dozens of copies of your pornographic material within moments and share it with hundreds of people before you even know what happened.
What Can You Do If You’re a Victim of Revenge Porn?
Once compromising images of you have been shared on the internet, you may not be able to completely control what happens next. There are a variety of ways that you can try to put the genie back into the bottle, but the most important thing to remember is that, no matter what you do, it’s likely that pornographic images of you will be released onto the internet. On the other hand, however, here are a few of the steps you can take to try to mitigate the effects that revenge pornography has had on your life:
- Request content removal: Whether compromising images of you have appeared on Twitter, Facebook, or Google, reach out to the customer service representatives for these platforms to request the removal of the offending content.
- Contact the webmaster: Even if Google or another search engine agrees to remove the offending content, this content may still be present on the pornographic website on which it was originally posted. Reach out to the webmaster for the website to request that they permanently delete the content so that it won’t be available on any more search engines.
- Learn more about revenge porn laws: Revenge porn laws vary from state to state, so you’ll need to learn more about your area’s specific laws.
- Keep copies: If you end up taking legal action regarding your revenge porn, you’ll need to maintain copies of the evidence to present. While it might be tempting to delete text messages or emails that contain compromising images due to the trauma that they have caused, you’ll need to overcome this urge if you want to seek justice.
If your partner is using revenge porn to threaten you but they haven’t released it yet, it’s important to take legal action immediately. It’s never the right idea to endure domestic violence and hope that it will get better, and since there are resources at your disposal to protect yourself, there’s no reason to stand idly by. In the state of California and many other states, the first step that you should take if you’re a victim of domestic violence is to call the police.
Contacting a Revenge Porn Legal Expert Near Me
If you’ve become a victim of revenge porn, it’s time to seek out the help you need to get your life back on track. The capable revenge porn attorneys at the offices of Van Nuys Criminal Attorney are standing by to assist you with the process of clearing your reputation and bringing the person who hurt you to justice. To get started on erasing the negative impact that revenge porn has had on your life, reach out to Los Angeles Criminal Lawyer by calling 818-484-1100 today!
Stalking charges have the potential to upend your life. If you are convicted of stalking, your life will never be the same. California has comparably severe stalking laws. Thankfully, help is available. Our legal team is here to clear your name and return your life to normal. If you are accused of stalking or charged with stalking, this is the time to develop an understanding of stalking charges and hire a stalking defense attorney. In the best possible scenario, you will have an attorney on your side before the charges are filed. Let’s take a look at the details of stalking charges.
The Basics of Stalking
Stalking is best defined as the repeated harassing, threatening or following of another individual to the point that the stalked individual fears for his safety. Furthermore, if the stalking victim fears for the well-being of his or her family, he or she is being stalked. The operative word in the definition of stalking is repeated. A single event in which someone follows another person or harasses them does not qualify as stalking as it is not repeated behavior. Let’s take a look at some examples of stalking,
Stalking Examples
There is a common misconception stalking is limited to trailing someone as they go from one place to another. Though physically following someone qualifies as stalking, it is just one of many different examples. Those who make repeated harassing phone calls can be found guilty of stalking. Even coordinating instances in which an individual intentionally crosses paths with the targeted person qualifies as stalking. Driving by the target’s workplace/home, sending multiple emails, texts, letters or even undesired gifts also qualify as examples of stalking.
Successful Stalking Defense Strategies
Our legal team has numerous stalking defense strategies at our disposal. The unique facts of your case dictate which strategy is optimal. A stalking defense attorney will evaluate the details of your situation and explain exactly why the selected defense strategy is optimal. In many cases, the allegations are false. Consider a situation in which two romantic flames break up and one party accuses the other of stalking in an attempt to obtain vengeance for ending the relationship. Such false stalking accusations are more common than most assume.
Golden State residents are sometimes tempted to file stalking charges simply because the state has harsh penalties for stalkers. You might have been accused of stalking by someone who is angry at you or has a grudge. You need a solid legal team on your side to review all evidence including everything from handwriting to audio, video, DNA, etc. to make the case to prove you are not guilty of stalking.
The First Amendment Defense
It is interesting to note the Golden State’s stalking laws are not applicable to activities related to the First Amendment, commonly referred to as the right to freedom of speech. There is a chance our legal team will be able to develop a credible argument that supposed threats made while participating in a protest or assembly were a component of your basic right to free speech. The bottom line is if you are participating in an activity protected by the Constitution, California’s stalking laws are not applicable.
The Lack of a Credible Threat Defense
In some cases, there is no credible threat. If you make a threat against an individual, it does not mean it is an act of stalking. Stalking mandates a credible threat. Consider a situation in which you make an outrageous threat in the heat of the moment. There is no way you can feasibly act on such a threat. Nor would the threat put a reasonable individual in fear. Therefore, the threat is not considered credible. If there is no credible threat, you cannot be found guilty of stalking. There is a chance none of the legal defenses detailed above will apply to your unique case. However, it still makes sense to meet with the stalking legal experts as we will fiercely advocate on your behalf to obtain a plea deal that does not significantly disrupt your life.
The Mistaken Identity Defense
There are some cases in which stalking charges are filed when the alleged stalker has been mistaken for another person. Those who have been victimized are often quick to blame an innocent person in an attempt to feel better. Our legal team is here to help in cases of mistaken identity. As long as you were not in the vicinity of the stalked party, we will likely be able to successfully argue you were physically far away and could not have stalked the accuser.
Additional Stalking Defenses
If your conduct does not meet the definition of harassment as detailed above, the charges might be tossed. The challenge is in proving the conduct did not elevate to qualify as harassment based on the law’s nuanced wording. Furthermore, it might be possible to prove your conduct was not malicious or willful. There are numerous other stalking defense strategies that have proven successful in the past. However, if you do not give our legal team the opportunity to analyze your case in-depth, you will not know if any of the stalking defense strategies noted above or those not noted in this post are applicable to your unique situation.
Stalking in the State of California
As noted above, the state of California takes stalking extremely seriously. Part of the reason why the Golden State takes stalking more seriously than other states is the high prevalence of such behavior in this part of the country. Countless celebrities located throughout California have been stalked. The state prosecutes stalking under section 646.9 of the Penal Code. The state of California considers the malicious, willful and repeated undesired contact with another person to be harassment. The threat must be construed as sincere and made in the form of the written or spoken word.
Even sending texts, emails and interacting with others in online chat rooms can qualify as a stalking threat. However, if the accused party’s actions did not put the victim in fear for his or her safety or life or the safety of their family, stalking has not occurred. The alleged stalker must have performed two or more actions that indicate continuity.
The term “credible threat” is especially important in the context of stalking. If there is not a credible threat, there is no stalking. A credible threat is one that makes the target worried about his or her well-being. However, this fear must be reasonable in for the threat to be considered credible.
The Emergence of Cyber Stalking
It was not long ago when stalking was limited to physical interactions, phone calls and regular snail mail. Nowadays, it is possible to stalk someone online. Internet stalking, also known as cyber stalking, is the use of the web or another electronic means to stalk another person. Cyber stalkers use all different forms of electronic communication to perform stalking. Everything from social media to instant messages, email, text messages, posts on internet discussion boards and the use of spyware can be used to stalk.
The transmission of obscene or threatening messages, posting incorrect information online, ordering goods/service in the target’s name and posting information with the intention of spurring criminal activity qualify as cyber stalking. Even bullying an individual on social media, an online message board, chat room or another online platform qualifies as cyber stalking. As long as the stalking is performed on an electronic medium, it qualifies as cyber stalking. One of the most notable instances of stalking in California took place two decades ago when an individual in Hollywood was accused of using the web to coordinate for a target to be sexually assaulted. This was accomplished by posting sexually suggestive ads on the web that displayed the targeted woman’s address.
California Stalking Penalties
If you are accused of stalking, the first thing you should do is lean on an attorney for assistance. Stalking can be charged as a felony or misdemeanor, based on the crime’s circumstances. Even the defendant’s criminal history can play a part in the penalty. Misdemeanor penalties have the potential to result in upwards of a full year in county jail. Misdemeanor penalties can also include a $1,000 fine. Felony penalties have the potential to put a defendant in state prison for upwards of half a decade. There is a maximum of a $1,000 fine for misdemeanor penalties. However, the penalties do not end there.
Those found guilty of stalking can also be slapped with a restraining order that bars contact with the supposed victim. Though you might not care for the individual pressing the stalking charges, you might desire or need to interact with him or her for various reasons. As an example, if you have one or several children with the party that is allegedly being stalked, you will desire to be in their company. However, if you are found guilty of stalking, you will likely be slapped with a restraining order that bars contact with the supposed victim. In fact, the restraining order will spell out exactly how close you can physically be to the alleged victim. If you have children or other mutual relatives with the party in question, you will not be able to see them if you have a restraining order.
Additional potential stalking penalties include forced commitment to a hospital for the mentally ill and sex registration. The details of each unique case determine if the defendant is to register as a sex offender in accordance with Section 290 PC of the state’s Penal Code. The judge will ultimately determine if sex offender registration is necessary. If the judge determines the stalking activity should spur sex offender registration and the guilty party fails to register as such, he or she will likely be charged with a felony offense.
A guilty party that violates an existing restraining order will face upwards of four years in prison. Those who have a previous felony stalking conviction will face up to five years in prison. An individual with a prior conviction for criminal threats or domestic violence can be sent to prison for two to five years. In certain cases, the length of imprisonment can be extended if specific circumstances apply. As an example, stalking while armed with a weapon can add between one and three years to a prison sentence. If bodily harm resulted, the prison sentence can be extended between three and five years.
It is important to note there are some situations in which stalking is automatically considered a felony offense. If the supposed stalker is accused of stalking a target while violating a protective order or if the defendant was accused of stalking in the past, he or she will be charged with a felony. It does not matter if the prior case is against a completely different person; the stalking offense will still be a felony as opposed to the comparably less severe misdemeanor. The logic in elevating the charge to a felony for such defendants is to discourage those who have a history of criminal behavior from repeating deviant activities.
Stalking as a Federal Crime
There is the potential for stalking to be prosecuted as a federal crime. There is a federal law against stalking on the books known as Interstate Stalking. This law was passed in 1996 as a component of the Violence Against Women Act. This act makes it a federal felony to harass or stalk someone from one state to the next if such actions induce fear, injury or death to the target or the target’s family. Furthermore, it is a federal felony to partake in stalking or harassment on United States territorial lands, Native American reservations or military property.
Consider the Ramifications of Being Found Guilty of Stalking
A stalking conviction will be a black mark on your record for the rest of your life. It will be difficult to obtain gainful employment, find a place to live, obtain government security clearance and generally live a normal life if you have a felony stemming from a stalking conviction. It might prove difficult to do something as simple as securing a studio apartment lease if you have a felony on your permanent record. So do not take accusations of stalking or formal stalking charges lightly. If you do not hire an attorney, there is a good chance you will be found guilty and face the challenges detailed above.
Though hiring an attorney takes some money, the life costs resulting from felonious stalking are much more severe. As noted above, those found guilty of stalking face potential penalties ranging from a significant fine to jail time and a marred permanent record. The end result of these punishments is missed life opportunities and misery. In fact, you might even end up on a list of registered sex offenders if found guilty of stalking. This would be quite the egregious injustice if you are completely innocent. Registered sex offenders have strict limitations in terms of where they can live and work. The sad truth is all it takes is one disgruntled person to frame you for stalking and you can end up with the problems detailed above and then some. You can avoid this nightmare by reaching our to our legal team for a thorough evaluation of your case. We will formulate the best possible legal defense to beat the charges and get your life back on track.
Why You Need a Stalking Defense Attorney on Your Side
If you are accused of stalking or charged with stalking, the worst thing you can do is nothing. You need a savvy and experienced defense stalking attorney in your corner to emerge with any semblance of justice. Do not wallow in self-pity, confront the accuser or argue with the police. Your first course of action should be consulting with our defense stalking attorney. We will evaluate your case, explain the nuances of stalking laws in California and zealously advocate on your behalf to get your life back on track. The last thing you need is jail time, a fine and unnecessary drama. Our legal teal is here to focus on beating your stalking charge and finally returning your life to normal. This is the professional, in-depth assistance you need during this difficult period of your life.
Finding a Stalking Defense Attorney Near Me
Have you been charged with stalking or domestic violence? Our legal team is here to help you avoid arrest, penalties, prosecution and the rest of the negative fallout of a stalking charge. Reach out to our Los Angeles Criminal Lawyer today at 818-484-1100 to schedule an appointment.
A restraining order or protective order is an order that is issued by a judge intended to protect someone from being stalked, harassed, threatened or harmed by another person who is specifically named in the order. The restraining order typically describes the type contact the individual is prohibited from having with his or her alleged victim, whether it be via phone, email or text contact, or coming within a certain distance of the person. When you are named as the “restraining party” in the order, and you deliberately disregard the specific terms of the restraining order you can be charged with a violation of a restraining order under Penal Code section 273.6. Violation of a restraining order is sometimes referred to as contempt of court. If you are the restraining party and you have violated a restraining order, you can be facing serious consequences.
However, in order for the prosecution to be able to obtain a conviction of violation of a restraining order against you, the following elements must be proved:
Elements of Violation of a Restraining Order
- A legal restraining order was issued by the court /judge,
- The restraining party knew about the order, and
- The restraining party willfully and intentionally disregarded the terms of the order
Restraining Order – What Penal Code section 273.6 means by a “restraining order” is that there must be evidence that the restraining order in question is a legal restraining order and that it was given in the proper jurisdiction.
The Person “Knew” About the Order – You must have had knowledge of the restraining order either by hearing the judge order it in court, hearing an officer tell you about it, or have it in writing by a third party.
Willful Violation of the Order – Willful means that that you violated the order intentionally or on purpose. If you accidently run into the person who you were ordered to stay away from, you haven’t violated the terms of the order. What you need to do in such an instance is refrain from having any communication with that person and leave the area immediately. Only if you fail to do these two things can you be found guilty of violating the restraining order under Penal Code section 273.6.
Here is an example of a violation of a restraining order: Janet and her husband get into an argument. He lashes out at her physically and hits her. The police are called and he is arrested. After court proceedings take place a restraining order is instated. The terms of this restraining order include not contacting each other in any way, not being within 500 yards of each other, and for Janet’s husband to move out of the home pending trial. Janet’s husband believes he has been unfairly treated and refuses to move out. Because this is a violation of the terms of the restraining order set by the judge, he is arrested and charged with a violation of Penal Code section 273.6.
Categories of Restraining Orders
The specific types of restraining orders that can be issued by a judge are civil harassment restraining orders, restraining orders for elder abuse cases, restraining orders for violence that occurs at the workplace, and finally and most commonly domestic violence restraining orders.
Civil Harassment – These restraining orders are meant to protect from neighbors, friends, or other people with whom you do not share a close intimate relationship.
Elder Abuse – These restraining orders are meant to protect senior ages 65 and older and even younger people who have certain disabilities and cannot protect themselves.
Workplace Violence – These restraining orders are meant to protect an employee from violence in the workplace.
Domestic Violence – These restraining orders are meant to protect to victims of domestic violence – which generally include people with which you have an intimate relationship.
Various Stages of Restraining Orders
Restraining orders come in three stages of protection:
Emergency Protective Orders – Emergency protective orders, otherwise known as EPOs, are issued in cases of emergency. These orders are most often ordered by the police after responding to calls of domestic violence. If there is evidence of immediate danger, the officer who responded to the call will get a hold of a judge who is on call to issue an emergency protective order. This emergency order can last up to 7 days. After the protective order expires, you must appear before a judge and request an extension, if necessary. You can request either a temporary restraining order or a permanent restraining order.
Temporary Restraining Order – Temporary restraining orders, commonly referred to as TROs, are restraining orders that can last up to two or three weeks. Temporary restraining orders are issued in cases of harassment or after an emergency restraining order expires.
Permanent Restraining Order – Permanent restraining orders, or PROs, are issued after court proceedings when the court determines that there is evidence of extended danger. The court hears from both the alleged victim as well as the defendant in order to decide whether or not to issue the order. The judge will also determine the specific restrictions and terms of the restraining order, as well as the period of time during which the protective order will be in effect. Permanent restraining orders can last for several years if necessary.
Penalties for Violating a Restraining Order
Penalties for violations of Penal Code section 273.6 vary dependent on the circumstances of the case. The penalties can be increased if this is not your first offense and if the victim sustained a serious injury. If this is the first time you are in violation of a restraining order, it will likely be charged as a misdemeanor crime. As a misdemeanor, you can face a maximum of $1,000 in fines and a maximum of one year in county jail. If convicted of felony violation of a restraining order you can receive a maximum three years in state prison and a maximum of $10,000 in fines. Additional penalties for conviction include: court fines, restitution to cover counseling for the victim, hospital costs and medical treatment costs. You may also be ordered to relinquish any firearms or other weapons in your possession. A violation of an order of no firearms during the course of a restraining order can result in an additional charge of a misdemeanor or felony.
Defenses for Violating a Restraining Order
There are some defenses that a skillful attorney can explore when trying to prove that a person is innocent of a charge of Penal Code section 273.6 violation of a restraining order.
Illegal Restraining Order – This is the first question that a criminal defense lawyer will ask. When a restraining order is issued you are mandated to abide by it with no excuses. Sometimes, however, these orders are issued on illegal basis. If the judge didn’t have the proper authority or jurisdiction to order it, if it was issued improperly, or if there was no imminent danger present because the victim embellished the facts of the case, the restraining order is considered invalid does not have to be adhered to. If this is the case, the Criminal Law Office of Van Nuys Criminal Attorney will present the evidence to the judge and prosecutor and advocate for the order to be revoked immediately and the charges dropped.
No Knowledge of the Restraining Order – You must have been aware of the restraining order in order to be in violation of a restraining order. A person named in a restraining order must be legally notified of the restraining order that is in place against them. There are specific requirements as to how the person named in the restraining order is to be notified in order to be in violation of Penal Code section 273.6. You must be notified personally by the judge if you are present in court, personally by an officer who has been ordered to notify the named party due to the justifiable belief that the named party is otherwise unaware that they have been named in a restraining order, or it must be in writing by a third party who is not involved in the case.
False Accusations – It is quite common for people to falsely accuse others of violating a restraining order. If this is the case, a dedicated and experienced attorney will investigate and likely find proof that you did nothing wrong and were falsely accused of a violation.
Driving crimes in Los Angeles, California can attract misdemeanor or felony charges depending on the intensity of the crime. These crimes include DUI, driving on a suspended license, vehicular manslaughter, a hit and run, reckless driving, and other traffic violation offenses. The Leah Legal Firm is specialized in representing people who are accused of these charges. If you contact us, we’ll evaluate your case and devise the best approach to handle your case, including representing you in court or negotiating with the prosecutor before formal charges are pressed against you. Either way, your charges might be dropped or penalties reduced.
An Overview of Driving Crimes
Anytime you are on the road, you may intentionally or unintentionally commit a driving crime. Driving crimes can lead to serious penalties, fines and jail terms depending on the type of the crime, the risk you pose to other road users, your previous record and whether anyone was injured. We have compiled the common driving crimes below.
- Driving Under the Influence
Under California DUI laws, it is a crime to drive while under the influence of drugs or alcohol. DUI crimes are charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony depending on whether:
- The offense resulted in injuries
- You have a previous DUI record
Driving under the influence is a priorable offense, meaning that the penalties for the crime increase as you commit more DUI offenses within a 10-year lookback period.
When you commit a first offense misdemeanor DUI, you may receive a probation or jail time if you are convicted. You may also be required to use an ignition interlock device for four months, get a license suspension for six months, and pay associated fines and penalties. The penalties for a first time misdemeanor DUI include:
- Informal probation of between three and five years
- A requirement to attend a court-approved DUI school for 3 to 9 months
- Fines of between $390 and $1000
- License suspension for 6 to 10 months
- A county jail term of up to 6 months
A second offense misdemeanor DUI committed within the ten years of the first offense attracts the following penalties upon a conviction:
- Summary probation of between 3 and 5 years
- A county jail term of between 96 hours and one year
- Fines of between $390 and $1000
- An 18 to 30 month California DUI school approved by the court
- Mandatory ignition interlock device (IID) installation for one year
- The DMV may suspend your license for two years
A third conviction for a California DUI within ten years of the first conviction attracts punishment that may include:
- Informal probation of between 3 and five years
- A jail term of between 120 days and one year
- Fines of between $390 and $1000
- Mandatory IID installation for three years
- License suspension of three years which may be restricted after 18 months
- The DMV assigns you the habitual traffic offender designation
Where a DUI results in injury, you may be charged for a misdemeanor or a felony depending on the circumstances of the arrest and your criminal background.
Where the misdemeanor offense causes injury to a third party, you may be subject to the following penalties:
- Summary probation of 3-5 years
- A county jail term of 5 days to 1 year
- An alcohol program of 3, 18 or 30 months
- Fines of between $390 and $5,000
- A 6-month mandatory IID installation
- Restitution to any injured parties
A California DUI can be charged as a felony when you have four or more DUI convictions within ten years. A felony DUI may attract the following punishments:
- A term of 16 months, two years or 3 years in state prison
- Fines of between $390 and $1000
- Mandatory installation of an IID for at least a year
- A designation as a Habitual Traffic Offender
A felony DUI with injuries to a third party attracts more serious penalties and could even lead to life imprisonment where death occurs. Some of these penalties include
- A prison term of between 16 months and 10 years in state prison and an additional and consecutive sentence of between one to 6 years. The prison sentence depends on the number of people you injured and the extent of their injuries.
- Fines of between $1015 and $5,000
- You may receive a strike on your record under the California three strikes law
- You may be required to attend a drug/ alcohol program for 18-30 months
- You earn the Habitual Traffic Offender designation for three years
- A mandatory 2 or 3-year installation of an IID
- Restitution to injured parties
- Vehicular Manslaughter
Vehicular manslaughter occurs when you are driving a car in a lawful manner but causes the death of another person, or cause death due to criminal negligence or recklessness while driving. Vehicular manslaughter is charged as either a felony or a misdemeanor depending on the surrounding circumstances. Some of the key elements that qualify a driving crime as vehicular manslaughter include:
- You committed an infraction, misdemeanor or lawful act in a way that might cause death
- The act threatened human life under the circumstances
- You were grossly negligent in committing the act. Gross negligence occurs where you committed a reckless act that posed a danger for great bodily harm, and a reasonable person would have known the risks of engaging in such an act.
- Another person died from your actions
A misdemeanor vehicular manslaughter charge occurs when you knowingly participate in a collision to make a false insurance claim or commit insurance fraud, and someone dies in the collision.
Penalties for a misdemeanor vehicular manslaughter charge due to gross negligence include misdemeanor probation, a maximum of one year in county jail, or a fine of up to $1000.
For a felony vehicular manslaughter charge, penalties include felony probation, imprisonment for 2, 4, or 6 years in the California state prison, or a fine of up to $10,000.
Where you committed vehicular manslaughter for financial gain, you can be charged a fine of up to $10,000 which may be accompanied by a 4, 6 or 10-years imprisonment in the California state prison.
The DMV will also revoke your license for at least three years.
- Driving With A Suspended License
The DMV may suspend your license for a number of reasons including:
- You have accumulated too many points on your driving license, which leads you to be declared a negligent operator
- You have a mental or physical disability
- You are convicted for a California DUI
Driving with a suspended license is a misdemeanor whose penalties depend upon the cause of the suspension of your license.
- Where your license is revoked due to offenses such as drug addiction, physical or mental conditions or reckless driving, you may spend between 5 days to 6 months in county jail and pay a fine of between $300 and $1,000.
- Where the license is suspended for general reasons and chemical test refusals, you may be sentenced to a maximum of six months in county jail and a fine of between $300 to $1000.
- Where the suspension is due to a DUI, you spend a minimum of 10 days and a maximum of six months in county jail, pay a fine of $300-$1000 and install an IID.
- Where your license is suspended because you have attained the habitual offender status, you spend 30 days in county jail and pay a fine of $1,000.
- Driving Without a Valid License
Driving in California without a valid driver’s license is unlawful. You can be charged for driving without a valid license when:
- You fail to renew your license
- You do not have a license
- You fail to get a license within ten days of becoming a California resident
Driving without a valid license is usually charged as either a misdemeanor or an infraction. First-time offenses are usually charged as infractions, but your lawyer can negotiate on your behalf to have your misdemeanor charge reduced to an infraction. As an infraction, you will be required to pay a fine of not more than $250. When charged as a misdemeanor, you can spend up to 6 months in county jail and may pay a fine of up to $1,000.
- Hit and Run
California vehicle code requires drivers involved in an accident to stop within a reasonable location closest to the scene of the accident. They are also required to help the injured parties and provide them with their personal information such as vehicle registration number, phone number, address and in some cases, insurance coverage information. Where no one is available to receive the information, they should leave a note with their personal information in the other vehicle or property. They should also notify the police about the incident within the shortest time possible. You can face a hit and run charge if you fail to stop to exchange personal information after hitting a passenger, being involved in a collision, destroying or damaging someone’s property while driving.
A hit and run misdemeanor attracts the following penalties
- A fine of up to $1,000
- A sentence of up to 6 months in county jail
- Restitution to the property owner for damages
- Up to three years of informal probation
Hit and run cases where only property is damaged are charged as misdemeanor cases. You may also be allowed to engage in a civil compromise where your charges are dismissed upon compensation to the property owner for the related damages. To qualify for a civil compromise, it should be your first offense, and there should be no aggravating circumstances or alcohol use.
A felony hit and run occur when you drive away from the scene of the accident without providing your personal information where the accident causes injury to another person. Penalties for a felony hit and run offense include:
- A fine of between $1,000 and $10,000
- 3 or 4 years in the California state prison
- Reckless Driving
VC 23103 defines reckless driving as driving with wanton disregard for the safety property or people. Wanton disregard if the driver:
- Knows that their actions present an unjustifiable and a substantial risk of harm, and
- Intentionally ignores the risk they present
Reckless driving is charged either as a felony or a misdemeanor depending on whether any injuries occur and the extent of these injuries. Where only the reckless driver is injured, the punishment is 5-90 days in county jail or a fine of between $145 and $1000 or both.
For a first offense misdemeanor charge, you can get misdemeanor probation without jail time. However, during this probationary period, you will be required to adhere to some set conditions.
Where reckless driving causes a minor injury to a third party, then the crime is punishable by a 30-day to a one-year sentence in jail and a fine of between $200 and $1000.
Where reckless driving causes serious injury to a third party, the crime is charged as a wobbler (the prosecutor can charge it as a felony or a misdemeanor at his or her discretion). Wobbler reckless driving offense results in serious injury and the offending driver has a previous conviction for reckless driving, an exhibition of speed and driving under the influence.
Some of the injuries that make a reckless driving a wobbler case include bone fracture, impairment of a body part or organ, concussions, extensive wounds that require suturing, serious disfigurement, brain injury and loss of consciousness.
When charged as a misdemeanor, it attracts penalties such as a sentence of between 30 days and six months in county jail and a fine of $220-$1,000.
As a felony, the penalties include 16 months, two years or 3 years in county jail and/or a fine not exceeding $10,000.
Reckless driving can often be linked to other driving crimes such as vehicular manslaughter or Watson Murder.
A Watson murder is a form of second-degree murder with the following elements:
- You commit a reckless act that causes the death of another person
- The natural consequences of the reckless act can cause death
- You knowingly ignore this danger
The penalty for a Watson murder resulting from reckless driving includes a sentence of 15 years to life imprisonment. The sentence increases to 25 years to life imprisonment if the victim is a peace officer.
When you drive recklessly to record it for a commercial purpose, you can be charged for a misdemeanor. The penalties you may get include a sentence of up to six months in county jail and a fine not exceeding $2000.
The prosecutor handling your case can only prosecute you for one crime when you commit reckless driving intending to record it for commercial purposes.
Reckless driving has other additional consequences including
- You earn points with the DMV which could lead to the suspension of your license
- Your insurance premiums are increased or canceled
Legal Defenses for Driving Crimes
When you are taken to court for a driving crime, you have to come up with a defense if you plead “not guilty” to those charges. Your lawyer will help you in preparing your defense and gathering evidence to support the defense. The commonly used defenses in driving crimes charges include:
- Necessity
You could have committed a crime such as driving without a valid license or driving recklessly to avoid causing greater harm to yourself or another person. In using necessity as a defense, you have to prove that you had no other legal alternative and that your actions did not cause greater harm than the one you were avoiding.
- The Injury to The Victim Was Not Serious
Where a driving accident causes an injury to a third party, you can indicate that the injury was not serious and did not cause serious bodily harm. When your lawyer uses this defense, your charges are likely to be reduced from a felony to a misdemeanor, or from a misdemeanor to an infraction.
- You Were Not Aware of an Existing Condition
For driving crimes such as driving with a suspended license, you could use lack of knowledge about the suspension as your legal defense. Lack of knowledge defense may be allowed where you can prove that you received no notification for the suspension of your driving license. For example, where you move to another location, but the letter notifying you of the suspension is mailed to your old address, you can be acquitted, or the charges reduced because of lack of knowledge.
Find a Criminal Lawyer Near Me
When you are charged with a driving crime, it is best that you hire the services of an experienced criminal lawyer to help in evaluating the case, gathering evidence, and protecting your rights. At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we have extensive experience in handling driving crimes and related charges in Los Angeles. We understand how the legal system works, how prosecutors handle cases, and how we can help defend you. You can schedule a consultation today with one of our Los Angeles Criminal lawyers by calling 814-484-1100 to let us know more about the situation surrounding your case and how we can help you.
Driving on a suspended license in California can result in fines, further license suspension, jail time, and other significant penalties. If you or a loved one have been charged with this crime, do not take it lightly or simply assume you can do nothing to fight the charges. Only by securing the services of an experienced criminal defense lawyer can you maximize your chances of a favorable outcome to your case.
At Leah Legal, we understand your situation if you have been accused of driving with a suspended license. We know the relevant California statutes and Los Angeles and Southern California court processes “like the back of our hand,” and we will apply that knowledge in your behalf and fight tenaciously for your future.
For a free legal consultation and to learn more about the law and available defense strategies for this practice area, call us anytime 24/7 at 818-484-1100.
Causes of License Suspension in California
Driving a vehicle with a suspended or revoked license is a distinct offense in California, covered under Vehicle Code Section 14601. Regardless of why the license was revoked or for how long, if you operated a motor vehicle on a public highway while you knew that your license was in suspension, you can be charged under VC 14601.
However, the reason for the suspension will affect which subsection of VC 14601 you are charged with and the sentence you ultimately receive if convicted.
Here are some of the most common reasons why a California driver’s license gets suspended/revoked:
- DUI or DUID, whether for a BAC of .08% or higher or for driver impairment due to intoxication regardless of the BAC.
- Refusal of a DUI chemical test, thus violating the “implied consent” rule.
- Wet or dry reckless driving, with or without injury caused.
- Operating a motor vehicle in a negligent or grossly negligent manner.
- Being labeled a habitual traffic offender after accumulating too many points on your driving record.
- Operating a motor vehicle without the mental/physical ability to do so safely.
- Getting caught with no auto insurance coverage after getting into a car accident.
- Failure to pay a traffic ticket or to appear in court after being issued a traffic ticket.
- Failure to pay child support.
- Evading a police officer.
Each of these offenses can lead to a driver’s license suspension, but the duration will vary considerably, ranging from 30 days to 4 years or more (for certain repeat offense DUIs). And those offenses which carry longer suspension periods will generally also carry more severe penalties if you are caught driving on a license suspended for that offense.
A Breakdown of VC 14601
As mentioned above, VC 14601 has many subsections, each covering different underlying offenses that led to a license suspension. To give you a basic idea of how this works, here is the breakdown:
- VC 14601a covers driving on a license under suspension for reckless driving, negligent/incompetent operation of a motor vehicle, for driving while mentally or physically impaired so that you cannot operate the vehicle safely, and driving while addicted to drugs or alcohol.
- VC 14601.2a addresses driving on a license suspended for a DUI or DUID. This is the most severely punished subsection under VC 14601.
- VC 14601.3 deals with driving on a license suspended for being a habitual traffic offender, which occurs when you had three or more accidents, three or more significant traffic violations, or two or more very serious traffic violations in a one-year period.
- VC 14601.1a covers driving with a suspended license for any and all reasons not already addressed in 14601a, 14601.2a, and 14601.3.
What Must the Prosecution Prove?
In order to gain a conviction on a charge of driving with a suspended license (VC 14601), the prosecutor must prove the following two elements of the crime beyond reasonable doubt:
- You did, in fact, drive a vehicle on a public highway in California while your driver’s license was suspended.
- You were aware at the time you drove the vehicle that the license was suspended.
The fact that your license was suspended is rarely at issue in these types of cases, although it can happen that a license is suspended by mistake. Usually, the case turns on whether or not you were aware of the suspension.
How do prosecutors seek to prove you knew your license was suspended? Here are some evidences they use:
- A California DMV notice of driver’s license suspension was mailed to your most recently reported address and was not returned to the DMV as undeliverable.
- You were given notice of the license’s suspension personally by a police officer or in court by the presiding judge.
Unfortunately, California reverses the normal “innocent until proven guilty” principle in driving with a suspended license cases. They use, instead, what is called “rebuttable presumption.” So, it is possible to bring forward evidence that you did not know of the suspension and win a case in this manner, but unless this is done, a presumption of such knowledge is assumed by the court.
Possible Punishments
Each subsection of VC 14601, driving with a suspended license, is punished differently, and the defendant’s past criminal record and details of each case can also affect the sentence. And if you have a 2nd driving with a suspended license conviction within 5 to 7 years of the 1st one, the sentence will be enhanced.
While penalties differ based on why your license was suspended and are stricter for such things as DUI, habitual traffic offender, or vehicular manslaughter, here is a basic breakdown of the possible punishments you could face.
Driving on a suspended license (VC 14601) is a misdemeanor charge. First-time offenses are punishable by:
- Between 5 days and 6 months in county jail.
- Summary probation.
- A fine of from $300 to $1,000 or more.
A repeat offense within 5 years of the first will result in a $500 to $2,000 fine and the usual county jail term. However, a second offense requires a minimum of 10 days in jail even if probation is granted.
If the underlying reason for the suspension was a DUI, driving with a suspended license requires at least 10 days spent in jail even for a first-time offense and at least 30 days for a second offense. Additionally, it will require you install an ignition interlock device (IID) in your vehicle at your own expense during the remainder of your probation period. A good lawyer, however, may be able to help you get your DUI probation period shortened or even canceled.
Finally, we should mention that driving with a suspended license can have particularly harsh repercussions for green card holders and other legal resident aliens. Immigrants would be wise to hire a defense lawyer with expertise in both VC 14601 defense and in immigration law.
Two Related Offenses
Two offenses similar to but different from driving with a suspended license are sometimes confused with VC 14601.
Driving without a valid driver’s license (VC 12500) covers driving without ever applying for and receiving a California license and driving when your license has already expired. It does not concern driving with a suspended license and is a lesser offense, always charged as either a misdemeanor or a mere infraction. Many people who move in from out of state fail to get a California license in time and end up facing this charge. It is punishable by a $1,000 fine and up to 6 months in jail (when charged as a misdemeanor), but usually, if the violation was unintentional and you hurry up and apply for a license before your court date, your lawyer can help you get a lenient sentence.
Failure to present a valid driver’s license (VC 12951) is an infraction. This charge concerns simply the fact that you forgot your driver’s license at home or another location or lost it, and thus, could not produce it when asked to do so by police. The maximum penalty for VC 12951 is a $250 fine.
Possible Defense Strategies for VC 14601
At Leah Legal, we have successfully handled numerous driving with a suspended license cases in the past, and we will know how to build an appropriate and effective defense strategy for your upcoming case.
Here are a few of the defenses we most commonly employ:
- Lack of knowledge. The prosecution must prove not only that you drove while your license was suspended but that you were aware of the suspension at the time of the incident. It is not always easy for the prosecutor to prove this. For example, if your notice of license suspension from the DMV was sent to an old address and the new resident did not write “return to sender” on the envelope and return it, this could be a valid defense.
- Wrongful suspension. In some cases, the DMV may make a mistake and wrongfully suspend or revoke a person’s license. On top of that, they may not even know the DMV has done this until pulled over by police. While rare, this can and does happen.
- Restricted license. After a DUI suspension, you may have been issued a restricted license allowing you to drive to/from work and DUI class. It could happen that, despite using your restricted license appropriately, you were stopped by police and accused of driving with a suspended license. If so, we at Leah Legal will be able to clear this up and win your case in court.
Getting Your Driver’s License Reinstated
When your California driver’s license is suspended or revoked for a period of time, and when you have completed any required DUI school, defensive driving course, or probationary period, you will then be ready to get your license reinstated.
Many wrongly assume that immediately after the license suspension period ends, they can rush out and start driving again. This is not the case and can lead to a driving with a suspended license charge.
In many cases, including DUI suspensions, you will need to get an auto insurer to both cover you and to issue an SR22 form to the DMV. This form makes it clear that the insurer understands the added risk of insuring you due to your recent license suspension. You will likely have to pay more for car insurance, but you can still shop around to get the best deal possible.
Once insured, you need to contact the DMV and pay a driver’s license reissue fee. The fee amount varies based on why the license was suspended, but the highest fee is $125.
At Leah Legal, we can help guide you through the process of getting your license reinstated. We understand how confusing the process can sometimes be and how crucial it is to have a valid license so you can work, visit family and friends, shop for groceries, and continue to lead a normal life.
Contact Us Today for Assistance
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we have a long track record of winning driving on a suspended license defense cases, securing for our clients the best possible outcome, be that a dismissal, an acquittal, or a reduced charge and/or sentence.
We have served the Los Angeles Area for many years and have handled virtually every scenario likely to come up in this practice area, and we will know how to build you a solid defense.
Contact our Van Nuys Criminal Defense Attorney Law Firm for a free, no-obligation consultation on the details of your case, call us 24/7/365 at 818-484-1100.
If you feloniously take a motor vehicle in possession of another person, you may be guilty of carjacking under California Penal Code 215 PC. You can take the car either from the person or from the immediate presence of the vehicle owner. You may also face carjacking charges if you take a vehicle from the person or the immediate presence of the passenger of a motor vehicle. Carjacking is a criminal offense in California with detrimental legal consequences. Leah Legal is committed to assisting clients facing carjacking charges in Van Nuys.
Overview of Carjacking
For a prosecutor to prove that you are guilty of carjacking, he/she has to outline several elements of the crime. To start with, it must be evident that a person had possession of a car. The prosecutor must further prove that you feloniously took the vehicle from the immediate presence of the car owner or the immediate presence of a passenger in the car. It must be clear that you took the vehicle against the will of the vehicle owner or passenger by inflicting fear or force. The prosecutor must also prove that you had the intent to deprive the victim of the vehicle either temporarily or permanently.
At the mention of carjacking, most people get a mental picture of an armed carjacker who orders a driver to get out of a vehicle, hops into the car, and drives off. In this scenario, the vehicle is in direct possession of the vehicle owner. The California law broadens the definition of carjacking by stating that you may face charges for taking a car out of a person’s immediate presence. Immediate presence implies that the vehicle is within the victim’s observation, control, or reach. For carjacking charges, the alleged victim does not have to be inside the car or even driving the car.
California law defines taking a vehicle against the will of another person as taking possession of a vehicle and moving it even for a short distance. If you do not move the vehicle, you may still face charges for attempted carjacking. Against a person’s will also mean that you took the vehicle without the consent of its owner or passenger. Consent refers to a free and voluntary agreement and not a deal coerced by fear or force. If the prosecutor proves that the victim did not give you the vehicle out of positive cooperation and free will, you may face charges.
California Penal Code 215 PC defines fear or force as threatening to inflict harm on the victim or the victim’s family or property. This fear makes the victim surrender his/her vehicle to you. For an element of fear in a carjacking crime, it must be evident that you inflicted sufficient terror to make the victim involuntarily surrender his/her asset. You satisfy the element of fear as long as the fear or force inflicted exceeded the victim’s resistance.
You can face carjacking charges even if the victim is not aware that you are using fear or force to gain possession of the vehicle. For instance, if you carjack a car with a small child or infant inside, the infant may not be aware of your actions. However, you may still face carjacking charges. In some instances, you may carjack a vehicle with an unconscious person lying inside. Even if the unconscious victim may not know your motive or your use of force, you may still face carjacking charges.
Unlike California theft crimes that require the defendant to have the intent to deprive the victim of property for good, carjacking is different. You might face carjacking charges even if you intended to deprive the vehicle owner of the vehicle temporarily or permanently. As long as you move the car from its rightful owner, you are guilty of carjacking. This applies even if you intended to use the vehicle for a short period and then return it. The charges also apply if you intended to take the car and then resell it.
The Legal Consequences for Carjacking
Under California law, carjacking is a felony offense. The legal consequences may include felony probation and jail time of up to one year in county jail. Formal felony probation requires you to regularly meet with the probation officer and make regular visits to the probation office. You also have to honor other conditions of probation that the court may put in place. If you fail to honor the terms of probation, the court may revoke the probation and recommend jail time instead.
In some instances, punishment for felony carjacking may include imprisonment in a California state prison. The imprisonment period may range from 3, 5, or 9 years. The court may also require you to pay a fine that does not exceed $10,000. According to California law, you face distinct punishment for each person/victim present in the vehicle at the time of the carjacking.
Sentence Enhancements for Carjacking
Other than the standard consequences for carjacking, you may face some additional penalties depending on the facts of the crime. With sentence enhancement, the court enhances your sentencing under certain circumstances. The court can enhance your sentencing under several circumstances:
If a Victim/Victims Suffer Great Bodily Injury
Under the California Penal Code 12022.7 PC, you receive a sentence enhancement if another person or persons suffer a significant bodily injury during the carjacking. In determining great bodily harm, the law focuses on physical injuries a victim sustains and not financial or emotional injuries. Significant bodily injury is not limited to the typical forms of severe injuries like paralysis and brain damage. Injuries suffered do not have to be very severe or permanent to qualify as great bodily injury. The prosecutors and other law enforcement officers assess great bodily injury on a case-to-case basis. In determining great bodily injury, some of the factors that count include the extent or severity of injuries sustained by the victim. Other factors include the medical treatment required by the victim and the resulting pain or suffering from the injury.
Some of the injuries that may qualify as great bodily injury include gunshot wounds and broken bones. Broken bones may comprise a broken arm, a broken nose, or broken jaw among others. Black or swollen eyes visible four months after the injury may qualify as great bodily injury. Great bodily injury may also comprise of burns. For instance, while carjacking, the defendant may throw hot grease on the vehicle owner/passenger’s face.
For great bodily injury, the court may add 3 to 6 years consecutive prison sentence to your prior penalty for a carjacking conviction.
Carjacking for the Benefit, Direction or in Association with a Criminal Gang
You may face enhanced sentencing if it is clear that you carjacked a vehicle under the instructions or in association with a criminal gang. You may also get sentence enhancement if it is evident that you carjacked a vehicle to benefit a criminal gang. The California Penal Code 186.22 PC makes the provision for a sentence enhancement if a criminal gang is involved. Under Penal Code 186.22(b) PC, any person who commits a felony offense for the benefit of a criminal gang must get a compulsory prison sentence. The compulsory prison sentence will be additional and consecutive to the penalty a defendant receives after a carjacking conviction.
Depending on the facts of the crime, an enhancement under Penal Code 186.22(b) PC may result in an additional 2 to 15 years to your sentencing. In some instances, the enhancement may range from 25 years to life imprisonment. This may apply even if you were not a member of the said gang. It may also apply even if you did not directly commit the underlying felony.
The enhancement is part of the STEP (California Street Terrorism Enforcement and Prevention) Act. Under the provisions of the STEP Act, California law is very harsh to gang members and people who associate with gang members. These people receive much more severe penalties than people who have no association with gang members.
Use a Gun, and You’re Done Law
Under the California Penal Code 12022.53 PC, you receive a California state prison enhancement that may range from 10, 20 or 25 years. The enhancement applies to various felonies where a defendant uses a gun to execute a crime. According to Penal Code 12022.53 PC, you receive an additional ten years to your sentence for using a gun. For firing/discharging a gun, you receive an additional 20 consecutive years to your felony sentencing. If you use a gun and you kill or seriously injure a person during execution of a crime, you may receive 25 years to life imprisonment on top of your felony conviction penalty.
The enhancements under Penal Code 12022.53 are applicable to serious felony crimes in California, including carjacking. Previously, the 10-20 sentencing enhancement was mandatory in California. However, things changed with the passing of Senate Bill 620 by the California Senate in 2017. In the interest of justice, the bill gave judges the freedom to use the 10-20-life sentence enhancement discretionary and not as a mandatory enhancement.
A Strike to Your Record
Under the California Three Strikes Law, you earn a strike on your record for committing a carjacking crime. Under California law, carjacking qualifies as a violent crime. Other than receiving a strike on your record, a carjacking crime requires you to serve a minimum of 85% of your sentence before gaining eligibility for parole.
If you, later on, commit another felony offense and you already have a strike on your record, you become a second striker. Second strikers receive twice the term required by the law. If you have two strikes on your record and you commit a third offense, you become a third striker. Third strikers serve a mandatory minimum sentence ranging from 25 years to life imprisonment in a California state prison.
Senate Bill 1437- Felony-Murder Rule
California law outlines new rules concerning felony murder as outlined in Senate Bill 1437, which came into effect on September 30, 2018. The felony murder rule may apply if you directly kill a person in the course of committing a felony or while attempting to commit a crime. The law may also apply if you abet or aid a killing. If you are a significant participant in the murder or if the victim is a peace officer engaged in performing his duties, a felony-murder rule may apply.
After committing a felony of carjacking, if you intentionally hit a victim or a witness and drive over him/her, the felony-murder rule may apply. Under the provisions of California’s felony-murder rule, you face first-degree murder charges if you kill a person while committing carjacking. The law applies even though you accidentally or unintentionally kill another person.
You may still face murder charges even if the victim does not die at the time of committing the carjacking crime. As long as the victim’s death is related to the crime, you are liable. For example, if a victim of carjacking suffers shock or a heart attack and dies, you may be liable. It is easy to link the heart attack to the shock/terror the victim suffers during the carjacking.
Deportation
Deportation is also a possible enhancement of carjacking penalties. Carjacking qualifies as an aggravated felony. Therefore, if you are an alien or a legal immigrant, a carjacking crime may have detrimental consequences, including removal or deportation.
Crimes Related to Carjacking
Depending on the nature of your crime, the prosecutor may charge you with other crimes closely related to carjacking instead of carjacking charges. In some other instances, you may receive charges for related crimes on top of the carjacking charges. Some of the related crimes include:
Robbery- under California Penal Code 211, carjacking may qualify as robbing as it entails robbing another person of his/her motor vehicle.
Grand Theft Auto-the crime is abbreviated as GTA. Under California Penal Code 487(d) (1) PC, GTA is a lesser crime than carjacking as it does not entail using force or fear to gain possession of a vehicle. For a grand theft auto, the defendant intends to deprive the vehicle owner of the car permanently. For carjacking, the intent is to deny the vehicle owner of the vehicle permanently or temporarily.
Other crimes related to carjacking include joyriding or auto theft, auto burglary, kidnapping during a carjacking, and battery.
Fighting Carjacking Charges
If you are facing carjacking charges, your attorney can assist you in coming up with legal defenses. With proper defense, the court may reduce your charges through a plea bargain. Some of the common defenses for a carjacking offense include:
You Did Not Inflict Fear or Use Force
You cannot violate Penal Code 215 PC unless you use force or inflict fear on a victim. This fear makes the victim surrender his/her asset (vehicle) to you. For instance, you may see the nice vehicle at the filling station with the door opens and the engine running, you then jump into the car and drive off. Under these circumstances, you may not face carjacking charges, as you did not use force or fear. Instead, you may face charges for a lesser crime of joyriding or grand auto theft.
Agreement/Consent of the Victim
You are only guilty of carjacking if you take a vehicle against the will of a driver or a passenger. If you prove in court that you had the consent of the driver or the passenger to take the vehicle, you cannot face charges.
For instance, you may borrow a person’s car, and you fail to return the vehicle at the agreed time. In such an instance, the vehicle owner may accuse you of carjacking. However, you cannot face carjacking charges as you had the consent of the vehicle owner to take the vehicle. This defense is similar to the defense that you did not use force or fear in obtaining the vehicle. You may, however, face charges for lesser crimes like grand theft auto.
Victim of Mistaken Identity
You can state that you are a victim of mistaken identity. Carjacking is a traumatic experience and may affect the victim’s ability to identify or remember the perpetrator. Mistaken identity is a leading cause of wrongful convictions in the United States. It is therefore very common for victims to misidentify and wrongly accuse suspects of carjacking. Therefore, you may face charges simply because you match the physical description of the alleged defendant. With the help of a criminal defense attorney, you can fight the charges in court and prove that you did not commit the crime.
Claim of Right
In some instances, you may be the rightful owner of a vehicle. If the vehicle is in possession of another person, you should not use force or inflict fear on the person to regain the car. Under California law, carjacking is a crime against possession and not ownership. Therefore, violently taking your vehicle from another person may attract carjacking charges, yet you are the rightful owner of the vehicle. Thus, the claim of right does not qualify as a defense under California law.
Contact a Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
If you are facing carjacking charges, seeking legal representation could significantly influence the outcome of your case. At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney in Van Nuys, we will walk with you and help you fight the criminal charges against you. Contact us at 818-484-1100 and speak to one of our attorneys today!
If you or a loved one have recently found yourself facing the charge of evading an officer, resisting arrest, or similar charges, you could face extremely serious consequences upon a conviction. The state of California treats this crime very harshly as they understand that unless law enforcement officers are respected, it will be nearly impossible to enforce any and every law, resulting in widespread chaos. However, there are also times when this charge is wrongly filed or when the offense committed is greatly exaggerated by the prosecutor.
At Leah Legal, we have successfully handled numerous evasion of a police officer defense cases in the past, and we understand the legal details and the real-world court processes upon which these cases typically turn. If you have been recently arrested for evading a police officer in Los Angeles or anywhere in Southern California, do not hesitate to turn to us for help by calling 818-484-1100 anytime 24/7.
Evading a Police Officer
California Vehicle Code Section 2800.1 defines “evading a police officer” as willfully fleeing pursuing police while driving a motor vehicle. This can mean simply ignoring the officer or actively trying to speed away from and “lose” him/her.
To gain a conviction on the charge of evading a police officer, the prosecution must establish the following elements of the crime beyond all reasonable doubt:
- A law enforcement officer pursued you while you were driving a motor vehicle.
- You purposefully attempted to evade and/or flee from the pursuing officer.
- The officer’s vehicle had one or more red lights flashing and in plain view, which you saw or should have seen. AND, the police vehicle’s siren was sounding. AND, the vehicle was clearly marked as a police vehicle. AND, the police officer was identified as such by a police uniform.
Note that even if the officer was pursuing on a bicycle, you can still be convicted of VC 2800.1 if he/she issued a clear verbal or hand-motion command to pull over and you continued to drive on.
However, under California law, you can only be charged with a single count of evading an officer no matter how many police vehicles joined in the chase. Yet, if you fled until many vehicles were pursuing, your sentence could be enhanced; and if more than one incident of evading an officer occurred, of course, then you can face multiple counts.
Evading an officer (VC 2800.1) is a misdemeanor offense, punishable by:
- Up to 12 months in Los Angeles county jail.
- A fine of up to $1,000.
- Impoundment of your vehicle for up to 30 days.
Common defense strategies we use at Leah Legal in defending against charges of evading an officer include:
- Lack of Intent. Unless you “willfully,” that is, intentionally fled from the pursuing officer, you are not guilty of violating VC 2800.1. It may have been, for example, that you simply did not see the officer right away or that you could not pull over due to heavy traffic or extreme weather conditions that prevailed at the time. If you can show you did not know you were being pulled over or that you reasonably thought it would be unsafe at the time to pull over, you can win your case.
- Improper Procedures. If police did not adhere to the strict procedures required when pulling someone over for a traffic violation or other valid reason, your case can be dismissed. If the officer did not have his lights and sirens going or did not have a clearly marked police vehicle and uniform, you are not required to stop. If the officer violated your rights in any way, we can probably get the evidence suppressed and your case dismissed.
- Lack of Evidence. If the prosecution’s evidence against you is incomplete and suspect at all, despite the arrest and the elements of their case that seem strong, a good defense lawyer can likely get you acquitted based on the prosecution’s weak points, or at least get VC 2800.1 reduced to a lesser charge.
- Emergency Situation. If you were in the middle of a genuine emergency situation, such as rushing to the hospital due to a medical emergency or because your wife was about to give birth, you cannot be convicted of evading an officer. Concern for the safety or yourself or others is valid reason to refuse to stop for the pursuing officer in many contexts.
Reckless Evading of a Police Officer
A more serious form of evading an officer is the felony charge “reckless evading of an officer” covered in VC Section 2800.2. This offense involves willfully fleeing a pursuing officer while also driving your vehicle with a reckless disregard for the safety, lives, and property of other people around you.
For example, if you simply fled an officer in a short chase on an open highway at 75 miles per hour and then stopped a mile or two down the road, you might be charged with misdemeanor evasion of an officer (VC 2800.1); but, if you fled through residential city streets at 75 mph, and nearly struck pedestrians, other drivers, and parked cars, you could be charged with reckless evading of a police officer (VC 2800.2), which can be a misdemeanor or a felony.
If charged as a misdemeanor, VC 2800.2 is punishable by:
- From 6 to 12 months in county jail.
- A fine of up to $1,000.
- Impoundment of your vehicle for 30 days.
If charged as a felony, VC 2800.2 is punishable by:
- From 16 months to 3 years in state prison.
- A fine of up to $10,000.
- Impoundment of your vehicle for 30 days.
Other possible consequences of a conviction for reckless evading of a police officer include:
- Losing your CDL (commercial driver’s license) for a full year. This applies to any major traffic violation involving a commercial vehicle, and especially to felonies. It will likely lead to the loss of your job if you have a CDL. And if you get a second or subsequent such offense, you will lose your CDL for the rest of your life.
- If your flight from the pursuing officer was due to your being involved with the manufacture, distribution, or sale of an illegal drug, and this is proved, then holders of CDLs will lose them even for a first offense.
- A conviction for felony-level reckless evading of a police officer will forfeit your 2nd Amendment right to own, carry, or buy a firearm for the rest of your life (under California Penal Code Section 29800). This is California’s “no firearms for felons” law, and it applies to all felonies, including even if the felony was a federal rather than a state offense.
Defenses against reckless evading of a police officer are partly the same as for simple evading of a police officer and are covered in that section. However, there is the added defense that argues your actions did not truly demonstrate a disregard for the safety and property of others or that due to an emergency situation, your actions were reasonable under the circumstances. In some cases, a charge reduction from reckless evading an officer to evading an officer may be possible even where a total victory is not.
Evading an Officer While Causing Injury or Death
Also included as a subsection in VC 2800 is coverage of the situation where, while evading or attempting to evade a pursuing police officer, you cause the injury or death of another person. That could mean another driver, a passenger in another car, a passenger in your own car, a pedestrian or bicyclist, or one of the police officers who was pursuing you.
The crime concerns only “serious” physical injury of others or death of others. It does not concern minor injuries or psychological distress.
Evading a police officer causing injury or death (VC 2800.3) can be charged as a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on the degree of injury inflicted, the facts of the case, and the defendant’s past criminal record.
When charged as a misdemeanor, VC 2800.3 is punishable by:
- Up to 12 months in a county jail.
- A fine ranging from $2,000 to $10,000.
- Impoundment of your vehicle.
When charged as a felony and involving the infliction of “serious” bodily injury, VC 2800.3 is punishable by:
- From 3 to 7 years in state prison.
- A fine of from $2,000 to $10,000.
- Impoundment of your vehicle.
When charged as a felony and involving the death of another person, VC 2800.3 is punishable by from 4 to 10 years in state prison.
Defenses against VC 2800.3 are largely the same as those used against VC 2800.1 (listed above). However, there is the additional possible defense that you actions did not actually cause the injury or death in question or that you could not reasonably have been expected to know your actions would likely cause injury/death to others. In some cases, a reduction from VC 2800.3 to VC 2800.1 might be part of a favorable plea agreement.
Related Offenses
Two charges commonly filed along with or instead of VC 2800.1, VC 2800.2, or VC 2800.3 are:
- Unlawful Driving/Taking of a Vehicle
In many cases, those fleeing the police hijack someone else’s vehicle to make themselves harder to find and then flee a pursuing officer in that other person’s vehicle. If the “desperado” escapes, it is possible the wrong person (the owner of the vehicle) might be mistakenly charged. But if he is apprehended, both evading an officer and VC 10851a can be filed against him.
To be guilty of this crime, you must take another person’s vehicle without his/her prior knowledge or consent. It matters not whether you intended to take it permanently or return it, keep if for a short while or for a long time.
Conviction can lead to up to 12 months in county jail and a fine of up to $5,000.
- Resisting Arrest
If you resist arrest by a police officer, obstruct/delay him or her in the performance of his/her duties, or delay/obstruct any “medical technician” (as defined in Heath & Safety Code Section 1797 and following), you are guilty of violating PC 148a.
In many cases, resisting arrest is charged instead of evading a police officer if you attempt to flee from a pursuing officer on foot, by bike, by train, by bus, or by any other means besides driving a motor vehicle.
Resisting arrest is a misdemeanor offense, punishable by up to 12 months in county jail and a fine of up to $1,000.
More information here on battery on a police officer.
Contact Us Today for Help
We understand your situation if you have been charged with any form evading an officer (VC 2800) or with a similar crime like resisting arrest (PC 148a). It may seem like there is no way to overcome the prosecution and you may be tempted to simply go unrepresented or rely on a busy, inexperienced public defender.
However, when the stakes are so high, you cannot afford to be without the very best possible legal representation.
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we stand ready to rush to your assistance in your hour of need with well seasoned legal expertise in the practice area of evading an officer defense. We have a long track record of winning the best possible outcomes for our clients in these types of cases, whether that mean a dismissal of the charges, an acquittal, or a reduced charge/sentence as part of a favorable plea agreement.
To learn more or for a free legal consultation, call our criminal attorney anytime 24/7/365 at 818-484-1100.
If you or a loved one have recently been charged with a hit and run crime in California, it is in your best interests to waste no time in securing the services of a defense attorney experienced in this practice area. The consequences of a hit and run conviction can be quite severe, depending on the details of the case, and it is well worthwhile to fight these charges in every way legally possible.
At Leah Legal, we have handled numerous hit and run defense cases for our clients in the Los Angeles Area and throughout Southern California in the past and have achieved favorable outcomes to their cases. We know how to build a solid defense based on the facts of the case and how to challenge the evidence and arguments of the prosecution. To learn more or to avail yourself of a free legal consultation on your hit and run case, contact us anytime 24/7 at 818-484-1100.
How Is “Hit and Run” Defined in California?
California Vehicle Code Sections 20001 and 20002 define and assign criminal punishments to “hit and run” violations. VC 20001 deals with felony level hit and run incidents and 20002 addresses misdemeanor hit and run charges.
In California, anytime a driver of a vehicle is involved in an accident, he or she is obligated to stop and perform certain duties aimed at ensuring the safety of victims and at ensuring you can be contacted later on if there are legal actions regarding the incident. To simply drive on after an accident, knowingly and willfully avoiding these duties is to commit a hit and run.
Property Damage Hit and Runs (VC 20002)
When a hit and run accident resulted only in property damage but no injury to another person, it will be charged as a misdemeanor. Note that it is still a hit and run even if you were not the at-fault party or if the amount of damage was minimal — so long as you left the scene of the accident without stopping to identify yourself, give out contact information to the other driver, and cooperate with any law enforcement officers present. Also note that, while the damaged property is usually the other driver’s vehicle, it can be anything, including a bicycle, motorcycle, trailer, fence, or mail box.
What, specifically, are the requirements you must perform if involved in a property-damage-only accident in California (under VC 20002)? They include the following:
- Stop immediately at the scene of the accident or as soon as it is possible to do so safely.
- Give the other driver your full legal name, current address, contact information, license number, vehicle registration number, and insurance information. Even if the other driver is not the owner of the damaged car, this information must still be provided. And if you were driving someone else’s vehicle, you must give the owner’s information along with your name and basic information.
- If you struck a parked car and the owner cannot be contacted at the time, leave a note with the same information and a short explanation of what happened. The note must be firmly attached to the vehicle so it will not simply blow off.
Note that VC 20002 does not require you to exchange insurance information with the other driver, but VC 16025 does, and to fail to do so can result in a $250 fine.
If convicted of VC 20002, a misdemeanor hit and run charge, you can be punished by a maximum of 6 months in county jail, up to 3 years of probation, full restitution to the property owner, and a fine of up to $1,000. You will also receive 2 points on your California driving record. And if a DUI was involved in the accident as well, you will face additional charges under VC 23152 and/or VC 23153.
Oftentimes, a civil compromise will be reached that will result in the hit and run charge being dismissed in exchange for the defendant making full restitution to the property owner. However, there are many defense strategies to use to fight for an acquittal, including:
- The only property damaged was that of the defendant or of the owner of the vehicle he/she was driving. If no property damage or injury took place affecting another person, then no hit and run has been committed under California law.
- You did not realize there had been an accident. This is often the case when no actual collision took place or it was an incident in which one car barely touched the other.
- You did not “willfully” leave the scene of the accident. It may be the other vehicle was on fire or unsafe to stop near, the traffic would not allow an immediate stop, or that you were on your way to the hospital during a medical emergency.
- You were not the driver. If someone else was driving your car, either because you loaned it to that person or because it was stolen, you may have been mistakenly accused of hit and run although you were not even driving the vehicle in question.
Hit and Run Causing Injury or Death (VC 20001)
When a hit and run incident causes the injury or death of another person, it will typically be charged as a felony under VC 20001. In some cases, however, it can be charged as a misdemeanor, such as when the injury involved was slight.
After an accident in which another is injured/killed, California law requires you stop at the scene, identity yourself, and cooperate with police who may be present. The requirements are essentially the same as for a property damage hit and run (discussed above), but there is the additional duty of providing immediate help to any injured victims at the scene to the best of your ability. This will often mean calling 911 for an ambulance, but it can mean lending physical aid as well.
If there was a fatality due to the accident, you must also call the police without delay (unless they are already present).
Note that you are required to stop and perform these duties regardless of whether or not you were the at-fault party in the accident and regardless of how severe the injury was to the victim.
VC 20001 can be charged as a felony or a misdemeanor. If injuries are not very serious, it may be charged as a misdemeanor and punished by:
- From 90 days to 12 months in county jail. But a good lawyer can often help you get the jail time reduced or eliminated.
- A fine of from $1,000 to $10,000 dollars.
- Full restitution to the victim for all related medical expenses and property damage.
When serious injury, permanent disablement, or death results from a hit and run incident, you will face a felony charge, punishable by:
- 16 months to 4 years in state prison.
- A fine of between $1,000 and $10,000.
- Full restitution to all victims.
- Loss of your driver’s license.
And if you are convicted of both hit and run and vehicular manslaughter, gross vehicular manslaughter, or gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated, you can receive an additional 5 years in state prison.
And there are yet further consequences for a hit and run conviction to be aware of, including these:
- The DMV will add at least 2 points to your driving record, and it only takes 4 points within a period of one year for your driving privileges to be suspended for 6 months or more. Thus, if you already have points on your driving record, you could have your license suspended even for a misdemeanor level hit and run.
- You will see your premiums shoot up on your auto insurance policy. Or your insurer may simply cancel your policy completely. In that case, you could have difficulty finding new coverage and will see high rates when you do find it.
- Besides the criminal penalties, you will likely face a civil suit. For property damage, your auto insurance company will have to pay, and you will have to cover any amount exceeding the value of the policy. For injuries, you can be sued, if the at-fault party, for medical expenses, loss of income, and pain and suffering claims. If a victim died in the accident, you can face a wrongful death suit.
Defense strategies against a felony-level hit and run charge are partly the same as for a property damage only hit and run, but different at other points. Here are some of the most common defenses used:
- If the only person injured in the accident was the defendant, he or she cannot be guilty of a hit and run under California law.
- Lack of knowledge. If the driver did not realize his driving had caused an accident, and especially not a serious accident where injury or death occurred, the hit and run charge can be defeated or at least reduced. For example, drivers of big rigs often get in accidents without even realizing they have struck a much-smaller vehicle.
- The defendant did not willfully abandon the scene of the accident. It could be the defendant was unable to stop due to dangers present at the accident scene or because of a medical emergency. It may be he/she intended to or actually did contact the police as soon as possible to report the accident.
The Value of an Experienced Criminal Defense Attorney
As can easily be seen from the coverage of misdemeanor and felony level hit and run charges above, a conviction on such a charge is an extremely serious matter. It is not something to be taken lightly, and you will greatly reduce your chances of a favorable outcome to your case if you enter the courtroom unprepared.
At Leah Legal, we not only bring a deep understanding of the California Vehicle Code to the table, but we also know how to help you assemble the evidences and summon the witnesses that can help you win your case. We will visit the scene of the accident, obtain photographs of the scene and of the vehicles involved if at all possible, examine the driving record of the plaintiff, and coach you on how to act and what to say in court to avoid incriminating yourself.
We will always make a dismissal or acquittal, that is “a full victory,” our goal first and foremost and fight tenaciously to achieve that end, leaving no legal stone unturned. However, we also possess well seasoned negotiation skills that we can employ where necessary to win you a reduced charge, a civil compromise, or a mitigated sentence.
We always keep you fully informed of the latest legal developments in your case, and we never act on a plea deal without your full knowledge and consent.
At Leah Legal, we always put ourselves in the shoes of each client and work in their best interests, treating them the way we would like to be treated were our positions reversed.
Contact Us Today For Assistance
If you have been recently arrested on hit and run charges, out team at Van Nuys Criminal Attorney stands ready to come to your aid with top-quality legal advice and representation to help you win your case.
We have an intricate knowledge of the California Vehicle and Penal Codes and longtime familiarity with the inner workings of local L.A. Area court processes. We can put our knowledge to work for you and win you the best possible outcome to your case.
Call us anytime 24/7/365 at 818-484-1100 for a free consultation and immediate attention to your needs.
If you or a loved one are currently facing charges of vehicular manslaughter, or a similar charge, in California, you are facing one of the most serious types of driving crimes covered in the California Penal Code. Needless to say, the consequences of a conviction would be far-reaching and long-lasting, both in regard to the actual sentence and in regard to how your criminal record could affect your reputation and your ability to find gainful employment.
At our criminal defense law firm, we understand the gravity of the situation when a vehicular manslaughter charge is involved. Any crime that results in the loss of the life of another is very serious indeed, but there are also many cases where vehicular manslaughter is wrongfully charged. We know how to get to the bottom of what really happened and defeat or reduce false or exaggerated charges.
To learn more about vehicular manslaughter defense in Los Angeles and Southern California and to avail yourself of a free legal consultation, contact us 24/7 at 818-484-1100.
What Is “Vehicular Manslaughter?”
Under California Penal Code Section 192c, vehicular manslaughter is defined as operating a motor vehicle in a negligent manner so that the driver’s negligence results in the death of another person in an auto accident.
Simple vehicular manslaughter is distinguished from gross vehicular manslaughter in that the former involves only “ordinary negligence,” while the latter involves “gross negligence” and often also involves intoxication with alcohol or drugs. Vehicular manslaughter is also distinguished from “vehicular homicide” or “Watson murder,” which is a second-degree murder charge. Thus, while vehicular manslaughter ranks as among the most serious driving crimes, there are a couple driving crime charges that are even more severe in nature.
Most of the time, vehicular manslaughter occurs when a driver breaks a traffic law, commits some other driving crime, or drives in a reckless or inattentive manner. This then leads to a collision in which someone is severely injured and ultimately loses his or her life due to the injury.
Note that it still counts as vehicular manslaughter even if the person killed in the car accident was riding as a passenger in the vehicle you were driving. So long as there was “criminal negligence” that caused the death of another person, it is vehicular manslaughter.
Also note that, while you will hear that a law must have been broken in order for an act to count as vehicular manslaughter, this is a bit misleading to those unfamiliar with California law. For, a legal act done in a negligent manner is considered an illegal act, so that most non-lawyers would probably say that either an illegal act or a legal but negligent act leading to the death of another constitutes vehicular manslaughter.
Finally, be aware that while the unlawful or negligent act must be a direct cause of the death of the victim, such that the death would not have occurred without it, it need not be the only or even the main cause of death. It cannot be a trivial, incidental cause. It must be a “substantial” cause of death. But it can be one among several substantial causes.
What Must the Prosecution Prove?
To prove you guilty of PC 192c (vehicular manslaughter), the prosecution must establish the following “elements of the crime” beyond all reasonable doubt:
- You committed a traffic violation, a misdemeanor crime, and/or were criminally negligent while operating a motor vehicle.
- Your actions were, in the circumstances in which they were performed, likely to risk the life of another person and you could reasonably be expected to realize that they posed such a risk.
- Another person, whether in your own vehicle, another vehicle, or a pedestrian, lost his/her life as a result of your act of unlawful and/or negligent driving.
Possible Punishments for Vehicular Manslaughter
Vehicular manslaughter is always a very serious offense, but it can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on the facts of the case and on the defendant’s past criminal record.
If “ordinary” negligence was involved, then vehicular manslaughter will be charged as a misdemeanor. “Ordinary negligence” consists of failing to drive with the level of caution a reasonable person would be expected to exercise in the same situation. Misdemeanor vehicular manslaughter is punishable by a maximum of 12 months in county jail.
If “gross” negligence was involved, then vehicular manslaughter will always be charged as a felony. “Gross negligence” consists of actions that exhibit a willful, reckless disregard for the safety of others, though it does not involve intentionally trying to hurt anyone. Felony-level vehicular manslaughter is punishable by 2 to 6 years in state prison.
You will also likely lose your driver’s license for any vehicular manslaughter conviction, and the judge may impose probation and other penalties as well.
And if you committed a hit and run along with vehicular manslaughter during the same incident, you can see up to 5 years added to your prison sentence.
When Vehicular Manslaughter Is Combined With DUI
When you are convicted of DUI and vehicular manslaughter for the same incident, the penalties will become significantly more severe. Even ordinary negligence combined with a DUI can get you 4 years in prison, and misdemeanor-level vehicular manslaughter with DUI will also automatically expose you to prosecution under VC 23153 (DUI causing injury) as well.
However, note that driving DUI cannot count as both the basis of the DUI charge and as the negligent/illegal act underlying the vehicular manslaughter charge. The prosecution must prove you guilty of some other act of negligence besides the DUI to gain such a conviction. The act need not be “inherently dangerous,” but it must have been dangerous under the circumstances.
The most serious way for DUI to be combined with vehicular manslaughter is under PC 191.5a, which covers the crime of “gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated.” This is always a felony and is punishable by 4 to 10 years in state prison. And if there are additional victims who survived but suffered “great bodily injury,” an additional 3 to 6 years of prison time can be added. This crime is a strike on your criminal record under California’s Three Strikes law. But note that you cannot be charged with DUI separately if charged with gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated since the latter includes the former already.
Finally, note that committing vehicular manslaughter while driving DUI can sometimes be charged as second-degree murder, called “Watson Murder.” Under PC 187, a vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated charge amounts to second-degree murder if the driver acted with “malice aforethought.” This is established by showing you were aware of the fact that driving under the influence of alcohol/drugs endangers the lives of others and yet chose to do it anyway. Generally, this can only be established if you had a prior DUI conviction since those convicted of DUI must sign a form saying they understand the dangers of driving DUI and/or take DUI classes that elaborate on the point. A conviction on charges of “Watson Murder” is punishable by 15 years to life imprisonment and a fine of up to $10,000.
Possible Defense Strategies Against Vehicular Manslaughter
While some might suppose their situation to be hopeless once formally accused of committing vehicular manslaughter, we at Leah Legal know different. We have handled many of this class of cases in the past and have obtained dismissals, acquittals, and reduced charges/sentences.
We always tailor the defense to the details of the case, customizing each defense rather than using a “cookie cutter approach.” Nevertheless, there are admittedly common general defense types that come up again and again in vehicular manslaughter cases, including these:
- Lack of criminal negligence.
It may be that you committed no illegal action nor did you act in a criminally negligent manner while driving your motor vehicle. The mere fact that an accident happened and a loved one died as a result may have led the victim’s family pressing charges even though it was simply an accident and not your fault.
- Lack of cause of death.
In other cases, it may be true that the defendant committed a driving crime or an otherwise legal act that was criminally negligent. Yet, that does not in itself prove that the death of the victim was due to the defendant’s actions. It could be that the other driver was also negligent, that the weather conditions contributed to the fatality, or that mechanical problems in either of the vehicles were to blame. The prosecution must show that the accident was your fault and that the accident was the cause of both injury and death to the victim. This is not at all always the case, and so must be proved rather than assumed.
- You were not the driver.
In some cases, the fact that your vehicle was involved in an accident leads to your being formally charged with a driving crime, even one as serious as vehicular manslaughter, despite the fact you were not the one driving your vehicle at the time of the accident. You may have loaned your vehicle to a friend or family member or it may have been stolen. If you can establish such facts or at least show an alibi to prove you were not at the scene of the accident when it happened, you will be found “not guilty.”
- Lack of gross negligence.
In felony-level vehicular manslaughter charges, a reduction to a misdemeanor charge will greatly reduce the sentence. By showing that your actions, while negligent, did not display utter disregard for human life and for the safety of others, we can establish it was only ordinary instead of gross negligence and win a charge reduction.
- Lack of intoxication.
In cases where DUI is involved, and especially in gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated charges, Leah Legal will work to undermine the DUI element of the charge as well as the vehicular manslaughter element. As DUI adds to your sentence of creates an additional separate sentence, this is a critical area to focus on. We can use any of the many defenses we use in ordinary DUI cases, such as police misconduct, a still-rising BAC, failure to adhere to Title 17 in storing blood samples, or medical conditions that mimic the effects of alcohol on one’s system.
At Leah Legal, we have deep experience at defending against all manner of vehicular manslaughter and related offenses in various ways. We know how to match the best defense to each particular case and how to use the details of the incident and of the defendant’s past record (or lack of one) to your advantage.
Even for lesser crimes, it is wise to enlist the help of an experienced defense attorney who is familiar with both the law and the local court processes. But with a charge like vehicular manslaughter, it is absolutely imperative that you avail yourself of the best possible representation.
Contact Us Today for Assistance
Here at Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we are always ready to rush to your defense in your hour of need. We do not shy away from high-stakes cases like vehicular manslaughter, and we have a long track record of winning these kinds of cases in local Los Angeles Area courts.
If you are facing a vehicular manslaughter charge, do not risk walking into the courtroom unrepresented or under-represented. Contact our criminal lawyer anytime 24/7/365 by calling 818-484-1100, and we will immediately give you a free consultation and begin building you a solid defense.
Drug Crimes & What You Need To Know
In California, drug crimes involve the use, possession, distribution, manufacture or trafficking of an illegal controlled substance. No criminal area has seen a greater increase in prosecutions and new laws than drugs and narcotics. Drug trafficking busts mean lots of publicity for prosecutors and politicians and California prosecutes drug crime cases quite aggressively. Since drug crimes have some of the harshest sentencing guidelines in the criminal justice system, it is essential that you have a reliable criminal attorney at your side. If you have been charged with a drug crime, seek legal representation immediately. At Leah Legal we have the expertise and attitude you need to help beat your charges.
Possession of Drugs
Under California law, there are two main types of drug possession crimes. The first category involves simple possession. If someone is found in possession of a drug that is listed in the California Health and Safety Code, they can be charged with possession of a controlled substance. These substances include cannabis, heroin, cocaine – including crack cocaine, methamphetamine, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, other amphetamines, LSD, PCP, psilocybin, MDMA and others.
The second type of drug possession is possession with intent to sell. If the police suspect that someone intended to sell the drugs in question, they can be charged with a much more serious crime. In addition, some substances that can be used as ingredients in the manufacturing of methamphetamine, PCP, and other illegal drugs are banned under state law, and individuals found in possession of them can be arrested.
It’s very difficult to predict what kind of penalties an individual might face for a drug possession conviction without knowing the nature and quantity of the drug involved as well as the alleged intent of the individual. Just possessing a controlled substance can be enough to put an individual behind bars for months or longer, while those convicted of possession with intent to sell can serve much longer sentences. Expensive fines, community service, and counseling can also be required for drug offenders.
Prop 47
Under Prop 47, a referendum passed by state voters in the November 2014 election, penalties were reduced for many nonviolent crimes including drug possession. Drug possession is now treated as a misdemeanor in California; however, there are special laws that apply to cannabis.
Cannabis Laws
In California, the possession of cannabis is treated differently from other drug crimes. In spite of the fact that cannabis is not legal, possession of an ounce or less is treated as a minor infraction (much like a traffic ticket) and defendants can usually expect to pay only about $100 in fines. Also, under the terms of Proposition 215 and Senate Bill 420, California residents with state-issued medical marijuana cards can legally purchase cannabis from designated dispensaries. However, users who don’t have medical marijuana cards and are found with larger amounts of cannabis can be charged with misdemeanors if the quantities involved are significant. Law enforcement officials will often charge individuals who are found in possession of non-criminal amounts of cannabis (less than an ounce) with possession with intent to sell in order to secure harsher sentences. Although being in possession of cannabis is a far less serious crime than those involving narcotics such as heroin and cocaine, it is still very much illegal in California.
Distribution of Drugs
Criminal charges that involve the selling, transporting, transferring, or importing of controlled substances are much more serious matters than those involving simple possession or possession with intent to sell. In order for a prosecutor to secure a conviction for a drug distribution crime, they will need to demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt that the individual planned to use the drugs in question for purposes other than personal consumption. The presence of physical evidence such as scales, firearms, and packaging materials can all be used to help secure such a conviction.
Depending on the circumstances of your case, there may be a number of ways to fight drug distribution charges. Some of these include proving that the drugs were for personal use only, or that entrapment was involved. An experienced drug crimes lawyer will help you tailor your defense to the specifics of your arrest. Sometimes, as with possession, violations of your 4th Amendment rights may have been involved, and defenses involving illegal search and seizure can be presented.
Though penalties are difficult to predict, sentences for drug distribution convictions are generally more severe than those resulting from possession-related convictions. California also has enhanced penalties for individuals who sell drugs to minors or sell drugs near schools or other locations where minors regularly congregate. Furthermore, offenders who have been previously convicted on drug distribution charges or other drug crimes can expect harsher sentences for second or subsequent convictions. Prison sentences of ten or twenty years are not uncommon in such situations.
Possession of Drug Paraphernalia
Another California drug crime you might be charged with, sometimes in connection with other charges like drug distribution or possession for sale, is that of possessing “drug paraphernalia.”
“Paraphernalia” is a very broad term under California law. It can be anything from a pipe to a needle to lab equipment or cocaine spoons.
You can get as much as six months in a county jail upon conviction of possession of drug paraphernalia, though normally this doesn’t happen since most charged with this crime can get into a drug diversion program (with help from a skilled defense lawyer.)
Plus, it is very common for the paraphernalia used as evidence to have been seized by police in an illegal search and seizure operation. In that case, we may be able to get the evidence suppressed and your case dismissed.
Possession of Meth
California has a separate Health and Safety Code section (11377) that singles out possession of methamphetamine drugs for special treatment.
However, Prop 47 also made this charge a misdemeanor in most cases; unless it is a possession of meth for sale charge, which is a felony punishable by years in state prison.
At Leah Legal, we have deep experience in every niche area of drug crimes defense, including charges of methamphetamine possession.
Manufacture of a Controlled Substance
HSC 11379.6 makes it a felony crime to manufacture a controlled substance. This crime can encompass any stage of the manufacturing process and can apply all manner of illegal drugs (including everything from meth to marijuana.)
You can get up to seven years in prison for an unaggravated drug manufacturing charge. If large quantities were manufactured or if children were present near the drug lab (as in being near a school or playground), the punishment gets even harsher.
However, it’s not enough for police to merely find equipment and drugs on your premises to prove this charge. Merely gathering supplies is not enough to violate the statute: manufacturing must have actually begun. But possessing chemicals and having an intent to use them to manufacture drugs can still be charged under HSC 11383.5 as “possession of materials for manufacture of drugs.”
Also note that cultivating or manufacturing peyote, a drug used in many Native American religious rituals is a related but distinct crime.
Being Under the Influence of an Illegal Drug
Those found under the influence of a controlled substance (drug use) can also be convicted in California under HSC 11550 and can get as long as a year in jail. A drug diversion program can usually be substituted for actual jail time, however.
If one was operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of drugs (even legal ones) so that it inhibited his or her driving abilities, then it would be treated just like a DUI. It’s sometimes called a “DUID” (driving under the influence of drugs), but it carries the same penalties as DUI alcohol.
At Leah Legal, we know how to challenge the alleged “signs” of being under the influence of drugs. Many of those used by prosecutors are inconclusive. And it is sometimes possible to challenge the results of drug tests as well, so don’t assume a drug test automatically closes the case.
Prescription Drug Charges
Not only illegal narcotics but prescription drugs too are controlled substances under California law. To possess them without a valid prescription counts as drug possession just like with cocaine or heroine.
These kinds of charges might involve allegations of using fraud to obtain the drugs, of stealing them, or using drugs prescribed to someone else, of possessing a greater quantity than prescribed, or of using the drug in doses not in accord with doctor’s orders.
And doctors and pharmacists can be charged with illegally prescribing drugs to those they know don’t need them and will use them recreationally, in order to get kickbacks.
But many are also falsely accused of misusing prescription drugs. At Leah Legal, we know how to win these types of cases, and we won’t let the prosecution go unchallenged.
Drug Diversion Programs in California
We at Leah Legal always fight first and foremost for a dismissal or an acquittal, but we also know how and when to apply our well seasoned negotiation skills to win a favorable plea.
Sometimes, this involves simply a reduced charge and sentence. But often in drug crime defense cases, it will include approval in a drug diversion program under PC 1000, Prop 36, or California Drug Court.
If your drug crime is a misdemeanor, is a non-violent offense, and you have not been recently convicted of a drug crime already, there is a good chance you will qualify for a diversion program.
Diversion programs help you avoid spending actual time in jail. Under PC 1000 Deferred Entry of Judgment, you would plead “guilty” to, say, simple possession and agree to complete a drug treatment program. Later, if you follow the program and complete it, your charges will be dismissed. This allows you to avoid having a criminal record.
Or, under Prop 36, you can be put on probation instead of going to jail. You also would have to complete a drug treatment process.
Either way, you have to comply with the “rules” of the program to avoid having the original jail sentence come back and be enforced.
Other benefits to California drug diversion programs include:
- No prior conviction is created. This not only means you fare better in applying for a good job but it also means your dismissed charge can’t be brought up as a prior if another drug crime charge comes up later.
- You can say you were never convicted of a drug crime and have it be legally true. This helps on job applications, lease and college enrollment applications, and more. However, if you apply for a law enforcement position or run for public office, you would still have to reveal that the drug charge had occurred.
- You don’t have to quit work or school. Even during the diversion program period, you can likely still attend school and continue your current job. Otherwise, going to jail could cause you to lose all income and all of your property and be separated from friends and family for months or years on end.
- You might be able to keep your professional license. In many cases, one convicted of a drug crime (even the least serious of drug crimes, like simple possession) will lose his or her state-issued professional license. That means your career will effectively end. A diversion program can often save you license, though some form of less severe professional discipline might still apply.
- You get help in recovering from a drug abuse habit. If you really do have a drug abuse problem, it’s easy for it to continue until it becomes a lifelong habit. And drug abuse tends to get worse over time and ruin you financially and destroy your relationships. A drug diversion program can help you overcome the addiction even while keeping you out of jail and avoiding a permanent criminal record.
Contact Us Today for Help in Winning Your Case
If you, a friend or a loved one has been arrested for any type of drug crime in Los Angeles, we want to hear about it. Call Van Nuys Criminal Attorney to schedule an appointment with a fearless drug crimes attorney who has been very successful in helping clients with their drug-related criminal charges. We look forward to speaking with you and getting to work on your criminal defense immediately.
To schedule a free initial consultation, call 818-484-1100 or fill out the form provided here.
Drug charges usually come with life-altering repercussions that may present obstacles in an individual’s personal and even professional life. If you or a loved one has been arrested for being under the influence of drugs or simple drug possession, it can be possible to avoid jail or prison term by taking part in a treatment program in what is known as Drug Diversion. This is a court-approved treatment program that includes drug education, narcotic replacement therapy or detoxification services, residential treatment or outpatient services, and aftercare services. Drug diversion does not refer to the drug rehabilitation services offered in jail or prison facilities.
The entire process of fighting for your rights and entering a drug diversion program is dependent on the kind of attorney you hire. The knowledgeable and skilled attorneys at Leah legal can be able to defend your rights and help you acquire entry into a diversion program. To speak with an experienced and aggressive drug crimes defense attorney, call Leah Legal today at 818-484-1100 for a free consultation.
Who is Eligible for Drug Diversion?
These programs are specifically intended for individuals with no history of serious criminal conduct and are charged with a low-level, violent-free offense. For the defendant to qualify for drug diversion program after being charged with either of the crimes listed below, they are required not to have had a preceding conviction for the same crime they are being charged with currently. Offenses that qualify for drug diversion include:
- Personal Possession of a Controlled Substance
- Possession of Drug Paraphernalia
- Possession of Less than 1oz of Marijuana
- Forged Drug Prescription
- Possession of Methamphetamines
- Aiding and Abetting Unlawful Use of Controlled Substances
- Possession of Xanax
- Driving While in Possession of Marijuana
- Solicitation
- Driving under the Influence of a Controlled Substance
- Public Intoxication
- Possession of Controlled Substance
- Possession of Toluene
Drug Diversion in California is authorized under
- Proposition 36,
- Deferred Entry of Judgment commonly referred to as PC-1000, and
- California Drug Court
California law is designed in a manner that allows eligible defendants to be granted the chance to change their lives without serving jail or prison term. This helps in reducing the number of persons affected by the complex problems associated with substance abuse and addiction. While a court-approved drug treatment program is a serious time commitment, it gives the respondent an opportunity to clear their name off drug charges and even aids in reinstating their health depending on the details of their case. Furthermore, the program offers the defendant an opportunity to start life afresh without serving prison or jail term and having the charges dismissed upon successful completion of the program.
It can be quite challenging to choose between the drug diversion options of PC-1000 and Proposition 36. But with the help of an experienced attorney, you can be in a position to choose the option that offers you the brightest promise for your future.
PC-1000 DRUG DIVERSION (Deferred Entry of Judgment)
In pretrial diversion program cases, commonly known PC-1000 drug diversion, the plaintiff will plead guilty to the drug charges and the judge will then suspend the sentencing or judgment of a finding of guilt until after 18 months. During the first 5 to 6 months, the respondent will be subjected to random drug testing and substance abuse counseling. This is then followed by unsupervised probation for 12 months. If the defendant effectively completes the first 5 to 6 months of random testing and substance abuse counseling and further manages not to be charged with any new criminal cases during the unsupervised probation period, the will be dropped and will not make it to the individual’s record as a conviction.
Once the defendant successfully completes PC-1000 program, the court may issue an order to seal the records as provided under California Penal Code 851.92. It’s worth noting that criminal justice agencies will still have the ability to access and use the records in accordance with applicable law. Also, individuals who successfully complete the PC-1000 program are protected from California professional licensing agencies from using the arrest to deny a license for professional misconduct or pursuing sanctions against a licensee.
What are the Consequences of Violating PC-1000 Probation?
Failing to complete PC-1000 Drug Diversion Program may result in the defendant being sentenced for the underlying charge or in some instances, they may be subjected to the most extensive Proposition 36 program. A defendant may fail to complete the PC-1000 Drug Diversion Program either by:
- Getting arrested,
- Not completing treatment, or
- Testing positive for drugs during the probation period.
Qualifications for the PC-1000 Drug Diversion Program
Generally, this program is available to drug offenders who have not had a previous drug conviction, those who are charged with being under the influence or simple possession, or those who have effectively completed the Deferred Entry of Judgment Program more than five years before the current arrest. Individuals who do not qualify for PC-1000 Drug Diversion Program are those whose activities go beyond simple use, possession, or personal transportation.
PROPOSITION 36 PROBATION
In Prop. 36 probation, the drug offender is required to enter a plea to the drug charges. Also, he or she will be required to complete a drug treatment and counseling for a maximum of three (3) years as prescribed by the probation department.
Levels of Prop. 36 Treatment
Prop. 36 treatment has six levels. The first level (the least stringent) involves random drug testing and out-patient counseling. Treatment then varies in levels of severity up to the sixth level, which involves in-patient residential treatment.
The level of treatment that a person has to go through once admitted to the program will frequently vary in the course of the program. If an individual is effective and acquiescent with the rules and orders of the program, he/she will be reallocated to lower levels of treatment. For those who are not compliant, violate probation, or in one way or another show that they aren’t effective in the program, they may be reassigned to a higher level of treatment that is more stringent.
Possible Problems with Violation of Prop. 36 Probation
If a drug offender on Prop. 36 Probation violates the terms of their probation for the first time, the judge is required to allow them to continue participating in the program provided the violations are exclusively drug related. As for a second time violation of Prop. 36, the judge has the discretion to give the drug offender yet another chance to continue in the program provided the desecration is drug-related. But things are quite different the third time that Prop. 36 is violated. The judge must terminate the Probation and impose the sentence, which usually includes a prison term under a California Department of Correction system.
Eligibility for Prop. 36 Program
In California, most people charged with simple drug possession qualify to join Proposition 36 program. Those who do not qualify are individuals who have been charged with non-drug related charges or sales related drug charges, and those who have been convicted in the past five years for offenses that fall under California’s Strike law provisions.
If you don’t qualify for Prop. 36 probation because you’ve been charged with a more serious drug charge, an experienced drug crime defense attorney may be able to get the charges reduced to allow for your eligibility. The best thing about this program is that you can do the program even if you get convicted at trial, and this allows you to skip going to jail.
DRUG COURTS
California drug courts is another drug diversion program similar to Penal Code 1000 PC. However, this is available to defendants who are represented by public defenders. The program is authorized by California PC 1000.5 and takes a unique interest in persons who may greatly benefit from drug rehabilitation program. As with Prop. 36 and PC 1000, the underlying drug charges can be dismissed upon successful completion of a drug court treatment program. The dismissal is used by the drug courts as a motivation to ensure that all participants succeed in the program. An experienced criminal defense attorney can present a compelling defense on your behalf and help you secure a place in a California drug court or in another drug diversion program.
Generally, all California drug courts integrate a system of graduated rewards or punishment for drug offenders who fail to comply. Also, it’s worth noting that each drug court basically runs itself, which means that each establishes its own protocols and requirements.
The main premise behind drug courts is that drug and alcohol rehabilitation is desirable over imprisonment when it concerns nonviolent drug offenders. The main goals of a California drug court include reducing drug use and repeat offenses (recidivism) as well as integrating other rehabilitation services with drug treatment to encourage long-term recovery
Since their formulation, California drug courts have established programs in
- Dependency courts- provides drug treatment to parents and allows them to continue caring for their children without the need of foster care.
- Adult courts- these drug courts focus on providing thorough drug treatment to adult offers for at least one year
- Juvenile courts- these courts were formulated to treat minors and offers therapy to their families. This drug courts aim at maintaining long-term soberness and providing immediate intervention to prevent further criminal activity
Regarding pleas
Whether or not you must enter a plea before participating in drug court will be determined by your criminal record and the nature of your current crime. An individual with a history of drug abuse but no other type of criminal history is not obligated to enter a guilty plea. Those with a criminal history of other forms of crimes may be obligated to enter a guilty plea before being admitted as a participant in a drug court. If you fall under the category of those who must plead guilty, you will be placed on a 36 months’ probation. And as a condition of probation, you will be required to take part a drug treatment program. On successful completion of the program, your charges will be discharged and probation dismissed.
Obtaining a Drug Diversion Offer
Drug diversion is discretionary and this implies that the decision lies with the prosecutor. In fact, the District Attorney’s Office doesn’t offer diversion programs to any person that satisfies the requirements. It’s important that you hire a competent criminal defense attorney who knows the processes involved and has a good relationship with the District Attorney’s Offices. After all, diversion is an agreement between the criminal defense attorney and prosecutor under the facilitation of the courts.
Benefits of Drug Diversion Programs in a Nutshell
- You can avoid having to serve jail time
- You can have your drug possession case dismissed
- The dismissal of the charges against you as a result of a drug diversion program won’t count against you
- You can truthfully report no conviction
- You may be able to keep going to school or work
- You may be able to avoid loss of your professional state license
- It gives you the opportunity to recover from a lifelong drug abuse problem
Absolute Commitment to Getting Clients Drug Diversion
Qualifying for enrollment in a drug diversion program can be quite critical, and at Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we are skilled negotiators committed to protecting the rights of persons charged with all sorts of drug charges. We know when and how to secure a favorable plea deal and have a long track record of representing our clients and winning the best possible outcomes.
With us on your side comes the possibility of not only lighter sentences but also getting the charges dismissed altogether. We will walk with you through every step of the way, zealously advocating for your rights and working to protect your future against unduly or undeserved punishment. No matter how daunting the charges against you may be, the team at Leah legal can help. Contact us anytime 24/7 for a free, no-obligation consultation on your case. Call us at 818-484-1100 and we can immediately start the process of building your defense.
If you have been arrested and charged with the crime of drug sales or transportation in Los Angeles or anywhere in Southern California, you are facing one of the most serious drug charges on the books. You can’t afford to be without a top-tier drug crimes defense attorney with deep experience in the sales/transport defense practice area. The stakes are simply too high, with long prison terms and heavy fines almost certain upon a conviction.
At Leah Legal, we have been successfully defending L.A. Area residents against all manner of drug crimes allegations for many years, including against the very serious charge of sale or transport of a controlled substance.
We understand the Health & Safety Code on these matters down to the legal minutia, and we also are intimately familiar with the inner workings of local L.A. and Southern California court procedures. We will know how to build you a solid defense and win the best possible outcome to your case.
Contact Leah Legal anytime 24/7 by calling 818-484-1100, and we will give you a free legal consultation and can immediately get started on building you a solid defense!
How Is Drug Sales or Transport Defined Under California Law?
Under California Health & Safety Code Section 11352, the crime of “sale or transport of a controlled substance” is defined and assigned harsh penalties. This statute can be violated in any number of ways. Doing any of the following actions in relation to illegal drugs violates HSC 11352:
- Selling illegal drugs.
- Giving them away “free.”
- Administering a controlled substance to a user.
- Transporting illegal drugs for the purpose of selling them.
- Importing them into California from another state, a US territory, or a foreign country.
Additionally, “offering” to do any of the above-listed crimes is a crime in itself, also violating HSC 11352.
However, to be guilty of committing this particular drug crime, you must have been aware of the presence of the controlled substance and of its “nature as a controlled substance,” and, the drug must have been present in a “usable quantity.”
What Must the Prosecutor Prove?
You might think the prosecution would have to prove that the drug in question was an illegal narcotic, but in fact, it can be any drug controlled under the Federal Controlled Substances Act, including high-risk prescription drugs that you don’t have a valid prescription for.
Proving the identity of the drug as a controlled substance and proving you possessed it are done just the same with sale/transport as with other drug crimes like simple possession or possession for sale.
That is, you had to have been aware of the presence of the drug and of its identity as a controlled substance. That doesn’t mean you had to be aware of its particular harmful effects, but simply that it was an illegal drug.
If you didn’t “possess” the drug, then obviously you couldn’t have committed a higher-level crime like sale/transport. Possession can mean “actual” possession (on your person), “constructive” possession (under your control), or “joint” possession (multiple people possessed the drug in one way or anther simultaneously.
But to gain a HSC 11352 conviction, the prosecutor must prove more. He must prove any of the following:
- You “transported” (moved) the drug while having an intent to sell it (not just use it personally). The distance need not have been great, and it doesn’t matter whether you walked, drove a car, rode a bike, or rode a boat or plane or anything else – so long as you transported the controlled substance. And importing drugs into the state still counts as transport.”
- You sold or gave away an illegal drug. It doesn’t matter if you received compensation or if so how much. Any kind of transaction is sufficient to convict.
- You administered illegal drugs to another person. That is, you assisted someone in using drugs in some way. “They wanted to take them” or “they asked me to help administer the drugs” is not a defense.
- You offered to do any of the other illegal acts mentioned in HSC 11352 and it can be shown that you intended to follow through on the offer.
Finally, note that the requirement of the controlled substance being present in a “usable amount” simply means it wasn’t just mere traces or residue. Anything greater than that will be construed by the court as “usable.”
Possible Penalties for Drug Sales/Transport
Sale/transport of a controlled substance (HSC 11352) is a felony in California, punishable by:
- 3 to 5 years in state prison, but 3 to 9 years in prison if you crossed two or more California county lines when you transported the drugs.
- A fine as high as $20,000.
- Formal probation.
In many cases, you can get probation or possibly even a suspended sentence even if convicted of drug sale/transport. But these possibilities are gone if:
- 14 ¼ or more grams of the drug were involved.
- The drug you sold or offered to sell was heroin, cocaine, cocaine base, or meth and you have a prior drug transport/sale or possession to sell conviction.
Sentencing Enhancements
Sentencing enhancements for a drug sale/transport conviction may apply for a variety of reasons.
If the crime was committed within a thousand feet of a drug-treatment center or a homeless shelter AND the drug involved was heroin/cocaine/cocaine base – an additional year in prison can be added to the sentence.
If you have a prior HS 11352 or other drug crime conviction, besides simple possession or personal use of a controlled substance, 3 years of jail/prison time are added per prior.
If you sold or transported heroin/cocaine/cocaine base in “large quantities,” the penalty rises with the amount. Three extra years for over a kilo of illegal drugs, five extra years for 4 or more kilos, 10 extra years for 10 kilos, 15 more years for 20 or more kilos of drugs, 20 years for 40+ kilos, and 25 years for 80+ kilos. And the fines for these large quantities can range from $1 to $8 million.
However, some of the harshest penalty enhancements of all occur if you sold/furnished drugs to a pregnant woman, a person with a violent felony on his/her record, or someone with a drug problem or mental health disorder.
And there are extra years added to the sentence if you sold/furnished drugs to a minor, employed a minor in your crime, or sold drugs within a thousand feet of a school, church, or playground.
Finally, note that there are serious immigration consequences for any immigrant convicted of sale and transport, including the possibility of deportation.
Common Defense Strategies
At Leah Legal, we have defended numerous clients in L.A. and all over Southern California from all manner of drug crimes charges, including sale and transport of a controlled substance.
We always build each client’s defense from the ground up based on the exact facts of the case. But we are also fully familiar with the most commonly employed defenses used in these types of cases and when it’s best to use each one of them.
These common defense strategies include:
- Unlawful Search/Seizure.
If your 4th Amendment rights were violated by an illegal police search or seizure of property – without a warrant or going beyond the valid limits of the warrant OR detaining you without probable cause, we can likely file a pretrial motion for suppression of evidence and effectively get your case dismissed so it never even goes to trial.
- Entrapment
If police coerced, threatened, or lured you into committing the crime by more than just a suggestion/offer, it could be a case of police entrapment. This would also allow us to get your case thrown out of court.
- Other Police Misconduct
If it can be shown that police planted evidence, lied on the police report or in court, lied about where they found the illegal drugs, invented a false claim of probable cause, or used “excessive force” to force a confession, we can get your case dismissed.
- Lack of Knowledge
If you didn’t even realize the drug was present on your person, in your car, or wherever it was found; or if you knew it was there but didn’t know it was a controlled substance (maybe it looked like sugar/flour and you thought that’s what it was), you can be acquitted of drug sales/transport (and of all drug crimes.)
- Lack of Intent
When the charge of HSC 11352 is based simply on “offering” to sell or administer drugs rather than actually doing it, the prosecution must prove intent to actually carry through on an offer. This is not always easy to do – for the burden of proof is high. We won’t let the prosecution get away with a hair’s breadth less than meeting that very high standard.
Related Offenses
When a drug sales or transport charge arises in California, there are other drug charges that often become involved as well. Sometimes, they are charged in addition to the HSC 11352 charge, other times they are charged instead of it as part of a plea deal.
Here are the most important offenses related to drug sales or transportation to be aware of:
- Possession For Sale (HSC 11351).
Actually selling drugs or transporting them with an intent to sell is a higher crime than simply possessing them with an intent to sell. These crimes are similar and both punished harshly, but at least, the penalties for possession for sale are a little less harsh than those for sale/transport, if you can get a charge reduction here.
- Sale/Transport of Methamphetamine (HSC 11379).
Meth and similar drugs like PCP are treated separately in the California Health & Safety Code. In this case, sale or transport of meth is punished a little less harshly than is a HSC 11352 conviction.
- Sale/Transport of Marijuana (HSC 11360).
Marijuana is also punished less harshly than other drugs as to sale and transport. It can be punished by 2 to 4 years in jail if larger quantities were involved, but if 28.5 or fewer grams were involved, it’s a misdemeanor with a $100 fine.
- Sale of Synthetic Drugs
If the drug sold wasn’t “the real” product but was a “designer” drug version of, say, marijuana or various stimulant drugs, it’s a misdemeanor offense. You can get up to six months in jail and a fine as high as $1,000.
- Sale of “Imitation Drugs”
“Fake” or “imitation” drugs differ from “designer” drugs in that they are totally “bunk” and not just a different “version” of the drug. But these concoctions can still hurt people and can still be addictive. Selling them is a misdemeanor offense, unless someone arranged to sell the real drug but then “double-crossed” the customer and delivered bunk drugs instead (then it can be a misdemeanor or a felony.)
- Money Laundering Drug Money
Making financial transactions with money derived from illegal drug sales (knowingly) is a form of money laundering, chargeable if at least $25,000 was involved over a period of a month or more. This can be a misdemeanor or felony and get you 2 to 4 years in prison. There is a fine of twice the amount laundered or up to a quarter million dollars.
- Running a Drug House (HSC 11366).
Opening or operating a drug production facility for illegal drugs is often charged with sale/transport. This is a felony, punishable by up to three years in state prison.
Contact Us Today for Help!
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we have a long track record of success when it comes to defending drug sales/transport cases in L.A. and beyond, and we stand ready 24/7/365 to take your call for help and assist you in winning your case.
We have won dismissals, acquittals, and reduced charges/sentences for many others accused of sale or transport of a controlled substance in Southern California, and we can do the same for you!
Contact us today by calling 818-484-1100, and we will give you a free, no-obligation consultation and a quick beginning to your case!
If you have recently been charged with manufacturing of illegal drugs in Los Angeles or anywhere in Southern California, you are facing the possibility of years behind bars in the state prison system, a fine that could be in the tens of thousands of dollars range, and having a felony drug crime on your permanent criminal record.
You can’t afford to risk walking into court to face a zealous prosecuting attorney without having the best possible legal representation fighting for you and your future every step of the way.
At Leah Legal, we have the detailed knowledge of the law and the in-depth, local experience it takes to win your drug manufacturing defense case. We have a long track record of successfully handling these and other drug crimes defense cases, and we will know how to build you a solid defense!
For a free, no-obligation consultation on the details of your case, contact us anytime 24/7 by calling 818-484-1100.
How Is “Manufacture of a Controlled Substance” Defined in California?
Under California Health & Safety Code Section 11379.6, it is a violation of state law to manufacture any controlled substance (as defined by the Federal Controlled Substances Act), to perform or assist in any stage of such drug manufacturing, or to offer to do any of these things whether for compensation or free of charge.
A “controlled substance” can be an illegal narcotic like cocaine, heroine, PCP, or LSD. It could also be marijuana, if you are manufacturing it without a license, methamphetamine, or even prescription drugs if illegally manufactured.
Any part of the process of drug manufacturing is enough to count as a violation of HSC 11379.6, including compounding, converting, deriving, processing, and more. You don’t have to 100% complete the manufacturing process to be found guilty of this crime. All initial and intermediate steps are covered by the statute, and you only need take part in one step to violate it.
However, you must have known that you were involved in drug manufacturing to be guilty. If you were working for someone else, for example, and didn’t know what the final product would be, you might not have “knowingly” manufactured drugs. And you can’t be convicted of manufacture of a controlled substance for merely assembling raw materials and equipment in preparation for possible drug manufacturing – the process has to have at least barely begun.
Possible Penalties
As mentioned above, HSC 11379.6 (manufacture of a controlled substance) is a felony crime in California. It is a very serious offense, punishable by 3 to 7 years in state prison and a fine of up to $50,000.
However, it is possible to get only probation plus a maximum of 12 months formal probation in place of the long prison sentence.
For merely “offering” to manufacture drugs, the sentence is lighter (though it’s still a very serious felony.) The penalty is 3 to 5 years in county jail OR formal probation plus up to 12 months in county jail.
Aggravating Factors
A drug manufacturing conviction can be sentenced even more severely if certain aggravating factors apply.
For the manufacture of “large quantities” of certain illegal drugs (PCP, GHB, meth), you can get 3 extra years of prison time if the quantity is 3 gallons (liquid form) or 1 pound (solid form) or more. If 10 gallons/3 pounds or more, it’s 5 additional years; if 105 gallons/44 pounds or more, it’s 15 extra years.
If serious physical injury or death is caused by your manufacturing or attempting to manufacture PCP/meth, then you add an extra year in state prison per injury/death inflicted. BUT self-injury or injury/death of an accomplice does not count for this sentencing enhancement.
If you are convicted of manufacturing meth/PCP in a building where a child less than 16 years old lived or was present OR within 200 feet of another building where people lived or “were present” at the time, you can get 2 extra years in state prison.
And if your drug manufacturing activities caused serious bodily injury to a child under 16, you can get 5 additional years in prison.
Finally, if you already have a drug crime prior on your record, you multiply the number of such priors by 3 to determine how many extra years in prison are added to your term.
Common Defense Strategies
Given the severity of the possible sentences you face for a manufacture of a controlled substance conviction in California, it is imperative to have a drug crimes defense attorney on your side who knows how to build the best possible defense.
At Leah Legal, we know how to build you a solid defense that fits the details of your situation and that challenges the evidence, arguments, and testimonies used by the prosecution. We have won dismissals, acquittals, and reduced charges/sentences to numerous drug manufacture defense cases over the years, and we stand ready to do the same for you!
Here are some of the most common defense strategies we use in winning these types of cases:
- Lack of Knowledge/Intent
If you were working for someone else and honestly believed you were manufacturing something legitimate OR had no idea what the end product was going to be, and only assisted with intermediate steps without knowledge you were manufacturing illegal drugs or any intent to do so, you are not guilty.
- Actions Preparatory Only
Even if you can be shown to have had an intention to manufacture a controlled substance but you did not actually begin the process – you merely took preparatory actions up to the time of arrest, you can’t be convicted of drug manufacture in California. You must have committed an “overt act of furtherance” to be guilty of this crime. But, an “attempt” to manufacture violates the statute; so it’s important for your defense attorney to be skilled to distinguish between “preparation” and “attempt” here.
- Wrong Place/Time
It often happens that a police sting operation results in arresting innocent people who were simplay at the wrong place at the wrong time. It may be someone else (probably living with you) was secretly manufacturing drugs on your property without your knowledge or consent. Or, you may have been at a drug lab and maybe were guilty of drug use or simple possession – but not manufacture. And the sentencing is very different for lower-tier drug crimes versus drug manufacture, so it’s crucial to get a good drug crime lawyer so you are not falsely convicted of a higher-level crime.
- Mistaken Identity
It could be the police “got the wrong man.” Maybe someone falsely accused you of drug manufacture to find a scapegoat and get off “Scot free” themselves – or just out of meanness or for revenge. It could also be a police informant gave a false tip or an eyewitness made a mistake, resulting in the wrong person being arrested. We know how to clear things up and clear your name by exposing the prosecution’s weak, false case for what it really is.
- Violations of Your Rights
Oftentimes, police make a raid and arrests without a search warrant, outside the limits of their search warrant, or without probable cause, without reading you your Miranda Rights and following all proper police protocols. If so, we will identify how your rights were violated and can likely get your case dismissed pre-trial.
Drug Diversion
Although we at Leah Legal always first and foremost fight for a dismissal or acquittal – a total victory – there are undeniably cases where such a result is not realistic. In that case, we do not “give up” but simply change our strategy. We continue to fight hard in your best interests with your knowledge and consent, to secure a charge reduction and/or lighter sentence as part of a favorable plea deal.
You can’t qualify for drug diversion programs under Prop 36, PC 1000, or through California’s Drug Court system IF you are convicted of manufacture of a controlled substance. BUT, we may be able to secure you a reduction to a lesser charge that would allow you to enter a drug diversion program.
Drug diversion allows you to enter a “guilty” plea in exchange for your sentencing being deferred while you complete an agreed upon drug rehab and education program (and probation). If successfully completed, your case is ultimately dismissed so that it doesn’t go on your criminal record.
Common Related Offenses
There are many other closely related drug crimes that sometimes come up during a HSC 11379.6 (manufacture of a controlled substance) defense case. Here are some of the most common ones you should be aware of:
- Simple Possession (HSC 11350) or Possession of Meth (HSC11377): It’s sometimes possible to get a drug manufacture charge reduced to that of simple possession of a controlled substance or specifically of methamphetamine. Although these crimes still can result in years in jail or prison and a heavy fine, you can often avoid all or most incarceration time and get approved for drug diversion instead, with the help of a good lawyer.
- Possession For Sale (HSC 11351): Possession of a controlled substance for the purpose of selling it is a felony and a very serious charge, but it’s still not punished as severely as is drug manufacturing, so this is another possible charge reduction in certain types of cases.
- Drug Transport/Sale (HSC 11352): If you moved drugs with an intention to sell them or distribute them, or if you actually sold a controlled substance, this charge could be made on top of the drug manufacture charge. It is a felony and punishable by 3 to 5 years behind bars – and up to 9 years if you moved drugs for sale over 3 or more county lines. But again, as severe as it is punished, drug manufacture usually has a still harsher sentence.
- Under the Influence (HSC 11550): Being under the influence of illegal drugs or of misused or wrongly prescribed prescription drugs is a crime in California. Many times, people arrested for drug manufacture are also found to have a “detectable amount of illegal intoxicating drugs” in their system at the time of arrest, and are thus also charged with HSC 11550. But if the drug manufacturing charge can’t be proved, you might only be convicted of being under the influence of a controlled substance, which is a far lesser offense.
- Possession of Drug Paraphernalia (HSC 11364): Possession of any and all instruments used to administer or personally use illegal drugs, such as needles, pipes, bongs, and cocaine spoons, constitutes the crime of possession of drug paraphernalia. Those charged with manufacturing illegal drugs often have such paraphernalia on hand – but note this differs from “equipment used to manufacture drugs.”
- Possession of Drug Manufacturing “Materials” (HSC 11383/11383.5): If you are found to have knowingly possessed specific substances that are used to manufacture meth or PCP, you could face 2 to 6 years in state prison, besides any prison time for a drug manufacturing offense.
- Allowing Others to Manufacture Drugs (HSC 11366.5): Even if you did not take part at all in manufacturing a controlled substance – IF you did knowingly and willfully allow someone else to do so in your home or on your property of any kind, you have violated HSC 11366.5, which is a felony offense. And, if you allow someone else to store or sell drugs on your property and/or protect the drug manufacturing site or distribution/storage point from police, you also violate this statute.
Contact Us for Immediate Help!
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we stand ready to rush to your assistance with top-tier legal advice and representation if you have been charged with manufacture of a controlled substance or other related drug crimes.
We combine exceptional legal aptitude with a tenacious, never-say-die attitude that always keeps us fighting for the best interests of each and every client we serve.
Contact Leah Legal anytime 24/7/365, by calling 818-484-1100, and we can give you a free legal consultation and immediate attention to your case!
In California, many mistakenly assume that since medicinal and recreational marijuana use was legalized, you can’t be prosecuted for using, possessing, selling, or manufacturing marijuana and marijuana-related products. But this is simply not the case.
While some actions regarding marijuana that weren’t legal before now are, there are still many marijuana drug crimes on the books and that can still be enforced.
If you or your friend or family member have recently been arrested on a marijuana crime charge in Los Angeles or anywhere in Southern California, don’t take the charge lightly – it can potentially result in very serious legal consequences. And don’t fail to equip yourself with the most experienced marijuana crime defense lawyer possible.
At Leah Legal, we have successfully handled countless marijuana crime defense cases and won for our clients. We stand ready to do the same for you! Contact us anytime 24/7 by calling 818-484-1100 for a free consultation and immediate attention to your case.
The Current “Marijuana Situation” in California
Californians voted to legalize recreational use of marijuana in their state by passing Prop 64 during the 2016 election, and that new law went into effect on day one of 2018.
This means that adults in California age 21 and up can legally possess up to one ounce of “dried marijuana,” up to 8 grams of “concentrated cannabis,” and grow 6 marijuana plants – IF all of this is done purely for personal use.
Obviously, this does not mean that everyone can legally possess marijuana in any quantity they like and do whatever they please with it. And there are still enforceable and enforced penalties for many marijuana violations, some of which can be quite severe.
Also realize that Federal law still prohibits the very things that Prop 64 made legal – so it’s even possible (if not likely) to be prosecuted in federal court for such activities.
And possessing marijuana with intent to sell it or actually selling it – without the proper state-issued license, is illegal and harshly punished.
Simple Possession of Marijuana
Anyone caught in actual (on your person), constructive (under your control), or joint possession of more marijuana or cannabis than legally allowed under Prop 64 is subject to a 6 month term in county jail and a fine of up to $500.
This is a misdemeanor “simple possession of a controlled substance” offense, but it does create a criminal record and could make it difficult for you to find future employment.
Also realize that you violate the law if you consume marijuana in public instead of on private property. And the owner of the property (if not yourself) can forbid you to use/smoke it there – so your landlord and/or employer can legally disallow you to use marijuana products on their property.
And you can’t smoke marijuana anywhere where smoking tobacco is prohibited.
If you are under 21 and possess marijuana in any “usable” quantity, you commit an infraction that subjects you to a fine of $100; but if you are under 18, then you are assigned to community service and drug counseling instead.
Simple possession of marijuana on school grounds (elementary schools) is a misdemeanor offense, subjecting you to a maximum fine of $150. But if under 18, you would commit an infraction and be sentenced to counseling and community service.
Cultivation of Marijuana
You are currently allowed to grow up to 6 marijuana plants for personal use in California, if you are 21 or older. But you must follow a number of specific “rules” on how you grow it.
You generally have to grow marijuana indoors in incorporated areas but may be allowed to grow it outdoors in unincorporated areas, depending on local regulations.
You cannot grow marijuana legally except in a “secure location” inaccessible to minors.
If you are under 21 and grow marijuana, it is an infraction and you can be fined up to $100. Those under 18 who cultivate marijuana can be sentenced to community service and drug counseling.
If you are over 21 and cultivate more than six marijuana plants at once, it’s a misdemeanor, punishable by 6 months in jail and a $500 fine. But for those with a serious past criminal record, this violation could be charged as a felony.
Possession of Marijuana For Sale
Unless you have a state and local license to sell marijuana in California, you can’t legally sell it, and you can’t legally possess it while having an intention to sell it.
Normally, possession of marijuana with intent to sell (without a proper license) is a misdemeanor, punishable by up to 6 months in jail and a fine of up to $500.
BUT if you have a violent crime on your past criminal record, it’s your 3rd offense of possession of marijuana with intent to sell, or if you sold or attempted to sell marijuana to someone you knew was under 18 – then this crime is a felony, punishable by from 16 months to 3 years in jail.
Illegal Sale of Marijuana
Selling marijuana without the required licenses OR transport of marijuana with intent to illegally sell it, is a misdemeanor offense in California, punishable by 6 months of jail time and a fine of up to $1,000.
For those under 18, this crime is an infraction only, punishable by counseling and community service.
The California Bureau of Marijuana Control does not want to tolerate a black market in marijuana, so selling marijuana without a license is likely to be among the most severely enforced of all marijuana crimes in our state.
For those with previous serious felonies, those who commit a 3rd illegal sale and/or transport of marijuana offense, those who knowingly sell marijuana to a minor, or for those who illegally imported marijuana into California, sale/transport of marijuana is a felony. In such cases, it is punishable by 2 to 4 years in county jail.
Sale of Marijuana to a Minor
Under HSC 11361, it is a felony offense to sell marijuana to anyone under the age of 18. This state statute was completely unaffected by the partial legalization of marijuana under Prop 64.
It doesn’t matter what amount of marijuana is involved – you can still be found guilty of HSC 11361, so long as it’s a “usable” amount as opposed to “mere traces.” But you could get a more severe sentence if large quantities are involved or if there are other aggravating factors.
Also, this statute covers the transport, giving away, preparation for sale, attempting to sell, and administering of marijuana or marijuana products to a minor.
Sale of marijuana to a minor and closely related violations are punishable by 3 to 5 years in state prison IF the child is between the ages of 14 and 18.
IF the child is under the age of 14, then the penalty is 3 to 7 years in prison.
Possession of Marijuana While Driving
Under California Vehicle Code Section 23222b, it is illegal to operate a motor vehicle with marijuana present. Driving under the influence of marijuana (a form of DUID, “doped driving”) is a different offense – merely possessing marijuana or cannabis while driving is prohibited under VC 23222b.
This crime is a mere infraction, punishable by a fine of up to $100. But you don’t want it on your record, so it’s still worth hiring a good drug crimes defense lawyer to defeat a driving with marijuana charge.
What About Medical Marijuana Law in California?
Under Prop 215, passed by California voters in 1996, use of marijuana for medicinal purposes was legalized in our state. These provisions are found in Health & Safety Code Sections 11362.5 and following.
When it comes to medical marijuana, you are not subject to the one ounce possession limit that applies to recreational marijuana. Instead, you can possess as much as a doctor legally prescribes and as you “reasonably” need, based on the nature of your condition.
Additionally, you can cultivate larger amounts of marijuana based on needing it for medical purposes. And there is no restriction based on being under 21. But you need a doctor’s orders to cultivate it in this way and you also need parental consent if you’re under the age of 18.
A doctor can legally prescribe medical marijuana only for certain conditions. These include: chronic pain, arthritis, migraine headaches, seizures, AIDS, and certain forms of cancer.
Not only a patient but also a “primary caregiver” can grow, possess, and administer medical marijuana. A primary caregiver must be chosen by the patient to handle his/her medical marijuana and must be responsible for the health/safety of the patient.
But neither a primary caregiver nor a patient can legally sell marijuana or grow far more than is reasonably needed to care for the patient. And everything must be done in accordance with a physician’s recommendations.
Medical Marijuana Dispensaries
For medical marijuana use, there are special dispensaries that were set up after medical marijuana was legalized in California but before recreational marijuana was legalized.
Eventually, it’s possible these dispensaries will be eliminated since you can buy marijuana anywhere. But it’s not clear whether or not this will happen.
These dispensaries operate under very strict regulations and can only sell at cost or give away free medical marijuana to patients or their primary caregivers. Such operations must be non-profit.
You still need to have a doctor’s prescription to legally get marijuana from a dispensary, and this particular marijuana is not allowed to go to recreational use.
Federal Marijuana Law
Under the US Controlled Substances Act, marijuana along with numerous other drugs are illegal to possess and use OR require a doctor’s prescription.
Despite Prop 215 and Prop 64, Federal law trumps state law on these matters, so you can technically be arrested and prosecuted for even the smallest marijuana violation based on federal law. And the penalty for simple possession of any usable amount of marijuana (even under an ounce) is a $1,000 fine and up to 12 months in Federal prison.
However, the reality is that the Federal government is very unlikely to prosecute marijuana offenses that are not also violations of California state law. And they are unlikely to pursue all but the most egregious cases, where big-time drug traffickers are involved.
You are more likely to be charged with violating Federal marijuana laws when on Federal property, like post offices and national parks, or at public airports or HUD housing complexes. And use at a HUD residence can lead to Federal housing assistance being legally denied.
Additionally, possession of marijuana for sale or actual sale of marijuana are Federal felony offenses that can have severe immigration consequences if you are even charged with them, much less convicted of them. This can include deportation, not only of illegal aliens but also of legal immigrants since these are considered “aggravated” felonies under Federal law.
Contact Us Today for Immediate Assistance!
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we understand the details of California’s marijuana laws and also have great familiarity with the way marijuana violations are actually prosecuted and how to best counter and defeat the case of the prosecution.
We have served numerous clients in Los Angeles and throughout Southern California with top-tier defense against all manner of marijuana-related drug crime charges. We will know how to build you a solid defense and win the best possible outcome to your case.
For a free legal consultation, contact us 24/7/365 by calling 818-484-1100, and an expert legal analyst will be quick to assist you!
If you have recently been arrested on the charge of drug possession in Los Angeles or anywhere in Southern California, you are facing serious, long-lasting negative consequences upon a conviction.
It’s true that simple possession is among the least harshly punished drug crimes, but even it can be punished harshly and create a permanent criminal record under tough California drug laws. And when a repeat or aggravated drug possession offense is in view, the repercussions can be even more detrimental.
At Leah Legal, we have many years of experience in defending and winning drug possession cases in the L.A. Area and beyond. We understand the intricacies of California’s drug statutes and the inner workings of local Los Angeles court processes.
We can come to your defense at a moment’s notice, anytime 24/7. Call us at 818-484-1100 for a free consultation, and we can help you better understand your legal situation and options.
How Is Drug Possession Defined in California?
Drug possession, simple possession, or possession of a controlled substance all describe a violation of California Health & Safety Code Section 11350. HSC 11350 prohibits, under state law, possession of any substance that the US Controlled Substances Act has already made illegal to possess under federal law.
It’s true that simple possession is normally a misdemeanor offense in California, since Prop 47, but it still can bring jail time, fines, a permanent criminal record, difficulty finding gainful employment, difficulty in getting an apartment to lease, rejection on college enrollment and financial aid applications, child custody consequences, and other long-term negative results. Plus, there are instances in which drug possession can be charged as a felony as well.
Drug possession under HSC 11350 can include illegal drugs or pain killers and the like for which you have no valid prescription. And it can still include marijuana, if in the right quantities or forms.
Whether the drug you possessed was Schedule I or II or generally less severe drugs in Schedules II through V, drug possession charges can still apply.
What Must the Prosecution Prove?
In order to gain a conviction on the charge of drug possession (HSC 11350), the prosecutor must prove the following elements of the crime beyond all reasonable doubt:
- You did in fact possess a controlled substance as defined under the US Controlled Substances Act.
- You did not have any legal right to possess the substance in question (like a prescription or a police officer confiscating illegal drugs.)
- You were aware of the presence of the drug and of its nature as a controlled substance.
- You were in possession of a “usable quantity” of the drug, as opposed to “mere traces.”
Note that you can “possess” a drug in three distinct ways: actual, constructive, or joint possession.
Actual possession means you have the drug physically on your person. Constructive possession means you had control over the drug, had access to it, stored it somewhere, or had others controlling the drug in your behalf. Joint possession simply means you and at least one other person had actual and/or constructive possession of the drug.
But also realize that it is not enough for a prosecutor to simply show a drug was on you or near you. You must have willfully and knowingly possessed the controlled substance in one way or another to be guilty of drug possession.
And you must have been aware of both the drug’s presence and its nature. That doesn’t mean you had to know its harmful effects or its chemical makeup, but simply that it was an illegal drug. If you thought it was flour or sugar, for example, you are not guilty. Or, if someone planted the drug on you or in your apartment or car, and you didn’t know about it, you are not guilty.
As to the requirement that you possessed a “usable” amount of the controlled substance, this does not mean it had to be a large amount. It just means that mere traces or residues of drugs are not enough to gain a conviction. There had to be enough of the drug there for someone to reasonably use, and enough of it so that the drug would have its usual expected effects.
Possible Penalties
The consequences of a drug possession conviction under HSC 11350 go far beyond the actual sentence, as we have already noted above. It affects one’s ability to get a job, go to college, get approved for an apartment lease, and more. But the legal consequences are certainly among the worst of the total array of consequences.
Normally, simple drug possession is charged as a misdemeanor in California. It is punishable by up to 12 months in county jail and a fine of up to $1,000.
Before Prop 47 was passed by Californians in 2014, all drug possession charges were felonies. Note that if you were convicted of a felony drug possession charge in California before passage of Prop 47, you can petition to get the charge reduced to a misdemeanor (and the sentence correspondingly reduced.)
Also note that even a misdemeanor level conviction for drug possession can have serious immigration consequences, including possible deportation. A Leah Legal, we can help non-citizens facing these charges navigate both legal and immigration fronts of the issue.
However, there are still some situations where drug possession can be a felony in California. If one already has a prior conviction on his/her record for a serious felony (like murder or vehicular manslaughter, for example) or for any sex crime that put you on the state sex offender registration list, then a drug possession crime becomes a felony, punishable by from 16 months to 3 years in state prison.
Common Defense Strategies
At Leah Legal, we have deep experience in defending all manner of drug possession charges in L.A. and Southern California courts. And while it’s true that no two cases are quite the same and every defense must be “custom built,” it is also true that many of the same basic defense strategies work again and again.
We have helped get many drug possession charges dropped or dismissed by challenging a prosecutor’s weak case early and forcefully. We have also gained many acquittals after presenting evidence, testimonies, and legal arguments in court. And finally, we have often gotten charges and penalties reduced in favorable plea deals, where that was the best possible option.
Here are some of our most commonly used legal defense strategies in California drug possession cases:
- Lack of “Possession”
In some cases, there may have no actual, constructive, or joint possession of a controlled substance, despite an arrest on that charge. It may be that the drugs were planted on you by someone else or left in your car, baggage, locker, or apartment by someone else.
- Lack of Knowledge
It may be you weren’t even aware of the presence of the drug nor of its nature as a controlled substance. If you didn’t realize the drug was illegal to possess, this defense may be viable. If you hid the drug, refused a drug test, or have a previous drug crime record, this defense will be more difficult to use.
- Valid Prescription
For some types of controlled substances, you can legally possess them and use them so long as you have a valid prescription from a doctor to do so. In that case, you must have used the drug only in the amount, frequency, and manner as prescribed.
You cannot have possessed more drugs than were prescribed, used a single prescription multiple times, or used a fraud prescription (even if the doctor agreed to fraudulently prescribe the drug). Nor can you use a prescription made out to someone else as a defense.
- Temporary Possession
In some instances, you can use the defense of mere temporary, transient possession as a defense against a drug possession charge. If you only possessed the controlled substance briefly while in the process of disposing of them or turning them in to police, this defense can work.
But, if you were disposing of the illegal drugs to prevent police from finding and confiscating them, this defense won’t fly at all.
- Police Misconduct
If police violated your rights during the arrest, it is often possible to get evidence against you declared inadmissible in court. And that often makes the case unwinnable to the prosecution.
If police conducted an illegal search and seizure, evidence illegally obtained can be banned from consideration in court. If the stop was illegal, no search warrant was obtained, police searched beyond the limits of the warrant, “excessive force” was used to seize the drugs, or if evidence was planted or fabricated, you can get a dismissal and win your case. We will file a motion to suppress evidence pre-trial so that no trial need ever take place.
- False Accusation
Obviously, any untrue charge of drug possession is a false accusation, but what we mean here is when someone reports you to the police trying to get you arrested for drug possession, when the story was just “made up.”
It may even be that “fake evidence” was used to frame you and make you look guilty. If so, we will know how to unravel the evidence of the prosecution, cross-examine witnesses against you, and get to the bottom of what really happened.
Drug Diversion Programs & Plea Deals
In California, most people arrested and charged with simple possession of a controlled substance can avail themselves of a drug diversion program. Drug diversion programs are available to those charged with misdemeanor (not felony) level drug possession.
The purpose of California’s drug diversion programs is to help those struggling with drug addiction to overcome it, to free up space in state prisons and county jails, to allow the justice system to focus more on felony and violent crimes, and to save the taxpayer money.
At Leah Legal, we know how to maximize your chances of getting accepted onto a drug diversion program and may often make this a part of a favorable plea deal.
To qualify for a diversion program, you must agree to plead “guilty” to the drug possession charge, but the actual sentencing will be “delayed.” In the interim, you must enroll in and complete a drug abuse treatment program of some sort and fulfill various other stipulations. It’s essentially like being on parole. If you fulfill these obligations, your drug charge will ultimately be dismissed and you won’t have a criminal record that could keep you from getting a good job.
Also, you won’t have to go to jail or prison if you qualify for drug diversion.
Finally, note that many times, someone charged with a higher level drug crime like possession for sale or sale or distribution of a controlled substance, can get the charge reduced to simple possession and get a much lighter sentence.
We at Leah Legal understand how to fight hard for and win a dismissal or acquittal wherever possible. But we also have well honed negotiation skills we can put to work in your behalf in order to get you the least severe conviction and sentence (including getting approved for a drug diversion program), where that is the best obtainable option.
Contact Us Today for Immediate Assistance
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we have deep experience in successfully defending against California drug possession charges. We know how to build a solid defense and win the best possible outcome to every case we take on.
And we don’t shy away from “the tough cases” but can also effectively defend against aggravated or repeat-offense allegations.
Contact us today, anytime 24/7/365, and we will be happy to give you immediate assistance. Call us at 818-484-1100 for a free, no-obligation legal consultation on the details of your case.
Not only is the possession of a controlled substance itself illegal under both federal and state of California law, but it’s also illegal to possess “drug paraphernalia” is designed to be used for illegal drug use. The penalties for this crime are not as high as for many other drug crimes, but they can still be very serious and impactful on one’s future life since it creates a criminal record.
It’s easy to get falsely accused of illegal possession of drug paraphernalia, but unless you have a good lawyer representing you in court, it’s not so easy to disprove such false charges. At Leah Legal, we have many years’ experience in winning these types of drug crimes defense cases, as well as defeating all other related drug crime charges.
Contact us today by calling 818-484-1100, and we can give you a free legal consultation on your drug paraphernalia possession or related charge. A well seasoned legal expert will walk you through your options and help you know how best to proceed.
How Is “Possession of Drug Paraphernalia” Defined in California?
Under California Health & Safety Code Section 11364, it is illegal to possess “drug paraphernalia” if items falling under that description are possessed illegally or for an illegal purpose. Paraphernalia includes such objects as opium pipes, hypodermic needles, syringes, cocaine spoons, and a host of other things used as an instrument for illegally smoking, injecting, or otherwise consuming a controlled substance.
However, another California law has created an exception to the possession of needles/syringes (but only up to 2021 unless extended or made permanent at or before that point) IF they are for personal drug use only AND they were obtained from a source with authority to legally sell syringes/needles. The idea is to try to at least ensure drug needles are sterile even when used illegally since dirty needles are a source of many problems far beyond the drug epidemic itself.
In particular, this exception clause is meant to prevent the spread of AIDS or HIV via drug needles or of other diseases that can be transmitted by contact with contaminated blood.
Additionally, drug scales and other items used to weigh, measure, mix, compound, encapsulated, package, or hide illegal drugs are NOT included under HSC 11364 as drug paraphernalia. But that’s not because it’s legal to possess such items or use them but because these items, associated as they are with drug manufacture, distribution, and sale, are covered under Health & Safety Code Section 11351 (Possession For Sale of a Controlled Substance), HSC Section 11352 (Transport & Sale of a Controlled Substance), and other laws.
What Must the Prosecutor Prove?
To be convicted of possession of drug paraphernalia (HSC 11364) in California, the prosecution must prove all of the following elements of the crime beyond all reasonable doubt:
- You were found in control of drug paraphernalia as provided for under HSC 11364 and with all relevant exceptions (as discussed above) taken into account.
- You were aware of the presence of the drug paraphernalia.
- You were aware of the nature of the items in question as drug paraphernalia.
Possession under HSC 11364 is construed as “control,” but this control can be either “actual” or “constructive.” Actual control means you physically had the object(s) on your person or in your hand, while constructive control/possession means that you had “ownership” of the item even though it may not have been found on your person by police.
So, if you own an opium pipe for smoking opium and it’s found in your dresser drawer where you store it – that’s constructive control. Also, if two or more people share control over drug paraphernalia, it’s considered “joint possession” and, in that case, both parties who jointly controlled it can be prosecuted under HSC 11364.
Finally, the item that counts as drug paraphernalia has to be intended for use in illegally using a controlled substance. So, if you have a syringe from a legal source and used it for a legitimate purpose, that’s not drug paraphernalia. If you used an ordinary spoon to take cocaine, on the other hand, that is drug paraphernalia.
Further Exceptions
While we’ve noted a few exception clauses already, there are more when it comes to illegal possession of drug paraphernalia. First of all, if police officers and other law enforcement personnel, doctors, dentists, vets, manufacturers, retailers, pharmacists, and some others with a license to possess hypodermic needles or syringes possess them – that, of course, is not a violation of the law.
Secondly, under Prop 64, personal use of marijuana for recreational purposes was made legal. And at this point in time, illegal possession of marijuana related drug paraphernalia is handled under separate marijuana laws in California. It’s much more difficult than before to be prosecuted for drug paraphernalia possession for use of marijuana nowadays, but in certain extreme circumstances, it can still happen.
Possible Penalties
A violation of HSC 11364, Possession of Drug Paraphernalia, is a misdemeanor crime in California. It is punishable by up to 6 months in county jail and a fine of up to $1,000.
A conviction also creates a criminal record, which will be viewable by future potential employers and anyone else who runs a background check. Plus, an arrest on this charge can lead to suspension or revocation of state-issued professional licenses AND a mere accusation potentially could force an immediate leave of absence of a teacher pending resolution of the matter.
Drug Diversion Programs
Most often, you can qualify for entry into a drug diversion program if convicted of HSC 11364 Possession of Drug Paraphernalia. However, if you were also convicted of a felony OR of a misdemeanor that rises above simple possession or personal use of a controlled substance – then you won’t be eligible for drug diversion.
What does drug diversion do exactly? It allows non-violent drug crime offenders to escape actual jail time and instead complete probation. The probation will include various programs designed to help combat drug addiction and abuse – and you agree to allow random drug testing to ensure you’re not taking drugs while on the program.
Under Penal Code Section 1000, those who qualify for drug diversion can enter a no contest plea or guilty plea in exchange for entering the program. A similar set up is also provided for under Prop 36. If you complete your diversion program successfully, then at the end of the probationary period, the judge dismisses your case so you won’t have a conviction on your record. But, if you fail to keep the terms of the diversion agreement, then you can be re-arrested and sent to serve the time in jail you would have served to begin with absent drug diversion.
Common Defense Strategies
We at Leah Legal understand how easy it is to be falsely accused of illegal possession of drug paraphernalia in California, and we have deep experience in defeating these types of charges. While each case is different and requires a somewhat unique defense, here are the most common defense strategies used against an HSC 11364 charge:
- Lack of Possession. If you did not exercise any control over the paraphernalia, you did not “possess” it and are not guilty. If the prosecution cannot prove actual, constructive, or joint possession beyond a reasonable doubt, you cannot be convicted.
- Not Paraphernalia. In some cases, an item not used for illegal drug use at all is assumed to be drug paraphernalia by police. It might look similar to paraphernalia, but perhaps, it’s really a pipe used for smoking tobacco or something used for legitimate medical purposes.
- Lack of Knowledge. If you were not aware of the presence of the drug paraphernalia, because someone planted it in your apartment or on your person or a friend left it in your car, for example, then you are not guilty. Or, if you knew of the object’s presence but did not realize it was drug paraphernalia, you also are innocent of this charge.
- Police Misconduct. If the drug paraphernalia, or alleged paraphernalia, was found during an illegal search or seizure or other violation of your Constitutional rights, then we can petition to prevent that evidence from being used in court against you. This often results in the case becoming unwinnable by the prosecution and the case is therefore immediately dropped or dismissed.
Other Related Offenses
Sometimes, a drug paraphernalia possession charge will stand alone in isolation, but quite often, other charges will accompany it. Or, it may be charged in place of a more severe crime in a plea bargain deal. Here are some of the most relevant related offenses to be aware of if you are facing an HSC 11364 Possession of Drug Paraphernalia charge:
- HSC 11350 Possession of a Controlled Substance
Simple possession of a controlled substance for personal use only is often charged along with possession of drug paraphernalia for obvious reasons. This charge is a misdemeanor in most cases and is punishable by up to a year in county jail. The amount and type of illegal drug possessed and whether or not it’s a first offense can also affect the sentence.
- HSC 11550 Under the Influence of a Controlled Substance
Also commonly occurring along with possession of drugs and accompanying paraphernalia is the actual use of such drugs. If under the influence of drugs while driving (DUID), the penalties will be steeper, but in California, simple use of illegal drugs is a misdemeanor punishable by a year in jail, up to 5 years of probation, drug counseling, and possibly community service.
- HSC 11364.5 Business Possession of Drug Paraphernalia
It is a special type of drug paraphernalia possession violation to operate a business where you store, display, or sell such items. For legal uses, some such items can be sold if they are kept in a separate room where only adults are allowed to go and buy them. There are no criminal charges to this violation as such, but you could still face regular HSC 11364 charges plus risk losing your business license.
- HSC 11364.7 Manufacture & Transport of Drug Paraphernalia
Under HSC 11364.7, it is illegal to transport, manufacture, or “furnish” drug paraphernalia to others – aside from just possessing it.
This law is used mostly when the guilty party knew or should have known, that the drug paraphernalia was going to be used in relation to selling and/or using illegal drugs. Also under this statute is prohibited the furnishing of such paraphernalia to minors or the possession of hypodermic needle on school grounds with the intention of furnishing it to a minor.
This crime can be a misdemeanor or a felony depending on the details of each case. As a misdemeanor, it’s punishable by a year in jail and a $1,000 fine. As a felony, you can get 16 months to 3 years in prison plus a $10,000 fine.
- HSC 11365 Aiding/Abetting Controlled Substance Use
It is a crime in California to “be present” where another person is illegally using a controlled substance if you are in any way aiding or abetting his or her drug use.
This is a misdemeanor and is usually punished by a maximum of 6 months in county jail. This charge often accompanies HSC 11360 because many will be present and in possession of drug paraphernalia while helping another person consume illegal drugs.
Contacting a Possession of Drug Paraphernalia Attorney Near Me
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we understand that time is of the essence when it comes to defending yourself against a drug crime allegation – including against the charge of illegal possession of drug paraphernalia.
We act fast for our clients and waste no time in beginning to build them a solid defense. And we have a proven track record of success in winning the best possible outcome for these sorts of cases.
Contact us anytime 24/7 by calling 818-484-1100 for a free, no obligation consultation. Our criminal defense attorney Leah will give immediate attention to your needs and help you defend your future and your reputation!
If you have recently been arrested in Los Angeles or anywhere in Southern California on the charge of possession for sale of a controlled substance, you are not alone. First, you are not alone because these kinds of arrests are extremely common in the L.A. Area. And secondly, you are not alone because an experienced criminal defense lawyer from Leah Legal can come to your immediate aid.
Possession for sale is a more serious charge than simple possession, and it carries potentially severe and long-lasting penalties. Plus, a drug conviction on your record can make it difficult to hold down a good job and to continue to live out your life the way you want to.
At Leah Legal, we stand ready to answer you call 24/7/365 – contact us anytime by calling 818-484-1100, and we will give you a free legal consultation and begin building you a solid defense.
How Is Possession for Sale Defined Under California Law?
Under California Health & Safety Code Section 11351, possession for sale of a narcotic of a controlled substance is made a felony crime.
This statute does not refer to the actual sale or distribution of illegal drugs but simply to the intention to sell or distribute such drugs, when you also have them in your immediate possession or under your control.
Any drug banned by the US Controlled Substances Act or otherwise regulated by it counts as a “controlled substance” for the purposes of HSC 11351. That means no only illegal drugs like cocaine or heroin, but also illegally possessed prescription drugs like codeine can count.
What Must the Prosecution Prove?
To gain a conviction on the charge of possession for sale (HSC 11351), the prosecutor must demonstrate all of the following elements of the crime to be true beyond all reasonable doubt:
- You illegally possessed or purchased a controlled substance.
- You were aware of the drug’s presence and of its nature as a controlled substance.
- You possessed a “usable” amount of the drug, not mere traces.
- You had an intention to sell the drugs you possessed or purchased.
Note that “possess” as used of illegal drugs in California law, can mean actual, constructive, or joint possession. Actual possession means the drug was on your person. Constructive means it was not on you but was under your control or you had access to it. Joint possession just means that you were one of multiple people who jointly held actual and/or constructive possession over the drugs.
In order to prove a violation of HSC 11351, the prosecution must show you knew of the drug’s presence and of its nature as a controlled substance. That means it can’t just be that someone planted the drug on you, in your car, or in your apartment. And you had to know the drugs were illegal.
You don’t have to have known the name of the drug, its chemical make up, or what effects it would likely have. As long as you knew it was an illegal drug, that satisfies the requirement.
Also, “useless traces” of a drug cannot get you convicted. But neither need there have been a large quantity – anything sufficient to use/sell and that would produce the drug’s “normal” effects in any detectable degree, is a “usable” amount.
Finally, even if it is proved that you possessed a controlled substance, your intention to sell or distribute the drugs must be proved, or else it would be the lesser (misdemeanor) crime of simple possession instead of the felony crime of possession for sale.
How Do Prosecutors Try to Prove Intent to Sell?
The mere possession of a controlled substance (HSC 11350) is, as mentioned above, a significantly lesser offense with much more lenient penalties than HSC 11351, possession for sale.
Thus, if prosecutors prove everything else but can’t prove the intent to sell, they can’t get a conviction on HSC 11351. But how do prosecutors go about trying to establish intent to sell?
First, realize that intentions are often difficult to prove in court. Without a confession from the defendant that he/she intended to sell the drugs in question, it is based on circumstances or on testimony of others.
The prosecution will likely call in a narcotics expert who will give his/her opinion one whether the drugs were likely intended for personal use or for sale. This conclusion will be based on things like:
- A large quantity of drugs being present.
- The drugs being packaged in bags or other evenly divided, countable way that drug sellers typically use.
- The presence of drug paraphernalia, such as pipes, needles, scales, and other tools used to measure or separate drugs.
- Large quantities of cash, guns, and other items may also be used as evidence of drug sales or of the intent to sell.
However, if the defendant was found under the influence of the drug possessed, then this makes it less likely that he/she intended to sell them. They are then viewed as probably just for personal use – though, it’s not impossible, of course, for a user to also intend to sell drugs.
Possible Penalties for Possession for Sale in California
A violation of HSC 11351, possession for sale of a controlled substance, is a felony crime in California. In some cases, it is punished by up to 12 months in county jail plus probation. Other times, you can get 2 to 4 years in jail. Either way, a fine of as much as $20,000 may also apply.
However, if it can be shown that the defendant intended to commit multiple acts of drug sales, then each intended sale counts as a separate offense – and the penalties multiply.
And any conviction for possession for sale can have serious immigration consequences, including possible deportation, for both legal and illegal aliens.
Aggravating Offenses
There are additional factors that can lead to an aggravated offense being charged. This will enhance the sentence beyond that of un-aggravated HSC 11351 convictions.
Possession for sale of cocaine-base can get you 3 to 5 years in jail, plus up to a $20,000 fine.
Possession for sale of cocaine, cocaine-base, or heroin can add 3 years of incarceration time if you possessed over a kg of the drug; 5 years for over 4 kg; 15 years for over 20 kg; 20 years for over 40 kg; and 25 years for over 80 kg. And fines in such high-volume cases can reach as high as $8 million.
Additionally, if you have a previous felony drug conviction, it could add 3 years to the jail term.
Common Defense Strategies
At Leah Legal, we have been winning possession for sale defense cases in Los Angeles and throughout Southern California for many years, and we know how to build you a solid defense that fits the details of your case.
And while there are many defense strategies we use, and not two defenses are exactly the same, here are a few of the most common types of defense we employ:
- Illegal Search/Seizure
If your constitutional rights were violated by a search without a warrant or that went beyond the limits of the warrant issued, we can get your case dismissed. Or, if police lacked probable cause for a traffic stop or a designated checkpoint was not set up in a legally compliant way, we can also win you a dismissal.
- Lack of Possession
This is really a group of defense strategies. It’s anything we would also use to fight a simple possession charge. It could be the “drugs” were really flour or sugar or you reasonably thought them to be so. It could be the whole story was fabricated against you – there were no drugs or someone else is framing you. Or, it could be you didn’t know of the drugs’ presence or of their nature as a controlled substance. Any of these points being proved would win you a full acquittal.
- Lack of Intent to Sell
Sometimes, there may be no way to fight the evidence of drug possession, but we may well be able to defeat the element of “intent to sell,” reducing the charge in effect to simple possession. That means a misdemeanor instead of a felony on your record and a much lighter sentence.
Drug Diversion Programs
Another key part of our defense strategy, in certain cases, at Leah Legal, is to get you qualified for a drug diversion program. If a dismissal or acquittal is not possible, drug diversion can prevent a permanent criminal record and get you into drug abuse education programs.
To qualify for Prop 36, PC 1000, or California Drug Court, drug diversion programs, it must have been a non-felony, non-violent crime. Thus, either the prosecution cannot prove intent to sell or they are willing to drop that part of the charge as part of a plea deal.
These programs allow you to meet a number of stipulations for a specified period of time, after entering a “guilty” plea. But then your sentence is not finalized and is held, as it were, “in limbo” while you complete the diversion program. If successfully completed, the charge can ultimately be dismissed. If not, however, you could be given the original sentence associated with that charge, including possible jail time.
It can be critical to qualify for enrollment in a drug diversion program, and at Leah Legal, we are skilled negotiators and know when and how to secure a favorable plea deal.
Related Offenses
Oftentimes, a possession for sale charge will be charged along with other drug crime charges. Or, a similar charge may be charged instead of HSC 11351.
Here are some of the most important related offenses to be aware of:
- HSC 11352, Sale and Transport of a Controlled Substance.
This crime goes beyond just intending to sell illegal drugs and entails actually selling them. It is a felony, punishable by 3 to 5 years in jail. But the sentence can rise to 3 to 9 years if drugs were moved over more than two county lines.
- HSC 11359, Possession of Marijuana For Sale.
It is a felony in California to possess marijuana with the intent to sell it (without a license). The penalty is from 16 months to 3 years in jail, plus a fine of up to $10,000.
- Methamphetamine Crimes
There are special sections in the California Health & Safety Code (11377, 11378, and 11379) that address the possession, sale, or transport of meth. Certain non-meth drugs like GHB, PCP, and particular anabolic steriods are also dealt with in these statutes. The penalties, in general, tend to be less severe than for possession/intent to sell/actual sale of other drugs.
- HSC 11363, Running a “Drug House.”
If one is found to not only have possessed drugs and intended to sell them, but also to have opened/maintained a drug house, from which to continue drug production and sales, he or she can additionally be charged under HSC 11363.
This crime can be either misdemeanor or a felony, depending on the details of the case. As a felony, it is punishable by from 16 months to 3 years in state prison.
Contact Us Today for Immediate Assistance!
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we have the deep-seated legal expertise and the never-give-up tenacity to fight for you both in and out of court and win your possession for sale defense case.
We have a long track record of winning the best possible outcomes to all manner of California drug crime cases. We know how to win dismissals pre-trial, win acquittals through strong argumentation and solid evidence in court, and when/how to fight for a reduced charge or sentence as part of a favorable plea deal.
Contact Leah Legal anytime 24/7 for a free, no-obligation consultation on the details of your drug crime defense case. Call us today at 818-484-1100, and we can immediately begin assisting you in building a solid defense!
Under California Health and Safety PC 11359, it is illegal to possess marijuana for sale. If you are convicted of marijuana possession with an intention to sell, you could spend a significant period in jail. There are only two outlets under California law that have licenses to sell marijuana. They are Medical Marijuana Dispensaries and those businesses with an express license to sell recreational marijuana to individuals above 21 years.
If you don’t fall under these categories, it’s illegal to possess marijuana for sale. If you are arrested and face charges for marijuana possession for sale, the Leah Legal can be of great help. We have competent attorneys in Van Nuys, CA, who can help you develop the best defense against your charges.
Contact Leah Legal anytime 24/7 by calling 818-484-1100, and we will give you a free legal consultation and can immediately get started on building you a solid defense!
Possession of Marijuana
Under PC 11359, possession occurs in three forms. These forms include joint, constructive, and actual possession. When you share possession of marijuana with another person, you have joint possession. For instance, if marijuana is discovered in a house you share with your wife, both of you’re in joint possession of marijuana.
When marijuana is discovered in an area, you have control over or access to; you have constructive possession. For instance, if the drug is discovered in your basement, you have constructive marijuana possession since you always access the basement. If marijuana is located inside your briefcase, purse, or pocket, you’ve actual possession of the drug. You are in actual possession of marijuana as long as it’s on your person.
Elements of Marijuana Possession under PC 11359
It’s an offense to possess marijuana for sale under California Health and Safety PC 11359. When the prosecutor accuses you of possessing marijuana for sale, he or she must prove several elements. The prosecutor has to prove that:
- You were aware of its presence (the marijuana)
- You possessed a significant or usable amount of marijuana
- You intended to sell the marijuana
- You were aware of the product’s character or nature as marijuana
- The substance was marijuana
You Were Aware of its Presence
If you’re accused of possessing marijuana for sale, the prosecutor must prove beyond doubt that you knew of the drug’s nature as marijuana and that you knew you possessed marijuana. For the prosecutor to prove that you knew that the drug you possessed was marijuana, he or she doesn’t need to prove that you were aware of its effects, chemical composition, or the exact name. The only evidence he or she requires is that you knew that the drug was marijuana.
You Possessed a Usable or Significant Amount of Marijuana
If traces or residues of marijuana can’t elicit the drug’s reasonable effect, then they aren’t enough evidence for charges under PC 11359. The amount of marijuana you possess should be in the quantity that can be consumed by the individual you intend to sell to.
You Intended to Sell Marijuana
If the prosecutor accuses you of possessing marijuana for sale, he or she must prove that you had marijuana for selling. However, if you possessed marijuana for your personal use, then the charges against you under PC 11359 don’t apply. Possessing marijuana for your use is legal under California law. In some instances, the prosecutor may charge you simple possession of marijuana. Simple possession of marijuana has fewer penalties or even none than possession of marijuana for selling.
Circumstantial evidence normally proves the intention behind your marijuana possession. The prosecutor will look out for certain signs that you possess marijuana intending to sell. Some of the factors that could portray your intention to sale marijuana include:
- Packaging of the drug in multiple baggies
- Presence of many cell phones
- Presence of weighing scales or instruments used to measure or separate the drug
- Receipts and ledgers
- Absence of drug paraphernalia
- When you’re under marijuana influence
- The amount of marijuana you possessed was more than several ounces.
- You had large amounts of cash and weapons alongside the pot
- You have a history of selling pot or other drugs.
- The law enforcement officers witnessed you engaging in a transaction of sale of marijuana. If the police witness you exchanging marijuana with cash or any other item of value, it’s an indication you possessed marijuana for sale.
How you package marijuana can be favorable evidence in your favor or damning evidence against you. If you package marijuana in many small baggies, it proves your intention to distribute or sell the drug. On the other hand, if you package marijuana in a single bag, it could be a clear suggestion that you just intended to have it for personal use.
The presence of drug paraphernalia such as syringe, pipe, or any other instrument used to consume marijuana indicates that you possessed marijuana was for personal use. However, the absence of drug paraphernalia shows that you possess marijuana for selling. Furthermore, the availability of an instrument such as a scale used to separate or measure marijuana shows that you intended to sell it.
The presence of ledgers, receipts, or many cell phones, indicates possession of transactions related to the sale of marijuana. Individuals who deal with drugs often carry many cell phones to dilute their transaction evidence or cover their tracks.
It could be a clear indication that you possess marijuana for personal use, if you were under marijuana influence at the time, it was found in your possession. However, this fact doesn’t refute your intention to sell marijuana. You could sell it and still possess it for personal use.
Punishment for Possession of Marijuana for Sale
In most cases, possession of marijuana for sale is a misdemeanor crime under California law. The offense’s punishment includes jail time of not more than six months in a county jail in California. You may also have to pay a fine that does not exceed $500.
After the passage of voter Proposition 64, you could face felony charges for marijuana possession for sale under certain circumstances. You will get a felony conviction if you have a prior conviction for serious felonies. Serious felonies under California law include sex crimes, sexually violent offenses, murder, and vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated, among others.
You’ll also be guilty of a felony if you have two or more convictions for marijuana possession for sale, you’ll automatically face felony charges. You’ll be guilty of possessing marijuana for sale if possessing the substance for sale to a person below 18 years.
For felony possession of marijuana for sale, the penalties include imprisonment for 16 months, two years, or three years in county jail.
Drug Treatment/Diversion
You will not be eligible for a drug diversion program if you are guilty of possessing marijuana for sale. Drug treatment or diversion instead of jail time is only available for the crime of simple possession of marijuana. The drug diversion is also available for the crime of cultivating more than the allowable amount of marijuana. Therefore, your attorney can attempt to negotiate your charges down to simple marijuana possession to allow you to participate in a drug diversion program instead of jail.
Probation
The court may recommend a summary or misdemeanor probation instead of jail time. If the court grants probation, you’ll not face jail time for possession of marijuana for sale. However, you’ll have to abide by several restrictions or conditions for probation. If you don’t abide by the probation conditions, the court may cancel the probation and impose jail time. Some of the conditions of probation that you may have to abide by are:
- Payment of restitution
- Submitting to drug testing
- Filing your regular progress reports with the court
- Participating in a group or individual therapy
- Community labor or community service
- Searches of your property or your person without a warrant
Legal Defenses for Possession of Marijuana for Sale
Under California PC 11359, there are several defenses to fight your charges of possessing marijuana for sale. Depending on the circumstances, the defenses include:
You didn’t Possess Marijuana
The circumstances surrounding your charges may show that you never gained access to the drug or didn’t know that it was in your possession. For instance, you may contact a marijuana dealer on the internet and arrange to buy it. The two of you may plan to conduct the buying at an agreed place. It may happen that the police arrested you before arriving at the transaction destination. In this situation, even if you had the requisite intention, you never possessed or took control of the drug. Therefore, you cannot be guilty of the PC 11359 violation.
You Didn’t Intend to Sell
Often the police interpret the simple possession of marijuana as an intention to sell the drug. However, you may possess a drug only for your personal use. Under California law, possession by itself doesn’t mean that you intend to sell. If the prosecutor fails to give strong evidence against your possession charges, his or her arguments may weaken the case that you possessed the drug for sale.
Unlawful Search and Seizure
If the police use the warrantless search of your home or vehicle, or if their search exceeded the warrant’s scope, you are a victim of illegal search and seizure. In this case, your attorney may file a better argument to challenge improper police conduct. Unlawful search and seizure of your property are against California’s law, and your attorney can use it to negotiate the dismissal of your case.
The Marijuana was for Medical Use
If you or your primary caregiver possessed marijuana for medical use, you can’t face charges for marijuana possession for sale. The charges will not apply even if the marijuana you possessed is more than the allowable legal limit. It’s common for doctors to recommend medical marijuana to patients suffering from certain conditions, especially chronic and terminal illnesses like cancer. In the case of medical marijuana, you can possess as much marijuana as your doctor deems necessary.
The Marijuana Was for Your Future Use
Habitual pot users may possess large amounts of pot to store some for their future use. The law enforcement officers may assume that the pot was for sale because you possessed a large amount of the product. However, you can point out that the pot was for your use. If you had placed the pot in separate small bags, you could state that it was already packaged in the bags when buying it.
You could also state that you were planning to share some of the pot with your friends and not sell it. In this case, the police may charge you with the crime of simple possession of marijuana. Simple possession of marijuana is a lesser offense than possession of marijuana for sale. Therefore, it would be better to have your charges reduced to simple possession instead of possession for sale.
You Were Disposing Of the Marijuana
You could also fight marijuana possession for sale charges by pointing out that you were in the process of disposing of the marijuana at the time of the arrest. However, it might be hard for you to convince the police of this fact.
Lack of Knowledge
You can’t face charges for marijuana possession for sale if you didn’t know about the presence of marijuana. Even if the marijuana was on your person or in a location over which you have control, you are not guilty if you didn’t know the marijuana was there. You must also have known that the substance you possessed was marijuana. If a person places the pot in your backpack or your pocket without your knowledge, the prosecutor can’t accuse you of possession of pot for sale.
How can the police tell that you knew about the presence of pot? It would be obvious that you were aware of the presence of pot if you tried to hide from the police. If you appeared extremely nervous at the time of the search, it could indicate that you knew about pot’s presence.
No matter how complicated your situation seems, it’s always possible to create a convincing defense. All you need is the assistance of a competent attorney to guide you through the process. Most people who possess large amounts of marijuana for personal use are often charged with marijuana possession for sale. You should never face a false accusation of intending to sell pot in the black market, yet you only possessed the marijuana for your use.
Attorneys understand all the tactics that law enforcement officers and prosecutors use. An attorney can challenge the prosecutor’s allegations and find any lapses or false evidence. You should contact an attorney immediately after your arrest to give him or her ample time to evaluate your case and defend you.
Crimes Related to Possession of Marijuana for Sale
Certain crimes are closely related to the crime of possession of marijuana for sale. Some of the related offenses are:
- HS 11357 – Simple Possession of Marijuana
- HS 11350 – Cultivation of Marijuana
- HS 11360 – Sale of Marijuana
- CVC 23222 (b) – Driving with Marijuana
Simple Possession of Marijuana
According to California HS 11357, it’s a crime for people above the age of 21 to possess more than 28.5g of marijuana. It’s also an offense to possess more than 8g of concentrated cannabis. The crime of simple possession is a misdemeanor offense. The penalties for the offense include jail time of up to six months in county jail. The court may also recommend a fine of not more than $500. If a person below 21 years possesses marijuana, the offense is a crime and is an infraction.
Cultivation of Marijuana
California law allows persons above 21 years to cultivate up to 6 marijuana plants. It’s a crime to cultivate more than six marijuana plants. It’s also a crime to cultivate marijuana in a place where the law does not allow. For the majority of defendants, the cultivation of marijuana is a criminal offense. However, in some instances, the cultivation of marijuana is a felony, especially if you have prior convictions or a history of committing violent felonies.
Sale of Marijuana
The sale of marijuana in California is only allowable if you have a valid license to do so. It’s a misdemeanor offense to transport or sell pot if you don’t have a valid license. If you have a prior conviction for violent felonies or two convictions for sale of marijuana, you’ll face felony charges for a subsequent offense of the sale of marijuana.
Driving with Marijuana
It’s an offense to possess an open can of marijuana in your vehicle. This crime is almost similar to that of driving with an open container of alcohol. Driving with marijuana is an infraction punishable by a fine that does not exceed $100.
Find a Drug Crimes Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
The crime of marijuana possession for sale could attract misdemeanor or felony charges, depending on its circumstances. After a conviction for this crime, you’ll not be eligible for drug treatment or diversion. The potential consequences include jail time, probation, and fines. You should not give up after an accusation of possession of marijuana for sale. Van Nuys Criminal Attorney provides reliable legal services in Van Nuys, CA. We can help you create a suitable defense to fight the charges. Contact us at 818-484-1100 and speak to one of our attorneys.
In California, drug possession in general is a criminal offense, but possession of certain particular drugs (including methamphetamine) are handled under a separate statute. Possession of methamphetamine is normally a misdemeanor offense, but it can carry relatively harsh penalties upon a conviction nonetheless. Additionally, having a drug crime on your police record would affect your ability to find gainful employment and pursue college and other life goals.
Thus, it’s well worthwhile to do everything possible to fight a meth possession charge. At Leah Legal, we bring the highest caliber of legal expertise and experience in methamphetamine possession criminal defense. We will know how to build you a solid defense and win your case!
Contact Leah Legal today by calling 818-484-1100, and we will give you a free, no obligation consultation!
California Meth Possession Law
Under California Health & Safety Code Section 11377, it is specifically prohibited to possess a methamphetamine controlled substance. The exact bounds of what constitutes “meth” are outlined in the US Controlled Substances Act, and California law simply piggy backs on US law here and borrows those parameters.
There are exceptions where you can get a valid prescription for a methamphetamine, and pharmacists and other medical professionals can’t be prosecuted for possessing meth in a legal manner in accord with the boundaries of their license. And, of course, police who possess meth while confiscating it as a part of their law enforcement duties are not violating the law. But for everyone else, it is a serious drug crime to even possess, much less use, manufacture, transport, sell, or intend or attempt to sell, any form of methamphetamine in California.
What Exactly Is “Meth”?
Methamphetamine is a stimulant drug that accelerates body/brain activity in the user. It can be found in powder or “crystal-rock” form, and it can be taken as a pill, sniffed in through the nostrils, inhaled as a gas, or smoked like a cigarette.
The majority of meth in California is illegally shipped in from Mexico, but some is still grown in our state’s Central Valley Region or elsewhere and then manufactured locally in meth labs. Because meth is so easy and cheap to manufacture, and because of its highly addictive nature, illicit meth trafficking is all too common in California and elsewhere in the US.
The Elements of the Crime
To gain a conviction for meth possession (HSC 11377), the prosecution must prove all of the following elements of the crime beyond all reasonable doubt:
The defendant did, in fact, possess methamphetamine.
The defendant knew he/she possessed it and was aware of its nature as a controlled substance.
The drug was possessed in “usable quantities,” as opposed to mere useless traces.
Note that “possession” of meth can be actual, as in on your person; constructive, meaning not on your person but nonetheless under your control; or joint, where two or more people possessed the drug either actually or constructively. Also, you must have had knowledge of the drug’s presence AND of the fact that it was an illegal, controlled substance. You do not, however, have to have known of the exact identity (or name) of the drug or of its chemical makeup. Finally, realize that “usable amount” doesn’t mean “large amount.” It could be a very small quantity, but it can’t be just a residue or mere traces of the drug, or else you are not guilty of violating HSC 11377.
One more point: there are some other drugs covered by HSC 11377 besides just meth, which would be prosecuted and punished in the same way. These “other drugs” are:
GHN
PCP
Ecstasy
Ketamine
Anabolic steroids
Other stimulants
Possible Penalties for Meth Possession
Simple possession of methamphetamine or another drug covered by HSC 11377 is a misdemeanor, punishable by:
Up to 12 months in county jail.
A fine as high as $1,000.
For those with a previous serious felony or sex crime conviction, meth possession becomes a felony, punishable by from 16 months to 3 years in state prison. However, also note that if you possessed more than 1 kilo of meth, you can get an extra 3 to 15 years in state prison added to your sentence. The exact number of years would depend largely on how large a quantity of meth you possessed.
Common Defense Strategies
At Leah Legal, we have longtime experience in defeating possession of methamphetamine charges. We understand the details of the law and the inner workings of the California legal system. We anticipate the moves of the prosecution and counter them. We know the kind of courtroom dynamics involved in these types of cases. And we know how to customize your defense strategy to the exact details of case.
Here are some of the most common defenses we use against a charge of meth possession:
Valid prescription. There are people in California who legally possess and use meth by prescription. Police may assume you possessed the drug illegally, but we can verify the validity of your prescription in court and show you possessed and used only the amount and kind of meth prescribed to you.
Delivery of meth to a prescription holder. If you only possessed meth because you were bringing it to someone with a valid prescription at his/her request OR disposing of it for him/her, AND you did not use or sell the meth, you are not guilty.
Lack of possession. It may be it wasn’t you but a friend or family member who possessed the meth. You may have been arrested simply for being in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Lack of knowledge. You didn’t know the meth was present OR you didn’t realize it was meth or any other illegal drug.
Police misconduct. If the evidence being used against you was obtained through an unconstitutional search and seizure, through police planting of evidence, falsification of police reports, or other violations of your rights, we can get it suppressed and probably get your case dismissed.
We always fight first and foremost for a complete victory (acquittal or dismissal), but we at Leah Legal are also skilled negotiators. We know when and how to obtain the most favorable plea deal possible, to get a reduced charge and sentence. Plus, we can often get you into a drug diversion program if you’re convicted of meth possession and it’s your first/second offense and you possessed the meth only for personal use. Drug diversion under Prop 36, Penal Code Section 1000, or California Drug Court can keep you out of jail and may ultimately get the charge against you dismissed if you abide by the terms of probation and of diversion program.
Finally, if you were convicted of HSC 11377 before 2014 when Prop 47 was passed, and you were convicted of it as a felony, we can likely get your charge and sentence reduced to a misdemeanor.
Possession of Methamphetamine for Sale
Thus far we have been speaking only of “simple possession” or “possession for personal use alone.” If, however, you are charged with possession of meth for sale under HSC 11378, you face a felony charge, punishable by 16 months to 3 years in state prison and a fine of up to $10,000. And you won’t be eligible for a drug diversion program.
Depending on the circumstances of your case, we at Leah Legal may be able to get a meth possession for sale charge reduced to a simple possession charge, in which case you would be eligible for drug diversion, and have a lighter overall sentence. Since it’s rather difficult to prove “intent to sell,” it’s not uncommon for this kind of a reduction from HSC 11378 to HSC 11377 to take place.
Also note that no actual sale or even attempted sale is necessary for HSC 11378 to be charged. Police and prosecutors generally look at the amount of meth possessed, the way it was packaged, the presence of scales and other drug paraphernalia, the presence of large sums of cash in small bills, and other “clues” to decide if they’ll charge possession for sale. But, in fact, such circumstantial evidence alone cannot “prove” the intent to sell meth or any other drug.
Transport or Sale of Methamphetamine
Under HSC 11379, it is a felony offense to sell, give away “free,” transport with intent to sell, or administer methamphetamine to another person. This is a more serious crime than even possession with intent to sell and is punishable by 2 to 4 years in prison plus a $10,000 fine. If you transported meth over three or more county lines or imported it into California from out of state or out of country, it is drug trafficking and can add 3 to 9 years in prison to your sentence.
At Leah Legal, we know how to successfully contest the prosecution’s evidence and testimony that they use to try to establish you sold, attempted to sell, or transported with intent to sell, meth.
Manufacture of a Controlled Substance
Under HSC 11379.6, the manufacture of any illegal drug, including methamphetamine, is prohibited and penalized. Note that manufacturing compounds to be later used in meth production also violates this statute, but not merely possessing the materials (that’s a separate offense covered under HSC 11383.5). As meth is an easy drug to manufacture, a large proportion of drug manufacturing charges are for meth production specifically. This crime is a felony and can be punished by 3 to 5 years in prison and a $50,000 fine.
Possession of Materials for the Manufacture of Meth
Under HSC 11383.5, it is a crime to possess the materials necessary to manufacture methamphetamine. Possession of such chemicals must be accompanied by the intent to use them to produce methamphetamine illegally. This is a felony crime, punishable by 2 to 6 years in state prison.
Also, note that possession of drug paraphernalia is a separate, though closely related, offense. HSC 11364 addresses the possession of equipment needed to make and use meth, while HSC 11383.5 addresses the possession of chemicals needed to manufacture it. Possession of drug paraphernalia (HSC 11364) is a misdemeanor, punishable by up to 6 months in county jail and a $1,000 fine.
DUI Meth (VC 23152f)
It is a specific crime in California to operate a motor vehicle while under the influence of methamphetamine. This is a particular instance of DUID, and it is punished in the same way as DUI alcohol.
DUI Meth is a misdemeanor offense, punishable by:
Up to 12 months in jail.
A fine of $390, plus additional court fees and other penalty fees.
Loss of your California driver’s license for at least 6 months.
Mandatory completion of a state-approved DUI Class.
Many times, if the meth was with you in the vehicle, you can be charged with both DUI Meth and simple possession of meth. At Leah Legal, we are experienced in defending against DUI charges and meth charges – and against their combination in the charge “DUI Meth.”
Under the Influence of a Controlled Substance
California Health & Safety Code Section 11550 deals with being under the influence of any controlled substance, including methamphetamine and the other drugs, such as GHB and PCP, covered under HSC 11377 Meth Possession. This is a misdemeanor, punishable by up to 12 months in county jail. You can be charged with possession of meth but not “UI Meth” or vice versa. And note that to be convicted of HSC 11550 charge, it need only be shown that any measurable amount of meth was found in your system.
Contact Us Today for Help!
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we have deep experience in defending our clients against the charge of possession of methamphetamine (HSC 11377) and all related offenses. We will know how to build you a solid defense and win the best possible outcome to your case. We have won a dismissal, acquittal, or favorable plea deal for numerous others and we can try to do the same for you! Do not hesitate to contact us anytime 24/7/365 by calling 818-484-1100 for a free consultation and immediate attention to your case!
In California, it’s not only illegal to possess, sell, transport, or use drugs that are always illegal, but it is also a crime to do the same with prescription drugs – without a valid prescription. California has a variety laws that specifically target abuse of prescription drugs, both on the user and health care professional side of the equation.
Anyone facing prescription drug charges in Los Angeles or Southern California could be looking at heavy fines, jail time, denial of financial aid for college, limitations on where you can work or which apartments you can get approved to lease, or loss of your professional license(s) IF convicted. These are serious potential consequences, and it behooves you to waste no time in securing a top-tier criminal defense attorney who will know how to win your case.
At Leah Legal, we have been successfully defending clients in Los Angeles, CA, and beyond against all manner of prescription drug charges for many years. We will know how to build you a solid defense and win the best possible outcome to your case. Contact Leah Legal anytime 24/7 by calling 818-484-1100 for a free legal consultation and immediate attention from a well seasoned prescription drug crimes defense lawyer!
Illegal Possession of Prescription Drugs (HSC 11350)
Illegal possession of prescription drugs has reached near epidemic levels in California and throughout the US. It’s no wonder that prosecutors are focused on trying to stem the tide of this problem – but, in many cases, innocent people get falsely accused of illegally possessing prescription drugs. At Leah Legal, we understand the details of California law on these matters. We will know how to defend you pretrial and in court, we our goal will always be a dismissal of the charge.
Under California Health & Safety Code Section 11350, it is against the law to possess a “controlled substance” in a usable amount. And that applies to legal drugs like Vicodin, codeine, fentanyl, or oxycodone, just as surely as to illicit drugs like cocaine, LCD, or heroin – IF you possess those drugs without a valid prescription. Possessing prescription drugs with an outdated prescription, a falsified prescription, or in greater amounts than your prescription allows is also illegal under California law.
Possible Penalties
Due to changes made by Prop 47, illegal possession of prescription drugs is often a misdemeanor instead of a felony in California. But factors like the quantity of drugs possessed, the type of drug possessed, and the defendant’s past criminal record can affect whether HS 11350 Possession of a Controlled Substance is charged as a misdemeanor or a felony.
HS 11350 is a misdemeanor for a first time, unaggravated offense, punishable by up to 12 months in county jail and a maximum fine of $1,000. But if you have a prior for a serious felony or sex crime, HS 11350 becomes a felony and can be punished by from 16 months to 3 years in state prison.
Elements of the Crime
To prove someone guilty of possession of a controlled substance, the prosecutor must demonstrate the following elements of the crime to be true beyond all reasonable doubt:
- You possessed a drug illegally.
- You were aware the drug was in your possession.
- You possessed the drug in a “usable” quantity.
Note that “possession” can mean on your person (actual possession), under your control though not on your person (constructive possession, or joint possession. Also note that you must have had knowledge of the drug’s presence and of it’s being in your possession in any of the three senses mentioned above. And, you must have been aware of the drug’s nature as a controlled substance (in this case, of the fact you lacked a valid prescription for a prescription drug.)
You can’t be convicted for mere traces of a trace being in your possession. There must have been at least enough of the drug present so that it could be used and have its normal effects. That doesn’t mean a large quantity must be found, however, just at least a barely usable amount.
Defense Strategies
At Leah Legal, we know how to build you a solid defense based on the specifics of your case. But in many cases, one or more of these common basic defenses will be included in the overall strategy:
- Valid prescription. You actually did possess a valid, current prescription from a state-licensed doctor. The prescription was yours, not someone else’s, and you did not possess or use more of the drug than prescribed.
- Lack of knowledge. You were unaware of the nature of the drug or of its presence. Maybe a friend or family member left it in your car or hid it in your apartment without your knowledge or consent.
- Police misconduct. If you were subjected to an illegal search/seizure or if your rights were other violated during the arrest, we can likely get evidence suppressed and win you a dismissal.
We always fight first and foremost to totally defeat all charges brought against you – and we have won in that manner for many past clients. However, in cases where a complete victory (dismissal or acquittal) is unrealistic, we can employ our well honed negotiation skills to win you a favorable plea deal. We may be able to get you approved for a drug diversion program that will allow you to avoid actual jail time but require you undergo drug rehab for 12 to 18 months. If you have no past felonies or drug charges in the last 5 years and your current offense was non-violent, then you will likely qualify.
Finally, also note that if you were sentenced for drug possession as a felony before passage or Prop 47, and if under Prop 47 you would likely have only been sentenced to a misdemeanor, we can help you petition to get your charge reduced.
Possession for Sale of Prescription Drugs (HSC 11351)
Under Health & Safety Code Section 11351, it is a serious felony to illegally possess prescription drugs with intent to illegally sell them. It is also an offense to legally possess the drugs by prescription, but nonetheless intend to sell them illegally to someone else.
When you possess large amounts of drugs, have them carefully packaged in regular quantities, have drug scales and a lot of cash in small bills, and many people are coming/going from your residence or other location where you have the drugs stored – prosecutors are likely to suspect you had an intent to sell the drugs and charge HSC 11351 Possession for Sale. Possession for sale of a prescription drug is a felony, punishable by from 2 to 4 years in state prison and a fine of up to $20,000.
A skilled lawyer can often get the sentence reduced to only 1 year in jail and probation following that. But no one convicted of possession for sale can qualify for a drug diversion program.
Defenses against possession for sale include the following:
- Lack of drug possession.
- You had a valid prescription.
- Lack of intent to sell – possession for personal use alone.
- Police misconduct.
Illegal Sale/Transport of Prescription Drugs (HSC 11352)
Under California Health & Safety Code Section 11352, it is a felony to illegally sell or transport (traffic in) prescription drugs. The law also applies to administering, furnishing, giving away free, or importing such drugs.
If convicted of HSC 11352, you could face 3 to 5 years in state prison, a year of probation, and a $20,000 fine. If you crossed two or more county lines in transporting the drugs for sale, you could get up to 9 years in prison. Plus, having a felony on your permanent police record could affect your future employment and other opportunities.
Defending against drug sale or transport charges is much the same as defending against possession for sale, up to a point. But additional defenses include: lack of transport for sale or transport a significant distance and lack of actual sale.
Illegal Use of Prescription Drugs (HSC 11550)
It is a misdemeanor offense in California to illegally use prescription drugs, under Health & Safety Code Section 11550. If you are under the influence of any controlled substance illegally, including prescription drugs, you have violated HSC 11550. However, to gain a conviction, the prosecution must prove the use was immediately before the arrest to be “current.” But realize that it is possible for “current” use to mean use as much as five days ago. And “current use” also implies that you are not undergoing withdrawal symptoms for “past use” of the drug.
Note that being under the influence of a prescription drug so as to impair your driving ability is a separate offense handled under Vehicle Code Section 23152a. That would be a DUID charge and could get you a license suspension of 6 months to 3 years.
For a driving under the influence charge, the prosecution has to prove your driving was affected by the drug so that you drove with less than “ordinary care and caution.” But with an HSC 11550 charge, any detectable amount of the drug in your system is enough to convict. HSC 11550 Illegal Use of a Controlled Substance is a misdemeanor charge in California, punishable by up to 12 months in county jail, up to 5 years of probation, mandatory drug counseling, and maybe community service.
And if convicted of this charge for a third time within a 7-year period after also refusing drug treatment programs the court appointed for you, you must spend at least 180 days in county jail – rather than getting all jail time exchanged for probation or community service.
Common defenses against the charge of illegally being under the influence of prescription drugs include: you were not under the influence of a controlled substance, you had a valid prescription, and you were a victim of involuntary intoxication.
California Prescription Drug Fraud Charges
Under Health & Safety Code Section 11173, the variety of prescription drug fraud called “doctor shopping” is prohibited and penalized. If you get prescription drugs prescribed to you based on fraud OR even just try to do so, you are guilty of violating HSC 11173. If you make false statements on a prescription or pretend to be someone legally allowed to prescribe drugs when in fact you are not, that also violates this statute. A final way to violate HSC 11173 is to falsify drug labels or packaging to misrepresent what type of drugs are in a container.
Any doctor who writes illegal prescriptions also violates HSC 11153, another California prescription drug fraud statute. HSC 11173 Prescription Drug Fraud can be a misdemeanor or a felony and can be committed by either doctors or patients. The same is true of HSC 11153.
Misdemeanor level prescription drug fraud in California is punishable by up to 12 months in county jail, while felony prescription drug fraud is punishable by anywhere from 16 months to 3 years in state prison.
Any medical professional who commits prescription drug fraud of any kind is very likely going to see his or her state-issued professional license revoked. Prescription drug fraud is a more complex charge than some of the other prescription drug charges because it involves both misuse of a controlled substance AND the crime of fraud.
In countering allegations of prescription drug fraud, Leah Legal uses many different effective defense strategies, including: lack of any fraud or deceit, lack of intent to write a false prescription (it was an accident), lack of knowingly misrepresenting your true medical condition to a doctor, and police misconduct such as entrapment, illegal search and seizure, planting of evidence, or failing to read the Miranda Rights.
Contact Leah Legal Today for Immediate Assistance!
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we have deep experience in defending against allegations of California prescription drug offenses. We know what it takes to win and we’ve done so numerous times before for clients all over Los Angeles and Southern California. Do not hesitate to contact us today by calling 818-484-1100 for a free, no obligation consultation and immediate attention to your case!
Proposition 36, also referred to as the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevent Act of 2000 or Prop 36 is a criminal sentencing initiative that falls under California drug diversion programs. The primary objective of Prop. 36 is to provide an alternative sentencing method to drug offenders charged with non-violent offenses. Instead of serving a jail or prison term, those who qualify for this proposition are required to take part in a 12 months drug treatment program. The program is purposely designed to make sure that individuals are not necessarily held in custody because of their addiction. It’s also meant to curb the devastating number of drug addictions cases.
Under California PC 1210, Prop. 36 is mostly accessible by first time drug offenders charged with simple possession or drug use offenses. Initially, drug offenders were required not to have any serious or violent felony convictions appearing on their criminal records. But from November 2012, the drug treatment program became open to offenders with two strikes for a simple drug offense conviction, provided the convictions occurred at least five years after you were convicted or after you were last released from prison. These individuals would have otherwise been subjected to a potential 25 years to life imprisonment if convicted of a third strike.
Despite the fact that defendants who have suffered drug related conviction before can still access prop 36, this proposition is not available for individuals charged with an offense related to manufacturing drugs, transporting, possession for sale, and/or cultivation of drugs. This proposition exclusively covers individuals charged with either simple possession or personal use of drugs. Also, to qualify for Prop 36, the offender must be considered amenable to treatment and willing to comply with the terms and conditions of the probation.
How Proposition 36 Work
Once an individual qualifies for Prop 36, he or she will be required to enter a guilty plea or “no contest” to the specific drug charge with an understanding that if they successfully undertake a court-approved drug treatment program, they will have their charges dismissed. This is followed by the judge putting on hold the criminal proceedings and places the perpetrator on a formal probation instead of imprisonment. The defendant will be required to participate in a treatment program that lasts a maximum of one year.
Apart from the court-approved drug treatment program, the judge has the discretion to establish additional conditions of the probations to help in monitoring the respondent’s progress. This conditions may include, regular check-ins with a probation officer, random drug tests, requirement to pay treatment costs, court appearances, and other restrictions on the defendant’s way of life.
The convictions are set aside and charges terminated once the defendant effectively completes the program. Failing to adhere to the specific probation conditions may lead to withdrawal of the probation and the offender may be sentenced based on the underlying drug charges. Nevertheless, it’s important to note that the court is barred from foisting any period of imprisonment as a condition of probation unless the defendant violates terms and conditions of their probation.
The court-approved drug treatment program refers to a treatment program that includes:
- Narcotic replacement therapy or detoxification services,
- Drug education,
- Residential treatment or outpatient services, or
- Aftercare services.
It’s important to note that this treatment program is different from the drug rehabilitation programs that are usually offered in jail or prison facilities.
Being one of the drug diversion programs, Prop. 36 necessitates that first and second time defendants who have been convicted of nonviolent drug possession may receive up to one (1) year of substance abuse treatment. This can, however, be prolonged to two more six months periods, instead of jail term or imprisonment. This alternative sentencing scheme also applies to parolees who commit a non-violent drug possession offense and violate their parole. Usually, a parolee who is found to have committed a non-violent drug possession crime during their parole or violates a condition that’s drug-related will be required to undertake a drug treatment program instead of serving a prison term.
What are Nonviolent Drug Possession Offenses?
A drug offense is classified as non-violent if it involves unlawful:
- Transportation or possession of narcotics for personal use, and/or
- Use and/or being under the influence of any drug found in the Controlled Substances Act.
Some of the drugs listed in the United States Controlled Substances Act include:
- Heroine
- Cocaine
- Peyote
- Ecstasy
- Ketamine (commonly referred to as “Special K”)
- Gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (also referred to as “GHB”)
- Marijuana
- Methamphetamines
- Certain Hallucinogenic substances like phencyclidine also referred to as “PCP”
- Some prescription drugs like hydrocodone (Vicodin) and codeine
How Can One Violate Proposition 36 probation?
A defendant can violate the conditions of a probation either:
- With a drug-related violation, or
- From a non-drug related violation, like failing to check in with a probation officer, or failing to appear on a definite court date.
A non-drug related violation may lead to an instant probation termination and the defendant may have to serve a maximum 3 years prison term. Conversely, Prop 36 gives a latitude to those who violate probation conditions with drug-related crimes, of course depending on the number of violations committed. If the defendant violates probation conditions for the very first time, he/she may be subjected to a serious or stringent treatment program. However, if the court finds the respondent a danger to society, the judge can instantly annul probation and this would lead to the offender facing a prison sentence based on the underlying charges.
If the defendant is a second time violator of probation conditions, the court may transfer them to a more stringent drug treatment program. Nevertheless, the court can choose to withdraw probation by means of a less restrictive standard than the one used before. If the respondent is proven to be “unamenable to treatment” the court can revoke his or her probation. A third drug-related violation will result in the respondent being denied the chance to continue with the treatment under Proposition 36. He/she will face a sentencing of up to 3 years in a state prison.
In determining whether a defendant is amenable to treatment, the judge may consider whether the defendant:
- Repeatedly violated the rules of the program in a way that hinders the ability to continue functioning in the program
- Committed a serious violation of the rules set forth at the treatment facility
- Recurrently refused to take part in the program or have requested to be withdrawn from the drug treatment program
Other Factors That Could Disqualify You from Proposition 36 Eligibility
While determining whether one qualifies for Prop 36, a number of factors are considered, including the type of offense committed. Even if your offense qualities for the Prop 36 drug diversion program, you, as the defendant must qualify as well. Here are five additional restrictions on eligibility for Prop 36.
- You have prior strike convictions
If you’ve been convicted of one or more serious or violent felonies, you cannot qualify for sentencing under proposition 36, unless the current nonviolent drug possession crime took place not less than five years after you were:
- Released from prison, and
- Convicted of either a misdemeanor that involved physical injury or the threat of physical harm to the person of another or a felony other than a nonviolent drug possession.
For instance, James is convicted of assault and battery-a strike under California Three Strikes law in 2000. He’s imprisoned and released in 2004. He then gets arrested again in 2008 for simple possession of cocaine. In this case, James is not eligible for Prop 36 because he picked up the new drug case less than 5 years after he was released from prison.
If you’re not qualified under this section, no judge has the discretion to terminate the offense(s) that disqualifies you. It’s also important to note that, any case determined by the juvenile court cannot prevent one from qualifying for proposition 36 sentencing even if they’re considered serious or violent felonies.
- You were simultaneously convicted of a non-drug-related offense
You are not qualified to take part in proposition 36 sentencing if you were convicted in the same proceedings of either a nonviolent drug possession offense and either a felony or misdemeanor not related to the use of drugs. The misdemeanor, in this case, does not involve failing to register as a drug offender, being present where drugs are used, simple possession of drugs or paraphernalia, or any activity similar to personal possession or simple use offense.
Different from the rule involving prior “three strikes cases” a judge has the discretion to terminate this type of additional charges to ensure that you qualify for a Prop. 36 drug diversion.
- You refuse drug treatment as a condition of probation,
- You were armed with a deadly weapon when you were arrested for the nonviolent drug possession offense
- You have taken part in two other California Prop 36 programs before
You do not qualify to take part in another round of Prop 36 sentencing if you have two separate prior convictions for nonviolent drug possession offense and
- For both of those offenses, you were sentenced under Proposition 36 and
- the judge is certain that you’re unamenable to any further drug treatment.
Is It Possible to Contest Your Case and Still Take Part in Proposition 36 If You Lose?
If you qualify for Prop 36, you will still have the opportunity to take part in the program even if you’re convicted at trial. The program does not hinder you from taking your drug case all the way to trial and shoot for an acquittal. If you’re acquitted, your case is over. But even if you are found guilty, you can still do proposition 36 instead of serving a jail term.
Successful Completion of Drug Treatment
You may petition the court to dismiss your conviction after successfully completing your California Proposition 36 drug treatment program. The judge must set aside and dismiss your case if he/she believes that you’ve substantially complied with all the terms and the judge can attest to that. Successful completion means that you followed the treatment as ordered by the court. It also means that there is reasonable belief that you’ll no longer be involved in any abuse of controlled substances. Once your charges are expunged, you’re released from all disabilities and penalties that resulted from the offense, but you may not be able to possess or own a firearm that is a concealed weapon.
With very few exceptions, you may be able to report no arrest or conviction for the offense that resulted in your treatment. However, your arrest and conviction must be disclosed:
- When asked by a law enforcement agency or when applying for a position as a peace officer
- In any questionnaire or application for public office
- With respect to any issued concerning serving on a jury
- When applying to a local or state license agency
Contact Leah Legal Today for Assistance
Drug charges and convictions are serious matters that can get complicated quickly. If you or your loved one is facing drug related charges, you need to contact a criminal defense attorney as soon as possible. Drug offense charges require a deep knowledge in the area and an experienced attorney who specializes in this area of law and understands the specific judicial system your case is presented before can be a great resource. Prop 36 drug treatment program could get you on the right track to making positive life changes and at Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we’re committed to ensuring that your future is protected.
We can help determine if you’re eligible for Prop 36 and if you’re not, we can still negotiate the drug charges down so that you may participate in the drug diversion program. We at Leah Legal are experienced in California drug cases and have successfully convinced prosecutors to allow our clients to take part in the drug treatment program. Time is of the essence in such cases, so, please contact us today at 818-484-1100 for a free, no-obligation consultation.
If you or someone you love have recently been arrested and charged with “using or being under the influence of a controlled substance,” you should not hesitate to avail yourself of skilled legal help to ensure the best possible outcome to your case.
It’s true that drug use is one of the least serious of all California drug crimes, but it’s still a criminal charge that could create a criminal record if you are convicted. And there are still serious potential sentencing elements and other repercussions of a drug crime conviction, like difficulty in finding and retaining gainful employment or in getting accepted on a college application.
At Leah Legal, we have deep experience in handling all manner of California drug crimes, including using or being under the influence of drugs. We have helped many others in Los Angeles and throughout Southern California win a dismissal, acquittal, or reduced charge or sentence in these types of cases, and we can do the same for you.
To learn more or for a free legal consultation on the details of your case, do not hesitate to contact us anytime 24/7 by calling 818-484-1100.
Health & Safety Code (HSC) Section 11550
Under HSC 11550, two closely related crimes are dealt with. First, the personal use of any “controlled substance” is prohibited. Second, being under the influence of a controlled substance (the natural result of the first crime, in sufficient quantities) is also prohibited.
Penalties for both use of illegal drugs and being under their influence are also assigned in HSC 11550.
It is important to realize that drug possession (HSC 11350) is a distinct crime but one almost necessarily also committed in order to violate HSC 11550. Some prosecutors may try to charge you with both drug use and drug possession for the very same underlying incident. But a good defense lawyer can generally prevent them from “getting away with” that.
What is a controlled substance?
The first element of the crime of drug use/influence that a prosecutor must prove is the identity of the substance in question as a controlled substance.
Any drug listed in the US Controlled Substances Act is a “controlled substance” in California. These drugs may be illegal narcotics, illegally used prescription drugs, or other “substances” that aren’t even normally thought of as “drugs” as such.
Cocaine, heroin, meth, peyote, PCP, opiates, hallucinogens, and prescription drugs like codeine, morphine, or Vicodin are common examples of controlled substances. But the full list is extremely long.
However, use of or being under the influence of marijuana is not handled under HSC 11550, but is covered under separate statutes. Punishments for marijuana related offenses tends to generally be less severe than for most other drugs, but unless you have a valid prescription and only possess/use marijuana within specific quantity limits, you can still be prosecuted. And driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of marijuana or simply being under its influence is still punishable if it violates any of the restrictions California places on legalized marijuana use.
Arrested for “drug use.”
If you are charged specifically with “use of” an illegal drug, California law requires that use be relatively “current.” Otherwise, you will simply be acquitted of the charge, even if you still face other drug charges like simple possession.
“Current use” is a somewhat vague term legally, but anything beyond 5 days before your arrest will certainly not be upheld. But remember that is based on the last time you used the drug before the arrest, so a binge that started 7 days prior to arrest but ended 4 days before is still chargeable.
Plus, realize that if it can be shown you had withdrawal symptoms from lack of use of the drug, then that indicates “past use” of a drug and prevents the prosecution from getting a conviction for “current” drug use under HSC 11550.
Arrested for being “under the influence.”
Most people are more familiar with DUI (driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs.) In a California DUI, being under the influence is determined either by a BAC of .08% or higher or by demonstrating that the drugs/alcohol have impaired your driving ability.
But in a HSC 11550 “under the influence” charge, you are guilty of “UI” if the influence of the drug on you is at all detectable in any way. You don’t have to show “impairment” or some kind of “misconduct” in order to be convicted.
Possible Penalties for Drug Use/Influence
Under California Health & Safety Code 11550, using or being under the influence of a controlled substance is a misdemeanor crime.
The penalties for this misdemeanor, however, are relatively severe, if less severe than for most other drug crimes. They include:
- Up to 12 months of jail time.
- Up to 5 years of probation.
- Community service.
And if you commit a 3rd time drug use/influence offense within 7 years of the first one, AND you refused a drug treatment program appointed by the court, you will be facing a minimum of 180 days behind bars.
Drug use plus possession of a firearm.
With certain specific drugs that can have extremely mind-altering effects, including cocaine, heroin, meth, and PCP, you will get a sentencing enhancement IF you ALSO possessed a loaded, functional firearm at the time.
Drug use/influence with a firearm can be charged as either misdemeanor or felony depending on the details of each case. But any repeat offense of this crime is an automatic felony, which can get you 2 to 4 years in state prison.
Also, a first offense of drug use with a firearm is a felony automatically too, IF you are shown to have been addicted to the drugs in question at the time – and in this instance, it won’t matter whether or not the gun you possessed or simply acquired was loaded.
Finally, conviction for a felony offense of any kind will cancel your gun ownership rights in California for life, unless you go through a legal process to try to restore those rights.
Common Defense Strategies for HSC 11550 Charges
At Leah Legal, we have deep experience in defending against the charge of drug use or being under the influence of drugs. We understand the relevant statutes down to the legal minutia, are fully familiar with local L.A. courtroom procedures, and know what kind of “courtroom” and “pretrial” dynamics to expect.
We can build you a solid defense regardless of the exact details of your situation. Whether it’s a first time charge or an alleged repeat offense and whether or not there are any aggravating factors, we know how to challenge the assumptions of the prosecution and win the best possible outcome for each and every one of our clients.
Here are a few of the most common basic defense strategies we often employ against HSC 11550 charges:
- Not Under the Influence
There are times when an arresting officer wrongly assumes someone is under the influence of drugs. You may have been very tired, sick, or had other physical symptoms or personal habits that the officer mistook for signs of drug impairment. Police are frequently exposed to people under the influence, and this can make them jump to conclusions and mistakenly identify an innocent person as being in that category.
If no drugs were found on your person or in your car or living quarters, and if there isn’t even a blood test showing you had an illegal drug in your system, the prosecution’s evidence of being “UI” is likely rather weak and can probably be defeated.
- Valid Prescription
If the drug in question in your case was a prescription drug, it may be you obtained the drug 100% legally through a valid prescription from a licensed doctor. If you used the prescription drug only as prescribed and did not illegally seek multiple prescriptions from different doctors (“doctor shopping”) in order to get additional quantities of the drug, you are innocent.
A “fake” or illegally obtained prescription, however, not only leaves one exposed to the drug use charge but potentially adds a prescription fraud charge.
- Involuntary Intoxication
In order to be guilty of drug use or being under the influence of drugs according to HSC 11550, the use of the drugs must have been voluntary.
If someone else drugged you against your will and/or without your knowledge, you cannot be guilty of HSC 11550.
California Drug Diversion Programs
In California, those convicted of drug use or being under the influence of drugs (or simple possession of drugs) usually qualify for a “drug diversion” program under Prop 36 or Penal Code Section 1000.
These programs are for non-violent offenders. They substitute drug rehabilitation, probation, and fulfillment of other requirements for jail time and allow for deferred entry of judgment, which lets you prevent a criminal conviction from actually appearing on your record.
With deferred entry of judgment, you plead “guilty” in exchange for being approved for the drug diversion program. But your case is left open, while you complete the program. If you successfully complete it, then your case will be dismissed instead of a technical “conviction” being rendered. This keeps your record clean.
BUT, if you are convicted of a felony, a DUI, or a no-qualifying misdemeanor crime along with your HSC 11550 charge, then you won’t qualify for drug diversion.
And other drug crimes like possession for sale, sale/transport of drugs, or anything above simple possession/drug use, can’t qualify for drug diversion. The purpose of diversion programs is to help people addicted to drugs recover not to let those selling drugs or committing violent crimes get a lighter sentence.
Also, you must submit to drug testing in order to qualify for drug diversion.
At Leah Legal, we frequently help our clients to qualify for a drug diversion program to keep their records clean, get them a lighter sentence, and help them recover from drug addiction. With HSC 11550 cases, it is extremely common for us to get you into such a program.
Related Offenses
Besides HSC 11550 itself, there are other crimes frequently charged along with it that you should be aware of if facing a drug use/influence charge. These include:
- Driving under the influence of an intoxicating drug, (Vehicle Code Section 23152f). This requires you were operating a motor vehicle at the time and that the drug impaired your driving ability and/or that you had a BAC of .08 or higher.
- Driving while addicted to a drug, (VC 23152c). This is punished the same as DUID and is often charged if DUID itself can’t be proved by prosecutors.
- Possession of a controlled substance, (HSC 11350). You can’t have used a controlled substance without first possessing it, so some prosecutors try to charge you with both simple possession and drug use for the same act. We know how to prevent this kind of unfair tactic from succeeding, however.
- Being present while another uses an illegal drug, (HSC 11365). This only can be charged if you aided and abetted such drug use and is only usually charged if evidence is weak you actually used drugs yourself.
- Under the influence of nitrous oxide (laughing gas), (Penal Code Section 381b). If not administered by a licensed doctor or dentist, it is illegal to use nitrous oxide.
Contact Us Today for Help!
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we have extensive experience in defending clients in the L.A. Area and beyond against the charge of drug use or being under the influence of an illegal drug. We know how to analyze each case, investigate thoroughly, find weaknesses in the prosecution’s argument or evidence, and win for our clients.
Contact us anytime 24/7/365 at 818-484-1100 for a free, no-obligation consultation and immediate attention to your case!
DUI Defense & what you need to know
A driving under the influence (DUI) conviction in California can have a very serious and negative impact on your life. While it mostly used to be considered a social nuisance, it is now a misdemeanor or felony criminal offense punishable by time behind bars, expensive fines, loss of driving privileges and other penalties. In some cases, drivers may have their licenses permanently revoked. More than 200,000 drivers are arrested on suspicion of DUI in California each year. If you are one of them, you need to act quickly to protect your rights and your liberty. Contact a DUI attorney at LeahLegal immediately for help.
California DUI Laws
DUI is defined as operating a motor vehicle while having a blood alcohol level (BAC) of .08% or greater. Drivers who are impaired due to the use of alcohol, however, can still be charged with a DUI if the officer deems it appropriate, even if their BAC is less than .08%. This is because DUI laws are meant to keep ALL impaired drivers off the road, and not just those with high BACs.
Probable Cause
In any case, probable cause must exist in order for a DUI arrest in California. Probable cause to pull a driver over and make an arrest exists when a police officer has reasonable suspicion that a driver is impaired.
Certain suspicious driving patterns or behaviors such as speeding, driving very slowly, weaving between lanes, driving in more than one lane at the same time, or hesitating before going through a green light may be sufficient cause to pull a driver over and arrest for DUI. Sometimes an officer may pull a car over for something as simple as a broken taillight and then notice signs of impairment that can serve as probable cause for an arrest. Signs of impairment include bloodshot or watery eyes, dilated pupils, slurred speech, unusual behavior and the odor of alcohol.
DUI and the DMV Hearing
If a police officer suspects that someone is DUI, he may ask him or her to perform certain tests known as field sobriety tests (FSTs). These tests may include:
- Balancing on one foot with arms at sides
- Following an object in motion with eyes while keeping head still
- Walking in a straight line, pivoting and walking back
The officer has probable cause to arrest for DUI if the driver is unable to perform the tests to the officer’s satisfaction. If the driver consents to a sobriety test and “fails” it, he can be arrested even if he didn’t understand the instructions for performing the test, has a medical condition that makes it difficult to perform the test, or the tests were conducted on the side of a dark road late at night.
An arresting officer can also simply ask a driver to take a preliminary breath test by blowing into a breathalyser. If there is a reading of .08% or higher, the officer can arrest the driver for DUI even if no other signs of impairment exist. In California, these tests are voluntary for drivers 21 years and over, however, refusal to perform them will probably result in an immediate arrest and a trip down to the local precinct for a mandatory chemical breath test.
The DMV Administrative Suspension
At the time of the arrest, the officer will take your driver’s license if the chemical test determines that your blood alcohol level is .08 percent or more. You will be issued a Department of Motor Vehicles 30-day temporary license, which will allow you to drive while you await administrative review before your license is suspended.
If you have been arrested for driving under the influence you must submit to a chemical test to determine the alcohol content of your blood. Refusal to take a test will result in a one-year suspension of your license by the DMV.
If you are arrested for driving under the influence, you must call the DMV within 10 days and schedule a DMV hearing to challenge the Department’s action against your license. When you call for the hearing you must request a stay, which will to allow you to drive until you have received notification of the hearing results. If you don’t request a hearing within 10 days of your arrest, your license will be automatically suspended or revoked 30 days after your arrest. If you lose the hearing or fail to request a hearing, your privilege to drive will be suspended for four months. However, you may be eligible for a restricted license after 30 days of your suspension.
DUI Penalties
The legal consequences for DUI are extremely harsh and DUI charges should never be taken lightly. Penalties depend on many factors, but the most important variable is whether or not a driver has been previously arrested for DUI. In any case, even first-time offenders can expect to pay thousands of dollars in fines and fees and be required to attend drunk driving classes. Generally, the driver’s license will be suspended for anywhere between six to ten months following a DUI conviction, but sometimes first-time DUI offenders can get a restricted license in order to drive to and from work. It’s not unusual for repeat offenders to receive hefty prison terms and pay tens of thousands of dollars in fines and restitution. In some cases, driver’s licenses will be permanently revoked. In addition, if bodily injury to another driver has occurred, felony charges may be involved and even harsher penalties will result. The best way to avoid the consequences of a conviction is to partner with an experienced DUI lawyer as soon as you can after an arrest.
Contact a DUI Lawyer Today
If you have recently been charged with DUI in Los Angeles County or elsewhere in Southern California, contact an aggressive drunk driving attorney to learn more about your rights and your legal options when it comes to fighting your charges. At LeahLegal we can assist you with both your criminal defense and the administrative suspension of your license by the California Department of Motor Vehicles. We never back down from a fight when a client’s future is at stake.
Drunk-driving laws in California are strict on commercial drivers who drive while intoxicated with alcohol, drugs, or both. Unlike non-commercial drivers, commercial drivers can get charged with DUI if they are arrested, and their blood alcohol concentration (BAC) is 0.04% or above. Among the many penalties that will result from this arrest is your commercial driver’s license (CDL) suspension. What is even more stressful is that the license gets permanently suspended if you are convicted for a second or subsequent offense.
The good news is that you still can fight the charges against you to prevent the license suspension. However, for this, you must seek the help of an expert DUI defense lawyer. If you are in Van Nuys and the surrounding areas, attorneys from Leah Legal are at your disposal to help. Using their knowledge and understanding of the California DUI laws, these attorneys may build a strong defense that could get you the best possible results for your case.
An Overview of California Commercial DUI Laws
California’s commercial drunk-driving law is defined under Vehicle Code (VC) 23152 d. This statute prohibits one from operating a commercial automobile while they have a 0.04% BAC or more. This BAC limit only applies when a motorist is operating a commercial motor vehicle. If the vehicle being driven is non-commercial, for instance, a car or motorcycle, the standard 0.08% BAC limit applies.
The 0.04% and 0.08% BAC levels are strict limits. This means they apply irrespective of whether the respective driver is impaired or not. To add on CDL suspension, commercial DUI can also subject you to other punishments like fines, probation, alcohol/drug education program, and a jail term.
What is a Commercial Vehicle?
Commercial vehicles in California are classified into two main types. They are:
- Those that are driven by drivers who hold Class B driver’s licenses, and
- Those that are driven by motorists who hold standard Class C licenses with a commercial endorsement
Smaller Commercial Automobiles
Drivers with standard Class C licenses can operate various small commercial vehicles. However, motorists who drive these kinds of vehicles must get an endorsement for commercial driving. Smaller commercial automobiles include:
- School buses
- Passenger motor vehicles that can carry ten or more passengers, the driver included
- Vehicles that move perilous materials and must have placards
- In particular scenarios, farm vehicles
- Tank vehicles
- Double trailers
Large Trucks
Big commercial automobiles that are operated by drivers holding Class B licenses include:
- Any truck that has a Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR) of over 26,000 pounds
- A 3-axle truck that weighs more than 6,000 pounds
Vehicles categorized in the classes mentioned below are not commercial:
- Agricultural automobiles that are driven by California drivers who don’t need to have a license to drive
- Recreational vehicles
California statutes further identify three kinds of CDLs, namely Class A, B & C. Each specific type of license allows a commercial motorist to operate a given sort of commercial automobile.
If you hold a Class A commercial driver’s license, you will be able to operate large trucks that weigh 26,000lbs or more. The towed automobile should weigh 10000lbs or more. On the other hand, if you hold a Class B CDL, you can drive motor vehicles that weigh 26,000lbs or more, but the automobile to be towed has to weigh 10,000lbs or less. And if you have a Class C CDL, you can drive any commercial vehicle apart from those classified under class A & B. Class C vehicles are mainly the smaller Commercial motor vehicles.
Generally, Class A license holders will operate a combination of trucks, truck-trailers, or tankers. Those who have Class B licenses will drive city-operating buses, construction vehicles, or delivery trucks. Class C holders will drive school buses, PSVs, or Hazmat vehicles.
How a Commercial Motorist Can be Cited for Drunk-Driving
Commercial drivers are subject to severe punishment if convicted of any drunk-driving. Scenarios that can cause DUI consequences for commercial motorists are as follows:
When the Motorist is Intoxicated with an Alcoholic Drink
A commercial driver is deemed to be intoxicated when his/her physical or mental abilities are so impaired that he/she can’t drive with the same caution as a sober driver would do.
When the Driver’s BAC Limit is more than the Standard Legal Limit
A driver’s BAC limit is considered to be past the legal limit when he/she operates a commercial motor vehicle when he/she has a BAC of .04% or more. Or it can also be when the driver operates any other automobile when he/she has a blood alcohol level of 0.08% or more.
This kind of DUI is referred to as per se DUI, meaning DUI of itself. If you have the standard blood alcohol level limit at the time of the arrest, you will be considered to be under the influence. It doesn’t matter whether you are impaired or not. On this note, when proving drunk-driving charges, the prosecutor doesn’t need to show you were indeed so impaired that you could not drive safely.
When the Motorist is Intoxicated with Drugs (with/without alcohol)
A motorist commits a drunk-driving offense when/she drives while intoxicated with any drug (DUID) or is intoxicated with both alcohol and drugs.
CDL Suspension and DUI
In California, DUI laws penalize CDL holders severely when they are put under arrest for DUI. Precisely, their CDLs will be revoked or suspended. DUI charges do not only originate from the actual drinking of alcohol but also other crimes associated with alcohol.
DMV Suspension
The DMV (Department of Motor Vehicles) is the agency that issues or suspends driver’s licenses in California. Once you are arrested for drunk-driving, the arresting officer forwards your case to this agency. Also, your driver’s license is seized and sent to the DMV. You are then issued with a temporary license, which will enable you to continue driving. The temporary license expires in thirty days.
The DMV will then give you only ten days within which you have to request a DMV hearing. The purpose of the hearing is for you to try and prevent the DMV from suspending your CDL. Failure to demand this hearing in the stipulated time, your CDL will automatically be suspended for a year. The suspension takes effect after the temporary driver’s license expires. If the DMV hearing takes place, and the outcome doesn’t favor you, your CDL will also be suspended.
Criminal Court Suspension
Remember that as your case is taken to the DMV, criminal charges will also be filed against you. This means that your case will be taken to court where criminal proceedings will take place. Here, the prosecuting attorney relies on witnesses and arresting officer’s account of events. Other proof to indicate that you were drunk or impaired includes the field sobriety test results. In case you are found guilty, the court will suspend your CDL for a year. Note that the court suspension is separate from the DMV’s suspension.
Other Offenses that Could Lead to CDL Suspension
Apart from impairment and being under the influence, various situations/offenses can also lead to the suspension of your CDL. These cases are as follows:
Refusing to Take Chemical Tests
According to the California implied consent law, a driver is allowed to refuse or agree to chemical testing. However, declining to take the chemical tests after a legal DUI arrest can subject you to severe legal punishment. You can’t be prosecuted for refusing to submit to a PAS test, except if you are on probation or if you are below 21 years. However, this is different when it comes to blood or breath test after an arrest.
If you decline to take chemical tests after a legal commercial DUI arrest, your CDL may automatically be suspended. In case after the refusal you are convicted of commercial drunk-driving, your punishment will be increased. Just like in any DUI offense, you have only ten days from the day you are charged with a chemical test refusal offense to demand a DMV hearing. In this hearing, you are supposed to challenge the DMV’s move to suspend your license.
Driving on a Suspended License
If at a certain point, you drive a commercial vehicle when your CDL is revoked or suspended, you may be subjected to severe consequences. As per VC 23152 d, a commercial driver cannot apply for a restricted license once his/her CDL is suspended. Thus, operating a commercial motor vehicle at the time your license is suspended is a crime. If convicted of driving on a revoked/suspended license, the period for the suspension may be enhanced. In this case, the additional suspension period will be equivalent to the initial suspension. The added period of suspension will start after the initial suspension period expires.
Accumulation of Points
If you commit a traffic violation, you will earn points on your criminal record. The total number of points you accumulate on your record depends on the severity and type of violation you commit. However, it’s critical to know that if you hold a CDL, you earn 1.5 points if you commit an offense that would earn an ordinary driver 1 point. If you accumulate a given total number of points in a span of a given period, your CDL will be suspended or revoked. Here are the circumstances under which your CDL can be suspended:
- Earning four points at the minimum to your criminal record within a year
- Getting six points in two years
- Receiving eight points or more in three years
Other situations that could lead to your CDL suspension include:
- Leaving the scene of the accident without first identifying yourself
- DUI of drugs
- Recklessly driving in that it increases the chances of causing a fatal accident. Reckless driving includes speeding or swaying between the lanes
- Using the commercial vehicle in committing a felony offense which involves manufacturing or distributing controlled substances
Generally, the standard period for a CDL suspension is a year. But, various situations can lead to the extension of the suspension period. For example, let’s say that in the commission of your DUI offense, you were transporting hazardous materials. In this case, if you get convicted, you will face a CDL suspension of three years.
Also, commercial drivers who get convicted of DUI causing an injury are subject to prolonged periods of license suspension. DUI causing harm is a wobbler offense. A felony or misdemeanor conviction carries its period of suspension. A misdemeanor conviction will subject you to a CDL suspension period of one and three years. On the other hand, a conviction of a felony will have you facing a CDL suspension of five years.
It is worth noting that a CDL suspension takes place even if you were driving a non-commercial vehicle during the commission of your offense. The DMV imposes harsh rules and regulations on CDL holders when operating non-commercial automobiles. The reason for this is that the law holds that how a motorist will handle a personal car tells much about how he/she will drive a commercial vehicle. It also reveals the respect the motorist has on road safety and traffic rules.
Lifetime Suspension
A second drunk-driving conviction for commercial drivers will lead to a CDL suspension for life. Commercial drivers who get arrested for a second-DUI offense should contact a skilled DUI lawyer as quickly as possible. The attorney may be able to work out a defense that may prevent a lifetime suspension.
The kind of training commercial drivers go through is of high quality compared to what ordinary drivers undergo. Additionally, the automobiles they operate are highly hazardous if driven recklessly. These two points are the reasons why commercial drivers face harsher punishments if they repeat their drunk-driving offense. The sentence for the first DUI offense is like a warning that mistakes will not be tolerated. And if they repeat the same mistakes, the DMV and the courts impose more stringent penalties.
Commercial vehicles also need to be driven by drivers that can be highly trusted. Therefore, if any driver breaks traffic rules, he/she is not spared.
Apart from receiving a permanent suspension for being a repeat DUI offender, you will also be subjected to lifetime suspension if you commit a traffic violation for the second time. A lifetime suspension also comes if you get convicted of committing a felony involving controlled substances using a commercial vehicle. Also, committing a drunk-driving felony when your CDL is still suspended may earn you a lifetime suspension.
A permanent CDL suspension means you will never, at any given point, be permitted to drive a commercial motor vehicle again. And even though there might be room to appeal the license suspension and have the suspension time lowered, these chances are rare. And even if your appeal goes through, the only automobiles you can be allowed to operate are Class C vehicles.
Reinstating Your CDL After a Suspension
Before you can attempt to have your suspended CDL restored, you first must ensure that your personal license has not been inactivated. Your CDL cannot be reinstated if your personal driver’s license has been canceled, suspended, or revoked. If you qualify to reinstate your CDL, the California Department of Motor Vehicles will send a notification to you. The contents of the notice include instructions on the reinstatement process and when to begin it.
If your CDL was suspended because of a drunk-driving offense, you might have been relegated to a non-commercial license holder. Being downgraded to non-commercial license holding enables you to apply for a restricted personal driving privilege while still serving a probation sentence. If this is the case, to reinstate your CDL, you may be asked to apply again for it afresh.
Note that you cannot reinstate your CDL before you go through a medical evaluation. Also, you need to have completed and handed in a ten-year filled form of History Record Check and paid the required fee of application.
In case your commercial driver’s license was suspended, then you got degraded to a non-commercial license holder, you may also be required to take tests on knowledge and driving skills. The Department of Motor Vehicles provides these tests before it can reinstate your license.
Another point to keep in mind is that you should embark on the CDL reinstatement process only after you have served the whole suspension period as ordered by the DMV or court. Also, you can’t reinstate your CDL if your personal license still reflects a denied status in the DMV system. Before your license can be fully restored, you will be issued a commercial driver’s permit, which you will use for some time.
Successful CDL reinstatement could depend on taking knowledge and driving skills tests. The CDL reinstatement process may vary based on the requirements of the DMV and the reason why the license was suspended to begin with. Before you start on reinstating your CDL, you should first consult a skilled drunk-driving lawyer. Additionally, you can consult a representative of the DMV in case you need to evaluate the fees, the involved steps, and the forms or tests involved.
Reinstating your CDL is not an easy process. Therefore, instead of going through all the procedures, we advise that you avoid cases that may cause a suspension. For instance, being designated as a negligent operator is one of the common reasons your license can be suspended. And, the DMV will label you a negligent operator mainly if you violate traffic rules, leading to a traffic offense charge. Any violation of traffic rules increases your DMV points, which in the long run, when these points accumulate to a certain level, they earn you the negligent operator title.
For instance, insignificant violations like speeding earn you a point on your record. On the other hand, severe crimes like hit and run earn you two points. When these points accumulate to a specific number, it makes the DMV suspend your privilege to drive for a particular period.
Drunk-driving cases in California are treated differently. This means there is no definite outcome for your situation. Consequently, the process to reinstate a CDL also varies based on several factors. Your Order of Revocation/Suspension may be a good starting point, but you will likely need a lawyer to assist you through the process. Generally, you have to do the following to have your license reinstated:
- Win the DMV hearing
- Pay reissue fee to the DMV
- Wait for the whole suspension period to elapse or obtain a restricted driver’s license in case you qualify
- Take any classes the court orders
The Fees Associated with CDL Reinstatements in California
As we said earlier, everyone’s case is different. This also means the costs to reinstate your CDL may vary depending on the offense. Usually, a CDL reinstatement in California requires you to pay specified fees as listed below:
- $55 for reissue fee
- $100 for APS suspensions
- $15 fee for court restriction
- $20 fees for removing a restriction
- $24 for drug-related suspensions
Note that you may be asked to pay all or any of the costs. This depends on how severe your offense was. Also, keep in mind the fines represent the DMV charges only. In other cases, you might even be asked to pay penalties sanctioned by the court, which may be above the ones we have listed. Your local DMV office could help you to determine the fee you need to pay to the DMV. However, you will need expert legal representation to help you navigate any extra penalties.
Find a Commercial Driver’s License DUI Defense Attorney Near Me
When your license is suspended, your job will be affected. For instance, a permanent suspension affects your employability as a commercial driver. As a result, your usual daily living will be affected, as well. This doesn’t have to happen to you. As soon as you are arrested for commercial DUI, you can start devising strategies you will employ to prevent a conviction. This is because license suspension only happens if you are convicted. One of these strategies is contacting a skilled DUI defense lawyer. If you are in Van Nuys, contact the Van Nuys Criminal Attorney law firm at 818-484-1100. Our attorneys will help you challenge the charges against you and possibly prevent the suspension.
In California, DUI defendants have to prove their innocence in two legal proceedings, the DMV administrative hearing and the criminal case in court. The DMV administrative hearing may not appear to have an effect on your sentencing, but it should not be taken lightly. One would need an experienced attorney to improve their chances of winning in a DMV hearing. If you get arrested for DUI in Los Angeles, contact Leah Legal law firm. We can represent and defend you in a DMV administrative hearing process as well as the DUI criminal court proceedings.
What is a DMV (Department of Motor Vehicles) Administrative Hearing?
A California DMV hearing refers to an administrative proceeding held at the local office of the Department of Motor Vehicles (but not in court). The main purpose of this proceeding is to determine whether your license should be revoked or suspended (or not) following your DUI arrest. This is an administrative process that deals solely with your privileges to drive. Thus, the DMV can’t impose fines or have you imprisoned, but it can revoke or suspend your driver’s license.
In case you get arrested for DUI, the officer who arrested you will seize your license and issue you with notice of suspension, which is normally pink in color. The notice will act as a temporary driver’s license. This license is valid for thirty days.
Also, the notice of suspension notifies you that you’re eligible for a DMV hearing in which you will defend yourself to stop the revocation or suspension of your driver’s license. However, you have to request this hearing within ten days from the day you were arrested.
If you don’t request a hearing within ten days, you cannot do it again, and your driver’s license would be suspended automatically once the thirty days are over. You will only qualify to reinstate the license after fulfilling the following:
- Enrolling in a DUI school
- Submitting an insurance form (form SR-22)
- Paying a reinstatement fee of $125
- In other cases, installing an IID (ignition interlock device) in your vehicle
If you demand a DMV administrative hearing, it will delay the suspension of your license until after the hearing outcome. If the DMV rules in your favor, your license may not be suspended.
The Relationship Between a DMV Administrative Hearing and a DUI Criminal Court Case
As we mentioned before, unlike a DUI court hearing, a DMV proceeding doesn’t dwell on whether you committed a DUI offense or not. The focus is solely on the facts surrounding your arrest and whether or not your license should be suspended.
Even so, the two hearings are still closely related. For instance, the testimony acquired during the DMV proceeding may move the prosecution to dismiss your case or lower the charges in the court case.
Also, if the court rules that you are not guilty of VC 23152(b) charges (DUI with a BAC of .08% or higher), the verdict may compel the California Department of Motor Vehicles to reissue your license. However, if the court dismisses your case, if you plead guilty or if you don’t contest the reduced charges, then your license suspension by the DMV will not be affected in any way.
The main difference between a DMV administrative hearing and a DUI court case is that a DUI trial is more comprehensive. This is because the attorneys have the freedom to apply a variety of defenses in fighting your charges.
Another difference is that a DMV administrative hearing is conducted by a hearing officer who is a DMV employee while a DUI hearing is conducted by a jury of 12 members who must agree unanimously on your guilt before they can convict you for DUI.
Thus, it is important to hire a DUI defense lawyer who is well-conversant with DMV hearings as well as DUI court trials. Since the hearings are conducted differently, it’s important that you have an attorney who knows how both processes work.
Your Rights at the DMV Administrative Hearing
DMV DUI hearings are not as tense as court proceedings. For instance, instead of a court judge, the hearing is presided over by a hearing officer from the DMV, who bears no official legal training. Additionally, the proof needed to show guilt, i.e., the burden of proof is easily contented in a DMV hearing as compared to a criminal court proceeding. Another aspect that makes these hearings less tense is that instead of happening in court, these hearings are carried out in an office. In other cases, they even happen through the phone.
However, despite all these informalities, you still have certain significant rights during the hearing. For example, you are entitled to attorney representation during the hearing, although this will be at your expense. This implies that, as opposed to a court hearing, the Department of Motor Vehicles will not choose a lawyer to represent you even if you are incapable of affording your own.
During the hearing, you have the right to:
- Testify on your behalf
- Review and contest proof
- Cross-examine the witnesses
- Subpoena and bring witnesses (even the arresting police officer)
Scheduling a DMV Administrative Hearing
For you to schedule this hearing, you have to reach out to your local DMV driver safety branch office. This is where the hearing will take place. Note that this is not the same office as the DMV office where you register your car or obtain your license. Remember you have to call or visit the office within ten days of the arrest requesting them to schedule the hearing. Failure to which, you will lose the right to the hearing.
In case you chose to be represented by a private defense attorney in your criminal court case, the attorney will most likely demand and arrange for the DMV hearing on your behalf, as long as you retain their services within ten days. The attorney can also attend the hearing for you. In this case, you don’t need to go to the hearing if you aren’t testifying. However, in many cases, this hearing will be held through the phone instead of physically.
How You Can Win at Your DMV Administrative Hearing
The extent of a DMV proceeding is a bit wide. There are various issues which the officer presiding over the case will consider. They include:
- The arresting police officer had probable cause or reason to believe that you were drunk driving.
- The officer had legal cause to arrest you.
- You were operating the vehicle with a .08% or more BAC.
In case you refused to take a chemical test, the last one of the points mentioned above becomes debatable at the hearing. Here, the crucial concerns will be:
- If the arresting officer notified you that your driving privileges will be revoked for a year or nullified for three or two years in case you refused to take a chemical test.
- If you willfully refused to take a chemical test after being asked for a sample.
Once the hearing officer has considered these issues, he or she will either suspend your license depending on the DUI you have been charged with or decide in your favor and not suspend the license. If the officer decides in your favor, it means you are not guilty of the allegations against you.
The officer may allow you to keep your license if you argue at least one of the concerns raised above successfully, or if you successfully prevent incriminating proof from finding its way to the hearing.
Your attorney could present the following DUI defenses for you at the hearing.
The officer arrested you at an unlawful license checkpoint
In case the officer arrested you at a checkpoint that doesn’t comply with the California legal requirements as stipulated under DUI laws of California, then he/she would be unlawful to do so. This implies that even if you were operating a vehicle while intoxicated, the illegal arrest would cancel that fact. This defense may enable you to win your DMV hearing.
You weren’t driving or in actual physical control of the vehicle
If the arresting officer didn’t personally see you driving, and the DMV doesn’t subpoena any eyewitnesses who saw you, or there’s no other proof that could substantiate that it is you that was driving, the DMV hearing officer may not suspend your license.
You could argue that after drinking, you got back to the car, but you knew you couldn’t drive. Thus, you sat in the car and decided to doze it off. An officer approached the car to find out if there was any problem. He/ she smelled an alcoholic odor on you and put you under arrest for DUI. The arrest would be illegal because you didn’t drive under the influence.
Lack of probable cause for the arrest
If the arresting officer didn’t have any reasonable cause to arrest you for DUI, the DMV hearing officer should not suspend your license. Your attorney could present multiple reasons why there was no reasonable cause for you to be detained. For instance, maybe you were following all traffic rules and were stopped only because of your race, or you were in a road accident but didn’t drink until you were home and the officer came to question you.
The equipment used for chemical testing was faulty, or it wasn’t calibrated
The Code of Regulations of California regulates the operation and maintenance of chemical testing equipment. The law dictates that the equipment has to be checked for accuracy after every 150 blows or 10 days. If the officer used an instrument that did not comply with these regulations to collect your samples, your BAC level might turn out to be incorrect. Thus, the hearing officer may reverse your license suspension. On the same note, if the equipment was malfunctioning, it could lead to false, exaggerated test results.
The officer didn’t do a proper observation before the arrest
The Code of Regulation of California also governs how chemical tests should be administered, results collected, analyzed, and stored. In case the officer did not follow the correct procedure, the test results will be subjected to scrutiny.
Additionally, the Code of Regulation provides that an arresting officer should observe the arrestee for 15 minutes at the minimum immediately before the breath test. The observation ensures that the arrestee doesn’t do anything that might interfere with the test results like drinking, eating, smoking, or vomiting.
If this observation is not conducted, the results may be jeopardized. This could mean that your BAC wasn’t at .08% or higher when you got arrested, which may result in you winning your DMV hearing.
There are physiological reasons for your inaccurate high BAC
There are several explanations why you may have a blood alcohol concentration of .08% or more, which are not related to the quantity of alcohol you consumed. For instance, low carbs and high protein diets may trigger false BAC results. Additionally, medical conditions like heartburn and acid reflux can produce false BAC results.
In case you experienced these conditions when you were submitting to a breath test, you might not have been operating the car with a .08% or more BAC as results indicate. Thus, there is a chance of you winning your hearing on this basis.
You didn’t refuse to take the chemical test
It could be that you didn’t refuse to take the test. Maybe you did take the test, but the samples in your breath were not enough to detect. Alternatively, perhaps you weren’t offered an alternative of a blood test. Or, you simply wanted to know more about the process; thus, you were asking questions, and the arresting officer mistook the inquiries for hostility and concluded that you were declining to take the test.
If you didn’t refuse to submit to the test, there are high chances of winning the hearing. This is because if there is no proof of refusal and there are no BAC test results, the hearing officer can’t suspend your license on this basis.
The officer didn’t inform you about the repercussions of declining to take a chemical test
In case you opt to decline to take a chemical test, the arresting officer has to caution you of an automatic one-year license suspension. The caution is in written form. Thus, the officer should read it to you word by word. If this did not happen, your chances of winning the hearing improve.
Since officers arrest many drunk driving suspects, they tend to brush through the statement. In case the officer forgot to caution you, deliberately chose not to caution you, or recited the warning in his or her own words rather than reading it, your license may not be suspended.
There were mistakes with the paperwork the officer filed
When you get arrested, the officer must complete certain compulsory paperwork and reports. If he/she indicates incorrect dates and times on the paperwork, fails to sign, does not report the results of the BAC test or inputs incorrect BAC results, and cannot remember the correct facts to correct the mistakes, the errors may result in the hearing officer deciding in your favor.
What Follows After You Win Your DMV Hearing?
In case you win the hearing, the hearing officer won’t suspend your license, meaning your privilege to drive will be intact. It also implies that the prosecutor might get you a better deal during the negotiations for a plea bargain in your DUI court case. In case the DUI court proceeding reveals significant mistakes in the case, it can persuade the prosecution to dismiss the charges.
However, since the DMV hearing and DUI court proceedings are held separately, winning your DMV proceeding doesn’t automatically impact the criminal court hearing. For some reason, the prosecution may still maintain that they have adequate proof to go to trial. If the jury convicts you for DUI in court, your license could still be suspended by the judge.
What if You Lose?
If you do not win your DMV administrative hearing, your attorney may still have obtained proof in the course of the proceeding, which could convince the prosecution to reduce your charges in the court case. A win at a court trial or a particular plea bargain might prompt the DMV to reverse your license suspension decision even if it was already affected.
However, regarding your driving freedom, your driver’s license suspension will take effect in case you lose the hearing. The suspension period and circumstances will be based on whether it’s your first or subsequent charge.
You Can Appeal Your DMV Hearing Verdict
If you lost but are not contented with the results, you can appeal the verdict. You can request the DMV to do a departmental assessment or appeal directly to the Superior Court of California.
Both of these procedures have specific deadlines and work under strict rules. Thus, you should have an experienced attorney by your side if you are planning on appealing the outcome of your DMV hearing.
The deadline to appeal and further instructions are found on the form informing you about the decision of the department concerning the hearing.
Contact a DMV Hearing Attorney Near Me
If you are in Los Angeles and are facing a DUI charge, contact Leah Legal at 818-484-1100. Our Los Angeles criminal attorney has many years of experience, thus are well-conversant with California DUI laws. We will defend your rights, represent you at the DMV administrative hearing, and also prepare a strong defense to fight for you during a DUI criminal court case. Call now!
A dry reckless occurs when you agree to plead to a reckless driving charge under Vehicle Code 23103 if charged with a DUI charge. In California, DUI charges are severely punished with hefty fines and lengthy jail terms under Vehicle Code 23152. However, your lawyer can persuade the prosecutor to charge you with a lesser offense through a plea deal. With a dry reckless, you face less stringent punishments than a standard DUI violation.
DUI charges are priorable, meaning if you repeat the offense, your punishments become harsher. This is an aspect you should not worry about when pleading to a reckless driving charge. One of the reasons dry reckless is a better deal than a standard DUI charge is that the offense is not priorable. However, to earn this deal, you need an experienced attorney’s help. If you are in California, contact Leah Legal for excellent representation.
Understanding Dry Reckless
Under VEH 23103, dry reckless is a misdemeanor offense. Vehicle Code 23103 defines penalties for driving vehicles with wanton disregard for other people’s safety or property. When you drive while intoxicated or impaired, your driving pattern could endanger other motorists’ or pedestrians’ lives and cause property destruction. The law considers this behavior as a willful disregard or disrespect of lives and property belonging to others.
An important aspect to understand this offense is that you don’t face direct charges. The charges for this offense originate from a standard DUI charge. If a traffic officer stops you on the road for suspected drunk driving, they will charge you with VEH 23152 violations after confirming the offense’s elements. The penalties for a DUI are harsher than for dry reckless. After your DUI charges, your attorney will discuss your case with the prosecutor and persuade them to allow you to take a guilty plea to the lesser charges of dry reckless.
The prosecutor has the discretion to reduce or uphold your charges. This means your attorney must be persuasive enough to present convincing facts to the prosecutor. However, before approaching the prosecutor, your lawyer discusses the available options with you and the advantages of the options over a standard DUI charge. Besides dry reckless, your lawyer will mention wet reckless as a possible plea bargain charge as well.
The distinguishing factor between dry reckless and wet recklessness is that a wet reckless conviction involves drugs or alcohol. On the other hand, dry reckless does not involve alcohol. After evaluating your case and the prosecutor’s evidence against you, your attorney will also inform you of the possible outcome under each aspect. If you are convinced that your attorney should approach the prosecutor to discuss a plea deal, a meeting will be set.
Obtaining a Dry Reckless Charge as a Plea Deal
After permitting your attorney to discuss a plea deal with the prosecutor, a meeting is set to discuss the various aspects or elements of the violation. During the discussion, your lawyer will express your desire for a plea deal. Further, your lawyer will present a convincing argument about why you deserve a dry reckless deal instead of any other. In this case, your lawyer acts as the go-between to present your needs.
If the prosecutor denies you the deal, your attorney will inform you of the decision, and you begin to prepare for a DUI defense. However, your lawyer will prepare you to take a guilty plea for the lesser charge if the deal is offered. When you take a plea deal, you must understand that you will not have the privilege of defending the charges against you. Instead, the judge will sentence you for the offense guided by the statute under which the violation falls.
After the deal is offered, your lawyer presents you with the outcome, and you discuss it. If it is agreeable to you, your attorney will go back to the prosecutor and inform them. When you are all in accord, the next person that must agree is the judge. In California, the judge must approve of the plea deal before the sentence is passed.
After the judge’s approval, you will then take a plea of guilty or no contest for the reduced charge of dry reckless. The DUI violations you were charged with initially are dropped in favor of the new ones. Communication is also sent to the DMV, informing them of the change in charges.
One dilemma every defendant is faced with is the question of accepting or declining the deal. The elements or facts and circumstances of the violation are often used to determine whether accepting the plea deal is to your advantage or not. Additionally, it would help compare the penalties under the type of a deal or a DUI charge before accepting the offer.
Why a Dry Reckless Charge is better than a DUI Charge
Your attorney would advise you to take a bargain deal primarily because of the many advantages over facing standard DUI charges. Some benefits of forgoing your right to a trial and opting for a dry reckless are:
Reduced Sentence Enhancements when you Repeat the Offense
A DUI and a wet reckless conviction or sentence are priorable. This means that should you repeat the offense, the charges you face are steeper based on your previous sentence. For instance, if you were ordered to pay $390 in fines for your first DUI offense, a repeat may result in you paying $500. However, when your charges are reduced to dry reckless, the sentence is not priorable. This means that if you repeat a DUI offense, your prior conviction or sentence will not be used to determine your punishment for the present charge.
DUI laws in California allow automatic increase for penalties for subsequent offenses, but this is not the case with a dry reckless. Although the judge can choose a more severe punishment when you repeat or have multiple offenses on dry reckless, they are under no obligation to increase your penalties compared to DUI charges.
Jail Time Sentence is Relatively Shorter
According to VEH 23103, a dry reckless conviction carries a shorter jail period than a standard DUI. If you are sentenced on a dry reckless, the maximum jail time would be three months in county jail. A DUI violation if a first offender carries a maximum of 6 months of county jail time. If you repeat the DUI, the second conviction in ten years carries a maximum of a year of jail time.
If the judge sentences you to probation under dry reckless, violating the terms could lead to probation revocation and a jail sentence. Here, your incarceration’s maximum time is 90 days, which is relatively shorter than the six months in a DUI conviction.
There is no Requirement to Fit an IID in your Car
If you are convicted of a DUI offense, the court will order you to install your vehicle or all the vehicles you drive an ignition interlock device. This device works like a regular breathalyzer where you are required to breathe into it before starting your car. If the gadget detects alcohol, the car will not start. But if no alcohol is present, the car starts, and after certain intervals, it will require you blowing into it again. With this device, however, you will keep driving to any place without restrictions.
Installation of this device is critical, especially where the court suspends your driving privileges. But, the dry reckless charge does not trigger the court to suspend your driving privileges. This means that to continue driving freely; you don’t have to fit your vehicle with an IID.
Shorter Probation Period
A first DUI conviction carries misdemeanor probation that ranges from three years to five. However, a dry reckless conviction probation period is relatively shorter than that of a DUI. Typically, probation after dry reckless sentencing lasts from one year to two. This makes dry reckless a better option when faced with DUI charges because you serve your sentence in a short time.
One of the conditions in a DUI probation is that you do not commit another offense as you serve it. Unfortunately, if you commit another DUI offense, your probation is revoked, and you serve a jail sentence of not more than 90 days. If your probation period was one year, and after you commit a DUI, the judge will not look at your prior record and punish you with a longer one.
Another advantage of the short probation sentence is that you can expunge your criminal record after a short time. If convicted on a regular DUI, you can only expunge your record after completing your probation period, which is longer than that of a dry reckless one.
Lesser Fines
Payment of fines is one of the standard penalties when faced with a DUI violation in California. The law is strict on DUI charges and, as a result, charges hefty fines if convicted. The fines in a DUI offense often are increased if aggravating factors exist on the offense. In a DUI charge, a conviction carries a fine of between $390 and $1,000. However, these charges are often higher because of other administrative fines charged. Normally, a first DUI offender can pay a total of $1,500 in fines, while a conviction on the dry reckless charge carries a maximum of $1,000. In comparison, a dry reckless minimum penalty charge is $145 and $390 for a misdemeanor DUI.
You Could Retain your Driving Privileges
As earlier stated, DUI charges initiate a compulsory suspension of a driver’s license. This suspension for a first offender can last a minimum of six months to one year. If you were previously convicted on a wet reckless or DUI, the suspension period becomes longer. But, you can still enjoy driving provided you fit an IID in your vehicle.
If you accept the plea deal under VEH 23103, the court will not suspend your license. But, the offense adds two points to your DMV record. If these points accumulate, your license may be suspended as a negligent operator.
An important point to note is that the court or the DMV can suspend a driver’s license. The DMV decision is independent of the court, meaning even when the court doesn’t suspend your license, the DMV can still suspend it. When you take a plea deal, it means you do not endure a criminal trial that results in the sentencing calling for a license suspension.
However, when you are arrested on suspected DUI and charged, the DMV is informed and will automatically suspend your license if you do not request a hearing to defend your license. If you do seek a hearing, it must be within ten days from the arrest day. Your lawyer is allowed to represent you and present arguments to the DMV why you should not have your license suspended. After the hearing, the DMV decides to suspend or not suspend your license. The court’s decision on how to charge you for the offense does not influence the DMV decision.
Shorter DUI School Programs
One of the sentences in a DUI conviction is attending a DUI education program. If you are a first offender, the minimum period is three months, and a repeat offense can extend to thirty months. But, when you are convicted on a dry reckless, attending a DUI school is not required. During the negotiations, the prosecution may indicate that you attend a DUI school as part of the conditions to offer a deal. If this is the case, the program is usually shorter, lasting a maximum of six weeks.
Advantages of Dry Reckless over Wet Reckless Conviction
When your attorney is negotiating to have your charges reduced, the options include wet reckless as earlier discussed. Under this, you will also take a guilty plea for reckless driving, and your conviction record will outline that the offense involved drugs or alcohol. Most prosecutors start a plea deal by offering wet reckless as the first option.
When the prosecution grants wet reckless, your lawyer can further negotiate to have a dry reckless instead. Advantages of dry reckless over wet reckless include:
Dry Reckless isn’t a Priorable Offense
Wet reckless is priorable, similar to a DUI. When you are convicted on a wet reckless, it means a subsequent conviction will attract steeper penalties. The period typically under consideration for repeat offenses is ten years.
On the other hand, a dry reckless isn’t priorable, meaning a subsequent conviction will not be pegged on your prior one. If you repeat the offense within ten years, the judge will not use your past DUI conviction record to sentence you, but instead, it will be considered your first offense. This is of benefit because first offenders are punished less severely than repeat offenders.
Your Insurance Service Provider will be more Understanding
When you are convicted of wet reckless, most insurance providers consider you a high-risk client just like a DUI conviction. This leads many to cancel your auto policy or to increase the premiums. But, if you are sentenced with dry reckless, your offense is not highly scrutinized by your insurance provider, and your premiums or policy will not be affected by it.
Qualifying for a Dry Reckless
When seeking a plea deal after a DUI charge, prosecutors will often offer wet recklessness instead of a dry reckless. Earlier, we stated that a wet reckless has more severe consequences than dry reckless, making it preferable to prosecutors. However, with a skilled attorney, they can negotiate your case to have the prosecutor reduce your violation to dry reckless. For you to qualify for dry reckless certain factors must be present, and they include:
Your BAC Level
A lower BAC level is highly considered in a dry reckless than a high one. If your BAC were below 0.08% or close, the prosecutor would consider granting you a dry reckless deal. When your BAC levels are high, this fact acts as an aggravating factor that will deny you the plea deal.
Insufficient Evidence
If the evidence for a DUI offense is weak, the prosecutor can easily be persuaded to offer you dry recklessness as a plea deal. This is typical where errors were made during a defendant’s arrest and investigations. For example, your attorney can argue that the BAC results were inaccurate or invalid since the breathalyzer device was not routinely maintained as required by the law. Additionally, your lawyer can ask for a retesting of the blood sample you provided to confirm the BAC levels.
While testing for BAC levels using chemical tests, the officer conducting the tests must follow the guidelines outlined under title 17. If any of the rules were breached, it might mean a compromise on the results. All these facts are adequate to have the prosecutor grant you a dry reckless plea deal.
Find a DUI Lawyer Near Me
Standard DUI offenses are severely punished in California. When you are faced with a DUI charge, one of the best ways to avoid the harsh penalties is by negotiating a plea deal with the prosecutor. A dry reckless charge is one of the best deals the prosecutor can offer you, but you need an experienced attorney’s help to secure it for you. At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney in California, we have represented many defendants facing similar charges and assisted them in obtaining dry reckless as a plea deal. Call us at 818-484-1100, and we will discuss the strategies that are best for your case.
Wet reckless is an unusual charge that results from a plea bargain. You cannot be arrested with wet reckless, nor can the prosecution initially charge you with wet reckless unless there is a plea bargain to get a DUI charge reduced. If you have been arrested for a DUI offense in Los Angeles, CA and want the charges reduced, reach out to us at Leah Legal. We understand wet reckless, why and when the prosecution accepts it as an alternative DUI charge, its advantages, and penalties, thus enabling us to give the best advice and guidance.
Overview of Wet Reckless
Wet reckless is a plea bargain to people being charged with driving under the influence as codified under Vehicle Code 23152(a), or drunk driving with a BAC level of 0.08% or higher under VC 23152(b). The DUI reduced charge is often filed as a misdemeanor after a plea bargain, and its penalties are lesser than those of driving under the influence charge. If you get multiple wet reckless convictions; however, the charges become felony wet reckless, and the fines and penalties are harsher.
Reasons Why Defendants can Get Wet Reckless Pleas Deal
In reduced drunk driving conviction, it is not mandatory that the offender was driving recklessly or were intoxicated. All that is required is to take a plea deal. The prosecution will agree to a plea deal if:
- The blood alcohol concentration (BAC) level of the offender was or above .08%,
- There is proof of rising levels of blood alcohol,
- You have no significant history of drug or alcohol-related offenses,
- There was no priorable cause of your traffic stop,
- The chemical test was not conducted properly according to the California Regulation Code, Title 17.
No prosecutor will be willing to move forward with a case they are not guaranteed of winning. In case the evidence is insufficient, or there were procedural errors, the prosecutor will agree to a plea bargain because with this, the defendant will be answerable to the law. A weak case, on the other hand, might see the defendant walk free.
If both parties agree on a plea deal, the court must also approve the agreement after which the defendant pleads guilty or no contest to reckless driving. Under Vehicle Code 23103.5, once the prosecutor has agreed to plead guilty of drunk driving, or driving with a BAC of .08% or higher as an alternative for the original DUI charge, they will note that there was a drug or alcohol use by the offender about the offense. The note is sent to the DMV about the wet reckless conviction and included in your criminal record.
If someone has multiple previous DUI convictions, the prosecution might turn down your wet reckless plea bargain. Before agreeing to a plea, make sure your DUI criminal defense attorney knows the truth about your “look back” period or criminal history, to find a perfect way to convince the judge or jury to reduce the original drunk driving charges.
Before going for a plea bargain to get a wet reckless conviction, you must evaluate its benefits and demerits. In certain circumstances, a reduced DUI charge will be an advantage, and in other scenarios a disadvantage. If you have three or four wet reckless convictions in the last ten years, it is an indicator your “look back” period is not clean and a later wet reckless conviction will lead to more severe punishment. However, if the “look back” period is clean with no prior wet reckless conviction, agreeing to wet reckless is the best idea.
Advantages of “Wet Reckless” Plea Deal to the Defendant
- No mandatory court order for driver’s license revocation or suspension
After an offender has received a wet reckless conviction, the court will not suspend their license. Unlike wet reckless conviction, a DUI conviction will lead to up to half a year license suspension for a first time DUI offenders, 24 months and 36 months license suspension respectively for second and third time DUI offenders.
Also, things like refusing to take a chemical test or driving under the influence when you are 21 years old or below can trigger suspension of license with no obligation to apply for a restricted license. However, in wet reckless convictions, these aggravating factors cannot lead to license suspension. Instead, the court might issue an order for the offender to install an ignition interlock device in their car.
Although the court might not suspend your driver’s license in reduced charge conviction, the DMV can still suspend your license if you don’t request a DMV hearing or when you lose the trial. Therefore, retain your driving privileges by requesting an administrative per se hearing within ten days after the arrest. It will help keep your license suspension on hold until the DMV hearing is concluded.
- There is a shorter sentence than in a standard DUI sentence
If convicted of wet reckless, the maximum time you will spend in jail is three months (90 days). Compared to the six months (180 days) sentence for standard DUI conviction, the punishment for wet reckless is far much shorter. The difference between these sentences will make more sense for offenders who are sentenced to probation instead of jail time. Remember, in California; probation violation can lead to a maximum jail sentence.
For instance, a person who was sentenced to probation under wet reckless conviction will only serve 90 days for violating probation conditions, but for a person convicted under standard DUI, he or she will be sentenced to jail time of up to 180 days which is double the sentence for wet reckless.
- Wet reckless has Less mandatory jail time for repeat offenders
If you have one or more priorable offenses within ten years, there is mandatory jail time. The period is less in wet reckless conviction compared to DUI conviction. For wet reckless conviction, the offender serves a minimum of five days of mandatory jail time. However, in DUI convictions, the minimum mandatory jail term is ninety days for second offenders and one hundred and twenty days for third offenders.
- Shorter probation period
In wet reckless conviction, probation is one to two years. A typical DUI conviction sentence carries three to five-year probation. The conditions for this probation include:
- Community service
- Restitution
- Avoiding the use of drugs or alcohol,
- Attending an alcohol or drug treatment lessons.
- Lower fines
When convicted for wet reckless, the fines paid are one hundred and forty-five dollars ($145) to one thousand dollars ($1000). On the other hand, once the court fines you a maximum of one thousand dollars, penalty assessments are also imposed increasing the fine to a maximum of $3000 in DUI convictions. That way, when convicted under wet reckless, you end up paying half the fines being paid in DUI convictions.
- Shorter California DUI school with no mandatory driver’s license suspension
A convict under wet reckless in the first offense will attend a DUI school for six weeks. The period is shorter compared to DUI convicts who attend DUI school for eighteen to thirty months. However, it is critical to note that multiple wet reckless convictions can increase the DUI School period to 9 months.
- Avoid mandatory IID installation
Installation of IID under wet reckless is left at the discretion of the court, which means it not mandatory even for multiple offenders. Not installing an IID prevents embarrassment and the costs that come with calibration after every two months. For repeat DUI convicts, an ignition interlock device must be installed in their cars.
- Wet reckless has no mandatory suspension of a commercial driver’s license
If you are convicted under wet reckless, it is not must your commercial driving privileges to be suspended unless the two points that are added in your DMV record have reached the negligent operator limit.
Disadvantages of Wet Reckless Conviction
Wet reckless has its disadvantages too. The downsides are:
- Prospective employers can discover it,
- The DMV can still suspend your license,
- The DMV adds two points on your negligent operator limit,
- Vehicle insurers still consider it as a DUI
- It remains priorable for ten years
Other Plea Bargains that are related to Wet Reckless
- Publicly drunk
You will be violating California PC 624 (f) if you risk the safety of other individuals and property by being intoxicated to the extent of not exercising care. If you fail to use caution or prevent others from enjoying their public rights due to your intoxication, then you will be violating this law. To be convicted of a publicly drunk charge, the prosecution must prove the following elements:
- The defendant was intentionally under the influence.
- The defendant was under the influence in a public place like a mall or nightclub, and
- Due to intoxication, the defendant prevented, interfered, or obstructed the free use of sidewalks and open ways.
To fight publicly drunk charges, the defendant can use some of the following legal defenses:
- You were not in public
If the incident that led to arrest didn’t occur in a place open to the public like a nightclub, then the charges will not stand.
- You didn’t knowingly consume the alcohol or drugs
If someone slipped a drug in your drink or food without your consent, or if you ingested drink without knowledge that it contained alcohol, then you didn’t willfully ingest the substance that led to intoxication. Publicly drunk charges will be dismissed.
- Lack of probable cause
If the law enforcement officers arrested you without seeing any signs of you being a danger to yourself, the public or interfering or obstructing the use of public streets or ways, then the charges will be dismissed too.
The penalties for this conviction are a fine of up to $1000, informal probation, and up to six months in county jail. For repeat offenders, the sentence is at least 90 days in county jail or an alternative of two months in an alcohol treatment program.
- Speed exhibition
The type of plea bargain is under Penal Code 23109. According to this law, it is unlawful to accelerate a vehicle at a speed that can make you lose control of the car endangering the lives of others due to alcohol or intoxication. You would be charged with speed exhibition even if the car speed did not exceed the limit. All that is required is to prove that the driver accelerated too fast. Compared to a DUI charge, speed exhibition convictions fines are up to $500, which is far lower than typical DUI fines.
The elements of speed exhibition include:
- The defendant was driving a motor vehicle,
- During the time of driving, the defendant intentionally accelerated the car or propelled at speed in a manner deemed unsafe, or dangerous,
- The intention of over speeding or accelerating fast was to show off or impress, and
- The defendant helps someone commit a crime.
Speed exhibition benefits offenders in very many ways over DUI. These benefits include:
- Lesser fines of $500
- Probation of two years instead of three to five years,
- Less jail exposure, or
- Lack of priorability when someone picks up a subsequent DUI offense.
- Dry reckless
It is a misdemeanor charge that applies to drivers who portray to be driving without regard to the safety of other road users or property. A defendant is charged with dry reckless if he or she succeeds to have the DUI charge they were arrested for reduced during a plea deal.
The prosecutor will agree to this deal if they have a weak case and if Title 17 was violated. When any of the California regulations were violated in title 17, a defense lawyer can prove that the results were not accurate or have specific errors; hence, it’s not reliable. In that case, the prosecutor might opt for a dry reckless charge.
Compared to wet reckless, dry reckless has its advantages. They include:
- Dry reckless is not a priorable offense while wet reckless is priorable.
If you are a second offender who has been previously convicted with a wet reckless charge, the sentence for the second offense will be enhanced due to the previous one. However, in a dry reckless conviction, even if you have a DUI conviction, the subsequent one will be deemed as a first offense.
- Auto insurers consider wet reckless as DUI conviction in most instances which leads to cancellation of a policy or increased premiums, but in dry reckless, the sentence is not deemed as drug or alcohol-related hence cannot lead to policy cancellation. However, at times the premiums might be increased but substantially.
- Dry reckless does not affect your driver’s license because it is not alcohol-related.
Wet reckless or DUI have their effects on the insurance and commercial driver’s licenses. However, with dry reckless, insurance companies will not be much concerned about it because it is not associated with drunk driving. So, if you are a commercial driver with a dry reckless conviction, you expect fewer inquiries about your sentence as compared to a wet reckless.
Wet Reckless Expungement
If you are wondering is a wet reckless criminal record can be cleared, the answer is yes. A convict can have a wet reckless conviction cleared or erased as codified in PC 1203.4. However, to be eligible for expungement, you must meet the following conditions:
- No pending criminal charges,
- Completed probation.
Once a person meets these conditions and the criminal record is cleared, he or she should not be afraid of saying they have never been convicted of drunk driving or wet reckless. However, a wet reckless will remain a priorable offense and will show if a subsequent DUI offense appears later within 120 months.
Obligations of Drivers Convicted with Wet Reckless
Wet reckless drivers must comply with specific state regulations. These regulations include:
- 12-hour individual counseling, or forty hours in group counseling which is monitored by the health care of California,
- First offenders must undergo a training program for at least 90 days, 180 days, or 270 days based on the chemical blood test results,
- A one and a half years program for second offenders where they undertake 52 hours of group therapy, six hours monitoring, weekly interviews, twelve hours training on the effects of drugs or alcohol, and eighteen months program education,
- DUI School program for thirty months for third and subsequent convicts, which includes twelve hours alcohol education program for three days plus 300 hours of community service plus individual interviews.
These regulations are not easy to adhere to, but with the right commitment, you can complete them and regain your driving privileges after a wet reckless conviction.
Defending Wet Reckless
Wet reckless is not a charge by itself. Instead, it is a strategy used by the defense for a plea bargain. Therefore, the offense cannot be dismissed; the only thing you can do is fight to have the penalties reduced.
Contact a DUI Defense Lawyer Near Me
California has one of the harshest drunk driving laws. To avoid being convicted of violating these laws, contact Van Nuys Criminal Attorney at 818-484-1100 to discuss your pending DUI case with one of our criminal defense attorneys in Los Angeles, CA. Our attorneys will educate you on the benefits of taking a wet reckless plea bargain and other related pleas that can apply as your defense to lower the consequences of a DUI conviction.
Leah Legal is a well-reputed and highly rated criminal defense law firm serving clients in and around the Los Angeles area. Our firm is dedicated to defending individuals of all ages and walks of life charged with or under investigation for committing misdemeanor and felony crimes. The attorneys for the firm are well-versed in California criminal law and can handle all types of DUI cases, including DUI Causing Injury cases. There are several DUI defenses, some of which include the lack of probable cause for your arrest or innocence based on symptoms similar to being intoxicated. It is also possible to argue that the procedures set forth by the California Code of Regulations Title 17 were not followed for chemical tests by the administering officer.
What is a DUI Causing Injury Under California Law?
California takes driving under the influence (DUI) very seriously and has some of the most stringent laws against DUI offenders. Under the California law, if a driver has a BAC (blood alcohol content) of 0.08 percent or above at the time of driving, the driver will be assumed as intoxicated in violation of the law. It does not matter if the driver “feels sober” or thinks he can “handle” it. Under California law, drivers under the influence of drugs or alcohol have impaired their physical and mental abilities to operate a vehicle as they would ordinarily, or as a cautious sober person. The BAC limit is 0.1 percent or higher (under “zero tolerance” law) for minors who are under 21 years to be considered alcohol-impaired by law. Although the laws to address the problem of drunk driving are strict, drunk drivers still get behind the wheel holding their own as well as the life of those who share the road with them at risk.
If you are involved in an accident or collision driving under the influence, which results in causing injury to someone, the consequences and associated penalties can be particularly serious. You will have to face the legal repercussions for a DUI accident with injury, which are typically more serious than a regular DUI offense. You may even be charged with a DUI felony under certain circumstances.
Under Vehicle Code section 23153 of California law, “DUI Causing Injury” is defined as a crime where an individual driving under the influence of any alcoholic beverage or drug and concurrently committing an additional unlawful act, such as causing bodily harm or injury to some other person as a consequence of it. As per the California VC 23153(a), drivers can be charged even if their blood alcohol content is below the limit of 0.08 percent if they are involved in an auto accident causing injury to another individual. This charge breaks the common misconception that you cannot be charged with a DUI if your blood alcohol content is below the legal limit of 0.08. You may get charged with CVC 23153(a) depending on whether the prosecution believes they have a strong case against you or not.
On the contrary, if you have a BAC of 0.08 percent or greater while driving a car and caused an accident that injured a person other than you, you will get automatically charged under the California Vehicle Code section 23153(b) for a DUI with an injury.
However, it is important to note that California VC section 23152(b)—driving under the influence—considers driving a vehicle under the influence of any alcoholic beverage as unlawful. So, even if you did not cause any injury to person or property, you will be charged under this statute.
Is DUI Causing Injury a Misdemeanor or Felony?
Driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs is mostly considered a misdemeanor DUI in California for first-time offenders. A misdemeanor is typically liable to be punished by some jail time, a fine, and probation. However, certain “aggravating factors” can escalate a simple, misdemeanor DUI and escalate the charges to felony DUI offense. One such aggravating circumstance in a DUI accident is causing injury or great bodily harm (or even death) to another person. Apart from DUI with an injury, other factors that can augment a simple charge to a felony include an elevated BAC (.16 percent), multiple prior convictions, a minor passenger in the vehicle, driving on a suspended license for a prior DUI, and others.
If you are a repeat offender of DUI Causing Injury, your DUI automatically qualifies to be considered a felony. The conviction for felony DUI holds stiffer penalties in addition to more lasting consequences as compared to a misdemeanor DUI charge. A felony DUI also requires a preliminary hearing, and you may have to go through several court proceedings, a minimum of one (1) year imprisonment (it can be more based on the circumstances), and many other collateral consequences of being convicted for a felony DUI.
If you are convicted for a DUI for the third time, but the two prior DUI convictions did not involve an injury or bodily harm to another person(s), your DUI will not be necessarily considered a felony. Your prior DUI convictions and the level of severity will play a significant role in deciding if your current case will make a felony or not.
If another driver hits into the driver charged with DUI while stopped at a stop traffic sign and endured injuries, under the California law, the intoxicated driver will not be charged for causing bodily harm. In such cases, the DUI charge will still be a misdemeanor, not a felony.
What a Prosecutor Must Prove for a DUI Causing Injury Conviction
To convict a driver of DUI Causing Injury under California VC 23153(a) or 23153(b), the prosecutor must prove the following three elements:
- the driver was found violating the DUI laws of California,
- while doing so, the driver broke another law in addition to DUI or showed negligent mannerism while driving, and
- the driver’s unlawful act or negligence caused injury to another person.
Whether you are driving under the influence or driving impaired of your natural physical and mental abilities, you can be considered of violating California’s DUI laws. Also, if you are driving a vehicle with BAC of 0.08 percent or higher, or driving under the influence of drugs, or a combination of drugs and alcohol, you will be considered guilty of violating the DUI laws.
Under the California Vehicle Code 23153, the prosecution must also provide that your act or negligence is the reason for another person’s injury while you are driving under the influence.
For commercial vehicle drivers, the prosecution only needs to prove that the driver has a blood alcohol level of 0.04 percent or higher.
Penalties for DUI Causing Injury
The penalties or a plea bargain for DUI in California will depend on a variety of factors. The two main factors that help the court decide on the DUI penalties specific to your case include whether you have prior DUI conviction records, which meaning if you have been previously arrested for DUI and if a person has sustained serious injuries as a result of your driving under the influence.
DUI offenses in California are “priorable,” and the penalty and/or punishment is going to increase each time you are convicted following your first DUI conviction, meaning for a second or a third DUI conviction, your penalty and/or punishment will necessarily increase. It is not unusual to expect fines and restitution of tens of thousands of dollars in addition to hefty prison terms for repeat offenders. Conducts such as hit-and-run may also be taken under consideration while deciding on penalties for a DUI conviction.
If you are a first-time DUI offender, under the California VC 23153 law, the DUI Causing Injury (aka California “wobbler” offense) will be prosecuted as a misdemeanor. The potential misdemeanor DUI Causing Injury penalties under California VC 23153 may include:
- Three (3) to five (5) years of informal probation,
- Five (5) days to one (1) year imprisonment in the county jail,
- Fines between $390 and $5,000,
- A mandatory, court-imposed alcohol education program for three (3), nine (9), eighteen (18), or thirty (30) months
- A one (1) to three (3) years of driver’s license suspension
- Restitution to all injured parties
It is important to note that from now (starting in 2019), you may be able to continue drive without limitation if you install an ignition interlock device (IID) in your car for six (6) months.
If the accident has caused a serious physical injury or death of a third party, according to the Vehicle Code 23153, it can be charged as felony DUI with an injury. A third party could be a pedestrian, a cyclist, a driver or passenger in another car, or even a passenger in your own vehicle. If you already have a past felony DUI conviction and/or multiple prior DUI convictions for driving under the influence under Vehicle Code 23153, it is most likely to be prosecuted as a felony. The penalties you will be subjected for DUI Causing Injury charge may include:
- Sixteen (16) months to ten (10) years in the California state prison
- An additional and consecutive jail sentence of one (1) to six (6) years for injured survivors, based on the number of persons injured as well as the extent of their bodily injuries
- Possibility to an additional “strike” on the defendant’s driving/criminal record (California’s Three Strikes Law), if the victim suffers significant bodily injury
- Fines ranging between $1,015 and $5,000
- A mandatory, court-imposed alcohol/drug program (DUI school) for a period of eighteen (18) to thirty (30) months
- Habitual Traffic Offender (HTO) status for three (3) years
- Revocation of driving privileges for five (5) years
- Restitution to all involved injured parties
Please note that starting in 2019, you may be able to continue drive without limitation if you get an ignition interlock device (IID) installed in your car for one (1) year or longer.
Defenses for a California DUI Causing Injury
If you have been arrested for DUI with injury, you should immediately get in touch with a criminal defense attorney. Your DUI lawyer can advise you on your rights and put up a solid defense to represent you in the court. There are various possible defenses for DUI with injury convictions, and an experienced and skilled DUI lawyer can explore all possibilities to argue in your defense.
Similar to a DUI charge, defenses against DUI with injury convictions are based on your DUI defense attorney arguing that you were not under the influence while the prosecution tries to prove the reverse. Your attorney will also make sure if all tests were accurate and may want to challenge the accuracy of the test results if your BAC is more than 0.08 percent. Generally, DUI breath tests are subject to a lot of errors, which may include instrument malfunction, improper device handling by the officer, your physiological conditions, outside environmental conditions, like radio frequency interference, which could play a role in generating erroneously high BAC reading and often makes the basis of a successful DUI defense strategy.
In your defense, your attorney will make sure that all the DUI investigation was appropriately done and that the administration and interpretation of the field sobriety tests were done correctly. Generally, there’s a video which the officer would make to treat the sobriety tests as evidence, so your attorney would want to gather them and check if they match to what was mentioned in the DUI report.
A good attorney may also put a defense that your negligence or unlawful action was not the immediate cause of the other person’s injury. Your defense attorney may also take on a new approach while investigating the accident and injury caused by working with an accident reconstruction expert, who can study and analyze the different aspects to “reconstruct” the scene. An accident scene reconstruction expert will take into account factors, such as road conditions, the weather, damage caused to the vehicles involved in the accident, or any other relevant evidence that may help the lawyer partnering him.
There are many other DUI defenses that can help an experienced criminal defense attorney can rely on to beat DUI charges under California law. A few examples include:
- Breath test instrument may have captured “mouth alcohol” rather than a sample of breath from your deep lung tissue
- Possibility of medical conditions like GERD, acid reflux, hiatal hernia, or heartburn, which can create possible mouth alcohol conditions
- DUI defense of rising blood alcohol, whether you had a DUI breath or blood test
- Potential for erroneous DUI blood tests results, based on storage and collection of your DUI blood test
- Any violation of California’s Title 17 regulations
- Lack of probable cause—reasonable suspicion or reasonable belief of DUI—for a DUI stop
- Arresting officer did not read Miranda Rights before conducting a custodial interrogation after the arrest
Also, sometimes the ability of your attorney to negotiate with the prosecution can get you a plea bargain, which can help reduce the legal punishment for which you are convicted.
DUI Causing Injury and Related Offenses
Some other related offenses where the prosecution may charge you with a felony DUI would include Gross Vehicular Manslaughter While Intoxicated under Penal Code section 191.5(a) or Vehicular Manslaughter While Intoxicated under Penal Code section 191.5(b) of the California law if all the victims of the accident died as a result of it. Both 191.5 (a) and (b) subdivisions are more serious crimes than a DUI Causing Injury conviction and may result in stiffer penalties and punishments.
If you have a prior DUI conviction and committed a fatal accident that killed someone while driving under the influence, the prosecution may charge you a California Penal Code 187, second-degree murder—also popularly known as “Watson Murder.” You may also be charged with California Vehicle Code 20001 Felony Hit and Run involving injury, if you are involved in an accident but fail to stop and provide your information, and administer any required assistance to a person who sustained serious injuries and required immediate medical attention. If you had a child as a passenger in your vehicle while driving under the influence and causing a DUI with injury, you could be charged with Child Endangerment law under Penal Code 273a. PC by the prosecution, which can land you up in the state prison for up to six (6) years.
Find a Van Nuys DUI Attorney
If you or a loved one has recently been charged with DUI Causing Injury in Los Angeles and you are looking to hire an attorney for representation, you should seek advice from an experienced and reputable criminal defense law firm like Van Nuys Criminal Attorney. We are a team of skilled and experienced attorneys who specialize in providing the best possible defense for the DUI Causing Injury charges under the California criminal law. With in-depth knowledge and a result-oriented approach, our attorneys can navigate through the intricacies of the legislative process and successfully argue in your defense. We work closely with our clients to give them personalized attention. To learn more about how we can help you with your DUI criminal charge, contact us 24/7 at 818-484-1100 and speak to one of our legal experts regarding your DUI Causing Injury case.
DUI with drugs is driving while your brain, nervous system or muscles are significantly impaired by drugs, to an extent that you are unable to drive with the same caution as a sober person. The drugs can either be legal, illegal, prescription or over-the-counter medications. DUI with drugs has increasingly become a safety concern across California and prosecutors are pushing for more arrests and convictions. If you are arrested for DUI with Drugs in or around Van Nuys and Los Angeles, CA, you may need the expert services of Leah Legal. We will represent and help you avoid potential jail time, hefty fines and other possible consequences.
DUI With Drugs Under California Laws
California law defines a drug as any substance or mixture of substances except alcohol, which can affect your muscles, brain, or the nervous system, and noticeably impair your ability to drive like a reasonably cautious person would do under similar conditions. Such substances include illegal drugs like methamphetamine, heroin and cocaine, legal drugs like marijuana, over-the-counter drugs such as cold medicines and antihistamines, and prescription medications even when they do not intoxicate you. Any medication affecting your muscles, brain or nervous system can lead to charges of DUI with drugs, even when it is necessary for your health.
The California Vehicle Code 23152(f) prohibits you from operating an automobile while under the influence of drugs. It is also illegal for you to drive while under the influence of both drugs and alcohol under Vehicle Code 23152(g). Experts are yet to come to a consensus on the exact level of drug concentration in the bloodstream that would make you too compromised to drive. Therefore, California has no legal limit for drugs and any amount present in your blood can result in charges of DUI with drugs. Whether the drug was legally prescribed or not is irrelevant. If it impaired your driving abilities, you may be prosecuted for DUI with drugs.
Although drug possession is an infraction under California laws, you may be arrested for DUI with drugs if a law enforcement officer suspects you of driving after using the drugs. You, however, cannot be prosecuted for being under the influence based only on a positive drug test except if you are on probation. There must be evidence that the drug impaired your ability to drive. Such evidence includes your driving demeanor and conduct as observed by the arresting officer. Additionally, a testimony by a Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) that preliminary tests indicated the presence of drugs can be corroborated by a positive urine or blood test. A DRE is a specially trained law enforcement officer who identifies any individual who has ingested narcotics.
The Arrest Process
A DUI with drugs investigation often starts at a traffic stop if you appear impaired. The officer will question you about your drug use and look for physical symptoms of drug use. He will also check for any visible drugs in the vehicle. The officer might request for a DRE (Drug Recognition Expert) if available, to assess you at the scene. The DRE will interview both you and the arresting officer and conduct physical tests and thereafter, urine or blood tests. Physical tests include checking your eye movement, pupil size, muscle tone, pulse rate, track marks and traces of narcotics in the nostrils and mouth.
The DRE will determine whether you have taken any drug and if positive, the type of drug it might be. During the investigation, you are legally permitted to exercise your right against self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment. You do not have to answer any questions from the DRE. There are no consequences if you refuse to submit to a chemical test before you are arrested.
If an officer finds probable cause for your arrest, you may be apprehended. The officer will read you your Miranda rights once you are in custody, and if they want incriminating answers to their questions. However, they do not necessarily have to read a Miranda warning if seeking the same answers before your arrest. You will be required to take a blood test if the officer reasonably believes that you were driving under the influence of drugs or marijuana.
Under California’s “implied consent” law, if you are lawfully arrested, you must submit to a urine or blood test when requested by a law enforcement officer. If you refuse the test, you may face enhanced penalties upon your conviction of DUI with drugs. Additionally, if you are unconscious or you were arrested for causing an accident, the arresting officer may obtain a warrant for an involuntary blood draw.
The blood sample is sent for a blood toxicology screen which lists any drugs detected in your system. The screen indicates whether you tested negative or positive for drugs but does not indicate the amounts detected. If you test positive for one or more drugs, quantitative analysis of your blood sample specifies the amount of each substance in your blood.
Although results of blood tests are not conclusive, the prosecutor can use them to prove the presence of drugs in your system, amounts present and sometimes, a timespan within which you may have consumed the drug. Since these do not prove impairment, the prosecutor will rely on testimonies of expert witnesses, and observations of the arresting officer and of the DRE. You may still face DUI with drugs charges if you were impaired after legally using prescription drugs or marijuana.
What to Expect at Your Trial
First, the arresting officer testifies about why he or she perceived that you were impaired. The reasons given may include your unsafe manner of driving and your physical signs of intoxication. Often, the arresting officer will testify that you were not driving with alertness typical of a sober person. The officer will also testify that you exhibited signs of inebriation such as an unsteady gait, slurred speech, a flushed face, and red, watery eyes. If you took a breathalyzer test that produced negative results, the officer will testify that he or she suspected that your symptoms of impairment were from drugs. This piece of testimony will be valuable for the prosecutor if you claim a lack of probable cause for your DUI with drugs arrest.
Second, the DRE will testify and this testimony will be the most valuable evidence in your DUI with drugs case. Training of DREs includes techniques to effectively testify in court. The district attorneys’ office also works with DREs to make their testimony persuasive. Therefore, DREs usually appear very polished and professional.
The DRE will testify about his or her extensive training and qualifications and their three main responsibilities. These responsibilities are; confirming that your impairment was not a result of alcohol only, confirming that you were under drugs and not a medical condition, and concluding that you had taken a specific category of narcotics. To prove impairment, the DRE will testify about the evaluation process and focus on evidence that supports the conclusion about the type of drugs that impaired you.
Third, the prosecution will introduce your blood test results. The results include a toxicology screen to prove the presence of drugs and a quantitative analysis report that shows the amounts of drugs detected. An expert witness will testify about studies indicating that impairment can be caused by the level of drugs in your system.
What the Prosecutor Must Prove
To sustain charges of DUI with drugs against you, the prosecutor must prove that you were driving, you drove while under the influence of a drug and that you were impaired while driving. Often, your case will depend on observations of the arresting officer that imply impairment. However, indications of drug-related impairment can result from other factors like fatigue or medical conditions.
Even if your blood sample tests positive for a controlled substance, that does not prove that you were impaired. Drugs metabolize differently in different people. Even if you were driving with a drug in your system, the prosecutor must provide evidence of impairment like erratic driving.
Penalties for DUI With Drugs
Under California Vehicle Code 23152(f) DUI with drugs is a misdemeanor. It becomes a felony if it is your fourth or subsequent DUI, or if you have a previous conviction for even a single felony DUI. DUI with drugs is also charged as a felony if you killed or seriously injured a third party or if it is your third or subsequent DUI with injury. Generally, the consequences of DUI with drugs depend on the number of your previous convictions. For purposes of determining punishments, any form of a previous DUI is considered a prior.
For a first-time DUI with drugs with no injuries to a third party, penalties include a jail term of not more than six months, a fine of between $390 and $1000, and a DMV license suspension for not less than six months. However, you may receive informal DUI probation for between three and five years or DUI School for a minimum of three months in lieu of jail time.
For a second DUI with drugs conviction within 10 years, you will receive a jail term of between 90 days to one year, a minimum fine of $390, suspension of your driver’s license for two years and complete a DUI program. Under Vehicle Code 23542, you may be eligible for probation but only after serving a mandatory 96 hours in jail.
A third DUI with drugs offense within a 10-year period carries a penalty of 120 days to one year in jail, $390 minimum fine, your driver’s license is suspended for three years, completion of a minimum 30 months of DUI program and a three-year designation of a habitual traffic offender after your conviction. You must serve at least 30 days in jail before you qualify for probation.
Your fourth or subsequent DUI with drugs crime within 10 years is a charged as a felony. The penalties include 16 months to four years in jail, or jail time for between 180 days to one year and a fine of between $1000 and $5000. Additionally, you may be designated as a habitual traffic offender for three years following your conviction and your driver’s license suspended for four years.
If you have any prior felony DUI convictions in the previous 10 years, you may go to jail for one year and pay a $390 minimum fine. Your driver’s license may be revoked for four years and you may receive a three-year habitual traffic offender label following your conviction. If your DUI with drugs injured a third party, you may receive stiffer penalties.
Other than jail time, license suspension and fines, there are other consequences of DUI with drugs convictions.
Since DUI with drugs is a crime, you will have a criminal record that appears on background checks for housing or employment. If a job involves driving, a potential employer may be unwilling to hire you. If you hold a commercial driver’s license, you will lose it temporarily after a conviction which may interfere with your income.
A DUI with drugs conviction on your record may lead to higher insurance premiums for your car. Your insurance carrier will decide whether to raise the premium and by how much based on their internal formulas. In case of a license suspension, you must purchase an SR22 certificate before your license is reinstated. An SR22 certificate is evidence of your minimum liability coverage. To get the SR22, you may have to purchase high-risk insurance which increases your premiums.
Common Defenses Against DUI With Drugs Charges
You can use several defenses to fight your charges of DUI with drugs. Some of the defenses relate to the arrest procedures as required by law. You may argue that there lacked a probable cause for the arresting officer to make a traffic stop or initiate an investigation for DUI with drugs. Additionally, you must be advised of your rights after your arrest, the police must follow Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations, and provide procedural evidence of drawing, storing and analyzing your urine or blood samples. If any of these procedures were not followed, you can use that loophole in your defense.
There is no scientific evidence showing a correlation between impairment and the amount of drugs in your system. Therefore, the presence of drugs does not necessarily mean you are under the influence. Moreover, drugs affect different people in different ways and with time, drug users develop tolerance to substances they use regularly.
The drug detection window is the amount of time that a drug is detectable in your blood or urine after you use it. Often, this window is longer than the period of time when you are high. The drug detection window often varies based on your weight, height, metabolism, tolerance, history of use and the method of ingestion. These factors also affect how long you remain under the influence and how long the drug remains in your system. Many drugs can remain in your system for days or weeks without any effect.
There are innocent explanations for signs similar to those of drug impairment. They may result from physical and medical conditions such as injury, anxiety, sickness, fatigue, allergies and diabetic ketoacidosis. Even recognizable signs of drug impairment can have innocent explanations. For example, poor balance can be caused by inner ear disorders or uncomfortable footwear; involuntary eye jerking (horizontal gaze nystagmus) occurs naturally to some people; and pupil size may be caused by light, darkness or excitement.
Even when your blood or urine samples test positive for drugs, they are not always accurate. Invalidity may be due to improper handling and storage of samples, improperly drawn blood or contaminated medical equipment. Under California DUI laws, law enforcers must preserve a portion of your blood sample for up to a year for retesting. Your defense team will request for the sample for independent retesting. The results can be used if they are helpful but if they are not, they are disregarded.
Crimes Related to DUI With Drugs
There are several crimes under California laws that are closely related to DUI with drugs.
California’s Vehicle Code 23152(c) is the state’s law on “driving while addicted”, which makes driving while you are dependent on any drug illegal. This crime is a form of DUI and the penalties are the same as those of DUI with drugs. The only exception is if you are on treatment in an approved program but you are still prohibited from driving while “high”.
Vehicle Code 23152(c) requires the prosecutor to prove that you were addicted to drugs and not a habitual or casual user. Often, prosecutors will charge you with driving while addicted when their case of DUI with drugs is weak, but your urine or blood samples tested positive for drugs.
Under Health and Safety Code 11550, you may face a misdemeanor charge for drug use if your urine or blood sample tests positive for illegal substances. To be convicted of using drugs, the prosecutor only needs to prove the presence of drugs in your system. If drugs are found in your vehicle, you may be charged for possession under California’s Health & Safety Code 11350. If you are in possession of drug paraphernalia you may be charged under Health and Safety Code 11364.
Contact a DUI Attorney Near Me
If you are arrested for DUI with drugs, it would be wise to contact an experienced attorney who has what it takes to defend you. The wrongful conviction of an innocent person is an injustice, therefore, Van Nuys Criminal Attorney will represent you and will fight hard to obtain the best possible result for you. If you are in Van Nuys and the greater Los Angeles area, contact our Los Angeles Criminal Lawyer at 818-484-1100 and let us handle your case.
If you commit a DUI offense with a minor in your car, then you will most likely face a sentence enhancement. The state will not only charge you for driving under the influence but also for endangering the life of a child. Committing a DUI offense with a passenger under 14 onboard will cost you an enhanced jail sentence. Whether you are a first time offender or you have committed a prior DUI offense; you will require the expertise of a competent attorney to represent you. For first time offenders, the court processes may be overwhelming while for prior offenders, their stakes of facing conviction may be high.
At Leah Legal in Los Angeles, our lead attorney Leah and her team of competent attorneys have the experience and skills necessary for DUI cases and will offer you the best legal representation possible. Here is all you need to know concerning DUI with a passenger under 14:
Overview of DUI with Passenger Under 14
DUI stands for Driving Under the Influence. It refers to the crime of operating a vehicle with a BAC Limit that exceeds the one set by a state. BAC limit refers to the amount of alcohol present in a driver’s car while operating a vehicle.
DUI with a passenger under 14 refers to a DUI sentence enhancement that drivers face when they commit a DUI offense with a child on board. The law states that drivers will face additional sentences and penalties if, during the time of a DUI arrest, there was a child below the age of 14 in the car. This DUI charge discourages drivers against endangering the life of minors.
The charge for DUI with Passenger under 14 falls under the vehicle code 23572 of California law. The law provides for severe penalties for offenders who operate vehicles while intoxicated and in the company of children under the age of 14 years. This means that the driver faces charges for driving under the influence and for endangering the life of a child.
You may also face charges under the PC 273a laws that are not DUI related. The law convicts people who endanger the lives of children in California. However, It is vital to note that you cannot face the above two charges simultaneously. You can only face standard DUI charges and a violation of one of the two laws.
The penalties for the violation of DUI with a passenger under 14 are more enhanced, and the court processes are somewhat overwhelming. The penalties will be more severe, depending on the circumstances surrounding your case.
Similarly, the sentence will be more enhanced if you have committed a DUI offense before. Hence, it is essential to hire an excellent attorney to represent you in court. This ensures that your penalties are reduced and that you do not face a sentence enhancement.
Understanding the DUI with Passenger Under 14 Offense
The DUI with a passenger Under 14 in California is a sentence enhancement set forth that consists of additional jail time on top of standard DUI penalties. This, therefore, means that you will face another additional sentence if, during a DUI arrest, you had a child under the age of 14 in your car. The offense falls under the Vc 23572. The jail time for each person varies depending on the circumstances that surround your case.
The Arrest
When a police officer notes that your driving pattern is wanting, he/she will request you to pull over your car for a BAC test.
The test will typically be a breath or blood test. Breathe tests measure the amount of alcohol present in the air when you breathe while blood tests measure the amount of alcohol present in your blood. While the legal systems prefer blood tests because of their credibility, they are more invasive and take a longer time to process. Most tests on the ground are done via breathing because blood tests have to be done in custody or a hospital.
Once the police officer determines your BAC limit, he /she will take your license away and charge you with either driving under the influence charge or driving with a BAC of 0.08% and above depending on your limit. If during the time of arrest, you have a passenger under the age of 14, then you will also face an additional sentence enhancement for violating the VC 23572.
Court Process
After determining your BAC limit and concluding that you have committed a DUI offense, the police officer will then forward your case to the court. Forwarding to the court is meant to help the prosecution team determine that you are guilty of the charges that they are accusing you of.
The court processes for DUI cases can be very lengthy and overwhelming. It, therefore, requires the expertise of excellent lawyers to maneuver around. The attorney should be able to defend you in the best possible ways, including seeking sentence reduction for the charges and a plea bargain.
DMV Hearing
In addition, the police officer will send your driver’s license to the Department of Motor Vehicles following your DUI arrest. The Department of Motor Vehicles is the body responsible for regulating drivers and licenses in California. You will be issued with a temporary driving license to give you enough time to apply for a DMV hearing. The hearing allows you to appeal for reinstatement of your license.
The DMV conducts the hearing via phone for minor cases and in-person for situations that are aggravated. While the outcome of the hearing does not have any impact on the actual court case, winning it could prove beneficial for you. Our lawyers may use the outcome of your hearing to influence the jury positively.
DUI Penalties
The penalties for DUI with a passenger under 14 vary depending on the category of DUI offense one commits. This is because DUI with a passenger under 14 is not a specific charge on its own but is an enhancement of your current charge. You will, therefore, face additional charges to your DUI charge.
You can only face charges of a DUI with a passenger under 14 if the state has charged you with either driving under the influence or driving with a BAC above 0.08%. The penalties for a standard DUI charge include but are not limited to:
First Offense DUI
The penalties for committing a DUI for a First-time offender are:
- Payment of a fine of up to 1000 dollars
- Your driver’s license may be suspended for between four to ten months
- A jail sentence of up to six months in a county jail
- You may face a probation period of up to five years as an alternative to your six-month sentence
Second Offense
The penalties for a person who has committed a prior DUI offense include:
- Suspension of Driving license for up to two years
- Payment of 1000 dollars as fine
- Jail sentence of up to one year in a county jail
- Mandatory attendance of a DUI school for up to eighteen months
Third Offense
The penalties for this offense are:
- Suspension of driver’s license for up to three years
- Mandatory enrollment in a DUI program
- Fines of up to 1000 dollars
- Jail sentence of up to one year
- Mandatory installation of an IID
Since a DUI with a passenger under 14 is only a sentence enhancement, a driver will face the above penalties for committing the DUI charge. This means that the driver will face an additional sentence for the DUI with a passenger under 14. The additional sentence will vary depending on the DUI offense one is facing. The sentence enhancement for DUI with a passenger under 14 are:
- First offense- an additional 48 hours sentence on top of your DUI charge sentence
- Second offense- an additional ten days sentence on top of your DUI sentence
- Third offense- an additional 30 days sentence enhancement
If the offender is facing a fourth of additional DUI offense, the jail sentence issued by the court will be enhanced by ninety days.
Additionally, it is essential for a DUI with a passenger under 14 offenders to remember that these sentence enhancements are mandatory. This means that if the court finds you guilty of committing the offense, you will have to face a jail sentence. The only way of avoiding the sentence is having your DUI with a passenger under 14 offense dropped. To get this outcome, you will need to hire an excellent DUI attorney to represent you. The attorney will seek to have the charges reduced to child endangerment.
Related Charges
As mentioned above, a DUI with a passenger under 14 is not an independent charge. This means that the offense has to be coupled with another DUI charge. The charges related to DUI with a passenger under 14 include:
Driving Under the Influence
The code for this law is the VC 23152, commonly known as the standard adult DUI charge. This code prohibits drivers against operating vehicles with a BAC limit that exceeds the accepted legal limit in California.
Similarly, you face this DUI charge when you operate a vehicle with a BAC limit that is above 0.08%. If you violate this code with a passenger under 14 in the car, then you will face the violation of VC 23572 and in worse circumstances, the violation of the Penal Code 273(a) child endangerment.
Child Endangerment
The child endangerment law in California punishes people who willfully endanger the life of minors. It falls under the Penal code 273(a). While this law does not directly relate to DUI, the court could also charge you for violating it.
Under this code, it is considered a crime to possibly put the life of a child in danger. Although the law specifically talks about the protection of minors, i.e., those under 18 years and below, it sometimes applies to DUI with a passenger under 14. If the circumstances surrounding your DUI crime is severe, and you have a child in the car, then the jury will charge you with this offense.
Most people with a DUI with a passenger under 14 may face this charge because it does not necessarily require the injury of a child for the state to convict you of the crime. If your lawyer is unable to present a good argument to the jury on your behalf, then you may find yourself facing this charge along with a serious DUI charge. It is therefore essential to hire a good attorney to ensure that your DUI sentence is as light as possible.
Common DUI Defenses
To get you off the hook for a DUI with a passenger under 14, your attorney has to come up with an excellent defense strategy that works in your favor. Most experienced Attorneys have no problem doing this because they are well vast on DUI charges and know where to look for weaknesses. A good defense will not only save you from a DUI with a passenger under 14 but could also get you reduced or zero penalties for Driving under the influence charge. The common DUI defenses that lawyers use are:
- Your arrest was not lawful
- The tests may have been tampered with
- The officer failed to read you your rights during the arrest
- The equipment measuring BAC may have been faulty
- The sobriety tests did not reflect intoxication
- The time taken to process the tests were wrong
DUI Plea Bargains
The common DUI defenses are not always applicable to all cases. This is typical when there is no loophole that the attorney can use to defend you. It, therefore, means that the prosecution team did not make any mistakes and that the BAC tests were accurate.
When this happens, your attorney may choose to take the plea bargain that the prosecution offers you. He/ She may take the bargain in order to get you off the hook for a DUI with a passenger under 14. The plea bargain offered to you will in most cases eliminate the enhanced sentence for a DUI with a passenger under 14.
Accepting the plea bargain means that the offender will accept to plead guilty of driving under the influence charge. In return, the prosecution will offer you a set of reduced penalties that your lawyer has to agree with. Although most lawyers prefer to battle it out in court, the plea bargain does have its merits. They include:
- Your driver’s license will not be suspended
- The fines will be lower
- The jail time may be minimal or none at all
- The impact on your car insurance will be less negative
The following types of charge reductions may be offered to you during a bargain:
- Wet Reckless charge – this charge refers to a reckless driving conviction with a note in the records that indicates that alcohol or any other drug was involved in committing the offense. However, this reduced charge is still probable meaning that if you commit another DUI offense, the court will convict you as a repeat offender.
- Dry reckless charge- This charge typically comes from a plea bargain. Unlike with the wet reckless charge, with this charge, your records won’t indicate alcohol or drugs. This charge will hence not count as a DUI, but the state considers it a misdemeanor crime.
- Traffic Infractions- the prosecution team, usually offers this bargain when they feel that the DUI charge will not stick. The infraction is not a criminal offense and will, therefore, not land you in jail. However, to receive such a bargain, your DUI charge should not be severe. This is because it is difficult to reduce a severe charge to a mere infraction. A traffic infraction is not a crime; it will only cost you a small fine.
The ability of your attorney to negotiate with the prosecution goes a long way in eliminating your DUI with a passenger under 14 sentence enhancement. You should have a team of excellent attorneys who are familiar with DUI defenses and child endangerment laws to represent you. This will ensure your rights are protected and possibly get a lighter sentence.
Find a Van Nuys DUI Attorney Near Me
It is always important to keep in mind that a good defense strategy is vital for any criminal case. This means that you should have the right legal representation team for your DUI case. A good lawyer will ensure that the prosecution team drops the DUI with a passenger under 14 charges or at least have your sentence reduced. Consequently, you could only face charges for child endangerment.
For many years, attorney Leah has been representing clients facing DUI charges and other criminal offenses. With the team of dedicated attorneys at Leah Legal, you can be sure to get the best possible legal representation from us. We believe that every defendant has a right to a criminal process, and we are ready to defend your rights. Please get in touch with us today at 818-484-1100, so we can help you.
A DUI charge is a severe offense in California for civilians. The consequences of the violation are more critical for service members with the impact affecting both civilian and military worlds. This means when a service member is charged with a DUI in a regular court, it will have an impact on their record when on base. Even as a service member, DUI charges result in prosecution in the ordinary courts. Getting a DUI attorney to represent you gives you a fighting chance against the allegations. At Leah Legal in Van Nuys, we are experienced and dedicated to providing you a defense that is favorable for the charges you are facing.
Military DUI Overview and Jurisdiction
As earlier indicated, military personnel arrested for a DUI can be charged with the offense in the regular courts as well as face disciplinary action from the military court. When a member of the military faces DUI charges while on a military installation, he or she is subjected to court-martial proceedings or Article 15. A DUI charge off the base would have severe repercussions on the base for the service member, as well.
When the local law enforcement officers charge you with intoxicated driving, your base commanding officer can also penalize you for misbehaving. In such cases, you may be given extra duties or asked to attend an alcohol program for abuse treatment.
When it comes to DUI offenses, the military courts don’t have sole jurisdiction. This is because, based on where the offense happened, civilian courts equally have jurisdiction. In some cases, both the civilian and military authorities can file DUI charges against an individual. When this happens, both entities work together and decide on how the prosecution of the service member will be carried out.
It is important to note that a DUI offense can lead to both civilian and military charges. However, if the charges against you in the civil courts are dropped or you are acquitted of them, it doesn’t affect the military court decision. The military court, if they see fit, can still penalize the defendant on the same offense, and sometimes the punishment may include a court-martial.
Generally, the military has jurisdiction over its service members that are on active duty and the crimes they may commit regardless of their location. On the other hand, civilian court jurisdiction is determined by where the incident happened and the circumstances of the offense. If the violation occurred at a military base or a federal military installation, the civil court has no jurisdiction.
A DUI Arrest on Base
If you are arrested on a DUI offense while on a military base, your charges will be brought in the military court. The penalties for this offense are found under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Sec 911 – Art 111. In addition, the defendant will also be subjected to adverse administrative action as well as a court-martial.
The statute prohibits the reckless operation of an aircraft, vehicle, or vessel when drunk. The law indicates as follows:
- An individual that controls or operates an aircraft, vessel or vehicle recklessly or in a manner described as wanton while intoxicated or
- Physically controls or operates a vessel, car, or plane when drunk or with a blood alcohol concentration that is beyond the legal limit will face penalties as directed by the court-martial
This means the person will not face DUI charges as a civilian. However, the defendant can still get their driver’s license suspended by the state, be ordered to install an ignition interlock device in their vehicle, as well as other penalties that will affect your privileges for driving.
A DUI Arrest Off Base
If you are arrested for drunk driving off base even when a member of the service, the law enforcement agencies, as well as the state, will prosecute you in a civilian court. Despite the criminal charges you will face, and the penalties that result, your commanding officer at his/her discretion can take administrative action against you. He/she may order you to seek treatment for substance abuse, revoke your pass privileges, as well as corrective training.
Additionally, the military may bring other charges against you following the incident, such as charging you with disorderly conduct. They can also institute further DUI charges against you after your civil trial comes to an end.
What Happens to a Civilian Arrested of a DUI offense on Base?
When you are arrested for drunk driving while at a military base as a civilian, you will not be charged in a civilian court, but in a federal court. However, the federal court, in most cases, uses the DUI laws of the state of California to punish you. The civilians that find themselves in such circumstances are friends or family members to service personnel or civilian employees with access to a military installation.
Consequences of a Military DUI Conviction
A conviction for a DUI offense in California results in severe penalties. The penalties are even steeper for military personnel charged with the same crime. There is a likelihood that the career of the service member may come to an end or face a severe impact. When military personnel is convicted of the offense, they are likely to face some of the following consequences. This is despite the penalties imposed on them by the court. These are:
- A probability of getting a dishonorable military discharge
- Getting your rank reduced
- Facing a pay cut
- Being charged with cash fines
- Losing security clearance privileges
- Facing imprisonment
For a member of the military, a standard DUI conviction can destroy all the work they have put into advancing their career, and sometimes can end it altogether. A dishonorable discharge is not taken lightly either, and many members are careful not to get discharged. This situation makes it critical for a service member charged with a DUI offense to hire an experienced DUI attorney to not only fight the allegations but to protect their career and reputation.
A military member guilty of a DUI while on the base will get punished by their commanding officer. The commanding officer has the mandate to decide how the case will proceed. The defendant may be subjected to non-judicial penalties as found under Article 15 or to a court-martial. The commanding officer may also decide to punish the defendant by imposing administrative penalties against them.
The administrative penalties are categorized in punitive and administrative action.
Punitive Action
Some of the penalties under punitive action may include:
- A member facing court-martial that may sentence the offender to a reduction of their grade, forfeiture of their pay, imprisonment, or dismissal from service
- A non-judicial penalty, as found under UCMJ Article 15, commonly known as Office hours or Captain’s Mast
Court Martial
Court-martial is what is known as a military court. It carries out trials for military personnel, just like the civil courts do for civilians. The court is constituted to determine what happens to military members that commit crimes or disobey the martial law. When a member is convicted of an offense martial court, it decides on the best punishment against the offender based on the offense.
A DUI offense is a serious crime when you are a member of the military, and the martial court is believed to issue steeper penalties for members found guilty of the offense. The law, according to article 111, clearly states that military personnel found operating vehicles recklessly due to drunkenness will be severely punished according to the directive of the martial court.
Three main kinds of court-martials can be used in a DUI case. These are:
- Summary Court-Martial – These are used to try members who have committed minor crimes. In this court, there are no lawyers or a magistrate, but the proceedings are presided over by a commissioned officer. When a member is convicted of a DUI offense in this court, their penalty may include being placed in confinement for thirty days. Additionally, they may receive a reduction in your pay or a reduction in your rank. A member can also be sentenced to forty days of hard labor.
- Special Courts-Martial – This court deals with more severe crimes and runs just like a regular criminal court. In this court, a defendant is allowed to have a defense attorney to defend them. If you are found guilty of a DUI offense in this court, the penalties are more severe. The sentence may include up to a year of confinement, withholding your salary for six months, possible dismissal from the service, or three months of hard labor.
- General Court Martial – This is the court that handles the most severe cases in the military. A DUI conviction under this court means, you are likely to face the maximum penalty as stipulated by the UCMJ. One of the most severe penalties may be being dishonorably discharged from the military.
Non-Judicial Penalty Under Article 15
The military has specific laws that govern and guide its operations and are found under the Uniform Code of Military Justice – UCMJ. If a service member violates any military rules, and the offense is deemed severe, he or she may require to have legal proceedings. This may lead to the member asking for a court-martial. The jury, in this case, is comprised of military and warrant officers. Based on the rank of the member on trial, other enlisted members may also be included in the jury.
If a member is charged with a minor DUI offense, he/she may not require to go through a judicial hearing. In such a case, Article 15 of the UCMJ allows the commanding officer for the defendant to decide on the member’s verdict. The commanding officer is also mandated with issuing penalties to the member based on the magnitude of their offense.
Military Administrative Action
Administrative action against a military officer found guilty of a DUI offense is very severe. Some of the penalties a member may face include having their pass revoked, being reprimanded, having their driving privileges revoked, corrective training, and a possible reduction of their grade based on their rank.
In some cases, the member’s commanding officer may order the offender to treatment for alcohol abuse. If a member has prior DUI related offenses, the penalties are steeper and different from a first time offender.
The penalties for drunk driving on a military officer are dependent on the circumstances of the offense. If a military offender is accused of reckless driving that does not result in severe consequences, the penalties may not be critical. However, if one is charged with a DUI that resulted in significant injuries or death, the penalties are more severe.
To determine the severity of the offense, the circumstances under which the incident occurred are taken into consideration. This is important in deciding what martial court will try the offender and punish them.
It is also important to note that a military offender is permitted to demand a court-martial trial as opposed to being subjected to non-judicial punishment. However, before issuing non-judicial sentencing, the investigation outcome must be analyzed to establish the fairness of the penalty the accused face.
Possible Legal Defenses for Military DUI
A military member, as earlier discussed, can find themselves being tried for a DUI offense in a civil court or a court-martial. Regardless of where one is facing the charges from, having an experienced DUI lawyer is essential to get appropriate defense. Your lawyer, in this case, can use various strategies in your defense. Some of these strategies may include:
Wrong Sobriety Test Results
Saying that the defendant was driving a vehicle while intoxicated by alcohol is not enough to get a conviction. Various tests must be carried out on the defendant and their results presented to the court as proof of their drunk driving. Your lawyer can challenge the accuracy of the results based on various issues.
The validity of the test results can be challenged based on the reliability of the gadgets used to administer the sobriety tests. Sometimes, the devices can be faulty and give unsatisfactory results. Other times, the procedure used to do the blood chemical tests may not have been followed correctly. If your lawyer can establish this, the test results may be inadmissible in court. Blood alcohol concentration results are significant in a DUI charge for the prosecution to get a conviction. If the court rules against the use of the results as evidence, the prosecution may find it challenging to get a conviction on a DUI offense.
There was No Probable Reason for the Arrest
Before a person is arrested for a DUI, there must be probable cause that caused the officer to stop you. If the officer had no reason to arrest you, but he or she did and carried out a chemical test on you, the results from the sobriety tests are not acceptable as evidence against you. When a defendant does not behave in a way to indicate to drunk driving, the police violated his or her rights in arresting them.
Even in a court-martial, the rights of a defendant are just as vital as the case is. If the rights of the defendant are violated during the proceedings, your DUI lawyer can challenge this and try to get the case dismissed.
Bad Driving is not the same as a DUI
A California DUI lawyer can argue that the defendant was driving poorly or erratically, but they were not intoxicated. Most prosecutors begin by focusing on the pattern of driving by the defendant. The arresting officer, when testifying, often will say the defendant was driving in a particular manner that suggested they were drunk. The officer may indicate that the defendant was driving at high speed or moving in and out of lanes.
Your lawyer will argue that sober drivers cause most accidents and that a driving pattern is not an indicator of drugged or drunk driving.
Physical Symptoms are not an Indicator of DUI
A lot of times, prosecutors use the physical signs of intoxication as an indicator that a defendant was driving under the influence. The physical appearance of a defendant is crucial in carrying out DUI investigations. The arresting officer can testify that the defendant:
- Spoke in a slurred manner
- Had watery red eyes
- The defendant’s face was flushed
- The smell of alcohol in the defendant’s mouth was strong
- The defendant walked in an unsteady gait
However, your skilled attorney can argue against these and indicate that some of these signs were because of the defendant:
- Has allergic reactions
- Was suffering from a cold
- The defendant was fatigued
- The defendant’s eyes were irritated.
All of the above are causes for having red and watery eyes and are not sufficient to indicate the defendant was drunk.
Field Sobriety Tests are not Accurate in Measuring Impairment
When arrested for a DUI, the arresting officer may ask you to submit to various sobriety tests. The prosecution may then use these findings as evidence against you. However, your lawyer can easily challenge the results presented by the arresting officer. Both the prosecutors and the arresting officers will insist that the defendant’s performance on the tests was poor.
However, balance can be affected by various things making it unreliable in indicating alcohol impairment in a person. Your lawyer can argue that:
- You naturally have challenges in physical coordination
- The defendant was nervous facing the officer
- The defendant was exhausted
- The defendant’s clothing made it difficult for them to maintain balance
- The defendant has natural flat feet that make it hard to stay balanced
Your lawyer can also argue that the administering officer was not well trained and did not communicate clearly to the defendant. The area where the test was being carried out was boisterous, making it difficult for the defendant to understand the instructions given by the officer. The ground where the test was being carried out must be conducive for the test. If the ground was not even, the defendant could not balance.
Mouth Alcohol Often Leads to Wrong BAC Results
Many times breath BAC results are false. This defense has been used often in DUI cases with great success. Before administering a breath test in California, the officer is expected to observe the suspect for about fifteen minutes continuously. This is necessary to avoid the defendant from putting things with any amount of alcohol in their mouths.
Some things that people use mindlessly include mouthwashes or sprays, medication, or other drinks. The observation is also necessary to ensure the defendant does not regurgitate or burp or belch. Any of these, when done, will transfer alcohol from your stomach to your mouth. This is known as residual mouth alcohol.
A breath test involves the defendant breathing deeply into the gadget. If your mouth already has residual alcohol, the results can show very high levels of alcohol. This is not an accurate indication of the amount of alcohol in your system, yet charges can be brought against you on these results.
Inflated BAC due to Medical Conditions or Diet
Certain medical conditions can cause the BAC to be inflated. A defendant who has diabetes or on a high protein diet can exhibit false BAC results. Some people go on a prolonged fast or are on a high protein diet. As the body is burning down fat, the liver produces ketones. These are substances similar to alcohol and are released through breath.
Unfortunately, the gadgets for testing alcohol in the breath can be tricked by ketones. Due to this, a defendant in this situation can test for high levels of alcohol when, indeed, they are not intoxicated.
Additionally, a person whose body is in ketosis will tend to have similar symptoms as those of a person high on alcohol. Such signs include:
- The person may act confused
- The person may lack coordination
- The person’s breath may smell like alcohol
If you have diabetes or are on a high protein diet, this can be an excellent defense in your case. This can result in the charges against you being dropped.
Finding a Los Angeles DUI Attorney Near Me
Typically, California has very severe penalties for drunk driving. The sentences are even steeper for individuals serving in the military. A career can be ended because of drunk driving allegations if not defended as well as they should be. If you are in the military and facing DUI charges in Van Nuys, you need to fight against the severe penalties as well as your reputation. Getting a skilled DUI attorney is a smart way to ensure a fair trial. At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we can defend you and ensure you are not penalized unfairly. Call us at 818-484-1100, and let us fight on your behalf.
A DUI offense is a serious crime in California for American citizens resulting in severe penalties. Similarly, a conviction of a DUI offense to a non-citizen bears similar consequences, but may not have severe consequences to their visa, especially if it is a first-time standard offense. However, some circumstances of the crime may make the offense a deportable one. In other cases, it may lead to a person being inadmissible to the country again. If you have multiple convictions or are charged with DUI with a minor, among others, a conviction may result in your deportation. Facing these charges can be devastating for a citizen, let alone a non-citizen. It is, therefore, essential to get a lawyer to help you fight against these allegations. At Leah Legal in Van Nuys, CA , we are experienced and can help you overcome these allegations.
An Overview of Immigration Law
U.S immigration laws are governed by the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). This Act outlines the various offenses that can result in deportation or inadmissibility to the U.S. or both. A crime that makes a person deportable means the person is evicted or removed from the U.S.
A crime that makes a person inadmissible means that the person cannot:
- Come back to the country once they leave
- Cannot naturalize to a citizen
- Seek to become a permanent resident
- Apply to get their status adjusted to legal from an illegal one
Under the law, various crimes exist that can lead to deportation. These crimes include:
- Aggravated felony crimes
- Crimes involving moral turpitude (CIMT)
- Crimes involving drugs or controlled substances
- Crimes of child neglect (DUI with a Minor)
Crimes of Moral Turpitude (CIMT)
The description of moral turpitude is not clear by the law. This causes it to be challenging in establishing whether a DUI offense can result in deportation. However, a CIMT crime is an offense that involves fraud, dishonesty, or actions that are dangerous to others and can cause injuries.
Aggravated Felonies
Various crimes have been categorized as aggravated by congress. Most of these are violent crimes against others, such as rape, murder, or kidnapping, among others.
However, there are other crimes not violent in nature but fall under this category. Some of these may include white-collar offenses or drug-related crimes. Currently, however, DUI offenses are not in this category of crimes.
Drug Offenses
The federal government has a list of substances that are described as controlled, illicit, or illegal. A guilty verdict for a drug offense found in that list is a deportable crime. Although drug crimes are defined differently by California, it makes it complicated when it comes to immigration law. Regardless, it is best to stay away from a DUID conviction because it may mean facing the possibility of deportation.
DUID with Previous Convictions
If one is arrested on a DUID offense, it may result in more investigations being carried out. Even when an individual does not get convicted of driving under the influence of drugs, an arrest can be problematic. The state of California prohibits any person from driving if they are on drugs that cause them intoxication or are addicted.
If, upon arrest, the police discover drug-related equipment in the car or the accused holds another DUID conviction, it can be assumed that he or she is a frequent drug user. This can cause severe difficulties for an immigrant.
If you are an immigrant and you get arrested for a DUID offense, you must get in touch with a DUI attorney that understands immigration laws as soon as you can.
Knowing Child Neglect – DUI with a Minor
A DUI charge with a minor sometimes gets prosecuted under PEN 273a child endangerment. Subsequently, when an immigrant is charged with and convicted of the offense, he/she may face proceedings for his/her deportation.
It is important to note that negligently putting a minor in danger will not lead to deportation, but knowingly placing a minor in a dangerous situation, is a basis for removal under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). This is also another complex aspect of the law that a defendant needs a DUI lawyer that understands immigration law.
Inadmissible Crimes
These are offenses that prevent an individual from entering back to America legally or becoming a citizen of the United States. These crimes also prevent a person from getting a green card. These offenses include:
- Crimes that involve moral turpitude and are committed in five years from the time a person entered the U.S
- Majority of drug crimes
- Two or more crimes that see a defendant spend five years in total in jail
- Crimes that show the defendant lacks good moral character
Sometimes one crime can fit in various categories. Due to this, it becomes difficult to determine what charge may result in the inadmissibility or deportation of a non-citizen.
Criminal lawyers everywhere must explain to their non-citizen clients the consequences to their immigration status when:
- They plead guilty or no-contest plea to an offense
- They are considering a suggested plea bargain
Immigration Laws and Standard DUI Charges
Most DUI convictions have no significant consequences for non-citizens. The most common DUI charges are prosecuted as misdemeanors and do not qualify as aggravated felony offenses or CIMT. Most courts hold that a simple DUI offense raises no grounds to have a person deported.
Some of the standard DUI offenses that don’t have consequences in immigration are:
- VEH 23152(a), driving under the influence of alcohol
- VEH 23152(b) arrested driving when your BAC is at 0.08% or more
- VEH 23153, a DUI offense resulting in injuries
However, despite these charges being normal, some circumstances may cause them to trigger consequences with immigration law. These circumstances are:
- If the accused had a previous conviction of a similar offense or another criminal conviction
- The defendant has been sentenced for a total of five years for the various convictions
- Moral Turpitude DUI Crimes
The Immigration and Nationality Act vaguely defines crimes of moral turpitude. Fortunately, a simple DUI offense does not qualify as a crime involving moral turpitude. However, courts in California have depended on the definition of crimes involving moral turpitude, as described by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). Crimes involving moral turpitude (CIMT), according to the explanation offered by the BIA are crimes that shock the conscience of the public. Behavior that is :
- Depraved or vile and
- Unacceptable of individuals living within a community or society
The Element of Intent in CIMT Crimes
During the process of establishing whether an offense can be classified as a CIMT, the court will analyze the statute that defines the crime. A CIMT offense needs a defendant to hold a specific intention of committing the offense. Simple criminal negligent behavior is not sufficient to classify an offense as a CIMT.
Due to this, a standard conviction of drunk driving is not considered an offense of turpitude. In California, for a person to be convicted of a DUI, there is no requirement to show the mental state of the defendant. The prosecutor needs only to prove two facts of the offense. These are:
- The defendant drove the vehicle
- Either drugs or alcohol highly intoxicated the defendant as they drove
This means the prosecution is not required to show the defendant had the intention of committing the offense or violating any laws.
- Moral Turpitude DUI Offense Causing Bodily Injury
Previously, a DUI offense that resulted in causing injuries to a third party was not categorized as an offense with moral turpitude. The law required a CIMT offense to have an intention. The crime needed to have been committed knowingly or willingly. This means that the accused wanted to see the results of their crime and was aware that their deeds would give the desired results.
However, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) later held that a crime involving criminal carelessness or recklessness was sufficient to qualify the offense as a CIMT. With this conclusion, it has been suggested that violations of PEN 191.5 gross vehicular manslaughter while under the influence qualifies as an offense of CIMT. This means if a person is convicted of this kind of a crime, they are inadmissible to the country. This is based on the reasoning that:
- A violation of PEN 191.5 needs the defendant to be grossly negligent and
- Gross negligence definition, according to the Supreme Court in California, is similar to that of recklessness that makes a crime a CIMT
- Moral Turpitude DUI Offense Resulting in Death
Typically, a DUI offense that results in death is not a moral turpitude crime. As earlier discussed, the defendant must have an intention for a violation to qualify as a CIMT. However, with recent happenings, this may change with regard to vehicular manslaughter when drugged or drunk.
- DUI Murder or Watson Murder
Watson murder or DUI murder is a DUI offense that is classified as a CIMT. A person is prosecuted on charges of Watson murder when he or she drives drugged or drunk and acts maliciously. This is known as acting with malicious aforethought. A person is believed to have acted maliciously when:
- The person purposely does an act for instance drives intoxicated intentionally
- The possible repercussions of the deed are risky to people
- As a defendant acts, they are aware of its danger
- The person acted deliberately consciously disregarding human life
The crime of murder is categorized as a CIMT and an aggravated offense or felony. This means that a non-citizen convicted of this crime is inadmissible and deportable.
Aggravated DUI Offenses
DUI offenses in California are not categorized as aggravated felonies. For a crime to qualify as an aggravated offense or felony, it must carry this definition in the Immigration and Nationality Act. However, the current aggravated felony list doesn’t have DUI offenses as one of them.
Additionally, the Supreme Court also does not consider DUI crimes as offenses of violence. In this case, the defendant must be convicted of vehicular manslaughter or Watson murder to call the crime aggravated. Generally, DUI crimes, even when they result in injuries or fatalities, are not crimes of violence.
However, in the future, this may change if Congress adds the offense of DUI, resulting in injuries or fatalities as an aggravated felony.
Consequences on Immigration when Charged with a DUID
As earlier stated, a simple DUI offense in California involving alcohol intoxication does not negatively impact the immigration status of a non-citizen. Unfortunately, a DUI involving drugs is as simple. The immigration laws of the U.S indicate that any person convicted of a drug-related crime is both inadmissible and deportable.
In California, a DUID offense involves the presence of controlled substances. When a conviction is given, the defendant is subjected to deportation.
However, the laws on drugs in the federal government and California define controlled substances differently. This means that a person convicted of a drug-related crime in California may not be deported successfully even when the said drug is listed as controlled. This does not mean that the state will not try to expel the defendant, but for him or her to stay in the state, he/she must challenge the deportation orders in court. Immigrants should plead no contest to crimes that carry insignificant immigration consequences.
DUI with a Minor
Driving intoxicated with a minor in the vehicle is a severe crime in California. It is equally serious for non-citizens. This kind of offense may lead to a child endangerment conviction, as found under PEN 273a.
Ideally, DUI convictions do not attract significant immigration consequences. An immigrant convicted of VEH 23572 of driving under the influence with a minor under 14 does not suffer immigration consequences. However, if the prosecutor decides to charge the immigrant with PEN 273a, Child Endangerment, as opposed to VEH 23572, this can have serious immigration consequences.
Child Endangerment as a CIMT crime
Child endangerment can become a CIMT crime as opposed to a DUI offense. One part of the law allows a person that places a minor in a dangerous situation knowingly to be punished. When a person intentionally endangers a child, these are grounds for deportation, according to INA.
On the other hand, PEN 273a punishes a person that puts a minor in circumstances where their health is endangered under negligent child endangerment. This is not a basis for deportation. Due to this, most immigration attorneys will contest that violations of PEN 273a must not be a basis for deportation. However, the judge has the discretion to make a ruling to deport or not to deport an immigrant guilty of the offense.
Repercussions of Multiple Convictions on DUI Offenses
A repeat offender is inadmissible in the U.S even when their convictions are of common DUI offenses. The total jail sentence the defendant has served dictates if the repeat offender can be deported or inadmissible. For an immigrant to be inadmissible, they:
- Have convictions of at least two crimes where at least one is a DUI offense and
- The cumulative jail sentence for the offenses equals five years or more
Felony DUI
An aggregate five-year sentence affects individuals convicted of DUI felonies in California, and have prior convictions of the same. DUI offenses are priorable offenses meaning for every subsequent offense; the penalty is more severe. In this case, a person facing a fourth DUI conviction within ten years will be convicted on felony charges, and the jail sentence can be three years. When this sentence is combined with previous jail sentences, it can get to five or more years. If an immigrant’s total jail time exceeds five years for any combination of crimes, he or she would be deported.
For instance, Martin is not a citizen of the U.S. However, over ten years, he has had four DUI convictions. In the first verdict, the sentencing was lenient, and he got probation and fine. The second conviction had an element of speeding that aggravated the offense. The judge hands him a six-month jail sentence. Later, he is faced with other charges of DUI, causing an injury. He is prosecuted on felony charges and gets two years in prison.
On his fourth conviction, automatically, the charges brought against him are felony charges, and the court is even harsher with him. Martin is convicted of the offense and sentenced to three years in prison. Cumulatively, his jail sentence comes to over five years.
The law indicates that a non-citizen needs only two convictions whose total jail time is five years or more to make him inadmissible. This means that Martin cannot get out of the country and get back as he would before; neither can he become a citizen of the U.S.
Consequences of DUI on Good Moral Character
An immigrant that wants changes in their status is required to demonstrate he or she is of good moral character. Some of the instances that require an immigrant to show they are of good morals are:
- When an immigrant wishes to become a citizen of the U.S
- When an immigrant wants to get his or her deportation orders revoked.
Typically, when a person has two or less standard DUI convictions, it does not affect their chances of getting naturalized. However, when one has multiple convictions, it will be concluded that the immigrant is an addict to alcohol. Under the immigration law, he is termed as a habitual drunkard who is not a character in good morals.
A habitual drunkard, in this case, is not an alcoholic. An alcoholic person can be of good character. However, the character or behavior of the individual when they are drunk is what leads to this conclusion.
For instance, Tom is a non-citizen but struggles with alcoholism. He joins Alcoholics Anonymous to help him overcome it and even attended a DUI school multiple times. He is typically very disciplined at work and respected in his community.
One day while at work, immigration officials do a sweep, and he is caught up. He is served with a notice for deportation for being in the country illegally. However, Tom decides to request a cancellation of the deportation order from the immigration court. Unfortunately for him, he already has multiple DUI convictions. These indicate that he is unable to control his drinking; hence, he is a habitual drunkard according to immigration laws. Because of this, his petition is denied on the basis that he doesn’t have good morals.
DUI Offenses by Unlawfully Present
By itself, a DUI verdict will not result in the removal of an immigrant. However, getting a DUI conviction will flag the unlawful presence of the immigrant in the country. However, this does not always apply. The state of California is referred to as the sanctuary state. What this means is that when an immigrant is found doing some things, the law enforcement agencies will not get in touch with ICE. These are:
- When an immigrant identifies themselves to the police or state agencies using an AB 60 license
- When an immigrant is arrested and convicted on a misdemeanor low-level offense like a simple DUI
However, every arrest and conviction is a public record, meaning it can be seen or accessed by anyone. If immigration and customs enforcement agency is searching for a person, your history of an arrest will help them locate you. It is possible to have your previous DUI convictions known to the ICE. There have been cases where ICE agents found undocumented immigrants from their old DUI convictions. These immigrants get arrested and deported because of their unlawful presence in the country.
Can an Alien Convicted of a DUI Avoid Deportation?
The answer is no. An unlawful immigrant can only avoid deportation on a DUI offense by avoiding using drugs or drinking and driving in the first place. An immigrant with a prior DUI conviction or one arrested for drugged or drunk driving needs to get in touch with a DUI attorney as soon as they can.
With your lawyer, it is possible to fight these allegations and may get the charges dismissed or reduced to simple DUI offenses that will not lead to your deportation.
Finding a Los Angeles DUI Attorney Near Me
A DUI offense is a priorable crime in California. The more you repeat the offense, the harsher the penalties become. This is true for both citizens and non-citizens alike. Multiple convictions and specific circumstances can make a person be deported or become inadmissible. This is devastating, despite the other penalties a person faces. When charges on drunk or drugged driving are brought up against you, getting in touch with a DUI lawyer is crucial to avoid the severe penalties. At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney in Van Nuys, we are experienced and ready to fight these allegations for you. Call us at 818-484-1100, and let us be of assistance to you.
DUI offenses committed in the State of California are considered priorable offenses, such as a second offense DUI. In this case, a second offense DUI has more penalties than a first offense DUI. Leah Legal in Los Angeles will take you through your legal options when charged with a second time DUI, as discussed further in this article.
What is Second Offense DUI Under California Law?
A second time DUI arrest may either be based on a driving under the influence of alcohol charge or a charge for driving with a 0.08 percent BAC or higher. Driving while intoxicated with alcohol is a crime under Vehicle Code 23152(a) while driving with a 0.08 percent BAC or higher is a crime under VC 23152(b).
Under the California DUI laws, the prosecution team must prove that you were intoxicated with alcohol when driving, and you actually operated a motor vehicle. VC 23152(a) considers alcohol intoxication as a factor in impairing a driver’s mental or physical abilities. You risk facing a DUI charge for being unable to drive your car as a sober person would do under similar circumstances.
Your second time DUI charge will be based on the allegation that you were driving a motor vehicle. In California, courts consider the movement of a vehicle as a factor constituting driving. Any sign indicating your car moved may be used as circumstantial evidence in your case. Though circumstantial evidence can directly prove guilt, prosecutors can infer it from your surrounding circumstances.
Being Charged with a Second Offense DUI for Driving with a 0.08 Percent BAC or Higher
Vehicle Code 23152(b) prohibits having a BAC of 0.08 percent or more when driving a motor vehicle. Violating this law (the Per Se DUI law) will automatically make you guilty of a DUI even if the prosecution cannot prove you were under alcohol influence. A VC 23152(b) violation is usually charged together with a VC 23152(a) violation. In this case, the prosecutors will allege that your BAC level was above the legal limit when charging you for a DUI offense.
Are There Any Aggravating Factors for a Second Time DUI in California?
A second offense DUI charge may worsen if various circumstances are present during your booking at the police station. The circumstances may include causing an accident, refusing to take a chemical test and having a BAC of 0.15 percent or more. You risk facing more significant consequences for driving at an excessive speed, having a child under 14 years of age and being under 21 at the time of the second time DUI offense. The enhanced penalties for each aggravating factor may depend on:
- Your criminal history
- The actual circumstances of your DUI arrest
- Type of prior DUI conviction
What Penalties Can You Face for a Second Offense DUI in California?
A DUI charge can either be prosecuted as a misdemeanor or a felony. Though most DUI cases fall under the misdemeanor category, they may be considered a felony if someone sustains an injury. A DUI conviction may carry a jail sentence or allow you to drive provided you have an ignition interlock device in your car.
The consequences of being convicted of a second offense DUI in California include fines (at a $390 to $1,000 range) and summary probation (of between three to five years). Other penalties include a jail sentence of between 96 hours to one year and enrollment in a DUI school approved by a California court. The conviction may also attract a mandatory license suspension valid for two years and an IID installation valid for one year.
The facts surrounding your DUI case will determine the severity of the penalties you may face. Furthermore, the penalties may vary with the county in which your DUI conviction occurs. California courts usually impose probation under DUI sentences to include various conditions. The conditions include:
- Agreeing not to commit any further crimes
- Complying with the California DUI laws (which prohibit driving a vehicle with any measurable alcohol amount in your blood)
- Agreeing to submit to a blood or breath chemical test if arrested for committing a subsequent DUI offense
Your circumstances as a defendant may determine whether a court will ask you to restitute injury victims or have an IID installed on your car. You may also have to attend NA (Narcotics Anonymous), AA (Alcoholics Anonymous) or MAAD (Mothers Against Drunk Driving) programs. These conditions will be part of the court-imposed summary probation for a second time DUI.
Are There Any Alternative Sentencing Options for a Second Offense DUI?
In California, you may qualify for alternative sentencing options when convicted for a DUI charge. These options will act as alternatives to your county jail sentence. They may include community service, roadside work residence in a sober-living environment. Others include incarceration in a city or private jail and house arrest (electronic monitoring).
Do You Risk Losing Your License for a Second Offense DUI?
The California DMV (Department of Motor Vehicle) has the power to suspend your driver’s license or issue you with a restricted license under various circumstances. A DUI conviction, according to VC 23152(a) or (b), may trigger a DMV license suspension. You may also lose your driving privileges after failing to schedule a DMV hearing ten days following your DUI arrest.
You risk facing a two-year court-triggered license suspension for having 0ne prior wet reckless or DUI conviction within ten years. The suspension will be valid for a year if it is imposed by the DMV for having one prior DUI conviction within ten years. Your right to obtaining a restricted license is only valid after you submit to a chemical test and have an IID on your car. A restricted license, which lasts twelve months, allows you to travel anywhere with your vehicle.
Does a Second Time DUI Conviction Attract a Permanent Criminal Record?
You may have a second offense DUI conviction discharged from your permanent criminal record through expungement. The conditions for expunging a DUI conviction in California include being placed on probation and completing the probation. Your attorney should file a court petition, which a judge will review to grant you DUI expungement.
How Will the Prosecution Team Prove Your Second Offense DUI Charge?
Vehicle Code 23152(a) considers DUI as a subjective offense, meaning that the prosecution team can comprise of various individuals. The team may include the arresting officer, prosecutor, and expert witness from a local law enforcement agency. Expect the prosecutors to begin the case against you in the investigation phase. During this phase, the arresting officer will prove you lacked the physical or mental ability to drive your car safely.
Prosecutors usually build DUI cases by relying on facts gathered from different sources. One of the sources includes an officer’s testimony regarding your performance on a field sobriety test, physical appearance, and driving pattern. Discussed below are the means used by prosecutors to strengthen a second offense DUI case:
An Official Testimony from the Arresting Officer
Your arresting officer will give a statement regarding your inability to drive or reckless driving. The officer will suggest you exhibited objective signs of being intoxicated. These signs may include wobbliness on the feet, the odor of alcohol in your breath, slurred speech or red and watery eyes.
If you poorly performed in your field sobriety test (FST), the officer will link the test results to the allegations of you being intoxicated. FSTs are mental and physical exercises administered by the police during DUI investigations. Law enforcement officers attribute poor performance on FSTs to impairment from drugs or alcohol. Examples of FSTs include the one-leg stand, the walk-and-turn, and the horizontal gaze nystagmus.
Blood or Breath Test Results
The prosecution team is authorized to introduce your BAC results to support their allegations against you. In DUI cases, BAC (Blood Alcohol Concentration) is a standard measure for the alcohol amount in a person’s bloodstream. Your BAC results will be used to establish whether you were driving under the influence at the time of your second time DUI arrest. The prosecutor must prove your inability to drive due to intoxication safely.
The legal limit for blood alcohol in California depends on the type of driver and vehicle. Adult drivers operating non-commercial vehicles should have a BAC of less than 0.08 percent. Underage drivers should not exceed the 0.05 percent limit while commercial drivers should not exceed the 0.04 percent limit. The legal BAC limit for ride-sharing, taxi, or limo drivers is 0.04 percent.
Statements from Expert Witnesses
When your second offense DUI charge is based on driving under the influence of drugs, the prosecutors will work with an expert witness to build the case. While the testimony from your arresting officer helps build your case, a Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) will be introduced for clarity reasons. The DRE’s role is to examine you and testify about your physical symptoms of being impaired.
Legal Defenses for a Second Offense DUI Charge in California
Prosecutors use extreme measures to support their allegations against you. Your attorney, on the other hand, should prove you were not actually intoxicated, or your driving was not impaired. The lawyer may also point out the wrongful arrest you were subjected to before being taken to the station. Your charge may be argued using the following legal defenses:
Physical Symptoms of Intoxication are Inadequate for a DUI Conviction
Your lawyer can challenge the use of objective symptoms of intoxication to invalidate the second-time DUI charge you are facing. The arresting officer may have considered you as a DUI driver for having red, watery eyes or a flushed face. Though these signs and symptoms are defined under a DUI arrest form, they are inadequate to imply you were driving under the influence. You may exhibit the traits of intoxication due to fatigue, eye irritation, a cold, or allergies.
Bad Driving Does not Imply Driving Under the Influence
One way to fight a second offense DUI charge is by suggesting that you were driving poorly rather than driving under the influence. Prosecutors pay attention to the driving pattern of DUI offenders when charging them. As a rebuttal, your attorney can argue that driving patterns are not an adequate DUI predictor. Furthermore, most traffic violations are usually committed by sober motorists/pedestrians.
Field Sobriety Tests Are not Accurate in Measuring Physical Impairment
Part of the prosecution’s evidence against you will be field sobriety test results. As the prosecutor links poor performance in this test to impairment, your attorney can challenge this claim. You may lose coordination and balance in the FSTs due to fatigue, flat feet, nervousness, or uncomfortable clothing.
Your BAC Was High Due to Various Medical or Physical Conditions
Conditions such as hypoglycemia or diabetes are known to inflate the blood alcohol content in the body falsely. Your BAC can also falsely be inflated after taking a high protein diet or fasting. The liver may respond to these conditions by producing ketones, which are toxic byproducts designed to mimic alcohol. This defense may help you challenge the validity of the BAC results used as evidence by the prosecution team.
Failure of the Arresting Officer to Follow Proper Procedures
DUI investigations are safeguarded by Title 17 regulations and procedures to protect drivers from police misconduct. Police officers are required to have probable causes for initiating a traffic stop. They are also supposed to read offenders their Miranda rights before interrogating them. If the arresting officer breached these regulations, your lawyer could request a hearing to invalidate any improperly obtained evidence.
The Officer Failed to Comply with the Regulations on Breath and Blood Testing
Code of Regulations Title 17 under the California laws governs the procedures for conducting DUI breath and blood tests. Under these regulations, the officer must wait for at least 15 minutes before administering the test adequately. Other requirements include proper training of the personnel, maintenance of the testing kits, and proper handling of blood samples.
If the officer did not adhere to these requirements, your test results could be inaccurate. Your lawyer can identify the Title 17 regulation that was breached and use it to invalidate the test results. The entire DUI investigation will be called into question, allowing you to defend yourself against the second offense DUI charges.
How a Lawyer Can Help You Fight a Second Offense DUI
Lawyers spend countless hours creating effective defenses for DUI charges. You will need expert legal help to collect and analyze evidence, interpret evidence, and settle for a better outcome. A good DUI defense lawyer knows how to gather and analyze pieces of evidence that are crucial to your case. Evidence gathering may include subpoenaing witnesses and obtaining the footage of the traffic stop from the police.
Apart from gathering evidence, your attorney will use the evidence to file written motions in your favor. For instance, your legal counsel may file a Pitchess Motion to get permission to look into the arresting officer’s work file. You also need a lawyer to negotiate with the prosecution team in the evident a deal for charge reduction is offered. Negotiating this kind of arrangement may prevent your case from going to trial.
Related Offenses
The most common instances of DUI offenses include first offense DUI, second offense DUI, and third offense DUI. Your DUI charge may be considered a subsequent one if you committed it ten years after the previous DUI charge. The various DUI offenses related to a second time DUI charge are as follows:
- First Offense DUI
A first offense DUI charge may be based on the fact that you violated VC 23152(a) and VC 23152(b). The charge may attract $390 to $1,000 in fines, jail time of up to 6 months, and informal probation of three to five years. You will also attend a court-approved drug or alcohol education program or have an IID installed in your car.
- Third Offense DUI
A third offense DUI committed within ten years of a second offense DUI in California attracts various penalties. They include fines, jail time, informal probation, and enrollment in a DUI education program. You will also have to install an IID in your car and be labeled as a habitual traffic offender.
- DUI Causing Injury
You may face this charge for exposing the third party to an injury due to your intoxicated driving. A DUI with injury charge may be considered as a misdemeanor or a felony. Penalties include habitual traffic offender status, fines, strikes on your DMV record and restitution to the third party.
- Felony DUI
Acquiring four or more DUI convictions in ten years may attract a felony DUI charge. The consequences of this offense include HTO designation, mandatory IID installation, and fines. You also risk facing sixteen months to three years in state prison.
Find a Competent DUI Defense Lawyer Near Me
The outcomes of your second offense DUI case depend largely on your willingness to work with a lawyer. At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we believe that every person deserves an adequate defense when facing a criminal charge. We are highly trusted for ensuring clients get the best defense strategy for their case. Schedule legal help from our Van Nuys DUI Lawyer by calling 818-484-1100.
It is difficult for a person without legal training or experience to assess both the strengths and weaknesses of a subsequent DUI offense because DUI laws are continually changing, and the circumstances of each case are unique. Therefore, getting help from a qualified Los Angeles DUI attorney like Leah Legal can be very instrumental in your defense. Leah Legal handles all DUI cases such as first, second, and third offense DUI (as precisely discussed in this article), among other DUI related offenses.
Understanding Third Offense DUI in California
A third DUI conviction in California within the past ten years has more severe consequences than a first-time or second conviction. This is because driving under the influence in California is a priorable offense, that is, penalties increase with every successive wet reckless or DUI sentence that occurs within ten (10) years.
For the prosecutor to charge you with a third offense DUI, they should prove that you:
- Drove a vehicle while under the influence of drugs, alcohol, or a combination of both
- Had a blood alcohol content of 0.08% or more at the time of the arrest
Although the above elements of the crime may seem straightforward, they need further explanation. Below are definitions of key terms to help you understand the offense better.
Driving
If the arresting police see you driving a car, then the element of driving is satisfied. However, this is not always the situation. What happens in an event you were sleeping in the vehicle? What happens when you got involved in a road accident, and the arresting police officer reached the accident scene after the crash? It is not sufficient for the prosecution to present evidence that you were intoxicated. They must submit proof that you operated the car while drunk.
The law holds that the following factors are needed to establish driving:
- The vehicle made some movement
- You were not asleep when the police showed up
- Your vehicle’s motor was running
- How close you were to the steering wheel
Under the Influence
Per the law, a motorist is said to be under the influence due to consuming alcohol, their physical or mental abilities are compromised and impaired to a level that they cannot similarly drive the vehicle as a sober driver would under similar conditions.
It is important to note that how you operated the car is not convincing of whether you were driving under the influence. It is just a factor the court puts into account when considering everything.
How the Prosecutor Team Proves that You were Driving Under the Influence
Third-time driving while intoxicated is subjective. That means the prosecution team (that consists of the prosecutor, prosecutor’s expert witness, and the arresting police officer) will try to present evidence that you are guilty of violating DUI laws using the arresting officer’s observations.
The case starts when the arresting police testify about things that you did not do right. The testimony will take account of your Field Sobriety Tests (FSTs) performance, driving pattern, and physical appearance.
Arresting Police Officer Testimony
Typically in DUI cases, the arresting officer will give evidence that you exhibited objective signs and symptoms of intoxication such as slurred speed, alcohol odor originating from the breath, unsteady gait, and red, watery eyes.
The testifying officer will also bear witness that you were driving erratically, weaving, or not in a position to drive with caution of a sober driver under similar circumstances.
What Penalties Does a Third Offense DUI Carry?
One of the most common questions asked by those accused of a third DUI offense is how penalties and consequences are different from those imposed after a first-time or second DUI conviction. Well, the answer depends primarily on the circumstances of the case. Also, some cases can be reduced from DUI after plea bargaining negotiations to wet reckless, speed exhibition, or dry reckless.
Typically, the court will impose the following penalties:
- Summary probation for three (3) to five (5) years
- Up to a one-year sentence in jail
- Penalty assessments and fines that range from $2,500 to $3,000
- Installation of Ignition Interlock Device (IID) in your vehicle for up to two years
- Attending DUI school for thirty months
- Revocation of your driver’s license for three years
If the court imposes a sentence that has probation, you must adhere to the following terms and conditions:
- You should not operate a motor vehicle with any quantifiable amount of alcohol in your system
- You shouldn’t refuse to take a blood, urine or breath test if you are arrested for DUI again
- You shouldn’t commit any other offense
It is worth noting that different from non-injury DUI under Vehicle Code 23152, a third-time DUI causing injury charge under Vehicle Code 23153 is a felony. It is punishable by:
- Two (2), three (3), or four (4) years in state prison
- Consecutive and additional three (3) to six (6) years in prison if any surviving victim suffers a severe bodily injury
- An additional one to three-year sentence for every person with an injury
- A strike on your criminal record under Three Strikes Law
- A fine that ranges from $1,015 to $5,000
- A Habitual Traffic Offender status for three (3) years
- Revocation of your driver’s license for five years (However, you can continue enjoying your driving privileges without restrictions provided you install an Ignition Interlock Device for more than a year)
Are there Aggravating Factors that Could Increase the Penalties for a Third DUI Charge?
Aggravating factors are circumstances (if present at the time of committing the crime) that will increase your sentence. Typically, the most common factors include:
- Refusing to submit a breath, blood or urine test
- Excessive speed
- Driving with a blood alcohol content of 0.15% or higher
- Causing a road accident
- Driving while intoxicated with a minor below 14 years of age as a passenger
- Being below 21 years of age at the time of the arrest
Will You Have a Permanent Record if You Have Been Found Guilty of a Third Offense DUI?
Luckily, a third-time driving under the influence conviction can be removed from your criminal record through an expungement. Whether convicted of a felony or a misdemeanor, you could be eligible for expungement as long as you were on probation and have completed probation.
How does Expungement Work?
Immediately you complete probation for your ‘driving while drunk’ offense, you could petition the court to expunge your criminal record. The court will then review the petition to decide if you qualify for the expungement. If the court grants the petition, either:
- You withdraw your guilty plea and re-enter an ‘’innocence plea”
- If you were found guilty after the trial, the court sets aside your verdict
Will Expungement Assist you Restore your Driving Privileges?
Under California Penal Code 1203.4 PC, expungement doesn’t overturn a suspended or revoked driver’s license. Typically, probation lasts longer than the period of compulsory license suspension. However, if your license was revoked, an expungement cannot restore your driver’s license.
Will an Expungement Make Searching for Employment Stress-Free?
One of the advantages of expunging a DUI conviction in California is that it makes it easier for you to find a job. This is because a potential employer cannot use it as a source of adverse employment effects. Again the law bans employers from inquiring about convictions and arrests from job applicants or before conditional employment offers are made.
However, a DUI expungement doesn’t affect your responsibility to reveal your conviction when applying for teaching credentials or state licenses.
How a DUI Criminal Defense Attorney Can Help you Fight a Third Offense DUI
When you engage a skilled DUI lawyer, there is a possibility of having your charges reduced or dismissed.
However, to fight your charges, it is crucial to contact a competent lawyer who will review your charges immediately after your arrest. This is because a lot involves coming up with a defense, which could be done within a few hours after the arrest. An experienced attorney will use legal defenses such as:
Field Sobriety Tests Do Not Measure Impairment Accurately
If you have been accused of drunk driving in California, and the prosecutor’s evidence includes your FSTs performance, your lawyer should be in a position to challenge those results.
DUI prosecution team heavily depends on Field Sobriety Tests and will most likely testify that you performed poorly on the tests. Consequently, they will conclude that you violated the drunken driving laws.
Your attorney will argue that your balance and coordination during FSTs could have been affected by nerves, your clothing, fatigue, flat feet, and natural physical coordination.
Moreover, your lawyer could challenge the reliability of the field sobriety tests. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, FSTs can only predict 91% of alcohol impairment at the time of the arrest. This percentage assumes that:
- Standardized FSTs were administered
- The police officer who conducted the FSTs was experienced and trained
- Test conditions were perfect
All the above factors can change and make the unreliable results a possible legal defense.
The Arresting Police Officer Did Not Conduct a Fifteen-Minute Observation Period
The arresting law-enforcement officer is required by the law to observe you for at least fifteen minutes before conducting a breath test. Questioning if that observation took place is a valid legal defense your lawyer should utilize.
Most police officers do not conduct the observation. Instead, they do paperwork and set up the chemical test gadget. Successively proving that the officer did not observe the observation period, challenges not only the breath test results but also the DUI investigation.
A High Protein Diet, Diabetes or Hypoglycemia Falsely Exaggerated Blood Alcohol Content
Any experienced lawyer knows that medical health conditions like diabetes, hypoglycemia, and popular diets could form a basis of legal defense to a third DUI charge.
Typically, human bodies get fuel from carbohydrates and under conditions like fasting, diabetes, or high protein diets, the body breaks down the stored fats for fuel. When burning the stored fats, your liver produces ketones. Ketones are toxic byproducts that chemically look like isopropyl alcohol.
Sometimes ketones are excreted in your breath. Unfortunately, the breath testing gadgets are not always able to distinguish between isopropyl alcohol resulting from alcohol drinks and ketones. As a result, this could result in falsely high blood alcohol content reading on the breath test and later a criminal charge.
Bad Driving Doesn’t Always Mean that You are Driving While Intoxicated
Another thing the prosecution will pay attention to during your case is your driving pattern. The police will testify that you were operating the vehicle in a way consistent with a drunk driver. Typically, this will include allegations that you were swerving within the lane or you were over-speeding.
Your lawyer should request the arresting officer to testify about the ways you drove safely and properly. The lawyer will then use the testimony to argue that driving pattern isn’t a reliable DUI predictor as well as sober drivers commit most traffic offenses.
Will You Lose Your Driver’s License for Third Offense DUI?
Being charged with drunk driving three times within ten (10) years is life-altering. At least you will face revocation of your driver’s license and designation of HTO status by the Department of Motor Vehicles.
You can only lose your driving privileges if you get convicted of DUI or lose a DMV hearing.
Luckily, you can acquire a restricted driver’s license in either six months or a year of the revocation if alcohol and drugs were involved respectively. To get a restricted license, you must submit the following to the California DMV:
- Proof of enrollment in an 18 to 30-month Multiple Offender Program
- Proof of installation of IID plus an agreement to keep the IID during the drivers’ license suspension period
- Proof of an SR-22 (It is acquired from an insurance provider and should be kept for three years after your conviction)
- Payment of $125 (restricted license fee) to the California DMV
Unfortunately, if you refused to submit breath, blood, or urine test, you will face more severe penalties. Your driver’s license will be revoked for three years, and you have no right to a restricted license during the suspension period.
Also, to obtain the restricted license, you should:
- Not be in probation of a previous DUI conviction
- Not have a BAC of 0.01% or higher
- Be above 21 years of age
Frequently Asked Questions on Third Offense DUI in California
- What is the Difference Between Driver’s License Suspension and Revocation?
Driving in California is not a right, but a privilege. DUI is one of the reasons why your driver’s license can be suspended or revoked. That is, license suspension or revocation can be part of your DUI punishment.
Driver’s license suspension means that your driving privileges have been withdrawn for some time. You can get the license back by paying fees or waiting out the suspension period. If arrested while driving on a suspended license, you could face more severe consequences such as a possibility of having the driver’s license revoked.
License revocation, on the other hand, means the DMV has taken away your driving privileges entirely and can’t be reinstated. To get a new driver’s license, you need to get approval from DMV, pay any penalties you owe and undergo through the licensing process that involves a road test and a written test.
- What Happens if You are Still on Probation from your Second DUI Conviction at the Time of Arrest for Your Third DUI Offense?
In most cases, the probation will be revoked. You will also face more severe penalties than you would if you were not on probation.
- What is the Purpose of a DMV Hearing? What Can it Do for you?
Unlike a criminal court proceeding, a DMV hearing is an administrative proceeding held at your local DMV office. DMV cannot sentence you. Instead, the primary purpose of this hearing is to determine if your driver’s license will be suspended due to your DUI arrest or not.
Once you are arrested, the police will take away your license and issue you with a Notice of Suspension, which is pink in color. The notice notifies you that you have a right to a DMV hearing to contest the suspension of your driver’s license. You need to request the hearing within ten days after your arrest. The notice also functions as your temporary license for thirty days.
Find an Experienced DUI Attorney Near Me
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we understand that the work done beforehand to prepare and analyze your case for trial is as important as competent representation in a court proceeding. To challenge your charges successfully, we explore all possible outcomes, review factors of arrest as well as investigate the arresting police officer conduct, witnesses, and evidence in your third offense DUI case. With this information, we can develop a defense strategy that meets your needs. We can also represent you in both criminal court and California’s Department of Motor Vehicles administrative hearing to challenge your license suspension. For more information, contact our Van Nuys DUI attorney at 818-484-1100 today!
Explaining the Driving Under the Influence Law in California
A Driving Under the Influence (DUI) charge happens when a person is caught by the police for having consumed alcohol or illegal drugs, or a combination of both while driving a vehicle. In California, it is not necessary for there to be alcohol or drugs within the vehicle for an officer to charge you with a DUI, you just need to be found ‘under the influence’ of one or more of these substances to be charged. California’s Vehicle Code 23152 defines the illegality of operating a vehicle while having alcohol in your body. While adults over 21 years old are allowed to have a certain percentage of up to 0.079% alcohol per weight contained in their bloodstream, the law is much more stringent for those under 21.
California’s DUI Law For Underage Drivers
California has a so-called ‘Zero Tolerance’ policy for drivers under the age of 21 if they are caught under the influence of alcohol while driving. Under 21 drivers who get charged with a DUI face the same adult penalties and possibly more. Depending on the level of blood alcohol content (BAC) found in your body, you will face a progressively higher criminal penalty. Let’s look at what these different levels and penalties mean for you:
- 01% BAC or higher: Because of the ‘zero tolerance’ law in California, anyone under the age of 21 who is found guilty of having a BAC of 0.01% will lose their driver’s license for a year. Nonetheless, this DUI charge of having a BAC of between 0.01 and 0.049 percent is not criminal, and you will not need to spend any time in jail or have a DUI on your record.
- 05% BAC or higher: This level of BAC carries a more significant charge for drivers under the age of 21 (though not illegal for drivers over 21). This charge is commonly called the ‘Underage DUI’ and does count as a DUI on your driving and criminal record. While you won’t be facing jail time for this conviction, your license will be suspended for a year; you’ll be fined $100 and have to pay for and attend a DUI course for three months.
- 08% BAC or higher: At this level, drivers that are under or over the age of 21 will face serious criminal charges. The fines and court fees could add up to thousands of dollars, and you could face jail time or juvenile custody of up to six months. You will also likely need to pay for and attend a DUI course lasting three to nine months. Your driver’s license will be suspended, and you will be on probation for years.
- Impaired driving: This DUI is not always tied to the BAC percentage in your body. If the officer finds you driving dangerously or serving due to the existence of alcohol in your system, they can charge you with a DUI. The penalties associated with impaired driving are the same as those for having a BAC of 0.08% or higher.
It is also important to note that driving with a BAC of 0.01 percent or higher is illegal for those currently on DUI probation.
Explaining Blood Alcohol Content (BAC)
The alcohol percentage (ethyl alcohol or ethanol) in someone’s bloodstream is their BAC. For example, if you have one part of alcohol for every 1000 parts blood, then your BAC is 0.10 percent. Below is a guideline for how your body might feel and what effects you might experience based on your BAC:
- 01-0.03% BAC: Besides feeling a slight elevation or change in your state of mind, you probably won’t notice any effects. However, if you are less than 21 years old, California law considers you to be legally impaired, so it is illegal to drive or bike at this point.
- 04-0.06% BAC: Your body might feel warm or relaxed, and your reasoning and memory could be slightly impaired.
- 07-0.09% BAC: At this more serious BAC, you might lose your capability to balance, see, speak, and conduct yourself normally. Crossing the 0.08% BAC limit for all drivers is taken very seriously by law enforcement regardless of age.
- 10-0.12% BAC: Your perception of judgment and motor coordination abilities will be severely impaired. You may also be slurring your speech.
- 13%+: At thirteen percent and beyond, you will experience very serious consequences and effects of alcohol in your system. You can find more details regarding the health and legal consequences of alcohol consumption at Stanford University‘s page on alcohol and drug use.
For everyone, and for new drivers, especially, it is very important to be aware of your consumption habits and how alcohol affects your mind and body. Don’t drink and drive.
Look At The Facts: Teen Drunk Driving Statistics
The US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) estimates that one out of ten high school teenagers drinks and drives. This is a deadly statistic because the CDC also predicts that young drivers (between the ages of 16 and 20 years old) who have a BAC of 0.08% or higher are 17x likelier to die in auto accidents than those who don’t drive under the influence of alcohol. Even without alcohol involved, teenage drivers are typically less experienced behind the wheel and are three times likelier to be involved in a fatal crash than experienced drivers.
While the percentage of high school teenagers that drive under the influence of alcohol shrank by 54% between 1991 and 2012, data shows that one out of 10 high school teens drink and drive.
Every weekend in the United States, car crashes cause the death of one teenager per hour on average. Almost half of these cases (45%) involve the consumption of alcohol.
Eighty-five out of every 100 high school teenagers who reported driving under the influence of alcohol also admit to having binge drank (defined as consuming five or more alcoholic beverages in less than two or three hours.
The CDC stands behind zero-tolerance policies, such as the law in California to help prevent youth from getting behind the wheel after drinking.
Additional Consequences For Those Under 21
Being convicted of a DUI can bear many costly consequences for a teenager as well as their family. Without considering emotional or psychological strain, the financial costs of a guilty conviction of a DUI for a driver under the age of 21 can be significant. Let’s take a look at some of the potential incurred costs of this situation:
- Two points will automatically be added to the youth’s driving record for 13 subsequent years, which will significantly increase auto insurance costs ($40,000 estimated)
- The required DUI classes ($650)
- Fees for a towed vehicle as well as mandatory storage for a minimum of five days ($685 or $137/day)
- Mandatory fines and attorney fees ($4000)
- Fee to reissue a driver’s license ($100)
This estimate totaling $45,435 can easily cripple the wellbeing of any working family. Not included in the estimate are possible medical or hospitalization bills for the teenager involved or any other parties that were hurt as a result of the accident. A lawsuit from an injured victim or their family could also increase the financial toll significantly.
The mental and psychological well being of the teenager charged with DUI the CDC reports that 85% of teenagers who drive under the influence of alcohol are binge drinkers, the risk of mental health issues greatly increases. The peer-reviewed Journal of Abnormal Psychology finds that more than 37% of alcohol abusers are afflicted by mental health disorders. These striking statistics show that teenagers who are caught drinking and driving likely abuse alcohol by binge drinking, have a mental health issue, or both. Combined with the stress of being charged with a DUI and possibly having injured another person, the psychological toll for the teenager involved is hard to quantify. Everyone deserves a trusted professional to talk to them through difficult circumstances, especially young people, and Leah Legal has the experience and passion for helping you and your family through this trying time.
A DUI Can Affect College, Financial Aid, and Job Options
While the Common App for college decided to stop asking students to specify whether or not they have a criminal record, certain individual colleges and universities still ask you to explain such past behavior. Both misdemeanor and felony convictions are considered to be crimes, while administrative offenses and infractions are usually not. While a DUI conviction on your record won’t automatically disqualify your application for admission or scholarship to most universities, it can be considered and might weaken your chances of acceptance.
A school can reject your application due to the DUI on your record without justifying or letting you know why you were denied. Even if the school doesn’t have an explicit policy excluding those with criminal records, on a case by case basis, the admissions office at the school can reject you.
A DUI will not affect your eligibility for California specific financial aid programs such as ‘Cal Grants’ and the ‘Middle-Class Scholarship’ unless you are currently incarcerated.
The more serious DUI convictions can be detrimental for financial aid and student loan applications. Your federal financial aid options will be significantly reduced if you have a criminal DUI on your record, that is if you were caught and convicted of driving with a 0.05% BAC or higher.
If you are currently serving in a federal or state prison, you will not be eligible to apply for a Pell Grant or to apply for federal student loans. Nonetheless, you are eligible to apply for the Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grant (FSEOG). Your chances of being awarded an FSEOG will be hindered because most of the awardees have also gotten a Pell Grant, for which you would be ineligible. You are still eligible to apply for the Federal Work-Study program, though you would need to be out of jail to begin work-study at a college or university.
If you are incarcerated in county jail, you aren’t eligible to apply for federal student loans; however, you are eligible for Pell Grants, FSEOG, and the Federal Work-Study program. Your chance to win one of these grants may be reduced, but are still possible in this situation.
The good news is that if you are released from jail before you are set to begin university or college classes, then the restrictions on these grants and programs don’t apply to you.
You are still eligible for federal student aid for most DUI circumstances. You would only lose eligibility from a DUI if it were considered a felony. A DUI felony conviction in the incident, someone was injured or killed, if you had three or more previous DUI convictions, or lastly if you already had a DUI felony in the past.
Some universities and colleges have honor codes to which the students swear an oath and must abide by specific codes of conduct. In most cases, criminal activity, such as a DUI counts as a violation of the honor code. While you might not be expelled for violating the honor code, but you may have to face an internal board made up of students or faculty to explain and justify your actions. For a first time violation of the honor code, most colleges and universities mandate lesser punishments as in probation, an academic warning, or several community service hours. It is always wise to be aware of the details of honor codes and codes of conduct of the institution you attend so as not to put your education or career in jeopardy.
What You Should Do If Pulled Over
Most importantly, stay calm and pull your vehicle to the nearest roadside shoulder to you while using your blinker to indicate to the officer that you’re pulling over. Keep your seatbelt on and remain patient. When the police officer asks you to do so, hand them your driver’s license and documentation for registration and insurance. Regardless of one’s immigration status, an AB California resident’s license should be accepted.
Be as respectful as possible to the arresting officer and don’t offer any reason for them to add any potential charges. Do not play loud music or offend the officer by attempting to make a bribe.
Keep your car from being cluttered with unnecessary objects and debris as some officers will make a judgment call to search your vehicle if they find it looking suspicious.
If requested, let the officer administer a chemical DUI test. Otherwise, you’ll be at risk of the officer suspending your license.
If the officer arrests you and is going to take you to jail, ask to have a friend with a driver’s license take your car away or if you can park it in a secure area so you won’t have to pay for towing or impound costs.
If you are let go with or without a ticket, take the time you need to put away your license and other documents. Breath calmly, and when you’re ready, follow normal traffic laws by turning on your signal and safely merge into the driving lane.
If you received a ticket, read it carefully and respond to the ticket or citation well before the stated deadline on the document. Failure to do so in the allotted time will result in costly fines. Your options in responding to the citation or ticket are admitting guilt to the charge, which requires you to pay a fine, attend DUI or traffic school (usually incurring an additional cost), or fighting the charge in court. Hinging on the severity of the charge, you may want to consult a lawyer to advise you or speak on your behalf.
Your Legal Course of Action and How a Lawyer Can Defend You
For a first time DUI, an experienced lawyer has a good chance of getting your charge to reduce or dropped. The more details of the situation that you can remember and share with your attorney, the more success you can have. This could mean anything from recalling what the officer said to you or how they tested your sobriety or intoxication levels, which could all factor into the strategic defense to help you avoid losing your license or needing to go to DUI school. For example, many women charged with a DUI due to failing a breathalyzer test can have the charge overturned because these tests are calibrated for the average man, not woman, so false BAC readouts are common.
Contact a Van Nuys DUI Attorney Near Me
If you or a teenager in your family has been charged with a DUI, an experienced DUI attorney will fight to get the best result in your case. At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we will make sure that you are not wrongfully convicted of a crime and put you in the best position to succeed. If you are located in Van Nuys and the greater Los Angeles area, contact us at 818-484-1100 and let us fight for you.
A 4th offense DUI is one of the severe forms of DUI that a person can experience. Since DUI is a priorable offense, subsequent offenses within ten years of the first conviction usually carry harsher penalties. Keep in mind that while in most cases, 1st, 2nd, and 3rd DUI offenses are charged as misdemeanors, a 4th offense DUI will be charged as a felony. Thus, it is crucial to have an experienced Los Angeles DUI defense attorney that will explore all the available options that could see your charges reduced or dropped. We invite you to get in touch with us at Leah Legal so that we can represent and defend you depending on the facts of your case.
An Overview of 4th Offense DUI in California
Driving under the influence is priorable in California. That means every time you’re convicted of wet reckless or another DUI offense, your penalties increase. If you have been arrested for DUI, and you have three previous DUI convictions within ten years, chances are you will be charged with a California 4th offense DUI (which is a felony). Under Vehicle Code 23152 VC, the previous convictions comprise of any of the convictions listed below:
- Driving under the influence (Vehicle Code 23152 (a))
- Operating a vehicle with a BAC higher than 0.08% (Vehicle Code 23152 (b))
- Wet reckless (Vehicle Code 23103.5)
- Any out-of-state conviction that can be considered as a conviction of any of the above crimes
- An expunged drunk-driving conviction for any of the above crimes
Elements of the Crime
To prove that you violated the Felony DUI laws under California Vehicle Code Section 23152 VC, the prosecutor must prove that:
- You drove a vehicle
- You drove with a blood alcohol content of 0.08% or higher
- You have three previous convictions under the California vehicle codes highlighted above within ten
To establish that you’ve at least three previous convictions, the prosecution team will use your certificates of successful completion of mandatory drugs or alcohol education programs, California Department of Motor Vehicles records, and court records. California records will establish California wet reckless and DUI convictions while out-of-state court and DMV records will prove out-of-state offenses that qualify to be drunk driving convictions in California.
Definition of Key Terms
Driving
If the arresting police officer sees you operating a vehicle, then this element of the crime is met. However, this is not always the situation. What happens if the car’s motor is running, but the defendant has not moved the vehicle? What if you were sleeping in the vehicle?
There are different driving under the influence circumstances that present themselves every day. Therefore, it isn’t adequate for the prosecution team to establish that you were drunk. They should show evidence that you were driving under the influence of alcohol.
Thus, the car should make some movement to constitute driving. Circumstantial evidence (evidence that does not point to guilt directly but can be concluded using the surrounding state of affairs) should prove this movement.
Under the Influence
Under Vehicle Code Section 23152 VC, a person is said to be under the influence due to consuming alcohol. In other words, you are charged with DUI if the alcohol you have consumed is impairing your judgment to a level that you cannot similarly operate a vehicle as a sober driver under similar circumstances.
Well, the way you drive is not decisive of whether you were driving under the influence. It is just one of the factors the court considers when putting everything into account.
How the Prosecutor Proves that You were Operating a Car while Intoxicated
Fourth DUI offense in California is subjective, and the prosecution team will present evidence that you were driving while drunk by relying on the arresting police officer’s observations. The charges against you start when the arresting officer gives evidence about everything you did not do right.
Typically, the officer will bear witness that you were swerving, not in a position to driving with caution like a sober driver and driving erratically. Also, the testifying officer will give evidence that you exhibited objective signs and symptoms of intoxication such as slurred speech, unstable gait, and red, watery eyes.
Penalties for a 4th Offense DUI
Felony DUI offenses in the state of California are harsh and require a solid defense. Although the fourth DUI offense originates from having several previous drunk driving convictions, the penalties vary from one case to another depending on your BAC levels and aggravating factors at the time of arrest as well as the circumstances surrounding the case.
Fourth DUI offense is punishable by:
- A 16 month, two (2) or three (3) year sentence in prison
- Fines that range from $390 to $1000
- A revocation of a driver’s license for four years
- Habitual Traffic Offender (HTO) status for three years
However, under Senate Bill 1046, you can continue enjoying your driving privileges provided you install an ignition interlock device (IID) for at least three years. An ignition interlock device is a breathalyzer that stops a vehicle from starting if it detects alcohol.
Aggravating Factors and Penalty Enhancements
Aggravating factors are circumstances and facts that, if present at the time of your DUI arrest, they will increase your penalties. They include:
- Refusing to submit a chemical test that leads to an additional eighteen-day sentence.
- Reckless driving or excessive speed (driving at 20 miles per hour on roadways or 30 miles per hour on highways) attracts sixty more days in prison.
- Having a minor below fourteen years of age as a passenger at the time of arrest, which attracts ninety more days in prison. There are instances in which you could be sentenced for California Penal Code Section 273a (Child endangerment) that is punishable by a maximum of six years in California state prison.
- Vehicle Code Section 23153 VC (DUI with injury) would lead to two years in California state prison, three to six years in prison if you caused severe bodily hurt and one to three more years for every person injured and a fine of $5,000.
- DUI manslaughter (California Penal Code Section 191.5 PC) is punishable by sixteen months, two or four years in prison, and $10,000 in fines.
- Under Penal Code Section 187 PC, Watson murder is charged as a second-degree murder, which is punishable by $15,000 in fines and fifteen years to life imprisonment.
An Arraignment in a DUI Court Process
A DUI court process starts with an arraignment and finishes when you’re sentenced for or acquitted of the charges. DUI arraignment is the stage where the prosecution team gives you the first offer. An offer in this context can be defined as the sentence that the prosecution team agrees to and recommends that you plead guilty to the charge.
In other words, it offers you an opportunity to plead guilty, no contest, or not guilty to your charges. If you plead guilty, you will be sent to prison, and your case will end. If you plead not guilty, you have a right to analyze and challenge evidence presented by the prosecutor.
Legal Defenses for Fighting a 4th Offense DUI
It is difficult for somebody without legal training or experience to assess the strengths and weaknesses of your DUI case. This is because California DUI laws are complicated and keep changing, and each case is unique. Therefore, getting the input of a qualified criminal defense attorney can be very instrumental.
Your DUI attorney will use the following legal defenses.
Objective Signs of Intoxication are Different from a DUI
One of the most effective methods to fight DUI charges is challenging the prosecution team’s use of signs and symptoms of intoxication to prove that you were drunk. Like mentioned earlier, the arresting officer will undoubtedly bear witness that you were intoxicated because you had an unsteady gait, red and watery eyes, flushed face, alcohol odor on the breath, and slurred speech.
Your lawyer should be able to argue that those signs were as a result of allergies, fatigue, sun exposure, cold, physical injury, or eye irritation. The lawyer should also argue that what is identified as alcohol on the breath can be the smell of other things found in alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks like malt and hops in beer.
The Arresting Officer Did not Adhere to Title 17 Regulations on Chemical Tests
Code of Regulations Title 17 outlines requirements on how chemical tests should be conducted. These requirements include:
- Proper training of the officer conducting the blood, breath, and urine tests
- Regular maintenance and calibration of the chemical testing equipment
- Proper administration of chemical tests
- Proper collection, storage, and handling of urine (although in rare cases) or blood samples
- A fifteen-minute observation by the arresting police officer
Failure to follow Title 17 Regulations could result in tainted chemical test results. A skilled DUI attorney can use the failure to strictly observe even a single requirement to call the investigation into question, hence successfully fight the driving under the influence charges against you.
You were not Driving under the Influence because you were mentally alert
The difference between mental impairment and physical impairment forms a basis of effective DUI legal defense. Typically, the prosecution team will testify that a defendant showed physical signs of impairment, but will occasionally prove that the defendant exhibited mental impairment signs.
DUI toxicologists will tell you that it is uncommon for a drunk person to be physically impaired but not mentally impaired. This is because drugs-related or alcohol impairment at all times presents itself as mental impairment first. As a result, a DUI defense lawyer can argue that a person who displayed no signs and symptoms of mental impairment most likely had other explanations of physical signs that resemble DUI.
The arresting Police Officer did not follow the proper procedures
Just like charges of several offenses, failure to follow proper procedures is a significant defense against fourth offense DUI. A DUI investigation should be guided by procedures that protect a defendant from police misconduct. These procedures include:
- A requirement that the law enforcers had probable cause to a traffic stop, DUI arrest, or DUI investigation
- Title 17 regulations and procedures (that were discussed above)
- The police read the Miranda rights before the DUI interrogation.
Miranda rights are warnings that the arresting officer should give before they start questioning you after an arrest. Typically they begin with the statement, “You have a right to remain silent.”
If any of the above protections are broken, your lawyer should request a California Penal Code 1538.5 PC hearing (suppression hearing). The hearing acts to:
- Remove any evidence that was not properly acquired, and
- Give your attorney a pre-trial opportunity to bring to light gaps in the prosecution case against you as well as persuade the court to reduce or drop the DUI charges.
DUI Sobriety Checkpoints did not comply with the law
DUI sobriety checkpoints should comply with the following strict legal requirements:
- Having officers organize, oversee, and supervise the checkpoint
- Advertising the roadblock publicly
- Ensure the field police officer follow a predetermined procedure of stopping vehicles
If any of these requirements are not met, your attorney can successfully challenge your arrest and DUI charges.
Rising Blood Alcohol Content
It is not unlawful to consume alcohol before operating a vehicle. What is unlawful is being impaired at the time you operate the car. When you drink alcohol, your blood alcohol content rises steadily and rapidly till it reaches its peak level. During this time, the BAC is said to be “on the rise,” which takes approximately fifty minutes.
So, assuming you had just finished taking alcohol and decided to take a short drive. Then a law enforcement officer arrests you and takes you in for a blood, breath, or urine test. If you had rising BAC during your arrest, the chemical test results are likely to show higher blood alcohol content than the one you had when you were driving.
How to Protect Your Driver’s License from Being Revoked
Shortly after being arrested, the arresting police will take your driver’s license and issue you a “Notice of Suspension.” The notice serves as a temporary driver’s license for thirty days. Additionally, the notice notifies you that you have a right to a DMV hearing, which should be requested within ten days after your arrest.
Although the DMV hearing is different from the court proceeding, you have a right to be represented by a DUI defense attorney. You are also entitled to analyze any proof presented against you as well as cross-examine any witness testimony. You can present evidence on your behalf or bring witnesses.
After the DMV hearing, you will receive a written decision. If the decision to revoke your driver’s license is maintained, you can request the DMV to conduct an administrative analysis of its decision. You are also entitled to appeal that decision with the superior court.
Losing the hearing or failure to request the California DMV hearing on time leads to the revocation of driving privileges.
How to Get a Revoked License Back
If your license was revoked and you want to restore your driving rights, you should take the following steps:
- Understand your situation’s detailsThe first requirement to reinstate the driver’s license depends on why it was revoked in the first place. Contact the Department of Motor Vehicles, request them to review your case, and learn what you should do. When making this call, make sure you have your previous driver’s license number and all details the California DMV sent you.
- Fulfill all Revocation RequirementsYou could be required to pay fines and fees that include court-related fees and other penalties enacted by the DMV. You are also supposed to complete your sentence, DUI school as well as present documents that you did so.Moreover, you will be obligated to present proof of an SR-22. In most cases, this is proof of vehicle insurance.
- Submit Necessary Payments and Documents to DMVOnce you have completed the above steps, you are in a position to apply for a renewal driver’s license. Sometimes if you have completed most of the above requirements, you could get a restricted license if your revocation period has not ended yet.
Can you Erase a Criminal Record if You Have Been Convicted of a Fourth Offense DUI?
Just like any DUI offense in California, a felony DUI can be sealed from your criminal record through an expungement. Since you are convicted of a felony, you need first to petition the court to reduce the felony to a misdemeanor.
The next step is filing an expungement petition with the court. However, there are strict guidelines on eligibility for an expungement. You can make your application either in person or through your lawyer. Then the judge could either:
- Allow you to withdraw your guilty plea and enter an “innocence plea” or
- Set aside the guilty verdict if you had been convicted after an “innocence plea.”
In both cases, the judge will dismiss the charges against you. Then you will be relieved from all consequences resulting from the crime.
Find an Experienced DUI Defense Attorney Near Me
With so much at stake for a 4th DUI offense, you should hire a competent Los Angeles DUI defense attorney like Van Nuys Criminal Attorney to represent you. Our attorneys will review the evidence being used against you to make sure your rights are protected. Call our Van Nuys DUI lawyer today at 818-484-1100.
California has strict firearm laws that manufacturers, sellers, and owners have to follow. Understanding these laws is essential in knowing who, where, and when to buy, carry or use a gun. Leah Legal goes into further detail about firearm laws in California, to help you remain on the right side of the law, or recover your gun after a charge for a gun offense in Los Angeles.
Who Can Possess A Gun in California?
Gun possession is legal under the laws of California. Any person aged twenty-one (21) and above can own a firearm without a license legally. There are exemptions for:
- A person aged eighteen (18) or older who has a valid hunting license from the department of fishing and wildlife, the permit should be unexpired
- Active peace officers who are allowed to carry firearms as part of their employment
- Active federal officers or law enforcement agents who have the authority to carry guns as part of their employment duties
- Persons who are active members or honorably discharged members of the US armed forces, National Guard, or active reserve components, and can provide the proper identification to the same
When selling a firearm, the buyer must provide clear evidence of age, including a valid driver’s license, alien registration number, or 1-94 number. Those purchasing handguns must provide proof of residency in California. Also, purchasers of handguns must provide a valid handgun safety certificate.
You may be among the persons prohibited to own or possess a firearm in California if:
- You have been convicted of a felony offense (not necessarily in California). Carrying a gun under this condition makes you guilty of a PC 29800 violation. A felon found to own, possess, purchase, or receive a firearm can have their gun rights revoked for at least ten years, and life in some cases. Juvenile offenders will be barred from owning a gun until they are thirty
- You are addicted to narcotics
- You have at least two convictions for brandishing a weapon (PC 417)
- You have been convicted with a PC 273.5 (domestic violence) misdemeanor
- People suffering from mental illness
- You are below eighteen (18) years and not in the exempted categories.
- A person who was dishonorably discharged from the military
- Illegal aliens
- Persons who have renounced their US citizenship
- Anyone who has been indicted or convicted for a crime with a sentence of more than one year
- Anyone charged or convicted with a stalking crime
- Fugitives of justice
Carrying a Firearm in California
Carrying a loaded or unloaded firearm is illegal in California unless you have a Carry Concealed Weapons (CCW) permit. The license allows you to carry a gun that can be concealed on your person. California does not recognize CCW permits from other states. To qualify for a CCW permit under PC 26155, you must meet the following conditions:
- Be of good moral conduct
- Be through with an approved firearms training class
- You have a good cause to justify the need for a permit. To prove a good cause for carrying a weapon, you need to justify that a clear danger exists to you or your family, and having the gun would mitigate the threat
- You are a resident of the county or spend most of your time at work in the county, or city within the county
Even with a permit, there are some restrictions, including the types of weapons you can carry. The license prohibits:
- Carrying assault weapons and generally prohibited weapons
- Brandishing a weapon in public in a threatening or angry manner. The law could excuse you if the act was in self-defense.
In addition to these general restrictions, your permit may have other restrictions, which you must adhere to, to keep your license.
Crimes related to carrying a firearm include:
- Carrying a concealed firearm (PC 25400) – which is charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony depending on whether there are aggravating circumstances. As a misdemeanor, you can spend up to one (1) year in the county jail and a fine of one thousand ($1,000) dollars at most. A PC 25400 felony is charged when you have a prior felony conviction for a firearm offense in California, you have a stolen firearm (which you knew was stolen), you are involved in a criminal gang, or you illegally possess the weapon, or it is an illegal weapon. This felony conviction is punishable by a jail term of sixteen (16) months, two (2) or three (3) years in county jail.
- Carrying a loaded firearm in public (PC 25850) – which prohibits carrying a loaded firearm on your person or in a car without a CCW permit. You can carry a gun in a vehicle if it is in the trunk or a locked container.
- Possessing a firearm in an airport or passenger vessel terminal (PC 171.5) – is an offense under California law and can be punished by a jail term of up to six (6) months in county jail, a fine not exceeding one thousand ($1,000) dollars or both.
- Knowingly possessing a firearm in public transit (PC 171.7) – is a misdemeanor offense punishable in the same way as a PC 171.5 violation.
- Possession of a firearm in school grounds (PC 626.9) – PC 626.9 prohibits the possession, discharge, or attempt to discharge a firearm in a school zone (an area that is within 1000ft of the school’s grounds). The law applies to both private and public schools. In most cases, violation of PC 626.9 is a felony that attracts a prison term of between three (3) and seven (7) years in state prison, depending on the circumstances of the case.
Selling or Buying a Firearm in California
California has laws that regulate the sale and purchase of firearms. Sellers are required to have a valid permit to sell, transfer, or lease a firearm. Selling a firearm without a permit is a PC 26500 misdemeanor violation. You can be jailed for a maximum of six (6) months in county jail with a fine of not exceeding one thousand ($1,000) dollars, for every firearm you sell, lease, or transfer without a permit. California also requires private parties engaging in any firearm transaction to do so through licensed dealers.
You can obtain a license to sell firearms in California by obtaining and maintaining:
- A valid federal arms license
- A local business permit
- A sellers permit from the State Board of Equalization
- A certificate of eligibility from the Department of Justice
- A local one-year license from an authorized licensing authority
When buying a firearm, even in a private transaction, you must involve a licensed dealer. The dealer requires you to provide valid identification documents to ascertain that you are a resident of California and meet the legal age requirements for purchasing a gun. After applying, the department of justice will require ten days during which it will conduct a thorough background check to determine whether you can possess a gun. Once approved, the dealer will record the transfer of ownership, after which you have thirty (30) days to pick up the firearm. California restricts firearm purchase to only one (1) firearm in thirty (30) days.
Laws on the Use and Storage of Firearms
California laws have restrictions on where and when you can use a firearm. Failure to adhere to these regulations can land you in jail or prison, in addition to suffering other consequences. Using a gun for self-defense where you believe you are in danger of bodily harm or to protect your home or property is legal under California law. Restrictions when using a gun include:
- Alteration of obliteration of firearm identification marks placed on the firearm (PC 23900) or purchasing a firearm with the knowledge that the identification marks have been altered or obliterated (PC 23920).
- Possession of a firearm on school grounds or within 1000 feet of the public or private school including Kindergartens through to 12th grade, colleges, and universities in California.
- Possession of a firearm in a courtroom or other restricted government premises. Such as the grounds of the California state capitol, any legislative office, the governor’s mansion or the Senate or Assembly.
- Knowingly possession of a firearm in an airport or passenger vehicle terminal or a public transit facility.
Gun storage laws require that firearm owners store firearms and ammunition in a locked or safe area where a minor cannot access them. Gun storage laws prohibit keeping a loaded firearm in your residence or property where you should reasonably know that a minor could access. In case a minor accesses the gun and harms themselves or others, you will be guilty of a PC 26100 violation.
Crimes Related to the Use of Firearms
- PC 417 Brandishing a Weapon
The penal code prohibits the exhibition, drawing or use of a firearm in an angry or threatening manner, whether or not you intend to cause harm. Brandishing a weapon is either a misdemeanor, wobbler of a felony offense.
Misdemeanor offenses are charged when you brandish the weapon in a public place. The penalty may include a fine of a jail term of between three (3) to twelve (12) months in the county jail. The same penalties apply for a wobbler offense charged as a misdemeanor. As a felony, you are punished by a state prison term of sixteen (16) months, two (2) or three (3) years.
PC 417.8 prohibits brandishing a weapon to resist arrest. In such cases, you can get a state prison sentence of either two (2), three (3) or four (4) years.
If you cause serious bodily harm when brandishing a weapon, you can be charged with either a felony or a misdemeanor (PC 417.6). As a misdemeanor, you will get a maximum sentence of one (1) year in the county jail. For felony offenses, you get a state prison term of sixteen (16) months, two (2), or three (3) years.
- Drive-in Shooting
PC 26100 prohibits the discharge of a firearm from a motor vehicle (stationary or moving). Allowing a person to carry a gun in a car you own, you are guilty of a misdemeanor. The penalty for a misdemeanor conviction is either a fine of up to one thousand ($1,000) dollars, a jail term of up to six (6) months in the county jail or both.
Discharging a firearm at someone else, or allowing a person in your car to do so, is charged as a felony. The crime is punished by a term of three (3), five (5), or seven (7) years in state prison and a fine of up to ten thousand ($10,000) dollars.
Prohibited Weapons
California law in PC 16590 has several weapons falling under the generally prohibited weapons category. The law makes it illegal to manufacture, support the manufacturing, sell, give, lend, or possess a prohibited weapon. Usually, prohibited weapons include firearms and accessories such as:
- Cane guns,
- Camouflaging firearm containers,
- Zip guns,
- Wallet guns,
- Guns not readily recognizable, and
- Unusual pistols.
The possession of a generally prohibited weapon is a wobbler offense. When charged as a misdemeanor, you can spend between one (1) and three (3) years in the county jail or sixteen (16) months, two (2) or three (3) years in the county jail for a felony conviction. Both charges include the confiscation of the weapon.
Assault Weapons and Rifles
California prohibits the manufacture, sale, exchange, and possession of assault weapons and BMG rifles. Assault weapons include AK series, Uzis, Colt AR-15 series semiautomatic rifles. The law allows legal ownership of assault weapons or BMG weapons under specific circumstances such as:
- Having a valid permit to possess an assault weapon
- You possessed the firearm lawfully before its classification as an assault weapon
- As the executor of an estate holding such firearms
- You are part of a lawful target practice
- You are a non-California resident who is part of a competitive match, league or competition, which involves the use of assault weapons
Crimes under PC 30600 can be charged on varying degrees from infractions to felonies as follows:
- Possession of a .50 BMG rifle is a misdemeanor offense attracting a penalty of one (1) year in the county jail and a fine of at most one thousand ($1,000) dollars.
- Possession of an assault weapon is either a misdemeanor or a felony. As a misdemeanor, you can stay for up to one (1) year in the county jail and pay a fine not exceeding one thousand ($1,000) dollars. For a felony, you spend sixteen (16) months, two (2) or three (3) years in the county jail and a maximum fine of ten thousand ($10,000) dollars.
- Possessing an assault weapon during the commission of another crime results in an additional sentence of one (1) year and other sentencing enhancements, including losing your firearm.
Restrictions on Guns, Ammunition, and Gun Accessories
The laws of California extend to placing restrictions on gun accessories and ammunition. These restrictions determine the type of ammo you can purchase or keep, the type of accessories you can and cannot use and the penalties for violating these restrictions.
- California PC 30315 prohibits the possession of armor piercing ammunition. Violation of PC 30315 is punishable as either a misdemeanor or felony by a county jail term of up to one (1) year or sixteen (16) months, two (2), or three (3) years respectively. Both charges can have a fine of not more than five thousand ($5,000) dollars.
- Possessing a silencer is a violation of PC 33410, which is charged as a felony. A conviction attracts a county jail term of sixteen (16) months, two (2) or three (3) years. A fine of at most ten thousand ($10,000) dollars may be charged.
- Aiming or pointing a laser scope or pointer at someone in a threatening manner, intending to cause harm is a violation of PC 417.25. If convicted, you can spend up to thirty (30) days in the county jail. However, the punishment is quite severe, where the victim is a peace officer. In such a case, you violate PC 417.26, which is punishable by a jail term of up to six (6) months.
Sentencing and Penalties for Gun related Offenses
You can violate the firearm laws in California in many ways. Finding yourself facing charges for firearm violations could subject you to additional or alternative sentencing. The judges will often determine your sentencing and penalties depending on your criminal record, the type of firearm, whether the offense is a misdemeanor or felony and the provision of the law on additional sentencing for the crime.
Alternative sentencing mostly includes formal and informal probation. The probation keeps you out of jail, as long as you meet all the pre-set conditions of the court. Felony charges may be subject to a sentence enhancement, which means, you spend more time in prison, in addition to the time you were to serve. Sentence enhancements in California include:
- Personally using a gun
- Use a gun and you are done (commonly used for offenses that involve using and firing a gun, or causing serious bodily injury or death to another person. The enhancement runs between ten (10) years to life)
- Criminal street gang enhancement applicable for gang members
- Committing a felony while possessing armor piercing ammunition or wearing a bulletproof vest
- Using a firearm when committing a sex crime
- Aiding someone with a firearm while they are committing a felony
Find a Firearm Attorney Near Me
If you are facing charges for violating firearm laws, you need to contact an experienced attorney who will help you to navigate the case. Our Van Nuys criminal defense lawyers at Van Nuys Criminal Attorney in Los Angeles understand the strictness of firearm laws in California, and will prepare a solid defense on your behalf. Contact us for legal representation today at 818-484-1100.
California, as you likely know, has stringent laws regarding the concealed carry of firearms (and many other weapons). Specifically, Cal. Pen. Code Sec. 25400 makes it a crime to carry a concealed weapon in your vehicle or on your person. This article will discuss (1) California’s laws about concealed carry weapons and the charges you could face; (2) exceptions to those laws; (3) possible defenses you could raise; and (4) the penalties if convicted.
Background and Constitutional Law Developments
California, unlike many other states, severely restricts concealed carry permits. Police may issue conceal carry permits only to individuals who demonstrate “good cause” which is consists of more than a general concern for personal safety. The classic example of people who can show good cause are jewelers because they could potentially be carrying thousands of dollars of easily transferrable merchandise. California’s law was challenged in federal court, which upheld the law in Peruta v. County of San Diego, finding that the Second Amendment did not create a constitutional right to carry concealed weapons. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the Peruta Decision when it declined the review.
California’s Conceal Carry Laws
Definitions
Cal. Pen. Code Sec. 25400 makes it a crime to carry a concealed firearm:
- On your person;
- In a vehicle you’re driving; and
- In a vehicle in which you are an occupant.
The law defines firearm broadly, including, pistols, revolvers, or “any other firearm capable of being concealed upon the person.” Presumably, this would include sawed-off shotguns (which are also illegal), Uzis, and other small firearms. Before you ask, yes, it is also illegal to carry unloaded firearms on your person in a public place.
Elements of the Crime
Every crime consists of “elements.” Elements are the various acts or omissions the district attorney must prove you did or didn’t do in order to charge and convict you with a crime successfully. If the district attorney fails to prove any element, the jury should acquit you. However, even if the jury doesn’t (which can happen), the judge can also rule the verdict invalid and acquit you since the prosecutor did not meet her burden under the law to convict you.
That being said, there are three elements to violation Section 25400:
- You concealed a weapon in your vehicle or on your person;
- You knew about the concealed weapon; and
- Moreover, the weapon was actually (or substantially) concealed.
What might immediately just at you is that you must “know” about the concealed weapon. How can someone not know they are carrying a gun? The purpose of this element is to highlight that this is a “specific” intent crime. You must always intend to commit a crime but there is a difference between knowing something is illegal and intentionally doing the act anyway in violation of the law and generally intending to commit criminal behavior that you may or may not know is illegal.
For example, if you commit homicide, the prosecutor does not need to prove that you had the specific intent to break the law by committing a homicide. The prosecutor need only prove that you intended to end the other person’s life – it doesn’t matter if you knew it was illegal or not.
Conversely, as applied to Section 25400, you must intend to commit this specific crime. This means that you must have intended to carry a concealed weapon on your person. Therefore, if you grab someone else’s bag by accident and get caught with a weapon that you didn’t know was in there – you cannot be charged with violation Section 25400 because you were unaware of the weapon on your person.
Definitions: Concealment
What does it mean to “conceal” a weapon? Concealment is broadly interpreted. It can mean a weapon that is fully hidden within a jacket or waistband. It can also include weapons which are partially concealed (i.e., sticking out of your pocket), even though the arresting officer can identify that a firearm is on your person.
Concealment excludes openly carrying a firearm. However, you could still be charged with a crime under Cal. Pen. Code Sec. 26350 if you openly carry a firearm in public. So, you avoid charges under Section 25400, but you’re still facing criminal penalties. Furthermore, subpart (b) of Section 25400 expressly excludes weapons carried in belt holsters (but, again, you could face charges under Section 26350).
Definitions: Weapon Capable of Being Concealed Upon a Person
What are the kinds of weapons that violate Section 25400? Cal. Pen. Code Sec. 16530(a) includes any device that is designed to be a weapon and which uses combustion or force of any explosion to expel projectiles, and which uses a barrel that is 16 inches or less (or can be interchanged with a barrel that is 16 inches or less). So, weapon modifications that can increase or decrease the barrel size of a weapon below the 16-inch threshold cannot be carried on your person.
Definitions: Firearm
Similar to the definition above, a firearm is any device that uses explosive force to expel projectiles through a barrel. So, the law excludes model rockets (which use combustion to expel projectiles) because the rocket doesn’t leave a barrel. While the law has that general definition, it also includes an illustrative list of examples:
- Handguns;
- Revolvers;
- Pistols;
- Shotguns;
- Rifles; and
Yes, taser-guns also qualify as firearms and cannot be concealed carry. Not all tasers – just the tasers that expel the electrical barbs through barrels that are less than 12 inches in length. So, tasers that require contact and do not shoot projectiles are not considered firearms for purposes of Section 25400.
You should also note that the definition is expressly limited to devices that use explosive force or some other form of combustions; so airsoft, BB guns, and other guns that use air pressure or springs are not “firearms” for purposes of Section 25400.
Finally, you should note that the law does not require the device actually to work. The law only requires that the device is designed to shoot projectiles. Therefore, even if you conceal carry a gun that is unloaded and inoperable (for example, the firing pin is removed), it is still a violation of Section 25400, and you could theoretically be charged with a crime.
Definition: carried on the person
The law prohibits you from carrying firearms on your person. However, what does that mean? Does it include guns in your waistband but exclude them from a backpack or purse? The law punishes anyone who physically possesses a firearm; so, it includes weapons in purses, bags, jackets, briefcases, rolled up newspapers, empty boxes of roses, or anything else you might think of to carry a weapon.
Exemptions to Section 25400
After getting through the law, you might have noticed that there isn’t an exception for people going to shooting ranges and you would be right. The law does expressly exempt certain individuals from Section 25400:
- Licensed firearm dealers;
- Members of the U.S. military;
- Peace offices (both active and honorably retired);
- Bank guards;
- Bank messengers;
- Licensed hunters and fishers who are transporting their weapons; and
- Members of shooting clubs and organizations who are transporting their weapons.
However, there are exceptions to these exemptions (yes, it can get very complicated). Without getting into too much detail, you are allowed to transport firearms if they are unloaded, stored in a secure lockbox, and are only used for certain activities (i.e., at a shooting range or hunting).
Possible Defenses to a Section 25400 Violation
There are two ways to defend against a criminal action: (1) you argue against one or more of the elements or (2) you raise an affirmative defense which, essentially, argues that even if the conduct occurred it was justified or necessary and therefore should not result in criminal penalties. A classic example is injuring or killing another individual in defense of someone else or yourself. This section will go over some examples of ways you could challenge a Section 25400 charge.
Did Not Know
Recall in the previous section the prosecutor must prove that you knew about the concealed weapon. So, if you didn’t know you had the weapon – you can’t be charged. Maybe, someone put the firearm in your bag as a joke, or you accidentally grabbed the wrong bag on the way out the door. There are a number of ways you could accidentally end up with a firearm on your person and not know it.
The Gun was Secured in a Locked Container
The law may make it seem like you can never transport your firearms out of your house unless you are going to the shooting range or hunting. However, California does provide exceptions (after all, if it didn’t, how would you get the gun from the gun store to your house after purchase?).
You don’t violate section 25400 if your firearm is in a locked container within your vehicle (but not the glovebox, and to be safe, it should be in the backseat) and you are legally entitled to possess or own the firearm. You are also not guilty if the gun is in the trunk of your vehicle. There is a lot of nuance about the exception, especially as it pertains to vehicles with separate trunks (i.e., sedans) and accessible trunks (i.e., SUVs and hatchbacks). When in doubt, store the firearm in a locked container in the trunk.
You’re Licensed to Conceal Carry
If you receive a valid conceal carry permit, you can carry a weapon (obviously). However, the burden of proving that your license is on you, not the prosecutor. So, you could still be charged then the burden is on you to prove that your license is valid and you were acting in accordance with it.
The Concealed Weapon was Within Your Business or Residence
You may carry concealed firearms in your home and in your business (not merely a place that you work, it has to be a business that you own). Also, before you start storing guns at your office, you may also want to check your lease because it is possible your landlord prohibits firearms on their commercial property.
In general, the law does not include people who work or live out of their cars with one big exception – taxi cab drivers may carry concealed weapons in their vehicle without violating Section 25400.
Fourth Amendment Violations
Hardly anyone is ever arrested based solely on a concealed firearm charge. Concealed firearm charges usually arise out of a different legal situation which gave the officer permission to frisk or approaches a suspect. For example, if you were speeding, and the officer pulls you over; they usually ask if you have a weapon in the vehicle and if you say “yes” and the office retrieves it from a location that is not compliant (i.e., under your driver’s seat outside of a locked container), you could be charged with Section 25400.
The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects you from unreasonable searches and seizures which includes searches of your person or vehicle. The officer is not permitted to pat you down or search your vehicle without probable cause or a search warrant. Therefore, an officer that searches your vehicle without probable cause (i.e., a reason to think he will discover illegal activity), anything he discovers from that search is not admissible evidence and cannot be used against you in court.
Police Misconduct
Finally, police misconduct is another possible defense. If you think the police officer violated your rights or behaved improperly, a defense attorney can file a Pitchess Motion on your behalf which unseals the officer’s record and allows you to determine if other individuals have lodged similar complaints against the officer which is the first step in attacking the credibility of the arresting officer.
Self-Defense
Unlike the first four examples, which attack elements of the crime, and the fifth and sixth examples which attack the evidence and are more “technical,” raising self-defense is an affirmative defense as discussed earlier in this section. In this case, you did violate the law, but the violation was necessary because you reasonably believed (1) your life was in grave danger or (2) because you secured court-ordered restraining order due to another person’s threats and/or conduct. While defense (1) is a classic example; defense (2) is a limited more complicated, but a skilled defense attorney should be able to convince a judge or prosecutor that the charges are not warranted to extreme circumstances.
Penalties
Section 25400 is a “wobbler” which means it can be charged as a misdemeanor or felony – depending on the circumstances of the crime. In this case, you will be charged as a felony if (1) you were previously convicted of a misdemeanor crime against person or property or a narcotics crime or (2) the firearm was loaded, and you are not the registered owner of the loaded handgun. Yes, do not transport your friends’ firearms if they are loaded; they should be unloaded, in a sealed container, in your trunk.
You must be charged as a felony if any of the following are true:
- The firearm was stolen, and you know or should have known;
- You are a member of a street gang;
- You were previously convicted of a felony or another firearm-related charge; or
- You are prohibited from owning or possessing a firearm pursuant to Pen. Code Sec. 29800 (i.e., you were convicted of a serious felony such as murder, robbery, or kidnapping).
Misdemeanor
If you are convicted of a misdemeanor, you could face up to $1,000 in fines and a year in county jail. You could be eligible for summary probation based on your criminal history, the nature of the crime, whether you intended to conceal carry, or other similar facts.
Felony
If you are convicted of a felony, you face a $10,000 fine and either:
- Probation with one year in county jail;
- 16 months of jail
- Two years; or
- Three years.
Enhancements
Finally, California mandates specific minimum punishments for individuals with a prior criminal history. If you were previously convicted of any felony or misdemeanor firearm charge, you must serve at least three months in county jail. If you were previously convicted of a serious crime involving a firearm such as assault with a deadly weapon, brandishing a weapon, or shooting at a car or dwelling house, you must serve between three and six months in county jail.
Help Finding a Criminal Defense Lawyer Near Me
If you need help finding a legal professional to defend you against a charge of violating Section 25400 “conceal carry” or other criminal defense issues near you, contact our Van Nuys Criminal Attorney at 818-484-1100 for assistance. Leah Legal Criminal Defense is a full-service criminal defense law firm that defends clients against charges of assault and battery, domestic violence, child abduction and neglect, driving under the influence, drug possession, fraud, and will assist you with post-conviction matters such as expungement and record sealing. Leah represents residents throughout Los Angeles County including the cities of Los Angeles, Van Nuys, East Hollywood, Montebello, Torrance, Santa Monica, Long Beach, Culver City, the City of Industry, San Fernando, Burbank, Calabasas and throughout Southern California. If you or a loved needs representation, call us today!
In the recent past, there has been a robust debate over gun control in California. Given the different arguments put forward, you can quickly get confused about some aspects of gun ownership.
Though the Second Amendment protects your right to bear arms, there are certain restrictions placed on handling loaded firearms in public. Other than the relevant federal laws, the state of California has its gun laws that regulate the carrying of loaded weapons. These are among the strictest gun control regulations in the entire nation.
Recent Gun Control Measures
To further enforce gun ownership regulations, the state recently passed bills that implemented the following changes:
- Increased age of purchasing shotguns and rifles to 21, up from 18 years.
- Made it harder to own devices with multi-burst triggers.
- Recommended lifetime bans on firearm ownership for anyone convicted on charges of domestic violence, or inadvertently hospitalized on mental health grounds more than once in a given year.
Laws concerning the carrying of loaded firearms are contained in California penal code 25850.
California’s Gun Laws
Under California’s Penal Code 25850, it is illegal to carry a loaded firearm in public or a vehicle in your possession. This applies to any public place or street located in an incorporated city or prohibited part of the unincorporated territory.
While California’s restrictive gun control regulations are meant to enhance public safety, sometimes innocent civilians might find themselves on the wrong side of such laws. To determine whether a gun is loaded, law enforcement officers are authorized to scrutinize any firearm you carry in public, either on your person or in a vehicle.
Refusing to allow an officer of the law to inspect the firearm could lead to arrest.
What it Means to Carry a Loaded Firearm in Public
Due to the complex nature of the law, it can be hard to understand precisely what it means to be accused of carrying a loaded gun in public. To avoid confusion and ambiguity, there are specific definitions for various aspects of this violation.
According to Penal Code 25850(a), you’re guilty of breaking the law if you carry a loaded firearm on your person or in a vehicle in any public place.
A firearm is considered loaded if it meets the following criteria:
- It contains an unexpended shell or cartridge.
- It has a case that contains a powder charge or bullet inside or somehow attached to the firearm.
If you’re carrying a muzzleloader firearm, it will be considered loaded if it meets the following two conditions:
- It’s primed or otherwise capped.
- Has a charge of powder and a shot or ball in its cylinder or barrel.
These are the guidelines used by peace officers to determine whether a firearm in your possession is loaded.
A firearm is defined as a device intended to be operated as a weapon, which can expel a projectile through a barrel, using an explosion or another method of combustion. This encompasses devices capable of launching rocket-propelled projectiles, or any device containing incendiary materials.
A public place is referred to as any place that is open to the general population and includes most government buildings and infrastructure. A prohibited area, on the other hand, is any place where the law forbids you to discharge a firearm.
Penalties for Violating California’s Gun Regulations
If found in possession of a loaded firearm, your case could be treated as a wobbler. This means it could be punishable as either a misdemeanor or a felony. Depending on the exact circumstances, you could be punished in the following ways:
- If convicted of a crime, you could receive an informal or summary probation. You could also serve up to a year in jail and receive a fine of up to $1000.
- Aggravating circumstances could easily see you convicted of a felony. A felony charge under such conditions could see you serve a term of up to 3 years in county jail as well as receiving a fine of up to $10,000.
Aggravating circumstances include previous convictions under the state’s gun laws, having a stolen firearm, having a gun that is not registered to you, and engaging in criminal activities as a member of a street gang.
These circumstances can escalate your conviction to either a wobbler or to a straight felony.
Wobbler Conviction
Having considered the particular cause of your arrest as well as your criminal history, the violation will be treated as a wobbler if, apart from carrying a loaded firearm in public:
- You have a previous conviction of a misdemeanor crime against an individual or property or have previously been convicted for violating California’s drug crime laws.
- The Department of Justice does not recognize you as the owner of the loaded firearm that was found in your possession.
If convicted on felony charges, you face penalties of 16 months, or two to three years in county jail, and an additional fine of $1000.
Straight Felony Conviction
If charged with a straight felony, it cannot be reduced to a misdemeanor charge. Circumstances that might attract a straight felony conviction include:
- Previously convicted of violating California’s gun laws.
- If you’ve been found carrying a loaded firearm when you knew or had reason to believe the gun was stolen.
- Having a firearm when you’re prohibited by law from owning, possessing or handling one, and
- Being an active member of a street gang involved in criminal activities.
It’s important to understand that you could be found guilty of participating in a street gang even if your arrest on charges of carrying a loaded firearm is not directly linked to your active involvement in one.
Expungement of a Penal Code 25850 PC Conviction
Even after being prosecuted under a felony, it is possible for a jury to reduce the charge to a misdemeanor. It is also possible for a judge to expunge your criminal record after serving the probation period of a misdemeanor conviction. Such expungement will be subject to your adherence to the terms and conditions of the probation.
Collateral Consequences of a Conviction
A PC 25850 conviction can also lead to collateral consequences. These refer to some civil state penalties that automatically apply to your criminal conviction. In case you’re a legal immigrant and get convicted for carrying a loaded firearm, the state could deport you as an additional penalty.
For you to be convicted of carrying a loaded firearm, the prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that:
- The gun in your possession at the time of arrest was indeed loaded.
- You were aware of the presence of a loaded gun on your person, luggage or inside your vehicle.
- You were in a public facility or place.
- Where applicable, you were not the registered owner of the loaded firearm.
If your attorney can successfully challenge the prosecutor based on these elements, you have a decent chance of beating the charges brought against you. It is important to note that you’ll still be considered to have committed an offense even if your loaded firearm is not in good working condition.
Prior Firearm Convictions
If you face charges of violating PC 25850 and have previous convictions relating to:
- Committing assault with a deadly weapon (Penal Code 254 PC violation)
- Shooting at a car or dwelling that is inhabited (Penal Code 246 PC violation)
- Public display or brandishing of a deadly weapon (Penal Code 417 PC violation)
- Any other violation of California gun laws,
You will serve a mandatory minimum sentence of three months in the county jail.
Owning a Firearm after a PC 25850 Conviction
Being convicted on a misdemeanor charge alone isn’t enough to have your gun ownership rights revoked. If the court also judges you to be a minor, or ward of the juvenile court, you’ll be banned from owning or having a firearm in your possession until you turn 30 years old.
Once convicted under a felony charge, you will be banned from owning, handling or possessing a firearm for the rest of your life. If your felony conviction occurs under a wobbler aspect of PC 25850, you have a chance of arguing for the reduction to a misdemeanor. If successful, you will have your gun ownership rights restored.
Theoretically, you could have your gun possession rights restored after successfully applying for a certificate of rehabilitation, and after receiving a governor’s pardon. This is a long shot though, and will not be applicable if your conviction involved the actual use of a firearm or any other dangerous weapon.
Under California law, a dangerous weapon is defined as any weapon, object, or instrument with a capability of causing great bodily harm or death. A loaded firearm is therefore considered a dangerous weapon under this definition.
Exemption from Prosecution
Under certain circumstances, you might be exempted from prosecution for carrying a firearm in public. Such circumstances include:
- Being an active or honorably retired California peace officer.
- Being a full-time peace officer employed by another state or the federal government. If you’re on official assignment in California, you won’t be prosecuted for carrying a loaded firearm in public.
- Being an honorably retired federal agent resident in California with permission from your county sheriff to carry a loaded firearm. Federal agents include members of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Internal Revenue Service (IRS), the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), among many other federal agencies in the country.
- Being a member of the US armed forces. This exemption only applies to members of the California National Guard or US military who are actively performing their duties.
- Having completed a firearms training course approved by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST certification). Exempted individuals under this program include but are not limited to school district police officers, district attorney investigators, and animal control officers.
- Having a loaded gun in a shooting range or for purposes of hunting. This exemption is subject to being permitted by the city council. You’re also required only to carry a loaded firearm in those specifically designated areas. While transporting the weapon from and to these facilities, it should always be in a locked repository.
- Having a concealed carry permit.
- Being a private investigator, armored vehicle guard, or security guard.
- Having a loaded firearm on private property or your business premises.
For the last exemption, you’re only protected if the loaded firearm remains on your business premises or private property. If found with the weapon in a public setting other than the specified locations, you will be charged with violating Penal Code 25850.
Defenses to Carrying a Loaded Firearm
If you find yourself accused of taking a loaded gun, there are a few arguments you can make in your case. The most common are listed below:
- You didn’t know you were carrying a firearm
You might find yourself in a situation in which you’re taking a gun without being aware of it. This could be due to using a bag without checking its contents first, or someone else maliciously slipped the weapon into your luggage.
- You didn’t know you were carrying a loaded firearm
Sometimes you might be aware that you’re taking a gun but be unaware that it’s loaded. It’s only natural for people to make mistakes once in a while.
- You had a firearm, but it wasn’t loaded
In some instances, it might serve you well to plead to a lesser charge of carrying an unloaded weapon.
- You didn’t carry a loaded firearm in a public place
If you can successfully argue that you were not in a public place when you were arrested with a loaded weapon, you stand a chance of beating the charges brought against you.
- The loaded firearm was carried as a self-defense measure
This defense might work if you feel there’s a real possibility of your life being in danger. If for example someone has been stalking or threatening you, you might be justified to carry a loaded gun because you’re not sure of their exact intention.
- The arresting officer did not follow due process
If the arresting officer fails to read you your Miranda rights, or goes against the laid down protocols, your lawyer could argue for the charges to be dropped on a technicality.
- You are permitted by law to carry a loaded firearm
This defense applies if you’ve been wrongly arrested for carrying a loaded gun. Certain individuals are allowed by law to take such weapons in public places. If you’re a peace officer, active or retired federal agent, or have a permit from your county sheriff to carry a loaded firearm, you stand an excellent chance of charges being dropped.
- Outright misconduct on the part of the arresting officer(s)
Not every law enforcement officer you encounter will adhere to high ethical standards. Some of them might engage in corrupt activities like planting evidence, threatening or coercing you into confessing, making false reports, and conducting unreasonable searches.
Why You Need a Qualified Attorney
If you’re ever accused of carrying a loaded firearm in public, you should do your best to engage the services of an experienced lawyer as soon as possible.
Attorneys understand the law and its complexities, so they can quickly figure out how to scrutinize and challenge evidence. If the evidence brought against you by the prosecution is defective, your lawyer will use that angle to cast doubt on the prosecution’s competence.
Due to their firm grasp of the inner workings of the justice system, attorneys can do the heavy lifting on your behalf as you prepare for the hearing of your case. Some legal procedures, such as filing paperwork and meeting certain deadlines, can overwhelm you if you choose to do them by yourself.
An attorney also has valuable insights concerning your case, as a result of taking part in many similar trials. Such insights can include how to cross-examine witnesses, how to spot loopholes and use obscure clauses of the law to your advantage. They are also better placed to negotiate plea bargains and settlements that might end up saving you a lot of time and money.
Have You Been Charged with Carrying a Loaded Firearm?
If you’ve been accused of violating California’s loaded firearm regulations, you should hire Van Nuys Criminal Attorney for the best defense of your case. Headed by the talented and aggressive Leah Naparstek, you can rest assured that she will use her legal prowess to fight for your best interests.
Her tireless energy and passion for improving the community make her your best bet for a positive outcome. Having successfully defended many other clients against seemingly insurmountable odds, her never say die attitude will inspire you to believe there may be hope for your case. To make an appointment and for a more in-depth discussion of your legal options, feel free to call my criminal defense law firm at 818-484-1100.
Some crimes attract additional penalties based on the elements of the crime and the severity of their outcomes. Therefore, you may be subject to a sentencing enhancement for committing a crime in possession of a firearm or using it during the unlawful activities. Usually, sentencing enhancements attract additional penalties to an existing sentence, meaning that you will likely spend more time behind bars to serve a consecutive sentence enhancement. Such punishments are severe for any offender, primarily because they are closely linked to your original charges. As a result, you may find it challenging to present defenses that prevent you from facing a sentencing enhancement for the possession or use of a firearm.
However, with a skilled criminal defense attorney’s help, you can develop different legal defenses to persuade the judge to discard the enhancements. The guidance and support will allow you to provide all the necessary information to your criminal defense lawyer, who will then incorporate the essential details when drafting sound and strong defenses on your behalf. At the Leah Legal, you can access professional criminal defense services from our highly experienced team. Many years of service in the criminal defense field have equipped us with all the information and expertise needed by our clients in Van Nuys, California, to present a strong defense for any criminal case.
Contact Leah Legal anytime 24/7 by calling 818-484-1100, and we will give you a free legal consultation and can immediately get started on building you a solid defense!
The Nature of a Sentencing Enhancement
Usually, a sentencing enhancement works to increase the penalties that you face. The kind of offenses listed in unique categories to qualify for firearm sentencing enhancements are specific to the California Penal Code provisions. Moreover, the judge also considers several other factors that could automatically lead to sentence enhancement.
It is up to the prosecutor to charge you for the original crime you faced arrest for by providing sufficient evidence to show that you are guilty of all criminal elements relevant to that offense. Alternatively, you may plead guilty of a gun offense at the arraignment stage, meaning that there will be no need for the matter to move to trial.
In such cases, the judge moves to sentence quicker than during the normal trial process, as there is no matter to contest or defend. While you may be inclined to plead guilty, we recommend avoiding taking the plea, especially if you can hire a criminal defense attorney. The admission of guilt without trial may ruin your criminal record, despite promise deals from the prosecutor to reduce your case’s outcomes.
If the judge finds you guilty in either of these circumstances, you will have to serve time in state prison or jail, depending on the firearm offense he/she committed. Your sentences will run concurrently, meaning that you will help time for the original crime.
Firearm Crimes that Attract Sentencing Enhancements
Section 12022 of the California Penal Code provides specific offenses that will amount to an enhancement where the defendant used or possessed the firearm when committing the crime. Each offense carries different elements for the prosecutor to prove, including whether you directly involved yourself in the unlawful activities. After making a valid case against you, it will then be up to the judge to provide an enhancement, as stated in the statutory provisions. The primary firearm offenses that attract enhancements are:
1. Making Personal Use of the Firearm to Commit a Crime
Section 12022.5 of the Penal Code provides the offense of personal use of a firearm for unlawful purposes. In this category, you will be eligible for a sentencing enhancement if you were the gun’s principal user, meaning that you handled it and used it to harm or scare a victim to promote your criminal intentions.
The prosecutor would consider you a firearm’s principal user if you used it directly to assault or harm the victim. For example, suppose you were involved in a shoplifting incident whereby you handled a pistol to scare the cashiers and other shoppers into letting you steal all available cash. In that case, you will be a primary handler of the gun and will be eligible for a sentence enhancement.
Moreover, you can become a principal offender by aiding or abetting the commission of a crime. In this case, a principal is held responsible for activities like passing the firearm to the active user who fires and uses it to intimidate others. Moreover, aiding and abetting also includes providing the person found guilty of a gun offense with the firearm. However, the prosecutor must prove that you were aware of the possible consequences of lending the firearm to the other guilty party, even if it was not apparent when you provided it.
Aiding and abetting a guilty party also involves trying to help him/her hide or destroy all evidence sources, including the firearm after the crime. You may do this by shooting witnesses or hurting any victim trying to escape and seek help to prevent him/her from raising the alarm. In any of these instances, the prosecutor will treat you as a principal offender for personally handling or using the gun.
Sentencing enhancement for personally using a gun may attract five, six, or ten years in state prison, on top of the current punishment you face.
2. Using a Firearm to Commit Sexual Offenses
Additionally, you may be guilty of using a firearm to coerce or target a victim for sexual abuse. In such circumstances, you may use the firearm to scare the crime victim into keeping quiet as you violate him/her, especially if you pose threats to kill the person in case of any attempts to raise the alarm. In other cases, you may cause actual harm to prevent the victim from escaping by shooting the person on the limbs to slow him/her down. Some of the sexual offenses that the judge considers are rape, sodomy, and spousal rape, whereby you hold the victim at gunpoint or in fear of harm as you commit sexual abuse.
It is essential to distinguish between using the firearm and possessing it when sexually abusing a victim. It will play a significant role in determining which sentence enhancement you will receive. When you possess a firearm, you are aware that you are carrying it during the sexual offense commission, even if the victim does not.
Moreover, you do not have to possess the firearm per se, because even ammunition will amount to possession charges. Secondly, you will be said to possess the gun if you know that it is available for your use if need be, especially if it is well within your reach. In such a case, the prosecutor’s primary factor in establishing that you are aware of having the weapon with you, as opposed to innocent or unintentional possession.
On the other hand, you will have used the gun if you fire at the crime victim. Firing a shot qualifies as firearm use, even if it misses the victim, and he/she is not injured. Sometimes, you may also become agitated and strike the victim with the firearm, causing possible injuries. Here, you will have used the firearm like any other weapon to inflict casualties on the victim.
Nevertheless, you may be found guilty of using the firearm to promote your unlawful behavior. Lastly, showing the crime victim your gun to indicate the intention of using it to cause injury or death if he/she resists your advances also amounts to use. Even if you do not use the firearm, it will have served its purpose by scaring the victim into complying with your orders for fear of injury or death.
The sentencing enhancement available for having a firearm when committing a sexual offense is one to five additional years in prison. If you are guilty of using the gun to undertake unlawful activities, you will be eligible to enhance the sentence to three to ten years in state prison.
3. Firearm Use When Carjacking
The crime of carjacking is categorized as a more violent and dangerous incident, mainly because it includes forceful removal of the victims from their vehicles to steal it. Therefore, most offenders have to use firearms to coerce the crime victims out of their cars and use any altercation or resistance from the victims. Section 215 of the Penal Code makes it an offense to engage in carjacking, and provides for further punishment when the defendant uses firearms to commit the crime.
In most instances, the defendant will be involved in gun use rather than gun possession as he/she aims to stop a vehicle and forcefully remove the passengers to escape with the car. In some cases, a carjacker may even shoot and kill the crime victims to prevent them from escaping and reporting the incident.
Suppose the prosecutor successfully shows that you are guilty of all elements related to carjacking. In that case, you will be eligible to receive a sentence enhancement for one to three years in state prison.
4. Using Firearms to Commit Drug Offenses
Involvement in organized drug crimes often involves the use of firearms to promote the sale and distribution of the narcotics, mainly where you distribute illegal schedule I and II drugs. Additionally, most defendants found guilty of drug crimes often operate in gangs, meaning that there is the constant use of firearms to evade the police to harm someone who appears as a threat to the gang operations.
The primary type of drug crimes involves drug trafficking, whereby you are responsible for transporting and distributing drugs to designated areas for collection by other involved parties. Moreover, drug trafficking also consists of recruiting new members to grow the distribution chain, leading to possible conflicts in organized gangs.
For example, if a new member finds the working conditions extraordinarily harsh or dangerous, he/she may decide to quit. However, you may likely result in killing such a member using a firearm to prevent the possibility of police obtaining information from reformed drug traffickers. Subsequently, most drug crimes will involve firearm use to promote unlawful activities.
The sentence enhancement ranges from one to three years in state prison on top of the extra punishment for your specific drug offenses.
Aggravating Factors Considered Before a Sentencing Enhancement
Once the judge determines that your offense will attract a sentence enhancement, he/she will issue the appropriate punishment based on several considerations that could aggravate your situation and result in severe penalties. The aggravating factors are related to different circumstances of the offense, while others relate to your characteristics. Overall, they all count in making a final decision on the sentencing enhancement you are set to receive. Some of these factors are:
Whether you Have a Previous Criminal Record
A first-time offender will commonly face different repercussions compared to a repeat offender, who may receive additional penalties for recurrent engagement in criminal activities. Consequently, if the prosecutor includes your past criminal convictions for different crimes, it may aggravate your circumstances and lead to higher sentencing enhancements.
However, the judge will consider a past conviction’s seriousness compared with the current one and exercise guided discretion to decide on the sentence enhancement level. For example, if you have a prior DUI conviction in your criminal record, you could receive a significantly lower enhancement that someone with a previous sentence for attempted murder.
A Record of Previous Violent Behavior
Apart from checking your criminal record, the judge will also consider whether you are prone to violent behavior using firearms by reviewing your history for any reports. One of the sources of information that may provide details on your violent history is police reports for different incidents you faced accusations for. Since most of these reports are only available from the Department of Justice, it is inevitable that your records if past violent activities are related to previous convictions.
Additionally, information from a therapist or reform program you enrolled in will provide a reliable source of information on whether your past violent behavior is psychological or purely for unlawful purposes.
The Nature of the Crime for Which You were Arrested
Engaging in vile unlawful activities will undoubtedly lead to serious sentence enhancements that could range to maximum increment. Some of the most vicious offenses that will amount to more extended enhancement include rape, sodomy, and drug trafficking. The nature of such crimes is so cruel that it leaves the victims highly traumatized for a significant period of their lives, with most of them facing traumatic problems for their entire lifetime.
Subsequently, the judge will consider the physical and psychological harm you caused by using a firearm to commit an offense and the possible effects on affected victims.
Whether You Were a Principal or Passive Firearm User
In the case of an organized crime that involved firearm use, you may be eligible for lower enhancements, especially if you were a passive party to the offense who neither actively held the firearm, nor aided or abetted another person in the criminal activity using a gun.
Conversely, acting as a primary firearm handler will lead to severe outcomes, primarily if the crime victim sustained severe injuries or died after you used the firearm on him/her.
Defenses For Firearm Sentencing Enhancement Offenses
Your criminal defense attorney plays a significant role in presenting sound legal defenses on your behalf to help you avert the unfair consequences for actions you did not engage in. Therefore, it is crucial to work closely with your lawyer to provide essential details that may strengthen the legal arguments for the court’s presentation. Possible defenses to avert firearm sentencing enhancements include:
- There was police misconduct.
- The firearm was found in an illegal search and seizure.
- You did not personally handle the gun to engage in unlawful activities
- You are innocent of the crime.
All the mentioned defenses vary in applicability, depending on the circumstances of your case. For example, you cannot claim to be innocent of the charged crime if the prosecutor has already successfully shown that you engaged in all the crime elements. Moreover, defenses like experiencing police misconduct require your criminal attorney to provide sufficient sources of evidence to support the claim. Before presenting such, applying diligence cases is essential, mainly because it imposes severe accusations on law enforcement officers, such as making false police reports and planting evidence. As a result, teaming up with your lawyer to discuss the best defense strategy is vital for proper defense development.
Contact a Criminal Defense Lawyer Near Me
Sentencing enhancements for using firearms during crime commission result in additional punishments for the underlying crime. Without the help of an experienced criminal defense attorney, you may have a hard time defending yourself and persuading the judge to drop the firearm sentencing enhancements. Therefore, you will have a better chance of receiving a favorable case outcome with the support and representation of a criminal attorney who is conversant with firearm offenses.
At the Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we work hard to provide the best criminal defense services to our clients in Van Nuys, California. Our team is happy to take on your case and provide personalized counsel for your case. Call us today at 818-484-1100 and discuss your case with us.
When you are already facing a serious criminal charge, that’s bad enough. But serious crimes with a gun are punished even more severely than the same crimes apart from the use of a firearm.
At Leah Legal, we have deep experience in defending against the full gamut of California criminal charges, including the most serious offenses on the books, like murder, rape, assault, battery, domestic violence, kidnapping, and more. We also have deep experience defending against charges with a gun enhancement or a charge where the use of a firearm is an integral part of the crime’s definition.
We do not shy away from the “tough cases,” like some other law firms do. If you are facing a charge for a serious crime with a gun, do not hesitate to contact Leah Legal anytime 24/7 by calling 818-484-1100 for a free legal consultation and immediate help in winning your case!
About Guns, Crime, & Punishment in California
Sometimes California’s gun laws don’t seem to make sense, and not infrequently, they change and flux from administration to administration.
For example, in November of 2017, the sentencing enhancement of 10 extra years of incarceration as a “mandatory minimum” with many crimes involving guns was repealed. Yet, at the same time, additional red tape was added that same year to those selling firearms to presumably law abiding citizens.
Also, some crimes defined as being committed with a firearm, and partly for that reason already having very stiff penalties can still get a firearm use enhancement slapped on the sentence.
And despite the removal of the mandatory minimum requirement, you can still potentially get as many as 10 extra years in prison based on a gun enhancement – it’s just not mandatory anymore – it goes on a case by case basis.
After years of low gun crime rates, California saw a surge in crimes committed with firearms between 2014 and 2016 according to California DOJ statistics – and there is every reason to suspect that trend has continued at least into 2018. This upsurge coincided with a national increase in gun use in murders and other felonies, but was particularly disappointing in California after so many efforts to curb gun crimes specifically.
The point is that one can argue California’s gun laws reflect an over-reaction to gun-based crimes versus otherwise equivalent crimes. Others say it’s the opposite – things are too lenient right now.
But at Leah Legal, we haven’t forgotten that many people are falsely charged with crimes, including crimes committed with a firearm, every year in California. And many others are overcharged by overzealous prosecutors OR mitigating circumstances that could get them a lower sentence are ignored by clumsy defense attorneys.
We at Leah Legal know how to fight for your best interests even in criminal defense cases where a gun was allegedly used. We have won for our clients on this class of cases many times in the past, and we stand ready to do the same for you.
California’s Sentencing Enhancement for Use of a Firearm
Possessing a firearm while committing a felony will activate California’s firearms sentencing enhancement under Penal Code Sections 12021.55 through 12022.55.
As mentioned above, these enhancements have recently been adjusted as far as the mandatory minimums were concerned, but otherwise, they remaind the same.
Note that the gun can be possessed by the defendant or his/her accomplice and it will count the same way. Thus, letting an accomplice be the “gun man” doesn’t absolve others assisting in committing a felony crime from any enhancements.
If you are “armed with” a gun during a felony or possess armor piercing ammo, use a firearm while committing certain sex crimes, furnish another with a firearm to help them commit a felony, use assault weapons or machine guns during a felony, or fire a firearm from a vehicle while committing a felony – a gun use enhancement will apply.
The exact number of extra years in jail or prison the enhancement will add to your sentence depends on which specific enhancement rule is in view, the type of gun used, if it was you or an accomplice who used the gun, whether the gun was merely possessed or was used to effect the crime, the nature of the felony the gun use was connected with, and the defendant’s past criminal record (if any.)
While the maximum additional years added is 10, it could also be only 2 or 3 years. It all depends on the details of the case.
Common strategies to use against a firearms enhancement are:
- To defeat the underlying felony charge.
- To show you did not personally use the gun to commit the crime.
- To prove police misconduct or an illegal search and seizure took place.
- To argue that mitigating circumstances should cause the enhancement to be dismissed in “the interests of justice” This is possible now because such enhancements are no longer mandatory.
Brandishing a Firearm / Weapon
Another major gun crime, often connected with other serious crimes, is PC 417 Brandishing a Deadly Weapon (in this case, a firearm).
If you exhibit a firearm in the presence of another person in an angry, rude, or threatening way, unlawfully, it’s a serious gun crime. Many times, this is done during a domestic or other dispute or in the course of committing another crime.
However, to display a firearm threateningly in self defense or to defend other people is not a crime. Any object that is used in a way capable of inflicting “great bodily harm” is a “deadly weapon.” But firearms are easily among the most obvious objects that qualify as deadly weapons under this statute. Even if the gun wasn’t loaded at the time, it’s still a violation of PC 417 to brandish the weapon. After all, others did not necessarily know it wasn’t loaded. But note that BB and pellet guns do not qualify as firearms for the purposes of PC 417.
You do not have to have pointed the gun at the other person or fired it. Nor is it required the other person even saw the gun, but simply that you produced it and others were present at the time. And it is not legally required that the offender intended to actually harm anyone for the manner of gun exhibition to count as “rude, angry, or threatening.” Plus, if you intended to threaten the victim, you could also be prosecuted for PC 422 Criminal Threats. However, if you brandished the gun in self defense or in defense of others, were merely showing off your gun but not making a threat, or the allegations are simply trumped up – you are not guilty.
PC 417 can be a misdemeanor or felony offense. As a misdemeanor, it is punishable by a 30 day minimum jail term if it occurs during a fight. Otherwise, it is punishable by 3 to 6 months in county jail. And if done in public, you can get 3 to 12 months and a fine up to $1,000. If you violate PC 417 on a daycare center grounds, while the center is open, you can get a misdemeanor with 3 to 12 months in jail or a felony charge with 16 months to 3 years in state prison. Similar steeper penalties apply if PC 417 violations are done on school grounds or gun threats are directed at an on duty police officer. Those convicted of PC 417 Brandishing a Firearm will likely lose their gun ownership rights if convicted.
Assault with a Firearm
PC 245 deals with another very serious gun crime, assault with a firearm. Even ordinary assault is a serious offense, but when a firearm is used during the assault, the offense becomes much more severe.
“Assault” does not have to involve any actual application of force, but only the attempt to inflict injury or death on another through the application of force. If even the slightest touch occurs, even a touch that causes no physical harm, “assault” becomes “battery.”
Assault does require an intention to take such actions as would likely result in bodily harm to another person – an accident or misunderstanding cannot be an assault. It must be a “willful” act. The results or possible results of the assault, however, do not have to be intended. One must have had the ability to accomplish the assault for it to count as assault. Thus, an unloaded gun being pointed at someone can’t be an assault, though it could be brandishing a firearm and making criminal threats. If you intended to bludgeon another person with the unloaded gun, however, then it’s still assault.
Assault with a firearm (PC 245a) can be a felony or a misdemeanor, depending on the circumstances of each case. As a misdemeanor, it is punishable by 6 to 12 months in county jail, a fine of up to $1,000, or both. As a felony, it is punishable by 2 to 4 years in state prison, a fine of up to $10,000, or both.
If a machine gun, assault gun, .50 BMG rifle, or semi-automatic firearm was used, assault with a firearm is an automatic felony. But if a “generic” firearm is used (almost all other gun types), it is can be misdemeanor or a felony (that is, it’s a “wobbler.”)
A felony with “non-generic” guns gets a steeper penalty: 3 to 12 years in state prison.
Assaulting an on duty police officer or fire fighter with a firearm when a reasonable person would have known the identity of these people, is a felony, punishable by 4 to 12 years in state prison.
Also, you can get a “personal use of a firearm” sentencing enhancement added to the charge of “assault with a firearm” even though that charge already includes the fact a firearm was used. This can add 3 to 10 years to a prison term.
Anyone convicted of PC 245a Assault with a Firearm will lose his or her gun ownership rights. And this offense is also normally a “strike” under California’s Three Strikes Law, which doubles incarceration terms for a second strike and can get you 25 years to life imprisonment for a third strike violation.
Possible defenses against Assault with a Firearm include:
- You acted in self defense. This only applies if you were in imminent danger of bodily harm or reasonably believed you were. And, the use of force was necessary and you did not use “excessive force” beyond what was necessary.
- You acted to defend others. The same “rules” apply here as to self defense, except that the person in danger of bodily harm was no yourself but someone else.
- Lack of intent. If you only appeared to make an aggressive or threatening action with the gun or there was some kind of misunderstanding or accidental movement involved, you are not guilty because assault cannot occur without the element of intent or “willfulness.”
- False accusation. It’s not uncommon for a completely exaggerated or totally fabricated story to make its way into court in a serious criminal charge, like that of assault with a firearm. Most commonly, this occurs in intense domestic violence disputes. We at Leah Legal know how to unravel such false accusations with real evidence and stern witness cross-examinations.
Contact Us Today for Immediate Help!
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we are well seasoned criminal defense attorneys with deep experience in all the ins and outs of California’s firearm crimes laws. We will know how to defend you against a charge of serious crimes with a gun in local Los Angeles or Southern California courts.
Don’t risk your future by trusting a less experienced law firm with your high profile case. We at Leah Legal can maximize your chances of a dismissal, acquittal, or a favorable plea deal with a reduced charge and/or sentence. We know how to win the best possible outcome to your case!
Call our Los Angeles criminal lawyer anytime at 818-484-1100 for a free, no obligation legal consultation and quick attention to your case. We serve all of Los Angeles and the whole Southern California region.
In California, anyone who has reached eighteen years can legally own and use a firearm as long as they follow the set California gun laws, such as guidelines on how you should use this firearm and where you can carry it. However, you could find yourself on the wrong side of the law by firing your gun in areas where you endanger other people or cause property damage. Knowing which situations can land you in court and what to do when faced with a situation where you negligently discharged your firearm is critical for firearms owners. This article will elaborate more on this topic. If there is information that you would like further professional clarification on or are looking for a criminal defense attorney, reach out to us at Leah Legal.
We have top-notch criminal defense attorneys dedicated to ensuring our clients’ satisfaction by fighting for their best interests. We believe that a reasonable criminal defense attorney can be the difference between the case against you being acquitted or facing a lengthy jail sentence, or a short one. With our well-experienced attorneys mitigating your case, you can be assured that you will have a strong defense. We offer criminal defense services throughout Van Nuys.
Contact Leah Legal anytime 24/7 by calling 818-484-1100, and we will give you a free legal consultation and can immediately get started on building you a solid defense!
Negligent Discharge of a Firearm Definition
A firearm is a weapon device that uses the force of an explosion to expel a projectile through a barrel. An example of a firearm is a pistol or hunting gun.
As per the California Penal Code 246.3, negligent discharge of a firearm is defined as willfully discharging a firearm without being authorized by law in a grossly negligent manner, which could result in injury or death of a person. It includes negligent acts such as leaving a child with or within reach of a loaded firearm, shooting at an inhabited house, or firing a gun in an event, celebration, or festivity.
Fortunately, a firearm’s negligent discharge does not include the release of a gunshot by accident. You must have committed the act either willfully or knowingly for you to be convicted for this crime. Therefore, if you pull the trigger unintentionally or without knowing that the gun was loaded, you cannot be convicted under Penal Code 246.3. So, what determines if you are charged for the negligent discharge of a firearm? Here are the main elements of this criminal offense.
Elements of the Crime
Negligent discharge of a firearm is fact-specific. It largely depends on particular circumstances that led to the defendant pulling the trigger. These include the exact manner the gun was discharged, the intention behind you firing the shot, and its location. Some elements used to determine if you are guilty primarily are:
Willful/Intentionally
Willful means that the act was intended. This means that you knew that your firearm was loaded, and you meant to fire that shot.
Gross Negligence
Gross negligence means that you did the action with more than ordinary mistaken judgment, carelessness, or inattentiveness, meaning you ignored a known or obvious risk. Consequently, your act can be deemed gross negligence if you act in a reckless manner that risks bodily injury or death. It includes working in a way that shows disregard for human life or your actions’ possible consequences. Primarily, if an ordinary person would act differently from you in such a situation and show reasonable care or exercise caution, then your act is considered gross negligence.
An example of gross negligence is when you are at a party with your friends, and you decide to show them how your gun works by firing a shot in the air. In such a situation, you can be charged under Penal Code 246.3, whether there was someone injured or not. This is because you acted in negligence, posing a danger of injury to the party’s people.
However, if your friend sees your gun on the table gun and without knowing that it is loaded, he/she pulls the trigger and fires a shot, then they can argue that they were not aware that the gun was loaded. If a person discharges a firearm and they did not know that it was loaded, they cannot be charged with the crime.
Injury and Death Possibility
Another element of this charge is the possibility of the shot you fired to cause injury or death. Remember that there need not be an injured victim or death for you to be prosecuted. As long as there was a foreseeable danger, you can be charged. For instance, if you fire a firearm to get attention from a group of people, you can face charges for a firearm’s negligent discharge. Whether you shot it in the air or towards the people, the shot you fired posed a risk of injury to the people around.
However, if you are in an isolated place and you discharge your firearm, then you are reported by someone who hears the gunshot from a distance, you will not be prosecuted for negligent discharge of a firearm. This is because there was no one around. Therefore, you did not pose a risk of injury or death to anyone.
State Law Penalties of the Crime
Negligent discharge of a firearm is a wobbler crime, meaning it can fall into either a misdemeanor or felony charge under California law. Penalties depend on the circumstances leading to you discharging the firearm and whether you have a criminal record. The court can issue penalties in the form of probation periods, a jail sentence or fines, and, in some cases, both.
For misdemeanor negligent discharge of a firearm, possible penalties include a maximum county jail term of not more than one year, misdemeanor probation, or a fine of $1,000. On the other hand, a felony charge can earn you a county jail term of sixteen months, two years, or even three years, felony probation, or a fine not exceeding $10,000.
It should be noted that you can face penalties even when no one was injured after you fired a shot. It is because the law focuses on the actual offense and not the consequences of that offense. However, the charges and penalty will be less severe than if someone was injured or killed.
Additional penalties can be being prohibited from owning a firearm or revocation of a firearm license. If charged with a misdemeanor, you will lose your Second Amendment right for a decade, and for a felony charge, you will lose the right to own a firearm for life. If you were formerly denied the right to own a gun in a prior conviction and are found in possession of a weapon, you will be charged under “felony with a firearm.”
California Penal Code 667 provides a law known as the Three Strikes Law. It is a provision for the enhancement of penalties for severe felony charges. A severe felony is any felony where the defendant risked inflicting fatal body injuries to another person. It states that if a defendant has one or more records of serious or violent felony conviction (includes the negligent discharge of a firearm), they will be subject to the following sentence enhancements:
- If the defendant has one such past conviction record, the punishment will be twice the penalty set for the current offense for which they are convicted.
- If the defendant has two or more prior severe or violent felony convictions, they will be subject to three times the penalty for the current offense or state imprisonment of twenty-five years.
In line with this provision, if you are convicted of a firearm’s negligent discharge, it will earn you a strike on your record. A second conviction (second strike) of any similar severe or violent felony will have you face a second jail sentence.
Sentence Enhancements for Negligent Discharge of a Firearm
If you discharged a firearm and injured a person, it is essential to contact an attorney as soon as you can. Violation of Penal Code 246.3 can have you face severe or multiple related charges, such as assault with a firearm. Therefore, legal advice is critical. These additional charges may include the following.
Discharge of a Firearm which Causes Injury or Death of a Person
If you discharge a firearm, thereby leading to someone’s death, you could face second-degree murder charges. California Felony Murder Rule allows you to be prosecuted if you kill someone by committing a discharge of a firearm felony crime, even when it is by accident. Involuntary manslaughter that occurred during a felony commission will earn you 15 years imprisonment in the California state prison.
An example is when a person at a party or celebration fires a gun in the moment of excitement, and the bullet hits another person in the party, killing them. The person who discharged the firearm committed involuntary manslaughter in the commission of a felony, and they will be charged with second-degree murder.
Gang Involvement
A further sentence enhancement is if the felony was committed in association with gang activity or assisting criminal acts of a group. It includes firing a gun to help a gang member escape, firing a gun because a gang member asked you, and any gang involvement when the felony occurred. It requires a two to five-year additional sentence to that of the negligent discharge of a firearm.
Immigration Consequences
Furthermore, negligent discharge of a firearm is a criminal offense it is considered as a deportable offense. If you are a non-citizen in California and you get convicted of the crime, you can be subject to deportation or inadmissibility as per the Immigration and Nationality Act. Whether you plead guilty or not to the charges, equipping yourself with an expert criminal defense attorney can help you negotiate less severe penalties or prove your innocence.
Loss of Gun Rights
When you are convicted of felony negligent discharge of a firearm, your gun rights are withdrawn. You are prohibited from possessing, receiving, or acquiring a firearm legally. If you are found in any of the stated acts, you will face necessary punishments as outlined in the law for possession of a gun with a felony conviction record.
What the Prosecutor Needs to Prove
For you to be prosecuted for a firearm’s negligent discharge, your prosecutor must prove the following:
- You intentionally shot the gun
- You fired the arm with gross negligence
- There was a possibility of the shooting injuring or leading to the death of a person
- You did not act in self-defense or defense of another person
What to do if You Accidentally Discharge a Firearm
1. Assess the Situation
The first step to take if you accidentally discharge a firearm is to analyze the situation. Check whether you caused any injuries. If there is an injured person, call 911 for emergency services. Assessing the situation is critical since it helps you know if you injured someone.
Then, check that you have unloaded the gun to ensure it does not discharge again. Put it in a place where it is no longer of harm to anyone. Do not proceed to the next steps before putting away the gun safely.
2. Assess the Damages You Caused
After ensuring that everyone is safe and that no one is injured, you should check whether you caused any damages. Damages vary depending on the location where you discharge your firearm, the type of gun, and the distance you fired.
Ensure that the shot caused the actual injuries or damages; so that you are not blamed for injuries you did not create.
3. Call a Criminal Defense Attorney
If you discharge your firearm and cause damages, injuries, or death of a person, it is in your best interest to contact your attorney. You will potentially face severe charges, and getting legal guidance is critical.
4. Take Responsibility
It is essential to take responsibility if you caused any injury or damages. You can do this by offering to cater for medical care costs or replacing the losses. Not all cases of negligent discharge of a firearm have to be reported to the police. Minor cases of property damage, especially where you and the victim believe it was an accident, can be settled outside court if both parties agree.
5. Ensure You Do Not Commit the Offense Again
As much as accidents happen, if you are charged with a firearm’s negligent discharge, it will have consequences whether or not it is deemed an accident. It is, therefore, in your best interest that you prevent a second occurrence. Anytime you are found with repetitive criminal offenses, your penalties become more severe, and your chances of winning in defense cases diminish.
Ensure you equip yourself with the law’s requirements: the restrictions and legal rights applicable in different locations and situations.
Common Legal Defenses
If charged with a firearm’s negligent discharge, the following defenses may be used by your attorney in your defense.
You Acted in Self-Defense
In California, it is lawful to act in self-defense or defense of another where there is imminent danger of being touched unlawfully or suffering body injuries. If your attorney proves that your life was in danger or someone else’s, which led to your discharging your firearm, you will be relieved of any penalties. An example is when you fire a shot in the air to scare a person or animal that is threatening your safety. It has to be evident that the force used was necessary to prevent the said danger and that the action you took was reasonable for such a situation.
You did not Know Your Action would Create a Risk
A common defense taken in cases of negligent discharge of a firearm is the defendant did not know that their action created the risk of injury or death to the people around him/her. It is possible that when you pulled the trigger, you were not aware that the gun was loaded. You can argue that you did not know that it was a loaded firearm with your attorney’s help when you discharged it. As long as you did not know the gun was loaded or intentionally pulled the trigger, you cannot be charged.
Discharge of a Firearm in an Isolated Area
If you fired the gun in an isolated area and no people were present, you could not be found guilty. However, the court can find you guilty of endangering yourself. Reasonable care is a solid defense since it will show that you did not act in negligence, and neither did you risk injuring people. You could not be charged with a firearm’s negligent discharge if the shot did not pose an actual danger to someone.
The Discharge Was by Accident
Another possible defense is that the discharge of your firearm was by accident. It can happen that you pulled the trigger by accident or that your gun had a malfunction. If you can prove this, you would not have fired the shot intentionally. Without this element of the crime, there will be no conviction.
There Was no Injury or Death
Your attorney can ascertain that you practiced reasonable care when discharging the firearm not to injure anyone. This defense is suitable when no one was injured or died from the shot you fired. It can help reduce possible penalties.
Related Crimes
There are several crimes associated with the negligent discharge of a firearm. Consequently, you can find yourself facing multiple charges, depending on your case’s seriousness. In turn, this will have you face additional penalties for these additional charges, as stipulated by the civil law. Some possible convictions that are in line with negligent discharge of a firearm are:
Discharging a Firearm at an Inhabited Dwelling or Car
According to California Penal Code 246, if you wilfully/intentionally discharge a gun at a rented dwelling house, occupied building, occupied vehicle or occupied aircraft, you are guilty of a felony. If convicted, you will face a penalty of state prison imprisonment or a county jail term of not less than six years and not more than a year.
Brandishing a Weapon
Penal Code 415 states that exhibiting, drawing, or using a firearm in a rude, angry, or threatening manner in the presence of another person or people, unless an act of self-defense, is a criminal offense. It often goes hand in hand with the negligent discharge of a firearm. Brandishing a weapon will have you face misdemeanor charges. Whether the gun was loaded or not, a misdemeanor charge of drawing or withdrawing a weapon is punishable by not less than thirty days of county jail imprisonment.
If the action happens in a public place and the firearm involved is small enough to be concealed, you will face a penalty of a fine not exceeding $1,000 or county jail imprisonment for not less than three months than a year. In some instances, you can meet both of the stated penalties.
Possession of an Unregistered Firearm
In line with a conviction for a firearm’s negligent discharge, you can also face possession of an unregistered firearm. In California, merely owning an unregistered firearm is not a crime. However, when you carry the gun with you beyond your home premises, work, or a public place, it becomes a crime. Therefore if you violated Penal Code 246.3, you could also be charged with this crime.
Ex-felon with a Firearm
If you had faced a felony charge that had you lose your right to own a firearm, you could be prosecuted for a gun’s illegal possession. In such a case, the conviction of a gun’s negligent discharge will require you to face charges for illegally possessing a firearm.
Find a Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
Facing any criminal charges requires the defendant to have a seasoned attorney if they want to challenge the charges against them successfully. We at Van Nuys Criminal Attorney have seasoned attorneys who can help you develop suitable defense strategies if you face charges of negligent discharge of a firearm or related charges. We serve the entire Van Nuys area and surrounding areas. Get in touch with us at 818-484-1100 for more information about how we can help you.
In California, there are numerous specific criminal charges related to the use of a firearm, sentencing enhancements for using a gun or another deadly weapon, and strict gun laws that make it easy for innocent people to be accused of weapons violations. If you find yourself facing weapons charges in Los Angeles or anywhere in Southern California, do not hesitate to contact Leah Legal for top-tier legal defense for this very unique practice area.
Only by having a lawyer experienced in weapons charge defense cases and familiar with the details of California gun laws fighting on your side, can you ensure the best possible outcome to your case. Leah Legal stands ready to assist you 24/7! Contact us today by calling 818-484-1100 for a free, no obligation legal consultation.
Overview of California Weapons Charges
Illegal possession or use of a firearm is normally a serious felony offense in California. In some cases, however, weapons offenses can be “wobblers,” meaning that either a misdemeanor or felony can be charged, depending on the circumstances of each case and on the defendant’s past criminal record. The type of weapon involved and the defendant’s actions or intent with the weapon will also play into whether it’s a felony or misdemeanor and how severe the sentence would be upon a conviction.
- Misdemeanor weapons charges can get you up to 12 months in jail and a maximum fine of $1,000.
- Felony weapons charges are punishable by anywhere from one to 20 years in state prison.
The use of a firearm in committing a serious felony or sex crime can lead to a sentencing enhancement. Up to 10 years can be added for possession of a gun during a felony, 20 years added if the gun was fired, and 25 years to life imprisonment added if the gun was fired and caused serious bodily injury or death to a victim.
Clearly, being charged with a gun crime in California is a very serious matter. You should therefore only trust the very best legal help to handle your case.
Gun Possession Laws in California
Any adult can legally possess a firearm in California unless he or she is specifically prohibited from doing so under state law. Normally, you don’t even need a license to buy a gun, and you can store it in your home or carry it around with you if it’s in a locked container.
But who exactly is excluded from buying or owning or carrying a gun under California law? Here is a list in answer to that question:
- Any convicted felon, for any felony offense in any jurisdiction (California, elsewhere in the US, or even a foreign country.)
- Anyone with 2 or more PC 417 Brandishing a Firearm convictions.
- Anyone addicted to a narcotic.
- Those with a serious mental illness.
- People convicted of certain serious misdemeanor crimes.
- Persons under the age of 18.
If you illegally possess a firearm or ammunition for a firearm, buy a handgun without a handgun safety certificate, possess a gun in a prohibited location, possess a banned type of firearm, or conceal carry without a permit, you violate California’s gun possession laws.
PC 29800 Felony Possession of a Firearm
Anyone with a felony on his/her record, or even certain misdemeanors, or who is addicted to drugs violates Penal Code Section 29800 if he/she possesses a gun. In some instances, those convicted of felonies lose their Second Amendment rights for 10 years, in other cases they lose them for life. Minors with felony level offenses can be banned from owning a gun until age 30.
PC 25400 Illegal Concealed Carry
To carry a concealed weapon, either on your person or in your automobile, is a crime in California unless you had a valid concealed carry permit. Prosecutors must prove that you were knowingly concealing the weapon in order to gain a conviction on this charge.
If the gun was unloaded AND in a locked container or locked in the trunk of a car, it is not a concealed carry violation. Nor can you be charged with PC 25400 if the gun was “non-concealable” like a rifle or shotgun. A violation of PC 25400 is a misdemeanor offense, punishable by a year in county jail and a fine of up to $1,000. But, PC 25400 becomes a felony if the defendant has a prior weapons related felony, the gun in question was stolen or illegally possessed, or the defendant was a gang member at the time. Then, it’s punishable by from 16 months to 3 years in jail and a $10,000 fine.
PC 2580 Carrying a Loaded Firearm in Public
It is a crime in California to carry a loaded gun on your person or in your motor vehicle. If any unexpended bullet is in the firing chamber, or attached to the gun via a clip/magazine, the gun is considered “loaded.” And even if the gun itself is non-functional, you can still be charged with PC 2580 so long as the gun is loaded. However, to be guilty of PC 2580, you must have known that the gun was loaded.
Penalties for carrying a loaded firearm are identical to those mentioned just above for illegally carrying a concealed firearm. But if the firearm was both loaded and illegally concealed, you can be charged with both crimes and get double the sentence.
Firearm Possession in Prohibited Places
Not only are certain persons prohibited from possessing a gun in California, but there are also specific places where you cannot legally take a firearm. Under PC 626.9, firearms are banned on school grounds or anywhere within 1,000 feet of school grounds. All levels of schools are included, both public and private. A violation of PC 626.9 can get you up to 7 years of jail time.
Under PC 171c, guns are also banned from all government buildings. PC 171d adds the governor’s mansion as a gun free zone. PC 171.5 bans guns from airports and passenger vessel terminals, while PC 171.7 makes it illegal to bring a gun to a public transportation facility.
Possession of Prohibited Firearm Types
Finally, illegal gun possession can relate to the type of weapon possessed. Under California Penal Code Section 16590, all activities related to a list of generally prohibited weapons are banned. You cannot manufacture, import, sell, buy, give away, loan out, possess, carry, or use these weapons legally in California.
Banned items include: camouflaged or disguised firearms, short barrel shotguns or rifles, wallet guns, can guns, and zip guns. Violation of this statute can be a misdemeanor or felony. As a misdemeanor, it is punishable by from 3 to 12 months in jail; as a felony, it’s punishable by 16 months to 3 years in jail. Finally, also note that assault weapons, like AK rifles, Uzis, .50 BMG rifles, or AR-15 semiauto rifles, are banned under a separate statute – PC 30600. A violation can be a misdemeanor or a felony and is punished the same as PC 16590.
Also, there are further weapons bans in California, including of:
- Armor piercing ammo (PC 30315)
- Gun silencers (PC 33410)
- Stun guns (PC 22610)
- Laser scopes/pointers (PC 417.25)
Charges Involving Illegal Gun “Use”
Thus far, we’ve only looked at California gun crimes to do with simply possessing or carrying a firearm, but now we’ll look at gun crimes where the firearm was “used” in some way. These crimes are, unsurprisingly, normally punished more severely than gun possession violations, making it all the more important to have expert legal assistance when you step into court.
PC 417 Brandishing a Weapon
To draw a gun, wave or exhibit it about, or display it in a threatening manner is to “brandish” a firearm. This act is criminalized and penalized under Penal Code Section 417. Note that you don’t have to have intended to actually use the gun or harm the victim to be guilty of PC 417. So long as the weapon was brandished in a “threatening manner.” PC 417 can be a felony or a misdemeanor, depending on the specifics of the case. As a misdemeanor, it’s punishable by 3 months to one year in jail and a $1,000 fine. As a felony, PC 417 is punishable by 16 months to 3 years in state prison.
PC 26100 Drive by Shooting
If you discharge a firearm from a motor vehicle, often referred to as a “drive by shooting,” under PC 26100 it can be either a felony or misdemeanor, depending on the details of the case. You violate this law whether you are the owner or driver of the car and allow a passenger to shoot from the car, or if you are the one doing the shooting. As a felony, this charge is punishable by anywhere from 16 months to 7 years in state prison and a $10,000 fine.
PC 245a Assault with a Firearm
An “assault” is the attempt, coupled with a present ability to carry that attempt out, to inflict physical injury on another person by any means. PC 245a deals with assaults involving the use of a firearm. Note that even if you fire a gun into a crowd without targeting a specific person, it can still be charged as assault with a firearm.
The penalty for PC 245a varies based, in part, on which type of weapons was used:
- If a machine gun or assault weapon was used, you can get 4 to 12 years in state prison.
- For semi-automatic pistols, PC 245a is punishable by 3 to 9 years in state prison.
- For all other firearm types, PC 245a can be a misdemeanor, punishable by 6 to 12 years in jail or a felony, punishable by 2 to 4 years in prison.
PC 246 Shooting at Inhabited or Occupied Buildings/Vehicles
To shoot at a building or vehicle where someone lives (even if they’re not home at the time) or where someone is located at the moment, is a felony offense under PC 246. PC 246 is punishable by 3 to 7 years in state prison. Also, PC 247 covers the same ground as PC 246 but applied to uninhabited and unoccupied dwellings and vehicles. It is punishable by up to 3 years in state prison if charged as a felony.
PC 246.3 Gross Negligent Discharge of a Firearm
Under PC 246.3, it is a crime to discharge a firearm (or a BB gun with CO2 canisters & ball bearings) in such a manner as might likely cause the injury or death of another person. The discharge of the gun must have been willful, not accidental, and the level of negligence must be “gross” rather than just “ordinary.”
Firearm Sentencing Enhancements
In California, there are not only specific gun crimes, there are also special sentencing enhancements that can increase the penalty of other crimes if a gun was used to commit them. Under PC 12022 & PC 12022.5, you can get from 1 to 10 additional years of incarceration added to your sentence if you were personally armed with a firearm when you committed the underlying offense.
If a generally banned firearm type was used or other aggravating circumstances exist, the enhancement will be on the high side. And if you violate another California gun law, say illegal felon gun possession, plus a felony crime with firearm enhancement, you can be convicted of both offenses resulting in a very severe total sentence. California’s firearm enhancements underscore the importance of having a skilled weapons charges defense attorney fighting on your side.
PC 12022.53 Gun Use Enhancement
Under PC 12022.53, if you commit murder, armed robbery, rape, carjacking, kidnapping, sex crimes, or other serious felonies AND have a gun with you at the time, you can get 10 years added to your sentence. If you fired the gun, you can get 20 years added. If you killed or seriously injured someone with the gun when you fired it, you can get 25 years to life added to the sentence. This is called the “Use a gun and you’re done” law or the “10-20-life statute.”
PC 12022.2 Armor-piercing Ammo / Bullet-proof Vest
If you commit a felony (any felony) while in possession of armor/metal piercing ammo and you used a firearm to commit the crime, 3 to 10 years can be added to the sentence. If you commit a felony with a gun and you are wearing a bullet proof vest, 1 to 5 years will be added to the sentence.
PC 12022.3 Sex Crime + Firearm Enhancement
If you use a firearm to commit a sex crime, be it rape or another serious sex crime, you can get 3 to 10 extra years in prison. If you are armed with a firearm but don’t “use” it to commit the crime, 1 to 5 years will be added.
PC 12022.4 Aiding/abetting a Felony with a Firearm
If you do not actually commit a felony crime, but you provide a gun to another person who does, you will still be found guilty of aiding and abetting a felony. And because you helped them commit a gun crime, a firearm enhancement of 1 to 3 years can be added to your sentence.
Defending Against Weapons Charges in California
At Leah Legal, we have extensive knowledge and experience in building effective defense strategies against any and all California weapons charges or sentencing enhancements.
Some of the most common defenses we use are:
- You were legally allowed to possess and/or carry a firearm while concealing it. You did not lose your gun rights in the past and you had a valid conceal carry license.
- Defense of self or others. You only carried a firearm or used it to defend yourself or another person against imminent threat of bodily injury or death. You used only so much force as was necessary to avert the danger.
- You are not guilty of “assault.” You may have possessed a firearm but you were not in a possession to use it to harm anyone or you made no attempt or threat to do so.
- Lack of knowledge. You were not even aware the gun was on you (it may have been planted), or you were not aware it was loaded.
- Police misconduct. An illegal search/seizure resulted in the discovery of the firearm, or other police misconduct occurred that violated your rights. In this case, we may be able to get evidence suppressed and force a dismissal of your case.
Contact Us Today for Help!
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we have full knowledge of the scope and depth of California weapons laws, and we also have extensive experience in handling and winning all manner of criminal defense cases that involve a charge related to firearms or other weapons.
We will know how to build you a solid defense and win the best possible outcome to your case, be that a dismissal, acquittal, or a reduced charge/sentence. Contact our criminal defense attorney today, or anytime 24/7/365, for a free legal consultation and immediate attention to your case! Just call us at 818-484-1100, and we’re here to help!
Fraud is mainly classified as financial fraud, insurance fraud, and mortgage or real estate fraud, among others. The punishments for fraud crimes differ depending on the type of fraud crime, which is determined by the specific elements of the crime. When you are facing fraud crime allegations, you should contact an experienced criminal defense attorney immediately because these charges usually carry hefty fines. Leah Legal has been helping people in Los Angeles who are facing criminal charges including fraud, and we are ready to hear your case and represent you in court.
What is Fraud?
Fraud refers to all behaviors that involve intentional deception to a person or a business organization, with the intention of financial gain or escaping justice for a crime. This offense can be committed by misrepresentation of facts, false documentation, or exaggeration of events. You will get convicted for fraud if the prosecutor can prove your actions were dishonest, you got undeserved benefit from the act, and you caused harm or loss to the victim of your actions. Fraud can attract both criminal and civil charges. Whether you get a criminal charge or a civil suit will depend on who is suing you. Government prosecutors are the only individuals allowed to bring criminal charges against fraud suspects. Civil suits are filed by the victims of fraudulent activities. For a criminal charge, fraud must be proven without reasonable doubt, and a conviction may lead to a criminal sentence and/or fines. In civil suits, not much proof is required, and the penalty is much lighter, where the defendant is expected to pay for monetary damages suffered.
Mortgage and Real Estate Fraud
Real estate fraud consists of a variety of behaviors involving misrepresentations or concealing facts in a way that harms another person’s interests in their property. Most forms of real estate fraud are prosecuted under California Penal Code 487 grand theft law. This form of fraud is considered as a form of theft through false threats. As opposed to petty theft, the crime of grand theft involves more than $950, which is usually the case in mortgage fraud.
To get convicted of real estate fraud, the prosecutor must prove that you knowingly deceived another individual by making fraudulent representation in regard to a real estate, with the intention to benefit yourself with the property. They should also show that the victim of your actions let you take ownership with reliance on the false information you provided. The most common types of real estate fraud are:
Civil Code 2945.4 Foreclosure Fraud
Given the current crisis in the real estate sector, foreclosure fraud is very common. Pending foreclosures are always listed in public records. Thus, this information can be used by foreclosure consultants to defraud distressed homeowners. The court will convict you for foreclosure fraud if
- You collect compensation from a homeowner for a service you have not provided,
- You take a lien or interest on a property from the owner,
- You collect money or compensation from a third party in regard to the services you are providing without the knowledge of the homeowner,
- You charge excessive fees for the service you provide or try to lure the homeowner into signing an illegal contract.
This offense can be charged to both individual and business organizations. If you are accused of foreclosure fraud, you should seek the representation from a competent attorney.
Forged Real Estate Documents
Pursuant to penal code 115 PC, you will get arrested and charged with real estate fraud if you force any real estate deeds with the aim of committing fraud and financially benefiting yourself. If you are found guilty and convicted of this offense, you may face additional charges under Penal Code 470 California forgery law.
Rent Skimming
California Civil Code 890 prohibits rent skimming which happens if, within the first year of acquiring rental property, you fail to apply for rent proceeds or to rent a property that does not belong to you and keeping the proceeds. However, if within thirty days of receiving those proceeds, you use them for unforeseen medical care for you and your loved one or to rehabilitate the property, you are exempted from this law. A first rent skimming offense will lead to a civil suit, but multiple rent skimming is punished as a felony.
The Flipping of Illegal Property
Flipping is a type of real estate fraud perpetrated by property appraisers and realtors where they intentionally exaggerate the price of the property. This results in buyers spending more than the property worth and may cause banks to lend more money on a property than its actual value. However, in case you renovate a property and sell it for a higher price, you cannot get charged for illegal flipping.
In California, real estate fraud is a wobbler and prosecuted as a misdemeanor or felony depending on the defendant’s criminal history and nature of the particular case. If you are convicted with real estate fraud as a felony, you may serve probation of up to three years or spend sixteen months, two years, or three years in county jail. If you defrauded an individual more than $65,000, you get an additional sentence of up to 5 years. If it is charged as a misdemeanor, you face a maximum jail sentence of one year and $1000 in fines.
Insurance Fraud
Insurance fraud laws of California seek to punish individuals who present false claims with the intention to defraud the insurance providers. You will be charged with insurance fraud if you attempt to obtain benefits from insurance companies when you are not entitled to get the benefits. Generally, for any type of insurance fraud, the prosecutor is required to prove your intention to defraud and your lack of a right for the claim. Also, they can show that you deserved the benefits but exaggerated to get higher compensation. The most common types of insurance fraud are:
Healthcare Insurance Fraud
Individuals who are commonly prosecuted for violating the healthcare insurance fraud laws are the doctors, medical equipment suppliers, and other hospital employees. You commit this offense if you receive extra benefits for giving specific prescriptions when you charge for medical services that were not provided to the patients, exaggerate medicine or medical equipment prices, or secure multiple prescriptions of one drug for financial benefits.
Automobile Insurance Fraud
You violate automobile insurance fraud laws if you attempt to obtain compensation from automobile insurance providers. This can be done by faking an accident to claim for compensation, exaggerating an insurance claim if you get into an accident, or destroying your own vehicle and claiming it was stolen resulting to your financial gain and loss to the insurance company.
Unemployment Insurance Fraud
Insurance fraud laws prohibit any attempts to modify the insurance benefits by increasing, decreasing or denying them. You commit this offense by collecting insurance benefits from multiple states or providing false information regarding the reason for employment termination with the intention of avoiding unemployment insurance contributions.
Workers Compensation Insurance Fraud
California workers compensation laws are violated by individuals who make false claims to get compensation from the workers’ compensation program. If you fake an injury or try to manipulate past injuries to appear work-related, you may face charges for workers compensation insurance fraud.
Punishment for insurance fraud as a misdemeanor is a sentence up to one year in county jail and a fine not exceeding $10,000 or both. If charged as a felony, the defendant will face up to five years with a fine of double the amount defrauded.
Financial Fraud
This is a deception involving financial transactions for financial gain. Some of the offenses classified as financial fraud are
Credit Card Fraud
You violate the credit card law by making an attempt to use or actually using a credit card unlawfully. Like other fraud crimes, an intent to commit fraud must be proven before you are convicted. The law punishes individuals who sell or transfer stolen credit cards or debit card information without the owner’s consent. You will also get charged with credit card fraud for forging credit cards. This is done by either creating a fake card, signing someone else’s card transactions, or altering the information on the card. This offense is treated and punished under California forgery law Penal Code 470. Also, using a stolen, forged, altered or expired card to carry out transactions with full knowledge of the card status is punishable under the financial fraud laws.
Securities Fraud
Securities are business arrangements where you get ownership of a part of a business entity or a right to get repayment for a debt. Common types of securities are interests in limited liability companies, certificates indicating ownership of profit in business arrangements, and stocks from a corporation. If you have a share in a business you are actively involved in running; the securities law does not apply to you. Securities fraud charges are complicated to a layperson; thus, if you are facing these charges, you should consult a criminal attorney to guide you.
You commit securities fraud when you sell securities that are not qualified by the Department of Corporations. Since lots of paperwork is required to register the securities, a lack of completion of this process can attract criminal penalties. However, if the business enterprise involved is small or the buyers purchased the securities their own accord without relying on an advertisement, you cannot get charged with fraud. There is a procedure you need to follow when selling your securities; thus if you don’t comply, it is considered an act of securities fraud.
Securities fraud is a wobbler offense, and the nature of its prosecution will depend on the circumstances and type of securities fraud you commit. As a misdemeanor, the defendant faces a fine not exceeding $1,000,000 or up to three years of jail time. If you are charged with a felony securities fraud, you face a jail sentence of between two to five years or a fine of up to $10,000,000. Also, people who claim to have suffered from your fraudulent behavior may file a civil suit against you. If found guilty, the court will expect you to compensate these people for the damages caused.
Penal Code 476 California’s Check Fraud
Check fraud laws prohibits acts of making, passing, writing, possessing or an attempt to pass altered or forged checks with the aim of acquiring cash or other services. This offense is prosecuted as a crime of forgery since it violates the general fraud laws. To obtain a conviction, the prosecutor must prove that you presented a fake check which could be from non-existent accounts. They are also required to show that the check you used was altered. You can alter a check by changing its legal effect or changing its appearance. However, regardless of the loss suffered by the other party, if your intention to defraud isn’t proven, you cannot get convicted for check fraud.
California Penal Code 332 Gambling Fraud
The law prohibits obtaining money or property from another person by use of deceit and games such as false fortune telling or cheating in card games. The extent of penalties for gambling fraud will be determined by the amount of money you are accused of defrauding. If the amount of money involved is below $950, you will get charged with a misdemeanor and a felony if it exceeds $950.
Tax Evasion
Although tax evasion is treated as a crime on its own, failure to intentionally pay your taxes or underreporting your taxable income is considered as fraud. Tax laws are may be quite complicated to understand. If you are facing tax evasion charges, it is best to seek legal representation. Your attorney will help you prove that you did not act with an intent to evade tax, but instead, you made an error.
Penal Code 530.5 Forgery and Identity Theft
Since forged documents are connected to impersonating someone else, forgery suspects are not only charged with fraud but also with identity theft. Personal identification information that can be used to commit fraud is social security numbers, identification cards, names, and bank account information. Fraud offenses that fall under this category include:
Counterfeiting an Identification Card or a Driver’s License
You are guilty of identity theft by changing your official details and assigning yourself a different name. To violate this law, you do not require to commit identity theft; as long as you get involved in the alteration of a driver’s license or identity card issued by the government, you will get charged with this crime. Also, owing or using documents bearing someone else identity is a violation of California fraud laws.
Internet Fraud
Due to the increased reliance on technology, internet fraud is on the rise. The law prohibits any fraudulent online activities such as making unauthorized purchases, creating and distributing computer viruses as well as cyberstalking.
False Personation
When you pretend to be someone else with the intention to secure a monetary benefit, you violate California’s false personation law. You are also considered to have committed identity theft if you use another person’s details to acquire welfare benefits or signing someone’s check or making an attempt to cash it. Sometimes, the offense can be online by hacking into another individual’s networking profile or trying to make purchases using a forged credit card.
Possessing a Fake Public Seal
California fraud laws prohibit unauthorized possession and use of public seals. However, the public seal does not have to be issued from the state of California to get you convicted for forgery. Regardless of the state where the seal belongs, as long as you use it in California to forge documents and impersonate someone else, you are guilty if identity theft.
Depending on the facts of your case and your criminal history, identity theft will either get charged as a misdemeanor or a felony. As a misdemeanor, you will pay a maximum of $1000 in fines and spend up to one year in county jail. On the other hand, a felony conviction will cost you $10,000 in fines and three years in jail. It is important to understand that each act of fraud is treated separately, even if it was against the same person. Thus, the more the number of the charges, the harsher your penalties would be.
Fight Fraud Charges with the Help of a Criminal Attorney Near Me
Cities such as Los Angeles are among the biggest metropolitans in the world, and with many business opportunities, fraud cases such as real estate fraud, insurance fraud, and financial fraud are common. While the state invests much in investigating and prosecuting fraud, it is true that you may get charged falsely or you unintentionally committed a fraud crime. That is why Van Nuys Criminal Attorney is here.
With our extensive experience in helping clients fight fraud crime and other criminal charges, we are ready to hear out your case and see the best course of action. We cannot guarantee the dismissal of your charges, but we guarantee that we will fight aggressively for your freedom. Please contact our Van Nuys criminal lawyer at 818-484-1100 if you want an experienced Los Angeles defense attorney to fight for your rights.
Defense Against Auto Insurance Fraud Charges
Auto insurance fraud occurs when you attempt to defraud your insurance company by exaggerating or faking injuries from an automobile accident. It can also include being untruthful about or staging a car theft or even planning a collision with another vehicle. Any action you perform that is intentionally done to gain undeserved finances from your insurance company is considered auto fraud.
If you have been charged or accused of auto insurance fraud, you need protection by a criminal defense attorney. There are several defenses your attorney can look into for an argument against a fraud charge. Contact your attorney immediately to protect your future and reputation against these charges.
Auto Insurance Fraud
To counter fraud rings local governments, law enforcement entities, and automobile insurance companies have combined forces. They are working together to put a stop to faked traffic collisions that are staged to collect money through false insurance claims. Fraud rings usually involve insurance claims adjusters and others who create fake police reports and then submit them to receive cash through claims.
Staged collisions are a considerable problem for insurance companies. They involve automobile fraudsters who drive into the middle of a busy intersection or roundabout and then slam on their brakes. By slamming on their brakes, it causes other drivers to rear-end them which places blame on the other driver as it is perceived they were driving too fast or too close to stop. These false claims may even contain fake personal injuries such as whiplash or other physical damages to their person.
California Insurance Fraud
In 1979 California established a law enforcement unit inside the California Department of Insurance. One of the programs within this unit is the automobile insurance fraud. The detectives in this division are experts in their field of insurance fraud. The detectives are all trained in how to conduct criminal investigations and are also set up to provide assistance in training consumers.
The detectives in the automobile insurance fraud department are sworn peace officers. Their scope of investigating includes undercover operations, surveillance, interviewing witnesses and suspects, and also conducting full investigations into the reported accidents. The detectives will serve search warrants, make arrests, and testify in court. Their jobs also entail helping various enforcement task forces such as computer forensics, auto theft, underground economy, disaster fraud, and pharmaceutical fraud.
When you knowingly lie to obtain an advantage or benefit from your insurance company that you are not entitled to, you are committing insurance fraud. If you deliberately deny a benefit that you know is due to someone, you are also committing insurance fraud. The California Department of Insurance Enforcement Branch (CDI) accepts referrals of people who have committed insurance fraud and prosecutes them as felonies.
If you are convicted of insurance fraud, your sentence could include probation, fines, restitution, jail time in county jail or state prison, or community service sentence. Under California Penal Code you can be prosecuted for auto insurance fraud if:
- You intentionally set out to defraud the insurance company. Auto insurance fraud is a specific form of crime, and the prosecutor has to prove you’ve knowingly performed an act to defraud.
- The act to defraud is carried through to the end. If you have only made a statement regarding fraud, the prosecutor cannot charge or convict you.
- You must have completed both the intent and the act. The prosecutor cannot convict one without the other.
- The insurance company doesn’t have to lose money if your claim was filed with the intent to commit the crime.
- Abandon, hide, or damage your vehicle with the intent to file an insurance claim seeking repayment under your policy
- You submit two or more insurance claims for the same occurrence to receive double compensation under your policy
- You participate or cause an accident with your vehicle with the intent to collect on your insurance policy
- You present written or oral statements falsely claiming you live in California with an application for auto insurance or submit false or misleading information on an insurance claim
- You are a business owner and solicit or accept business from another party knowing they intend to commit auto insurance fraud
- You are an owner of an auto repair center and offer insurance agents a commission or profit sharing arrangement if they refer policyholders to your shop
Often the insurance companies do not have all the information, or misinformation was given, and you are mistakenly accused of auto insurance fraud. Do not let these charges ruin your life. Contact a criminal defense attorney to protect your rights and future.
Defense Against Auto Insurance Fraud
The most common defense if you have been charged with auto insurance fraud is the prosecutor not having the proof of your intent. Also, many times claims are not false as the insurance company, or their reviewers are saying, or there was a mistake of fact. Many times, only a portion of your claim is invalid, but most of the facts are legitimate, and your policy should cover them.
If you’ve been charged with auto insurance fraud in California, there is a good chance you can get the charges reduced or dismissed. Contact a criminal defense attorney as they may be able to argue that you did not act with fraudulent intent or discover there is not sufficient evidence available to support the charges.
If you are convicted of auto insurance fraud in California, you will most likely be charged with a felony. There are a few cases of auto insurance fraud such as submitting a false statement or forms which are mostly seen by businesses or auto shop center, that are considered California Wobblers . Depending on the facts of the incident, these can either be charged as a misdemeanor or a felony.
If charged with auto insurance fraud and you are found guilty and convicted of a felony, you could face from sixteen months to five years in prison. Convicted as a felony also means you could be facing fines up to $50,000 or double the amount of the fraud depending which is more.
Definition of California Auto Insurance Fraud
Penal Code 548 – Damaging or Abandoning Vehicle
Under California law, you have committed a crime if you:
Abandon, hide, destroy, injure or dispose of a motorized vehicle which has been insured against such occurrences.
The act has been done with the intent to defraud your insurance carrier.
An intent to defraud is defined as purposely deceiving your insurance carrier in an attempt to receive money from them to pay money, or to cause injury to their property, financial, or legal rights. You can be found guilty of auto insurance fraud if you’ve done any of the above actions to a vehicle even if it is not yours and even if the insurance company does not experience a loss due to your efforts.
Penal Code 550 – Fraudulent Claims
Under California law, there are several different ways you can commit car insurance fraud. One of these falls under Penal Code 550 that states it is a crime to present false claims for destruction, theft, or damage to a vehicle.
The legal definition for this Penal Code is:
You falsely claim payment for a loss of your vehicle due to damage, destruction, or theft. It also covers claiming these losses of a motor vehicle part, or the contents that were in your vehicle.
You have filed the claim with full knowledge it was false.
You filed the claim with the full intention of defrauding your insurance company. Just as with Penal Code 548, it is not necessary for your insurance carrier to actually experience financial loss from your actions.
Just as with Penal Code 548, it is not necessary for your insurance carrier to actually experience financial loss from your actions.
Penal Code 550(a) – Causing an Accident
Under California law, you will have committed a crime if you:
Participated or caused a vehicle accident.
You caused this accident in an attempt to defraud your insurance carrier.
The accident was created with the intent to defraud your insurance and receive money by filing a claim.
You are guilty of auto insurance fraud if you have ’caused’ an accident which was a direct, probable, and natural consequence of your actions, and it would not have occurred had you not done those specific actions.
Penal Code 550 – Multiple Claims
You will have committed a crime in California if you:
File two or more claims on the same loss to several different insurance companies.
You have knowingly filed those multiple claims with the intent to defraud the insurance carriers.
Penal Code 550(b) – False Statements
Under California law, you will have violated the law if:
You have given oral or written statements in opposition to a claim or as part of an auto insurance payment or another benefit with false or misleading information regarding the material fact.
You have created any oral or written statement which you intended to present to your insurance carrier with a goal of receiving car insurance for living in the state of California when you actually live in another state.
Auto Insurance fraud by employees or business owners
Employees, owners, or representatives of auto-related businesses violate California law and can be held criminally liable if:
They accept or solicit any form of business from any person with full knowledge that it was performed with reckless disregard and know the party they are performing work for is filing a fraudulent claim to an auto insurance company.
They offer a commission, profit-sharing, fee, or any other form of compensation to an agent of an insurance company, adjuster, or broker in exchange for sending policyholders to their shop for repairs covered by auto insurance.
Insurance Companies Can Make False Claims of Fraud
There are insurance companies that do not like to pay out on claims. One way for them to avoid paying is to look at a policyholder’s initial application to see if there is an alleged fraud. They look to see if there is any evidence of intentional and material misstatement of fact, so they are able to deny coverage. If there is any such evidence of distortion of truth, they are able to cancel your insurance policy and therefore turn down your claim. They will also turn the case over to the federal government as an auto insurance fraud case for criminal prosecution.
You will need a criminal defense attorney working with you through a challenge from the insurance company. Insurance companies have attorneys working for them to file charges and see the case through the court system and you will need strong representation to ensure your case is handled fairly.
The insurance industry is very serious about investigating fraud cases and employs a staff with experience in the field of private investigators. These investigators are generally former federal agents and prosecutors with knowledge of the law and how to look for evidence that will implicate offenders. You will need someone on your side with equal experience in discovering facts and an understanding of the criminal court system.
If you are charged with auto insurance fraud, you have to take the inquiry seriously and treat it with the same gravity as you would handle other federal criminal investigations.
Insurance Companies Need Protection Against Insurance Fraud
Insurance fraud in California affects the lives of the general public as well as the insurance companies. Some of those effects include:
- There are more than $15 billion a year filed in California each year that cost the average resident around $500 a year. This expense comes from having to pay higher premiums, taxes, and prices.
- The NICB (National Insurance Crime Bureau) reports insurance fraud is the second highest crime in the country, bypassed only by tax evasion.
- Law-abiding, innocent citizens, are the most affected by insurance fraud. Perpetrators of fraud stage auto accidents that result in innocent victims losing their lives, driving companies losing their business, and inappropriate medical treatments being performed on defenseless victims.
- Those who fraudulently falsify insurance claims most often target vulnerable groups such as the elderly, immigrants, and small businesses.
Those who commit auto insurance fraud can range anywhere from first-time opportunists to criminal organized rings. These criminals steal millions of dollars from insurance companies and consumers as their actions inflate the cost of services for ordinary citizens. Auto insurance fraud is the most widespread theft of all insurance claim frauds. If a person is convicted of auto insurance fraud, they can be punished with up to five years in state prison and a $50,000 fine.
Those who commit auto insurance fraud can range anywhere from first-time opportunists to criminal organized rings. These criminals steal millions of dollars from insurance companies and consumers as their actions inflate the cost of services for ordinary citizens. Auto insurance fraud is the most widespread theft of all insurance claim frauds. If a person is convicted of auto insurance fraud, they can be punished with up to five years in state prison and a $50,000 fine.
Contact A Criminal Defense Attorney If Charged with Auto Insurance Fraud
If you or someone you know finds themselves under investigation for insurance application fraud, fraudulent marketing of insurance products, or filing false claims, you need to speak with a criminal defense attorney. You need someone on your side who understands the insurance industry as well as the criminal legal system. These are serious charges that can damage your reputation, cause you enormous financial loss, and if convicted send you to prison. Protect yourself, your business, and your future by having experienced legal counsel working with you.
Finding an Experienced Auto Insurance Fraud Lawyer Near Me
If you or someone you know has been charged with auto insurance fraud call 818-484-1100 to speak with a representative at Van Nuys Criminal Attorney. Leah Legal has the knowledge and experience you will need to fight the charge of auto insurance fraud. Insurance companies have a strong legal counsel on their side, and you deserve the same.
You need someone who will fight for your legal rights and help you get the charges reduced or dismissed altogether. California prosecutors work hard to prosecute those charged with auto insurance fraud, and you will need an experienced defense team who understands federal insurance and fraud defense. You need the Leah Legal criminal defense team working with you. Check through criminal attorney website to discover all the legal services we have available to help you get through any criminal legal process.
CHECK FRAUD – CALIFORNIA PC 476
If you have been accused of committing the crime of check fraud in Los Angeles or Southern California, you cannot afford to go to court without the best possible legal representation. The penalties for many forms of fraud, including check fraud, can be quite severe, and the risks are, therefore, simply too high to rely on anyone but a defense attorney with longtime experience and success in this specific practice area.
At the Criminal Law Office of Leah Legal, we have been representing and getting great results for check fraud defense clients for years. We understand what it takes to build a solid defense against these charges and how to anticipate and counter the moves of the prosecuting attorney. We stand ready to assist you 24/7. Simply call us at 818-484-1100 any time that is convenient for you for a free legal consultation and immediate attention to your case.
How Does California Define “Check Fraud?”
Under California Penal Code section 476, check fraud is defined as creating, possessing, or using a check with the intent to defraud another person or entity and to benefit financially from the transaction yourself. The intent, however, to defraud must be accompanied by an actual presentation of the check as being valid before check fraud has been committed.
There are a number of different ways to commit check fraud, including forging a signature onto the check, adjusting the dollar value of the check, or manufacturing a completely fake check and attempting to fill it out and use it. All check fraud, however, is considered not only a fraud crime but also a forgery crime, under California law.
What Must the Prosecutor Prove?
To gain a conviction on the charge of check fraud, the prosecution must prove beyond all doubt the following “elements of the crime:”
- The defendant knowingly possessed, altered, or made OR attempted to alter or make a check that would not be valid to pass.
- The defendant had an intention to pass said invalid check as if it were genuine.
- The defendant intended to defraud another by passing the check and to benefit financially from the transaction.
- The defendant presented the fraudulent check and represented it as genuine.
It is not sufficient that even all of these elements but one be true to gain a conviction. Unless you are proven to be guilty on all four elements, you cannot be convicted as guilty at all.
Intent to Defraud – It is key to remember, however, that you need not have actually succeeded at defrauding another person to be convicted of check fraud. So long as you possessed a fraud check, intended to use it, and presented it with intent of passing it off as genuine, that is check fraud.
Represent as Genuine – But how does one present a check as genuine? This can be done in words, in writing, by actions, in person, via mail, and in may ways, but basically, any time you attempt to use a fraudulent checking, knowing that it is fraudulent, that amounts to presenting as genuine what in fact is not.
Types of Check Fraud
There are a number of different types of check fraud that are specifically criminalized in California Penal Code section 476. Below, we look at two particular forms of check fraud in a little more detail:
- Passing Fictitious Checks
A fictitious check is not one that doesn’t exist but one for which a bank, bank account, or signer does not exist. It is simply legalese for a fake check.
Such checks are sometimes created on private computers or manufacturing machines. The perpetrator of the fictitious check then attempts to pass the forged check off as genuine, either by cashing it, depositing it, or paying for goods/services with it.
This crime is distinguished from attempting to pass a check for an account that has been closed or that does not have sufficient funds. While those would also be illegal actions, they would not count as passing fictitious checks.
- Altering Checks
Check fraud can also be committed by altering an existing check by adding information to it, deleting information, or changing it in some way. The alterations must be such that the physical check appears different than in its original state, and the changes made must be such that they would change the legal status or monetary value of the check.
For example, adding an extra zero to change $10 to $100, adjusting the date on a post-dated check, or changing the routing/bank account number on the check would all constitute check fraud by alteration.
Possible Penalties for California Check Fraud
As mentioned above, check fraud under Penal Code section 476 is considered to be a forgery crime in the state of California. It is, therefore, generally punished as are other forgery crimes.
Check fraud is a wobbler crime and can be either a felony or a misdemeanor, depending on the circumstances of the case and on the defendant’s past criminal record.
If the amount of money the forged check was written out for was $950 or less, a check fraud charge will be a misdemeanor, while a fake check written out for over $950 would make it a felony.
However, there is an exception imposed by Prop 47, which was passed by California voters in 2014: if the defendant is convicted of both check fraud and identity theft, under California Penal Code section 530.5, it will be a felony regardless of the dollar amount on the check.
And there is a second exception as well: regardless of the amount of the fraud check, if the defendant has a violent felony or sex crime on his/her record, the charge can be either a felony or misdemeanor, a wobbler charge.
When charged as a misdemeanor, check fraud in California is punishable by:
- Up to 12 months in county jail.
- Up to a $1,000 fine.
When charged as a felony, California check fraud is punishable by:
- 16 months to 3 years in jail OR probation and 12 months in jail.
- A fine of up to $10,000.

Possible Defense Strategies
At Leah Legal Criminal Defense, we have been defending clients in Los Angeles and throughout Southern California against charges of check fraud for years. We have seen cases involving every type of check fraud imaginable and know well how to build a solid defense for each particular scenario.
Some of the most common defenses we use in these types of cases include:
- Lack of Fraudulent Intent: With any form of fraud in California, including check fraud, you cannot be convicted unless it can be shown you had an intent to defraud another person or entity. Thus, someone could (hypothetically, for there would be little reason to do so) make a check out to himself for $100,000 but have no intention of trying to use it. That would not be check fraud. A more likely scenario would be if someone else paid you with a fake check, and then you went to deposit it in your bank account or cash it. You could be arrested and charged with check fraud, but if you did not know and had not reason to believe the check was fake, you would not be guilty.
- Possession of Consent: In another scenario, you might have indeed made changes to a check. Perhaps, you adjusted the dollar amount or even signed in the payee’s name. However, it the payee or whoever had authority to permit you to do so, allowed you to make the change for some reason, then it would not be check fraud. People give permission to make these kinds of changes all the time; and while not necessarily 100% protocol, it is certainly not check fraud.
- Mistaken Identity or False Accusations: Another possible defense is that, as those committing check fraud seek to remain hidden, you were the victim of circumstantial evidence or even of a “frame job.” It could also be that someone accused you of check fraud on purpose, knowing you were innocent, out of a spirit of revenge, having some sort of grudge against you. A good lawyer will know how to get to the bottom of these kinds of situations. There will normally be evidence and witnesses available to help your case, and as the opposition’s case can only be founded on circumstantial evidence, a good defense lawyer will know how to challenge and undermine that evidence.
Other Related Offenses
There are other offenses similar to check fraud that often come up in check fraud cases, either as being charged alongside a check fraud charge or in place of one. Some of the most common related offenses include:
- Writing Bad Checks (PC 476a): When you write out or pass a check, while aware of the fact that you do not have sufficient funds in your account to cover the amount it is written out for, and with intent to defraud another party, it is a crime under California Penal Code section 476a. Sometimes, you can be charged with both check fraud and writing bad checks, or you might get a charge reduction from PC 476 to 476a in a favorable plea deal. Writing bad checks is a misdemeanor if the amount involved is $950 or less, otherwise, it is a “wobbler.” And you can also be sued for the amount of the bad check, and pay extra damages that can be as high as $1,500.
- Forgery (PC 470): Forgery is a very broad category in the California Penal Code, while check fraud is a very specific kind of forgery crime. If forgery involves checks and other payable notes, it is classed as check fraud. Normally, you will be charged under Penal Code section 476 for check fraud, but sometimes, the prosecutor may choose to charge you under Penal Code section 470 instead of or in addition to the PC 476 charge. However, he can only do this if your forged a signature or a document, and you cannot be convicted on both PC 470 and 476 for the same offense.
- Grand Theft (PC 487): Any time you take property belonging to another person without the owner’s consent and with intent to deprive the owner of that property, it is theft under California law. In general, if the value of the property or money you stole was over $950, it is grand theft. Thus, one can be charged with both grand theft and check fraud when he or she succeeds at defrauding someone of over $950. Grand theft can be charged as a felony or misdemeanor, but when the amount stolen is over $65,000, it will always be a felony and incur incarceration time beyond that of even an ordinary grand theft felony. As a misdemeanor, grand theft is punishable by up to one year in jail. As a felony, it is normally punished by 16 months to 3 years in county jail or state prison.
- Petty Theft (PC 488): In California, the unlawful taking of the property of another valued at or below $950 is considered a petty theft. Petty theft is a misdemeanor, punishable by 6 months in county jail and a fine of up to $10,0000. It is possible to be charged with both check fraud and petty theft for the same offense.
Contact Us Today For Help
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we have a proven track record of success in defending against check fraud charges in Los Angeles and the Southern California area. Our detailed knowledge of the law, our longtime familiarity with local court processes, and our personal knowledge of many judges and prosecutors in the region uniquely fit us to win your case.
Call our Los Angeles Criminal Lawyer today, or anytime 24/7/365, for a free consultation, at 818-484-1100.
Credit Card Fraud – CALIFORNIA PC 484e – 484j
If you find yourself facing the charge of credit card fraud in the state of California, it is in your best interests to act quickly to secure the services of a criminal defense attorney with deep experience in this practice area. Given the potentially harsh and life-changing sentences you could be facing upon a credit card fraud conviction, you will need every possible advantage when you walk into the courtroom.
At Leah Legal Criminal Defense, we have a long track record of successfully defending clients in the Los Angeles Area who have been accused of credit card fraud. And we stand ready to put our intricate knowledge of California credit card fraud law and of local Los Angeles and Southern California court processes to work for you.
For a free legal consultation, call us anytime 24/7 at 818-484-1100.
How Is “Credit Card Fraud” Defined in California?
California Penal Code Section 484 criminalizes credit card fraud in California and subdivides it, under numerous subsections, into various specific types of credit card fraud. In general, the statute concerns all manner of fraudulent actions involving a credit card, debit card, or the information associated with such a card or account.
Fraud is defined as any activity wherein one unlawfully attempts to attain an undeserved benefit for himself and/or cause another person an undeserved loss. To attempt to use a credit or debit card or associated information to intentionally defraud another person and enrich yourself is an act of credit card fraud.
California Penal Code sections 484e through 484j outline particular instances of credit card fraud and assign punishments to each class. While there are many different specific crimes listed, they are generally all punished the same as petty theft, grand theft, or forgery, being seen to fall under those classifications.
Credit card fraud is also a federal offense if committed against a government entity, on government-owned property, or in more than one U.S. state. It is possible, in such cases, to be charged with violating one or more state statutes and with violation of U.S. Code, Title 18, Section 1029. It is also possible to be charged on either the state or federal level instead of on both. Punishments for California credit card fraud are already very severe, but if convicted of a federal violation, you could see heavy fines and up to 20 years in prison as part of the sentence.
Types of Credit Card Fraud
As credit card fraud can be committed in a great variety of ways, the California Penal Code devotes substantial space to this crime, in Penal Code section 484 subsections e, f, g, h, i, and j.
Penal Code section 484e
This subsection deals with the sale, acquisition, or transfer of a credit or debit card or associated account information. To do any of these activities without the cardholder’s knowledge and permission is considered fraud.
To even knowingly possess someone else’s card and/or information without their permission and with intent to use it for fraud, is itself a crime. If, however, you did not actually carry out the intended fraud, it is classed as an act of petty theft and is punishable by:
- 6 months in county jail.
- A $1,000 maximum fine.
If you did carry out the fraud, it is an act of grand theft, but can be punished as either a misdemeanor or felony. As a misdemeanor, it is punishable by:
- A $1,000 fine.
- 12 months in jail.
As a felony, it is punishable by:
- 16 months to 3 years in jail.
- Up to 12 months in jail with probation.
- A maximum fine of $10,000.

Penal Code section 484f
This statute concerns the forgery of credit cards and of credit card information. It is violated by someone knowingly and illegally counterfeiting, altering, or signing and using a credit card to defraud another person and benefits his or herself financially.
As forgery, it is punished under Penal Code section 470 but is punished the same as Penal Code section 484e (as either grand or petty theft).
Penal Code section 484g
Penal Code section 484g concerns the fraudulent use of an access card, which means either a credit or debit card, or of the associated account information. Using a counterfeit/forged, stolen/lost, or expired/revoked access card in an attempt to benefit financially is fraud.
If you steal via access card property valued at over $950, within a six-month period of time, it is grand theft credit card fraud. If the value of the stolen property is $950 or less, it is petty theft.
Penal Code section 484h
Penal Code section 484h differs from the statutes covered so far in that it is committed by retailers. Retailer credit card fraud can be committed a number of different ways, including:
- Knowingly accepting payment via an access card that the retailer knows or should have known was being fraudulently used. As the retailer stands to gain financially by making sales, regardless of whether the card is valid, there is a clear motive for violating Penal Code section 484h.
- Presenting evidence of an access card transaction so as to collect on it, when in fact, the retailer delivered no goods/services of value for the money charged OR delivered less value than the amount charged.
Punishment for Penal Code section 484h is the same as for Penal Code section 484g, as petty or grand theft.
Penal Code section 484i
This subsection deals with counterfeiting credit card. It, therefore, overlaps with Penal Code section 484e but is, nonetheless, a separate statute.
Penal Code section 484i is violated by any of the following activities:
- Possession of a blank/incomplete access card, while intending to later fill it in with a cardholder’s data without his/her consent.
- Alteration of any part or feature of a credit card, the alteration being done for fraud purposes.
- Permitting or facilitating the unlawful alteration of a credit card or the card holder’s account information.
- Possessing, producing, or trafficking in credit-card manufacturing equipment or in “blank cards,” knowing that the person to whom you sell the equipment intends to use it for fraud.
A conviction on Penal Code section 484i, credit card counterfeiting crimes, varies based on the specific act. To possess a blank card while intending to later complete it for fraud purposes, is a misdemeanor, punishable by:
- A 6-month maximum jail sentence.
- A fine of up to $1,000.
To fraudulently alter information on a card is forgery and can be either a felony or misdemeanor. It, along with Penal Code section 484f, is punished under California’s forgery statute, Penal Code section 470.
Unlawful manufacture, possession, or sale of card-making equipment can be either misdemeanor or felony. As a felony, it can be punished by:
- 16 months to 3 years in jail.
- A fine of up to $10,000.
As a misdemeanor, it is punishable by:
- Up to 6 months in jail.
- A fine of up to $1,000.
Penal Code section 484j
Under Penal Code section 484j, it is illegal to publish credit or debit card information without the knowledge and consent of the cardholder and with the intent to defraud another person. This also applies to ID numbers, passwords, and all manner of account information.
“Publishing,” here, simply means to communicate the information in any way, shape, or form; be it verbally, in writing, or electronically via computer.
Illegal publishing of credit card data is a misdemeanor offense and is punishable by:
- A maximum jail term of 6 months.
- A maximum fine of $1,000.
Penalties for Credit Card Fraud
We have already listed the punishments for various forms of credit card fraud, but it should also be said that you can only be convicted of one of the above-listed subsection charges for the same offense, even if the crime could conceivably fall under more than one subsection of Penal Code section 484. Of course, if there were multiple acts of fraud, then multiple convictions could take place.
The great majority of credit card fraud cases in California are punished as a form of forgery, with it being counted as either petty or grand theft based on if the amount stolen was over or under $950. However, we have seen that there are also many other specific forms of credit card fraud, each with its own set of particular punishments.
Possible Defense Strategies
At the Criminal Law Office of Leah Legal, we have great familiarity with all of the various forms of California credit card fraud listed in PC 484 and at other places in the California Penal Code. We also understand the courtroom dynamics that take place during credit card fraud cases and know which types of defenses are most likely to prevail in each specific legal situation.
Some of the most common defense strategies we use in defending against the charge of credit card fraud are:
- Lack of Fraudulent Intent: Regardless of all other facts of the case, if the prosecutor cannot prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you intended to defraud another person or entity, you cannot be convicted of credit card fraud. For example, if you tried to use an expired access card at a gas pump, it is not fraud if you simply didn’t realize or remember that it was expired.
- Lack of Sufficient Evidence: All elements of the crime must be proved to gain a conviction, which is not always easy for prosecutors to accomplish, especially with a skilled defense attorney fighting them every step of the way. For example, even if one had fraudulent intent when using a revoked credit card, in this case, he/she must have received prior notice of the card’s having been revoked before a conviction is allowed.
- False Accusations: It is not at all impossible that someone with a grudge against another person might falsely accuse that person of credit card fraud out of revenge. If, for example, a dating couple willingly shared a credit card, the cardholder might suddenly pretend that he or she had not given permission to use the card after the couple break up.
- Mistaken Identity: As the person committing credit card fraud may well be “hiding behind a computer” or otherwise hidden from the view of those he/she is defrauding, it is not at all uncommon for someone else to be framed or to be wrongly assumed guilty based on circumstantial evidence.
Other Related Offenses
Other offenses often charged along with or instead of credit card fraud include the following:
- Identity Theft: The illegal use of someone else’s personal information, including credit card account information, without that person’s knowledge and consent, is identity theft. This crime is punishable by heavy fines and a prison term as long as 25 years. It is also a federal offense.
- Internet Fraud: Whenever any form of credit card fraud is committed over the Internet, it is a special crime called Internet fraud and is a federal offense. Illegal online purchases with someone else’s card, sale online of goods obtained through a stolen credit card, and advertising online that you sell credit-card manufacturing equipment can all be prosecuted as Internet fraud and can be punished with large fines and long prison terms.
- Burglary (PC 459): While burglary is not associated in the popular mind with credit card fraud, under California law, entering a building with intent to steal is burglary. If you enter with intent to steal a credit card or intent to use a stolen credit card at a store, it counts as burglary.
- Elder Abuse (PC 368): When those 65 or older, or those classed as dependent adults are the victims of credit card fraud, it can be elder abuse. For example, if a worker at a nursing home manipulates a resident to gain access to his/her credit card, it would be both credit card fraud and elder abuse.
- Mail Theft (PC 530.5e): As credit cards are often stolen out of mailboxes used by the U.S.P.S., it is not uncommon for mail theft to be charged along with credit card fraud.
Contact Us Today For Help
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we will work diligently from day one to build you a solid defense against the charge of credit card fraud. We know how to challenge the evidence and the argument of the prosecution, how to win a dismissal or acquittal where possible, and how to negotiate a favorable plea when necessary.
To learn more or for a free consultation on the details of your case, contact our criminal lawyer anytime 24/7/365 by calling 818-484-1100.
What is Gambling?
Gambling is the participation in betting, gaming and lottery activities. These gaming and betting activities are either licensed or unlicensed. Gaming licenses draw the fine line between legal gambling and illegal gambling.
Gambling activities can be categorized in the following sectors; Arcades, Betting, Bingo, Casino, Lotteries, and Gaming Machines.
Arcades
Arcade games offer amusement for both adults and family. Adult arcade centers (also known as Adult Gaming Centers) require a license or permit from the local Gambling or Gaming Commission. Adult Gaming Centers have a strict age restriction, and no person under the age of 18 should be allowed to participate in gaming. Family Arcade Centers are categorized according to whether the establishment is licensed or not. These categories include Licensed Family Entertainment Centers and Unlicensed Family Entertainment Centers.
Betting
Betting is the activity that involves placing a stake in favor of a particular outcome. There are different types of betting; fixed odds betting, pool betting, and spread betting
Fixed odds betting is the most common type of betting. In this type of betting, your winnings are determined by pre-determined odds. For example, a $10 stake placed in favor of the New England Patriots in the 2019 Super Bowl (with fixed odds of 20/27) returned $ 17.40. Fixed odds betting is offered online, on racing tracks, and in betting shops.
In pool betting, the winnings are determined by the sum of stakes in the pool. Pool betting is offered for racecourse pool betting, sports pool betting, and fantasy football pool betting.
Casino
Casino games are offered in casino premises or online. Games offered in casinos include American Roulette, Baccarat, poker, gaming machines, and Blackjack.
Lotteries
Raffles, sweepstakes, and tombolas are types of lotteries. The State of California organizes and manages the State Lottery. The minimum age limit for participation in a lottery in California is 18 years. Participants under the age of 18 years suffer the risk of being charged with a misdemeanor.
Gaming Machines
Gaming machines are devices that act as platforms for gambling. Examples of gaming machines include fruit, jackpot and slot machines. Dual use consoles and domestic computers are not regarded as gaming machines in the context of gambling.
Gaming and gambling take various forms; from card games, slot machines to horse-racing. All forms of gambling are regulated by the State of California. Not all types of gambling are legal. Playing, dealing or conducting the following games is illegal in the State of California; Monte, Faro, Roulette, Rouge et Noire, Lansquenet, Tan, Rondo, Seven-and-a-half, Fan-tan, Twenty-one, Hokey-pokey, or any Banking and percentage games played with cards or dice.
Legal Gambling Platforms in California
The state laws of California recognizes the following gambling and gaming platforms:
Indian Casinos: These are Vegas-style casinos and Bingo halls. Common games include blackjack, poker, and slots. Indian Casinos are located on Indian land.
Cardclubs: Cardclubs are different from casinos. At a casino, players bet against the house while at defense players bet against themselves. Cardclubs make money by charging the players a participation fee.
Parimutuel Horse Wagering: Also known as mutual betting. It is a type of gambling where players are pooled against one another. The house collects the players’ stakes then deduct taxes and management fees. The remainder comprises the winnings. California only allows Parimutuel betting only in the context of horse racing.
Charitable gambling: It is a form of gambling where all the proceeds go to charity. Most often than not, the games are hosted by charities. California only allows charitable gambling in the context of Bingo.
State Lottery: The State of California organizes and manages the California Lottery. The games involved in the lottery include Mega Millions and SuperLotto Plus.
Gambling Fraud
Penal Code 332 PC defines gaming or gambling fraud as fraudulently obtaining a person’s property or money through a game of “Three-Card Monte” or fortune telling or betting on a sure thing. Does this mean that all gambling is illegal in California? If not then what are the legal forms of gambling? PC 330 of California’s Gaming Law prohibits the use of card tricks and stacked card decks or other schemes to lure people into betting on a “sure thing.”
Penal Code 332 PC defines gaming or gambling fraud as fraudulently obtaining a person’s property or money through a game of “Three-Card Monte” or fortune telling or betting on a sure thing. Does this mean that all gambling is illegal in California? If not then what are the legal forms of gambling? PC 330 of California’s Gaming Law prohibits the use of card tricks and stacked card decks or other schemes to lure people into betting on a “sure thing.”
Common Types of Gambling fraud
There are numerous types of gambling fraud. Below is a highlight of the most common types of gambling.
1. Multiple Account fraud: Gambling through online platforms require the opening of a user’s account. Sometimes players open multiple accounts for different reasons. If these accounts are opened using fake credentials, the user is guilty of multiple account fraud.
2. Bonus Abuse: For promotional purposes, many online gambling services offer signup bonuses for new members. For example, on joining Legendary bet, you get a 100% bonus on your first deposit. There are those players that will take advantage of this opportunity by opening multiple accounts on the same platform. Opening numerous fake accounts to benefit from bonuses is known as bonus abuse.
3. Gnoming: Gnoming is the use of multiple accounts to maximize winnings and bonuses by deliberately losing.
4. Chip dumping: At a poker table, chip dumping is the use of multiple accounts to influence the game. With numerous accounts, a player can cheat in favor or against another opponent. This act of cheating counts as a type of gambling fraud.
5. Top up fraud: Top up fraud is common among online gambling platforms. It is when players top up their accounts using credentials from stolen credit cards.
6. Chargebacks: A chargeback is a request sent to your bank or credit card provider to reverse a top up you made on a gambling site. What makes this activity qualify as a fraudulent act is that your money will be refunded at the gambling provider’s expense.
7. Top up abuse: These days, many online casinos and betting site offer phone top-ups. Fraudsters take advantage of this to trick other people into topping up the fraudster’s balance with the victim’s money. It is the equivalent of stealing money to fuel one’s gambling addiction.
Gambling Fraud and The Law
Article 332 of the Penal Code also prohibits the acquisition of property or money through fraudulent gambling. This includes poker chips and tokens with monetary value. Melinda and Hillary set out to scam the public in the form of a poker game. Melinda organizes the technicalities of the game including betting. Money is represented in the form of poker chips. Each chip represents a value of $10. Hillary acts as an innocent participant. Melinda hands the stack of cards. Hillary shuffles the card in such a way to ensure that Melinda wins. Hillary and Melinda are guilty of gambling fraud. Gaming or gambling fraud is a serious offense and consequences include prosecution and conviction.
Fortune Telling Fraud
In addition to illegal gambling; California’s gaming fraud laws also prohibits fortune-telling fraud. Fortune telling is subject to many laws. Technically, fortune telling is considered as free speech, and the first amendment, therefore, protects it. In a way, a fortune is like a prediction to the future. A Maryland court thwarted an attempt to ban fortune tellers and their art form. The argument was that; banning fortune tellers is like banning stock predictions, sports tips, or newspaper horoscopes.
What defines the legality of fortune telling? There are religious practices that believe in exorcism, fortune telling, and gift offering. The constitution protects the right to religion. If a fortune teller claims a religious lifestyle that justifies his or her practice, the fortune teller is not guilty of fraud. If the fortune teller lets his or her clients know that the services on offer are purely for entertainment purposes, the fortune teller can be excused from fraud charges.
However, if there is evidence that the astrologer or fortune teller does not believe in his readings and predictions, the practice is regarded as a fraud. The fortune teller or astrologer suffers the risk of a successful prosecution under California’s gaming laws.
California cities like Berkeley and Oakland have strict psychic rules. In San Francisco, the Police Department may get involved. According to the San Francisco Police code; the following activities are considered as fortune telling; cartomancy, clairvoyance, phrenology, tarot card reading, tea leaves, coffee grounds, crystal gazing, astrology, curse lifting, palmistry, and telepathy. Fortune telling is regulated by the city and to get a legal permit, and you would have to visit the Hall of Justice. The application for a fortune telling permit involves background checks, fingerprinting and public hearings. The background checks prevent repeat offenders from getting permits.
Penalties for Gaming Fraud
Similar to theft cases, the penalties for gaming fraud are dependent on the monetary value of the payment that the defendant obtained from the victim. For fraud involving property or money worth more than $950, the crime is regarded as a “Wobbler.” A wobbler is a crime that is charged either as a felony or as a misdemeanor by California’s laws. In most cases, the prosecutor decides the direction of the case (as a misdemeanor charge or as a felony charge). The judge has the power to decide whether to punish the wobbler crime as a felony; even if the prosecutor presented the case as a misdemeanor offense. If convicted, the defendant can petition the court’s decision to reduce the felony conviction to a misdemeanor conviction. For felony convictions, the perpetrator is prohibited from owning a firearm.
If convicted for gambling fraud as a felony offense, the defendant suffers the risk of felony probation, jail time or fines. Felony probation is also known as formal probation. It is when the convicted serves part or the whole time of the sentence in the community. Felony probation usually lasts between three to five years. The probationer is required to report to a probation officer regularly. Under California’s Realignment Program, the convict could serve 16 months, two years, or three years in county jail. For first time offenders, a fine not exceeding $5,000 could be charged. Second or subsequent offenders can pay up to $10,000 in fines.
If the fraud involves a monetary value of less than $950, PC 332 of the Penal Code dictates that the offense can only be charged as a California misdemeanor. The potential penalties for gaming fraud as a misdemeanor include; misdemeanor probation, fines and jail time. California’s misdemeanor probation is also known as a summary or informal probation. It is the alternative of jail time where the convict serves most or the entire sentence under court-supervised community work. If the court punishes the misdemeanor with jail time, the convict may serve up to six months in county jail. Fines involved in the violation of PC 332 as a misdemeanor usually do not exceed $1,000.
Other penalties to gambling and gaming fraud involve deportation for non-U.S. citizens, professional or occupational permit restrictions, or restraining orders. In some cases, it is possible to have the cases dismissed. Gaming fraud offenses are not considered as violent crimes or as severe as those offenses defined in the Three Strike Sentencing Law of California.
Legal Defenses and Strategies Against Gambling Fraud
Fraud cases can be won because the ideas can be abstract on what is considered fraud. It is a matter of perspective. Fraud cases are very complex, and it will take the prosecutor a lot of time and resources to break down the case. The complexity of the case is a window of opportunity to the defense.
A common defense to gaming and gambling fraud is insufficient evidence. If a bet was not recorded, it could be hard for the prosecution to prove that the defendant wagered a particular stake in favor of a particular result. Cash transactions in the case of fortune telling are hard to trace. No cash, no evidence.
A coerced confession is a strategy that the defense can also use to fight the case. Other strategies include entrapment, mistaken fact, and expiry of the statute of limitations. Each case is different and unique in every way. As soon as you get arrested, it is recommended that you get in touch with a qualified attorney to discuss your case and your options.
Get the Best Legal Representation Near Me
Each case is unique in every way. We take our time to independently investigate and understand each case before we formulate a defense strategy. Criminal defense is not a “9-5” venture. Our practice is a 24/7 affair; we are available for calls and consultation at any time. Call 818-484-1100 for a free consultation today let us discuss your options. Do not wait until it is too late, there is a lot of preparation that takes place before your court date. If you feel like there is a reason for an arrest against you or your loved one, get in contact with Leah Legal. We aggressively defend our clients and treat every case with the care that is needed. Do not let your name get tainted over gambling fraud charges.
Legal References
1. Penal Code 332 PC: Obtaining money or property from another person through card monte or other similar games and bets is an offense. Anyone and everyone who by the game of Three Card Monte or any other device, game, sleight of hands, pretensions to telling fortunes, tricks, schemes by the use of playing cards or other implements or instruments, fraudulently acquires money and property shall be punished as in a case of larceny of property of similar value for the first offense except that the fine does not exceed $5,000. A second or subsequent offense shall be punished as in the case of larceny except that the fine may not exceed $10,000 or both fine and imprisonment. In this section of the penal code, the phrase “fraudulently obtains” includes, but not limited to cheating. Cheating in this context refers to gaining an unfair advantage over other players through tactics and schemes that are not sanctioned by the rules of the game.
If you are facing charges of health care fraud in Los Angeles or Southern California, you could be looking at years in jail and thousands of dollars in fines if convicted, besides the loss of certain professional licenses, a damaged reputation, and a permanent criminal record. To avoid these consequences, or to at least minimize them as much as possible, it is critical to waste no time in availing yourself of a passionate and compassionatedefense attorney with long experience in defending health care fraud cases.
At the Criminal Law Office of Leah Legal, we have been successfully defending those accused of health care fraud in California for many years. We have an intricate knowledge of the details of the relevant state statutes and are fully familiar with the inner workings of local L.A. Area court processes. Contact us today at 818-484-1100 for a free legal consultation, and we will work tirelessly to help you with your case
How Is “Health Care Fraud” Defined in California?
Health care fraud, or “health insurance fraud,” is a type of insurance fraud which is committed by health care providers who submit false or inaccurate claims to either government-run or private insurers for the purpose of defrauding the insurance company out of funds and wrongfully obtaining financial benefits for themselves.
Unfortunately, this type of insurance fraud is not at all uncommon in California, or throughout the U.S. for that matter. Part of the reason for this problem is the great complexity and depersonalization of our nation’s health care system, where much of the money paid to health care providers comes not from the patient but from insurance companies. The payments system may be very complicated and can leave much room for fraud to slip by.
On the other hand, the top-heavy bureaucratic health care payment system is so complex that it becomes very easy for people to make an honest mistake and then get accused of committing fraud.
Much of the health care fraud that goes on involves Medi-Cal and other state-run insurance programs designed to assist the elderly, disabled, and low-income families who can’t afford private insurance. Thus, prosecutors are often zealous to score points by protecting the vulnerable and protecting the taxpayer, but oftentimes, the defendant may be completely innocent.
Normally, health care fraud is filed against doctors, nurses, and other medical professionals; but it is also commonly filed against secretaries and clerks who work at hospitals and in offices of private practices. Typical allegations include: billing for services never received, overcharging, and double charging.
Types of Health Care Fraud
There are a number of different types of California health care fraud, and more than one statute addresses the potential abuses that can occur in relation to health insurance claims. Some of the most common types of health care fraud are looked at briefly below.
- Submission of Claims for Services Never Rendered
California Penal Code section 550 criminalizes the submission of a claim to a health insurer when the patient never actually received the service for which the claim is being made. These “ghost claims” may name real patients or use fictitious ones, but the services named in them never occurred.
- Submission of Other False or Fraudulent Claims
Besides simply inventing a claim out of thin air, other types of fraudulent claims submissions include: claims for services performed but that the patient never actually needed; “upcoding,” meaning submitting a claim for a procedure that costs more than the actual procedure performed; and adding in extra charges to patients who use insurance that are not charged to those who pay out-of-pocket.
- Submission of Multiple Claims for a Single Service
Oftentimes, the correct service and claim is submitted, but it is submitted twice (or more) rather than just once. This double billing practice is also addressed in Penal Code section 550. Accidental double billing is also a common occurrence, so the prosecutor must work hard to prove there was an intent to defraud rather than there being only a simple mistake.
- Correcting Undercharges but Not Overcharges
Penal Code section 550 also deals with the practice of re-billing insurance providers for past undercharges but neglecting to also bill them for overcharges that were discovered. Medical billing mistakes happen, and thus, in reviewing their accounts from time to time, health care providers may discover some discrepancies. A partial, one-sided correction of such discrepancies, however, amounts to health care fraud.
- Preparation of Documents in Support of a Fraud Claim
California also specifically criminalizes the preparing of any written documentation that will be used to support a fraudulent claim of any kind. This can add extra punishment to those who commit fraud, but it can also get innocent parties, who simply worked for a medical professional as a secretary, charged with health care fraud. This is a good example of where a skilled defense attorney can help establish you knew nothing of the fraud and did not benefit from it.
What Must the Prosecutor Prove?
In order to prove beyond all reasonable doubt that the defendant committed health care fraud and gain a conviction, the prosecutor must do more than simply show that a wrong claim (such as any of the kinds mentioned above) was submitted.
It must also be demonstrated that the defendant was aware that the false claim being submitted was such or were aware that a document prepared to support a false claim would be used for that purpose. It must be shown that an intent to defraud the insurer and benefit financially as a result existed. With very few exceptions, the element of intent is required before an action counts as California health care fraud, and this is often the most difficult element of the crime for prosecutors to prove.
Common Defense Strategies
At Leah Legal Criminal Defense, we have the experience in defending against the charges of health care fraud under California law. We understand how to build a solid defense to each case we handle and how to challenge the evidence and the arguments of the prosecution.
Aside from disputing the facts as to what claims were submitted and by whom and as to what was the correct amount to be billed, two common defenses against the charge of health care fraud are:
- Lack of Knowledge
If a secretary or assistant to someone making fraudulent health care insurance claims prepares the paperwork but does not realize that fraudulent claims are being made, he or she cannot be convicted of health care fraud. Without having the knowledge of the fact that the claims were fraudulent, no crime was committed by such an assistant.
- Lack of Intent
If a doctor or other health care professional submits claims that he or she believes to be accurate, accidentally makes a double charge, discovers a past undercharge but inadvertently fails to notice a past overcharge, or makes a mistake as to the amount or the type of charge to be submitted, it is a mistake and not considered fraud. Without an intention to defraud the insurer, the defendant is innocent of health care fraud.
Possible Penalties for a Health Care Fraud Conviction
While there may be various factors that play into the exact sentence a person convicted of health care fraud receives, including the specific nature of the offense and the defendant’s past criminal record, in general, health care fraud is punished more severely based on how much money was stolen or that the defendant attempted to steal.
If a fraud claim is over $950, or if a series of fraud claims within a single year total over $950, the punishment will be more severe than if $950 or less was involved.
For fraud claims under $950, health care fraud is a misdemeanor offense, punishable by:
- Up to 6 months in county jail.
- A maximum fine of $1,000.
If fraud claims exceeded $950, health care fraud can be either a felony or misdemeanor. As a misdemeanor, it is punishable by:
- Up to 12 months in county jail.
- A maximum fine of $10,000.
As a felony, it can be punished by:
A fine of $50,000 OR twice the amount of the fraud charge. Whichever fine is larger will be applied.
From 2 to 5 years in jail OR probation and up to 12 months in jail.

Normally, it is health care workers who are charged with health care fraud. Thus, the revocation or suspension of their professional licenses upon a conviction is potentially another serious part of the sentence. Loss of one’s job or practice and loss of customers or potential new customers are major impacts of losing one’s license temporarily or permanently.
Other Related Offenses
Along with or in place of health care fraud charges, there are other offenses that may come up in a typical health care fraud case. While the full list would be too numerous to list here, we have included the most common related offenses:
- Assisting, Soliciting, or Conspiring to Commit Health Care Fraud
California Penal Code section 550 not only criminalizes committing health care fraud personally but also assisting others to do the same. It also makes it a criminal offense to solicit someone else to submit a fraud claim in your behalf or to conspire with other people to submit fraud claims. All of these acts make you an accomplice in committing health care fraud and expose you to punishment equal to that of the main perpetrator.
- Medi-Cal Fraud
As the California Medi-Cal insurance program covers many low-income, senior citizen, disabled, and other needy patients, it is a very large insurer and a major target for health care fraud. And those who specifically defraud or attempt to defraud Medi-Cal can be given additional punishments under Welfare & Institutions Code 14107 besides those sentenced under Penal Code section 550. This double sentencing is seen as appropriate because of the vulnerable nature of the people Medi-Cal is meant to protect and because of the extra costs being thrust upon taxpayers when Medi-Cal fraud occurs. Finally, note that when patients submit false claims to gain extra benefits or lie in order to qualify for Medi-Cal, that is also a form of Medi-Cal fraud.
- Prescription Fraud
There are two types of prescription fraud that are prevalent in California, both of which are under the umbrella of health care fraud. First, health care professionals may issue prescriptions to those they know should not be taking a certain drug simply to gain extra income. Second, patients commit prescription fraud by “shopping” around for multiple doctors to fill out for them the exact same prescription.
- California Workers Comp Fraud
While submitting false claims for California workers’ compensation insurance benefits is a separate crime, yet, Penal Code section 550 also covers such claims as part of health care fraud. It is possible, then, to be charged with both workers comp and health care fraud for the same offense. The reason for this seeming discrepancy is that health care services will normally be provided as part of what a workers comp claim covers. Workers commit this type of fraud when they lie about where they were injured, fake an injury, or exaggerate the severity of an injury to receive extra benefits. Employers can commit workers comp fraud by misrepresenting the conditions in which an employee worked when he or she was injured. And doctors can commit workers comp fraud by assisting in the submission of a fraudulent workers comp claim in order to get the extra business.
Contact Us Today For Help
At the Criminal Law Office of Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we stand ready to assist you in your hour of need with top-tier legal advice and representation in your health care fraud defense case. We have deep experience in this practice area and will fight tenaciously to secure the best possible outcome to your case.
Call our criminal attorney anytime 24/7 at 818-484-1100 for a free legal consultation.
IDENTITY THEFT – CALIFORNIA PC 530.5
If you are facing the charge of identity theft in California, you can expect the prosecution to vigorously pursue their case and, if convicted, there are severe state-level penalties, and in some cases, federal charges may be filed as well for the same offense. Given that so much is at stake, it is more critical than ever to secure the services of an experienced and passionate lawyer who is skilled at defending against these specific charges.
At the Criminal Law Office of Leah Legal, we have a solid track record of successful identity theft defense cases in the Los Angeles Area and throughout Southern California. We have a firm grasp of the both the California Penal Code and of local L.A. court processes and know how to build a solid defense for all manner of identity theft cases.
To learn more or for a free legal consultation with an expert defense attorney, feel free to call us anytime 24/7 at 818-484-1100.
What Is “Identity Theft?”
While the two words identity theft are well known and much on the public mind in this “information age” in which we live, most of us do not know the details about the actual crime and definition of identity theft. For example, while identity theft is quickly associated with Internet fraud, it is not always realized that forging a signature on a paper check or unlawfully using a credit card are also examples of identity theft.
Under California Penal Code section 530.5, identity theft is defined as any unlawful taking or use of another person’s personal identification information so as to defraud that person of money or property and benefit oneself financially.
Whether it is money, commercial services, products, real estate, medical services, or anything else of value stolen; and whether it be by means of credit card, debit card, checks, or food stamps; and whether it be in person or while “hiding behind a computer,” it makes no difference — it is still identity theft.
Sometimes, identity theft is committed to inflict a loss on another out of spirit of pure revenge; sometimes, it is done to escape being punished for a crime by posing as another person while committing that crime; but usually, identity theft is done simply to obtain financial gain.
Identity theft can involve not only the actual use of others’ personal information, but also acquiring it, storing it, selling it, or transferring it without the owner’s knowledge and consent.
The information stolen can be a variety of things, including: access card numbers and expiration dates, bank account information, social security numbers, medical data, physical addresses, and more. So long as it is illegally possessed/used and there is a fraudulent intent involved, it constitutes identity theft.
What Must the Prosecutor Prove?
Under Penal Code section 530.5, the prosecution must prove the following elements of the crime of identity theft beyond all reasonable doubt in order to gain a conviction:
- The defendant unlawfully acquired, possessed, stored, bought/sold, or transferred another person’s personal identification information.
- The defendant acted without the knowledge and/or consent of the person whose personal information he made use of.
- The defendant acted knowingly and willfully in his illegal actions.
- The defendant acted while having a fraudulent intent.
Willfully – In that the defendant must have acted “willfully,” it is simply to say that he did what he did on purpose. This kind of intentionality need not imply that the information in question was actively sought out. It could very well be that it was initially stumbled upon. But if the defendant decided to accept that information and then misuse it, it was a willful acquisition. Thus, if one accidentally comes across someone else’s email password and then decides to keep it and later decides to access their email and send out emails to that person’s friends posing as the true owner of the email address, it is identity theft.
Personal Information – In the modern world, personal information can be numerous different things. Tax ID numbers, employee ID numbers, dates of birth or death, driver’s license numbers, passport numbers, green card numbers, and telephone numbers can function as personal ID information as easily as credit card and bank account numbers.
Fraudulent Intent – Fraudulent intent denotes any act whereby one obtains or seeks to obtain illegitimate gain at the expense of another person or entity on whom an undeserved loss is inflicted. Normally, fraud moves in the financial realm, it being money or things money can buy that are defrauded of another person, but really, it can be anything.
Unlawful Purpose – Also of importance is the fact that an unlawful purpose need not equate an attempt to commit a criminal offense. Even a violation of California’s Civil Code is unlawful in this sense.
Possible Penalties for Identity Theft
In California, Identity Theft (PC 530.5) is a wobbler offense, meaning that it can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on the facts of the particular case, on how much money the defendant allegedly defrauded or attempted to defraud, and on the defendant’s past criminal record.
When charged as a misdemeanor, identity theft is punishable by:
- Up to 12 months in county jail.
- A fine of up to $1,000.
When charged as a felony, identity theft is punishable by:
- 16 months to 3 years in jail.
- A fine of up to $10,000.
It is also important to recognize that someone can be convicted of and punished for identity theft as outlined above for each particular violation. Thus, even if someone stole personal information from multiple people or multiple times from the same person, he or she could have multiple counts of identity theft and a very severe overall sentence.
And those convicted of identity theft are often also convicted of related offenses, which add yet further punishments.
Finally, it is possible to be prosecuted under United States Code Title 18 Section 1028 for identity theft, adding the penalties for a federal offense to the state-level sentence. Under federal law, presenting someone else’s ID to make others believe it is your own, transferring stolen ID documents, and selling/buying machinery to produce fake IDs is also covered; and conviction under USC Title 18 Section 1028 is punishable by hefty fines and up to 30 years in federal prison.
Common Defense Strategies
At Leah Legal Criminal Defense, we employ a number of specific defense strategies in identity theft defense cases and have acquired, over the years, a long track record of successful resolution of these types of cases, whether that means an acquittal, a dismissal based on evidence being declared inadmissible, or a reduced charge or sentence that is part of a negotiated plea. The key is winning the best possible outcome to each case.
To accomplish this, we always custom-build every defense to the precise needs of the particular case; but undeniably, there are basic types of defenses that frequently recur in identity theft cases. These include:
- Lack of Unlawful Purpose: In order to be guilty of identity theft under PC 530.5, there must have been an unlawful purpose in the illegal acquisition of another person’s personal information. It is not required that the information already has been used, but unless it can be shown that you intended to use it in an illegal and fraudulent way, you cannot be convicted of identity theft. Closely related to having an unlawful purpose in the statute is the nearly indistinguishable idea of fraudulent intent. It is, ultimately, intent (the state of one’s mind) that makes it identity theft rather than simply the taking or possessing of information.
- False Accusations: In some cases, a false accusation of identity theft may arise because someone has a grudge against you and wants to take out revenge by accusing you of this crime. For example, this could occur if a couple agreed to share a credit card, but after breaking up, the actual cardholder retroactively accused their former intimate of identity theft for having used his or her credit card. Or, it could be a false accusation occurs due to circumstantial evidence and the victim jumping to wrong conclusions. Finally, mistaken identity can bring about false accusations, since the real ID thief may be hiding himself (or even framing the defendant).
- You Are a Computer: Yes, this defense is spelled out right in PC 530.5f and specifies that an “interactive computer service/software provider” cannot be guilty of identity theft. However, if the provider obtains or uses personal identification information while having an intent to use it fraudulently, then such providers can be prosecuted like any other person or business entity.
Other Related Offenses
Identity theft is a crime that normally has other crimes charged along with it, the reason being that stealing personal information is typically done for the purpose of committing other crimes. Thus, credit card fraud, insurance fraud of various types, forgery, Internet fraud, and the crime of false personation are often charged alongside identity theft.
Besides these, other related offenses include:
- Grand Theft or Petty Theft (PC 487/484): As identity theft is done, usually, for the purpose of stealing something else of monetary value, it is common to have grand or petty theft charged along with it. Grand theft, in California, normally applies when property worth over $950 is stolen, while petty theft applies to amounts of $950 and less.
- Elder Abuse (PC 368): When the identity of a senior citizen (65 years old or older) or another dependent adult (often physically or mentally disabled) is stolen, or when stolen IDs are used to steal their property, it is not only identity theft and grand/petty theft but also elder abuse. This extra charge is added because elders, being particularly vulnerable, are a specially protected class. Elder abuse is punishable by up to 3 years in jail and a $1,000 fine when charged as a misdemeanor and up to 4 years in prison and a maximum fine of $6,000 when charged as a felony.
- Conspiracy: When identity theft is committed by working in concert with one or more other people, it is punishable as conspiracy to commit identity theft. As a misdemeanor, conspiracy is punishable by 12 months in jail and a $1,000 fine; as a felony, it is punishable by up to 3 years in state prison.
- Unauthorized Computer Access (PC 502c): If identity theft or a related crime was committed via accessing a computer or network without proper authorization, PC 502c can also be charged. This is very common when an identity thief hacked into a computer network to gain access to personal data stored there. Penal Code section 502c can be charged as either a felony or misdemeanor.
- Mail Theft (PC 530.5e): In the very identity theft statute itself (PC 530.5) is a subsection dealing with mail theft, which is, however, a distinct offense. The close association between these two crimes arises from the fact that personal information is often obtained by stealing the victim’s mail out of their mailbox, at the post office, or even from the person of the mail delivery worker. Mail theft can also be committed by arranging to divert someone else’s mail to your own mailbox or by otherwise receiving or possessing stolen mail of any kind. Mail theft is a misdemeanor offense, punishable by up to 12 months in county jail.
- Attempted Crimes (PC 664): Under Penal Code section 664, even if you failed to commit identity theft but it can be shown that you attempted to do so, you can be given a sentence half as severe as what would be handed out had you succeeded at the crime. Under federal law, however, the punishment for committing identity theft and simply trying to commit it are the same. And California’s attempted crimes statute also applies to the other related offenses that are often charged along with identity theft. Thus, even attempting identity theft is harshly punished.
Contact Our Los Angeles Criminal Defense Lawyer Today For Help
At the Criminal Law Office of Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we have fought and successfully resolved a multitude of identity theft defense cases for clients all across L.A. and Southern California, and we have the legal expertise and the undying commitment to our clients it takes to win your case as well.
For a free legal consultation, do not hesitate to contact our criminal defense law firm by calling 818-484-1100 anytime 24/7/365.
When you suddenly find yourself facing allegations of real estate fraud in California, the very severity and long-term nature of the criminal penalties and other consequences of a conviction make it imperative that you secure the services of a defense attorney with deep experience in this practice area.
At Leah Legal, we stand ready to assist you in your hour of need, and successfully defend you against the charge of real estate fraud. We have a long track record of successfully resolving all manners of real estate fraud defense cases, and we can win your case as well. Call us anytime 24/7 at 818-484-1100 and we will waste not time in getting started on your case.
How Is “Real Estate Fraud” Defined in California?
In California, real estate and mortgage fraud is covered under a number of different sections of the state penal code, due to the fact that real estate fraud comes in a great many forms. However, there are still basic elements of the crime, such as intentionally presenting false or misleading information concerning real estate as if it were true in order to gain someone’s confidence and get them to act in a way that is against their best interests (in regard to a piece of real estate or a mortgage). The same thing can also be accomplished by simply omitting information that ought to have been provided in order to create a false impression.
Examples of real estate fraud would include:
- Mortgage Fraud (Penal Code section 487)
- Foreclosure Fraud (Civil Code section 2945.5)
- Rent Skimming (Civil Code 890)
- Recording Forged Deeds (Penal Code section 115)
- Illegal Property Flipping
We will look at these different types of real estate fraud in more detail just below.
Mortgage Fraud – Penal Code section 487
Mortgage fraud, and other forms of real estate fraud are often prosecuted under Penal Code section 487, California’s grand theft statute. So long as the value of the property exceeded $950, which is nearly always the case, it can count as grand theft.
More specifically, it is theft by means of false pretenses, which in essence, is the same as saying theft by means of fraud.
Whenever you give out information you know to be false or misleading with the intention of deceiving a property owner or a mortgage lender into making decisions concerning a piece of real estate that defrauds the rightful owner out of all or part of the value of the property and enriches yourself, it is real estate fraud. When this fraudulent activity involves securing a mortgage or taking possession of a mortgage, it can be termed mortgage fraud.
Foreclosure Fraud
Civil Code 2945.4 covers foreclosure fraud, which is always a common form of real estate fraud, but especially during an economic downturn. In fact, there are many professional organizations and individuals who routinely engage in foreclosure fraud as their main means of income. And the fact that upcoming foreclosures are by law made public makes it easy for fraudsters to get the information they need to carry out their misdeeds.
Typically, foreclosure fraud is committed by consultants who appear and offer desperate homeowners their “services” as a means of saving their home or at least of not losing all of their equity in it.
Examples of foreclosure fraud include:
- Collecting large fees for services that you have not yet, and may never, actually provide.
- Trying to get the homeowner to sign an illegal contract in order to take possession of his or her property.
- Illegally or by false pretenses taking away the power of attorney of the homeowner.
- Taking money from a third party in relation to services provided to the homeowner but not disclosing that fact to the homeowner.
- Buying the homeowner’s property in order to turn around and rent it to him or her. This is called title transfer and normally involves the property owner losing all his equity and ultimately being evicted from his own home.
- Using a “bait and switch” tactic to get the homeowner to unknowingly sign over the title to his house. The consultant may falsely inform the homeowner that he is signing a document that will help him get a lower mortgage payment and not lose his home. Sometimes, this is accomplished by getting someone to sign a blank form and promising to later fill it in with what was agreed to verbally. Other times, it may be that the type is very small, the writing illegible, or the verbiage too confusing to understand.
- Phantom help schemes, where assistance in preventing a foreclosure is promised in return for an advance fee, but no work is really done to prevent the foreclosure, which occurs despite the homeowner thinking it will be averted.
Rent Skimming
Civil Code 890 deals with the illegal practice known as rent skimming. Rent skimming occurs when, during the first year after purchasing new rental property, the buyer does not use the rental income to pay on the mortgage. It can also happen when someone who is not even the property owner pretends to rent out the property and then keeps the rental income generated for himself.
However, if rental proceeds were used (30 days or less after receiving them) to pay for needed and unplanned medical expenses for one’s self or one’s family OR to pay for labor and materials needed to make improvements in the rental property that were legally required to make it officially habitable, this will not be considered rent skimming
While rent skimming is a civil offense, it can become a criminal offense if there are multiple incidents perpetrated by a single individual.
Recording Forged Deeds
Penal Code section 115 prohibits and assigns penalties to the forging of deeds and other official documents and recording them publicly, often in a county clerk’s office. As this form of real estate fraud also involves forgery, violators can be punished under Penal Code section 115 and Penal Code section 470 (California’s forgery statute) simultaneously for the same illegal act.
Illegal Property Flipping
While property flipping, buying up houses to fix them up and quickly re-sell them for a profit, is legal in many forms, real estate professionals sometimes get involved in the practice in ways that are not.
Examples include:
- Fraudulent appraisals that cause buyers to pay more for the property than it is actually worth.
- For bankers, knowingly lending out money for properties to sell them at much higher prices than they are worth.
Possible Penalties for Real Estate Fraud
Real estate fraud can be punished in many different ways, depending on the specific nature of the fraud committed. Below, we look at the possible punishments for a variety of types of real estate fraud:
- PC 487 (Mortgage Fraud/Grand Theft) can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony. When charged as a misdemeanor, it is punishable by:
- Up to 12 months in county jail.
- Summary probation.
- A fine of up to $1,000.
When PC 487 is charged as a felony, it can be punished by:
- 16 months to 3 years in county jail.
- Formal probation.
- A maximum fine of $10,000.
- An additional 1 to 5 years in state prison if the value of property defrauded was over $65,000.
- Civil Code 2945.4 (Foreclosure Fraud) can also be punished as either a felony or a misdemeanor. Either way, it is also punished as grand theft and in the same way as mortgage fraud. However, there is a special rule that allows foreclosure fraud penalties to be added on to other real estate fraud charges (you can be convicted of both it and another real estate fraud charge), which can greatly enhance your overall sentence.
- Civil Code 890 (Rent Skimming) is a civil offense if committed only once but a criminal offense if committed two or more times. If you face a civil suit for rent skimming, damages can include:
- Recovering of the actual funds taken.
- Additional fines of varying amounts.
- The plaintiff’s legal expenses, if you lose the suit.
When rent skimming becomes a criminal offense, it can be either a misdemeanor or felony and is punished the same way as foreclosure fraud and mortgage fraud.
- PC 115 (Forging Deeds) is always a felony in California. It can be punished as follows:
- 16 months to 3 years in county jail.
- Formal probation.
- A $10,000 maximum fine.
Also note that the incarceration terms in felony real estate fraud convictions will be enhanced if the value of the property defrauded was especially high, according to the following standards:
- An extra year behind bars for defrauding someone of over $65,000.
- Two extra years if the amount was over $200,000.
- Three extra years for amounts over $1.3 million.
- Four extra years for amounts over $3.2 million.
And, if you receive two felony-level (and closely related) real estate fraud convictions AND the amount defrauded was over $100,000, you can face 1 to 5 extra years in state prison plus very large fines.
Finally, as real estate fraud is often charged against realtors, brokers, and others whose livelihood depends on real estate transactions, it is highly significant that professional real estate licenses can be lost and professional discipline imposed on such professionals for a real estate fraud conviction.
Common Defense Strategies
As real estate fraud is considered a white collar crime, it is vigorously hunted for and prosecuted by law enforcement agencies, district attorneys, and other prosecutors. And the California Bureau of Real Estate is constantly looking for red flags on pending real estate sales and is always ready to listen to complaints it receives.
Yet, at the same time, the complexity of real estate law makes it very easy for someone to accidentally make an illegal move. And it is not uncommon for someone to be falsely charged with real estate fraud on purpose by someone with an axe to grind.
At the Criminal Law Office of Leah Legal, we have been defending people accused of real estate fraud in Los Angeles and throughout Southern California for many years and have seen all manner of real estate fraud cases. We understand how to form a solid defense and how to challenge the evidence of the prosecution. Some of our most commonly used defense strategies in real estate fraud cases include:
- Lack of Intent
No matter what specific act you may have done in relation to a real estate transaction, the fact is that without an accompanying intention to defraud others and secure undeserved gain for yourself, no real estate fraud took place. It may have been a mistake that will have negative consequences for you, but it is not a criminal offense.
- Possession of Consent
Depending on the specific type of real estate fraud being charged, having the consent of the property owner may be a viable defense. Sometimes, an elderly person actually forgets that they gave consent to make a real estate transaction, and someone is falsely accused of both real estate fraud and elder abuse. While genuine elder abuse does occur, and some of it involves property scams, it is possible that someone intending to follow through on a good faith, 100% legal transaction could be accused of misconduct. At Leah Legal, we understand how and when to use owner’s consent as a defense strategy.
- False Accusations
Sometimes, a person is accused of real estate fraud because someone who legitimately sold a property wants to get it back. Other times, it may be a matter of being framed or of mistaken identity (especially when the true fraudsters have kept themselves behind the scenes. In some cases, someone may even have stolen your identity and then proceeded to take out a fraud mortgage loan in your name.
Contact Us Today For Help
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney Criminal Defense, we have seen nearly every type of real estate fraud case imaginable and have learned to successfully employ the most appropriate defense strategy in each case we take on. We have an intricate knowledge of the California Penal Code, of the local L.A. court system, and of the real-world situations that are typically involved in real estate fraud cases.
For a free legal consultation on the details of your case, contact our Los Angeles criminal attorney anytime 24/7/365 at 818-484-1100.
It’s unlawful to practice medicine in California without a valid license. Business and Professions Code section 2052 governs medicine practice in California. You could face the charges under this statute if you attempt to practice or if you practice medicine without a valid license or on a suspended or revoked certificate. You cannot legally practice medicine in California, even if you hold a license in another state or have completed medical school in another state. Licensed providers may also face the charges for abetting and aiding unlicensed medicine practice if their independent contractors, employees, or agents engage in the unlawful act. The penalties for unlicensed practice of medicine include imprisonment, fines, or both. The penalties are imposed regardless of whether someone suffers harm or not. If you are facing the unauthorized practice of medicine charges in Van Nuys, get in touch with us at Leah Legal for representation.
Elements of Unauthorized Practice of Medicine Under PC 2052
In California, if medical providers and professionals like veterinarians, dentists, nurses, doctors, and other healthcare workers practice medicine without a license, they may face severe financial, professional, and legal penalties. It’s unlawful to deliberately practice medicine without a license or on a suspended, expired, or revoked license. It’s also illegal to practice against the scope the healthcare license provides. Unauthorized practice of medicine constitutes the following:
- Engaging in a practice of medicine by an unlicensed person and
- Treating a person with a psychological or physical condition
- Attempting to detect a person’s physical or psychological conditions
- Advertising, trying to practice, practicing, or holding yourself as practicing medicine or a system of treating illness
- Prescribing or diagnosing medication for any disease, disorder, other mental or physical condition.
- Signing a chart using a false identity or name of someone who is licensed to practice medicine
- Practicing medicine beyond delegation of services, beyond the scope of training, or without the supervision of a licensed physician
- Practicing telemedicine for patients in a state where you are not licensed
- Performing surgery or using devices to penetrate tissues
Engaging in the Practice of Medicine by Unlicensed Person
If you retain ownership of the practice of medicine without a license in that medical field, you may face charges under PC 2052. Even if you don’t perform any medical treatment on another individual personally, you could still be liable for violating PC 2052. As long as you are the owner of a medical establishment, it is enough to face a California conviction.
Psychological or Physical Condition
You could face charges under PC 2052 for treating another person with a psychological or physical condition without a license. Under this statute, what constitutes mental or physical condition has a broader definition. For instance, you could be guilty under this statute if you assist another person in delivering a baby, even if the pregnancy does not have special treatment needed. You may still face the charges even if there is no health complication with the patient.
Detecting Physical or Psychological
You can violate PC 2052 in California by attempting to diagnose or treating someone’s condition. If you use any method, device, or system to detect someone with a psychological or physical condition, you are considered diagnosing. Testing another person’s blood pressure also falls under this definition, except figuring out another person’s tallness or pound measurement.
Treating involves the practices the statute considers purely medical. For instance, if you give another person a shot or medical prescription, you are attempting to treat. Treating may also include additional fringe treatments like acupuncture or hypnosis. The only unsettled medical law in California is marijuana medication.
Nobody Suffer Physical Injuries or Get Sick
For you to face charges under PC 2052, another person does not need to get hurt or get sick because of your unlicensed medicine practice. Some defendants often think that since their patients did not get hurt or sick, they are out of the hook. You could be deceiving yourself because you may still face the charges under PC 2052, even if nobody gets sick or suffers injuries.
Even if you did not have intentions of hurting or harming another person, you would still face the charges. You could be having a genuine desire and good intentions to help people in society. Unfortunately, such intentions cannot protect you from facing the charges of the unlicensed practice of medicine. You might face severe financial, liberty, and social penalties for the act, even if you had good intentions for the society.
Unauthorized Practice of Medicine in California
You can only face the unlicensed practice of medicine charges if the act happens within the boundaries of California State. Previously, you could be easily identified for engaging in medicine’s unlicensed practice by merely looking at your physical location. It is currently hard to determine whether a person engaging in medicine’s unlicensed practice is within California due to the growing online medicine.
Penalties for Violating PC 2052
Engaging in the unlicensed practice of medicine attracts severe penalties in California. A conviction of this act is a wobbler offense. You could face misdemeanor or felony charges. It is worth noting that if you face a felony charge, your case’s prosecution could take place in the district attorney’s office. If you face a misdemeanor charge, your case’s prosecution could occur in the city attorney’s office. However, even if you face a misdemeanor or a felony charge, the prosecutor must provide sufficient evidence before your case proceeds to a trial hearing for the jury or judge to determine the guilty verdict.
Under California law, regardless of whether your case is charged as a misdemeanor or a felony, two factors are considered. First, the circumstances of your case that lead to the conviction. If your offense seems more serious, you may face a felony charge. For instance, if your unlicensed medicine practice caused bodily injuries to another person, you could face a felony charge. Second, the prosecutor may look at the history of your criminal record. You may face a felony charge if you have a past criminal record of violating PC 2052. You may face a misdemeanor charge if your past criminal record is clean.
A felony charge could lead you to a fine of up to $ 10,000, a sentence of three years in county jail, or felony probation. Felony probation has more conditions compared to misdemeanor probation. You may be required to meet the probation officer regularly. The court may recommend a jail term and revoke the probation if you fail to adhere to your probation conditions. A misdemeanor charge could lead you to a fine of $ 1,000, a sentence of one year in county jail, or misdemeanor probation. You do not have to meet regularly with the probation officer if you are serving misdemeanor probation. While on this probation, you are also not required to visit the probation office regularly.
At times, the prosecutor may charge you for working in a clinic controlled and owned by an unlicensed person. As a licensed doctor working in such a clinic, you may challenge your charges by alleging that you did not know that the clinic owner is unlicensed. The prosecutor may charge you with misdemeanor charges rather than felony charges if it’s apparent that you had no knowledge the clinic is unlicensed. In California, doctors face professional discipline if the court convicts them of a felony or misdemeanor crime of unauthorized medicine practice. The professional discipline is based on regular criminal convictions. Facing professional discipline could lead to the revocation of your doctor’s license.
You may face civil liability for the unauthorized practice of medicine in addition to your criminal charges. If your unauthorized practice of medicine causes harm or injuries to your patient, he or she may sue you for the damages. The judge may assume that negligence was exercised to the patient if the caregiver is an unauthorized medical practitioner. The patient may file a claim for medical expenses he or she incurs on injuries sustained because of your unauthorized medicine practice.
The patient may also file a claim for lost wages for the period they took away from work because of the injuries sustained from your negligence. He or she may also file a claim for lost earning capacity if they cannot go back to work due to the injuries sustained because of your negligence. The patient may sue you for punitive damages in addition to seeking compensation. Punitive damages are intended to punish and prevent you from repeating the crime in the future.
Unauthorized Practice of Medicine by Medical Assistants
In California, a medical assistant may face charges for unauthorized practice of medicine. This is because medical assistants do not hold medical licenses. They have no legal permission to practice medicine under Professions and Business code 2052 independently. Medical assistants only have permission to help licensed healthcare workers carry out medical services under this statute. A medical assistant cannot face charges under PC 2052 as long as they perform administrative or technical services. The medical assistant may only face a conviction if he or she participates in treating and diagnosing people.
You may face a conviction under Professions and Business code 2052 even if you administer what seem to be minor operations. For instance, it is a violation of this statute if you engage in running or conducting a silicone party. You may face a conviction for an unauthorized practice if you administer silicone without a medical license. A medical license is required in California, even for minor cosmetic procedures.
Referring the Sick to Unauthorized Medical Practitioners
If you refer sick people to unauthorized doctors, you may face charges under Professions and Business code 2052, even if you possess a medical license. It is unlawful to abet, aid, or conspire to practice medicine without a license or authorization in California. You may face charges under PC 2052 if you knowingly and deliberately refer the sick to unauthorized medical practitioners.
Defenses to Unlicensed Practice of Medicine Charges
A conviction for unlicensed practice of medicine attracts severe penalties. Fortunately, with the help of your attorney, there are legal defenses you can employ to fight your charges. Your attorney can utilize defense strategies to challenge your criminal charges. Your attorney’s best procedural strategies can influence the outcome of your conviction. You may only know the best action to take in your case if you have a competent attorney by your side.
In case the prosecutor presents a strong proof against your case, your attorney’s procedural defenses could be more reliable rather than challenging the prosecutor’s proof. If the prosecutor does not have substantial proof against your case, your attorney may employ substantive arguments and motions to challenge the prosecutor’s proof. Some legal defenses for your offense of unauthorized practice of medicine include:
Self-Help Group Engagement
You may challenge your unauthorized practice of medicine charges in California by alleging that you were engaging in a self-help group. The court may not convict you under PC 2052 if you provide sufficient evidence that you were not practicing medicine but instead participating in a self-help group or a support group. In California, self-help groups do not face the charges for practicing medicine without a license. Often, their members who are unlicensed in healthcare lead self-help groups. They only suggest treatments or remedies but not practicing medicine.
False Accusations
In California, people in healthcare conditions face all kinds of trauma, concerns, and emotions. Often, this situation makes patients and care providers engage in all sorts of disputes and arguments. Your former patient can accuse you falsely of engaging in the unethical practice of medicines or business. Suddenly, you may find yourself facing charges under PC 2052 if they inform the authorities. This is when you require a competent criminal defense attorney to employ skilled investigators and the right experts to create the best evidence in your favor. If your attorney’s evidence succeeds, the charges against you could be dismissed early in the process.
You Did Not Practice Medicine
There is another option of therapy and healing in the United States that has continued to expand daily. This is happening because United States treatment is based on western methods of treatment. For instance, gym trainers are educating their customers on the diet and handling body ailments. Because the method is murk and confusing, you may face charges under PC 2052 since what you could be doing is not considered legal as medicine. With the help of your attorney, you can allege that what you did was not medicine, and therefore you do not deserve to face charges under PC 2052. If you move aggressively and present a reliable argument, your charges could be reduced or dismissed.
Insufficient Evidence
You may not face charges for unauthorized practice of medicine if the prosecutor fails to prove the charges against you. Most of the time, victims of unauthorized practice of medicine drop the charges because of delays and poor investigations. Your attorney could take advantage of this situation to challenge the prosecutor’s charges against you. The court could reduce or dismiss the charges if the prosecutor fails to provide convincing evidence.
Related Offenses
In California, several offenses related to the offense of unauthorized practice of medicine. The court may convict you with related offenses rather than the unauthorized practice of medicine. The court may also convict you with related offenses alongside the offense of unauthorized practice of medicine. Some of the related crimes are:
Unauthorized use of Letters or Title
It’s a crime in California for any unlicensed medical doctor to use the terms like a physician, doctor, or initials like M.D, or Dr in any letterhead, advertisement, business cards, or sign. This crime is a misdemeanor in California, and the potential penalties you could face include a sentence of six months in county jail or fine of up to $ 1,000.
Unauthorized Practice of Law
In California, only active members of the California State Bar are allowed to practice law. This rule applies to lawyers whose bar membership has been revoked or suspended and people who have never been lawyers. Similar to the unauthorized practice of medicine, unauthorized practice of law attracts severe criminal penalties. In most cases, a conviction of this offense is a misdemeanor under California law. However, a conviction of unauthorized practice of law becomes a wobbler if a disbarred or suspended attorney in California commits it. The crime of unauthorized practice of law charged as a wobbler might attract felony penalties.
Medical Marijuana
In most cases, medical marijuana law in California intertwines with the State’s law on medicine’s unauthorized practice. Medical marijuana laws are complex and confusing on their own. Individuals possessing a medical marijuana cooperative in California could face medicine’s unauthorized practice because of the two laws’ overlapping. You may face charges under Pc 2052 if you own a medical marijuana cooperative and hire a licensed medical practitioner to examine and issue marijuana prescriptions to the patients.
Find a Defense Attorney Near Me
Under California law, the crime of unauthorized practice of medicine attracts severe penalties. The implications for your offense may be worse if aggravating factors like causing injuries on someone are apparent. If you are facing charges for unauthorized practice of medicine in Van Nuys, CA, Van Nuys Criminal Attorney can help you fight your charges. Contact us at 818-484-1100 and speak to one of our attorneys.
If you are facing charges of unemployment insurance fraud in the state of California, you should not walk into the courtroom alone or with anything but the best possible legal representation. The prosecution will be determined to gain a conviction, seeing it as a victory for the taxpayer and for the unemployed, without any regard to the possibility of your complete innocence or of the existence of any mitigating factors.
Only by securing the services of a defense attorney with deep experience in defending unemployment insurance fraud cases can you maximize you chances of a favorable outcome. At the Criminal Law Office of Leah Legal, we have been successfully winning these types of cases for years for our clients in Los Angeles and Southern California, and we can do the same for you.
For a free legal consultation, contact us 24/7 at 818-484-1100.
What Is “Unemployment Insurance Fraud?”
Whenever false, misleading, or incomplete information is provided for the purpose of defrauding a state or federal level unemployment insurance program and acquiring unlawful gain to oneself, unemployment insurance fraud has taken place.
There are many forms in which unemployment insurance fraud can occur, and these are criminalized and assigned penalties in the California Penal Code, and more particularly, in the California Unemployment Insurance Code. While punishments vary based on the specifics of the crime and incident and on the defendant’s past criminal history, heavy fines and long jail/prison terms are often part of the sentence.
In California, the EDD (Employment Development Department), which is a combination state and federal program, manages unemployment insurance. The purpose of the program is to assist those who have recently lost their jobs through a tough time until they can find new employment. The program will provide from $40 to $450 per week to qualifying recipients for up to 12 months.
In general, you can only legally get unemployment insurance payments if you lost your job through no fault of your own, but there are some exceptions. When you were fired or quit your job, instead of laid off, you have to apply to the EDD for special consideration to receive benefits, and these decisions are made on a case by case basis.
Other requirements to receive unemployment benefits include:
- You cannot file while still employed or simply because your hours have been reduced. Even if you know you will soon be laid off, you must wait till you are actually laid off to file.
- You cannot file more than 18 months after the last day you were employed.
- You must be ready, willing, and able to work but simply unable at present to find a job.
- You must be actively searching for a new job.
When people file in violation of the rules of the program mentioned above or by falsifying their applications in some way, it is unemployment insurance fraud. When people on the inside of the program, who are responsible to disburse unemployment funds according to the law, wrongfully withhold or wrongfully disburse them, that also is fraud. And when employers lie about why a worker ceased to work for them or about how many hours or how much income they had, or otherwise wrongfully try to eliminate or reduce valid benefits, that is yet another form of California unemployment insurance fraud.
Types of Unemployment Insurance Fraud
Going into more detail, here are some examples of how California unemployment insurance fraud can be committed:
- Employees Commit Unemployment Insurance Fraud When They:
- Collect benefits while working and not reporting that fact to the EDD. This is known as “double dipping.”
- Fail to report other forms of income, such as pensions, workers comp payments, or social security benefits, to the EDD while collecting unemployment insurance benefits.
- Fail to actively search for work and submit applications to potential employers and tell the EDD that they have done so.
- Lie about the reason they lost their job. Saying it was a lay off when, in reality, they were fired or they quit.
- Collect benefits from more than one state simultaneously.
- Cash another person’s unemployment insurance check without their knowledge and consent.
- Use a fake name, SSN, or other information to obtain unemployment benefits. If personal information of another actual person is used, then it is also identity theft.
- Invent a fake employer, saying they were laid off by that employer and then collecting benefits on that basis.
- Employers Commit Unemployment Insurance Fraud When They:
- Lie about why an employee is no longer working for them, saying he or she was fired or they quit, when in fact, the employee was laid off.
- Lie about the wages, hours, or other information concerning a former employee that would potentially increase his or her unemployment insurance benefits.
- Purposefully withhold unemployment insurance deductions from employees’ checks, while not making the corresponding unemployment insurance contributions to the EDD.
Unemployment Insurance Fraud Investigations
As unemployment insurance (UI) fraud is a high-profile, hot-button issue these days, given its widespread occurrence and the high cost it incurs on California taxpayers, the EDD is very vigilant in seeking to discover and prosecute suspected UI fraud incidents.
The EDD collects hot tips on possible instances of UI fraud through their public fraud report hotline. And while that is the source of the majority of their tips, they also get tips from their field offices, when an EDD employee happens to notice a red flag that raises his/her suspicions.
The EDD then assigns suspected cases of UI fraud to a special investigation unit. If that unit is able to find sufficient evidence that the EDD is convinced both that fraud has taken place and that the case is winnable, they are likely to file unemployment insurance fraud charges. If evidence is insufficient, they will either drop the case entirely or work to obtain further evidence.
Possible Penalties for Unemployment Insurance Fraud
In California, UI fraud can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on the details of the case and on the defendant’s past criminal record.
The punishments will also vary based on the particular type of UI fraud that was committed and on whether it was a violation of Penal Code section 550 or Unemployment Insurance Code section 2101. Penal Code section 550 covers the more typical scenarios, while UIC 2101 deals mostly with serious offenses.

Under Penal Code section 550, which also covers other types of insurance fraud, if the value of the benefits involved in the fraud claims amounted to $950 or less, it is a misdemeanor offense. But, if the fraud claims total to above $950, it can be charged as a felony or as a misdemeanor. Note that all fraud UI claims within a 12-month period will be added together to determine if the total is above/below $950.
As a misdemeanor with fraud benefits at or under $950, Penal Code section 550 is punishable by:
- Up to 6 months in jail.
- Up to a $1,000 fine.
As a misdemeanor with fraud benefits over $950, Penal Code section 550 is punishable by:
- Up to 12 months in jail.
- Up to a $10,000 fine.
As a felony, Penal Code section 550 is punishable by:
- From 2 to 5 years in county jail.
- A fine of $50,000 OR twice the amount of the fraud claims, whichever amount is larger.
If charged under UIC 2101 as a misdemeanor, your sentence can include:
- Up to 12 months in county jail.
- A fine of up to $20,000.
If UIC 2101 is charged as a felony offense, it is punishable by:
- 16 months to 3 years in state prison.
- A fine of up to $20,000.
Besides the fines and incarceration terms for PC 550 or UIC 2101 listed above, there are other consequences of a UI fraud conviction as well. These include: professional discipline, loss of certain professional licenses (either permanently or temporarily), not qualifying for any future unemployment insurance benefits, and full repayment of fraudulently taken benefits, along with 30% extra as a penalty.
However, there are times when a good defense lawyer may be able to negotiate a plea deal in which making restitution for the fraudulently taken benefits will secure a lessened sentence or even allow you to avoid being convicted at all. Such deals would require you to pay back so much money in so much time and follow a regular payment schedule. If you fail to fulfill the terms of the agreement, a criminal conviction will likely follow.
Common Defense Strategies
At Leah Legal Criminal Defense, we have handled nearly every type of unemployment insurance fraud case imaginable during our years of serving our clients in the Los Angeles Area. We know how to build you a solid defense and how to customize that defense to the precise details of your case. Here are some of the most common defenses we have successfully used in defending against charges of unemployment insurance fraud:
- Lack of Intent
In order to be convicted of UI fraud in California, it is not enough that you simply filed a claim that was factually inaccurate. It is also required that your actions were done with an intention to defraud the UI system and obtain personal financial benefits as a result. If you truly believed you were submitting a valid claim, accidentally put down incorrect information, or were not aware that certain types of income had to be reported, you are not guilty of UI fraud.
- Insufficient Evidence
Many times, UI fraud charges are filed based on red flags and anonymous tips, when in fact, there is nothing more than circumstantial evidence seemingly against the defendant. The prosecutor may try to puff up weak evidence to intimidate you into capitulating, but a good defense lawyer will know a weak case when he or she sees one and will know how to challenge the evidence and argument of the prosecution. “Beyond all reasonable doubt” is a high standard to meet.
- Not “Material”
Even if you purposefully put down false or misleading information on a UI application and intended to thereby secure wrongful benefits, if the false information was not “material,” that is, it was not relevant to whether you would receive a benefit, retain a benefit, or have existing benefits increased, a conviction will likely not be sustained against you.
- False Accusations
It is not at all uncommon for false accusations of UI fraud to be leveled. This can happen when an instance of internal fraud is pinned on the recipient (or vice versa), when someone with an axe to grind makes false accusations to the EDD hotline out of spite, when circumstantial evidence leads investigators to target the wrong person, or when someone else has stolen your identity and used it to apply for a fraudulent UI benefit.
Other Related Offenses
Other crimes often charged along with or in place of UI fraud include the following:
- Grand Theft (PC 487): When the value of the fraud UI claims exceeds $950 over a 12-month period, it can be charged as grand theft, which when charged as a felony, is punishable by up to 3 years in jail and a $10,000 fine.
- Forgery (PC 470): Whenever UI fraud is accomplished via forging someone else’s signature or forging a public document of any kind, it can also be charged as forgery, which can be either a felony or a misdemeanor.
- Perjury (PC 118): Giving out false information on a UI application to receive fraud benefits can also result in a perjury conviction. Perjury is a felony in California, punishable by up to 4 years in jail and a $10,000 fine.
- Conspiracy (PC 182): In California, when you conspire with others to commit a crime, including to commit UI fraud, it is a distinct offense and a felony.
Contact Us Today For Help
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney Criminal Defense, we stand ready to assist you in defending against allegations of unemployment insurance fraud with top-tier legal advice and representation. Our great familiarity with both the California Penal Code and with the local L.A. Area court system gives us the advantage in the courtroom and helps us to win you the best possible outcome to your case.
For more information or for a free consultation on the details of your case, contact our Los Angeles Criminal Attorney 24/7 at 818-484-1100.
If you are facing allegations of committing welfare fraud in California, it is in your best interests to avail yourself of a criminal defense attorney with extensive experience in this practice area as soon as possible. The consequences of a welfare fraud conviction can be harsh and long-term, and by securing expert legal representation without delay, you can greatly improve your chances of winning a favorable outcome to your case.
At the Criminal Law Office of Leah Legal, we have a long history of successfully defending those accused of welfare fraud in Los Angeles and Southern California. Our deep knowledge of the California welfare system and the California Penal Code, along with our longtime familiarity with local court processes, gives us a distinct advantage in the courtroom.
To learn more about what to do if charged with welfare fraud in California and for a free legal consultation on the details of your case, contact us anytime 24/7 at 818-484-1100.
How Is “Welfare Fraud” Defined in California?
In California, there are numerous state-run programs designed to provide assistance to needy families and individuals, and unfortunately, there is also a good deal of taking advantage of these programs or “working the system” to receive unlawful benefits. That said, there are also many false or exaggerated accusations of welfare fraud, which can put innocent people in a position where their whole future may be in serious jeopardy, depending on the severity of the charges.
In general, any time false, misleading, or omitted information has been purposefully used to secure a welfare benefit that is not legally “deserved,” welfare fraud has taken place. This fraud can be committed by either welfare recipients or internally by those who work at government welfare organizations. Or, fraud schemes could even involve a collaboration between welfare workers and recipients.
Welfare fraud can usually be prosecuted as either a misdemeanor or felony, and a conviction can bring jail or prison time, probation, heavy fines, and the requirement to make full restitution. In some cases, however, a good defense lawyer can negotiate a deal whereby if you pay back most or a all of the monies wrongfully taken, a more lenient sentence will be permitted.
For the most part, welfare fraud is covered under Welfare & Institutions Code (WIC) 10980, which criminalizes:
- Purposefully providing false information or omitting relevant information so as to gain, keep, or increase a welfare benefit.
- Applying to receive benefits under multiple names or multiple times under the same name.
- Selling, buying, changing information on, or counterfeiting food stamps.
State of California welfare programs that are common targets of fraud claims include:
- CalWORKS, which is meant to provide short-term cash payments to poor families with children to help meet their basic needs.
- GAIN, which is a work-search assistance program that is required to accompany CalWORKS benefits.
- CalFresh (food stamps), which provides food-only cash equivalent payments on a monthly basis. Both CalFresh and CalWorks payments are generally delivered electronically to a kind of debit card.
- GA/GR, meaning “general assistance” and “general relief” is the catch-all program for adults living in poverty. It is the safety net of the safety net.
- MediCal, which is a state-run Medicaid program, which covers low-income residents with state-provided health insurance. MediCal fraud is considered health care fraud as well as welfare fraud.
Welfare Fraud Investigations
In California, L.A. and other local district attorneys and other prosecutors can get tips on possible instances of welfare fraud from a variety of sources. These include public welfare fraud hotlines, department of social services locations, and various government agencies that have reason to suspect possible fraud.
The investigation will begin when an investigator contacts the welfare fraud suspect and questions them concerning their current welfare benefits and the information they provided in securing those benefits. Family members, friends, and acquaintances of the suspect may also be questioned. There may also be surprise home inspections.
At some point, the inspector will present all of his or her findings to a local DA who will then decide if enough evidence exists to file welfare fraud charges. If evidence is insufficient, then the case will be dropped, the investigator will be sent to gather more information, or an attempt will be made to put the suspect in a restitution program instead of actually seeking a conviction.
Types of California Welfare Fraud
In general, almost all California welfare fraud can be classed as either recipient fraud or internal fraud.
Recipient fraud involves any attempt, successful or not, by a welfare beneficiary to secure, retain, or increase a benefit by means of submitting false, misleading, or incomplete information. Examples of recipient fraud include:
- Not reporting income that would affect your benefits.
- Claiming a fictitious child or one who no longer lives in your home.
- Claiming to be a single mom or dad when, in fact, both parents live together at the same residence.
- Accepting benefits from two states simultaneously.
Internal fraud is a type of fraud that is committed by employees of state-run welfare agencies. It will often involve the worker illegitimately disbursing welfare benefits to himself, to a family member, or to a friend. Typically, the worker colludes with someone on the outside, and then, the two or more parties divvy up the fraudulently obtained benefits. Those who are convicted of internal welfare fraud may also be charged with embezzlement, misappropriation of public funds, and other serious crimes.
Possible Penalties for California Welfare Fraud
Under WIC 10980, you can be charged with a variety of different forms of welfare fraud, and the charge can be either a misdemeanor or a felony. Below, we look into the possible penalties in some detail:
To make a false or misleading statement in order to gain a welfare benefit is a misdemeanor offense, punishable by:
- Up to 6 months in jail.
- Up to a $500 fine.
Filing a completely fraudulent application, as in filing for a fictitious person, filing under multiple names, or filing multiple times under the same name, can be a misdemeanor or a felony. As a misdemeanor, it is punishable by:
- Up to 12 months in jail.
- Up to a $1,000 fine.
As a felony, filing a fraudulent application is punishable by:
- 16 months to 3 years in jail.
- A maximum fine of $5,000.
Fraudulently obtaining or retaining welfare benefits is a misdemeanor if the fraud benefits were valued at $950 or less, but a felony if they were valued at over $950. Penalties for the misdemeanor include:
- 6 months in jail.
- A $500 fine.
Punishments when filed as a felony include:
- 16 months to 3 years in jail.
- A fine of up to $5,000.
For selling, buying, or misusing food stamps, it is a misdemeanor if the amount involved was valued at under $950 but a felony for amounts greater than $950. This crime is punished the same as fraudulently obtaining benefits (listed directly above).
However, if any form of welfare fraud involves electronically transferred benefits, additional incarceration time can apply when large amounts of money were wrongfully transferred. The rules are as follows:
- One extra year behind bars when the fraudulent electronic transfer was over $50,000.
- Two extra years if it was over $150,000.
- Three extra years for amounts over one million dollars.
- Four extra years when the amount exceeds $2.5 million.
Besides the jail time and fines mentioned above, many convicted of welfare fraud can lose their professional license, lose their current job (especially if he or she is a government employee), become disqualified to receive any future welfare benefits, and be deported if they are a non-citizen U.S. resident.
Welfare Fraud Restitution
While making restitution may anyway be required upon a conviction, many times, the prosecution and presiding judge may be willing to accept a plea deal wherein most or all of the fraudulently taken money is returned in exchange for a reduced charge and/or lighter sentence. A judge may even give substantial time for the defendant to repay the specified amount and fulfill his or her end of the plea bargain.
In some California counties, it may even be possible to gain entry into a welfare fraud diversion program and avoid gaining a criminal record at all! In cases where the amount stolen is relatively small, the defendant has a clean or nearly clean police record, and the defendant is willing to enter a guilty plea, a diversion program may be possible. Such programs would require you to complete a class and pay back the fraudulently taken funds. If this is done, the charges will then be dismissed; if not, you will end up sentenced anyway.
Finally, note that even without a diversion program, voluntarily returning the fraudulently taken funds – especially before charges are even filed against you – may persuade the presiding judge to be lenient.
Common Defense Strategies
At Leah Legal Criminal Defense, we have successfully disposed of numerous welfare fraud defense cases in the past using a variety of defense strategies, each time tailoring the defense to the specific needs of the case. Below, we list some of the most common defenses we have successfully employed in these types of cases:
- Lack of Fraudulent Intent
Regardless of the specific information you did or did not provide on a welfare application form or of what other circumstances may be involved in your case, unless the prosecutor can prove you intended to defraud a state welfare program to benefit yourself financially, you are not guilty of welfare fraud. It may be, for example, that you made a mistake on a welfare form, didn’t know you had to report certain types of income, or forgot to update your status in a timely manner. However inexcusable those things may be, they are simply not fraudulent activity.
- Insufficient Evidence
Many are accused of welfare fraud on purely circumstantial evidence or red flags without any thoughtful consideration of whether someone is likely truly guilty. But merely probable or suggested evidence are not sufficient to convict. Your guilt has to be proven on all elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. That is a high standard to reach, and a good defense attorney can help ensure that when it is not met, no conviction takes place.
- False Accusations
In some cases, someone is accused of welfare fraud due to someone else having an axe to grind against them rather than based on solid evidence. And in other cases, it could also be a case of internal fraud, and yet, be mistakenly pursued as recipient fraud. And finally, you could even be the victim of identity theft, and the identity thief may have used your personal information to fraudulently apply for welfare benefits.
Other Related Offenses
Besides being charged with welfare fraud under WIC 10980, there are other statutes you can be charged with violating instead of or alongside the WIC 10980 charge. These include:
- Grand Theft (PC 487): When the value of the benefits stolen via welfare fraud exceeds $950, you can be charged with grand theft, which can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on the circumstances of the case.
- Forgery (PC 470): If, in the process of committing welfare fraud, you forged someone else’s signature, altered food stamp information or created counterfeit food stamps, or otherwise forged documents in part or in whole, you can be charged with the crime of forgery, which can be either a felony or a misdemeanor.
- Perjury (PC 118): Those who use an assumed name, a fake social security number, or intentionally gave false information on a welfare application can be charged with perjury, which is a felony.
- Conspiracy (PC 182): Those who conspired with others to commit welfare fraud can be charged with conspiracy to commit a crime, which is a felony in California.
Contact Our Criminal Lawyer Today For Help
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we will apply our full legal expertise and our deep experience with welfare fraud defense cases to secure you the best possible outcome to your case. We always fight first and foremost for a dismissal or acquittal, but when necessary, we know how to apply our well seasoned negotiating skills to secure a reduced charge or sentence as part of a favorable plea.
To learn more or for a free consultation, contact us 24/7/365 by calling 818-484-1100.
If you have been accused of committing workers’ comp fraud in the state of California, the potential consequences of a conviction could be quite severe, including heavy fines, years of jail time, loss of certain professional licenses, and a permanent criminal record. Only by securing the services of a well seasoned defense attorney can you maximize your chances of a favorable outcome to your case.
We at the Criminal Law Office of Leah Legal have been successfully defending L.A. Area clients against the charge of workers’ comp fraud for many years, and we will know how to build you a strong defense and win your case. Our intricate knowledge of the California Penal Code and our intimate familiarity with local Los Angeles court processes give us an advantage over the prosecution.
To learn more or for your free legal consultation, contact us anytime 24/7 at 818-484-1100.
What Constitutes “Workers’ Compensation Fraud” in California?
California’s state-run workers’ compensation insurance program is designed to compensate workers injured on the job site or while performing job-related duties elsewhere. It is meant to provide assistance for both medical care connected with the job-related injury as well as make up for lost income, to a degree, and thus help struggling families make it through a difficult time.
Any time a worker submits a claim for benefits they are not entitled to under the provisions of California’s workers’ comp laws, knowingly presenting false, incomplete, or misleading information so as to defraud the workers’ comp system and secure financial benefits to themselves, that is workers’ comp fraud. It is also possible for employers to commit workers’ comp fraud by lying in order to wrongfully deny rightful benefits to an injured worker.
There are several different statutes that address workers’ comp fraud in California. These are as follows:
This is the most important anti-fraud statute concerned with the workers’ comp system in California. It covers the following types of fraud, all focused on employers fraudulently denying benefits:
- Preparing or having another prepare for you a false or otherwise fraudulent statement for the purpose of wrongfully denying workers’ comp benefits to an injured employee.
- Assisting or conspiring with one or more other people to wrongfully deny workers’ comp benefits to an injured employee.
- Making a false statement verbally or in writing in order to intimidate or discourage someone rightfully entitled to workers comp benefits from even trying to collect them.
- Lying to an insurance company concerning how many people you employ, what are the true duties of a particular employee, or about the workplace conditions that prevailed when an injury occurred on the job site.
In this statute, a number of types of workers’ comp fraud that employees can commit are criminalized. As workers’ comp benefits are partly paid by covering medical expenses, Penal Code section 550 also applies to health care fraud. The statute addresses:
- Preparing or causing to be prepared for you a fraudulent claim for the purpose of receiving a workers’ comp benefit that covers a medical expense.
- Purposefully submitting a workers’ comp health care claim for a medical service that was never used.
- Intentionally submitting two or more claims for a single health care expense covered by workers’ comp insurance.
Also note that health care providers can commit this class of workers’ comp fraud by independently submitting false claims or by conspiring with a workers’ comp beneficiary to do so. Physicians and other medical workers who commit worker’s comp or other health care fraud are liable to lose their licenses either temporarily or permanently.
Penal Code section 549 addresses forms of workers’ comp fraud that are often filed against doctors and involve commercial bribery or “kick-backs,” besides direct financial benefits. Penal Code section 549 criminalizes knowingly accepting business from those whom you know or ought to know intend or likely may intend to commit workers’ comp fraud.
What Must the Prosecution Prove?
To gain a conviction on charges of workers’ comp fraud, prosecutors must establish:
- That a false, incomplete, or misleading claim was submitted to the workers’ comp insurance system by the defendant.
- That the defendant was aware of the nature of the claim as false or otherwise fraudulent.
- That the defendant had an intention of deriving financial gain from the fraud claim by defrauding the workers comp program of undeserved benefits.
Benefits can include: immediate and ongoing medical care, temporary disability payments to cover lost wages while recovering, permanent disability benefits for those permanently unable to work due to the job-related accident, and death benefits to the families of those killed in a work-related accident.
The prosecutor will have no interest in trying to show that the workers’ comp beneficiary lied about who caused the accidental injury or death because California workers’ comp insurance is a no-fault system. However, there could be fraudulent claims based on the location of the injury, since it needs to have taken place on the job site or at least while performing job-related duties.
The statements at issue can include both information made on the workers’ comp claim application form or made orally in the interest of securing a claim. It can also include supporting evidence, such as medical bills, hospital records, X-ray results, and proof of lost income.
The statement(s) in question can be fraudulent for a variety of reasons, including:
- The injury is fake.
- The injury is not work-related.
- The injury was not as severe or costly as represented.
- A previous injury was not disclosed.
- Previous claims filed were not disclosed.
- The same claim was filed under multiple employers.
- The defendant worked while collecting workers comp benefits.
Most critical to many workers’ comp fraud cases will be the issue of intent and of whether a false statement was material. To be convicted of workers’ comp fraud, you must have had an intention to defraud rather than simply make a mistake. And any false statements, even if knowingly made, must be such as would affect the approval or amount of a claim.
Possible Penalties for Workers Comp Fraud
For the most part, workers’ comp fraud in California can be filed as either a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on the facts of the case, the monetary value of the claim(s), and the defendant’s prior criminal history, if any.
In general, misdemeanor-level workers’ comp fraud can get you up to 12 months in jail, while felony-level worker’s comp fraud is punishable by 2 to 5 years in prison and heavy fines.
However, the penalties vary based on which statute was broken, as follows:
- Insurance Code 1871.4 Violations
Generally committed by employers, these acts of fraud are punishable as a misdemeanor by:
- Up to 12 months in county jail.
- Summary probation.
- Full restitution.
- A fine of $150,000 OR of twice the amount of money defrauded, whichever is greater.
As a felony, Insurance Code 1871.4 is punishable by:
The same fine as when charged as a misdemeanor.
- 2 to 5 years in county jail.
- Formal probation.
- Full restitution.

- Penal Code Section 550 Violations
These are generally committed by workers but can also be committed by health care professionals. As a misdemeanor, PC 550 convictions can be punished by:
- Up to 12 months in jail.
- Summary probation.
- A maximum fine of $10,000.
As a felony, PC 550 is punishable by:
- 2 to 5 years in jail.
- Formal probation.
- A fine of $50,000 or twice the amount of the fraud claim, whichever amount is greater.
Note that Penal Code section 550 is always charged as a misdemeanor if the amount of the fraud claim(s) within a 12-month period is $950 or less. In this case, the punishment is reduced to 6 months in jail and a $1,000 fine. Fraud claims exceeding $950 can be charged and punished as either misdemeanor or felony as outlined above.
- Penal Code Section 549 Violations
These crimes are generally committed by health care professionals. They are punishable, when a misdemeanor, by:
- Up to 12 months in county jail.
- A fine of $50,000 or double the amount of the fraud claim, whichever is greater.
When charged as a felony, PC 549 violations are punishable by:
- 16 months to 3 years in jail.
- The same fine as for the corresponding misdemeanor charge.
Professional Discipline
Workers’ comp fraud, when committed by health care professionals, will lead to professional discipline on top of the applicable penalties mentioned above.
When a doctor, nurse, pharmacist, or other health care worker commits fraud in order to secure financial gain, it is considered “substantially related to” their basic qualifications as a health care professional. Thus, professional licenses of these practitioners can be revoked or suspended permanently or for a specified period of time due to a workers’ comp fraud conviction.
Civil Penalties
Besides the incarceration terms and fines you can be sentenced to under criminal law for a workers’ comp fraud violation, there are also civil fines that may apply.
In most instances, the very same criteria that leads to a criminal conviction for workers’ comp fraud will also expose you to the following civil fines:
- A fine of from $4,000 to $10,000 per fraudulent claim submitted.
- A fine of as much as triple the amount workers comp insurance paid out for medical and/or legal expenses on a fraud claim(s).
- For those who have prior conviction under PC 549 or Insurance Code 1871.4, an extra $4,000 per service paid for by means of a fraud claim.
Possible Defense Strategies
At the Criminal Law Office of Leah Legal, we understand that government agencies, police, and prosecutors are especially alert to suspected workers’ comp fraud, due to the fact it is a large and fast-growing class of California insurance fraud. We also understand their motivation to protect the taxpayer and those whom the California workers’ comp program is meant to benefit.
However, there are also many false or exaggerated allegations of workers’ comp fraud filed in California every year. The complexity of the system often leads to simple mistakes being made, which are sometimes assumed to be fraud.
We are just as vigilant in defending our clients against the charge of workers’ comp fraud as prosecutors are of seeking a conviction. Here are some of the defenses we commonly use to win workers’ comp fraud defense cases:
- Lack of Knowledge
It may be that, especially as secretary or other assistant, though you prepared documents that were in fact fraudulent, you were not at all aware of their being fraudulent. Nonetheless, you can be charged with fraud along with your employer or other party that actually committed the fraud. In this case, Leah Legal will fight vigorously for an acquittal or a dismissal of the case brought against you.
- Lack of Intent to Defraud
Often, even if you are the one who knowingly submitted a claim containing false or misleading information, you may not have had any intention of defrauding workers’ comp. It may have simply been a mistake on your part. This kind of human error is not at all uncommon, and a good defense attorney can likely prove your innocence.
- Fraudulent Information Not “Material”
Even if you knowingly submitted false information on a claim application to workers’ comp, if that information was not material (relevant) to getting a claim or increasing the amount of the claim, then you cannot be convicted of fraud.
- Insufficient Evidence to Convict
In many cases, the evidence brought against you may be very complex and hard to decipher. It may seem impressive by its sheer volume, but in point of fact, it may not meet the burden of proof.
Contact Our Criminal Defense Attorney Today For Help
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney Criminal Defense, we have the expertise and the grit and determination to fight both skillfully and tenaciously in your best interests if you have been accused of committing workers’ comp fraud. We know how to secure a dismissal or an acquittal where possible and how to negotiate a favorable plea agreement with a reduced charge/sentence where necessary.
For a free consultation and immediate attention to your case, do not hesitate to our criminal attorney anytime 24/7/365 at 818-484-1100.
Juvenile Offenses & what you need to know
A juvenile crime is any criminal act that is committed by a minor (a person below the legal age of 18). When a minor is accused of a crime or is being investigated, it is a painful and stressful time for everyone in the family. There is always the fear that the police, prosecutors and judges won’t treat the young person as the child that he or she is – a child that in most instances has used youthful poor judgment and has made a mistake.
Although the juvenile court system was originally created to rehabilitate and not to punish, the harsh laws that have recently been enacted have diminished that mission statement. All too often parents assume that because a minor committed the crime, he or she will not be subject to harsh legal penalties if convicted. This belief is far from the truth. In California, all juvenile crimes are taken very seriously by law enforcement and are prosecuted vigorously. Some juvenile crimes are even treated more harshly than if the crime had been committed by an adult.
JUVENILE CRIMES AND PENALTIES
Some of the juvenile crimes we handle include the following:
- Assault and Battery
- Violent Crimes
- Theft and Shoplifting
- Sexual Misconduct
- Vandalism
- DUI and Traffic Violations
- Sealing of Juvenile Records
Once a minor is convicted of a crime, penalties can include jail time, placement in a juvenile detention center, large monetary fines, community service, probation, parole, mandatory drug and alcohol counseling and court-ordered therapy. In fact, the final outcome of a juvenile criminal case can follow your youngster into adulthood and can severely hinder his or her future education and employment. You need the help of a caring criminal defense attorney to ingeniously and aggressively protect your child’s future.
How We Can Help Your Minor
Criminal Defense Attorney Leah Naparstek understands how important it is to effectively communicate with a child that is in trouble. First and foremost, a child must feel that he or she is being heard. At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney we listen to our client – your child, and we bring in counselors for additional help and assessment, if necessary.
In representing your minor child, we assess the particular facts of his/her case and define the best strategic defense in order to minimize a juvenile criminal record. We fight tooth and nail to protect the minor’s rights and freedom and we negotiate with the appropriate authorities to try to prevent the child from being treated as an adult. If necessary, we represent the child in juvenile court, where a juvenile can still be held in custody until adulthood. At every stage of a juvenile case, we try to find creative ways to solve problems for our young client.
To schedule a free initial consultation for a juvenile offense, call (818) 484-1100 NOW today or fill out the form provided here.
An arrest can be a traumatic and overwhelming experience, particularly for minors who don’t understand the California criminal process. Not only will it be overwhelming for your kid, but also you, the parent, irrespective of the offense they’re alleged to commit. And even though guilty minors are not punished as adults (with a few exceptions), they still face punishments known as dispositions. One of these consequences is being sent to the Division of Juvenile Justice (DJJ) facilities.
Understanding how the DJJ system works helps you know what to expect if your child is sent to these facilities and what you can do to prevent it. At Leah Legal, we have worked with many young offenders in Van Nuys and have an in-depth knowledge of how the juvenile justice system operates. Therefore, we can accord your child the best legal representation, enabling them to achieve the best possible outcome for their case. Please don’t hesitate to call us when your young one is in trouble with the law.
Understanding The California DJJ System
For several years, the worst young offenders in California were taken to the California Youth Authority (CYA). In 2005, the CYA started being controlled by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR). CYA is today called the DJJ.
The DJJ provides treatment and education to juvenile wrongdoers up to 25 years old. Approximately 225,000 juveniles are placed under arrest in California every year. Of these, only less than seven hundred are taken to the DJJ. Being sent to a DJJ facility is similar to being taken to adult jail or prison under the juvenile criminal system.
DJJ facilities refer to locked institutions meant for serious young offenders. Currently, there are three of them and a forestry camp. Of these three, two are in Stockton, while the other is located in Camarillo. The camp is based in Pine Grove.
The primary reason for sending youths to DJJ facilities isn’t punishment. Instead, they’re sent there aiming to achieve victim restoration, offender treatment and training, and community restoration. There are three ways through which your child can be committed to any of the DJJ facilities. They include if:
- A juvenile court’s judge commits him/her there.
- He/she is tried as a grownup, sent to adult jail/prison, but the court directs that a DJJ houses him/her.
- He/she is prosecuted as a grownup, and a criminal court commits him/her there.
When the judge is considering committing your child to a DJJ facility, he/she may order that the child enrolls for diagnostic study for ninety days. This study recommends treatment options to the court.
Crimes that Warrant DJJ Facility Sentencing Option
Your child can only be committed to one of the DJJ facilities if they are a ward of the court and:
- Their latest crime is a sexual offense that requires registration as a sex offender, including:
- Indecent exposure
- Incest
- Child trafficking
- Child pornography
- Rape
- Child molestation
- Sodomy
- Sexual battery
- Murder
- Assault with intent to commit rape or forced penetration
- Lascivious and lewd acts with a minor
- Oral copulation by force
- Their latest crime is specified under WIC 707(b), including:
- Murder
- Robbery
- Arson causing significant bodily harm or arson of an inhabited building
- Rape with violence, force, or threats of significant bodily injury
- Sodomy by violence, force, or threats of substantial bodily harm
- Attempted murder
- Oral copulation by violence, force, or threats of substantial physical harm
- Lascivious or lewd conduct on a minor below 14 years with violence, force, or threats of substantial bodily harm
- Kidnapping for ransom, robbery purposes, sexual assault purposes, during a carjacking, or with bodily injury
- Torture
- Carjacking
- Aggravated mayhem
- Voluntary manslaughter
- Assault using a destructive device or firearm or one accomplished through force likely to cause significant bodily injury.
- Forcible sexual penetration
- Drive-by-shooting
- Discharging a gun in an occupied or inhabited building
- The felony crime of dissuading or bribing a witness
- Exploding a destructive device intending to commit murder
- Escape using violence or force from a juvenile home, camp, hall, ranch, forestry camp after significant bodily harm is deliberately inflicted on a juvenile facility’s employee.
- A crime described under PC 1203.9 against an individual over 60 years or disabled.
- Manufacturing, selling, or compounding controlled substances listed under HSC 11055(e)
Your kid must be eleven years old or above for them to be committed to a DJJ facility. And if your child has been convicted as an adult prison, they will be moved to an adult prison upon reaching eighteen years old, except if they can serve all their prison term before turning twenty-five years old. They also have to make use of any offered program to avoid transfer to adult prison.
Juvenile offenders in DJJ facilities stay in housing units that resemble prison but are geared towards the offender’s age. The facility can accommodate juveniles up to 25 years old, but younger offenders are usually separated from older ones if possible.
Generally, a DJJ sentencing option is severe and lasts for an extended period. When your child arrives at the DJJ facility, they will be assessed and assigned to a course based on different criteria such as their maturity level, age, treatment needs, personal risk, educational needs, and the facts surrounding the underlying offense.
The child, as with all other offenders, has to go to school full-time. The state’s Department of Education accredits classes offered at these facilities. If they finish high school, they can enroll in vocational training and college programs that are offered. Most youths are also given jobs at these facilities from which they receive wages. These jobs include janitorial work, food prep, landscaping, etc. They will also be assigned a Youth Correctional Counselor who monitors their behavior and progress.
Apart from the core courses, your child may also be enrolled in programs that address specific personal needs. They include intensive behavior treatment, sexual conduct treatment, behavior treatment programs, mental health management, Successfully Dressed program, anger management, victim awareness activities, and substance abuse treatment.
Generally, any person who is not a threat may visit an offender in the facility. Every facility has its visitor guidelines concerning the number of people who can enter at a time, permitted items, and dressing.
The Length of a DJJ Sentence
Before your kid is taken to a DJJ facility, the judge must establish the maximum confinement period. It can’t exceed the term that a grownup could face for a similar crime. The court is also permitted to impose a confinement time that’s less than the adult’s maximum. There’s no minimum confinement period that the court must order.
During the disposition hearing, the judge considers the offender’s criminal history and various factors surrounding the offense. A ward convicted of criminal misconduct not specified under WIC 707(b) has to be set free after 24 months or at the age of 21 years, whichever comes last.
A ward found guilty of a crime listed under WIC 707(b)(with only one exception) has to be released at the age of 23 years or after serving 24 months, whichever comes last. The one exception being referred to here is if the offender committed an offense whose consequences would include seven or more years in prison for a grownup. It doesn’t necessarily need to be an offense listed under WIC 707(b). In this case, the offender has to be released after 24 months or at his/her 25th birthday, whichever happens last.
Note that your child might not go to a DJJ facility if they are sentenced to less than ninety days.
It is also worth noting that DJJ facilities only house challenging juveniles. They don’t house troublesome and truant youths against whom the prosecutor hasn’t filed charges for committing a crime. Other young offenders that the DJJ doesn’t accommodate are:
- Minors convicted of a direct file crime
- Those whose conviction is of a severe felony, which they committed when they were sixteen years or older
- Those found guilty of a violent felony whose sentence is life in prison or the maximum prison term goes beyond their 25th
Juvenile Appeal
Young people, just like adults, can appeal the judge’s decision. Through their lawyer, your child could file a petition seeking that given orders and judgments by the juvenile court be overturned, including the judge’s decision to commit them to a DJJ facility. The appeal will be dependent on legal mistakes committed, discontent with the outcome of the case, and ignorance of the juvenile’s rights during the court process.
The child will bring a Notice of Appeal through his/her lawyer within sixty days after the disposition hearing or the day of the court’s order.
The arguments that the lawyer representing your kid could use in persuading the court to agree to the appeal include violation of the child’s legal rights or improper exclusion or inclusion of proof during the court process. Under certain circumstances, the minor can ask the judge to set aside (change or cancel) the sentence because they have new evidence, or their situation has improved since the case started.
Commitment to a DJJ Facility Can be Modified or Changed
The court can modify or change the wardship conditions. For instance, if your child’s needs aren’t being satisfied at the facility, his/her lawyer can bring a motion seeking modification of the commitment. If the judge determines that the child isn’t benefiting from the facility, he/she can alter its prior orders.
Your Child Undergoes Parole Once They Are Released From the DJJ Facility
The BJH (Board of Juvenile Hearings, a subdivision of the DJJ carries out the following functions:
- Holds discharge hearings
- Creates yearly reviews
- Oversees wards
- Presides over DJJ parole consideration proceedings
- Conducts case reviews
This board has to review the case of every new ward within forty-five days of their commitment. It also has to set a parole deliberation date, which could be not more than a year for non-severe crimes. For severe criminal misconducts, including murder, the date could be seven years. Each case should be reviewed annually, at the minimum, to establish whether existing orders ought to be modified or changed.
Additionally, the BJH has the authority to discharge a juvenile at any given time if they appear rehabilitated. The probation department and sentencing court supervise a minor released from a DJJ on parole. The board recommends specific conditions of supervision to these supervising bodies upon release on parole.
The board can recommend your child for release if he/she has completed all program goals. The juvenile court judge determines the length of a parole period and discharges from parole.
Other Sentencing Options
Commitment to a DJJ facility is just one form of punishment your kid could face for committing a crime. And as we mentioned, DJJ facilities are for those juvenile offenders who have committed a crime that requires sex offender registration or an offense specified under WIC 707(b). There are several other sentencing options available in the California juvenile delinquency system that your child can face. They are:
Formal Probation at Camp or Home
If a juvenile court orders that your child is made a ward of the court, it can sentence them to a probation term. At times wards may complete their sentence at home (although they’re wards of the court). In other cases, the judge sends the ward to a suitable placement in a group home or relative’s home.
Probation terms may include any action reasonably necessary for the minor’s rehabilitation, including:
- Curfew restitutions.
- Compulsory school attendance.
- Community service.
- Alcohol/drug abuse counseling.
- Graffiti removal.
- Not associating with particular people.
If your child needs a higher structure level, they can be committed to probation camp, where they can remain for a period ranging from three months to a year. Most camps resemble dormitories and have a structured daily schedule that involves treatment and education programs. A few others include fire/wilderness camps with emphasized firefighting and forestry training, family-style and military-style camps that focus on small-scale intensive treatment.
Informal Probation
If your minor’s case isn’t severe, he or she may qualify for diversion and informal probation under W&I (Welfare & Institutions) 654 or W&I Sec. 725. Informal probation may be imposed in a first-time nonviolent crime like PC 594, vandalism, or PC 602, trespass.
- Informal Probation Under W&I Code 725
The judge decides whether to impose informal probation against your child. The difference between this and W&I Code 654 probation is that a petition will be filed here, but it’s placed on hold, so the juvenile has a second chance. The child won’t admit guilt, and provided he/she adheres to the probation conditions; the petition will be dismissed.
Generally, probation conditions include counseling for the child and their parents, curfew, and school attendance. Other conditions may include restitution and drug testing. Informal probation under W&I Code 725 lasts six months.
- Diversion and Informal Probation Under W&I Code 654
Under W&I code 654, your child’s case will be diverted to probation before petition filing occurs. In juvenile courts, there are often cases that involve petty theft violations like shoplifting. Considering that these are minor crimes, juvenile defense lawyers will try convincing the judge to impose W&I Code 725 informal probation or W&I Code 654 diversion. This means your kid will evade a filing of charges, to begin with, or the charges against them will be dismissed if they complete probation.
To adjust the situation, which brings the child within court’s jurisdiction or creates the possibility that the kid will soon be within that jurisdiction, the probation officer develops a plan for the juvenile that can last not more than six months. Generally, the program includes counseling and education.
If the juvenile doesn’t perform well, the probation officer could still initiate formal petition proceedings with the juvenile court.
Deferred Entry of Judgment (DEJ)
Another sentencing option your child could be subject to is DEJ under W&I Code 790. DEJ requires that the child admits guilt to the petitioner’s allegations, but results in charges being dismissed after completing the DEJ program. DEJ is imposed on first-time juvenile offenders that aren’t classified under WIC 707(b) crimes. It lasts for a period ranging from one to three years.
Find a Juvenile Criminal Defense Lawyer Near Me
Sending a minor to the DJJ can take a toll on them since a child needs to grow surrounded by their parents, family, and friends’ love. When your child is arrested in Van Nuys, CA, Van Nuys Criminal Attorney can help you fight to achieve the best possible outcome possible that does not entail being separated from you and the community.
We will build a solid defense strategy that may have your child’s case dismissed or their charges lowered, so they receive lenient punishments like probation and not being sent to a DJJ. Call us as soon as the arrest is made at 818-484-1100 to share the case facts, and we will start building a robust defense right away.
When handling juvenile cases, the California court follows a different procedure from the one used in adult criminal cases. Every state has a unique juvenile court system for juveniles who engage in illegal activities. Even though some courts judge minors to be delinquent, everyone that plays a part in a juvenile case, including the judges, prosecutors, and police officers, have broad discretion to create other consequences.
Juvenile cases can be complex to handle, which is why you should reach out to an experienced juvenile attorney if your child has been arrested. Our qualified attorneys at Leah Legal are willing to help you fight for the rights of your child. Reach out to us today if you are in Van Nuys, and we will guide you through the entire process.
Factors Contributing to Juvenile Delinquency
Certain factors lead to minor’s involvement in illegal activities. They include:
- Peer pressure
- Violence in their social circles
- Poor standards of education
- Poor school attendance
- Violence at home
- Poor moral guidance
- Alcohol or drugs abuse
- Socioeconomic factors
Parents and caregivers must guide the minors from an early stage as some of these factors could have long-lasting impacts on the minor’s life.
The Background of Juvenile Representation
In California, juvenile systems follow different ruling procedures from the adult systems, but that does not make juvenile cases simpler.
After a juvenile offender has been arrested, he/she stays in police custody until a detention hearing is organized(usually done within the first 72 hours). Even if they are not detained, the detention hearing must also be done within 72 hours. After the hearing, the offender can request another hearing (individually or through his/her attorney) to challenge the charge’s efficiency. It should be done within three days.
Depending on the charge, additional hearings would be considered to:
- Examine the evidence
- Determine the duration the juvenile will be detained
- Determine if the minor will be detained
- Consider jurisdiction matter
Some courts may choose to:
- Guide the juvenile offender to legal guardianship
- Put the offender on an adoption plan.
- The rights of the offender’s parents may also be invalidated.
Type of Juvenile Crimes In California
Some of the common juvenile cases in California include:
- Vandalism — keying cars and cutting auto tires, tagging, graffiti, or drawing on public toilet walls.
- Alcohol-related offenses — Some of the crimes related to alcohol are Underage purchase or possession of alcohol, Consumption of alcohol by underages, Giving alcohol to underages, or if the underage was found in a public area with an open alcohol container.
- Theft/ larceny — shoplifting, stealing from backpacks and lockers, or stealing a bicycle.
- Disorderly conducts — Some of these conducts include, Fighting in a public place, cursing a teacher, flashing, mooning, or indecent exposure.
- Possession of Marijuana — using marijuana in a public area or having a small amount of marijuana is also considered a severe crime in California.
- Battery/ simple Assault — shoving a person, bullying resulting in an assault, a physical disagreement between a child or a parent
- Traffic Violations —not wearing a seatbelt or wearing it wrongly, over speeding, riding behind a truck.
- Tobacco Offenses — Illegal purchase of tobacco, using tobacco in school, or giving youths tobacco.
However, for some cases, the California juvenile grants rehabilitation of the juvenile offenders instead of imprisonment. But for some cases, depending on the age of the offender and their criminal history, the judges may seek harsh penalties. In a minor’s case, the judge makes the final judgment since there is no jury. Most judges make their decisions based on:
- The flight risks
- The offender’s criminal history
- The nature of the crime
Following the detention hearing, the case moves to a fitness hearing, which takes place in the juvenile court.
Fitness Hearing
The prosecutor is likely to petition for a fitness hearing depending on the severity of the case. At the fitness hearing, the judge determines whether the offender will be tried with the juvenile system or the adult system. The severity of the crime and the offender’s age are factors that the judge will look into.
If the judge decides that your child will not benefit from the juvenile court’s rehabilitation, he/she is taken to an adult court.
Explanation of The 602 Proceeding
In California, if any child below 18 years is arrested for committing a crime, they should be taken to juvenile court, according to The California Welfare and Institution Code Unit 602. It is also called “the 602 proceedings”.
There is no guilty or not guilty rule; if based on the evidence presented, the judge decides that you are guilty of the crime, he/she will check the district attorney’s petition.
According to Senate Bill 439, only a minor below 12 years can be tried under the juvenile court system. However, it is used in cases where the offender juvenile has:
- Has been involved in oral copulation by either duress, fear, or violence
- Acted in sexual penetration by fear of injury, violence, forces, duress, or menace
- Committed murder
- Was involved in sodomy by either force, violence, duress, menace, or fear of injury
The Difference Between an Adult Criminal Court and a Juvenile Court
The adult criminal courts and the juvenile court systems have a few differences. As per the juvenile court systems, adults who have committed a crime are very different from the juveniles who have committed a crime. They believe that even though the youth has committed an offense, they should be handled differently from adult offenders.
The most common differences include:
- The cases are presented to the judge, and the prosecutors present the evidence to be ruled upon. In both courts, there is a defense attorney who defends the juveniles. However, the juvenile court has no jury. It is the responsibility of a presiding judge to decide if you are guilty of committing the crime or not.
- In the juvenile court, if the judge decides that the juvenile is guilty, he/she supports the petition filed by the district attorney. Instead of sentencing the minor, the judge recommends dispositions like local home probation, Welfare, and Institution code 725 formal, and code 654.
Juvenile Crimes Tried as Adult Cases
As per California law, certain offenses lead the minors automatically to an adult court.
These crimes are noted on the California Welfare and Institutions in section 707(b). Some of them are:
- Kidnapping
- Robbery
- Murder
- Forceful rape
- Forcing oral or sodomy copulation
- Carjacking
- Arson causing severe harm
- Assault using fire
- Attempted murder
- Forcing Lewd and lascivious acts on minor below 14 years
- Disposing of a gun in a residential apartment that is occupied
- Voluntary manslaughter
The prosecutor can either file the offenses direct to the adult court or appeal for a fitness hearing and let the judge make a decision.
Penalties For Juvenile Crimes
In California, the juvenile criminal law applies only to juveniles between 12 to 17 years who have committed an offense. In other cases, it could also be used for adults between 18 to 22 years.
What Happens to Offenders Below 12 Years?
In California, children under 12 years are not prosecuted. If a child below 12 years commits a crime, the parents are urged to guide them or send them to a youth care counseling center for professional guidance. If the child fails to change his/her behaviors after the counseling, a family member is appointed by the court to supervise the child.
The Halt Juvenile Crime Prevention Program
This program is meant for minors who commit minor offenses. The program gives them a chance to correct their evil ways and be better people. If they complete the halt program and pay for all the damages they caused and apologize to the victims, their criminal records will be cleared.
However, if they fail to attend the HALT program or fail to complete it, their case risk is forwarded to the public prosecutor and prosecuted.
Alternative Sanctions
They comprise a training program, community services/unpaid work, or the orders combined. During these sanctions, the Child Protection Board supervises the juveniles.
Youths Detention
The detention of youths occurs in a young offenders’ Institution. For the minors sentenced to youth detention and are between 12and 15 years, they are convicted for one year, and juveniles between 16 and 17 years are convicted for a maximum of two years.
Youth Protection and Custody Order
Juveniles with behavioral disorders require intensive treatment and counseling to help them not fall back to their old destructive behaviors. A “PPIJorder” is established, and the juvenile is put in a youth protection and custody center.
The PIJ order runs for three years, but it can be pushed to up to 7 years in some cases. However, during their last year of a PIJ order, juveniles can have the order lifted but be closely monitored by the probation services.
Overnight Detention
It is a type of provisional detention. Students are detained at night in these kinds of custody and allowed to attend school during the day or attend classes in a young offender’s center. It will enable the minor to participate in school or work.
Behavioral Program Order
If the suspended sentence is witty, and the custodial sentence appears harsh, the minor is likely to be put under a behavioral program (GBM). This program comprises training courses on refraining from drugs and alcohol and treatment sessions. The youth probation services are responsible for monitoring this order.
Other Juvenile Penalties and the Non-punitive Orders
Additional penalties and non-putative orders include:
- Payment and fines on damages caused
- Blended sentence — JUveniles are convicted in a juvenile facility until they turn 18 years after being taken to an adult jail.
- Confiscation of property and goods that were acquired illegally
- Adult jail — If your child committed serious offenses, he/she could be detained in a county jail or state prison.
Juvenile Probation
Your child could be put on informal probation depending on the nature of their case under the “California Welfare and Institution code 654.” If your child is placed on informal probation, it means that they do not accept the wrongdoing.
If the juvenile completes the probation program, their charges will be dismissed. Even if your child has a specified ward in the court, he/she could still be allowed to undergo probation from home. Some of the terms for the informal probation program include:
- Removal of any graffiti
- Community service
- Curfews
- Restitution to the victim
- Substance abuse counseling
- Mandatory school attendance
- Restrictions on the people they are supposed to hang around
If you want to understand these terms better, you can contact our law firm to offer free consultations.
Constitutional Rights For The Accused Juveniles
Although juvenile cases in California are held in civil courts and not the criminal courts, juveniles are still entitled to several constitutional rights. In the criminal justice system, youths share the same rights as adults. These rights are:
- Right to notice charges — As a juvenile, you have the right to know the charges you are being tried for.
- Probable cause to arrest — The police must have a possible reason when charging you with various reasons, but officials with a “quasi-parental relationship” like the school officials only need a reasonable suspicion to detain the juvenile rather than a probable cause.
- The right to make a call — If a juvenile is in police custody and is likely to be detained for longer, he/she has the right to make a phone call. They can call their parents or guardians, who will later reach out to a defense attorney on their behalf. The minor can also decide to reach out to the defense attorney by themselves.
- Right to counsel — If the minor or his/her guardian cannot afford to pay the attorney fee, the state is supposed to appoint a lawyer for the minor.
- Right to confront and cross-examine the witness — As the juvenile, you have the right to challenge testimonies presented by the witnesses through your lawyer. There is no limitation on the number of questions you are supposed to ask, so you can ask as many questions as you wish, but the questions have to be related to the incident/case.
- Right to seek bail — You have the right to seek bail even though most juveniles are set free before the arraignment.
- Right to have charges fully proved — If a juvenile is charged with incarceration or adjudication, the U.S supreme court states that the state must prove these charges “beyond a reasonable doubt.” However, if the juvenile is charged with other charges, the government only needs to prove by “preponderance evidence.”
- No right to jury trials — In California, Juvenile delinquency cases do not allow jury trials apart from a few exceptional circumstances.
- Self-incrimination privilege — Juveniles are not supposed to testify against themselves involuntarily during the juvenile proceedings.
The Juvenile Court Process
The arrest of the juvenile offender is the first step of the juvenile court process. At times, the police may decide to use a simple reprimand and release the minor after a few hours. In other cases, the minor offender is taken to the county probation department, resulting in filing a petition against the minor and the offender’s detention in the juvenile hall. Several hearings happen in the California juvenile court. They include:
- Adjudication hearing — The judge looks at the district attorney’s evidence and concludes if the juvenile committed the crime.
- Detention hearing — If the minor has been detained for over two days, the judge determines if the minor stays in custody or if he/she should be set free.
- Disposition hearing — If the juvenile offender is found guilty of committing the crime, the arrangement of a disposition hearing begins. A disposition hearing is also the sentencing.
- There is also an arraignment for minors in custody.
- Transfer hearing which mainly involves offenses listed on 707(B)
In each of the mentioned hearings, the California law issues the timeline and procedures included.
However, your defense attorney and the prosecutor could reach an agreement and move directly to the disposition at each stage. There could be one or multiple red-herrings if errors occur at any stage.
As a parent, you are allowed to attend all the court hearings.
Sealing of Juvenile Records
After completing the juvenile crime sentence and turning 18 years, your child has the right to file a petition with the court to destroy his/her conviction records. For the petition to be granted, the court will look at the crime committed and how long it has been since committing the crime. The juvenile crime records could hinder your child from great future opportunities; that is why it is vital to have his/her criminal records destroyed.
Find a Juvenile Attorney Near Me
As a parent, the detention of your child not only affects his/her life, but it could also affect his/her future as well as their mental stability. Reaching out to a skilled and experienced attorney could be the best alternative following the arrest of your minor. A Juvenile attorney can help with dismissing your child’s case and having their criminal records erased. Van Nuys Criminal Attorney has dedicated attorneys ready to help you fight for your child’s freedom. Contact us today at 818-484-1100 if you are in the Van Nuys area.
Being arrested can be a traumatic experience, especially the arrest of a minor under your care. For a child, the incident will leave an impression on their young minds. Imagine what goes through their mind when law enforcement officers handcuffs and takes them away from the love and comfort of their homes.
When a minor breaks the law, they are taken to a juvenile court where a judge will adjudicate on their actions. After your child’s arrest, you should contact an experienced criminal defense attorney. At Leah Legal, our attorneys will defend your child’s rights and help them get back to their normal lives.
The juvenile court is supposed to rehabilitate your child and cause no effects on their adult life, for example, leaving them stigmatized. The California juvenile court system offers several different legal options for your child, which do not necessarily involve juvenile confinement. In this article, we will provide an overview of California’s juvenile court system, and you learn what to expect when your child violates the law in Van Nuys.
What is a Delinquent Act
A delinquent act is a law violation carried out by someone under the age of 18. When a minor commits criminal offenses, the law considers and treats it as a delinquent act instead of a criminal act.
What Juvenile Courts are
When a minor breaks the law, the arresting officers take them to a juvenile delinquent court where their case is heard instead of attending an adult court. A Juvenile court adjudicates on the following:
- Curfew violations.
- Truancy violations.
- Felony charges.
- Status offenses.
- Misdemeanor charges.
In California, these courts deal with juvenile case procedures like court hearings. A juvenile delinquent court has jurisdiction over children aged between 12 and 17 and sometimes on minors below age 12.
The juvenile court system is part and parcel of civil law. The court only involves a judge and a prosecutor with no jurors, making the entire process less intimidating to a minor. When the judge adjudicates, your minor will never receive a guilty or an innocent conviction. When the prosecutor proves beyond any reasonable doubt that your child committed a delinquent act, the judge will uphold the prosecutors’ petition.
When a juvenile judge sustains a prosecutors’ petition, they will impose different sentences on your minor. These sentences involve:
- If your minor admits to violating the law, a juvenile judge may send them to the California Youth Authority, a correctional facility for the young ones.
- If your child denies the allegations of a law violation, the judge may issue an informal probation order. When your child completes the probation program successfully, they will receive a case dismissal.
There are two goals that a juvenile justice system is committed to achieving. One goal of the California Juvenile Judicial system is to keep the public safe and well protected from the effects of silly delinquency acts. The other purpose is to offer rehabilitation, counseling, and guidance to children accused of violating the law.
Who is a Ward of the Court?
A minor will become a court ward when the juvenile court has taken over the responsibility of ensuring the minor’s safety and treatment. The court may also set the minor under foster care, group home, and attend a probation camp.
Rehabilitative Goals
The California juvenile court system’s key feature is rehabilitating young offenders, entirely different from the adult criminal judicial system. If an adult commits any crime, the court system’s design is to rectify the behavior by punishing the offender, contrary to minors who break the law. If a minor undergoes probation or is put in a camp, the court system intends to ensure they receive the necessary skills to change their behaviors.
A child is to receive education and skills, which will be essential for overcoming their offenses. The juvenile justice court system aims at rehabilitating these minors into responsible members of society who will integrate well with the community after their time in the juvenile judicial system.
Penalties are not Meant to Punish
Though the juvenile justice system’s goal is to rehabilitate young ones, it doesn’t mean that they will go scot-free when they violate the law. The child may be sanctioned or penalized for their conduct with the aim of the penalties being for discipline purposes.
Penalties may involve one or all of these acts:
- Community service,
- Paying fines,
- victim impact class attendance,
- Foster home placement,
- Juvenile camp, hall, or ranch attendance,
- Undergoing probation,
- Commitment to the Division of Juvenile Justice.
Challenges Associated with the Juvenile Justice System
Despite its noble goals, the juvenile justice system faces endless challenges and criticism for what most people view as its failures. The state of California has been sued for the adverse conditions of its CYA. The critics accused the state of the following deplorable conditions, which did not provide the minor with the conducive environment that rehabilitation requires:
- Failure to provide adequate mental and medical services to the children
- holding kids in cells while they attend classes
- Locking children for 23 hours in cells
- Controlling children by using psychotropic medicines
- Mistreatment of the children; by using excessive force
Realignment of Juvenile System to the Counties from State
In 2004, the California Youth Authority made a consent agreement to rectify the abuses it was accused of committing in a highly publicized Farrell v Harper lawsuit in 2003. As a result of this lawsuit, the juvenile justice system has undertaken a realignment process in California. The realignment has the County probation officers responsible for the treatment, protection, and guiding minors violating the law. Despite this, a juvenile court may send any minor who commits a serious offense to a CYA.
Eligibility for a Juvenile Delinquent Court
The juvenile delinquent court handles cases against minors who are below the age of 18. There are some instances where a minor can be charged and tried in an adult court. If a person committed an offense when they were little, but the violation is discovered when they are already in adulthood, their offense will be addressed in this court.
You should note that not every crime committed by people under the age of 18 are juvenile. Some crimes committed by minors are charged in adult courts and not in the juvenile courts. The law states that when a person aged 16 and above commits an offense listed under PC 707(b), they will go through a hearing, determining the court where their trial will occur. It can either be a juvenile or adult criminal court. A juvenile judge will use the following facts to decide whether the little should be taken to an adult court for prosecution or not:
- The minor’s juvenile delinquent history.
- The success of any previous rehabilitative effort on the minor.
- The degree of creativity exhibited by the minor when they committed the crime.
- If the minor can be rehabilitated when their program with the juvenile court comes to an end.
- The nature of the crime committed by the minor.
Despite the severity of the crime, if a minor below 16 commits it, their case never receives a transfer to adult courts. California Welfare & Institutions Code Section 707(b) lists the following crimes, among others:
- Murder
- Robbery
- Kidnapping for ransom
- Assault using a destructive object or firearm
- Kidnaping for robbery purposes
- Forcible sexual penetration
- An offense against people living with a disability or over 60
- When the minor commits a felony offense by personally using weapons listed under PC 16590(a)
- Assault offense that produces severe bodily injury
- Discharging a firearm into an occupied building
- Attempted murder
- Committing an offense listed under PC 12022.5 or PC12022.53
- Bribing a witness to dissuade them from witnessing under PC 137 and 136.1 respectfully
- Torture
- Carjacking
- Aggravated mayhem
- Forcible rape
- The threat of severe bodily harm
- Kidnapping with the intention to commit sexual assault
- Voluntary manslaughter
Transfer Hearing
The prosecution may request for this hearing, but it’s left to the judge’s decision whether the minor will face adult court for trial. Depending on the circumstances surrounding the minor’s case, the judge may choose to transfer the little one to an adult criminal court.
Once the judge passes the decision to transfer the minor, you can appeal against the juvenile court decision by having your attorney file a petition. This appeal should happen within 20 days after the arraignment. If your child is under arrest for crimes involving firearms, or any crime listed under WIC 707 (b), you will need to hire an experienced defense attorney to defend them. Any crime listed under Welfare & Institutions Code section 707(b) and the prosecution will demand to transfer your child to adult court for prosecution. If your defense attorney fails to provide enough evidence, your child may end up receiving charges in adult criminal courts.
When the juvenile judge upholds the petition, your minor remains at the juvenile justice court system until they attain the age of 21, when the court’s responsibility for your child comes to an end. When the minor’s offense led to their commitment to a CYA, the judge’s judicial jurisdiction will be up to when they attain the age of 25.
Juvenile Court Procedure in California
A juvenile delinquency court is a special court established to deal with cases involving minors who violate the law by committing delinquent acts. This particular court is different from adult courts in the way it handles the offenders.
A juvenile court procedure starts when law enforcement officers apprehend a minor for committing delinquent activities. When the contrary act is little, the law enforcement officer will correct the child and send them on their way. Depending on the offense’s severity, the law enforcement officer may give your child a citation order, which will set them free when they commit the crime, but they must appear in court later.
The law enforcement officer may arrest your child and have them at the juvenile court if the offense is severe. Law enforcement officers may interrogate your minor after their arrest. It would be prudent to hire a criminal defense attorney to protect you and your child’s rights regarding interrogations.
After your child’s arrest, they are taken to a juvenile hall, where they meet a probation officer in charge of the juvenile hall. A probation officer will interview your child and base their decision on the following:
- Release the minor from the juvenile hall, but have them attend a court hearing later on
- Let the minor off the probation program without having them appear before a juvenile court
- The probation officer will let the little understand that they will have to appear in court if they disregard their probation orders
- Have the minor at the juvenile hall until a juvenile judge reviews their case
When a minor faces juvenile courts, they attend four hearings, namely:
Detention Hearing
During this hearing, the court decides if it would benefit the minor to go home or stay at the juvenile hall and wait for their case adjudication.
Transfer Hearing
This hearing is set to decide if a minor’s case should be prosecuted in a juvenile or an adult court. A transfer hearing occurs when a violation of WIC 707(b) occurs under the minor’s hands.
Adjudication Hearing
An adjudication hearing is where both the juvenile judge and the prosecutor are present without the jurors.
Disposition Hearing
During this hearing, the judge makes their decision regarding the minor’s petition. If the judge sustains the petition, your child will receive their sentence.
Juvenile court proceedings are a complex issue, and you will require the services of an experienced criminal defense attorney at your side during the entire process.
The Sentencing
When the judge sustains the petition against a minor, they will pass sentence. This sentencing will depend on various facts like the nature of the offense and your child’s delinquent history, among other considerations. A juvenile judge will have to choose the best disposition, which aligns with the court’s primary objective of rehabilitating a minor during sentencing. A judge will come up with either of the following dispositions:
Informal probation (WIC 654 & 725)
Under Welfare & Institutions Code 654 and 725, a judge may have your child under informal probation if they have no juvenile history. The offense against them is a non-violent one, like trespassing. Your child’s petition does not involve a juvenile court intervention under informal probation because it is a low-level delinquent offense.
Under this probation, your child will undertake counseling and receive an education per the probation rules. If your minor does not follow all the rules governing their probation, the prosecutor may file a petition at the juvenile court.
When your minor admits to a misdemeanor offense, the judge will have them under six-month informal probation. When under probation, your child is not a ward of the court, but they can become one if they don’t follow up on their probation terms.
Informal probation involves the following conditions:
- Compulsory school attendance
- Observing curfew
- Receive counseling
- Community service
- Victim restitution
- Graffiti removal
Once your child completes the terms of their probation, they will receive a petition for dismissal.
Formal Probation
The California juvenile judicial court system can declare a minor as its ward and sentence them to formal probation. The court will require the little to complete their probation either at their home or at a place the court designates like group homes or camp.
Deferred Entry Judgment
Under WIC790, your minor may have the option of receiving a DEJ. For a little one to accept this judgment, they will have to admit to committing the offense. A DEJ program takes between 12-36 months to complete, and upon successful completion, your minor will receive charges dismissal.
For your minor to qualify for a DEJ, they must meet the following:
- Be aged 14 and over when they are adjudicated
- No previous felony record
- No prior sentencing to CYA
- No prior probation revocations
- The offense committed is not listed under Welfare of Institutions Code section 707(b) or outlined under PC 289
Commitment to the Division of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
When a minor commits a severe offense, they are sent to a DJJ, formerly CYA. A juvenile court imposes maximum internment in these facilities.
Find a Juvenile Defense Attorney Near Me
Your child’s formative years are the most crucial ones. The child can make mistakes that will have long-lasting effects on their lives. When your child or a minor under your care commits a crime in Van Nuys , you want to seek a criminal attorney’s help. At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we have the experience and qualifications to deal with juvenile issues. We understand the pain and uncertainty that your child faces with a juvenile record. Call us today at 818-484-1100 and set up a free consultation with our attorneys. Let us work together to ensure your minor has the best representation.
Unlike in adult criminal cases, there is no bail in juvenile offenses in California. After a juvenile arrest and placement in custody, a minor is subject to a detention hearing. The purpose of the juvenile detention hearing is to determine whether a child should remain in custody awaiting the outcome of their case. If a minor faces criminal charges, it is crucial to ensure that they seek legal representation at every legal process stage, including the detention hearing. If a juvenile loses the detention hearing, they must remain at the juvenile hall until their case is resolved. If you need legal representation during a detention hearing in Van Nuys, California, Leah Legal can help.
Understanding a Juvenile Detention Hearing
The juvenile detention hearing is the first court hearing that a minor attends after an arrest and placement in custody. Even if the minor is released after an arrest on home supervision, they are still entitled to a detention hearing. The main difference between the adult justice system and the juvenile criminal justice system is that minors have no right to bail like adults. Therefore, it is crucial to ensure that you seek the best legal representation to increase the minor’s chance of release during the detention hearing.
If a probation officer places a minor in custody, the only way to get them out of the juvenile hall is by convincing the judge during the detention hearing. At the hearing, the judge will decide whether the minor should stay at the juvenile hall or whether the juvenile will go home pending the case’s outcome. The judge will consider several factors while determining whether to release the minor from custody or not.
Arraignment takes place at the detention hearing. This means that the judge informs the minor about their charges and their constitutional rights. The minor also enters a plea. Besides informing the minor of the charges against them, the judge tells them about their right to counsel and right against self-incrimination. The minor also has a right to subpoena witnesses, present evidence, and the right to cross-examine or confront witnesses.
The minor will finally enter a plea to the charges outlined in the petition. The juvenile justice system is different from the adult justice system, and the juvenile does not have to enter a guilty or not guilty plea. Instead, a juvenile may admit the allegations against them or deny the allegations. A minor may also not be content with the allegations. A minor also has the option of denying the claims by reason of insanity.
If the minor is not in detention, the first court hearing is the arraignment and not a detention hearing. During the arraignment, the judge will inform the minor about their charges and constitutional rights before the juvenile enters a plea to the allegations.
When a Minor Has to Remain in Custody
At the juvenile detention hearing, the judge will consider several factors to determine whether a minor should remain in custody. Judges use the criteria outlined in the California Welfare & Institutions Code Section 635 while deciding whether a minor should remain in custody.
According to Section 635, a judge can only retain a minor in custody after finding out that the prosecutor made a prima facie case that the minor committed an offense. It should be evident that the minor:
- Violated or failed to honor an order issued by the juvenile court
- The minor escaped from the juvenile court’s commitment.
- The minor is a flight risk.
- Detention is necessary as a matter of urgent or immediate necessity for the protection of the minor.
- Detaining the minor is necessary for the protection of a person or property.
How does the judge determine whether a minor is a flight risk?
The judge will consider whether a child is likely to escape after their release from custody. The judge will also consider the minor’s past actions. The juvenile court might be reluctant to release a minor if a child has a history of escaping from a juvenile detention facility. The juvenile detention hearing is similar to the bail system in the adult justice system. The judge considers the defendant’s likelihood to appear in future court trials after release from custody. The minor’s attorney will strive to prove that it is possible to rehabilitate the minor successfully and that the child is not likely to escape.
Unless the court believes that it is in the child’s best interest to go home, they will not release them from custody. The court will consider the factors that triggered the minor’s engagement in criminal activity. The court will also consider the minor’s social life, including their likelihood to join criminal gangs. If the court feels that it would be unsafe for the minor to go back home, they may prefer to retain the juvenile in custody.
Before releasing a juvenile offender from custody, the court considers society’s safety, other people, and property. If a minor has committed a violent offense and the court feels that they may pose a risk to the community, the judge may retain them in custody. A child is likely to remain in the juvenile hall if they face charges for violent offenses or sex crimes. If a minor has acted violently against people in the past, the court may not be willing to release them from custody.
The court will also consider whether a minor is likely to violate the juvenile court commitments. If a juvenile has a history of failing to appear for court appointments, the judge may decide to retain them in custody. However, the minor’s attorney can point out that the minor will be present for all the future juvenile court commitments.
Before deciding whether to detain the minor, the judge will ask for other parties’ input, including the probation officer, the district attorney, the minor, the minor’s parents, or the minor’s counsel. An experienced attorney will seize every opportunity to convince the judge that the minor is not a danger to themselves or the community. An attorney will work to disregard any proof that indicates that the minor requires the detention. If the judge feels that the minor does not fit in the category that requires custody, they may release the minor. The juvenile detention hearing is the initial stage in a juvenile court system. If the juvenile detention hearing’s outcome is good, the other hearings might have a positive outcome.
Before concluding the detention hearing, the judge listens to the minor, the minor’s attorney, and the probation officer. The judge may decide to have the minor detained at the juvenile hall. This will happen if the judge feels that release from custody is not in the juvenile’s best interest. The court will order the probation officer to ensure that the minor will be under favorable conditions while in detention. The minor will stay in detention until the following court date.
The judge may order the minor to go home and await the court hearing. This will happen if the judge feels that it would not be proper to continue detaining the minor. In some instances, certain services may be necessary to enhance the child’s return home, and the court will order the supervision of these services.
The judge might also order home supervision of the minor. This means that the minor will still be under legal watch but will not be in a juvenile hall. The child will be subject to in-home detention/custody. The minor’s guardian or parent must guarantee that the minor will be present during all the scheduled juvenile court hearings. If a minor gets home supervision instead of detention in a juvenile hall, they must adhere to certain conditions. The conditions include abstaining from drug use or possessing. The minor may also have to secure a job or attend mandatory counseling.
When a Detention Hearing Occurs
If a juvenile is in custody for a non-violent or non-serious offense, a detention hearing occurs within 48 hours from the minor’s placement in the juvenile hall. However, this period does not include holidays or weekends. If a juvenile has committed a misdemeanor offense involving violence or a felony offense, the hearing takes place within 72 hours from when the police took the minor into custody. The District Attorney must file a petition within 48 hours after the minor’s placement in juvenile hall.
If the minor’s attorney requests a rehearing, it must take place within three court days. However, if a particular witness is unavailable, the rehearing must occur within five court days from the initial detention hearing.
The minor’s parents must receive a notification regarding the detention hearing. If the minor’s parents do not receive a notice for the detention hearing, they may request another detention hearing within 24 hours to ensure that they are present.
If the judge decides that the child should remain in custody, the minor will remain in the juvenile hall until their next court date. The minor has a right to a jurisdiction hearing, also known as a trial, within 15 days. The jurisdiction hearing occurs in the Juvenile court.
What is the role of the minor’s parents and guardians during the detention hearing?
The court will inquire regarding the minor’s overall conduct, including schooling attendance. The parent’s or the guardian’s testimony will play a crucial role during the detention hearing and might influence the judge’s decision to detain or release the minor. Therefore, the minor’s parents or guardians need to seek legal counsel before giving testimony in court.
As a parent or a guardian, you may be angry or disappointed at your child, and you may want the juvenile court to teach them a lesson. For instance, you might think it is appropriate for a minor to remain at the juvenile hall. However, it is essential to understand that the living conditions in a juvenile hall are not pleasant. Your child will stay with other offenders, some of which might be older, and some may have committed serious offenses. It might take weeks or even months before your child is granted freedom from the juvenile hall. Therefore, parents and guardians need to be cautious when contributing or giving their testimony during the juvenile detention hearing. It is crucial to have an attorney guide you on what to say to avoid messing up the detention hearing outcome.
What to Expect During the Detention Hearing
The court gives the juvenile a notice of the date, venue, and time of the juvenile detention hearing. The hearing usually occurs in the juvenile courtroom. The minor can have a criminal defense attorney represent them at the hearing. Most of the juvenile court proceedings are not open to the public. However, if the minor commits a serious crime, the juvenile hearing may be similar to an adult trial open to the public. For instance, drug crimes, gun offenses, violent crimes, and sexual crimes may attract public attention. However, an attorney can negotiate to have the juvenile court proceedings closed to the public to preserve the minor’s privacy.
Typically, the parties present at a juvenile detention hearing include the minor, their attorney, the minor’s parents or guardians, the probation officer, and any other relevant authority. Compared to a criminal court hearing, a detention hearing is informal. However, you still require an attorney because the hearing’s outcome will determine whether you will go home or remain in custody.
The Role of a Probation Officer in a Juvenile Detention Hearing
When a minor faces charges for committing a crime, the court assigns a probation officer to the case. The probation officer will investigate the matter, consider the juvenile’s criminal history, social issues, and conduct.
At the juvenile detention hearing, the probation officer will be present. The officer has to prepare a report before the heating. The officer will outline the minor’s overall conduct in the report and recommend whether the court should release or continue detaining the juvenile. The probation officer presents their report to the court before the detention hearing. The probation officer may recommend the minor’s detention while awaiting the case outcome if the juvenile has committed a severe offense.
The probation officer may recommend the minor’s release if the child has no history or prior criminal convictions. The officer may base their recommendation on the minor’s performance in school.
In most cases, the court presumes that the probation officer’s report is accurate. However, if you feel that the probation officer misrepresented some facts, you can challenge their report with an experienced attorney’s help. If your attorney proves that the probation officer misrepresented specific points in their report, the judge may release a minor from custody even if the probation officer recommends otherwise.
Requesting for a Rehearing
If a minor loses at the detention hearing, their attorney may request for a rehearing. An attorney may request a rehearing if they feel that the judge decided based on unreliable or questionable evidence. For instance, a judge may have decided based on a law enforcement officer’s report, yet the officer did not testify. In this case, the judge might order the law enforcement officer to attend the rehearing and testify. During the rehearing, also called a Dennis H hearing, the minor’s attorney would cross-examine the law enforcement officer to ensure that everything is okay and accurate.
Community Detention Program (CDP)
If a judge is reluctant to remove a minor from detention, the minor’s attorney may request to have the minor placed in a community detention program commonly abbreviated as CDP. CDP is a form of house arrest. If a juvenile is on CDP, they will have to wear a monitor, usually an ankle monitor. The juvenile justice will track the child via a phone line in your residence. Therefore, for your child to qualify for the CDP program, you must have a landline phone. The tracking equipment is available at the juvenile hall. Upon completing the CDP program, the tracking equipment is returned to the juvenile hall.
While under house arrest, the judge will most likely allow the minor to go to school and then back home. However, an attorney may request the judge to allow a minor to attend other essential programs like counseling, medical appointments, after school classes, and other crucial programs. If a minor has to be somewhere besides at home, you should ensure that the attorney is aware of requesting the court to have the minor leave home for a particular purpose.
What happens when a child violates the terms of the CDP? If a child fails to adhere to the CDP’s necessary terms, the probation officer may recommend a minor’s detention at the juvenile hall. Therefore, while on CDP, the minor, their parent or guardian, and their attorney need to understand how CDP works.
Find a Juvenile Defense Attorney Near Me
Juvenile detention hearings are complicated. You require an experienced juvenile defense attorney who understands the proceedings of the hearings. You should look for an attorney who understands the juvenile system. If you seek the best legal counsel and representation at a detention hearing in Van Nuys, CA, Van Nuys Criminal Attorney can assist. Contact us at 818-484-1100 and speak to one of our attorneys.
When your child faces arrest in Van Nuys for breaking the law, they could face certain charges. During the trial, the prosecution and your child’s defense attorney present their arguments in court, and the presiding judge makes the final verdict based on the evidence provided. Disposition hearing in a juvenile court is when the judge presents their ruling or sentencing in the case. This is similar to sentencing in adult cases.
When the judge is convinced that the minor committed the offense they are accused of, they must decide on the disciplinary action to impose. A wide range of options for sentencing exists depending on the particular violation. Some options may be more favorable than others.
You want to increase your chance of achieving the most favorable outcome for your child by engaging an attorney experienced in the juvenile court system. At Leah Legal, we understand the need to rehabilitate your child favorably. We will work with you and your child to petition the court for a favorable outcome.
Understanding Juvenile Disposition Hearing
The juvenile court refers to a minor’s trials as adjudication hearings. During the hearing, the minor is represented by a lawyer, while a prosecutor represents the state. If the minor is found guilty or loses the case, the next stage is sentencing, also known as the juvenile disposition hearing.
Before the judge can sentence a minor, they make considerations that include:
- The minor’s age
- The seriousness of and circumstances surrounding the crime
- The minor’s prior delinquent history
If a minor refuses to take a guilty plea or to confess to committing the crime, they will not be punished for that. However, if the minor commits perjury according to PEN 118 through giving false testimony, this can be taken into account during their adjudication hearing.
For instance, Chris is found with Vicodin, a controlled substance, violating H&S Code 11350. The evidence presented in court is strong to convict Chris, and he is found guilty of the violation.
Fortunately, Chris has no past juvenile delinquency record and is an excellent student. In this case, the judge sentences Chris to probation under the supervision of a probation officer. Further, Chris is permitted to serve his sentence at home.
Additionally, the judge gives Chris more conditions to his probation that includes attending school and avoiding the company of the kids that supplied him with Vicodin. Another condition to his probation may be completing a drug program approved by the court. Chris’s parents bear the drug education program’s fee unless they show the court that they cannot meet the costs due to financial constraints.
In another example, Charles is 16 and a member of a street gang. Together with other gang members, they decide to shoot at an inhabited house violating PEN 246 of the California statute. In this case, Charles drove the getaway car, and the offense was committed for the good of the street gang he belongs to. Besides facing PEN 246 charges, Charles will also face other enhancement charges according to PEN 186.22.
Following the trial, Charles is detained at the Juvenile hall to wait for his disposition hearing. On the day of sentencing, the judge sentences him to a county’s probation camp to rehabilitate him. This is a favorable outcome for Charles, considering the magnitude of the crime he was involved in.
When a minor is charged with such severe offenses, a prosecutor might start a transfer hearing seeking the minor to be tried as an adult in an adult court. If the prosecutor can convince the court to transfer the case, Charles would have faced ten years of imprisonment in a regular adult prison.
Because of the understanding that children need guidance and counseling, our lawyers work hard to earn your child probation that will rehabilitate them as they continue with their education.
When does Disposition Hearing Occur?
Generally, disposition hearings are scheduled immediately after the trial. However, this is only when the judge is provided with all the necessary information to facilitate sentencing. In some cases, the probation officer can delay giving their report on the social aspects of the case that includes their preferred sentence.
Additionally, the minor’s family or the minor may want to present materials relevant to the case to help in their sentencing. In both these cases, the disposition hearing can be deferred to a later date. The judge might order a psychological examination in cases where a minor has a mental or psychological health issue. This, too, will delay the disposition hearing.
The delay is never that long but depends on when the information can be presented in court. If the child is detained in a juvenile hall, the information missing must be provided fast because a disposition hearing must be scheduled ten days after the trial’s conclusion.
During the sentencing hearing, the minor has a right to be present. Additionally, through their lawyer, they can issue a written impact statement and speak to help their case. This means, if the minor wants to testify during their sentence hearing, they have a right to do so.
Possible Sentences a Minor can Receive at the Disposition Hearing
After the conclusion of the trial, a date for a disposition hearing is set. This is when the judge will issue a sentence based on the evidence and findings from the case. Every parent and the accused minor are anxious to know the type of sentence they will receive. At their disposal, the judge has several sentencing options to impose on the minor found guilty of the offense they are accused of.
Normally, under the guidance of the law, the judge imposes a sentence to discipline the youth and equip the minor with essential tools to a more productive citizen.
The sentencing options vary from dismissing the case altogether to probation options and commitment to CYA. These options include:
- Dismissing of the case according to W&I Sec 782
- Sentencing the minor to informal probation according to W&I Code 725
- Deferring entry of judgment as found under W&I Sec. 790
- Being put to stay with a relative as a formal probation
- Being sentenced to a group home as a formal probation
- Being sentenced to attend a probation camp managed by the county
- Being committed to the California Youth Authority (CYA)
Below, we discuss some of these sentencing options in greater detail.
Informal Probation
If the offense a minor is alleged to have committed is not a serious one, they may be sentenced to diversion and informal probation according to W&I Sec 725 or W&I code 654. For instance, if your child is charged with a nonviolent offense such as vandalism according to PEN 594, and it is their first time, the judge can sentence them to informal probation.
According to W&I code 654, such a minor, nonviolent offense is diverted, and the minor is ordered to probation prior to filing the petition. A lot of the cases brought in juvenile courts involve petty offenses such as shoplifting under PEN 484. Because of the trivial nature of the crime, the defense lawyer for your child will argue to have the child sentenced to diversion or informal probation. Under this, your child will avoid filing the case against them, or the charges of shoplifting are dismissed once probation is completed accordingly.
The probation program is designed by the probation officer who aims at bringing the child within the court’s jurisdiction. Generally, the program offers counseling and education to the minor. Sometimes the minor can fail to perform according to the set guidelines of the probation. In this case, the probation officer has an option to start formal proceedings in court.
Informal probation, according to W&I Sec 725, is slightly different from that under section 654. Here, the petition against the minor is usually raised, but the judge puts it on hold to award the minor with another chance. In this case, the youth does not take a guilty plea, and if they comply with the terms and conditions of their probation, the petition against them is dismissed.
The minor is also given probation conditions under the informal probation program. The minor is ordered to attend school without fail, go for counseling, and is given a curfew. The parents of the minor are also ordered to counseling by the judge. If the offense involved drugs, the minor would be expected to submit to drug testing periodically, and if the damage were caused, the parents would pay restitution. Informal probation, in this case, does not go beyond six months.
Deferred Entry of Judgment (DEJ)
This is another sentencing option the judge can give during juvenile disposition hearings. According to W&I code 790, for a minor to receive this kind of sentencing, they must admit they violated the law according to the allegations against them. If the minor completes their DEJ program, the charges against them are dismissed.
First-time offenders in felony matters not found under section 706(b) are the ones eligible for DEJ programs. DEJ programs typically last from 12 to 36 months.
For instance, Allan is 16 and is found hiding pot in his car’s gas tank. The marijuana volume is such that it was for sale, and he was taking it to his customer. In this case, Allan will face charges for violating H&S code 11359 possession to sell and H&S code 11360 transporting controlled substances. Fortunately, this is Allan’s first offense.
Although he has had a troubled past, Allan has lately been trying to change, and he is performing well in school. Additionally, his home environment is stable and peaceful. The probation officer assigned Allan’s case believes that Allan can be productive through education, rehabilitation, and treatment.
Even when Allan’s offense displays sophistication, the court still wants to deter others from committing such offenses and sending a message that such crimes are unacceptable. In this case, Allan will qualify for DEJ. Upon completing his program, Allan can withdraw his guilty admission, and the charges are dismissed.
While growing up, children often mix with the wrong crowds and make mistakes that can affect their future. However, the California juvenile court system understands the need to rehabilitate and not punish minors that violate the law. With an experienced attorney in children’s matters, your child can have excellent representation in a juvenile court that could earn them a favorable outcome.
Formal Probation
This is the opposite of informal probation. When during the disposition hearings, the judge sentences your child to formal probation, which means the minor is a court’s ward. Although the juvenile is termed a court’s ward, sometimes they can be permitted to complete their formal probation term at home.
When the court makes a juvenile their ward, they can sometimes place them at a relative’s home for formal probation or in a group home. If the minor is emotionally disturbed, they can be placed in a level 14 group home.
Formal probation for minors also has various conditions or terms that the court finds necessary to aid in the minor’s rehabilitation. These terms that must be followed strictly include:
- A must attendance of school
- The minor is subjected to a curfew.
- The child must attend counseling for substance abuse, where applicable.
- The minor will be prohibited from associating with particular persons.
- The child can be ordered to community service.
- The minor can be ordered to remove graffiti.
- The minor can be ordered to pay restitution for damage caused by their violation.
If the judge finds the minor needs a higher standard of structure in serving their probation sentence, the minor can be sentenced to camp. Probation camp programs in California last between three and twelve months.
California has about seventy probation camps spread across the counties. A majority of the camps have dormitories, offering a more structured schedule to be followed daily. These schedules incorporate education, treatment, and counseling programs.
Other camps though not many exist for minors in California that include fire or wilderness camps. In these camps, the emphasis is on firefighting training and forestry, military-like boot camps, and home-like camps that attend to small groups but offer intense training and treatment.
CYA Commitment
Besides probation, a minor can be committed to CYA. This is the most severe punishment imposed on a minor besides serving time in an adult prison. This type of punishment is reserved for minors that commit serious offenses as found under 707(b) or those that have committed crimes that require them to register as sex offenders.
Repercussions of a Juvenile Adjudication
When a minor is found guilty of committing an offense at a juvenile court, they will be sentenced, as discussed earlier. Similarly, a record of their wrongdoing remains with the court, and despite having made a mistake as a youth, the adjudication can affect their future.
If a juvenile is convicted or their petition is sustained, it can count as a strike according to California’s three-strikes law. This means, if the minor commits another offense in the future, their sentence is more enhanced compared to a first time offender. Further, the Rules of the Court in California permit adult courts to investigate the minor’s criminal history before making their sentencing decisions.
Juvenile adjudication can also result in the minor registering as a sex offender and being civilly confined as a sexually violent predator (SVP). But, if the offense was less serious, with the help of a lawyer, the record of your child can be sealed and remain so. This is only possible if the child completes their sentence and does not commit other crimes for a period.
How Can a Lawyer Help Your Child Receive a Favorable Outcome?
Like in adult courts, a minor who has committed a crime and is charged in a juvenile court has a right to a hearing and representation by an attorney. Hiring an attorney is critical for your child’s case presentation because they understand the law, the juvenile court lingo, and the system, as well as how to find loopholes in a prosecutor’s case.
Further, your child’s attorney is always on your child’s side and wants their best interests met. As such, the lawyer investigates the alleged crime’s circumstances to formulate strategic defenses in your child’s favor. Additionally, your child’s lawyer can fight for them by presenting contrary evidence that can see your child exonerated from the crime they are alleged to have committed. Additionally, the lawyer is committed to rehabilitating your child and providing them with the best chance to correct their mistakes.
Find a Juvenile Delinquency Lawyer Near Me
Being arrested and charged with a crime is scary and confusing for an adult, let alone a minor. If your child is arrested and faces criminal charges, your biggest concern would be their safety and steering them back to a good path. California’s juvenile court system understands this and works with your child’s defense lawyer to achieve this noble course. At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we are passionate about helping facing charges in Van Nuys fight against cases against them. Call us at 818-484-1100 to discuss your child’s case in detail.
When a juvenile violates the law, they are held accountable for their actions like adult offenders. However, different laws govern trials and punishments in the juvenile system. After an arrest of a minor, the process they go through depends on the type and severity of the crime they committed.
Juvenile informal diversion is when the minor undergoes informal probation, and criminal charges are not filed. Not all juvenile cases qualify for informal diversion. Receiving a juvenile informal diversion is an excellent opportunity for your child because they avoid the harsh consequences of juvenile convictions. Your child is also given another chance to correct their mistakes and make better decisions in the future.
The issues surrounding juvenile delinquency cases are quite complicated. Therefore guidance from an experienced criminal attorney is crucial. At Leal Legal, we offer consultations and legal representation to ensure a favorable outcome for your child. We serve clients throughout Van Nuys, CA.
Overview of the Juvenile Justice System
The juvenile justice system deals with individuals below eighteen years old and who have violated the law. When a minor commits a crime, they are expected to be accountable for their actions. However, the juvenile justice system aims at rehabilitating the children other than punishment handed out in adult courts.
Minors are often allowed a second chance at life since their mental capacity may not mature enough to make the right decisions. Also, youths could be easily manipulated to engage in criminal activity. Thus, the law is lenient on them.
Juvenile cases are often minor and are charged as infractions or misdemeanors. However, if a child commits a serious crime such as murder, rape, or other serious crimes, they could be charged as adults and face severe legal penalties. If your child has been arrested, it is crucial to seek legal guidance. After an arrest, the officer could either release the minor with a warning or take them to the detention hall.
While at the detention hall, several hearings are held. A judge could decide to release the child to you while waiting for the case outcome or continue to detain them. A minor is not entitled to bail. However, if you can prove that the minor is not a risk to others and is not a flight risk, they could be allowed to go home and return to the hearing. If a minor has committed a crime, they could be put on house arrest, juvenile camp, or detention facilities. Another option is informal probation and probation officer’s supervision.
The probation department plays a significant role in each stage of juvenile cases. The officer carries out interviews with a minor after an arrest and decides whether to detain the juvenile. At the adjudication phase of the juvenile case, the probation officer has insight into whether the prosecutor will file a petition against the minor.
During probation, a minor is required to communicate with their probation officer regularly. The officer in charge ensures they are adhering to the terms and write a report at the end of probation. The severity of a minor’s crime will determine the type of sentence they face in juvenile court. The most common punishment in juvenile cases is placement in a juvenile diversion program. A diversion could occur before the beginning of the case or after the offender has been found guilty. If your child is arrested, it is crucial to seek legal guidance for them as soon as possible.
Types of Juvenile Probation in California
The laws on minors are stipulated in the Welfare Institute and Code. In California, probation is often an alternative to a jail sentence in criminal cases. However, for juveniles, it is a common cause of action. Children are subject to various forms of probation, including:
- Informal Diversion. Under WIC 626(b), an arresting officer can refer a minor offender to the informal diversion program. However, the offender may appear before a teen court with the victim to resolve the matter.
- Informal Probation (WIC 654). This type of informal probation is under the probation department, and the juvenile court is not involved. The probation is voluntary, and the prosecutor does not need to file a petition against the minor. The youth will remain in their home for up to one year while serving this kind of probation.
- Deferred entry of judgment. Under this provision, a minor needs to admit to a misdemeanor violation, but the court places them on probation for six months under the probation department. However, the court could extend your probation period for failure to follow the probation officer’s conditions. When there is a deferred entry of judgment under WIC 725(a), the minor is not a court ward unless they fail to abide by the set conditions.
- Wardship probation. A minor becomes a ward of the court when the prosecutor files a petition and has committed the alleged offense. In this case, the juvenile delinquency court retains authority over the child. Wardship probation lasts for up to six months. The juvenile offender on Wardship probation must follow probation conditions that could include counseling, mandatory school attendance, and keeping away from criminal activity.
- Deferred entry of judgment probation. Under WIC 790, a youth who commits a serious felony and meets specific criteria, the entry of judgment is deferred, and they are placed on probation. This type of probation criteria requires that the youth be less than fourteen years old and have not been sentenced to the Department of Juvenile Justice. Also, a minor should not have committed a crime that requires sex offender registration.
Juvenile Informal Diversion
Children are arrested like other offenders. However, how their cases are handled is different. If the arresting officer takes your child to the juvenile hall, a probation officer will take over the case. The probation officer investigates the occurrences and could release the minor, place them in an informal diversion program or refer them to a prosecutor who files a petition. The probation department plays a vital role in determining the course in which a minor’s case will take.
Cases that end up in a petition are a result of more severe crimes. If your child is a first-time offender and hasn’t portrayed troublesome behavior in the past, the probation officer will send them into the informal diversion program. An informal diversion is also known as informal probation. Diversion is a program where an offender is placed instead of filing a petition. In the Juvenile informal diversion, a minor is placed under a probation officer’s supervision for up to six months.
Under section 654 of the California Welfare and Institution Code, all crimes involving minors will not necessarily result in a criminal case. The less severe offenses are handled informally by the probation department. When deciding to put a minor into the diversion program, the probation officers need to consider the child’s and societies’ best interests. The following are some factors considered when putting a minor offender in the informal diversion program:
- The severity of the minor’s crime is crucial. The juvenile justice system often deals with minor offenses committed by children. Therefore, informal diversions are the most common option for the case. However, sometimes minors commit serious crimes, and the prosecutor opts to hand over the case to a prosecutor to file a petition. In other instances, juveniles could be tried as adults and face legal consequences like adult offenders.
- The ability to solve the matter outside court is critical. Minors are often arrested for actions that are not considered criminal when done by an adult. Therefore, some issues could be solved without a need for formal action. If the probation feels that a problem could be solved outside court, the minor is placed in an informal diversion program.
- A minor’s history of delinquency and dependency is vital. California law is often stringent on repeat offenders, even for juvenile crimes. Having a history of criminal conduct will negatively affect your child’s situation. The juvenile system is aimed at rehabilitation, but a minor could be punished for continually breaking the law. The probation department may be reluctant to impose the informal diversion on minors who have committed crimes in the past.
- The minor’s home environment. In most cases, informal probation is served at home, and parents or guardians need to ensure that the minor does not return to the criminal activities. If the probation officer believes that the home and community environment is not conducive to rehabilitate the minor, they would be reluctant to put them on informal diversion.
- The child’s age and capabilities are considered. The age and maturity level of a juvenile offender is used to determine whether they would benefit from an informal diversion program. Younger first-time offenders are less likely to be tried in the juvenile delinquency court, and their cases often end at the informal diversion.
- The minor’s likelihood to benefit from the program. An informal juvenile diversion aims to rehabilitate a minor. During the program, they are given a second chance to be better people and make the right decisions. A diversion also ensures that your child does not have a criminal record that could impact their lives. Before placing a minor in the informal diversion program, the probation officers consider the offender’s attitude, willingness to learn from their mistakes, and whether or not they change their behavior.
In California, probation officers must further observe a minor offender before deciding to hand them over to the prosecutor or place them into the informal diversion. If your child is arrested, it is crucial to consult a criminal attorney. Your child’s lawyer can guide them on the steps to take and what to say to avoid self-incrimination.
Probation after a Petition in Juvenile Court
Sometimes, the probation officer could refer a minor’s case to the prosecutor for filing the petition and recommend informal probation. In such a case, the judge needs to evaluate the case and decide. Some of the factors that the judge considers include:
- The minor’s circumstance at the time. A juvenile court can order minors to be placed on an informal diversion even when the prosecutor or probation officer is against it. This is because the court puts much importance on a child’s safety and wellbeing. After the informal diversion is granted, you need to agree to guide your child through education and counseling programs.
- The future wellbeing of the juvenile. If the judge feels that a juvenile offender will benefit from the diversion program and make the right decisions in the future, they are likely to place them in the program.
California law has zero-tolerance for underage drinking and driving. Therefore, if a juvenile’s underlying offenses involve DUI or other drug-related crimes, the minor must complete alcohol education while on informal probation. Informal probation does not protect your child from the DMV imposed consequences of drunk driving.
Terms of Informal Probation in California Juvenile Cases
In California, informal probation comes with specific conditions that one needs to follow. An informal diversion has similar rules to informal probation. The probation officer reviews the case’s facts to set terms and conditions that a minor, the parents, or guardians must abide by throughout the program. If your child is placed in an informal diversion, you have the responsibility to ensure they successfully go through the program. Some of the standard terms of informal juvenile diversions include:
- The minor offender is required to participate in counseling or parenting programs designed by the probation officer. The juvenile justice system aims to rehabilitate minors and create a conducive environment to learn and change their ways. By attending counseling sessions, minor offenders can realize their mistakes and purpose to do better.
- A minor must receive treatment for addiction or substance abuse if they are placed in an informal diversion. Juveniles may be arrested for the use of controlled substances such as marijuana. If the offense is minor, they are sent to a diversion program where treatment and counseling are offered.
Should your child fail to participate in the programs recommended by the probation officer, the officer could hand over the case to a prosecutor who files a petition. The probation officer can also request the filing of a petition against minors who perform poorly on probation. A petition resulting from a failed probation may be filed within ninety days of completing probation or through the six-month probation program. An informal diversion is an excellent opportunity for a minor offender to escape criminal charges and all the repercussions that result from it. Therefore, it is crucial to ensure they complete the program.
Completion of Juvenile Informal Diversion
A juvenile informal diversion lasts for six months. After completing the diversion, a minor has to appear to the court to determine their case. The court requires the probation officer to present a report containing all minor information and performance during probation. If the probation officer’s report indicates that the minor has completed probation, their petition is dismissed, and they are allowed to go home.
If a minor’s conduct during probation is not satisfactory, the prosecutor may extend the probation period or file a petition with the court. After filing, the court has up to one year to proceed with the case.
Violation of Informal Probation by Juveniles
Even though probation is a less severe penalty than jail time, an offender must complete the sentence and adhere to all probation terms. If any person violates probation, the county may terminate the probation. However, the probation officer is required to present sufficient evidence indicating the condition you violated.
If a minor violates probation by breaking curfew or failing to attend school while on probation, the court could proceed with a petition. If your issue was a different probation matter, the court could revoke probation and declare the minor a ward of the court. The probation department is required to prepare a report on how well a minor has abided by probation conditions. If your child faces the juvenile justice system for violation of informal probation, legal guidance is crucial.
Find a Criminal Attorney Near Me
When a minor is arrested for committing a crime in California, the officers could either release them or take them to the juvenile hall. At the juvenile hall, a probation officer takes over the situation. If a petition is filed against a minor and found guilty, they could be sentenced to formal probation or worse, be charged as adults, and face jail time.
A juvenile informal diversion is a standard option for first-time offenders and minors who have committed minor crimes. The diversion is an opportunity for a minor offender to avoid the criminal consequences of their actions.
The juvenile informal diversion is complicated. You need to familiarize yourself with the legal procedures to understand your loved ones’ fate should they be arrested. If you are in Van Nuys, CA, you will require legal guidance from Van Nuys Criminal Attorney. Contact us today at 818-484-1100 and allow us to help you through the process for the best possible outcome.
Juvenile probation is a court order imposed on many juvenile offenders. The juvenile justice system’s main aim is rehabilitating minors, not punishing them. Therefore, probation is a less severe sentence than jail time. During probation, minors could undergo various programs to make them become better people.
During probation, rules and restrictions are set, and your child must follow them. Note that probation is not imposed on all minors. If your child is facing charges, contact a competent criminal attorney for guidance. At Leah Legal, we offer legal guidance and representation for juvenile offenders facing criminal charges in Van Nuys, CA. Contact us today for legal help if you learn about your child’s charges.
Overview of Juvenile Probation in California
Juvenile probation is a court order imposed on many juvenile offenders. The juvenile justice system handles minors between 12 and 17 years. When a minor is found guilty, the court could impose several punishments. Possible punishments your child could face include payment of restitution, detention in the juvenile hall, and juvenile probation.
Juvenile probation is an alternative to jail time and a better option for your child. While on probation, your minor can continue to attend school and remain in the community. Also, the child can avoid the psychological trauma that arises because of detention.
Juvenile probation is varied. Should your child become a ward of the court, then the court will have the authority to remove your child from home when the circumstances warrant it. Since juvenile court aims at rehabilitating minors for a better future, most juvenile defendants are sentenced to probation. This requires the probation department to be involved in all phases of a juvenile case. The juvenile court greatly relies on probation officers to check on the juvenile offenders and give recommendations.
Juvenile Probation Types in California
Juvenile offenders are subject to several types of probation under the Welfare and institutions Code:
Informal Diversion — WIC 626 (b)
When a minor commits a crime, a police officer could refer them to a diversion program. No charges will be filed in such a situation, and the court does not intervene in the matter. However, your child may need to appear in a juvenile court or meet with the victims to resolve the matter.
Informal Probation (non-Wardship) —WIC 654
The non-wardship informal probation is a program that is entirely under the juvenile probation department. The prosecution does not need to file a formal petition on a juvenile offender to be placed on this probation type. Your child remains at home for the six months probation period. Non-Wardship probation is often for juveniles who commit minor crimes. However, a youth who commits a felony could qualify if they have not been sentenced to probation before.
Informal Probation – WIC 654.2
WIC 654.2 probation is under the court’s authority. Your child is sentenced to this type of probation after formal probation is filed. After sentencing, the petition is put on hold for months while the juvenile participates in the diversion program. Your child is required to complete the diversion program before the charges are dismissed.
Deferred Entry of Judgment – WIC 725(a)
For this provision, a juvenile offender admits to a misdemeanor, but the youth is placed under a six months’ probation under the probation department. If a minor fails to complete all the conditions in the six months, the court extends probation. Unless a minor fails to abide by the probation terms, the juvenile is not a court ward.
Wardship Probation – WIC 725 (b)
Wardship probation gives the juvenile court jurisdiction and authority over the minor. This kind of probation lasts for up to six months, and the terms and conditions must be followed.
Deferred Entry of Judgment Probation – WIC 790
If a minor commits a less serious felony, the judgment’s entry could be deferred and the offender placed on probation. However, there are strict criteria for this type of probation:
- A minor should be at least fourteen years at the time of the hearing.
- The youth has not been previously declared a ward of the court for a felony.
- The crime is not a 707b offense. 707b offenses are serious crimes such as murder, rape, arson, kidnapping, or sexual assault. If a minor commits one of these offenses, they could be charged as adults and face serious consequences.
- The juvenile has never had a probation sentence revoked for violation of probation terms.
- The crime for which they are child is not sex-related
Wardship Probation – WIC 602
If a juvenile is taken to court and the judge finds that they violated the law, the minor is placed under Wardship probation. If your child is a ward of the court, the court will have authority over them until they turn twenty-one years. If your child is facing criminal charges in juvenile court, it would be wise to seek legal guidance for them.
The Role of juvenile Probation Department during a Juvenile Case
In an adult criminal case, the leading players are the criminal defense attorney, the judge, and a prosecutor. However, in a juvenile delinquency case, a probation officer plays a significant role:
Arrest Phase
If a youth is arrested for a serious crime, the arresting officer will take them to a probation officer to be interviewed at the juvenile hall. The probation officer will then send the minor to a diversion program, send them home, or detain them.
Adjudication Phase
At the adjudication phase, the probation officer could recommend the prosecutor file a petition against the minor in juvenile or adult court. In most cases, the nature of the minor’s crime will affect the probation officer’s recommendation. Also, a minor’s attitude to the programs offered in the juvenile justice system is fundamental. If a minor committed a severe offense classified under 707b, the prosecutor would likely recommend they be tried in adult court.
If the court imposes formal probation, the juvenile must regularly report their progress to the probation officer. The probation officer is responsible for ensuring that the youth meets all the terms set by the court. Also, the officer needs to assist the juvenile in attending the programs mandated by the court.
As a parent, the court required you to be in close contact with your child’s probation officer and report any violations. In case a minor violates probation, the probation officer is the one to report the matter to the court and provide evidence at the probation violation hearing.
Sentencing Phase
If the judge sustains a petition against a minor, the probation officer is responsible for supervising them. Also, the probation officer may be required to give the court recommendations on whether or not the minor committed the offense for which they are charged. The probation officer appointed by the probation department must keep watch of the juvenile delinquent. This will be the case whether the juvenile is on probation or placed in a juvenile camp.
Drug testing
There are several offenses for which minors could be arrested, some of which are drug-related. Also, if a juvenile is sentenced to probation, they need to undergo random testing. The probation department requires a juvenile to submit urine samples for illegal drugs such as heroin or cocaine. This helps understand the juvenile’s choice of drugs for testing in the future. A drug recognition expert could also help determine the category of drugs ingested by the minor.
Violation of Juvenile Probation
When the juvenile court places a youth on probation, the judge outlines a list of rules and conditions a minor must meet during the probation period. The probation department and the minor’s parents are responsible for ensuring that the juvenile delinquent completes probation successfully. The probation could impose the following conditions:
- A minor who is serving probation may be required to participate in anger management and drug-related programs.
- Mandatory School attendance. When your child is sentenced to probation in California, they can carry on with their lives since school attendance is one probation term.
- Random drug test. In California, an individual is only required to submit to a drug test under certain circumstances. However, when your minor child is on probation, they may have to submit to the tests randomly.
- Victim restitution. If a youth committed a crime that resulted in loss or injury to another person, they might be required to compensate the victim as part of probation.
- House arrest. Movement for a minor on probation is restricted to places such as school, doctors’ appointments, or counseling.
- If your child is on probation, they need to adhere to a strict curfew.
If a minor violates a term of probation, they could face f=more serious consequences. At a probation violation hearing, the prosecution presents evidence and witnesses to establish that a juvenile violated or set more rules when they were sentenced to probation. Your child’s attorney can cross-examine the witnesses and present counter-evidence on the probation violation claim.
In a violation hearing, there is less burden to prove that a minor violated a rule. If the judge is convinced that your child violated probation, they may be placed back with more strict regulations or revoke probation and reinstatement of detention.
If a minor is already a ward of the court, the prosecutor could file a petition to revoke probation. The department will prepare a report outlining how the youth perfumed in probation. If your child is facing charges for juvenile probation violation, it would be beneficial if an attorney represents them.
Alternative Punishment for Juvenile offenders
A criminal defendant who is under 18 years is sent to a juvenile court. In the juvenile justice system, minors are not tried in front of a jury. Instead, the judge reviews the evidence and concludes whether the minor committed the alleged offense. Even though many juvenile offenders are sentenced to probation, there are several other forms of punishment your child could face if they are found to have committed a crime in California.
For juveniles, sentencing options fall under two major categories:
Incarceration Options
If a juvenile court finds that a minor violated a criminal law, they may be incarcerated to punish their actions. Some of the various forms of incarceration may include:
- Home confinement. For this kind of punishment, the court orders a minor to remain home with exceptions of places such as school or counseling visits.
- Placement out of the home. Sometimes the judge may place a minor in a foster or group home as part of a punishment for their crimes.
- Juvenile hall. For a minor who is found in violation of the law, the judge could order them to stay in juvenile hall for some time.
- Adult jail. Sometimes minors commit serious offenses that could prompt them to be charged as adults. Crimes such as murder, manslaughter, or sex-related offenses may cause a minor to spend time in an adult jail.
- Blended sentence. For some crimes, the court could order a minor to spend time in a juvenile facility until they turn eighteen then transfer to an adult jail.
Non-incarceration Punishment
For less serious crimes, the judge could order rehabilitation options without a need for confinement:
- It is crucial to understand that the minor’s parents or guardians shoulder any juvenile crimes’ financial obligations.
- Depending on the crime your child is arrested for committing, the court could order mandatory counseling to rehabilitate their behavior.
- Community service. As punishment for juvenile crime, a minor may be required to serve community work.
Regardless of the case’s circumstances, a knowledgeable attorney is necessary to help guide your child through the challenging process.
Juvenile Probation Frequently Asked Questions
In California, probation is often an alternative to a jail sentence. Not all juvenile defendants are eligible for probation. However, a competent attorney can help convince the judge to impose this sentence. The following are some frequently asked questions on juvenile probation:
- Can I visit my child in juvenile hall?
Family visitation is a significant part of the rehabilitation process, and the probation department encourages it. Through this process, the juveniles have an opportunity to engage in confidential conversations under supervision. On arriving at the juvenile hall, the minor needs to give a list of family and guardians who can come to visit. Detention in a juvenile hall can be life-changing for your child. Therefore, family visitation could do so much good for them.
- What should I do if my child is sentenced to probation?
When your child is put on probation for juvenile crime, you must check in with the probation department where your child will be oriented. A probation officer is selected to check on the minor to check the progress.
- How long does juvenile probation last?
Several factors play a role in the duration that your child needs to spend on probation. The severity of the offense committed and a minor’s reception to rehabilitation will affect the court’s decision.
- What does it mean that my child is declared a ward of the court?
When a minor violates the criminal law, they are taken to juvenile court. The judge reviews evidence brought against the minor to determine if he committed the alleged crime. If the court finds sufficient evidence against your child, they will be put under probation, and the court takes primary responsibility for the minor’s control.
- What happens if my child violates probation?
When a minor is on probation, their progress and adherence to probation conditions are closely monitored by the probation officer. The consequences of a probation violation depend on the seriousness of the violation. In most cases, a probation violation could cause revocation of probation and reinstatement of more severe punishment.
Find a Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
According to California law, minors lack the mental capacity to understand the nature of their actions. Therefore, when an individual below 18 years commits a crime, they are rehabilitated under the juvenile justice system. The juvenile system aims to rehabilitate the children, and children who have committed minor crimes are sentenced to probation.
Probation is beneficial in that your child can continue to attend school and remain in society. The type of probation imposed on your child depends on the nature of their crime. If your child faces charges in juvenile court, the situation could be devastating for you and them.
Seeking guidance from an experienced attorney will help your child understand their situation and take steps to help achieve the best outcome in the case. If your child is facing charges in Van Nuys, CA, we invite you to contact Van Nuys Criminal Attorney today at 818-484-1100.
People below 18 are considered too young to understand the consequences of their actions. When a minor breaks the law, the case is heard and determined by the juvenile justice system and not a criminal justice system. Juvenile courts in the state are geared towards rehabilitation rather than punishment. The law holds that minors deserve another chance in life and are given time to rectify their behavior.
There are instances when a juvenile conviction can impact an adult’s sentencing through the state’s Three-Strike Law. It could happen if your child commits a serious or violent felony at the age of sixteen or seventeen. Engaging the services of an experienced attorney can ensure your child receives the best legal representation in court. For the best criminal defense services in Van Nuys, contact us at Leah Legal.
Understanding California Three Strike Law
The Three Strike law is a California sentencing scheme that provides a maximum sentence of twenty-five years to life to offenders sentenced to three serious or violent felonies. This law, which is provided under California Penal Code Section 667, ensures that serious felonies in the state receive a harsher prison sentence. The sentence increases with every consecutive serious felony. If you commit a serious or violent felony and are convicted, the conviction will affect any subsequent felony sentence you’ll ever receive.
For instance, if you have a previous violent/serious felony conviction in your record, the subsequent felony conviction will be punished by twice the term provided as punishment by the law. On the other hand, if you have two prior convictions for a serious or violent felony, the third conviction will be punished by twenty-five years to life imprisonment.
Examples: Years ago, Paul was convicted for robbery alongside three of his friends. Currently, he’s facing an extortion charge, which is also listed as a serious offense in California. Because of the previous robbery conviction, Paul is now considered a second striker. It means that if he is convicted for extortion, Paul is likely to receive twice the normal sentence for extortion under the state’s Three-Strike Law.
If Paul is charged with a third serious felony several years later, he will be considered a 3rd striker and could be punished to twenty-five years-life in prison.
California Three Strike Law aims at giving felony defendants harsher and longer prison terms if they have any prior felony convictions in their criminal record.
Under this law, third strikers are defendants who have two previous convictions for serious or violent felonies and are currently facing charges for a crime of the same magnitude. If you have two prior convictions for a violent/serious felony, but the current felony charge is not of the same magnitude, the punishment for your third strike will be double the sentence provided by the law for that offense.
On top of longer prison terms, strikers also receive low custody credits in their consecutive sentences. In California, credits are earned by all prison inmates for the time served behind bars with good conduct. Credits could earn the defendant an earlier release from incarceration after serving at least half of their sentence. However, California’s three-strikes law eliminates this privilege.
Second and third strikers must complete at least 80% of their prison sentence before being considered for an earlier release, even when they portray good behavior throughout their time. Those convicted of violent felonies must at least serve 85% of their prison time.
Lastly, if you face charges for more than one offense under one court case, you cannot complete the sentence for all the offenses at the same time if you’re a striker. The law requires strikers to serve their time consecutively. Thus, you’ll only serve one time after another.
California Juvenile Three Strikes Law
California law is very protective of minors. The law will consider ways to rehabilitate minors even when they commit a crime. That is why juveniles are generally not tried in adult courts like adult criminals, but in juvenile courts where punishments are more rehabilitative than punishing. However, there are instances when minors are tried as adults in criminal courts. It occurs when minors at the age of sixteen or seventeen commit offenses considered serious or violent felonies. They are the crimes listed under California Welfare & Institutions Law Section 707(b). When this happens, the minor will be tried under the Juvenile Three-Strike Law.
Therefore, Juvenile Strikes are offenses considered as strikes under California Three Strike Law, when committed by persons below the legal age of 18. When a minor commits any of those offenses, they could be tried as adults in an ordinary criminal court. Alternatively, the conviction can affect any felony conviction they might receive in the future. Here is a list of crimes listed under the state’s Welfare & Institutions Code Section 707b. They are also the offenses considered as Juvenile Strikes:
- Murder/attempted murder
- Robbery
- Arson of occupied structures or arson producing great physical injury
- Sodomy through force, threat, or violence or through the threat of serious bodily harm
- Rape through violence, force, or threats of serious bodily harm
- Sexual penetration through force
- Oral copulation by means of force, violence, and threats of serious bodily harm
- Kidnapping for the purposes of ransom, robbery, or kidnapping resulting in physical harm
- Discharge of a weapon into an occupied structure or building
- Personal use of a gun in the commission of an offense
- Assault by the use of force, and likely to cause great physical injury
- Assault by the use of a gun or any other destructive device
- A violent offense in which the victim is disabled or an older adult over 60
- Aggravated mayhem
- Torture
- Carjacking
- Kidnapping during a carjacking or for sexual assault
- A felony crime in which the offender (a juvenile) used a dangerous weapon
- Dissuading or bribing a witness
- Voluntary manslaughter
- Drive-by shooting
- The explosion of a destructive device to commit murder
- Escaping from a county facility and intentionally inflicting great physical injury on an employee of that facility
- Lascivious or Lewd acts on a minor below 14 by the use of violence, force, or threats of causing the minor great physical injury
- Selling, manufacture, or compounding at least eight ounces of a controlled drug
- A violent offense that would lead to criminal gang penalty enhancement
A conviction for a juvenile strike could significantly affect the future of a child. That is why it is advisable to involve an experienced criminal attorney to help prevent your loved one from facing juvenile strike charges in the first place.
Note that not all juvenile criminal convictions count as strikes under the California Three Strike Law, but only those that involve violent or serious felonies, such as those listed above. Additionally, an offender must be at least sixteen or seventeen years for their violent/serious felony to be considered a strike. Offenders who commit serious crimes at 18 or older are automatically tried in a criminal court.
If you are a minor of at least 16 years, a prosecutor will file a case in court to have them and their case transferred and determined in a criminal court. If the offender loses the case or takes a plea bargain in a criminal court, they’ll have a criminal conviction in their record. If the crime is among those listed under the California Welfare and Institutions Act Section 707b, the conviction will be considered a strike.
The main determining factor, in this case, is the age of the minor. The law requires the offender to be at least sixteen years or more when the offense was committed. It means that a conviction will not be considered a strike if the alleged offense was committed by a minor below 16, even if the conviction occurred when the juvenile was 16 years or older.
There are mainly four conditions that need to be satisfied for a juvenile criminal conviction to be considered as a strike:
- That the minor was at least sixteen years when the offense was committed
- That the minor was considered fit for their case to be adjudicated through the California juvenile justice system
- That the offense committed was a violent/serious felony.
- That the juvenile court declared the minor a court’s ward based on the commission of a violent/serious felony.
The Impact of Juvenile Strikes
If your child’s criminal conviction is considered a strike under the state’s Three Strikes Law, it could lead to the following:
- He/she could be confined in a California Juvenile Justice Facility or DJF.
- It could increase his/her adult criminal sentences.
DJF refers to a rehabilitation and detention system specifically used for the state’s severe juvenile offenders. The facility was formerly referred to as California Youth Authority and is a section of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. The facilities offered in DJF are the closest a juvenile offender would experience to a prison.
Juvenile offenders who are sent to DJF are those that:
- Have been made wards of the court
- Have their most recent offense listed under the state’s Welfare and Institutions Act Section 707b, or
- Have their most recent offense being a sex-related offense provided under Section 290.008c of California Penal Code
Juveniles sent to DJF serve long and more serious punishment because of the nature of their offense. The amount of time an offender can be placed on detention could be the same as what they could have served in adult prison if they were charged and convicted as adults. Once the minor is in confinement, they are placed in locked-down institutions according to their age, educational needs, maturity level, individual needs, and risk.
Once there is a record of incarceration in DJF, your loved one will be considered a striker. If he/she commits another offense in their adulthood, this record could cause an increase in their sentences.
As an older offender, a juvenile criminal record is taken as a previous strike if the following are true:
- That the minor committed a violent or serious offense at the age of sixteen or older
- That the court made the minor ward of a court
- That the offense the minor committed is listed under the state’s Welfare and Institutions Act Section 707b. Or the offense isn’t listed under this law, but it is violent or serious.
- That a juvenile court judge sustained the crime in one petition
What Legal Options Does a Minor Have?
If your child is facing charges for a juvenile strike, it is important to consider their options to avoid the above and other consequences that come with a conviction. An experienced attorney will advise you accordingly and ensure that your case’s outcome aligns with your child’s best interests. Some of the options you can consider are:
A Plea Bargain
The law allows a defendant to bargain with the DA for reduced charges to avoid consequences of a more severe offense. In that case, you can have your attorney bargain with the district attorney to have your child’s charges reduced to avoid a juvenile strike conviction. Whether juvenile or adult, charges cannot be dismissed or added without a prosecutor’s approval in every court. In some instances, negotiations could also involve the judge.
If you agree to a plea bargain, your loved one has a right to keep the same judge that took his/her admission to determine the minor’s disposition or sentence.
Transfer Hearing
A transfer hearing refers to moving the minor and their case from a juvenile to a criminal court. A juvenile aged sixteen or older who faces charges for a juvenile strike could be eligible for a transfer hearing. In this case, the judge in a juvenile system decides whether the offender is unfit to stand trial in a juvenile justice system. If the judge feels that the minor is unfit for juvenile court after a series of considerations, he/she can transfer their case to a criminal court for a proper hearing. Here are some of the instances in which a minor’s case could be referred to a criminal court:
- If the minor is facing felony charges at 16 or older
- If the minor is charged with any crime listed under the California Welfare and Institutions Act Section 707b and is aged 14 or 15 but wasn’t caught until the end of the juvenile court’s jurisdiction
A judge makes a series of considerations before transferring a minor’s hearing from a juvenile to a criminal court. Some of these considerations include:
- The extent of sophistication the minor exhibited in committing the offense.
- If there is a chance for the minor to be reformed before the end of the juvenile court’s jurisdiction
- If the juvenile has any prior history of delinquent behavior
- If there are any successful attempts to rehabilitate the minor in the past
- The seriousness and conditions surrounding the underlying violation
If the juvenile system judge finds the minor unfit for a juvenile court proceeding, their case will be referred to a district attorney in a criminal court.
There are advantages of having a minor in a juvenile court and having them stand trial in a criminal court. An experienced criminal defense attorney will help you weigh both situations for an informed decision.
If your child’s case is determined in a juvenile court, they could benefit from the following:
- A juvenile court’s decision is always guided by a minor’s best interests, the interests of victims, and the general public.
- A juvenile court process will be faster when compared to a criminal court process. thus, the matter will be resolved a lot quicker
- The minor is safe from exposure to adult criminals as long as their case is handled in the juvenile justice system.
- It is a lot easier to have juvenile criminal records expunged for a fresh start in life.
However, this doesn’t protect the minor from receiving a juvenile strike and facing the consequences of his/her actions. That is why it might be a good idea to have their case transferred to a criminal court. As opposed to a juvenile court system, an adult criminal system can offer the following to a minor:
- Access to bail — your loved one doesn’t have to remain in incarceration until their matter is determined. You‘ll be able to secure his/her release from jail, provided the minor attends all court dates without fail.
- Right to a trial — a defendant’s right to defend themselves against the charges they are facing is not granted in the juvenile justice system. But in a criminal court, your loved one will get a chance to give their account of what happened.
- Plea bargain — plea bargains are very common in adult criminal courts. They give a defendant a chance to have their charges dismissed or reduced.
- Shorter sentences for serious offenses — sentences for violent or serious felonies are somewhat shorter in the adult justice system than in the juvenile court system.
Find a Van Nuys Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
If your child is facing charges for a violent/serious felony in Van Nuys, you must do all you can to prevent them from receiving a juvenile strike. Understanding what a juvenile strike is and the options available for your loved one could help you prepare for a proper defense. If he/she is facing violent/serious felony charges today, contact Van Nuys Criminal Attorney at 818-484-1100. Let our skilled and experienced criminal defense attorneys review your case and advice on the best legal option for your situation.
The thought of you or your child facing criminal charges is scary. It is more alarming when the child could be tried as an adult. According to statistics, in 2007, 39,014 offenders under the age of 18 were placed on probation. 15, 989 were placed in secure confinement. In 2009, 204,696 offenders under the age of 18 were arrested in California. Over 1,115 juvenile offenders were tried in adult courts.
As a result of increased juvenile offenses, California has passed many laws to try minors as adults. In normal circumstances, if you are under the age of 18, you are tried in a juvenile court. In special circumstances, though, you can be tried as an adult.
If you or your child is facing criminal charges, it is advisable to use an experienced criminal lawyer’s services. At Leah Legal, we have an excellent rating, are affordable, and are highly trusted. We have been representing clients facing charges in Van Nuys and the larger California for a long time, and we have a track record of success. If your child is facing a trial as an adult, do not hesitate to contact us.
Who Does the Law Consider A Minor in California?
In California, the law considers you a minor if you are under 18. As such, when you commit a crime, you are tried in juvenile court. However, you can be tried as an adult under certain circumstances. The main difference between an adult court and a juvenile court is how the criminal case is handled.
The main aim of a juvenile court is to rehabilitate you as a juvenile offender. In contrast, the primary purpose of an adult court is to punish the offender. As a juvenile offender, the law gives you a chance to mend your ways and become a law-abiding citizen. California law prohibits juveniles from being tried as adults. But you can be tried as an adult when you commit certain offenses.
When you commit a crime in California as a minor, you are tried in juvenile court. The juvenile court’s primary mandate is to adjudicate or try cases committed by offenders 18 years and below. A juvenile court has jurisdiction over minors who are 12 to 17 years. However, in some cases, the juvenile court can have jurisdiction over a child who is less than 12, depending on the offense’s nature.
In California, judges hear juvenile cases or cases involving minors. Unlike adult cases, no juries are present during the case hearing. Juvenile court cases are mostly confidential. You cannot be released on bail in a juvenile case as it happens with an adult case. According to California law SB 439, the juvenile court can only adjudicate your case if you are 12 or below under special circumstances.
The court has jurisdiction over you when you are under 12 if you are accused of committing serious crimes, including rape, murder, sexual penetration by force, oral copulation, the threat of great bodily harm, or violence. In normal circumstances, you cannot be adjudicated in a juvenile court when you are younger than 12.
The juvenile court, as earlier stated, adjudicates minors who are less than 18. But some offenses may warrant you to be tried as an adult.
Proposition 21
In 2000, voters in California passed what is known as Proposition 21 or The Juvenile Justice Initiative. The initiative was meant to curb the high incidents of juvenile crimes, especially related to gang activities. Under the law, a prosecutor can decide to try you as an adult even if you are under 18. The law also specifies certain crimes where juvenile offenders are automatically tried as adults. In California, you will be tried as an adult when you are accused of murder, certain sex crimes, and other serious and violent crimes.
Senate Bill 1391
In 2018, Governor Brown signed into law senate bill 1391 which replaced Proposition 21. Under the previous law, a juvenile as young as 14 years could be tried as an adult. According to Bill 1391, the court can only charge you as an adult as long as you are 16 and above.
According to Senate Bill 1391, you cannot be prosecuted as an adult for any crimes you committed while under 16 years. previously, you could be tried as an adult for some serious and violent crimes you committed when you were 14 or older. According to the bill, you can only be tried as an adult when:
- You are 16 years and older
- You committed the crime when you were under the age of 16 but you were not caught until you were over 18.
- The prosecutor deems it necessary to request the court to transfer your case to an adult court provided you are older than 16.
Previously, you could be tried as an adult if you were 16 or older and you committed a felony. You could also be tried as an adult if you committed serious crimes when 14 or 15 years.
What Is Juvenile Crime?
A juvenile crime is any crime you commit when you are under the age of 18. A crime is any act which the law prohibits, and you can receive punishment for carrying out the act. A crime can also be the failure to carry out an act which the law requires you to perform. Whether carried out by a juvenile or an adult, the law classifies crimes as either a felony or a misdemeanor.
Felony
A felony is the most serious offense. You can be charged with a felony if you murder a person, commit some sex offenses, or are accused of drug-related charges. If the court finds you guilty of a felony, you can be tried as an adult and sent to adult prison even if you are a minor.
Misdemeanor
A misdemeanor is a less serious offense than a felony. You can be charged with a misdemeanor for public drunkenness, petty theft or battery. The punishment for a misdemeanor includes fines, probation, or juvenile detention. In most cases, the court does not try you as an adult when you are charged with a misdemeanor.
In California, the prosecutor can charge you with a misdemeanor or a felony. Offenses that can either be charged as a felony, a misdemeanor, or an infraction are called wobbler charges.
In California, three broad categories exist under which these offenses fall. The offense can be violent, property, or a drug-related crime. Violent or serious crimes often include murder, sexual crimes like rape and aggravated assault, which result in great bodily harm. If you are accused of such crimes, you can be tried as an adult.
Property crimes involve the use of violence or deceit to gain property without the owner’s consent. Theft and burglary are examples of property crimes. The last category of offenses is drug-related. Possessing or trafficking certain drugs is an offense in California.
The Juvenile Justice System in California
In California, the juvenile justice system has undergone continuous change over the years. The premise of the juvenile justice system is that the law should give juveniles a chance to change. The juvenile justice system has different procedures, courts, laws, procedures, and rules from the adult court.
If you are tried as an adult when you are a minor, the trial can either occur in an adult court or a juvenile court. If you are found guilty or adjudicated for the crime, you can either serve time in a juvenile detention facility or an adult prison, or county jail. On the other hand, if an adult is charged with a similar offense, the case’s hearing will happen in an adult court. They will also be sent to an adult prison.
The Process Which Might Lead You to Be Tried as An Adult in California
The juvenile court process starts with an arrest. Depending on the offense’s seriousness, the arresting officer might set you free with a simple reprimand. The arresting officer might let you go but instruct you to appear before a court at a later date. If your offense is serious, the arresting officer will take you to the juvenile hall.
Once you are at the juvenile hall, you will meet probation officers who run the juvenile halls. The intake officer at the juvenile hall will interview you and take some actions, which include:
- Sending you home with the instruction to appear in court at a later date
- The probation officer can send you home with a probation program. In this case, you will not be required to appear in court at a later date.
- The probation officer can keep you in the juvenile hall until a judge looks at your case.
To determine if you will be tried as an adult, you must attend your case hearings. These case hearings include detention hearing, transfer hearing, adjudication, and disposition hearing.
Detention hearing
The detention hearing is meant to determine if you will stay at the juvenile hall or the court will set you free. In California, a minor cannot place bail as would an adult. At the detention hearing, the judge decides whether or not to let you go as you await the outcome of your case. Therefore, it is paramount to seek an experienced California criminal lawyer’s services to convince the judge to release you from the juvenile hall.
Fitness hearing
At this stage, the judge decides if you should be tried as an adult. If you are fit for the juvenile court, your case is heard at the juvenile court. If the judge finds you are not fit for juvenile court, you are tried as an adult in an adult court. You will be tried in a juvenile court in most incidences unless you have committed a serious or violent crime and you are older than 16 years.
Adjudication
If you are not sent to an adult court, your case is heard in the juvenile court. Here the judge adjudicates or hears your case. If the judge determines you committed the crime, the court will sustain the prosecution’s petition.
Disposition
Disposition is the same as sentencing in an adult court. At this stage, the judge determines your punishment.
Offenses You Can Be Tried as An Adult in California Even If You Are A Minor
It is possible for you as a minor in California to be tried as an adult under certain circumstances. If you are 16 to 17 years, you can face adult charges in a California Superior Court. The procedures under which you can be tried as an adult in California include:
- When the prosecutor files for a fitness hearing. The fitness hearing is meant to determine if you are fit for juvenile court. If the court finds out you are unfit to be tried in a juvenile court, you will be tried as an adult.
- If you commit a premeditated aggravated offense, which warrants an automatic trial as an adult
The Process of a Juvenile Court Fitness Hearing in California
A juvenile court fitness hearing’s purpose is to determine if you are fit to face trial in a juvenile court. The prosecutor might request the court for a fitness hearing. The judge will decide if you’re fit for a juvenile court hearing based on the following criteria:
- The degree of criminal sophistication you exhibited when you carried out the offense
- If you can rehabilitate before the time you have been sentenced to juvenile camp or juvenile detention center is over.
- Your delinquent history
- Previous success in efforts to rehabilitate you
- The seriousness of the offense you are accused of committing
If the court determines that you cannot be rehabilitated or unfit for juvenile court, you will be tried as an adult.
Incidences Where Prosecutor Can File A Fitness Petition
The prosecution can request a fitness hearing under the following circumstances:
- You are at least 16 years old and you are accused of committing a felony.
- You are accused of committing a felony when you have previously been made a ward of the court.
- If you have been convicted of two previous felony offenses when you were above 16. With such a record, the court deems you unfit for rehabilitation.
- If you have committed any offenses under the California Welfare & Institutions Code 707(b)
If you commit any of these offenses, the court presumes you cannot be rehabilitated. The offenses under WIC 707(b) include:
- Lascivious or lewd act on a child under 14 with the threat of great bodily harm, violence or force
- Torture
- Causing great bodily harm to an employee of a county facility when escaping
- Rape with force, the threat of great bodily harm or with violence
- Voluntary manslaughter
- Carjacking
- Aggravated mayhem
- Oral copulation using force, violence or the threat of great bodily harm
- Selling, manufacturing or compounding eight ounces or more of a controlled substance
- Committing a violent felony to a disabled person or a person who is over 60
- Forced sexual penetration
- Kidnapping for ransom, sexual assault, robbery
- Using a weapon personally as a minor
- Murder or attempted murders
- Assault resulting in great bodily harm, or with a destructive object or a firearm
- Discharge of a firearm into an inhabited or occupied building
- Exploding a device to commit
Crimes That Will Automatically Lead the Court to Try You as An Adult in California
Under California Welfare & Institution Code Section 602(b), certain crimes warrant you to be tried automatically as an adult if you are at least 16. You will be tried as an adult If you are accused of personally murdering under certain special circumstances. You will also be charged as an adult if you are accused of personally committing specific sex offenses. These sexual offenses include:
- Rape with force and if you caused great bodily harm or threat during the commission of the rape offense.
- If you are accused of committing spousal rape with great bodily harm or threat during the commission of the rape offense.
- Forcefully committing a sexual act with another person.
- If you are accused of committing lascivious and lewd acts on a child under 14 years. If you cause great bodily harm or violence when committing the offense.
- If you are accused of forceful sexual penetration
- If you are accused of oral copulation or sodomy by force, violence or the threat of great bodily harm.
Can You Appeal the Court’s Decision to Try You as An Adult?
If the court finds you unfit for juvenile court, you will be transferred to an adult court where you will be tried as an adult. At the adult court, the rules that apply to adults will apply to you too as a minor.
In California, you can appeal the decision to transfer you to an adult court by filing a writ petition. You should file the petition within 20 days from when you were arraigned in court for the offense you are accused of committing.
Can You Face the Death Penalty When You Are Tried as An Adult in California?
Even if you are tried as an adult in California, you cannot face the death penalty as a minor. Additionally, you cannot be sentenced to life without parole as a minor if your offense is not a homicide crime.
Call A Juvenile Delinquency Lawyer Near Me
Facing a criminal charge as a minor is a harrowing experience. The situation becomes worse if you are tried as an adult. In California, a minor is a person under the age of 18. Usually, as a minor, you are tried in juvenile court. The purpose of the juvenile court is to rehabilitate rather than punish you for your crime. The aim of the adult court, on the other hand, is to punish the offender. But in some instances, you can be tried as an adult if you commit certain crimes.
If you are accused of murder, rape, kidnapping for ransom and other serious and violent crimes, you can be charged as an adult. If you or your child is facing criminal charges, it is prudent to seek the services of a well-experienced criminal lawyer.
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we have represented many minors who have been tried as adults and achieved a favorable outcome for them. You can reach us at 818-484-1100 any time of the day or night. Make an appointment with us to receive the best legal representation in Van Nuys, California.
Some minors may go through mischievous phases that sometimes cross the line and become criminal behavior punishable by law. When police arrest your child for any alleged delinquent act, you must act quickly to protect his/her rights because the potential consequences of a sustained juvenile petition against him/her in California can harm his/her future.
The California juvenile justice system is lenient to minors because it focuses on rehabilitating the juveniles instead of imprisoning them like in the adult justice system. Although the possible sentences (disposition) a minor can face are not stringent, a sustained juvenile petition can have a significant impact on your child’s future, even as an adult.
When you receive a notice or a call that your child is in police custody for whichever delinquent act, we invite you to reach us at Leah Legal, wherever you are in Van Nuys. Our attorneys are understanding and can protect your child’s rights and interests during these challenging moments to dismiss or reduce the alleged charges against him/her.
An Overview of California Juvenile Delinquency
Sometimes even childs can run afoul of the law and face the criminal justice system, which is different from that of adults in many ways. Notably, juvenile justice system legal terms are also different from those of the adult justice system.
For instance, in a juvenile court, the judge does not find the defendant (minor) guilty. Instead, the judge “sustains the petitions” submitted by the district attorney. Other terms that you will often hear in a juvenile court include:
- “Disposition” instead of a “sentence.”
- “Adjudication hearing” instead of a “trial.”
- “Delinquent act” instead of a crime
- “Juvenile delinquent” instead of “offender.”
Juvenile delinquency is typically an act of engaging in illegal behavior as a minor or an individual below the majority’s statutory age, which is eighteen years. Any person who is above eighteen years of age goes through the normal adult justice system.
Your child might engage in a delinquent act unknowingly or due to peer pressure from a group of friends with mischievous traits. When that happens, the police may take the child to a juvenile court or not, depending on the alleged delinquent act’s seriousness. Typically, police officers in California have the following options after arresting your child:
- Detain him/her for a while, warn about the repercussions of committing the alleged delinquent before releasing him/her
- Detain and hold him/her until you arrive at the police station, then release him/her
- Take your child into custody and refer him/her to a juvenile delinquency court officer.
When the case reaches the juvenile court officer, also often known as a probation officer, he/she can choose to deal with the case informally “off the record,” file formal charges or dismiss the case. Dealing with a delinquent act “off the record” means your child may appear before a judge or an officer for informal judgment of the case. Potential consequences of informal judgment include:
- Paying restitution to the victim
- Enrolling in a counseling class
- Paying a fine
- Community service
- Probation
The worst that can happen to your child after the case reaches the juvenile court officer’s hands is the filing of formal juvenile charges. Here is what the juvenile court officer will consider before filing your case for formal judgment:
- Whether you are capable of controlling your child or not
- The child’s attitude
- The severity of the delinquent act
- The child’s age
- The evidence of the delinquent act
- The child’s past delinquency history
- Whether the child has an attorney or not
When the juvenile court officer files your child’s case for formal judgment in a juvenile court, you should consider retaining an attorney because you wouldn’t want your child to go through the formal judgment’s possible consequences.
If the judge sustains the petition against your child, the minor could be subject to confinement in the Division of Juvenile Justice (DJJ) facility or other punishments. Sustained juvenile petitions could also lead to life-long consequences to the child, including registration as a sex offender if the delinquent act was sexual assault.
Common California Delinquent Acts that Can Lead to a Sustained Juvenile Petition
Most delinquent acts that the court would consider a crime if an adult did the wrongdoing can lead to a sustained juvenile petition. You will need an aggressive lawyer to fight for your child’s right through the whole juvenile justice process to avoid possible dispositions “sentences.”
There are specific delinquent acts “crimes” common in Van Nuys and might lead to a sustained juvenile petition once the matter reaches the juvenile court. These delinquents include:
Trespassing
According to California Penal Code 602, trespassing is a misdemeanor offense that involves entering and staying on another person’s property without the right or permission to do so. Below are common ways minors violate this statute in Van Nuys:
- Entering another person’s property with malicious intent to obstruct or interfere with activities or business going on there
- Entering and occupying or remaining on another person’s property without permission or consent to do so and refusing to leave upon request
- Entering another person’s property with the intent to destroy or damage their property
- Taking stone, dust, or soil from another person’s property
If your child engages in any trespass acts, you must contact a criminal defense attorney for legal representation to protect your child’s rights and interests. Your child’s attorney can raise the following potentially helpful legal defense arguments during adjudication hearing for dismissal or reduction of the charge:
- The minor had consent to be on the property.
- The minor had the right to be on the property.
- The property was not signed for trespass as an infraction or fenced.
Shoplifting
California Penal Code 459.5 defines shoplifting as entering a commercial building with the intent to commit larceny when the building is open during regular work hours, and the property value is less than $950. Example of situations when the police would arrest a minor for shoplifting charges include:
- Entering a bookshop with intent to buy three books and sneak two others into his/her backpack
- Entering into a jewelry shop with the intent to steal a watch or necklace that is worth $700
Suppose the court sustains the juvenile petition against your child in violation of California Penal Code 459.5. In that case, the minor could be subject to an informal probation disposition or, even worse, confinement in a DJJ facility. A reliable attorney can counter these charges against your child by raising the following viable legal defense arguments during adjudication hearing:
- There was a mistake of fact, and the minor did not have the intent to shoplift
- There is no sufficient viable evidence against the minor.
- The minor will repay the business owner via a civil compromise.
Vandalism
You commit California vandalism when you destroy, deface, or damage another person’s property. Under California Penal Code 594, this offense is a misdemeanor if the amount of the damage was less than $400 and a felony if the damage exceeded $400. For the court to sustain the juvenile petition against your child for vandalism, the prosecutor must prove that the minor maliciously:
- Destroyed, damaged, and defaced his/her property with graffiti or any other inscribed material
- The property did not belong to the minor or his/her parents
Vandalism is a common delinquent act among many minors in Van Nuys, but a reliable attorney can assert the following legal defense to counter these charges against your child:
- It was an accident
- Mistaken identity
- False allegations
Sexual Battery
The court can sustain a juvenile petition against your child for sexual battery if he/she touches intimate parts of a friend without his/her consent for sexual gratification, abuse, or arousal. Under California Penal Code 243, a violation of this statute is chargeable as either a misdemeanor or a felony, meaning it is a wobbler offense.
Sexual battery, also commonly known as sexual assault, is a common delinquent act among minors as they go through adolescence stages. Sexual assault disposition hearing might make the minor subject to confinement in a DJJ facility where he/she will face stringent terms and conditions.
Sustained juvenile petitions of sexual battery can also lead to life-long consequences because the minor will continue registering as a sex offender, even if he/she turns eighteen years old. For that matter, you should find an attorney as soon as you receive a notice that your child is in police custody following a sexual assault charge for legal representation.
Depending on the minor’s delinquent act seriousness, sometimes the prosecutor can also file the case in an adult court. Whether or not your child should remain in the juvenile justice system depends on what the judge will lure out during the minor’s transfer hearing.
A transfer hearing is a court proceeding where the judge determines if the minor’s delinquent act fits the juvenile justice system. The prosecutor will initiate a transfer hearing if the charges the child faces falls under Welfare and Institutions Code 707(b), and the minor is over sixteen years of age. These offenses include:
- Arson
- Murder
- childnapping
- Rape with bodily injury or harm
- Forcible sexual penetration
- Attempted murder
- Carjacking
- Torture
- Voluntary manslaughter
Unfortunately, if your child loses the transfer hearing, he/she will have to undergo the adult justice system, which could subject the minor to a prison term and hefty fines. When your child is in police custody following a juvenile case arrest, the sooner you contact a criminal defense attorney, the better because a juvenile case disposition can significantly impact the minor’s future.
Disposition “Sentencing” Options Following a Sustained Juvenile Petition
If the juvenile court sustains the petition against your child for engaging in a delinquent act, he/she could be subject to a variety of dispositions, depending on the nature of his/her wrongdoing.
The judge with jurisdiction over the case will craft a disposition that can discipline the child, and at the same time, help him/her become a productive citizen. Here are some of the disposition or sentencing options open to the juvenile judge after sustaining a juvenile petition against your child:
- Home on Probation
In a disposition hearing, a judge may decide to place the minor on probation. Minors on a home on probation are allowed to live with their parents, but they have to follow specific terms and conditions such as:
- They have to pay any owed restitution
- They must attend school.
- They must abide by a curfew.
Home on probation sentences comes with two options, which are upon the judge to decide. These options are:
Placement at Home Without Wardship
Placement at home without wardship is the least intrusive option that the judge could impose for this form of disposition or sentence. The judge will place your child at home probation without wardship if:
- The minor is a first-time offender
- The delinquent act was not serious.
- You will be supportive of him/her during this rehabilitation period.
Placement at home without wardship probation lasts for six months, and after that, the minor will be free from the probation’s obligations.
Placement at Home With Wardship
The more serious the delinquent act, the more likely the judge will order placement of your child at home with wardship. Commission of the following category of offenses as a minor can lead to placement of the defendant at home with wardship in a disposition hearing:
- Gang-related crimes
- Serious WIC 707(b) offenses
- A felony when you are over fourteen years of age
- Controlled substances offenses
If the judge imposes a home on probation disposition after sustaining a juvenile petition against your child, he/she must abide by the terms and conditions of his/her probation. Violation of the probation conditions can lead to:
- More strict terms and conditions and, or
- Removal of the child from home on probation
- Placement of the child to probation camp, juvenile hall, or Division of a Juvenile Justice (DJJ) facility
- Placement in a Probation Camp
There are also other delinquent acts where the judge will order placement of the minor in a probation camp as a disposition following a sustained juvenile petition. The ultimate goal of these probation camps is to:
- Reunite the minor with his/her family
- Reintegrate the minor into his/her community
- Help him/her develop behavioral and social skills.
These camps provide the following type of services to the minor for the ultimate purpose of his/her rehabilitation:
- Mental health services
- Educational services
- Vocational training
- Tutoring
- Counseling
The length of stay in a probation camp can either be 3, 6, or 9 months long, depending on the nature of the minor’s delinquent act and rehabilitative goals of the disposition. While at the probation camp, the minor can visit his/her family and finish high school studies.
- Suitable Placement
The judge can also order the child’s removal from your custody at home and order placement of the child in a foster home, which is also known as foster care or suitable placement. The juvenile court judge has the discretion of making any reasonable orders for your child’s custody, supervision, conduct, care, and even medical treatment. Before the court orders removal of the minor from your custody as the parent, the judge must find that:
- The minor was on probation at home under your custody, and he/she has not reformed
- The minor is a chronic truant.
- Your child’s welfare requires removing him/her from your physical custody.
- You are not able to provide proper training, maintenance, and educational needs to the child.
The county probation agency has the authority of determining the appropriate and suitable placement of the minor for foster care when the court orders his/her removal from your custody. The county probation agency has the following options for the minor’s suitable placement away from home:
- Staying in foster and resource family homes
- Staying with family and extended family members
- Staying at treatment centers and group care homes
Placement of your child outside your home must be in a safe setting that is family-like, least restrictive, and meets the child’s individual needs to become a productive citizen.
- Placement in a Division of Juvenile Justice (DJJ) Facility
DJJ facilities are detention and rehabilitation centers for most serious juvenile wrongdoers or offenders. When the judge orders placement of your child in a DJJ facility, he/she will face severe and prolonged commitments, which negatively harm his/her future due to interaction with other young offenders.
A minor could be subject to confinement in a DJJ facility for the maximum time an adult would be subject to for commission of the same offense. The lockdown institution for confining your child will depend on:
- His/her educational needs
- His/her maturity level, individual risks, and needs
- His/her age
If the judge sustains the juvenile petition against your child for the commission of any of the following offenses, he/she could be subject to this kind of disposition:
- A sex offense under California Penal Code Section 290.008(c), for example, rape.
- Offenses listed under WIC 707(b), for example, murder, robbery, carjacking, etc
Commitment to a DJJ facility is the most severe disposition or sentence the juvenile court judge can impose on your child after sustaining the juvenile petition against him/her. A sustained juvenile petition against your child does not have to come down to a commitment in a DJJ facility. A reliable and experienced juvenile delinquency attorney can fight for a dismissal or reduction of the charges against your child for a less severe disposition like home on probation.
Find a Juvenile Delinquency Attorney Near Me
A sustained juvenile petition against your child can negatively impact him/her, harming his/her future education and career goals due to the possible disposition the judge can impose, like confinement in a DJJ facility. When the police arrest your child for an alleged delinquent act, we invite you to contact Van Nuys Criminal Attorney at 818-484-1100 if you are in Van Nuys to receive an aggressive and assertive representation to protect your child’s future.
The availability of your juvenile delinquency records to the general public is disadvantageous since it prevents you from advancing in life. Additionally, the records may lead to significant discrimination, including normal daily interactions. Therefore, sealing juvenile records brings about several advantages, like helping you avoid hardships when seeking job opportunities. While sealing your juvenile records should be an accessible process, you may find it difficult to navigate without a criminal lawyer’s help. This is because you must meet numerous requirements and fill in various documents.
Working with an experienced defense attorney makes your work easier. The assistance you receive not only helps you present a valid written petition, but it also increases your chances of success in the court proceedings. You need to remember that the judge holds discretion concerning the granting of record sealing orders. As a result, having an experienced lawyer to argue for your case should always be a priority. Partnering with Leah Legal enables you to work with highly trained and experienced criminal attorneys who put your needs first. Our services are available to clients who plan to petition for sealing juvenile records in Van Nuys, California.
Constituents of Juvenile Records
An accused’s juvenile records constitute different documents and items, depending on the trial proceedings and the circumstances surrounding the juvenile offense. Therefore, you should identify the types of records you intend to petition for sealing, as they help you know what to expect after the court grants the orders.
Usually, juvenile records consist of any material related to your arrest and charging, provided it relates to a criminal offense you committed when you were a minor. Hence, your lawyer should look into all your records to establish whether he/she includes all the relevant documents in the record sealing petition. The main components of a juvenile record include:
Juvenile Probation Reports
Mostly, the judge issues probation among other rehabilitative sentences to juvenile delinquents. Subsequently, your probation reports are a significant record, as they give details of your entire probation duration.
For example, the reports state whether you completed the probation and whether you complied with all terms. When petitioning for record sealing, your defense attorney should include the probation reports as part of the specific documents to be sealed.
Court Judgements and Rulings
Any preliminary rulings that the presiding judge issued during your juvenile proceedings are valid records. These rulings serve to show the continuous court processes that your juvenile proceedings took until the judge granted the final judgment. Hence, your criminal lawyer should research on existing documents to confirm the submissions of your record sealing petition.
Further, the final judgment/verdict issued in the juvenile court is an important record. Normally, the juvenile court may declare you a ward of the court, meaning that you should be held responsible for your unlawful actions. On the other hand, the judge may have dismissed your case on various grounds.
Regardless of the verdict issued, the documents remain as part of your juvenile records. As a result, you want to strive to have them sealed, primarily if they did not lead to a conviction. This way, you prevent negative associations with the record despite having been acquitted of the charges.
Juvenile Court Exhibits
On top of this, any court exhibits that a prosecutor used in juvenile trial proceedings are also stored as records. For example, if you engaged in violent crimes that involved crude weapons, the department of justice retains the actual exhibit in your records. Moreover, exhibits include photographs of the scene of the crime and any transcribed audio or video footage.
What it Means to Seal Juvenile Records
Upon applying to have your records sealed, you will be asking for the court to allow the closure of your juvenile file. As a result, no member of the public can access your juvenile records because they no longer exist within their access.
California law allows record sealing procedures, as stated in the Welfare and Institutions Code 781. The provisions also provide multiple requirements and thresholds for any person looking to seal their records to help them prepare.
The process should help you eradicate the discrimination and additional scrutiny you may receive from potential partners, employers, and other significant members of the public.
Persons Eligible to Benefit From Juvenile Record Sealing
Before applying for the process, you need to check whether you meet the existing eligibility criteria. Doing so saves you from filing an invalid petition that leads to wasted time and resources. Some factors to look out for when checking eligibility are:
- Whether the court believes that your rehabilitation from unlawful behavior was successful.
- You are at least eighteen years old, or the juvenile court’s jurisdiction terminated five years ago.
- You have not engaged in recent felonies or crimes of moral turpitude.
Parties Ineligible for Juvenile Record Sealing
Similarly, several restrictions exist to prevent specific persons from having their records sealed. In this case, the prohibition restricts people who committed crimes listed under section 707(b) of the California Welfare and Institutions Code.
Some of the crimes under the section are:
- Sex offenses
- Robbery
- Arson
- Murder or attempted murder
- Felonies involving violence
- Carjacking
Moreover, the person should have been at least fourteen years old when committing the crime for the restrictions to apply.
The Process of Sealing Your Juvenile Records
Learning of the procedure to undertake in record sealing is also crucial because it equips you with necessary substantive and procedural information. Despite this, your defense lawyer understands the various procedures to undertake to not have to worry about the technicalities.
Filing the Record Sealing Petition
The first step to take involves filing a court petition requesting for granting of records sealing orders. Since the petition is the backbone of your plea, your lawyer should be diligent in entering vital information that justifies the need for record sealing.
Moreover, the petition should entail the specific records you would like sealed, coupled with detailed arguments that support the claims. When you include the precise details, it helps the judge track your records more easily and find it easier to issue the final verdict.
Filing the petition at the specified time is also important to prevent inconveniences. While you may file your court documents at any time, you also need to factor in all time-related requirements. Conducting sufficient research enables you to establish that you have met the eligibility criteria.
The Court Interview
After filing the petition, the court receives and assesses it in preparation for a physical interview. Usually, the judge only directs your criminal lawyer to attend the interview if no extraordinary issues that also require you to appear are present.
However, some judges may insist on interviewing the petitioner in person and prompting you to make a court appearance. During the interview, the judge will ask basic questions concerning the application, to check whether you or your attorney comprehend the reason for the petition.
The interview also gives the judge a chance to make a first impression on you, especially if you appear in person. So, making a good impression is key to set the pace for the actual hearing and increase your chances of success.
Finally, the judge will also inquire on any pressing issues that prompt a court hearing as soon as possible. For example, if you will be traveling outside the country soon, your lawyer may present the urgency of receiving a short waiting period before the hearing. The judge analyses your application and determines whether your reasons make valid arguments to influence the hearing date.
Receiving the Hearing Date
Once the judge settles on a date, he/she then communicate it to your attorney through an official notice. When you receive the date, we recommend setting reminders to keep track, as your attendance could be mandatory.
Sometimes, you may need to adjust the hearing dates due to unforeseen circumstances. If you find yourself in the situation, it is always best to contact your lawyer as soon as possible to enable him/her to convey the information to the court promptly.
Afterward, the judge will set another date that aligns with your availability. However, if extreme cases prevent you from appearing in court at all, the hearing may proceed with your lawyer standing in for you.
The Petition Hearing
The actual hearing involves holding court presentations where the judge assesses your arguments and evidence brought forth. Normally, a hearing arises when the prosecutor who handled your juvenile case disputes your move to apply for record sealing.
The dispute may come from the prosecutor’s view that your juvenile offense was serious. Hence, the argument may be that your records should not be destroyed for the sake of future reference. Consequently, the hearing entails presenting arguments that plead your case and counter the prosecutor’s claims.
Pending the hearing date, your attorney should help you gather relevant documentary evidence that will persuade the judge to seal your juvenile records. For example, you may gather all probation reports and certificates of completing rehabilitative treatment prescribed by the juvenile court in the past.
Moreover, we advise you to present the original juvenile court judgment. The document will come in handy if you intend to argue that you deserve to have records sealed because you did not receive a juvenile sentence.
Luckily, you may appear in front of the same judge who handled the juvenile case since you should petition the respective juvenile court that handled your matter. If so, you may have an easier time convincing the judge of your reforms.
Also, the evidence you provide will play a significant role in helping the judge ascertain the facts of your previous juvenile case. Similarly, the prosecutor will present his/her evidentiary material that may be from various sources.
Often, the contesting prosecutor uses details from the District Attorney’s office and the local department of probation as evidence. Essentially, his/her goal is to adduce evidence that discredits your claims of reform or eligibility for the record sealing process.
After the judge has analyzed all presented arguments and sources of proof, he/she will make the final decision. Sometimes, the court may have to adjourn several times to give the judge enough time for in-depth analysis.
The Possible Court Decisions and their Effects
The judge may approve your request and order for the sealing of your juvenile records. If the petition is allowed, the judge should authorize the sending of court orders to all entities that may have accessed the juvenile records.
The court orders will include statements requesting the entities to destroy all your juvenile records following the allowed petition. As a result, no member of the public should access your juvenile records anymore, giving you a chance to have a fresh start.
On the other hand, the judge may choose to deny the petition and retain your records. When the court dismisses your request, you do not have to worry about it, as there is room for re-application or appeal after some time. Additionally, you will still have a chance to go through the court judgment and determine what may have led the judge to deny you the chance to seal your records.
The Total Waiting Period
When your lawyer drafts a court petition ready for filing, you are likely to enter a long waiting list. The waiting period depends on where you file the petition, as most court stations are overwhelmed with numerous record sealing applications.
Lastly, when you receive a positive case outcome that allows you to seal the records, you may have to wait for three months or ninety days before the sealing occurs.
The Possibility of Reopening Sealed Records
In some cases, the court may allow your sealed records to be reopened as a reference point for justified undertakings. In each instance, you will be notified of the intention to reopen the juvenile records in advance to help you remain aware of the process. The two instances where your records may be reopened are:
In a Defamation Lawsuit
If you are party to a defamation lawsuit, the court will authorize the reopening of sealed records. Usually, accessing the records provides admissible evidence that will help discredit the defamatory statements made against you. For example, if the person defaming you falsely claims that you were guilty of a sexual offense, the records serve as proof to show the actual charges you faced.
You will be content to know that the records are sealed again after the defamation suit concludes. Thus, the court reinstates the status quo that prohibits members of the public from accessing your records.
For an Insurance Company’s Scrutiny
Alternatively, an insurance adjuster may request to check your juvenile records, especially if you faced DUI charges. Checking your records helps them make an accurate risk assessment as you apply for insurance.
Further, the scrutiny should be authorized by the Department of Motor Vehicles. The procedural requirement helps to keep track of the reopened records, to prevent an arbitrary scrutiny process that could lead to the loss of vital documents. Moreover, the DMV regulates the process to submit only relevant details to the insurance adjuster.
Destroying Juvenile Records After Sealing Them
After having your juvenile records sealed from the general public’s access, they will eventually be destroyed. The process brings a finality to the existing records, as nobody can access them beyond the order of destruction. However, several time restrictions exist before you become eligible to have juvenile records destroyed.
Firstly, you may benefit from the process five years after you received court orders to have the records sealed. To qualify, your juvenile case should have led to your declaration as a ward of the court. The title is often issued to juveniles who engage in repetitive truancy or disobedience.
Generally, being a ward of the court may be equated to being guilty of an offense. However, the unwanted behavior is not necessarily criminal and does not cause significant harm. As a result, you can access the five-year threshold compared to juvenile delinquents who committed felonies.
Secondly, you may have to wait until you turn thirty-eight years old to have your records destroyed. This second category involves minors who were declared a ward of the court after committing criminal activities.
Naturally, people who previously engaged in criminal offenses are thought to pose more danger to the general public. Thus, the public holds onto the right to have access to your juvenile records for longer, despite being restricted by sealing.
Contact a Juvenile Record Sealing Attorney Near Me
Numerous benefits of having your juvenile records sealed exist, including having a new chance at many aspects of life. Therefore, finding a reliable defense lawyer who understands the petition process and needed requirements is crucial to the success of your case.
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we provide excellent criminal defense services when filing a juvenile record sealing petition. With our help, you are in a better position to seal your juvenile records and allow you to advance in life. If you need to seal juvenile records in Van Nuys, California, call us today at 818-484-1100.
Several scientific studies, court decisions, and experiences have shown that minors should not be tried like grown-ups for the same criminal conduct. The same has also indicated that children are less capable of meaningfully navigating justice system processes, including working with their lawyers.
Additionally, the justice system involvement could have adverse and long-lasting health and psychological impacts on minors. Eventually, their supposed crimes are better addressed via alternative ways other than a prosecution, including education, child welfare, human services, or health care.
Senate Bill 439 excludes particular children from prosecution in juvenile court. It protects young offenders from the adverse effects of the formal justice system, safeguards their health and well-being through alternative child-serving systems, and lower the number of resources used in the juvenile justice system.
If your minor is facing criminal charges, they may have protection under Senate Bill 439. You will need to hire an attorney to advise you on your child’s legal options. If the child faces charges in Van Nuys, California, contact Leah Legal, and we will do our best to protect their rights.
How California Juvenile Cases Are Handled
In California, juvenile cases go through two separate court systems— juvenile dependency and juvenile delinquency court systems. The juvenile delinquency court system focuses on children charged with offenses, while the juvenile dependency court system deals with children that have been abandoned, neglected, or abused.
Generally, children have to be categorized under either of the systems, but not both simultaneously. However, in given cases, a child can fall under both jurisdictions. If this is the case, the minor is considered to have a dual status. Prosecutors strive to keep juveniles out of the delinquency court system to enhance rehabilitation instead of punishment.
Generally, the juvenile delinquency court system handles crimes perpetrated by children aged between twelve and seventeen years. But in given cases, it handles offenses committed by minors under the age of twelve. The juvenile court system isn’t under the criminal court system—it’s under the civil law system.
As far as the juvenile court system is concerned, judges address cases, whereas prosecutors and defense lawyers participate. There are no juries. Typically, a juvenile case is confidential.
In 2018 the juvenile justice system underwent some changes after the signing into law of Senate Bill 439, which required the juvenile delinquency system to assume jurisdiction only over minors below twelve years under specific circumstances.
What Senate Bill 439 Says In Detail
On 30th September 2018, California Governor, Jerry Brown, passed into law Senate Bill (SB) 439, but the law wasn’t operative until January 2019. This bill prevents the juvenile court from having jurisdiction over juvenile offenders below twelve years old. However, it doesn’t apply to minors who commit rape, murder, oral copulation, sexual penetration, or sodomy.
The juvenile delinquency court system would still take over in these kinds of cases, even if the offender is below twelve years, as long as the commission of the offenses was accomplished through violence, menace, threats of bodily harm, or force.
Laws Before SB 439
SB 439 substantially changed the laws on juvenile court jurisdiction. Per the State’s previous law, the juvenile court had the official power to make legal decisions and judgments over all minors below 18 years old who violated any California or federal statute. There wasn’t the least age of a minor where the court couldn’t try a case.
Current Laws Under SB 439
SB 439 provides that the juvenile court system has power over a child when they are between 12 and 17 years old and violate any statute of the U.S, California, or a municipal order. Per the bill, the state’s juvenile court still has the power to make legal decisions and judgments over a minor below 12 years old when the child commits murder, oral copulation, sodomy, sexual penetration, and rape. For the last four offenses, the court has authority over these cases only when a minor commits the offenses through violence, force, menace, threats of physical injury, and duress.
In all the other cases that involve children below twelve years, SB 439 provides that all counties devise alternatives to the juvenile justice system that are less strict. This bill doesn’t say anything about who is liable for coming up with these alternatives. However, it does mention that the responsible people can provide health-, community-, and school-based services as alternatives.
The Logic Behind SB 439
The advocates of the current law uphold it for the following reasons. They are:
- Research reveals that if children go through the justice system so early in their lives, they will more likely become chronic offenders.
- Interacting with the justice system early in life causes harm to minor’s educational or developmental outcomes
- The current laws highly correspond to brain development science, which indicates that minors’ brains require a more extended period to develop into adulthood.
Apart from California, twenty other states have the least age when a minor can enter the juvenile justice system. The age ranges from six to 12 years. Massachusetts was the first to set the least age at twelve years earlier in 2018 before California followed suit. SB 439 amends Welfare & Institutions Code (WIC) 602 and 601.
Legal Rights for Juvenile Offenders After SB 439
A child facing juvenile court proceedings won’t have the same legal rights as offenders going through adult court criminal proceedings, but most are similar. Prior to the I960s, young offenders had limited constitutional rights. Because juvenile court proceedings are formal, the state and juvenile courts have strengthened minors’ rights. The following are legal rights in juvenile delinquency proceedings. They are still the same as those of the previous law:
- The police need probable cause to search a child— law enforcement officers can only search and place your child under arrest if they have probable cause to do so. That is if they have reason to suspect the minor violated a law. However, any public official in a quasi-parental relationship with the child, for instance, a school staff, only needs suspicion of misbehavior to search and, if need be, detain them.
- Your child is entitled to a phone call— generally, a minor offender has the right to place one phone call if they’re detained, and there’s no chance that they’ll be released soon. They can opt to contact their guardian or parent, who will then talk to an attorney. Or, they could call a lawyer directly. By demanding to call their parent/guardian or lawyer, the child invokes his/her Miranda rights. In case the police ignore the minor’s request to speak with a parent/guardian or attorney, they can’t use anything he/she says to them against him/her in court.
- Your child has a right to legal counsel— in the re Gault case, the United States Supreme Court held that minor offenders have the constitutional right to have a lawyer by their side during their juvenile proceedings. In case they can’t afford one, a public defender has to be appointed to represent them.
- No right to bail— juvenile offenders aren’t entitled to make bail. However, many of them are set free before arraignment.
- The right to receive notice of the charges— again, the Supreme Court directed that a juvenile offender has to be notified of their charges.
- The right to invoke the 5th amendment privilege against self-incrimination
- The right to interrogate and cross-examine witnesses— whereas the adjudication hearing is not formal, your child has the legal right to confront and cross-examine witnesses. This means he/she could question the parties testifying against him/her and challenge their testimony through an experienced lawyer.
- California does not allow trial by the jury in juvenile cases.
- Your child is entitled to have his/her charges proven beyond a reasonable doubt if he/she is facing adjudication or incarceration because of juvenile court proceedings. The prosecution has to prove the charges against your child beyond a reasonable doubt. In case the minor isn’t facing incarceration or adjudication, the prosecution only has to establish the charges through a preponderance of the evidence.
Sentencing Options for Juvenile Cases Remain the Same Even With SB 349 in Place
When your child commits an offense, the probation department or prosecution can file a petition. The petition requests the juvenile court to become involved in the case. It states what the state thinks your child did. It’s the judge’s job to sustain or deny the petition. Should the judge grant the petition, your child will be subjected to any of the available sentencing or disposition options we’ll discuss below. The disposition option the child will face depends on factors like the severity of the criminal conduct, prior criminal history, whether the involved victim suffered severe bodily harm, and the supposed victim’s status.
Even though SB 439 provides relief on the age of juvenile offenders who can undergo the juvenile justice system, sentencing options remain the same for all the offenders that must go through this system.
Deferred Entry of Judgment (DEJ)
DEJ is a kind of juvenile probation. Under this sentencing option, your child will be required to agree to the allegations in the petition. The judgment and sentencing are then deferred or not entered (postponed) while he/she serves a probation sentence. Once the child completes the probation sentence, the court dismisses his/her case. The probation lasts for one to three years, and the judge may order the following terms and conditions based on the individual case:
- Random alcohol and drug testing
- Warrantless searches of the child and areas under their control (compulsory)
- Restitution
- Curfew restrictions
- The requirement to attend school (mandatory)
This disposition option is mostly for less serious offenses that don’t include gang-related crimes, sexual assault, violent felonies, crimes involving firearms, and crimes under WIC 707(b).
The court can’t dismiss your child’s charges earlier than 12 months and later than 36 months from the date of referral to the DEJ program.
Your Child May Face Diversion
Prior to the prosecution or probation department filing a petition, the parties involved may settle on the diversion sentencing option per WIC 654. The probation officer may devise a plan, including the minor’s participation in a treatment or education program for up to six months. Your child may spend three months in a community facility as part of the diversion program. Should they complete the program, his/her case is dismissed, and the prosecution or probation department won’t file a petition.
Formal Probation
The court can also sentence your child to a probation term, which they can serve while at camp, home, group home, or relative’s home. Probation terms and conditions may include anything that can reasonably be useful in rehabilitating the child, including:
- Curfew restrictions.
- School attendance (mandatory).
- Community service.
- Alcohol or drug counseling.
- Not mingling with particular people.
- Graffiti removal.
Generally, if your child is committed to a juvenile camp, he/she will be required to enroll in a short-term program. The program offers vocational training, counseling, recreational activities, work experience, and educational services.
Commitment to the Division of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
Your child will face this disposition option if he/she has committed:
- An offense under WIC 707(b)
- A serious felony
- A crime that requires him/her to register as a sex offender
Informal Probation Under WIC 654 and 725
Under this sentencing option, a petition against your child is filed, but they may be subject to informal probation. This probation may involve a supervision period that won’t go beyond six months, whereby you and your child enroll in a drug or alcohol treatment/counseling program. Other terms may include:
- The child has to follow curfew rules except when you’re accompanying him/her.
- Mandatory school attendance for the child.
- The minor has to pay restitution to the supposed victim.
Generally, this disposition is for nonviolent offenses like vandalism and trespass. Once the probation term ends, and the child has complied with all probationary terms, the case against him/her will be dismissed.
Sealing Criminal Juvenile Records
California allows juvenile record sealing to protect minors from prejudice arising from those records. For your child to have his/her record sealed, he/she should file a petition in court. The judge has the power to grant the petition and seal the record or deny it, and the record remains unsealed. Consequently, engaging a skilled lawyer will increase the likelihood of a successful outcome.
Once a juvenile record is sealed, the public can’t access it. This means your child can legally deny having been arrested or convicted if asked. However, the records could be reopened in these situations:
- If the child is an involved party in a civil suit
- The DMV (Department of Motor Vehicle) may allow vehicle insurance providers to scrutinize the child’s driving records to analyze his/her insurance eligibility and risk.
- The DA could access these records when looking for and disclosing evidence in a case.
Your child can file the petition to seal his/her juvenile record after:
- He/she has reached 18 years and successfully served his/her probation sentence, or
- Five or more years have passed since the jurisdiction of the juvenile court was terminated.
The child isn’t eligible for sealing their record if they committed an offense classified under Welfare & Institutions Code 707(b) after turning fourteen.
SB 439 Did Not Change the Fact that a Minor Can Be Tried As a Grown Up
Despite SB 439 providing relief for minors under 12 years, it doesn’t change the law on prosecuting children as adults. Per the law, any juvenile offender aged 16 years and above can be prosecuted in adult court. Crimes that can make your child be tried in adult court are, among others, murder, aggravated mayhem, robbery, carjacking, kidnapping, and other WIC 707(b).
As far as prosecuting a minor as a grown-up is concerned, the judge schedules a fitness hearing to determine whether the minor is fit to go through the juvenile court process or not. He/she considers the following factors in establishing whether the minor will benefit from the juvenile’s court rehabilitative services:
- The severity of the offense
- The past criminal record
- How successful the previous attempts for rehabilitating the child were
- The degree of criminal sophistication the child exhibited
In case the judge rules that rehabilitation won’t benefit your child, the minor is taken to adult court.
Find a Skilled Juvenile Delinquency Defense Lawyer Near Me
Children usually act and make mistakes without considering the repercussions of their actions. It’s part of their growth and development process. These children shouldn’t be judged harshly and made to go through the justice system that could affect them psychologically and emotionally. SB 439 has made sure of this to a given extent. With SB 439 in place, children’s mistakes should also not follow them into their future. Unfortunately, the juvenile justice system does not share the same opinion and is more concerned with proving the child committed a mistake, which leaves a criminal record.
At the Van Nuys Criminal Attorney law firm, we consider minors developing members in our communities who have to be given all benefits the law can offer, including SB 439. We may help defend your child’s rights if he/she is facing charges in Van Nuys, CA. Contact us today at 818-484-1100 to schedule a free consultation.
This article is for you if you are a parent/ guardian and your minor faces arrest for a crime in California. You could feel powerless and confused when your minor goes through the harsh criminal justice system. Fortunately for you, parents have particular rights in California juvenile delinquency cases.
For example, you have the right to know when your child faces arrest, what crime they committed, and to hire a defense attorney to represent them in court. Then again, the law expects you to perform particular obligations like compensating the state for the expense of your child’s support and care while in custody or the plaintiff.
Navigating the California justice system alone is challenging, so you want to hire a competent attorney to help you. At Leah Legal, we have experienced criminal attorneys who cannot only advise you on your rights but also fight for your child’s rights. You cannot go wrong by working with us if your child faces criminal charges in Van Nuys, CA.
California Juvenile Cases Overview
In California, when a minor commits a crime, they are tried under juvenile law. The juvenile delinquency court has a different jurisdiction than the adult court, including procedures and terminology. After your child’s arrest, the police detain them in juvenile hall.
The probation officers have the jurisdiction to send your minor home with a citation or keep them in custody at the juvenile hall until they appear in court. The juvenile case involves different court hearings, including detention, transfer, adjudication, and disposition hearings.
During the detention hearing, the juvenile judge determines if your minor should remain in juvenile hall until the case is resolved. In the transfer hearing, the court determines if your minor’s case should remain in juvenile court or be transferred to an adult court. Adjudication involves trying your child in front of a judge rather than a jury. If the juror sustains the charges against your minor, the final sentence is made during the disposition hearing.
You have various rights from the start to the end of your child’s case, including:
- A Right To Receive A Notification About Your Child’s Arrest And Detainment
As mentioned above, your child is detained in juvenile hall after their arrest in California. The arresting officer should notify you of your minor’s arrest. It is devastating not seeing your child come home and you are unaware of their whereabouts. That is why your right to be notified if the minor is arrested should be observed.
Knowing about your child’s arrest prompts you to look for legal solutions like having the minor released on bail, settle the case out of court, or hire an attorney. However, you have no right to be present during your minor’s investigation. You could advise your minor to remain silent or exercise their Miranda rights until they speak to an attorney. Exercising Miranda rights is vital as law enforcement seeks any information to build a case against your child and helps the child avoid incriminating themselves.
Note that you could visit your child when they are in custody. The visits are not confidential as the interrogation rooms have surveillance cameras that could record your conversation with the minor. You want to avoid the urge to ask your minor questions regarding the crime even if the police are not physically present. Remember to seek legal guidance before visiting your child while they are in the juvenile hall.
- A Right To Be Informed Of Your Child’s Constitutional Rights
California law protects the rights of defendants and suspects of all ages. Your minor has various rights regardless of the offense they commit that should be respected during arrest through trial. As a parent, you also are required to be informed of your child’s constitutional rights. Since minors are aged below 18 years, their parents and guardians should ensure their children’s rights are observed.
Your child could be traumatized for undergoing arrest or even the juvenile justice system. Because of the shock your child could experience, they could incriminate themselves when speaking to the law enforcers. If you know your child’s rights, you know the ideal advice to offer them. When fighting a juvenile case, your minor has various constitutional rights, including:
- A law enforcer must have probable cause before arresting or searching your minor.
- In case your child is put in jail and is not released, the law allows them to use a phone to call you. That means you could look for and hire an attorney fast and have your minor walk out of jail. The police violate the child’s Miranda rights should they deny them a phone call. As a result, the court could rule that the information the police gathered is inadmissible.
- Law enforcement should tell your minor the charges they could face after the arrest.
- Your child has a right to legal representation in juvenile court. You want to contact an experienced lawyer immediately after your minor’s arrest.
- Your child has the right to examine the plaintiff’s witnesses. Even if the juvenile court has a different approach to an adult court, your child has the right to question the witnesses invited to testify against them.
- Your minor has the right to have allegations against them proven beyond a reasonable doubt. The prosecutor must prove that your minor is guilty before the court considers them delinquent.
- A Right to Seek An Attorney’s Help
You could easily blunder in court if you decide not to hire a criminal lawyer to represent your minor in court. When your child is facing charges, you have the right to seek legal counsel under California Welfare and Institutions Code 627.5. If you cannot afford to hire a private defense lawyer, the state should provide you with one.
Note that hiring an attorney has a myriad of benefits to you and your child. You could focus on other projects while the lawyer interviews witnesses and gathers pieces of evidence. Since a lawyer is trained to handle criminal cases, you and your child gain confidence that you will achieve a positive outcome.
You want to confirm certain aspects to ensure your lawyer is ideal for handling your child’s case, including:
Many Years Of Experience
You want to work with a lawyer who has worked for many years and learned the ropes of juvenile cases. The lawyer must also have experience with criminal cases and have won several of them. Note that an attorney experienced with handling adult cases could not be ideal for your minor’s case.
In-Depth Knowledge On Juvenile Cases
Your attorney must have studied for the specific practice area in law school apart from having an incredible experience. Working with a learned attorney is vital because of reasons like:
- A knowledgeable lawyer can identify the possible consequences of your minor’s crime.
- They know common strategies and tactics that the p[rosecution uses.
- They can discern the character and tendencies of the judge handling your minor’s case.
- They know where and how to look for the availability of treatments, programs, and other alternative sentences.
They Are A Local Criminal Lawyer
Each state has laws that differ from those of another state. For a smooth experience, you want to hire a lawyer with knowledge regarding California laws. Working with a local criminal attorney makes it easier for you and your child to meet the lawyer. As a result, you spend less as there are no flight costs, and you can schedule meetings with the lawyer faster.
Compatibility With You And Your Child
Compatibility is the fact that you should never overlook when hiring a lawyer. When checking compatibility, ensure the lawyer can connect well with children. The attorney must be hospitable and of good morals. You don’t want to entrust your child to someone with a questionable character.
Smooth Communication
Handling children is not the easiest thing. Often, children cannot discern what the law requires them to do when facing charges. You rely on the attorney to relay relevant and essential information to your child and in an understandable manner. Upholding steady communication between your minor and their lawyer ensures they do not miss court dates, lawyer meetings, and meeting the probation officers if need be.
- A Right to be Present During the Juvenile Court Proceedings
Many court hearings occur after your minor’s arrest and before conviction. A detention hearing is the first healing that the court holds to determine if your child remains in the juvenile hall or goes home. You should be present since the court identifies every child’s parent or guardian before detaining them. You don’t want to miss these hearings as you have the right to attend, plus you are there to offer support to your child.
The jurisdiction hearing comes after the detention hearing. During the second hearing, the court determines if the petition is correct. If you choose not to contest the petition, another hearing, the disposition hearing, is scheduled. During the disposition hearing, the court could dismiss the case or sentence the child.
If the child is sentenced to probation, the court holds a review hearing after every six months. The reviews are to know your child’s progress and how you are ensuring your child obeys the court orders.
- A Right for Your Child’s Hearing to Remain Confidential
In California, the juvenile court operates differently from an adult court. A juvenile court’s main role is rehabilitating and not punishing minors. Since the court purposes of addressing your minor’s best interests, you have the right to ask the court to hold the proceedings in private.
California Penal Code 5.530 states that the public is prohibited from attending juvenile court proceedings. However, the statute details authorized persons who could be present in court during your minor’s hearing proceedings. These people must have a direct interest or involvement in the case.
You can request the court to allow other persons in court during the juvenile proceedings. However, the minor could object to another party’s admission as long as the court rules that such presence could prejudice the case. Your attorney could help you identify who can’t be in juvenile court during your minor’s hearings.
- A Right to Inspect Your Minor’s Juvenile Court Files
California PC 5.552 gives parents and guardians the right to inspect your minor’s court file. Also, you have the right to view all probation records of your child. Under this law, you can petition the court to allow you access and review your child’s case file together with your attorney. The court requires you to explain why you should access the case files, the particular files you want to access, their connection to your minor’s case, and your role in the case.
The court reviews your application and determines if you can review the files. If your reasons show good cause, you are given access to check the documents under protective orders. The court must follow the application process to ensure your interests and those of the child and public are not compromised.
- A Right to Protect Your Minor from Coercion
California Senate Bill 203 states that minors cannot undergo custodial interrogation until they talk to their lawyers. The bill’s primary goal is to prevent children’s rights from being violated without knowing. At times law enforcers disregard the fact that they are handling minors and use force to draw information and build a case against your minor. You want your criminal attorney’s presence during interrogation.
The law described three types of coerced confessions that the court could dismiss. The first is a voluntary false confession that a psychiatric disorder is caused by wrapping up your child’s sense of reality. Because of the disorder, your child could confess as it creates a belief that it could bring fame. Secondly, your minor could confess to protect you, especially if the allegations were against you.
Lastly, it is the compliant false confession. This is a type of coerced confessions that could happen during a police interrogation. Complain false and persuaded false confessions have similarities where the minor is put in a situation that makes them doubt their memory. As a result, the minor is convinced that they violated the law. Sometimes children confess, thinking that their honesty will make the judge give a lighter penalty or forgive their crime.
Law enforcers also try using psychological abuse until the minor confesses to committing a crime. Psychological abuse involves using mental tricks and emotional ploys. For instance, the police could tell the child that they will receive harsh sentences or promise to release them if they do not confess.
- A Right to Appeal Your Child’s Case
You have the right to petition for a review hearing after disposition. You want first to write a Notice of Appeal to inform other parties that you are appealing the juvenile court’s ruling. As the parent, the law requires you to file the notice within 60 days after the disposition hearing. Also, you are required to file the notice in the court that handled your minor’s case, not the Court of Appeal. You want to consult your attorney when filing and before signing the appeal forms.
Following are the elements you must include in the appeal letter:
- A statement saying that you are appealing
- The sentence you are petitioning against
- Clearly state if you are appealing against the ruling or part of it.
- Your signature and that of your minor’s lawyer for identification purposes
Your Obligations in a Juvenile Case As a Parent
Apart from the rights you have in your child’s case, you have particular obligations, especially to cater for expenses involved. You bear the burden since children are not expected to work and should be under the care of a parent or guardian. These obligations include:
- Paying for restitution, for example, medical costs, lost wages, and damaged property.
- Covering the attorney fees if hiring a private attorney
- Covering the electronic surveillance costs
Find a Juvenile Delinquency Attorney Near Me
Juvenile offenders are not tried similarly to adult offenders. The law requires juvenile offenders to be tried in juvenile courts. These courts follow particular procedures that aim to rehabilitate minors. Since these are children in crime, parents and guardians have rights in juvenile cases. As a parent to a juvenile facing criminal charges in California, you have the right to know about your child’s arrest, charges, court proceedings, and appeal the court ruling.
While you have several rights in a juvenile case against your child, navigating the justice system is hard, especially if you don’t have juvenile law experience and knowledge. You want to hire a competent lawyer with many years of experience handling juvenile cases. Your minor’s attorney will tell you what rights you have and help with ensuring the law enforcers and prosecution alike respect them.
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we could help you fight for your rights as a parent and those of your child facing charges in Van Nuys, CA. Contact us the instant you learn about the allegations against your child at 818-484-1100. Time is of the essence! Reach out to us before the case escalates, or the court imposes severe sentencing on your child.
A transfer hearing is a juvenile court proceeding where a judge decides whether a minor should be charged as a juvenile or adult. If the judge feels like the minor will not benefit from any juvenile programs, the minor is transferred to an adult court and charged as an adult.
In Califonia, most minors accused of going against the law are arbitrated within the juvenile delinquency process. But if the minor has committed a serious crime, the judge orders the minor to be tried in a criminal court as an adult.
Only the judge can decide whether the juvenile stays in juvenile court or/is transferred. A minor transferred to adult prison is likely to face a longer sentence than adult offenders. It is essential to hire an experienced attorney who knows the juvenile laws in California to help you fight for the rights of your child. You can use a skilled attorney to stop your minor’s transfer hearings to adult courts. If you are charged with a crime in the Van Nuys area, get in touch with us at Leah Legal for help.
The California Judicial Juvenile System
In California, criminal cases among teenagers are always on the rise. There is no much difference in the crimes committed by minors to those committed by seniors; the main difference is that they are both tied in separate courts. Like the adult justice system, the California juvenile delinquency system’s major aim is public safety. In California, there are about 41% of minors felony arrests every year. Examples of these felony crimes committed by juveniles include assault, ape, grand theft, and murder.
Unlike the justice system used by adults, whose main objective is to discipline the criminals, the juvenile delinquency system’s main goal is to rehabilitate and treat the juveniles. California has some methods and programs used to tackle juvenile crimes. The application of these programs depends on the juvenile offender’s criminal background and the seriousness of the offense. Examples of these programs include:
- Incarceration
- Rehabilitation programs
- Community work
- Detention.
- Schools
- Social service organization
- Churches
The arrest of the juvenile offender is the first step of the juvenile justice process. Like other offenders, after a minor does something illegal, they are first arrested. Depending on the seriousness of the offense committed, the arresting officer can decide to set offenders free to their parents or take them to a juvenile hall. The juvenile facility is under the care of the probation department. This department also has a right to decide if they will register him/her or not. In case they are not taken in by the juvenile hall, he/she remains in the hands of the police officers. Note that the probation department only accepts registering the juvenile if he/she committed a serious crime.
Due to the rising violent cases among the minors, California juvenile halls are always overcrowded. This is why the department fails to register the arrested juvenile, not unless they have committed a violent related crime.
After the juvenile is registered into the juvenile facility, the probation department can choose to:
- To apply for a plea against the juvenile with the juvenile court, which is the same as filing an adult’s criminal case.
- To transfer the juvenile to an adult court with the request of the district attorney. This happens if the distinct attorney perceives that it is not okay to have your case dodged as a juvenile, depending on the seriousness of your offense.
- In case the petition goes through and the adjudication of the minor to remain at the juvenile court, the juvenile will be:
- Placed in foster care
- Sent to probation and afterward taken back to the society
- Placed on youth Authority
- Incarcerated in a juvenile ranch or camp
But if the juvenile is tried as an adult offender, they will be sentenced but placed on the juvenile Authority up to the time they turn 24 years.
The Meaning of Transfer Hearings
As seen above, minors are not always tried in the juvenile court. At times, the judge could decide to take some juvenile cases to be dodged and punished as adults. This is called the transfer hearings. This is a specific motion in a minor’s court where the judge chooses a particular case(mainly involving a serious crime) to a grown-up court system from a juvenile delinquency system. The minor will then be tried as an adult.
It is important to remember that the majority of the juveniles’ crimes are tried in the juvenile courts in California. Only a few cases are transferred to an adult court for trial. Also, note that even though the prosecutor wants to move the juvenile to another court, he/she has no power to do that. It is only the judge who has the power to do that.
If the transfer healing takes place, and the minor is tried as an adult, he/she is likely to be sentenced for a long and spend a long time in prison with fellow offenders. This is the reason why there are only a few hearing transfers that take place in serious cases. If your child has committed serious felony crimes, it is essential to seek help from a skilled criminal attorney. An experienced lawyer can halt the transfer hearings to prevent severe penalties your child is likely to experience in the adult court.
What are The Judges Considerations?
There are several factors that a judge looks at before transferring a juvenile’s case to an adult court system. They involve:
- The minor’s criminal record
- The severity of the crime committed.
- The programs available to treat the behaviors of the juvenile
- If the juvenile has had treatments before and how well they reacted to the treatment.
- The intellectual development and psychological maturity of the minor
- The social background as well as the age of the juvenile offender
Whether the rehabilitative services will benefit the juvenile offender is another consideration that the judge looks at. If it is clear that the juvenile cannot benefit from the services, he/she is transferred to a senior court.
These are some of the situations that could lead a Califonia district attorney to begin the transfer hearing:
- The minor is above 16 years of age, and the crime they have committed is a violation noted under PC 707(B) on the Welfare&Institutions or a felony.
- The minor was 18 years during their arrest for a crime they were accused of when at the age of 14/15. And the offense they were arrested for should also be under code 707(b) on the institutional welfare.
It is important to note that prosecutors will mainly initiate transfer hearing when the minor’s offense is under code 707(B) in the Welfare &Institution. Transfer hearings usually take place after the detention of the minor and prior to the dodging trial. Before the transfer, the juvenile offender has the right to be notified five days before the transfer, and the prosecutor usually does this.
For Instance: A 16-year-old minor is taken into police custody for gambling, and the minor has no criminal history before this arrest. A petition will be filed in the juvenile court on the minor. Since this is not a felony offense, the prosecutor has no power to instigate the hearing transfer. Moreso, gambling is not a crime noted under code 707(B) of the Welfare & Institution offenses.
But for instance, if a minor was arrested for murder. Murder is a serious offense and falls under felony crimes. The minor could be subjected to a hearing transfer. Since no rehabilitation or educational services could help the minor change his behaviors, the judge will transfer his /her hearings to an adult court.
Offenses That Make Minors Be Tried in Adult Courts in California
Under code 707 of the California Welfare & Institution, there is a list of various crimes that are likely to lead to the transfer hearings. Only when a minor has committed the crimes noted under this law can the district attorney initiate transfer hearings of the juvenile. Minors arrested between 14 and 15 years are not transferred to adult criminal courts not unless, when they were arrested, they had already become adults.
The following are some of these offenses:
- Kidnapping for robbery
- Torture
- Attempted murder
- A homicide involving a fetus or a person
- Ransom kidnapping
- Arson resulting in severe physical injury or arson of an occupied structure
- Lewd or lascivious actions with a child below 14 years by threat, force, or violence
- Kidnapping leading to physical assault
- Sodomy by threat, force, or violence
- Rape through threat, force, or violence.
- Kidnapping with the intention of sexual assaults
- Oral sex through threat, force, or violence
- Voluntary manslaughter
- Assault by use of weapons
- Carjacking leading to kidnapping
- Attacks by force leading to severe physical harm
- Aggravated mayhem
- Exposing a gun in a residential property that is occupied
- Exploding destructive devices to cause murder.
- Assult using destructive devices
- Bribing a witness or dissuading, under CA penal code 136.1 and 137
- Assault against an elderly over 60 years or a person living with a disability under CA penal code 1203.9
- Escape from the ranch, juvenile home, camp, forestry camp, or juvenile hall by force leading to physical harm of one of the employees.
- An offense under CA penal code 12022.5 or 12022.3 with a weapon
- Manufacturing, compounding, or selling substances that are illegal as described under penal code 11055(E) under Health & Safety Section
- Committing a crime using a gun, a felony crime described under CA penal code 16590(A)
- A vicious felony is described under CA penal code 186.22(B). The felony crime that could lead to a gang sentence
Does the Family Have the Right to Appeal the Court’s Ruling?
The consequences of the crimes above are very harsh. But if a juvenile stands a trial at the juvenile court, they will likely not face the harsh sentencing. This is why it would serve justice’s interest that the juvenile is taken to a senior’s court. This will ensure the minor will receive a punishment that fits the weight of the crime they committed. The jury will put into consideration some of these aspects before his verdict. But trying the juvenile using the adult criminal system might not always be in their best interest; this is why the family comes in with their attorney and appeals against the court’s decision.
Transfer hearings take place to see if the minor is fit to be tried in juvenile court. In case the minor loses the case, he/she is automatically transferred to an adult court. And the family has no option other than to accept that there is a possibility that their minor will serve time in prison together with adult offenders. However, they have another opportunity to appeal to the court’s decision and try convincing the jury that the programs offered by the juvenile system could benefit their loved one.
Following the first prosecution in the juvenile court, the minor has twenty days to plead the court’s decision by filing a writ petition. The family could use these few days to look for an experienced and skilled criminal lawyer to represent them and try to maintain the case in the juvenile court. These cases are complex, and only a qualified attorney can offer the help required. More so, the lawyer will be needed to create a preponderance of proof to prove to the judge that the juvenile would benefit more in the minor’s court. This means that the lawyer should also be knowledgeable on the California juvenile laws.
What Happens If the Minor Fails to Win The Appeal?
The minor is likely to lose the appeal if he/she has a past criminal history and if the case in question is severe. If she/he loses, the case is tried in adult court, and the minor is likely to face severe penalties like the adult offenders.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Transfer Adult court
Minor offenders and their attorneys do their best to have the case remain in juvenile court. However, there are some pros and cons of the case being tried in the adult court. These advantages and disadvantages include:
Pros of Adult Criminal Court
Although this has lots of disadvantages, there are a few benefits that a minor might experience from this.
One of the advantages is that everyone facing criminal charges in a court, including the juveniles, is eligible for a free and fair trial. Before determining the verdict, the jury will look at both sides of the story, which means, even if there is compelling evidence presented to the court, the court can rule that the juvenile is not guilty. An experienced attorney could find and compose a great defense against your case.
Another advantage is that in adult courts, the juries are more lenient with juveniles than adult offenders. Before making their verdict, they will request more than the normal evidence; they will need more concrete evidence. This might lead to the minor receiving fewer penalties even though they were found guilty.
Additionally, because most adult jails are always overcrowded with people, the jury may issue a lighter punishment to the juvenile. In case the court does not find enough reasons to transfer the minor to jail, they can suggest better sentencing other than sentencing.
Cons of Adult Criminal Court
The following are some of the disadvantages of fo minors in adult courts:
- The minor is likely to face severe punishments.
- In adult court, there is no wide range of punishment options as compared to the adult courts. Additionally, treatment options in juvenile court like counseling are not available in adult court.
- There is more stigma associated with the sentencing in adult courts as compared to juvenile courts.
- In adult courts, the minor may be convicted for several months in prison or jail instead of detention halls.
- It is hard to seal an adult criminal record compared to juvenile records.
Death Penalties and Life With no Parole for Juvenile Offenders in California
Although the United States Supreme Court canceled the death penalty for minors, there are still around 227 juveniles in California prisons who have been sentenced to death. These juveniles have been convicted to prison forever with no possibility for freedom and no chance for parole. The worst part, the adults they committed the crimes with will one day be free since they received lower sentencing.
In the recent past, there has been a reduction in minors’ cases being convicted to death or life with no parole. With a skilled and experienced attorney, minors can have their cases remain in the juvenile court since there are more punishment options than the adult courts and the punishment in juvenile courts is not harsh as in adult courts.
Find a Criminal Attorney Near Me
It is crucial to reach out to an experienced criminal attorney if your child faces a California transfer hearing. Our professional attorneys at Van Nuys Criminal Attorney will do their best to have the case remain in juvenile court and help the minor get fair sentencing. We believe that everyone deserves a second chance in life, and we are ready to help you fight for what is right. If you are charged in Van Nuys, CA, contact us today at 818-484-1100.
When the court declares your child a ward of the court, it takes the legal responsibility for treatment and control of them. This is a serious decision that can make you lose contact with your child and limit your authority over the child. There are instances when your child will not be placed under your care when he or she is declared a ward of court. The court will do that if it finds out that:
- Your child was previously on probation and did not reform well
- You are incapable of providing training, care, and maintenance to your child
- The welfare of your child is best taken care of when away from you
The options that are available for the ward of court range from probation to division of Juvenile Justice. When declaring your child a ward of the court, there are some considerations that the court must put in place. They are:
- Your child’s age
- The circumstances that led to your child committing the offense
- The seriousness of the offense
- The previous delinquency history of your child
Ward of court declaration may make you lose contact with your child and have no control over them. It is crucial to have an attorney to guide you through the hearing process. The attorney understands the law and will represent you by providing all the available options. He or she will increase the chances of having the decision revoked when your child is declared a ward of court. If you are in the Van Nuys area, get in touch with us at Leah Legal for legal help in all juvenile delinquency matters.
Length of Probation
Wardship may last for a specified period or continue until there is a court order to stop. Your child can be supervised or unsupervised, depending on how well he or she will carry themselves in terms of behavior. In unsupervised probation, the court puts your child under probation without a probation officer to monitor them. The court will only set the terms and conditions to be followed by your child, expecting that the child will adhere to them.
Supervised probation is where after your child is placed on probation, they are assigned a probation officer to monitor the behavior change. Some offenses may make your child be placed on supervised probation. The offenses include burglary and the possession of a controlled substance such as cocaine. Suppose your child is found guilty of committing a crime while in a foreign county; he or she may be returned to the home country and put under your custody.
Your Child’s Right In a Juvenile Court
According to California law, the rights the ward of the court is entitled to are:
- The right of family visitation – If your child has been placed in foster care far away from home, he or she has a right to be visited by their family members
- Access to the internet and computer – when your child is far from you or the guardian, they can access computers and the internet. Denial of the right may show a law that is being broken somewhere by the law enforcement officers.
- The right to gender identity – Placement of juveniles in probation facilities depends on the gender of your child. That will be done regardless of the sex outlined in the welfare record.
Conditions of the Probation
When your child is under probation, they too have some rights. There will be conditions and requirements that the minor will have to adhere to; however, they must be reasonable. The conditions of the probation should aim at rehabilitating and reforming your child. Therefore, the requirements of the conditions should:
- Related to the crime committed by the minor
- Be related to noncriminal conduct
- Forbid or ban the actions committed by the minor in the future
Probation Requirements
When your child is placed on probation, some conditions and requirements are set. Your child is expected to adhere to them. The conditions set are usually related to the specific crime that your child committed. Attending school and avoiding violating the laws in California. The conditions that will be set for your child when put on probation are:
- Being restricted to drive
- Not violating the truancy laws and attending school
- Wearing a device to monitor them
- Not engage in any related criminal activity
- Prohibition to associate with a specific group of people in the community
- Honoring the provisions and conditions for curfew
At times you will be required to attend counseling sessions with your child as one of the probation conditions. Therefore, you have to accompany your child whenever they are attending the sessions. There may be excuses for violating some conditions set. For example, your child may fail to attend school if:
- Your child is attending a dental, vision, or any other medical treatment
- Your child is sick
- The health offices have quarantined him or her
- He or she needs to attend a special occasion with the family members, such as a funeral
- Your child wants to spend time with a family member who is engaged in military duty
- He or she has jury duty
- There is a justifiable reason to miss school
As long as there is a reasonable reason for your child to miss school, that will not violate the probation conditions.
Placement Far From Home
When your child becomes a ward of the court, they may be placed far from you or the guardian. The placement is done for their child’s best interest or if the court finds out that the home probation has failed. Placement far from home can be done in different facilities that include:
- A foster home
- A private institution
- In a relative’s home
- In a public agency
Placement in a Foster Care
When the court decides to place your child in foster care, he or she will be placed far from home in an unlocked facility. The foster care may be a close relative or approved non-relatives. Other foster care facilities include group homes and licensed community care facilities. When the judge declares your child a ward of the court, there are crucial decisions regarding the medication, care, conduct, supervision, and support. Before placement, there are factors that the court should confirm.
- That you are not in a position to provide guidance, training, and education to the minor
- That your child’s need to be under supervision for monitoring
- Your child had previously been under supervision, and that there was no improvement
- It is in the best interest of your child that he or she is far from you
When choosing the facility to place your child, the court may also consider the options you and other family members will give. However, the probation officer has the final decision on where your child will be placed.
Ward of Court Confinement
Since punishment is not usually the main agenda in a juvenile case, the court may order the ward to be confined. Confinement helps to instill some form of responsibility in your child. Felony convictions are the crimes that will make your child be placed on mandatory confinement. If they have a particular mental disorder, they will be placed in an alternative program for treatment. Some of the facilities where your child can be confined include:
- A camp or a ranch
- Juvenile hall
- A juvenile home
- A juvenile justice institution
The facilities are generally found in the community that your child comes from. In case they committed a minor crime or have a mental problem, they will be placed in a private institution for recovery. Your child’s period will be confined depending on whether the crime committed is a felony or a misdemeanor. The longest length of confinement may be similar to that of an adult crime.
Division of Criminal Justice (DJJ)
It’s a treatment facility where violent and felony juvenile offenders are placed. There are some considerations that the court looks at before placing your child in a DJJ. There should be a concrete reason showing why your child should be placed in the DJJ. The court should also show the need to have your child in a juvenile justice division instead of other alternatives. The considerations are:
- The importance of addressing the victims’ injuries
- The protection and safety of the public
- The best interest of your child
- The minor’s age
- Their educational needs
- Maturity level’
- Individuals risk needs
Other Options for Your Child’s Placement
There are times when the court may consider placing your child in an extended family. In that case, the extended family becomes the legal guardian to your child and will make all the decisions regarding medical care and education. There are also instances when the court may decide to place your child in a foster agency or therapeutic foster care. If need be, they may also be placed in a treatment program out of state.
Since the juvenile courts aim to correct the child’s behavior, they will return to their home country after probation if they were placed out of their country. The time that your child will spend on probation will depend on various factors. They are:
- If your child will pose any threat to the community
- Your child has completed the treatment programs
- The needs of your child and yours
Placement hearings are then done after every six months.
Restitution, Fines, and Fees
Depending on the crime committed by your child, the court may order them to pay fines. The fines are in addition to the restitution fees. The penalties may be similar to that of an adult. For the court to order your child to do so, it must find out that your child can pay. If not, you, as the parent or the guardian, have the financial liability. If your child’s criminal activity led to any economic losses, then they will be required to pay restitution fees. The victim, in this case, includes even the immediate family of the plaintiff. In case your child caused damage to public property, they will be required to pay the restitution fees to the government to replace and repair purposes. The restitution fee includes payment for:
- Medical expenses for the victim
- Mental health services, if any
- Profits or wages lost by the victim
- Damaged or stolen goods
The restitution hearing is done to determine the amount of compensation to be done by your child. However, he or she has a right to dispute the restitution amount. Depending on how severe the crime is, your child may be required to pay:
- $100 -$1,000 as restitution fees for felony offenses
- $100 as restitution fees if the offense is classified as a misdemeanor
Your Financial Responsibilities as A Parent or Guardian
You may be liable for paying fees, fines, and restitution if your child is not in a position to do so. If you cannot do the same, you should ensure that you show your inability to pay the fees and fine. You also should show that you did not have any notice issued for liability and that you were not present during the delinquency hearing that required you to pay the fees and fines.
Hearing Held in a Juvenile Court
Your child may be required to attend either of the following hearings in a juvenile court.
Detention hearing — the detention hearing is held the third day after your child is locked up for two days. The detention hearing is held for the judge to decide whether your child will remain in custody or go home with you.
Settlement or pretrial hearing — It is a hearing meant to solve issues without going through trials. If the issues are solved at the pretrial stage, there will be no need to attend the court hearing. If not, a transfer hearing is held.
Hearing on motions — Hearing on motions is for setting the date on which specific issues will be heard. The hearing on motions can come at any time
Transfer hearing — The hearing is held to decide if your child will be tried as an adult or minor. If the judge decides to have your child tried as an adult, they will be taken to an adult court. A trial in an adult court happens if your child is more than the age of 14.
The jurisdiction hearing — It is a hearing held to decide if your child is guilty of committing the crime or not. At this hearing, it is essential to ensure that your child has an attorney to guide them on what to say. At the same hearing, the judge will present the legal defenses to increase your child’s chances of winning the case. Many are times when minors will confess and agree to the offenses they have done. If the judge finds your child guilty, then a disposition hearing is held. The disposition hearing can be held the same day as the jurisdiction hearing or scheduled on a different date. If your child is innocent, they are let go, and the case against them is dismissed.
Disposition hearing — A disposition hearing is held to decide what punishment to be imposed on your child. If not found guilty, then there will be no disposition hearing. At the disposition hearing, there are different things that the judge may order:
- That your child stays at home with you and with probation supervision for a maximum of 6 days
- That your child is better put on probation and sent to a ranch or a probation camp
- That your child should be put in a Department of Correction and Rehabilitation
- That your child is in better hands when put on probation and sent to a foster home
- You, as the parent or the guardian, should attend parenting training and counseling sessions
Review hearing — If your child is placed on probation, review hearings are held to determine their progress.
It is a requirement that during these hearing, that:
- You show up
- The judge makes the final decision in the best interest of your child. There will only be an exception if you convince the judge that your child is a good listener and will change the behavior when letting go home with you.
- The judge may involve you in the hearings by asking questions
Your child may request an interpreter if they need one.
Find a Reputable Juvenile Attorney Near Me
It’s a serious decision by the court to declare your child a ward of court. That may negatively impact your life and that of the child because you may be required to separate. You may also lose control over your child. If your child has committed a crime and is about to be made a ward of court in Van Nuys, California, it is essential to seek help from an experienced attorney. The attorney will help negotiate the options available for your child to prevent your child’s declaration as a ward of court. At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney we will represent your child in a juvenile court and present a strong defense against the case. Feel free to contact us at 818-484-1100 and consult our attorneys.
If you want to put your best foot forward when it comes time to search for a new job, you may want to seal your arrest record in California. If you’ve been arrested but none of those arrests led to a conviction, a new California law can help you make your record sparkling clean when employers and other interested parties want to take a look. To make sure that you’re ready to tackle this legal process when the time comes, it’s important for you to know everything you can about arrest sealing in California and the specific ways that qualified legal teams can help you navigate the complex framework surrounding this exciting new development in California law.
What Is an Arrest Record?
An arrest record is a log of all of your arrests that is kept by the state of California. Even if an arrest doesn’t lead to a conviction, record of this arrest will be added to your record. Every time that you have an interaction with law enforcement that leads to arrest, a record of this interaction is kept, and these records will stay on file unless you take action. All types of arrests are logged in your arrest record, so even arrests for seemingly petty offenses can follow you for decades and make it difficult to get the jobs that you want. Recent legislation, however, has made it possible to seal your arrest record, which makes it legally inadmissible for anyone but law enforcement officials to view these arrests.
What Is Arrest Sealing in California?
Arrest sealing is the process of sealing your arrest record. This process was made a matter of right with California Senate Bill 393, which was signed into law in October of 2017. Arrest sealing is now enshrined as a right of all citizens of the state of California by California Penal Code 851.87 PC, which allows California citizens to have their arrests sealed as a matter of right if the following conditions are met:
- No criminal charges were ever filed for the arrests in question.
- Criminal charges were filed, but they were later dismissed.
- The defendant was acquitted in a jury trial.
- The defendant appealed successfully to have their conviction vacated or overturned.
- The defendant completed a pretrial pre-sentencing or diversion program.
Are There Exceptions for Arrest Sealing?
Even if you were never convicted for your arrest or arrests and you meet all of the above conditions, there are still certain circumstances under which the state of California will refuse to seal your arrest. If you have arrests or convictions on your record for domestic violence, child abuse, or elder abuse, the state will refuse to consider your request to have your arrests sealed.
If even one of your arrests is for one of the above crimes, and even if you were never convicted of one of the above crimes, the state of California may be reluctant to seal any of your arrests. Technically, your arrest record must display a pattern of domestic violence, child abuse, or elder abuse for your right to have your arrests sealed to be taken away, but a judge may still see your case differently if it appears that you may be prone to these crimes. In regards to these crimes, a pattern is defined as two or more arrests or more than five arrests within a three-year period.
However, this refusal to seal your arrests can always be overturned by a judge if they feel that is in the interests of justice to do so. Therefore, your ability to seal your arrests if you have been arrested or convicted for domestic violence, child abuse, or elder abuse all depends on your ability to convince a judge that the potential situation in which these arrests or convictions remain on your record is unfair or unreasonable. This state of affairs makes it even more important for you to have a qualified arrest sealing attorney at your side when it comes time to state your case before a judge.
Should You Seal Your Arrests in California?
There may be some situations in which it might not make sense for you to seal your arrests in California. For instance, if you don’t care about the fact that potential employers, partners, and random people off the street can see information detailing all of the times that you were arrested, sealing your arrests might not matter that much to you. To most of us, however, it matters that arrest and conviction records are available for the public to see, and if you’re anything like the average California citizen, it probably makes sense to seal your arrests if you can.
Prospective employers, insurance companies, and state licensing agencies will all be interested to know about your arrest history whenever you interact with them, and sealing your arrests makes sure that these interested parties will only see a clean slate when they look you up in the California law enforcement database. Of course, these parties can also see that you were never convicted for your arrests if you don’t seal them, but you can’t trust these individuals to distinguish the fine line between arrests and convictions. Even though it’s illegal for employers in California to discriminate against job applicants if their arrests never led to convictions, it’s best to seal your arrests altogether with the help of a qualified California arrest sealing attorney.
When you seal your arrest record in California, you don’t just seal records of your arrest. You also seal any fingerprints, photos, police investigative reports, or court records that may be associated with the arrest. If you value your privacy, you should pursue the process of sealing your arrest record without delay.
Are There Alternatives to California Arrest Sealing?
As we mentioned previously, only persons who have arrests on their record that did not lead to convictions are eligible for arrest sealing in California. If any of your arrests have led to convictions, you are not eligible for arrest sealing, but you may be eligible for expungement under certain circumstances. Expungement is a process by which convictions are removed from your record, but expungement is not a right in the state of California. Instead, it is a privilege that you must work quite hard to be granted.
The reason why expungement is hard to achieve in California is that you have already been found guilty of a crime that you have been convicted of. Therefore, there is proof in the court proceedings and the conviction paperwork that you committed the crime, which means that many more conditions must be met to reverse this finding than is the case with arrest sealing. If you want to have convictions expunged from your record, it is absolutely essential that you seek the services of an attorney who is well versed in this subject.
What Particular Factors Prohibit a Person from Sealing Their Arrests?
If you have been arrested for certain crimes, you are ineligible for arrest sealing. However, you will also be ineligible for arrest sealing if a variety of other factors are at play. You will not be eligible for arrest sealing if:
- You were charged for any offenses upon which the arrest was based even if you weren’t convicted for some of the offenses stipulated in the arrest.
- The arrest was for any crime for which there is no statute of limitations under California law, such as murder, unless you were acquitted or found innocent of the charge.
- You weren’t charged because you intentionally avoided the efforts of law enforcement officials to prosecute your arrest. Leaving the jurisdiction in which the arrest was made is an example of evading charges.
- You avoided prosecution for your arrest by engaging in identify fraud, and you were eventually criminally charged for this act of identity fraud.
Can a Sealed Arrest Record Still Be Used?
While sealing your arrest record destroys this record for most purposes, it doesn’t destroy it entirely. If you are prosecuted for any other offense after your arrest record has been sealed, your previous arrest record can be used as evidence in court. If, in the course of its normal duties, a criminal justice agency finds it necessary to disclose and share your arrest record with law enforcement, they may also do so. Here are a few examples of things that do not change even if you seal your arrests:
- Sealing your arrest record does not preclude you from registering as a sex offender pursuant toCalifornia Penal Code 290 PC.
- If your arrest prohibits you from holding public office, this prohibition stays in effect even if you seal your arrest record.
- Prohibitions against owning firearms and susceptibility to California’s “felon with a firearm” law stay in effect with a sealed arrest record.
- If you are directly asked to disclose information on your arrest pursuant to the law in the case of application for public office, employment as a law enforcement officer, or in the process of licensing with a state or local agency, you must also disclose such arrest information.
Can You Seal All of Your Arrests at Once?
No, you can only seal one arrest at a time. If you want to seal multiple arrests that are on your record, you will need to submit separate petitions for each arrest.
When Should You File for Arrest Sealing?
Under Penal Code 851.8, which was the previous law in place for governing the process of arrest sealing, applicants were only provided with two years from the date of their arrest to request arrest sealing. However, the new legislation, Penal Code 851.87, provides applicants with an unlimited amount of time to seal their arrests. Even though you can now file to seal your arrest at any time, you should still get ahead of the game an seal your arrests as quickly as possible. Qualified California arrest sealing attorneys can help you learn more about the best timing when it comes to sealing your arrests.
How Do You Seal Arrest Records in California?
When you’re ready to seal your arrest, you’ll need to pursue the following process. First, you’ll need to file your request to seal your arrest either in the court where the charges based on the arrest were filed or in the city or county where the arrest took place if no charges were filed. Then, the petition must be served on both the prosecuting attorney in the city or county where the arrest took place and the law enforcement agency that made the arrest.
The petition must include the following information:
- The petitioner’s full legal name and date of birth.
- The date of the arrest in question.
- The city and county where the arrest happened.
- The name of the law enforcement agency that made the arrest.
- The case number or court number of the arrest if available.
- The names of the alleged offenses upon which the arrest was based.
- If applicable, a legal statement that the petitioner is entitled to have their arrest sealed in the interests of justice or as a matter of right.
- A statement regarding how justice would be served by arrest sealing if the petitioner is asking to have their arrest sealed based on the interests of justice.
If the petition is contested by the D.A., a hearing will be scheduled. The county where you live will determine whether you must appear in court or whether your defense attorney can represent you, and the hearing will consist of an examination of your arrest record.
How Long Does It Take to Seal Arrest Records?
After you file a petition, it generally takes about 90 days for your petition to receive a court order. Once the court issues the order to seal your arrest, the court will notify the law enforcement agency that performed the arrest, the administrators of master criminal history records, and the California Department of Justice that your records are to be sealed. Then, your record will be stamped to make it unavailable to anyone outside of the criminal justice sector.
Finding an Arrest Sealing Attorney Near Me
To get the professional help you need when it comes time to seal your arrest record in California, reach out to the qualified team at the offices of Van Nuys Criminal Attorney. Navigating the intricacies of the California penal code can be tough, but the expert legal minds at Leah Legal can make the process simple and straightforward. To receive the legal help you need, call Los Angeles Criminal Attorney Leah Legal at 818-484-1100.
A criminal history can haunt you after serving your sentence and changing your habits. It can lock you out of employment opportunities, deny you housing in specific neighborhoods and even keep you within the authority’s leash— just in case a crime happens within your area. Fortunately, if you have managed to stay out of trouble, California laws allow you to put down the weight of past convictions through a certificate of rehabilitation. At Leah Legal, we obtain certificates of rehabilitation for numerous clients in Van Nuys, CA, each year. We have the best legal team that can make it easy and fast for you to file a petition and demonstrate to the courts that you are worth a pardon.
It is hard to become a productive member of your society with a conviction history hanging on your neck. While obtaining a certificate of rehabilitation will not take a conviction off your record, it will help remove some statutory prohibitions allied with felony convictions and make it easier to obtain professional licenses.
Understanding Penal Code 4852 (Certificate of Rehabilitation)?
California’s Penal Code Sections 4852.01 to 4852.21 PC codify the regulations that touch on the Certificate of Rehabilitation (COR). This is an official court document that offers an enticing way to clear your criminal history and show that you are now an upstanding citizen, despite your criminal record. Note that the document only clears your criminal history—it doesn’t erase it.
Once you file a petition to obtain a certificate of rehabilitation, a judge will consider it and determine whether you are worth a pardon. If you are granted post-conviction relief through a COR, it will serve as an official application for a Governor’s pardon. The courts will forward the COR to the governor, although there are no guarantees that a pardon will be granted.
If you are convicted of a felony in California, you can apply for a COR through the superior court in your county. However, you may not be eligible for this option if you were convicted for a sex offense or for felony offenses which include:
- Penal Code 289(j) — forceful sexual penetration of a minor
- Penal Code 288.5 — ongoing sexual abuse of a child
- Penal Code 288a(c) — oral copulation by force or with a minor
- Penal Code 286(c) — sodomy by force or with a minor
- Penal Code 288 — child molestation)
Only sex offenders registered under Penal Code section 290 may apply for a certificate of rehabilitation. While there are other options of clearing your criminal history, applying for a certificate of rehabilitation may be your best option in certain circumstances. They include:
- If you don’t qualify for expungement because your sentence involved serving time in state prison
- If you have already had your felony expunged but need additional post-conviction relief
- If you are a registered sex offender under Penal Code section 290
It remains imperative to understand the power of a Certificate of Rehabilitation as well as its limitations. Knowing what this document can or cannot do will help you set realistic expectations.
What a Certificate of Rehabilitation Can Do
- Serve as an automatic official application for a governor’s pardon
- Restore some of the citizen rights you lost due to a conviction (like the right to own a firearm)
- Relieve you of the duty of registering as a sex offender
What a Certificate of Rehabilitation Cannot Do
- Erase your conviction— you still have to disclose your criminal history to potential employers.
- Give you a clean slate— your past conviction can still be used to impose sentence enhancement for future offenses.
Certificate of Rehabilitation Petition Process
There are requirements you must satisfy to qualify for a certificate of rehabilitation. Persons convicted of felony or misdemeanor sex offenses and were punished through probation must first obtain an expungement to have their criminal conviction removed from their record. If the courts grant expungement and seal your record from the criminal justice system, you can petition for a COR.
It remains imperative to deal with the COR application process with care. While it is perfectly okay to handle this process without involving an attorney, enlisting one can help reduce the risk of blunders that may force the courts to dismiss your petition. Filing for a COR will not cost you a dime, and the only expense you need to incur is for a skilled criminal defense attorney.
Whether to grant your request for a certificate of rehabilitation or to deny it is entirely up to the judge. This makes it wise to seek the counsel, guidance, and representation of a seasoned criminal defense attorney.
We can arrange to meet with the prosecution before your hearing and plead for their support by presenting arguments during non-formal negotiation. With the help of the prosecution, the judge may feel inclined towards granting the COR.
Some of the factors a judge may consider during the hearing include:
- Your reasons for filing a petition for a California Certificate of Rehabilitation
- Proof of residing in California continuously for the minimum waiting period (5—10 years)
- Evidence that you are employed or in school
- Your educational and professional history
- Proof of your volunteer work
- Your social or family support network
- Letters of recommendation or support from employers, friends, colleagues, professors, etc
- The individual facts of crimes you have been convicted for
- Your trial and prison history
- Whether you completed parole/ probation
- Arguments from the District Attorney and the Governor’s Office
- Other forms of evidence that support your rehabilitation, eligibility, and character
The petition for a COR should be filed with the county clear at your county superior court. The District Attorney’s Office is tasked with establishing which petitioners are eligible for a COR. Your petition will be reviewed, and investigations conducted to affirm that you qualify for the post-conviction relief.
If the District Attorney’s Office deems you an eligible candidate, the courts will schedule a petition hearing date and notify you via mail. You must send a notice of the hearing to the District Attorney and the Governor’s Office not less than 30 days before the petition hearing date.
Note that you must notify the District Attorney’s Office in each county where you have been convicted. While it is not necessary to file multiple petitions irrespective of your number of convictions, it is essential to provide the following information:
- The date of every conviction
- The county where you were convicted
- The precise charge(s) you faced
- The penalties/sentence imposed
- The date of discharge from parole/ probation or when you were released from prison
Typically, it takes 2—6 months from the hearing date for a judge to decide whether you qualify for a COR. The expected time span may vary from one county to another.
If you are deemed ineligible for a COR, you will be notified about this via mail. You may choose to file a motion with the court to receive information from the District Attorney’s Office about the cause of your petition’s denial.
California Certificate of Rehabilitation Eligibility Requirements
Your attorney can help ensure that you meet the requirements to apply for a California Certificate of Rehabilitation. The conditions you must meet include:
- You must not be serving probation for a felony conviction
- You have not been jailed after serving your criminal conviction sentence
- You have been a California resident for at least 5 years continuously
- You have been a stand up citizen for the “minimum number of years,” depending on the nature of your past conviction.
Unfortunately, you do not qualify for a California Certificate of Rehabilitation if:
- You were convicted for a misdemeanor sex crime that is not listed under Penal Code 290
- You currently serve in the U.S. military
- You are under mandatory life parole
- Your sentence involved the death penalty
- You were convicted of a felony in another state
Even in the worst of cases, there is always hope for rejoining society and becoming a productive citizen, free of your criminal conviction history. For instance, even if you are ineligible for a COR, you can still enjoy post-conviction relief by obtaining a full pardon from the governor.
Usually, you can appeal a judge’s decision, although appealing requires you to pay a fee. The decision of whether to reconsider the last judgment will still be at the discretion of the judge, making it hard to enjoy a ruling that is in your favor.
The best course of action is to wait a while and reapply for the COR in the future. We can review your case and inform you about the likelihood of your COR application being granted or denied. Additionally, we can educate you about your options based on the specifics of your past convictions.
How Long Must You Wait Before Applying For A California Certificate Of Rehabilitation?
Before you apply for a California certificate of rehabilitation, you must prove that you have gone through a “satisfactory period of rehabilitation.” This means you must have resided in California for at least 5 continuous years. The clock starts ticking from the moment you complete probation/parole or from the instance you are released from community or mandatory supervision.
Depending on the crimes that lead to your conviction, the satisfactory period of rehabilitation may be increased by 2—5 years. For instance, there is a 9—year waiting period for offenses like assault causing significant bodily harm, murder, and crimes that carry a life sentence. On the other hand, there is a 10—year waiting period for sex offenses that require you to register as a sex offender.
Is It Possible To Have The Rehabilitation Waiting Period Waived?
It is possible to have your rehabilitation waiting period waived by a California judge. Your attorney will need to convince the court that waiving this period will serve in the best interests of justice. Even though the judge has the discretion of waiving this period, it is rarely waived. Moreover, this option cannot be pursued if your offense requires you to register as a sex offender.
Benefits of Obtaining a Certificate of Rehabilitation
A governor’s pardon offers numerous enticing benefits, some of which you can enjoy by obtaining a certificate of rehabilitation. What makes a COR highly beneficial is that it serves as an automatic application for a governor’s pardon.
Other benefits you may enjoy include:
- Improved employment application prospects
- Fewer hurdles obtaining professional licenses because state licensing agencies cannot deny licensure based on your past conviction
- Relief from having to register as a sex offender
Moreover, the courts will also forward copies of the certificate to the Department of Justice, the Parole board, and the Supreme Court, which can be beneficial in some cases. If you are considered for a governor’s pardon, you qualify to have your gun rights reinstated, and you may also dodge deportation if you are a foreigner.
Once you are granted a Certificate of Rehabilitation, the FBI and the Department of Justice will place a notation showing that you have obtained post-conviction relief for the list of offenses on your certificate.
About the Governor’s Pardon
For most convicts, the only way they can obtain a governor’s pardon is by first obtaining a certificate of rehabilitation. Once the document is granted, it serves as an automatic application for the governor’s pardon, an order by the California governor granting you forgiveness for a past conviction.
The governor’s pardon is only available to convicts who demonstrate exemplary conduct after conviction and sentencing. While the pardon can clear your criminal history, it also has some limitations. For instance, it is limited to California criminal convictions and cannot pardon you for a felony or misdemeanor convictions from other states.
“Exemplary conduct” refers to completing your sentence and satisfactory rehabilitation successfully. You can demonstrate that you are worth the governor’s pardon by rejoining the society and remaining a law-abiding citizen for 5—10 years or more. Obtaining and maintaining lawful employment can also work in your favor when seeking a governor’s pardon.
Governor’s Pardon Eligibility Criteria
There are requirements you must satisfy to qualify for a California governor’s pardon. They include:
- You must have been convicted in California.
- You must have served your sentence or been released on parole or probation.
- You must have stayed away from legal trouble in California for 5—10 years.
- You must not have a history of violating probation rules.
Methods for Applying for a Governor’s Pardon
Method 1 —Obtain a Certificate of Rehabilitation
If you want to obtain a governor’s pardon, the first step is to apply for a Certificate of Rehabilitation (COR). If the document is granted, it will act as an automatic application for the California Governor’s pardon. The Superior Court, where you petition your COR, will forward your certificate to the Governor’s Office.
Method 2—Apply Directly For a Governor’s Pardon
If you don’t qualify for a COR, perhaps because you relocated from California, you have the option of applying for a governor’s pardon directly. In this case, the first step is to petition for Executive Clemency.
Executive clemency is an official plea for a pardon from the U.S. president. You need to file this plea/petition with the Pardon Attorney in the DOJ (Department of Justice) in Washington D.C. The petition will give notice of your intention to apply for executive clemency. It must be filed with the DA’s Office (District Attorney’s Office) in each county where you were convicted.
Once the DA’s Office receives the notice of intent, they will forward it to the Governor’s Office, where you can file your application for a governor’s pardon.
Whether you simply want a certificate of rehabilitation or you require an extra level of post-conviction relief by applying for a governor’s pardon, we can help. A skilled criminal attorney can prove to be an invaluable asset, especially when you cannot afford to have your applications denied.
Other Legal Options to Consider If You Have a Criminal Record In California
If you don’t qualify for a Certificate of Rehabilitation or a governor’s pardon, all is not lost. There are various other options you can explore to clear your criminal record in California. These options include:
Reduce Charges from a Felony to a Misdemeanor
Any criminal record can have a negative impact on your life. However, misdemeanors are perceived to be less serious than felonies. You may be able to have your charges reduced from a felony to a misdemeanor if:
- You were convicted for a California wobbler offense
- You have served your sentence or probation for the offense
Expungement
Another option is to have your criminal record expunged. Expungement is arguably better than a certificate of rehabilitation because it offers far more benefits. These benefits include:
- Protection from employment discrimination grounded on an expunged conviction
- Fewer hurdles obtaining professional licenses in California
- Reinstatement of your right to stand as a credible witness in court
Sealing and Destroying Of an Arrest Record
You have a right to request to have your California arrest record sealed and destroyed. You can exercise this right if:
- You have been arrested and the charges dismissed (no conviction)
- Your conviction was cleared out (vacated) on appeal
Moreover, persons adjudicated as juvenile delinquents may also qualify for California juvenile record sealing and destroying. The eligibility criterion is as follows:
- You must be at least 18 years old, or you must wait for 5—years from the adjudication
- You must not have been convicted for crimes involving immorality in adulthood
- The original conviction must not be for a serious offense like armed robbery or murder
Commutation of Sentence
If you are serving your sentence, you may qualify to have it commuted by the California governor. While a successful petition may not restore the lost civil rights, your sentence may be reduced, or you may now qualify for parole.
Find Leah Legal Near Me
If you need assistance applying for a California Certificate of Rehabilitation, we will be glad to review your case and immediately begin working on your petition. At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we have a skilled and compassionate team representing clients in Van Nuys, CA. We understand the hurdles of rejoining society with a criminal history and inform you about various options to help clear your arrest records or criminal convictions. If you have questions about post-conviction relief options, call us at 818-484-1100 for a free consultation.
This country’s members of the military go through unique personal, physical, and psychological challenges due to the nature of their work. These challenges may make them commit crimes that they otherwise wouldn’t have committed if they were in their normal state. California legislators and court systems have put this into consideration, and thus they have allowed for military diversion programs as alternative sentencing to these members instead of jail. If you’re a member of the military and your psychological problems have led you to commit an offense, you possibly may not be put in jail/prison but a military diversion program instead.
However, certain rules determine whether you go into military diversion or jail. For one, it needs to be proven that you suffer from certain conditions for you to qualify for diversion programs. For this, you will need a competent lawyer who is conversant with military rules and operations to help you out. The attorney may be able to successfully present his/her arguments as to why you need a military diversion and not jail. At Leah Legal, we have experienced military criminal defense lawyers who would fight to ensure you get the best possible outcome for your case. If you are a military member in Los Angeles and have been arrested, CA, do not hesitate to call us. This article focuses on what military diversion entails.
The Definition of Military Diversion
Penal Code (PC) 1001.80 defines military diversion as a special form of pretrial diversion. A Military diversion is a sentencing option that is an alternative to jail time for a misdemeanor conviction against active military members or veterans. You don’t have to enter a no-contest or guilty plea for you to obtain a military diversion. Instead, what happens is that the court postpones the proceedings while you participate in an education and treatment program.
After completing the education and treatment program, the charges you are facing will be dropped. If you fail to complete this program, the court will resume the criminal proceedings against you. Also, California offers a similar program of mental health diversion whereby a participant can also have his/her charges dropped and their criminal record sealed.
Conditions that Qualify a Defendant to Join Military Diversion Program
You may be eligible for military diversion in case, because of your military service, you suffer from:
- Military sexual trauma
- Substance abuse
- Traumatic brain injury (TBI)
- Mental health issues
- Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
The problems mentioned above must have occurred due to your military services. Also, note that military diversion option is usually available only to first offenders. In case you have been previously convicted of the same crime you are facing now, you will be sent to a Veteran’s Court. This court provides a higher level of structure as well as supervision compared to military diversion. We shall discuss it in detail later in the article.
As we said earlier, a military diversion program will be an option for you only if you are facing misdemeanor charges. Typical misdemeanor crimes that affect veterans or military members include but not restricted to:
- DUI
- Misdemeanor assault & battery
- Narcotic possession
There is usually a process involved for you to be approved for military diversion. First, your criminal defense lawyer has to request the court if it could get the diversion. Then, the court might or might not require doing an evaluation to assist it in reaching a decision. In case the court approves that you are eligible, and provided you consent, you’ll be put in a pretrial military diversion program. Then, criminal proceedings against you will be suspended for not more than two years as you receive treatment.
Treatment Programs You Can Use
The judge evaluates whether you ought to be directed to join a community or federal-based treatment program. Preference is given to those treatment programs with a track record of effectively treating persons suffering from trauma because of their military services. Examples of these programs are those run by the U.S Department of Veterans Affairs or the U.S Department of Defense. The treatment program you are ordered into, and the court may team up with the U.S Department of Veterans Affairs to maximize services and benefits provided to veterans.
If you are ordered to undergo treatment for mental health, the court might also refer you to a reputable mental health facility in the county. This is provided the facility is willing to accept accountability for:
- Your treatment
- Filing of progressive reports in court
- Coordination of suitable referral to veterans service officers in the county
Other Terms for Participation
You have to comply with all conditions the diversion program you are assigned, or the court imposes. These conditions include, among others:
- You have to attend treatment sessions
- You must undergo counseling for substance abuse or domestic violence (as appropriate)
- You have to agree to random drug/alcohol testing
- The agency running the program must prepare progress reports
The agencies/agency running your assigned program will give the reports on your progress to the prosecutor and court not less often than after every six months. Generally, any military diversion program lasts twelve to twenty-four months. As the law provides, criminal court proceedings against you can only be postponed for a maximum of two years.
Note that military diversion can be terminated before you complete it. As earlier mentioned, the responsible agencies or agency will be filing reports with the prosecuting attorney and court on your progress at least after six months. After the court goes through the reports, it might, at any point, convene a hearing should it appear that:
- You aren’t performing satisfactorily in that program, or
- You aren’t benefiting in any way from the services and treatment the military diversion program provides
If the judge determines that the treatment isn’t working, he/she may end the diversion, then resume the criminal court proceedings against you.
Your Arrest Record Will Be Sealed Should You Complete Your Military Diversion Program
After you complete your treatment program, the charges against you will be dropped. When this happens, no authority or person may use your record of diversion or arrest without your permission in any manner that could cause a denial of benefits, certificates, licenses, or employment. Therefore, when responding to any question concerning your previous criminal record, you can honestly indicate that you weren’t arrested or ordered into a diversion program for the crime.
However, we have an exception when you’re applying to be a peace enforcement officer. Here, you must disclose that you were arrested when answering the direct question in the application or questionnaire for the position of a peace enforcement officer. Also, the Justice Department may disclose the record in reply to your application request.
Also worth noting is that if you were arrested for drunk or drugged driving and your license got suspended, it will not necessarily be returned after you have completed the program. Even though military diversion covers misdemeanor DUI offenses, completing the diversion program doesn’t prevent the DMV from taking administrative actions. One of these actions includes suspending your license.
PTSD Can be a Legal Criminal Defense
In an applicable case, a criminal defense lawyer can raise post-traumatic stress disorder as a valid defense to an offense. A PTSD defense falls within the insanity defense. Also, an attorney can raise PTSD as proof of mitigation. Even though mitigation is not a complete defense, it may help you receive a lenient treatment, especially during felony sentencing.
- PTSD as an insanity defense
You can enter a not guilty plea on the grounds of insanity. That is, your attorney can argue that you committed the offense when you were legally insane. For a defendant to be considered legally insane, it means that during the commission of the crime, he/she:
- Didn’t comprehend the nature of his/her act
- Couldn’t distinguish between what is right or wrong
You have to prove that you were insane by a preponderance of the evidence. By this, it means that you have to make the jury think it’s more likely than not that you were insane during the commission of the offense. If you successfully show this, then you will be taken to a mental hospital where you will be committed and receive treatment rather than going to prison.
- PTSD as evidence of mitigation
Even if post-traumatic stress disorder cannot be applied as a valid defense under the context of insanity, it may still be used as mitigation proof. When used as evidence of mitigation, you will have to prove that due to emotional trauma, you shouldn’t be blamed for your conduct. You should show that you would have acted otherwise were it not for the trauma. After this argument, the court may be persuaded to sentence you to reduced jail time. Or, it may sentence you to a treatment program or probation instead of jail.
Post-Conviction Treatment In Lieu of Jail (PC1170.9)
PC 1170.9 and PC 1001.80 are similar. The only difference between these two is that PC 1170.9 applies after the defendant in question has entered a guilty or no contest plea to an offense or the court has found him/her guilty. Like PC 1001.80, PC 1170.9 permits the court to convict veterans or active military members to treatment in lieu of jail or prison. Also, the offense must have been as a result of TBI, sexual trauma, PTSD, mental health issues, or substance abuse arising because of their serving in the U.S military.
Before, PC 1170.9 was limited only to combat military veterans. However, in 2010, this law was amended to get rid of the requirement to be a combat veteran. PC 1170.9 works in a way that if you fall within it, a hearing has to be held to determine if you are eligible. If the court rules that you qualify for the alternative sentencing, you will then face a treatment program sentence instead of prison or jail.
Treatment programs under Penal Code 1170.9 last for a duration that doesn’t surpass that which you would’ve spent in custody. Certain defendants get sentenced to probation under PC 1170.9 and ordered to enroll in a residential program of treatment. If this happens to you, you will receive sentence credits for the actual period you spent in that residential treatment.
For you to be eligible for enrolment into a treatment program under PC 1170.9, you have to qualify for a probation sentence. Due to this requirement, Penal Code 1170.9 isn’t an option in certain types of cases. For instance, cases that involve violent felony offenses and serious felonies in California do not carry a probation sentence as a punishment. As a result, these crimes won’t apply under PC 1170.9.
Even if you technically qualify for probation, alternative sentencing under Penal Code 1170.9 isn’t an option unless the court actually sentences you to probation.
Veteran’s Courts
Recently, several court systems in California counties have established special veteran’s courts. Examples of court systems that instituted veteran’s courts include the Superior Courts in San Bernardino, Orange, Los Angeles, and Ventura Counties. The design of veteran’s courts is similar to that of any other collaborative court, for example, homeless court and drug court. These courts strive to resolve fundamental problems like mental health problems and substance abuse that result in crime, to begin with. Veteran’s courts and military diversion are similar, but veteran’s courts provide quite a higher magnitude of supervision and structure.
Generally, veteran’s courts only take on nonviolent offenders. But, the Combat Veteran’s Court in Orange County, which is also the first one of its type in California, takes on violent offenders sometimes.
How Veteran’s Courts Work
After a veteran has been admitted into the court’s program, he/she is allowed to have a group of participants. These participants include the judge, defense attorney, Veterans Administration caseworker, and prosecutor. These team members are supposed to work together on designing ways and assisting the veteran in question through an all-inclusive treatment plan. If the veteran completes the program successfully, his/her charges are usually dismissed under PC 1170.9.
Another critical point to note is that the veteran might have the mechanisms to cope and systems to support them. These may enable them to productively and positively mingle with mainstream society.
Alternative Sentences for Felony Charges
Even if you aren’t facing misdemeanor charges, you may still get relief for the felony charges against you. Under PC 1170.9, one may be eligible for an alternative sentence when facing DUI charges or a felony.
California law dictates that any former or current member of any branch of the United States Military who might be suffering from the following
- TBI
- PTSD
- Military sexual trauma
- Mental health issues, or
- Substance abuse due to their military services and get charged with an offense are entitled to an alternative sentence.
In Los Angeles, the veteran’s court that has been established allows several felonies and DUI charges that qualify to be accorded special treatment. The veteran’s court program is an intense one and requires a full commitment. However, if the defendant is successful, his/her charges will be reduced, and the case may even be dismissed.
Here are a few of the advantages of participating and completing a veteran’s court program:
- You will have a higher chance of getting probation
- The felony charges you are facing may be reduced to a misdemeanor
- Receiving treatment in lieu of jail or prison time for given crimes
- Probation conditions may be considered satisfied early (except for restitution), and probation may be terminated earlier than expected
- A veteran’s court program may permit the court to dismiss penalties, restore your rights, or vacate the conviction for given crimes
Is Military Diversion Program the Best for You?
It is no doubt that military diversion programs are a useful tool for several members of the military, including veterans. However, before you decide if the diversion is the right option for you, have to consider a few things. These include the facts of the charges against you, proof you or the prosecution has, and your past criminal history. In certain cases, diversion might not be the best for you.
At Leah Legal, before advising you on what to do, we will first do a comprehensive investigation to determine whether military diversion is appropriate for alternative sentencing. We will employ proactive measures to assist you in determining the required steps that will prevent you from having a conviction on your record. Reach out to us for a consultation where we will discuss whether or not a military diversion program is the best option for your situation.
Find a Military Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
As we have seen, you don’t automatically qualify for military diversion until you have proven yourself before the court that you deserve it. The best person to help you do this is a criminal defense attorney. The lawyer you choose may be the difference between getting the treatment you need and going to jail/prison. Apart from getting treatment, your arrest record will be sealed once you complete your assigned military diversion program successfully. If you are a military member or veteran in Los Angeles and have been arrested, call Van Nuys Criminal Attorney at 818-484-1100. Our attorneys will evaluate your case and inform you whether or not you qualify for military diversion.
People who face felony charges are usually sentenced to state prison or county jails. Some of these offenders have to undergo parole after serving a prison/jail term. Parole is a program that helps the inmate to serve their sentence in the community while observing specific terms and conditions. The parole conditions will depend on the type of sentence that you are facing. If you are in Van Nuys, you can contact us at Leah Legal to help you understand if you are eligible for parole and how we can help you.
Facts about California Parole Program
The parole program was not as popular or developed as it is today. Before 1977, parole boards had concerns over the rehabilitation of an inmate through the prison system other than the parole program. Therefore, there were hardly any parole dates set for those who were eligible for the program.
The California legislature was unhappy with this process since they believed that an inmate would only serve a sentence that is proportional to the offense that he or she has committed. Therefore, if one has served the time that falls under the sentence, one should be paroled. However, one cannot go through the program if he or she poses a risk to the safety of the public. This applies to those that have been convicted with life imprisonment, once they have served the determinant period.
A parole board determines whether a prisoner is eligible for parole. It consists of 17 commissioners appointed by the governor. This board is responsible for conducting a hearing for both determinate and indeterminate inmates. The hearing for indeterminate inmates is considered lifer hearings since they face life imprisonment.
Please note, a determinate inmate is deemed eligible for parole at the end of a sentence. Also, the fact that you have the chance of getting parole does not mean that it is automatic. You need to meet some aspects to be eligible for the program.
Factors that Determine Eligibility for Parole
Eligibility for parole depends on the kind of sentence that one is serving and the good time credit that one has achieved while in prison. Here is a detailed view of these factors.
Determinate Sentence
A determinant sentence is a sentence that runs for a particular number of years. For instance, if you are convicted for five years in prison, this means that the five years of imprisonment are determinant.
Indeterminate Sentence
This is a sentence that runs for an indefinite number of years. It is usually referred to as a sentence of a specific number of years to life. The number of years provided is the determinate part, while the “life” represents the indeterminate. When a judge is convicting someone with an indeterminate sentence, but without a specific number of years, the minimum eligible parole is usually seven years.
Work Time Credit or Good Time
Sometimes inmates have the chance of earning good time credit or work time credit while serving their prison sentence. The credit allows them to serve part of their sentence and become eligible for parole.
Initially, inmates with good time credit would only serve half of the determinate sentence before being released on parole. However, this changed and required them to serve two-thirds of their sentence to be eligible for parole. The decision was later overruled, and inmates turn back to serving half of the sentence through a “day to day” credit due to overcrowding in jails and prison.
Nevertheless, not all felony inmates are eligible for the half-term sentence parole. Those that are convicted under California violent felonies are required to serve 85% of their prison sentence before being eligible for their parole. California violent felonies include first-degree burglary, rape, and lewd act on a minor below the age of 14 or child molestation.
Finally, two classes of inmates cannot earn any good time credit. These include those convicted for murder and those with previous convictions for two or more prior felonies. Inmates who are under this category should serve the entire determinate period to be eligible for parole.
The parole board must determine whether you are ready to re-enter society if you do not pose any risks to the safety of the public. Some of the other factors that the board can consider are:
- The extent of your underlying offense
- Your motivation towards committing the crime
- Whether you committed the crime in a heinously
- Signs of remorse
- Age
- Psychological evaluations
- Your attitude towards the parole program
- You lack insight
- The possibility of integrating into society through community support, job, and family.
Changes in California Parole Program
Laws related to California parole are always changing. Whenever a new law goes into effect, it does not usually affect inmates who were previously convicted under the former law. Instead, it works for prospective and future inmates. That’s why it is necessary to understand the minimum eligible parole date once you are convicted.
One of these changes is the effort to improve parole supervision and reduce the rate at which parolees re-enter into criminal activities. That’s why the California Department of Corrections, which oversees the California parole program, came up with a new parole program back in January 2010.
This new program is meant to achieve three goals, which are:
- To reduce recidivism through the completion of rehabilitation programs that can offer substantial-good time credit. This includes programs like inmate firefighting
- Improving the supervision of parolees with high risk by hiring more parole officers and implementing new low-risk parolees management programs that will help them to reduce chances of repeating an offense
- Using community partnership to supervise parolees with minor convictions and sending them to local correctional facilities rather than sentencing them to the state prison
Understanding Parole Officers and What They Do
Once an inmate gets parole, he or she is expected to answer to a parole officer or agent. The agents have the responsibility of protecting the public and helping the parolees in re-entering into the community. The state is responsible for hiring these officers, and they work directly with the Department of Corrections.
These agents report directly to the Board of Parole Hearing, plan, and make recommendations before the release of their inmates. They also help the parolees in arranging services such as housing, social activities, employment, medical care, and social services.
It is the responsibility of the parole officer to investigate allegations claiming that the parolee has violated parole. After that, the agent will recommend to the parole board to allow the parolee to remain on parole or revoke the parole and rearrest the individual.
Qualification for Parole Agent in California
Some high standards have been institutionalized to meet the requirements for California parole officers. Eligible candidates must meet the following criteria before joining the department:
- At least 21 years or older
- Bachelor’s degree or associate degree with two years of experience in correction or law enforcement. Some of the courses that one must be qualified include criminology, psychology, sociology, and correctional science. A recognized school must offer the course
- A United States citizen or an alien with permanent residency status
- A minimum of a year of professional experience in psychiatric care, parole or probation, and has passed a background check
- Can pass a physical fitness test that considers components such as upper body strength, bicycle endurance test, grip strength, and sprint bicycle test
Apart from the factors that make one eligible to be a parole agent, several other factors can prohibit one from such an opportunity. These factors include participation in illegal drug activities, marijuana use, having an active warrant, and pending criminal prosecution. Also, you might be disqualified from the application if you have a recent driving violation, DUI, court probation, and a military court-martial.
Parole Agent Training in California
Once you have met all the requirements needed for a California parole agent, you must go through a ten-week training program at the Parole Agent Academy. Here, you will be trained in three areas, which include academic, firearms, and tactical skills. This three courses will consider:
- Shotgun use
- Chemical agents
- Arrest and control techniques
- Casework
- 9mm semi-automatic pistol training
- Practical skill demonstration
- Your duties and responsibilities as a parole officer
Levels of Parole Supervision in California
When an inmate has managed to secure parole, he or she will go through six levels to achieve complete integration into society. The parolee might experience increased or decreased supervision according to the needs and the extent of risk that they pose to society. These levels are as follows:
- Intensive re-entry, which enhanced surveillance once one has been re-released into the community
- Regular re-entry, which allows temporary acquisition of housing and employment once a person has been re-released into the community
- Specialized caseloads, which guarantees concentrated and intensive services for parolees at high risk
- Case management supervision, which allows a lesser supervision o a parolee who has demonstrated that he or she can successfully integrate into the community
- Electronic surveillance, which allows 24-hour electronic monitoring as part of enhanced supervision if found necessary
- Personal care and subsistence, which will enable parolees to transit to services like clothing, cash, parenting education, and transportation once they re-enter the community
Non-Revocable Parole Program
There is a different form of parole where a parolee does not have to report to a parole agent. This means that it is not-supervised like the regular one. This law came into effect on 25th January 2010. Not every inmate is eligible for this program, and is limited to people who meet the following criteria:
- Inmates who have not registered as sex offenders in California
- Inmates without serious felony convictions such as lewd act with a child below the age of 14, or any other conviction stated-above
- Someone who has not been convicted as a sexually violent predator and does not have a previous sexual, violent offense
- An inmate who is not a validated gang associate or member
- Someone without a designated serious disciplinary offense while serving imprisonment
Please note, parolees under the non-recoverable parole program are not relieved from any requirements needed during parole. They must comply with the conditions provided by the Board of Parole Hearings. However, when one commits a crime, he or she will be charged and will be subject to the legal consequences that apply for that specific offense.
The non-recoverable parole program benefits the state and the Department of Correction in one way or another. With this program, low-level offenders are removed from parole supervision, which allows the program to focus on parolees with serious criminal convictions. The program also allows law enforcement to continue and maintain search without a warrant on these parolees, reduce the number of parolees returned to custody after violating parole, and depopulate county jails and the state prison.
Conditions for California Parole Program
A parolee has to follow certain conditions while on parole. These parole conditions comply with special terms depending on the specific offense that one has committed and criminal history. Generally, the conditions that California parolees have to consider are:
- Submission to a search on you and property without a search warrant
- Restrictions from leaving the state without a permit
- Waiving of the extradition if found outside California
- Reporting to a parole agent one day after you have been released from prison or jail
- Report your work and residence address to the parole officer
- Report your new residence to the parole officer before you move
- Report to the parole officer within three days after changing your job
- Request for a travel pass if you intend to leave one county to the other for more than two days
- Get advice from a parole agent if you get a ticket or arrested
- Restriction from the use or possession of firearms or bullets
Apart from the general conditions issued to the parolee, there are specific conditions that one might be imposed. One might be restricted from contacting the victim or victim’s family within a particular distance, which is typically 100 yards. This includes the victim’s place of employment or residence. Also, the parolee might be restricted from using the internet and associating with known gang members.
Violation of Parole Conditions
Once a parolee violates parole conditions, he or she will risk the possibility of having the parole revoked. The Board of Parole Hearings governs the revocation hearing, although a single deputy commissioner oversees the whole process. The deputy commissioner is hired similarly to a civil servant rather than an appointment by the California governor.
Penal Code 3056 provides that a parolee should be held in county jail, awaiting the revocation hearing. If the revocation goes through, the inmate will have to return to the state prison and serve the remaining sentence period.
The deputy commissioner must determine whether the parolee should return to prison and how long one should serve a sentence. If the deputy commissioner decides to revoke the parole, the parolee will face imprisonment for a maximum of a year.
If the parolee misconducts while in prison for violating the parole conditions, he or she may end up having an addition of twelve months extended in the prison term. Please note, although the maximum imprisonment period is one year, the district attorney might start a new case file against the inmate, which is separate from the parole revocation. If the case goes through, the inmate will end up being imprisoned for the new offense.
The parole hearing has two components. This includes the preliminary hearing or the probable cause hearing and the final parole revocation hearing. The likely cause hearing is held first to consider whether there is a probable reason to proceed to the final revocation hearing. It means that there is a reasonable suspicion that the parolee violates parole condition.
Both hearings are conducted similarly, and the parolee’s criminal defense attorney has the entitlement to provide defenses to mitigate the accusations. At the same time, the state will be giving evidence that supports why the parole needs to be revoked.
According to the 2005 California parole laws, the parolee should be retained until the parole gets released after winning the probable cause hearing. The parolee is also retained until the parolee is released after the hearing or gets re-imprisoned.
If the deputy commissioner resolves that a violation occurred, he or she will order a final parole revocation hearing to determine whether to provoke or reinstate the parole.
Defenses for California Parole Revocation Hearing
Since a parolee has the right to seek professional legal assistance, your attorney should employ relevant legal defenses to fight against the charges that are leveled against you. The state has high chances of winning the case, unless you prove that the allegations are not true and the situation involves serious mitigation circumstances. Some of the defenses that your criminal attorney can use are false allegations and breach of your parole hearing violation rights.
Find a Parole Legal Advisor Near Me
There are a lot of considerations involved in the California parole program. These considerations require a professional attorney to ensure that the rights and expectations of the parolee are considered. Van Nuys Criminal Attorney offers credible legal services to anyone seeking parole in Van Nuys. For more information about our services, contact us at 818-484-1100 and schedule a consultation with us.
A murder sentence comes with severe penalties. For instance, you could face life imprisonment and sometimes even the death sentence based on the specific facts of the case. However, under certain circumstances, you don’t have to face these penalties. Under California law, it is now possible to have your murder sentence removed from your criminal record. This is made possible by filing a petition.
At Leah Legal law firm, we can assist you or a loved one convicted of PC 187 murder through this process. Our attorneys are familiar with California law and all the changes it undergoes. They also have profound experience helping Los Angeles residents with legal matters. Thus, you can be confident they will accord you the assistance you need. The following sections explain the law on a petition to vacate a murder sentence.
What Vacating a Murder Sentence/Conviction Means
The word ‘vacate,’ as used in law means overrule or declare something null & void. Court judgments can be vacated due to mistakes that are so significant that they can affect the outcome. Your conviction can be vacated only if a court decides that you are eligible for the vacation. For you to be eligible, you have to meet various requirements of the law as we shall discuss later. After, the court vacates your conviction; the sentence will be deleted from your criminal record.
To kick off the process to vacate your murder conviction, your attorney has to present a motion before the court. Other parties to participate in your petition are the prosecuting attorney who works under the DA’s office and his/her team. Every U.S state has its independent laws that address the vacation of criminal judgments. The petition your attorney will file has to follow States’ laws on murder for you to stand a chance of having the conviction vacated.
California Laws that Permit You to File a Petition to Vacate Your Murder Conviction
Under the pre-existing California murder law, first-degree murder is a murder offense committed in the commission or attempt to perpetrate different felonies. These felonies include arson, sex crimes, robbery, carjacking, train wrecking, burglary, mayhem, kidnapping, and torture. First -degree murder penalties under the current murder law include life in California State prison (with no parole) or twenty-five years to imprisonment for life California state prison. On the other hand, the penalties for a second-degree murder include fifteen years to imprisonment for life.
However, recently, a new murder law was passed. The Governor of California, Jerry Brown, signed into a new law Senate Bill (SB) 1437 on the 30th of September 2018. This law enables offenders who have reason to believe their conviction was biased to file a petition in court seeking for their sentences to be overruled. Thus, the new law changed the murder law that pre-existed. This is so because, now, individuals that can be charged with murder are limited only to three categories:
- Those showed the intent to commit murder
- Those that committed actual murder
- Offenders that aided and abetted the killing
Before SB 1437 was enacted, California laws on murder didn’t have any exceptions for offenders. Offenders sentenced for murder were not allowed to present a petition in court contesting the verdict. But, with the introduction of this law, unfairly convicted offenders can seek justice. The good feature about this law is; it’s retroactive. This means individuals that were sentenced or alleged to have committed a murder offense by the previous law can petition their sentence. If the petition is successful, a person’s murder charges will be reduced or dropped entirely.
The main reason SB 1437 was enacted is to ensure all California criminal convictions are handled justly. In the long run, the law will help to lower overcrowding in state prisons. Congestion will be reduced because long sentences that aren’t equated to the offenders’ liability as actual murderers are the leading cause of overcrowding in prisons.
The Process of Filing Petition to Vacate a Murder Conviction
The rules to follow when submitting a petition to vacate a murder conviction are highlighted under PC 1170.95. Even though the law doesn’t provide the statute of limitations for presenting the petition, you’ve to meet certain eligibility requirements. The requirements are as listed below:
- The charges against you allow the prosecuting attorney to argue the case under a ‘felony murder’ or ‘natural & probable consequences’ theory.
- You were convicted of first or second-degree murder after entering a plea bargain instead of a trial or after a trial.
- You can’t face a first/second-degree murder conviction as a result of the changes that SB 1437 brought to the law.
A petition to have a murder conviction vacated is brought in a similar court where your sentence took place. After filing the petition, your lawyer has to serve petition copies to the D.A involved in your sentencing. In case the judge that delivered judgment isn’t present, the presiding judge appoints a different judge who provides a ruling on your case. Your petition should include:
- The year you were convicted
- Your case number
- Your declaration acknowledging you are entitled to a conviction vacation under SB1437 depending on the above requirements.
- Whether you request counsel appointment.
If the details are as required and the court confirms that you are eligible, your case proceeds to a trial. The District Attorney is allowed time to respond by filing a response. Your attorney will also be given time to submit a reply. Additionally, the court determines whether or not a hearing for your case should be conducted. Your attorney and the prosecution) refer to your record of conviction to either support or contest the case.
Your murder conviction can be vacated in the prosecution fails to show beyond any reasonable doubt that you are ineligible. Also, your sentencing may be resentenced to a shorter period or reduced altogether. Usually, people whose sentences are resentenced receive certain credits for all the term they served previously. Often, judges will have them serve parole for up to three months once they complete the sentence
However, if any necessary details are missing or the court cannot readily ascertain them, your application may be denied without prejudice. The court will then advise you that it can’t rule on your petition if there’s no necessary information. The good news is that in case your petition is denied on this basis; it won’t prevent you from re-petitioning when essential information is available.
Facts that Make an Offender Ineligible for a Murder Sentence Relief Under SB 1437
Even though SB 1437 provides little relief to offenders convicted of murder, it has its exceptions. You will be entitled to the relief in case the prosecution proves the following:
- You are the real killer of the victim
- You didn’t kill but aided and abetted the real killer with the intent to kill
- The murder victim was a law enforcement officer who was in his/her line of duty
- You were the main participant in the perpetration of the murder and acted with great disregard to human life
Petition Hearing Procedures and Formalities
As per PC 1170.95c, the prosecuting attorney should file a response to your petition and serve it to your attorney in sixty days of receiving the notice. Your attorney will then have thirty days after being served to reply to the case. The court could choose to prolong the time for replies and responses based on the good cause established by either party. If you prove before the judge that you are eligible for relief, the judge on your case issues a directive to have the petition proceed.
In sixty days of the issuance of the order, the court has to conduct a hearing that determines whether the conviction should be vacated or you should be resentenced. If you are being resentenced, the new sentence should be shorter than the previous or initial sentencing. However, the prosecuting attorney and your attorney can agree to waive the hearing then stipulate that you are qualified to vacate your conviction or for resentencing. This will also apply in case the court/jury findings indicate that you didn’t act recklessly in disregard for human life. It also applies if you were not the leading participant.
In case a hearing happens, the prosecuting team will bear the burden of proof. The team will have to prove beyond any reasonable doubt that you are not entitled to a resentencing or vacating your murder conviction. Failure to prove this would lead to the sentence being vacated or you would be resentenced based on any of the outstanding counts. The two parties may depend on the hearing as well as trial transcripts or produce additional or new proof.
The judge may rule that you are eligible for relief because your murder case was generically charged. If this happens, it will show that the main target crime wasn’t charged legally. Thus, the court has to restructure the conviction of your charges as the target or felony crime to resentence.
In case of a resentencing, the law compels the prosecutor to give you credit for the time you have served. After serving your sentence, you will be released permanently. However, as we mentioned earlier, the judge can order you to serve parole for not more than three years upon the completion of your sentence.
The Difference Between Petition to Vacate Murder Conviction and Motion to Vacate Criminal Judgment
A motion to vacate criminal judgment enables you to request the court to overturn a past order/judgment. On the 27th of September 2018, California Governor signed into law Assembly Bill (AB) 2867. The purpose of enacting this bill was to provide relief for criminal sentences. A court can withdraw a criminal verdict under AB 2867 if there’s adequate evidence of a significant error. The error should have damaged the capability of someone being fairly charged with an offense to qualify as a defining factor.
Assembly Bill 2867 was first introduced to amend PC 1473.7 law on California criminal convictions. Under the AB 2867 law, individuals convicted of murder cannot have their verdicts withdrawn. This is where the difference between a motion to vacate a criminal judgment and a petition to vacate a murder conviction lies.
A motion is usually a written/oral application presented before a judge to seek a verdict or order in an ongoing case. Contrarily, a petition refers to a written request that initiates a proceeding. Thus, instead of a motion seeking to vacate your murder conviction, you’ll have to present a petition. The petition serves as a request asking for authority to prevail when you’re being granted privilege or relief.
Other Legal Ways to Modify a Murder Sentence
In California, filing a petition seeking a murder sentence/conviction vacation is the latest lawful way to modify a murder sentence. Other legal options that existed before include appealing the sentence, petitioning for a reduced sentence, or seeking pardon from the Governor. Let us look at them in detail.
Filing a petition seeking a sentence reduction
Apart from having a murder conviction vacated, SB 1437 also enables one’s sentence to be reduced. For your sentence to be reduced, you have to petition to your sentencing court or prosecuting agency. The petition has to include a declaration showing that you are eligible for a sentence reduction. The requirements to qualify for a sentence reduction are similar to those for the vacation of a murder sentence.
After the court proves that you are eligible, a hearing will be conducted. The job of the prosecuting attorney is to show that you don’t deserve a sentence reduction. He/she has to prove this beyond any reasonable doubt. If the prosecutor fails to prove, the court will reduce your sentence.
Seeking a Governor’s Honor/Pardon
A Governor’s honor/pardon refers to a kind of honor a governor grants to people that have gone through rehabilitation for an offense. The pardon relieves most penalties these people faced when they were criminally convicted. The timeframe for applying for this pardon ranges between seven and ten years. This timeframe starts after you completed probation or parole. Any person convicted of a criminal offense, murder included, can apply for the pardon.
After a court vacates a murder sentence, that conviction won’t be counted as a previous offense in case a conviction of a similar offense occurs. However, when the Governor pardons a conviction, it still will reflect on a person’s criminal record. It will also be counted as a previous conviction if the person faces a subsequent conviction. A governor may agree to pardon your criminal conviction after you’ve spent over ten years since the completion of your probation or parole. Additionally, you should not have committed any serious crime within these years to stand a chance of being pardoned.
You can get a Governor’s honor by filing a request with the Governor’s office. Also, you can get the pardon through the filing of a Certificate of Rehabilitation (COR) in a court that is more superior. Or, you can be recommended by the Board of Parole Hearings for the honor. Applying directly to the Governor’s office is the most effective way of the three.
Appealing your murder sentence
Because judgment for a murder case is usually delivered in the court of a lower ranking, an appeal will allow you to request a court of a higher ranking to assess the verdict. The California process of appealing doesn’t include admitting new evidence into the case. It also doesn’t involve hearing witness testimonies or trying the case for a second time. Two different courts handle appeal cases in California. The appellate court presides over misdemeanor appeals while the Court of Appeal hears felony appeals.
A person who is appealing his/her case is called an appellant, whereas the opposing party is the respondent. The appeal procedure involves the high-ranking court examining the proceedings and judicial judgments of a lower-ranking court for any legal errors. After a conviction, you have up to 60 days of presenting Notice of Appeal. The process of appeal is lengthier and more complicated compared to seeking to have your murder sentence vacated.
Court recall
A judge/court can recall your conviction within 120 days after sentencing you without filing a Motion for Resentencing. If a judge recalls a sentence, he/she has to issue a directive for your fresh sentencing. The new sentence shouldn’t be longer than the initial or previous sentence. Before recalling your sentence, the judge reconsiders several factors. They include:
- Your rehabilitation records
- Your disciplinary record
- The risk you pose or the capability of committing criminal violence in future
- Your interest to seek justice
Find an Attorney Near Me to Help Me File a Petition to Vacate a Murder Conviction
Negotiating for vacating a murder conviction isn’t easy if you don’t have an expert attorney by your side. If you, a family member, friend or a person you love needs to petition the judgment on their cases, they should hire a competent lawyer. Van Nuys Criminal Attorney law firm has professional attorneys who are well-versed and experienced in petition matters. Call our Los Angeles criminal lawyer at 818-484-1100 to schedule a consultation with our attorneys. They will expound on the process of filing the petition as well as the best possible way to solve your case. We serve residents of Los Angeles County and Van Nuys, who need help in handling legal matters.
When you are facing a legal violation of any kind in California, you can face either a felony or misdemeanor charges. If you are found guilty of the offense, the judge will sentence you to some penalties, with one of them being serving either a formal or informal probation time. Probation is typically issued instead of or in addition to other penalties. Every probation sentence comes with a set of conditions that one must adhere to. If you fail to adhere to these conditions, the court under PEN 1203.3 has the mandate to change, revoke, or modify the sentence issued. This is typically done after going through a probation revocation trial where a new sentence may be issued. Violation of your probation terms can lead to various consequences if found guilty of the offense. Due to this, you will need the services of an attorney to assist you in your defense. At Leah Legal in Los Angeles, we will defend you passionately to ensure a favorable outcome.
Understanding Probation and its Conditions
When found guilty of a crime, the judge typically sentences them to penalties according to the law violated. In most cases, there is usually an option of probation, which is issued by the judge after reviewing the facts of the case and determining whether it is a suitable penalty. There are two types of probation: felony or informal probation and summary or misdemeanor probation. As the name suggests, a person facing felony charges can receive a felony or formal probation. Misdemeanor or summary probation is can also be issued to individuals convicted of misdemeanor offenses.
When a person is sentenced to probation, they will either have their jail sentences shortened or remain out of jail. According to the courts, probation is aimed at rehabilitating the offenders instead of punishing them for the crime committed. A judge after reviewing a case will decide if the person will benefit more from rehabilitation or jail time, and make their ruling.
Probation, however, carries various conditions that must be adhered to. According to PEN 1203, judges are given the discretion to come up with the conditions or terms of probation. The only requirement, however, is for the conditions to relate to the crime a person is convicted of reasonably. This means that the judge decides on which conditions fit the offense and imposes them upon the defendant. A few of the common probation conditions are:
- The defendant may be ordered to mandatory payment of restitution to the victim
- In some cases like those on domestic violence, a defendant may be ordered to stay away from the victim and never get in touch with them
- A DUI conviction may have the defendant being ordered to abstain from drugs or alcohol or both. In doing so, the defendant may be required to attend a program for alcohol or drug addiction, such as narcotics anonymous or alcoholics anonymous.
- The defendant may be ordered to never operate a vehicle with any detectable alcohol in their system. Additionally, when they are pulled over for suspected intoxicated driving, they must submit to chemical testing to determine their BAC levels.
- A defendant found guilty on a DUI offense may be ordered to install an ignition interlock device in their vehicle for them to keep driving.
- The defendant may be ordered to permit personal or property searches by the police at any given time and that a warrant will not be necessary for the search.
- The defendant may be ordered to attend therapy individually or be part of a group
- The defendant may be ordered to Cal-Trans roadside works or community service
- The defendant may be required to maintain gainful employment
- If the defendant is found guilty on certain crimes such as sex crimes, they may be required to be monitored electronically
- A defendant is also ordered against violating any other laws while on probation.
Misdemeanor Probation
When a person is facing misdemeanor charges, the probation they would receive upon conviction would be that of summary, informal, or misdemeanor. The probation period will, however, not exceed five years. Some of the primary features of summary probation include:
Probation Report
In a misdemeanor case, a judge can decide between:
- Asking to be given a probation report that helps them decide whether to issue probation or not or
- Deciding to issue probation without the need for a report.
The law only expects a judge to get a report on probation prior to sentencing the defendant to misdemeanor probation if the defendant has a prior sex crime conviction. Additionally, the offense required them to register as sex offenders.
Progress Reports as Opposed to Probation Officer
When one is sentenced to misdemeanor probation, they do not need to have a probation officer they report to. However, the defendant will be expected to appear in court for a progress report periodically. During the progress reports, your case will be reviewed by the judge to ensure you are adhering to all the conditions of your probation. In case you are found not to be adhering to the requirements, you may be asked to present yourself for a hearing to discuss your probation revocation.
Felony Probation
A defendant facing felony charges when found guilty can be sentenced to formal or felony probation. Usually, the probation period may last between three and five years. Felony probation differs from summary probation on two aspects:
Probation Reports
In issuing misdemeanor probation, the judge is given an option to have or not to have a probation report prior to sentencing. However, before issuing formal probation, a judge must request to have a report on prior probation for the defendant.
The county probation department is the one that prepares all probation reports. These reports are upon reviewing the criminal history of the defendant and the alleged crimes they may have committed. In many cases, the detective that investigated the alleged crime, witnesses, the victim, and defendant are interviewed before writing the report.
Supervision by a Probation officer
A defendant sentenced to felony probation must have a probation officer assigned to them. This officer is tasked with supervising the defendant, and the defendant must report to them once each month. Regardless of how frequent the judge sentences a defendant to visit their probation officer, a failure to do it may lead to a hearing. This is because of violating the terms of your probation.
The supervision is necessary to ensure the defendant remains within the state. And is adhering to all the conditions of the probation as issued by the judge, and avoid any violations. The probation officer is authorized to confirm your employment status if it was a requirement as well as administer periodic drug tests.
Sometimes, the probation officer can carry out searches on yourself or your premises to see if you have illegal weapons, drugs, or anything that will be in violation of your probation terms.
Hearing for Probation Violation
A violation of the terms issued for your probation can trigger a hearing on the violations. Because of the harsh conditions of probation, many probationers end up violating these conditions. When one is found guilty of violating the terms of their probation, there are various unfavorable consequences, as we shall discuss later. It is, however, essential to ensure you have a lawyer to represent you during this hearing to avoid undeserving consequences.
Some of the common violations to probation include:
- Willingly failing to pay restitution or a fine when one can
- Failing to attend court when required to
- Failing to make periodic visits to the probation officer as ordered to
- Violating the law and committing another offense
- Declining to submit to or failing alcohol or drug test
If a defendant is suspected of these violations, he or she may be arrested and taken before the judge. A judge can also issue an arrest warrant if the probationer fails to visit their probation officer is needed.
The Rights of the Defendant during a Probation Hearing
Probationers are accorded similar rights to those of other defendants in a court of law. Some of these rights include:
- Having a right to be defended by a criminal lawyer
- Having a right to have witnesses testify on your behalf and be able to subpoena witnesses that may be resisting to come and testify
- Having a right to show any mitigating or unavoidable circumstances that lead to your violating the probation conditions
- Having a right to issue your own testimony
- Having a right to see the evidence the prosecution has against you
Expectations from the Revocation Hearing
When the hearing to determine whether a probationer violated the conditions of the probation concludes, a judge will make a ruling. If you are found to have violated your probation conditions, the judge will consider the following factors before ruling. These are:
- The probationer’s criminal history
- How long had the probationer carried out their probation sentences before violating the conditions
- How severe was the violation
- What recommendations if any has the probation department made
Upon considering these elements, the judge will have various options in their ruling. He or she may:
- Decide to have the probation continue with the same conditions and terms
- Adjust the probation terms to stiffer ones
- Revoke the probation sentence and reinstate a jail time instead
If the judge decides to revoke your probation and sentence you to prison time, the time served on probation is taken into consideration and credited to your prison time. With an experienced criminal lawyer, however, the judge can be persuaded by revoking the probation to modifying it.
Consequences of Probation Violation
Violation of probation conditions can lead to various consequences, as earlier mentioned. This makes it imperative for one to have an experienced lawyer in probation violation matters to defend you during the hearing. Here, we discuss in detail the various consequences a probationer would face if found guilty of violating the terms of their probation. These are:
Revocation of the probation and imposing of the original sentence
In sentencing a defendant to probation, the judge often suspends the original jail sentence for probation. When one violates the terms of probation, it may lead to the judge revoking probation and subjecting the defendant to their original penalty that involved prison time.
For instance, if you were found guilty for a grand theft crime that carries a county jail sentence, a judge can sentence you to serve two years in prison. However, the judge may opt to suspend the sentence and issue you probation instead. If later you are found guilty of violating the terms outlined in the probation, your probation may be revoked and your original sentence of two years imprisonment imposed instead.
Revocation of Probation and Imposing of maximum Sentence according to the Law
Each violation is found under a particular statute that directs its minimum or maximum sentencing if one is found guilty of the offense. If, after the hearing, you are found guilty of violating the terms of your probation, the judge can revoke your probation and impose the maximum sentence according to the law. For instance, if you were sentenced to formal probation as opposed to state imprisonment that carries a maximum of three years prison time, a revocation of your probation may result in a maximum jail sentence of three years.
Extension of the Probation Period
If you are found guilty of violating the probation terms, the judge can decide to extend your probation period. This can be done by first revoking the original probation and imposing a new one with a more extended period where certain conditions still apply.
Be ordered to attend counseling
Depending on the reasons for violating the probation terms, a judge can order the probationer to additional conditions such as those of attending counseling. If one has anger problems, they could be ordered to go for counseling in anger management, among others.
Additional Probation Conditions
When you are found in violation of your probation terms, a judge can look at what is best with regards to justice and order other terms to your existing probation terms.
Community Service
In most cases, judges would order a probationer to give their hours to the service of the community or government as part of their rehabilitation. This is also at the discretion of the judge to decide which service best suits the offense committed.
Violating your probation terms can lead to consequences that can be life-changing and severe. The above-discussed consequences are some of the common ones. The judge can impose others depending on the facts of the case.
Comparing Regular Hearing to Hearing on Probation Violation
When a person is facing a criminal hearing, they are usually before a jury in court. However, when one is accused of violating their probation, the hearing usually is before a judge and not a jury.
Additionally, in a standard criminal trial, the prosecutor must present the facts of the case beyond doubt to get a conviction. However, in a probation hearing, the prosecutor is only required to show evidence that the probation terms were violated. This means the prosecutor only needs to show that the probationer may have likely violated their probation terms.
In a regular trial, hearsay evidence is never admissible in court unless backed with concrete evidence. In comparison, during a hearing for probation violation, the court allows hearsay evidence provided it is reliable. A witness can issue a written statement in supporting a probation violation that the court may allow even when the witness will not be cross-examined. Although hearsay evidence is allowed in court, it is not always acceptable because it denies the probationer the right to cross-examine the witness.
For instance, if a probationer can be ordered to stay away from his ex-wife following a domestic dispute as one of the probation conditions. However, the wife can call the police claiming the probationer made contact. To support this during the probation hearing, the wife may have a written statement read in court on their behalf. Unfortunately, when this is allowed, the judge can make a decision on the violation based on the hearsay evidence when the probationer’s lawyer has not been able to cross-examine the witness.
Fortunately, the court will allow the lawyer of the petitioner to question the prosecution on the reasons they did not produce the witness and challenge the evidence before it is admitted. An experienced attorney can argue the case and have the hearsay statement thrown out.
Expunging your Record after Probation Violation
Usually, after serving your probation successfully, you would stand an excellent chance to have your criminal record expunged. Expungement is typically under the discretion of the judge. When a petition is filed for expungement, the judge evaluates it. This is in addition to your probation report to make a decision.
Although violating your probation terms does not work to your advantage, one can still get their records expunged. An experienced criminal defense attorney can petition for expungement. He or she can present a convincing argument on your behalf that will result in the expungement of your record.
Find a Criminal Lawyer Near Me
As discussed, the repercussions of violating your probation terms can be severe. Sometimes a person can be wrongly accused of violating their probation and will need to challenge the accuser to avoid wrongful convictions. With an experienced criminal lawyer, one can be able to challenge the allegations and avoid the unpleasant consequences. Speaking to the lawyers at Van Nuys Criminal Attorney in Los Angeles can be your best option when you or your loved one is faced with these allegations. Call us at 818-484-1100, and let us discuss your defense strategy.
How to Expunge a Conviction from you California Criminal Record
Being convicted of a criminal offense in California can have serious repercussions. Some convictions will make it difficult to impossible to find suitable employment. A conviction may mean you are facing hard jail or prison time, and if not a citizen, you could be facing deportation.
Having a criminal record can make your life difficult at many levels, but you do have the recourse of getting your adult records expunged. This process is a means to clean up your files and limit the information that could show up on a background check done on you. A criminal defense attorney can guide you through the process as they understand California law and the court system.
What is an Expungement?
An expungement or dismissal is a process of having your adult records limited as to what information can be obtained if someone needs to conduct a background check on you. Dismissal is a better term for this process as your criminal record is not entirely erased as if it never existed.
Dismissal is a more appropriate term as the steps for this involve the courts reopening your case and the ‘finding of guilt’ is withdrawn. In place of a guilty verdict, a ‘not guilty’ plea is entered, and the court is then able to dismiss your case. Having your case dismissed does not mean the offense is completely erased from your files, it just shows your conviction was dismissed.
Some public agencies can still see the charge on your file, and it can be used for immigration as well as for sex offender registration. The conviction can be hidden from certain people such as credit agencies, some employers and some landlords. If a conviction has been expunged, private employers will not see it on your files when they run a background check.
Crimes that Cannot be Expunged
There are some crimes that once you are convicted, you can never expunge them from your records. You can file for a Certificate of Rehabilitation if you do not qualify for expungement. These are convictions you cannot have expunged from your record:
Under California Penal Code:
- 261.5- covers ‘statutory rape’ which occurs when a person engages in sexual intercourse with another who is under the age of 18.
- 286(c)(2)(B)- committing sodomy with another person under the age of 14 and the act is against the other’s will. The act is performed using force, menace, duress, or violence or there was an immediate fear inflicted along with the unlawful bodily injury.
- 288(a)- is a felony conviction for lewd or lascivious acts with a child.
- 288a(c)(2)- is a felony conviction for oral copulation by duress, menace, force or violence. The victim sustained immediate fear and unlawful injury to their body.
- 288.5(a) covers continuous sexual abuse of a minor. There have been three or more acts of sexual abuse performed with a child under the age of 14. The child can be either in the home of the abuser or someone they have recurring access to.
- 289- is the crime of forcible penetration with a foreign object.
- 311.1(a)- is a crime of knowingly sending child pornography for either distribution or to sell. This code covers sending through the internet.
- 311.2(b)- under this penal code you will have been proven guilty of offering to distribute or possessing with the intent to distribute obscene materials.
- 311.3-is the sexual exploitation of a minor child.
- 311- covers child pornography and the involvement of any person under 18 years of age where you have distributed material showing them engaged in sexual activity
Under California Vehicle Code:
- 2800-covers disobeying a police officer
- 2801- failing to stop and submit to an inspection of your vehicle which a police officer feels is unsafe or endangering others
Additional Restrictions:
You are also not eligible for expungement of records if you have a current case in the courts that you are being prosecuted for, or you are currently on probation, post-release community, mandatory supervision, or parole. You also cannot file a request for expungement of records if you have been sentenced to state prison.
Crimes or Convictions that May Be Expunged
If you have been convicted of a misdemeanor and denied probation, or if you have been convicted of an infraction, you may file to have your record expunged.
- Misdemeanor in California is defined by the sentence you receive. There are various types of misdemeanors including simple assault, petty theft, disorderly conduct, vandalism, and prostitution. Check with your criminal defense attorney for others that may qualify you for expungement of records.
- An infraction is a public offense, but not always considered a crime. An infraction is not punishable by imprisonment but may involve a fine. If you are in public office, an infraction charge could have you removed from your position.
Before filing for an expungement, you must wait one year after your conviction, and you cannot be on probation or any other form of supervision for another crime. If you served time in a county jail for a conviction and not a state prison, you have to wait one year before requesting a dismissal or expungement.
If you’ve served time in a state prison, you can only request a dismissal or expungement if your case can be reclassified as a misdemeanor, or if you were sentenced before October 1, 2011, and the conviction would now involve time in a county jail versus a state prison. If your conviction does not fall under any category which would qualify for an expungement, you can file for a Certificate of Rehabilitation.
What is a Certificate of Rehabilitation?
A COR (Certificate of Rehabilitation) is the determination by the courts that you have been rehabilitated from the crime which you were convicted. This process is used to clean up a record of someone who has been convicted of a felony and sent to state prison. If you have been convicted of a limited number of misdemeanor sex offenses, you may also apply for a COR.
The COR will not seal your records or remove any of the convictions from your file; it is intended to help you apply for employment, find housing, or apply for a professional license. If you meet the legal requirements and demonstrated rehabilitation, you can apply to the Superior Court where you live for a COR.
How Does an Expungement Change My Record?
Having a conviction expunged means a new entry is made on your records showing the case against you was dismissed. This change allows you to check that you have not been convicted of a crime when applying for employment. An expungement may also open eligibility for student loans if you were once denied due to a drug conviction.
If you apply for a government job, however; the conviction will be discovered, so you should disclose this information on your application. Finding the expungement records on your files is possible. Anyone who understands how to look for this type of information will be able to see it on your records.
What Doesn’t an Expungement Cover?
Under California Penal Code 1203.4, California and FBI criminal history will still appear on your records with the dismissal information. You will not be allowed to possess firearms and will be required to register as a sex offender if your conviction fell under Penal Code 290. A COR may relieve some sex offender from future registration, check with your criminal defense attorney for further information.
An expungement will not remove your conviction record if applying for public office or government issued licenses and does not prevent the crime from being used in the ‘strike prior’ when receiving increased punishment through the California Justice System.
Receiving an expungement of a charge will not be considered if you were refused or had a government license revoked. These licenses and permits include real estate license, bus driver’s license, teaching license, security guard certificates, and other public safety positions. The expungement will also not be considered when conviction resulted in deportation.
How to File for an Expungement
Your first step should be to secure your criminal defense attorney. They understand California law and know their way around the court system. Knowing whether or not your conviction qualifies for an expungement involves knowing the California legal system.
Certain petitions for expungement are complicated, and the judge may need additional information from you before reviewing your case. Having an attorney working with you to research the records, write the petition, motions and declarations will make your case stronger. They are also able to appear in court with you and assist in your argument for dismissal.
Your criminal defense attorney will have you file a Petition for Dismissal (Penal Code 1203.4- 12034a)which is then submitted to the Superior Court along with all supporting documents proving to the courts you are eligible for expungement. This petition and all the supporting documents will also have to be sent to the prosecuting agency.
When will the Expungement Appear on Records?
The expungement process can take from 30 days to 4 months to go through the system. It depends on factors such as which courthouse your case is heard in and if your case involves a misdemeanor or a felony, also whether or not a court hearing will be required.
What Determines if a Court Hearing Being Required?
If you are requesting expungement of a misdemeanor conviction; chances are you will not be required to appear at a court hearing. The judge will look over the documents you present showing why you feel an expungement qualifies in your case and issue a court order.
If you are requesting an expungement or dismissal of a felony conviction, you will be required to make a court appearance. If you are unable to appear in court, you can present your attorney with written permission to appear on your behalf.
Is There a Time Limit on Expunging Records?
The court can purge or destroy any misdemeanor charges that are five years old or older at any time, depending on why you were charged. This purge does not mean it can’t be seen on your records by those looking for this type of information.
If your file has been purged, it will be more difficult to request an expungement. A request to the Department of Justice in Sacramento will have to be sent asking for a report on your criminal history. This record will be needed to petition for expungement.
The Department of Justice can provide you with a record of your criminal history. It is recommended requesting this report if you’ve had multiple convictions. This history shows all of your cases and what happened to them in the California legal system. If a conviction shows up on your criminal history record, then you know it will show up whenever a background check is requested on your files.
Requesting a copy of criminal history can also provide you a chance to correct any errors that may appear, and provide you with a copy of what your background check is going to show. Knowing ahead what will appear on your file gives you a chance to be prepared to answer any questions that may be asked.
Is There a Fee for Filing Petition?
Depending on the county you live in will determine the fee for petitioning for an expungement. Some examples include; San Bernardino County asks for a $270 filing fee, San Diego County will require a $120 filing fee for felony convictions and $60 for misdemeanor convictions, while Los Angeles County will request a maximum $270 fee once the court makes the motion.
Contacting a Record Expungement Attorney Near Me
Van Nuys Criminal Attorney will provide you with the best record expungement legal advice possible. We represent clients throughout the city of Los Angeles, CA with driving crimes, DUI defense, Domestic Violence, Drug Crimes and more. Leah has a passion for helping those who need their rights and freedom protected. She is a former teacher, community activist, and early Childhood Director and fully understands California law and its court system.
You will be in the best hands possible for all your legal needs when you call Leah Legal at 818-484-1100 and schedule an appointment. Check the rest of our website today and choose the criminal defense attorney who can make a difference in your life and protect your freedom.
How You Can Seal Your Arrest Record Under Penal Code Section 851.87
On October 11, 2017, Governor Brown signed into law S.B. 393which revised the Penal Code to allow certain individuals to petition the court to seal their arrest record if certain conditions are met. S.B. 393 is codified in several code sections, including Penal Code § 851.87.
Arrest records, unlike criminal records, are recorded and kept by the police. Every time a police officer runs your identity, or you submit to a background check, your arrest record will show up – even if no charges were filed or the arrest was a mistake. Arrest records follow you even if you didn’t do anything wrong and, before S.B. 393, the process for sealing arrest records was difficult.
When Can You Seal and Seal Your Arrest Record?
You are eligible if:
- No criminal charges were filed;
- Criminal charges were filed but dismissed;
- You were found not guilty (i.e. acquitted) in a jury trial;
- Your conviction was overturned or vacated on appeal; or
- You completed a pre-sentencing or pre-trial diversion program.
However, requests to seal arrest records can still be denied if the person arrested has a criminal history that includes arrests and/or convictions for child abuse, domestic violence, and/or elder abuse.
Why Was S.B. 393 Passed?
Before S.B. 393, individuals who were arrested but not convicted (i.e. charges dropped or dismissed) could not file to seal their arrest and criminal record. The burden was on the individual to prove that he was factually innocent (meaning the burden was on you to prove you were innocent, rather than on the prosecution to prove you were guilty).
Arrest records appear in background checks for jobs, housing applications, etc. which led to discrimination against individuals who were never charged or had charges dropped.
S.B. 393 switches the burden from individuals to prosecutors. All you have to show is that you were never convicted of the charge; then it is up to the prosecutor to show that you are not entitled.
Why Should I Bother with Sealing My Arrest Record?
Criminal records are public, anyone can access them; a potential employer, a potential landlord, insurance companies, licensing agencies, even a date you met on Tinder. Also if the arrest was a mistake or the charges were dismissed, the mere appearance of an arrest influences people’s perceptions – especially if they don’t have a personal relationship with you. Sealing your arrest record removes it from the public domain; so only criminal justice agencies in limited situations can access it.
Are You Eligible?
You are eligible to seal your arrest record if your arrest did not result in a conviction. For example:
- You were released without any charges being filed;
- The charges against you were dropped by the prosecution;
- The judge dismissed the charges;
- The jury returned a verdict of “not guilty;”
- Your conviction was overturned on appeal; or
- The charges were dismissed after you completed a pre-sentencing or pre-trial diversion program. For example, a Penal Code 1000 deferred entry of judgment or Prop 36 drug treatment program.
What If Your Arrest Resulted in A Conviction?
If your arrest resulted in a conviction, the process is now called “expungement.” Under Penal Code § 1203.4, you can get your arrest and criminal record expunged, however, the process is far more stringent and onerous.
What Did the Law Change?
Under the old rule, Penal Code § 851.8, the person who was arrested had the burden of proving that he was factually innocent; meaning, that you didn’t actually commit the crime. The new rule, Penal Code § 851.87 shifts the burden from the person arrested to the prosecutor. So, now the prosecutor has to prove that the arrested person does not deserve to have their record sealed.
The law carves out specific examples, such as elder abuse, child abuse, and domestic violence. These cases are difficult to prove because the witnesses know their abusers and are often intimated by them, therefore, are reluctant to give testimony. Everyone else is entitled to have their record sealed as a matter of right.
Who Can’t Have Their Record Sealed?
You are ineligible to have your record sealed if:
- The prosecutor may still bring charges against you;
- The arrest was for a serious crime with no statute of limitations (a statute of limitation is the time-limit the prosecutor has to bring charges) unless you were acquitted in a jury trial. For example, murder has no statute of limitation;
- You evaded arrest;
- You evaded the prosecutor by stealing someone’s identity and the prosecutor subsequently charged you with identity fraud; or
- Your record demonstrates a pattern of abuse.
Basically, if you were arrested for a serious crime or tried to evade arrest – you can’t get your record sealed.
What Is A Pattern of Abuse?
A pattern of abuse is defined as two or more conviction or five or more arrests within a three-year period. Basically, if your criminal history shows a pattern of abuse for domestic violence, elder abuse, or child abuse, it is harder for you to seal your record.
You can still get your record sealed but you must show that doing so “serves the interests of justice.” In determining if sealing the record serves the interests of justice, the judge may consider:
- Your record of convictions;
- The hardship caused to you by the arrest;
- Evidence or testimony regarding the arrest; and
- Evidence or statements regarding your moral character.
Can A Sealed Record Still Be Used?
Yes, but in limited situations. However, the sealed record is effectively destroyed for the vast majority of cases. For example, petitioners:
- Must continue registering as a sex offender;
- Are prohibited from holding public office that results from the arrest;
- Are prohibited from owning firearms;
- Are required to disclose the arrest in the following situations:
- Applications for public office;
- Applications for licenses from a state agency;
- Contracts with the State Lottery Commission; and
- Applications for employment as a peace officer.
Moreover, criminal justice agencies may access the sealed records in the “regular course of its duties” to the same extent as it would if the record had not been sealed. For instance, police departments may access sealed records in the course of criminal investigations.
Finally, keep in mind that sealing the record only applies to the specific arrest – it does not erase your entire criminal record. You have to submit separate petitions for each arrest that did not result in a conviction. So, if you have three arrests that did not result in convictions, you must submit three separate petitions to seal your arrest record.
Is There A Deadline?
Under the old rule, you had to two rules to file a petition to seal your record. Under the new rule, there is no time limit. However, it is recommended that you file your petition as soon as you can.
How Long Does It Take for The Petition to Go Through the System?
It takes about ninety (90) days for your petition to work its way through the system. Within 30 days, the court will notify the (1) law enforcement agency that made the arrest; (2) the law enforcement agency that administers the master criminal history records; and (3) the California Department of Justice.
Once the petition is accepted, the master criminal history record agency will update the record to note that it is sealed and may not be released to the public. The local law enforcement agency ensures that this note is applied to all investigative reports and other reports that the record is sealed and may not be released to the public. Once sealed, the records are only released under two circumstances:
- A criminal agency reviewing the information in the regular course of its duties; or
- The person whose arrest was sealed.
What Is the Process To Seal Your Record?
First: File the Petition
The petition to seal your record must be filed in either (1) the court where the charges for the arrest were filed or (2) if charges weren’t filed, in the city or county where the arrest took place. After you file your petition, you must “serve” it on the prosecutor of the city or country where the arrest took place and the law enforcement agency that made the arrest. “Service” refers to the legal process of providing the documents to the required person or agency. Service must be affected by someone over 18 and has to be personally dropped off at the agency.
When you file the petition, you must include the following information:
- Your name and date of birth.
- The date of the arrest which you are trying to seal.
- The city and county where the arrest took place. For example, Los Angeles, Los Angeles County.
- The name of the law enforcement agency that made the arrest.
- Other information that would identify the arrest, i.e. a case number.
- The alleged offense(s) on which the arrest was based.
- A statement that you are entitled to get your arrest sealed as a matter of right or, if you are otherwise ineligible, in the interests of justice.
- Finally, if your petition is based on the interests of justice, you must submit declarations (i.e. written testimony) stating how justice would be served by sealing your record.
Second: Attend the Hearing
Once the petition is filed, one of two things will happen, either, the prosecutor will concede the petition and your arrest will be sealed or the prosecutor will contest it and a hearing will be scheduled. If a hearing is scheduled, it will be in the county where you live, and you are required to appear or have an attorney appear on your behalf.
At the hearing, the judge will examine your arrest record and, if necessary, evidence regarding the interest of justice. For example, the judge will consider declarations submitted on your behalf and testimonials given by the prosecutor.
The judge has much discretion to grant or deny your petition, so it is critical that you present a strong case at your hearing. Moreover, the judge can dismiss your petition with prejudice (meaning, if you lose, you can never re-file your petition). If a hearing is scheduled, you should retain Leah Legal, a Los Angeles criminal defense attorney to assist you.
What Happens If Your Sealed Record Is Released?
If your arrest record is improperly released, there is a mandatory civil penalty of $500 to $2,500 per violation (each release is a violation, so if it is emailed to 10 people, it could be $500 x 10 (for 10 emails) = $5,000). The penalty is enforced by the district attorney, city attorney, or the Attorney General.
If you’re affected, you can bring a suit for compensatory damages if the release harmed you (i.e. you lost out on a job or housing opportunity). If the release was intentional or reckless, you might be able to seek punitive damages.
Sealing Arrest Records vs. Sealing Juvenile Records
Sealing an arrest record under Penal Code § 851.87 is a different process from sealing juvenile records. You can seal your juvenile record if:
- You’re an adult or the jurisdiction of the juvenile court ended five years ago (meaning juvie court hasn’t been able to determine your case for at least five years);
- You haven’t been convicted of any crimes of moral turpitude (i.e. crimes of immoral behavior or dishonesty); and
- There are no pending civil suits derived from the juvenile record.
Finding a Record Sealing Attorney Near Me
Do you want to seal your arrest record? Would you like to find out if you’re eligible? Do you have pending criminal charges? Then give Van Nuys Criminal Attorney a call at 818-484-1100 or visit our website to learn more.
At Leah Legal we coordinate our defense strategies with multiple attorneys to ensure that you get balanced representation and experience; there won’t be any blind spots in our strategy. We are available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. We offer free criminal defense consultations, accept cash, checks, and credit cards, and are available for weekend/evening appointments.
There are particular offenses in California whose conviction could affect a person’s immigration status. If the person is not a United States’ Citizen, they may face deportation if already in the country and not be admitted if they seek admission, or have their request for naturalization denied even if they are qualified. These offenses are, for example, violent crimes, crimes categorized under aggravated felonies, like sexually assaulting a minor, and those crimes categorized under crimes of moral turpitude, like theft and fraud.
Before standing trial for these offenses, the law requires the offender to be well informed about the consequence of a conviction on their immigration status. If this does not happen and you are convicted, you may be able to file a motion in court to vacate or set aside your conviction. For more information regarding this matter or if you need an experienced attorney to take you through the process, contact the Leah Legal team in Van Nuys, CA.
Understanding the Meaning of Inadmissible Crimes
Every conviction in California brings with it severe consequences whose severity is determined by the nature of the offense and the offender’s criminal record. Some crimes are severely punished than others, though each conviction affects the life of an offender differently. If you are not a legal citizen of the United States, some sentences will hurt your immigration state. As mentioned above, you could be deported, be denied entry into the country, or lose your chance for naturalization. That is why engaging a competent attorney’s service is essential if you or your loved one face a conviction for a serious felony.
There are several offenses in California whose conviction will affect your stay or admission in the country. The violations are called inadmissible crimes, and they are:
Crimes of Moral Turpitude
These are offenses that involve corruption of one’s essential social duties that he/she owes to other people and society. They include the antisocial conduct that consequently harms other people or the social good. Examples of crimes of moral turpitude include:
- Arson
- Burglary
- Assault by use of a deadly weapon
- Cultivation of marijuana
- Grand theft auto
- Kidnapping
- Murder
- Receiving stolen property
- Forgery
- Possession of controlled substances for sale
- Rape
- Grand theft
- Repeated felony DUI convictions
Drug-Related Offenses
If a person is convicted of a drug-related offense or admits to all the elements of a drug-related crime, the conviction will affect their immigration status. Note that this applies to both state and federal convictions. Examples of drug-related crimes are:
- Manufacturing of illegal drugs
- Transportation or transportation for sale of controlled substances
- Possession of controlled drugs for sale
- Simple possession of controlled substances
Multiple Convictions
A person is also declared inadmissible in the US if they have convictions for more than two offenses and the sentences they received for all those crimes total to more than five years. Note that this does not depend on the type of offense you have committed.
If your offense falls in any of the categories above, your attorney is required by law to advise you accordingly about the consequence of a conviction on your immigration status. Additionally, the court is required to do the same before allowing your plea of guilt. If that does not happen and you are eventually convicted, you will file a motion to set aside the conviction.
By filing a motion to set aside the conviction, you admit you did not fully understand the consequence of your guilty plea, so you want to withdraw it. The procedure that follows is called vacating or setting aside a conviction. Remember that this motion is only allowed on two grounds, namely:
- That the court did provide adequate advice on record, which is a violation of Section 1016.5 of California Penal Law
- That your lawyer did not provide sound advice, which is a violation of California Penal Law 1437.7
Let us discuss this further.
Vacate or Set Aside a Sentence Under California Penal Code 1016.5
California Penal Law 1016.5 states that before a person enters a plea of guilt to a particular offense, the court must advise him/her on record that if they are not citizens of the United States, a conviction for that offense might lead to deportation, inadmissibility to the U.S or their application for naturalization will be denied. The same law allows the offender to move a motion in court after conviction, to vacate that conviction if the court did not fulfill its mandate of providing the required advice.
Therefore, a defendant must at least be informed of all the three likely consequences of their plea. If the effects are not correctly articulated, the advice will be inadequate, and the judge will be guilty of failing to comply with this law’s provisions. It means that if the defendant did not understand the consequences based on how the court delivered the information, it would be assumed they were not adequately advised and so will be allowed to withdraw their plea. If the prosecutor cannot refute that presumption, the court will have to vacate the conviction and withdraw the defendant’s plea of guilt.
The prosecutor and your attorney can then settle on an appropriate charge you could plead guilty to, which will not have severe consequences on your immigration status.
Example: Mark is facing charges for aggravated sexual assault of a minor, violating California Penal Code Section 269. It is an offense whose conviction might affect his immigration status. Mark has been living and working in California for three years now. At the beginning of the trial, the court tells Mark that if he is found guilty of the offense, he may be deported, and after that, he will be prevented from entering the country again. Mark is found guilty and is facing the harsh reality of deportation.
However, his attorney advises him to move a motion to set aside the conviction on the grounds that the court did not adequately advise him on the consequence of a sentence. Mark is right because the court’s information was insufficient and was not provided exactly as it is in the constitution. Thus, Mark did not understand what the immigration consequence of the conviction entailed.
Based on that, the law will compel the court to drop the conviction. Mark’s attorney and the prosecutor will then advise him to plea to another charge, whose conviction will not carry the deportation consequence.
Remember that the law does not require the court to advise the defendant about the immigration consequences of a conviction and provide the advice on record. If the court advised the defendant, but it was not on paper, the defendant may still move a motion in court to vacate the conviction.
What the Defendant Must Show
The success of a defendant’s motion to set aside a criminal conviction under California Law Section 1016.5 is based on the following:
- The motion must be timely.
The time the defendant moves the motion to court is crucial. It means that the time must be reasonably after the defendant has discovered the potential effects the conviction has on his/her immigration status. California law requires the defendant to investigate the matter and act quickly before the motion is deemed untimely.
Example: A conviction took place in 2001. The court put the defendant on removal proceedings in 2004. She hires a lawyer, who removes her from the proceeding temporarily. She later learns her 2001 conviction will cause her to be deported, affecting her admission to the country or her naturalization. She also finds out that she needs a lawyer to help her file a motion in court to set aside the conviction to free herself from its severe consequences on her immigration status. However, she waits until 2010 to move a motion in court. In this case, the court will render the motion untimely.
- The conviction must have at least one of the three consequences.
- That the court failed to advise you on at least one of those consequences
- That there is a likely chance that you would not have entered a guilty plea had you been adequately
The court will require the defendant to demonstrate the reasonable probability that they wouldn’t have entered a guilty plea to the offense had they been appropriately advised. He/she may be required to testify through a sworn statement. He/she may do so by demonstrating to the court that they understood that the immigration consequence of their conviction prevailed in severity over any jail time they would have received had they not pleaded guilty. It could also be, had he/she known the seriousness of the three consequences, they would have asked their lawyer to negotiate with the court for a more favorable outcome.
If the judge finds the above situation reasonable, he/she may consider allowing the defendant to put forward a motion to vacate the conviction.
Vacate or Set Aside a Verdict under Section 1437.7 of California Penal Law
Section 1437.7 of the California Penal Code states that a conviction is legally unacceptable if there was a prejudicial error that made it impossible for the defendant to understand, defend themselves against, or willingly accept the potential or actual consequences the conviction has on their immigration status.
Again, a motion to set aside a sentence under this law must be moved with reasonable diligence following these, whichever of them comes first:
- The date the defendant receives a notice requesting him/her to appear in an immigration court
- The date when the court’s order for the defendant’s removal becomes final
The defendant’s motion to set aside or vacate the conviction will succeed only if:
- There is reason to believe that the defendant acted in due diligence, which shows that the motion was moved promptly.
- That indeed, the defendant is a victim of prejudicial error, which means that he/she couldn’t understand or agree to suffer the consequences their plea had on their immigration status because their attorney failed to advise them on those consequences adequately.
Due Diligence
Under this law, a motion is said to be moved on time if after receiving a notice from the immigration court stating that his/her conviction had subjected them from removal, or the removal had been final, the defendant made the right steps at that instant to set aside the sentence. It is what the law means by acting with due diligence. If the defendant took the time to file a motion to set aside the verdict, he/she would be said not to have acted in due diligence. Consequently, their motion will not be acceptable by the court.
Example: Mary was facing charges for California murder. The court convicted her of an aggravated felony in 2006. Among the effects of the conviction that Mary faces is denial for naturalization. Mary’s attorney did not adequately advise her of the immigration consequences she might face if she pleads guilty to murder. In 2010, Mary received a notice that she is supposed to attend a hearing in an immigration court for her removal proceedings following her 2006 conviction. Mary hires a lawyer, who advises her to move a court motion to set aside her conviction under California Penal Law Section 1437.7.
If Mary acts almost immediately, the court will realize that she proceeded with due diligence and will accept the motion to set aside the conviction. However, if it takes her several years to file the motion, she may lose her chance to vacate the sentence and then face the conviction’s full consequences.
Prejudicial Error
A prejudicial error is another ground on which a defendant can file a motion to set aside a conviction in California conviction. A prejudicial error would have occurred in the following situation:
- The defense counsel did not adequately advise the defendant before taking a guilty plea. The law requires a defense attorney to investigate and adequately advise their clients about the exact immigration consequences a certain conviction carries if they plead guilty to the charges they are facing. If this doesn’t happen, the defendant can convince the court to set aside the sentence and give him/her another chance at trial.
- The defense team has failed in defending their client against the immigration consequences a particular conviction carries while trying to negotiate with the prosecution team for an alternative disposition that is immigration-safe.
- If the offender did not meaningfully comprehend the immigration consequence, the conviction carried. The defendant may have been well advised by his/her defense attorney but did not understand the gravity of immigration penalties.
In any of the above situations, the court will agree that the defendant suffered a prejudicial mistake, and so has a right to move a motion in court to set aside or vacate the conviction.
Note that, just as mentioned earlier, merely mentioning the immigration consequences of a conviction isn’t sufficient to prove that the defendant was adequately advised or he/she well understood those consequences. The law requires your defense attorney to inform you of the exact immigration consequence you might face if you are convicted for the charges you face.
Example: Tim is facing charges for transportation for sale of illegal substances near a school. His attorney realizes how serious the charges are, and so he advises Jim to plead guilty to transportation for sale of illicit drugs to avoid a sentence enhancement. His attorney then warns him that doing so might affect his efforts to be admitted into the country.
You realize that Jim is not adequately advised about the consequence of the conviction he is facing. For that reason, he can move a motion in court to set aside his conviction based on prejudicial error. His attorney owed him a duty of detailed information on the consequence of pleading guilty to possession for sale of illegal substances, but he/she failed in that duty.
If Jim moves the motion under Section 1437.7 of California Penal Law, the court might grant the motion. It means that the court will dismiss the previous conviction, and the court will require Jim to stand trial for another chance that does not have the immigration consequence.
It is not a simple motion to support in court, and so, the help of an experienced attorney is required to ensure that the motion is granted and that your immigration situation is not affected.
Find Post Conviction Relief Services Near Me
If you or your loved one is about to face severe immigration consequences for a previous conviction, talk to us. At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we have the resources needed to examine the details of your sentence to conclude whether you have a right to relief under Sections 1437.7 and/or 1016.5 of the California Penal Code. We will then help you file a strong motion in court, detailing how the law applies to your case’s details. Call us at 818-484-1100 if you are in Van Nuys, CA, and let us help you attain a favorable and just outcome.
Property crimes are offenses that involve the destruction of other people’s property. They range from minor offenses to major crimes that attract severe penalties. If you are accused of any type of property crime, having a seasoned lawyer may mean the difference between your freedom and serving a prison sentence. The outcome of your case is highly dependent on whom you choose to represent you.
With our extensive experience, our attorneys at Leah Legal will defend you aggressively. We aim to defend you, protect your rights and possibly have your charges reduced if it’s not possible to get your case dismissed. We will utilize our expertise to represent people battling criminal cases in Los Angeles, California.
Property Crimes Under California Law
California’s Penal Code outlines different categories of property crimes. Each property crime is charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony under a specific section of the Penal Code.
Arson
Actions that constitute arson are described in two separate sections of the California Penal Code.
Section 451: You will be charged with arson if you maliciously or willfully set fire to, burn, trigger, assist, procure or counsel the act of burning any property, forest land or structure. To charge you with malicious arson, the prosecutor must prove the following elements:
- You burned or set fire to property, forest land or structure
You will have committed the crime of arson if you destroy or damage even a small part of the object with fire.
A structure includes a building, tunnel, bridge, power plant or a public or commercial tent. Forest land refers to woods, grasslands, forest, cut-over or brush-covered land. Property refers to personal property like furniture, boats, cars, clothing or land other than forest land.
Burning is only a crime if the object burned is someone else’s personal property. If the property is yours, you can only be charged with arson if you:
- Burned the property with an intention to defraud
- Injured another person or their property
- You acted maliciously and willfully
You are guilty of malicious arson if you deliberately act with a plan to annoy, defraud or injure someone else or their property. The element of will and malice can be satisfied if you were aware of the facts that would make a reasonable person realize that their actions would naturally, directly or most probably cause a fire.
Section 452 is California’s statute on reckless arson or reckless burning. You would be charged under this code if you did not cause the fire intentionally. The elements of this crime are:
- You burned or set fire to property, forest land or a structure
- Your action was reckless. Recklessness is acting in total disregard for safety and can be proved if you:
- were aware that your action had a significant and unjustifiable risk of igniting a fire,
- ignored the risk, or
- acted in total deviation from how any reasonable person would behave under similar circumstances.
Penalties for Arson
After you are convicted of any crime of arson, the judge may order that you undergo a psychiatric evaluation to help decide the length of your prison or jail sentence.
Penalties for arson vary depending on:
- Whether your conviction is for reckless or malicious arson
- The type of property that you destroyed
- Whether anybody was injured in the fire
- Your criminal history
Malicious arson is a felony punishable by imprisonment in state prison for:
- 16 months, 2 years or 3 years for personal property
- 2, 4 or 6 years for forest land or a structure
- 3, 5 or 8 years for causing the burning of an inhabited property or inhabited structure
- 5, 7 or 9 years for causing significant bodily injury
You may also face:
- A fine not exceeding $10,000
- A “strike” in your criminal record as provided by California’s Three Strikes Law.
- If your action was for financial gain, you may face an additional $50,000 fine or double your anticipated or actual profit.
Reckless burning or reckless arson is a misdemeanor. The penalties include:
- Not more than 6 months in a county jail
- A fine not greater than $1,000
- Both
If you burned a forest land or a structure or caused serious bodily injury, your reckless arson offense becomes a wobbler. A wobbler means that the prosecutor has the discretion to charge you with a misdemeanor or a felony. The possible punishments are:
- Burning forest land or a structure
- Misdemeanor: A maximum of 6 months in a county jail
- Felony: 16 months, 2 or 3 years in prison
- Burning inhabited property or an inhabited structure
- Misdemeanor: Up to 1 year in a county jail
- Felony: 2, 3 or 4 years in prison
- Causing considerable bodily injury:
- Misdemeanor: Not more than 1 year in a county jail
- Felony: 2, 4 or 6 years in prison
Aggravated Arson
Under California law, you will be sentenced to an extra, consecutive 1 – 5 years prison term for aggravated arson if:
- You have a previous felony conviction for reckless or malicious arson.
- An officer, firefighter or emergency personnel suffer substantial or significant bodily injury from the fire.
- More than 1 person suffers considerable bodily injury from the fire.
- You burn multiple structures.
- While committing the crime, you accelerate or delay the ignition of the fire using a device.
- Burn a structure in retaliation against someone whom you believed is the owner of the structure.
- You were aware that you were setting fire to a place of worship.
You would be sentenced to serve 10 years in prison if you intended to damage an inhabited structure or injure other people and
- you had a previous conviction of arson within 10 years,
- the fire caused losses totaling to more than $5,650,000 including the costs of suppressing the fire, or
- at least five inhabited structures were damaged.
Registration as an Arson Offender
California law requires you to register as a convicted arson offender after your conviction for any of the following:
- Malicious arson
- Aggravated arson leading to more than 10 years in prison
- Possession, manufacture or disposal of combustible or flammable material or device in relation to your arson charges
- Attempted malicious arson
Damaging Utility, Phone or Electrical Lines
You will have committed a crime under California Penal Code 591 if you maliciously remove, disconnect, obstruct or injure wires for electrical, cable or telephone services or any equipment linked to those wires. This crime is more serious than vandalism. Penal Code 591 will most likely be used to charge you if you damage phone equipment or cut phone lines while committing burglary or in an episode of domestic violence. Interfering with phone lines or equipment to prevent another person from receiving help can also result in a violation of Section 591.5 of the Penal Code.
You are guilty of damaging utility, phone or electrical wires if you
- Maliciously and unlawfully
- Disconnect, obstruct, cut, take down, remove or injure
- An electrical, telephone, telegraph, cable television or any equipment served by or connected to such a line, or
- Maliciously connect an electrical line without authorization
You can only be convicted of this crime if you acted maliciously. Acting with malice is when you act purposely to commit an offense or to injure someone else.
Penalties for Damaging Utility, Phone or Electrical Lines
This crime is a wobbler. You will be charged with either a misdemeanor or a felony depending on the nature of your charges and your criminal history.
For a misdemeanor, you will receive:
- Summary probation
- Not more than 1 year in a county jail
- A fine not exceeding $1,000
- Both a fine and jail time
For a felony, the possible penalties are:
- Formal probation
- 16 months, 2 years or 3 years in a county jail
- A fine of up to $10,000
- Both jail time and a fine
Vandalism
You will be charged with and convicted of vandalism under Section 594 of the California Penal Code if the prosecutor can prove that:
- You maliciously destroyed, damaged or defaced property with any inscribed material or graffiti. Acting with malice means that you intentionally committed a wrongful act with the aim of injuring or annoying someone. If your actions were accidental, you are not guilty of vandalism. Inscribed material or graffiti refers to any unauthorized design, figure, mark or word that is painted, drawn, etched, scratched or marked on personal or real property. Basically, any unauthorized drawing or writing on another person’s property qualifies as vandalism. The mark does not necessarily have to be permanent.
- You either owned the property with someone else or did not own it. If you vandalized public property, the judge could assume that you did not own and neither were you permitted to destroy, damage or deface the property. You can also be charged with vandalism if you deface, destroy or damage property that you jointly own with your spouse.
- The amount of destruction, damage or defacement was either less than $400 for misdemeanor charges, or $400 and above for a wobbler. If you are charged with multiple acts of vandalism and the prosecutor proves that they were all part of a single plan, impulse or intention, they will be combined and charged as a felony if the damage totals to $400 or greater.
Penalties for Vandalism
Several sections of the California Penal Code outline the punishments for vandalism based on the type of property that you vandalize. In addition to the specific penalties, CA Vehicle Code 13202.6 allows a possible suspension of your driver’s license for up to 2 years. If you do not have a license, issuance will be delayed for between 1 – 3 years.
Section 594.3: Vandalizing a place of worship. This crime is a wobbler regardless of the value of damages.
As a misdemeanor, the possible consequences are:
- A county jail term of up to 1 year
- A maximum fine of $1,000
- Probation
As a felony, you face:
- Imprisonment for 16 months, 2 years or 3 years
- A fine not exceeding $10,000
- Probation
If your act of vandalism was meant to intimidate or scare a victim based on their religious beliefs, the offense becomes a hate crime and an automatic felony.
Section 594.35: Vandalism of a mortuary or cemetery: The penalties are similar to those of vandalizing a place of worship.
Section 594.4: Vandalism involving chemicals: Vandalism using butyric acid or any related caustic or noxious substance or chemical is a wobbler regardless of the value of damages.
As a misdemeanor, the possible penalties are:
- Time in a county jail for up to 6 months
- Between $1,000 and $50,000 in fines depending on the value of damages
- Probation
As a felony, it is punishable by:
- 16 months, 2 years or 3 years in prison
- Fines ranging between $1,000 and $50,000 depending on total damages
- Probation
Section 640.7: Vandalism near or on a highway: This code criminalizes vandalism within 100 feet of a highway including but not limited to highway accessories and facilities such as traffic signals, signs, guardrails and snow poles, but excluding street name signs.
A crime under this code is a misdemeanor. The consequences are:
- Up to 6 months in a county jail for your first conviction and 1 year for a second conviction.
- A maximum fine of $1,000
- Community service or counseling
Section 640.8: Vandalism near or on a freeway: Vandalism of freeway facilities such as, but not limited to overpass supports, overpasses, guardrails, signals, and signs is a misdemeanor under this statute punishable by:
- Up to 1 year in jail for a first conviction
- A fine not greater than $5,000
- Community service or counseling
Trespass
Section 602 of the California Penal Code is the state’s statute that criminalizes trespass. Under this code, there are more than thirty activities that constitute criminal trespass. The most common include:
- Entering another person’s property while intending to destroy that property
- Entering another person’s property while intending to obstruct or interfere with the activities conducted there.
- Entering and occupying someone else’s property without permission
- Declining to get out of the private property after you have been requested to do so
- Removing stones, dirt or soil from another person’s land without permission
- Removing oysters or other types of shellfish from somebody else’s property
- Refusing to be screened at a courthouse or airport
Although defining trespass legally is complicated by the numerous ways in which you can commit the crime, the prosecutor must prove certain elements to sustain charges of trespass against you. These are:
- You entered another person’s property willfully. Willfully means that you intended to act in the way you did.
- You specifically intended to interfere with the person’s property rights. Specific intent means that you deliberately and precisely planned both the action and the consequences.
- You interfered with the person’s property rights. If you did not damage property or interfere with the activities on the property, you did not commit trespass even if you entered the property.
Penalties for Trespass
Under California penal code sections 601, 602 and 602.8, your trespass charges can be infractions, misdemeanors or very rarely, felonies.
Misdemeanor trespass is charged under Penal Code 602 and is punishable by:
- Summary probation
- Up to 6 months in county jail but some forms may attract up to 1 year in jail
- A maximum fine of $1,000
- Both a fine and jail time
Trespass under Penal Code 602.8 PC will be charged as an infraction if:
- You willfully enter another person’s land without authorization and
- That land is fenced or has “no trespassing” signs erected at intervals of 3 or more for each mile.
Possible penalties include:
- A fine of $75 for a first conviction
- $250 for a second conviction on the same land.
- A third offense for the same land will be charged as a misdemeanor.
Aggravated or Felony Trespass
You will be charged with this crime under Penal Code 601 PC if you:
- Make a believable threat to severely injure someone else, with the intention to make the person fear for their safety and that of their family, and
- Within 30 days of threatening the person, enter their workplace or property with an intention to execute the threat.
Aggravated trespass is a wobbler. It is charged as a misdemeanor or a felony depending on your criminal record and the circumstances surrounding the crime.
Penalties for aggravated trespass as a misdemeanor are:
- Not more than 1 year in a county jail
- A maximum fine of $2,000
- Both the fine and sentence
For felony aggravated trespass, possible punishments are:
- 16 months, 2 years or 3 years in a county jail
- Formal probation
Contact a Property Crimes Attorney Near Me
Are you facing property crime charges? The first step is to seek a qualified attorney to represent you. Whether your action was deliberate or an accident, your best option is to hire a competent attorney. If you are in or around Los Angeles, CA, call our Los Angeles criminal lawyer at 818-484-1100 to speak with Van Nuys Criminal Attorney. We will spare no resource or time in our endeavor to discredit the evidence against you for the best possible verdict.
A person can be charged with arson if they knowingly and purposely set fire or assist in setting fire to private and public property. Arson is a serious felony that can be charged with up to 9 years in jail and with fines that can range up to $50,000. The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) explains that arson is a prevalent crime that has the capacity to affect many lives each year. The NFPA describes that there were roughly 261,300 annual intentional fires between 2010 and 2014. The fires caused a total of 440 deaths and resulted in 1,310 injuries. The costs of property damage were as high as 1 billion in each of the four years.
The numbers presented above have dramatically lowered since 1999 when Clark County Fire Department in Nevada reported a total of 418,000 intentional fires across the United States. Their report states that the fires caused around $2.7 billion dollars in property damage and a total of 622 deaths. Since 1991, the investigation found that 50 percent of all intentional fires were caused by juveniles. The number of juveniles that interact with fire and burn buildings or other public areas is also significantly high in recent years.
The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) believes that through passions and education we can reduce the number of arson-related fires. Teaching our youth about the dangers of intentional fires can impact the actions of future generations. To learn more about the NFPA and their mission, you are encouraged to visit the following page: www.nfpa.org/About-NFPA
While the NFPA is on a mission to reduce the number of arson-related cases across the United States, there are multiple individuals who do not receive the message and end up in jail as a result of their actions. In the state of California, there are a number of penal codes that describe the different forms of arson that are punishable by law. People who set fire to parks, forests, public buildings, and other private entities, will face serious charges if their acts were intentional and out of malice. However, individuals who accidentally set a building or public space on fire may also be guilty of acting recklessly if their actions amounted to property damage and harm to another person.
If you are being charged with arson in a court of law, you should speak with a local state attorney. In related arson cases, the state of California will consider the defendant’s intent and if their actions caused harm to a bystander. For an arson-related conviction, there are three essential components that are present, 1) the intent to purposefully and maliciously commit a crime, 2) willingly set fire or assist in setting fire to public or private places, 3) setting fire to private and public buildings, forests, and other property.
Cases that involve arson requires the attention of a specialized attorney who is versed in the specific penal codes that address arson. If you need to speak to an attorney about your case, you are encouraged to contact Leah Legal at 818-484-1100. In a courtroom, the prosecuting party will attempt to place fault on the defendant especially when they seek reparations. Even when individuals did not act out of malice, if a courtroom decides that their actions were reckless, they may be required to pay certain fines and face a certain amount of time in prison. If you are innocent and your actions were not intentional, you will require the attention of an attorney who can vigorously represent your case.
We are capable of evaluating your case and finding any weakness in the prosecutor’s case. Depending on the factors of your case, we may be able to reduce the fines and jail sentence if we can prove that your actions were not intentional. However, if there is enough evidence to support that your actions were unlawful you will need legal representation in a courtroom. If you are guilty of arson, you will vigorous representation to ensure that all the facts of your side are adequately represented.
Why do people burn public and private places?
There are a number of reasons as to why an individual will engage in arson activities. Some individuals have fire protection insurance and burning their building might be motivated by monetary incentives. On the other hand, individuals may burn a public or private place just for their own guilty pleasure. Most commonly individuals burn buildings and public places for the following reasons:
- Monetary Incentive: As mentioned earlier, an individual may set fire to his or her property for monetary gains. Burning a building to receive money from insurance companies is a form of fraud that can be punished as a felony.
- Mischief: People can choose to act out of malice meaning that their intentions are not reasonable. Individuals who wish harm to others out of their actions can be punished with an arson felony.
- Retaliation: Sometimes there are individuals that engage in arson to retaliate or to find revenge.
- Conceal a crime: People may choose to set a place on fire to hide evidence in a crime. Sometimes individuals may choose to burn a building to hide a body or to choose to burn a car so that their evidence disappears.
If a prosecutor is able to establish that the defendant acted with one of the motives mentioned above, a judge will most likely order harsh fines and punishments. To determine the punishment terms and conditions a judge takes into account the age of the defendant, the defendant’s intent or justifications, the defendant’s mental state, and other factors. Before an arson conviction, the court will take into great consideration the reckless behavior that might have led to the fire. If the court can prove that the individual acted recklessly with no regard for human life, the charges can quickly increase.
California Penal Codes: Arson
The following are penal codes that apply to individuals that engage in an arson-related crime. If you are charged with violating any of the following penal codes, the consequences can result in jail time and high fines.
- California Penal Code 451: states that a person can be convicted of arson if they purposely and knowingly set fire to a park, forest, private property, private real estate, commercial structures and other public lands.
- Section (a): explains that arson that causes bodily harm to another person can be punished with jail time ranging from five to nine years.
- Section (b): explains that it is a felony for individuals to burn property that is ‘inhabited’ and can be punished with up to six years in prison.
- Section (c): explains that setting fire to a building structure or forest land is punishable with a felony.
- Section (d): explains that it is a felony to burn other people’s property. It also describes that it is not illegal to burn one’s own property unless the individual burns the property for fraudulent reasons.
- Section (e): explains that a prison sentence under arson will be added to an existing prison sentence
- California Penal Code 451.5: goes a step further adding that assistance in the burning of property or structures with premeditation can be charged as a felony. In addition, it states that an individual can be charged with an ‘aggravated arson’ if the defendant has a history of arson within the last ten years or if the arson has caused over 7 million in property damages. Furthermore, an aggravated arson is ruled when the fire has burned five or more residential or inhabited structures. Individuals who are charged with an aggravated arson may be looking at 10 years to life in prison.
- California Penal Code 452: this penal code explains that unlawful fires that burn structures, forest or other property, can be punished as a felony.
- Section (a): if the fire causes a bodily harm to another individual the defendant can face up to six years in county jail.
- Section (b): if an unlawful fire caused the burning of an inhabited building the punishment can include up to three years in prison and other fines may be applied.
- Section (c): If an unlawful fire led to the burning of a structure or forest the felony can be punished with up to three years in prison.
- Section (d): explains that unlawful fires affecting property can be charged with a misdemeanor.
- Section (e): if individuals are already a jail sentence, the punishments will be consecutive to the sentence the individual is currently serving.
- California Penal Code 453: this penal code explains that it is punishable by law for individuals to have, distribute, or produce material that is created with the intent to burn a building structure, public lands, or property. The possession or creation of an ‘incendiary device’ is punishable by months no longer than a year in county jail.
- California Penal Code 455: this penal code adds that ‘placing’ an incendiary device in a structure, forest, or other public/private property with the intent to cause a fire, is punishable with up to three years in prison.
- California Penal Code 457.1: establishes that arson is a violation of the above mentioned penal codes. This penal code also adds that individuals convicted of an arson felony will be required to register with the law enforcement agencies in their region or school (if they are attending college).
Arson Penalties
A court may order some of the following punishments for the following convictions:
- Causing great bodily harm to one or multiple individuals can be punished with up to 9 years in prison.
- Attempting or planning out a fire can be fined with up to three years in prison
- Setting a certain property on fire can be fined with up to three years in prison
- Setting on fire an inhabited building can be punished with up to eight years in prison
At any moment, any individual charged with arson for violation of the penal codes states above may be charged with a fine of up to $50,000. The fines and prison sentences can increase when there is a 1) history of arson, 2) when the fire has caused great bodily harm to multiple individuals, 3) when the fire has affected multiple buildings, 4) when the individual has used an incendiary device to plot a crime, 5) when firefighters or paramedics are hurt due to the incidental fire.
When deciding the right type of punishments the court will take into account the cost of human and the overall property damage that is caused by the fire. The prison sentence can range from a couple of months to a lifetime in prison especially property damage exceeds 7 million and more than one life is affected as a result of the fire. In other instances, an aggravated arson is a serious crime that can be punished with up to life in prison. In some courts, a person charged with aggravated arson will not be eligible for parole until after ten years.
Arson is a very serious crime that has the ability to affect many lives. Setting to a building, public space, forestland, or other private property has grave consequences. Aside from the consequences that can be calculated, a fire can cause incalculable damage to the environment. Wildfires can alter ecosystems, affecting animals and wild life that exists in the forest. In addition, arson can cause great harm to multiple individuals affecting the lives of victims forever. If you are being charged with arson, you should speak with an attorney to learn how the laws apply to your case. In some cases, you may be capable of proving that your actions were not intentional.
To avoid a wrong conviction you are encouraged to seek legal guidance and professional representation. In a courtroom, the prosecutor will attempt to place fault on individuals that are thought to have caused a fire. Fires can cause great damage to property which means that owners and other victims of arson are looking for monetary reparations. Whether or not you assisted with arson, an arson charge can have serious consequences. If you are charged with arson, you may contact Van Nuys Criminal Attorney today to schedule a consultation. Our offices can be reached at 818-484-1100.
Damaging phone, electrical, or utility lines under California Penal Code section 591 is a crime that must be committed in a malicious manner in order for there to be a conviction. This crime is a more serious offense than the crime of vandalism Penal Code section 594, which is of a similar nature. The reason that the act of maliciously damaging phone, electrical or utility lines is considered a serious offense worthy of stringent sentences upon conviction, is that now more than ever we rely heavily on our electricity and our phones to connect and communicate with one another on a day to day basis. Especially now during the age of internet communication, we use them at home and at the workplace. We use them for business and we use them for pleasure. We also need phone and electricity lines to make sure that are able to contact emergency response services, if necessary. If you disconnect, remove, injure, or obstruct wires for telephone or cables service, you can be charged and convicted of this crime. Oftentimes the offense of a violation of Penal Code section 591 is charged in combination with other offenses such as domestic violence or burglary.
In order for a person to be found guilty of having committed the crime of damaging phone, electrical or utility lines under Penal Code section 591, the prosecution must prove the following elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.
Elements of Damaging Phone, Electrical or Utility Lines
- A person must have unlawfully and maliciously taken down, removed, injured, disconnected, cut or obstructed a line of telegraph, telephone, or cable television, or another line used to conduct electricity or any part thereof, or appurtenance or apparatus connected to it, or
- The person must have severed a line of telegraph, telephone or cable television, or another line used to conduct electricity, or
- The person made an unauthorized connection with a line, other than a telegraph, telephone or cable television line, used to conduct electricity or a part thereof, or appurtenance or apparatus connected to it.
Willfully – What does it mean for a person to commit an act willfully? It means that he or she did the act on purpose. What it does not mean, however, is that the person had the intention to break the law or hurt someone else. Example: Johnny and Mary Ann have been married for 10 years. After several years of unhappiness Mary Ann informed Johnny that she no longer wanted to continue the marriage and that she had filed for a divorce. Johnny was convinced that there was another man but Mary Ann assured him that there was not. He waited until she fell asleep and went outside to try to tap the phones to the house so that he could listen in on her conversations and find out who it was she was leaving him for. In the process, rather than successfully tapping the phones, he simply broke the cable lines. Johnny has committed a violation of Penal Code section 591 damaging phone, electrical or utility lines because he acted both willfully and intentionally. And this is true even as his intentions were not to damage the lines but rather to simply tamper with them and as result of his unlawful tampering with the phone lines damages ensued. Since he willfully committed the act of tampering, he can be found guilty of this crime.
Maliciously – What the Code means by “maliciously” is that the person intended to hurt someone else or to commit a wrongful act. If a person doesn’t act with such intent, he cannot be convicted of Penal Code section 591 damaging phone, electrical or utility lines. Example: Shawn is having trouble with his cable TV and he thinks that the issue might have something to do with the wires running through his backyard. When he tries to untangle them, he ends up causing damage not only to his wires, but to the wires that run to several of his neighbors’ cable service. However, since Shawn never intended to hurt someone else or commit a wrongful act against them, the element of malice is missing and he cannot be guilty of damaging phone, electrical or utility lines pursuant to Penal Code section 591.
Penalties for Damaging Phone, Electrical, or Utility Lines
Damaging phone, electrical, or utility lines under California’s Penal Code section 591 is considered a wobbler crime. If a crime is considered a wobbler it means that the violation may be charged as either a misdemeanor or felony crime. The manner in which it is filed – misdemeanor or felony – is totally up to the discretion of the prosecution. The prosecutor, in making this determination, will look to the seriousness of the facts of the case, or lack thereof, and will take into consideration whether or not the defendant has a prior criminal history,
If a person is convicted of a misdemeanor violation of Penal Code section 591 damaging phone, electrical or utility lines, he or she can receive a maximum fine of $1,000 and/or a maximum of one year in county jail, as well as misdemeanor or summary probation.
If a person is convicted of a felony violation of Penal Code section 591 damaging phone, electrical or utility lines, he or she can receive either 16 months in county jail, two years in county jail, or three years in county jail under California’s realignment program, a maximum fine of $10,000, and the possibility of felony probation.
Defenses for Damaging Phone, Electrical, or Utility Lines Penal Code 591 PC
The offense of damaging phone, electrical or utility lines under Penal Code section 591 carries serious consequences. If you or someone that you know or love has been charged with this crime, it is crucial that you consult with an attorney who is knowledgeable and experienced in these types of matters. Attorney Leah Naparstek of the Criminal Defense Law Office of Leah Legal is very skilled at handling such cases. She is highly regarded as a tough yet compassionate defender who has a deep knowledge of the law.
Accident – The most common defense for these cases is that the incident was simply an accident. In order to be successfully convicted of a violation of penal code section 591 you must have acted willfully. If the incident in question was an accident then you did not act willfully therefore you did not commit a crime. Example: You are driving down the street when you hit a patch of ice. The ice causes your car to spin out uncontrollably. Your car subsequently hits a telephone pole causing some of the telephone wires to become entangled and to emit sparks. The police come and question you and you inform them that is was merely an accident. This situation is not a situation where you could be charged with a violation of Penal Code section 591 because even though you did cause damage to telephone wires, this was an accident and you did not act willfully.
Related Crimes
Vandalism, Penal Code section 594 – Vandalism is a very severe crime wherein someone maliciously defaces someone else’s property, damaging it, or destroying it.
Domestic Violence, Penal Code section 243(e)(1) – Domestic violence is a misdemeanor crime of inflicting harm upon an intimate partner or cohabitant.
Burglary, Penal Code section 459 – Burglary is unlawfully entering a building with the intention to commit a crime once inside.
You probably have heard about trespassing at one point in your life or found a warning sign indicating that you should not trespass a given property. Most people understand trespassing as unauthorized entry to someone else’s property without their permission. Legally, regardless of your intention, an unauthorized entry in someone’s property is considered trespassing.
In California, trespass is a civil crime punishable in both civil and criminal court, which means that you can face charges from the property owner or the state. Such crimes carry a possible jail time and hefty fines based on various factors. If you The best way to fight such charges is by hiring a professional attorney. The law firm of Leah Legal in Los Angeles is capable of taking on such a situation based on their level of experience and responsiveness. Even so, it is essential to learn a few things about trespass crimes in California to follow through your case accordingly.
Legal Definition of Trespass in California
California Penal Code 602 defines trespassing as entry onto the property of another person without permission to do so and with the intent of doing something. The code provides over thirty activities, considered criminal trespass. However, common acts that fall within California trespassing laws include:
- Entering into another person’s property to damage the property
- Entering another person’s property with the intention of obstructing the business activities conducted there
- Entering another person’s property without permission and occupying it
- Entering another person’s property and refusing to leave when asked to do so
There are other activities considered as forms of trespassing under Penal Code 602. These actions include:
- Taking soil from another person’s property without his/her permission
- Taking any shellfish from another person’s land
- Refusal of screening in a public place such as a courthouse or an airport
All the above-stated activities complicate trespassing laws. In that case, there are specific elements of crimes that make up the legal definition of most forms of trespass in California.
Elements of California Trespass
Under Penal Code 602 PC, there are specific elements a prosecutor must prove to court to successfully convict you with a trespass crime. The elements of the crime are as follows:
- You Willfully Entered Someone Else’s Property
Willfully entering someone else’s property means that your action was deliberate or on purpose. It does not mean that you intended to break the law per se, but it means you had the intention of carrying on with the trespass. Therefore, wandering into someone’s property without any intention to do something does not count as trespass.
- You had a Specific Intention with the Other Person’s Property
Specific intent explains a particular mental state. This means that you did not specifically intend to do something, but you were consciously aware of the consequences that follow after the act.
- You Interfered with the Property Rights of the Owner of the Property You Entered
The kind of interference considered in this element must consider damaging the property, or interference with the usual activities carried out in a business. Besides, you must have succeeded in your intention to cause interference to satisfy this element.
- You Occupied the Property
This is a common element that applies to California trespass lawsuits. The legal definition of occupying the property is remaining on someone else property continuously for a given time.
Penalties for Trespass in California
Under California laws, trespass can be filed in three different ways based on the circumstances surrounding the crime. These charges include:
Trespass
Under Penal Code 602 PC, a majority of trespass cases are considered misdemeanors. Misdemeanor cases carry potential penalties, such as:
- Summary probation
- Imprisonment in a county jail for up to six months
- A fine that can amount to $ 1,000
However, particular forms of misdemeanor trespass, like failing to leave the house of a battered woman, carry a potential jail sentence lasting up to a year.
Infraction
Trespass, as an infraction, is one common type of crime in California. Trespass is considered as an infraction if:
- You entered someone’s else property willfully and
- The land has an enclosure, or there is a signpost warning people from entering the area and is within three or more miles from the land.
Under Penal Code 602.8 PC, such an action is considered an infraction and carries potential penalties such as:
- $75 fine for the first offense
- $250 fine for the second offense on the same land
For a third offense, you will end up being charged with misdemeanor trespass and bear all the penalties that fall in such crimes.
Felonies
Under Penal Code 601 PC, aggravated or felony trespass occurs when you:
- Make a credible and believable threat or seriously injure someone with the intent of making the person feat for his or her safety or that of his or her family
- Enter the person’s property within 30 days of making a threat on the person owning the property
In California, an aggravated trespass is considered a wobbler, meaning that it can either be regarded as a misdemeanor or a felony. The factors that determine whether it is a misdemeanor or felony include:
- Your criminal history
- The circumstances surrounding your offense
A misdemeanor aggravated felony carries a penalty of jail imprisonment for up to a year or fine that can reach up to $2,000.
If you are charged with an aggravated felony trespass, you risk imprisonment for 16 months, two years or three years in county jail. Alternatively, you can get a felony( formal) probation.
Possibility of Expunging a Trespass Charge from the California Criminal Records
Anyone who faces a trespass conviction in California can have his or her criminal records dismissed under certain circumstances. For instance, if you complete your probation, the judge might consider expunging your charge from the California criminal records.
Even so, the judge might fail to expunge your criminal record if you did not adhere to all the terms provided on your probation.
Legal Defense for California Trespass
Being charged with California trespass does not mean that all hope is lost. You can still get a lesser charge or even walk scot-free if you hire an attorney. Any professional attorney would use relevant legal defenses to ensure that you get a fair trial and ensure that your rights are well-represented. Some of the legal defenses your attorney could use include:
- Claim that You had a Right to be on the Property
Under Penal Code 602 PC, the prosecutor must prove that you had no legal right to be on a property to satisfy the requirements of trespass charges. Therefore, if you had the right to be on the property, the charges do not count as valid. For instance, if being on someone else’s property is part of your participation in a labor organization activity, then there is no claim of trespassing in such an instance.
A skilled attorney should help you determine whether participation in activities such as those considered by labor organizations are constitutionally protected activities and protected by the American constitution.
- Argue that You had Consent to be on the Property
It is easier to defend yourself from trespass charges if you can prove that the property owner had initially provided consent to be on his or her property. Such kinds of defenses are ideal when the prosecutor claimed that you unlawfully occupied another person’s property.
However, the defense is invalid if the owner asked you to leave the vicinity of his or her property and refused to do so. In such a case, you might end up criminally liable unless you were participating in a labor organization party or other activities protected by the constitution.
- Claim that You did not Occupy the Property
Under Penal Code 602 PC, there are specific requirements needed to conclude that someone occupied a property. These requirements include:
- Depriving the owner of the property enjoyment of his or her property in some way
- Occupying the property for a substantial period
Therefore, if your charges include a brief stay on someone else’s property without his or her permission, then you can argue that you are not guilty of trespass.
- Assert that You Never Obstructed or Interfered with the Activities within the Property
Under Penal Code 604 PC, it is prohibited to enter someone else’s property to interfere with the business activities carried out within the property. Therefore, if your unauthorized entry did not obstruct the business activities in any way, you can use this defense to argue that you did not commit criminal trespass.
- Claim that the Land had no Sign Warning Trespassers
Under Penal Code 602.8 entering another person’s property without consent if it is either:
- Enclosed or fenced or
- Marked with a signpost indicating that you should not trespass is considered an infraction.
In such a conviction, you can claim that the property was not fully enclosed, or there was no signpost warning trespassers. In such a case, you might have your charges dismissed by the judge.
- Claim that You had No Intent to interfere with the Property
Because of the element of intending to interfere with the property, failing to have such intent can be a good defense for your trespass charges.
Crimes Related to Trespass in California
Certain charges are filed with or instead of California trespass. Here is an in-depth view of some of the common crimes related to California trespass.
Vandalism
Under Penal Code 594 PC, it is prohibited to damage, deface, or destroy another person’s property. Therefore, any actions that fall within such description are considered as vandalism and attracts different penalties and punishment.
Under California laws, the punishment for vandalism depends on whether the property was worth more or less $ 400. For damages worth less than $400, the crime is a misdemeanor, while those above $ 400 are considered as a wobbler.
Burglary
California Penal Code 459 PC contains burglary laws. The law applies when one enters someone else’s property intending to commit a felony or steal something inside the respective property. Therefore, if you enter another person’s property intending to commit aggravated trespass, you might end up charged with both burglary and aggravated trespass.
However, based on the circumstances of your actions or arrest, the judge can consider your criminal trespass as a lesser offense of a burglary. Therefore, you will end up being punished for only one of the offenses rather than both.
California burglary is a felony when committed to someone else’s house and wobbler when committed in another type of structure. The potential punishment for the crime includes a jail sentence ranging from a year for a misdemeanor and up to six years if it is a felony burglary.
Theft Crime
If one trespasses another person’s property without consent and steals something from the property, the prosecutor might charge him or her with both trespass and theft crimes. However, the prosecutor determines whether the action was a theft crime based on the circumstances of the offense.
Domestic Violence
Particular types of domestic violence have connections with criminal trespass. For instance, if you violated California’s Stalking Law ( Penal Code 646.9 PC), there are connections with California trespass charges.
Also, if you violated California’s criminal threats law(Penal Code 422 PC), where you made credible threats to another person, you might be charged along with trespass.
Being charged with either Penal Code 646.9 PC or Penal Code 422 PC means that you illegally entered the premises of another person, which can lead to trespass charges and domestic charges as well.
Using Trespass as a Plea Bargain
For anyone convicted with criminal charges such as domestic violence or burglary, the attorney can use trespass charges in a plea bargain negotiation to reduce the penalties of more severe charges. Trespass is quite reasonable since it does not have a pronounced stigma in social circles and usually carries lesser penalties.
There is a different implication of immigrants’ using trespass in a plea bargain. Such a bargain carries severe consequences on your immigration status because it is considered as a crime with moral turpitude.
However, this does not mean that you can use the plea as a bargain for your criminal charges. There are certain forms of trespass that do not count as moral turpitude. For instance, if you entered a property with the consent of its owner and had no intention of doing any harm, this does not count as a severe trespass offense.
Homeowners Liability for Trespassers Injuries
Under California laws, homeowners have the obligation over anyone within their property, but with their consent. However, if the other person does not have any permission from the owner, he or she is not liable for the injuries that the trespasser sustains. Even so, the law does not provide that the homeowner should willfully injure the trespasser.
Also, if the homeowner is knowledgeable of frequent trespassing, he or she might be liable for the injuries if they were caused by the unsafe condition of the property if:
- The owner is responsible for creating the condition
- The condition had a likelihood of causing severe bodily injuries or death
- The owner believed that the trespasser would not discover the condition
- The owner did not exercise reasonable care to warn trespassers of the condition and the risks associated with it
Liability for Injuries Involving Children
There are different rules when children are involved in trespassing a property. In case children wander to a property due to various items that can lure them to trespass, the homeowner is liable for the injuries that the children will sustain.
The property owner has the responsibility of inspecting the property and check whether it poses any potential danger to the children. Under California laws, the property owner is liable for injuries if he or she knows or should have known:
- Young children would likely trespass the property, and you are aware of the dangerous condition of a property that poses bodily injury to the children
- Young children would not be aware of the risk posed by the dangerous property
- The utility of the property is smaller compared with the threat that it poses
Statute of Limitation for California Trespass Crimes
A statute of limitations is the law that offers the period within which a prosecutor has to file a lawsuit. The statute of limitations for trespass applies under California Civil Code 338(b). The time limit for trespass crimes is three years, starting from the date of arrest or trespass. Therefore, if your prosecutor takes more than three years to file charges to court, the judge will likely dismiss your case since its timeline exceeds the required time limit.
Hire a Los Angeles Criminal Attorney Near Me
California’s trespass cases involve many complexities. It can be hard for you to handle such cases without the intervention of a professional criminal defense attorney. You need to engage an attorney with vast experience and a good reputation in the legal industry. We at Van Nuys Criminal Attorney are the best option to consider if you are in Los Angeles area. Contact us today at 818-484-1100 to talk to one of our attorneys today.
Vandalism is an act of intentionally harming someone else property. This kind of crime is usually associated with bored and misguided youth and fall under California Criminal Laws, specifically, Penal Code Section 594C.
Anyone convicted of this crime can face both mild and severe charges according to the kind of crimes committed. It is essential to hire an attorney to ensure that you get a fair trial and legal advice needed for such a case. We at Leah Legal are committed to ensuring that our clients get the best services. Even so, you must learn various aspects related to vandalism to be sure of the legal proceedings.
Definition of Vandalism Under California Law
The California Criminal laws defines vandalism as the malicious destruction or defacing of the property of another person. The crime falls under the Penal Code 594 PC and revolves around three elements of the crime.
Elements of Vandalism Crime in California
For a prosecutor to successfully convict an alleged person, he or she must prove all the elements of the crime. In vandalism, the elements of the crime are as follows:
That you Maliciously Destroyed or Damaged other Person’s Property by Defacing with Graffiti or Using any Other Inscribed Material
In this context, the emphasis is usually on the graffiti or any other inscribed materials. These terms refer to any unauthorized inscriptions, figures, mark, or design written, drawn, etched, or painted on personal property. In other words, this means that any unauthorized drawing or writing on the property using any tool qualifies in the description.
Real property includes any building attached to the land. On the other hand, personal property refers to anything within someone else’s property, such as a car, furniture inside a house, among other items. The law is not clear whether the graffiti or inscribed material should be permanent or not to qualify to be part of the charges.
Apart from graffiti, there are other acts within California Vandalism laws. These actions include:
- Spraying paint on the highway or a public bridge
- Keying the vehicle of another person
- Carving a heart or your initials in a public bench or tree in a park
- Slashing the tires of your ex’s car
- Throwing a rock on your or another person’s window
- Breaking into your property or another person’s property
Another Person Owned the Property
It might seem clear that vandalism is associated with a property that one does not own, but there are fine details that deserve a discussion. For instance, if the alleged vandalism was on public property such as the beach or park, the jury presumes that you do not have ownership of the property, which warrants the allegations.
Also, according to the Penal Code 594 PC, Vandalism law applies to a property that is jointly owned. For instance, if you vandalize a property you co-own with your husband or wife, you still stand to be convicted with vandalism allegations.
The Act was Malicious
A malicious act is defined as:
- Intentionally did a wrongful act
- An action that was unlawful and intended to annoy or injure someone else
The act does not mean that one intended to break the law per se. Therefore, if you did the action accidentally, then you are not guilty of vandalism.
The Level of Defacement, Destruction or Damage was within a Particular Financial Value
There is a specific monetary value of the property destroyed that determines whether vandalism is a misdemeanor or felony. For instance, if the economic cost of replacing or repairing the vandalized property is less than $400, the prosecutor will charge you with misdemeanor vandalism.
If the financial value of repairing or replacing the property is above $400, the prosecutor will consider the crime as a wobbler, meaning that he or she can charge you with a felony or misdemeanor.
For the prosecutor to decide whether it is a felony, he or she must consider whether you have prior acts of vandalism on your criminal record and if the total value of the damaged property is above $400.
Note, you might have committed numerous acts of vandalism, but if they do not sum up to $400, the jury might decide to award you with a misdemeanor instead of a felony. Also, vandalism on the motor vehicle is not under Penal Code 594 PC but falls under the Vehicle Code 10853.
Penalties for Violating Vandalism Laws
Anyone who is allegedly convicted with vandalism in California faces harsh penalties, punishment, and sentencing. There are complicated penalties associated with vandalism in California. The penalties are as follows:
- Penalties For Misdemeanor Vandalism
A misdemeanor vandalism charge is one that the financial value of the damaged property is below $400. In such crimes, the penalties that might apply are:
- Imprisonment lasting up to a year
- A maximum fee of $1,000 to $5,000 if you had prior vandalism convictions
- Probation
The probation carries various restrictions and punishments, which are:
- Suspension of your California driver’s license for up to two years. If you do not hold any driver’s license, you might face a delay of your eligibility to get one for one to three years.
- Participation in community service. Some of the activities that you might be subjected to include personally cleaning, repairing, replacing the damaged property
- Keeping the damaged property or the property of another person free from any graffiti up to a year.
- Penalties for Felony Vandalism
Under California Penal Code 594 PC vandalism damages that amount more than $400 are considered as a wobbler. Therefore, for damages above $400, the alleged person faces penalties such as:
- One year of imprisonment
- A maximum fine of $10,000 or up to $50,000 if the financial value of the damage amounts to $10,000 or more
- Similar probation conditions to misdemeanor vandalism
For anyone convicted with felony vandalism, he or she faces penalties such as:
- Probation with one-year imprisonment in county jail, a jail sentence for sixteen months, two years, or three years.
- A fine that can amount up to $10,000 or a maximum of $50,000 if the damages are worth $10,000 or more
- Similar probation conditions provided for misdemeanor vandalism
Note, if you have ever served probation in one or two of your previous vandalism, the California law provides that you should serve a prison sentence or jail time in your current case.
- Penalties for Graffiti Damages
For a prosecutor to charge you with graffiti damages, the damage value limit is $250. This means that the damages must be valued less or more than $250. In such a case, the prosecutor might opt to charge you under Penal Code 640 .5 and 640.6 PC rather than Penal Code 594 PC. For the prosecutor to charge you with 640.5 PC or 640.6 PC, you probably had committed prior California graffiti or vandalism crimes.
- Penalties for a First Vandalism Conviction
California laws consider any graffiti vandalism conviction without a previous similar conviction as an infraction. In such a crime, the potential penalties include:
- A fine that can reach up to a maximum of $1,000
- Community service
- Penalties for a Second Vandalism Conviction
Under Penal Code 594 PC and other California vandalism law, a prosecutor should charge you with a misdemeanor if the damage costs were below $250. Therefore, the penalties for such crimes fall under misdemeanor vandalism.
If the offender gets convicted under Penal Code 640.5 or 640.6, the penalties might be different from those under Penal Code 594 PC. The penalties include:
- Imprisonment in a county jail for up to 6 months
- A fine that can reach up to $ 2,000
- Community service
- Penalties for Third and Subsequent Vandalism Conviction
There are three things you need to consider to determine whether a particular conviction falls under this category. They include:
- A sentence with two or more previous vandalism offenses
- Served a jail sentence or probation for one or both convictions
- You were convicted with graffiti worth less than $250 under Penal Code 640.5 or 640.6 PC.
For anyone who falls within the elements provided above, he or she will face the following misdemeanor penalties:
- One year of county jail imprisonment
- A fine that can reach up to $3,000
- community service.
Penalties for Other Types of Vandalism
Apart from the Penal Code 594 PC, other laws can convict anyone who conducts an act of vandalism. However, other statutes do not focus on the cost of the damage but consider the type of property and the type of vandalism the offender conducts. The act of vandalism is as follows:
Vandalism on a Place of Worship
Under Penal Code 594.3 PC, vandalizing a place of worship, whether it is a church, temple, mosque, or any other place of worship, is regarded as a wobbler despite the cost of the damage.
For a misdemeanor offense, the penalties are as follows:
- Imprisonment in a county jail for up to a year
- A fine that can amount to $1,000
- All probation conditions that apply under Penal Code 594 PC
If anyone gets convicted with a felony, he or she risks penalties such as:
- Imprisonment for 16 months, two years or three years
- A maximum fine of $10,000
- Probation with all conditions applied under Penal Code 594
Note: if you intended to intimidate or scare someone based on his or her religious beliefs, then the action is considered a hate crime. In such a case, you will automatically face a felony conviction.
Under Penal Code 594.35 PC, conducting a similar act as the one stated-above at a mortuary or cemetery will attract similar penalties.
Vandalism on or Near a Freeway or Highway
Penal Code 640.7 and 640.8 PC set forth the penalties for vandalism that occur on a highway or freeway. Such crimes are considered misdemeanors and are punishable by:
- Six months imprisonment for a first conviction on or near a highway
- Jail time for up to a year for the second conviction or the first conviction of vandalism on or near a freeway
- Community service or attend counseling
Possibility of California Vandalism Conviction Expungement
Since there is a possibility of probation sentence in a misdemeanor vandalism conviction, your case might get expunged from the California criminal records if you complete your probationary period. Even so, the judge might deny your expungement if you fail to adhere to some of the conditions of your probation.
Besides, anyone who has been convicted with felony vandalism can seek the reduction of charges to a misdemeanor. Also, you might get an early termination of your probation if you adhere to the terms and conditions of your probation within the first year or two years.
Legal Defenses for California Vandalism Charges
You need to hire an attorney if you want to be successful in your case. Your attorney should apply relevant legal defenses on your behalf to avoid severe punishment or have the judge dismiss the trial. The legal defenses for California vandalism charges include:
- Your Action Was Not Malicious
As required by Penal Code 594 PC, you must maliciously vandalize another person’s property to satisfy that the act was a vandalism crime. So, if the act was accidental, you can use this aspect as your defense.
- You Owned the Damaged Property
Penal Code 594 PC requires an offender to have maliciously defaced or destroyed another person’s property to satisfy the crime. Therefore, if you did the action within your property and there is legal evidence it belongs to you, you can use this aspect as your defense in a trial.
- You had Consent from the Owner
If you get consent from the property owner to destroy something, the act is not malicious since you have permission from the owner. However, to satisfy this legal defense, you must prove you had consent from the owner.
- The Claim was False
Most vandalism crimes have a connection with domestic cases. Therefore, there are possibilities of false allegations due to jealousy, revenge, or anger against you. Someone else might deface or destroy another person’s property and lay blame on you as a form of revenge or jealousy.
- You were Mistakenly Identified
You can also claim that you were mistakenly identified with the real wrongdoer. This might happen if:
- Your description matches the offender
- You were in the company of the offender
- Someone mistakenly believes you are responsible for the act and blamed you for it, although it is not true.
Crimes Related to Vandalism
There are particular offenses with similar charges or have a connection to California vandalism. These kinds of offenses include:
Trespass
Under Penal Code 602 PC, it is prohibited to enter another person’s property without his or her right. Therefore, if you trespassed another person’s property and vandalized his or her property, you will be charged with both offenses.
Burglary
Under Penal Code 459 PC, it is prohibited to enter the property of another person to commit petty theft or felony once you are inside. Therefore, if caught inside a property and with the intention of committing felony vandalism, the prosecutor will charge you with both burglary and vandalism.
Burglary, in an inhabited structure or house, is considered as a felony and carries a maximum of 6 years of state imprisonment. If the act was in an uninhabited structure, the case becomes a wobbler.
Arson
Penal Code 451 PC describes Arson as an act of maliciously setting fire to another person’s property. Also, in some cases, the law applies to your property, as well. If one gets charged with Arson, the prosecutor might also charge you with vandalism since you destroyed the same property under California law.
The act usually carries felony penalties which depends on:
- If there were injuries sustained by the victims
- The type of property involved
- Whether you set the fire willfully or it was a reckless act
Domestic Violence
As mentioned earlier, there is an excellent connection between vandalism and domestic violence. This occurs when the action arose from a dispute between a couple. In such a scenario, two statutes apply, which are the Penal Code 273.5 PC and Penal Code 243(e)(1) PC.
Under Penal Code 273.5 PC, one spouse should willfully inflict bodily injury on their spouse, leading to a traumatic condition such as a visible wound. On the other hand, Penal Code 243e1 PC involves a willful act of inflicting any amount of force or violence on your spouse- even when it did not leave any visible wound or mark on the spouse.
Statute of Limitations for Vandalism
The Statute of Limitations provides the period that a prosecutor has to file a lawsuit. Since vandalism is a wobbler, the period in the statute of limitations that applies depends on the maximum prison term you will get if the charge was a felony. Therefore, since the maximum penalty for vandalism is three years, the statute of limitations provides three years for vandalism cases.
Find an Criminal Attorney Near Me
Cases related to vandalism in California are complex. It is hard for any person to follow through such cases without the intervention of a professional attorney. If you are in Los Angeles, CA, we at Van Nuys Criminal Attorney are the best attorneys for your vandalism case. We are ready to offer the best services that match the reputation we have established with our former clients. For more information, reach out to us at 818-484-1100 and schedule an appointment with us.
If you commit a criminal offense in California, and you have a mental illness/disorder, the law may allow you to seek diversion/treatment for the disorder. This program goes by the name pretrial diversion program in California. The California PC 1001.36 outlines the pretrial diversion program. If you complete the mental illness/disorder diversion/treatment successfully, The Court might dismiss your criminal charges. At this point, the law allows the sealing of your record or arrest for the majority of purposes. You will enjoy your freedom as if the arrest never took place. If you are facing criminal charges in Los Angeles, California, and you have a mental illness, Leah Legal can advise you on a pretrial diversion program.
Understanding Pretrial diversion program
The California PC 1001.36 PC allows defendants with mental illness/disorders to take advantage of the mental health pretrial diversion and diversion/treatment program in the form of pretrial diversion in California. A pretrial diversion is a program that gives the defendant a chance to hold further action is his/her case and participates in a diversion/treatment program. With the help of an attorney, a defendant may request a pretrial diversion program at any stage in the criminal case. The defendant should request for the mental health pretrial diversion before the sentencing.
The program is advantageous because, after completing the diversion/treatment successfully, the court suspends/dismisses your criminal charges. The court then seals your record of arrest, and you cannot face victimization based on the arrest record. For instance, when applying for employment, potential employers will not be able to learn about your past arrest record even if the employer runs a background check.
Other forms of pretrial diversions in California available to people facing criminal charges include the California drug diversion program and the diversion program for military veterans who have mental disorders. Also available is the California diversion program for a bad check. In some parts of California, clients may take advantage of a diversion program for a general misdemeanor. The California pretrial diversion program came into effect after the coming to effect of Senate Bill 8 in California. The California statute outlining the diversion program took effect in June 2018
Eligibility for Pretrial Diversion Program
According to California law, the court has the discretion to decide whether to grant a pretrial diversion program or not. However, for you to qualify for the diversion program, you have to meet some requirements. It must be evident that you have a mental illness or disorder. In determining the existence of mental illness/disorder, the court relies on the recent edition/version of the DSM-V (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental illness/disorders). Some of the mental illness/disorders that may qualify for pretrial diversion include post-traumatic stress, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar disorder. It is important to note that some conditions like an antisocial personality, pedophilia, and borderline personality may not qualify for pretrial diversion.
For the court to consider that the defendant is suffering from a disorder, a careful evaluation of the DSM-V is necessary to help consider whether the mental illness/disorder qualifies for diversion. The court might request your attorney to provide any evidence of your mental illness/disorder. The evidence may include reliable medical records revealing the results of mental tests carried out by a competent health professional.
Suffering from a mental illness/disorder is not enough to help you qualify for the pretrial diversion program. The disorder must have greatly contributed to your commission of the said crime. The court must be sure that you will benefit from the diversion program. Therefore, your symptoms and signs motivating the criminal conduct must be capable of responding to mental diversion/treatment. In determining whether your condition can respond to mental diversion/treatment, the court relies on the opinion/viewpoint of a competent mental health professional.
For you to qualify and benefit from the diversion program, you have to consent to participate in the diversion/treatment. If you give consent to the program and waive your right to a fast/ speedy trial, The Court might grant you the chance. However, there may be an exception to the conditions if you are incompetent or unqualified to participate in a trial. If you are not willing to participate in the program, the court cannot force you. Instead, the court will continue with the sentencing and impose imprisonment, hefty fines, or pronation, depending on the circumstances of your case.
Above all, before granting the pretrial diversion program, the court must be sure that you will not pose a significant unreasonable risk to the safety of the public upon allowing you to participate in a pretrial diversion program. In determining whether you are a risk to the safety of the public, The Court might seek the opinion of the District Attorney. The court might also rely on the counsel of the defense or qualified mental health professional. Before granting the pretrial diversion program, The Court might consider your criminal history and or your history of violent behavior. While deciding whether to grant diversion, the court will also consider your current case. For instance, if the current case included violent conduct, you may not qualify for the program. The court might also consider any other factors that it may deem relevant to your criminal case.
Unreasonable Risk of Danger to the Public
According to California law, PC 1170.18 (c), a significant unreasonable risk of danger to the safety of the public means that there is a risk that you will commit a new violent felony. In considering whether you will pose a risk to the public, the court aims at preventing your commission of future claims. You may pose a significant unreasonable risk to the public under various circumstances.
First, you may pose a significant unreasonable risk if you are likely to commit sexually violent offenses outlined under the California Welfare & Institutions Code Section 6600 (b). Other unreasonable risks include sexual assault like oral copulation, sodomy, and sexual penetration if you commit the offenses against a person who is below the age of fourteen years. You also pose a significant unreasonable risk if you commit a sexual offense on a person who is more than ten years younger than you.
Other offenses that qualify as unreasonable risk include lascivious or lewd acts involving a child below the age of 14 years in violation of California PC 288. It is an offense to commit a homicide offense as outlined under California PC 187 through PC 191.5. Included in this category is a crime of gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated in violation of the Penal Code 191.5 (a).
You may pose a significant unreasonable risk to the public if you solicit the commission of murder as outlined under California PC 653 f. You may be a risk to the safety of the public if you are likely to commit an offense assault with a machine gun on a peace officer or a firefighter, or a peace officer as outlined under the California PC 245 (d) (3). It is a risk to the public to possess a weapon of mass destruction. If you are likely to commit a violent or severe offense punishable by the death of life imprisonment in California, you are likely to pose a risk to the public.
How long will the Mental Diversion/Treatment Last?
According to the California PC 100.36, a mental diversion/treatment may last for two years. The program may either consist of inpatient and outpatient diversion/treatment, depending on the unique needs of the defendants. Before the court approves a defendant’s participation in the pretrial diversion program, the court puts into account the defense’s request, prosecution, defendant, the safety of the community.
Costs for the Diversion Program
As you plan to apply for a pretrial diversion program, you may wonder about who will be responsible for meeting the costs of the diversion/treatment. Mainly, costs for mental health diversion/treatment, according to PC 1001.36, are paid by private or public funds. If you do not have the financial capability to afford private diversion/treatment, the court might refer you to a county health agency. The court might also refer you to collaborative courts. It is important to note that you will only take part in the diversion/treatment if the set-aside entity has taken up the responsibility for your diversion/treatment. For you to participate in the program, there must be an availability of resources that you qualify for.
The court has to be satisfied that the inpatient and the outpatient program you select will be able to meet your specified mental and health diversion/treatment needs. The diversion program must not last for more than two years. While you are on diversion/treatment, the provider of diversion/treatment should provide regular updates of your progress to the court and both counsels.
Usually, the provider of mental diversion/treatment sends the progress report to both the prosecutor and the defense. In some instances, the court might hold a court hearing to decide whether to modify the diversion/treatment program. During the hearing, the court might also decide whether to refer the defendant to an investigator for conservatorship proceedings. Before the court takes any action to amend the mental diversion/treatment program, the court informs the defendant, the prosecution, and the defense counsel.
Reinstatement of Criminal Proceedings or Modification of Mental Diversion/treatment
While you are on the pretrial diversion program, certain factors may trigger reinstatement of criminal l proceedings of modification of your diversion/treatment. For the court to modify the diversion/treatment or reinstate the criminal proceedings, the court has to hold a hearing. Some of the factors may trigger a court hearing. For instance, if you commit another misdemeanor offense during the mental health pretrial diversion period, it may trigger a hearing. The misdemeanor offense should reflect your propensity for violence. You may trigger a court hearing if you commit another felony during the mental health pretrial diversion. If you engage in criminal behavior that renders you unsuitable for pretrial diversion, The Court might hold a hearing to decide on the way forward. The court might hold a hearing depending on the advice of a qualified mental health professional. The expert may recommend for modification of your mental diversion/treatment if you are performing below expectations during the program. The expert may also recommend a modification if you are gravely disabled. In assessing disablement, the expert relies on the Welfare and Institutions Code section 5008 (h) (1) (B). It is only upon a finding under this statute that you can be subject to referral in a conservatorship investigator.
Successful Completion of Mental Diversion/treatment Program
Upon successful completion of the mental diversion/treatment program At the completion of the diversion period, the court suspends/dismisses your criminal charges. The law considers you to have completed a program successfully if you have complied with all the conditions of the diversion program. You must have avoided additional violations of the law not related to your mental health while on diversion programs. You must also have in place a plan for extensive mental diversion/health care. If you fail to complete the diversion program successfully, The Court might reinstate your criminal proceedings. After the reinstatement of the criminal proceedings, you may use various defense strategies for your criminal case.
When you complete the mental health diversion/treatment, the court will seal your criminal arrest and your criminal charges. For most uses/purposes, the sealed criminal records will not appear, and it will be as if you did not commit the crime. For instance, an employer cannot deny you employment based on a sealed criminal record. With a sealed criminal record, you can be able to access other benefits, including state licensing, certificates, and benefits.
However, sealed records may count in some instances. For instance, if you are applying to be a police officer in California, you have to disclose the sealed criminal record. In connection with an application for this post, the DOJ will disclose the sealed arrest. The criminal justice agencies will have access to and even use sealed criminal records when performing their ordinary work duties. When the court is determining whether to grant you a pretrial diversion program upon committing a future criminal offense, The Court might consider previous sealed criminal records. At times, the sealed criminal record may be necessary to enhance the provision of continuing care and diversion/treatment.
Sealed Criminal Records and Immigration
Successful sealing of your criminal record in California will not prevent it from counting in the immigration court. However, you may not face immigration consequences/implications from your mental health pretrial diversion if you do not admit charges to deportable or an offense that may make you inadmissible to the United States. You cannot face immigration consequences if you do not accept charges for facts that may be essential elements of a deportable crime in the U.S.
If you are an immigrant in the United States, it is advisable to seek the counsel of an attorney before you agree to take part in a pretrial diversion program. Also, as an immigrant, you should never accept charges for an offense before you fully understand the immigration implications.
The Duty of the Court after the Dismissal of your Charges
Once you complete the pretrial diversion program and the court suspends/dismisses your charges, the court will have some roles to play. First, the court clerk must file a record of dismissal of your criminal charges with the Department of justice. The court also has to order a restriction of access to your dismissed criminal record. The restriction of the access of the criminal record is following California law PC 1001.9.
Incompetency to Stand Trial
If the court finds you incompetent or unqualified to participate in a trial, you may still qualify for a diversion according to the California PC 1370 and 1370.01. If the court charges you with a felony offense and you are ineligible to stand trial, you may qualify for diversion under several circumstances. You will qualify for diversion as long as you have not gained access to a mental health facility. If the court has received any information outlining that you may benefit from the diversion, you may be eligible. The court might also use its discretion to determine whether a dependent may benefit from a diversion. For you to qualify for a diversion program, the program must not last more than two years for a felony offense.
If you commit a misdemeanor offense and you are incompetent or unqualified to participate in a trial, you may qualify for diversion if the court decides that you are an ideal candidate for diversion. For a misdemeanor offense, you are eligible for diversion as long as the pretrial diversion program does not last for more than one year.
An attorney plays a major role in determining your qualification for a pretrial diversion program in California. If you or your loved one would benefit from the California Pretrial diversion program, you must get in touch with an experienced attorney. Go for an attorney who has assisted numerous people in finding a just and equitable resolution to their criminal charges. This way, you can be sure that the attorney will negotiate for the best outcome of your case.
Contact a Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
If you or a loved one commits a criminal offense in Los Angeles, CA, and you have a mental illness/disorder, you may benefit from the California pretrial diversion program. It is important to seek legal counsel from a reliable criminal defense attorney. Van Nuys Criminal Attorney can advise you on the best legal route for your case. Contact us at 818-484-1100 and speak to one of our attorneys.
Sex Crimes & What You Need To Know
Having police at your door suspecting you of a sex crime can be extremely troubling. You are right to be very afraid because just the accusation alone can carry a social stigma and ruin your reputation. This is especially as a result of the prosecution’s hostile portrayal of the accused and the emotional outcry from the media. A conviction will severely affect the rest of your life since it could mean the loss of freedom, employment, and even your family. There’s a wide array of illegal sexual behavior under the umbrella of sex crime ranging from violent sexual offenses to social transgressions.
Defending yourself against the charges is a difficult task given the complex nature of the crime. It is not easy to find a criminal defense firm with the training, experience, and resources required to win such serious charges. That’s why it is imperative to contact Leah Legal as soon as possible. Our sex crimes attorney has extensive and success in dealing with these types of cases. We understand that only one side of the story is brought out in the victim’s allegations and there’s a legitimate possibility of false allegations. Discussing these issues can be extremely uncomfortable but failing to talk about them with your sex crimes attorney could improve the chances of a conviction, which comes with severe penalties. We understand how the sex crimes cases operate and will come up with a strong defense strategy tailored to the specific facts of your case. If you have been accused of a sex crime, schedule a free, confidential consultation with our experienced attorney. You can get in touch by calling us on 818-484-1100 or by filling out our online contact form.
Consequences of Sex Crime Convictions in California
Different factors may determine whether the sex crime will be charged as a misdemeanor or felony. These include the type of crime committed, the age of the accuser, whether the victim was injured, prior criminal record, and prior sex crime charges. A misdemeanor conviction carries a penalty of up to one (1) year imprisonment in a county jail. A felony, on the other hand, is a crime whose penalties range between one (1) year, and life imprisonment. When convicted, one also faces court-ordered fines and restitution to the victim. Some of the sex crimes that are categorized as misdemeanors include:
- Indecent exposure
- Prostitution
- Lewd conduct
- Solicitation and Prostitution
- Improper touching of a child
Felonies include:
- Child pornography
- Rape by force
- Oral Copulation
- Spousal rape
- Date rape
- Pimping
- Statutory rape
Wobblers include:
- Sexual battery
- Statutory battery and
- Unlawful sodomy
Sex crimes in California are handled very seriously with the prosecution being very aggressive in their quest. Often times, a full police investigation follows a simple accusation. The penalties can vary greatly, but one that stands out is the social stigma associated with sexual offenses. One can face up to eight (8) years in a state penitentiary for each act committed. If convicted of multiple sexual offenses, you can face a prison sentence of up to 100 years. Many of these crimes do not allow for probation instead of prison time with some having stringent probationary terms. Also, you will be required to register as a sex offender for life. If you have been accused of a sex crime, it is in your best interest to consult with an attorney immediately.
Internet Sex Crimes
One of the most growing concerns for prosecutors if online sex crimes. A sexual offense does not have to be physical, you can be arrested or charged with sex crimes even if you were only involved via the internet. Some of the crimes that can be categorized as internet sex crimes often involve indecent exposure and lewd conduct, prostitution, solicitation of minors for child abuse, and child pornography. Prosecution for an internet offender is also done under state and federal law. If you’ve been arrested or accused of a sex crime from behind a computer screen, we will work with IT experts to analyze computers. It could be that you downloaded illegal material accidentally when downloading legal material and we will gather evidence to prove that to the prosecution.
The Sex Offender Registration Act- California Penal Code 290
One of the common penalties for being convicted of a sex crime is the requirement by the court for you to register as a sex offender under California Penal Code section 290. Having to do so can be devastating for both your personal and professional life. The requirement for sex offender registration remains in effect for life since you will have to update your registration annually with a law enforcement agency if you attend school, work, or live in California. Simply put, “registering” means ensuring the local law enforcement are aware of your whereabouts. The Department of Justice runs a sexual offender website where the names, addresses, and photographs of sexual offenders are released to the public. This is better known as the Megan’s Law. You can face additional charges if you fail to register as a sex offender since it means you’ll be violating Penal Code Section 290. You can fight for your chance to avoid this harmful criminal consequence by retaining an experienced sex crime lawyer at Leah Legal.
California’s Sexually Violent Predator Act
The Sexually Violent Predator (SVP) Act of California allows the state institute civil commitment proceedings to incarcerate prisoners if they find out that the prisoner has a prior conviction for sexually violent offenses or a diagnosed mental disorder likely to lead to another similar crime. If you face a Sexually Violent Predator parole hearing, let the Leah Legal help you avoid a civil commitment for the rest of your life. We will work meticulously to have you release into the community.
Typical Evidence That Can Be Used Against You
- Statements from the victim
- Photographs provided by the victim
- DNA results from a rape kit examination
- Witness statements
- Text messages, Facebook messages, phone recordings
- Incriminating statements you made to police officers
- Audio police recording
- Prior criminal record
Do Not Talk to Police
Cases involving sex crimes are not filed against someone for some time. This is especially due to the fact that law enforcement seeks additional evidence. Often times, police will approach a suspect in a friendly manner. They can later use the statements to incriminate the suspect. If police call or approach you in regards to a sex crime, it is imperative to know that they are not questioning to help you but rather to get additional evidence. If this happens, don’t provide them with any information, instead, retain a lawyer immediately.
Expunging Your Record as a Registered Sex Offender
You may be wondering what steps to take to remove your name from the list of sex offenders. Different factors will determine if expunging your record is a possibility, but you will have a few options. Depending on the offense committed, you may be able to get your record expunged after completing your probationary terms successfully. However, you will still have to register as a California Sex Offender even if you manage to get the charge removed from your record. Another option that can help you get your name from the sex offender list is by seeking a Certificate of Rehabilitation. This can be possible within seven (7) to ten (10) years after the completion of probation or release from custody. Also, there are other residency and behavioral requirements you’ll be required to meet in order to obtain your Certificate. If you succeed in obtaining a Certificate, you’ll no longer be required to register as a sex offender. Another option would be to seek a pardon from the Governor. Typically, this will be granted only if you have been crime-free for about ten (10) years.
Common Legal Sex Crime Defenses
- Consent: In sex crime cases, the issue of consent may come up. You could have an absolute defense if the alleged victim consented to the acts. Under California Penal Code Section 261.6, consent shall be defined to mean “positive cooperation in act or attitude pursuant to an exercise of free will.” This means that the person must have knowledge of the nature of the act and act freely and voluntary. However, consent does not include a situation where the accused and the victim are or had been dating, the victim complied with the act to avoid injury, the accused used a birth control device, or the victim didn’t resist the attack.
- Falsely accused: False accusations are common and often motivated by revenge, jealousy, child custody, or financial gain. A full investigation can be conducted to collect the relevant evidence that can be used to expose the victim’s fabrications. Being falsely accused of a sexual offense is unfortunate which is why it is imperative to retain a seasoned sex defense attorney.
- Exaggerations of the alleged victim: The victim may be blowing the circumstances of the incident or their injuries out of proportion. Exaggerations may lead to serious charges being filed against you. Your defense attorney will conduct an investigation to expose the hypersensitivity of gross exaggerations raised by the victim.
- Mistaken recollection/ memory: There are different factors that would impair or falsify a victim’s recollection of the events. Examples of such factors include improper tactic of building false memories and pressure from the victim’s family and law enforcement. With time, the victim will end up thinking that certain events occurred when in reality they never happened.
- Mistaken identity: This is a growing concern in the courts especially when there’s no tangible evidence to prove the accusations. It is unfortunate that even in situations when the identification of the defendant is questionable, the prosecution tends to maintain their charges against the accused. An experienced and knowledgeable attorney will create a strong defense strategy to fight against the charges and prove that you were not responsible for the acts.
Sentencing Mitigation in Sex Crimes Cases
Those found guilty of sex crimes have the opportunity for mitigation. This means that the judge can impose a more lenient sentence. In sex crime cases, mitigating factors can include (but not limited to):
- You mistakenly believed your conduct was legal
- You voluntarily acknowledged wrongdoing before the arrest
- You compensated the victim
- You have no prior or only an insignificant criminal record
- Your performance on previous probation or parole was satisfactory
Your Sex Crimes Representation
Sex crime conviction is a life changer. The penalties are harsh and come with long prison sentences and mandatory lifetime sex registration. It is unfortunate that there are many sex cases are prosecuted in California even with poor quality law enforcement investigations and lack of physical evidence. In fact, many of the cases are prosecuted on the sole basis of the testimony given by the victim such that the case is basically a she said- he said situation.
Our sex crimes defense attorneys can help you by:
- Arranging for bail, bail reduction, or release without bail.
- Understanding the likely outcome and the possible penalties.
- Arranging for a lie detector test to show the accuser’s motive to lie.
- Hiring investigative experts to interview witnesses and gather evidence.
- Vigorously challenging every aspect of the prosecution’s case.
- Presenting the best legal defense for your case.
- Negotiating with the prosecution to have the charges against you reduced.
- Negotiating with the jury for alternative sentencing programs such as residential treatment, electric monitoring, counseling and informal probation.
Contact the lawyers at Van Nuys Criminal Attorney to discuss your legal situations. The earlier you retain us to defend your case the better. We can make arrangements to minimize the pain and embarrassment of being prosecuted for a sex crime. When defending you against sex crime charges, our attorneys will conduct a thorough defense by arranging for a psychological evaluation. With the evaluation, we can show that you don’t fit the sexual profile of the crime you are being charged with. We will also work with medical experts to review medical records. Through our extensive investigation, we can be able to uncover a past history of dishonesty on the accuser’s part and inconsistencies in the prosecution’s case.
The Leah Legal sexual assault team includes investigators, forensic interviewers, psychiatrists, social workers, and lawyers with a deep understanding of the unique areas of all sex crimes and all provable defensible strategies. Our attorneys are talented litigators both inside and outside the court.
If you or your loved one is facing sex crimes charges, call us at 818-484-1100 or fill out our online contact form and let us show you how we protected our own. We will do everything possible to protect your interests.
California’s sex crime laws against minors are strict on punishing offenders. You can get a conviction for a felony offense for engaging in a sexually motivated act directed towards a minor. Leah Legal understands the complex and sensitive nature of sex crimes against minors. Therefore, our Los Angeles-based attorneys will explore possible ways to defend you against these charges. Fighting the charges could help you avoid the negative consequences of a sex crime conviction such as a sex offender status.
What It Means to Annoy or Molest a Child Under 18
An innocent interaction with a minor could result in a charge for annoying or molesting a minor. The offense could arise, for example, if you pose a sexual question to a child that would reasonably offend another person or the child.
PC 647.6 prohibits engaging in conduct that would disturb or annoy a child. The act must be sexually motivated.
When you direct this annoying or disturbing behavior towards a child or a group of children, then you are guilty of annoying or molesting a minor.
The offense differs from other sex crimes that require you to make physical contact with the victim.
Instead, PC 647.6 punishes actions that a normal person would immediately find irritating or annoying. The action must also violate a child’s privacy and security.
The child must not be offended by the conduct for you to be guilty of the offense. The standard used here determines the possibility that a reasonable person will automatically find disturbing.
The prosecution must also prove that you committed the act due to an unnatural sexual interest in a child. Proving that your actions were sexually motivated can be difficult for the prosecution, which has to rely on circumstantial evidence and your criminal history.
Also, the prosecution has to prove that the victim was a minor at the time of the offense.
Like in all sexual crimes against minors, consent is never a defense. Minors do not have the legal power to consent to sexual activities.
Also, indirect actions such as masturbating outside a school gate when children are leaving school constitute annoying or molesting minors.
Legal Defenses for Charges of Annoying Or Molesting a Child Under 18
Fortunately, you can fight the charges against using several legal defenses. The first step, however, should be hiring a respectable sex crime attorney who has represented other clients for similar offenses.
Experience is critical in understanding what the most appropriate defenses are, as well as their strengths and weaknesses. Here are some of the common defenses for annoying or molesting a minor.
You Reasonably Believed That the Victim Was An Adult
You cannot be guilty of molesting a minor if you reasonably believed that the victim was an adult. You may believe the victim is not minor:
- If the victim or a person closely related to the victim tells you that the victim is 18 or above
- You found the victim in an establishment such as a bar that only allows adults
- The victim provided fake proof of age such as a fake driver’s license
- The has the physical appearance of an adult
The prosecution will have to establish that you believed that the victim was 18 or older and that this belief was reasonable.
The Witness Lacks Credibility
Witnesses might be lacking credibility if they have a preexisting bias towards the defendant or are lying. Your attorney could subpoena account information of the witness on social networking sites, counseling records, medical records, and email messages.
The attorney could also interview people who are close to the witness to determine whether he or she has a history of giving false testimony.
If the witness is found to be lying, the prosecution could dismiss your charges.
You Did Not Direct The Conduct Towards A Minor
You must direct the offensive conduct towards a minor for you to be guilty of molesting the child.
However, if you did not intend a minor to witness the conduct, then you cannot be guilty of the offense.
You are not guilty of accidental situations such as when a minor overhears you making an offensive statement that would be considered molestation.
The Conduct Was Not Sexually Motivated
The prosecution has to show that offense you had an abnormal sexual interest in a child or children in general. The evidence will include any past convictions for sex crimes against minors and the circumstantial evidence for the offense.
Proving sexual interest in a child can be hard for the prosecution, which gives you a chance to fight the charges.
You might have to explain the motive behind the action, however. For example, if you are concerned that a child could be facing sexual abuse from a child, and you ask sexual questions, then you cannot be guilty of the offense. You will need to prove that you reasonably believed that the child was a victim of sexual abuse.
The Conduct Could Not Have Offended a Reasonable Person
The conduct should be offensive to a reasonable person under the same circumstances. However, an overreacting child could exaggerate your conduct so that it appears to be molestation.
For example, you accidentally brush against a girl’s chest while walking past her. If she reports you for molestation, your lawyer will help you prove that a reasonable person could not have been offended by the act.
False Accusations
Some charges for sex crimes against a minor arise due to false accusations. The child or another adult could report you for annoying or molesting a minor to revenge, due to anger or malice.
Some children are also known to regularly lie about being sexually assaulted, injured, or abused.
Your attorney will interview the person who reported the incident and other witnesses. He or she will then evaluate the child’s records to determine whether the child tends to make false accusations.
If the child is a habitual liar, then the prosecution will likely dismiss your charges.
In some cases, false accusations arise from adults who are overprotective of children. In such a case, the accuser could misinterpret innocent actions as illegal actions.
Some adults also coach children into making a false accusation. False accusations damage your reputation and career prospects; therefore, hiring a defense attorney should be a priority.
Defense attorneys are not made equal. Not all specialize in sex crimes or are ideal for your case. Therefore, you need to be careful when choosing the right defense team.
Some pointers include:
- The attorney can answer various questions about your charges, the potential penalties, and the possibilities in your case.
- The attorney communicates openly with you about the progress of the case, new developments and how these changes affect your case
- Your attorney must be a good negotiator. Most cases are settled during the pretrial stage. Such solutions are less uncertain, unlike going to trial.
- The attorney must have confidentiality. If he or she reveals everything you tell him or her, then he or she should not be defending you. A lawyer must have the ability to preserve client confidentiality. His or her job is to defend you.
- Find an attorney who has high ratings from past clients and other attorneys. You can find these ratings online. You could also ask friends and family for a recommendation.
- Your attorney must have an understanding of how the court system works and different techniques that local police, prosecutors, and judges use. These factors contribute greatly to developing the most appropriate defense.
- Lastly, your attorney should have good analytical skills to help him identify gaps that the police might have overlooked. For example, police and prosecutors might focus more on the evidence against the defendant and ignore possibilities that the defendant could be innocent. Thus, it is your attorney’s job to identify such omissions to defend you.
PC 647.6 Penalties
The penalties of violating PC 647.6 will help you understand the gravity of the offense. California charges annoying or molesting a minor as either a misdemeanor or a wobbler.
The offense is a misdemeanor if no aggravating circumstances exist. The penalties for a misdemeanor include up to a year in county jail and a fine of up to $5,000.
The offense becomes a wobbler if aggravating factors are present. These factors include:
- Entering an inhabited dwelling, coach, or trailer without consent
- Entering an inhabited part of a building
When charged as a misdemeanor, the penalties will include a maximum of:
- One year in county jail
- $5000 in fines
The prosecutor will charge the offense as a felony if:
- You pose a danger towards other children
- You have at least one prior conviction for a PC 647.6 offense
- You have a prior felony conviction for rape of a minor under 16, child pornography, continuous sexual abuse of a child, and lewd acts with a minor.
The penalties for a felony conviction will include 16 months, two or three years in state prison.
If you have a prior conviction for the specified offenses, you will be incarcerated in state prison for two, four, or six years.
Your lawyer could negotiate for alternative sentencing instead of jail or prison. You could be sentenced to a misdemeanor or felony probation, depending on how the court prosecutes your case.
You might have to fulfill certain conditions while on informal probation such as:
- Paying fines
- Paying victim restitution
- Community service
- Make progressive reports to the court regularly
If you are sentenced to formal probation, the court will attach some or all of the following conditions:
- Pay victim restitution
- Report to the probation officer as required
- Spend up to one year in county jail
- Counseling
- Avoid contact with the victim
Registration as a Sex Offender
When convicted of violating PC 647.6, you will have to register either as a tier-one or tier two sex offender. You will have to register even if you were convicted for a misdemeanor offense.
For your first offense, you will have to register for at least ten years and twenty years for subsequent offenses.
If you are a habitual sexual offender, you will have to register as a tier three sex offender for life.
You should make the first registration within five days of:
- Your sentence if you are released on probation
- Your release from jail or prison
- Your discharge from a treatment facility
You should also update your registration annually within five days after your birthday. Other situations in which you should update your status include:
- Every time you change a resident, you must update your registration with the local law enforcement body within five working days
- If you have multiple residences, in or out of state, you must report them when registering
- You must also update your status if you move to a new state. You will be subject to the registration requirements of that state
- You must also register even if you do not live, but you work or study in California
- You must also register with the campus police in the college you are physically at
- If you do not have a fixed residence, you should report your location at least once every thirty days
- If you intend to move out of California, you must notify the local law enforcement agency of your intention, five days before you move. You should also indicate whether you will be returning to California.
- You must update your details if you change your name
- You must disclose your sex offender status when applying or accepting employment or volunteering at an organization where you will be in contact with minors. If you were convicted for a sex crime against a minor aged below 16, then you cannot legally apply for or accept such a position.
The public can view your information through the Megan’s Law website. The extent your details are displayed depends on the seriousness of the offense and your criminal history about sex crimes.
You could apply for internet exclusion to prevent your sex offender status from being available online if you were convicted for misdemeanor molestation of a minor.
Fortunately, the law provides a way of getting relief from the requirement to register as a sex offender. If you registered as a tier-one or tier two offender, you could petition for this relief after 10 or 20 years, respectively. The court has the discretion to accept or deny your petition.
Another way to get relief from the duty to register as a sex offender is to get s certificate of rehabilitation or the governor’s pardon.
Clearing Your Criminal Record
If you were convicted for annoying or molesting a minor, you are eligible for record expungement under PC 1203.4. Expunging your record will set aside your conviction, then your records are sealed. Therefore, potential employers, landlords, and the public cannot view your conviction record.
You can expunge your records if:
- You successfully complete your probation
- You did not serve time in state prison
- You are not facing charges for another crime
- You are not on probation or serving a sentence for another offense
If you were convicted of a felony, your attorney must have the offense reduced to a misdemeanor, then proceed with the expungement.
A record expungement does not relieve you from your duty to register as a sex offender. However, it betters your employment and career prospects as you do not have to disclose your conviction.
Once you expunge your records, you can apply for a certificate of rehabilitation. A certificate of rehabilitation serves as an application for the governor’s pardon. The certificate also shows that you are now a law-abiding person.
The eligibility requirements include:
- You have been released from custody, probation or parole
- You are not on probation for a felony
- You have lived in California for five consecutive years before registering for the certificate
- You have completed the minimum rehabilitation period, in this case, five years
- You were sentenced for a felony or misdemeanor, and your record has been expunged
Once your petition is accepted, you will be free from the duty to register as a sex offender.
You can also apply directly for a governor’s pardon. You can apply for a governor’s pardon after seven to ten years after probation, parole, or release from custody.
Cleaning your criminal record gives you a second chance and relieves you from most of the negative consequences of a conviction.
While you can handle record cleaning yourself, hiring a lawyer will help you avoid common pitfalls. You can also focus on other matters as your lawyer handles your legal matters.
Find a Sex Crimes Defense Attorney Near Me
Molesting or annoying a child under 18 can result in severe penalties like registering as a sex offender for life. These consequences stay with you for the rest of your life. The penalties will affect your professional and personal life. It will become harder to get professional licenses, housing, or certain employment opportunities. Potential partners can also see your sex offender status. However, you stand a chance against the consequences by hiring an experienced Los Angeles sex crimes defense attorney like Van Nuys Criminal Attorney. We have set ourselves apart as a firm dedicated to providing the best legal defense possible to our clients. We will evaluate your case and provide you with an analysis based on your case. Call us today at 818-484-1100.
Child pornography is punishable both under the State and Federal laws in California. Child pornography, also known as child sexual abuse material, refers to the depiction of sexually explicit content or conduct that involves a minor. It is illegal to produce, distribute, import, receive, or possess any images and videos both under the federal and state laws. Violation of the federal child pornography laws is a serious crime that can lead to a prison sentence of up to 8 years and a fine of $100,000 for convicted offenders. In case you are charged with child pornography crimes, it is crucial to involve a criminal defense lawyer as the process can be life-altering. Leah Legal is a result-oriented law firm that handles child pornography crimes in Los Angeles, California.
California Child Pornography Laws
California law defines Child pornography as the availability of any images, videos, computer files, or data that portray a minor in a sexual act regardless of whether it is real or simulated. The sexual act may include masturbation, oral copulation, intercourse, or displaying the child’s genitalia for sexual satisfaction.
The contents are in various forms and may include either of the following:
- It may be a visual representation of a minor engaging in sexual activities or displaying the genital area. Nudity does not make content obscene, meaning there should be the presence of sexual activity.
- An audio recording which its primary purpose is to portray and describe a minor having sexual intercourse.
- A written material that uses vulgar and inappropriate language while inclusively unfolding erotic scenes that involve a minor.
California’s child pornography is outlined under penal code 311. The law punishes the following acts that constitute the criminal offense of child pornography:
- Under subsection 311.1 and 311.2 of the penal code, it is against the law to knowingly transport, send or duplicate any child pornography with the intent to distribute it.
- Subsection 311.3 clearly explains the charge of sexual exploitation of a minor by knowingly developing, printing, duplicating, or exchanging any child pornography.
- As stated in the 311.4 penal code, it is illegal to knowingly hire, employ, coerce, or persuade a minor to partake in a pornography film.
- It is prohibited to advertise morally indecent child pornography for sale or distribution knowingly.
- Possession or controlling of any child pornography produced using a minor is illegal, as stated in penal code 311.11.
California’s law considers the age of the victim during the production of sexually explicit material. However, in cases where the minor is legally emancipated, or a married couple is involved in a consensual act, then that does not qualify as child pornography.
You will be charged in a federal court if you either distribute to or receive child pornographic materials from other states. Although the federal authorities lead the case, the state prosecutors can also charge you on child pornography.
Penalties for Child Pornography in California
The penalties for child pornography in California is dependent on facts surrounding the case. Only the possession of a child pornography case is charged as a wobbler, which is a third-degree offense. Therefore, offenders can be tried as misdemeanors or felonies.
When your case is charged as a misdemeanor child pornography, that means you can receive a jail term of up to one year in county jail and a maximum fine of $2000. For felony possession of child pornography, you can spend up to three years in state prison and receive a fine of up to $10,000. The penalties under penal code 311 apply if you shared a child pornographic material with an adult or charged with sexual exploitation.
If you shared child pornography with a minor, then your case will be considered a felony, and you can be sentenced up to three years and receive a fine of up to $10,000.
Possession of child pornography for commercial purposes is a felony, meaning you can spend up to six years in state prison and fined up to $100,000.
Section 311.4 indicates that hiring or employing a minor for a first time offender will be a second-degree charge, and you can be sentenced for up to one year in county jail. You can also receive a maximum fine of $1000. If you are charged with a felony, your jail term can increase to a maximum of three years in state prison and fined up to $10,000. For subsequent convictions, it will be considered a first-degree charge and can result in three years prison term and a maximum fine of $50,000.
Using a minor to produce pornography for commercial purposes is a felony crime, meaning you can receive punishment for up to eight years prison term in state prison. You can also be subjected to a $10,000 fine. Production of child pornography for non-commercial purposes will result in a three-year jail term and a $10,000 fine. If the victim was under the age of 14 years, it is considered a first-degree charge, and you can receive an additional six years in state prison.
If you are convicted of advertising child pornography for sale or distribution, it will be considered a second-degree offense. You will face up to one year in county jail and a fine not exceeding $1000. The subsequent convictions felony of this penal code is considered a first-degree charge and can yield a four-year prison term and a fine of up to $50,000.
Section 311.11 indicates that if you are charged with possession and control of child pornography, you can be punished with one or three years in county jail and a fine of up to $2,500. If you are a subsequent offender, then your sentence will increase with up to six years in state prison and a fine of $10,000.
California Sex Offender Registration
Current California law of the sex offender registration act states that anyone convicted of child pornography charges should be included in the state’s sex offender registry. However, California Senate Bill 384, Chapter 541, has made changes that will take effect from the year 2021. The sex offender registry will be divided into three degrees.
The first degree will require an offender to be listed for a minimum of ten years, the second will be twenty years, and the third for a lifetime. Child pornography cases will be classified under the first or third degree. If your claim is charged as a misdemeanor, you will be registered for a minimum period of ten years. For felonies or subsequent felonies, you will be required to be listed under lifetime registration.
California Megan’s Law
Megan’s law was enacted in 1996 and mandates that all convicted sex offenders be registered as sex offenders and also notify the local communities in which they reside. A website known as California Megan’s Law website was created to summarize the duties required by sex offenders. The responsibilities include the following:
- If you are convicted as a sex offender, then you are required to register within a maximum of five days after your release.
- You are also required to update your information regularly.
- It shows how you should present your information to the public using zip codes, cities, counties, and in some cases, home addresses.
- If you were found in possession of illegal pornography, you are permitted to apply the exclusion of private information from public disclosure.
California penal code 290.018 states that failure to register as a sex offender is a crime. The crime will result in you spending at most one year in county jail and a fine of up to $1000.
What the Prosecution Must Prove
For you to be convicted on child pornography charges, the prosecution needs to prove either of the following without reasonable doubt:
The prosecuting attorney needs to demonstrate your involvement in sending, bringing, or causing the transportation of a sexually explicit material depicting a minor into the state.
If you were in possession, prepared, published, developed, produced, duplicate, or printed obscene material showing a minor having sexual acts or displaying their private parts.
You owned child pornography to distribute, show, or exchanging the material with either an adult or a minor. The prosecution can also prove that you knowingly offered to distribute obscene matter.
The prosecution needs to demonstrate how you used illegal pornography material for commercial purposes or in other ways that can benefit you. The benefit does not necessarily be financial.
For the case to be pursued by California state prosecutors, they need to prove that at a certain point, the explicit content depicting a minor was within the state boundaries. The content may have been sent by mail or accessed through the internet.
If you were involved in the acting process of illegal pornography, the prosecutors would need to prove that you knowingly participated, even though a minor was hired or employed to be part of the film.
Your involvement in the advertising of sexually explicit content through your media for sales or distribution purposes needs to be demonstrated. For you to be convicted, the prosecutor must prove you advertised the content despite knowing the depiction of a minor engaging in sexual activities in the material.
The prosecuting side should prove you used, employed, persuaded, or induced the minor. The demonstration can also show your involvement in coercing the minor’s guardian or parent. For this to be admissible, the prosecution side needs to prove the minor personally engaged in or simulated sexual conduct.
Common Defenses to Fight Child Pornography Charges
There are several legal defenses to a conviction of a child pornography case:
The defense can argue that you did not have the intention of violating a law. You will have to prove that you purchased an order of sexually explicit content, but you were unaware of a minor’s involvement. If the prosecution can not prove that you knew the minor was depicted in the material, then the judge or jury gives the final ruling in your favor.
In some cases, the police officers might obtain evidence through illegal means. If you are a victim of unlawful search or seizure without probable cause or a warrant, then the evidence will be excluded from the trial. Since there will be no relevant evidence at your trial, the case will be dismissed.
The court can not convict you based on a false accusation. If you are a victim of a false allegation that can not be proved, then the case will not proceed further. You also have the right to sue the false accuser for damages.
You may have participated in a film or ordered one where an adult played the part of a minor. Since the element of the performer being under aged can not be established, the judge or jury must find in your favor.
The defense can also argue that you have a psychological addiction. If you underwent the necessary psychological evaluations, the psychologist could be called to testify as a witness in your case. If the psychologist’s testimonies show you are addicted and unable to make rational decisions, you will not be convicted. The court will ask you to seek professional help instead of serving time in prison.
You might have been a victim of unlawful entrapment. In some cases, the police officers being aware of your sexual misconduct in another state might set you up and arrest you. If you make an order as a result of badgering or repeated requests by law enforcement, it can create a defense to conviction. If the defense makes a proper argument, then you should be released.
Offenses Related to Child Pornography
The crimes are usually charged together with child pornography cases and, or have similar facts that the prosecutor must substantiate. The instances, according to the California Penal Code, include the following:
Lewd conduct with a minor: The California penal code 288 defines the behavior as an adult engaging in a sex act with an underage person. It is charged differently depending on the minor’s age. The prosecution will need to provide evidence of you touching the minor with the intent of gratification of lust, passions, or sexual desires. The consent of the underage individual to the sexual act is not considered in court. If found guilty, you will spend three, six, or eight years in state prison. You will also be fined a maximum of $10,000.
Statutory Rape: As stated in the CPC section 261.5, this is applicable if you had unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor who is not married to you. The charge, in this case, is different depending on your age and the victim’s age. If you are convicted, you will be imprisoned in a county jail for up to one year and fined a maximum of $1000. In this case, you are not required to register as a sex offender, unless other dangerous acts are involved.
Contributing to the delinquency of a minor: CPC section 265a explains that this occurs when you encourage or cause a minor to fail to conform to the law. The charge is a misdemeanor as it involves sexual abuse of the minor. If convicted, you will face up to one-year jail term in county jail and a fine of at most $2,500.
Human trafficking of minors: Section 236.1 of the CPC states that this occurs when persuade, induces, or attempt to cause a minor to engage in a commercial sex act. The charge is considered a felony and will attract a fine of up to $500,000 and life imprisonment in state prison. The judge or the jury will consider age, violation of the minor’s liberty, and the relationship to you to give the final verdict. If the minor is handicapped or disabled, then it will be considered in the final ruling.
Creating or distributing revenge pornography: Revenge porn is prohibited under section 647j of the CPC. Revenge porn occurs when you intentionally distribute private sexually explicit content depicting a minor and end up causing emotional distress. The offense is considered a misdemeanor, and if found guilty, you will be subjected to a jail term of up to one year in county jail and a fine of up to $1000. You will not be charged if you distributed the content to comply with a court order or while reporting the offense.
Find a Child Pornography Attorney Near Me
Facing a child pornography charge is a serious offense that will interfere with your rights, freedom, and livelihood. The trial case for sexual abuse against the minor involved is one of the hardest to fight. The emotional hardship causes the justice department to be ruthless if you are found guilty. You will require the services of a professional criminal defense lawyer to negotiate a lesser charge in a plea bargain. In case you go to trial, the lawyer can reduce your sentence or get your charges dismissed altogether. It is, therefore, critical that you hire the services of a skilled and dedicated criminal defense attorney. To get a hold of such a law firm in Los Angeles, contact Van Nuys Criminal Attorney at 818-484-1100 for the best representation in court.
District attorneys in California have a low tolerance for sex-related crimes. One of the most common sex crimes in California is forcible sexual penetration or forcible sexual penetration with a foreign object. California law also states this crime as sexual penetration by fear or force. The California PC 289 outlines the offense of forcible sexual penetration. A crime under PC 289 carries detrimental consequences and may have devastating impacts for the rest of your life. If you are facing charges under PC 289 in Los Angeles, CA, Leah Legal can advise you on the best course of action.
Elements of the Crime
For the prosecutor to charge you with forcible sexual penetration under PC 289, the prosecutor has to prove several elements of the crime. It should be evident that you committed an act of sexual penetration with another individual. You should have accomplished sexual penetration using an unknown or a foreign object.
The prosecutor has to prove that you did not have the consent of the victim. You should have committed the forcible sexual penetration through force, fear, menace, or violence. You may also have committed the crime by inflicting illegal bodily injury on the victim. You may also have committed the forcible sexual penetration through a threat to retaliate.
In some instances, the victim may not have the ability to give consent for sexual penetration. In this case, you would still face charges even if you claim that you have the consent of the victim. A victim with a physical or developmental disability or a mental disorder may not be able to give consent. If a victim is unconscious of the nature of the sexual penetration act, you cannot claim that you had the authority or permission of the victim. You may also face severe charges if you commit forcible sexual penetration on a person who is intoxicated and unable to resist your actions.
The motivation for forcible sexual penetration with a foreign object is to gain sexual gratification, arousal, or to abuse the victim sexually. A person may face charges under PC 289 for any type of penetration, albeit slight, of the anal or genital opening of the victim. It is an offense to make the victim penetrate, even slightly the genital or the anal opening of another party. It is also an offense under PC 289 to make a person penetrate his or her genital opening even slightly.
What is a foreign object? According to California law, a foreign object is any object other than a sexual organ. Therefore, another body part may qualify as a foreign object. Penetration with a sexual organ without the consent of the victim will attract rape charges under PC 261 instead of charges under PC 289. When the victim of forcible sexual penetration is female, the defendant may face charges even if he/she does not penetrate the victim’s actual vagina. As long as there is a penetration of the outer lips of the female genitalia, often known as the labia majora, the crime is complete.
The motivation of the defendant is essential. The defendant is only guilty of forcible sexual penetration if he/she penetrates the victim with a foreign object for sexual gratification, arousal, or sexual abuse. Sexual abuse entails penetrating the victim to cause him or her pain, discomfort, or injury.
Lack of Consent
You cannot face charges if the victim agrees to the act of penetration with a foreign object. For a victim to consent to sexual penetration with a foreign object, the victim should act voluntarily and freely. The victim must also understand the nature of his/her act.
A dating relationship may have existed between the victim and the defendant. However, this fact is not enough to prove that the victim had given consent to sexual penetration. Even if the victim and the defendant are married or were previously married, it is not enough to prove consent.
Forcible Penetration
For the defendant to face charges for forcible sexual penetration with a foreign object, the defendant should have used force. This means that the defendant applied adequate physical force to overcome the victim’s will. The defendant may also have used violence, including inflicting physical injury on the victim, to make the victim consent to his/ her actions.
Forcible penetration may also occur if the defendant places the victim under duress while conducting the activity. Duress entails making the victim do something that he/she would not otherwise do. The victim complies with the demands of the defendant for fear of danger, violence, retribution, or hardship.
The defendant may also use menace to make the victim comply. Menace refers to a statement, a threat, or an act indicating the intention to injure a person. The defendant may threaten the victim with immediate bodily injury. The defendant may also warn the victim of imminent harm if the victim fails to cooperate. Imminent harm may include unlawful restraining or confining, kidnapping, serious bodily injury, or death of the victim or another person.
A Disabled Person/Victim
At times, you may face charges under PC 289, even if you do not use force or duress. For instance, if you forcibly penetrate a victim with a mental disorder that prevents the victim from understanding your actions and the potential consequences, you are guilty under PC 289. The same case also applies if you penetrate a victim with a physical or developmental disability that prevents him from understanding your actions.
For you to face charges, it should be evident that you know or that you should reasonably have known about the disorder or disability of the victim. You should have known that the victim could not consent to a sexual act.
An Unconscious Victim
You may also face charges for forcible sexual penetration for penetrating a victim who is unconscious with a foreign object. It is important to note that you will face the charges even if you do not use force on the victim. When a person is unconscious, he/she is not aware of what is happening around him/her.
It is an offense to engage in any form of sexual penetration with a foreign object if the victim is unconscious of the nature of the act. It should be evident that at the time of committing the offense, you were aware that the victim had no power to resist your actions.
It is important to note that the victim does not have to be physically or unconscious for this law to apply. Being unconscious means that the victim is not aware that penetration is occurring. It may also imply that the victim does not understand the nature of the act because the defendant uses trickery, conceals information, or lies to the victim. Being unconscious may also have a literal meaning implying that the victim has passed out or is asleep.
An Intoxicated Victim
A person may also face charges for forcible penetration with a foreign object for committing an act of forcible penetration of an intoxicated person. For instance, the victim may have consumed alcohol, drugs, or other intoxicating substances. Due to intoxication, the victim may not be able to resist. At the time of committing the offense, the defendant should have known that the victim was intoxicated and could not consent or to oppose the act of forcible penetration.
Numerous gray areas surround the fact that the victim was intoxicated. It is common for people to engage in sexual activities after consuming drugs or alcohol. Many sexual acts take place when one or both victims are intoxicated. A person may be too intoxicated if the person cannot understand the moral and the physical nature of sexual penetration. The victim may also not be able to understand the probable consequences of the act.
Consequences for Forcible Sexual Penetration
The crime of forcible sexual penetration is a felony under California law. The possible consequences include serving formal probation. It is important to note that probation is only available in cases of sexual penetration involving a disabled person. However, in cases of forcible sexual penetration by fear or force, probation may not be an option. Probation may also not be available if the defendant engages in forcible sexual penetration of an intoxicated or an unconscious person.
The alternative name for formal probation is felony probation. While on probation, the defendant has to adhere to certain conditions of probation. For instance, the defendant may have to engage in community service. The defendant may also have to meet with the probation officer regularly or make regular visits to the probation office.
The defendant may also be subject to imprisonment in a state prison in California. He/she may serve an imprisonment of three, six, or eight years. The court may also impose a hefty fine of up to $10,000 on the victim.
Committing the crime of forcible sexual penetration on a minor is an aggravating factor. According to the law, a minor is any person below 18 years. If the offense involves a minor, the potential consequences increase. The consequences applicable will depend on the actual age of the minor. If the minor is fourteen years of age or older, the defendant may face imprisonment of six, eight, or ten years in state prison. If the minor is below fourteen years of age, the sentencing increases to eight years, ten years, or twelve years in a state prison in California.
Registration as a Sex Offender
The state of California observes a three-tier sex registration. Registration as a sex offender for a minimum of ten years applies to first-tier sex offenders. First-tier sex offenders are the lowest level of offenders. For second-tier or mid-level sex offenders, registration as a sex offender for a minimum of twenty years is applicable. Third-tier or high-level sex offenders have to register as sex offenders for life.
The applicable registration period will depend on the magnitude of the crime under PC 289. If you commit a misdemeanor offense under PC 289, you will fall under tier one. You will be under tier one for some felony offenses subsections c, f, g, h, and i. For a tier-one sexual offense, you have to register as a sex offender for ten years.
If you commit a sexual act against the victim’s will by threatening to retaliate in the future against the victim or another person, you may qualify as a tier-two sex offender. You will also qualify as a tier-two sex offender if, at the time of committing the act, the victim was unable to give consent due to development or physical disability or a mental disorder. For an offense under this category, you have to register as a sex offender for twenty years.
You will qualify as a tier 3 sex offender if you commit the act of forcible penetration through fear, force, or duress. If the victim is below the age of fourteen years, similar charges will apply. You will also face enhanced charges if the victim was intoxicated or unconscious and could not give consent at the time of the act. For a tier-three offense, you will have to register as a sex offender for a lifetime.
Any convicted sex offender living in California has to register with the county or the police of the city where they reside. You will have to renew the registration as a sex offender every year. You have to make the renewal within five working days of your birthday. You also have to renew your sex offender registration every time you move to a new residence.
Fighting Charges under PC 289
You should not give up hope upon facing charges under PC 289. With the help of an experienced attorney, you can fight the charges in court successfully. You require an experienced criminal defense attorney who has handled similar offenses in the past to fight on your behalf. The attorney will know the best legal defenses to use for your case. Some of the applicable legal defenses include:
You had the Victim’s Permission
While fighting charges for forcible sexual penetration, you may assert that the victim had given consent. Lack of consent is a critical element of an offense under PC 289. In many cases of forcible sexual penetration, there is a lot of ambiguity on whether the victim consented or not. It may be difficult to prove a lack of consent against reasonable doubt. Therefore, if the victim had given permission, you may fight the charges in court on this ground. Unless the prosecutor proves beyond a reasonable doubt that there was no consent, you cannot face charges under PC 289. In most cases, the prosecutor may not have the ability to prove consent.
You Believed the Victim had Consented
You may still fight charges under PC 289, even if you did not have the consent of the victim. Even if the victim did not allow you or consent to the sexual penetration, you might still have a valid defense. Most judges can understand the ambiguity that surrounds the issue of consent in sexual matters. In most cases, most people engage in sexual activities while intoxicated. One partner may believe that the other has consented only to face charges for forcible sexual penetration. This makes reasonable belief of a partner’s consent one of the most powerful ways of fighting charges under PC 289.
False Accusations
You may also assert in court that you are a victim of false accusations. Just like with other criminal offenses, people face false allegations of forcible sexual penetration all too often. Your current or former sexual partner may falsely accuse you of the crime. The main reasons for false accusations include jealousy, anger, and revenge. An accuser may also be your relative, including your children or your parents. A business or romantic rival may also accuse you falsely to gain an advantage over you. With the help of an experienced criminal defense attorney, you can fight false accusations of forcible sexual penetration. An attorney can help to unearth the truth and prove that you did not commit the crime.
Related Offenses
Some violations under California law are related to the offense of forcible sexual penetration. The crimes include oral copulation by force or fear under the California PC 288a. The violation is almost similar to an offense under PC 289. However, under PC 288a, the crime does not include sexual penetration but oral sex. Most people face charges under both PC 289 and PC 288a. This is because, in most cases, a defendant may conduct several forms of sexual assault on the victim.
Other related offenses include Rape under the California PC 261. You may face rape charges if you engage in non-consensual sexual activities through fear, force, or threat.
If you touch another person’s private parts without their consent with the intent of sexual gratification, abuse, or arousal, you may face charges under PC 243.4 for sexual battery.
Contact a Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
If you are facing charges for forcible sexual penetration, the associated consequences may be detrimental. It is important to ensure that you seek the help of an experienced attorney to help you fight the charges. If you are in Van Nuys, contact Van Nuys Criminal Attorney at 818-484-1100 and speak to one of our attorneys.
Indecent Exposure Charges Have Serious Consequences – Why You Need A California Criminal Defense Attorney
Exposing yourself inappropriately in California is against the law. There are indecent exposure laws which fall under the sex crimes category when one has been found guilty of revealing his or her private parts in a public area. If you or someone you know has been charged with indecent exposure, contact a criminal defense attorney immediately as consequences for a conviction of this nature can be severe and long-lasting.
Explanation of California Penal Code 314
California Penal Code, chapter 8 defines indecent exposure, obscene exhibitions, bawdy and other disorderly actions. In order for the prosecution to convict you of such a crime, they must prove several elements. Under the heading for chapter 8, a person must have:
- Exposed their private areas of the body in a public area, or an area where other people were present and annoyed or offended by the action
- Helped another person to expose themselves, taken part in a model artist exhibit, or made any other form of a public exhibition to any number of people which was viewed as offensive or lewd, or attempted to achieve sexual gratification or arousal
The threshold for convicting you of such acts hinges on the fact that you performed these actions willfully. Prosecution does not have to find you guilty of being fully unclothed, only that your private parts were in full view of those around you.
Under this law, you must have been charged with exposure in a public area. This area can be one where people pass or walk by, or if you’ve entered a private dwelling without invitation that others inhabited and performed an unwanted display.
Penalties for an Indecent Exposure Conviction
If convicted of Indecent Exposure under California law, you can face serious consequences. As a first time offender, you may receive a misdemeanor conviction. This conviction could result in you being sentenced to a term of imprisonment in a county jail or state prison for up to one year.
- A misdemeanor under California law is defined as a crime where the punishment if convicted is no more than one year inside a county jail or state prison. The misdemeanor is considered more serious than an infraction of the law but is not as serious as a felony conviction.
- A felony conviction in California results in the maximum sentence possible and can even be punishable by death. Receiving a felony conviction could also result in up to $10,000 in fines.
As a second-time offender of indecent exposure or if you’ve been convicted of other sex crimes, you could face a felony conviction. This conviction is treated with much more severely and punishment could result in prison time as well as having to register yourself as a Sex Offender in the state registry.
If convicted of misdemeanor and in violation of Penal Code 314, you are facing a maximum sentence of six months in a county jail. There may also be a fine of up to $ 1,000 plus the request to register on the Sex Offender Registry.
If convicted of a felony and in violation of Penal Code 672, you could be facing a prison sentence of sixteen months to three years. Under this code, you could face additional fines up to $10,000 and will receive the lifetime requirement to register on the California Sex Offender Registry.
What it Means to Register as a Sex Offender in California
Having to register as a sex offender in California is a lifetime requirement. Under California Penal Code 290, you will be required to disclose where ever you move for the rest of your life unless legal relief is granted.
As a registered sex offender, your entire life is impacted. The community where you live will see your registration and know you are on this list making your reputation questionable and you untrustworthy. The registration can affect your employment and require that you stay away from public areas such as schools, and possibly parks.
This registration will impact your quality of life for years if not the rest of your life which makes it imperative to seek legal counsel as soon as you are charged. You will want to plead your case in court with the experienced help of an attorney who understands California law and knows their way through the court system.
Defending a Charge of Indecent Exposure in California
There are several defenses against indecent exposure charges available to you. Your criminal defense attorney will guide you through the process to ensure your rights are protected. One defense is your First Amendment right to perform an artistic expression as long as there was not an obscene intent or value. Your attorney would prove that your expression of art was not an intention to be obscene or to offend others but to merely make an artistic statement.
With an indecent exposure charge, your attorney may be able to follow the ‘guilty mind’ or ‘mens rea’ theory with your case. This theory supports the difference between what you were thinking at the time of the event and what your intentions were for your actions. It is basically the difference between whether or not your intentions when setting out for the event were to commit a crime or were the actions unintentional.
An example of ‘guilty mind’ theory would be if you and a friend set out one day and ended up in a public park. During the course of a conversation, the two of you begin talking about a recent surgery performed on your private parts. To show your friend what you were talking about in regards to the procedure, you expose those private areas just as a mother and her two young children pass. The mother, of course, would become alarmed and report you to the authorities for indecent exposure. Your actions were not intended as a means of public display, and your defense attorney can prove you did not intentionally break any laws to the court.
On the other hand of ‘guilty mind’ it would have to be proved that you intended to show not only your friend those private parts, but everyone visiting the park that day. Even though you were having a private conversation with your friend, your actions to demonstrate that conversation annoyed or offended others intentionally.
The prosecution will have to prove you actually exposed your private areas. If you only revealed part of your body and undergarments were covering the private parts, you, in fact, did not commit indecent exposure. The prosecution will also have to prove you were in a public area where it was intended uninvited viewers see your exposure. They must show you willfully expected others not from your group be exposed to your private parts.
Cases of mistaken identity occur often. If you are in a public area, it is entirely possible someone accused you of an act you did not commit. You may be charged with indecent exposure by accident due to poor vision by another. Your defense attorney will help you prove your innocent by introducing evidence to show the victim’s perception of what happened is not reliable.
Other false accusations occur when another becomes vengeful or angry with you over personal matters such as a divorce, break-up of a romantic relationship or other personal issues. They may attempt to hurt you through legal repercussions associated with an indecent exposure conviction. Your criminal defense attorney will help you sort through these statements to prove your innocent and make sure your legal record is not damaged.
Statute of Limitations on Indecent Exposure Charges
If you’ve been charged with indecent exposure under Penal Code 314 more than one year after the event occurred, the District Attorney cannot charge you. Your criminal defense attorney can file that Statue of Limitations has run out and inform the prosecution they are procedurally barred from charging you.
If the charge is being filed as a felony indecent exposure under Penal Code 314(2), the prosecution then has up to three years from the date of the event to bring criminal charges against you. After the three year time-limit, the Statue of Limitations would then prevent them from filing charges.
What is Considered Lewd Conduct in Public?
California Penal Code 647(a) states it is an offense to engage in ‘lewd’ conduct while in a public area. This area is defined as one where people are open to enter when they choose. You cannot touch your private parts, or those of another while in these public areas and others are able to observe and be offended by the scene.
You cannot touch your private areas with the intent to reach sexual gratification while in a public area, and you cannot solicit someone to join you in this form of behavior. While the laws are still somewhat vague on this issue in California, it is becoming enough of a concern in today’s world for criminal charges to follow what others may perceive as lewd conduct.
An example may be where a man and woman go to a bar in the evening for cocktails. During the course of the evening, the woman flashes her chest at the man in an attempt to sexually excite him. Though the event was personal between the two of them, it was performed in a public bar and she could then be charged with a lewd act in a public place.
Mooning has been a long time joke performed when another feels like playing a prank on someone. This act of ‘mooning’ (showing one’s buttocks) is now a serious charge. If you should be caught mooning another, there are serious consequences under California law.
What is Aggravated Indecent Exposure?
Indecent exposure charges can become even more serious if filed as ‘aggravated’. This form of exposure occurs when someone enters a home or structure owned by another without their permission. If after entering this dwelling, an indecent exposure occurs, the person will be charged with aggravated indecent exposure resulting in more serious sentencing and penalties.
Can Your Attorney Settle A Case of Indecent Exposure Out of Court?
It is essential to settle the charges against you for indecent exposure as soon as possible. You need to contact your criminal defense attorney at your earliest chance in hopes the case can be reduced in charges or dismissed altogether.
Having an attorney working with you that understands criminal law and the laws of California specifically will help you investigate these charges and negotiate on your behalf to settle this case before it is sent to court. Even should there be no dismissal of the charges, your attorney can work with the prosecution to significantly reduce them to lessen the more serious consequences.
Is It Necessary to Have Legal Representation for Indecent Exposure Charges?
Your best chance of protecting your future and your quality of life depends on good legal representation against indecent exposure charges. Your attorney will understand the importance of early intervention and how it can change the outcome of your possible conviction.
One example of a person being charged with an indecent exposure that could have affected the rest of his life was when he could not find a local restroom soon enough and decided to relieve himself beside a tree. He intended to quickly and quietly relieve himself without notice but was surprised when a mother and her young child walked by the tree. Before he could cover himself, the child observed his private part which she pointed out to her mother. The mother was offended and told the authorities of his action along with the license number of the car he got into.
Police arrested him by tracking his license number, but by him contacting his criminal defense attorney before charges were filed, he was given a chance to negotiate the case. Explaining his actions and the fact that there was no intent to offend, his attorney was able to plead the case to a lesser offense which did not include a sex offense, and he was able to walk away with just a small fine. Without the help of his attorney, he could have faced jail time and the requirement to file with the State Sex Offender Registry.
What You Should Do If Arrested for Indecent Exposure
The first thing you should know about being arrested is you don’t want to talk before you’ve consulted with your attorney. Give authorities your name and address and then request your attorney be present before answering any further questions.
Generally, if the police are questioning you about an incident, they are attempting to gain information from you that will be held against you. An example of this with an indecent exposure charge is someone may have reported a vehicle like yours in their area, and they witnessed someone was performing an indecent or lewd action.
The police will trace what information they’ve been given to you and with certain forms of questioning, they can get you to admit to an act you were never even aware of happening. Should an act have occurred in your vehicle that someone misunderstood, they cannot prove the act without an admission from you that your vehicle and you were at the location. If they get an admission from you that your car was there and you were the person inside, they can arrest you without any other facts.
You need legal representation as soon as questioning begins regarding an illegal action. You have rights to a lawyer and the right to remain silent, and you should take advantage of these rights until your attorney gives you legal advice on the situation.
Contacting an Experience Indecent Exposure Defense Attorney Near Me?
Defending your rights, freedom, and quality of life against indecent exposure begins with experienced criminal defense. Van Nuys Criminal Attorney Criminal Defense Law knows California law and their way through the court system. They have been serving the Los Angeles and Southern California area for years and provide excellent legal representation and advice.
If you’ve been charged with indecent exposure or any other criminal activity contact our Los Angeles criminal attorney at 818-484-1100 to receive the best chance of getting a positive outcome with your case. Check through the website to ask questions regarding your case or to schedule an appointment to meet with them today.
You could be facing long-term and potentially severe consequences if convicted under California law. Leah Legal knows and understands the Penal Codes and is ready to fight with you to protect your future.
If you have been charged with the crime of lewd acts with a child (PC 288) in Los Angeles or anywhere in Southern California, you are facing extremely serious consequences that could affect you for the rest of your life. Securing for yourself the best possible criminal defense is imperative in these kinds of cases, even more so than in most other types of charges.
At Leah Legal, we have a long track record of winning for our clients accused of committing lewd acts with a child. We know the details of the law on these matters, and we have deep experience with local court processes in Los Angeles and beyond.
When you entrust your case into our hands, we give you top-tier legal advice and representation that you would be hard pressed to find elsewhere. And we handle your case at highly competitive rates and treat you with respect every step of the way.
To learn more or for a free legal consultation, contact Leah Legal anytime 24/7 by calling 818-484-1100.
How Is Lewd Acts with a Child Defined Under California Law?
Under California Penal Code Section 288, the crime of “lewd acts with a child” is defined as touching a minor with the intent to sexually arouse or gratify either yourself, the child, or someone else.
PC 288 is also sometimes called “acts of lewd and lascivious conduct.”
This crime typically involves the touching of a child’s sexual organ(s) or some other obvious act of child molestation. However, it can also include even touching the clothes of a child (versus the bare skin) or touching a non-sexual part of a child’s body, so long as it was done for sexual gratification of some sort to someone.
What Must the Prosecutor Prove?
To be convicted of PC 288, lewd acts with a child, the prosecution must prove the following elements of the crime beyond all reasonable doubt:
- The defendant did, in fact, touch the body of the victim, either directly or through the clothes.
- This touching was done “willfully.”
- The touching was also done for the purpose of sexual arousal or gratification, either of the defendant, the victim, or a third party.
Note that “willfully” does not mean you knew what you were doing was illegal or that you intended to harm another person. It simply means it was done “on purpose,” that is – not by accident.
And it is not required that the prosecutor prove that sexual arousal or gratification actually took place, but simply that you had the intent of producing it, for whatever party.
The Legal Process in PC 288 Cases
It is not at all uncommon for people to be falsely accused of PC 288 (lewd acts with a child) in California, and yet, even a false accusation that is defeated in court can permanently damage one’s reputation.
Nonetheless, losing in court would have far greater negative consequences. At Leah Legal, we can help you through the legal process from beginning to end – as soon as you are arrested, charged, or you know/suspect an investigation is being opened up against you.
Guilty Until Proven Innocent
Oftentimes, an accusation of lewd acts with a child is automatically assumed true by police, investigators, parents, and others. It is thought that a child would never make up such an accusation and that he/she wouldn’t even know how to describe the acts testified about.
However, there are times when a child might invent a false story (on his/her own or after being coaxed by adults to do so) in order to get a step parent or other disliked adult out of their life. It could also be in retaliation to a parent’s discipline of a child or ignoring of a child. Or, it could just be to get attention or to not have to be left with a babysitter anymore.
As to the content of the accusation, if it is very explicitly sexual, it is possible that TV, the Internet, friends at school, or other sources are involved.
Police Investigations
As child molestation of all varieties is a very serious crime, and among the most despised in our society, every accusation is liable to be quickly investigated.
And police devote a lot of resources to these kinds of investigations. There are even special law enforcement agencies that follow up on molestation allegations, and there are specially trained police detectives who handle such cases.
Sources of accusations all normally go back to the child, unless it’s obvious to an adult that something happened or if there was an eyewitness to the crime.
The child might report the molestation to police, to a parent, to a teacher, or to some other adult or older person, who then relays it to police. Or, it might be reported only many years after the fact, perhaps, by someone who is now a adult.
The next step is an interview of the alleged victim by police. A psychologist and/or detective will be present and the interview will be put on audio and/or video so it can serve as evidence later. The interview must not be one in which the child is coaxed or pushed into saying there was abuse, but it must truly be the “child’s own story.”
Unless the incident took place long ago, the next step will be to gather medical and any forensic evidence from the scene of the alleged crime or from the child’s clothes he/she was wearing at the time. If body fluids or hair are found, a DNA test will be run on them.
Another element in an investigation is often a staged “pretext call” where the alleged victim calls the alleged perpetrator, while police are listening on the line.
Also, police will search for other victims of the accused, since it is rare for a pedophile to have only one victim. These child victims may also be interviewed.
Finally, the suspect him or her self will be interviewed. An attempt will be made to get a confession or to agree to submit to a polygraph machine test. Sometimes, the interview will take place at the suspect’s home; other times, in the police station. Either way, police will seek a confession or evidence against you, even if they approach with friendly words and a smile on their face.
Possible Penalties for a PC 288 Conviction
The possible punishments for a PC 288 (lewd acts with a child) conviction vary quite a bit depending on the age of the child-victim and other factors.
If the child was ages 16 or 17, the charge would not be PC 288 but would be either statutory rape (PC 261.5) or sexual battery (PC 243.4).
If the child was ages 14 or 15, and the perpetrator was ten or more years older than the victim, PC 288 can be filed. It can be filed as either misdemeanor or felony. If a misdemeanor, it is punishable by 12 months in county jail and a probationary period. If a felony, it is punishable the same as the misdemeanor OR more severely, with up 3 years in state prison being possible.
If the child was below the age of 14, lewd acts with a child (PC 288) is always a felony, punishable by probation and a year in jail OR by from 3 to 8 years in state prison. BUT, if force or fear was used to subdue the child victim, it is punishable by 5 to 10 years in prison. And if due to previous similar convictions for sexual crimes, the defendant is classed as a “habitual sexual offender,” he/she could get 25 years to life in prison.
Also, realize that each act of molestation can be charged as a separate crime, even if done to the same child. This means long prison terms are not uncommon for those convicted of PC 288, because distinct acts “pile up the penalties.”
Sex Offender Registration
Aside from the other penalties of a PC 288 conviction, registration as a sex offender is also required. This is a duty that, if neglected, carries its own penalties under PC 290.
Lewd acts with a child can get you either 20 years or lifetime registration as a sex offender.
Realize that the presiding judge has no authority to waive the duty of those convicted of lewd acts with a child to report to the California Sex Registry. But, the duration of the requirement can vary based on the details of the case, and a good lawyer might be able to get PC 288 reduced to a lesser charge that wouldn’t require sex offender registration.
Defending Against a PC 288 (Lewd Acts with a Child) Charge
At Leah Legal, we have deep experience in effectively defending against PC 288 and other sex crime charges and crimes against minors charges.
Over the years, we have won victories in these types of cases where other attorneys failed or where they ran away from “the hard” cases out of fear of failure.
Here is a basic overview of the kinds of defense strategies we employ in PC 288 (lewd acts with a minor) defense cases:
- Credibility of the Accuser
First of all, if often is the case that there is no conclusive physical evidence and no confession by the accused. In that case, it’s all about the credibility of the child-witness. We will run background checks, interview family, friends, and acquaintances of the accuser, and access email, medical, counseling, and other important records. If there is any reason that the child’s credibility in making the accusation should be questioned, we will find it.
- Accidental Touching
Another approach is to show that while the touching, perhaps, did take place, it was purely accidental. Unless the touch was “willful,” it was an accident and not lewd conduct.
- Lack of Intent
In some cases, the touch may have both occurred and not accidentally, but it may have had nothing to do with anything sexual. It may have occurred without any intent on the defendant’s part in regard to sexual arousal or gratification.
- Child of Wrong Age
To be convicted of PC 288, the child must have been under 14 years of age or 14 to 15 years old while the defendant was 10 years older at the time. Otherwise, it is not lewd acts with a child, though another California sex crime charge might apply.
- Private Polygraph Tests
Not all polygraph tests are done by the police. Sometimes, a private polygraph exam can be done and if the defendant passes, it can be presented as evidence in your favor – not to the court (for it’s inadmissible in court) but to the D.A. And sometimes, this is enough to convince the D.A. to drop an already weak case.
Mitigation to Win Probation
Though we at Leah Legal always fight first and foremost for a full acquittal or dismissal, but there are also cases where we have to resort to a “mitigation” strategy.
Mitigation has to do with fighting to get a lesser sentence for the same crime. We show that the defendant is well known to be of generally good character and that he/she acted “out of character” in this case. And we also show that the act is isolated and not likely to ever occur again.
This can often win you probation instead of years in state prison – so it’s not at all a “lost” case.
Contact Us Today For Immediate Assistance!
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we stand ready to assist you today, at a moment’s notice, in building a solid defense against the PC 288 (lewd acts with a child) allegations you are facing.
We understand the gravity of this kind of a charge, and we know how to win the best possible outcome to your case, be that a dismissal, acquittal, or a reduced charge and/or sentence.
Contact Leah Legal today by calling us at 818-484-1100, anytime 24/7/365, and we can give you a free, no-obligation consultation and immediate attention to your case.
Loitering is hanging around a business or a public area without a legal or specific motive to be in the area. In Van Nuys, where the police seek to crack down on prostitution, you can be charged with loitering to commit prostitution when the prosecutor is not able to establish that you were soliciting prostitution. Even though the offense is a California misdemeanor, a conviction could mean a potential jail sentence, paying fines, and a criminal record. If you’re wrongly accused, you might still be found guilty should you fail to engage an experienced criminal defense lawyer like our attorneys at Leah Legal.
Loitering to Commit Prostitution (PC 653.22)
The term “prostitution” can be defined as committing sexual conduct for remuneration or compensation. A defendant could also be put in custody and imprisoned under California Penal Code Section 653.22 if they were loitering and planned to engage in prostitution, even if they never committed the act, or were arrested while offering to commit it.
The police search for suspects in specific locations and particular signals that they are prostitutes who are looking for customers. That means the police can arrest you because they thought you wanted to commit prostitution.
Understanding the Elements of the Crime
To find a defendant guilty of the offense in question, the prosecution should establish the below facts beyond any reasonable doubt:
- The defendant was loitering
- The defendant loitered in a public area
- The defendant intended to engage in prostitution
To comprehend the above legal definition, here is an overview of all the facts of the crime.
Loitering
Loitering is lingering or delaying in one place with no legal purpose and with the intent to engage in an offense if an opportunity arises.
Therefore, you aren’t loitering if you’re passing through an area. To be charged under Penal Code Section 653.22, you need to have spent some time in the area.
Additionally, you can’t be arrested for Penal Code 653.22 if you prove that you have another reason why you are in the area, for instance, you are drinking with your friends in a restaurant.
Public Place
You can only violate Penal Code Section 653.22 PC if you were in a public area.
The term “public place” refers to any area that is open and accessible by the public. Perfect examples include a park, driveway, plaza, parking lot, or an alley. Please note, parking and moving motor vehicles are also public places.
Moreover, movie theaters, strip clubs, bars, restaurants, and buildings that are open and accessible by the public are public places. Entrances, doorways, and grounds around the buildings are also public areas.
However, you can’t be charged with loitering to engage in prostitution for conduct that happens in a party held at a person’s private home.
Intent to Engage in Prostitution
This is another element of the offense where the prosecutor should prove that you planned to commit prostitution.
Prostitution refers to a sexual act for cash or any other form of payment. However, it doesn’t take in sexual conduct, which happens in a play, stage performance, or entertainment that is accessible by the general public, such as strip club performances.
How Does the Prosecution Know You Planned to Engage in Prostitution?
Determining whether you purposed to engage in prostitution is hard. Therefore, it is common for police to misinterpret a person’s conduct who is in the wrong area at the wrong time. Any competent defense lawyer should assist a defendant in finding weaknesses and missing gaps in the prosecutor’s case.
Proving Intent
As previously mentioned, you can only be sentenced to loitering with an intent to engage in prostitution if you showed the intention to engage in prostitution. You show the intent by behaving in a way, as well as under circumstances that openly prove that you have the purpose of getting another person to engage in prostitution or soliciting prostitution.
Conduct that Could Demonstrate Intent
According to California Penal Code Section 653.22, the following conduct can show that a defendant planned to engage in prostitution:
- The defendant continuously signals, stops, talks with or attempts to speak with or stop people passing by, in a manner that shows the defendant is soliciting prostitution
- The defendant continually stops or tries to stop motor vehicles by waving, calling the motorists, or gesturing, or talks or attempts to talk to motorists, in a manner that shows the defendant is soliciting prostitution
- The defendant circles a place in a car and continuously contacts or beckons on, or attempts to reach or stop drivers or pedestrians, in a manner that shows the defendant is soliciting prostitution
- The accused has committed at least one of the mentioned above conducts previously highlighted, or any other conduct that shows the defendant is soliciting prostitution within six months before their arrest
- The accused had a previous soliciting lewd conduct, loitering to commit prostitution, or lewd conduct in public, prostitution, soliciting prostitution conviction within five years
These conducts are likely to prove intent to engage in prostitution if they occurred in a place that is popular for prostitution.
The Accused Determination
It is worth noting that the situations listed-above are not determinative or exclusive. That means you do not need to perform any of the conducts to be sentenced for violating PC 653.22.
The jury can also put other factors into consideration. For instance, they can put into account conduct, which shows you had previously solicited prostitution, even when the behavior happened more than six months before your arrest.
Other acts that can prove you planned to engage in prostitution include:
- Carrying condoms
- Being together with a person with a previous prostitution conviction
- Giving the police a fake name when questioned
Well, you can see the amount of discretion the cops, judges, and prosecutors have in accusing and sentencing a person for breaking Penal Code Section 653.22. The law allows law enforcement officers to target specific individuals, groups, or neighborhoods unfairly.
Fortunately, it is not a must that you are found guilty because you performed one of the acts listed above. You will only be sentenced if the circumstances in your case demonstrate that you planned to engage in prostitution.
Penalties Attracted by Violation of PC section 653.22
Violation of PC 653.22 is a misdemeanor. It carries the following potential penalties:
- A maximum of six months in jail
- Up to one thousand dollars in fine
Only the judge determines the exact jail term.
Additionally, if a U.S immigrant is convicted, they risk deportation or losing privileges granted to them like a green card, work visa, or permanent resident alien status.
How to Fight Penal Code Section 653.22 PC Charges
Any sex crime conviction in California has long-lasting repercussions on a defendant’s future, career, and life. Luckily, there are several legal defenses that your experienced Los Angeles criminal defense attorney can use to fight the charges. They include:
Insufficient Evidence that a Defendant Planned to Engage in Prostitution
Various factors might demonstrate that a defendant purposed to engage in prostitution. However, to establish this, the judge has to:
- Put into consideration all the case’s circumstances, and
- There requires to be adequate proof.
For instance, you could have made eye contact with female motorists because you were hoping a person will give you a ride or you enjoy being flirtatious. Unfortunately, under Penal Code Section 653.22, the police can detain anyone for a harmless act like this, particularly if it occurs in an area where prostitution happens. You will also be jailed if the judge buys the police’s side of the story.
Since the law gives discretion to the prosecution team and judges, you cannot afford to overlook the importance of a criminal defense lawyer. The lawyer will collect all the essential facts. They will also tell your side of the story persuasively.
Entrapment
Entrapment is not one of the most common defenses. It is used when a law enforcer induces a law-abiding individual to engage in an offense that they wouldn’t have otherwise engaged in. Usually, police operating undercover make Penal Code Section 653.22 violation arrests.
Entrapment could be an effective defense if the arresting officer acted in a bossy manner, such as using threats, flattery, pressure, or harassment.
Jury Nullification
Jury nullification is a process where the jury votes an innocent verdict, even though the judge believes beyond any reasonable doubt that the accused is guilty. It occurs when the judge has a personal, ethical, or moral objection to finding the accused guilty. A judge can nullify any case’s verdict, but it’s common in prostitution and loitering to commit prostitution cases.
Technically, jury nullification is not a legal defense to Penal Code Section 653.22 PC charges. Instead, it is something that happens as most judges don’t believe the offense should be punished, at least in the context of adult prostitution offenses charged as California misdemeanors.
Mistake of Fact
A mistake of fact defense happens when a defendant mistakenly thought a fact was true, while it is untrue, and as a result, the offense is not completed. For instance, if you loitered intending to engage in what you thought was prostitution, but you loitered with a motive to engage in what was not prostitution, then you can use the mistake of fact as a defense.
This case can happen where you loitered outside a hotel, with an intent to enter the hotel and watch people engaging in prostitution. Mere presence at the time of the offense commission isn’t an offense. In other words, because you loitered aiming to perform an act that is not an offense (that is to watch prostitutes).
Miranda Violations and Police Misconduct
Sometimes the police should have a search warrant reinforced by probable cause before searching a defendant’s motor vehicle in a California PC 653.22 case. This is true if the law enforcer thinks you are using your car regarding violation of PC 653.22.
Under the United States 4th Amendment, the police officer should get your waiver to remain silent before being interrogated (Miranda Rights).
Any search or seizure of evidence conducted without a warrant is breaking your right to privacy. Consequently, any evidence collected during the illegal seizure or search might be prohibited in your case.
It also applies if you made an incriminating statement to law enforcers without first waiving your right to keep quiet or your entitlement to have a lawyer present during the interrogations.
Other police misconduct concerns that could result in Penal Code Section 653.22 defense include:
- Police officer’s racial profiling
- Excessive application of force by the police
- Police false reporting
- Use of coercive strategies to get confessions
- Failure to present exculpatory discovery (proof that favors the defendant)
Statute of Limitations
Statute of limitations can be defined as the amount of time the prosecution team has to bring criminal charges against you. In California, the statute of limitations is a year from your arrest’s date. Otherwise, the judge will not listen to the criminal case.
Plea Bargain
The best outcome in your criminal case is a dismissal of the charges. It is sometimes possible, depending on your criminal history and the strength of the prosecutor’s case.
If the attorney is unable to have the charges dismissed, they can bargain for a charge reduction that carries less stigma or a lesser sentence.
Your charge could be reduced to PC 602 (trespass) or PC 415 (disturbing the peace). Your penalties could be reduced to house arrest, probation without a jail sentence, or work release.
Related Offenses
Discussed below are offenses that are charged in place of or alongside PC 653.22:
Loitering to Solicit the Purchase of Alcohol
Under Penal Code Section 303a, it is a crime to loiter near a restaurant, bar, or any establishment that sells alcohol with an intent to persuade people to buy you drinks. It is a California misdemeanor.
Sometimes, prostitutes find customers in clubs or bars and start the deal by convincing their clients to buy them a drink or two. If arrested under similar circumstances, you can try to get the loitering with a purpose to engage in prostitution charges reduced to a Penal Code Section 303a charge. Loitering to solicit the purchase of alcohol conviction will carry less stigma on your criminal record.
Local Ordinances
When PC 653.22 passed, the legislature did not stop the local government from imposing their laws on loitering for prosecution. Therefore, county and city governments can impose more severe restrictions and penalties like forfeiture of property on this conduct.
Lewd Conduct in Public (PC 647a)
You are more likely to be found guilty of loitering to engage in prostitution if you have a previous Penal Code Section 647a PC conviction. The same is true for a solicitation of lewd conduct prior conviction.
Lewd conduct in public can be defined as touching your or somebody else’s private organs with sexual arousal intentions. It should be done when you are aware or ought to have known that there is a person nearby who will be offended.
Violation of California Penal Code 647a is a misdemeanor.
Prostitution and Solicitation of Prostitution (PC 647b)
Sometimes, the prosecution team will tag loitering to engage in prostitution charges on solicitation of prostitution or prostitution charges because a loitering charge is easy to establish.
Additionally, you will probably be sentenced for loitering to engage in prostitution if you have a solicitation of prostitution or prostitution conviction within the past five years.
A defendant can be charged with prostitution if they engage in prostitution and acts so willfully (on purpose or deliberately).
To be found guilty of soliciting prostitution, the prosecution team should present evidence that a defendant:
- Solicited somebody else to engage in prostitution
- Acted so with an intent to engage in prostitution
Violation of Penal Code Section 647b PC is a California misdemeanor.
Understanding the Relationship Between Loitering to Engage in Prostitution and S.B. 1322
According to California Senate Bill 1322, a Penal Code Section 653.22 charge does not apply to children below eighteen years of age. Signed into law in 2016, this defense applies, even if all the facts of the offense prove otherwise. Instead, the minor could be committed as a defendant minor in a juvenile proceeding.
Also, S.B. 1322 doesn’t apply to people who solicit a minor to prostitution.
This law was tailored to protect exploited minors of human trafficking from undergoing the stigma that comes with a Penal Code Section 653.22 conviction.
Moreover, under SB1322, it is illegal to have a minor prostitute as an uncharged accomplice of pimping, something that permitted under Penal Code 266h.
Expungement
Violation of Penal Code Section 653.22 PC is only prosecuted as a California misdemeanor. That means if convicted, you are eligible for expungement under Penal Code Section 1203.4.
Also known as dismissal, an expungement will release you from the negative repercussions and penalties of the conviction. One of its benefits is that the sealed conviction will not be disclosed to your potential landlord and employees. It also makes it easier to acquire professional licenses.
Hire a Los Angeles Sex Crimes Defense Attorney Near Me
It is illegal to loiter with a motive to engage in prostitution (Penal Code Section 653.22 PC) in Van Nuys. The charge carries a social stigma that often results in a damaged reputation or embarrassment. You also risk having a criminal record, paying fines, and serving a jail sentence. At Legal Leah, we understand that sex charges shouldn’t be taken lightly. Consequently, we can help protect your rights and realize the best possible outcome. To speak to one of our compassionate attorneys, call us at 818-484-1100 today.
If you have been arrested on a charge of prostitution or solicitation of a prostitute in California, don’t be fooled into thinking “no one prosecutes those kinds of crimes anymore.” That simply is not true, and a conviction on either of these two crimes could lead to serious long-term consequences, including lifetime registration as a sex offender.
At our Los Angeles criminal defense law firm, we understand the details of how prostitution-related charges are prosecuted under California Penal Code Section 647b. We have defended all manner of prostitution and solicitation cases in the past and have won the best possible outcomes for our clients. We stand ready to do the same for you.
To learn more or for a free legal consultation, do not hesitate to call us 24/7 at 818-484-1100.
How Are Prostitution, Solicitation, and Similar Crimes Defined Under California Law?
Under PC 647b, both prostitution and solicitation for prostitution are defined and criminalized. And there are also additional closely related crimes that fall under this same umbrella.
- Engaging in prostitution is defined as having sex or committing any lewd sexual act with some other person in return for money or some other form of compensation.
To be guilty of prostitution, you must have committed this crime willingly and knowingly. That does not mean you had to know the act was illegal but simply that it was not a misunderstanding but a willful act of prostitution.
Note that a lewd act can be touching the genitalia of another person or touching the but or female breasts, if it be done for the purpose of sexual arousal or gratification.
- Solicitation for prostitution is defined as luring or inducing another person to commit prostitution. The act must have been done for the purpose of actually committing the crime.
It is possible for solicitation to be committed by a prostitute, by someone trying to contact a prostitute, or by someone trying to get someone who never committed prostitution in the past to do so.
In order to prove “specific intent” in a solicitation case, normally it must be shown that money or other compensation, such as narcotics, were offered for sex. It generally isn’t sufficient to simply show a particular gesture was made or that sex was asked for.
It isn’t enough to simply show a person was present in a place where prostitutes often wait “for business,” nodded or waved to a passerby, or stood scantily clad by a busy street. Those elements might be brought up in a trial, but they cannot prove the charge by themselves.
And it is also generally required that the person being solicited “received” the solicitation. If it went unnoticed, a conviction would be very difficult to say the least. But that doesn’t mean the person solicited had to agree to the offer for a conviction to take place.
In some cases, where it is proved you attempted to solicit but your message was never received, a lesser charge of attempted solicitation could be filed, which would cut your sentence in half in terms of fine and jail time if convicted at all.
- Agreeing to engage in prostitution is defined as indicating you would agree to commit prostitution when solicited to do so, with the intent of actually doing it, and with some other action done in “furtherance” of the crime.
To be convicted of this crime, you not only had to be solicited to prostitution and had an intent to engage in it, but an act of furtherance, such as making a payment for the “service,” traveling to the place where the sex was to take place, or taking money from an ATM to give to give to the one who solicited you. Sometimes, speech acts can count as furtherance, but that would require something rather clear and beyond a simple “yes.”
Possible Penalties for Prostitution Crimes
The crimes delineated under PC 647b are misdemeanors. The punishment is generally the same whether the crime was engaging in prostitution, solicitation to prostitution, or agreeing to engage in prostitution.
Likely sentencing elements include:
- A maximum of 6 months in jail.
- A maximum fine of $1,000.
But if your charge is reduced to attempting to solicit for prostitution, the penalty would be halved: a $500 maximum fine and up to 3 months in county jail.
And for repeat offenses, there are relatively high minimum actual jail time: 45 days for a second offense, 90 days for third offense.
Prostitution While in a Motor Vehicle
There are additional punishments if a violation of PC 647b takes place while the defendant was in a motor vehicle. This can lead to 30-day license suspension or to driving on a restricted license for up to 6 months. A restricted license allows you to legally drive to/from work (or school) but virtually nowhere else.
It is also possible that your vehicle could be seized by the state under “asset forfeiture” policies if you committed a prostitution crime while in your car.
Sex Offender Registration
Unlike many other California sex crimes, sex offender registration under PC 290 is NOT required automatically for a PC 647b violation.
But it is possible that the presiding judge will include sex offender registration as part of the sentence. This is hardly ever done, but it is still possible. And sex offender registration is for life, and failure to register and keep updated is a felony crime with severe penalties.
Common Defense Strategies
At Leah Legal, we understand the gravity of a PC 647b charge. We realize the impacts it can have on your reputation, career, and relationships, besides the direct legal consequences of a conviction.
Our team of legal experts will work “hard and smart” from day one in building you a solid defense. And the years of experience and numerous prostitution defense cases of every sort we have handled in the past mean that we will know exactly how to defend your case.
Here are some of the most common defense strategies we use at Leah Legal to win an acquittal or a dismissal to a PC 647b charge:
- Mistake of Fact
In order to be guilty of prostitution, solicitation, or agreement to a solicitation, you must have intended to commit these specific acts.
If someone responds to an “escort service” ad, but only is looking for a date, for example, that would not be solicitation for prostitution (even if the service turned out to be a front for a prostitution ring.)
Or, if you were arrested due to your location, attire, gestures, or other factors but did not intend to engage in prostitution, you are not guilty.
- Police Entrapment
This is a very common defense because many people are brought up on charges of prostitution crimes due to police sting operations.
While undercover police can catch people in the act and gain a conviction as a result, there are limits on what police are allowed to do. They cannot apply “high pressure,” threats, sexual flattery, and other “overbearing” methods without it counting as entrapment, which could get your case dismissed.
In most cases, the undercover agent will be posing as a prostitute, but they can also pose as “customers” in order to nail a suspected prostitute. It is frequently the case that the methods used go too far and may merit an entrapment argument by the defense.
- Insufficient or Untrustworthy Evidence
As in all other criminal cases, the bar is high: “beyond all reasonable doubt.” And that bar is often too hard for prosecutors to reach.
In many cases, there is no tape recording or video or the alleged prostitution agreement being made. And the Los Angeles Police Department will often have decoy cops wired but yet not record the conversations. This obviously makes one wonder why the conversations was not recorded if it was so convicting. Perhaps, there is something the officer is trying to hide.
In other cases, real evidence is indeed presented by the prosecution, but it doesn’t come across as unambiguous and clearly incriminating. There may be question as to whether a genuine intent to engage in sex for compensation really existed on the part of the defendant.
Reduced Charges
In some cases, when a conviction cannot be totally avoided, it may still be possible to secure a reduced charge that will have a much less severe sentence.
Most commonly, a prostitution crime (PC 647b) will get reduced to either PC 415, disturbing the peace, or to PC 602, criminal trespassing. Neither of these charge reductions is much related to the original charge; they are simply related to why the police officer suspected you of prostitution or solicitation to begin with.
Needless to say, having a disturbing the peace or trespassing charge on your record will be much less embarrassing than a prostitution crime conviction. Most people will have no idea there is any connection between your criminal record and the reason you were originally arrested.
A Word on the History of PC 647b in California
Today, with the changing cultural mores, one might think that (especially in a state like California) prostitution and solicitation would not be against the law or at least not be commonly prosecuted. But that simply is not the case.
Prostitution has been around for as long as anyone can remember, and it has always been a problem in the United States. Even during the War for Independence, many sexually transmitted diseases were spread among soldiers because of prostitution.
For a long time, there wasn’t a lot of enforcement of anti-prostitution laws. And it wasn’t uncommon for police to be bought off to look the other way.
But in California, in 1961, PC 647 was introduced. This cracked down on prostitution and solicitation of prostitutes, and a new crime of agreement to prostitution was added in 1986. It’s not as if prostitution and related acts weren’t illegal in California earlier, but there was a new emphasis and the number of arrests quickly rose.
And the reason the addition of the agreement to prostitution section was added was because prostitutes were evading arrest by simply agreeing to whatever their “customers” asked for, knowing that that could not get them convicted or in trouble even with an undercover cop.
But many arrested for prostitution crimes due to police decoys began to argue the police entrapment defense, which led to the legal system ultimately requiring an “act in furtherance” of any agreement to commit prostitution before a conviction could be had.
Today, police will sting massage parlors, strip clubs, and other areas where the word on the street is that prostitution is going on. Undercover police will also respond to online or telephone directory ads that seem to be a front for possible prostitution. They will pose as “Johns” as easily as prostitutes these days.
Despite these efforts, prostitution in California and throughout the United States remains common. And false arrests or exaggerated charges of prostitution related crimes are also common in California. And with prosecutors as zealous as ever, it is crucial to avail yourself of a criminal defense attorney with experience in this practice area before stepping foot into the courtroom.
Contact Us Today For Immediate Help
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we stand ready to stand up and fight for you against any prostitution, solicitation, or other related crime you may be charged with. We have deep knowledge of the California Penal Code and of local L.A. Area court processes regarding these types of cases, and that gives us the edge in the courtroom.
Contact our experienced criminal defense attorney anytime 24/7365 by calling 818-484-1100, and we will give you a free consultation and give immediate attention to your case.
If you have been accused of rape and are facing formal charges of a rape crime in Los Angeles or Southern California, it is imperative that you waste no time in availing yourself of the best possible legal defense. The potential penalties of a rape crime conviction are simply too steep to risk “going it alone” or relying on an attorney without sufficient experience in this specific practice area.
At Leah Legal, we understand how common it is for false charges of rape to be filed in California and yet how prone people are to believe every rape allegation they hear without conclusive evidence. We have a long track record of successfully defending against all manner of rape charges in the L.A. Area, and we can come to your assistance as well.
To learn more or for a free legal consultation, do not hesitate to contact us 24/7 by calling 818-484-1100.
How Rape Is Defined Under California Law
California Penal Code Section 261 is the main statute defining and criminalizing rape in our state, though there are a number of other statutes that deal with specific types of rape. PC 261 defines rape as engaging in sexual intercourse with another person without that person’s consent.
Lack of consent can mean that physical force or threats were used to coerce the victim into submission. The case of physical force being applied is the usual and most obvious means of committing rape, but rape by threat is more complex and diverse.
For example, a direct or clearly implied threat that causes a person to act in a way they would not otherwise is “duress.” A threat to injure the victim or another person he/she cares about is a “menace.” A threat must cause a “reasonable fear” in the victim or at least a “real fear” that the perpetrator “takes advantage of.”
Lack of consent can also come in less ordinary forms, such as presenting sex as a “professional service” or “therapeutic treatment,” having sex with someone too drunk or drugged up to know what he/she is doing, or taking advantage of someone with a mental or physical disability. It is also rape to have sex with someone who is asleep or by fraudulently convincing that person that you are his/her lawful spouse.
Also note that consent can be withdrawn, so that sex that begins as consensual can “become” rape at a later point. However, the person withdrawing consent must communicate they no longer desire the intercourse and attempt to stop it. They must do so in a way that would make a “reasonable person” understand their intention and then have the other person “forcibly continue” before it is rape.
Finally, although we will focus here on rape charged under PC 261, we should mention some of the other relevant California laws:
- Statutory Rape (PC 261.5). This is intercourse with a minor (under 18) regardless of consent.
- Spousal Rape (PC 262). Those who are married do not have license to force sex on their spouse, but rape of a spouse is charged under PC 262 instead of PC 261.
- Oral Copulation by Force (PC 266c)
- Forcible Penetration With a Foreign Object (PC 289)
Note that “date rape” is not a legal category and would be charged under PC 261 or another applicable statute.
Possible Penalties for Rape
PC 261, non-spousal rape, is a felony in California, and is punished very severely. Possible penalties include:
- 3 to 8 years in state prison; in certain types of cases, 1 year in county jail and formal probation can stand in place of the prison term. If “great bodily injury” was inflicted, 3 to 5 extra years in prison are added.
- A fine of up to $10,000.
- A “strike” on the defendant’s criminal record under California’s Three Strikes Law.
If the victim is a minor, punishments become more severe. Prison terms of 7 to 11 years apply to rapes of those under 18, as handled under PC 261 (versus handled as statutory rape, where consent allegedly existed but the age alone qualifies it as rape).
If a child under age 14 is raped and the rape is charged under PC 261, the punishment is 9 to 13 years in state prison.
Also, when a minor is the victim, the fine can be up to $25,000.
And lifetime registration as a sex offender will also be required of those convicted of rape, with failure to register or update information after a change of address being a crime in itself, addressed in PC 290.
However, do note that rape by means of fraud or threat of arrest/deportation will not result in sex offender registration even upon conviction. But those are the only two exceptions.
Any conviction of rape on your criminal record is a stigma that won’t go away and that will affect your ability to find employment and live a “normal” life in your community. Thus, it is critical to fight a rape charge in every possible legal way and to rely on the expertise of an experienced rape crimes defense attorney.
What Must the Prosecution Prove?
To prove a defendant guilty of the crime of rape under PC 261, the prosecutor must demonstrate the following four elements of the crime beyond any reasonable doubt:
- Sexual intercourse, defined as “any penetration, however slight” did in fact take place between the defendant and the alleged victim.
- The two persons involved were not married at the time, for then it would be charged under PC 262 (spousal rape), a distinct crime.
- There was a lack of consent on the part of the victim, either before or after the sexual intercourse commenced.
- The sex was accomplished by means of physical force, threat, or fraud.
In most instances, the prosecution’s case will hinge on establishing the lack of consent. Note the following:
- Having a current or previous dating relationship or a previous marriage relationship with someone in no way automatically implies consent to sexual intercourse.
- Asking someone to wear a condom or use a contraceptive device does not automatically prove consent. However, such a request could show a reasonable belief of consent in the defendant, if not demonstrate consent in conjunction with other evidence.
- The prosecution must prove that the defendant was aware of the lack of consent or could reasonably have been expected to be aware of it.
- Both men and women can be convicted of rape. The fact that most rapes are committed by men against women in no way changes the possibility of the opposite occurring.
- Aiding and abetting a rape makes one a “principal actor” in the crime under California law. It means you can be convicted of the crime itself as if you had personally done the rape.
- It is not necessary the prosecution prove the victim put up “resistance” to the sex in order for it to count as rape. That used to be the law in California in earlier years, but the fact that different people react differently in such situations (such as “freezing” instead of fighting/screaming) led to the change of law on this point. However, lack of resistance may still be an element that could demonstrate a reasonable belief of consent on the part of the defendant.
- You cannot prove consent by showing evidence that the alleged victim had a promiscuous sexual history or reputation. This is called the “rape shield” law.
As you can see, there are a number of rules of evidence that favor the prosecution but also others that favor the defendant. And some of these rules are not what we might expect them to be. Thus, you cannot fight a rape charge by building your defense on what you assume the law should be. You need a good lawyer who knows the complex details of what the law actually says and how those laws typically play out in court.
Possible Defenses Against a Rape Charge
Many times, someone accused of rape may feel hopeless to defend him or her self in court. But at Leah Legal, we understand that there are a number of viable defense strategies to use to defeat these charges.
While the exact defense is determined by the facts of each particular case, here are some of the major types of defenses we use to win in court:
- Consent Existed
This is the most commonly used defense against a rape charge in California. If the intercourse took place by mutual consent and both parties were adults, rape did not occur. This defense also will not hold if the defendant had a mental disability that prevented him/her from legally giving consent. But in most cases, consent is a pivotal element of the crime that must be established to gain a conviction.
If consent was later withdrawn and the defendant continued the sexual act, it would be rape, but only if the alleged victim clearly communicated their withdrawal of consent. A lack of such a communication can be a viable defense.
- Mistake of Fact
It may also be that, though consent did not exist or though it was withdrawn, the defendant nevertheless had a reasonable belief to the contrary. If so, it was not rape. If the alleged victim sent “mixed messages” and never resisted or clearly communicated a desire to avoid or stop the intercourse, this defense can be used.
- False Accusation
In many cases, rather than the rape allegation stemming from a misunderstanding about consent, it is simply a complete fabrication. It is very easy to file a rape charge in California; it requires very little evidence to get as far as the trial phase. Unfortunately, too many false accusations of rape are made out of revenge or spite. Different studies suggest between 10% and 50% of rape charges are simply false.
- No Intercourse Occurred
In some cases, it may be that no intercourse (or oral copulation) occurred, making it, perhaps, sexual assault, but not rape. It could be that, whether or not consensual, physical and sexual touching took place but without actual penetration.
- Mistaken Identity
When a rape is committed by a complete stranger who ambushes the victim at night and wears a mask or other disguise, it is very easy for a mistaken identity to occur, even when an eyewitness makes the identification. And a person’s past criminal record can also influence who is accused of the rape, but this clearly does not prove guilt in a new, specific case.
- Lack of Sufficient Evidence
In many cases, a rape victim will not seek immediate medical care or even let anyone know what happened for months or years. This can create a situation where all physical evidence is absent and the whole case moves based on testimony alone. It is certainly possible for testimonial evidence to be sufficient for a rape conviction, even years after the alleged fact, but in many cases, the evidence is simply too sparse and inconclusive.
Contact Us Today for Immediate Assistance
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we have comprehensive knowledge of all California statutes relating to rape crime charges, and we also have well seasoned courtroom skills, being fully familiar with local L.A. Area court processes.
If you have been accused of rape, do not assume that your case is indefensible. We have won many rape crime defense cases in the past. We know how to challenge the evidence, testimony, and argument of the prosecution and win the best possible outcome to your case.
For a free consultation regarding your criminal defense matter, call us anytime 24/7/365 at 818-484-1100.
There are few allegations you can face that can ruin your reputation and result in stricter, longer term consequences than a sexual battery or other sex crime charge. Yet, many give up too easily when facing a sexual battery charge, assuming that the “deck is stacked against” them and they cannot win.
But the truth is that, though it is very easy to be accused of sexual battery in California, and though it takes an experienced defense attorney to maximize your chances of defeating such a charge, nonetheless, many sexual battery cases do in fact end in dismissal or acquittal.
At Leah Legal, we understand the details of PC 243.4 and other parts of the California Penal Code relevant to sexual battery cases, and we have longtime experience in successfully winning these types of cases in Los Angeles and throughout Southern California.
To learn more about our top-tier criminal defense services or to avail yourself of a free legal consultation concerning the details of your case, do not hesitate to call us anytime 24/7 at 818-484-1100.
How Is “Sexual Battery” Defined in California?
California Penal Code (PC) Section 243.4 criminalizes and assigns penalties to what is called either “sexual battery” or “sexual assault.” The statute forbids one from touching another person’s “intimate part” for the purpose of sexual gratification or arousal or with purposefully abusive intent.
Many confuse sexual battery with other crimes like rape or sexual molestation, but in reality sexual battery is a different (if similar) crime.
While any kind of illegal and/or unwanted sexual touching can count as sexual battery, there are several specific sub-categories of this crime you should be aware of:
- Sexual assault while the victim is restrained: Subsection (a) of PC 243.4 covers sexual assault of someone who is unlawfully restrained and sexually touched against his/her will.
- Sexual assault of a disabled person: Subsection (b) of California’s sexual assault statute concerns itself with crimes committed against the physically or mentally disabled.
- Sexual assault under false pretenses: Subsection (c) of PC 243.4 targets sexual assaults that are committed by using fraud or misrepresentation. This can happen when a physician, for example, uses an examination as a pretense for sexual touching.
- Sexual assault by forcing the victim to touch: Subsection (d) of the sexual assault statute deals with forcing a victim to masturbate, touch him or herself sexually, touch one or more perpetrators sexually, or touch any other person sexually against his/her will.
- “Ordinary” sexual assault: Subsection (e) of PC 243.4 simply deals with general sexual assault, while the previous four subsections deal with specific and somewhat more aggravated and/or unusual forms of sexual assault. However, this class is also distinguished in that no form of restraint was used and in that it is a misdemeanor crime.
What Must the Prosecution Prove?
To gain a conviction on a sexual assault charge under PC 243.4, the prosecution must prove beyond all reasonable doubt a number of different “elements of the crime.”
However, each type of sexual assault has slightly different specific elements to be proved. The general (no-restraint, misdemeanor) sexual battery offense, covered in subsection (e), requires the following elements be proved:
- The defendant touched another person’s “intimate part.”
- The defendant’s touching violated the will of that other person.
- The defendant did the touching to take/give sexual pleasure of some kind and/or to purposefully abuse the victim.
To prove sexual assault while restraining the victim, PC 243.4 (a) or (d), the prosecutor must prove the following:
- The defendant illegally restrained the victim or used force in the process of committing the sexual abuse.
- The defendant touched the victim’s intimate part while he/she was restrained or forced the victim to touch him or her self or another person sexually while restrained.
- The sexual touching violating the will of the victim.
- The sexual touching was done for the sake of sexual pleasure or abuse.
To prove sexual assault of one disabled mentally and/or physically or institutionalized under PC 243.4 (b) or (d), the prosecution must demonstrate beyond doubt the following:
- The victim had a physical or mental disability and/or was institutionalized at the time for medical reasons (often in a hospital setting).
- The defendant touched the victim sexually or forced him/her to engage in sexual touching.
- The sexual touching was against the alleged victim’s will.
- The touching was done for sexual pleasure or to inflict sexual abuse.
To prove sexual battery by pretense under PC 243.4 (c), the prosecution must establish the following elements of the crime:
- The defendant touched the alleged victim’s intimate part.
- The touching was done for the purpose of sexual gratification, arousal, or abuse.
- The perpetrator used fraud, deception, or a pretense (like a doctor’s exam) to gain sexual access to the victim.
- The alleged sexual assault victim was not aware, at the time, of the sexual nature of the act of touching. “Consent” was only given for an act of a different nature.
Felony Versus Misdemeanor Sexual Assault
In California, sexual assault can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on the details of the case, the defendant’s past criminal record, and other factors.
For a misdemeanor, any physical contact whatsoever done for sexual pleasure or abuse, even if through the clothes, qualifies as “touching.” And there need not have been “success” at bringing about sexual arousal or gratification nor any actual physical harm done to the victim for a misdemeanor sexual battery charge to hold.
But with felony-level sexual assault, the touching must be directly on the bare skin, there having been actual skin-to-skin contact between defendant and alleged victim and/or between victim and another party. And “intimate part” for a felony conviction must mean a male or female sex organ, the buttocks, the anus, or a female breast.
Here are some specific examples of (possibly) misdemeanor-level sexual assault:
- Fondling the breast of a woman you don’t even know without her consent.
- Touching another person’s buttock without gaining his or her consent.
- Any form of sexual assault not deemed felony and of a relatively low level of severity.
Felony sexual assault takes on a variety of forms, including such instances as these:
- The victim of sexual assault was unlawfully physically restrained or force was used to accomplish the act of touching.
- The defendant held the victim in place while unzipping his/her pants and slipping his/her hand inside the underwear to fondle a sexual organ or buttocks.
- Forcing a victim to masturbate his own penis or that of another person or to touch him or her self, the perpetrator, or another person in a sexual way.
- Taking advantage of a physically disabled person or someone temporarily incapacitated in a hospital to commit sexual assault against him or her.
- Duping a mentally handicapped and/or institutionalized person to take part in or allow sexual touching.
- A doctor using his/her position of trust to convince a patient to allow sexual touching under the pretense of a medical exam.
- A psychologist convincing a patient to allow sexual touching as part of the victim’s “therapy” session.
Finally, note that if you commit an act of sexual assault against a minor (under 18 years old) and you already have a felony conviction of any kind on your criminal record, you will be charged with a felony.
As we shall see just below, the penalties for a misdemeanor vs. felony sexual assault conviction can vary greatly, so if the best outcome possible is to get a reduction from felony to misdemeanor, it is well worth fighting for.
Possible Penalties for Sexual Assault in California
Misdemeanor level sexual assault in violation of PC 243.4 is punishable as follows:
- Up to 6 months in a county jail, but up to 12 months in certain more egregious cases.
- A fine of up to $2,000, but up to $3,000 if the victim was your employee.
- Mandatory lifetime sex offender registration under PC 290.
Felony level sexual assault in violation of PC 243.4 is punishable as follows:
- From two to four years in California state prison.
- A fine of up to $10,000.
- Mandatory lifetime sex offender registration under PC 290.
Sex Offender Registration (PC 290)
Under California Penal Code Section 290, most convicted of sex crimes (including those convicted of misdemeanor or felony sexual assault under PC 243.4) must register with the state as sex offenders.
This is one of the most difficult parts of a sexual battery sentence to bear since it will last for the rest of your life. And if you relocate or other relevant information changes, you must update your information quickly or face additional penalties.
In registering, you must disclose your address, place of employment, and other pertinent information to local law enforcement agencies. You must resubmit this information every year. If you are homeless or a “transient” who has no permanent address, you must resubmit your information every 30 to 90 days.
If you are a student enrolled in college, you are required to register as a sex offender with the campus police besides with the local city or county police.
If you are relocating to California and already a registered sex offender in your current state, you will likely have to register as a sex offender in California as well. Conversely, if you are a registered sex offender in California and move out of state, that status will likely move with you.
All of the above-mentioned requirements are burdensome, but the worst part is that your status and information may be put in the public domain via the “Megan’s Law” state website. Wherever you go, it will easy for people to find out about your past if they wish to and know how to look it up.
At Leah Legal, we understand that many innocent people are accused of sexual assault in the L.A. Area and throughout California, and that many others are over-charged by over-zealous prosecuting attorneys. We understand the true impacts a conviction will have on your future life, and we also know how to fight back in every way legally possible. For example, a skilled attorney may can sometimes get the sex offender registration requirement dropped or at least get you off of the publicly displayed Megan’s Law website.
Common Defense Strategies Against Sexual Assault
At Leah Legal, we tailor-make each defense based on the facts of the particular case, but we are also quite familiar with the most commonly applied, effective defense strategies used against a California sexual assault charge.
Some of our most commonly employed defenses against a PC 243.4 charge include:
- The alleged victim actually gave consent. It is not uncommon for a person who engages in consensual sexual touching to suddenly later file a sexual assault charge. It could be a way to get revenge at a past lover, a way to “save face” by pretending to friends and relatives that the act was not consensual, or it could have been a set up from the beginning.
- No sexual touching took place. It may be there was no intention of the defendant to bring about sexual pleasure or to abuse the alleged victim by the act of touching. This could be the case in a legitimate medical exam. It could also be that the touching was not to an intimate body part.
- Lack of evidence. A false accusation, mis-identification, or a weak case based on hearsay may lack the evidence to meet the high standard of “beyond all reasonable doubt.” In this case, a good criminal defense attorney can likely get the charges against you dropped.
Contact Us Today For Help
Criminal defense lawyer will stand ready to rush to your aid at a moment’s notice when we receive your call for help.
Our team of top-tier attorneys have deep experience in winning dismissals, acquittals, or a reduced charge/sentence in all manner of California sexual battery cases. We will know how to build you a solid defense and secure the best possible outcome to your case.
Contact our Los Angeles anytime 24/7/365 for a free initial consultation by calling 818-484-1100.
If you have been accused of committing statutory rape in Los Angeles or Southern California, you are facing extreme penalties with long-term or even life-long consequences upon a conviction. You cannot afford to be without the very best criminal defense. Too much is at stake.
At Leah Legal, we understand how easy it is to be falsely accused of rape, including of statutory rape, in California. The fact is it is very easy to file a rape allegation with very little supporting evidence.
We understand how to expose the weaknesses in the case brought against you and how to fight for and win a dismissal, acquittal, or a reduced charge or sentence.
For a free legal consultation on the details of your case, do not hesitate to contact Leah Legal anytime 24/7 by calling 818-484-1100.
How Is Statutory Rape Defined in California?
Under California Penal Code Section 261.5, California’s statutory rape statute, it is illegal to have sexual intercourse with a minor (under 18) regardless of any consent allegedly given. The reason is that minors are not considered to be of an age to properly understand the nature of a sexual act and its true significance/consequences.
In cases where the age difference between the two parties is great, most would agree with the premise of the statute. But it also applies, though in somewhat modified form, even when the age difference is relatively small.
Statutory rape can be charged as either a misdemeanor or felony, depending on the facts of the case and the defendant’s past criminal history (if any). The seriousness and penalties of the crime vary greatly depending on the exact situation.
For example, many teenagers today are sexually active. Consensual sex between a girl one day away from turning 18 and a man who turned 18 one day earlier is technically statutory rape. Consensual sex between a 50 year old and a 15 year old is also statutory rape. Obviously, this class of crime covers a wide range of possible scenarios.
Possible Penalties
As mentioned above, statutory rape can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony.
How much of an age difference existed between the two sexual participants is one of the most important factors in determining if a felony or misdemeanor will be charged. When the defendant is 21 or older and the alleged victim is under 16 (at least a 5 year difference), a felony charge with severe sentencing is likely.
If the age difference is three years or less, statutory rape is always charged as a misdemeanor.
Thus, if the age difference is over 3 years, a felony charge is possible; while if it is over 5 years, a felony charge is likely.
As a misdemeanor, statutory rape (PC 261.5) is punishable by:
- Up to 12 months in a county jail.
- Informal probation.
- A fine as high as $1,000.
As a felony, statutory rape is punishable by:
- 16 months to 3 years of incarceration. If the perpetrator was over 21 and the victim under 16, the maximum sentence is 4 years behind bars.
- Formal probation and a year in county jail is a possible alternative to the above.
- A fine of up to $10,000.
Civil penalties can apply in addition to the criminal penalties listed above IF the defendant is an adult (18 or over). Civil fines apply as follows:
- When the age difference is under 2 years: $2,000.
- With an age differential of between 2 and 3 years: $5,000.
- When the age difference is 3 years or more, $10,000.
- When the victim is under 16 and the perpetrator is over 21: $25,000.
Finally, note that (unlike “ordinary” rape charged under PC 261), you do not necessarily have to register as a sex offender if convicted of statutory rape. But, if you are also convicted of, say, lewd and lascivious acts with a child (PC 288), sex offender registration would be required.
What Must the Prosecution Prove?
To gain a conviction on a charge of statutory rape (PC 261.5) in California, the prosecutor must prove the following elements of the crime beyond all reasonable doubt:
- The defendant did in fact have sexual intercourse (defined as any penetration, however slight) with a specific person.
- The two parties were not, at the time at least, married to each other. If they were, the charge would be spousal rape (PC 262).
- The younger party involved in the sexual act was a minor (under 18 years of age).
In the most common statute used against rape (PC 261), the case normally hinges on a lack of consent, but with statutory rape, the prosecution has no burden to show that consent did not exist. Consent is irrelevant.
Also unlike “ordinary” rape, there is no need to show that physical force, trickery, or threats were used to get the victim to submit to the sex.
One key to statutory rape cases is sometimes proving the age of the alleged victim. The age is officially reckoned this way under California law: one minute after midnight on your birthday, you are now “one year older.”
Also note that minor and minor consensual sex also falls within the scope of California’s statutory rape statute. When both parties are under 18, the older party could be charged with the crime (though, technically, you could argue both were victims of each other).
However, it is rare for consensual minor and minor sex cases to be pursued. More likely, the minor who was older may be sent to the state juvenile court to be sentenced there, if at all.
Defense Strategies
Statutory rape (PC 261.5) is a very serious charge that you cannot afford to face alone. Do not rely on busy, often unconcerned public defenders or on lawyers without adequate experience in this specific practice area.
At Leah Legal, we have successfully handle numerous statutory rape cases in the past and we understand how to build you a solid defense. We will fight tenaciously in your best interests from day one to the conclusion of your case.
Here are some of the most common defense strategies we use in statutory rape defense cases:
- Mistake of Fact
If the defendant believed the victim to have been 18 or older, and it was “reasonable” under the circumstances for him or her to hold such a belief, it was not statutory rape. For example, if the victim told you that she/he was over 18, was dressed in a manner that suggested an older age, looked older than his/her actual age naturally, or was met up with in a bar or “adult establishment,” such a belief could be deemed reasonable.
- Mistaken Identity
If the minor or other eyewitness did not get a good look at the perpetrator or simply assumed that a person they knew the victim had been “going with” committed the crime, a misidentification could take place.
- False Accusation
Like other rape crimes, statutory rape is a crime that sees many false allegations. It is not uncommon for charges to be fabricated out of a sense of revenge after a break-up or because the minor’s parents dislike his/her choice of a dating partner. If this is the case, rest assured that Leah Legal will know how to cross-examine witnesses and challenge false or misleading evidence to help clear your name.
The above are only a few of the more common defenses used against the charge of statutory rape. There are many more. In every instance, we never use a “cookie cutter approach,” but build each defense based on the specific facts involved. But the knowledge we have gleaned from many years of hands-on experience in this field certainly assists us in assisting you in the most effective manner possible.
Related Offenses
There are a number of other serious charges that are often filed alongside or instead of statutory rape (PC 261.5). Here are two of the most common such related charges to be aware of:
- Non-spousal Rape (PC 261)
The two major distinctions of the crime of statutory rape are that it is with a minor and that consentuality is not relevant. But the prosecution may charge that the sex was not only with a minor but also was not consensual. Then it would be a violation of both PC 261.5 (statutory rape) and PC 261 (“ordinary” rape).
The crime of rape (PC 261) is always charged as a felony and involves a lack of consent on the part of the victim and the rape being accomplished by means of physical force, fraud, or threats.
A PC 261 conviction can get you a long term in state prison when committed against a minor. And the penalties of PC 261.5 can still apply. A rape conviction will be a strike on your criminal record under California’s Three Strikes Law and will require lifelong registration as a sex offender. You would have to update with the sex offender registry every time you relocate as well or face an additional criminal charge.
When facing both rape and statutory rape charges, you are doubly in need of a good defense attorney. At Leah Legal, we can work in such a situation to get both charges dismissed, but a plea that gets the rape charge dismissed would at least prevent sex offender registration and could prevent a felony charge.
- Lewd or Lascivious Acts with a Child (PC 288a)
This is basically California’s child molestation statute. It is a felony that can get you up to 8 years in state prison, and thus, an extremely serious offense. The crime only applies when with minors 14 or under, though a few exceptions exist that would include a child who is 15.
If you are convicted of PC 288a, you will have to register for life as a sex offender. That point is simply non-negotiable. If you fail to register and keep updated with the system, you could be charged with a felony for that failure under Penal Code Section 290.
Lewd/lascivious acts with a child is not an offense that is limited to actual sexual intercourse, but it can be charged for any kind of sexual act (including sexual touching through the clothes). If the act was done for the sake of sexual arousal or oneself or of the child or for any sex-related reason, it counts as a violation of PC 288a.
And, like statutory rape, it does not matter if the child allegedly consented to the act(s). That is irrelevant here as far as a potential conviction is concerned.
Again, we at Leah Legal will fight both statutory rape and lewd or lascivious acts with a child charges (often filed together) to defeat them both. But, as PC 261.5 (statutory rape) is the lesser offense of the two and not necessarily a felony and does not require sex offender registration, we prioritize getting the PC 288a charge dropped in any plea deal that is negotiated.
Contact Us Today for Help
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we possess a deep knowledge of California rape, statutory rape, and related statutes. And we also have great familiarity with local L.A. Area court processes that will impact your case.
We appreciate the gravity of a statutory rape charge and will fight for your future as if it were our own. Our team of experienced criminal defense attorneys will know how to build you a solid defense and win the most favorable outcome possible in each situation.
To learn more or for a free consultation, call us anytime 24/7/365 at 818-484-1100.
Engaging in oral sex is legal in California. However, it is against the law if the interaction between somebody’s mouth and another individual’s intimate parts is non-consensual. Whenever you force someone to engage in oral sex with you either by use of physical force or fear, you violate PC 288a oral copulation by force/fear. At the Leah Legal, we have highlighted the following information to help you understand how PC 288a applies in your situation.
Understanding Oral Copulation by Force/Fear
California PC 288a defines oral copulation as when somebody’s mouth gets into contact with another person’s genitals or anus. By force or fear means that you engage in these actions without the consent of the other partner by application of violence, coercion, force, unlawful injury, or through fear and threats. The law can also apply in cases where the person involved is below the age of consent, which is 18 years or where the victim is too intoxicated to give consent. Also, you can face PC 288a charges where the victim is legally not in a position to give consent because of physical or mental disability.
It is critical to understand that the act can only be deemed as illegal where the victim had not given prior consent. But if your partner had previously agreed to the action, then it remains legal. The penalties for PC 288a violation depend on the age of the victim, bodily injuries involved, and an application of force or fear.
Elements of PC 288a
Whenever you are facing any charges, it is critical to understand that you are innocent until proven guilty. With that said, it is up to the prosecution to establish particular facts for them to convict you of the PC 288a violation. Some of these facts include:
- You Engaged in Oral Copulation with Someone Else
The prosecution should establish to the court that there was a creation of contact between a person’s mouth and another individual’s intimate part or anus. Keep in mind that it doesn’t count how slight the touch is between one individual’s genitals or anus and the other person’s mouth, you will still be guilty of this crime. Sexual penetration is not crucial in this case. An orgasm or ejaculation is also not important when proving a violation of PC 288a.
- You had No Consent from the Other Partner
Remember, just like in other sex crimes, the prosecution must prove there was no consent from the other partner. Approval means that the person you engaged in oral sex with acted freely or willingly and understood the essence of the act he or she was participating in. The judge will still consider oral sex as illegal if you initially had consent from the other person, but they later changed their mind or withdrew the consent. If you continued with the act after the withdrawal of consent, it would be considered a violation of PC 288a.
Note that you might be considered to have lacked consent from the victim even if:
- You and the victim were dating or dated
- You and the victim were married or had been married
- The victim requested you to put on a condom
All these three things don’t prove that you had consent from the victim, although it might appear so which is why you need an attorney.
- You Engaged in the Act by Use of Force or Fear
It is the role of the prosecutor also to demonstrate that you used some of the following things to engage in oral sex with the victim:
- You made use bare minimum force necessary to overcome the victim’s will
- You threatened to use power on the victim, and your actions would have made an average person do something they could not have otherwise done was it not for the threat
- You made threats or statements that would make the victim believe that you were going to inflict injuries on them
- You threatened the victim with illegal bodily injury
- You threatened the victim with retaliation if he or she did not engage in the act
Understanding Oral Copulation Involving an Intoxicated Person
Charges of PC 288a violation could be brought against you even if you didn’t use fear or force. It happens when you engage in oral sex with a partner who is:
- Unable to resist the act because he or she is intoxicated by drugs, alcohol, or any other substance that can cause intoxication
- You were aware or ought to have known that the victim could not have consented to the act because of the intoxication
Being convicted for oral copulation with an intoxicated person isn’t a walk in the park because many people who engage in sexual activities do it when partying or intoxicated. It makes it difficult to tell when someone is too intoxicated to give consent. PC 288a considers a person to be too drunk to give consent if the person is incapable of understanding or to weigh the real character or the act, an honest eccentric, and likely consequences.
Understanding Oral Copulation of an Unconscious Person
PC 288a violation also occurs when you engage in oral sex with someone insensible with the nature of the deed and when you knew or should have recognized that the individual is unable to resist the action because he or she is unconscious. In this case, the victim doesn’t need to be in actual unconsciousness. What is important is to show that the victim was unaware of what was happening or asleep. Also, where the victim isn’t aware of nature, the law assumes they were unconscious.
Oral Copulation and Disabled Persons
You are guilty of PC 288a violation when:
- You take part in oral sex with somebody who has a mental ailment, physical infirmity, or developing disability that impedes him or her from understanding the nature of the act and the likely consequences
- You recognized or must have realized that the mental incapacity by the victim would prevent him or her from consenting
Penalties for Penal Code 288a Violation
As said earlier, the law puts many things into consideration before they can decide on the sentences to impose. Some of these penalties include:
- Eight years of incarceration if you made use of force or violence to engage in oral sex with the victim
- As much as 364 days in jail if the victim of your actions is a minor but not younger than sixteen years
- Eight years’ prison sentence where the victim is below 14 years
- Up to 8 years sentence if you intoxicate the victim to engage in oral sex
- No more eight years’ imprisonment if you threatened the victim with deportation or arrest so that he or she can join in the act
- No more than 12 years in prison if you forced yourself on a victim under the age of 14
Note that if you aid an aggressor into committing this crime, you will also be subject to the same charges. It is referred to as oral copulation by force or fear in concert. So, if you were aided by another person to commit the crime or you in person committed the offense, you will be subject to enhanced penalties of:
- Five, seven or nine years’ prison sentence where the victim is a minor
- 8,10, or 12 years if the accuser is under the age of 18 but 14 years or above
- Ten, twelve, fourteen years in prison where the minor is below 14 years
Sex Offender Registration
As part of your punishment for violating Pc 288a, the judge might require you to register as a sex offender. PC 288a violation falls under the tier three system, which means you will have to register as a sex offender for life. Any sex offense convict is required to register with the local police then renew the registration after every single year within five days of his or her birthday or every time he or she moves to live in a new place.
Registering as a sex offender for life comes with a lot of stigma in society. Even if you change your residence, the requirement that you should renew the registration whenever you move means that even the people in your new locality will know of your conviction. It is the worst punishment that the judge can do to a person. The registration also means you cannot live in places close to where children meet like parks or schools. Additionally, you might not engage in events where kids are present. You will relinquish most of your constitutional rights after registering as a sex offender, so make sure you hire the best defense attorney to prevent a conviction.
Defenses for PC 288a
As seen above, the social stigma and other penalties that can with a conviction for violation of PC 288a can be life-changing. Because of that, you need a defense attorney that understands these consequences so that he or she can help you avoid these penalties in every way possible. With a solid defense, these charges can be dismissed or reduced. Some of the arguments that can apply when defending against PC 288a charges include:
- False Accusation
Remember, under PC 288a, no penetration or ejaculation is required. It means that it is easy for people to accuse others of oral copulation falsely. Cases of false accusations occur mostly among ex-spouses where one of the spouses is retaliating, jealous, or seeking vengeance against the other. If you have a profound defense attorney on your side, he or she will build substantial evidence to prove that the allegations against you have no basis.
- Consent
Getting consent is essential when engaging in any sexual act. When you have permission from your partner, they have no right to file charges. Also, the lack of consent is a crucial element that the prosecution uses to prove you are guilty. Because of that, asserting that the victim had given permission or consented to engage in oral sex can aid in the charges being reduced or dismissed. Proving consent is not something easy because it is an allegation. Remember that the court will assume you had no permission if you engage in oral copulation with a minor, an intoxicated person, or a person who has a disability. This defense will, therefore, not hold if the victims are any of the categories of people mentioned above.
- Incomplete Evidence
PC 288a is very different from rape because there is no physical evidence. So, other than the allegations by the victim, the prosecuting party doesn’t have any other hard evidence to prove that the act occurred. In such a situation, your defense attorney can argue that the prosecution lacks sufficient evidence to convict you. He or she can support the assertion by providing private polygraph test results. Although they cannot be used as evidence in court, they will help convince the prosecuting party to accept that they have a weak case; hence they should drop it or lower the charges.
Note that if the victim consented to the act, then in the process did not want to continue, but didn’t withdraw consent, you can argue that you had approval. However, you must have reasonably believed that the victim had given you a go ahead with the act. There is a lot of vagueness that surrounds this defense because it is difficult to prove that the defendant had no consent.
Furthermore, some people engage in sexual relationships where consent is understood even if the other partner says no. The judge will have a hard time distinguishing what is legal or illegal among the acts.
Cases of PC 288a violation have many uncertainties, and at times caveats of the case can swing it in your favor or against you. However, what is essential to understand is that with the right criminal defense attorney, you can turn the case in your favor and avoid harsh punishments.
PC 288a and Related Offenses
PC 288a has many similar offenses that can be charged in place of or in conjunction with it. These are:
Oral Copulation on a Minor
PC 288a defines this crime. It makes it illegal to engage in oral copulation with a minor regardless of whether the act was consensual. If the under ages is intoxicated or has a mental disability making him or her legally incapable of giving consent, you will be facing a more severe offense of oral copulation by use of fear or force.
The offense is a wobbler if the minor is above 16 years, and you as the defendant is 21 years or below. Here, if you get a conviction for a misdemeanor, the punishment is as much as one year in jail. For a felony conviction, the penalty is 16, 24, or 36 months’ prison incarceration.
Where the victim is below 16 years, and the defendant is above 21 years, you will be facing felony charges. The potential penalties for a conviction are similar to those of a felony conviction above. Where the victim is under the age of fourteen, and the defendant is ten years older than the minor, the potential penalties increase to 36, 72, or 96 months in prison. The worst punishment for a conviction for this offense is registration as a sex offender. You will upload your personal information and the type of charge you were convicted for in the California Morgan’s Law Website. Anyone who needs to access this information can easily do it, which leads to social stigma.
You can, however, avoid these penalties by claiming that you reasonably believed the minor was over 18. The other argument you can make is claiming you are falsely accused.
Rape
PC 261 prohibits individuals from engaging in non-consensual sex by use of threats, force, or fraud. The offense is very similar to PC 288a, but they only differ because, in rape, there must be sexual intercourse. In cases involving sexual intercourse without consent, you will be subject to both PC 261 and PC 288a. The crime of rape in California is, in most cases, a felony that will subject you to prison incarceration for three, six, or eight years.
Sexual Battery
Under PC 243.4, it is an offense to touch someone else’s sexual or genital parts without their permission for sexual fulfillment, abuse, or arousal. The crime is also a wobbler, and a felony conviction carries penalties of as much as forty-eight months in prison. Compared to PC 288a, PC 243.4 carries lesser penalties. As such, when planning to take a plea deal, you can obtain the plea bargain using this charge. Again, keep in mind that you can be charged with both offenses at once.
Find a Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
Whenever you find yourself facing charges of oral copulation by force/fear or other sex crimes, you need to speak to an attorney. A profound criminal defense attorney will help you understand your case, thus making informed decisions on how to proceed with the matter. If you have more questions regarding this crime and wish to speak to an attorney, call Van Nuys Criminal Attorney at 818-484-1100.
Many people charged with theft crimes are good, productive citizens who made an unfortunate mistake and deserve a second chance rather than a permanent criminal record and jail time. Moreover, many innocent people are wrongly accused of theft crimes based on false allegations or misleading evidence.
A California theft related conviction can be particularly harmful in terms of gaining future employment, state licensing and other benefits. Although most theft convictions can eventually be expunged, they will still surface on background checks. Employers tend to shy away from applicants with theft records, fearing them to be dishonest and having the potential to steal from their companies. Furthermore, most California theft offenses are considered “crimes of moral turpitude.” This means that state license boards will often cite theft convictions as a reason to deny licenses and certifications. In addition, these convictions may also have immigration consequences for immigrants seeking a visa, green card or naturalization to the United States.
At Leah Legal, we understand the gravity of facing a theft crime charge and the long-term effect the outcome of your case can have on your life and livelihood. We have a long track record of successfully defeating these sorts of charges and of winning the best possible outcome to each case, be that a summary dismissal of the charges, a courtroom acquittal win, or a favorable plea deal that reduces your charge and/or sentence.
Below, for your benefit, we cover the basic of what constitutes a California theft crime, what are the common types of theft crimes, which defense strategies can be effective against a theft charge, and more.
COMMON CALIFORNIA THEFT CRIMES
Theft is the taking of another person’s property without his or her consent. The crime of theft is a rather broad one; there are various ways in which a person can commit theft, and each one is its own specific crime.
Some theft crimes are distinguished by the value of the property stolen, others by the nature of the property stolen, and still others by the manner in which property not yours came into your possession. And theft crimes can be everything from minor misdemeanors to serious felonies, with penalty severity being correspondingly diverse.
Petty Theft
This is the stealing of property valued up to $950. Although the offense is generally classified as a misdemeanor, a second offense can be charged as a felony.
Grand Theft
Grand theft is the stealing of property valued at more than $950. While it is a “wobbler” and can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony, the majority of grand theft charges are considered felonies.
Grand Theft of a Firearm
Any theft of a firearm counts as grand theft, regardless of the value of the gun. This offense is a felony if the firearm is more than $950 in value.
Grand Theft Auto
California law treats theft of an automobile as grand theft if the value is more than $950.
Burglary
Entering a structure with the intent to commit a felony or theft inside constitutes a burglary. If the structure is a home or “inhabited dwelling,” residential burglary may be charged. This would count as a “strike” pursuant to California Three Strikes Laws.
Auto Burglary
Breaking into a locked vehicle for the purpose of stealing it constitutes auto burglary under California law.
Robbery
Robbery is the use of violence, force or threats to take property from someone’s immediate possession. This too counts as a strike under California Three Strikes Laws.
Carjacking
This is basically robbery of a vehicle. If one uses force or fear to take a vehicle from someone’s immediate possession, a California carjacking may be charged.
Embezzlement
An individual who wrongfully steals or misappropriates property entrusted to him by the rightful owner may be charged with embezzlement.
Receiving Stolen Property
This occurs when someone purchases or receives property that he/she knows or reasonably should know is stolen.
PROP 47
Passed by California voters in November 2014, Proposition 47 turned a number of felony crimes into misdemeanors. If you have been convicted of felony burglary, receiving stolen property, check fraud, forgery, grand theft firearm or grand theft auto, you may be eligible to have your felony sentence reduced per Proposition 47.
SHOPLIFTING LAW IN CALIFORNIA
Another area where California has reformed its theft laws is that of shoplifting. Mostly, shoplifting is now charged as a misdemeanor and is distinguished from burglary. To be guilty, you must have entered a commercial building with the intention to steal, during business hours, and have taken or intended to take nothing over the value of $950. If you have previous shoplifting or other theft convictions, shoplifting could be charged as a felony, but otherwise, it’s almost always a misdemeanor offense.
PENALTIES FOR THEFT CRIMES
While the penalties for theft crimes vary greatly, the penalties for embezzlement, forgery, and writing bad checks, as well as the majority of theft-related offenses, may include state or federal prison, community service, formal probation, informal probation, and/or parole. Theft crimes also tend to have financial ramifications in the event of a conviction. Court fines and restitution are often mandatory, and an experienced attorney can guide and advise you from a financial perspective how to lessen the impact of these collateral consequences.
By skilled negotiations, we at Leah Legal often get penalties and charges reduced even where a complete victory (via a dismissal or acquittal) is impossible. We fight for and obtain, again and again, the best possible outcome to the cases we take on. We have often helped our clients avert spending actual time behind bars, won more lenient probation terms, and helped avert the creation of a permanent criminal record.
What Must the Prosecutor Prove?
To prove you guilty of a California theft crime, the prosecutor must demonstrate all of the following elements of the crime true beyond all reasonable doubt:
- You took into your possession property that belonged to another person.
- You took the property in question without the consent of the owner.
- You had an intent to keep the taken property either permanently or for a “significant amount of time.”
- You moved the property and kept it in your possession.
But as straightforward as these elements of the crime of theft might seem at first glance, their precise definitions and applications can be difficult to nail down or to prove in a specific case. A good defense attorney won’t let the prosecutor get away with a win based on weak or merely circumstantial evidence. At Leah Legal, we will ensure that nothing short of the high bar of “beyond all reasonable doubt” is treated in the courtroom as if it were fact.
For example, if property actually belonged to you, you had a reasonable belief at the time that it belonged to you, or if it was jointly owned by you and your accuser, that challenges the first element that you took property belonging to another.
And, similarly, if you reasonably thought you had the owner’s consent or had no intent to keep the property, that also can thwart the prosecution’s case.
But realize that, in regard to moving and keeping the property, it is not required that it was moved very far or kept for very long. And you can’t use the defense that you stole property only to “collect on a debt the owner owed you.” Thus, to challenge the prosecutor’s attempt to prove the four elements of the crime of “theft,” you’ll need a skilled theft crimes defense attorney who knows what works and what doesn’t.
DEFENSES FOR THEFT CRIMES
It is important that an attorney helps you to strategize about possible defenses to theft accusations, including mistake of fact, business relationships gone awry, and simple human error.
Sometimes the prosecution’s evidence may be overwhelming. Even then, an aggressive criminal defense lawyer can often negotiate an arrangement with the judge or prosecutor to get the theft charges reduced or dismissed. This is especially true in first offense theft cases, where the client has no record and just made a bad mistake. If a defendant agrees to repay the victim and to do a course of community service or theft counseling, it is oftentimes possible to convince the D.A. or the court to drop the charges and spare the client the stigma of a permanent criminal record.
Here are some of our most commonly used theft crime defense strategies in more detail:
- Lack of “Specific Intent:” No matter which theft crime you are being accused of, you must have specifically intended to commit the theft to be guilty of it. Otherwise, it was an accident or misunderstanding.
- Lack of “Asportation:” In legal terminology, “asportation” means that a piece of property was cut off from the owner’s possession, came into the full possession of the taker, and was moved in the process, even if only slightly. If any of these things did not occur, it cannot be considered a true theft under California law.
- Right of Ownership: It is not uncommon for a person to be accused of stealing his or her own property. Maybe it was lent out and you came to recover your goods, for example. Plus, if you believed it was your property, it is not theft even if you were mistaken.
- Lack of False Pretense: If you are charged with theft by false pretense (PC 484), the charge will not stick if it can be shown you gave information in good faith, even if you were mistaken. And you can’t be blamed for withholding information you were not obligated to give out. Plus, if you made a promise you intended to keep, you cannot be convicted of theft by false pretense simply because you failed to keep that promise.
- Consent to Transfer Ownership: In cases where theft by trick is charged (often in relation to real estate), you cannot be guilty if you can prove that the owner actually did intend to transfer ownership of the property in question.
- Proof of Permission: If you are charged with embezzlement of property entrusted to you, one defense you may be able to use against that charge is that you had valid legal permission to use the property for your own benefit or for the purpose for which you used it.
- Authorization of Use: In many grand theft (especially grand theft auto) cases, it can be a defense that you had or reasonably thought you had the permission of the owner to use the property in question. If you had no intent to keep the property and deprive the owner of it and merely used it in a way you had or believed you had permission to, it is not theft.
Contact Us Today For Immediate Help
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we understand the urgency that you feel when suddenly charged with a California theft crime. We also understand that the complexity of the legal system and of local L.A. Area court processes means that without an experienced lawyer, it would be almost impossible to effectively fight the charges brought against you.
We have deep experience in defending against all manner of theft crimes charges in Los Angeles and Southern California courts, and we stand ready to rush to your aid with top-tier legal advice and representation.
If you are under investigation, or are facing theft charges, call Leah Legal at (818) 849-5406 today for a free, confidential initial consultation.
If you have been recently arrested and charged with the crime of burglary in Los Angeles or Southern California, you need the assistance of a skilled defense attorney to avoid the heavy fines, probation, and potentially long incarceration periods that can apply upon a conviction.
At Leah Legal, we have successfully handled numerous burglary defense cases in the past in the L.A. Area, and we have acquired, over our years of service to the community, deep knowledge of the statutes, court processes, most effective defense strategies, most beneficial plea agreements, and all other aspects of California burglary cases. We are prepared to put that knowledge to work for you and to fight diligently in your behalf to secure the best possible outcome to your case.
For a free legal consultation, do not hesitate to call us 24/7 at 818-484-1100.
How Does California Law Define “Burglary?”
California Penal Code Section 459 criminalizes “burglary,” which it defines as the entering of a building, room, or other structure while having an intention to commit a grand theft, petty theft, or any felony-level crime.
In California, burglary is subdivided into first and second degree burglary. The former is always a felony and involves the entering of a “residence,” meaning any inhabited building. The latter can be either a felony or a misdemeanor and covers burglary in an uninhabited structure, including places of business.
What the Prosecutor Must Prove
In order to gain a conviction on the charge of burglary, the prosecution must prove the following “elements of the crime” beyond all reasonable doubt:
- That the defendant entered a particular building, room, locked vehicle, or other structure.
- That the defendant entered said location with an intent to commit a theft crime or a felony.
- The value of the property stolen or that the defendant had an intention to steal was over $950, OR a residential building was entered to commit the crime, OR a commercial building was entered but not during business hours.
The prosecutor need not prove that the property was actually successfully stolen, but he must prove that the defendant’s intention to commit the theft or another crime existed at the time he entered the building rather than it occurring to him to attempt a theft only after already inside the building.
Residence – Also note that there is a wide array of possible structure types that “count” as residences and qualify a burglary as 1st-degree. Anything that is being used as a dwelling place, even if the resident is not present at the time of the intrusion, is an “inhabited structure.”
This includes hotel rooms, boat houses, and travel trailers if in use. It also includes garages and other rooms/structures connected to a house. Only if the resident left and has no intention to return is it no longer considered “inhabited.” However, during a natural disaster, even an abandoned residence counts as inhabited for the purposes of burglary law.
Entering – Finally, a word about what the prosecutor must prove as to “entering” a structure. In regard to burglary in California, you “enter” a building when any part of your body or any part of any object you hold and/or control moves inside the structure’s “outer boundary.”
So, if the tips of one’s fingers slip barely inside a room through an open window or the tip of a crow bar enters that same room through the same window after it was used to break the window’s glass, it is an entrance in both cases. Even if nothing more happens and the would-be thief runs away, if he is caught, he can be charged with burglary.
Is Shoplifting Equivalent to Burglary?
It should be noted that burglary, as such, differs from “shoplifting” (PC 495.5), which is defined as entering a presently open business with intent to steal property valued at $950 or less, provided the perpetrator has no “serious,” relevant priors on his/her criminal record.
Priors that will make shoplifting, normally a misdemeanor, a felony charge with much the same sentencing elements as 2nd-degree burglary, include rape, various sex crimes (especially against children), and murder.
Before Prop 47 was passed in 2014, shoplifting was not a distinct crime, though the definition of the term “shoplifting” was of course already widely known. Before Prop 47, shoplifters could potentially be charged with 2nd-degree burglary, even as a felony, since they had entered a place of business with intent to steal.
Those who were sentenced on felony-level burglary charges before Prop 47 passed can apply to have their sentences reduced to misdemeanor shoplifting levels, though help from a skilled defense attorney will be needed and sentence-reduction is not guaranteed automatically.
Is Breaking and Entering Equivalent to Burglary?
“Breaking and entering” is not technically equivalent to committing burglary under California law. The reason is that you do not have to actually break into a building to commit burglary.
It makes no difference how you got into the building or whether it was legal or illegal to enter it. The point is that you entered with an intent to steal or commit a felony.
However, the exception to this rule is “auto burglary.” With auto burglary, you cannot commit burglary unless you first commit breaking and entering because it is only considered burglary if the vehicle was locked and you proceeded to break into it to steal something or commit another crime.
Possible Penalties for a Burglary Conviction
As mentioned above, burglary can be charged under PC 459 as 1st or 2nd degree and as either a felony or a misdemeanor.
If charged as a 1st-degree felony, burglary is punishable by:
- From 2 to 6 years in state prison.
- Formal probation.
- A maximum fine of $10,000.
- A strike on your record under California’s “Three Strikes” law.
If charged as a 2nd-degree felony, burglary can be punished by:
- From 16 months to 3 years in county jail.
- Formal probation.
- A maximum fine of $10,000.
If charged as a 2nd-degree misdemeanor, burglary is punishable by:
- A maximum fine of $1,000.
- Up to 12 months in county jail.
- Summary probation.

With such steep potential punishments, it is indispensable to rely on only the most experienced criminal defense attorney. If there are weaknesses in the prosecution’s case, you need a well seasoned lawyer who will exploit them. If a conviction cannot be avoided, you need an attorney who knows how to negotiate the most favorable plea possible, in order to minimize your sentence and, if possible, get the charge reduced (especially from a felony to a misdemeanor).
Common Defense Strategies
At Leah Legal, we have a large repertoire of possible defenses to use against a charge of burglary. We have the experience with a wide range of burglary cases to give us both familiarity with these defense types and the wisdom to know when and how to employ each one of them.
Some of the most common arguments we use in defending our clients against burglary charges include:
- Lack of Intent
No matter which building you entered, if you lacked criminal intent, there is no way you can be guilty of burglary. And even if you later, after already being inside the building, formed an intent to commit a theft or a felony crime, it still does not count as burglary — for you must form the intent before entering to count as a violation of PC 459.
- Claim of Right
It may be that you entered a building not only without any intent to steal anything but with an intent to take or reclaim what was, or what you at least believed to be rightfully yours. This cannot count as burglary. It would also not be burglary if you entered a building to take an item believing you had permission from the owner to do so, even if your belief was mistaken.
- Factual Innocence
It may be that you never entered the building in question, had any intent to steal anything, or ever had anything to do with the alleged burglary incident. Perhaps, it is a case of mistaken identity, of a false accusation leveled out of a spirit of revenge, or of circumstantial evidence leading police to the wrong conclusion (with or without a “frame job” behind that evidence).
- Police Misconduct
Sometimes, police give in to the temptation to violate the rights of a burglary suspect and resort to unorthodox methods. They may, for example, plant or invent pieces of evidence, bombard their “favorite” suspect with “leading questions,” commit illegal searches and seizures, coerce a “confession,” or fail to read you your Miranda Rights when you are arrested. If evidence was falsified or illegally obtained, a good lawyer can get it thrown out of court and likely get the charges against you dismissed. A “Pitchess Motion” can also be filed to discover if a particular police officer has a history of misconduct or complaints/accusations of misconduct.
Other Related Offenses
Other charges often filed along with or in place of a burglary charge include the following:
- Possession of Burglary Tools (PC 466): To possess tools which one intends to use in a burglary, including a crow bar, screw driver, or “slim Jim,” is a crime in itself in California. Those caught in the act of burglary or immediately thereafter often are still in possession of such “burglar’s tools” and end up being charged with both PC 459 and PC 466. Additionally, making a key to use in accessing property to commit burglary is covered under PC 466. This crime is punishable by up to 6 months in county jail.
- Burglary of a safe/with explosives (PC 464): When explosives or other devices are used to force open a safe or vault, it is a felony-level burglary crime regardless of whether the building entered was inhabited or not. Burglary of a safe is punishable by 3 to 7 years in state prison.
- Forgery (PC 470): Forgery is the knowing creation or alteration of a document that one intends to use to commit fraud, depriving another of their property and gaining personal benefit for oneself. If one enters a bank/place of business with a forged check and an intent to cash it, he/she could be charged with both burglary and forgery.
- Robbery (PC 211): Robbery is the unlawful taking of the property of another from his/her person by means of force or threat. If after entering a building to burglarize it, you proceed to use force or threats to gain possession of property you intended to steal before even entering the building, you can be guilty of both burglary and robbery. Robbery is a felony and is punishable by 2 to 5 years in state prison.
- Trespassing (PC 602): Entering someone else’s property without the owner’s permission is a crime regardless of whether you entered for the purpose of committing a theft or felony. However, it is possible to enter property legally while having an intent to steal, and thus, all burglary crimes do not automatically include trespassing. Trespassing is a misdemeanor (or even a mere infraction), and a good defense lawyer can sometimes negotiate a plea deal to get a burglary charge reduced to PC 602.
Contact Us Today For Help
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we stand ready to come to your aid with expert legal advice and representation in your hour of need. Our long familiarity with the court processes in the L.A. Area, with the burglary defense practice area in particular, and even personal knowledge of local judges and prosecutors, ideally fits us to help with your case.
To learn more or for a free consultation and immediate attention to your case, call us anytime 24/7/365 at 818-484-1100.
Legal Defense When You’ve Been Charged with Burglary of a Safe or Vault
In the State of California burglary, (a form of theft) is separated from general types of theft and is also broken down into different kinds of burglary. Based on how the crime was committed, charges will vary as well as the levels of penalization. California Penal Code 464 states it is illegal to burglarize a safe by using explosives or any torch device. The Penal Code refers to both vaults and safes.
Definition of Burglary under California Law
California Penal Code 459 states burglary consists of entering a building with the full intent of committing a felony once you are inside. The building you enter can be either residential or commercial and even if theft is not completed; the intent to steal once inside constitutes burglary.
The Penal Code 459 lists any tenement, apartment, house, room, store, stable, warehouse, shop, barn, mill, outhouse, or any other building, tent, or vessel that is entered with an intent to commit petit larceny, grand larceny or any felony is considered burglary. The crime of burglary is divided into two degrees.
- First-degree burglary is committing the crime in a residence.
- Second-degree burglary occurs in any other type of structure.
Proposition 47, passed by California voters in 2014, distinguishes shoplifting as a separate form of crime from that listed under Penal Code 459 . Shoplifting falls under Penal Code 459.5 and occurs when a person enters an open business with the intent to steal materials worth $950.00 or less.
If convicted of first-degree burglary in California, you are facing consequences which could include prison time from two, four, or six years. A second-degree burglary conviction is a ‘wobbler’ which means, you could be charged with either a felony or misdemeanor. If the prosecution decides charges are serious enough to charge you with a felony, your sentence could be jail time of sixteen months, two years, or three years. If charged as a misdemeanor, your sentence could include jail time of up to one year.
Contact a criminal defense attorney if charged with any form of burglary. An experienced attorney can help you identify common legal defenses used against Penal Code 459 and protect your rights and future.
Burglary under Penal Code 459 versus Burglary of a Safe or Vault
California Penal Code 464 covers the burglary of a safe or vault and is considered a crime of burglary with the use of explosives. Committing a crime using acetylene torches, explosives or other similar devices to open a vault, safe, or another secure place is more serious under the law. This offense is a felony no matter what the targeted location is; residential or commercial. If convicted of this crime, you are facing three, five, or seven years in a state prison.
Legal Definition of Burglary of a Safe or Vault
California Penal Code 464 defines the burglary of a safe or vault when you:
- Have entered the building
- When inside the structure, you’ve attempted or have opened a secure place such as a vault or safe
- Opened or attempted to open the secure place with the use of explosives or a torch
- Entered the building with the specific intent to commit a crime
You can be charged under Penal Code 464 whether the building is vacant or inhibited. If you are caught entering the structure with explosives during the day or at night, you can be charged. This charge is different than California burglary law which applies different penalties for commercial versus residential burglary charges. It also only applies if you have actually entered the structure. Under this Penal Code, you must have first entered the structure and then attempted or actually opened the secure area.
California considers a burglary of a safe or vault to have used an acetylene torch or burning bar, electric arc, oxygen lance, thermal lance or other similar devices that are capable of burning through a solid substance such as concrete or steel. Explosives include nitroglycerine, gunpowder, or other explosive materials.
Laws Regarding Possession of Tools
States all have their laws criminalizing the possession of tools that are capable of being used to force entry into a structure, vault, or safe. These tools are considered to show intent that you plan to use them to commit a burglary, theft, or to trespass. Tools which are found to be burglary tools or burglarious tools have laws in many states to be proof of intent when charging one with a crime.
Burglary tools can be defined as an instrument, device, or another object that has been designed, modified, or are one commonly used to force entry into a structure and used for theft of items. There are some states which have created statues containing a list of prohibited items that when found in your possession show an intent to commit burglary. The intention must be proven that you were going to use the tool to force an entry. For example, blacksmiths who carry tools to pick locks are not committing a crime as they are tools of their trade. If you are bringing these same tools and attempting to enter a building not part of your personal property or one you have been hired to open, these tools are then burglarious tools and possessing them is a part of your crime.
The tools found in your possession at the time of arrest can be used against you as evidence when charged with burglary. For example, if you are found on someone else’s property which had been locked with a padlock, and you have a bolt cutter or crowbar in your possession, the prosecutor can show proof of your intent. These are some of the tools considered burglary tools:
- Screwdrivers
- Hammers
- Crowbars or other devices used to pry open objects
- Bolt cutters
- Tools that are able to burn through steel or concrete such as torches
- Explosives
- Ceramic spark plugs
Possession of Destructive Devices or Material
California Penal Code 18710 was enacted in recognition of the potential damage which can be done by destructive devices or explosives. The damage these materials can cause is immense, even when discharged accidentally. The Penal Code 18710 prohibits any unauthorized possession of these deadly devices, and Penal Code 18720 covers the possession of destructive device materials.
The prosecution must prove these points in order for the courts to find you guilty under California law:
- You possessed a destructive device or materials
- You knew these devices or materials were in your possession
- You knew the destructive possibilities of these devices or material
The list of destructive devices is not really clear but the Penal Code 16460 lists items that can be considered destructive devices including these:
- A Molotov cocktail
- Working cannon or other device containing a caliber more than 0.60 (excluding a shotgun, antique cannon, or antique rifle)
- Incendiary or tracer bullets (excluding those made for use in shotguns)
- An explosive missile, grenade, any bomb or a similar device used in launching explosive projectiles
- A rocket launcher
- Any sealed device which contains dry ice assembled for an intended purpose of making an explosion
The list of destructive device material is also listed under Penal Code 18720 and includes:
- Gunpowder
- Chemicals used to trigger explosives when combined with other agents
- Fertilizer
- Blasting caps
If you or someone you know has been charged with the possession of destructive materials or device, you need to contact a criminal defense attorney. We can help you prove you did not knowingly possess the material or devices, or that you did not know the extent of damage these materials can cause. If the items you are charged with are considered antique, your attorney can help establish this fact. It may also be these items were discovered while authorities performed an improper search and it was not done with probable cause. If either of these is discovered in your case, an experienced criminal attorney can have evidence of destructive materials suppressed from your charges.
The prosecution will have to prove your possession of these materials is proof of your intent to commit a crime. For example, it is not illegal to own large amounts of fertilizer when living in a rural area. It would be the burden of the prosecution to prove you specifically own this material with the intent to create an explosive.
Penalties for Possessing Destructive Materials or Devices
If you are convicted of charges for possessing destructive materials or devices, the prosecution can use the ‘wobbler’ and charge you with either a misdemeanor or a felony. How it will be charged will depend on the circumstances of your case and your past criminal history. If charged as a misdemeanor, you can be sentenced up to one year in jail. If convicted under felony charges, you can be sentenced up to three years in prison.
In addition to these charges, you would have to forfeit any destructive devices found in your possession. If charged as a felony offense, you will be prohibited from possessing a firearm for the rest of your life. If you’ve been charged with possession of destructive materials or devices, you need legal counsel right away. We have the knowledge and experience to argue prosecutorial evidence and reduce charges or dismiss them and protect your future.
Proving Intent to Commit a Burglary
A prosecutor will have to prove you possessed a specific tool to commit a burglary. Owning and carrying a screwdriver, for example, would not usually be a crime. Depending on the circumstances of where you are found with this tool and how you were using it will give the prosecutor the evidence needed to charge you with illegal possession of the item. Having a criminal defense attorney working with you through these charges will help in establishing an alternative reason the article was in your possession.
It is often argued that state laws criminalizing burglary tools have gone overboard or are too vague. The United States Constitution prohibits criminal statues which are considered unclear and make it difficult for a person to determine what exactly falls under criminal conduct. There have not been many challenges to this statue which have proven successful, but it is one area for your criminal defense attorney to consider.
If you are convicted of possessing burglary tools, you can be charged with a felony. Most often this charge falls under a misdemeanor. Having a criminal defense attorney working with you if charged with possession of a burglary tool can help you get the charges reduced or dismissed.
Conviction of Penal Code 464
If you are convicted under Penal Code 464, it is not a small offense. The conviction under this charge will be considered a felony and could land you a sentence of up to seven years in a county jail with up to $10,000 in fines. It is a serious crime and one that will require you to obtain the services of an experienced criminal defense attorney. You will need the representation that defends your rights and can fight the prosecution’s case under reasonable doubt.
If you are convicted of a felony in California, you are facing serious consequences which can include jail or prison time along with a fine. The repercussions after serving your sentence are even more devastating. Long after you have served your time and paid your fine, you will still feel like your punishment is continuing.
Your rights, such as your civil rights and privileges can be taken away, and you will find it difficult, possibly impossible to gain substantial employment. Having a felony conviction on your records will also make it impossible or extremely difficult to earn a promotion. Employers are able to ask about the conviction on your files and if there is a legitimate, business-related reason for them to refuse hiring or promoting you, it is considered a legal act.
If you’ve been convicted of a felony and served your sentence, but feel you are receiving unfair or unconstitutional prejudice in your employment, contact a criminal defense attorney. We are able to look into your records to determine the reason behind your conviction, and whether or not it legally affects your employment opportunity, you are pursuing and being denied.
Another right you can lose after a felony conviction is the right to vote. The Fourteenth Amendment states your right to vote due to participation in a crime can be revoked. California suspends your right to vote while you are imprisoned or on parole when convicted of a felony.
An exemption to this revocation of voting rights would only be if the judge suspends execution of your sentence and has placed you on probation with the condition you serve one year less in a county jail. This probation will allow you to retain your right to vote while you are serving your time in jail.
You will not be allowed to serve on a jury in California if you have been convicted of a felony. The only way to serve after this type of conviction is to have your civil rights restored. To restore these rights, you have to apply for and be granted a Certificate of Rehabilitation and Pardon, or receive a direct pardon from California’s Governor. Contact your criminal defense attorney to help you through this process and ensure a successful outcome.
The seriousness of a felony conviction is long lasting and life-changing. If you are being charged with a crime that may result in a felony conviction, you need an experienced criminal defense attorney working with you to reduce or dismiss your charges. Don’t let one event in your life change your quality of life. Contact an attorney with experience in the California legal and court system help you protect your rights and future.
Criminal Defense Attorney with Experience in California Law
Contact Van Nuys Criminal Attorney if you or someone you know has been charged with burglary of a safe or vault. Call our Los Angeles Criminal Lawyer at 818-484-1100 today and speak to an attorney who knows the court system and laws of California to receive the best protection of your future. Check further through our website at to discover how we can help with all your legal needs.
If you find yourself facing a carjacking charge, or if you believe you may be under investigation for carjacking and soon charged with this very serious offense, do not hesitate to avail yourself of the best possible legal defense. The sooner you act to defend yourself, the better.
Carjacking is an extremely serious felony offense in California, and prosecutors are not shy about aggressively pursuing their case. Only by pitting an experienced criminal defense attorney against the prosecution can you expect to beat them and win your case.
The prison terms, fines, and other penalties for a carjacking conviction are simply too high for you to put your case into the hands of any but the very best.
At Leah Legal, we understand the gravity of the charge you are facing, and we have deep experience in winning these types of cases. We have helped numerous clients in the L.A. Area and throughout Southern California win dismissals, acquittals, and reduced charges/sentences when up against a carjacking allegation.
For a free legal consultation and quick attention to your case, contact Leah Legal 24/7, 365, at 818-484-1100!
How Is “Carjacking” Legally Defined Under California Law?
Under California Penal Code Section 215, “carjacking” is defined as the taking of a vehicle from the immediate possession of another person by means of force or fear.
For the prosecution to gain a conviction on a carjacking charge, it must prove the following:
- Someone else was in possession of the vehicle in question.
- The defendant took control of the vehicle away from that person or in that person’s immediate presence.
- This taking was accomplished by force or fear.
- It was done against the will of the victim.
- It was done for the purpose of depriving the victim of the vehicle.
Note that carjacking doesn’t always have to be the prototypical scenario where a man with a gun or knife orders a driver out of his/her car, gets in, and drives off. That’s only one of a number of possible ways a carjack “job” may take place.
As long as the car is within the immediate possession or presence of the victim, it’s still a carjacking rather than just an “ordinary” auto theft. This distinction is akin to the difference between simple theft and robbery, except that a car is specifically the property being stolen.
The “taking” of the car simply means (legally) the taking of control over it and the moving of it even a small distance. If the car could not move, for any reason, it would be attempted carjacking at most, rather than carjacking.
Physical force or threats used to induce fear must have been used to get the victim to give up possession of his or her car. A willing handing over a vehicle can never count as carjacking.
The “fear” involved in carrying out a carjacking can be a physical threat of violence against the person in possession of the car or against his or her family member(s).
As to the element of intent to deprive the victim of possession of his/her vehicle, this intended deprivation can be either permanent or just temporary. If someone steals a car by force or fear only intending to “borrow it” and return it later – it still counts as carjacking. (Carjacking refers to the act of violently taking a vehicle not to how long one intends to keep the vehicle once taken.)
Possible Penalties for a Carjacking Conviction
If you are convicted of simple, unaggravated carjacking in California, it is a felony offense and is punishable by 12 months in county jail (OR probation) OR by 3 to 9 years in state prison plus a fine of up to $10,000. Which penalty you receive will depend on the severity of the case.
And you have to multiply the punishment by the number of persons present in the vehicle when it was carjacked – thus, the total sentence can be very steep indeed.
Additionally, there are certain sentencing enhancements that apply in aggravated carjacking cases. First, if great bodily injury was caused to someone due to the carjacking, you can get 3 to 6 years in prison for the offense.
If the carjacking was related in any substantial way to a gang, the street gang enhancement may apply (PC 186.22), which adds 15 years to the prison sentence or even makes it a life sentence.
Under California’s “use a gun and you’re done” law, 10 years are added to your prison term for using a gun to commit a crime, 20 years if you actually fired the gun, and 25 years to life if you inflicted substantial injury or death with the gun.
Plus, if a carjacking conviction is your second violent felony, it will likely be the second “strike” on your criminal record under our state’s “Three Strikes Law.” That will double your sentence. A third strike would impose a sentence of 25 years to life imprisonment.
Under the felony murder rule, if a person dies in connection with the carjacking, it is automatically charged as first degree murder. That’s true even if you didn’t intend to kill the person and even if they die from, say, a heart attack that was triggered by the stress of the carjack situation.
Finally, since carjacking is viewed as a particularly severe felony in California, a conviction will typically lead to deportation for both illegal and legal immigrants.
Common Defense Strategies Against a Carjacking Charge
At Leah Legal, we are adept at creating a customized defense strategy to win each and every case we take on. We know how to apply the basic defense types for carjacking cases to particular situations and when to use one defense as opposed to the other – or a combination of multiple defenses on the same case.
We fight to put you in the best position possible legally even before the trial begins. Pre-trial motions can often weaken the prosecution’s chances to the point they give up and drop the case. In-court, we are skilled at presenting arguments, testimonies, and evidences in your favor and working to discredit those of the prosecution.
Leah Legal has consistently won dismissals, acquittals, and reduced charges and/or sentences in carjacking defense cases in Los Angeles and Southern California – and we stand ready to win the best possible outcome for you as well.
Here are several of our most commonly used defense strategies against a California carjacking charge:
- Consent Was Given
If there was not a lack of consent from the person in possession of the vehicle, then your taking it cannot have constituted carjacking.
It must have against the will of the driver, passenger, or other other person present.
Let’s say you borrowed a friend’s car and did not return it or, at least, not on time. That could be joyriding or even grand theft auto (lesser offenses) – but it can’t be carjacking.
- No Force/Fear Used
Carjacking (PC 215) requires that some form of force or fear (threatening) was used to coerce another person present to allow you to take possession of the car.
So, if someone’s car is running keys-in at a gas station, and you jump in and drive off – even if they watch helplessly as you do it – that’s auto theft but not carjacking.
Why? because you didn’t use physical force or fear on the victim to take possession of the vehicle. It’s similar to the difference between simple theft and armed robbery.
- Mistaken Identity
In some cases, the carjacker may have been disguised and may not have been apprehended in the act. There might be a question about who the true perpetrator is.
Witnesses in these instances may make mistakes about who the criminal was. This is especially so because of the extreme stress people are under during a carjacking and because of the speed at which the whole incident can occur.
- False Accusation
In rarer instances, it may sometimes occur that someone simply creates a false story that you committed a carjacking – maybe out of a spirit of revenge. Or, you may have been framed to cover for the true culprit.
We at Leah Legal know how to get to the bottom of fabricated stories by cross-examining witnesses and challenging circumstantial or outright false pieces of evidence.
- Police Misconduct
If your rights were violated in any way, especially in an illegal search and seizure, the evidence the prosecution is relying on may not be admissible in court.
In that case, you can likely win a dismissal of the case even before having to ever go to trial.
Finally, we mention that “claim of right,” that is, a defense which says it was fine for me to take the car by force because it really was my car or the victim owed me money – is NOT A VALID DEFENSE against the charge of carjacking.
Why not? Because carjacking is all about the taking of a vehicle from the immediate possession of another person by violence. It has nothing to do with the ownership of the car in question – that’s another matter that has to be dealt with separately.
Related Offenses
It helps, in a carjacking defense case, to be aware of and familiar with other related offenses that may come up. It’s possible some of the following charges could be filed along with or instead of the carjacking charge:
- Robbery (PC 211)
The taking of another person’s property from his/her immediate person or possession is robbery. Carjacking is just robbery of a car, but it is punished more harshly than other forms of robbery.
In some cases, you could be charged with both robbery and carjacking. For example, if the victim’s wallet was stolen along with the car.
BUT, you can only be punished for one or the other offense if they both were part of the same incident. The penalty for the lesser offense of robbery would probably be stayed if you’re convicted of both robbery and carjacking.
- Grand Theft Auto
If no force or fear was used to steal an automobile but you are still found guilty of stealing it, you’ll likely be charged with grand theft auto instead of carjacking.
However, the car must have been worth at least $950, or else it’s just auto theft but not grand theft auto.
And you must have intended to permanently take the car away from its rightful owner with grand theft auto. If you steal an empty car with intent to temporarily deprive the owner of its use, then that is “joyriding,” a distinct crime.
- Auto Burglary
When a car is locked and someone breaks into it to steal something inside or to go joyriding in it – it’s the crime of auto burglary.
Auto burglary can be a felony or a misdemeanor, and it’s penalties are much lighter than those for carjacking. But if auto burglary is added on top of a carjacking charge, the sentence becomes that much more severe overall.
- Kidnapping while carjacking.
Under PC 209.5, it is a distinct crime to commit kidnapping while in the process of committing carjacking. If you drive off with someone still inside of the car, even if you intend to drop them off down the road, it counts as kidnapping.
If you only moved the victim out of the car at the carjack point, then it’s just ordinary carjacking. You can’t be convicted of both carjacking (PC 215) and kidnapping while carjacking (PC 209.5). The latter crime is punishable by life in prison without parole.
Contact Us Today For Immediate Legal Assistance!
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we will know how to build you a solid defense against any and all carjacking charges you may face. We understand the California Penal Code on carjacking and related matters down to the legal minutia, and we add to that knowledge longstanding practical experience and deep-seated familiarity with local L.A. Area court processes.
Contact Leah Legal today, by calling 818-484-1100. We are standing by 24/7/365 to take your call for help!
MISAPPROPRIATION OF PUBLIC FUNDS – CALIFORNIA PC 424
If you are facing charges of misappropriation of public funds, you are facing a serious theft crime which is severely punished in the state of California. It is to your benefit to make no delay in availing yourself of top-tier legal defense that will maximize your chances of a favorable conclusion to your case.
At Leah Legal Criminal Defense, we have intricate knowledge of the law and the courtroom dynamics involved in misappropriation of public funds cases. While many L.A. Area defense attorneys are not familiar with the details of this particular practice area, we are, and we have successfully defended numerous other clients charged with misappropriation of public funds in our years of serving and defending the people of Los Angeles and Southern California.
To learn more or for a free legal consultation on the details of your case, call us anytime 24/7 at 818-484-1100.
What Constitutes “Misappropriation of Public Funds?”
Under California Penal Code section 424, misuse or misappropriation of government (public) funds is criminalized. The crime involves those who have been put in a position of public trust misusing their authority to wrongfully distribute or use funds placed under their care.
The crime is essentially equivalent to that of embezzlement, with the distinction that the funds or property embezzled or misused were public instead of private. However, those funds deriving from the sale of stocks/bonds and other types of securities can also count as “public monies” for the purpose of the statute.
Typically, it is state, county, municipal, or other government employees and officials who are charged with California Penal Code section 424, misappropriation of public funds. The reason is clear: since they have been put into positions of managing such funds, they are far more likely to be the ones who, unfortunately, sometimes misappropriate them.
And as there are few effective ways to check on those in certain government positions, taking public funds for personal gain is not nearly as uncommon as we might like to believe. On the flip side it is also easy to be falsely accused of this crime since “watchdog” groups and police are always on “high alert” with regards to this type of crime and they are sometimes quick to make a charge based on purely circumstantial evidence.
What Must the Prosecutor Prove?
To gain a conviction on the charge of misappropriation of public funds, the prosecution must prove beyond all reasonable doubt, the following elements of the crime:
- The defendant was in the employ of a state or local government, and thus, put into some kind of position of public trust.
- The defendant was put in charge of receiving, disbursing, storing, or transferring public funds.
- The defendant took advantage of his/her position of public trust and access to public funds and, in some way, misused or misappropriated those funds.
Misuse of Public Funds – There are a number of possible ways that the element of misuse of public funds can be satisfied, including:
- Unlawfully loaning out public monies to oneself or someone else.
- Using public monies to make a profit for oneself.
- Keeping a fake account or entering a fake entry into an otherwise valid account or erasing information from a public account.
- Refusing to pay out or appropriate public funds to appropriate parties who presented valid orders for a withdrawal to be made.
Possible Penalties for Misappropriation of Public Funds
Misappropriation of public funds (PC 424) is always charged as a felony in California. Upon a conviction, possible punishments include:
- 2 to 4 years in state prison.
- Formal probation.
- A fine of up to $10,000.
Whether one receives closer to the minimum or maximum of each sentencing element and what other sentencing elements, if any, are included, will vary from case to case.
A prior criminal record, particularly with other theft crimes, a repeat offense of Penal Code section 424, or other felonies, can often result in harsher sentences. When larger amounts of public monies were taken or when the position of trust was violated in an especially reprehensible way, the sentence will also likely be very harsh.
And, in addition to the other punishments, those convicted of PC 424 lose the right to hold any public office in California, whether on the state or local level.
Varieties of Misappropriation of Public Funds Violations
As there are numerous different types of positions of public trust and numerous ways in which public monies could potentially be misused, Penal Code section 424, misappropriation of public funds, comes in a wide variety of specific forms.

Below, we look at some of these varieties of PC 424 violations and related matters.
1. Appropriation of Public Funds Without Proper Authority.
Appropriation of public monies without authority to do is the basic most common form of a Penal Code section 424 violation. It involves simply taking public funds and applying them to personal use or giving them unlawfully to another person.
To be convicted, it must be shown that you were an officer of a state or local government who was put in charge of managing public funds. This can include elected officials, those holding their positions by appointment, and those hired to work for the government. And the charge can even be made against those not actually “employees” of the government but nonetheless having control over government funding via some other position.
In many cases, the monies may have been taken for personal use. In other cases, it may have been to benefit a family member or friend. It makes no difference before the law to whom the monies were given, so long as they were illegally given to that person and by someone in a position of public trust.
To be guilty of the crime, you must also have known that the law disallowed the action you took in disbursing the funds or, at least, displayed criminal negligence by neglecting to try to discover if the appropriation was legal or not before making it.
Note that knowledge of your appropriation being illegal does not imply full knowledge and understanding of all the details of the law. It simply indicates that you knew the action taken was not permissible under California law.
Criminal negligence in failing to find out if your action was legal or not goes beyond ordinary negligence. The latter involves a failure to exercise proper and reasonable care; but the former involves reckless behavior that anyone should have known was likely to result in a misappropriation of funds.
2. Loaning Out or Profiting From Public Funds.
This variety of misuse of public monies involves lending them out in order to gain interest from them or otherwise using the funds to profit from them. Unlawfully using the funds to gain profit, thus, is distinguished from simply taking and consuming the funds themselves, though both are violations of Penal Code section 424.
Ordinarily, no public official (or anyone else for that matter) is permitted to loan out public money to gain a profit from it. If you did so, or otherwise illegally used the public funds to gain a personal profit, and you knew or should have known that this was illegal, you would be guilty of this variety of misappropriation of public funds.
3. Making False Accounts or Unlawfully Changing Public Accounts.
This crime involves knowingly creating or keeping fully or partially false records of how public funds were used. It covers entering all manner of false information on a public record, deleting or wrongfully omitting true information, or changing information already present from true to false.
There must have been, along with the keeping of false accounts of public funds, an accompanying purpose to defraud the government of its funds or defraud the rightful recipients of government funds from receiving them.
Thus, the making of a false account is criminalized in and of itself, though it is really just the means by which one may have misused or attempted to misuse public funds.
4. Wrongfully Refusing to Pay/Transfer Public Funds.
While not appropriating funds may seem to be an unnatural fit for the crime of appropriating funds, Penal Code section 424 nevertheless includes the illegal refusal to pay out or transfer public monies.
When a valid draft, order, or warrant for public funds is submitted by a valid authority person asking you to release government funds in accordance with the dictates of the law, it is criminal activity to refuse to comply.
As always, however, you must have been aware that your actions were illegal or criminally negligent in not knowing this before a conviction can be gained on this charge.
Defending Against the Charge of Misappropriation of Public Funds
At the Criminal Law Office of Leah Legal, we understand the gravity of facing the charge of misappropriation of public funds (PC 424), especially to show who in public employ would see their careers destroyed by a PC 424 conviction. Additionally, these kinds of cases can often get a lot of exposure in the media, which exacerbates the damage done to one’s reputation.
We have deep knowledge and experience in defending against these charges, and there are many possible defense strategies that can be used, but here are two of the most commonly deployed defenses we successfully use:
1. Lack of Knowledge and Lack of Negligence
It may be that you did misappropriate public funds but did so without realizing that your actions were against the law. If you made no attempt to hide what you were doing, a credible defense of simple lack of knowledge of the law could be argued.
However, even if you did not know the law, you had an obligation to seek to know it. If “reasonable” efforts were not made to discover if your actions were legal, and a reasonable person would have made such efforts, you can be tagged with negligence. But that is not enough for a PC 424 conviction. It must have been criminal negligence. That is another way of saying gross or aggravated negligence. It is not easy for prosecutors to prove that high a degree of negligence, and a good defense attorney will often be able to defeat PC 424 charges on the basis of a lack of criminal negligence.
2. Incidental or Minimal Amounts Involved
There is an exception clause that applies even when all other elements of the crime of misappropriation of public funds have been satisfied. The public monies in question cannot have been for merely incidental or minimal amounts. In essence, this means it cannot have been for a very small amount of money.
There is not straightforward, all-encompassing definition of what amount of money is considered incidental and minimal in the statute, and therefore, this must be determined on a case by case basis and based on precedents.
A few dollars would certainly always fall into this exception category, but even several hundred or several thousand dollars could as well, depending on the situation.
Two Related Offenses
Along with or in place of Penal Code section 424 misappropriation of public funds, other crimes are also often charged. Two of the most common of other offenses that come up in PC 424 cases are:
- Embezzlement (PC 503): In California embezzlement is defined as the fraudulent misappropriation of funds/property by someone in a position of trust. Embezzlement normally concerns misuse of private instead of public funds. But, in some cases you could be charged with embezzling public property, which would be a felony charge.
- Bribing a Public Official (PC 67/68): The charge of bribing or attempting to bribe a government employee can be charged against government employees themselves or against others. Offering money or property to a public official for the purpose of getting him/her to act illegally is a violation of PC 67 or 68. While this crime can be either a felony or misdemeanor, it is always a felony when committed by a government employee.
Contact Us Today For Help
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we have the legal expertise and long practical experience in local L.A. Area courts to give you the advantage over the prosecution. If you have been accused of misappropriation of public funds, we can help build a solid defense, challenge the evidence and the arguments of the prosecutor, and get the best possible outcome for your case.
Call us at 818-484-1100, anytime 24/7/365, for a free consultation and immediate attention to your case.
Why You Need an Attorney if Charged with Petty Theft in California
Being arrested for petty theft in California means a possible fine of up to $1,000 and jail time for up to six months. In some cases, the court can impose both punishments. Depending on the facts involved, the prosecutor could either charge the act as misdemeanor or an infraction.
If you or someone you know is facing charges of petty theft, contact a criminal defense attorney as soon as possible. If convicted of petty theft, the charge will be entered into your criminal history record, which could affect employment opportunities. A criminal defense attorney can work on your behalf to reduce and possibly dismiss these charges.
Types of Theft Crimes in California
California divides theft crimes into two categories. One category is petty theft; the other is grand theft. Grand theft was chargeable when specific types of property were taken regardless of the value before the passage of Prop 47 but have since been changed on the books:
- California Proposition 47 was initially called The Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act and was a referendum passed by voters in November of 2014. The proposition redefined some nonviolent offenses as misdemeanors instead of felonies. This proposition was intended to expire in 2017 but has been extended by Governor Jerry Brown until November of 2022.
With the passing of Prop 47, grand theft is only charged if the property taken has a value of more than $950.00. Petty theft is now charged for any items taken with a value less than $950.00. If the value of the property taken is less than $50.00, you would be charged with an infraction or misdemeanor unless there are other convictions on your criminal record.
Definition of Theft under California Law
Under the California Statute, penal code 484(a) theft is defined as a person taking, carrying, leading or driving away with personal property belonging to another. It is also considered theft to fraudulently appropriate property that has been placed in your trust, or to defraud someone of their money, personal or real estate, or labor. Another form of theft under the law is causing another to falsely report their wealth to obtain possession of that wealth or labor.
Degrees of Theft under California Law
The two different degrees of theft under penal code 486 include grand theft and petty theft. These thefts are broken down into four separate penal codes:
- Penal Code 459.5 defines shoplifting as going into a commercial business with the intent to commit larceny during that business’s hours of operation. The value of the property does not exceed $950 to be considered shoplifting. If an entry is made after business hours, the act is considered burglary. Shoplifting is charged as a misdemeanor unless you have other convictions on your record.
- Penal Code 487 defines grand theft with the following criteria:
- When personal property, money, or labor taken exceeds $950 in value
- Item taken was a plane, automobile or other vehicles of transportation
- Animals such as a horse
- Certain farm produce including fruit and nuts
- Aquaculture products valued at more than $250 and taken from a research facility or fishery
- Property taken off of another with physical force
- Penal Code 490.1 defines petty theft with the following criteria:
- When personal property, money, or labor taken exceeds the amount of $50
- The property or services taken has a value less than $950
- Violations under this section charged as an infraction will receive a fine not to exceed $250
- Penal Code 490.2 (a) defines Proposition 47 with the following criteria:
- It does not apply to the theft of a firearm
- It does not apply to a theft that will be charged as an infraction
- Property, money, or labor taken from another individual or others but does not exceed a value of $950 will be charged as a petty theft and will be punishable as a misdemeanor, unless the person charged as more than one conviction on their criminal history
Elements Involved in the Crime of Petty Theft
One of the most common charges in California are those for theft crimes. Most of the crimes related to theft involve shoplifting, but under Penal Code 484(a) and Penal Code 488 any theft that has been valued under $950, was taken directly off another person, and is not an automobile or gun can fall under the petty theft section.
Shoplifting is considered by prosecutors to be petty theft by larceny, and there are certain elements they will have to prove to obtain a conviction. They must show you took the property which you knew to be owned by someone else and were not given permission to take it. It will have to be proven; you took the item or items to another location, no matter how close or far away from its original site, and kept it for any period of time. The last thing to prove is that the property did not have a value of over $950. These are some of the crimes of theft that occur where a person will be charged for petty theft:
- Tricking a person into giving you their property while they believe it to be only a temporary transaction and you attempt to turn it into a permanent action. Examples of this type of theft would be taking your computer to a home repair shop to have work done on your device. The repairman takes your computer but then refuses to return it to you. This form of theft is considered theft by trick.
- Deceiving or using false pretense to gain property from someone. Examples of this form of theft would be a person standing out on the sidewalk selling tickets to an upcoming raffle. This person takes your money with the assurance you’ll be contacted if you win, when in fact there is no raffle, and you will never have the chance of winning any prize. The person would be charged with theft by false pretense as they deceived you into giving them money.
- Embezzlement is considered a white-collar crime and involves changing the ownership of property illegally. People usually commit this form of crime when they are in a position of trust and then steal money from accounts they’ve been entrusted to care for.
- Burglary is defined under California Penal Code 459 as when you enter a room, building or other structure with the intent to commit a felony-level crime, petty theft, or grand theft. Burglary is divided into either a first or second-degree charge. First-degree burglary is always a felony and is defined as entering a residence which is occupied. The second-degree is assigned when entering an uninhabited dwelling with the intent to steal property.
- Examples of shoplifting charged as petty theft would be a woman going into a retail clothing store and choosing several garments to try on in the fitting room. While in the room, she hides one or more of the items and upon exiting the fitting area begins to head towards the exit. Security can stop her, and the business can charge her with shoplifting. This charge is valid even though she never exited the store. The statue only requires that the property was intended to be removed which can be proven by her concealment of the items.
- An example where shoplifting might be misunderstood is if you are purchasing multiple small items. While at the checkout you lay what you think are all of the pieces down, but it is discovered on the way out the door, one unpaid item is still tucked in your hand. You could not be charged or be held criminally liable for petty theft in this situation as there was no intent to take the property without paying.
Is Burglary the Same as Shoplifting?
Shoplifting is defined differently from burglary. Shoplifting occurs when a business is open to customers, and you enter with the intent to steal merchandise. The items must be valued at less than $950. If you have prior convictions on your criminal record, shoplifting will more than likely be charged as a felony rather than a misdemeanor.
If your charges fall under burglary and it is considered first-degree, you are facing a prison sentence from two to six years. In addition to prison time, you could be fined up to $10,000 and face formal probation when released from prison. This conviction is also recorded under California Strike Three Law.
If the charge is filed as second-degree felony burglary, you are facing a sentence from sixteen months to three years in jail, formal probation when released from jail, and a maximum fine of up to $10,000. Second-degree misdemeanor burglary means up to twelve months in jail, summary probation, and a maximum fine up to $1,000.
These sentences are extremely serious, and the conviction of burglary will significantly impact your criminal records. Having these charges on your criminal history means finding suitable employment or being able to rent may be affected. Call your criminal defense attorney to help you solve these charges and look for possible reductions or dismissals.
Why You Need a Defense Attorney if Charged with Petty Theft
If you are charged with petty theft, you could be looking at a sentence of up to six months in jail, if convicted. The court could also impose stay-away orders, restitution, and other fines. The prosecution can reduce your charges to an infraction under California Penal Code 490.1 if this is your first offense or they could request you complete a diversion program to avoid the charge appearing on your criminal history.
A criminal defense attorney will help you to get the lightest sentence possible, or they can defend your actions to have the charges dropped. The charge of petty theft can only be applied if you had the intent to remove property or defraud another willfully. If you honestly and reasonably believed the action in question was not performed with the intention of taking an item illegally, your attorney will help prove your case to the prosecution.
If the case is considered a ‘wobbler’, the prosecution can choose to charge you with a felony. This charge could result in a sentence of up to three years in prison with much higher fines. The conviction would appear on your criminal records and anyone performing a background check on you such as landlords or employers will be able to see the file.
Who Decides What the Charge Will Be?
The prosecution makes the decision on how you will be charged. They will look into your case and determine if it will be an infraction, misdemeanor, or felony based on your criminal background. They will also consider the value of the property in question that was reported stolen as well as any circumstances surrounding the event.
Before this charges are filed, it is essential you have proper legal counsel. They will fight for you to get the charges reduced or dismissed to try and prevent any serious damage to your criminal records. You will also want your attorney present and informed if charges are filed, and you are assigned a court date.
First Court Date
When are first assigned to appear in court, it is called an arraignment. The arraignment is where you will tell the judge whether or not you are guilty of the charges. If you’ve been charged with a misdemeanor, your attorney can make the court appearance without you, however; if charged with a felony, you are required to appear in person.
What Can Happen with a Conviction
If you are convicted with petty theft, you could be required to pay restitution. This sentence requires you to pay the victim back for the value of the item or items taken. Restitution is almost always required with a charge of theft.
You can also be placed on probation or parole with a conviction. Parole or probation means a parole officer will supervise your actions for a defined length of time. This sentencing can include paying fees, keeping appointments with the officer assigned to your case, completing a community service program, be subject to alcohol and/or drug screenings, or any other requirement your parole officer might require. Failing to comply with any of the officer’s request means you will be sent to jail to sit out your entire sentence.
If community service is required from you, it means your punishment includes performing a specified amount of time working with a government or non-profit organization. California uses the CalTrans Program for most of its community service sentences which involves freeway cleanup.
Being charged with petty theft is a stressful situation as it can affect your daily life in many ways. Speak with a criminal defense attorney as soon as possible to talk about your legal situation and gain their help in fighting to reduce or dismiss these charges.
If Convicted of Petty Theft with a Prior
If you have a conviction (prior) on your records for petty theft, carjacking under Penal Code 215, Robbery under Penal Code 211, grand theft, burglary, auto theft under VC 10851 or a felony violation under California Penal Code 496, you are facing increased penalties. The courts will take any of these convictions into consideration when sentencing for a new charge.
Who Can Help with Petty Theft Charges Near Me?
Van Nuys Criminal Attorney Criminal Defense is your answer to finding a dedicated defense for any criminal charges. They are ready to help you no matter what stage of criminal proceedings you are in to provide the best legal defense possible. Call the office at (818) 484-1100 and schedule an appointment to discuss your case. The earlier you call, the better chance the team at Leah Legal Criminal Defense has to find the best resolution to your case.
If you or someone you love is facing charges of petty theft you can further throughout our website to find out more on how serious this can affect your future. Getting the best legal defense counsel is essential to protect your future, and Leah Legal has the experience you will need to ensure your future and protect your rights.
At Leah Legal, you will appreciate how personalized your attention is and how well they understand this stressful and complicated time you are going through. They will keep you informed and communicate honestly throughout your case to help make this difficult time move more smoothly. Call our Los Angeles criminal lawyer today 818-484-1100 and schedule an appointment with one of the strongest and most creative defense teams available.
If you have been charged with the crime of receiving stolen property, under California law, you could be facing significant fines and/or jail time if convicted. By acting quickly to secure the services of a criminal defense attorney experienced in this specific practice area, you will greatly improve your chances of winning in court.
At the Criminal Law Office of Leah Legal, we have a long track record of successfully defending clients accused of receiving stolen property. We have a thorough understanding of the details of the relevant California statutes and a deep familiarity with local L.A. and Southern California court processes that are involved.
Contact us anytime 24/7, for a free consultation, by calling 818-484-1100, and we will waste no time in getting started at helping you with your case.
How Is “Receiving Stolen Property” Defined in California?
California Penal Code Section 496 criminalizes “receiving stolen property,” defining the crime as accepting, hiding, buying, selling, or wrongfully withholding from its rightful owner, the property in question. The crime can be either a felony or a misdemeanor, depending on the facts of the case and the defendant’s criminal record.
It makes no difference how the property was stolen, by grand/petty theft, by pickpocketing, by shoplifting, by robbery or burglary, by embezzlement, or any other method. But it is required that the person receiving the stolen property knew it to be such at the time of its reception.
What Must the Prosecution Prove?
To gain a conviction for receiving stolen property, the prosecution must prove beyond all reasonable doubt the following elements of the crime:
- The defendant received, bought/sold, hid, or withheld from its rightful owner, property that had been obtained by theft or extortion.
- The defendant was aware of the property’s presence.
- The defendant was aware that the property had been stolen when he/she chose to accept it.
Received – What does it mean to “receive” stolen property? The legal definition used in relation to Penal Code section 496 is to simply take it into your possession. That need not mean, however, to physically lay hold on it. Constructive possession applies if the property is “under your control.” Also, if you are one of multiple people who possessed the property (joint possession), it still counts as possession.
Awareness That the Property Was Stolen – Note that for property to count as having a “stolen” status, it doesn’t matter which particular theft crime was committed in order to gain possession of it or who committed that crime. And if intimidation was used to gain consent from the owner to give up his/her property, it is considered extortion and the property still counts as having been stolen.
In some cases, a thief or an accomplice may plant stolen goods on another person’s property, his clothing, his effects, in his car, or even on his person without his being aware of it. This is done to escape being detected as the thief while the case is “hot.” Later, the thief will attempt to recover the stolen property. Thus, it is required that you knew of the presence of the stolen property in order for you to be guilty of Penal Code section 496, receiving stolen property.
Note that receiving more than one piece of stolen property at one time is but a single count of Penal Code section 496, but the prosecution can charge you with multiple counts of this particular crime if there were multiple occasions on which the alleged reception of stolen property took place.
Special “Rules” for Owners of Specific Kinds of Businesses
Under Penal Code section 496, there are specific classes of business owners who need not have known of the fact that received property was stolen in order for them to be convicted of receiving stolen property. One such class of businessmen is swap meet vendors. But in addition to these types of vendors, many businesses that are primarily focused on obtaining and reselling pre-owned personal property fall under this special exception.
The reason for the exception, aside from the ease and volume at which stolen property could be incandescently resold at such businesses, is that such business owners are expected to be on the lookout for stolen property and they are also expected to take special precautions to avoid acquiring it.
If property was obtained by a swap meet vendor or other resale agent under circumstances wherein a reasonable inquiry ought to have been made into whether the person selling the property to him/her was the true owner, and no such inquiry was made, guilt under Penal Code section 496 can apply. In essence, the law says that a suspicious situation must be investigated before the property is accepted.
In some cases, as with junk or scrap metal dealers, or when a book with a library impression is acquired by a book dealer, due diligence must be done regardless of whether there were any suspicious circumstances.
It is very easy for owners of these types of businesses to be falsely accused of receiving stolen property or to become guilty of Penal Code section 496 when they had no knowledge of the property’s stolen status. Thus, great care must be exercised and a good lawyer should be consulted early on if a problem arises.
Possible Penalties for Receiving Stolen Property
Receiving stolen property (PC 496) is a wobbler offense in California, meaning it can be charged as either a felony or misdemeanor. Which option the prosecution takes will depend on such factors as the value of the stolen property, how obvious its stolen status is thought to have been, and other details of the specific case. It will also depend on the past criminal record of the defendant.
However, if the value of the property stolen is $950 or less, the same parameters that apply to petty theft, receiving stolen property can only be charged as a misdemeanor. Before Prop 47 was passed in 2014, it was possible to charge low-value instances of Penal Code section 496 as felonies, but this is not allowed today.
When charged as a misdemeanor, the crime of receiving stolen property is punishable by:
- Up to 12 months in county jail.
- Summary probation.
- A maximum fine of $1,000.
When charged as a felony, receiving stolen property is punishable by:
- A fine of up to $10,000.
- From 16 months to 3 years in county jail.
- Formal probation.

Also note that a civil tort action to sue for damages can be filed separately from the criminal charge. If that lawsuit is won, it can result in recovery of three times the damages inflicted, with the losing party paying the legal costs of the plaintiff as well.
Finally, foreign nationals in the United States face could face deportation if convicted of Penal Code section 496, depending on the details of the case, as it can be classed as a crime of moral turpitude. And such a conviction can also prevent even legal immigrants from reentering the U.S. after traveling abroad, and prevent acceptance of a green card or other immigration application. Non-citizens accused of receiving stolen property are wise to seek a lawyer who understands both PC 496 and federal immigration law, or else a separate lawyer for each area of expertise.
Common Defense Strategies
At Leah Legal Criminal Defense, we use a variety of defense strategies to defend against the charge of receiving stolen property (PC 496), always tailoring the specific kind of defense employed to the nature of the case at hand. Some of the most common defense strategies we successfully use in these types of cases include:
- Lack of Knowledge: Other than with owners of certain types of businesses in certain situations, it is required that you knew of the fact that the received property had been stolen in order for you to be convicted of receiving stolen property. Once a piece of stolen property is found, and it is discovered who has it in his possession or who sold it at some point, a charge of PC 496 may well be leveled even against innocent parties unwittingly involved. A good defense attorney, however, can challenge this kind of circumstantial evidence. Also, it could be that you lacked knowledge in a different sense, meaning that you didn’t even know you had the stolen property in possession. It may have been planted on you by the thief or by someone who had a grudge against you.
- Innocent Intent: In certain cases, someone may receive stolen property for the purpose of returning it to its rightful owner or of turning it into the police. If so, your intentions were innocent, and you are not guilty. However, this defense requires that you intended to return/turn in the property when you received it. If you at first intended to keep it but then later changed your mind, or alternatively, if you at first intended to return it but then later decided to keep it, you will still be guilty under PC 496.
- Voluntary Intoxication: While drunkenness is not a valid defense in many types of criminal cases under California law, in the case of PC 496, it can be. If you can demonstrate that you were too drunk or intoxicated with drugs to have realized you were receiving stolen property, then no criminal intent can be ascribed to your actions.
Other Related Offenses
Other crimes closely related to Penal Code section 496, receiving stolen property, and oftentimes charged along with it or in its place, include the following:
- Grand/Petty Theft (PC 487/488): Taking property not belonging to you worth over $950 is grand theft, while theft of property valued at $950 or less is petty theft, under California law. Although you cannot be charged with both theft and receiving stolen property for the same transaction, if a prosecutor suspects you as the thief but has a weak case, he/she may charge you with receiving stolen property instead.
- Embezzlement (PC 503): In the same kind of situation as mentioned above for Penal Code section 487 or Penal Code section 488, but when the suspected theft crime is embezzlement, a prosecutor with a weak case may resort to a receiving stolen property charge. Embezzlement is the fraudulent appropriation or misuse of property entrusted to the defendant by the property owner, so as to deprive the owner of his property or its value and to benefit the perpetrator.
- Appropriation of Lost Property (PC 485): Under PC 485, it is a crime to attempt to keep any lost property you may find for yourself. This crime is closely related to receiving stolen property but is classed as a kind of theft (grand or petty, depending on the lost property’s value) instead of simply receiving stolen property. The reason for this is that no one else has previously stolen the lost property before you obtain it, and you cannot properly be said to receive “stolen” property if the property was only lost but never had been stolen. Those who discover lost property are supposed to make a reasonable effort to find the owner and return the property to him/her. However, if you were not in a position to find the owner or return the property to him when you found it, the charge of theft or appropriation of lost property can be defeated.
A good defense lawyer can help to defeat both PC 496 and other related charges that may be filed against you. In cases where a total victory is not possible, an experienced criminal defense lawyer can also apply his/her negotiation skills to get your charge and/or sentence reduced as part of a plea bargain.
Contact Us Today For Help
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we have the legal expertise and the undying commitment to each and every client to defeat charges of receiving stolen property. We will know how to build a solid defense for your case and to secure the most favorable outcome possible.
Contact us anytime 24/7/365 for a free legal consultation, by calling 818-484-1100.
If you are awaiting trial on the charge of robbery in the state of California, you should waste no time in securing for yourself the best possible legal representation. Only by relying on a skilled, experienced criminal defense attorney with expertise in the specific practice area of robbery defense can you maximize your chances of a favorable outcome to your upcoming case.
At Leah Legal Criminal Defense, we have been successfully defending L.A. Area clients accused of robbery for years. Our knowledge of the relevant California statutes and our familiarity with local Los Angeles court processes enable us to effectively serve the best interests of each of our clients.
To learn more or for a free legal consultation, call us anytime 24/7 at 818-484-1100.
What Is “Robbery” Under California Law?
California Penal Code section 211 criminalizes robbery, and defines it as unlawfully taking property not belonging to you directly off of someone’s person and/or in his or her immediate presence. The definition also includes that the property was taken without permission from the owner/possessor and was taken by means of force or threat.
Robbery is automatically a felony-level crime in California. Thus, it is punished severely in all cases, though additional aggravating circumstances can enhance the punishment yet further.
Most people imaging robbery as a man with a gun holding up his victim and making off with his money or other property. While this is one form of robbery, it is not the only one. For example, a burglar who enters a residence and threatens people who are then present in the building is a robber; as is one who drugs another person in order to easily make off with that person’s property; as is one who issues a threat only to escape with property already unlawfully taken into his possession.
The common thread is stealing by force or by fear when another person is present. Other factors simply determine which type of robbery has taken place.
What Must the Prosecution Prove?
To gain a conviction on the charge of robbery, a prosecutor must demonstrate all of the following elements of the crime to be true beyond all reasonable doubt:
- The defendant took into his possession property not belonging to him.
- The property in question was then in the immediate possession of another person.
- The property was taken while the perpetrator was in the immediate presence of another person.
- The property was taken in violation of the will of the property owner.
- The defendant resorted to the use of physical force or fear tactics (threats) to overcome or prevent resistance to the theft.
- The defendant had an intention to deprive the property owner of his or her property, its use, or a significant part of its value.
Took – To count as having “taken” a piece of property, it must be that the defendant brought it under his/her control and moved it at least a short distance.
Possession – Possession, as used in Penal Code section 211, need not mean that the property was actually being held or touched by another person. It could also be “constructive possession,” where the other person has control over or at least the right to control the property in question.
Possession of Another Peron – Nor is it necessary that the property was taken from the presence or possession of its owner. It could have been taken from some other person who had a right to control it and against the owner’s wishes.
In Violation of the Will – And the owner need not even have been aware of your taking the property. If you lacked consent to take it, it is considered “against the owner’s will.” Furthermore, if threats are used to intimidate someone into giving “consent,” it does not count legally as consent.
Fear Tactics – Use of fear to secure property indicates that a threat was issued or implied to harm the person present during the theft, to harm that person’s family member, or to damage property belonging to that person. Picking pockets, then, would not count as robbery for lack of “force or fear” being used, but drugging a victim would, since drugging someone is considered force used render the victim unable to resist the taking of his property.
Possible Penalties for Robbery in California
Penal Code section 211 (robbery) is always a felony in California, but it can be classed as either first-degree robbery or second-degree robbery, which classification will greatly affect how it is punished upon a conviction.
First-degree robbery involves incidents taking place in a residential building or structure, while or just after the victim makes use of an ATM machine, or where the victim is a driver or passenger on virtually any form of public transportation (as taxi, bus, subway, etc.)
First-degree robbery is punishable by:
- 3 to 6 years of time in state prison.
- Up to 9 years in prison if you colluded with two or more others in committing the robbery.
- Formal probation.
- A maximum fine of $10,000.
Second-degree robbery is defined simply as all other classes of robbery that fail to meet the first-degree robbery threshold. It is punishable by:
A fine of up to $10,000.
2 to 5 years in state prison.
Formal probation.

As robberies are “counted” based on how many victims were involved (not on how many pieces of property were taken), using force or fear to rob a single item can count as multiple instances of robbery and will increase your sentence. On the other hand, taking multiple items from the same person in one incident is just one count of robbery.
If, during a robbery, you caused great bodily injury to another person, your sentence can be enhanced under Penal Code section 12022.7 to add 3 to 6 extra years of incarceration.
If you made use of a firearm to commit the robbery, under Penal Code section 12022.53, your sentence can be enhanced by an extra 10 years behind bars. If you fired the gun, it is 20 years; and if you caused great bodily injury by means of the gun, it is 25 years to life.
Robbery is a “strike” on your criminal record under California’s Three Strikes Law. This means that if you get a second strike, your sentence will be doubled; and if you get a third strike, you will be sentenced to from 25 years to life in state prison.
Common Defense Strategies Against the Charge of Robbery
At the Criminal Law Office of Leah Legal, we use a wide range of effective defense strategies to defend against the charge of robbery, whether 1st or 2nd degree, and to secure a dismissal, an acquittal, or a reduced charge or sentence. Here are some of the most common defenses we use in these types of cases:
- No Force or Fear Involved: Without the use of force or fear, a charge of robbery will be reduced to that of some other theft crime, and your sentence will likely be significantly lessened. It is not considered sufficient to prove force or fear by simply showing that the crime took place in the presence of another person. If that person was afraid enough to hand over the property simply because he or she saw you there, without any attempt on your part to induce fear or to forcibly take the property, it will not stick as robbery under Penal Code section 211 in a California court.
- Claim of Right: If you genuinely believed that the property you took was yours, regardless of whether it really was yours or of whether your belief that it was yours was reasonable, it is not robbery under California law. The exception to this rule, however, is that you can still be charged with robbery if you take money/property from another (by force or fear) in order to satisfy a debt that was owed to you.
- Mistaken Identity: It is not uncommon for a victim to mistakenly identify a person as the robber, especially because the robber may have come during the night and have had his or her face covered with a mask. Without a good look at the perpetrator, it may be impossible for the victim to identify him or her with certainty. But that does not stop many from trying. A good lawyer will challenge these kinds of identifications and also fight heavy reliance on circumstantial evidence.
- False Accusations: As with many other crimes, it is not unheard of for false accusations of robbery to be leveled intentionally by someone who knows the defendant and holds a grudge against him or her. It could also be that the true perpetrator framed the defendant or even that the accuser or a witness of the prosecution is the true robber.
Other Related Offenses
Other offenses that often come up during robbery cases, and are charged either alongside or instead of the charge of robbery, include the following:
- Burglary (PC 459): Burglary occurs, like robbery, when a person enters a building with the intent to commit a crime once inside. This similarity results in both crimes often being simultaneously charged against a defendant for a single incident. However, burglary does not involve use of force or fear. When burglary occurs in an inhabited building, it is a felony and can get you from 2 to 6 years in state prison.
- Carjacking (PC 215): When the property taken by force or fear out of the immediate presence of another person was an automobile, it is called “carjacking” but is really just a special class of robbery. Nevertheless, both robbery and carjacking can be simultaneously charged, and carjacking is punishable by 3 to 9 years in prison.
- Grand Theft (PC 487): If the value of the property stolen was over $950, in certain cases where a vehicle or firearm is stolen, and in all cases where property is taken directly off someone’s person, it is called grand theft. Otherwise, it is petty theft under PC 488. Grand theft can be a felony or a misdemeanor, and as a felony, it is punishable by 16 months to 3 years in jail. It may be possible, in some cases, to get a robbery charge reduced to grand theft and thus lessen the sentence. In rarer cases, a reduction to petty theft, a misdemeanor crime with a maximum penalty of 6 months in jail, may be possible.
- Kidnapping (PC 207): When force or fear is utilized not merely to gain possession of and steal property but to move a person any significant distance, it is kidnapping under California law. Even if the real purpose of moving the person was to get him out of the way so as to take his property, it can still count as kidnapping. However, the distance cannot be merely incidental to the robbery. Kidnapping and robbery combined is punishable by life imprisonment without parole, and ordinary kidnapping is punishable by 3 to 8 years in state prison.
- Extortion (PC 518): The use of force or fear to influence another person to give up money/property can be charged as extortion if the victim was intimidated into consenting to handing over his or her property. When no such consent occurred, it is robbery. And extortion may involve issuing threats other than to inflict physical harm, such as to reveal information, get an illegal alien deported, or accuse a person of a crime. Extortion is a felony and is punishable by 2 to 4 years in jail.
Contact Us Today For Help
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we stand ready to assist you in your hour of need by providing you with the best possible legal representation across a wide range of practice areas, including robbery defense. We have handled numerous robbery cases and have a long track record of doing well by our clients by obtaining the best possible outcome for them.
For a free consultation on the details of your case, do not hesitate to contact us 24/7/365 by calling 818-484-1100.
Shoplifting is a crime that involves willful concealment of retail merchandise with the intent to permanently deprive the store owner of pay for the item or items. Shoplifting is a larceny crime against a retail establishment. Expensive small items are attractive to shoplifters. Everyday items targeted for shoplifting include; baby items, clothing articles, jewelry, alcoholic beverages, food items, medication, mobile electronic items, and cosmetics. Shoplifting involves the concealment of these items in a bag or under a coat or jacket.
Acts that Constitute Shoplifting
Everyone typically thinks that you need to leave the store with the stolen item to get charged with Shoplifting. The law defines shoplifting as willful concealment of retail merchandise; it is possible to get a shoplifting charge without leaving the retail establishment. Slipping retail items in your handbag, backpack, or under your jacket is enough to get you in trouble as long as your intention to permanently deprive the store of the item is clear. For example; during a trip to the local store, Meagan picks various make-up items and hides them in her purse. In this case, a security guard has the power to detain Meagan even though she has not yet left the store with the items.
In most states in the United States, altering the contents of an item or switching the barcodes to pay less is considered as shoplifting. For example, when you switch the barcode of an expensive perfume with that of a cheaper fragrance so that you may pay less, you are guilty of shoplifting. Same applies when you switch the contents by exchanging the covering carton, lead or container so that you may pay less.
Detention of Shoplifters
Police officers do not guard malls and shopping stores. Instead, private security agents offer security for these establishments. When you are a suspect for shoplifting, what happens to you? Is it legal for a suspect to get detained without his or her will? False imprisonment is holding a suspect by a private citizen against his or her will. Criminal laws of the land traditionally prohibited false imprisonment. To deal with shoplifting, many states have enacted special by-laws and statutes that allow security guards to detain and interrogate suspects as they await the arrival of the police.
The merchant or store owner is allowed to detain the offender in the case of shoplifting. If the offender refuses to produce the stolen items, the merchant can conduct a reasonable search within reasonable limits. The merchant is allowed to search the suspect’s handbag, purse, backpack, or whatever form of a package that can be used to conceal items. The merchant or security guard on duty is not allowed to search the suspect’s clothing. These powers are given to store owners, movie theater operators, and librarians.
Limitations were created to prevent security guards from abusing the powers given to then in the case of shoplifting. Suspects may be detained if there is “probable cause” that a crime has occurred. Probable cause is established through witness (other customers) statements, surveillance video recordings, or personal observation. Mere suspicion of a crime is not sufficient to imply probable cause. The security guards cannot hold a suspect for an unlimited period to force a suspect to sign a confession or waiver personal rights. Questioning or interrogating the suspect is allowed within the limits of reason. Use of force to interrogate or restrain the suspect is not permitted.
Charges for Shoplifting
In some states, shoplifting is a lesser form of larceny, and it is often referred to as “petty theft.” Other states have established special statutes to deal with the shoplifting. The approach of a state to punish these crimes is described in its local or state penal code. For California, the Penal Code 459.5 defines shoplifting as gaining entry into an open business with the intention of stealing merchandise worth $950 or less. Stealing merchandise worth over $950 constitutes grand theft. The value of the items stolen is determined by the amount listed on the price tag.
According to the California Penal Code 459.5 PC; all acts of shoplifting shall be punished as a misdemeanor unless there are prior convictions against the defendant. A misdemeanor in California is a crime or offense with a maximum jail time sentence of one year in county jail. A misdemeanor is less serious than a felony but more severe than an infraction.
In California, there are two categories of misdemeanors depending on the punishments they serve:
- Standard California Misdemeanors: Punishable by jail time not exceeding six months or a fine not exceeding $1,000 or both jail time and the fine.
- Gross or Aggravated Misdemeanors: Punishable by up to one year (364 days) of jail time or a fine of up to $1,000 or more or both.
As the law states, all shoplifting offenses shall be punished as misdemeanors except when the offender has a prior severe conviction under his or her criminal record. These prior offenses include forcible sex crimes, homicide, and any other offense that requires the perpetrator to register as a sex offender.
In California, a felony is a crime that is punishable by a maximum sentence of over one year in a county jail or prison. In addition to or in the stead of jail time, the convict may be fined up to $10,000. Alternatively, the court may sentence a felony offender to formal probation where the offender serves not more than a year in county jail.
The California Penal Code defines shoplifting as stealing items worth the value of $950 or less. It goes on to mention that, unless prior convictions, all shoplifting charges are treated as misdemeanor offenses. There is an exception to this rule when the items involved include explosives, firearms, or incendiary devices. Anyone accused of shoplifting these items shall be charged with felony shoplifting regardless of whether it is the first offense. The ATF (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives) monitors the sale transportation and loss of any goods that may be used in the making of bombs. This also includes ammonium nitrate (a key ingredient in plastic explosives that is also found in garden fertilizer). Shoplifting items that are monitored by the ATF could complicate the case to the jurisdiction of terrorism.
What is The Difference Between Misdemeanor Charges and Felony Charges?
Felony charges are more serious than misdemeanor charges. Because of this difference, felony punishments are more severe than misdemeanor punishments. Misdemeanor charges, according to the laws of California, are punishable by a jail sentence not exceeding one year (364 days). Misdemeanors may also include cash fines. Usually, the fine does not exceed $1,000. The fine charged depends on the value of the items stolen.
Felony charges are punishable by prison sentences that last longer than one year (364 days). The fines involved in felony charges are higher than those involved in misdemeanors. In California, felony fine can rise to $10,000. Felony charges may range in degree from one to five; one being the least serious and five being the most severe.
There are special charges referred to as “Wobblers.” These crimes cannot be classified as misdemeanors or as felonies. For wobbler offenses, the prosecutor may decide to charge the offense as a felony or as a misdemeanor. The judge may also weigh in his decision in the matter and determine whether to punish the offense as a felony or as a misdemeanor conviction.
Shoplifting in The Case of Persons Under the Age of 18
What Happens When a Minor Gets Caught for Shoplifting?
16-year old Brad walks into a convenient store and stuffs several items in his backpack. Unfortunately for him, he is caught by the store manager. He is under the age of 18, what happens to him?
The store is allowed to detain Brad for a reasonable amount of time while they investigate young Brad’s intent to steal. If the store discovers the stolen items in his backpack, the manager is required to call Brad’s parents and the police. If charged, the store may sue Brad for attempting to steal their products. Merchants are allowed by the law to sue offenders for damages between $50 and $500. The merchant may also sue the offender for the value of retail items if they are recovered in a damaged state. For persons under the age of 18, the matter is handled by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). The OJJDP treats minors with the intention to correct their ways.
For first offenders, the court may release the minor to his or her parents with a stern warning. Other penalties include restitution, probation, diversion, counseling, confinement, or placement.
What Should You Do When Charged with Shoplifting?
Finding yourself on the wrong side of the law can be frustrating and emotionally draining. However, knowledge of your rights and how to handle the situation can help you develop a stronger defense for your case. Below are the top five things you should do when you are facing shoplifting charges.
- Do no flee store management or security: The first personnel on the scene of a possible shoplifting case is usually the mall or store security. The police are rarely involved unless they are called upon. When a guilty suspect is caught, some instincts may tempt the offender to flee the scene. Whether guilty or not, the suspect is advised to resist any temptation to flee. If you run from the store security, it may be used against you in court as strong evidence of guilt. Instead of escaping, you should comply (for instance, if you are detained for longer than adequate) can be used to challenge the merchant in court.
- Do not make any custodial statements to the police: Once the store hands you over to the police, you will feel obligated to make an “innocent statement to the police.” In most cases, these statements are used as an admission of guilt. Therefore, making your defense a harder task than it could have been. “You have the right to remain silent,” this right is protected by the constitution of the land. Do not talk your way into an unfortunate conviction. When the police question you, invoke your right to counsel. The law requires any form of questioning to stop until the arrival of your lawyers.
- Hire a qualified and competent defense attorney: A shoplifting charge can evolve to a serious criminal charge. You need someone who is more experienced in the field — a lawyer who understands California’s legal fabric. At Leah Legal Practices, our phone lines are open 24/7 every day of the year. We know that law is not a 9-5 job but an all-day and all-night venture.
- Make restitution: In most cases, if you are caught for shoplifting, it means that you did not get away with the goods. In case the goods were damaged during the incident, the merchant may ask for restitution. In such a case, make restitution immediately. If you are confident in your innocence and wish to challenge the matter in court, you are allowed to ignore the call to make restitution. If you are not sure about how to respond, consult with your lawyer.
- Make sure you appear in court: A summons issued by the courts should be honored. If you do not appear in court on the set date, the judge will issue a warrant for your arrest. In court, you will have to issue a plea; Guilty or Not Guilty. If you plead guilty, it is advisable that you ask your lawyer to request the judge to consider expunction when you complete your sentence. Consult with your lawyer heavily on how to conduct yourself in court.
What Are the Merchant’s Rights in Case of Shoplifting?
Most malls and stores do not have policemen as security. Instead, they may hire private guards for security. Security guards and private citizens do not have the same powers that police officers have. However, during shoplifting, the owner of the store (the merchant), or anyone hired to manage the security of establishment, inherits certain powers to secure the suspect. Below are the rights of the merchant in the case of shoplifting.
The merchant has the right to detain the suspect for a reasonable amount of time while he or she waits for the arrival of the police. This right also extends to movie theater operators who have established probable cause for detention. Probable cause in a movie theater could be the operation of a video recording device within the premises.
If the suspect refuses to hand over the stolen items, the merchant has the right to conduct a reasonable search. A reasonable search means going through the suspect’s handbag, purse, backpack, or any other equivalent. Searching the suspects’ immediate clothes are not considered as reasonable.
Should a need arise to restrain the suspect, the merchant has the power to use reasonable but undeadly force to suppress the suspect. The need to apply restraint could be triggered when the suspect of shoplifting threatens to destroy the merchandise.
The merchant may sue the suspect or the parents’ of the suspect (in the case of a minor) for damages between $50-$500. The market value of the merchandise shall be determined by the value of the goods as stated by the price tag.
The Shoplifter’s Rights
In case the merchant uses an unreasonable force, and you are not resisting, then you have the legal privilege to defend yourself.
The merchant can only search your items if he or she has probable cause. Without probable cause, you can refuse to be searched. The merchants cannot frisk or search the shoplifter’s immediate clothing unless the shoplifter allows it. It is not advisable to permit a close frisk or search as you could be waiving your right to sue the store for misconduct.
In case your rights were infringed during detention, you have the right to sue the merchant.
Find a Shoplifting Defense Attorney Near Me
In summary, when you are charged with shoplifting, do not resist detention or flee from the scene. If the merchant has probable cause to search your possessions, comply. Most important of all, call our Los Angeles criminal lawyer for the best criminal defense in Van Nuys. We have enough experience to defend you or your loved one against any charges of shoplifting. In case you feel like your rights were violated during the process call us today for a free consultation. We have the best lawyers ready to defend your rights.
Call 818-484-1100 today!
If you have recently been arrested and charged with a violent crime in Los Angeles or throughout Southern California, you are facing potentially severe repercussions upon a conviction. While there is a wide range of sentencing guidelines even among violent felony crimes, all of them are treated very harshly, and some even can lead to life imprisonment or execution.
At Leah Legal, we have deep experience in handling all manner of California violent crime defense cases. We understand the details of the California Penal Code relative to these crimes, and we are fully familiar with the inner workings of local, L.A. Area courts.
Contact us anytime 24/7 for a free legal consultation by calling 818-484-1100, and we will waste no time in getting started on your case!
What Is a “Violent Crime” Under California law?
The term “violent crime” is often used in a purely descriptive way, or even somewhat loosely, in everyday language. But in a legal setting, its definition is more definite and more specific.
Under California law, a “violent crime” is defined as any criminal activity that inflicts physical harm on another person, or that involves an attempt/threat to inflict such harm.
It is typical for a violent crime to be a felony, but certain misdemeanors may also qualify as violent crimes. And even among violent felonies, the use of a firearm or deadly weapon, the existence and extent of bodily injury inflicted on the victim, a crime being “gang related,” or the defendant having previous felonies and violent crimes on his/her criminal record can all enhance an already severe sentence.
As to specific examples of violent crimes, we give you an overview of the main categories just below. But be sure to look up the relevant charge-specific pages here on our website to get more detailed information about each particular type of violent crime.
Assault & Assault with a Deadly Weapon
PC 240 is the statute covering “simple assault,” which refers to the attempt to inflict unlawful bodily injury on another person. It differs from battery in that battery is the actual carrying out of that attempt.
To prove someone guilty of assault, the prosecution must show that he/she willfully (i.e. not accidentally) committed an act that was likely to cause bodily injury to another person.
It must also be shown that the defendant knew, or can reasonably be expected to have known, that his/her actions would likely injure another person. And, finally, you must have had the ability to carry the act out to be convicted (it can’t be an empty threat to do something you obviously couldn’t have done.)
Simple assault is a misdemeanor, punishable by up to 6 months in jail and a fine of up to $1,000.
But assault with a deadly weapon (PC 245.a1), where you used a weapon or force likely to cause “great bodily harm” to the victim is a felony, punishable by anywhere from a year in county jail to 4 years in state prison, plus a $10,000 fine.
Common defenses we use against assault charges include: self defense, defense of others, lack of intent (it was an accident or misunderstanding), lack of ability to carry out the assault, false accusation, and lack of sufficient evidence.
Battery
PC 242 is California’s battery statute. “Battery” is defined the same way as “assault” except for one difference: physical contact took place. Technically, even the slightest touch can make the difference between assault and battery.
If actual physical harm was inflicted on the victim, especially “great bodily injury,” then the battery charge will be much more serious and punished more severely than if a touch took place but without any harm done (but it can still be charged as battery nonetheless.)
Battery involves touching in a harmful or offensive manner, intentionally, against the will of the one touched. With no harm inflicted, it is a misdemeanor, but when serious injury is caused, it’s a felony and can be punished by up to 4 years in state prison.
Common defenses are self defense, defense of others, and exercise of reasonable discipline on a child.
Finally, note that when committed against a domestic partner, battery becomes “domestic battery” and carries an enhanced sentence.
Sexual Assault/Battery
PC 243.4 covers the crime of sexual assault, also called sexual battery. Anytime unwanted touching of someone’s “intimate parts” takes place, it is an act of sexual assault.
“Intimate parts” are defined as sex organs, the anus, the butt, or female breasts. The touching must have been done for the purpose of sexual gratification or abuse, and not for a lawful purpose. It doesn’t matter, however, if the touching was direct to skin or through the clothes.
Note that if the assault culminated in forced sex, it would be charged as rape, a more serious crime, and not as sexual assault.
Sexual assault can be a misdemeanor, but as a felony, it is punishable by anywhere from 12 months in county jail to 4 years in state prison, and a fine of up to $10,000.
Consent is one of the most common defenses against sexual assault, though accidental touching or fabricated accusations are also possible defenses.
Rape
PC 261 defines the crime of “rape” as non-consensual sexual intercourse that was carried out through force, threat, or fraud (deceit). If a victim was passed out (unconscious) or not capable of giving legal consent, it also counts as rape.
If rape is committed against a minor (even by another minor), it is statutory rape under PC 261.5.
If one rapes his/her spouse, it is spousal rape under PC 262.
When rapes take the form of oral sex, it is oral copulation by force under PC 266.
A “simple” rape conviction under PC 261 is punishable by 3 to 8 years in state prison, and you can get up to 13 years for the rape of a minor. Penalties can vary greatly, however, based on the specific class of rape, the details of the case, and the defendant’s past criminal history.
At Leah Legal, we realize how common false rape charges are, and we know how to defeat false and flimsy allegations. Defenses we use against rape charges include: false accusation, lack of evidence, mistaken identity, lack of intercourse, and consent or reasonable belief consent existed.
Domestic Violence Crimes
Domestic violence is a broad-brush umbrella term under California law, inclusive of many specific offenses. The common factor that ties them all together is the class of person against whom they were committed.
When battery, assault, and other crimes are committed against a spouse, former spouse, fiancé, other romantic partner, or the parent of your child, it becomes a domestic violence crime. Crimes against your child or elderly people can also count as domestic violence.
Corporal injury to a spouse (PC 273.5), Domestic Battery (243.e1), Child Abuse (PC 273d), Elder Abuse (PC 368), and Criminal Threats (PC 422) are specific examples of domestic violence crimes. Penalties will vary greatly, depending on the specific crime, the details of your case, prior criminal record, and other factors.
At Leah Legal, we have numerous effective defenses we use against domestic violence charges, a class of crime that is frequently falsely charged.
Robbery & Armed Robbery
PC 211 is California’s robbery statute. “Robbery” is defined as the taking of another person’s property, against his/her will, off his/her person or from in his/her immediate presence, and by means of force/fear.
Robbery is always a felony in California. First-degree robbery, committed in an inhabited structure, at an ATM machine, or on public transportation, is punishable by 3 to 9 years in state prison. Second-degree robbery (all other situations) is punishable by 2 to 5 years in prison.
Armed robbery adds 10 years to your sentence, 20 years if you fired the gun, and can get you 25 years to life in prison if you killed or badly injured someone with the gun.
Common defenses against a robbery charge include: no force/fear was used to take the property, the property was yours or you reasonably believed it to be yours, mistaken identity, and false accusation.
Murder & Attempted Murder
Under PC 187, there are three levels of “murder” in California. First-degree murder takes place after premeditation, by means of explosives, WMDs, or certain other devices, while torturing someone, or while committing another felony crime.
Second-degree murder applies to many cases where you commit a felony or an inherently dangerous act and someone dies as a result. Vehicular manslaughter, often while intoxicated, is an example of second-degree murder.
Capital murder applies to certain extreme cases like drive-by shooting murders, murder based on racism, committing multiple murders at once, murdering for money, or murdering a police officer.
Even the lowest term for a 2nd-degree murder conviction is 15 years in prison, and 25 years to life, or the death penalty are possible penalties.
If it can be shown that your actions did not result in the death of another person/fetus or that you had no “malice aforethought,” you will be found innocent. Self-defense, defense of others, and false accusation are also common defenses.
Attempted murder (PC 664) occurs when someone intends to kill another person and takes at least one “direct step” toward doing so, provided the victim does not actually die. In the first degree, attempted murder is punished by life in prison, but with parole possible. Second-degree attempted murder is typically punished by 5 to 9 years in state prison.
Other Violent Crimes
The above are not nearly the full list of California violent crimes, and we at Leah Legal can also defend you against such allegations as arson, stalking, torture, firearms/weapons related charges, issuing terrorist threats, kidnapping, gang related crimes, and more.
Most violent crimes tend to be felonies and carry stiff punishments. Heavy fines, long terms in state prison, or even life imprisonment or death are all possible penalties. We at Leah Legal are fully familiar with California’s legal definitions of various violent crimes and with the court processes involved in defending against a violent crime charge. We know how to form a “customized” defense strategy that fits the details of your case and puts pressure on inherent weaknesses in the prosecution’s case.
The Three Strikes Law
Anytime you are facing a violent crime charge, you need to be aware of California’s “Three Strikes” Law. This piece of legislation affects the sentence of those committed of various repeat violent felonies/crimes.
Crimes qualifying as “strikes” on your criminal record include: rape, various sex crimes, robbery, firearm crimes, murder, and more. A second strike will result in a doubled prison sentence, while a third strike will get you a term of 25 years to life in prison.
The Three Strikes Law makes it all the more important to keep a violent crime conviction off your record. At Leah Legal, we understand what is at stake when you face a first-time or repeat violent crime charge, and we know how to maximize your chances of a favorable outcome to your case.
Contact Us Today for Help
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we have a strong track record of winning for our clients against a violent crime allegation. We know how to find exculpatory and mitigating evidence in your favor and how to challenge the evidence upon which the prosecution’s case rests. We also are skilled at cross-examining witnesses to expose weaknesses in testimony brought against you.
Our first goal is always to get your case dismissed by filing pretrial motions and other measures that cause the prosecution to doubt the ability to win their case. Then, we fight skillfully and tenaciously to win in court by strong argument and solid evidence in your behalf. And even when a dismissal/acquittal is unrealistic, we know how to use our well honed negotiation skills to secure you a reduced charge and/or sentence that will significantly benefit you.
To learn more or for a free, no-obligation consultation on the details of your case, call our Los Angeles criminal attorney anytime 24/7/365 at 818-484-1100.
If you are being charged with attempted murder in Los Angeles or anywhere in California, or think you may soon be charged with this crime, you need to act fast and avail yourself of the best possible criminal defense lawyer. The penalties for an attempted murder conviction in California can be very steep, and having this crime on your permanent criminal record will make life very difficult going forward.
We at Leah Legal will know how to build you a solid defense and win your case. We have won numerous attempted murder defense cases in the past, and we will fight tenaciously and apply our full legal expertise in your best interests as well.
Contact Leah Legal anytime 24/7 by calling 818-484-1100 for a free consultation and immediate attention to your case!
How Is Attempted Murder Defined Under California Law?
Under Penal Code Section 664, California defines, criminalizes, penalizes the act of attempted murder. Attempted murder is just that, an attempt, not merely a wish, contemplation, or musing about killing someone else – but an actual attempt at carrying out such a criminal desire.
The elements of the crime of attempted murder are only two:
- You had an intention to kill another person.
- You took a “direct step” toward carrying out that intention.
Proving that a person intended to kill another person can be very difficult. If the intention was actually to kill but to injure (even severely), it falls short of attempted murder. In general, prosecutors try to argue that an attack on the upper body where the vital organs are located indicates an attempt to kill, while an assault on the lower body indicates the intent was merely to injure. But obviously, those are only circumstantial pieces of evidence and rules of thumb that can’t necessarily prove your intention.
If there was no injury whatsoever done to another person, then it becomes even more difficult to prove an intent to kill.
Also, the intention to kill usually has to be directed toward a specific individual to make an attempted murder charge stick. But there are exceptions to this. For example, if it can be proved you intended to kill “someone,” that is sufficient for an attempted murder conviction. This might happen where someone does, say, a drive-by shooting and sprays bullets all around trying to kill people but not necessarily being concerned about which particular person or persons are killed as a result. This is called a “kill zone” type of attempted murder.
Finally, a “direct step” toward trying to kill another human being must have been taken. That means more than just planning, plotting, or even preparing to do it. It means taking one or more steps to actually put the plan into action – in such a way that unless something intervenes, the murder will be completed as planned. Examples of a direct step might be firing a firearm, stabbing with a switchblade, or paying someone else to commit the murder.
Possible Penalties for Attempted Murder in California
PC 664 Attempted Murder is a felony crime in California. It can be either a first or second degree attempted murder, mirroring these same distinctions with PC 187 Murder. In general, incarceration time is around half for attempted murder as it would be for a corresponding murder crime.
First degree attempted murder occurs when the attempt was “willful, deliberated, and premeditated,” while second degree lacks those elements. For first degree attempted murder, you can get a sentence as high as life imprisonment but with possible parole. If the attempt to kill was against a police officer or someone else in a “protected class” while carrying out his/her duties, there is also a 15 year mandatory actual prison stay.
For second degree attempted murder, you can get from 5 to 9 years in state prison.
For both first and second degree attempted murder, aside from the prison time, there is also a fine of up to $10,000, the requirement for full victim restitution, and the loss of all firearm rights by the perpetrator (as with other California felony crimes.)
Since attempted murder is a violent felony, it is a “strike” under our state’s Three Strikes law. A second strike receives twice the prison time it would otherwise have received, and a third strike is punishable by from 25 years to life in state prison.
Under PC 186.22, if you commit attempted murder in connection with a street gang, a sentencing enhancement of 15 years to life can be added to the PC 664 attempted murder sentence. If you are an immigrant and commit attempted murder, you are very likely to be deported.
If you use a firearm in the commission of attempted murder, under PC 12022.53, you will also receive sentencing enhancements. For simply using a gun, it’s 10 extra years; for using and firing it, it’s 20 extra years; and for causing great bodily injury or death with a gun, you will get 25 years to life added to the sentence.
Common Defense Strategies
At Leah Legal, we are familiar with the most effective defense strategies to use against an attempted murder charge, and we have won many cases for other clients using the following (and other) defenses:
- Lack of Specific Intent
If the prosecution cannot prove that you had a specific intent to kill another person or persons, or a random person(s) in a “kill zone,” then they cannot gain a conviction against you for attempted murder. If they can prove an intent to maim, inflict serious injury on, or intimidate the victim, then a conviction for a lesser crime might be possible, but not for attempted murder at least.
- No Direct Step Taken
Should the prosecution prove that the defendant planned a killing, bought the murder weapons, arranged the plan, discussed the plan, and done everything else except take even one small step to actually put that plan into action, then under California law, it’s not attempted murder.
Up to that point, a person could still abandon the plan of murder; but once the “direct step” line is crossed, you can be convicted for PC 664 Attempted Murder. In some cases, if you took a direct step but then gave up the plan and no harm followed, the prosecution might agree to a plea deal.
- Self Defense
If you act to defend yourself (or another person) from imminent bodily harm, that is self-defense or defense of others. If another person is attempting to kill you and to defend yourself, you attempt to kill them – and you did not provoke the incident, then you are innocent. You cannot be convicted of attempted murder.
- False Accusation
Sometimes, someone will file an attempted murder charge against someone that is totally fabricated or exaggerated. It might be done, for example, to gain custody of a child when a divorce case is already underway or out of a spirit of revenge. Leah Legal will know how to cross examine false witnesses to expose them for what they are and clear your name.
- Mistaken Identity
When someone attempts to kill another person but does it in the dark or with a mask or other disguise on, it’s easy for the wrong person to get accused of the crime. It could even be a framing job. Or, because a person robbed a store in the area (for example) and an attempted murder took place in the same neighborhood around the same time, he might be assumed to have done both crimes, though he did not.
- Illegal Search & Seizure
If evidence the prosecution is relying on was illegally obtained by police, we can file a pretrial motion to have it declared inadmissible in court. This often results in the charge being dismissed. And if any other violations of your rights took place, this also often can help to win your case.
Other Related Offenses
Here are 7 other related offenses that often are charged instead of or along with an attempted murder charge in California:
- Drive-By Shootings (PC 26100): Anyone shooting from a car that is moving or temporarily halted and then speeding off and shooting at other people can be convicted of PC 26100. Shooting the gun towards people is enough to count as targeting them even if the perpetrator didn’t care who exactly was killed.
- Reckless Shooting (PC 246): If you do basically the same thing as in a drive by shooting only it’s not from a moving car – but it’s targeted at an inhabited building or a currently occupied vehicle, that’s a violation of PC 246. In most cases, those charged with PC 246 will also be charged with PC 664 Attempted Murder.
- Solicitation to Murder (PC 653): Making a request of another person to get them to kill someone is not yet attempted murder, but it is a crime in its own right. If you set the plan fully in motion, you could still be charged with attempted murder, but otherwise, it’s a serious but still lesser offense than PC 664. Many attempted murder cases end in a plea bargain down from attempted murder to solicitation to murder.
- Attempt to Aid Suicide (PC 401): Under PC 401, it is illegal to even attempt to help someone else kill him or her self. Assisting a suicide that succeeds is murder, if say, you push someone off a skyscraper just because he/she asks you to do so. But, if you provide a gun to someone who asks for it specifically to commit suicide, that would be aiding/abetting suicide. If the suicide fails, you could be charged with attempt to assist a suicide instead.
- Human Torture (PC 206): If someone purposefully inflicts extreme bodily pain on another person, it could be charged as torture under PC 206. On the other hand, as torturers may intend to kill their victims in the end or not care if they die in the process of torturing them, an attempted murder charge might be added by the prosecution as well.
- Domestic Violence. California has a number of different laws against domestic violence, and there are some cases where the victim also accuses the defendant of trying to kill him or her. If great bodily injury was inflicted and a firearm, knife, or other lethal weapon was wielded during the incident, there is a greater chance of attempted murder being charged along with the domestic violence charge.
- Attempted Voluntary Manslaughter (PC 192): When someone kills another person in the heat of the moment without premeditation OR in a mistaken, unreasonable, but honestly held fear that the other person was about to kill him/her, then voluntary manslaughter would be charged instead of murder. If the other person did not die, then it would be attempted voluntary manslaughter.
Of course, there are many other charges that could come up in an attempted murder case, but these are the major ones that might be made additional charges or be available as possible charge reductions in a plea deal.
Contacting an Attempted Murder Attorney Near Me
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we don’t shy away from the “tough cases” like some other law firms. We know how to win against the most serious charges and even where other lawyers might refuse to take the case. We have won numerous attempted murder defense cases in the past, and we win your case as well!
For a free legal consultation and quick attention to your case, contact our Los Angeles criminal attorney anytime 24/7/365 by calling 818-484-1100!
If you have been charged with the criminal offense of dissuading a witness or victim in Los Angeles, you may face severe consequences upon conviction. Therefore, you need to find a highly experienced and reputable criminal defense attorney who can help you obtain a favorable outcome.
If the court convicts you for this offense, you will receive a stain on your criminal record. Also, you may be required to serve a jail/state prison term of up to four years, or pay a fine of up to $10,000.
We at Leah Legal have extensive experience in defending individuals who have been charged with this offense. We invite you to contact us for a free consultation if you or your loved one has been accused of this offense. Remember that getting legal help as quickly as possible is paramount in helping you win your case.
We focus exclusively on criminal defense. As soon as you get in touch with us, we will start applying our legal expertise to your case. We will be with you at every step of the criminal trial process and fight your charges aggressively.
The Legal Definition of Dissuading a Witness or Victim
Penal Code 136.1 is California’s Primary Law on dissuading a witness or victim. According to Penal Code 136.1, it is unlawful to maliciously and knowingly dissuade or prevent a witness/victim to a criminal offense from:
- Testifying or attending court-authorized criminal proceedings
- Making reports
- Providing information or cooperating with the California Criminal Investigation Department and the Prosecution Department
- Arresting or making or causing another person to be arrested on the basis of committing a crime or being involved in the commission of a crime.
Take note that you can still be charged under PEN 136.1 if you only attempted to dissuade a victim or witness, regardless of whether or not you were successful. The criminal offense of dissuading a witness/victim is categorized as a wobbler. This means that the California Department of Prosecution can charge it as a felony or a misdemeanor. This will depend on the facts and circumstances of your case.
What the Prosecution must prove for you to be convicted for Dissuading a Witness or Victim
For the court to convict you, the prosecutor must prove the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
- You acted maliciously and knowingly
- Your actions were directed towards a victim/ witness
- You dissuaded or prevented
Let us discuss each of these elements comprehensively:
1. Maliciously and Knowingly
Knowledge is a crucial element that the prosecutor must prove for you to be convicted for this offense. The prosecutor must show that you knew that the person you dissuaded or prevented (or attempted to) was a witness/victim. If you didn’t know that whom you were dissuading was a victim or a witness, then you probably have a good defense.
Also, the prosecutor must show that you knew you were acting in a manner that may cause the victim or witness to be dissuaded. If you provide sufficient proof to show that you had no knowledge that your actions would have dissuaded the victim, you might receive an acquittal.
Additionally, the prosecution must demonstrate that you acted maliciously. He/she must prove that you had a specific intent to injure, harm, annoy, or threaten a witness or victim.
2. Victim or Witness
The scope of the term ‘victim’ is quite narrow. According to PEN 136.1, a victim is someone who believes or thinks that you or another person has committed a federal or state crime against him/her.
On the other hand, the term ‘witness’ is broad, and it encompasses numerous situations. A witness can be a person who has probably heard or seen you being involved in a criminal act, is under oath or subpoena to testify during criminal proceedings, or reported a crime.
The prosecutor must prove that your actions were directed towards a victim or witness. This means that you can exonerate yourself if you accept that you threatened, harmed, annoyed, or injured another person or attempted to do so, but he/she wasn’t a witness or victim.
3. Dissuaded or Prevented
The prosecution must demonstrate that you dissuaded or prevented a witness/victim from attending court proceedings, testifying, reporting a criminal offense, or helping in the arrest or prosecution process. You can still be convicted under PC 136.1, even if you were unsuccessful in dissuading or preventing the victim/witness.
The court would hold that you have dissuaded or prevented a witness or victim if you utilized threats or force against him/her. Moreover, you may receive a conviction if the prosecution proves that you had conspired with another person or group to dissuade or prevent a victim/witness.
The Penalties for Dissuading a Witness or Victim
The California Department of Prosecution can charge you with the criminal offense of dissuading a witness or victim as either a felony or a misdemeanor. If you are convicted for misdemeanor dissuading a witness or victim, you may be ordered to pay a fine not exceeding $1,000 or serve a county jail term of a maximum of one year. The punishment for felony dissuading a witness or victim is a jail or state prison term of a minimum of 16 months and a maximum of four years, or a fine of up to $10,000.
However, this criminal offense is typically charged as a misdemeanor. Specifically, you will be charged with this offense as a felony in the following situations:
- You acted with extreme force or violence against the victim or witness
- You acted to further a conspiracy against the witness or victim
- You have one or more prior convictions for this offense
- You were promised financial gain or any other form of consideration by another person for dissuading the victim/witness
Sentencing Enhancements for Dissuading a Witness or Victim
The court can make you face additional consequences upon conviction for PC 136.1. For instance, you may be ordered to restitute or compensate the victim.
Take note that even if you have been convicted, the victim still has the right to institute a civil claim against you for compensation. If the victim wins the lawsuit, the court can award him/her punitive damages, which you will be required to pay. This means that you can find yourself facing two separate court proceedings: the criminal trial process and the civil lawsuit.
The burden of proof in a California Civil Lawsuit is on the plaintiff, and the standard of proof is on a balance of probabilities. This standard of proof isn’t as high as that required in criminal cases, and the plaintiff can win the case quite easily, especially if you have already been convicted. If you won the criminal case, you might have a higher chance of winning the civil lawsuit.
If you utilized a gun when dissuading the victim or witness, you might receive a sentencing enhancement of 1 – 10 years. Additionally, if you had dissuaded a witness or victim to further the interests of a criminal street gang, the court may sentence you to imprisonment for a minimum of seven years to life.
Immigration Consequences for Dissuading a Witness or Victim
If you are a non-US citizen and you have been convicted for felony dissuading a witness or victim, you may face negative immigration consequences. According to the US Immigration Law, if a non-US citizen is convicted for an aggravated felony, he/she may be deported and become marked as ‘inadmissible.’ The offense of dissuading a witness or victim, if charged as a felony, falls into the class of aggravated felonies.
Therefore, if you are a non-citizen and you have been charged with felony dissuading a witness, you should hire an attorney who has expertise in both criminal defense law and immigration law. This way, you will boost the chances of obtaining a favorable outcome in your criminal trial, as well as avoid being deported and becoming marked as ‘inadmissible.’
How a Conviction under PC 136.1 Affects Gun Rights
If you have been convicted for either misdemeanor or felony, you may lose your gun rights. This means that you will not be permitted to possess or own a firearm.
Upon conviction for misdemeanor dissuading a victim or witness, you will lose your right to possess or own a gun for ten years. A felony conviction for this offense will result in a lifetime ban. For you to restore your gun rights, you will have to receive a pardon from the Governor of California.
Legal Defenses to Dissuading a Witness or Victim
You can raise various legal defenses to fight the criminal charge of dissuading a witness/ victim. The most common California legal defenses to this charge include:
- Absence of malice or knowledge
- No victim or witness
- False accusations
Here is a brief discussion of each of them:
1. Absence of Malice or Knowledge
Remember that for you to be convicted for dissuading a victim or witness, the prosecutor must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you acted with both malice and knowledge. Therefore, you can employ a defense strategy to convince the court that you didn’t have a specific intent to dissuade the victim or witness.
2. No Victim or Witness
The prosecutor must show that you dissuaded a victim or witness. You can attempt to exonerate yourself by convincing the jury that although you threatened or injured another person, he/she wasn’t a victim or witness to a specific crime.
However, if you admit that you had threatened or injured another person, or attempted to do so, you may be charged with another offense, such as criminal threats or assault, in lieu of dissuading a victim or witness. You should only consider using this defense strategy if you intend to enter into a plea bargaining agreement with the prosecutor.
3. False Accusations
This defense is often used in cases involving domestic violence. For instance, your spouse can inform the police that he/she was abused, and you threatened that you would abuse him/her more if he/she reports the crime.
In this situation, you can simply say that your spouse ‘wrongfully accused’ you. However, you will be required to provide sufficient proof to show that, indeed, it was a false accusation.
Apart from domestic violence, false accusations might also come from angry business partners or corrupt police officers. Whatever the situation, an experienced criminal defense attorney will conduct a thorough investigation of the false accusations, and highlight their inveracity during the trial.
4. Insufficient Evidence
The burden of proof in California criminal cases is on the prosecution, and the standard of proof is beyond a reasonable doubt. The prosecutor must attain this high standard when proving each element of this criminal offense.
In most instances, the prosecution normally fails to reach this standard, especially if you have built a robust defense strategy. Your attorney can poke holes in the case by discrediting witnesses and evidence. Subsequently, your case will be dismissed.
5. Human Rights Violations
Often, the police do not always observe the proper procedures when arresting or investigating a suspect. As a result, some of your human rights may be violated during arrest or investigations.
For instance, they may search your house or car without having a search warrant. Or, they may force you to confess towards the commission of the crime.
During consultations, make sure you inform your attorney if you believe that law enforcement violated some of your human rights during investigations or at the point of arrest. Your attorney can request a suppression hearing to exclude the evidence obtained at these stages. This way, the prosecution will be left with insufficient evidence, and you may receive either a dismissal or an acquittal.
Expungement of a Conviction for Dissuading a Witness or Victim
You can expunge a conviction for misdemeanor dissuading a witness or victim. On the other hand, it will be difficult to expunge a felony conviction for dissuading a witness or victim, unless you did not serve state prison time.
Pc 1203.4 is California’s Primary Law on expungement. According to it, when you receive an expungement, you will be released from virtually ‘all disabilities and penalties’ that arise from the criminal conviction.
Dissuading a Witness or Victim and Related Offenses
Various offenses are related to dissuading a witness or victim, including the following:
- Penal Code 422 Criminal Threats
- Penal Code 236 False Imprisonment
- Penal Code 207 Kidnapping
Let us discuss each of these offenses briefly:
1. Penal Code 422 Criminal Threats
According to PC 422, it is unlawful to threaten to kill or harm another person. For you to be convicted for this offense, the prosecution must prove that the alleged victim reasonably feared for his/her life and safety due to your threats. Also, the prosecutor must show that the threat was unequivocal and specific, and you communicated it verbally, through an electronically transmitted device, or in writing.
Unlike PC 136.1, it isn’t necessary for the person threatened to have been a victim or witness. Also, just like PC 136.1, this offense is a wobbler, and it can be charged as either a felony or a misdemeanor. The penalty for misdemeanor criminal threats is a jail term of a maximum of one year or a fine of up to $1,000. A felony conviction is punished by a state prison term of 16 months, two years, or three years.
2. Penal Code 236 False Imprisonment
As per PC 236, you can be charged with the criminal offense of false imprisonment if you restrain, confine, or detain another person without his/her consent. Dissuading a witness or victim by detaining, restraining, or confining him/her, the prosecution could opt to charge you with false imprisonment, alongside or instead of dissuading a witness or victim.
PC 236 is a wobbler. As a misdemeanor, it attracts a fine whose maximum value is $1,000 or a jail term of up to one year upon conviction. The punishment for felony false imprisonment is a state prison sentence of 16 months, two years, or three years.
3. Penal Code 207 Kidnapping
If you abduct another person and hold him/her captive while using fear or force, you will be charged under PC 207. Note that if you had dissuaded or attempted to dissuade a victim or witness by kidnapping him/her, you may be charged under PC 207, alongside or instead of PC 136.1. In such a situation, the prosecutor can elevate this offense to aggravated kidnapping.
Upon conviction for kidnapping, you will be obliged to serve a state prison sentence of a maximum of eight years. Aggravated kidnapping has more severe consequences – it carries a minimum of a five-year state prison term, which can be lengthened to life.
Find a Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
If you have been charged with dissuading a witness or victim and you would like to speak to an attorney in Los Angeles, contact Van Nuys Criminal Attorney at 818-484-1100 for a free, confidential consultation. We are here to help you.
In 1988, the Street Terrorism and Prevention Act (STEP) was enacted by California legislators to curb gang violence. According to PC 186.22, a criminal street gang is an organization of three or more individuals, who have a common name, identifying symbol or mark, and whose primary activity is to engage in certain criminal activities.
As per the STEP act, gang associates or members who are convicted of felonies will receive punishment for those felonies; and other additional penalties because of their participation in a criminal street gang. Typically, such individuals receive the most severe penalties.
We at Leah Legal can help you build an excellent defense strategy if you have been charged with a crime involving gang affiliation in Los Angeles. We will also work towards helping you avoid the sentencing enhancement if you become convicted.
How California Defines the Criminal Offense of ‘Participating in a Street Gang’
The legal meaning of the criminal offense of ‘participating in a street gang’ is set out under PC 186.22(a). This legal definition highlights the three main elements that the prosecution must prove for the jury to find you guilty of this crime.
As per PC 186.22(a), it is a criminal offense to participate in the activities of a criminal street gang willfully. The court will convict you under PC 186.22(a) if the prosecutor successfully proves the following elements:
- You had ‘actively participated’ in a street gang
- You had knowledge of the fact that the members of the gang were engaging in a criminal activity
- You willfully furthered, assisted, or promoted, criminal conduct of a felony by a street gang
Let’s discuss these elements in greater detail:
Actively Participated
As per California’s criminal street gang law, the term ‘actively participated’ means that you took part in the activities of the gang in an impassive manner, or not just by name. You don’t have to be a gang leader or a 100% active member. Also, it isn’t a requirement for you to have devoted a significant amount of your time to the gang’s activities.
Criminal Street Gang
The term ‘criminal street gang’ is used to refer to three or more individuals who have formed a specific group or organization. This group or organization should have a specific name, mark, or symbol. Also, the primary aim of the group or organization should be to commit one of the enlisted criminal offenses under California’s gang enhancement law. Furthermore, the gang members should have committed a ‘pattern of criminal gang activity,’ either by themselves or together as a group.
The legal definition of ‘pattern of criminal gang activity’ as per California’s gang enhancement laws is hugely complex. But, very simply, this term means:
- Committing two or more offenses specified under California’s gang enhancement law
- In two or more different events and by two or more individuals
- Within three years
- One of the crimes was committed after the enactment of the STEP act (September 1988)
The prosecution does not need to demonstrate that the offenses committed were gang-related. Some of the crimes specified under California’s gang enhancement law that can constitute a criminal gang activity pattern include robbery, drug crimes, murder, assault using deadly weapons, felony vandalism, and vehicle shootings, among others.
‘Furthered, Assisted, or Promoted’ a Gang Activity
For the prosecutor to provide proof that you ‘furthered, assisted, or promoted’ a street gang activity, he or she must show the court that you were actively and directly involved in the commission of a felony, or you acted as an aider or abettor in its commission. Additionally, you must not have aided or committed the crime alone, but with the help of two or more gang members. The court will not convict you of participating in a street gang if you had committed the offense by yourself. However, the court may still subject you to the gang enhancement as per the STEP law.
Punishments for Participating in a Street Gang
PC 186.22(a) is categorized as a wobbler. California prosecutors can charge it as a felony or a misdemeanor, depending on the facts and circumstances of your case.
The criminal penalties for misdemeanor PC 186.22(a) include a county jail term of a maximum of one year or a fine not exceeding $1,000. A felony participating in a street gang conviction may result in a state prison sentence of a maximum of three years or an order to pay a fine not exceeding $10,000.
The California (STEP Law) Gang Enhancement
PC 186.22(b) sets out the California gang enhancement, fondly referred to as the STEP law. Under Penal Code 186.22(b), you may receive a sentencing enhancement if you are convicted of the offense of participation in a gang. Of course, the court will only convict you of participating in a gang if the prosecutor has proved each and every element we discussed. However, it isn’t a requirement for the prosecutor to show that you were an ‘active member’ of the gang when you were involved in the commission of the crime.
Penal Code 186.22(b) does not stipulate a fixed timeframe by which your jail term or state prison sentence is increased. What Penal Code 186.22(b) sets out are different sentencing enhancements for various types of offenses. Therefore, how much your state prison sentence or jail term will increase will depend on the criminal offense you committed. Below, we analyze for you various sentencing enhancements for different criminal offenses as enlisted in PC 186.22(b):
1. Generic Felonies
If the jury convicts an individual of an offense where the STEP law applies, the judge will sentence him/her to an additional state prison/jail term of either two years, three years, or four years. However, this rule has numerous exceptions.
2. Serious Felonies
In an event where the court convicts a person of a serious felony in which the STEP act is applicable, this person will receive an additional state prison term of five years. As per California’s criminal laws, serious felonies are over 40 in number. Some examples of these serious felonies are assault using deadly weapons against firefighters or peace officers, certain drug crimes, issuing criminal threats, and shooting an occupied car or inhabited dwelling.
3. Violent Felonies
The court will sentence an individual to an additional state prison sentence of ten years if he/she receives a conviction of a violent felony, and PC 186.22(b) applies. There are over 20 violent felonies as per California’s criminal laws. Some of them include murder, mayhem, certain sex crimes, and any criminal offense that results in significant bodily injury to the victim.
4. Specific Felonies
PC 186.22(b) also sets out several specific felonies, which, if the convicts committed them with the primary intention of promoting or assisting a gang, can result in longer state prison sentences. Convicts of robbery, carjacking, drive-by shooting, or shooting at inhabited dwellings or occupied cars may receive an additional state prison sentence of 15 years, which may be lengthened to life. Individuals whom the court convicts for either dissuading a witness or extortion may face a state prison sentence of seven years, which can also be lengthened to life. Finally, if the punishment of the felony you have been convicted for is life imprisonment, then the court will sentence you to state prison for life. In such a scenario, you won’t qualify for parole until you complete at least 15 years in state prison.
5. Misdemeanors
According to PC 186.22(d), the California Department of Prosecution can convert a misdemeanor offense to become a felony. This is in circumstances where it was committed to benefit, assist, promote, or further the interests of a gang. In such a scenario, the court will sentence you to a state prison term of one year, two years, or three years; instead of receiving the normal misdemeanor sentence of a county jail term of a maximum of one year. If prosecutors choose this option, the law does not permit them to subject the ‘new felony’ to a gang enhancement under PC 186.22(b).
Other Considerations During Sentencing for PC 186.22(b)
Besides the gang enhancements prescribed for different types of offenses, the court may also consider several factors when punishing you as per the STEP law. Let’s analyze these factors:
School Zones
If the crime was committed within a school/campus area and school activities were ongoing, the judge will take it as an ‘aggravating factor.’ This means that he/she can potentially increase your sentence.
Interest of Justice
According to PC 186.22, California judges have the discretion to strike off the gang sentencing enhancement for the sake of justice. However, this happens rarely and in unusual circumstances too, and only at the persuasion of an experienced and highly skilled criminal defense attorney.
Multiple Enhancements
You will be generally subjected to only one enhancement for the crime you committed, even if the crime leads to multiple charges. However, if you committed two or more offenses that can be distinguished by both distance and time, and they involved multiple victims, you will be charged for each act. You will also receive multiple gang sentencing enhancements.
How the Gang Enhancement Relates to Other Criminal Sentencing Enhancements
The gang enhancement relates to two other criminal sentencing enhancements in California: the ‘10-20-life’ law and enhancement for the personal use of a gun. These two enhancements may be imposed instead of, or alongside the gang enhancement. Here is a detailed discussion of how these two enhancements relate to the California gang sentencing enhancement:
Personal Use of a Gun
The California sentencing enhancement for the personal use of a gun is set out under PC 12022. PC 12022 states that an individual will be subjected to an additional state prison sentence of one year if, while committing a felony, an individual is in possession of a firearm or his/her principal is armed with it. Moreover, PC 12022.5 imposes a consecutive and additional sentencing enhancement of three years, four years, or ten years if you utilize a gun to commit a felony.
In some cases, the prosecution may persuade the court for you to receive this sentencing enhancement, instead of, or in addition to the gang sentencing enhancement. This is especially in situations where you were in possession of, or you used a gun to commit a felony to further the interests of a criminal street gang.
10-20-life
The ’10-20-life’ enhancement is frequently charged alongside with the gang enhancement. This enhancement is enlisted under PC 12022.53. According to PC 12022.53:
- You will receive a consecutive and additional ten-year state prison sentence if you personally use a gun while committing a specific felony
- The court will issue you an additional state prison term of twenty years if you personally fire a gun while committing a specific felony
- If the victim suffered death or significant bodily injury because you fired a gun during the commission of a specific felony, you will receive an additional state prison sentence of twenty-five years, which may be lengthened to life
Because Penal Code 12022.53 imposes extremely grievous penalties, it is commonly referred to as the ‘use a gun, and you’re done’ law. Some examples of specific felonies that may trigger the imposition of the Penal Code 12022.53 sentencing enhancement include kidnapping, murder, carjacking, and robbery.
If you fire or use a gun while committing a specific felony to benefit a criminal street gang, then you may receive both the 10-20-life sentencing enhancement and the gang sentencing enhancement upon conviction. Also, if you were a principal while committing the specific felonies to further the interests of a gang and your accomplice utilizes a gun, you may still face the 10-20-life enhancement together with the gang enhancement, even if you didn’t personally discharge or use the gun.
How to Defend the California Criminal Street Gang Enhancement
Your defense attorney can use various tactics to fight PC 186.22 charges. Some of the legal defenses to the California criminal street gang enhancement include:
1. You did not commit the Felony to Which the Gang Enhancement Applies
You cannot receive a gang enhancement if the court does not convict you of the felony to which it applies. Note that the standard of proof in criminal cases is beyond a reasonable doubt. In most instances, the prosecution is usually unable to reach this high standard of proof because of insufficient evidence.
2. You weren’t an Active Member of the Gang
If the prosecutor has charged you under PC 186.22(a), the court will not impose an additional sentence if he/she fails to demonstrate that you were an active member of the gang. It is generally difficult for the prosecution to prove that you were a full and active member of the gang, and your attorney can find various loopholes to instill doubt in the minds of the jury.
3. You were not Acting to Further the Interests of a Street Gang
Even if you were a full member of the gang, the prosecution must still demonstrate that you committed the felony for its benefit. You will not receive the gang enhancement if you committed the felony due to your own individual reasons.
For instance, maybe you robbed another person just because you wanted money to help your family. In such a situation, the judge will not subject you to a sentencing enhancement because you were not acting for the benefit of the gang. However, an overzealous prosecutor may still stick you up with the sentencing enhancement for you to serve more state prison time. Even if the court convicts you of the offense of robbery, you can always avoid the gang enhancement if you have a highly skilled criminal defense attorney by your side.
4. The Gang Enhancement has been Imposed Illegally
California’s criminal street gang laws are quite complex. Sometimes, a prosecutor may fail to understand various statutes and institute illegal or inappropriate charges, no matter how well-meaning he/she is.
It is crucial for a criminal defense attorney to review each aspect of your charges meticulously to make sure that you have not been charged unfairly or illegally. If your attorney realizes that the prosecutor has imposed the sentencing enhancement illegally, he/she will fight to have it struck off.
5. The Gang Enhancement is Against the Interest of Justice
The judge can strike off a gang enhancement if it is against the interest of justice. However, this happens rarely and in unusual circumstances too. But, maybe you might qualify for a strike-off to protect the interests of justice – you never know!
Find a Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
Over the years, we have gathered extensive experience in helping defendants facing gang affiliation charges. Don’t put your future at risk by attempting to speak out for yourself. Call us today at 818-484-1100 for a free case evaluation. We will be delighted to help you.
The California PC 192b outlines the crime of involuntary manslaughter. You may be guilty of involuntary manslaughter if you unintentionally kill another person. You may kill another person by committing a crime that does not qualify as a dangerous felony. You may also kill another person through an unlawful act, which is likely to cause death without due caution. You do not need to have had the intent to kill another person for you to face involuntary manslaughter charges. The crime of murder requires you to have malice aforethought while killing another person, but involuntary manslaughter does not need you to have intent. If you are facing involuntary manslaughter charges, Leah Legal can help you fight the charges by coming up with a convincing defense strategy.
Elements of Involuntary Manslaughter
For the prosecutor to accuse you of the crime of involuntary manslaughter, he/she has to prove several elements of the crime. It must be evident that you are guilty of committing a crime other than an inherently dangerous felony. The crime may be either a misdemeanor or an infraction. You may also be guilty of performing a lawful act unlawfully. The prosecutor must also prove that you committed the said crime with criminal negligence. The prosecutor must finally prove that your lawful or unlawful acts led to the death of another person.
You will only face the charges for involuntary manslaughter if you do something wrong and cause the death of another individual in the process. In the case of a pure accident, you may not face charges. The wrongful act leading to the death of another person may be an infraction. An infraction is a low level of crime in California that does not attract severe penalties. In most cases, the applicable penalty for an infraction is fine. The wrongful act may also be a California misdemeanor. Depending on the nature of the wrongful act, the act may qualify as a felony, which is not inherently dangerous. The wrong act may also be a lawful act that does not qualify as a crime but done unlawfully.
You may kill another person while committing an inherently dangerous felony. In this case, you are going to face enhanced charges. Instead of receiving involuntary manslaughter charges, you may face murder charges under California law. This is following the California felony-murder rule.
For you to face charges for involuntary manslaughter, the prosecutor must prove in court that you acted in criminal negligence. It does not matter whether your crime is based on an underlying crime or an underlying lawful act. Criminal negligence is more enhanced than normal or ordinary negligence. Criminal negligence exceeds ordinary carelessness, a mistake in judgment, or inattention. You may be guilty of acting in criminal negligence under California law if you act in a reckless manner that creates a high risk of great bodily injury or death. It must be evident that under similar circumstances, a reasonable person would have known that acting in such a manner would pose such a risk.
You will only face involuntary manslaughter charges if another person dies due to your lawful or unlawful act. If you act in criminal negligence, but another person does not die, you may not face charges for involuntary manslaughter. The law considers your act to have caused another person’s death if the death of the person was the direct or natural and probable consequences of your actions. You are guilty of causing another person’s death if the person would not have died, were it not for your actions. It must be apparent that a reasonable person would have realized that his/her actions would lead to the death of the victim.
Involuntary Manslaughter Resulting from Failure to Perform a Legal Duty
Involuntary manslaughter may occur due to failure to perform a legal duty. The California Penal Code 192b outlines the crime of involuntary manslaughter for failure to perform a legal duty. This crime has a legal definition than the crime of involuntary manslaughter. To prove that you are guilty of involuntary manslaughter for failing to perform a legal duty, the prosecutor must prove that you owed the victim a legal duty. The prosecutor must further prove that you did not perform the legal duty. It must be evident that your failure to perform the legal duty was criminally negligent. It must also be evident that your failure to perform the legal duty led to the death of the victim. A judge and not a jury is responsible for deciding whether a person has a legal duty to another person in cases of involuntary manslaughter.
According to California law, some of the relationships where one party owes the other party a legal duty include a parent-child relationship. There is also a legal duty between a caretaker and the person the caretaker is offering care to. A legal duty exists in a relationship between two people where one person has assumed responsibility for the other person.
Penalties for Involuntary Manslaughter
The penalty for involuntary manslaughter in California can be harsh. It is important to seek legal assistance as soon as possible if you are facing an involuntary manslaughter charge. Your attorney will come up with mechanisms to help defend you against the serious and overwhelming consequences of criminal charges. Under California law, the crime of involuntary manslaughter is a felony offense. The potential penalties for the offense include felony or formal probation. You may also serve jail time of two, three, or four years. The court may require you to pay a penalty that does not exceed $10,000.
You may serve your sentence for involuntary manslaughter in jail instead of state prison. This arrangement is outlined under California’s alignment legislation. The realignment legislation in California rook effect in 2011 and has altered the structure for numerous offenses in California. Many offenses that strictly attracted imprisonment in the past can now attract jail time instead. Before the California realignment law, the crime of involuntary manslaughter attracted state imprisonment of two, three, or four years. Even if the crime is a felony, it carries a jail sentence instead of a prison sentence.
The court may allow you to serve part of your sentence in jail and serve the remaining sentence in a probation facility. While on probation, you would be under the mandatory supervision by the rightful county probation officer. The California realignment legislation greatly altered the California criminal justice system.
You may face civil charges for committing the crime of involuntary manslaughter. The relatives of the victim may file a wrongful death claim against you to seek justice for their loved ones. If the court finds you guilty of causing wrongful death, you may have to pay large sums of money. You may face penalties for wrongful death in addition to the criminal punishments and fines for involuntary manslaughter.
The crime of involuntary manslaughter may attract additional penalties under California law. For instance, you may lose some of your privileges, including the privilege to own a weapon. After the conviction of involuntary manslaughter, if you own, purchase, or possess a firearm, you may face additional felony charges under the California Penal Code 12021.
A conviction of involuntary manslaughter in California may also lead to the loss of state licenses you may currently hold. The state licensing agencies in California have the mandate to take away your licensing privileges after a conviction of a crime.
If you accidentally kill another person using a firearm or another dangerous and deadly weapon and the court finds you guilty of involuntary manslaughter, you may earn a strike on your record. The crime of involuntary manslaughter will be a strike on your record according to the California Three Strikes Law.
Federal Level and State Level Penalties and Sentencing
The crime of causing another person’s death due to reckless behavior or through the commission of another crime without intent to kill attracts lesser penalties than other forms of homicide. The same case applies in the sentencing for voluntary manslaughter and involuntary manslaughter. Voluntary manslaughter has harsher penalties than involuntary manslaughter under California law. The crime of involuntary manslaughter is a felony at both the federal and the state level. The penalties for the felony offense may include imprisonment, fines, and probation.
At the federal level, the sentence for involuntary manslaughter is a prison sentence. The period of imprisonment will vary depending on whether you committed the crime through an act of reckless conduct. If you commit involuntary manslaughter using a vehicle, the crime changes to vehicular manslaughter. Judges tend to use a certain level of discretion in cases involving involuntary manslaughter using an automobile.
The sentencing for involuntary manslaughter at the state level varies greatly from the sentencing at the federal level. This is even though states often get cues from federal courts when coming up with sentencing guidelines. Typically, the state gives a range of possible sentencing for a crime. The judges are then at liberty to use discretion in determining the suitable sentence for a particular crime.
When making a judgment for an involuntary manslaughter case, judges consider many factors, including aggravating and mitigating factors. These factors help judges to decide how harsh a sentence should be. The presence of aggravating factors will increase the severity of the crime. Some aggravating factors in an involuntary manslaughter case may include bad credit history and reckless behavior. On the other hand, mitigating factors help to reduce the severity of the crime. Mitigating factors in involuntary manslaughter charges may include accepting responsibility for the crime. A lack of criminal history may also serve as a mitigating factor in an involuntary manslaughter case.
Common Legal Defenses for Involuntary Manslaughter
If you are facing charges for involuntary manslaughter in California, you do not have to agree with everything the prosecutor states. Several legal defenses to the crime of involuntary manslaughter in California exist. An experienced attorney can present the defense strategies on your behalf. Some of the common defenses include:
Self Defense or Defense of Others
You may fight involuntary manslaughter charges by asserting that you were acting in self-defense or defense of another person. However, to use this mechanism, you have to prove in court that you believed that you or another person was in imminent danger of great bodily injury, or other dangers like murder, rape, and robbery. You must also prove that you believed that your immediate use of deadly force was necessary to prevent the inherent danger from occurring. It must be apparent that you did not use more force than was necessary under the circumstances to prevent the inherent danger from occurring. If you can prove all the elements of acting in self-defense or defense of another person, you can fight involuntary manslaughter charges.
Insufficient Evidence
You may fight involuntary manslaughter charges if the arresting officer does not have enough evidence against you. It is common for the police to make snap decisions regarding the deaths of victims. When the police present their case to the prosecutors, prosecutors often buy into the police’s story. An experienced attorney can challenge the evidence the arresting officer and the prosecutor has against you. Your attorney can conduct his/her investigations. For instance, the attorney may invest time and effort in interviewing witnesses. The attorney will also re-examine the evidence against you and identify any lapses. In some instances, attorneys consult with experienced independent forensic scientists to unveil what happened.
You Killed the Victim through an Accident
In some sense, all cases of involuntary manslaughter are accidents. The defendant often lacks the intention to kill the victim. If the defendant did not engage in any form of wrongdoing and did not act in criminal negligence, he/she may state that the victim died due to an accident.
To use the accident defense, you must be able to prove that you did not have a criminal intent to cause them harm. It must also be apparent that at the time of the crime, you did not act in criminal justice. You may also use this defense strategy if you were actively involved in lawful activity at the time of the accident.
False Accusation
It is common for people to accuse each other falsely. Therefore, another person may falsely accuse you of committing involuntary manslaughter while you are innocent. A person intending to take revenge against you may accuse you of involuntary manslaughter. At times, family members or friends of the victim may have taken part in the death of the victim. To minimize their role in the victim’s death, the family or friends of the deceased may accuse you falsely. Your lawyer has experience in handing manslaughter charges. An attorney understands the importance of technical details. These details come in handy in fighting involuntary manslaughter charges.
Related Offenses
Under California law, several offenses are related to the offense of involuntary manslaughter. The judge may charge you with the related offenses alongside the involuntary manslaughter offense. The judge may also charge you with the related offenses instead of involuntary manslaughter. Some of the related offenses include:
Voluntary Manslaughter
If you kill another person during a sudden quarrel or in the heat of passion, you may face charges for voluntary manslaughter. The California law PC 192a outlines the crime of voluntary manslaughter. Just like the name of the crime, voluntary manslaughter refers to intentional killing. You may face charges for this crime of you intentionally, or voluntary kill another person. However, this crime is often because of the strong emotions of the defendant. Therefore, the penalties are less severe than the penalties for murder.
However, the penalties for voluntary manslaughter are more severe than the penalties for involuntary manslaughter. The penalties include imprisonment in California state prison. The imprisonment period may range from three years, six years, or eleven years. You will also earn a penalty of getting a strike on your criminal record as outlined by the California three strikes law.
Murder
There is one major distinction between murder and manslaughter, the presence of malice aforethought. For a crime to qualify as murder, it must be evident that the defendant had the intent to kill. The California law PC 187 outlines the crime of murder. Under the felony-murder rule, if you accidentally kill a person while committing a dangerous felony, you will face murder charges instead of manslaughter, even if you had no intent to kill. The potential sentence for a murder conviction under California law is 15 years to life imprisonment. You may face the California death penalty if you commit special circumstances murder. A special circumstance murder may include killing a police officer, a witness, or killing a person for financial gain.
Vehicular Manslaughter
The crime of vehicular manslaughter is almost identical to the crime of voluntary manslaughter, but there is one main difference. A crime of vehicular manslaughter occurs when the defendant is operating a motor vehicle. If you commit vehicular manslaughter in gross negligence, you will face enhanced charges for gross vehicular manslaughter. Depending on the prosecutor’s discretion, a crime of vehicular manslaughter may attract misdemeanor or felony charges. The California law PC 192c outlines the crime of vehicular manslaughter.
Contact an Los Angeles Criminal Attorney near Me
The charges for involuntary manslaughter can be devastating. Without proper legal representation, you may face negative consequences. Van Nuys Criminal Attorney has many years of experience in assisting clients charged with involuntary manslaughter. Contact us at 818-484-1100 and speak to one of our attorneys today.
When someone loses his or her life, it’s not uncommon for an innocent person to be charged with manslaughter (or even murder) as a result, even when the death was an accident. And it’s also all too common for simple mistakes and, perhaps acts of ordinary negligence, to be exaggerated by prosecutors into gross negligence, recklessness, or even malicious intent.
If you have been charged with manslaughter in Los Angeles or anywhere in Southern California, OR if there is a police investigation against you and you fear you may soon be charged with manslaughter – do not hesitate to contact Leah Legal today for immediate assistance!
We at Leah Legal have an intricate understanding of California manslaughter and related laws, as well as extensive practical experience in successfully defending our clients against such charges in local L.A. Area courts. Contact us anytime 24/7 at 818-484-1100, and we will give you a free legal consultation and can quickly get started on your case!
How Is “Manslaughter” Defined Under California Law?
Most people have heard of the crime called manslaughter but may not know its exact legal distinction from the related crime of murder. In general, murder requires “malice aforethought,” which implies a strong degree of intentionality in the perpetrator. This could be “cold blooded” planning to kill, but it could also be a decision to engage in extremely reckless behavior likely to cause another person’s death, without showing any regard for that person’s safety or even “hoping” the reckless action might cause his/her death.
Additionally, if someone was killed as a result of the actions someone took while committing a felony, the prosecution will normally charge the defendant with murder rather than manslaughter – though that’s not an absolute rule, and a plea bargain down to manslaughter is often possible. Anytime a wrongful death is caused, which is not purely accidental in the sense that the defendant did nothing illegal or reckless to cause the death, it’s possible for murder or manslaughter to be charged, aside from any civil suit that may be filed. Anytime the state of mind of the defendant, or the circumstances (committing a felony), do not make it murder, manslaughter is likely to be charged instead.
Three Types of Manslaughter
In California, there is not only a distinction between manslaughter and murder, but there are in fact three types of manslaughter:
- Voluntary manslaughter
- Involuntary manslaughter
- Vehicular manslaughter
We will look at each these three classes of manslaughter below, along with the penalties and possible defense strategies for each charge.
Voluntary Manslaughter in California
Voluntary manslaughter is the “next step down” from a murder charge. It involves, as the name implies, a voluntary action that caused another person to die. Typically, voluntary manslaughter occurs during an intense argument or in some other tense, emotional situation – “in the heat of passion” or “in the heat of the moment.” A sudden outburst of anger when provoked, pressed, or stressed might result in an act intended to inflict bodily harm on someone else.
If there was a prior plan to hurt or kill the person, murder could be charged instead of voluntary manslaughter. If there was no intention at all to hurt anyone or commit an act likely to hurt someone, involuntary manslaughter might be charged. Voluntary manslaughter is the “middle ground” between murder and involuntary manslaughter.
Many people commit involuntary manslaughter, for example, after discovering their spouse committed adultery, in the heat of a lover’s quarrel, or during a fight or feud where both parties involved were combative. However, note that if enough time has elapsed between an act of provocation and the killing of another person, it would be considered premeditated and thus murder under California law.
California Penal Code Section 192 defines the three types of manslaughter, and Section 193 goes on to list the penalties.
Voluntary manslaughter is a felony. It is generally punishable by anywhere from 3 to 11 years in state prison.
The most common defenses used against a charge of voluntary manslaughter include:
- Self-defense. If there was an imminent threat of bodily harm or death and you used only reasonable and necessary force to prevent it, then it is self-defense and not manslaughter. This is true even if you only “reasonably thought” that the threat existed or that the force you used was necessary.
- Defense of others. The same rules that apply to self-defense also apply if you were defending someone else against an imminent threat of bodily harm.
- Involuntary intoxication. If someone else caused you to get drunk against your will, and that’s the only reason that you acted the way you did, a manslaughter charged can be defeated on that basis.
- Lack of mental capacity. If you were insane or incapable of understanding what you were doing, that also can defeat a manslaughter charge.
Involuntary Manslaughter in California
Involuntary manslaughter is a lesser crime than voluntary manslaughter, but it’s still a felony in California, punishable by 2 to 4 years in county jail OR in state prison and possibly a fine of up to $10,000.
Involuntary manslaughter lacks any intent to kill or to commit an act likely to kill another person. But it does involve committing an act that actually did lead to another person’s death: either while committing a non-felony crime (if a felony, murder would be charged), OR while committing an otherwise lawful act but without due caution.
Here are a few examples of where involuntary manslaughter might be charged:
- A man steals a bicycle and rides it recklessly down the sidewalk to get away before the owner spots him. He accidentally hits a pedestrian, who ultimately dies of the resulting injuries.
- A construction supervisor threatens to fire his whole crew if they don’t work despite a tornado warning and fierce winds and weather. They comply, and one of them dies when the storm strikes the construction site.
- A woman lets her dog run loose even though it has a history of attacking people. It attacks and kills a 5-year old boy at the park.
As you can see, involuntary manslaughter is a very serious offense, but does not rise to the level of voluntary manslaughter, much less murder.
Common defense strategies used against an involuntary murder charge include: Self-defense, Defense of others, Accidental killing with no reckless behavior, Lack of sufficient evidence, and False accusation.
Vehicular Manslaughter in California
When manslaughter is committed while operating a motor vehicle, it’s a distinct crime in California, handled under PC 192c. Specifically, if someone causes the death of another person while driving an automobile AND while committing some other non-felony crime OR while engaging in a lawful act in a dangerously negligent manner, then he/she is guilty of PC 192c Vehicular Manslaughter. Note that if a person causes the death of another person while driving a vehicle and while committing a felony crime, it would be charged as murder instead of vehicular manslaughter.
If vehicular manslaughter is committed by someone voluntarily under the influence of alcohol/drugs, then Vehicular Manslaughter While Intoxicated would be charged.
If gross negligence was involved, then it’s Vehicular Manslaughter with Gross Negligence. Gross negligence involves a misdemeanor, infraction, or an act that was dangerous given the situation. It goes beyond “ordinary negligence” and implies a more severe level of disregard for the lives and safety of others. Specifically, gross negligence means your actions were very likely to cause the death or bodily injury of others and you knew, or should have known, that that was the case.
If you commit both gross negligence and are under the influence of drugs/alcohol when you commit vehicular manslaughter, it will be charged as Gross Vehicular Manslaughter While Intoxicated.
Note that if the death of the victim is the direct, natural, or probable result of the defendant’s negligent acts, then he/she “caused” that death under California law, for the purposes of a Vehicular Manslaughter charge. And even being a substantial causative factor is enough to result in a conviction – it doesn’t necessarily have to have been the only cause.
Possible Penalties for Vehicular Manslaughter
PC 192 Vehicular Manslaughter with ordinary negligence is a misdemeanor, punishable by a year in county jail, a $1,000 fine, and summary probation. The same punishment could apply if vehicular manslaughter with gross negligence is charged as a misdemeanor. But, vehicular manslaughter with gross negligence as a felony is punishable by 2 to 6 years in state prison, a fine of up to $10,000, and formal probation.
Vehicular manslaughter for financial gain (such as in insurance fraud schemes) is a felony, punishable by 4 to 10 years in prison and a $10,000 fine. Anyone convicted of vehicular manslaughter with gross negligence OR for financial gain will have their license revoked for a minimum of three years.
Vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated can be a felony or a misdemeanor, depending on the circumstances of each case and the defendant’s past criminal record (if any.) As a misdemeanor, it is punishable by up to 12 months in county jail; as a felony, it can be punished by 16 months, 2 years, or 3 years in state prison.
Gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated is a felony, punishable by 4 to 10 years in state prison.
What About “Watson Murder?”
It is possible for a DUI-caused death to be prosecuted as murder instead of vehicular manslaughter in some cases. You can be charged with DUI murder or “Watson Murder” as it’s often called, if:
- You caused the death of another person while driving a motor vehicle.
- You were under the influence of drugs or alcohol at the time.
- It was not your first DUI offense.
- You were duly informed of the danger DUIs pose to others on the road and/or you were given the Watson Warning to that effect around the time of a previous DUI conviction.
However, it is not true that everyone who causes the death of another person while intoxicated can be prosecuted for murder. Watson Murder is a specific offense that requires additional elements of the crime to be proved beyond all doubt, as compared to the crime of vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated.
Common Defense Strategies Against Vehicular Manslaughter
At Leah Legal, we use a variety of defense strategies against the charge of vehicular manslaughter. The exact defense used will vary based on which type of vehicular manslaughter is being charged and based on the details of the case.
Here are a few of our most commonly used defenses against this charge:
- Lack of Negligence.
Mistakes happen, and decisions made while driving that seemed right at the time might end up causing an accident and a death. That doesn’t necessarily equal “negligence.” And without negligence, it’s not vehicular manslaughter (unless a crime was being committed at the time by the defendant) – it’s just an accident.
- Lack of Gross Negligence
In some cases, negligence may have existed, but the prosecution may wrongly try to exaggerate it into “gross negligence.” Defeating that attempt can greatly reduce the charge/sentence.
- Lack of Causality
Even if, in fact you were negligent (or grossly negligent) while driving, unless that negligence can be shown to have caused the death of the victim, it’s not manslaughter. It might be an accident merely, or it might even have been someone else’s act of negligence that caused the death.
- Sudden, Unexpected Emergency
If you were suddenly faced with an unanticipated emergency and acted reasonably under the circumstances, it is not negligence nor is it vehicular manslaughter in California.
Contact Us Today for Immediate Assistance!
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we have deep experience in defending against all manner of California manslaughter charges, as well as related charges like first or second degree murder or vehicular homicide. We consistently strive to win the best possible outcome for our clients, be that a dismissal, acquittal, or a reduced charged/sentence. We will know how to build you a solid defense and win your case!
Contact our Los Angeles criminal attorney anytime 24/7/365 by calling 818-484-1100 for a free, no obligation consultation and quick attention to your case!
In a court of law, murder requires an unlawful action that was intentional and resulted in the death of a person. Murder charges can be placed in the killing was intentional and premeditated or unintentional and not premeditated. Homicide laws make a clear distinction and provide different degrees of punishments between premeditated and unpremeditated actions that result in the death of another person. The specific details of the killing allow the judge to charge an individual with varying ‘degrees of murder’ and if the death resulted from self-defense, the killing will be acknowledged as lawful. For example, if a robber enters your home, he is illegally on your property and death that results if the homeowner decides to take action, will not be considered illegal in most states. In the earlier case, deaths that result from ‘malice’ or premeditated action will be charged with either first or second-degree murder in 47 states. The other three states add an additional 3rd-degree murder and it describes different punishments that are lesser than the first two.
In most states, first-degree murders require that the killing was intentional, malicious, and/or premeditated. In addition, the 47 states with the exception of Pennsylvania, Minnesota, and Florida, ‘felony murders’ or murders that resulted from a felony crime, are considered first-degree murders. In the state of Pennsylvania, Minnesota, and Florida, ‘felony murders’ are charged with third-degree murders that can hold a sentence of up to 40 years. First-degree murders can result in the death penalty which is why some states make a separate category ‘third degree’ to charge deaths that were not necessarily intentional.
Murder is a crime that falls under the homicide laws that address the actions of an individual when his or her actions result in a death. The different courts will either rule a first-degree murder, second-degree murder, and a voluntary or involuntary manslaughter. The first two charges hold the highest legal repercussions while voluntary and involuntary manslaughter are less impactful. The court may also rule that the homicide was justifiable in which case the court has decided that the actions that led to a death were out of self-defense.
The distinct laws that guide different courts across the United States, requires the attention of a specialized local attorney. Every state defines murder in their own terms and provides different punishments when presented with the various factors of a case. Courts can punish an individual with a lifetime in prison while in other cases, it may provide parole options for individuals that committed a second or third-degree murder.
Knowing the specific details of the laws that guide murder may be the difference between receiving a lifetime in prison or a lesser punishment. Individuals who are entering a courtroom will need to understand that the judge is there to provide a verdict based on the evidence and facts of each side. To have a fair verdict, individuals facing murder charges, are encouraged to speak with a local state attorney that is capable of representing their case in a court of law. If you are in the California area, we invite you to contact Leah Legal at 818-484-1100. We are ready to provide a clear assessment of your case, guidance, and representation in a United States courtroom.
Key Terms in Murder Cases
Whether you are looking to learn more about the murder laws in the United States or if you are involved in a murder case, you will want to have a clear understanding of the common terminology that accompanies most cases. While the following will provide an understanding of the common terms, it is up to a lawyer to explain how these terms apply to your case. To have a clear understanding of your case, you are encouraged to speak with a state attorney today. The first three terms are highly related to first and second-degree murder cases.
What is intent?
The intent is what differentiates a murder from a manslaughter. Intentional murder entails that the perpetrator has knowingly or purposely killed an individual out of their own recklessness. In some courts, intentional murder is also a murder that occurs as a result of irresponsible or reckless behavior. Intentional murders will usually be treated with first-degree murder charges. Individuals who knowingly and purposely kill another person will be charged with the highest degree of punishments.
What is “malice”?
Malice is when an individual wants the death of another person and therefore takes actions that are considered implied or expressed. Expressed malice is when that actions that lead to a death were done so with a purpose; of course, the purpose being the death of another individual. Implied malice is when the death results from reckless and conscious actions. Intending to cause ‘bodily harm’ to another individual is known as implied malice.
Ex: If Tom bats someone on the head just for the sake of murdering someone, the court will see his actions as intentional. Tom’s actions were out of malice and can be charged with serious penalties if the victim dies or is hospitalized.
What is premeditated murder?
Premeditated murder is a murder that happens after an individual has planned an attack on someone to end their life. For a premeditated murder charge, the accusing party will need to prove that the murder was planned out for a certain amount of time. The time between the planning and the killing can be the difference between minutes to days and months. In the event that an individual “second guesses” and acts outside of the heat of the moment, the killing will be considered to be premeditated. Premeditated murders require planning and conscious thinking. Premeditated murder cases are intentional and will, therefore, be treated with first degree charges.
For example, if Tom finds his wife Toodles, fiddling in bed with another man, he may decide to take action or to file a divorce. If divorce is not an option for Tom and he decides to take action while in the presence of Toodles and the other man, Tom may be charged with ‘voluntary manslaughter’ for acting out of rage. In another instance, if Tom leaves the house in a fury and returns with a shotgun and kills the man that slept with his wife, he will be charged with a first-degree murder. In the latter case, Tom premeditated his actions and knowingly chased a victim after he caught his wife in bed. The difference between premeditated murder and manslaughter is that the first requires that the murderer takes place after a conscious decision. The latter is a result of engaging in the heat of the moment.
What is felony murder?
A felony murder is charged when an individual commits a felony such as burning a building, and his or her actions result in the death of a bystander. The individual that violate the law and whose actions result in death may be charged with a first-degree murder. In most states, a felony murder can be charged with a lifetime in prison or the death penalty. However, the case results in lesser punishments for individuals who indirectly kill an individual because of his or her actions. In states like Pennsylvania, Minnesota, and Florida, felony murders are treated as a third-degree offense and do not hold the option for the death penalty or for a lifetime in prison. In any case, the judge will take into account the specific details in each account and will determine the appropriate measures. Individuals charged with a felony murder are looking at up to 40 years to a lifetime in prison depending on the gravity of the situation.
Degrees of Murder
When a judge decides between first and second-degree murder or between voluntary and involuntary manslaughter (all of which hold different degrees of punishments), the judge will consider all the factors that belong to the situation. 1) A judge will consider the actions of the individual: was the individual acting recklessly? Was the individual acting with intent? Was the act premeditated? Was the individual acting with a disregard for life? 2) the number of victims involves. 3) other crimes that occurred (if any). The following section will discuss the differences between the varying degrees of murder charges.
First-degree murder
A judge may rule the first-degree murder if the killing of another person was the result of an intentional premeditated plan. In addition, a judge will rule a first-degree murder charge if the death of another person was the result of a felony as with a felony murder.
Ex: Johnny goes to a grocery store and upon taking the money from the register, he shoots the clerk. Johnny will be charged with first-degree murder for intentionally killing another individual. More so, Johnny will face additional charges for burglary.
Ex: Johnny gets into a heated argument with his coworker. Upon leaving work, Johnny follows his coworker home and shoots him when he gets the chance. Johnny has had enough time to think clearly from the heated argument and has chosen or premeditated a plan to kill his coworker. Johnny will be charged with first-degree murder.
Second-degree murder
Individuals may be charged with a second-degree murder if their actions were not premeditated or if their reckless behavior resulted in a death. Individuals who are charged with a second-degree murder committed a killing that was unplanned. The law explains that a killing can be intentional and unplanned if it occurred while in the heat of the moment. In addition, a judge can order a second-degree murder instead of a first-degree murder charge for certain deaths that result from reckless activities.
Ex: Johnny is in a dispute with his neighbor over an overarching tree. Johnny addresses the situation with his neighbor one day and during the process, they begin to fight. Johnny ends up killing his neighbor. Johnny would more than likely be charged with second-degree murder for killing his neighbor in consideration of the bad blood that existed between them.
Voluntary and Involuntary Manslaughter
Voluntary Manslaughter
Voluntary manslaughter can be ruled when an individual commits a crime of passion that was caused by his or her emotional or mental state. Killings that are not premeditated and hold no malice are treated with lesser punishments given that there was no initial intent for a ‘reasonable’ person to engage in a murder. Voluntary manslaughter can include deaths that arise from bar fights or from deaths that arise from infidelity.
Ex: Johnny is drinking at a bar with a couple of coworkers. Johnny has one too many beers and starts fighting with his buddies who are also drunk. Johnny pulls out a knife and kills his coworker over a football dispute. Johnny would be charged with second-degree murder because his actions were not premeditated. In some courts, Johnny would be punished with manslaughter which holds a lighter punishment.
Involuntary Manslaughter
Involuntary manslaughter is when individuals commit a crime such as driving while under the influence, and their actions result in the death of another person. In such cases, individuals can be punished with lesser penalties if they can prove that their actions were unintentional. However, if the individual who’s DUI resulted in the death of one or more person, he or she may be charged with a first-degree murder.
Ex: Johnny is driving back home from a long night at a bar. On his way home, he runs over and kills a pedestrian. Johnny reckless behavior can be charged with an involuntary manslaughter since his actions were not out of malice or intentional.
Murder is a very serious offence that can hold different types of penalties depending on the factors of the case. Murder is an aspect of homicide which addresses the death caused by the actions of another person. Homicide laws hold varying degrees of penalties and fines that arise when a person is killed. In some cases, the killing of another person can be seen as self-defense in which case the individual cannot be charged with homicide. To learn the specifics about your case and to learn how the case will hold up in a court of law, you are encouraged to speak with a local attorney. Van Nuys Criminal Attorney offices may be contacted at 818-582-2350. We are ready to represent your case and provide legal guidance in every step of the way.
Just like murder, manslaughter is also a homicide as it is an unlawful killing of a human being, but it is still considered a lesser crime than murder. Voluntary manslaughter depends on the nature of the incident that caused the death of the other individual. You cannot plead down murder to voluntary manslaughter if you take someone’s life while committing another serious offense such as robbery with violence. Voluntary manslaughter is rarely charged as an original charge as one is first accused of murder. Get in touch with us at the Leah Legal, and our experienced Los Angeles criminal defense attorneys can help secure a favorable deal for you by proving your innocence or negotiating a plea on your behalf.
California’s Law on Voluntary Manslaughter
PC 192 defines voluntary manslaughter is generally defined as the intentional taking of another person’s life without deliberation, premeditation, or malice aforethought. This means that voluntary manslaughter occurs when an individual takes the life of another person after an adequate provocation, which could have incited a normal person to unexpected and intense passion. Even though the defendant may have decided to kill the victim, it can still be charged as voluntary manslaughter, but not if it was premeditated.
Once you intentionally take the life of an individual or consciously disregard human lives, you can either be charged with murder or voluntary manslaughter. The proof of acting with deliberate malice is what separates the two. Malice aforethought is applied when one acts with the intention of taking someone’s life or deliberately neglecting human life.
Elements of Provocation
A charge of voluntary manslaughter needs the provision of evidence that the provocation would be enough to emotionally challenge a normal person in similar circumstances. Voluntary manslaughter is the most common charge in cases that involve uncontrollable emotion or unexpected quarrels leading to death. For this to apply, there has to be the element of provocation. The provocation should have caused the defendant to act with an aggravated passion that clouded his or her judgment. The provocation should be enough to show that a reasonable person would have acted in the manner from emotions and not judgment.
The killing should have taken place within a sensible period after the provocation to prove that the defendant did not have time to cool off. If the difference in time between the event you get provoked and the act of killing is more than enough to have you cool down and come to your senses, then you will most likely face murder charges. In California, there are no set criteria to establish sufficient provocation, but it can not be remote or slight.
The following cases have in the past reduced from homicide to a voluntary manslaughter conviction as it was determined that there was sufficient provocation:
- An individual took someone’s life when a group of young people trespassed into his property with weapons and had hostile intent. The mob destroyed the defendant’s property and challenged him to a fight. The court determined that there was sufficient provocation as the defendant feared for his life, and in the moment of panicking, he fired some random shots to frighten the mob.
- In a previous case, the defendant physically assaulted and killed a suspect in his brother’s case just a few hours after getting information on the alleged murderer. The court concluded that the defendant acted with uncontrolled emotions as witnesses acknowledged he was extremely distressed when confronting the murder suspect.
In the following cases, the court determined the provocation was insufficient to reduce a murder case to a voluntary manslaughter charge:
- The court concluded that smirking, name-calling, and taunting no matter how offensive would not cause a reasonable person to kill.
- In a previous case, the defendant killed an individual for molesting his daughter, but the act of killing in retaliation happened two days following the molestation. The court determined that it was enough time for the defendant to cool off, and his judgment was not clouded.
- Killing someone while taking part in another crime does not establish sufficient provocation even if the victim was resisting.
Possible Defenses to a Voluntary Manslaughter Charge
An experienced criminal defense attorney can present the following defenses to voluntary manslaughter while representing you:
Imperfect Defense or Self-Defense
Imperfect self-defense happens when a person truly believes that fatal self-defense is justified under the circumstances, but that belief is regarded as unreasonable. Had the self-defense been proportional and reasonable, the killing would have been justified. Under California law, one is permitted to use force in defense of other people or self-defense when a person believes that oneself or another is in inevitable danger, force is necessary to stop the threat, and uses an appropriate level of force in defense. This, however, does not free you from conviction, but it acts as a mitigating factor and can reduce the charges filed against you.
In California, self-defense is justified if you kill another person while trying to defend yourself or some other individual from suffering severe bodily injury, getting killed or being robbed, raped, maimed, or other atrocious crime.
For murder to be excusable or justifiable on account of the defense of another person or self-defense, you must have reasonably thought that you, or other people, were at the risk of getting killed or physically assaulted immediately.
In other words, if you honestly believe that someone is deliberating on killing or harming you in the future, you cannot kill them to keep that from happening and still claim the legal defense of justifiable homicide.
Insanity
The defense of insanity in California law means that one cannot be found guilty of an offense if they were legally insane when they committed the crime. Under California’s insanity defense, you are only considered legally insane if you either did not comprehend the characterization of your act or did not understand that whatever you were doing was morally unacceptable. If your mental state meets the M’Naghten test, it does not matter whether it was a temporary or a permanent condition, or if it lasted for only a few hours.
Accident
In cases of misfortune or accident, California criminal law excuses your conduct. This means that if you did not have the intention of harming, you were not neglectful, and you were engaged in legal conduct at the event of the accident, then you should be absolved of any criminal liability.
If death is genuinely an accident, despite the fact that it involves uncontrollable emotion and there is sufficient provocation, the accidental nature completely frees you of criminal liability.
Voluntary Manslaughter Used as a Defense in a Murder Case
It is essential to realize that the offense of voluntary manslaughter can also be a defense in California murder cases.
Your lawyer will have to establish the following if you were initially charged with murder so your charge can be reduced to voluntary manslaughter:
- You had a reasonable incitement of fear or anger as you were provoked, causing you to act under the influence of intense emotion.
- There was insufficient time between provocation and the killing for a reasonable person to calm down.
Sentencing, Penalties, and Punishment
If found guilty of violating PC 192 California’s laws on voluntary manslaughter, you face 3, 6, or 11 years in state prison. In comparison, the punishment for committing PC 187 murder is at least 15 years but can extend to a life sentence and could also result in a death penalty.
The Voluntary manslaughter sentence could also result in the following penalties and punishment:
- A possible strike sentence on your criminal record in accordance with California’s laws on three strikes which might increase your punishment if you had any prior offenses or any felonies you are convicted for in the future,
- A fine not more than $10,000,
- The loss or reduction of your right to possess or own a firearm in accordance with PC 29800 California’s laws on convict with a gun,
- Community restitution or labor services,
- Counseling services including anger management programs, and
- Other conditions set by the court for your rehabilitation.
A judge can take into consideration aggravating and mitigating factors while determining the punishment for a manslaughter sentence. Mitigating factors, more often than not, reduce a sentence. The factors may show that you in no way pose a significant risk to the safety of the public. Usual mitigating factors include your age, lack of a criminal record, admitting responsibility for the offense, or mental capacity.
Aggravating factors most likely increase the severity of a criminal conviction. Courts will often take into consideration factors such as your criminal record, the facts, and the nature of the crime and the vulnerability of the victim.
Offenses Related to Voluntary Manslaughter
The following are some offenses related to California’s laws on voluntary manslaughter as they also involve the unlawful taking of life:
Murder
PC 187 California’s laws on murder and voluntary manslaughter are alike as both offenses involve the intention of taking someone’s life. The difference is that in murder, the presence of malice is required, which means a deliberate and voluntary disregard for other people’s lives while voluntary manslaughter cases do not.
Although one cannot be charged with more than one homicide for a single crime, a murder charge might be reduced to voluntary manslaughter if there is sufficient evidence of being provoked in a barely emotionally controllable situation.
Attempted Murder
California’s laws on attempted murder are relevant when you perform one or more direct but inefficient act towards taking someone’s life or killing an unborn child, with the intent to kill.
The intent is a required element for an attempted murder charge. For this element to be met, an individual must have made the decision to kill another person, or acted in a way where killing another person was a real possibility based on their reckless actions. In some cases, intent can be a difficult element to prove, and lack of intent is a common defense to attempted murder charges.
California’s laws on voluntary manslaughter allow an attempted murder charge to be reduced to attempted manslaughter if your attorney can provide evidence that you had the intention of killing but without malice aforethought.
Involuntary Manslaughter
You can also be charged with PC 192(b) California’s laws on involuntary manslaughter when you kill someone without malice, with no intention of killing, and without consciously disregarding an individual’s life. Involuntary manslaughter applies to the violation of a misdemeanor only if the misdemeanor legislative act was designed to protect people, or the defendant broke the law in a way that shows neglecting and ignoring the safety of people.
Involuntary manslaughter is different from killing a person by accident as you are participating in either:
- An unlawful act considered a misdemeanor, or
- A legal act with a high risk of severe bodily injury or death where you act without caution.
The accidental killing of a person only applies if you are in no way breaking laws at the moment of the incident.
If found guilty of involuntary manslaughter in California, you may be sentenced to 2, 3, or 4 years in jail. Similarly to voluntary manslaughter, a charge of involuntary manslaughter could be brought by the prosecuting attorney as a lesser crime, along with other related charges.
Vehicular Manslaughter
California’s laws on vehicular manslaughter are relevant to scenarios where a motorist drives:
- In an unlawful manner considered a misdemeanor, with evident negligence, during a legal act which could illegally result in death, or
- Deliberately be the cause of the vehicle casualty for financial benefits, which also can be an infringement of California’s laws on car insurance fraud.
You are guilty of PC 191.5(b) vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated if your action was out of ordinary carelessness (here, you did not use reasonable caution to prevent predictable injury or death to a person). You behave carelessly when you do either of the following:
- Performing something that a normal and sensible person would not do in a similar circumstance, or
- Failing to carry out an activity that a prudent individual would do in a similar case.
Vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated charges can only stick if your careless conduct causes a person’s death.
Under Penal Code 191.5(b), to be convicted of vehicular manslaughter, the death must be a natural, direct, and probable result of your actions.
Vehicular manslaughter is considered a wobbler meaning prosecuting attorneys can charge the case as either a felony or a misdemeanor. If found guilty of a felony charge of vehicular manslaughter in California, you may be sentenced to a minimum of 2 years and a maximum of 10 years in state prison. Also, if found guilty of a misdemeanor charge of vehicular manslaughter in California, you may receive a jail term of not more than one year.
DUI Manslaughter
If the motorist were accused of concurrently violating California’s laws on DUI, the prosecuting attorney would likely file a case either on:
- PC 191.5 California’s laws on negligent vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated. Under California PC 191.5, the crime of vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated occurs when a defendant both commits a California DUI and engages in some additional negligent behavior while driving, and as a result, another person is killed.
- PC 191.5 California’s laws on gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated: Gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated under P C 191.5(a) occurs when a defendant commits both California DUI and a grossly negligent act, and as a result, another person is killed.
- 2nd degree DUI murder, which is also referred to as Watson murder.
Prosecuting attorneys are likely to charge you with a case of Watson murder if you face consistent charges with DUI and kill an individual while intoxicated. For those aware of the Watson advisement when being convicted, they are most likely to be charged with DUI manslaughter as they have knowledge of the risks of driving while intoxicated.
The Watson warning states that it is exceedingly risky to human lives to operate a vehicle while intoxicated. It also clearly warns that if you end someone’s life while intoxicated, California prosecuting attorneys may file a murder case against you.
The difference between this offense and a 1st-degree murder charge is that for a 2nd degree DUI murder case, the intention of killing a person cannot be shown. If found guilty, you may face a similar punishment imposed in relation to a 2nd-degree murder conviction, that is, a minimum of 15 years up to a maximum life sentence in the California state prison.
Contact a Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
Facing a voluntary murder charge can be extremely difficult as you might be uncertain on how to proceed, that is why we are here to evaluate the facts of your case and figure out applicable defenses. Get in touch with us at the Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, and our experienced criminal defense lawyers can provide tenacious representation throughout your case and fight hard for your freedom. We represent clients in Los Angeles, so call us today at 818-484-1100, and we can help you resume your life by proving your innocence or dismissal of the charges.
Aiding suicide attracts severe penalties in California. Anyone accused of this crime can end up serving three years in the State Prison and a huge fine. Hence, it is recommendable to seek professional legal services to have your case dismissed or reduced by the court. Leah Legal’s years of experience provide an opportunity to offer the best legal services to anyone prosecuted of aiding suicide in Van Nuys.
Definition and Elements of the Crime
Anything to do with aiding suicide is prosecuted and convicted under California Penal Code Section 401. For a prosecutor to successfully charge someone with assisted suicide, he or she should prove that a person committed or attempted suicide. The prosecutor should also show that the defendant deliberately helped, advised, or encouraged the person to do so.
In a situation where the person helps someone in suicide but fails to achieve the intended results, the aiding party is not guilty of PC 401. In such a case, one will be charged with attempted crimes under Penal Code 664.
Based on such an argument, different questions arise in this statute. These questions include:
- If suicide is a crime
- mercy killings
- the End of Life Option Act
- The difference between aiding someone suicide and murder
Suicide as a Crime in California
Committing suicide is not a Californian crime. However, there are situations when a person can be charged under this statute during a failed suicide attempt. This is common when there is a suicide pact. A suicide pact is considered when two or more people concur to kill themselves, and there is one mean for both parties to die.
An example of a suicide pact includes two people agreeing to commit suicide by driving a vehicle off a cliff or two people committing suicide by carbon monoxide poisoning.
In both situations, one party will be guilty of assisted suicide due to the suicide pact if he or she survives the attempt while the other party dies.
Mercy Killings
Mercy killings can be defined as taking someone else’s life as a way of fulfilling their wish. This action is usually performed when one decides to take a large painkilling drug dose. It is a crime to commit mercy killing in California. It is considered as euthanasia and applies in all the fifty states.
End of Life Option Statute
The End of Life Option statute is a physician-assisted dying law that applies in California, which came into effect in 2006. According to this statute, patients may request life-ending medications through a physician’s prescription.
The law only allows a physician to prescribe the medications. If a physician gives the drug to the person, this would be considered a criminal act of euthanasia.
If a person intends to commit suicide under this statute, he or she must fulfill the following requirements.
- Must be a Californian residence with a minimum of eighteen years
- Must have an irreversible disease that will lead to death within six months based on a sound medical judgment
- Must be able to make the medical decision all alone and must request an aid-in-dying drug
- Should be able to administer the medication by himself or herself.
Meaning of Aiding, Encouraging or Advising Suicide
When one is accused of encouraging, aiding, or advising suicide, he or she probably counseled, persuaded, or recommended the person to commit suicide. It also means that the defendant provided the person with the necessary knowledge, tools, lethal doses of drugs, with the carnal knowledge that they will be used to commit suicide.
Comparison between Assisted Suicide and Murder
Assisting or encouraging suicide is different from murder. The difference arises from the active or passive role that a defendant took in committing the crime. For instance, if you furnished the means that another person would die, this becomes a passive role and will make you guilty of Penal Code 401.
However, if you participated in causing the demise of another person, then this is considered as an active role and will put guilty of murder.
Penalties for Aiding a Suicide in California
Violating Penal Code 401 is a felony in California. The crime is punishable by State Prison custody for a maximum of three years, a fine of up to $10,000, or both penalties.
The judge can also award you with a formal or felony probation in place of your prison term.
Formal or Felony Probation
Felony probation can be defined as an alternative for prison sentencing in California. It provides an opportunity for felons to serve their part of the sentence out of custody under a probation officer’s supervision. Since anyone convicted for aiding suicide is eligible for felony probation, it is necessary to know about this kind of probation and how it works.
When someone is on probation, he or she should follow certain conditions. Common felony probation conditions that are imposed on felons include:
- Meeting with the probation officer
- Performance in a community service
- Agreeing to submit to police searches
- Agreeing not to violate any laws
The above-stated conditions are just a few examples that the judge can consider. There are other types of requirements that might be imposed on you if the judge finds them reasonable and logically related to the offense you commit.
If you violate any terms imposed on you, the court will consider holding a probation violation hearing. During the trial, the court can decide to warn you and reinstate the probation condition, include harsher conditions or revoke the probation. If your probation is canceled, you will have to spend your time in the state prison.
Legal Defenses for Violating California Penal Code 401
Once you hire an attorney, it means that he or she should prepare legal defenses against your accusations. A professional attorney should use legal arguments that are relevant to the allegations at hand and have high chances of helping in winning the case. Here are some of the legal defenses that your attorney should consider.
False Accusation
A false accusation can be a suitable legal defense if you can prove that you are not guilty of aiding a suicide committed by someone. False accusation usually results from mistaken identity, official misconduct, misrecollection, and malicious false allegation. In such a situation, your attorney should file for a pre-file investigation to determine whether the alleged accusation is false or true. If the investigation can accurately conclude that you were falsely accused, your charges will be dropped.
Lack of Deliberate Intent
Under Penal Code 401, you should deliberately aid, encourage, or advise someone to commit suicide to be guilty of the accusation. The term knowingly means that you specifically intended to do something.
However, if you did not intend to assist the other person into suicide, you can use your situation as a defense. For instance, if you accidentally caused someone to take his or her life, this does not imply that you aided him or her to commit suicide, making a good defense for your accusations.
No Intent by the Person who Committed Suicide
For the prosecutor to prove guilt for an attempt or committing suicide, he or she must prove that a person undertook the action. However, if there is no proof that the person had attempted suicide, you cannot be prosecuted under this statute. Such instances are common when you provide information on how to take a life, and the recipient decides to use them without your knowledge.
Mere Suicide Discussions
Mere talking with someone about suicide cannot be considered as a crime. You might be prompted to discuss suicide with someone only to find out that the person took the information and committed suicide. However, if you encouraged and provided the necessary tools to do so, you will be guilty of the offense.
Actions were Per the End of Life Option Statute
If you are a doctor, you might be charged under this statute if you prescribe life-ending medications and help the patient take the pills. However, if you employ all the requirements needed in this statute, you will be innocent of these accusations.
Alibi
Alibi can be defined as demonstrating that you were in a different place from the scene of the crime. It is easy for a defendant to use this defense without giving up your constitutional right to remain silent. You might rely on witnesses or pieces of evidence to demonstrate that you were in a different location, but it would be easy to testify it by yourself.
You can use different ways to prove your absence from the scene of the crime. This includes using evidence such as receipts, debit card information, surveillance footage, and other methods to prove your innocence.
Coercion
Coercion involves the use of threats and violence to intimidate someone into a particular behavior. In this case, you might be forced by another person to aid someone to take life as a way to get back on him or her. While using coercion as a legal defense, you have the burden of proving that there were threats for death or bodily injury, a reasonable fear to execute a threat, and there was no reasonable opportunity to avoid it. Once you have proved these elements of coercion, you might prompt the court to dismiss your case.
Police Misconduct
There are different ways you can prove police misconduct. Typical forms of police misconduct include false arrest, committing perjury, unlawful detention, excessive force, racial profiling. If you can manage to associate your conviction for aiding suicide to any of the stated police misconducts, you can have your case dismissed by the court. It is complicated to prove any form of police misconduct, but with the help of a professional attorney, it is easy to handle the case.
Involuntary Intoxication
Intoxication is a long shot towards disapproving your sentence in court, but it can be successful when well presented. In most cases, involuntary intoxication is the best approach in this kind of legal argument. All you need to prove is that your actions to aid someone into suicide was done out of involuntary intoxication. The basis of your intoxication can be someone trying to get back to you by ensuring that you help someone commit suicide.
Violation of your Constitutional Rights
The Miranda warning should be spoken during your arrest. A police officer or other official must tell you the full Miranda warning to warn you about your rights and not to say anything that implies that you are guilty. The Miranda warning provides the following rights to an arrestee.
- The right to remain silent
- Anything that you said will be used against in court
- The right to an attorney
- Appointment of an attorney if you cannot afford one
This means that you are not required to speak to the police officer, but you can request for an attorney. If the police officer violates the Miranda warning requirements, the evidence collected during your arrest might not be relevant. Please note, this does not entirely mean that your case will be dismissed in court.
Another instance that officers might violate your constitutional rights is by conducting an unlawful search and seizure in your property. In this case, the investigation team is usually involved in a property search without a search warrant. If the prosecution team presents evidence obtained through the unlawful search and seizure, it might be inadmissible in court.
Although unwarranted search and seizure are considered unlawful, a police officer is allowed to search your property without the warrant when there is suspicion of destroying evidence.
Crimes Related to California Penal Code 401
Several crimes are related to California Penal Code 401. These crimes are either convicted along with the statute or share the same prosecution principals. Here are some of the crimes associated with aiding suicide in California.
Murder: California Penal Code 187
Penal Code 187 is the statute that explains everything related to murder in California. Murder is defined as the unlawful killing of a human being or a fetus with malice afterthought. Malice afterthoughts imply that the murderer has wanton disregard of human life and did the action with the carnal knowledge that it will lead to death.
Murder can be convicted as first or second-degree. In a first degree, murder carries a sentence for twenty-five years to life imprisonment in the State prison. A first degree is accused when the murder is achieved through a destructive device, using weapons of mass destruction, lying in wait, and torture. One can also be charged with first-degree murder if the murder was done willfully, deliberately, and premeditated. Finally, one can be accused of first-degree murder if it was done in the course of committing a serious California felony.
Other forms of murder are referred to as second-degree and generally carries a fifteen-years to a life sentence in the state prison.
Attempted Murder: California Penal Code 664/187
Under Penal Code 664/187, attempted murder can be defined as an intention to kill someone by taking a direct step towards achieving your aim, but failed to kill the victim. Similar to murder, attempted murder is divided into first and second-degree. Attempted first-degree murder involves a premeditated and willful intention to kill someone, while second-degree attempted murder involves any other form of attempted murder.
If you are accused of attempted first-degree murder, you will face a life sentence in state prison. If you are convicted for attempted second-degree murder, you will be punished by State imprisonment for five, seven, or nine years.
Voluntary Manslaughter: California Penal Code 192(a)
Under California Penal Code 192(a), you can be accused of voluntary manslaughter if you kill someone during a sudden quarrel, during a heat of passion, and based on an honest but unreasonable notion that you needed to defend yourself.
This is a lesser offense compared to murder, and most attorneys try to have their murder charges reduced to it. A conviction carries a maximum of 11 years in State prison, which is lesser than the life, twenty-five, or fifteen years imposed for murder.
Solicitation: California Penal Code 653(f)
Penal Code 653(f) makes it an offense to solicit someone into committing a California criminal offense. Under the statute, one is guilty of the crime if the following elements are correct.
- You request another person to commit a crime which falls under the California criminal solicitation law
- You had the intention to have the crime committed
- The other person receives the information containing the request to commit a crime
The kind of penalties that result from solicitation depends on the crime that one commits. Since murder is quite closer to aiding a suicide, the potential sentence that follows include three, six, or nine years in state prison, a maximum fine of $10,000, or both.
Investigation for Aiding a Suicide Conviction
If you are accused of aiding suicide, there has been an investigation, and the results consider you the perpetrator. During the investigation, the primary tools used by police are interviews, interrogations, and collection of physical evidence. Here is a basic procedure that police investigation will take place in your allegation for aiding a suicide.
Investigations at the Crime Scenes
Since alleging that someone aided a suicide is a passive action, the police officer might consider investigating the scene of the crime to collect relevant evidence. The evidence will gather the evidence by interviewing all potential witnesses at the scene, taking pictures, and taking forensic evidence. The investigation team might also make general observations and check for any connection to the crime.
At this time, the police should obey the Fourth Amendment rules that expect them to have a search warrant for your home.
Interviewing Witnesses
When the police officers are interviewing witnesses, they are trying to establish different facts about your case by figuring out what happened and whether you are responsible. Often, they will interview every witness separately to identify everyone’s recollection of the event.
The police will consider someone with personal knowledge of the crime. This means that one should have been directly involved with you while aiding someone to commit suicide. The police will then carefully document the officers’ statements to ensure that it is available for the prosecutor.
Law Enforcement Observation
One of the critical components of a criminal investigation is observing the scene of the crime. Police officers are trained to observe and notice any details that might indicate your aiding of suicide. One of the aspects that shows your criminal involvement is acting suspiciously once the officers start to interrogate you or are within your presence.
Physical and Forensic Evidence
The investigation team also collects physical evidence at the scene of the crime. This includes photographs, blood samples, fingerprints, and measurements that associate you with the crime. The team collects the evidence with gloves to preserve the prints that might show your relations to the crime.
The evidence will then be placed in a special bag that is correctly marked for easy identification. This will help maintain a chain of custody for every evidence to establish the whole investigation process.
Custodial Interrogations
The most effective tool used by the investigation team is interrogation. This process intends to try to get a confession from the suspects. Forensic evidence might be a useful tool in determining whether you are guilty, but it is quite expensive and time consuming compared with custodial interrogation. Interrogations are faster and cheaper, which cuts down the time and expenses used in the whole process.
During the interrogation, a skilled interrogator is used. These professionals have the skills of studying human behavior and body language to decide whether one is lying or not. They also know how to pose the right questions that will prompt you into a confession. Meanwhile, the police officer will try to violate your Miranda or constitutional rights while obtaining a confession.
Contact a Criminal Attorney Near Me
You can end up facing the legal consequences for aiding a suicide if you enter into a trial without the help of a professional criminal attorney. We at Van Nuys Criminal Attorney are at the forefront in helping people facing prosecution for aiding suicide and other crimes in Van Nuys. We will apply our legal expertise to help you win your case from the time we receive your phone call. To learn more about us, feel free to call us anytime at 818-484-1100, and get immediate assistance.
Aiding and abetting means offering some form of assistance in the execution of a crime. It entails doing something or saying something that enhances or furthers criminal activity. Aiding and abetting are also known as accomplice liability theory. If you are facing charges for aiding and abetting in Los Angeles, we at Leah Legal can help you fight the charges.
Overview of Aiding and Abetting
You can face charges for aiding and abetting if you help another person to commit a crime. To charge you with the crime of aiding and abetting, the prosecutor has to prove several elements. The prosecutor has to prove that you were aware of the illegal plan of the perpetrator of the crime. The prosecutor has to prove that you intentionally encourage or facilitate the execution of the plan. It must be evident that you took part in aiding or instigating the crime under investigation.
Most people assume that to face charges for aiding and abetting, you must have promoted or encouraged the criminal activity in advance. However, this is not the case; you can commit the crime of aiding and abetting instantaneously as the crime. You may learn about the execution of a crime and instantly encourage, promote, or facilitate the commission of the crime. In such a case, the court may find you guilty of aiding and abetting.
Your conduct of facilitating or promoting a crime does not have to be a substantial factor in the offense. You can be guilty under California Penal Code 31 even if you slightly aided the commission of a crime. Some examples of aiding a crime include acting as a lookout to check whether the scene is clear and warn the crime executors of any danger or presence of law enforcement officers. You may also be guilty of abetting if you keep a car engine running with the intention of helping the criminals vacate the scene of a crime. You may also be liable if you drive the vehicle used by offenders to escape from the crime scene.
You may still face charges under Penal Code 31 PC even if you are incapable of carrying out the crime yourself. For example, a woman may be guilty of rape under Penal Code 31 PC even if it is not possible for a woman to rape another woman. If a woman encourages a man to rape another woman, and even looks out for the man as he commits the offense, the woman may be guilty of aiding and abetting rape. Charges may also apply if a woman encourages another woman to meet in a deserted place with a man with the intention of having the man rape the woman.
Most people confuse the crime of aiding and abetting with the crime of conspiracy. The two crimes are closely related yet very distinct from each other. In the crime of conspiracy, an agreement to participate in committing criminal activity must exist. However, in aiding and abetting, an agreement to participate in a crime is not necessary.
Accomplice Charges
It is important to note that when you commit a crime of aiding and abetting, the prosecutor does not charge you with aiding and abetting. Instead, the prosecutor charges you with the underlying crime. For instance, if you aided the crime of robbery with violence, the prosecutor charges you with robbery with violence. The prosecutor then presents your case on the theory that you aided or abetted the commission of the crime.
As the court determines whether you acted as an abettor, several factors will count. The court will determine whether you were present at the scene of the crime. The court also determines your companionship with the other executors of the crime. The court also evaluates your conduct before and after the crime under investigation. These three factors will help the court determine whether to charge you as an accomplice. However, these factors are not conclusive.
Even if you were not at the crime scene, you might still face charges for aiding or abetting a crime. You may also face aiding and abetting charges even if you did not logistically or physically assist in the execution of the crime. As long as it is clear that you promoted, instigated, or encouraged the commission of a crime, you may face these charges. The California Penal Code 31 considers that if you aided in any way, directly or indirectly, the commission of a crime, you are liable to criminal charges. The law also considers if you encouraged the perpetrator by word of mouth or by gestures to carry out the crime.
For example, your spouse may encourage you to commit insurance fraud by filing a fraudulent personal injury claim. Your spouse forges all the paperwork and files all the necessary claims. All along, you are aware of the fraudulent activities, and you even confirm to the insurance company that you suffered the said damages. You even tell the insurance company that you had received medical treatment yet you had not. You lie that you had taken some time off work and yet you had not. Upon facing fraud charges, you argue that you are not guilty because you did not forge the insurance documents and you did not file the false claims. Although your spouse filled the fake claim documents and filed a fake claim, you may still face charges for aiding and abetting an insurance fraud.
The court may maintain that since you were aware that your spouse filed fake claims on your behalf, you are guilty as well. You were aware of the perpetrator’s plan. You also aided the plan of the perpetrator by lying to the insurance company. Therefore, even if you did not physically participate in the crime, you are guilty under the aiding and abetting theory.
Knowledge Alone Does Not Qualify for Aiding and Abetting Charges
At times, you may be aware that an offense is about to occur, and you fail to prevent it. However, this knowledge is not enough to earn you a conviction for aiding and abetting. However, if you have a legal duty to take reasonable steps to prevent the crime, you may face charges. You could face aiding and abetting charges for failing to exercise your legal obligation to prevent a crime.
How can you tell that you have a legal duty to report a crime? Certain people in different professions have legal duties to prevent or report a crime. For instance, doctors, teachers, and other professionals have a legal duty to report suspected criminal activities and abuse. In California, parents also have a legal duty to exercise reasonable supervision, control, protection, and care over their minor children.
You may face charges under California Penal Code 31 if you have a legal duty to prevent crime and you fail to do so or attempt to stop the crime. For example, a defendant watched as her partner molested their five-year-old daughter on several occasions. The defendant did not report the crime or raise awareness of what was happening. Upon facing charges for aiding and abetting lewd acts on a minor, the defendant denied the charges. She argued that she did not take part or encourage the lewd acts on the daughter. However, her presence encouraged the partner to molest the daughter and encouraged her daughter to comply with the act instead of resisting.
The defendant also had a legal duty to protect her daughter because, in California, parents have a legal obligation to protect minor children from harm. Therefore, the defendant will face charges for aiding and abetting.
Fighting Aiding and Abetting Charges
There are several ways of fighting charges under California Penal Code 31. With the help of an experienced criminal defense attorney, you can fight the charges against you. Some of the most common defenses include:
You Did Not Aid, Encourage, or Facilitate Commission of the Crime
You cannot be guilty of aiding and abetting if you did not facilitate, encourage, or aid the commission of a crime. For instance, you may board a passenger vehicle without knowing that the driver and other occupants are on a mission to execute a crime. The driver parks the vehicle and alights with other occupants leaving you in the vehicle. You are not aware that the driver and the other occupants have proceeded to rob a store. In this situation, you were merely present, and you did not know the intention of the driver and other offenders. You did not do anything to facilitate the perpetrators’ plan.
It is common for misunderstandings to occur, making you an accomplice in a crime. The prosecutor may allege that you aided, encouraged, or facilitated a crime, yet you are innocent. If you did not intentionally engage in aiding a crime, you should not face accomplice liability according to California Penal Code 31.
You Were Falsely Accused
In this case, there is no physical proof that you took part in aiding a crime. Therefore, it is easy for another person to accuse you of aiding and abetting a crime while you are innocent. A perpetrator may attempt to divert his/her criminal liability by framing you as the mastermind of the crime. A person may also accuse you of aiding or abetting a crime out of anger, jealousy, or revenge. A criminal defense attorney can use effective ways of investigating and scrutinizing witnesses. With the help of an attorney, you can fight to aid and abetting charges and ensure that the truth comes out.
Withdrawing from Participation
You can also fight charges for aiding and abetting a crime by asserting that you withdrew from participation in criminal activities. There are many ways of withdrawing from criminal activity. One such way is by notifying perpetrators of the crime or other people involved in executing the crime of your intention to withdraw from the crime. You may also withdraw if you do everything that you are capable of to prevent the crime from going forward.
For example, you and your friend may decide to rob a convenience store. Your role is to be on the lookout as your friend enters the store and threatens the cashier. As you drive towards the store, you decide that you no longer want to take part in the crime. You tell your friend that you are backing out of the crime and even attempt to tell him to do the same. However, your friend is stubborn and decides to execute the crime single-handedly. You call the police and anonymously inform them that a robbery will take place at the store. However, the police arrive late when the robbery has already happened.
In this scenario, the court may determine if you effectively communicated your intention to back out /withdraw from the robbery. You also tried to talk your friend out of the robbery, thus attempting to stop the commission of the crime. The court may drop the robbery charges against you and wet you free.
You may decide to withdraw from the robbery, and you inform your friend of your intention. You even attempt to talk your friend out of the plan but without success. However, instead of informing the police, you decide to go home even if you are aware that your friend will still carry on with the robbery. In this case, you did not do anything to prevent the crime from occurring. Therefore, the court may still consider you an accomplice in the robbery.
No Legal Duty to Act
You may be aware that a crime is about to take place, and you do nothing to prevent it. However, you cannot face charges unless you had a legal duty to act. Under the Penal Code 31, you cannot face charges for being an aider or abettor if you had no legal duty to stop the crime. Often, the law confers legal duties upon you. As long as the legal duty does not exist, you can walk free. The mere knowledge of an underlying crime is not enough to make you face aiding and abetting charges.
Aided the Crime after Its Commission
You can strive for a reduction of your charges by asserting that you only aided/facilitated a crime after its commission. If you facilitate a crime after it is over, you are not an aider or abettor. In this case, you are an accessory after the fact. If you are an accessory after the crime, you are not an accomplice under Penal Code 31, but instead, you are an obstructer of justice.
For an accessory after the fact, you will face a much lower penalty than you would if you were an accomplice in crime. For example, if you aid or abet a crime of carjacking in California, you may face up to 9 years in state prison. However, if you are an accessory after the fact, the longest imprisonment you can face is three years in a California State Prison.
Acted Under Duress
You may also assert that it was against your will to aid or abet the execution of a crime. You may say that you were under a threat of serious bodily injury or death or yourself or another person, and this made you aid in the commission of the crime. This defense is known as duress and is a viable defense under many criminal offenses.
Penalties for Aiding and Abetting a Crime
Under California law, there is no difference between the principal perpetrator and the accomplice of a crime. Therefore, for a conviction of aiding and abetting, you will face similar charges as the principal perpetrator of the crime. You will face the same consequences as the person who executed the crime. If you aid a crime after its commission, you will face charges for accessory after the crime. This is a charge on its own and is a misdemeanor or felony under California law.
Natural and Probable Consequences
In some instances, a person who is guilty of a particular crime may be guilty of other crimes that may arise due to your aiding and abetting. The prosecutor may charge you with a related crime as long as he/she can prove that you are guilty of the intended crime. The prosecutor must also prove that in committing the intended crime, you committed a related offense. It must be evident that a reasonable person in your position would have been aware that the related offense was a natural and probable consequence of the intended crime.
Accomplice Liability for Murder
In some instances, an aider or abettor may face greater charges for homicide-related offense than the perpetrator of the offense. The Supreme Court of California recognized this fact. This may happen because, at the time, the defenses that are personal to the perpetrator may not apply to the aider or abettor. For example, two people may fire shots, and only one shot kills the victim. The killer is the perpetrator of the crime while the other person who shot and missed is the aider or abettor. On facing charges, the perpetrator may argue that he acted in self-defense. The perpetrator may face lower charges of voluntary manslaughter. If the aider is not able to defend himself and faces accomplice charges, he will be guilty of murder while the real killer faces lower charges of voluntary manslaughter.
Contact A Van Nuys Criminal Lawyer
If you are facing Aiding & Abetting charges, the associated penalties are similar to those faced by the principal perpetrator. You don’t have to fight this charge alone. We at Van Nuys Criminal Attorney in Los Angeles can help you to come up with a proper defense for the charges. Contact us at 818-484-1100 and speak to us today.
Animals deserve proper care and protection. This is the responsibility charged on every animal owner or one who has been charged with the care of an animal. Therefore, the harming, neglect, mistreatment, or killing of an animal amounts to the abdication of your responsibility, which can amount to animal abuse charges. Our team at Leah Legal offers Los Angeles and Van Nuys residents with legal counsel and representation if they are facing animal abuse charges.
What Constitutes Animal Abuse
The legal definition of animal abuse or animal cruelty is covered under Penal Code 597. An animal is considered to be abused or to have suffered cruelty when it is the victim of neglect or cruel treatment.
Penal Code 597 addresses two aspects in an animal abuse case, that is, intentional abuse and intentional neglect. Intentional abuse refers to actions that cause physical harm to an animal, whereas willful neglect occurs in situations where an animal is deprived of shelter, water, food, or veterinary services.
Code 597 PC prohibits any cruel, malicious, or intentional mutilation, maiming, torturing, or wounding of an animal. The killing of an animal is also a crime under the Penal Code 597. The code goes further to include overworking, driving, or riding an animal unfit for labor as violations punishable under this code.
Law enforcement agencies may not be present to witness animal abuse. This challenge, however, is remedied under Penal Code 597. Anyone who witnesses animal cruelty should report the matter to either the law enforcement agencies or animal rights entities. There are hotlines available to the public that one can use to report animal abuse. Licensed veterinarians are encompassed under this section of Penal Code 597. They must report cases of neglect or animal abuse.
Animal abuse takes form in various ways. California’s penal system addresses the different forms. Looking at them will help understand animal cruelty in a broader sense.
Animal Sexual Abuse
Animal sexual abuse, commonly referred to as zoophilia or bestiality, is the use of an animal to satisfy a sexual desire. Such actions contravene Penal Code 286.5. Sexual abuse in human sex abuse cases may have an aspect of violence or the lack of consent. However, in animal sexual abuse cases, sexual contact is sufficient evidence.
Violations of Penal Code 286.5 are misdemeanor offenses punishable with a $1,000 fine and a six-month sentence.
Cockfighting
Cockfighting is an organized fighting match between two roosters. The roosters are equipped with razor-sharp metals called gaffs and are trained to kill their opponents. Gaffs are meant to stab the opponent directly into their flesh to deliver a deadly end.
People attend cockfights and place a wager to earn a margin from the winning rooster. They cheer on as the cocks battle it out to death. Most often, the losing cock ends up dead while in other instances, they are too weak to recover and are often thrown in a trash bin, regardless of whether they are alive or not.
Cockfighting meets the criteria of animal cruelty. Roosters suffer pain and malicious, wounding, or maiming. Therefore, any organizer or participant, or owners of the roosters in a cockfighting match violates Penal Code 597. The code prohibits the following:
- Attendance of a cockfighting match
- Allowing, organizing, or facilitating the game as entertainment or for financial gain
- Owning, rearing, or training a rooster for a cockfighting match
- The manufacture, purchase, exchange, sale, or possession of gaffs
Law enforcement agencies can storm in residence without a warrant if they believe or have information on a cockfighting event in the premises. Therefore, any arrests they carry out will be upheld by the courts. Of interest to the arresting officers and prosecutors are the rooster owners, the event organizers, as well as spectators.
Prosecutors may decide to prosecute event organizers and rooster owners under section 597 (a), malicious and intentional maiming, mutilating, wounding, and killing of a rooster. Such violations attract a felony penalty of a jail sentence as directed by the court and a fine of no more than $20,000. However, should prosecutors pursue misdemeanor charges, you will be fined a sum of no more than $20,000 and/or a jail term of no more than a year.
Spectators, on the other hand, will be punished for their part as parties to the match. However, these charges are viable only if your role was that of a spectator and not an event planner or the owner of the roosters. If convicted as a spectator, you face misdemeanor charges punishable by a fine of not exceeding $1,000 and/or a jail sentence of up to six months.
Dogfighting
Dogfighting is packaged as entertainment with deadly consequences to the dogs. Above the injuries sustained from the fight, the losing dogs are either shot, electrocuted, hanged, or drowned. Such actions violate Penal Code 597.5.
Penal Code 597.5 considers the following actions as prosecutable:
- Possession, rearing, or training of dogs with the intention of featuring them in a dogfight
- Causing the maiming or death of a dog through organizing, or planning for a dog fight with the intention of packaging the contest as an amusement or avenue for financial gain
- Participating in a dogfight as a spectator
Prosecutors have the discretion of pursuing felony or misdemeanor charges. Being a spectator in such a fight is a misdemeanor offense. If convicted of the misdemeanor offense, you risk spending one year in jail and paying up to $5,000 in fines. Felony charges, on the other hand, are punishable with a 16-month, two or three-year prison sentence. Furthermore, the felony charges attract fine to the tune of $50,000.
Leaving an Animal in a Vehicle Unattended
Leaving an animal unattended in a vehicle may seem like a small matter. However, it is considered as abuse because it may affect the well-being of the animal. Penal Code 597.7 considers such an action as an offense because it endangers the health of the animal.
Prosecutors will need to prove to the court that you left the animal unattended in the vehicle:
- In cold or hot weather
- Without food or water
- Deprived of adequate ventilation
- In other circumstances that could reasonably cause the disability, suffering, or death of the animal
A successful conviction of a first-time Penal Code 597.7 violation is punishable with a fine of no more than $500 and a jail sentence of no more than six months. Such a conviction is upheld if the animal suffered injury. If not, you risk a fine of $100 per animal. A subsequent conviction is punishable by a fine not exceeding $500 and a six-month prison sentence. These penalties are imposed regardless of whether the animal suffered bodily injury.
Prosecutors may pursue Penal Code 597.7 violations as well as introduce additional charges of neglect under Penal Code 597.
Other Animal Cruelty Laws
The circumstances of your case determines what charges a prosecutor will pursue. They may seek a conviction of violations of Penal Code 597 or the following offenses. They may also pursue punishment of any of the subsequent crimes in addition to a Penal Code 597 violation.
- A prosecutor would seek a conviction under Penal Code 596 if you poisoned an animal
- Any transportation of an animal in an inhumane manner, which is a violation of Penal Code 597a
- Holding, rearing, selling of pets from a pet store in a way that contravenes the provisions of Penal Code 597l
- Restraining an animal in a manner that causes them injury, gets them entangled, or limits their access to water and food. Such actions are a violation of Penal Code 597t
- Restraining a dog to a stationary object, which is a violation of Code 122335 HS, the Health and Safety Code
- Violations of Proposition 2. The law states that eggs sold to the public shall come from hens that can stand up, lie down, and extend their limbs and wings without touching the sides of the cages as well as each other.
Other Aspects Considered as Animal Abuse, Cruelty, or Neglect you Should Know
Animal cruelty encompasses various aspects that negatively affect the health and wellness of an animal. It is not only limited to the above issues addressed in the above laws. Prosecutors use these very aspects to prosecute alleged offenders.
Noticeable Body Trauma
An animal’s body tells a tale of its health and level of care. A filthy coat with open soars and wounds shows an injured animal. Limping, congested eyes, and physical distress also speak to the suffering of the animal.
The Lack of Sanitation
All animals should live in a clean environment, one that does not affect their health. Therefore, the presence of accumulated feces, garbage, or any other health-compromising agents present around your animal’s shelter could land you in trouble. Animal abuse charges may be introduced based on this finding.
Animal Hoarding
You can have numerous animals whose care you are charged with. However, the number becomes an issue if it compromises their health. Such actions are called animal hoarding. Animal hoarding deprives the animals of an environment that they can be free without the dangers that accompany overcrowding.
Abnormal Animal Behavior
Animals generally exude confidence and friendliness, especially with their owners. That is why it is unusual for an animal to cower in fear when their owner is around. Such behavior attracts the attention of the arresting authority with the assumption that the animal is or has been abused. If the investigations prove that there was abuse, the animal’s behavior will be introduced as evidence supporting the abuse case.
The Lack of a Shelter
It is expected that all animals have a shelter to protect them against hot, rainy, and cold weather conditions. It is anticipated that these animals should be in an environment where they are not exposed to these conditions. Should an animal die or suffer because of these conditions, animal abuse charges will be introduced against you.
Prosecutors use the above issues as the basis of their animal abuse case against you or as evidence supporting your cruelty against the animal.
Every animal abuse matter is penalized, according to the law violated. This very principle informs the penalties sort after by the prosecution of animal abuse matter pursuant to Penal Code 597 violations.
Penalties Imposed on Animal Abuse Cases or Penal Code 597 Violations
Animal cruelty cases are punishable as misdemeanors or as felony offenses. The prosecution takes into consideration the facts in your case as well as your criminal history to determine what charges you should face. If the animal did not suffer significant bodily injury, you might face misdemeanor charges. If the animal suffered substantial harm or died, or you have a prior conviction, you might be facing felony charges.
Misdemeanor offenses are penalized with a fine not exceeding $20,000 and/or a one-year jail term. Felony offenses are punishable by a 16-month, two or three-year long prison sentence and/or a fine of no more than $20,000. Additional prison terms may be imposed. You may also be required to pay the cost of caring for the animal from when the animal was seized until the conclusion of your case. The judge may also instruct that the animal be taken away from your care permanently. Furthermore, counseling may be part of your conviction for the animal abuse matter.
Aggravated penalties will be imposed if the animal abused is a protected or endangered species. The judge determines what penalties suit the offense. Furthermore, animals used in labs or for educational purposes are not subject to the same protections as other animals. This means that you cannot be charged if you have the authority to conduct educational or lab experiments.
While it is upon all animal owners take care of their animals as a matter of responsibility, a mistake on your end or that of the investigating team could see you penalized for animal abuse. Furthermore, instances of false accusations, or mistaken identity could see you pay for a crime you did not commit. Thus, you need an attorney to defend your case.
Defenses against Penal Code 597 Violations
The circumstances surrounding an animal abuse matter are unique. Your attorney will use these very circumstances to develop a defense strategy that may involve the use of any of the following defenses:
- The Harm to the Animal was an Accident
The prosecution should prove that you intended to harm or kill the animal in the case. However, there are instances you actions could have been purely accidental. Your defense attorney should prove this to the court. The circumstances that led to the injury and your actions after the injury should demonstrate that the harm was accidental.
- Your Actions were in Self-Defense or Defense of Others
The argument of self-defense is upheld if you used a force that was reasonable to the threat you or another faced. The legal system in California allows one to defend themselves or another against the danger of harm or death. Therefore, if you killed or injured a dog that was attacking you or another (person or animal), then you can argue self-defense.
- You were a Victim of Mistaken Identity or False Accusations
In some instances, persons reporting animal abuse matters do so to settle a score with the defendant, or satisfy a revenge plot against the defendant. Such cases are rampant. If this is your situation, your defense attorney will introduce the false accusation or mistaken identity argument to fight off the unfair charges.
- Failure by the Judge to Provide Unanimity Instructions
Prosecutors, jury, and judges rely on two circumstances in every animal abuse case. The case must either be:
- A continuing matter. That is, you failed to provide proper care to your animal over time. This means that your current animal cruelty situation resulted from your failure to stop the abusive actions on your animal, or
- A one-time action. In such instances, the matter before the court is an action seeking your prosecution for a single occurrence of animal cruelty.
If the matter is based on a continuous behavior of animal cruelty, the judge will instruct the jury to unanimously agree on an instance of animal abuse, if any. You will be held culpable for this instance. Should the jury not unanimously agree on a specific occurrence, your attorney will introduce this defense.
A jury in one-time actions, on the other hand, must unanimously agree on particular conduct, which contravenes the law. The judge will instruct the jury to agree unanimously in that specific conduct as the basis of the case. If this instruction is not passed to the jury, your attorney will introduce this defense.
Fight Animal Abuse Charges with the Help of an Attorney Near Me
Championing for animal wellness and care is a responsibility we should all take part in. The law seeks to enforce this very concept. However, some people or situations may cause you to suffer an animal abuse conviction as well as the penalties for the crime. An attorney will help defend you against the charges. Our team at Van Nuys Criminal Attorney in Van Nuys defends those facing animal abuse charges. Give our Los Angeles criminal defense lawyer a call today at 818-484-1100 for a case assessment.
Knowingly putting another person at risk of contracting an infectious disease without the victim’s knowledge is not morally correct. Moreover, it is a severe offense, and you risk facing incarceration, paying fines, and having a criminal record. Fortunately, it’s possible to defend against the allegations with an experienced attorney like Legal Leah handling the case. We take pride in protecting the constitutional rights of hundreds of clients in Van Nuys.
What is Deliberate Exposure to Communicable Infections?
Under Health and Safety Code 120290, it is illegal to deliberately put somebody else at risk of a health condition that you hold.
To be sentenced for the violation of this law, the prosecutor should prove that:
- You were aware that you or another person held the communicable or infectious ailment.
- You acted with the intent to spread or make the third party to spread the disease to somebody else.
- You performed an act that posed a significant danger of spread to somebody else.
- You transmitted the infectious ailment to somebody else (it can be your conduct or those of a third party)
An individual is also guilty of Health and Safety Code Section 120290 HS if:
- A medical expert acting under a situation which makes obtaining a doctor order or quarantine infeasible has ordered the accused not to perform an act that has significant risks of transmission of an infectious health condition, and
- The accused executes the act within ninety-six hours of the doctor’s instruction
- The doctor may issue two (2) instructions to the accused that can lead to breaking this code.
Please note, the following doesn’t violate Health and Safety Code Section 120290 HS:
- Being expectant while infected with a contagious ailment
- Declining treatment for a communicable disease while pregnant
- Continuing the pregnancy while suffering from a communicable disease
Definition of Legal Terms
As far as the Health and Safety Code Section 120290 is concerned, the definitions below apply. They will help you understand HS 120290 better.
Communicable or Infectious Disease
The term “communicable or infectious disease” refers to a health condition that spreads from one person to another and has a substantial public health impact. The spread can be either directly or indirectly. Perfect examples are AIDS, HIV, herpes, chlamydia, COVID 19, and gonorrhea.
Typically, the court will not charge HS 120290 to a person with a cold. However, the story changes when you intentionally transmit cold to an immuno-deficiency patient.
Conduct Which Poses a Significant Danger of Transmission
The term ”conduct which poses a significant danger of transmission” refers to conduct that has a practical possibility of transmitting the disease. It can be sharing needles for drug injections or unprotected sex.
Knowledge
Before a defendant is found guilty of HS 120290, the prosecution team must present evidence that they were aware of the disease. However, that doesn’t mean the defendant can avoid criminal responsibility by avoiding getting a diagnosis for the health condition.
In layman’s language, the law mandates that the defendant only knew of the potential risks. The test is whether a reasonable, prudent individual in a similar situation could have realized the presence of the risk. Whether a situation is believed to be reasonable hinges on the case’s facts and the jury.
For instance, if you had been involved in a lot of unprotected sexual activity and had lesions on the genitalia, there is a likelihood that the judge will rule that you knew of the possible risks of engaging in sexual intercourse. Therefore, it does not matter whether you get a sexually transmitted disease test or diagnosis to confirm you had the STD. On the contrary, if you lately separated from your partner, where your spouse cheated on you and got a sexually transmitted disease without your knowledge and spread the ailment to your new partner, the judge will likely find you innocent.
Additionally, the jury significantly affects what is considered reasonable. While a conservative Christian jury member who opposes pre-marital sex find a lack of knowledge about an STD unreasonable, a young judge might find the lack of knowledge practical.
Bearing that in mind, the jury you choose affects your case outcome. Your criminal defense attorney should be able to help you in selecting the jury.
Unprotected Sex
Sexual activity can be:
- Insertive anal or vaginal intercourse by an infected man
- Receptive consensual vaginal intercourse by an infected female with a man
- Receptive consensual anal intercourse by an infected person with a man
Typically, a defendant engages in insertive and receptive sex when they are a top and bottom, respectively.
Sex is unprotected if the defendant fails to use a condom. Oral sex is not unprotected sex.
How Deliberate Exposure to Communicable Infection Case is Built
Per HS 120290, the prosecution should use a pseudonym when referring to the witness. The prosecutor should only disclose the name, among other identification details in court using a camera. Additionally, the court is required to seal the case details to prevent more revelation unless requested at the time of discovery.
In other words, you will not know the plaintiff’s name and identifying characteristics like address, marital status, residence area, age, ethnicity, or race until the details are disclosed in court. Court decisions, orders, motions, or petitions brought by you or the witness will be worded. This strategy prevents members of the public from identifying the plaintiff.
A court after a finding a probable cause which a defendant has violated HS 120290, shall order:
- Attendance of an individual with the knowledge thereof, or
- Producing of the defendant’s medical records,
provided the attendance of the individual subpoenaed or return of the medical record is initially submitted to a court of law for an in-camera inspection. Only after a realization that the defendant’s medical record or testimony is essential to the crime will the information discovered from the court order be revealed to the prosecution team as well as admissible.
Surveillance reports or records maintained by the state or health experts or medical records, medical devices, prescription, or medications won’t be used to prove the intent. Moreover, the defendant is banned from using their medical proof to establish that they did not plan to transmit the infectious disease.
Penalties Attracted by Deliberate Exposure of Communicable Infections
Violating 120290 HS is a misdemeanor. It attracts the following consequences:
- A maximum of six months in county jail
- One thousand dollars in fines
Immigration Penalties
A 120290 HS conviction does not carry adverse immigration penalties.
According to the U.S. immigration law, only criminal conviction of drug crimes, domestic violence offenses, aggravated felonies, firearm offenses, and crimes involving moral turpitude can result in:
- An immigrant being marked inadmissible, or
- An immigrant being deported.
Nevertheless, violation of the Health and Safety Code Section 120290 is not one of the convictions mentioned above.
Firearm Rights Impact
120290 is a misdemeanor and doesn’t affect your firearm rights. That means you will not lose your entitlement to possess, use, or own a gun.
How to Fight HS 120290 Charges
If charged with deliberate exposure to communicable infections, you can avoid a conviction by using one of the legal defenses below. The legal defense you use depends on your case circumstances.
You Did Not Have Knowledge of the Communicable Disease
A defendant is guilty of HS 120290 if they were aware that they had the infectious medical condition. That means it’s a valid defense for the defendant if they didn’t know.
You Didn’t Have the Intention to Transmit the Disease
One of the elements of the crime in question is that you intentionally transmitted the disease.
According to STD law, the accused doesn’t act with intent if they take, try to take reasonable means to stop transmission. Practical means to prevent transmission is a device, behavior, activity, or method demonstrated scientifically to measurably reduce or limit the danger of transmission of the contagious disease. It can be the use of a condom, prophylactic device, barrier protection, or good faith compliance with a medical treatment regimen for the disease prescribed by a medical practitioner.
Therefore, your criminal defense attorney can fight the charge by proving that you didn’t plan to transmit the medical condition.
There Was No Transmission
You can only be sentenced for deliberate exposure to contagious infections if you indeed transmitted the disease. Your defense attorney, therefore, can attempt to prove your innocence by establishing transmission did not occur.
Unconsciousness
A judge could pardon your conduct if you were unconscious when you allegedly violated HS 120290. Your attorney can base the unconscious state of mind on factors like coercion or involuntary intoxication.
Entrapment
The entrapment defense is applicable where the defendant would not have transmitted the disease if another party hadn’t intervened. You can argue that the other party’s harassment, threats, or coercion resulted in you committing the offense.
A coerced confession can assist in establishing entrapment defense. Your defense attorney might claim that the law enforcers used improper or unlawful interrogation methods to obtain a disclosure from you. The strategies can include continuing to question you even when you request for a lawyer, beating you, or depriving you of food, water, or sleep.
Related Offenses
Discussed below are offenses that are charged alongside or together with Health and Safety Code Section 120290:
Medical Donation by an Individual with HIV
According to HS 1621.5, it is a California felony for an individual infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus to donate breast milk, semen, body tissue, body organ, or blood.
HS 1621.5 applies when the donation is meant for distribution. Moreover, it applies when the donation is made to breast milk or semen banks or medical centers.
However, the code doesn’t apply to blood donated for personal use. Therefore, if you donate blood prior to undergoing surgery or if you require a blood transfusion, you aren’t guilty of medical donation by a person who has HIV.
The offense attracts a two (2), four (4) or six (6)-year county jail sentence.
Sentencing Enhancement for Sex Offenses by Individuals with AIDS or HIV
Penal Code Section 12022.85 PC provides three years of penalty enhancement when a defendant with HIV/AIDS is found guilty of:
- Rape- Penal Code Section 261 PC
- Statutory rape- Penal Code Section 261.5 PC
- Sodomy- Penal Code Section 286 PC
- Spousal rape- Penal Code Section 262 PC
- Oral copulation with a child under 18 years of age- Penal Code Section 288 (a) PC
Please note the sentencing enhancement is consecutive and additional to the consequences of the underlying offense.
Sexual Battery (Penal Code Section 243.4 PC)
While HS 120290 can be defined as an act that poses the risk of transmission, sexual battery revolves around touching another person’s intimate part for sexual arousal, abuse, or gratification. An intimate part can be anus, sexual organ, female breast, buttocks, and groin.
It is a wobbler. If charged with a California misdemeanor, you will face:
- Six (6) months in jail
- Two thousand dollars in fines or three thousand dollars if the victim was your worker
- A five-year summary (informal) probation with terms like community service and enrollment in a batterer’s education program
A felony, on the other hand, is punishable by:
- A felony (formal) probation
- Two, three, or four years in state prison
- Ten thousand dollars in fines
- Registration as tier three sex offender for life
Understanding the Difference Between Intentional Transmission of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HS 120291) and HS 120290
Deliberate exposure to communicable infections involves all infectious diseases. Intentional transmission of HIV, on the other hand, is particular to HIV. HS 120291 requires the defendant to have planned to infect the alleged victim with HIV. To be sentenced for Health and Safety Code Section 120291 HS, the prosecutor must prove that you:
- Engaged in unprotected sex
- Were aware that you had HIV during the sex
- Didn’t tell the victim about the HIV status
- Acted with a specific intent to infect the alleged victim
Violation of HS 120291 is a California felony. It carries three (3), five (5), or eight (8) years in California state prison.
How Specific Intent Differs from Willfully
While these legal terms refer to deliberate conduct, they have a difference as far as codes 120291 and 120290 are concerned.
About Health and Safety Code Section 120290 HS, you willfully transmitted human immunodeficiency virus, if you allowed a condition needed for infection and did it with the knowledge of the likelihood of infecting somebody else.
Specific intent in HS 120291 means deliberate conduct of transmitting HIV to your partner. In layman’s language, the primary reason for having sex was to infect your sexual partner with the virus.
Criminal Court Process Following an HS 120290 Arrest
Because HS 120290 is a California misdemeanor, the case will go through five phases following the arrest. The court can choose to drop the case at any stage if the evidence presented is weak. Here is the breakdown:
Arraignment
This is your first opportunity to enter a plea in the case. You can enter either guilty, no contest, or not guilty plea.
If you enter a no contest or guilty plea, the case proceeds to a sentencing hearing. If you enter a not guilty plea, the judge will address your bail.
Bail and Bail Hearing
Bail is the money you post with a court of law as a guarantee you will attend your court hearings. Typically, bail is set according to the county bail schedule.
However, during a bail hearing, the law allows you to request the judge to lower the bail amount. The judge will put the severity of the offense, criminal history, among other factors, into account before reducing, raising, or eliminating the bail amount.
Pretrial Stage
Usually, the pretrial phase includes filing motions, court appearances, discovery, and negotiations. It gives the prosecution team and your attorney an opportunity to outline the case’s weaknesses and strengths. Also, the parties can discuss the different circumstances surrounding your case and plea bargains.
Jury Trial
Trials can be of two categories: jury trial or bench trial. A bench trial happens when the judge functions as both the jury and judge. A jury trial involves twelve members of the community hearing the evidence against you and deciding whether you are guilty.
Appeal
If you think the judge made a wrong ruling, you are entitled to appeal the case. The appeal process involves hearing witness testimony, accepting new proof, and retrying your case. The result of the appeal could have the case overturned, reversed, or remanded.
Can You Get Your Conviction Expunged?
An expungement is a type of post-conviction relief under PC 1203.4. It releases the defendant from disabilities and penalties that come with a conviction.
Expungement offers you a fresh start from the criminal record. Moreover, it helps you maintain or secure professional licenses, employment, housing, and join educational institutions.
If you are convicted of the crime in question, you are entitled to expungement as long as you:
- Successfully completed probation
- Completed your jail term
If you violate probation terms and conditions, you can still get your offense expunged. However, this is within the court’s discretion.
Find Legal Representation Near Me
If you know that you are infected with herpes, coronavirus, HIV/AIDS, or any other infectious disease, you might face a criminal charge should you deliberately expose another person to the health condition. Specifically, you could face a six-month jail sentence and pay a fine of one thousand dollars. If you are charged with the offense, the legal team at Legal Leah can assist you. We can analyze the case circumstances and facts and help you develop a valid defense. To book your initial free consultation, contact us at 818-484-1100.
California PC136.1 explains the offense of dissuading a witness, also known as witness tampering or intimidating a witness. According to this law, it is a crime to prevent a victim of a crime or a witness from testifying. If you are facing charges for dissuading a witness or victim in Van Nuys, get in touch with us at Leah Legal for expert criminal defense services.
Elements of the Crime of Dissuading A Witness or Victim
A prosecutor cannot accuse you of dissuading a witness unless he/she can prove various elements of the crime. It should be evident that you acted intentionally or maliciously to prevent, dissuade, or attempted to prevent or dissuade a victim or a witness to a crime from testifying. You can violate PC 136.1PC if you prevent a victim from:
- Testifying or attending a judicial meeting
- Reporting an offense
- Aiding or assisting in the prosecution process
- Aiding or assisting in the arrest process
The crime of dissuading or intimidating a witness is a specific intent crime. Therefore, to be guilty of this offense, you must have acted intentionally and with malice. Acting knowingly means that at the time of dissuading the witness, the defendant was aware of his/her actions and the consequences. Malice means that the defendant had the desire to injure or annoy another person.
Who is a victim under California law? A victim is any person who feels or believes that a state or federal violation or crime has been committed against him/her. On the other hand, a witness is any person who knows about the facts of a crime and whose declaration under oath could be accepted as evidence. Any person who has reported a crime or who has been served with a subpoena qualifies as a witness. If you believe that the person you are trying to dissuade fits the description of a witness, then intimidating the person could implicate you.
You do not have to succeed in intimidating the witness or victim for you to be guilty. You could face charges as long as you attempted to intimidate the witness.
Most people commit the crime of dissuading a witness without even realizing it. For instance, you might realize that someone has seen you or your loved one commit a crime. You decide to talk to the person and persuade him/her not to report what he/she saw. By doing this, you could put yourself into jeopardy of facing felony or misdemeanor charges for dissuading a witness.
Does Dissuading a Witness Always Involve Threats?
When a victim or a witness gives their account of what happened in a crime scene, this evidence could implicate the accused. The witness or the victim reveals to the judge what he/she witnessed and this influences the outcome of a case. In some cases, there is no such physical evidence and a witness statement could be all a prosecutor is relying on. Without the witness testimony, the prosecutor might not have any other evidence and might have to drop the case. For this reasoning, doing anything to prevent a witness or victim from giving testimony is a crime.
You do not have to threaten a victim or witness to be guilty of dissuading a witness. In a case of domestic violence, a relative could try to persuade the victim to drop the charges. A relative could convince the victim that the accused person made a mistake and deserves forgiveness. However, even if the dissuasion does not involve a threat but a persuasion, it is still a crime.
It is unlawful to persuade or attempt to persuade a victim or a witness from reporting a crime. This involves reporting a crime or victimization to the law enforcement officer or a judge. You should not stop a person from filing a complaint, and indictment, or reporting a parole violation. You should not stop someone from seeking the arrest of a person for victimization. If a restraining order exists and the restrained person violates the order, it is illegal to prevent the victim from reporting the violation.
Consequences for Dissuading a Witness
Intimidating a witness is a wobbler according to California law. The prosecutor has the discretion to charge the crime as a felony or misdemeanor. If the offense is a misdemeanor, the offense is punishable by jail time of up to one year in county jail. The court could also impose a penalty that does not exceed $1,000.
If the crime is a felony, the penalties include imprisonment in a state prison in California. The imprisonment period could be up to four years. You could also have to pay a hefty fine not exceeding $10,000.
In some instances, the crime of dissuading a witness is an automatic felony:
- If the dissuasion was part of a higher conspiracy
- If you used violence or force while dissuading the witness
- If you have a prior conviction of dissuading or intimidating a witness
- If another person hired you to commit the crime of dissuading a witness of his/her behalf
Immigration Consequences of the Crime
The crime of intimidating or dissuading a witness could have negative immigration consequences. Therefore, if you commit this crime and you are not a citizen of the United States, you should seek immediate legal counsel. The crime could lead to deportation or removal from the United States. A conviction could also render you inadmissible into the United States.
Crimes that often render a defendant deportable or inadmissible are aggravated felonies. The prosecutor has the liberty of charging the crime of intimidating a witness or victim as a felony. Therefore, if the crime is a felony, you might be deported from the U.S. If you are inadmissible, you cannot be able to gain U.S citizenship through naturalization or another method.
Effects on your Gun Rights
The crime of intimidating a witness could also affect your gun rights in California. For a crime of misdemeanor intimidating a witness, you could receive a ban on your gun rights for ten years. For a felony intimidating of a witness or victim, the court could impose a ban on your gun rights for a lifetime.
If you dissuade a witness at the direction of, in association with, or for the benefit of a criminal street gang, you could face additional charges. The California gang enhancement law imposes additional and consecutive sentencing to your state prison sentence.
If the prosecutor charges the crime of dissuading a witness as a felony, it might count as a strike on your criminal law according to the Three Strikes Law in California. If you commit a subsequent felony, you will become a second striker. A second striker should serve twice the minimum sentence recommended by the law. If you later commit another felony and earn a third strike, you could be subject to 25years or life imprisonment in a state prison in California.
Expungement of the Conviction
The expungement of a criminal conviction is the removal of the conviction from your record. After an expungement, the conviction will no longer appear on your record even after conducting a background search. An expungement is beneficial because it protects you from discrimination based on your criminal history. When seeking employment, your potential employer is likely to conduct a background check on you. If the check reveals your previous criminal record, you might not get the job. The conviction could also affect your ability to get tenancy or a license.
A person convicted of intimidating a witness can get an expungement after completing the probation successfully and complying with all the requirements of probation. You could also qualify for expungement after you complete the jail term successfully. This condition will depend on whether the court had imposed a jail time or probation after you committed the offense.
Can you qualify for expungement if you violate the terms or the conditions of probation? Yes, it is still possible to get an expungement even after violating the terms of probation. However, this will depend on the judge’s discretion. The California PC 1203.4 outlines the expungement law, which helps to relieve the defendant all the disabilities and penalties that could arise from a conviction.
Typical Legal Defenses
You should not give up after an accusation of dissuading a witness. With the help of a competent criminal defense attorney, fight the charges in court. Some of the typical legal defenses for the crime of dissuading a witness are:
You did not Act Knowingly or Maliciously
You cannot be guilty of dissuading a witness if you did not act intentionally or knowingly. It should also be evident that you acted with malice. The crime of intimidating a witness is a specific intent crime. Therefore, you cannot be guilty unless the prosecutor proves that you acted with both knowledge and malice. You can defend yourself by convincing the judge that you did not act with this specific intent.
Being a witness to a crime can be dangerous. A witness or a victim of a crime could be willing to give a testimony about what happened. However, in fear of what might happen to the victim or witness, a family member could attempt to dissuade the victim or the witness. If your interest was only to protect the witness or the victim, you can defend yourself by pointing out that you had no malice.
Not a Victim or a Witness
You can only be guilty of dissuading a witness or a victim if the person you dissuaded is indeed a witness or a victim of an offense you have committed. Therefore, you could defend yourself by pointing out that even if you threatened or intimidated someone, he/she is not a victim or a witness to a crime you committed. However, it is important to note that California law prohibits threatening another person. Therefore, even if you will not be guilty of dissuading a witness, you could still be guilty of issuing criminal threats as outlined under PC422.
False Accusation
You could be a victim of false accusations especially in a case of domestic violence. Your spouse could go to the police and accuse you of threatening him/her to prevent them from reporting a crime. If you are the victim of a false accusation, you can beat the charges with the help of your attorney.
You Did Not Know about the Pending Court Case
You can also fight charges for dissuading a victim by pointing out that you were not aware of any pending or existing court case, inquiry, or proceeding. You can also point out that you were not aware that the person you were talking to was a witness or a victim. You should talk to an experienced attorney to find out about the best defenses available to help you fight the conviction of dissuading a witness.
Insufficient Evidence
The prosecutor could accuse you of dissuading a witness based on allegations and not facts. The defense of insufficient evidence could apply if there is an absence of evidence collaborating the accused person’s claim of being intentionally intimidated or dissuaded. A case with insufficient evidence has little substance and has room for defense.
Related Offenses
Three crimes in California are closely related to the crime of dissuading a witness:
California PC 422-Criminal Threats
You could be guilty of criminal threats under PC422 if you threaten another person with immediate harm and cause reasonable and sustained fear in that person. For the prosecutor to accuse you of criminal threats, he/she has to prove several elements of the crime.
The prosecutor should prove that you intentionally or willingly threatened to seriously injure or kill another person. You should also have issued a threat verbally, either electronically, or through a written statement. The threat issued should be unconditional, unequivocal, specific, and immediate. The threat should also convey an immediate likelihood or possibility of execution. The prosecutor also has to prove that the threatened person feared for his/her safety or the safety of his/her family.
According to California law, the prosecutor might charge the crime of criminal threats as felony or misdemeanor. When deciding whether to charge the offense as a felony or misdemeanor, the prosecutor will consider your criminal history and the circumstances of the offense.
If you use a dangerous or deadly weapon to communicate the criminal threat, you could get one additional and consecutive year to your sentencing. The penalties could also apply for each threat if you issue criminal threats on more than one occasion, against different individuals, and for different objectives.
California PC236-False Imprisonment
You could be guilty of false imprisonment if you unlawfully violate the personal liberty of another person without the person’s permission. You do not have to use force or violence while committing false imprisonment. The prosecutor should prove that you knowingly detained, confined, or restrained another person. It should be evident that confinement or detention forced the person to go to another place even for a short period. The prosecutor should also prove the victim did not consent to the imprisonment. It should be apparent that the victim suffered harm, or that the actions of the defendant were adequate to cause harm to the victim.
The crime of false imprisonment is a wobbler that could attract misdemeanor or felony charges. For a misdemeanor charge, the penalties include a fine that does not exceed $1,000. You could also be subject to imprisonment in a county jail for a period not exceeding one year.
For felony false imprisonment, penalties include a county jail term for 16 months, two years, or three years. You could adopt several defenses for the crime of false imprisonment including self-defense, victim’s consent, legal authority to restrain, parental rights, and shopkeeper’s privilege.
California PC 207- Kidnapping
You can commit the crime of kidnapping under California OC 207 if you move another person for a substantial distance without the person’s consent. To be guilty of kidnapping, you should have moved the person using fear or force.
Aggravated kidnapping charges might apply if the victim of the kidnapping is a child below 14 years. If you kidnap a person and hold him/her for ransom, aggravated kidnapping charges might apply. Aggravated charges might also apply if you kidnap another person during a carjacking or if you subject the victim to great bodily harm or death.
The crime of simple kidnapping is a felony under California law. The penalties include imprisonment in a state prison in California for three, five, or eight years. You could also be subject to a fine that does not exceed $10,000.
You will face long imprisonment if you commit an aggravated kidnapping crime. You could be subject to imprisonment in a state prison in California for 5, 8, or 11 years if the person you kidnapped is less than 14 years. The crime of kidnapping will also earn you a strike on your criminal record according to the Three Strikes Law in California.
Find a Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
You should not attempt to fight the charges of dissuading a witness or a victim on your own. The prosecutor will be determined to prove that you are guilty. You need a competent and experienced criminal defense attorney to stand up to the prosecutor. You can count on Van Nuys Criminal Attorney for the best criminal defense in Van Nuys. Contact us at 818-484-1100 and talk to one of our experienced criminal defense attorneys.
Extortion is also commonly referred to as blackmail, where a person uses threats or force to persuade another to give property or money. Extortion can also be used to force a public official to carry out an official act. When you get accused of extortion or blackmail in California, it is a felony offense severely punished with incarceration and hefty fines.
Misunderstandings can also be confused for extortion, where one is accused of the crime falsely. Regardless of whether the allegations are true or not, the most critical thing for you is to avoid a conviction, or to get a favorable outcome. Finding a criminal attorney when faced with these accusations is necessary for an excellent result. If you are in Los Angeles, an attorney from Leah Legal has extensive experience to defend you against these allegations.
Defining Extortion According to PEN 518 in California
The law defines extortion based on its four elements that a prosecutor must prove to get a conviction. These elements include:
- That the accused threatened to carry out any of the below to the supposed victim:
- Injure, use force or threaten the victim or a loved one to acquire their property or money
- Accuse the victim or a loved one of an offense or
- Revealing the victim’s secret or involving their loved ones or associating them with a scandal or crime to disgrace them.
- When the defendant used force or threats, he or she intended to make the victim consent to giving them property, money, or performing an official duty.
- Because of the threats, the supposed victim gave the accused property, or money or did an official duty.
- The supposed victim actually gave in to the defendant’s demands and gave them property or money or did the official deed.
When accused of the crime of extortion, the prosecutor must prove any of these aspects for a conviction. On the other hand, your criminal defense attorney will discredit the evidence produced to create doubt and get the case dismissed.
Some words or phrases used in defining the crime of extortion must be well understood to constitute a crime. These words include:
Threaten
A person can be found guilty of blackmail even when they don’t actually injure the victim or also use force. What would matter according to the law, is the threats used against the victim. For threats to be used in extortion charges, the defendant must have:
- Demanded for a specified amount of money to be given or,
- Used specific words to threaten or other suggestive words instead. A threat can be subtly conveyed or implied depending on the circumstances.
Interestingly, you get charged with violating PEN 518 even when:
- You threaten to perform a perfectly legal act or
- You are convinced to have a legal right over the property or money you want to receive by extortion; for instance, if the alleged victim of the extortion owed you the property or money.
For instance, if Gary finds out his neighbor Mary grows marijuana in her compound, he may threaten to tell the authorities unless she gives him pot for free each month. Although the act of reporting Mary is legal, he can still face extortion charges. This is possible because he threatens Mary with exposure, unless she gives him something in return.
Injury
Injury based on the extortion law in California, it means criminal damage. This means you cannot be charged with extortion if you use threats to indicate that you will do something that you are legally entitled to do. However, you will be found guilty of blackmail when you threaten another person or their assets, which you do not have a right to under the law.
For instance, John owes Peter money. Unfortunately, Peter has tried to get John to pay him in vain. He instead threatens John with a beating if he declines to pay him. Legally, Peter has no legal right to inflict corporal punishment on John. According to the extortion law of California, Peter can get charged with extortion.
On the other hand, if you threaten a person or their property and you have a legal right to do so, you cannot be charged with the offense. For instance, Hanna wants to extend her house. However, according to the homeowner’s association, she must consent from her neighbors before she continues. On approaching her neighbor Tom, he asks her for $500 for him to give his permission for the extension.
Arguably, Tom threatens to injure Hanna’s property if not given the money he asked for. But, based on their bylaws, he has a right to deny her consent to extend her house. If Tom declines to consent to her request, he cannot get charged with extortion. This is because he has not inflicted any unlawful injury to Hanna’s property.
Exposing a Secret
According to the law on extortion, a secret is defined as:
- An unknown fact to people or to a person that has an interest in finding it out and
- Would cause harm to the supposed victim’s reputation or credibility and other investments to a great extent such that he or she would be willing to give property or money or even do a thing to protect revealing of the fact.
For instance, Cindy is the mayor of her city and maintains that she graduated from an Ivy League university. Unfortunately, Grace, a resident that went to college with her, knows Cindy went to the university but did not graduate. This is a secret that Cindy has kept, but Grace uses it to threaten her to get her daughter a job in the city, or make the secret public.
Because Cindy’s secret is unknown to the greater public, if revealed, it will cause damage to her reputation and integrity. Based on this, Grace can be charged with extortion because her behavior meets its definition.
Official Act
When a government employee or a public official does something in their capacity as such, it is termed as an official duty. Every employee has particular mandates or obligations they should perform according to their job description. When one is accused of threatening a government official with extortion, it is so that they may do a specific duty in a particular way.
For instance, when a congress member is to vote on a gun-right issue, an activist may approach him and demand that he should vote against the motion. If the congressman declines to vote as directed, his extramarital affair will get exposed.
Typically, congress members vote regularly on various laws as part of their official duties. When the activist blackmails or extorts the congressman to vote in a certain way, it is an offense punishable according to the law.
Consent
According to PEN 518 that speaks of extortion, consent in this case is defined specially. Usually, consent is permission given willingly and freely. But, under the law on extortion, consent means coerced agreement that an alleged victim gives unwillingly because they are forced or scared.
When a threat is given and the fear of force that accompanies it, it is the reason consent gets obtained to receive property or money from the other party. Equally, it is the reason to compel a public official to perform their duty in a particular way.
The Act or Deed must have been Done
Another critical element for extortion in California is when the alleged victim carried out the deed that they agreed to under coercion. This means they must have parted with their property or money or have carried out an official duty. If this happens, the extortion offense is completed.
However, as earlier mentioned, you can still get accused of attempted extortion even when the victim did not carry out the act. But, according to the extortion statute in California, two other kinds of extortions exist that are defined slightly differently. These are:
- Using a threatening mail or letter to extort and
- You are extorting a signature.
PEN 523 – Using a Threatening Letter to Extort
You can also get charged with extortion if you wrote a threatening letter to demand something. According to PEN 523, this offense is best defined when the perpetrator fulfills the following elements to the crime:
- The defendant or perpetrator delivered or sent a letter, email or other types of a written document to another threatening them,
- And in that letter, the perpetrator threatened to:
- Cause harm to the person, their loved one or their assets illegally,
- Make criminal allegations against the person, their family member or a loved one or
- Reveal a secret not known to the public regarding the victim, or their loved one to connect them to a criminal offense or discredit them, and
- When the defendant sent the letter, he or she planned to use it as a threat to gain property, money, or get something done by a public official.
Based on the above, violating PEN 523 is similar to PEN 518, where extortion is carried out by the use of fear and force. However, two main differences include:
- When one gets charged with extortion through the use of a threatening letter. The threat to the victim must be in writing either through a message, email or other means, and
- The supposed victim doesn’t have to have given their property or money or committed an official duty or agreed to it, for a person to be found guilty.
For instance, if Christy puts her profile online to meet men in chat rooms and have brief sexual encounters, she can use this to extort them. If she writes letters or emails threatening them with sexual assault allegations, if they refuse to give her money, it is extortion even when none consents to the threat. If any of them reports her to the authorities, she can get charged with blackmail, resulting in hefty fines or jail time, if not both.
PEN 522 – Extorting Signature
When one gets charged with extorting a signature in California, a conviction will mean all the elements to the crime are actual. These are:
- The perpetrator threatened the alleged victim with any of the following:
- To unlawfully injure the victim, their property, or a loved one
- Accuse them of a crime, or their loved one or a family member or
- Reveal a secretly kept fact about the person or their loved one and connect them to an offense to disgrace them.
- The threat is intended to make the person append their signature to a document. Or a check transferring property or money to them or leaving the victim with a debt, and
- Because of the threats, the victim actually signs a check or the documents presented.
Just like extortion by issuing a threatening letter, one can be found guilty of the offense even when they never actually obtained the property or money from the victim. What the law looks at to be found guilty is if a document was actually signed.
For instance, if Mary has a rich auntie and knows that one of her children is from a different father, yet this fact is not known, she can use that as extortion. She threatens her auntie with the revealing of the secret unless she includes her in her will. Later, her auntie tears the will and writes another one where Mary will inherit nothing when the auntie dies. Although Mary will receive nothing upon the aunt’s death, she can be charged with extortion because she has a signed document transferring property to her.
Penalties for Violating PEN 518 – Extortion
In California, when charged with extortion or blackmail, you face felony charges, and a conviction carries the following sentences:
- A county jail imprisonment for two or three or four years,
- A hefty fine not exceeding $10,000
- A formal probation together with or instead of the fine.
When the crime of extortion was carried out against a mentally or physically challenged individual dependent on others or an elderly, the penalties are enhanced. These aggravating factors increase the penalties a defendant faces. Additionally, according to the Three Strikes law of California, a conviction on this crime can earn the defendant a strike. However, this happens only when the offense is connected to gang activity, according to PEN 186.22.
However, for the enhancement, according to PEN 186.22 to apply, one must have performed extortion to benefit or in conjunction with an illegal street gang directly. The act must also have been to help or enhance the criminal activities of the group.
Attempted Extortion Penalties
Earlier, it was stated that even when the perpetrator of the offense never benefited from the criminal act, they will still get charged with attempted extortion. This offense is a wobbler meaning one can face misdemeanor or felony charges.
The penalties for a misdemeanor conviction include:
- County imprisonment for not more than a year,
- A fine not exceeding $1,000,
- You get sentenced to summary probation in addition to or instead of the fine.
When one gets charged with a felony, a conviction results in the following penalties:
- A more extended county jail imprisonment lasting sixteen or twenty-four or thirty-six months,
- A hefty fine not exceeding $10,000
- You get sentenced to formal probation in addition to or instead of the fine or jail time.
Misdemeanor Extortion
According to the statute, there are some types of extortions that are directly punishable as misdemeanors. You can be charged with misdemeanor extortion when:
- You use another person or directly deliver a document that is falsely claiming it as an official document from the court. The document is designed in a way to persuade the supposed victim that it is a court document,
- Whose purpose is to gain property or money from the alleged victim by extortion.
Additionally, you can be found guilty of this misdemeanor offense when you print, share, or sell or participate in the making of the document. When you get convicted of the crime, you will face the following penalties:
- County jail imprisonment for not more than six months,
- You pay a fine not exceeding $1,000 besides or instead of the jail time.
Legal Defenses for PEN 518 Violations
When charged with the crime of extortion, a conviction will adversely affect your life. For a defendant to avoid a conviction or to get a favorable outcome, hiring an experienced defense attorney is critical. After studying the prosecutor’s case, your lawyer will formulate defense strategies to give you the most beneficial results. Some of the common defenses your attorney may use include:
- Consent – For a conviction on extortion charges to be reached, the defendant’s threat should be the only reason the victim consented to releasing their money or property. However, your lawyer can show that your threat was not the reason; instead, other reasons compelled the victim to consent. If this argument is substantial, you will not be convicted of the crime.
- False accusations – Persons falsely accusing others with criminal allegations are common. The alleged victim may have given you their money or property willingly and later realizes he or she should not have to. If they ask for the property back and you refuse, or you had already used it, they can claim you extorted them. Your attorney will bring forth evidence that no threats or coercion was used, and the accusations against you are based on falsehoods. If this argument is accepted, you will be innocent of the offense.
- Insufficient evidence – Before one is convicted of a crime, the prosecutor must prove that a crime was committed beyond a reasonable doubt. If the prosecutor has insufficient evidence, he or she cannot convince the jury of your guilt. Your attorney will challenge the circumstantial evidence and get you a win.
Find a Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
Criminal allegations are devastating, let alone a guilty verdict. The primary goal for anyone accused of a crime is to avoid a conviction, especially when they are innocent. Sometimes you may not be aware that your actions can be termed as extortion, and you face criminal charges. Whatever the case, an experienced Van Nuys Criminal Attorney attorney can help you prove your innocence from the allegations. Call us at 818-484-1100 to further discuss your situation and how to win it.
California Penal Code 236 PC defines the criminal offense of false imprisonment. You commit this crime if you confine, detain, or restrain an individual against their consent. By doing this, your act causes your victim to be detained somewhere they didn’t intend. You could violate PC 236 without involving violence nor using force. In this regard, California PC has similar characteristics to PC 207, which defines the kidnapping crime. However, with kidnapping, you must make the person move besides confining them.
Getting accused of violating California PC 236 doesn’t mean you are guilty of the said allegations. Hiring a criminal defense lawyer from Leah Legal could increase your chances of acquittal to a great extent. Our team of experienced attorneys has, for many years, helped defendants accused of false imprisonment in Los Angeles and the nearby areas.
Definition of False Imprisonment Per California Law
In California PC 236, the law defines false imprisonment as wrongly restraining, detaining, or confining someone else against their will. This means you illegally deprive someone else of their liberty. The prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you committed the elements below to prove you are guilty of this offense:
- You illegally and deliberately restrained, confined, or detained someone else
- Your unlawful acts made someone else go or stay somewhere they never intended for some time, however short
- The plaintiff never consented your actions
- You were armed
- Your illegal act was a significant factor in inflicting injuries to the accuser
The above five elements are often summarized and simplified into two. These are:
- You denied someone liberty by illegally and intentionally confining, detaining, and restraining someone else
- The confinement, detention, or restraint compelled the accuser to stay or even go somewhere against their will
California PC 236 is closely related to PC 207. The primary disparity is that kidnapping is charged when you take someone else away and compel them to move against their wishes. In contrast, false imprisonment is generally charged when you prevent a person from leaving against their will.
Examples of false imprisonment are:
- If you get into an argument with your spouse and want to go, you violate California PC 236 if you lock them in the house preventing them from leaving
- Barricading someone else to prevent them from leaving their house
- Preventing another person from leaving a nightclub when they wish to leave
- Blocking another person’s vehicle so they cannot leave the parking lot
- Tying another person to a seat or evening grabbing their arm to prevent the person from leaving
What Is the Meaning of Confined, Detained, or Restrained?
While the initial element of false imprisonment is one that the prosecution must prove the first, it also doubles as a confusion source. Because of the confusion factor, California courts amended rules to clear concerns touching, detaining, confining, and restraining someone else, under California Penal Code 236. To commit false imprisonment, you don’t have to lock someone else in a prison or jail.
California courts ruled that there is not one single manner in which you can falsely imprison another. Examples of ways you can confine, detain, or restrain someone else per California law are:
- Through threat of force or actual force
- By deceit, fraud, or any unreasonable duress
- Through the use of physical barricades or menace
Another clarification suggests that your victim doesn’t have to be aware you are detaining, confining, or restraining them.
Civil vs. Criminal False Imprisonment
Falsely imprisoning someone else against their will is unlawful per California PC Section 236. Also, false imprisonment is a tort that brings about civil lawsuits. Per California PC 236, the elements of both tort and crime of false imprisonment are similar. Like false imprisonment crime, the civil tort comprises the premeditated detainment of someone else, to unlawfully deprive them liberty against their wishes, for any period, however short.
Also, like the crime of false imprisonment, you could confine another person under the tort of false imprisonment by:
- Detainment by physical blockades
- Physical force
- Threat of force
- Other ways of unwarranted duress
Per California law, if you are guilty of the crime of false imprisonment, you face criminal punishment. In contrast, if you face charges under a civil suit, the court orders you to compensate the accuser for the damages caused by false imprisonment. Examples of possible damages that the accuser could recover in a civil suit are:
- Reputation damage
- Business interruption
- Physical harm or illness that false imprisonment caused
- Inconvenience or physical discomfort
- Time lost
Sentencing, Penalties, or Punishment for False Imprisonment Convicts
California PC 237 makes the crime of false imprisonment a wobbler. This means the prosecution could charge you with either a California misdemeanor or a felony. Additionally, under Penal Code 237, the prosecution could decide to enhance your charges if the victim of false imprisonment is a dependent adult or an elder.
Misdemeanor False Imprisonment
False imprisonment is charged as a misdemeanor per California PC 236 if you did not use violence, fraud, deceit, or menace when detaining your victim. As a misdemeanor crime, false imprisonment carries a penalty for serving up to one year in county jail or paying a fine of up to $1,000.
Felony False Imprisonment
Violation of California PC section 236 becomes a felony if you detain another person by deceit, fraud, menace, or violence. Per Penal Code 236, deception and fraud consist of depriving another person’s freedom duping them. The prosecution must prove the deceit or fraud was intentional before the court can convict you.
For example, if you ask your workers to remain in their work stations because of a terrorist threat, believing the information to be correct, the court cannot convict you, although you made a mistake. However, you are guilty of false imprisonment if you purposely lied to your employees about a bomb threat.
Violence, on the other hand, constitutes physical force that surpasses levels that are deemed necessary to confine another person. Menace involves issuing threats of harm physically or verbally. You could issue express threats by a statement or an act, for instance, placing a knife on another person’s neck. If the prosecutor files false imprisonment as a felony crime, your conviction could carry 16 months, two years, or three years in state prison.
Enhanced Penalties with Elder or Dependent Parent Victims
California PC 368(f) states that if your felony false imprisonment victim is an elder or dependent adult, for example, your parent, you could serve time in a county jail for two, three, or four years. According to Penal Code 368 (f), an elder means someone aged 65 or older, whereas a dependent adult refers to a person between 18 and 64 years of age with particular mental or physical conditions.
According to subdivision (b)(2) of PC section 368, if a dependent adult or elder incurs serious bodily harm, when you falsely detain them, the court could impose an additional prison term. The enhancements include:
- Additional five years in the accuser was at the age of 70 or above
- Extra three years if the plaintiff was below the age of 70 during your crime commission
California PC 368(b)(3) is applicable in the circumstances like:
- When you commit false imprisonment
- Your crime commission leads to the death of the dependent adult or elderly victim
If the elderly or the dependent adult victim dies because of restraining them, the judge has the jurisdiction to enhance your prison sentence. The enhancements include:
- If the victim were at the age of 70 years or above when your crime commission caused their death, you would attract seven years in prison
- If the victim of false imprisonment was below 70 years old, the judge imposes an additional five years to your sentencing
Suitable Legal Defenses for California Penal Code 236 PC
Even though false imprisonment is a serious offense, it is also a crime that many innocent people get wrongly accused. You may have had the legal authority to detain the person like making a citizen’s arrest or retaking your property. That said, you can build strong defenses and fight the lawsuit successfully, getting the criminal charges dismissed or reduced. With the help of your lawyer, you can use the legal defenses below to argue against your charges in court.
You Didn’t Restrain the Plaintiff Against Their Will
If you didn’t hold the alleged victim against their consent, it could not be false imprisonment. This suggests that if you were with the accuser, and their presence was voluntary without you restraining or constraining them, that’s not false imprisonment. You need an experienced lawyer to build a strong defense if you did not confine the plaintiff by using force or deceit.
Parental Rights
Every parent has the jurisdiction to control their child and instill discipline in ways such as imposing timeouts or grounding them. It is perfectly legal to restrain your child against their consent as long as they don’t experience needless suffering or incur injuries. The court cannot convict you for falsely imprisoning your child if you are not acting with any malicious or unlawful intent.
You Made A Citizen’s Arrest
Another common defense you could use is you secured a citizen’s arrest. Often there is a misconception about this, but if you made a lawful citizen’s arrest, the court cannot and should not convict you. Under California law, you can confine another person if you catch them committing a crime like a burglary or battery.
Shopkeeper’s/ Store Owners Privilege
Per California law, shopkeepers and store owners are allowed to detain, confine, or restrain someone else who is found shoplifting according to California Penal Code 459.5 PC. You, as a store owner, have the privilege to restrain the suspect and investigate their activities. However, the law requires you to investigate the matter in a sensible manner and for a reasonable time. The court, though, can determine reasonableness by storekeepers on a case by case basis.
You Acted in Self-defense
Under California law, you are allowed to use proportional physical when defending yourself from impending possible harm. You, however, must prove to the court that there was a reasonable belief that you were about to sustain bodily injury. You could, for example, defend yourself from a violent spouse if you reasonably believe that they are about to inflict bodily injury to you by locking them in the house from outside. If your spouse press charges against you for false imprisonment, your lawyer can prove to the court that the victim lied, and you were defending yourself from violence.
The Accuser Consented to Your Acts
Lack of consent is an element the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt in court when facing false imprisonment charges. If the accuser consented to the confinement, detainment, or restraint, your criminal lawyer can defend you in court and have the case dismissed. Also, if the accuser consented to any of these acts, the court cannot convict you for false imprisonment. These acts include:
- Restraining someone else during a self-defense session
- Running a commercial “escape room” game
- Engaging in consensual bondage
You carry the burden to prove that the plaintiff consented to the detainment. Pieces of evidence you can to prove consent are:
- Eyewitness testimony
- Written communications like email and text messages
- Audio and video recordings
You Had Legal Authority to Restrain the Plaintiff
The court cannot convict you for false imprisonment if you are legally allowed to restrain someone else. Usually, persons with the legal authority to detain other persons are law enforcement persons and police officers. This means if you fall under the category of police officers, guards, or any other law enforcement officer, you can argue in court using this defense.
Crimes You Can Get Charged In Lieu Of or Adding to California PC 236
These are that offenses the prosecution could choose to charge you in place of or adding to your PC 236 charge. The judge also has the jurisdiction to lower and add these charges determined on a case by case basis. Crimes related to California false imprisonment are:
California PC 278: Child Abduction Law
Per California PC 278, child abduction, also called child-stealing, occurs when you maliciously take or confine a child from their legal custodian/ guardian when you have zero custodial rights over the said child. When you don’t have custodial rights over a child means you have no obligation to control or take physical care of the child. Persons who right of custody include:
- One who has received custodian rights through a court order
- The child’s parent given that the court has not revoked or restricted their right of custody
Under child abduction laws in California, you don’t have to move the child or make them go somewhere. Instead, you only have to hide the child from their guardian or detain them. PC 278 makes child-stealing a wobbler. The prosecution has the jurisdiction to charge you either with a misdemeanor or felony child abduction.
If the jury convicts you for a misdemeanor crime, you could serve time in the county jail for not more than one year or pay a fine not exceeding $1,000. If the judge convicts you for felony child abduction, you could serve time in state prison for a period not exceeding four years or pay a fine of an amount not exceeding $1,000. Also, the court could order you to compensate the prosecution agency for costs incurred to track down the abducted child.
California PC Section 210.5: False Imprisonment to Protect from Arrest
You are guilty of false imprisonment of a hostage per California PC section 210.5 if you use menace or violence to imprison another person to protect yourself from arrest unlawfully. To prove that you violated Penal Code 210.5 the prosecution must reveal that:
- You faced an impending arrest
- You detained, confined, or restrained someone else by threat or force
- You intended to protect yourself from an imminent arrest by restricting someone else
- You made your victim go or stay somewhere against their consent
- Your act of false imprisonment increased the risk of psychological or physical harm to the victim you used as a shield
California PC Sections 207, 208, 209, and 209.5: Kidnapping
Per California PC 207, you commit kidnapping when you move someone else to another place against their will by using fear or force. The law considers moving the victim even the shortest distance as kidnapping. Under PC 207, 208, 209, and 209.5, confinement, the threat of violence, or actual violence are necessary elements of the crime that the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt before the judge can convict you. Use of fear or force means that you kidnapped the victim by force or threatened to cause bodily harm to them if they refused to move.
The court can enhance your charges to aggravated kidnapping if you move someone else by using fraud, fear, or force and:
- You kidnap someone else when committing the crime of carjacking
- The victim incurs physical injuries or dies
- You hold the victim for ransom
- The victim is a minor below the age of 14
- When you demand ransom to release the kidnapping victim
Aggravated kidnapping attracts severe charges in California, where you could serve time in state prison for five, eight, or 11 years if the kidnapping victim were at the age of 14 during the crime commission. The judge could sentence you to life imprisonment with the possibility of parole is you kidnapped somebody for:
- A reward
- A ransom
- Extortion as detailed under PC 518
- Robbery as detailed under PC 211
- Various sex crimes like unlawful sodomy (PC 286), forced oral sex (PC section 288a), and lewd acts with a child (PC 288)
Contact a Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
False imprisonment charges can compromise your career, reputation, savings, and even worse, prevent you from seeing your family or loved ones should you get sentenced to prison. Hiring a competent criminal defense attorney is essential to increase the chances of your acquittal.
The team at Van Nuys Criminal Attorney consists of criminal lawyers with a proven track record and many years’ experience with defending clients around Los Angeles against false imprisonment charges. Solid defense, representation in court, and thorough research are what our attorneys zero in on until the court dismisses or reduces your sentencing. To speak with a defense lawyer, call 818-484-1100. You can ring us anytime, and you will get first-class legal counsel.
California has extremely harsh penalties when a person is found guilty of resisting arrest. The state takes the crime seriously because if citizens fail to respect peace officers, EMTs, or public officers, it will interfere with the performance of their duties, which will lead to chaos. But sometimes the prosecutor might exaggerate the charges or wrongfully accuse a person of committing this offense. At the Leah Legal, we provide the best defense for people facing charges of resisting arrest. Our Van Nuys attorneys have further highlighted the crime in this article.
Overview of Resisting Arrest
As per PC 148, it is a criminal offense for a person to intentionally or deliberately obstruct, delay, or resist a peace officer or EMT from executing his or her official duties. The lawful duties in question include almost everything job-related and not limited to the act of making an arrest. PC 148 is a crime on its own with distinct penalties upon conviction.
Take note that you don’t need to be guilty of the underlying crime to be convicted of violating PC 148. Even if you are innocent of the crime whose reason for arrest you disputed, the court will find you guilty of resisting arrest. This means that it is against the law for an innocent person to resist arrest.
However, law enforcement officers are prohibited from using excessive force when responding to the reaction of a suspect resisting, delaying, or obstructing an investigation or arrest.
Recently, in the new circles, cases of police using excessive force on suspects resisting arrests have been on the rise resulting in serious injuries or death on the person resisting arrests. Most of these cases have, however, been associated with racism or ethnic biasness by police. While these cases are there, it’s critical to understand what prosecutors must prove to convict a person for resisting arrest.
Three Things a Prosecutor Must Prove Under PC 148 to Convict you of Resisting Arrest
To demonstrate that the defendant is guilty of violating PC 148, the prosecutor must assert the following elements:
- The Casualty a Peace Officer, EMT, or Public Officer Lawfully Executing or Attempting to Execute Official Duties.
The prosecutor must show the jury that the victim, in this case, a peace officer, was executing or trying to execute official duty that is within his or her job description. If the officer were doing anything outside his or her job description, the arrest would be illegal in the first place, which means you can challenge resisting arrest charges that are brought against you for disputing an arrest.
Keep in mind that an officer can only be executing lawful duties if he or she uses reasonable force when conducting an arrest. If the force exceeds what is considered reasonable force, the force becomes excessive, and the officer will no longer be engaging in a lawful duty. Therefore, you can challenge this element if excessive force was used during the arrest.
- The Offender Intentionally Fought Back, Foiled, or Delayed the Execution of Lawful Responsibilities.
Under this element, critical terms are consciousness and intention. You don’t need to know that your conduct is illegal to be guilty. If your actions were deliberate, you would be subject to PC 148 charges. But if you inadvertently conduct yourself in a manner that obstructs a peace officer form executing legal duties, then you are innocent of these charges.
Note that the terms resist, delay, or obstruct may sound vague. For this reason, it is up to the prosecutor to show the actions amount to resisting, obstructing, or delaying arrest. They must show that you intentionally ran away, hid, or physically fought off the arresting officer.
You could still be guilty if the prosecutor can show there was physical compliance, but you gave a false name during the arrest and booking process.
Similarly, a third party who has not committed any crime can end up with a conviction for resisting arrest if the officer feels their actions, for instance, talking to the arrestee, is delaying the arrest the officer is trying to make. A third party will also be guilty of resisting arrest if they swear, jeer or say things that threaten the safety of the officer making an arrest. If the words don’t pose any threats of violence against the EMT or public officer, the action will not be deemed as resisting arrest.
- The Offender Knew or Ought to have Known that the Victim was Executing Official Duties.
The prosecuting attorney must also show that you had knowledge or should have known the officer was engaged in the execution of official duties. But the decision on whether or not you knew an officer was performing lawful duties is objectively left to the court.
For example, if you are on the phone while driving and fail to notice that a police officer is pursuing you, the court will still find you guilty of resisting arrest even if you were not aware an officer was pursuing you. The court will presume that if a reasonable person were driving under the same circumstances, he or she would have known that an officer was pursuing them and stopped.
You should understand that PC 148 is not only limited to the act of resisting arrest. Any interference of the performance of official duty amounts to resisting arrest. If you prevent the authorities from interviewing a witness, interfere with the travel of police officers to the scene of a crime, or attempt to interfere with officers monitoring a suspect, you are guilty of PC 148 violation.
A person is subject to PC 148 charges if he or she commits any of the acts defined under this statute, which are; resist, obstruct, or delay. Also, with the arrival of smartphones, Californians record officers every time they are making an arrest, mainly if there is an altercation at the scene. If you are where you are required to be or in a public place when recording an arrest, the officers don’t have any right to arrest you. However, if you are recording the video at a location you have no right to be, you can end up with charges and a sentence for resisting arrest.
Penalties for Resisting Arrest as per PC 148
Resisting arrest is a misdemeanor in California, and upon conviction; you will be subject to the following consequences:
- No more than twelve months in a Los Angeles County jail
- Up to 1000 dollars in court fines
A judge may also impose summary probation in place of jail incarceration. But keep in mind that the probation comes with a lot of conditions. If you violate these terms of probation, the judge will cancel the probation and have you serve the original sentence.
Fighting a Resisting Arrest Charge
Whenever you are facing resisting arrest charges in Van Nuys, you should talk to Leah Legal immediately so that they can begin preparing your defense. The reason you should speak to a criminal defense attorney is that they have in-depth knowledge of these statutes and will ensure you won’t face charges for a crime you didn’t commit. An attorney will analyze the specifics and nature of your case and put up the right defenses. Some of the legal defenses that can apply in these charges include:
No Likely or Probable Cause
The 4th Amendment requires an arresting officer to have likely or probable cause for an arrest to be considered legal. If the officer lacked probable cause during an arrest, the arrest is not lawful. This means that even if you resist, obstruct or delay the unlawful arrest, the court will not find you guilty of violating PC 148. Also, if the officer engages in any unlawful activity while making the arrest, such as racial profiling and conducting an illegal search, then even if you resist, the court will not find you guilty.
It is not common for law enforcement officers to enter a property where they suspect drug activity and search the area without a search warrant and then claim that they had consent from the owner once they have enough evidence. If the police officer observed the crime, then he or she can make a lawful arrest but with an arrest warrant. The only other way an arrest will be legal is when an officer has probable cause.
Probable cause will be present if a sober and cautious officer believes that a person is engaging or has engaged in criminal activity. An officer must point out specific facts that make him or her believe that the defendant engaged in criminal activity before the arrest.
Similarly, an illegal arrest means that the evidence gathered against you will not hold up in court because it is inadmissible. The prosecution may be forced to offer a plea deal or drop the charges.
Our defense attorneys at the Leah Legal could also file a Pitchess Motion there is evidence to show an officer engaged in police misconduct. If the judge grants the motion, the officer must provide a copy of the personnel file containing all documentation of complaints and police misconduct. With this kind of evidence, your criminal defense attorney can force the prosecution to offer a better plea deal.
False Allegations
A police officer might falsely accuse you of resisting arrest just to cover up their misconduct. Others will bring false accusations just because they don’t like you or due to racial profiling. Moreover, you might face resisting arrest accusations because of requesting an explanation for the reason for your arrest. An officer who thinks that it is rude to request an explanation for arrest will arrest you for resisting arrest.
If this happens and you are facing charges of violating PC 148, your defense attorney should explain the events that led to the criminal accusations. The police bodycam footage and statements from eyewitnesses can be used as evidence to show you are falsely accused. Filing a Pitchess Motion could also help you prove that you are a victim of false allegations.
Self-Defense
Police officers are required by the law to use reasonable force when making an arrest. Any use of force that exceeds reasonable is excessive, and if an officer of the law uses excessive force during arrest, you have a right to resist or fight back. However, there is a particular set of standards on when you should back off. One of these standards is you can use no more force than what is deemed necessary for self-defense. The other standard is that the force used to fight back is reasonable, and a sober person under similar circumstances could have used the same force.
If this is the case, then your attorney can assert that you were protecting yourself or another party from harm. Take note that if the police officer uses excessive force when responding to forceful behavior or aggressiveness from your part, the court will not consider resisting arrest as self-defense.
No Willful Act
As mentioned earlier, an accused can only be guilty under PC 148 if the conduct was intentional or willful. An excellent attorney can argue that you obstructed delayed or resisted arrest by accident and that you didn’t resist arrest knowingly.
Critical Evidence in Resisting Arrest Cases
A defendant cannot use self-defense if an arrest is lawful, which makes self-defense a common defense strategy in PC 148 charges.
Police cannot fabricate evidence to justify their reason for entering a household and conducting a search if they have no probable cause for doing so or for making an arrest. It is your role as a defendant to provide all the evidence that can help demonstrate the conduct by the police at the time of arrest was illegal. Some of the crucial evidence you will require for this includes:
- The Law Enforcement Officer’s Personnel File
Where there are suspicions of police misconduct, your attorney can register a Pitchess Motion. If the court grants the motion, the defense team can access documents that contain complaints registered against the officer in the past.
If the file shows that the officer has a history of police misconduct, the court will share with the defense team the name and contact of the people who registered various complaints. Excellent criminal defense attorneys usually have investigators who conduct independent investigations on complex cases. Such an investigator will be used to track down the complainant and find out if the complaints are credible. In the event they are, the attorney can use this for negotiations during plea bargains.
- Video Evidence
The Van Nuys police department has equipped its officers with body cams. Police cars are also fitted with cameras, dash cams, and audio because every event that happens before an arrest is critical in determining if there was police misconduct.
Eyewitnesses also can use smartphones to record when an arrest is going on if they are in the right place. If an officer was using excessive force, these videos could act as reliable evidence.
- The Police and Defendant Testimony
When an officer makes an arrest, the law requires the officer to prepare a police report consisting of the offender’s and victim’s testimony. If the officer lies in the police report, the body and dash cams will show otherwise. Statements by eyewitnesses can also help in building a strong defense.
Plea Bargains and Resisting Arrest Cases
A plea deal is an agreement between the accused and the prosecutor, where the accused confesses to committing another crime in exchange for a lesser sentence. Usually, the defendant is the one that initiates this process, but at times, the prosecution can also initiate the process. If the charges against you are for resisting arrest, the prosecutor will only accept a plea for trespassing or disturbing peace.
Plea deals are good for defendants because they reduce embarrassments and are cheap. If the facts of the case are against you and no kind of defense can save you, a plea deal can be a great alternative. The prosecutor won’t quickly agree to a plea deal unless they realize they have no guarantee of winning a case. When this is the case, your defense attorney makes an offer, and if the prosecuting attorney agrees to it, they lower the charges in exchange for a confession for another offense.
Plea bargains are often costly and time-consuming, and despite this, the deal must go before the court so that they can determine if it is in the interest of justice. It is up to your attorney to convince the prosecutor and the court in general that you need to face a different and lesser charge because the defendant has no prior offense, was provoked, or because it is in the interest of justice.
Related Charges
Multiple crimes are related to resisting arrest. These are:
Resisting an Executive Officer
As per California PC 69, it is illegal to resist an executive officer. CPC 69 is violated when you willfully and unlawfully attempt to avert an executive official from executing their official duties using threats or violence or use energy or violence to contest an executive officer from executing official duties.
An executive officer, in this case, includes elected officers, government prosecutors, and defense attorneys, judges, and police officers.
Prosecutors file this offense as a misdemeanor or a felony. A conviction for a misdemeanor attracts a penalty of no more than a year in jail while a felony sentence will attract 16, 24, or 36 months in the Los Angeles county jail.
Assault
Assault is defined under CPC 240 as an attempt to commit a violent injury to somebody else. The charge is compounded with resisting arrest, where there is a physical altercation between the suspect and the arresting officer. Keep in mind that even if the officer is not injured, but you made verbal threats, and you had the present ability to carry out the threat, you will still be charged with assault.
To earn a conviction, the prosecutor must prove the following elements:
- You as the defendant did something that could result in the use of force against an officer
- You engaged in the act deliberately
- You knew of the facts that would make a sober person believe that the conduct would openly or perhaps result in the use of energy.
- When you acted, you could apply force on someone else
The punishment for assault is a maximum of twelve months in jail and 2000 dollars in fine.
The Battery on a Peace Officer
It is possible to be charged with battery on a peace officer on top or in place of resisting arrest. California PC 243 is the statute that defines this offense as the intentional and illegal touching of a peace officer in a harmful or offensive fashion when the officer is executing official duties. The statute is violated when you commit battery, and you know or should have known that the victim of your actions is an EMT, public or private officer executing lawful duties.
The penalties for this offense upon conviction include jail incarceration for a year and court fines amounting to a maximum of two thousand dollars. These consequences are similar to those of assault, but if you cause severe injuries to the officer, the offense becomes a felony punishable by four years in prison.
Evading Arrest
California Vehicle Code 2800.1 forbids intentionally evading a pursuing officer in a vehicle. VC 2800.2, on the other hand, prohibits evading a pursuing officer while driving recklessly. VC 2800.1 is a misdemeanor with a sentence of no more than a year in jail, while VC 2800.2 is a wobbler and can be filed as a misdemeanor or felony based on the facts and circumstances of the case.
Find a Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
If all officers adhered to the law when making an arrest, very few people would face resisting arrest charges in Van Nuys. Unfortunately, many officers violate the law resulting in wrongful accusations. At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we are here to provide defense against these charges. Contact us today at 818-484-1100 for a free consultation.
Providing alcohol to a minor by buying it for them or selling it directly to the minor is a punishable offense, attracting many penalties. Moreover, it is unlawful to give your underaged child alcohol, regardless of whether it happens at home or elsewhere. The law provides specific punishment for each case where a minor gets access to alcohol, whether he/she got it from someone else’s purchase or by himself/herself. Despite the existing regulations, it is common for defendants to face accusations for facts that do not accurately portray what went on. Thus, you may find yourself facing charges for an offense that you were not aware of committing, mainly because the minor in question lied.
Therefore, the different situations that lead to arrest and trial warrant the need for a criminal defense lawyer who will help you navigate your case for a good outcome. With your lawyer’s help, you can prepare legal defenses and provide evidential sources to support your claims based on the case’s circumstances. We at Leah Legal work hard to provide excellent legal services to our clients in Van Nuys, California, by creating open interactive sessions with them. Through the different meetings we hold with you, we will determine the cause of arrest and create personalized solutions to help you overcome the charges and resume your normal life.
The Legal Definition of Vending or Providing Alcohol to Minors
Once a police officer arrests you for vending or providing alcoholic drinks to a person under 18 years, several repercussions could lead to prosecution. Therefore, you must understand the different elements that define the crimes to raise awareness of the kinds of arguments that the prosecutor is likely to present against you. In section 25658 of the California Business and Professional Code, it is an offense for either a vendor to sell alcohol to minors or for a minor to buy the drink by unlawful means. Consequently, the crime affects both the vendor and the receptor, who, in this case, is an underaged person.
Upon arraignment in court, your lawyer will guide you through the various requirements, including the plea-taking stage. We recommend pleading not guilty for the offense, especially if you can rely on your evidential sources. In doing so, you will allow your criminal defense attorney to present persuasive arguments that could secure your acquittal or significantly reduce the penalties issued. However, during the trial period, the prosecutor also makes his or her presentations against you, showing all admissible proof to persuade the judge to find you guilty.
Criminal trial processes place the burden of proof on the prosecutor, meaning that he/she will have to show that you are guilty of the charged offense beyond any reasonable doubt.
To do this, the prosecutor will have to prove that you engaged in all the crime elements relevant to your charge and therefore be answerable to the authorities. Since the standard of proof is high, the prosecutor must also strive to prove all elements, meaning that the case may be dismissed by failure to establish a single factor. Thus, your criminal defense lawyer should be keen to pick up on matters that can create reasonable doubt to prevent the trial’s successful completion in the prosecutor’s favor. The elements that the prosecutor must prove are:
- You Provided or Sold Alcohol to a Person
Different scenarios could make up the first element of the crime, depending on your position as an offender. Normally, selling an alcoholic drink would require you to be an owner or employee in a liquor store or any other similar establishment. Subsequently, the prosecutor must prove that you could perform vending activities under the store owner’s mandate or supervision.
Upon establishing that you were involved in running a Liquor store by selling drinks to different people, the prosecutor should also show that you engaged in a sale. A regular sale of items involves an offer and acceptance, whereby the customer will provide money in return for the goods. Moreover, a purchase receipt should be available for records and a copy issued to the buyer. Thus, the prosecutor will rely on such receipt records to show that you conducted the sale. Since most receipt formats also include the date and time of the purchase, the prosecutor can use the information to make an accurate establishment of the correct time of sale.
Alternatively, you may be an adult who does not work in a Liquor shop or supermarket but offered to buy the minor’s alcohol. In such circumstances, the prosecutor should show that you either volunteered or gave in to the minor’s requests to buy the alcohol for him/her. Therefore, following these requirements, the prosecutor must provide proof of you handing the drink to the underaged person. The evidential sources may come from witness statements, police reports that include observed facts before the arrest, or surveillance footage.
Regardless of the source used to prove your involvement in providing the minor with alcohol, your criminal defense lawyer can raise counterarguments to challenge the prosecutor’s claims, especially during the prosecutor’s witness cross-examination. Moreover, it is not sufficient to show that you handed alcohol to the minor, especially if there is no proof of him/her consuming it after. Therefore, your lawyer will have to observe the prosecutor’s tactics and derive discord points to prevent the prosecutor from making exaggerated allegations.
- The Person who Received the Alcohol was a Minor
It is also crucial for the prosecutor to prove that the alcohol receptor is minor for the California Business and Professional Code. The necessity of providing this element is paramount because establishing that the person in question was not a minor would lead to a case dismissal. Showing that a person is below the legal drinking age may be easy, depending on the kind of proof that the prosecutor chooses to rely on.
In most cases, the prosecution team will get in touch with the person who received the alcohol and request certified documents, including birth certificates, proof of school admission dates, and driver’s license. Using these documents, the prosecutor can establish whether the person was a minor, and therefore unlawfully held to taking alcohol from you.
However, your criminal defense lawyer should remain keen enough on the prosecutor’s documentary evidence to ensure that they are legitimate. Moreover, suppose there are any witnesses called to corroborate the documentary sources of evidence supplied by the prosecutor. In that case, it is necessary to cross-examine them, especially if you or your lawyer spot inconsistencies with their account of events concerning the minor in question’s date of birth or school admission years.
Conversely, if you are a minor arrested for your unlawful engagements in buying alcohol, the prosecutor will likely engage your parents or guardians when trying to source evidence. Moreover, he/she may also approach you directly and ask you some questions to derive a conclusion on your underage position. Suppose you are to attend such interrogation sessions. In that case, we recommend getting in touch with your lawyer, who will ensure that the prosecutor does not impose irrelevant questions for you to answer. However, the process should not be too invasive, as it is usually not difficult to establish a person’s age, especially if sufficient records exist to provide the necessary information.
- You Consumed the Alcoholic Drink after Obtaining it
Proving that you took the alcohol applies when you, like the minor, are also party to the prosecution for the unlawful engagements. Thus, the prosecutor’s focus will be showing that you opened the alcohol and took it, meaning that you violated statutory regulations completely. The prosecutor will be keen to show that you took the drink close to where you purchased it, even outside the premises. Showing this detail is important, as it rules out the possibility of you purchasing alcohol from another establishment and consuming it at a different location.
Typically, the prosecutor’s claims will only succeed if sufficient evidence is available to support his/her shares. Thus, there may be video footage of you taking the alcohol, whether you were alone or in your friends’ company. Moreover, the judge accepts evidence from sworn witnesses who saw you take the alcoholic drinks after buying it from a store or any other place where alcohol is available. If the judge accepts these sources of proof, the prosecutor is likely to succeed in showing your criminal indulgence.
- You Faced Arrest During a Trapdoor Operation
As mentioned, many different circumstances lead to arrest for vending or providing alcohol to underage persons. Among these circumstances is when you, as a minor, face arrest for trying to enter a club or any other age-restricted area and trying to buy alcohol while there. Additionally, you are most likely to face arrest during such an operation for showing a fake Identification card or driver’s license that you hope will give you access to the club.
There will be security officers at the club doors during a trapdoor operation whose work is to admit people into the establishment. These officers will be in coordination with the police to provide information on any minors’ presence in the place. Therefore, once the security guards spot you and suspect you of being a minor, they will contact the police and stall you until the law enforcement officers arrive and take you in their custody.
When arraigned in court, the prosecutor will not have to do much to show that you were involved in the unlawful purchase of alcohol, since the facts serve as evidence that can attract penalties. However, the prosecutor must establish that you got hold of alcohol or were interested in purchasing before the police officers arrived at the club location to promote relevance in the charges you face.
- You are a Vendor who Worked or Owned a Valid Alcohol-Selling Establishment
Where you are a vendor or an owner of an establishment selling alcohol, the prosecutor will have to prove that you have all the necessary licenses to conduct the business and sell alcohol to a minor. Moreover, the prosecutor will have to prove that you allowed the minor(s) to drink at your establishment by providing seats for them or even serving them.
In this case, any establishment from a hotel, a small drinking joint, or even a Liquor shop with a sitting area outside. Depending on the facts in your case, the prosecutor will also have to show that you knew the alcohol buyers were minors and provided the drinks. Conversely, even if you did not suspect that the person in question was underage, the court will not accept it as a defense, especially where you do not provide persuasive evidence to support your claims.
- You Faced Arrest in an Undercover Operation
Moreover, law enforcement officers have a mandate to conduct occasional undercover operations that aim to capture adults who enable underage drinking by purchasing alcohol on behalf of minors. The California Bureau on Alcohol Control also partners with the police in such operations that target unmonitored outlets where minors may easily get away buying alcohol.
During an undercover operation, police officers often engage with an underage volunteer who works for them by approaching you and requesting you to buy alcohol for them. Although you will be unaware of the underlying plan, you will be guilty of an offense for proceeding to take money from the minor and buying the alcohol. Other times, the police may become directly involved by placing one of their younger-looking officials to conduct the same exercise to lure you into buying alcohol for them. It is beneficial for you to note that the prosecutor will still succeed in finding you guilty even if the officer was not a minor, as long as you believe he/she was one and bought alcohol after the requests.
Once the officers observe you providing alcohol to the minor, they will arrest you and detain you for the unlawful activity. During the trial, you may find it challenging to deny the charges against you, especially because of the overwhelming evidence that the undercover investigation officers present to the prosecutor. Nevertheless, with a criminal defense lawyer present, you can still raise several defenses that will lead to the acquittal of charges or mitigation of penalties.
Penalties for the Offense of Providing Alcohol to Underage Persons
The punishments issued after the prosecutor succeeds in showing your guilty engagements range based on the specific offense you are guilty of. The particular crimes and their penalties are:
Providing a Minor with Alcohol
Suppose you are an adult who enabled underage drinking by buying alcohol for a minor. In that case, the judge may order you to pay fines of up to $1,000 and provide twenty-four hours of community service in a coroner’s office or at a medical treatment facility.
You may also face additional penalties if the minor you provided alcohol to sustained injuries from getting too drunk. You may receive a jail sentence ranging from six months to a year in county jail. You may also have to pay a $1000 fine.
Minors Buying Alcohol
If you are an underage defendant, you will likely receive a $250 fine penalty and up to thirty-two hours of community service for a first-time offense. You will receive additional penalties for subsequent violations, including $500 fines and forty-eight hours of community service.
Serving Alcoholic Drinks to Minors
When you are guilty of serving drinks to minors in an establishment, you will face a fifteen-day license suspension, meaning that you cannot operate your business during these fifteen days. Additionally, you are liable to meet all other penalties issued to adults enabling underage drinking.
Parents Providing Alcohol to Children
If found guilty of providing alcohol to your children, the judge will issue a one-year jail sentence or a payment of a $1000 fine.
Defenses Available for the Offense
Your criminal defense lawyer should prepare several defenses available for the case that will support your claims. The possible defenses include:
Law Exceptions
If you are a minor, you can plead an exception under B&P Code 25667 that excludes you from legal liability if you were the first to contact emergency medical services after consuming alcohol and facing adverse effects. However, you must ensure that you remain where an accident occurred until the medical professionals arrive. It is also important that you do not engage in drunk driving after consuming alcohol, as it will reduce your chances of using the defense.
Moreover, you can include B&P Code 25660 that provides exceptions for vendors who reasonably believed that the minor was not underage. Supposing the minor presented an identification card that appeared valid, the exception will be applied, as you had no means of scrutinizing the card to determine that it was fake.
Mistake of Fact
Sometimes, you may also escape liability by a genuine mistake of fact that the minor was of legal age. The error arises when the minor presents himself/herself more maturely by dressing or behaving like an adult. While this defense is acceptable, it is not always easy to convince the judge or jury about your genuine error. Hence, your lawyer must ensure that there is enough information to prove your honest mistake and absolve you of criminal liability.
Find a Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
Facing a criminal arrest and trial is quite stressful, mainly because of the numerous procedures and requirements you must fulfill. Therefore, it helps to have a defense attorney who will support you throughout the trial process by raising defenses and counterarguments on your behalf. At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we provide legal services you can count on to help you combat criminal charges of providing alcohol to a minor. Call us at 818-484-1100 to get started with us today.
Often, when you hear the phrase ‘white-collar crimes,’ you may remember the 1990s Enron scandal or how Martha Stewart was practicing insider trading. White-Collar crime is an unlawful act, which involves deceit, and its perpetrator does not need to use force or threats to commit it.
Individuals who have been charged with white-collar crimes are alleged to have taken part in fraud or theft, thus prejudicing their victims. Victims of white-collar crimes may lose money due to fraudulent transactions or suffer non-monetary injury, including losing their reputation and good name.
Convicts of white-collar crimes may face a lengthened prison or jail term, as well as be ordered to pay hefty fines. This is why you require a highly-qualified white-collar criminal defense attorney to help you build an excellent defense strategy.
At Leah Legal, we have helped numerous defendants in Los Angeles become acquitted of their white-collar crime charges. In some instances, we may enter into a plea bargaining agreement with the prosecution for you to obtain reduced charges. Read on to know more about white-collar crimes.
History of White Collar Crimes
White-collar crimes such as embezzlement and bribery outdate modern history, since they have been in existence for a long time. However, the first recorded case of a law regulating white-collar crimes was in 1473 in the U.K.
In the past, individuals committing white-collar crimes did not receive much attention. However, this changed upon the onset of the industrial revolution. During the industrial revolution, some monopolistic companies developed policies to squelch their competitors, and this led to highly-priced, low-quality goods. The public was outraged for paying high prices for cheap items just because of corporate greed. This led to various laws that talk about white-collar crimes. For instance, in the United States in 1890, Congress enacted the Sherman Antitrust Act.
In the early 1990s, some journalists strayed from reporting regular news to talk about incidences of corruption in both the private and public sectors. These journalists were fondly referred to as the muckrakers, and they highlighted cases of medical insurance fraud, insider trading, and bribery, among others. These journalists incensed the public, and there was a clamor for more laws criminalizing such acts.
Edwin Hardin Sutherland coined the term ‘white-collar crime’ in 1939. He was a famous author on this subject, and he perpetuated the view that the elite class primarily committed these crimes. Sutherland’s work inspired many states in the U.S. to enact strict laws regulating white-collar crimes, including the state of California.
How are White Collar Crimes Investigated?
Both federal and state agencies have the power to investigate white-collar crimes. In the state of California, white-collar crimes are investigated by the FBI and the Department of Justice. Under the Department of Justice, there is the Bureau of Investigation, which has specialized White Collar Investigation Teams. These teams investigate all types of white-collar crimes, and they majorly concentrate on complex cases that are linked to organized crime and criminal networks. They target multi-layered and sophisticated cases of fraud.
White-collar criminal investigations can stretch for a couple of months or even years. Sometimes, you may be unaware that you are the subject of a white-collar crime investigation until the prosecutor files formal charges against you.
Immediately you suspect that a federal or state agency is involving you in an investigation; you should reach out to a white-collar criminal defense attorney. At the early investigation stage, you may find it difficult to know whether or not you are a suspect. Make sure you consult with an attorney before meeting any law enforcement officer, even if you believe that you are being interrogated as a potential witness.
Types of White Collar Crimes
The types of white-collar crimes include:
- Environmental law violations
- Fraud
- Intellectual property theft
- Tax evasion
- Organized crimes with no violent elements
- Antitrust violations
- Trade secrets theft
- Embezzlement
- Insider trading
- Money laundering
- Welfare fraud
- Bribery
- Securities fraud
- Counterfeiting
- Medical insurance fraud
- Public corruption
- Extortion
- Bank fraud
- Credit card fraud
- Cell phone fraud
Here is a detailed analysis of the most common types of white-collar crimes in the state of California:
1. Fraud
Fraud is the use of deception to obtain an unfair or unlawful gain. According to California Penal Code 470 – 483.50, an individual can be charged with fraud if it is found out that he secured or intended to acquire goods, money, or services at an extremely reduced price, or sell them at exorbitant prices; or if he obtained a document or license by issuing false information.
Penal Codes 470 – 483.50 highlight that the offense of fraud encompasses mortgage fraud, tax fraud, check fraud, banking fraud, insurance fraud, mail fraud, and fraudulent activities against aged individuals. The offense of fraud is a wobbler, and the prosecution may charge it as either a felony or a misdemeanor.
Fraud convicts may face severe punishments, including revocation of professional licenses, payment of hefty fines, significant jail term, and seizure of personal assets. Fraud convicts who are also undocumented immigrants may be subjected to forceful deportation or detention.
Furthermore, fraud is considered as an offense involving moral turpitude. This means that a conviction of fraud may prevent you from accessing job opportunities in the future, as well as securing a place to live. A prior fraud conviction can negatively impact your social life and that of your loved ones because most people will view you as a dishonest and untrustworthy person.
For you to be convicted of fraud, the prosecution must show that you had a specific intent to defraud another person. If you had no such intent, you would be acquitted. Your defense attorney can use various methods to demonstrate that you had no intent to defraud. For instance, he/she can assert that you desired to return the fraudulently obtained money or goods to its rightful owner.
2. Embezzlement
According to California Penal Code 503, embezzlement is the act of taking an item that is entrusted to you and belongs to another person. For the court to convict you of embezzlement, the prosecution must show that some property was entrusted in your care, and you possessed it temporarily. Some examples of individuals who are prone to embezzlement charges include employees in the public and private sectors, trustees, organization principals, and board members.
Most individuals who have been charged with embezzlement argue that they had an intention to return the property or money. This defense may not suffice, even if it is true, especially if you do not have an attorney to help you.
You might be charged under California’s grand theft embezzlement laws if you embezzled money or goods whose worth exceeds $950, automobiles, or guns. Grand theft embezzlement is a wobbler, and the prosecutor may charge it as a felony or misdemeanor depending on his discretion. The penalty for misdemeanor grand theft embezzlement is a jail term of a maximum of one year, while that for felony grand theft embezzlement is a three-year jail term.
On the other hand, the prosecution will charge you of petty theft embezzlement if you embezzled items or money whose total value is below $950; and the items do not include automobiles or firearms. The punishment for petty theft embezzlement is a jail term of a maximum of six months and fines that should not exceed $1000.
A conviction of embezzlement can wreak havoc in your personal and professional life. For instance, no person may be willing to give you a job.
3. Identity Theft
The offense of identity theft is well-illustrated in California Penal Code 530.5. There are many cases of identity theft in California. In 2014, the Federal Trade Commission recorded over 330,000 identity theft complaints; and most of them were reported to have occurred in the state of California.
According to Penal Code 530.5, an individual will be held to have committed the offense of identity theft if he uses the information of another person to engage in fraudulent activities. For instance, a person may sign up for a credit card in someone else’s name; and use it to make purchases or gain access to bank accounts or personal information of that person. The elderly and children are the most targeted victims of identity theft in California.
The offense of identity theft is a wobbler, and it can be charged as a misdemeanor or a felony. The penalty for felony identity theft is a state prison term of a maximum of three years or fines that may be up to $10,000. A misdemeanor identity theft conviction may make you serve a county jail term of up to one year or pay fines whose total value should not exceed $1,000.
4. Forgery
You will be charged with the offense of forgery if you design fake business documents or government-issued documents. Also, you will have to answer forgery charges if you create counterfeit U.S. currency, file a false claim with your insurer to obtain money, or even if you write another person’s will without receiving proper authorization.
For the court to convict you of forgery, the prosecution must prove three crucial elements. These elements include having a specific intent to defraud, using writing that is specifically listed in the forgery statutes, and falsely making or altering this writing.
The prosecution department of California considers the offense of forgery as a wobbler, and they can charge it as either a misdemeanor or a felony. According to California Penal Code 473, a person may be charged with the offense of misdemeanor forgery if the property in question has a worth of below $950. The maximum punishment for misdemeanor forgery is a county jail term of one year, community service participation, or $1,000 fine.
The prosecutor might charge you of felony forgery if you had dealt with an item whose value exceeds $950. Convicts of felony forgery may receive a state prison sentence of a maximum of three years, hefty fines that may be up to $10,000, and a court order to participate in community service for a specified period.
Sometimes, you may unknowingly write hot checks, pass false financial documents, or sign for another person in a legal document. These acts can make you face forgery charges, no matter how innocent your intentions were.
If your charge involves writing bad checks, your defense attorney can negotiate for you a bad check diversion program in lieu of jail term. When you opt for the former option, you will have to restitute the victim and take a financial skills class. Once you complete the bad check diversion program, your attorney can assist you to erase the conviction from your record.
5. Insider Trading
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) criminalizes insider trading. According to SEC Rule 10(b) (5), it is unlawful for an individual to sell or purchase security based on information that is not privy to the public.
For the court to hold you guilty of insider trading, the prosecution must show that you sold or purchased security, you possessed private information that was material, and the public was not aware of this information. The offense of insider trading has the most severe penalties. Insider trading convicts may face both criminal and civil penalties. For instance, they may pay fines of up to $5million, or serve a state prison sentence of a maximum of 20 years. Additionally, the value of the fine that the court will order you to pay may be up to three times the total amount of losses avoided or profits gained from the illegal trade.
Sentencing Enhancements for White Collar Crimes
The state of California has an aggravated white-collar crime enhancement law, and it is enlisted in Penal Code 186.11. This law permits a judge to add 2 – 5 additional years in prison if there are some aggravating circumstances in your case.
These aggravating circumstances include having prior white-collar crime convictions on your record, or if the offense involved items whose worth exceeds $100,000. Note that the amount of property or money the victim lost will determine the length of your time in state prison upon conviction. For example, if the victim incurred losses that exceed $100,000 but less than $500,000; the judge will add an extra one or two years to your state prison sentence. If the victim lost goods or money whose value exceeds $500,000, you might face an additional 3-5 years in state prison.
The Criminal Trial Process of White Collar Crimes
Typically, a white-collar charge is treated the same way as any other criminal offense. You can be charged with more than white-collar offense, depending on the government’s evidence against you.
As asserted earlier, the investigation process of white-collar crimes usually takes an extended period. Therefore, you must consult a white-collar criminal defense attorney before the prosecution launches its case. An attorney’s early intervention may cause no charges to be filed against you, or the prosecutor will reduce your charges should he decide to file your case.
After the conclusion of the investigation, the law enforcement officers will request an arrest warrant from a judge. The judge will issue the warrant to the police if he believes that the evidence against you is substantial, or you may have possibly committed or involved in the commission of the crime.
When the police receive the warrant, they will put you under arrest. You will have to remain in police custody until you post bail. The bail amounts for white-collar crimes are usually exorbitant. As illustrated by California’s Penal Code 1275, the prosecutor has powers to investigate the source of the money you intend to use to post bail. This is to ensure that you do not get back your freedom with the help of unlawfully obtained funds.
After you have been released on bail terms, the court will schedule a date for arraignment – the first hearing of your case. During the arraignment, the judge will inform you of the charges filed against you; and ask you to take a plea.
If you take a plea of not guilty, the court will set a date for a preliminary hearing or early disposition. If you have been charged with a misdemeanor, your case will be set for pre-trial instead of the preliminary hearing.
The date of the preliminary hearing must be within ten days from the day when you were arraigned in court. In the preliminary hearing, the judge will evaluate your case, and if he holds you answerable to any of your charges, he will set a date for a felony arraignment. At the felony arraignment, the court will again inform you of your charges and ask you to retake a plea.
After the felony arraignment, your case will proceed to the pre-trial conference stage. Here, the judge, the prosecutor, and your attorney will discuss your case. Most plea negotiations occur at this stage. If your case is not resolved at the pre-trial conference, it will move to the final step – trial. During the trial, the jury will listen to the evidence presented by both sides; then issue their verdict.
Find a Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
If the Prosecution Department of California charges you with a white-collar crime in Los Angeles, you should retain an attorney who has extensive experience in defending such cases. At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we understand the serious nature of white-collar cases, and we know the best way to help you solve your case. Call us today at 818-484-1100 for a free consultation.
Cases of bribery are common in the State of California, which form a significant part of the cases we deal with at Leah Legal. Penalties associated with this offense can be severe, and they include a long time behind bars and hefty penalties. Bribery cases involving influential persons and those holding public offices could significantly affect their jobs and social status.
We know that cases of false accusations can thrive for such a severe offense as bribery. We also know that people can misinterpret an innocent act of kindness and mistake it as bribery. That is why we are here, to help people that are facing bribery charges in Los Angeles, California.
We offer guidance, advice, and legal representation to protect your rights and ensure that you get justice in the end.
Legal Understanding of California Bribery Offense
Bribery means offering or accepting anything valuable in exchange for influencing public or government officers or employees. Bribes can take many forms, including gifts and cash payments. In most cases, bribes are taken or issued to influence or trigger favorable treatment. An example is in the case where a public officer asks or receives cash payments to help a business person acquire a government contract. Privileges, favors, services, property, and various goods have been used before as bribes.
In the state of California, bribery applies to any effort to influence a public officer in the line of their work through corruption. It can be in the form of gifts or money. California bribery law is far-reaching and includes various laws with different Sections of the state’s Penal Code, applying to separate entities.
The reason why there are many statutes in the state dealing with bribery is that the general public considers it a repugnant crime. It is not right to cheat the public out of straightforward government services. That is why anyone found guilty of bribery is likely to face severe penalties, which may include a long time of imprisonment and hefty penalties.
The law targets both parties in the deal. It will apply to the person who proposes the bribe and one who seeks the bribe. In most cases, it doesn’t matter whether the offender received or made the bribe. The thought about giving or receiving a bribe and taking action on it is enough to convict a person of bribery.
Again, it will not matter whether or not money explicitly changed hands. An inferred bribe will also count, for instance, through what was said and done or through what was not said or not done.
Elements of California Bribery
There are specific elements to this offense that a prosecutor must prove beyond reasonable doubt for an offender to be found guilty of bribery. These are:
- That the offender gave or offered to provide a public officer a bribe
- That a public officer asked, received, or agreed to accept a bribe
Bribe, in this case, will mean something valuable that was given or received with a fraudulent intent to impact an official issue.
Just like any other criminal case, the prosecutor will have the burden of proof on a bribery case. To understand the elements of this crime better, we shall look at each aspect separately:
California bribery law mainly covers public officers. Public officers, in this case, will include the following:
- Police chiefs
- District attorneys
- Deputy city coroners
- Police officers
- City councilmen/women
- California state senators
- Jurors
- Judges
- Members of the board of supervisors
- Apparent Authority
- Witnesses
The public officer could have technical power in a particular case or not. What matters is that the officer acted within a general range of their jurisdiction.
The officer and the person offering or giving bribe does not have to agree to the idea of bribery. A person can still face bribery charges even if the person they were trying to bribe did not agree to it. Example: An attorney, working on the defense of a person convicted of fraud, attempted to influence a witness not to show up in court. The witness pretends to go along with that idea while all along he/she is cooperating with law enforcement officers. The attorney will still face bribery charges even though the witness did not accept the bribe in the end.
Something valuable: Value is a comprehensive term. In this case, though, the inherent value of the gift or money issued out or received is not essential. What matters is that what was issued out or offered was of a significant amount.
With a corrupt intent: the crime of bribery has a specific intention. A person could not be convicted of bribery in California unless they acted with a corrupt intent. The prosecutor must be able to prove that the defendant acted with wrongful or harmful purpose. The question is, how is it possible for a prosecutor to demonstrate what is in another person’s mind?
California laws allow a prosecutor to use a wide range of substantiation to support his/her claims. Evidence, in this case, could be direct or circumstantial. The prosecutor can present it in the form of videotapes, recordings, and witness accounts. After that, the burden will fall on the judge and the jury to determine what happens in every case.
An official matter: Trying to influence any official matter with a gift or money will be considered as bribery, punishable by law. Any official matter will be applicable in this case, including a decision, vote, or opinion.
Note that bribery laws in California do not specify the exact tradeoff that could result in the crime of bribery. The offense can be committed in more ways than one and can be used to gain favors in more than one area. A person can bribe to obtain general or specific support.
California Bribery and Extortion
California bribery has very similar grounds with another crime in the state, provided under Section 518 of California Penal Code, Extortion. However, both offenses are very different and are charged separately. In both cases, a person gets another to do something. Their difference lies in the leverage they use to make both crimes happen. In a bribery case, the advantage is money, but in extortion, the leverage is fear.
Example: A film manager offers a significant donation to a county official hoping to get an affirmative vote in a deal involving filming rights. This will be a straight case of bribery. However, if the executive intimidates to uncover the corrupt conduct of the office if he does not get an affirmative vote, this will be charged as extortion.
Types of Bribery Crimes in California
Bribery of or by Executive Officers or Public Employee
If you are an employee or a public official, and you receive payments in the course of your job, you can face bribery charges. The law will apply the same to chiefs of police, district attorneys, traffic clerks, building inspectors, among others. This law is provided under Sections 67 & 68 and California Penal Code.
Section 67 of California Statutes covers bribing executive officers. According to this law, it is a felony offense if a person was to offer or give an executive officer something valuable with a corrupt intent to influence the officer’s stand in an official matter. Executive officers covered under this law include:
- District attorneys
- Police officers
- Police chiefs
- Deputy city coroners
Section 67.5 of California Laws covers bribery of public employees and ministerial officers. This section of the law makes it a felony offense for anyone to offer to give or give a public employee or ministerial officer something valuable with a corrupt resolve to influence their stand on an official matter. Examples of public employees include:
- Traffic clerks
- Building inspectors
A public officer is an executive if they have discretion in their job. A ministerial is an officer who follows instructions from a person in higher authority.
Section 68 of California Laws covers bribery by public employees and officers. This section of the law makes it illegal for a ministerial officer, a federal employee, or an executive to ask, receive, or even agree to a bribe. A bribe, as defined above, is something valuable that is given or received with a corrupt resolve to influence an official matter.
Bribery of or by Legislators and Elected Officials
Section 85 of the California Penal Code makes it illegal for anyone to bribe or offer a bribe to legislators to influence their choice in an official matter. The offense is a felony in the state of California. The people covered under this section of the law include:
- State legislators
- City legislative bodies’ members
- County legislative bodies’ members
- School district legislative bodies’ members
Section 85 of the California Penal Code also makes it illegal for a person to use corrupt conduct like deceit or menace to coerce legislators to withhold or give a vote on an important issue. Use of force or threats to oblige a public officer to do something official can also face prosecution under the California Extortion law, provided under Section 518.
Section 86, on the other hand, covers bribery by legislators. According to this law, it is a felony offense for a legislator to agree to receive, ask, or receive something valuable with a corrupt resolve to influence their vote in an official matter.
This same section of the law makes it illegal for any legislator to condition his/her vote on the vote of another legislator.
Bribery by or of Judicial Officers Judges, or Jurors
Section 92 of the California Penal Code makes it a felony offense for a person to offer to give or give a judicial officer something valuable with a corrupt intent to influence their decision on an official matter. Judicial officers covered under this section of law include:
- Judges
- Referees
- Jurors
- Umpires
- Arbitrators
Chapter 93, on the other hand, covers bribery by jurors and judicial officers. According to this law, it is a felony offense for judicial officers to receive, ask, or agree to take a bribe to decide in favor of the person offering the bribe. These are the people charged with determining the outcome of court cases. This section of the law covers the same people covered under Section 92.
Bribery of or by Witnesses
Bribery of witnesses about their testimony is illegal as provided under Section 137(a) of California PEN. Any person who offers or promises to provide something valuable to a witness to influence their testimony can face a felony conviction. The same law makes it illegal for a person to use fraud, or threats of force to make a witness withhold information or give false testimony. The latter could be prosecuted as extortion and charged under Section 518.
Bribery of witnesses concerning trial attendance is provided under Section 138(a) of California PEN. Any person who provides or offers to provide a bribe to a witness to influence their presence to trial will face charges under this law.
Penalties for California Bribery
Bribery is a severe offense in the state of California. Because of the nature of the crime, the offender can face severe consequences if found guilty. The results may include payment of hefty fines, imprisonment for several years, and the possibility of losing one’s position or job. The crime of bribery is always convicted as a felony in the state, unless in cases where the value of the bribe was lower than $400.
Generally, if convicted of bribery, the offender will face two to four years of incarceration. The court will also require you to pay fines in this manner:
- Between two thousand and ten thousand dollars in case the bribe wasn’t received
- The exact amount of bribe or $2000 on the minimum, the one that is greater, in case the bribe was received
- Any amount that is large or more than double the amount of bribe or $10,000, the one that is greater in case the bribe was received
Also, public officers will be required to forfeit their office with no possibility of coming back if they face a conviction of bribery in the course of their duty.
Legal Defenses for California Bribery
Penalties for California bribery are somewhat harsh and will significantly affect several aspects of your life if you get convicted. That is why you need the best legal defense you can garner. Finding an excellent criminal defense attorney will make a significant difference in the outcome of your case. Fortunately, there are several defense strategies that your attorney can use to defend you against bribery charges. Some of these are:
No corrupt intent:
As mentioned above, the crime of bribery is a specific intent one. It means that an offender cannot be convicted if they did not have any corrupt intent. If you are facing bribery charges and you did not intend to influence any official matter corruptly, the court may not find you guilty of the charges. Your defense attorney could argue misunderstanding to explain why you got arrested in the first place. It could also be that you were set up or drunk.
Note that in most bribery cases, the jury will go with the side it believes. If your defense attorney can demonstrate to the court that your actions were misunderstood, you may be set free.
Fortunately, voluntary intoxication is usable as a legal defense against bribery charges in California. Your attorney will have to prove to the court that you were drunk though and that because of intoxication, you could not formulate the necessary intent to commit the offense of bribery.
The idea was a mistake
This defense could be used if the thought of offering a bribe occurred in a spur-of-the-moment. Depending on the circumstances of your case, the court may accept the fact that it was just a mistake and drop or reduce the charges. However, the account of how that happened is needed to prove to the court that you did not intend to offer or promise to bribe a public officer.
Entrapment
In California, entrapment occurs when an innocent individual is induced into committing a crime that he/she could not have committed. With this defense, your attorney could argue that you were harassed, pressured, or threatened to bribe a public officer. As long as the court understands that the idea to bribe was not yours, but from the law enforcement officers, your charges could be dropped or reduced.
Find a Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
A conviction of bribery will change many aspects of your life. Other than spending years in prison and losing a substantial amount of money to court fines, you may lose your job and position in society. You do not have to go through all that because we at Van Nuys Criminal Attorney can help. We have a strong team of criminal defense attorneys who have excellent skills and experience in California bribery laws. Our team will be willing and ready to take up your case if you are charged in Los Angeles CA. Call us at 818-484-1100 and let us come up with a strong defense to help you get the most favorable outcome.
Most people think of bribery as the form among government officials and holders of public offices. However, members of the private sector often knowingly or unknowingly through kickback initiatives, engage in commercial bribery. Commercial bribery occurs when employees or agents of the employer receive gifts to secure an advantage for the giver when the advantage is damaging to the employer. Before you return a favor or accept a gift, you need to ensure that you are not committing commercial bribery. Leah Legal will cover the basics of commercial bribery laws in California and what to do when you are arrested for commercial bribery in Los Angeles.
Commercial Bribery Overview
California’s bribery laws are wide. Most of these were developed to deter bribery among public officials, which is why most people associate bribery to that which involves public officials. Private businesses have long engaged in giving-to-take relationships where they exchange favors, gifts, or money for a benefit. It is almost an accepted part of negotiations that ‘smoothens’ the way and increases the giver’s chances of getting an unfair advantage over others.
Commercial bribery is a white-collar crime in California covered under PC 641.3. The penal code prohibits soliciting or accepting a gift (or money) that is worth $250 or more with the corrupt intent of awarding the giver special consideration or advantage.
A person might give a bribe without telling the receiver that the gift or money is a bribe to smooth things over as they attain their goals. However, you are engaging in commercial bribery after they ask you to do a favor for them to the detriment of your employer.
Commercial bribery laws punish both the giver and receiver of the bribe as they collaborate to defraud or take undue advantage of the employer.
The elements of commercial bribery include: (a) You are an employee with corrupt intent (b) You solicit, accept, or agree to accept (c) money, a gift, or another valuable item whose value is above $250 (d) From someone other than your employer (e) With neither the consent nor knowledge of your employer (f) In exchange for giving the other party an undue advantage or benefit using your position as the employee.
Corrupt intent implies that you commit the bribery or accept the bribe with the full knowledge that the act is illegal, and you intend that the bribe will smoothen your way into getting or giving service.
Employees are bound to their employers by the fiduciary duty, which refers to the legal obligation of the employee to act in a manner that is in the best interests of the employer.
Commercial bribery deprives the employer of the employee loyalty that they should get. In addition, it places an undeserved competitive edge on the receiving party, often at the jeopardy of the employer’s business.
California is strict on commercial bribery due to the effect it has on the economy and the employer. It is also a breach of employee ethics, which could land you in state prison in addition to paying fines.
When your employer gives you the authority to perform business on his or her behalf, or you are allowed to make decisions for his or her behalf, then you are expected to act with integrity. The actions your employer expects you to engage in are those that will further the purpose of the business and are following the policies of the business.
Commercial bribery is hard to detect in most cases due to its widespread use and acceptance in the private sector.
Forms of Commercial Bribery
Commercial bribery takes on different forms depending on the industry. Some of the common types of commercial bribery include:
Kickbacks
Kickbacks are the most common form of commercial bribery. It involves an agreement whereby an employee will give an unfair advantage to the bribing person, in exchange for money or a gift. Some people may use kickbacks to get a positive recommendation even when they do not deserve it.
In most cases, kickbacks are hard to detect; therefore, most of them go unprosecuted. However, they result in the hiring of incompetent contractors or vendors or the use of substandard raw materials.
Using incompetent contractors or poor raw materials affects the bottom line of your employer. If the employer detects commercial bribery among his or her employees, he or she may sue you. Some of the red flags that might indicate that a kickback occurred include:
- There lacks a competitive bidding process
- There is minimal or no supervisor of the purchasing process
- The prices of goods and services are higher than normal
- The employee recommends that the business use a vendor or contractor that others avoid
- The contractor has numerous problems with the law and regulatory bodies
- Employees are too close to the vendors
- Management pressurizes its staff to use a particular vendor, for example, an insurance company
- Kickbacks are common in that industry
- The vendor misses on deadlines and is unreliable
- The employee continues using the vendor even after he or she displays poor results
In most cases, kickbacks are pre-negotiated before the service or favor is given. Kickback brokers may also be involved in commercial bribery. These are individuals or entities who help connect two or more people in exchange for a commission form one or both parties. For example, A connects B with company C and then requires B and C to pay him or her for the efforts. Essentially, A is soliciting for a bribe.
Match Fixing
Match-fixing is a form of commercial bribery in the sporting industry. It happens when a match-fixer negotiates with the parties in the sport to achieve a predetermined goal in exchange for money or a gift. In match-fixing, a team may play poorly, or other teams let one team win by playing poorly.
Match-fixing aims to gain an advantage in the game or get lesser opponents. Other teams engage in match-fixing to obtain a future competitive advantage.
In some cases, match-fixing is motivated by gambling. The match-fixers arrange that a certain team loses to increase their winnings after the match.
Match-fixing occurs in small and big-league games. Teams whose players are lowly paid, or have corrupt officials are more likely to co-operate in match-fixing schemes.
Match-fixing is illegal and punishable as commercial bribery. The bodies that regulate sports also punish match-fixing through fines and jail time.
The different forms of match-fixing include:
- Spot-fixing fixers predetermine the events at a certain fragment of the game
- Interference with the playing arena
- Match-fixing by referees and officiators
Payola
Payola is a form of commercial bribery in the entertainment industry. It is common among record labels, which bribe or offer gifts to broadcasting stations to play a record from a specific singer or label. Record labels are legally allowed to promote their record through a radio station, but the radio has to indicate that the song is played as a part of advertising. However, if the radio fails to inform the listeners, then it is engaging in corruption.
Payola denies record labels and musicians who cannot afford to pay for their songs to be aired a level playing field.
Evidence for Commercial Bribery
When the prosecution brings charges of commercial bribery against you, it must provide proof of the violation. In most cases, the prosecution relies on circumstantial evidence to come up with theories of what might have happened. Depending on the jury and the skills of the prosecuting attorney, the jury might be influenced to believe that indeed, you committed the offense.
Some of the materials used in gathering evidence include bank statements, phone conversations, taped conversations, text messages, and email conversations. These can be used to prove that the parties were in contact at the time the bribery allegedly took place.
The prosecution will also examine your lifestyle during, and after the time the offense was committed and compare it to the one you had before. A sudden change in the lifestyle of the employee in comparison to the income will be analyzed. If, for example, the prosecution notices that you spent money on expensive items that you cannot afford with your current salary, the prosecution will raise questions.
The prosecution also monitors your bank statements and transactions. These provide proof of your banking behavior and could show suspicious activities. In some cases, the prosecution may examine the bank account and spending habits of your wife around the time the crime was allegedly performed to determine whether the two of you collaborated. Other evidence may be collected through subpoenas.
At other times, the prosecution will interview you hoping to get a self-incriminating remark. If the prosecution wants to interview you, you have to refer them to your lawyer or request your lawyer to be present for the questioning.
Commercial bribery cases can also be proven with video surveillance clips if the meeting or exchange occurs in areas with surveillance.
When the prosecution gathers this evidence, it will explain what might have happened. Such a theory aims to show that your actions prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you committed the bribery. Sometimes the prosecution might convince the co-accused to collaborate with the government as a witness in exchange for leniency.
Before your case proceeds to trial, your lawyer will have examined the prosecution’s evidence. He or she may challenge some or all of the evidence through different techniques and using the legal defenses for bribery.
One of the common occurrences in bribery cases is plea-bargaining. It is a pretrial process through which the prosecution and defense make an agreement that is favorable to both sides. The prosecution will come up with a plea deal that requires the defendant to plead guilty to lesser charges or the offense in exchange for lesser or lenient sentencing.
Your lawyer will advise you on the pros and cons of taking a plea deal. If you choose the plea deal, you are already aware of the sentencing you will get. In contrast, going to trial for a bribery case could lead to sentence enhancements and additional charges. When your case goes to trial, the prosecution might dig deeper, which could be potentially harming to you.
If your lawyer believes you have a strong case that is likely to win at trial, then he or she may advise you to reject the plea deal. Whatever the case, you have the right to go to trial instead of settling for a plea deal.
Legal Defenses
Commercial bribery can result in loss of employment and difficulties in being employed in the future. Employers are likely to shun you for fear of engaging in illegal activities that will jeopardize their bottom line. In addition, your current employer may fire you for engaging in such an activity. In sports, people have lost their chances of ever playing the sport due to sport-related commercial bribery.
Having a defense lawyer by your side can help greatly when you are facing charges for commercial bribery. Below are the common defenses.
Entrapment
Law enforcement officials may be too eager to arrest a person for bribery that they create an incentive for you to commit a crime. Entrapment is rarely used as a defense to bribery. However, your lawyer will provide you with sufficient advice and recommendation of when the defense might work.
When using entrapment as a defense, you have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the law enforcement officer coerced or was out to tempt you to commit the offense.
For example, your lawyer will have to prove that you would not have committed the offense under normal circumstances and that the coercion by the law enforcement officer would have made a person who is not inclined to bribing to provide a bribe.
Insufficient Evidence
The prosecution has to prove every element of commercial bribery beyond a reasonable doubt. The burden of proof, which rests upon the prosecutor, gives your criminal defense attorney the chance to challenge the defense of the attorney. If the prosecution cannot present the facts that prove each element of the offense, then you might avoid a conviction.
False Accusations
False accusations are common in commercial bribery claims. A person can accuse you of committing bribery in anger, revenge, or malice. In some cases, your employer can falsely accuse you if a deal goes wrong and they do not want to shoulder the loss.
For example, if your employer is the one who required that you hire a certain contractor over another, but turns the pointer around you when the deal goes sour, then you may be a victim of false accusations.
Lack of Intent
The intent is one of the elements of commercial bribery. The prosecution has to prove that you had the intent to commit the crime. However, if you did not perceive the action as an exchange for services, and continued to award the benefit on merit, then you can argue that you did not have the intent to commit a crime.
Coercion
In some cases, the receiver of the bribe may have coerced the giver, through threats of other forms of duress. If this happens, your lawyer can successfully prove that you did not intend to commit the offense, were it not for the coercion from the other party.
Voluntary Intoxication
Voluntary intoxication can be used to defend against actions that you committed while drunk. For example, if you were at a party, and after several drinks, you approach someone with an offer in exchange for something else, then you can use intoxication as a defense. Intoxication prevents you from forming the specific intent required in committing commercial bribery.
Penalties for Commercial Bribery
If the court finds you guilty of commercial bribery, you face possible consequences such as jail time and fines. The specific consequences depend on the amount involved in the offense.
For commercial bribery involving less than $1000, the offense is a misdemeanor whose penalties include a maximum term of one year in county jail.
If the bribe is over $1000, the offense is a California wobbler. You face a potential sentence of up to three years in state prison if convicted as a felony.
In addition to incarceration, the court might require you to refund the losses your employer suffered through the offense.
Your lawyer might also request for an alternative sentence, such as probation instead of incarceration. If the judge grants your probation, he or she will impose several conditions that you should meet during the probation.
Find a Van Nuys Criminal Defense Lawyer
Bribery is a serious offense in California, which affects the economy and gives some people an unfair competitive edge over the others. If you are charged with commercial bribery, you face potential consequences such as the loss of your job, difficulties in finding employment, fines, and penalties. In addition, you may be required to repay the losses your employer incurs due to your actions. These consequences can affect your life significantly, which is why Van Nuys Criminal Attorney advises you to hire an attorney as soon as you are arrested. Your attorney will investigate the case, call witnesses, and examine footage or evidence that the prosecution has against you to prepare a strong defense for your case. If you want help with your commercial bribery case in Los Angeles, call us at 818-484-1100 today.
Criminal offenses extend to white-collar activities that involve analyzing and verifying different documents. You may therefore find yourself answerable to criminal charges for presenting invalid documents to various entities. In most cases, the defendants facing arrest for filing the false documents have unlawful intentions to access profits or exclusive opportunities. However, you may also face similar charges, even where there is a genuine mistake or lack of knowledge about the nature of documents. As a result, you want to contact the best criminal defense attorney you can find to help you through the criminal trial and evade conviction.
Getting in touch with the Leah Legal team will give you access to some of the best defense attorneys in Van Nuys. With our help, your legal defenses will be appropriate for your case to help persuade the judge of your innocence. On top of that, we are happy to provide other forms of support, including brief legal counseling sessions that equip you for the pending court trial processes. Therefore, you can count on us to do our best in helping you evade the felony charges issued to defendants guilty of filing false documents.
Defining the Crime of Filing False Documents
The California Penal Code makes it unlawful to record, file, or register a false document in the country under section 115. Moreover, the section states that the criminal activity involves filing these forged documents in public offices. Thus, several elements of the crime lead to your conviction, based on the prosecutor’s findings.
In a criminal case, the burden of proof always rests on the prosecutor to establish guilt leading to a conviction. Thus, he/she works with several investigation officers to gather enough evidence and present it against you in court.
Additionally, the prosecutor can call on various witnesses to testify against you in various events that may have transpired. Therefore, you have to remain conscious of the prosecutor’s ongoing preparations and work with your defense attorney to find reliable and persuasive defenses for you. The elements of the crime that define filing false documents are:
- You Provided a Document for Filing, Registration, or Recording in a Public Office
The primary factor in committing the crime is providing a public office document for recording, registration, or filing. In giving this element, the prosecutor should show that you offered the document personally to the general office in question, or procured someone to do it for you. In this case, a public office is any government-based agency or organization that provides public services. Therefore, a public office may be a department office, a public employer’s office, or even a record-keeping building established in your county.
When proving that you provided the document yourself, the prosecutor may rely on witnesses present during your operation. Possible witnesses include the front desk operator who received your documents or other public office workers who had delegated authority to pick the files from you.
Moreover, witnesses may also include people in the public office to perform the same actions by presenting their documents for recording or registration. Thus, if one of the people you waited in line with observed you and can provide relevant evidence against you, he/she is likely to be a witness.
You should also remember that if you made another person present the documents on your behalf, the prosecutor might also include him/her in the witness list. As a result, the person may reveal critical information for your intentions by presenting the documents to the public office. However, you do not have to worry about such information being released, as your criminal lawyer can talk your agent out of being a witness before the prosecutor approaches him/her.
Surveillance footage is also a reliable source of proof when showing that you provided the documents yourself. Here, the prosecutor will request the public office to copy their camera footage for the prosecution team to analyze and find the video’s essential points. Since the primary objective will be to prove the actus reus- criminal activity, such footage is sufficient.
- You Knew the Documents Were False When Filing Them
The main point to prove in this element is that you had the criminal intent to gain unlawful access to monetary gains or other fraudulent benefits. The prosecutor will try to prove this by showing that you knew the nature of the documents you presented to the public office.
Usually, providing enough proof on a defendant’s knowledge is not easy, primarily because it is a mental factor that does not manifest easily, unlike physical activities. Nevertheless, the prosecutor will use circumstantial evidence to derive evidence from your criminal intention by knowingly submitting the false documents.
Since circumstances may differ for each case, you will find that the prosecutor may apply versatile tactics to retrace your steps back to when you committed the offense. For example, unlawful intentions can be implied whereby you paid someone to deliver the documents for you, even though you could have quickly done it yourself. In such instances, the prosecutor can mean that you were trying to avert possible liability after presenting the forged documents.
Alternatively, evidence may also come from your demeanor during the presentation of the documents. If you insisted on seeing one specific officer in the public office, the prosecutor might request the investigation officers to conduct further investigations on the specific public office worker. The main aim will be to establish whether you and the worker had conspired to push the false documents without anyone else noticing it.
Lastly, the investigations may lead to a computer search on your digital data to scour any visited sites and conversations that can prove you knew about the forged documents. For example, if there are suspicions that you generated the forms yourself, there may be sourced evidence from the computer software you used to duplicate the papers’ details. If any, the conversations between your counterparts are also significant clues that may help the prosecutor prove his/her case.
- You Knowingly Changed Vital Information on the Documents to Defraud Others
In specific cases, the prosecutor will show that you were directly involved in manipulating data or changing vital information that promoted your fraudulent intentions. The data in question varies based on the types of documents you altered. Showing that you changed the information on the documents matters where you are likely to face additional charges for a separate crime.
For example, if you are an accountant to manipulate monetary records for a company’s tax reports, you will be answerable to the crime of filing false documents. The prosecutor will have to establish your role in fabricating information on the forms, which may be active or passive. Thus, you need to note that you may face arrest and prosecution even if you directed another person to perform the alterations on your behalf.
Some evidence may also come from the method used in altering the documents that easily prove your indulgence in the crime. When you use visible forms of correction like white-out to introduce false data on individual records, it will be easier for the prosecutor to show that you directly manipulated the information to defraud a party.
- The Documents Would be Accepted if they Were Valid
Lastly, the prosecutor must prove that the forged documents would be accepted if you presented the valid versions. Therefore, he/she will have to show that you presented regularly used papers in the public office, and the only difference is that yours were false.
Sources of information on the element would arise from presenting the documents you submitted in court and getting an original copy for comparison. The prosecutor would then invite the judge to check both documents to accept that they are similar and that your papers may be acceptable in usual circumstances.
Additionally, the prosecutor can include your intentions in presenting the forged documents to show that you had tried to pass off unlawfully made papers for your purposes. For example, giving a forged real estate deed will attract scrutiny that may later become additional evidence for the prosecutor to use against you.
Penalties for the Crime of Filing False Documents
If the prosecutor prevails in proving your engagement in filing false documents, the trial process will move to sentence, whereby you will receive several penalties based on your actions. The offense attracts felony charges, which is a severe classification of crimes, leading to adverse consequences.
The penalties available for a guilty defendant include serving a county jail sentence for three years or paying a maximum fine of $10,000. The presiding judge may choose to issue one or both of the penalties based on your case’s circumstances. Moreover, the judge has discretion in issuing the amount you will pay as a fine penalty based on the case facts.
You can also receive a probation penalty, where you are subject to following court orders and guidelines under a probation officer’s supervision. Usually, probation requires you to sit through several counseling sessions, primarily if the judge determines a recurrent trend in engaging in unlawful activities. Moreover, you will have to pay restitution to any aggrieved parties that incurred losses from the use of your forged documents. The court will issue additional orders based on individual circumstances.
While probation is a viable option for most defendants who would like to evade jail sentences, it is unavailable for some parties. Firstly, if you have faced any past criminal convictions for filing false documents, you will not be eligible for probation.
Additionally, you become ineligible for probation when your crime caused losses of above $100,000 to the aggrieved party. Such cases involve facing a conviction for two or more counts of filing false documents, regardless of whether they occurred consecutively.
Aggravating Factors to Your Case
On top of facing the regular penalties, your case may include aggravating factors. If so, you will meet sentence enhancements that attract additional penalties depending on the applicable aggravating factors.
Typically, you do not want to face more penalties for an offense, as you will have to serve more time in a sentence or pay additional fines. Nevertheless, your criminal record will be the determinant of how severely the aggravating factors affect your case. Common factors include:
You Committed the Crime Against Two or More Separate Victims
If investigations reveal that you presented false documents that caused losses for two or more separate parties, you will be liable to face additional penalties from your engagements. In this case, the aggravating factor is that your forged papers affected multiple victims. Subsequently, you are answerable to various complainants, despite undergoing a single trial process.
You Accessed Over $100,000 from the Forged Documents
Moreover, if you managed to trick over $100,000 from the aggrieved party, the case is aggravated. Such amounts are significant in any agency or individual’s operations. Hence, the court will consider the magnitude of losses incurred by the complainants and provide additional penalties based on the money you accessed from filing false documents.
You Committed the Offense Against One Victim in Separate Occasions
You targeted one victim on different occasions and used false documents to have your way. You will also face sentence enhancements. The prosecutor will focus on proving that you engaged with the same victim on more than one occasion by sourcing evidence of past transactions. If the judge accepts the evidence and uses it to consider the sentence you will receive, it will likely be enhanced.
You Face a Conviction for Multiple Fraudulent Activities in the Same Criminal Trial
As discussed, it is possible that you conspired with other people in the public office to affect your operations, or that you engaged in several unlawful activities that involve false documents and embezzlement of funds. The most common example is where the false documents give the authorization to access a monetary account. Upon arrest, you can face two or more different charges for your unlawful activities, including acquiring funds illegally and conspiring to commit fraud using the forged documents.
Filing the False Documents paved the way for More Criminal Activities
If you proceed to engage in additional crimes after accessing an account or money from the false documents, you will also face a sentence enhancement. For example, if you are guilty of making pretenses to suit the forged documents’ identity description, you will have engaged in another crime that attracts additional penalties.
You may also use the accessed funds to gain ownership, at the rightful owner’s detriment. Such cases may amount to theft, especially if the prosecutor can prove your intentions to deprive the owner of his/her property permanently. Consequently, additional criminal activities are enough to warrant enhancements from the judge.
Effects of Aggravated Factors
Once the judge finds that your case qualifies for sentence enhancement, he/she will include the additional penalties and order you to follow them accordingly. Consequently, you may face five other years in state prison after completing your three-year jail sentence.
Moreover, the judge can impose additional fines for causing losses of up to $500,000. Alternatively, you will be subject to pay the penalties based on the amount you swindled from presenting false documents. Thus, more massive amounts will lead to higher fines penalties.
Defenses to the Charges
Your criminal defense attorney has a chance to present criminal defenses for your case after the prosecutor concludes his/her presentation. During this time, your lawyer will explain the arguments to introduce reasonable doubt that sets the matter in perspective by including additional details that the prosecutor may have missed.
When presenting defenses, your attorney must select only the arguments that apply in your case, despite having access to multiple defenses for the matter. Thus, the case facts play a role in determining the relevant ideas that will mitigate your issue or lead to an acquittal. Common defenses for filing false documents include:
You Did Not File the Documents in a Public Office
Since the case details matter in the charges, you can raise a claim stating that you did not file the documents in a public office, and are therefore not criminally liable. While the defense is applicable, it helps to remember that it may not absolve you of facing penalties but may mitigate them significantly.
You Face False Accusations
Facing false accusations is also a common occurrence, especially if you have several adversaries with ulterior motives. Moreover, the false allegations may come from police misconduct, whereby the arresting officers may include inaccurate details in police reports. Your lawyer will work to prove the falsehood of charges placed against you by providing additional evidence to clear the matter.
You Were Unaware that You were Filing False Documents
If you faced arrest and trial for an innocent mistake where you did not know the documents presented were false, you might also escape liability. Here, your defense attorney should provide relevant information on circumstances that may show your innocent indulgence in delivering the documents. You may also use the defense if a third party sets you up to provide the copies without knowing their invalid state.
Contact a White Collar Crime Attorney Near Me
Upon facing arrest and criminal charges for filing false documents, it may be challenging to find the right way forward. The situation may be more difficult if working alone than having a criminal defense lawyer by your side. We also understand the hardships that come with charges based on false accusations and other malicious intentions, primarily when you risk losing your reputation, career, and family. Therefore, it is crucial to consider hiring a lawyer who will help you combat the criminal charges.
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we provide exceptional legal services from some of the best attorneys in Van Nuys, California. We believe in putting your needs first by personalizing legal approaches to fit your situation seamlessly. Thanks to our years of experience in criminal defense, you can count on us to present sound legal reasons in the trial, as we push for the best outcome for your case. Don’t hesitate when your life is on the line call today at 818-484-1100.
Forgery is a crime under California law outlined under PC 470. You can commit this crime if you alter certain documents fraudulently or if you falsify a signature. The crime of forgery in California pertains to a wide range of offenses. California PC 470 forgery is assigning the name/title of another individual or a fictitious individual. Counterfeiting or forging the handwriting or seal of another person is a forgery. Forgery also entails altering, corrupting, or falsifying a judgment, will, or codicil. Falsifying or altering specific documents like bonds, money orders, and bonds is also a form of forgery. Forgery is a serious offense with severe consequences. We at Leah Legal can help you come up with a proper defense if you are facing forgery charges in Van Nuys.
Elements of the Crime
Sometimes, a simple action may qualify as a forgery. For instance, you can commit forgery if you sign the name of a doctor on a fraudulent prescription. If you add a page to a person’s will to raise your chances of getting more money, you would also be guilty of forgery. You may as well commit the crime if you endorse a check issued to another person without the person’s consent.
Altering certain documents could lead to forgery charges. The materials include bonds, checks, money orders, contracts, traveler’s checks, property deeds, stock certificates, and contracts.
A wide range of activities involving altering, signing, or using a written instrument may qualify as a forgery. The instrument in question could be printed, handwritten, recorded, or typed. You may commit forgery if you write a new will, and you present it as the valid will of another individual.
It must be apparent that you committed an activity that qualifies as a forgery, as outlined above. For instance, the prosecutor may identify a written instrument and show that you made the written instrument. The prosecutor could also prove that you made a material alteration on an existing written instrument. The prosecutor must also confirm that you falsely signed a written instrument.
The prosecutor has to prove that you had the intent to defraud another individual while committing the crime. You could portray an intention to defraud if you lie or deceive another person. It should be apparent that you deceived the victim with intent to deprive him/her money, legal right, or property.
You could get charges for acting with the intention to defraud even if you did not succeed in defrauding the victim. Even if the victim did not incur a legal, property, or financial loss, you could still get forgery charges.
Consequences of Forgery in California
Violating the California PC 470 is a wobbler offense. This means that the crime is a felony or a misdemeanor, and the prosecutor has the discretion to assign the appropriate charges. If forgery is a misdemeanor, the consequences are misdemeanor or summary probation. The court might also impose jail time not exceeding one year in a county jail in California. You might also have to pay a fine that does not exceed $1,000.
If the offense of forgery is a felony, the penalties include serving formal probation. While on probation, you have to comply with the requirements of probation. One condition of formal probation is meeting with the probation officer from time to time. Visiting the probation office is also a condition of formal probation. If you violate the probation conditions, the court might decide to revoke the probation and recommend jail time.
A felony conviction is also punishable by a county jail sentence for up to three years. The court could impose a high fine, not exceeding $10,000.
It is imperative to note that misdemeanor charges will only apply if the forged document like a check or money order is worth $950 or less. If you forge a document worth more than $950, the crime is an automatic felony.
In charging the crime of fraud as a misdemeanor or felony, the state may consider your criminal record. The state could also consider the presence of aggravating or mitigating factors in the case. Aggravating factors are facts that could lead to enhanced charges, including being a repeat offender.
Forging a document of high value is also an aggravating factor in forgery cases. On the other hand, mitigating factors could make the prosecutor assign lesser or misdemeanor charges instead of felony charges. If you forge a document with a minimal value, it may serve as a mitigating factor that would save you from getting felony charges.
Immigration Consequences of Forgery
A conviction of forgery could have negative immigration consequences. A court in California ruled that forgery is a serious offense, which involves moral turpitude. Therefore, if you are a non-citizen in the U.S and you commit the crime of forgery, you will face the risk of deportation. Deportation is the forceful removal from the United States. The crime could also render you inadmissible into the United States. The state of being inadmissible means that you might not be able to become a U.S citizen through naturalization. Therefore, if you commit forgery and you are a non-citizen, you should seek immediate legal representation to help you fight forgery charges.
Forgery Conviction and Gun Rights
A forgery conviction in California could affect your gun rights. You may not be able to retain your gun rights in California after a felony conviction of forgery. It is unlawful for convicted felons in California to possess or own a gun. The prosecutor could charge the offense of forgery as a misdemeanor or a felony. You will only lose your gun rights if the crime is a felony. If the crime is a misdemeanor, it will not have any effects on your gun rights.
Expungement of the Conviction
Just like other convictions in California, with the help of an attorney, you may apply for an expungement of your felony conviction. After an expungement, you will no longer face the hardships associated with the conviction. You could apply for an expungement after you complete probation successfully, and you abide by the terms of probation. You could also apply for expungement after completing jail time successfully and abiding with the applicable terms. If you have competent legal representation, you can negotiate for an expungement of the conviction even if you did not comply with all the terms of probation.
Possible Legal Defenses to Forgery Charges
You can challenge a charge under PC 470 by adopting certain legal defenses. You will need an attorney who can help you develop a convincing defense that will persuade the judge to dismiss or reduce your forgery charges. Here are some of the common legal defenses for forgery charges.
Lack of Intention to Defraud
An essential element of a forgery crime is the intention to defraud. You can only face forgery charges if you intended to deceive or lie to the victim to help you obtain property, legal rights, or money from the victim. You will only be guilty of forgery if you had the intention to defraud. You can point out that you did not intend to take the victim’s money or property. For instance, the forgery was a prank or a joke, and the intention was to make fun of the victim and not to defraud the victim.
False Accusations
You could fight forgery charges successfully if it is apparent that you are a victim of false accusations. The majority of forgery cases take place in intricate legal and business dealings. Most forgery crimes take place in offices and workplace settings. It is common for perpetrators of forgery to accuse other people of the crime to help conceal their own mistakes and guilt. If you did not commit the crime of forgery, you could point out that you are a victim of false accusations. Your attorney can help to uncover hidden evidence, which would probably point to the real perpetrator of the crime.
The Police Coerced you to Confess
If the prosecutor charged you with forgery after confession and you feel that the Police coerced you to confess to the crime, you can point out this fact in court. It is illegal under California laws for the Police to use overbearing or extreme measures to make a victim confess to a crime. If you can prove that the Police coerced you and forced you to admit, the judge may exclude the confession from the evidence against you. The judge might also drop your case if it is apparent that you confessed to a crime you did not commit.
The Role of a Criminal Attorney
Because the crime of forgery is a wobbler, the sentencing range for the crime is broad. A competent criminal defense attorney could make a significant difference. If you work with a well-trained attorney, he/she can attempt to reduce your felony offense to a misdemeanor. An attorney will strive to have your sentence and fines reduced or to have the case dismissed altogether.
If your forgery case proceeds to trial, your attorney will use every strategy available to the task and make the prosecutor prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you are guilty. The prosecutor has a burden of proof to show that you intended to defraud another person. It is hard to prove intent, especially when the prosecutor is facing a skilled criminal defense attorney.
Your attorney could have defended many individuals facing forgery charges before. Therefore, the attorney understands the right steps that he/she should take to defend your case. You should not wait long before contacting an attorney. You should get in touch with an attorney immediately after your arrest. Timely involvement of an attorney gives him/her ample time to investigate your case and come up with the best defense strategy.
Related Offenses
Under California law, certain crimes are closely related to the crime of forgery. The related crimes include:
Forging Credit Card Information
California statute PC 484f outlines the crime of forging credit card information. You may violate this law if you alter a credit or debit card. You may also violate this statute if you create or counterfeit a debit card or credit card. If you sign another person’s name in a transaction, which involves a credit or debit card without the person’s permission, you may violate PC 484f. While carrying out the mentioned activities, you must act with the intention to defraud. Defrauding or acting in a fraudulent manner means trying to trick a person through dishonest means.
An offense under PC 484f is punishable under the California forgery law outlined under PC 470. Therefore, a violation under PC 484f is a wobbler offense punishable as either a felony or a misdemeanor. The punishment for misdemeanor offense includes serving jail time in county jail. For a felony violation, the penalties include imprisonment in a state prison in California.
You can challenge an accusation under PC 484f by coming up with a valid legal defense. A good defense could make the court reduce or even dismiss your charges. You are only guilty of forgery under PC484f if you acted knowingly while altering or using a credit card to your benefit. If you did not act with this type of knowledge while committing the offense, you could fight the charges in court. For instance, you could have signed your name in another person’s credit card information by mistake. In this case, you would not be guilty of having any knowledge of carrying out the crime.
You can also state that you had no intention to defraud the victim. This defense is also applicable while fighting forgery cases in California. You are only guilty of forging credit card information if you intended to defraud the victim. If you did not have this requisite defense while performing the crime, you might not face charges. For instance, you could have made a counterfeit credit card as a practical joke with no fraudulent intent.
According to the Fourth Amendment to the United States constitution, the Police can only arrest you for a crime if they have probable cause. Therefore, if the Police had no probable cause to conduct the arrest, you can use that fact as the basis of your defense.
Check Fraud
Check fraud, which is an offense outlined under California PC 476, is almost similar to the crime of forgery. The prosecutor has to prove certain elements to convict you of check fraud. The prosecutor should show that you made, possessed, used, passed, or attempted to use or pass an altered, false, or fictitious check for payment of property or money. At the time of carrying out the activities mentioned above, you should have known that the check was altered or false. At the time of committing the said actions, you should have had the intention to defraud the victim.
If the prosecutor charges you with possession of a false or fraudulent check, the prosecutor has to prove some aspects of the crime. The prosecutor has to show that you possessed the document. It should also be evident that you intended to pass or use the document as genuine despite knowing that the document is false. What is a fake or fictitious check? It is a check, which is not legal or real. For instance, a check is fictitious if it is drawn from a bank that does not exist. A check could also be fictitious if the person who has endorsed the check does not exist.
A person who commits a check fraud is guilty of forgery under California law. The prosecutor may charge the offense as a misdemeanor or felony, depending on your criminal history and the facts of your case. Just like the crime of forgery, check fraud could have negative immigration consequences. The crime, if charged as a felony, could also affect your gun rights in California.
Making or Selling Counterfeit Goods
The California PC 350 outlines the crime of selling or making counterfeit goods. Under this statute, selling, possessing for sale, or counterfeiting trademarks is an offense. You may face prosecution under this statute if you sell or intend to sell counterfeit versions of original branded products.
The crime of making or selling counterfeit products is almost similar to the crime of forgery. However, the punishment for the crime of counterfeiting is more like punishment for California theft crimes.
The punishment for the crime of counterfeiting depends on the number and the value of the goods involved. If the counterfeit items are less than 1,000, the crime is a misdemeanor. A violation under PC 350 is also a misdemeanor if the counterfeit goods have a value of less than $950.
The crime is a wobbler if the counterfeit items exceed 1,000, and if the value of the goods exceeds $950. If convicted as a felony, the penalties for the crime will include felony probation. Other potential penalties include 16 months, two years, or three years in a county jail in California. The court could also impose a high fine, not exceeding $500,000 for individual offenders and one million dollars for companies or entities. The court could also order forfeiture for all counterfeit marks and the goods bearing the marks.
Find a Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
If you are facing an accusation of forgery in Van Nuys, you can reach out to Van Nuys Criminal Attorney at 818-484-1100. Our attorneys are well versed in California criminal law and are ready to help you build a strong defense strategy for your charges.
Prescriptions are a critical part of treatment for ailments. Usually, only authorized medical personnel are allowed to prescribe medications, and most drugs sold by pharmacists require prescriptions. Under California law, prescription of drugs is done under stringent regulations as per several criminal codes.
These strict statutes are imposed to create awareness about prescription drug addiction and curb drug abuse. The measures outlined in these criminal codes include prohibiting possession of drugs without prescriptions, with the intent to use them, traffic them, or distribute them. Furthermore, if you obtain such drugs by providing false medications or forging prescriptions, you will be guilty of forging or altering a prescription. This offense is charged under criminal law.
Professional legal guidance is critical to ensure your defense is a success. Leah Legal is a law firm that specializes in the criminal defense practice area of California law. At Leah Legal, we endeavor to provide the most reliable legal guidance and representation for our clients. Our top-notch criminal defense attorneys are result-oriented, ensuring that our client’s best interests are preserved. We offer our services to residents of Van Nuys in California.
Definition of the Crime under California Law
Forging or altering a prescription is a white-collar crime. White-collar crimes are non-violent criminal offenses, usually in the business or professional realm, committed with monetary gain intentions. Such crimes can be perpetrated by individuals or by corporations. The statutes that handle white-collar crimes are available at both state and federal levels.
Furthermore, faking or changing a prescription’s contents violates the California Business and Professions Code 4324. Some aspects of the crime can also be convicted as violating some of California Health and Safety Codes. The forging or altering of a prescription offense entails signing somebody else’s name (whether fictitious or real) or falsely making changes on a drug prescription or attempting to pass fake medications as genuine. The crime also includes any unnatural acts done or words of deceit uttered to a pharmacist or doctor to obtain prescription drugs. Examples of forgery or altering of a prescription are:
- Anyone who presents or attempts to submit fabricated or altered prescriptions;
- Anyone who utters false prescriptions;
- Taking prescriptions meant for another patient and using them to access drugs for your use;
- Forging a doctor’s signature, a veterinarian’s signature, or any other medical staff’s signatures authorized to give drug prescriptions.
Elements of the Crime
Further breaking down the forging and altering a prescription crime into its constituent elements will help you understand this crime. Gaining an understanding of the specifics considered when judging your case so that you can assist your attorney better prepare suitable defenses for your case. In a trial, the prosecutor’s role is to analyze the crime elements and use them to prove your guilt in the offense’s commission.
On the other hand, your lawyer will verify that your acts do not fall within these elements and nullify the prosecutor’s evidence in your defense. The aspects of forging or altering a prescription are per the crime’s description under the California Business and Professions Code 4324.
Altering a Prescription
The first element of this offense is the term prescription; a prescription is an order or a guide for the issuance of a drug or medication. Medications can be in written form or instructions given through a phone call and guidance on how to take medicine sent via electronic communications. Information that must be present on the prescription is the patient’s name, the drug being prescribed and the required amount, directions for use, date of issue, contact details of the prescriber, and signature. A prescription for controlled substances of category II-IV is valid for six months from the date written. If you fake or change the contents of such instructions to receive or purchase a drug or medication, you are guilty of forging or altering a prescription.
Altering a prescription is defined as changing the constituents of one already issued prohibited by law. It includes changing a prior date of an administered medication into a current date. For instance, when you finish a dose that your doctor had prescribed to you three months ago, then change the date to the present one, then go and present that prescription to a pharmacist.
Also, changing the dosage of a prescription is within this crime. A dosage outlines how many drugs one should take daily and how long they should follow that schedule. An example is, take two tablets three times a day. Therefore, increasing intervals at which to take your medicine or increasing the amount of medication you take at each interval will also increase the number of refills you require. Committing any of these actions is within the scope of this crime. You can also be said to commit the offense of altering a prescription if you change the medicine originally prescribed and replace it with another one.
Forging a Prescription
Forging a prescription is defined as writing a false prescription and using it or passing it as genuine. The act of forging can be by signing on a prescription the name of a doctor, nurse, medical assistant, or veterinary without their consent, to suggest that they prescribed the written medications.
An example of forgery of a prescription is; person X is addicted to painkillers; he sees his doctor claiming severe joint pains. However, he cannot convince the doctor to prescribe the drugs since the doctor, with time, notices a pattern of addiction in him. While the doctor isn’t looking, person X manages to rip off a page from the doctor’s prescription notebook.
Person X then writes his prescription and signs it forging the doctor’s signature. He then takes the prescription to a pharmacist and purchases the painkillers. To access the drugs, person X published a false prescription, passed as genuine. Consequently, person X is guilty of forging or altering a prescription.
Uttering a False Prescription
Another element of this crime is uttering a false prescription. As used in the legal definition of the forgery or altering of a prescription offense, Uttering is different from its use in regular conversations. You are guilty of uttering a prescription if you use words or actions to convey that specific drug usage is genuine or when you use statements to pass a forged prescription as authentic to attempt to use it as an original. An example is taking a forged medication to a pharmacist and claiming you acquired it from your doctor.
Definition of a Drug
A drug is any chemical substance that, when taken, alters the natural functioning of the body. It could include medical drugs that require prescriptions or medicines that can be accessed without prescriptions. The severity of charges depends on the type of drug prescription altered or forged and its effects on the body. Lastly, the crime involves drugs that can be prescribed; prescribed drugs can be meant for human or animal consumption.
Controlled Substances
Drugs are categorized into five schedules as per the US Controlled Substances Act (CSA). The schedules are based on the drug’s safety, possible abuse of the drug, and its medical uses.
- Schedule II drugs are drugs with a high possibility of abuse and are also employed for medical treatments. Examples of such substances are painkillers and narcotics such as morphine. Schedule III drugs are considered as drugs accepted for medical usage and considerable potential abuse. They are considered safer than schedule II drugs. An example is antidepressants and steroids.
- Schedule IV and Schedule V drugs are at a lower potential of being abused than all other schedules. An example is prescription cough medicine.
What the Prosecutor Needs to Prove for the Defendant to be Found Guilty
For you to be convicted of forging or altering a prescription, the prosecutor must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you are guilty of the charges. Being apprehended for a crime does not automatically mean you are guilty of the said crime. The court places the burden of proof on the prosecutor. The prosecutor should search for evidence that incriminates you. Therefore, with an experienced criminal defense attorney’s guide, the evidence against you can be nullified or deemed insufficient, thereby letting you off the hook without a conviction or at least a mild penalty.
For you to be found guilty of forging or altering a prescription, the prosecutor must prove that:
- You forged or altered a prescription.
- You knew that the prescription was forged or altered, but you still used it or attempted to use it.
- You gave false information to be issued a prescription.
However, you do not have to undergo a trial to be convicted of forging or altering a prescription. If you formally admit or confess to committing the offense, you will be found guilty without going to court; the same case applies in pursuing a negotiation for a plea bargain.
Common Defenses
The more experienced an attorney is in handling criminal defense cases, the sturdier your trial advocacy will be, and the greater the outcome of the case for the defendant. Your attorney can negotiate for a plea bargain or convince the prosecutor not to file charges against you. Moreover, if your penalty is probation, your attorney can fight for the penalty to be reduced to a fine and community service. However, requesting for a jail sentence penalty to be reduced to probation. Consult an experienced criminal defense attorney to know legal negotiations are suitable for your case. Some appropriate legal safeguards for forging or altering prescription charges are:
Demonstrating Addiction by Medical Testimony
If a defendant is addicted to prescription drugs, they can convince the court to give them a probationary term. A medical report from a licensed medic will be required to demonstrate that the defendant is suffering from addiction. If probation is granted, you will be required to undergo a compulsory rehabilitation and drug counseling program. You will also be subject to random searches of your car and house. A violation of the probationary terms leads to the application of full penalties for the crime you committed.
Authority to Prescribe
If you are an authorized medical practitioner, facing forgery or altering prescription charges, your attorney can argue that your occupation’s nature allows you to give or change prescriptions. If you lawfully modified instructions on drug usage, you cannot be charged with this offense.
Coerced Confession
A coerced confession is whereby you are forced into accepting guilt of a crime you did not commit. Coerced confessions can be obtained through the passing of threats, inflicting physical injuries, or manipulation. An example is when violence or a firearm is used to make you admit to a crime. If applicable, your attorney can argue that you felt threatened or physical pain was inflicted on you, forcing you to confess to the offense.
False Accusation
False accusations from a person with malice can lead to a charge of forging or altering a prescription. With the right analysis of the evidence presented against you, your attorney can prove that you were framed. One way of doing this is ascertaining that you did not sign or write the prescription.
Suppressing of Evidence
Conducting a search or seizure without a search warrant is illegal. If, for example, you are put into custody, and the police officers had no valid reason to arrest you, they may decide to search your car or house without your consent or a court permit. If they conduct the search or seizure without a license, you can suppress any evidence they find against you by arguing that they acquired it by violating your rights. Filing a motion to suppress evidence will put the burden of proof on you and your attorney. You are required to prove that the evidence in question was obtained unlawfully.
On the other hand, the prosecutor will put forward facts and reasons why the evidence should not be dismissed. The judge can approve the motion as a whole or a part or reject it. If part of the motion is approved, then some of the prosecutor’s evidence will be dismissed, thus weakening the prosecutor’s case against you. Furthermore, if the request is wholly accepted, the prosecutor must drop the charges against you, and the case will be dismissed. However, it is essential to note that suppressed evidence can still be used against you in deportation or parole hearings.
Other alternatives to the above defenses, your lawyer argues that you did not know that you were not authorized to write or change the prescription. Attorneys also use the legal safeguard to help lessen the charges and penalties against their clients.
Diversion Programs
California’s pretrial diversion is an option that defendants can take before trial to avoid judgment being made for the charges against them. Diversion programs are of two types, namely mental health programs and Misdemeanor diversion. The latter includes drug diversion programs. Consequently, if charged with a misdemeanor of forging or altering a prescription, you can pursue a drug diversion program.
If you are a first-time prescription drug offender, the diversion Program helps you acquit the charges against you and dodge penalties by completing probation and a drug rehabilitation program. That is, your attorney can help you request to undergo rehabilitation programs before your case is judged in court. After the successful completion of a rehabilitation program, the judge may dismiss the charges against you.
Before 2018, for a respondent to pursue a diversion program, they had to plead guilty to the charges against them. It meant that judgment was already made, and if the rehabilitation failed, the deferred penalties would be significant. However, with the 2018 amendment of this statute, you can now apply for such programs without pleading guilty. Once you complete the program, your record can be sealed.
Penalties for Forging or Altering a Prescription
Forging or altering a prescription is a wobbler crime; therefore, the prosecutor can charge you for a misdemeanor or a felony offense. The charges against you largely depend on your criminal record. The first time you commit a crime, the prosecutor is lenient in filing charges, and you may also face mild penalties. However, if you have a criminal record, you may face felony charges, and if found guilty, the penalties will be severe.
Furthermore, the prosecutor also considers other factors such as the nature of the drug prescribed, whether you wanted to sell the drug, and the available evidence against you. Whether you are being charged with a misdemeanor or a felony, the legal guidance and representation of a top-tier attorney are critical. Lawyers possess the knowledge and experience to handle criminal law proceedings and are therefore adapted to the courts’ language. Consequently, there’s a greater chance of a successful case with a lawyer by your side.
A conviction of forging or altering a prescription as a misdemeanor carries a one-year county jail term, informal probation of up to five years, or a fine of not more than $1,000. On the other hand, a conviction of the offense as a felony will be subject to a fine of up to $10,000, formal probation, or 16 months to 3 years County jail term.
Fortunately, a court can suspend a defendant’s sentence under certain conditions. Consequently, you can be granted probation of three to five years with a few terms. Terms for a misdemeanor offense conviction are undergoing random drug tests, doing community service, and completing drug counseling sessions.
Similarly, for a felony offense conviction, you will be given a condition of probation and random searches of your premises and car. You will also be required to regularly report to a probation officer to undergo random drug tests. The police are allowed by the court to search your house and car; therefore, any evidence found against you during such searches is legitimate.
If you are on probation for the forging or altering of a prescription offense and commit another crime, the probation can be revoked. Consequently, you can be subject to the sentence penalties stipulated for the crimes committed.
Related Crimes
Prescription Drug Possession
Possession of any controlled substance without an authentic prescription is a violation of the California Health and Safety Code 11350. This offense is punishable under California law as a misdemeanor when committed for the first time. The penalty for a first offense is a one-year jail term. However, if convicted for the crime more than once, you will face felony charges carrying 16 months or a two-year county jail term. If the court permits probation, a first offense carries a fine of $1,000, and a repeat of the crime will have a $2,000 fine.
Prescription Fraud
Prescription fraud is trying to obtain a controlled drug by concealing some facts, uttering false statements, or affixing an incorrect label on a drug’s packaging. The crime is a violation of the California Health and Safety Code 11173. The offense also entails “doctor shopping.”
Doctor shopping is whereby you go from one doctor to the other, and the same medication is prescribed for the same ailment multiple times. Prescription fraud entails any act of deceit where a person uses illness as an excuse to acquire more drugs. Whenever they visit a doctor, they conceal information that they had prior treatment and present the case as a new one. An example of doctor shopping is a person who is suffering from a cold going to three different doctors and being treated for the cold. In the end, they obtain three prescriptions of medicine for the cold.
This crime is a wobbler, meaning you can be charged with a misdemeanor or felony charge depending on the circumstances under which the crime was committed. As a felony, prescription fraud carries a sentence of up to three years.
Find a Defense Attorney Near Me
If you or someone close to you is facing forging or altering a prescription charge, hiring an expert criminal defense lawyer to handle your case is critical. At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we will offer you customized criminal defense services specific to your case. Leah Legal is a trusted criminal defense law firm offering defense services in Van Nuys. We are fierce and passionate about fighting for our client’s rights and best interests throughout the court proceedings. You can contact us for legal representation at any stage of your case. We also offer free consultations on all new cases, so please call us and talk to us about your case. Contact us at 818-484-1100 to speak with a white-collar criminal attorney today.
If you have recently been arrested in the L.A. Area or anywhere in Southern California on a charge of lewd conduct in public, you should not hesitate to seek experienced legal help as soon as possible.
There are serious, long-term potential consequences upon conviction of the crime of lewd conduct in California, but a skilled criminal defense attorney can often prevent that from happening.
At Leah Legal, we have been defending clients against lewd conduct charges for many years and have successfully handled numerous such cases. We understand the details of the California Penal Code on this matter as well as the dynamics of local Los Angeles courtrooms.
We will fight tenaciously to win for you the best possible outcome to your case. We have won many dismissals, acquittals, and reduced charges/sentences for others with cases very similar to your own, and we stand ready to do the same for you.
For a free legal consultation, contact Leah Legal anytime 24/7 at 818-484-1100.
How Is “Lewd Conduct” Defined Under California Law?
Under California Penal Code Section 647a, it is against the law to engage in or solicit “lewd” or “dissolute” conduct in a public place.
Specifically, lewd conduct is defined as touching one’s own or someone else’s genitalia, but, or a female breast for the purpose of sexual gratification or to purposefully offend another person.
Note that it is illegal to engage in lewd conduct in any place open to the public or that is easily viewable by the public.
It is not automatically lewd conduct, however, even in public, unless the defendant knew (or should have known) that his/her actions could likely offend another person who might be present.
What Must the Prosecution Prove?
To gain a conviction on the charge of lewd conduct in public, the prosecution must prove the following elements of the crime beyond all reasonable doubt:
- The defendant touched his/her own genitals, but, or female breast OR that of another person.
- This touching occurred in a public place or in a place open to public view.
- The act was done for the purpose of sexual arousal or gratification OR to annoy/offend someone.
- Another person was or could easily have been present who would have taken offense. AND, the defendant knew or could reasonably have been expected to know the his/her actions would likely be seen and be offensive.
A few points to clarify in regard to what the prosecutor must prove are as follows:
Under PC 647a, lewd and dissolute have the same meaning. They are not two separate crimes.
“Lewd/dissolute” conduct is limited to sexually related conduct, according to the traditional use of the terms, as understood by California courts.
“Public” is broadly interpreted. It can be public property (government-owned), a place open to the public (like a shopping mall), a private home’s front yard where no fence blocks the view, a vehicle parked by the side of the road, and a host of other locations. It would not be inside your home or hotel room unless you can be seen through an open door or window with no blinds/curtains.
Also note that more than the bare possibility of being seen by others is needed to meet the bar of “knew or should have known” that one’s conduct would likely be seen and be found offensive. It must be likely, not merely possible. A good lawyer will be able to carefully distinguish the two.
Possible Penalties Upon a Lewd Conduct Conviction
PC 647a (lewd conduct in public) is a misdemeanor offense in California, punishable by up to 6 months in jail and a maximum fine of $1,000. However, it is very common for the jail time to be exchanged for informal probation.
Probation terms will typically include being banned from the location where you allegedly committed lewd conduct, additional fines, and mandatory counseling sessions and AIDS testing.
Unlike many California sex crimes, lewd conduct convictions do not require registration as a sex offender. Oftentimes, however, a prosecutor will charge a defendant with indecent exposure (which does require lifetime sex offender registration) to gain leverage. Only a skilled defense lawyer will know how to successfully counter these kinds of moves and win you a favorable outcome.
Common Defense Strategies Against a Lewd Conduct Charge
At Leah Legal, we have seen a wide range of lewd conduct defense cases over the years, and we will know how to build you a solid defense.
We use a great variety of defense strategies in lewd conduct cases. And while every case is unique, we have used certain basic defense types again and again with great success, including these:
- False accusation. Perhaps, the police officer or another witness are saying you touched yourself or another person in a certain way, but you simply didn’t do it. The burden of proof is on the prosecutor to prove you did what you are being accused of. Oftentimes, there isn’t enough evidence to prove the allegation beyond all reasonable doubt.
- Lack of intent. It may be that though you touched your genitals or other private part as accused, yet, you did not do so with the intention of sexually arousing/gratifying yourself or another person. It may have been you touched your genitals to urinate or because they itched, for example.
- You thought no one was present. If you had a reasonable belief that no other person was or would become present who would likely be offended by your actions, you cannot be convicted of PC 647a.
- Not in a public place. If the prosecution can’t demonstrate the action took place on public property, in a place open to the public, or on private property but still viewable to the public, you cannot be convicted of lewd conduct.
- Police entrapment. When police go too far on undercover sting operations and “induce law abiding citizens to commit crimes they were not already disposed to commit,” it is entrapment, which can lead to your case being dismissed.
About L.A. Lewd Conduct Sting Ops
Most arrested for lewd conduct are arrested by an undercover police officer during a “sting operation.” And usually, it is an officer posing as a homosexual male who is out “cruising.”
The officer acts as a kind of “decoy,” oftentimes, in public restrooms or in common gay hook-up locations, like Griffith Park. But stings also take place in dark alleys, malls, gyms, massage parlors, adult book stores, and elsewhere. And it can sometimes be other than a homosexual decoy sting, of course.
These stings can take place because of complaints to the police department from concerned citizens. But it can also be simply a matter of common knowledge that certain places are likely spots for lewd conduct in public to occur.
After a Lewd Conduct Arrest
In many instances, people are given a citation after a lewd conduct arrest, and that is all that ever happens. In other cases, arrestees may be cuffed, taken to the police department for fingerprinting, and booked in jail temporarily before being let go with an order to appear in court later.
Whatever the details of your arrest, you should contact a skilled defense attorney with deep experience in this practice area without delay.
Many times, in the interim between the arrest and the case being formally filed, your defense attorney (if you have one already) can meet with the prosecution and dissuade them from pursuing the case.
Also note that you do not technically have to appear in court for a lewd conduct in public charge. As this is a misdemeanor offense, your lawyer can appear in your place.
Once in court, your lawyer can get access to the police report and all evidences to be used by the prosecution. And a good lawyer will also inspect the scene of the alleged crime, look into having a background check done on the arresting officer, and find additional evidence and witnesses in your favor.
In some cases, with the defendant’s full knowledge and consent, it may be wise to seek a favorable plea deal. Many times, a lewd conduct in public charge can be reduced to a lesser offense like trespassing or disturbing the peace. But often, we can win a dismissal or an acquittal because the prosecution’s evidence is often not as strong as they would have you believe.
Related Offenses
Offenses that are often charged along with lewd conduct OR that may be a lesser offense charged instead of lewd conduct as part of a plea deal, include the following:
- Indecent exposure (PC 314). This charge is worse than a PC 647a lewd conduct charge in that it requires lifetime registration as a California sex offender. When one exposes his or her genitals in public rather than simply touching them, it becomes indecent exposure. But this exposure must be shown to have been done for sexual gratification or to purposefully offend. Often, a good defense attorney can defeat this charge due to weak evidence. We know how to call the prosecutor’s “bluff” when he/she charges PC 314 just to try to get you to knuckle under on the PC 647a charge.
- Trespassing (PC 602). Trespassing is simply entering someone else’s property without his/her consent to do so. This is a relatively minor offense, which can be a low-level misdemeanor or a mere infraction. Often, a plea will allow conviction on PC 602 instead of PC 647a, even though the two crimes have very little in common.
- Disturbing the Peace (PC 415). Fighting in public, using “fighting words” in public, or disturbing others with unreasonably loud noises in public, can all qualify as “disturbing the peace.” Again, this is a crime that can be a misdemeanor or an infraction and that is punished much less severely than lewd conduct in public. It is used as a plea deal reduction, though it has little to do with PC 647a aside from the actions taking place in a public.
- Loitering near a public toilet to commit lewd conduct (PC 647d). Interestingly, there is a separate California law against loitering around a toilet for the purpose of committing lewd conduct in public, PC 647a. The statute also cover toilet-loitering for other similar purposes, however, such as committing any kind of lewd and illegal act. This is not a charge reduction for lewd conduct since it has the same penalties attached to it. It can be a challenge for a prosecutor to prove a defendant’s actions indicated a lewd purpose when he/she did not actually carry it out, but this is a charge your defense attorney needs to guard against during the trial.
Contact Us Today For Immediate Help
Here at Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we understand the gravity of situation you are in when facing a lewd conduct in public charge in a California court. We know how to win these cases, and have done so many times before.
Lewd conduct law is somewhat “non-intuitive” at points in California, and you can’t rely on your mere “common sense” to represent yourself at trial. Nor should you entrust your future to an over-worked public defendant who may not put the time and effort into your defense that you truly need.
Winning the best possible outcome to your case, be that a dismissal, acquittal, or reduced charge or sentence, is by far most likely when you rely on an experienced criminal defense attorney like those at Leah Legal.
Call our Los Angeles criminal defense law firm anytime 24/7/365 at 818-484-1100, and we will give you a free, no-obligation legal consultation and can immediately begin building you a solid defense.
If you are facing charges of embezzlement in the state of California, you may be looking at long incarceration terms, heavy fines, and other severe sentencing elements upon a conviction. With these kinds of penalties involved, it is critical to avail yourself of the most experienced legal defense possible, for the results of your trial will determine your future for many years to come.
At Leah Legal, we have intricate knowledge of California’s embezzlement statutes, great familiarity with the inner workings of the local Los Angeles court system, and a long track record of winning our clients the best possible outcome to their cases.
To learn more or for a free legal consultation, feel free to contact us at Leah Legal anytime 24/7 by calling 818-484-1100.
How Is “Embezzlement” Defined Under California Law?
California Penal Code Section 503 covers the “white collar crime” known as embezzlement. The crime is defined as taking advantage of being trusted to manage or care for the property of another person and using the property for your own benefit instead of for that of the owner.
While most people automatically associate embezzlement with upper class employees and with extremely large amounts of money, the truth is that embezzlement can occur even with smaller amounts of money and with all manner of employees.
Another misconception is that embezzlement only occurs if the person who wrongfully took or used another person’s money or other property intended to actually keep it. In fact, it is still regarded as embezzlement even if the perpetrator was only “borrowing” or “temporarily using” the other person’s property.
What Must the Prosecution Prove?
To gain a conviction on charges of embezzlement, the prosecutor must prove beyond a reasonable doubt the following “elements of the crime:”
- The defendant was entrusted with the property of another by its owner, whether directly or indirectly.
- A “relationship of trust” existed between the defendant and the property owner.
- The defendant, by some form of fraud, made use of the property placed under his care for his own personal benefit.
- In misusing, or converting and taking, the property in question, the defendant had intent to deprive the owner of the possession, use, or value of the property.
Relationship of Trust – There are many specific examples of a “relationship of trust” which must have existed in order for a theft to count as an act of embezzlement. Often, it is an employee-employer relationship, in virtually any type of job setting. It can also be a valet parking attendant and the owner of a car, a trustee or property manager, or a host of other relationships. On the other hand, there must be evidence of trust beyond just the fact that someone was an employee of the alleged victim. In fact, because of this requirement prosecutors sometimes have difficulty in establishing that trust truly existed.
Fraud – It is also necessary that the defendant’s actions were “fraudulent” in the sense that they constituted of “taking undue advantage of” the plaintiff and/or causing him/her financial loss by a violation of a trust. And not only must loss have been caused to the victim, but undeserved gain or benefit must have accrued to the perpetrator.
Intent – Finally, note that the benefit gained cannot have been accidental or incidental. There must have been an intention to deprive the owner of the property or its use and to wrongfully take gain to oneself. However, it makes not difference for how long the property was taken or if the defendant intended to return it — it would still count as embezzlement.
Possible Punishments for Embezzlement
There are a number of different varieties of embezzlement, and the punishments vary for each class. The differences in how severely an embezzlement crime is punished mostly hinge on the type and value of the property involved.
Grand Theft
If the value of the embezzled property was over $950, or if the property is an automobile or firearm of any value, it is “grand theft.” If a number of small sums were embezzled across a one-year period that add up to over $950, this is also grand theft.
Grand theft embezzlement can be filed as a felony or a misdemeanor, but when a firearm is embezzled, it is always a felony.
Felony-level grand theft embezzlement is punishable by:
- From 16 months to 3 years in county jail.
- For firearms embezzlement, incarceration will be in state prison instead.
- Formal probation.
- A maximum fine of $10,000.
Misdemeanor-level grand theft embezzlement is punishable by:
- A maximum of 12 months in county jail.
- Summary probation.
- A maximum fine of $1,000.

You can also face extra time behind bars on a grand theft conviction if the property is of especially high value, according to the following rules:
- An extra year for embezzling property worth over $65,000.
- Two extra years for embezzling property worth over $200,000.
- Three extra years for embezzling property worth over $1.3 million.
- Four extra years for embezzling property worth over $3.2 million.
Petty Theft
In general, “petty theft” is defined in California as the stealing, by embezzlement or otherwise, of property worth $950 or less. It is often more practical, however, to simply remember that anything not chargeable as grand theft is automatically petty theft.
In definition, there is not substantial difference between petty and grand theft other than the type or value of property taken. Sentencing for petty theft, however, is much lighter than for grand theft.
Petty theft is punishable by:
- A maximum of 6 months in county jail.
- Summary probation.
- A maximum fine of $1,000.
Elder Abuse
One important aggravating factor that often comes up in embezzlement cases, and which results in punishment enhancements upon a conviction, is that of “elder abuse.” (See practice area on Elder Abuse Penal Code section 368 for more detailed information about this crime).
Normally, this occurs when embezzlement is perpetrated against a senior citizen (65 years old or older). However, the same rules also apply if the victim was a dependent adult but perhaps with a mental/physical disability.
Elder Abuse (PC 368) can be either a misdemeanor or felony. As a misdemeanor, it incurs a fine and up to 12 months in county jail. As a felony, it can get you 2 to 4 years in state prison.
Mitigating Factors
At Leah Legal, we understand that even when a conviction cannot be totally avoided, there are often “mitigating factors” that we can bring to the judge’s attention, which may result in a lesser sentence.
One such factor is having returned the embezzled property of your own accord before being formally charged. This is not a defense, but it is a possible mitigating factor. Turning yourself in and only committing the crime under intense pressure to provide for your family might also be considered as mitigating factors.
Common Defense Strategies
At the Criminal Law Office of Leah Legal, we understand how destructive an embezzlement conviction can be to our clients’ careers and future lives, and we take great care and effort in developing a defense strategy ideally fitted to the details of each case we take on.
But as unique as each case is, there are also common basic defense types that we commonly use to successfully defend against charges of embezzlement. These include the following:
- A Good-Faith Claim to Right
If you honestly believed that the property you took, converted, of used for your own personal benefit was your own, you cannot be convicted of embezzlement. However, there are two caveats to be aware of. First, this defense will not work if you in any way attempted to hide what you were doing with the property from the owner, from police, or from others. Second, this defense is invalid if you took the property to satisfy a debt that the property owner owed you.
- Lack of Intent to Embezzle
It can be challenging for prosecutors to prove the element of criminal intent beyond all doubt, but unless they do so, no conviction can be gained. Without intent to take or wrongfully use the owner’s property, it would at worst be a serious mistake or unfortunate misunderstanding, but not embezzlement. There must have been a purpose to deprive the owner of what was rightly his or hers in order to take benefit from the property for yourself.
- False Accusations
It is not at all uncommon to be falsely accused of the crime of embezzlement. The fact that this crime always involves a preexisting relationship with the alleged victim increases the chances of false accusations being leveled by someone “with an ax to grind.” It could also be that the true embezzler is looking for a scapegoat or that someone who mismanaged his own finances and lost money wants to blame someone else for his own mistakes.
Other Related Offenses
Other crimes that are often charged along with embezzlement or in place of embezzlement include the following:
- Fraud Crimes
In California, “fraud” is committed when the actions of one person, or the information that person gives or withholds, cause someone else to be unjustly deprived of their property (or the use/full value of it) and/or cause the fraudster to enjoy an undeserved benefit of some kind.
There are many different types of fraud, including insurance fraud, credit card fraud, and real estate fraud, which are often charged along with embezzlement. Fraud crimes will be punished by heavy fines and jail/prison terms of various lengths, depending on the value of the property taken.
- Misappropriation of (Public) Funds
PC 424, the crime of misappropriating public funds, is very similar to that of embezzlement. However, it applies specifically to the knowing misuse of a government position to misappropriate government funds. Typically, this crime is committed only by government employees.
Ways in which the crime can be committed include: appropriating or lending government funds without proper authority, creating fake government financial records, and deceptively altering existing government financial records.
However, accidental misappropriations or that which deal in only very small amounts of money are not chargeable under PC 424.
Misappropriation of public funds is a felony charge and is punishable by 2 to 4 years in state prison.
- Forgery (PC 470)
In many cases, one can be charged with both embezzlement and forgery, as when for example a person forges a signature to his/her employee’s check before cashing it. Whenever one creates or alters any kind of document to enable embezzlement or any kind of theft crime, it is an act of forgery.
Forgery can be punished as a misdemeanor by up to 12 months in jail or as a felony by 16 months to 3 years in jail.
- Burglary (PC 459)
While few think of burglary as having any connection to embezzlement, in fact, those who enter a building (including a workplace) with full intention to commit embezzlement once inside are technically “burglars” under California law.
Burglary is punishable as a misdemeanor or a felony when 2nd-degree, but always as a felony when 1st-degree. The difference is that in 1st-degree burglary the building that was entered was inhabited.
Felony-level 1st-degree burglary is punishable by 2 to 6 years in state prison, felony 2nd-degree burglary by 16 months to 3 years in county jail, and misdemeanor 2nd-degree burglary by up to 12 months in county jail.
Contact Us Today For Help
At the Criminal Law Office of Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we have the both the legal expertise and the unflinching commitment to each and every client it takes to win a favorable outcome even in high profile, high stakes cases like embezzlement defense. We know how to build you a solid defense, challenge the evidence brought against you, and anticipate and counter the legal moves of the prosecution. When necessary, we also can deploy our well seasoned negotiating skills to win you a reduced charge or a lighter sentence as part of a plea agreement.
If you or someone you love have been accused of the crime of embezzlement, contact us 24/7 for a free consultation by calling 818-484-1100, and we will walk you through the law, your rights, and your best legal options.
Auto Insurance Fraud, Check Fraud, Credit Card Fraud, Health Care Fraud, Identity Theft, Real Estate Fraud, Unemployment Insurance Fraud, etc.
If you have been charged, or believe you may soon be charged, with committing a crime of fraud in the state of California, you could be subject to heavy fines and long jail or prison terms upon a conviction, and cannot afford to be without the best possible legal help when you go up against an aggressive and determined prosecutor.
Fraud crimes come in many varieties, from insurance fraud to real estate fraud to identity theft, but no matter which particular type of fraud charge is filed against you, the consequences for your career, reputation, and whole future could be extremely harsh upon a conviction.
At Leah Legal, we understand the gravity of a fraud charge, and we also understand in great detail the statutes and the courtroom processes that will affect the outcome of your case. Contact us today, anytime 24/7, by calling 818-484-1100, and we will be happy to give you a free legal consultation and to begin work immediately on building your case.
How Is “Fraud” Defined in California?
While there are numerous different classes of fraud crimes under California law, a number of which we will look at in the sections just below, “fraud” in general is defined in California as providing false or misleading information, withholding important and relevant information, or committing any other act that:
- Results in your gaining an undeserved benefit
- And causes an undeserved loss to another person.
It is also necessary that the act and its results were done intentionally. Generally, the motive for fraud crimes is either financial gain or an attempt to escape criminal liability. There can be other motives, however, depending on the type of fraud and the specific circumstances involved.
Insurance Fraud
There are numerous types of insurance, and thus, numerous types of insurance fraud; but the common thread in all of them is generally the submission of false information on a claim or an application for the purpose of receiving benefits that you are not rightfully entitled to.
It is also possible to commit insurance fraud by omitting information or giving partial, misleading information. And it is even possible for insurers themselves to be guilty of insurance fraud when they act in bad faith and refuse to pay out on legitimate claims.
Below, we look at some of the most common forms of California insurance fraud:
- Auto Insurance Fraud: Typically, auto insurance fraud is done by submitting an “inflated” claim, staging an accident and then seeking to collect on it, or arranging for your car to disappear and then reporting it as stolen. Auto insurance fraud is the most common type of insurance fraud, and many are falsely accused of it when insurers use automated “red flag” systems to identify “suspicious claims.” On the other hand, many instances of fraud escape insurers’ notice due to the sheer volume of auto insurance claims that occur every year.
- Health Insurance Fraud: Health care workers and pharmacists sometimes commit fraud by charging for services never rendered, overcharging on a single bill or “double-billing,” or by getting special kickback payments for prescribing particular drugs. Fraudulent claims by policy holders for faked or exaggerate injuries or denial by insurers of legitimate claims also occur.
- Unemployment Insurance Fraud: Unemployment insurance fraud can occur when a former employer lies about why a worker was fired or about that worker’s wages in order to avoid paying into the unemployment insurance system. Or, it can occur when claimants lie about their work search efforts, collect benefits while employed, or collect benefits in multiple states simultaneously.
- Welfare Fraud: The two main types of welfare fraud are recipient fraud, where those not qualified for benefits provide false information in order to collect them and internal fraud, where a worker at a government welfare agency takes extra benefits for himself or distributes them unlawfully to friends, family, or others, possibly for a kickback.
- Workers’ Comp Fraud: Faking injuries, claiming an injury as work-related when in fact it was not, and concealing information about a previous injury that would affect your claim are common forms of trying to defraud the California workers’ compensation system.
Real Estate Fraud
Another major class of California fraud crimes are those involving real estate and mortgages, where one party seeks to defraud another out of all or part of the value of the real estate via all kinds of “tricks” and by providing false information upon which they get the victim to rely in deciding on how to dispose of his/her real estate.
Some of the most common types of real estate fraud are:
- Foreclosure Fraud: This scheme involves the taking of compensation by a so-called real estate consultant who pretends he can delay or prevent a foreclosure, but has no intention of doing so. He may or may not also attempt to take possession of the property at the scheme’s end.
- Predatory Lending: When banks and lenders violate California laws designed to protect borrowers, and entrap unsuspecting borrowers in loans with exorbitant interest that they have no ability to repay, it is considered a form a fraud.
- Property Flipping: Not all “property flipping” is illegal and fraudulent, but some of it is. Specifically, when the selling price is boosted based on fake appraisals, the buyer has been defrauded.
- Rent Skimming: “Rent skimming” involves renting out property that you don’t really own and keeping the proceeds or part of them for yourself, or collecting rent without paying on the rental property’s mortgage.
- “Straw Buyer” Schemes: This occurs when a realtor or someone posing as a realtor convinces someone with good credit to co-sign for a fictitious buyer to help him get approved on a home loan. The agent then takes the loan money and leaves the co-signer responsible for repaying the loan.
“Generic” Fraud
Fraud schemes listed under this heading are considered so closely aligned with the basic idea of fraud as defined by California law as to be referred to as “generic.” Examples include:
- Check Fraud: Creating, making use of, or even merely possessing a fraudulent check, while presenting that check as genuine and intending to use it to defraud another person is check fraud. Another form of check fraud is using a genuine check to obtain an amount of money you know is not in your account, and yet another, is signing and attempting cash someone else’s check without permission. The later instance is also false personation.
- Credit Card Fraud: Any transaction or attempted transaction wherein a person has the design to wrongfully benefit financially, while using a credit card, a debit card, or the account information of a credit/debit card is “credit card fraud.” This may mean stealing or finding a lost credit card and then trying to use it, making/selling a counterfeit credit card, or even trying to use your own credit card that you know is no longer valid or no longer has sufficient funds in its available credit line for the desired purchase.
- Forgery/Identity Theft: Forgery and identity theft are closely linked since stolen personal information is often incorporated into forged documents that are then used to fraudulently obtain financial gain. Forging check signatures, driver’s licenses which are then sold, state ID cards, and California public seals are all examples of commonly forged documents that are intricately connected with identity theft.
Senior Fraud
When acts of fraud are perpetrated upon our nation’s seniors (65 years old or older), it is deemed particularly reprehensible since the fraudster is taking advantage of their age, and possibly senility, to defraud them of monies they have worked all their lives to save up.
Oftentimes, scammers target the elderly because they are easy targets and because they often have a good deal of money in comparison with others. Common schemes involve telemarketing, household repairs and improvements, real estate scams, predatory lending, and funerary or cemetery related fraud.
Unfortunately, many times elder fraud occurs in our nation’s nursing homes. Workers there may harm residents physically, manipulate them emotionally, or take advantage of them financially. They may get an elder to agree to give up his/her property to them, forge the elder’s name on a check, or simply overcharge them for services and keep the excess for personal use.
Other Forms of Fraud
There are some forms of fraud that do not fit neatly into any of the categories mentioned above but that are common forms of fraud nonetheless. These include:
- Mail Fraud: When any act of fraud makes use of the U.S. postal system to carry out the scheme, it is mail fraud (a federal offense). This means that mail fraud will be charged in addition to many other types of fraud and serve to increase the total sentence upon a conviction.
- Handicap Parking Fraud: Those who make illegal use of a handicap parking “placard” in order to assure themselves of always having a good parking space are guilty of this crime. It can involve buying a placard, forging one, or simply parking in a handicap space while the handicapped person who owns the placard is not present in the vehicle.
- Vehicle Registration Fraud: It is considered a form of fraud in California to forge or alter a license plate or vehicle registration sticker in order to avoid paying the relevant fees or in order to sell the illegal plates/stickers to another person for a profit.
- Gambling Fraud: When one cheats at card games, uses confidence games like “Three Card Monte,” or engages in fraud fortune-telling to deprive people of their money, it is “gambling fraud.” This crime is a misdemeanor if the amount of money taken was $950 or less but can become a felony for greater amounts, depending on the details of the case.
Possible Penalties for California Fraud Crimes
Crimes involving fraud are generally considered “white collar” in nature, which leads to the imposition of heavy fines and long incarceration periods as possible punishments. Some fraud crimes are handled as separate offenses, while others are dealt with under state theft, forgery, or perjury laws.
Most commonly, fraud crimes in California are “wobblers,” meaning they can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony depending on the circumstances involved and on the defendant’s prior criminal record.
Additionally, some fraud crimes are also federal offenses, meaning you could be prosecuted in both state and federal court for the same offense. And those fraud crimes considered acts of “moral turpitude” can lead to deportation of illegal aliens and other immigration consequences.
And those with certain types of professional licenses can lose them if convicted of a fraud crime.
Defending Against the Charge of Fraud
Given the complexity of California statutes dealing with fraud crimes and the severe penalties that can apply upon a conviction, it is crucial that your defense strategy be a proven approach that is in the hands of an experienced defense attorney.
At the Criminal Law Office of Leah Legal, we use many defenses to win fraud cases, each class of fraud and the details of each case and of each client’s background guiding us as to which defense to utilize.
Lack of fraudulent intent, false accusations, mistaken identity, and police entrapment are a few of the main defenses we employ in fraud cases. Lack of relevance in affecting a claim is another defense used in insurance fraud cases. We always employ the most appropriate defense that will maximize your chances of a favorable outcome.
Contact Us Today For Help
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney, we stand ready to come to your aid with top-tier legal advice and representation and to fight tirelessly in your best interests from the moment we take on your case.
We have a history of attaining the best possible outcomes in fraud defense cases. We always fight first of all for an acquittal or a dismissal, but if that is not possible, we have well seasoned negotiation skills that we can use to secure you a favorable plea,
To learn more or for a free consultation on the details of your case, do not hesitate to contact us anytime 24/7/365 at 818-484-1100.
If you or a loved one have been recently arrested on the charge of grand theft in Los Angeles or throughout California, you are facing potentially dire consequences upon a conviction. Long terms in county jail or state prison are possible punishments, and only by enlisting the help of a skilled criminal defense lawyer can you maximize your chances of a favorable outcome to your case.
At the Criminal Law Office of Leah Legal, we have the long experience, legal expertise, and intricate knowledge of the L.A. and Southern California court system to fight for and get the best possible outcome to your case. We put ourselves in your shoes and fight tenaciously for your future as if it were for our own, because that is the value we believe each and every client deserves.
For a free legal consultation and immediate attention to your case, do not hesitate to call us anytime 24/7 at 818-484-1100.
How Is Grand Theft Defined in California?
In California, grand theft is defined under Penal Code Section 487 as the “unlawful taking of the property of another person when that property is valued at over $950.”
Grand theft can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on the facts of the case and on the criminal history of the defendant. A conviction can bring not only incarceration but also loss of professional licenses and a permanently damaged reputation.
Types of Grand Theft
While the basic definition of grand theft given above is accurate, it is important to know that there are a number of different specific types of grand theft charges, each differing in regard to the manner in which the theft was carried out.
The basic types of grand theft under California law are as follows:
- Larceny: When grand theft is committed by means of larceny, the physical carrying away of the stolen goods is involved.
Grand larceny includes the following elements which must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt: taking of another’s property valued over $950 without permission, with intent to deprive the owner of all or a significant portion of its value, and while moving the taken property any significant distance, for even a short period of time.
- False Pretenses (Penal Code section 532): When false pretenses are used to commit grand theft, the crime is defined as purposefully deceiving another person by giving them false information that is presented as true in order to gain possession/ownership of property with the owner’s permission.
“Recklessly asserting a thing as true with no basis for believing it to be true, failing to give out legally required, important information, or making promises with no intent to keep them can all also count as ‘false pretenses’.” It is required, however, that the false pretense was relied on by the property’s owner as one major factor in making the decision to dispense with his/her property.
In addition, either a document of some kind (a false token) that puts the false pretense into writing, two witnesses to a verbally given false pretense, or one witness along with another form of evidence are necessary for a conviction. This requirement exists to guard against letting those who hand over property 100% legally simply changing their minds later and accusing the other party of using false pretenses in order to get their property back.
- Grand Theft by Trick: This class of grand theft is very similar to grand theft by false pretense, but it differs in several respects. It involves taking possession of the property by means of trickery and deceit but where the owner never intended to give up ownership of his/her property.
Thus, with grand theft by trick, the perpetrator may have used some form of cunning to lure the owner into signing away the property without even realizing he/she was doing so; while with grand theft by false pretense, the owner knew what he/she was doing but did so based on the false information provided.
With grand theft by trick, it must be shown that the defendant knew that the property was owned by the other person and knew he/she lacked permission to take it. Otherwise, it would be only a mistake or a misunderstanding.
- Embezzlement: When over $950 is wrongfully taken by someone who was entrusted with said property by its owner and given permission to manage it on behalf of the owner, it is grand theft by embezzlement.
The property must, however, have been taken or used in a fraudulent manner so as to benefit the person put in trust of the property instead of its owner.
And there must have been an intention to deprive the owner of his/her property, whether permanently or for a limited time only. The intention to return the embezzled property does not exonerate, though that could later on become a mitigating factor that might help the defendant get a lesser punishment.
Finally, note that the jury need not agree on which type of grand theft was committed in order to convict, so long as they agree that some form of grand theft did occur. If, however, the jury cannot decide on whether it was grand or petty theft, only a petty theft conviction will hold.
Grand Theft vs. Petty Theft
Petty theft and grand theft are generally exactly equivalent under California law except for the property stolen being above or below the mark of $950.
However, before Prop 47 passed in 2014, grand theft automatically applied to crimes where the stolen property was, or at least included, any of the following:
- A firearm
- An automobile
- Valuable animals like horses and pigs
It was also automatically grand theft if the property was taken directly off the victim’s person (body, clothing, or held container).
Today, the above-mentioned aggravating factors can still turn petty theft to grand theft (even without the value of the property being over $950), provided the defendant has a sex crime or serious felony crime on his/her criminal record, but not otherwise.
The theft of an automobile will normally be grand theft, however, if the car is of relatively small value, it would be petty theft.
Additionally, if one embezzles money from the same source in numerous small transactions that add up to over $950 across a one-year period, it will be grand theft.
Possible Penalties for Grand Theft
Grand theft (PC 487) can be either a felony or misdemeanor in most situations. When charged as a misdemeanor, it is punishable by up to 12 months in county jail. When charged as a felony, it is punishable by 16 months to 3 years in prison OR up to 12 months of probation.
In the case of committing grand theft by means of or while in possession of a firearm (grand theft firearm), you will always face a felony charge. This can get you 16 months to 3 years in state prison, and it will also be a strike on your criminal record under California’s Three Strikes Law (which is not true of most other grand theft felonies).
Besides the “basic” punishments for grand theft convictions, the sentence can also be enhanced with extra time in prison if it is a felony charge and if the value of the property is exceptionally high.
The enhancement schedule runs as follows:
- For property valued over $65,000, an extra year in state prison.
- For property valued over $200,000, two extra years in prison.
- For property valued over $1.3 million, three extra years.
- For property valued over $3.2 million, four extra years.

Also note that all pieces of property taken under a “common scheme” will be added together for purposes of determining the value stolen in an “act of theft.” And if there were two or more schemes involved, you can be charged with multiple counts of grand theft and get jail/prison time for each count.
When the property stolen over $950 in value was an automobile, you will be charged with grand theft auto under California Penal Code section 487.d.1. The charge is not essentially different than grand theft in general, but it can result in a somewhat different penalty. Most likely, it will be a steeper penalty since grand theft auto is usually charged as a felony. A good attorney may be able to get the charge reduced, however, to Vehicle Code Section 10851 – joyriding – in a plea deal in some cases.
Petty Theft Charges
Again, petty theft (PC 484 and 488) is basically identical to grand theft (PC 487) except for the value of the property being valued at $950 or less.
However, there are cases where the value of the property is a point of contention. If goods had not been appraised for many years before being stolen, the owner may have had a too-high estimate of their value. Depreciation could have set in and/or the items may have been in imperfect condition.
A charge reduction to petty theft could lessen the sentence to a fine of up to $1,000 and/or a maximum of 6 months in county jail.
Also note, however, that “petty theft with a prior”, Penal Code section 666, can result in more severe punishments than for simple petty theft. If the defendant has a previous violent crime, sex offense, or a theft-related elder abuse conviction on his/her record, it is possible for even petty theft to become a felony and lead to penalties not too distant from those for some grand theft convictions.
Common Grand Theft Defense Strategies
At Leah Legal Criminal Defense, we always take the time to painstakingly investigate and analyze each case we take on and to build a solid, “customized” defense that maximizes your chances of securing the most favorable outcome possible. Yet, over our years of serving the Los Angeles community, we have also become fully familiar with the most effective common defense strategies used in grand theft cases. These include:
- Lack of Intent: No matter if you took property or of what value it was, it you had not intention of stealing the property, it is not theft – much less grand theft. A mistake of some kind may have occurred, and however absent-minded or inexcusable it may have been, it is not theft if it lacked intent to steal.
- Claim of Right: It may be that you did (or even still do) claim the property in question as your own. If you honestly believed it to be yours and that belief was “reasonable”, it is not theft, even if the belief was wrong. If you tried to hide the fact that you had taken the property, however, this defense will not be available.
- Owner’s Consent: If you had or reasonably believed yourself to have the permission of the owner to take the property in question, it is not theft. However, you cannot have used the property in a way inconsistent with your belief of what the owner gave you permission to do with his/her property.
- False Charges: It may be that you have been falsely accused of grand theft. Perhaps, the true thief or embezzler has framed you or someone who has a grudge against you is taking revenge. It could also be a case of mistaken identity, where the accusation is false even though the accuser honestly believes you to be guilty.
Contact Us Today for Help
At Van Nuys Criminal Attorney we have successfully handled numerous grand theft defense cases in Los Angeles and Southern California in the past, and we stand ready to come to your aid in your hour of need. Attorney Leah Naparstek will know how to build the best possible defense for your case and get you the best outcome possible, be that a dismissal, acquittal, or a reduced charge and/or sentence.
To learn more and to avail yourself of a free legal consultation, contact us anytime 24/7/365 by calling 818-484-1100.
At our law firm we maintain a small caseload. We feel that it is crucial to work closely and directly with our clients and to be easily accessible to them in order to assure high quality representation. Personalized attention helps to ease much of the frustration and fear that are an inevitable part of being caught up in the criminal justice system. Our clients remain informed of the legal process and developments in their case and they can expect honest communication at all times.
In order to develop the strongest and most creative defense possible for any given criminal charges, Leah Legal works closely with a team of skilled and experienced attorneys who specialize in that particular area of criminal law. This means than more often than not our clients have the benefit of more than one legal mind working on their case without having to pay additional fees.
To learn how we can help you with your felony or misdemeanor criminal charge, contact us online or call our office at (818) 484-1100 at any time – 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. We offer free initial consultations, accept cash, checks, and credit cards, and are available for weekend/evening appointments.
Unfortunately, a conviction for certain crimes carries long-term consequences beyond jail time and fines. In addition to affecting your employment opportunities and eligibility to acquire a practice license, a criminal conviction history could strip you of your gun rights, especially if the offense you have on your record is a felony.
A felony conviction typically results in the loss of rights to own, carry, or possess a firearm. When you have a conviction for a felony offense on your record, it will be a felony crime to purchase, buy, carry, possess, or receive a firearm. This can significantly impact individuals who rely on firearms for activities such as licensed hunting.
While the court imposes a lifetime ban on gun ownership, with the help of a skilled attorney, you could qualify to have your firearm rights restored through a gubernatorial pardon. If you are a felon or have a criminal record and are wondering whether you can own a gun, you are in the right place.
Felon With a Firearm Law Under Penal Code (PC) 29800
PC 29800 imposes a lifetime ban on firearm ownership or control by anyone convicted of a felony crime. Specifically, this statute makes it a felony crime to buy, own, possess, receive, control, or have a firearm in your custody if:
- You are a felon
- You are a drug addict
- You have two or more misdemeanor convictions for brandishing a weapon offense under PC 417(a)(2)
If your case reaches the trial phase of the criminal court process, the prosecution team must prove the following facts to secure a conviction against you under PC 29800:
- You either:
- Have a conviction for or an outstanding court warrant for a felony offense
- Have a drug use disorder (drug addict)
- Have two or more convictions for a PC 417(2)(a) violation (brandishing a weapon)
- Have a conviction for a PC 23515 violation (violent use of a firearm)
- You owned, possessed, received, or purchased a firearm
- You were aware of the gun’s presence
Here is a detailed overview of these facts, or “elements of the crime”:
A Felon
A felon is any person convicted of a felony criminal offense in any state, country, or government. Examples of these felony offenses include (but are not limited to) the following:
- Kidnapping
- Grand Theft Auto
- Attempted murder
- Murder
- Burglary
- Assault and battery
- Drug trafficking
- Home invasion robbery
- Assault with a deadly weapon
A conviction for any of these offenses will strip you of your gun rights. When you have a conviction or an active warrant for any of the above felony crimes, doing the following could attract charges under PC 29800:
- Buying a pistol
- Carrying a rifle in your vehicle trunk
- Receiving a shotgun from a friend
A Firearm
A firearm or gun is any object or device designed and intended to function as a weapon and can use combustion or explosion to shoot a projectile through its barrel. Even if it is not in operational condition or is unloaded, it is still a firearm in the eyes of the law. Generally speaking, firearms are referred to as guns and could include any of the following:
- Pistols
- Rifles
- Shotgun
- Tasers
- Revolvers
A Drug Addict
You could lose your gun rights if you have a drug use disorder or addiction. For the sake of this statute, you are a drug addict if you are physically or emotionally dependent on a drug substance or narcotics. You could also qualify as a drug addict if you have increased tolerance to the substance’s effects.
Possession of a Firearm
Having a gun in your possession does not automatically mean that you had it in your hand or bag. In the eyes of the law, possession could be actual or constructive. Actual possession of a firearm means you had physical and direct control. For example, when you carry a gun in your backpack, the prosecutor can argue you had actual possession of it.
On the other hand, having constructive possession of a gun means you had access to it or the legal right to control it. For example, if the police discovered a rifle in your apartment, the prosecutor can argue you had constructive possession of the firearm to secure a PC 29800 charge conviction against you.
Which Penalties Will a Felon Face After a Conviction Under PC 29800?
If you are a felon, a conviction under PC 29800 will attract felony penalties, including the following:
A Jail Term
Jail time is almost inevitable if you are guilty of a felony offense. After a conviction for a PC 29800 violation, you could face sixteen (16) months, two (2), or three (3) years of jail time.
A Fine
The fine you will pay for a felony PC 29800 charge conviction could be significant, amounting to up to $10,000.
Probation
With the legal assistance of your defense attorney, the judge could award you a felony probation instead of jail time after a PC 29800 violation conviction. Some of the conditions the court could require to adhere to include the following:
- Refrain from buying, owning, possessing, or carrying a firearm
- Perform community service
- Seek counseling services
- Submit to regular drug test requirements
- Agree to regular and impromptu searches by the police or a probation officer
- Agree to regular check-ins with a court-appointed probation officer
Failure to comply with these terms could lead to a re-arrest and detention in the state prison for the maximum period required for your offense.
Other Consequences of a PC 29800 Charge Conviction
Unfortunately, even after serving your jail term, a conviction record for a PC 29800 violation could follow you and impact the quality of your life. Below are examples of possible other detrimental consequences you could face in addition to the above legal penalties:
Challenges Securing Employment
A criminal record, particularly for a felony offense, could make it challenging to secure reliable employment, affecting your ability to earn an income to care for yourself and your loved ones.
Deportation and Being Marked Inadmissible
A conviction for any firearm-related offense, including a PC 29800 charge, could result in deportation to your home country and being marked inadmissible, meaning you cannot re-enter the country after deportation. Therefore, if you are a non-citizen, you should consult a skilled attorney immediately to determine whether it is possible to have your charge reduced to a non-deportable offense.
Challenges Securing Professional Licenses
Licensing agencies will consider your criminal record before accepting your license application. If you have a PC 29800 charge conviction, securing a professional license to pursue your career dreams could be challenging. That is particularly true if you are a medical practitioner, lawyer, or schoolteacher.
Challenges in Renting a House to Live
Your prospective landlord could consider your criminal record when determining whether you are eligible to live in his/her apartment. Finding reliable housing could be challenging if you have a criminal record for a PC 29800 charge.
Limited Access to Financial Aid
A felony PC 29800 violation conviction could make you ineligible for student loans or scholarships if you want to join a college or university to pursue a professional course.
Loss of Your Civil Rights
A felony conviction could make you lose your civil rights, including the right to serve on a jury, vote, and own a firearm.
Social Stigma
Another detrimental consequence of a felony conviction that you cannot overlook is social stigma. The social stigma associated with felony convictions could make it challenging to maintain relationships with people in your community and also with your loved ones.
If you are under arrest or investigation for a PC 29800 case, it is advisable to consult an experienced defense attorney. With the legal help of a reputable defense attorney, you could avoid a PC 29800 violation conviction or secure a lighter sentence after conviction.
Legal Defenses to a PC 29800 Charge
Since every case is unique, a thorough investigation is necessary to determine the best legal defenses that could work in your favor to secure a dismissal of the PC 29800 charges or a lighter sentence. This underscores the importance of consulting a defense attorney if you are under investigation or facing charges under PC 29800.
Below is an overview of some of the legal defenses your defense attorney could use to challenge a PC 29800 charge:
- Your Possession of the Firearm Was for a Brief Period When Disposing of it
Arguing that your possession of the firearm was for a brief period while disposing of it is a valid legal defense for a PC 29800 charge. For example, that could be a viable legal defense to this charge if someone planted the gun in your vehicle.
To support this legal defense, your attorney can also argue that you had no intention of interfering with the police investigation or preventing them from seizing the weapon.
- You Had the Gun Because You Seized it From Someone Committing an Unlawful Activity
While the law prevents you from owning or possessing a firearm, it does not mean you cannot defend yourself when necessary. For example, if someone wants to fire a gun at you or your loved one, you can exercise self-defense and seize it if possible, and then report the case to the police.
However, this defense could only be valid if your attorney can prove you delivered the gun to the police as soon as possible. That means you did not possess it longer than necessary after seizing it from the assailant. Your attorney can use surveillance videos and eyewitness testimonies to help support this legal defense argument.
- The Police Seized the Firearm Through an Illegal Search
Even if you are a felon, the police must have a valid court-ordered warrant before searching your person, vehicle, or other property. If the police conducted a warrantless search on your vehicle without any valid reason, your attorney can raise an issue of police misconduct as a legal defense to PC 29800 charges.
If the judge finds that the arresting police officers seized the gun from you without a warrant or any valid reason to necessitate the search, he/she could dismiss or reduce your PC 29800 charges.
- You Did Not Know You Had a Gun in Your Possession
You cannot be guilty under PC 29800 if you did not know of the firearm’s presence. That means it would be a valid defense to argue that you were unaware of the firearm’s presence. For example, that could be possible if your roommate carried the gun to your shared apartment without informing you about it.
If your defense attorney can provide sufficient evidence to prove to the judge that you did not know of the gun’s presence, the court could dismiss or reduce your charges to a lighter offense.
- You Did Not Have Any Firearm in Your Possession
Just because you passed near a house with firearms or inside the house, it does not automatically mean these weapons were in your possession. For example, if you attended a party with people who have guns, your attorney can argue you were not in possession of these weapons because you did not have any physical control over any of them.
As mentioned in the previous paragraph, “possession” has a distinctive meaning under PC 29800. If your attorney can prove with clear evidence that you did not have actual or constructive possession of the firearm in question, the court will dismiss or reduce your PC 29800 charges.
- You are a Victim of False Accusations
A PC 29800 charge is a crime ripe for false accusations. For example, if you were involved in a domestic dispute, your partner or spouse could accuse you of having a gun in your possession as revenge or to gain an advantage over you in a child custody battle.
If your defense attorney can prove to the judge that the accuser lacks trustworthiness and was motivated by jealousy, anger, or vengeful motives, he/she could dismiss your case.
How to Restore Your Gun Rights
If you rely on your gun for hunting, self-defense, or sport shooting, you should do your best to restore your gun rights after a conviction for any felony or a crime that prohibits gun ownership. Below are three ways that could work in your favor to restore your gun rights:
- Seeking a Reduction in Your Felony Conviction
Reducing your felony offense to a misdemeanor could restore or reinstate gun rights. That is particularly true if your offense is a wobbler, meaning the prosecutor can file the offense as a felony or misdemeanor. The prosecutor makes this life-changing decision based on the following:
- The facts and circumstances of your unique case
- Your criminal record
If your charge reduction petition is successful, the court could reinstate your rights to buy and own a firearm.
- Securing a Certificate of Rehabilitation (COR) and the Governor’s Pardon
A COR is a form of post-conviction relief where the court declares that you have received the necessary rehabilitation and are a rehabilitated individual. Generally speaking, you could qualify for the COR if you have a past conviction of:
- A misdemeanor sex crime listed under PC 290, and the court has expunged your conviction
- A felony and received a probation sentence, but the court has expunged your conviction
- A felony and served a state prison sentence, but the court has expunged your conviction
To be eligible for a COR, you must also have received additional rehabilitation services for two to five years, securing your release from prison or probation. Additionally, you must have resided here for at least five (5) years.
Securing a COR will act as an automatic application of the governor’s pardon, meaning no further action by you or your attorney is needed. If the governor grants the pardon, the court will reinstate your gun rights. However, if you are ineligible for a gubernatorial pardon after your application of COR, the court will not reinstate your firearm rights.
Some of the factors the governor will consider when deciding whether to grant a pardon include the following:
- The circumstances of your underlying charge
- Whether you received appropriate rehabilitation services
- Whether you pose a threat to public safety
- Your reasons for requesting the pardon
Your attorney can help during the application of the COR and the governor’s pardon to increase your odds of securing a favorable outcome. The services of an attorney when handling post-conviction matters are as important as any other legal issue.
Find a Defense Attorney Near Me
Unfortunately, in addition to the lengthy jail term and unaffordable fines, a conviction for a felony offense will also take away your firearm rights. However, with the legal assistance of a seasoned attorney, the court could restore these rights.
If you are under investigation or arrested as a suspect in a felony offense that could strip you of your gun rights, or you already have a felony conviction on your record, our defense attorneys at Leah Legal could help. We invite you to call us at 818-484-1100 to discuss your case with our credible defense attorneys, wherever you are in Van Nuys.
No matter what other cases you have pending, do not go through this alone and without the proper representation. Having the right attorney by your side speaks volumes for putting your nerves at ease, walking you through the process, keeping you informed of all important case dates, guiding you to the best possible outcome, and most importantly representing your rights. Van Nuys Criminal Attorney is committed to standing by your side this most difficult time and posses the knowledge navigate the criminal courts system properly.
Fierce, Uncompromising Criminal Defense
Criminal defense is about defending rights. And everyone has rights. Yet when you have been charged with a crime and are swept up in the criminal justice system, you quickly learn that nobody is as interested in defending your rights as you are, and you cannot do it alone.
- Aiding a Suicide
- Aiding & Abetting
- Animal Abuse
- Assault
- Assault and Battery
- Bribery
- Burglary
- Battery
- Carjacking
- Child Pornography
- Commercial Bribery
- Concealed Weapons
- Deliberate Exposure to Communicable Infections
- Dissuading A Witness or Victim
- Drug Possession
- DMV Hearings
- Domestic Violence
- Dry Reckless
- DUI/DWI
- DUI Causing Injury
- DUI With Passenger Under 14
- Drug Crimes
- Expungements
- Extortion
- False Imprisonment
- Federal Crimes
- Firearm possession
- Firearms Sentencing Enhancements
- Fourth Offense DUI
- Gang Enhancements
- Gun charges
- Insurance Fraud
- Internet Crimes
- Juvenile Offenses
- Manslaughter
- Murder
- Negligent Discharge of a Firearm
- Possession of Marijuana for Sale
- Probation
- Probation Violation
- Petition to Vacate Murder Conviction
- Public Intoxication
- Reckless Driving
- Resisting Arrest
- Restraining Orders
- Temporary Restraining Order
- Permanent Restraining Order
- Emergency Protective Order
Whether on TV, in the news, or even in casual conversations, we frequently hear the terms “homicide” and “murder” used interchangeably. While these two crimes are closely related because they involve the killing of another person, they hold different meanings in the Penal Code that make a significant difference in the sentence you could face after conviction.
Understanding these distinctions is crucial if you are under arrest, investigation, or charged with an offense that involves the killing of another person. That is where the services of an experienced criminal defense attorney become crucial.
In addition to helping you understand your legal options and rights, an experienced attorney can help you navigate the criminal court process and prepare defenses to weaken the prosecutor’s case against you for the best possible outcome.
What is Homicide?
Homicide is an umbrella term for all killings of another person, whether legal or illegal. Unlike what many think, homicide is a criminal offense when you commit it without a legal excuse or justification. Homicide could be excusable or justifiable under any of the following circumstances:
- You were acting in self-defense
- You are a police officer and were exercising your duties
Under these circumstances, killing another person is legally permissible, meaning you will not face any penalties. However, these intentional killings are only justifiable under certain circumstances. That means you need a credible attorney to help convince the prosecutor and the judge that the killing was justifiable in your situation.
Criminal or illegal homicide includes all killings of another person without any lawful justification or excuse, including murder or manslaughter. If you are under arrest or charged with murder or manslaughter, your freedom could be at risk because these offenses carry a lengthy jail sentence, including up to 25 years to life in jail.
Understanding the Distinction Between Murder and Manslaughter
Murder and manslaughter cover all acts that involve the illegal killing of another person, but they have varying legal definitions and penalties under the Penal Code. Here is what you need to know about murder and manslaughter, respectively:
Murder
Murder is an illegal homicide that involves the intentional killing of another person with malice aforethought. Malice aforethought refers to your mental state before committing the murder offense. Malice aforethought does not necessarily mean you acted out of hate or spite. You act with malice aforethought when you do the following:
- Behave with disregard for human life
- Behave with a specific criminal intent to kill another person without legal excuse or justification
A murder charge under Penal Code (PC) 187 can result in serious and life-changing consequences after conviction. Depending on the unique facts of your case, the prosecutor could file your murder charge as:
- First Degree Murder
You commit first-degree murder when you intentionally kill another person with premeditation and malice aforethought. You act with deliberation or premeditation when you weigh and consider your options before killing another person. To secure a first-degree murder charge against you, the prosecutor must prove the following:
- You lie in wait for the victim
- You plan and create an escape route
- You created the escape route
- You organised a plan to kill the victim
When the prosecutor’s evidence is sufficient and clear beyond a reasonable doubt, the court will convict you of first-degree murder. In that case, your sentence could include up to twenty-five years to life behind bars without the possibility of parole.
- Second Degree Murder
Second-degree covers everything that does not qualify as first-degree murder. You commit second-degree murder when you intentionally kill another person with malice aforethought, even though you did not have a premeditated intent. For example, the prosecutor could file second-degree murder charges if:
- You intended to cause serious physical injury, but it resulted in the person’s death
- You had the intent to commit a felony, but it resulted in the death of another person
A second-degree murder conviction will result in a jail sentence of up to fifteen years to life.
- Felony Murder
The court can convict you of a felony murder if another person (the victim) died during your commission of a felony. That is true even if:
- You had no intent to kill the person
- The killing was an accident
- You were unaware that a homicide occurred
All the prosecutor needs to prove to secure a felony murder conviction against you is that the killing is directly related to the underlying felony offense.
Generally speaking, the prosecutor can file a felony murder offense as either first-degree or second-degree, depending on the facts of your case. The standard jail sentence for a first-degree felony murder conviction includes up to twenty-five years to life in jail.
However, when charged with second-degree felony murder, the penalty you will face after conviction could include fifteen years to life in jail.
- Capital Murder
Capital murder is a first-degree murder with special circumstances. However, capital murder is not a separate charge. Instead, it indicates that you could be eligible for the death penalty or life without parole. You could be at risk of these harsh penalties if any of the following facts are true:
- Your offense is gang-related
- Your offense involved a drive-by shooting
- Your offense involves the killing of another person for financial gain
- Multiple people lost their lives
- The victim was a prosecutor, a firefighter, an elected official, a police officer, or a witness to prevent him/her from giving his/her testimony
If your murder case qualifies as a “capital murder,” your penalties after conviction could include life in prison (without the possibility of parole) or the death penalty, depending on the facts of your unique case.
Manslaughter
In addition to the above various types of murder, manslaughter also qualifies as homicide. However, manslaughter is a less serious offense than murder. Manslaughter is the killing of another person without malice aforethought.
Many times, during the plea bargain process, the prosecutor could be willing to drop your murder charge, but in return, you have to enter a guilty plea to a manslaughter offense. Here are three types of manslaughter offenses you ought to know:
Voluntary Manslaughter
According to PC 192(a), you commit a voluntary manslaughter offense when you illegally kill someone in the heat of passion, during a sudden quarrel, or because of an honest but unreasonable belief that you needed to defend yourself. Some of the key elements the prosecutor must prove to secure a conviction against you under this statute, through a sudden quarrel or in the heat of passion, include:
- The victim provoked you
- Due to the provocation, you acted irrationally and were overcome by a strong emotion that clouded your judgment and reasoning
- The provocation would cause any average and sober person to act the way you did
Unlike a murder offense, voluntary manslaughter lacks malice aforethought or premeditation. For the sake of PC 192(a), you need to understand what “heat of passion” means. The term “heat of passion” under this statute means intense or violent emotion that could make you act impulsively.
That means if you had time to cool off after the provocation but later decided to kill the victim, your offense will not qualify as voluntary manslaughter. In this case, the prosecutor could file premeditated murder charges against you. Here are a few examples of acts that could qualify as voluntary manslaughter under PC 192(a):
- Walking in on your wife cheating, in a sudden rage, you grab a knife and stab her
- Using deadly force against a disarmed pickpocket
- Using lethal force against another person in self-defense after a physical altercation
- Responding to insults with deadly force
- Killing another person you unreasonably believe is a threat to your child
If the prosecutor secures a voluntary manslaughter charge conviction against you, the judge could decide to:
- Grant probation, but you have to serve up to one (1) year behind bars
- Deny you probation and impose a three (3), six (6), or eleven (11) years of jail time
- Impose a fine of up to $10,000
Your attorney must provide convincing mitigating arguments to convince the judge to grant the most lenient sentence. For example, your defense attorney can argue that:
- You have no criminal record
- You cooperated and portrayed utmost respect to everyone throughout the prosecution process
- Any reasonable individual in your position would behave in a similar manner
Involuntary Manslaughter
PC 192(b) defines involuntary manslaughter and the penalties you could receive after conviction. According to this statute, you commit involuntary manslaughter when you illegally kill another person due to your criminal negligence.
Unlike murder, which requires the prosecutor to prove that you acted with malice aforethought, for a conviction for a PC 192(b) violation, the prosecutor does not have to prove that element. Here are examples of acts that could attract a PC 192(b) charge:
- During a fight with her husband, Hellen retrieves a gun and waves it at him to threaten him (brandishing a weapon under PC 417), but the gun accidentally fires and kills the man
- A man with a bulldog that has a history of attacking other people decides to let his dog run off-leash at a dog park, and it attacks another dog owner, mauling him to death
To secure an involuntary manslaughter charge against you, the prosecutor must prove the following facts with clear and satisfactory evidence:
- You committed a misdemeanor offense, a felony that is not “inherently dangerous,” or a legal act in an illegal way
- You committed the offense or acted with criminal negligence
- Your acts caused someone’s death
Regardless of whether your involuntary manslaughter charge involves an underlying legal act or underlying offense, the prosecutor must prove that you acted with “criminal negligence” to secure a conviction against you under PC 192(b). According to this statute, criminal negligence is anything more than inattention, ordinary carelessness, or a mistake in judgment. In a nutshell, criminal negligence occurs if:
- You act in a reckless manner that creates a high risk of serious bodily injury or death
- Any reasonable and sober person would have known that behaving in that manner could create that kind of risk
Also, the court will consider your act or conduct to have caused the victim’s death if his/her death was due to a natural, probable, or direct consequence of your acts. That means that person’s death would not have occurred if it were not due to your acts.
Since a PC 192(b) charge is a felony, a conviction can result in grave penalties, including the following:
- Two, three, or four years of jail time
- A fine not exceeding $10,000
- Felony probation
Vehicular Manslaughter
You commit the crime of vehicular manslaughter when you kill another person while driving unlawfully or negligently. For example, when you kill another person in a car accident while speeding or doing other distracting activities like texting, the prosecutor can file involuntary manslaughter charges against you under PC 192(c). The penalties you will face for a conviction under this statute will depend on the following:
- The degree of your negligence
- Whether you were under the influence
- Your criminal background
Unlike the offenses of involuntary manslaughter and voluntary manslaughter, a vehicular manslaughter offense occurs when you are driving. If the prosecutor proves you acted with ordinary negligence, you will receive misdemeanor penalties after conviction, including up to one year of jail time.
However, if your offense involves gross negligence, you could face felony or misdemeanor penalties because it is a wobbler. A conviction for a felony PC 192(c) violation will carry six years of jail time. However, a misdemeanor conviction will carry up to one year of jail time.
Other Consequences of a Murder and Manslaughter Charges Conviction
In addition to the possible legal penalties, a conviction for a murder or manslaughter offense could result in the following consequences:
- A strike on your criminal record under the Three Strikes Law, meaning a third conviction could result in up to twenty-five (25) to life behind bars
- A permanent criminal record, which can affect your employment opportunities
- Loss of your firearm rights, particularly if your offense is gun-related
The Importance of a Defense Attorney When Charged with Manslaughter or Murder
Having a credible and reliable defense attorney in your corner when you are under investigation or charged with a manslaughter or murder offense is crucial. A skilled defense attorney will play a crucial role in navigating the complexities of these offenses by:
- Seeking Eyewitness Testimonies
Eyewitness testimonies can go a long way in helping your attorney secure a dismissal of your charges or a lighter sentence. In addition to seeking testimonies from eyewitnesses of the incident, your attorney can work with specialists like psychologists and forensic experts to help provide testimony that can work in your favor to secure a desirable outcome.
- Investigating and Evaluating the Evidence in Your Case
In addition to investigating your case details, your defense attorney will evaluate the strength of the prosecutor’s evidence against you and identify any gaps or inconsistencies to help you secure a favorable outcome.
- Negotiating Favorable Plea Deals
When appropriate, negotiating a plea deal could work in your favor to avoid the trial for the underlying murder or manslaughter charge, which carries harsh penalties after conviction. Negotiating with the prosecutor to reduce your murder or manslaughter charge in exchange for your guilty plea could work in your favor, especially in cases where the prosecutor has overwhelming evidence against you.
It takes a seasoned attorney to know whether negotiating a favorable plea deal is wise because the plea option you choose will attract some penalties. Sometimes, challenging the underlying murder or manslaughter charges at trial could be the best move if the prosecutor’s case against you is weak or lacks crucial evidence.
Common Legal Defenses Your Attorney Could Use to Challenge a Murder or Manslaughter Charge
While every case is different, the following legal defenses could work to your advantage to secure a lighter sentence or dismissal of your murder or manslaughter charge:
- You acted in self-defense — Arguing that you killed the person because you were protecting yourself or a loved one could help you secure a favorable outcome when charged with murder or manslaughter
- The killing was accidental — Arguing that the killing was accidental and lacked criminal intent or premeditation is also a valid legal defense for a murder or manslaughter charge
- You are a victim of mistaken identity — If the murder or manslaughter offense occurred in an unlit environment, your attorney can argue that you were mistakenly identified as the perpetrator because you have the same height as the actual perpetrator. With proper evidence to support this legal defense argument, the court could drop or reduce your charges.
- You were insane at the time of the offense — Arguing that you were legally insane at the time of the offense, and you did not have the mental capacity to understand the nature of your acts, is also a valid defense for manslaughter or murder charges
These legal defenses focus on undermining the key elements that are necessary for the prosecutor to secure a murder or manslaughter charge against you.
Find a Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
If you are under arrest or charged with a serious offense like murder or manslaughter, securing the services of a skilled defense attorney for legal representation is critical. We invite you to call our dedicated legal defense attorneys at Leah Legal at 818-484-1100 if you or a family member is under investigation or charged with murder or manslaughter in Van Nuys.
If you are under arrest or investigation as a suspect in a felony case, it is natural to worry about the offense’s impact on your life. Before even the prosecution process begins, you could wonder how long a conviction for a felony will remain on your criminal record.
Generally speaking, a conviction for any felony offense will stay on your criminal record indefinitely, affecting several aspects of your life, including your voting rights, employment prospects, and firearm rights. However, it is not the end of the road for you because even after a conviction, you could qualify for post-conviction relief options, like expungement.
Since a felony conviction can significantly alter your life, understanding your legal rights and options when the prosecutor secures a conviction against you is critical.
What a Felony Means
A felony is any grave criminal offense that carries more than a year of jail time after conviction at trial. Unlike misdemeanor offenses, a conviction for a felony could attract life-altering repercussions even after serving your jail time. Below are examples of common felonies you ought to know:
- Robbery
- Lewd or lascivious acts with a minor under 14
- Sale of a controlled substance
- Murder
A conviction for any of these felony offenses will affect your freedom and your future after serving your sentence.
Straight Felonies Versus Wobblers
While felonies are generally serious offenses, not every felony is the same. The lawmakers designate certain offenses as straight felonies and others as wobblers, and this distinction will affect how the prosecutor handles your case and the possible penalties you could receive after conviction. Here is what you need to know about straight felonies and wobbler offenses, respectively:
Straight Felonies
A straight felony is any crime that is charged and punishable as a felony. Also, when charged with a straight felony, you will be ineligible to have the charge reduced to a misdemeanor. Common examples of straight felonies include the following:
- Selling controlled drug substances
- Rape
- murder
Wobbler
A wobbler is any offense that the prosecutor can file as a misdemeanor or a felony. When making this decision, the prosecutor will consider the following:
- Your criminal record
- Aggravating factors in your case
- Your unique case’s facts
Working with a skilled attorney could make a significant difference in your case if you are under arrest or charged with a wobbler offense. A seasoned defense attorney can convince the prosecutor to reduce your felony to a misdemeanor, which carries lighter penalties after conviction.
Factors That Will Affect How Long a Felony Will Remain on Your Criminal Record
Generally speaking, a conviction for a felony offense will remain on your criminal history forever unless you or your attorney takes the necessary steps to have the record removed by the court. That means when you fail to take action about it, a felony conviction can affect your future for several years. The following factors will influence the duration a felony conviction will stay on your criminal background and its impacts on your life:
- Your type of felony offense — Some felony offenses are ineligible for expungement, meaning they will stay on your criminal record forever
- Completion of your sentence — Securing an expungement could be challenging if you have not completed your probation or secured an early termination of the probation
- Subsequent crimes — Remaining crime-free following your felony conviction is vital and can increase your odds of securing an expungement
- Whether you have taken any legal action on the issue — Seeking an expungement and record-sealing could remove your felony conviction from the public view
It is worth noting that even though you have a felony conviction on your criminal history, not every background check will show the offense because some checks only check your record within the past seven to ten years. Also, while an expungement can erase your felony conviction from the public view, law enforcement officers and the court can access the record when charged with another offense.
However, when you fail to take action to remove your conviction from your record, the following people can see it, affecting your opportunities and prospects.
- Landlords
- Potential employers
- Professional licensing agencies
- Educational institutions
What Expungement of a Felony Conviction Means
Securing an expungement is one of the most effective ways of removing a felony conviction from your criminal record. An expungement is a legal process that allows you to have your criminal records updated by the court and reflect dismissal of the felony offense.
While an expungement will not completely remove a conviction from your record, it will lessen and mitigate the several impacts associated with a criminal history. Unfortunately, not every person qualifies for an expungement under PC 1203.4. Some of the factors that will affect your eligibility for post-conviction relief under PC 1203.4 include the following:
- Whether you were incarcerated in the state prison
- Whether you have pending charges or are serving your sentence for a different offense
- Whether you breached any condition of your probation
- Whether you have completed all the legal penalties of your conviction, including probation (if you are still on probation, you can request early termination)
If you meet the above eligibility criteria, your attorney can help you prepare and file your PC 1203.4 petition with the court. However, it is worth noting that certain felonies could make you ineligible for an expungement under PC 1203.4, including the following:
- Acts of terrorism
- Murder
- Assault with a deadly weapon causing severe injury
- Specific sex offenses when children are involved
- Statutory rape
- Violent crimes
- Involuntary and voluntary manslaughter
If you are looking for a fresh start after serving your sentence, you should consult a seasoned attorney to help determine whether you qualify for post-conviction relief under PC 1203.4.
Benefits of Seeking an Expungement of Your Felony Conviction Record
As mentioned in the previous paragraph, a felony conviction has several other detrimental consequences beyond incarceration and hefty fines. That is why seeking an expungement is vital after serving your sentence and paying all your dues. Understanding the benefits of securing an expungement can assist you in deciding whether it is an option worth considering after serving your sentence.
To that end, below are some of the advantages of seeking an expungement of your felony conviction record:
Increased Employment Opportunities
One of the main benefits of securing an expungement is increased employment opportunities because you do not reveal your criminal record during job applications or interviews. You are only obligated to disclose your criminal record when applying to become a police officer, running for a public office, or seeking a job at the Lottery Commission.
Increased Housing Opportunities
Securing an expungement can make securing approval on your rental applications easier because your prospective landlord will not know you have a felony conviction on your record. Additionally, securing a house or apartment to live in your desired areas will become easier if your felony conviction record is not visible to prospective landlords or homeowners.
Better Education Prospects
Securing an expungement increases your eligibility for admission to universities and colleges. Also, you are more likely to qualify for grants and scholarships if your past felony conviction record is expunged.
Increased Chances of Securing Professional Licenses
Professional licensing agencies will consider your criminal record before granting a practice license. That is particularly true if you are a qualified and trained healthcare provider, attorney, dentist, or teacher. Therefore, to stand a chance of securing a professional license to chase your career goals, you should consider securing an expungement of your felony conviction record.
You Will Have Certain Legal Benefits
While an expungement will not restore your gun rights, securing an expungement can help restore other legal benefits, including your ability to serve as a witness in a criminal case. The court will not question the credibility of your testimony based on your expunged felony record. Securing an expungement will also increase your odds of securing a desirable outcome in any future legal matter.
You Will Have a Fresh Start in Your Life
Finally, securing an expungement gives you peace of mind because you do not have to disclose that you have a felony conviction record in most cases. Moving on with your life after securing an expungement will be easier because you will not experience the stigma associated with felony convictions.
Knowing that a conviction record cannot affect your future opportunities also increases your self-confidence and esteem.
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Petition the Court to Expunge Your Felony Record
Now that you understand the advantages of securing an expungement and the eligibility requirements, your next step should be to begin the process. Here is a step-by-step guide on how to petition the court to expunge your felony conviction record:
- Hire an Attorney
You are more likely to secure a favorable outcome on your expungement petition if you have legal representation by a seasoned attorney. A seasoned attorney who understands how post-conviction matters work can help you prepare your PC 1203.4 petition and attach all the evidence needed to secure a favorable outcome.
- Obtain and Fill Out all the Required Forms
When your attorney finds that you qualify for expungement under PC 1203.4, the next step is to obtain all forms necessary for the petition. If you have already completed your probation, you should file Form CR-180 (Petition to Dismiss). However, if you have not yet completed your felony probation, you must file a motion to terminate your probation.
If your offense is a wobbler, your attorney will help you file a motion to reduce it to a misdemeanor for expungement. However, if your felony offense is not a felony, you can still have it reduced to a misdemeanor by filing a 17b motion. Once the court reduces your felony to a misdemeanor, your attorney will file a petition to reduce the misdemeanor.
Your attorney can obtain all the forms necessary when seeking an expungement at the local courthouse. He/she will know which forms are necessary and how to fill them out correctly to increase your chances of securing a favorable outcome in your expungement petition.
- File Expungement Petition
Once your attorney fills out all the necessary forms and attaches the necessary supporting evidence, he/she will file your PC 1203.4 petition with the superior (trial) court that handled your criminal case. However, you should be ready to pay the necessary filing fee.
How much you will pay to file your expungement petition will depend on whether your case is a felony or the court reduced it to a misdemeanor. However, sometimes the court can waive these fees if your attorney can prove you are indigent. After filing your expungement petition, the court will schedule an expungement hearing in four to five months.
- The Expungement Hearing
Generally speaking, you do not have to attend your expungement hearing if you have an attorney. Your attorney will prepare for the hearing by compiling all the evidence that can help prove to the court you are an excellent candidate for expungement.
Unlike a trial where a judge or a jury makes the decision on a case, at the expungement hearing, you should expect a judge ready to decide whether you qualify for this post-conviction relief. The hearing will last around ten minutes. Some of the factors that will come into play when determining whether you are an excellent candidate to secure an expungement of your record include the following:
- Your criminal history
- The nature and facts of your conviction
- Whether you performed community service
- Whether you have active employment
- Whether you breached any requirements, and the terms of your probation
- Your community ties
When the court accepts your petition, you will receive a formal signed order from the judge showing a dismissal of your conviction. However, when the judge denies your petition, your attorney can inquire about the reason and what is necessary to have your PC 1203.4 petition accepted. Then, after six months, your attorney can help you refile the expungement petition with all the necessary adjustments.
Limits of an Expungement Under PC 1203.4
Securing an expungement of your felony record has numerous benefits, but this post-conviction relief option has its limits. Common limitations of an expungement you ought to know about include the following:
- It does not reinstate your firearm rights
- You will have to continue with your sex-offender registration duties if your conviction involved a sex-related violation
- It will not reinstate your driving privileges if the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) has suspended or revoked your license
- The court can consider your expunged felony conviction when charged with a crime that qualifies as a “strike” under the Three Strikes Law
It is also worth noting that a successful expungement petition will not remove your arrest record. You will only qualify to have your arrest record sealed and destroyed under PC 851.87 if any of the following is true:
- After an arrest, the prosecutor did not file charges against you
- The court dismissed your case
- A jury acquitted you
- You are a victim of wrongful arrest
- You appealed a conviction, and the court overturned it
If the court records sealing petition is granted, the following arrest records will cease to show on most background checks:
- Your fingerprints
- Police reports
- Booking photos (mugshots)
- Rap sheet entries
Other Alternatives You Can Consider if You Are Ineligible to Expunge Your Felony Record
Unfortunately, if you are not an excellent candidate for expungement under PC 1203.4, all hope is not lost. With the legal assistance of your attorney, you can seek the following alternatives:
A Certificate of Rehabilitation (COR)
A COR is a court-issued document that declares that you are now a rehabilitated individual after your conviction. In other words, it shows that you are no longer a threat to public safety and are a law-abiding citizen. Unlike an expungement, a COR will not dismiss your conviction from your record.
However, potential employers or any person who performs a background check on you will know you are now a rehabilitated individual.
A Governor’s Pardon
Securing a COR acts as an automatic application of the gubernatorial pardon. A gubernatorial pardon will restore specific legal rights you lost due to a felony conviction, including the right to:
- Own a firearm as long as the underlying offense does not involve the use of a lethal weapon
- Right to vote
- Serve on a jury
Generally speaking, a gubernatorial pardon is particularly helpful if you served a sentence in the state prison and are ineligible for an expungement.
Find a Credible Criminal Defense Attorney Near Me
Understanding how a felony conviction will stay on your criminal record and how an expungement can help is vital if you want to move on with your life. Although a felony conviction can attract devastating and life-altering impacts on your life, an expungement could help give you a fresh start and improve the quality of your life after serving your sentence.
Our attorneys at Leah Legal are here for you if you have more concerns about how long a felony will remain on your record. We invite you to call us at 818-484-1100, and we will guide you through the expungement process and offer you legal representation to secure a favorable outcome, wherever you are in Van Nuys.
The 4th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects you from illegal search and seizure. If law enforcers believe you used a property to commit an offense, they can obtain a search warrant from a judge. The warrant allows the police to search you or the property for evidence associated with the criminal activity and seize it as evidence. Before the judge issues the search warrant, the police should have probable cause that you used the item in the offense. If the law enforcers lied when acquiring the warrant, the court could dismiss any evidence acquired through the unlawful search and seizure. You should bring a Franks motion to the court to fight the search warrant.
A Deep Dive Into Franks Motions and Hearings
The 4th Amendment safeguards citizens of the United States from unfair searches and seizures by police officers.
Before searching any property, police officers should obtain a signed warrant from a magistrate or judge according to the details in a sworn statement or affidavit given by the police officer seeking the warrant.
Nevertheless, if the information is misleading or false because of reckless or intentional omission of truth, any proof obtained through the search may be inadmissible in court.
The Franks motion and subsequent hearings refer to the judicial process of a defendant contesting the legality of an arrest or search warrant, known as traversing the warrant. Therefore, a Franks hearing is a court proceeding where a suspect challenges the veracity of a warrant before a judge.
You should bring a Franks motion to contest the affidavit that is the basis of a warrant. The motion challenges the accuracy of the affidavit’s details by offering evidence proving the following:
- It had false material information
- The warrant contained misstatements of fact or false statements
- It had misleading omissions or details that were used to grant the warrant
- The police acted so with a complete disregard for the truth
The motion can prove that law enforcement omitted material information from the affidavit that may have prevented the judge from issuing the warrant.
Understanding the Background to the Franks Motion
In the Franks v. Delaware case (1978), the United States Supreme Court created the legal framework for contesting the legality of a search warrant. The Supreme Court upheld that an accused person can contest the frankness of statements in a search warrant affidavit. If successful, the court can suppress the proof obtained because of the warrant. In the Franks legal matter, law enforcement secured a warrant for the accused after taking an oath that two (2) of the suspect’s coworkers informed the police that the suspect’s clothes comprised the items the alleged rape victim described.
While executing the warrant, the police confiscated the clothes described earlier. The suspect’s defense attorney talked with two coworkers who denied making statements imputed to them in the affidavit or ever talking to the affiant.
Upon appeal from the trial and the lower appellate court’s refusal to take into account the affidavit’s false statements, the Supreme Court directed that a viable, supported assertion of the affidavit’s deliberate falsehood warrants a court hearing and evidence’s suppression once the Franks motion proves case elements that include the following:
- Omissions or falsehoods — The suspect must prove that the police deliberately or carelessly included falsehoods or excluded material facts in their warrant’s affidavit.
- Affidavit’s remaining content — Upon the removal of the omissions or falsehoods, the affidavit stops showing the presence of probable cause. A Franks motion is a formidable tool to suppress any incriminating proof, especially if the evidence discovered while executing the search warrant is crucial to the prosecutor’s possibility of convicting a suspect.
- Materiality — The falsehoods or omissions should be material; they were essential to create probable cause for the judge to issue the warrant.
Extensions to the Franks Rule
In Johnson v. State (1995), the court extended the Franks requirements to omissions in affidavits, requiring the judge to review the following:
- Whether the excluded material, if included in an affidavit, could have trumped probable cause.
- Whether the omissions were deliberate or reckless law enforcement conduct that can be deemed as deception.
Furthermore, in the Johnson ruling, the Court reviewed how the Franks rule should be applied to factual omissions in an affidavit. The Johnson Court ruled that the reasonable legal standard for ascertaining the impact of the omissions would be to determine whether probable cause might still have existed if the excluded material were in the affidavit.
Please note that the omitted details in the probable cause court hearing do not alone result in an inference of deception. Nevertheless, there could be some cases where the omission is so striking that the inference is persuasive.
Filing Your Franks Motion Procedure
The steps of filing the Franks motion consist of the following:
- Submission of the motion and supporting proof — Your attorney will submit the motion detailing why you think the search warrant was issued through false statements or reckless omission of facts. Your lawyer should present proof supporting these arguments.
- Court evaluation — The judge will review your motion and preliminary proof. The judge can schedule a hearing if your case is strong.
- Franks hearing — In the hearing, your lawyer will summon witnesses to testify to the alleged wrongdoing. The judge can also interrogate the individual who drafted the search warrant to ascertain if it has falsehoods, inaccuracies, misrepresentations, or omissions.
What to Expect When Filing Your Franks Motion
For the court to consider a Franks motion, you, the defendant, should meet specific criteria regarding the evidence. These requirements include the following:
- The defendant should have substantial preliminary proof showing the search warrant was false, misleading, or contained certain omissions.
- The suspect should argue that a police officer knew of the falsehood during the submission.
- The defendant should demonstrate that the judge used omissions or misleading statements when deciding whether to grant the search warrant.
Consequently, the Franks motion may also indicate that law enforcement deliberately excluded details from the affidavit, which could have prevented the issuance of the search warrant. If, during the trial, the court establishes that your motion is compelling, the judge can conduct the Franks hearing.
Suppose your attorney provides a substantial preliminary demonstrating that the affidavit was untrue. In that case, the judge can issue the Franks order and suppress all or part of the proof seized per the warrant.
The U.S. Supreme Court established the exclusionary rule that forbids using unlawfully obtained proof in a trial.
How Judges Issue Search Warrants
After judges issue search warrants, law enforcement executes them.
The grounds or requirements for granting the search warrant include the following:
- When property was embezzled or stolen
- The seized evidence contains child pornography
- There is an active arrest warrant against an individual
- If a person living with a mental health condition is arrested for possession of a gun
- If the defendant used a gun or any other lethal weapon to commit a crime
- If an individual subject to a restraining order owns a gun and fails to surrender it.
- If the property the police should seize is proof of a felony taking place or that a specific individual has engaged in a felony.
- If the property being seized is with someone who plans to use it to commit an offense or is with someone who could transfer it to hide it from being discovered.
Understanding Probable Cause
Probable cause is the standard of evidence by which law enforcement has the legal grounds to conduct an arrest, a search, or obtain an arrest warrant. Probable cause guarantees the constitutional entitlement against searches and seizures.
To establish that probable cause exists, the judge can question under oath the following:
- The peace officer
- The prosecutor
- The investigator who made the application for the warrant
- Any witness that the individual seeking a warrant depends on to decide whether they need a warrant.
A prosecutor filing an affidavit or a police officer can make the search warrant application under penalty of perjury. An affidavit can be oral or written and should contain facts that establish the legal grounds for the application or probable cause.
Challenging Other Warrants
In addition to search warrants, you can challenge the following:
Arrest Warrants
You can file a motion to stop your arrest warrant by claiming it is illegal or invalid.
A magistrate issues arrest warrants once they believe there is reasonable grounds to think that an individual has violated the law.
Bench Warrants
Judges grant bench warrants (arrest warrants granted after a person fails to make court appearances when required).
Per Penal Code Section 978.5 PC, a judge can issue a bench warrant if you fail to show up after the following:
- Being instructed to attend court in person at a particular place and time
- Released from detention on bail and instructed to attend court at a particular time
- Securing an own recognizance release and promising to make court appearances
- Authorized to attend court by legal counsel, and the judge instructed that you physically appear
- Released upon citation and promised to attend motions
To recall or challenge your bench warrant, the court should schedule your case in the court that issued the warrant. Next, you can make an oral motion to recall or quash in the court.
A judge can quash a warrant once you have adhered to your initial order to show up in court.
Understanding Motion to Suppress
Search warrants are subject to motions to suppress based on PC 1538.5. As mentioned earlier, search warrants should be supported by probable cause. Suppose a judge later deems that the initial warrant should not have been granted due to insufficient supporting proof. In that case, they can suppress it or exclude any evidence obtained through the execution of the search warrant from the criminal proceeding.
However, certain exceptions to the motion suppression rule exist, including the good faith of peace officers.
How to Prepare for Your Franks Motion and Hearing
You can adequately prepare for your hearing by doing the following:
- Understanding the motion — With the help of your lawyer, you should start by comprehensively assessing the motion filed against you. Analyze the arguments, supporting proof, and relevant case regulations cited.
- Collect evidence — Gather all necessary proof, affidavits, exhibits, and documentation that reinforce your position in the motion. Make sure that your proof is admissible and appropriately authenticated.
- Legal research — Your attorney will perform thorough legal research to find relevant regulations, statutes, and case precedents that apply to your motion. They will identify legal principles and precedents that reinforce your arguments.
- Prepare your witnesses — If there is a need for witness testimony, your legal counsel will prepare your witnesses for cross-examination and advise them on what to expect in court. Anticipate potential cross-examination and objections and ensure your witnesses are honest and articulate.
- Court etiquette — Wear professional attire, arrive early for your hearing, and obey all courtroom etiquette.
- Rehearse oral arguments — Practice your oral submissions before the hearing to ensure coherence, clarity, and persuasiveness.
- Prepare legal briefs — Your lawyer can help you draft clear and convincing legal briefs detailing your arguments.
- Evaluate court processes — Familiarize yourself with how the court works and the guidelines that govern motion hearings. Know the timeline for filing motions, submitting proof, and presenting arguments.
- Prepare for case outcomes — Consider the possible outcomes of your motion hearing and establish contingency plans accordingly. Evaluate your case’s merits and demerits and be ready to adapt promptly.
How Your Attorney Can Assist in a Frank Motion Hearing
Discussed below are reasons why you need experienced legal assistance during your Franks hearing:
Preparing Formidable Arguments
A motion hearing needs well-designed and convincing arguments. Your attorney will study your case’s facts and applicable statutes to develop a strong case. They can also draft a convincing motion for you.
Address Your Options
Legal matters are complex and even confusing. Your attorney can help you grasp what the motion entails and what you should expect. They will explain the possible outcomes and how they could impact your case.
Represent You in Court
During the motion hearing, your attorney will present your case in court. They will use concise language to address the facts, cite applicable laws, and highlight why the court should rule in your favor. Once the prosecution argues against you, your attorney will respond promptly to challenge their points. The back-and-forth requires experience, skill, and confidence, qualities only a skilled attorney possesses.
Safeguarding Your Rights
Your attorney will work aggressively to safeguard your constitutional protections. They will also ensure that the opposing side adheres to proper legal processes and uses no unethical tactics.
Negotiating For a Resolution
Sometimes, motion hearings may evolve into negotiations between involved parties rather than a formal hearing presided over by the judge. Your attorney could use this avenue to resolve problems in your favor without proceeding to trial.
Additional Facts about Franks Motion
Here are less-known nuances and facts about evidence that are the subject of losing or prevailing in the motion. Understanding these facts can prevent anxiety and help you obtain the best case outcome.
- Evidence in the Franks motion does not address a confession acquired in breaching the 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination or identifying a witness in a lineup per the 6th Amendment. Instead, Franks motion only excludes tangible proof acquired from an illegal search and seizure.
- From the previous point, it is crucial to note that the court can suppress evidence, testimony, statements, and police officer’s observations acquired following an illegal search, arrest, or detention per PC 1438.5. The key is that the court should order tangible proof excluded.
- Unlawfully seized proof that a judge ordered suppressed could be used to impeach an accused person, but the same proof cannot be utilized to impeach any defense witness.
- The judge can consider the suppressed evidence during sentencing. It is common for most defendants to feel that the court violated their rights.
- The prosecutor can use previously suppressed evidence in a new criminal case. They can also use it against you if the court dismissed your case and refiled. Finally, a verdict in federal court suppressing proof does not bind in a state court handling the same proof.
- The court can later utilize previously suppressed evidence to revoke a parole. However, the court cannot use it in a probation revocation hearing.
Find Seasoned Legal Assistance Near Me
A Franks hearing allows you, the defendant, to request the court to examine whether the police used false details to secure a search warrant. The hearing aims to ensure the integrity of the criminal judicial process by holding law enforcers liable for their conduct. If you can verify that police recklessly or knowingly included false statements in their warrant affidavit, it could exclude the proof acquired through the warrant. While a Franks hearing can be a powerful tool in your criminal defense arsenal, understanding its complexity and effectively leveraging it in your favor requires skilled legal assistance. Leah Legal can help you draft compelling arguments, negotiate with the prosecutor, and represent you in court. Please contact us at Van Nuys at 818-484-1100 to schedule your free case review.